Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large and exclusive amount of content.
Mostly attractive models.
Good picture quality ... however ...
Cons:
... let me start with the biggest con. Pictures should be their strength. That's what the magazine is all about however they manage to ruin every single set (latest ones zipped and around 1600px) with an oversized, intrusive, aggravating watermark that's been placed in the wrong spot. So for many collectors pictures are out.
As to the videos, they are woeful, with the newest ones in 640x360 wmv format with a total bitrate between 1500 and 2500. Older ones are even tinier in 320x240 mpg format. I had to get my info re. the latter by taking a peak at TBPs review because, as the previous reviewer stated, my browser crashed every time I attempted to download an older video.
Homepage is hopelessly cluttered with sales offers and other extraneous material. Preview pictures of recent updates are ridiculously tiny.
Way too much hardcore material. This might be a plus for some but with the material coming from a magazine this disappointed me, personally.
Bottom Line:
I didn't check my personal statistics but this must be the lowest rating I've ever given anyone.
I see no redeeming value in this site because between picture sets that are being ruined by the watermark, and videos that are only available in yesterday's outdated quality, plus the browser crashes, as well as the crass and obvious attempts to make some extra sales to their members there's absolutely nothing for me here.
I had always had my quarrels with these folks about the watermarks (see my previous comments) but was tempted to subscribe because sister sites 50plus MILF and 60plus MILF finally gave me some lingerie I liked and I was hoping for the same here, at least in the videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A lot of material
- Daily movie and gallery updates
- Reasonably good navigation options
- Most models in 30s & early 40s, which works for me
- Good movie quality; streaming, download options and screen caps
- Some good/protracted strips from casual and business attire
- Would prefer a camerawoman rather than man for the interview/chat movies
Cons:
- Age of models (some under 30) may stretch 'OW' for some
- Slightly retro design (although front end has been updated; am sure member area will follow)
- Very typical lighting/sets/premise for all scenes
- Many models a little too enhanced for my taste, and relatively few unshaved
- Very little girl-girl content
- Could use a few more navigation options
- Older movies are lower quality and split into parts.
- Some daft fake uniforms and hackneyed outfits (newer sets are redressing this, thankfully)
Bottom Line:
Looking for girls up to around my own age (40), it was a choice between this, Anilos and All over 30. They all look similar and suspect they offer similar content; the quality of samples I found on TGPs just tipped the scales in favour of Karups OW. (Interestingly, they include bonus content from, and link some models to, the other two sites.)
There is a lot of material here, it's a bit daunting at first! On top of that, they add a new movie AND a new photo set 6 days a week, so it is growing at a good rate. Navigation is fine; 4 categories of pictures and two of movies - although with the amount of material, we could use more, and/or the ability to sort each list by model name or date added.
Most of the material is soft, with maybe a quarter hardcore; the latter isn't really my thing, but actually the scenes are relatively well-positioned and I enjoyed them. Of the softcore, it's probably about 50/50 between toys and fingers; and there are some good strips and teases before getting to that point. Only a handful of girl-girl shoots and movies; I'd like to see more.
Movies are good quality, sharp and well-lit (even if slightly saturated) - 720p and each page shows a few download options and screen caps of the action, which is useful. This format goes back about a year and a half (a bit less for the screen caps); before that, the movies are mostly SD and many are only available in parts. Image quality is OK; available in 1024px and 1500px which is just about acceptable; I'd prefer 2000px.
I was quite disappointed that so many of the models have fake:
- boobs (I'm no expert but could spot these a mile away)
- tans (and the lighting makes them look even more orange)
- smiles (only the minority of models show their personality and a range of expressions)
Natural is always better in my book, but it seems this is endemic in the milf genre. Similarly, I like a mixture of pubic hair arrangements; shaved, trimmed or natural - although I do prefer the latter and there are very few unshaved girls here. Am hoping it tells them something that the hairiest girl I found is their 4th top model! (Am planning to join We Are Hairy at some point to redress the balance.) OTOH, it's a little churlish to complain, given the quantity of material here.
Overall, nothing groundbreaking here but a good site nonetheless. Although I'm only staying one month, I've definitely got my $30 worth; I will likely join again sometime, but will probably try the other two sites beforehand.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
01-28-1111:08am (Update History) Reason: Original score restored. See remarks below and also under comments.
Pros:
A huge archive of mature, attractive models.
Picture sets: Older sets display at 1024x680 px, not bad if they are all like the sample set, dated 2005, that I test-downloaded. Newer sets are at 1500x1001px.
Latest videos are in HD at 1280x720, total bitrate close to 4000 kbps. Nice! I could not quite determine when either pictures or videos changed to a higher resolution but it cannot have been too long ago because even early 2010 videos are in 640x480 at 2000 kbps. However it must be stressed that they, as well, are of good quality and quite crisp if one does not insist on watching them full screen.
Excellent search engine.
Excellent basic home page lay out, even though it looks a bit dated, but it makes it very easy to find one's way around.
Cons:
Bonus pictures and feeds: Bonus picture sets are from AllOver30 and Anilos. It would be nice if they could be downloaded zipped and in their best resolution. Many of us simply don't feel like downloading a set, one picture at a time.
The bonus "feeds" are even more disappointing because they consist of 1 minute clips of various DVDs only, and are further ruined by a logo running across the picture. Karups would do better not to offer bonuses that aren't really bonuses.
However, in all fairness, one of the bonuses, KarupsPC Content, is a nice little gift because the picture sets are zipped and the quality itself is fine even though they date back to 2005.
Search engine, as much as I like it, should have the additional function of filtering HD content and High Res Picture sets. Many users are no longer content with less than HD quality and don't like to sift through all the updates and models to find what they want.
Too many enhanced breasts.
Cons continued below:
Bottom Line:
The term older does not really fit because most models would be called MILFS or Cougars or Mature in other places. There is only a handful of models over 50 and only one over 60.
Bottom Line:
A nice, solid, quality site for lovers of mature women. So far it does not live up to my personal expectations because my preferred niche is erotic lingerie, while most models that are found under "Lingerie" or "Panties" in their advanced search appear to wear daily ho-hum "underwear" that is practical rather than arousing.
Experience has taught me that my taste is not necessarily the generally accepted one so I won't hold this against the site.
I have also found a few videos and picture sets that do come a bit closer to what I want in the short time I have been with this site, so who knows, maybe between the updates and the site's vast store of material I'll be able to dig out a few more erotic nuggets during my month of membership.
Edited Jan. 28, 2011
I received a notice yesterday informing me that my subscription had expired despite the fact that I have still three weeks to go. Access was cut off immediately and two emails to support to correct the situation brought no response. It is impossible to get in touch with their Billing Company because the only link provided is that of KarupsOW support. Because support, when needed, plays such an important part I have downgraded my review by five points.
Edit: Score restored to its original because I got a response to my 3rd email informing me of a glitch in their system and their efforts to correct it. Additional days have been promised for every day lost now.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive, Real Mature Content
- No DRM
- No Download limit
- Variance of content (Hardcore, solo, toyplay, and lesbianism)
- Photoshoots are not only video stills (they are included though)
- Above average resolution pics available in zip format with 2 sizes (1024 and 1536)
- Above average quality of videos available in 2 formats (.wmv: 640 X 480, 1089 kbps and .mpeg: 640 X 480 with higher quality, maybe around 1.5 - 2 kbps)
- Great model profiles including an original scan of the paper questionnaire they filled out
- 21 other video feeds including 6 HD feeds all in variance of content (from hardcore to solo) that are not in the mature niche
- Model index and search functions
- Updates 1-2 times a day with an average of 4 photo sets plus a movie (could be a hindrance in my opinion, more in bottom line)
- Active forum
- Bonus updates which are photosets from karups older women about every 3-4 days
- Simple design and easy to browse
Cons:
- Niche makes it harder to find extremely hot models (more in bottom line)
- While videos are above average, they could be better with at least 1280 4kbps or widescreen
Bottom Line:
I have rented a lot of Mature dvds and they almost never hit the niche correctly. This site, really does hit it right. The majority if not all, are over 30 and you can tell. However, true mature sites are scarce and so are very good models and I feel the need to update constantly has put a damper on some of the models here. While the majority are natural and of age which vary in where they live (from USA to Europe), there are quite a lot that are just not attractive. I mean, they were probably not even very attractive in their teens or 20's or so on. But, they are truly mature and this is obviously a plus and a con at the same time. By the way, don't expect those models from those 'milf' sites you usually see, these models are mostly all natural and are actual older women showcasing their true mature bodies.
The videos are great when it comes to content. They display most models in a hardcore scene but you almost always get them in a solo fingering scene or toyplay which can be downloaded in full scenes or scene clips (at least, the newer ones). While the quality could be better for this day n' age, they are alright. The videos can range from an amatuerish feel to being done professionally and I have noticed a lot of videos the camera man has traveled to their actual homes for the scene. There are some 'fetish' videos which might showcase feet or another area, but nothing gets too out of the ordinary. Plus, there are interview videos as well for almost every model if you are in to these. As of the date of this review, they currently have 1142 Videos.
The photo sets are great here. They showcase sets that are exclusive and are not just video stills. This means, these photo sets are good softcore sets showcasing their bodies that are not in video format as well. Plus there are plenty of these. They all vary in a type of 'costume' for the model which include showing them in an home enviornment doing simple chores and undressing. Another type is the "9 to 5 lady" which is usually the model in office wear and usually by a computer or phone. There are shoots of the models in regular attire that they would just wear out to a mall and they strip. Then, there are the "Elegent ladies" which displays the model in a nice dress and strip. Currently, as of this date, there are 381,690 photos.
This site really has a lot going for them. I enjoy the site a lot and always look forward to the new content. The real reason I just can't give them a higher score is the attractiveness of a lot of the models. Don't get me wrong, in the mix I have found A LOT of models that I love. But, when a site has a lot of less attractive models, I cannot give it the highest. But, they do stay true to the niche which is absolutely great. Plus, they do update a lot which will cater to most. However, I feel that if this place becomes a bit more discriminate in their models (even if it lowers updates) they will be the top of all mature sites. They are in the top 3 atm for su
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ pictures now have 2000 pixels on the long side
+ good customer support (my account got unlocked in a few minutes)
+ good mix of beautiful models of all ages of which some have (intimate) piercings and or tatoos which is IMHO great
+ models come from the US and Europe too
+ updates come regular (but could be more)
Cons:
- navigation is poor compared to other sites in the same niche
- all new ZIP files are named model_name.zip which forces you to rename them all plus there's no chance to find out which sets are the new ones which is very annoying
- not many videos and quality is poor
- I found some ZIP files with broken images (even within the newest updates!)
- older content still available but only good for collectors that want to have everything from their favourite models
- DL limit of 10 GB per day.
- beware that this site offers softcore only and only a few scenes seem to contain insertions of vibrators, dildos and other objects
- only some information about the models. Even their measurements or a short bio are missing.
- only a basic comment system and it can take 1 or two days until your comment has been approved
Bottom Line:
I quickly reached the DL limit while being at home on a Sunday. The error message I got was misleading to problems with my password being guessed by someone else. I was puzzled to read that my account was blocked for "excessive downloads". My access to the Internet is not that fast but I managed to download 10 GB during daytime.
The site itself is quite nice but needs lots of improvement as compared to my favourite site which is AllOver30. They update more often (from Monday to Saturday) and offer better quality even though they lack some beauties in the age over 60 that Aunt Judys offers.
More care should be taken when uploading ZIP files to the members area. It's always embarassing to find archives with broken content.
My download manager (GetRight) won't work for this site which makes it even harder to hunt for the good content. I experienced that 6 simutaneous connections are the limit so you also have to be careful not to download more than 4 or 5 files in a row because otherwise the site will block further connections.
To be honest I'll cancel mysubscription soon and may come back in a year or so to give them time to improve and update their site. I'll give AJ 73 points which is the maximum I can give based on the fact that their archive is quite large but it's hard to hunt down the gems :-(
Those that like older girls should give it a try but keep in mind that surfing there can be frustrating. If you are after videos then this site won't give you much to look at.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The women are hot and look like cougars, and the scenes are hot
- No DRM or download limit
- HD videos look very good
- Download manager friendly. Resumes downloads, multiple connections, queue and download later works
- Zip downloads for the photos. And separate links for soft and hard photos
Cons:
- Some of the navigation links don't seem to work. If you click on "models" sometimes nothing happens.
- Also some of the video files in ipod format are missing.
- No actual model pages.
- Ads, including Adult friend Finder, in the member's area
- A little too expensive for a site with no network access
- Only one update a week, and it's late at times
Bottom Line:
This is a good one if you like hardcore MILF scenes with pornstars. These are traditional video style scenes with a little scenario and everything, not reality gonzo. These are well known pornstars and they seem to look the part of cougars. I'd say they're all between 35-50, I don't know Nina Hartley is probably the oldest one they have. It's all white women with the exception of one scene and it's exclusively B/G. Most of the content seems exclusive, but I have definitely seen at least one of the scenes elsewhere. There were 163 scenes at the time of this review and updates come once a week, occasionally more. The update schedule is irregular, but they do come.
Four types of files are offered for the video downloads, HD mp4, standard rez mp4 & wmv, and an Ipod size mp4. The wmv's are just average, and they do get blocky at times. Go for the HD mp4s they appear to be 1280x720. There are full scene downloads or split into 10 clips. Like I mentioned in the cons, the ipod format is missing sometimes. Also you'll find 3 qualities of streaming flash.
The top quality still photos are 1077x1616, and screen caps are 960x540. Could be better could be worse. One thing that was strange was that they offer "high quality" photos and "high resolution" photos. The "high resolution" are the better of the two. Pretty dumb naming system if you ask me. One thing I like about the way they did photos was that they have separated hardcore and softcore photos. I usually go for the softcore photos because I have video for hardcore. There are separate zips of hard, soft and screencaps.
I really enjoyed this site, I thought the content was good and I would recommend it. I would add 10 points to the score if the site was either cheaper, or was part of a network. If you are wondering the amount of videos they had worth $30, I say yes. However, Naughty America has several similar sites and over a dozen other niches and I usually only pay $10 for that. My suggestions for improvement would be to lower the price and spice things up a bit. Do an occasional threesome or use a model of a different ethnicity.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They have nearly 530 models to choose from.
-They have over 2150 videos.
-They have over 5900 phtosets.
-Movies can be streamed online with flash player
-All the videos can be downloaded as a complete file in either WMV or MPG. They also have some videos.
-All photosets can be downloaded as a complete file. They all offer pics 1024 and 1536 format and some of the newer ones also come in 2400.
-They have an active forum for their members.
-They have a calender showing the updates for the next 7 days.
-Update are a mixture of 5 photosets/videos.
-Content is all dated.
Cons:
-The majority of photosets and videos are mostly softcore to midore so very little hardcore to choose from.
-There are nearly 3 times more photosets than videos.
-The majority of models are 41 or less so you might want to look elsewhere if you were looking for older ladies.
-They don't update with the models photoset and corresponding video at the same time.
Bottom Line:
-This is an impressive site with a large library of content but I can't help but feel disapointed that there is so little hardcore to be found inside and also that there are so few videos. I may have gottent my hopes up thinking that there would be much more than there really is.
-The site should update with a photoset and the video that goes with it instead of doing it over a certain period of time.
-This is a hard site to recommend because I'm not sure exactly who they are trying to cater to. It's a mature site but since most of the models are in their 30's then that might not be what some of us consider very mature. There is hardcore but again not that much so that might not be enough to satisfy those people. There weren't too many glamour videos or photosets so again that cuts another group. I guess if you want to see women from the age of 30 to 41 do solo shoots and some fetich and hardscore then this might be the site for you. I suspect most others will be a disapointed like me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The content is all exclusif.
-Most of the models appear to be true unknows so that adds a little to the sites premise.
-They have a good selection of models.
-They have 73 videos and they are at a decent 720x480 resolution.
-You get acccess to 31 other sites.
Cons:
-They don't update very often. They have only added 10 videos since mbaya's June 2009 review.
-A large amount of the content on the other sites is leased material and most of it is of poor quality and pretty old.
-The models on this site also appear on a couple of the other sites and they perform similar sex acts so might not be worth downloading.
-The content isn't really dated. It's possible to find the info but it's time consuming research through the update pages.
-They have photos at a 1024x768 resolution but these can only be downloaded individually.
Bottom Line:
-This is a decent site with some pretty well shot sex scenes. The premise is that men are sending their wives/girlfriends to Dirty D to be trained in the fine art of satisfying them. The sex is on the raunchy side with a blowbangs in most of them and anal in over a dozen videos.
-There is a lot of material to be found on some of the other sites and most of it is of similar quality as this one.
-My score is in part because you get access to many other sites and I also enjoyed the content on those sites.
**I was able to get access to the network for half the price by visiting skunk riley's site and trying to leave it. There is apop up that appears and offers you a discount. I just wish they would forgo these gimmicks and simply offer it upfront but I won't refuse the discount.**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Mostly attractive mature women.
Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.
Videos can be streamed.
Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.
Updates are regular.
Cons:
Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.
Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.
If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.
Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message.
Bottom Line:
I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.
I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.
The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.
In one scene, for instance, a “cougar” is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.
In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised “young” man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.
Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.
One other thing that bothers me is that the “boys” are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.
Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)
General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.
Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to “Stunning Matures.”
As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is the new site by the Milf that everybody on the net is talking about. First saw her in some NA stuff that blew everybody away.Her site surpasses the stuff she did for NA. It has it all...anal, interracial, solo...And this girl loves sex. She's very "real", unlike a lot of porn actresses who are obviously faking their sex scenes. That makes all the difference in the world to have a woman like this REALLY fucking on film.
Cons:
The only thing I can think of would be if you wanted a variety of women for your paysite dollar. But if you enjoy watching a big tit gorgeous Milf who fucks with a passion...then you have found your place.
Bottom Line:
At this time, this is simply the best big tit Milf site on the web. Claudia-Marie is the very definition of "Milf" She has a perfect round ass, huge swinging titties, bleach blonde hair, and a gorgeous face. A woman like that is usually unapproachable. But with her friendly personality, sexy southern accent, and nympho approach to hardcore fucking...it's a dream "cum" true for me!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- The models are all very sexy and genuine, the most part with natural breasts.
Here, the models are not looking as playmates being past their prime.
Here, you have really to look for among hundreds of models to find siliconed boobs.
Furthermore, this site is one of the rare sites where we can admire 60+ Beauties.
- Huge updates : 7 or 8 videos per week, each one at least 500Mo, some times 800Mo.
- The quality of lighting, scenary, is improved, with the last updates.
Cons:
- Too much porn with guys.
If I want to see a cock, mine is enough.
And I am not sure that many gay sites offer much of mature women in their galleries, if you see what I mean ....
The videos are huge and updated daily, but, on the other hand, the "screennplay" is really too repetitive : fucking, fucking and fucking.
- There is also a bit lack of chemistry.
No leg teasing, or feet teasing, for instance. Or not much of erotic poses. So the nylon fetishist will remain hungry, here.
Bottom Line:
So, It's a little boring, for the guy who loves to admire a mature Lady, but not necessarely another guy, to have so much porn with a guy..
And it's all the more boring because the models are really very genuine and cutie, for the guy who loves to admire a mature Lady.
About the chemistry, screenplays, etc..., this cons can be applied with 90 or 95% of the porn sites, today on the web.
I just hope that the level of quality will increase very soon, but today, everybody seems to be happy with crappy and repetitive contents.
So I give a 90, because I saw that some others sites with the mature niche, having a score which seems really very high, when I compare with this one.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
The quality of the shows.
The scenaries are excellent, models have not always the same look, as in allover30, for example.
Here we have mature Beauties who are looking like mature Beauties, with natural breasts and not siliconed strip dancers being past their prime.
Here, none of the same boring dildoing, 10 minutes lying on the back, after the same boring interview, if you see what I mean.
Here, each model does a perfect teasing.
Cons:
Too short videos.
Updates are really tiny.
Bottom Line:
The new site mature-underwear, is better : more of lesbian shows.
Otherwise, about DL, the review is FALSE : if you want to save the videos, a right clic and save works perfectly.
Just have to see the blue link, at the bottom of the page.
The site would deserve a better score, if updates would be larger.
I give a 85 because the chemistry with models is really excellent. Much of eroticism with real genuine mature models, here.
This kind of chemistry would be fantastic, with huge updates, as in some sites of Netherland. ;o))
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of video scenes, the site lists 19433 (labeled misleadingly as "videos".)
Lots of pictures, site lists 3.951.559.
123 Bonus sites. These sites are incorporated into "easy elders" because no password is required to navigate between them. Download speeds were usually around 400 - 600 KB/s.
The price is right for our members.
Cons:
There is very little "elder" content in the main site. Milf would describe it better. The contents listed under "Pros" are scattered over 122 very small sites, most having nothing to do with "elder." i.e. there is a fairly large gay and trannie section. Some video segments, in some sites, are downloadable but most of the sites are streaming only. Even then streaming is iffy .. quite a few sites stutter and I could only stream properly when using a "dial-up" speed setting which greatly reduced the viewing quality.
Picture quality on all sites is generally poor, average size 600x800 or less and not zipped!
Awkward navigation, guessing game when it comes to updates. Some sites might never update and you would never know it unless it happens to be your favorite site. Entry into the site is unnecessarily complicated, a pin number (or email address) is required on top of username, password and the security code. A bit of an overkill just to enter a mediocre site.
Bottom Line:
A bunch of little sites thrown together. All of them outdated, unoriginal, and not offering much excitement.
If you look for pictures, look elsewhere, the quality is that bad! If you look for "elder," look elsewhere. If you look for young and pretty, also look elsewhere because most of the time after you finally find something you like you'll only be disappointed because you can only stream it. I suppose it's not too bad a deal for ten dollars but that's all you can say about this "network."
Very lukewarm recommendation for those who want to subscribe for the special price!
Not recommended for those who pay the regular subscription price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ exclusive content
+ network access (but limited until you are there for the 3rd month)
+ at the time of review 187 unique scenes are available (1 update on every Wednesday)
+ many old & young scenes (b/g or g/g)
+ model age range from not so MILF to real granny
+ newest videos starting from mid of October 2009 are available in full HD
+ site seems to have no download limit
+ download speed never broke down even with 5 simultaneous donwloads
+ new user interface has a clean layout and lots of nice options
Cons:
- pictures are only 1280 pixel on the long side
- you have to enter a captcha code every time you login
- can't use my download manager with the site
- some unneccessary comments can be heard in the videos
- no model bios not even measurements are given
- age description of models in the scene descriptions is not consistent
- new user interface still needs some work
Bottom Line:
This site is part of a network that offers mostly exclusive content. Content that is going much further than what can be seen on AllOver 30 or AuntJudys. Fisting, anal sex, fucking machines, light BDSM and rougher sex can be seen there. The real hard stuff seems to be on cumming matures which is available after being a member for more than two months.
That is because you get access to 30 network sites when you join. Additional 10 after one month of membership and another 10 after two months.
The content itself is mostly great. O.k. there are some models I don't like but the majority of them is nice and I like the old & young content most. To see young and petite Bianca Arden (soon on ALS Scan b.t.w.) get into action with GILF Sandora (great body if she's really 65 years old) alone is worth a subscription. Even though there's an impression of overacting especially with Sandora which is a quite common impression with girls from Eastern Europe :-(
If only they would have left out the lengthy introduction to the video.
There are now several download options for videos available with mp4 starting from 640x360, 960x540 up to 1920x1080 and wmv starting from 960x540, 1280x720 up to 1920x1280. If you need further details please feel free to ask me.
The picture section is not that good as 1280 pixel on the long side seems to be not enough compared to the quality they offer in the video section.
I joined through Epoch because I didn't want to make the experience Messmer had with increasing spam in his mailbox. I give 89 points because of the network access. The site alone would get slightly more than 80 points because one update per week wouldn't be enough.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A plentiful amount of models or varying ages and looks now that AJ and Older Women have been combined.
Picture sets are HR, 2000 pixels on the long side, zipped.
A movies only section is also part of the deal.
Updates appear to be regular.
Speed was fairly good for me. All you need for, what is basically, a photo site.
Cons:
Very awkward way of naming their sets.
No true Hi-Res pictures.
Movies are a disgrace.
Site navigation and viewing are unnecessarily complicated.
Navigation is sticky.
Most photo sets are uninspired.
Bottom Line:
Well, they did it to me again. I got a special Memorial Day offer that took ten dollars off their regular price for one month and, as a lover of mature women, how could I resist, despite previous vows never to subscribe again. What can I say? Hope does spring eternal in the human breast! Maybe they improved in the meantime?
This site is still basically second rate when compared to other mature sites. The 2000 pixels long side sets lack the crispness and the ability to count every pore, every hair on a model that is found on just about every other picture site these days. Here, the pictures seem basically enlargements, and that's it.
The naming of the picture sets itself is very awkward and it is incomprehensible to me why they would do things this way.
Let's say you find a favorite model and want to download all of her sets. Well, they are all named Eve.zip (example only).
Your computer will most likely make sure that they are re-named Eve (1).zip, Eve (2). zip etc. however every picture within every set is named exactly the same. Why would they do that? This requires a lot of renaming, and if you ever make the mistake of unzipping all of them at the same time you will find yourself with an unholy mess.
The whole set-up is awkward and hard to navigate. Seeing that Aunt Judys, Older Women and Older Women movies are now one "super site" why not have everything in one spot and just keep listing the various niches.
Want to look at the high res version of a picture in a set? First click on thumbnail of model, then click on thumbnail of the picture you want to look at, within the set. This gives you the small version of the picture you want to study in detail. Now click on that and a new window opens with another small picture you have to click on in order to finally get your so-called HI-RES 2000 pixels long version. So many unnecessary steps.
But I would forgive them for every one of their attempts to make it harder for me to navigate and view, if only their picture sets were not so incredibly stiff, lifeless, unimaginative, dull, inept.
As usual, there are exceptions to the rule, but generally speaking their stable of photographers should be fired wholesale.
The movies are a farce. I cannot find a bit of difference between their DVD quality movies and their so-called HD quality wmv files. I found, to my great disappointment that their "HD" videos were without exception 640x480 px with a total bitrate of approx. 3300.
Now other sites manage to give you a decent picture even with those specifications but trust me, the quality here is really bad. I cannot bear to watch anything I have downloaded so far, especially in full screen.
Low recommendation. They are not ripping you off, but they don't give you top quality either and if you subscribed at their regular price you would pay too much.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of pictures
Allows search by ethnic groups, sexual activities (Hardcore, Lesbians, Solo), amateur etc.
Cons:
I won't dignify this site with a long review because I took two looks, downloaded some samples from each site on the "network" and decided never to go back.
Amazing Grannies offered some potentially nice pictures but they cannot be zipped. None of the models featured on their tour could be found. Most are much younger than "Grannies."
Videos were so so in quality. The bonus sites "Hairy Pussy Cuties,"Vintage Cuties," "Home Made Junk" were horribly outdated. In Hairy Pussy Cuties, as one example, there is also the effort to deceive the customer: five updates are listed as having been added on November 29, 2010 but those updates all consist of pictures with dimensions 800x600 and lead me to assume that the sets are old and have just been given a new date to make it look as if the site is still active. The site news had its last entry in 2006!! Vintage Cuties is of horrendous quality. I realize these sets are old but there is always Photoshop to bring the best out of vintage pictures.
Bottom Line:
All four are utter garbage sites. Amazing Grannies as a stand alone site might get a sixty from me if the picture sets could be zipped but I am not in the mood to download pictures one by one even if the set only contains about 30 pictures. Email to support re. zips only brought deafening silence.
Oh, yeah, almost forgot to mention, communication between the various sites is slower than cold molasses. Downloads from every site but Amazing Grannies was around 70 KB/s.
Avoid like the plague. This is another case where I wish I could give my subscription away to someone else because, after only two days, I ain't goin' back!
Minor addition:
One other thing I forgot to mention, they gave me a choice of billers. Both CCBill and Epoch are listed as alternates but no longer do business with this site because I was kicked over to Segpay when I tried to pay through either! That tells the whole story right there!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Over 500 models.
-Over 280 hardcore videos.
-Over 1000 softcore videos.
-Nearly 2300 photosets.
-They have a good search system that allows searches by age, body type, fetish and so forth.
-They update with new content daily and all of it is dated.
Cons:
-This may only be me but I find that many of the models don't fall under my understanding of the term older. I guess they are older than models on their other site but not by that many years.
-This is primarily a photoset site with most of that content being softcore.
-Only about half of the movies are in one file.
Bottom Line:
-This is another site that has disapointed me because it doesn't really have what I'm looking for in older content. I was hoping for a lot more hardcore videos but that doesn't seem to be karups way. It has the same qualities found on karups PC but not anywhere near the same amount of content. I guess that's normal since porn is often a young girls job.
-I'm not really sure who will really enjoy most of the content found on this site. I guess if you like women over the age of 30 and prefer softcore photosets than you should get your moneys worth. It probably isn't worth staying a long term member.
-It should be avoided by anyone wanting hardcore videos with older women. You're likely to be disatisified with this site.
-My score is based on what the site offers and not what I found to my liking. I in fact did not find one video that I want to keep.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Plenty of content
+ New video and pics are decent quality
+ Network access
+ Model List
+ Search by niche
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Easy cancellation link
+ HD, Streaming and IPOD videos
+ Video available in parts
+ Customized DVDs available
Cons:
- 1990s style layout and navigation
- Abysmal download speeds
- Erratic update schedule
- No download acceleration with download manager
- Huge watermarks on just about everything but mature.nl content
- Files not named
- Not Opera compatible
- Blank model pages???
- Only one file type on newer content (wmv)
The only search on the site is by niche. 25 categories: Anal, Asslicking, Bigbutt, Biglady, Bigtits, Blowjob, Cum, Facials, Fisting, Gangbang, Groupsex, Hairy, Interracial, Lesbian, Masturbation, MILF, Old & Young, Old & Young Female, Pantyhose,Pissing, Public, Shaved, Solo, Threesome and Toys. Some of the more extreme niches have very few sets.
The model list, which has thousands of models, pops up a thumbnail of each model when pointing to the name. Some models have no video, especially in the oldest sets. With nothing dated outside of the update pages, there's no telling what you're going to find on a particular model.
Pictures:
Click on one of six thumbnails on a model's page and a strip of thumbs appear on the left that have to be scrolled through to get to the page jumps. Found it particularly annoying that clicking on the first thumb didn't always take you to the first picture in the set. Newer pictures are 1440 on the long side, older ones are 1024 long side.
With more than a few blurry shots, poorly lit and oddly framed pictures, there doesn't appear to be much editing on what's posted.
Video:
More than adequate quality files - HD: 1280 x 720 @ 4700+ kb/s, Streaming (From one sample): 720 x 406 @ 768 kb/s, Ipod: 320x240 @ 700+ kb/s
Since the download speeds averaged around 250 kb/s, I was surprised that streaming was even possible. Some one gig files took 3 hours to download - with a download manager. No acceleration was allowed and FreeDownloadManager reported that resuming broken files wasn't guaranteed. I never got to the older mpg files mentioned on TBP, so no comment there. The watermarks do get a comment - On most of the niche sites they were excessively large. Yeah - I get it - you've branded your product with a ridiculous distraction. Thanks.
Various:
Using a download manager (FDM), all pictures download as showPicture.php, all video as V3GetMovie.php. Right clicking to save video and they're merely numbered. Pictures are still showPicture.php. Utterly ridiculous.
I found several models whose link goes to a page with no content. WTF???
I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but this site seems to shoot anyone who will take her clothes off. You know it's bad when you find yourself on a model's page and you say, "Holy shit!", out loud.
Each scene has a link to add it to a custom DVD. Clicking takes you to a page where it shows you how many minutes of content you can still add. Averaging three scenes each and costing €27.95 (including shipping), they aren't cheap.
I gave this site a 68 based mostly on the amount of content available. Beyond that, it needs a lot of work to bring it up to 2012 specs. The clumsy, flash-based navigation, the lack of proper file names, the S-L-O-W download speeds and the sporadic blank pages are annoying as hell. I don't know that I'd recommend this network to anyone but the most ardent mature fan. For over fifty dollars a month, I expected better than this.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-ALOT of Mature Content
-Many exclusive hot older broads you wont find many other places
-TONS of updates
-Unlimited Downloads...no restrictions
-Good hardcore and softcore content.
-Alot of HD picture sets and videos
-Something for everyone
-Easy Site navigation
-Links to other sites with the certain girls
Cons:
-MANY of the photosets are completely fucking ruined because of poor direction.
-A fair share of the older women are really rough to look at....IMO anyway. (Didnt age well, too hairy, ugly in general, etc...)
-Not a ton of hardcore content. Plenty of it, but in general its primarily a softcore picture site.
-Price...a little too expensive given the other options out there for cheaper.
-Some older sets and videos are fairly mediocre in quality.
-
Bottom Line:
Let me make one thing perfectly clear.....this site in many regards is VERY good, and if someone gave it a score in the high 80s, I wouldnt argue it. The big reason I took off 10-15 points was personal preference, and Ill tell you my issue...
Recently, I got into photosets. For a long time i was only a video guy, but i started really liking pictures for some reason. In terms of pure quantity of content, this site is amazing. TONS of content, and as mentioned something for everyone. BUT, one fatal flaw fucked up ALOT of the content in my eyes.
The issue being is poor direction. What do I mean by that? Many of the sets repeat the same shots over and over and over. They are way too obsessed with pussy shots. Now, before you go calling me a fag or something, I dont mean I dont want to see it at all. But they will focus on it way too much and MANY of the shots will be the exact same, except maybe the girls fingers are in a different position or her head it titled in another direction. In tons of sets, they ignore ass shots....sometimes completely.
I love everything about a women and I want to see a girls entire body, and Im much more of an ass man these days. Many of the sets really didnt give me what I want. Some of the girls had great asses, but they would hardly show it and sometimes not at all, and in some cases, even when they did show it, the girl was reaching around and fingering herself or had her hand on her ass and you dont get a good view of it.
If this were just a few sets here and there, I wouldnt make an issue. But NO, this is a mistake repeated CONSTANTLY, not just on AllOver30, but also on KarupsOW. Both sites suffer from the same fucking issues. Its like they were trying to be as obnoxious as possible and limited the quality of how good the sets could have been, simply because they just showed the same shit over and over.
All of that being said...this site, even with my issues, is worth joining at least for a month. If you can look past those issues or they simply dont bother you, you may want to make this site a staple.
As for me, I enjoyed my month, but I doubt Ill join again after my membership expires. Between the price and my issues, I PERSONALLY just cant justify staying longer than a month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+They offer content from a niche that is rare to find on the net.
+They offer all exclusif content.
+They have a surprisingly wide selection of models who for the most part look natural.
+These women handle some pretty huge dicks and a fair amount of them even do anal with said dicks.
+The sex is often quite good but(see con).
+There are 133 videos that can be streamed online with a resolution of 480p and 720p.
+All the videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is at least 1200x800.
+They are still updating and it appears that it's anything from two to four updates per month.
+All content is dated.
+Many of the performers are unknowns so this is probably the only place you'll see them do this kind of stuff.
+You also get access to 60plus milfs.
Cons:
-The biggest con against this site is that it's for all intense and purposes a streaming only site. You can only download videos released in the last six weeks.
-The sex is hardcore and quite good but there is no kissing at all which I found disapointing.
-The navigation could be improved with the addition of keywords but then again the site is so small that this isn't such a problem.
-The load time for streaming is inconsistent so that it will sometime load quickly and stream well and other times it takes a while for the video to load and you can forget skipping ahead or suffer slow load time.
-The same performer will sometime have more than one scene so that may or may not be a problem for some.
-These women are in their 50's and although they don't always look their age. They also don't look like young women anymore.
-Videos can only be downloaded in one resolution which is 640x360.
Bottom Line:
*This site offers content that is badly underrepresented and therefore it is nice that it exist. It would be a lot nicer if all the videos were made available for download. They have their reason why they aren't but I've never really understood them.
*The important thing to know about this site is that you are watching women in their 50's have hardcore sex with men that are often half their ages and who plow into them like there is no tomorrow. This is not vanilla porn so if that is what you want then you'll want to stear clear because hard pounding vaginal and often anal sex is on the menu on this site. A significant amount of the male performers are Latino and African American so if interracial isn't your thing then you'll also want to stay away.
*The one thing that I wanted to see and which is lacking is kissing before and during the scene and strangely there isn't a single instance where you see this. Kissing would go a long way in increasing the heat factor and since there isn't any then that's make the scene less appealng than it could be.
**Of course making videos available for download would be nice and they lose points because they don't but not as many as some other sites might because their content is too rare to excessively penalize them for a business decision.** They probably already lose customers due to their no download policy anyway.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
11-06-1212:14pm (Update History) Reason: Streaming and DL Managers now possible.
Pros:
Vast amount of old Aunt Judys/Older women material stored in the archives.
Very much improved members' page under the new management of ATK.
Much improved quality in Hi-Res picture sets and an even more startling improvement in videos over those offered by “Older Women” in the past. Most updates (except remastered ones) are now in true HD.
Same excellent search engine as in the other ATK sites.
Access to ATK Lounge.
No download restrictions.
Fast download speeds ... however, read below.
Cons:
Streaming a video is discouraged, so that more bandwidth is available for downloads. Despite my fast download speeds (max of my modem) navigation within the site was sluggish.***
Download managers are not allowed. I wasn't sure if Firefox' DTA, when downloading one video at a time, was considered to be a true manager and used it consistently without being stopped. If I crossed the line, my apologies to the new managers of the site. ***
*** This was only recommended during the first few days. Streaming and Download Managers are now allowed. Score upgraded by 5.
Updates are a mixture of Aunt Judy and “bonus” picture sets and videos imported from ATK Natural and Hairy (Mature Hairy). This has caused complaints from those who are subscribing to both sites at the same time. I was surprised myself when I downloaded some picture sets and found that I had them already from a previous membership to ATK N&H.
Bottom Line:
I must confess that it was a disappointing month for me. I had received an email by the old "Aunt Judys/Older Women” site offering me a membership for $ 9.95 a month (recurring), with the notification that the site was now under new management. I had not liked AJ/OW for a long time because the “tease and erotic factor” had declined dramatically over the past few years, but could not resist .. just to see how ATK would do with one of my formerly favorite sites.
My first impression was and still is: not ready for prime time. Without the imports from “Mature Hairy” their updates would be very skimpy but what saddens me more is that ATK's new content is every bit as bland as that of the former site in its dying years. And no I am not calling for hardcore material, just for more excitement in the solos.
This might appear to be a very unfair assessment when viewed from the “web owner's“ side but I have to repeat once again that any review, especially that of a layman, has to be subjective so take my score with a grain of salt. Not everyone feels the way I do. And I still believe that the new management will eventually create a very attractive site. If it will be for me remains to be seen.
Old AJ (pre 2007 or so): lots and lots of enticing lingerie, or a prolonged strip, on attractive “housewifey” models.
New AJ/OW (until take-over by ATK): most models came with three very basic items of clothing that they would take off within the first few pictures of a set, or within a couple of minutes if it was a video.
New ATK AJ: same thing, which can make a set very boring unless one absolutely loves a model and collects her, no matter how utilitarian and sparse her attire may be.
My old complaint, as in so many other sites, is that the tease factor has disappeared and, without that, so has my libido when it comes to most sets or videos. There are only so many positions you can place a naked body in so, why give them so little to wear and why undress them so quickly. At least if you dressed the women in more than the “bare” essentials there would be a difference from set to set.
I let the subscription lapse (yesterday was my last day) despite the low price because I could not find any picture sets during the past month that truly excited me. I gave some of them high marks because of the model herself, or because of factors like quality and lighting and crispness of picture etc. Or because of the way the photographer posed his models but it was done half-heartedly.
I sincerely hope that the pendulum will eventually swing back to the way things were and that at least one set from a shoot will contain a nice strip or lingerie.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
TBP hit this one on target. The exclusive content comes in heaps on this site. The models are pretty good looking, and the scenarios are actually a bit believable. There are more pics than you can look at, and you can download them in zip files. Network access is worth more than you pay in this case.
Cons:
There is a 1 gig download limit. That sucks b/c you paid for "FULL access". Weekly updates are a bit of a drag, but there's enough content to hold you over. Site design could be better, but who really care about that, it's about the porn.
Bottom Line:
This is a damn good MILF site. One of the best. As I always say, network access is a HUGE bonus for this one. Better have a HUGE hard drive if you're a downloader Get in before they realize 24.95 is too cheap.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-An interesting amatuer feel.
-part of a network, so there's some choice here.
Cons:
-Though it's fun a first view, it's nothing more than the same old same old.
-Videos are okay, but not exceptional.
-Photos are just okay at best.
Bottom Line:
-Any review of one site, is a review of all as they include all when you join.
-When you look at Wives and Girlfriends, you're looking at a a collection of sites. Within this collection are a fair number of repeats or duplications. The sites offer creampies, but sadly once you're seen one, you've seen all of them.
-If there's a model you've been following, then you may want to join for a month.
-If you've been looking to see some amatuer style creampie action, you may want to join for a month.
-If you want to find an interesting site with something new to offer from time to time, then you don't want to join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site offers a large amount of digital picture galleries with very high resolution shots, numbering over a hundred per update
-Brandi updates the site at least once or twice a week with archives going back to 2004
-There's no doubt that mature, lingerie and pantyhose fetishists will find much to enjoy here
-When purchased through the Wild Rose Network, you get full access to dozens of other amateur sites all for under $20 a month
Cons:
-You get some videos on the site, but they are only listed on the picture pages and aren't very good quality
-The design of the site is very plain and there is no apparent intgeraction with Brandi or her other members
-There isn't a whole lot of creativity going on here since the themes are fairly repetitive with lesbian or outdoor content being outnumbered by solo or straight sex with an older guy I assume is her husband
-The extras like stories, jokes, and just4fun seem like an afterthought
Bottom Line:
Brandi's site is the last of the four "Stars" from the Wild Rose Network I've reviewed. While I would rate the four sites as very uneven, this site is definitely one of the best, at least where her target audience is concerned. Unfortunately, it leaves other parts a bit neglected as a result.
The site is focused almost exclusively on her photo galleries that are plentiful, both in the number of shoots and the amount of pictures per set. The pics themselves are of very high resolution and if you like mostly solo sessions by a mature women with lots of pantyhose and lingerie there's a lot of that to be found. She also specializes in foot fetish shoots, but actually has another site entirely dedicated to that niche. So, you won't find much of that here.
There are videos on the site, but they don't get their own section and are only available through the photo galleries and are always from a pic session. The quality isn't great and it's clear that Brandi's focus is on picture lovers, with some other "bonus" material that really doesn't amount to anything special.
There are different kinds of users, some wanting a few vids with their pics and other looking for a few pic sets with their vids. I am definitely the latter so for me the site wasn't really worth the time, but if you are the former this will definitely be up your alley. And since pictures are what Brandi offers the most, I can give it a higher rating than I would otherwise since she hits the mark she aimed for.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Regular up dates once a week for each site. Movies can be downloaded in 1 LARGE file or smaller 1 min clips YOUR OPTION. Pictures can also be downloaded which are in zip files. I think if you join this site you will not be disappointed because of the other sites that come along with with web site. The price is great compired to other over priced sites. Some really hot MILF models...1 connecting site that they have has a movie that is 2 gigs long....WOW
Cons:
There is a download limit, it was either 4 or 5 gigs in a 24 hour period. After that is reached you will need to wait 24 hours to log back on to download.
Bottom Line:
Over all I was very pleased with this site and that I have been a member for over 1 year.....
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
