Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 51-75 of 245 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Amazing Grannies

51. Amazing Grannies (0)

Pay
Active
50
messmer (137) 12-03-10  10:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of pictures

Allows search by ethnic groups, sexual activities (Hardcore, Lesbians, Solo), amateur etc.
Cons: I won't dignify this site with a long review because I took two looks, downloaded some samples from each site on the "network" and decided never to go back.

Amazing Grannies offered some potentially nice pictures but they cannot be zipped. None of the models featured on their tour could be found. Most are much younger than "Grannies."

Videos were so so in quality. The bonus sites "Hairy Pussy Cuties,"Vintage Cuties," "Home Made Junk" were horribly outdated. In Hairy Pussy Cuties, as one example, there is also the effort to deceive the customer: five updates are listed as having been added on November 29, 2010 but those updates all consist of pictures with dimensions 800x600 and lead me to assume that the sets are old and have just been given a new date to make it look as if the site is still active. The site news had its last entry in 2006!! Vintage Cuties is of horrendous quality. I realize these sets are old but there is always Photoshop to bring the best out of vintage pictures.
Bottom Line: All four are utter garbage sites. Amazing Grannies as a stand alone site might get a sixty from me if the picture sets could be zipped but I am not in the mood to download pictures one by one even if the set only contains about 30 pictures. Email to support re. zips only brought deafening silence.

Oh, yeah, almost forgot to mention, communication between the various sites is slower than cold molasses. Downloads from every site but Amazing Grannies was around 70 KB/s.

Avoid like the plague. This is another case where I wish I could give my subscription away to someone else because, after only two days, I ain't goin' back!

Minor addition:

One other thing I forgot to mention, they gave me a choice of billers. Both CCBill and Epoch are listed as alternates but no longer do business with this site because I was kicked over to Segpay when I tried to pay through either! That tells the whole story right there!
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cheating Whore Wives

52. Cheating Whore Wives (0)

Pay
Active
77
RustyJ (145) 11-11-10  07:16am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Great quality FullHD video on all scenes
-Excellent photosets even though none of them are up to 21Sextury's new high res quality
-Nice mix of models. They have Europeans and Americans as well. I guess the MILF business isn't really that big among European models
-It's a new, free bonus for loyal subscribers
Cons: -Only 23 scenes and updates have already stopped! Quite strange that an exclusive premium site comes to such an abrupt stop after five months of weekly updates
-They are certainly stretching the meaning of term "housewife". Sure, you can have young housewives and girls that are technically MILF's in their twenties and before but that's not quite the point of it. It seems that big tits is more like the common theme here which on the other hand suits me just fine
-Quite tame content even if it's all HC
Bottom Line: Another site that 21Sextury has decided to add as a bonus to all subscribers with full loyalty bonus. I'm not sure how long one has to be member to get this but after two months the bonus is maxed.

It's quite nice bonus considering the general mix of the network. With few exceptions the content is divided between quite young girls (which is ok) and grandma aged elderly women (which I cannot even look at). There really was a gap for this MILF or "housewife" content to fill. They have also lacked in dedicated big tit content which I think this is more than MILF content.

What you actually get varies from scene to scene. There are some with big names that certainly fall into the MILF category like Puma Swede and Kerry Louise and others with younger looking girls who I thought were more in teeny category or just out of it (Katie Kox, Angel Dark). Of course there's the obligatory one with Phoenix Marie who seemingly must be featured in anything that even approaches this genre.

The score I gave reflects the fact that this is a part of something I already had and got this as a free unexpected bonus. I don't know if one can subscribe via this site itself and wouldn't recommend that in any case. I'd give it an additional 5-10 easily if it started updating again!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 40 Something Mag

53. 40 Something Mag (0)

Pay
Active
62
messmer (137) 11-06-10  10:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large and exclusive amount of content.

Mostly attractive models.

Good picture quality ... however ...
Cons: ... let me start with the biggest con. Pictures should be their strength. That's what the magazine is all about however they manage to ruin every single set (latest ones zipped and around 1600px) with an oversized, intrusive, aggravating watermark that's been placed in the wrong spot. So for many collectors pictures are out.

As to the videos, they are woeful, with the newest ones in 640x360 wmv format with a total bitrate between 1500 and 2500. Older ones are even tinier in 320x240 mpg format. I had to get my info re. the latter by taking a peak at TBPs review because, as the previous reviewer stated, my browser crashed every time I attempted to download an older video.

Homepage is hopelessly cluttered with sales offers and other extraneous material. Preview pictures of recent updates are ridiculously tiny.

Way too much hardcore material. This might be a plus for some but with the material coming from a magazine this disappointed me, personally.
Bottom Line: I didn't check my personal statistics but this must be the lowest rating I've ever given anyone.

I see no redeeming value in this site because between picture sets that are being ruined by the watermark, and videos that are only available in yesterday's outdated quality, plus the browser crashes, as well as the crass and obvious attempts to make some extra sales to their members there's absolutely nothing for me here.

I had always had my quarrels with these folks about the watermarks (see my previous comments) but was tempted to subscribe because sister sites 50plus MILF and 60plus MILF finally gave me some lingerie I liked and I was hoping for the same here, at least in the videos.

A bitter disappointment and waste of my money.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Old Pussy Exam

54. Old Pussy Exam (0)

Pay
Active
75
messmer (137) 10-17-10  11:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to niche (Gynecological Exams of older women).

Exclusive contents.

All videos in HD at 720p.

Large picture sets (over 300 not unusual) usually around 2000 px with zip download available.

Super fast download speed for me through Firefox when downloading videos one at a time. (3.5MB/s)
Cons: Not download manager friendly.

Daily download limit of 20 GB.

Contents still small with 29 models and 58 videos as well as 58 picture sets.

Updates only weekly, usually alternating between video and picture set.

Quality of HD movies and pictures could stand a bit of a boost in my opinion. The movies all seem a bit too bright (details in whites, like coats or panties, hard to make out because of this) and not quite as crisp as one would expect from 720p.

Pictures as well are not quite as sharp as one would expect with 2000px. Rather than true high resolution pictures they look more like enlargements. However I have been spoiled by sites where one could make out every pore on a models skin so it could be that I am a bit too demanding when it comes to the video and picture quality of this site. Compare TBPs review to mine and maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between.

Some of the models could still fall under the MILF category (a plus for many, I'm sure).
Bottom Line: Just to give you a bit more of a feel for the site. All models have two videos and two picture sets. One video and picture set is called "Naughty Nurse" (Solo) and another video and picture set is of the "examination" itself.

Nurses' uniforms tend to be be either tacky or inadequate (a simple hospital shirt). Because I'm not interested in uniforms this leaves half of the contents of little interest to me. You might like it.

There are further problems for me. I love older women and I get them on this site but the whole thing gets stale in an awful hurry, with the same "office," the same "doctor" and elderly, mostly BBW (and I like chubby) women who wear bikini or thongs style panties that would look good on younger women but get too often hidden by drooping bellies (again nothing wrong with that in my eyes), not only that but the models tend to get undressed in an awful hurry as well.

The procedure after that is strictly Gynecology 101 with probably some actions on the part of the doctor (recommendation of a dildo for therapy, as one example) that would be frowned upon by the College of Physicians and Surgeons, I am sure.

There is no hard core action unless extreme vaginal gaping or use of a dildo is considered hard core.

This is not a minus for me, but the sameness of each video and picture set will leave you bored after a very short time.

I am two days into this site and after having looked at five different videos (approx. length 20 minutes) the joy of discovering something new and different is already starting to evaporate.

Mildly recommended to lovers of gynecological prolonged close ups and nurses' uniforms, but that's about it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cougars In Heat

55. Cougars In Heat (0)

Pay
Active
80
Wittyguy (95) 09-16-10  04:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ $3 for a 3 day full access trial membership through TBP
+++ Lots of actual American MILFs (no 25 yr olds)
++ Lots of good hardcore action
++ Multiple viewing and DL options for vids plus all vids have accompanying screen cap shots.
++ Exclusive content.
+ Each set has a softcore photo shoot (no softcore vids though)
+ No DRM or DL limits, supports DL manager
+ About 175 scenes, all with pics and vids
+ No watermarks on pics or vids.
+ Pic size comes in at 1600 x 1070, all have zips
+ Good DL speeds (500 to 700 KB/sec for me)
+ Updates are dated so you if you rejoin later you know where to start.
+ No cross sales on sign-up
Cons: --- Down to 1 update a month.
-- Most every scene is shot the same (especially the pics), it gets repetitive.
-- HD videos aren't HD and the best "non HD" files still come out blurry when viewed full screen.
-- No scene tags or real search function.
- Many of the video trailers for the sets don't work.
- Photo closeup shots are out of focus on body parts (get a camera man who knows how to shoot stills).
- About half the models have boob jobs.
- No model directory or model info.
- Bonus sites didn't work for me.
- Advertising on main page.
- Navigation needs some work.
- Canceling membership a bit of a pain.
Bottom Line: It's just about time for hunting season around here so thought I try a change of pace and check out some cougars on the prowl. What you get here is actual cougar material (women in their 30's to 50's) with the stretch marks, wrinkles and the occasional hairy bush pouncing on younger porn dudes for some basic sex (no anal, toys or bizaare stuff). The price was right for the trial so I signed up and here's what you get:

PHOTOS: Best quality pics are 1600 x 1070 and each set has zips. Most scenes have about 120 to 150 HC pics. The lighting and production value is pretty good with minimal airbrushing. One beef I had was that on shots closer than full body, something is always out of focus ... get a better camera or someone who knows how to use it. The softcore sets had more pictures than the HC and they're pretty good, no toys used - just posing, gradually stripping and maybe some fingering. For those who like older women stripping and posing, this would be a good site to try. My biggest complaint here is that every freakin' set is shot the same. Couple fully clothed, cougar gets half undressed for sex on back, side and cowgirl. Girl gets naked for reverse cowgirl and doggie. Every set, every time. Apparently imagination is not one of this site's strong suits. There are screen caps for each scene too.

VIDEOS: Lots of viewing options, DL in different sizes, stream in different speeds with the inscreen browser or one of yours, and there's an i-pod option too. The problem here is that even though I have a small computer screen, even at full screen only the "HD" vids weren't grainy. The best nonHD vids come in at about 300 mb for a 30 minute video so you can see why. The HD is good but it's not true HD, just big files (1.5 gigs for a 30 min. vid) and the HD only is available in the MP4 format. DL speeds were good. Many of the trailers for the vids didn't actually show the vid so that's a bit of a pain. The vid production was pretty good with only a few sets having the annoying cameraman yakkin' it up.

THE REST: No model info or directory. Navigation is a bit of pain, lots of forward and back clicking and it took a few minutes to figure out the DL functions. The site itself is pretty plain. The bonus sites didn't work but that maybe because I was on a trial membership. Updates have really slowed but the quality of the material is generally pretty good. The advertising is on the main pages or at the bottom of the screen but it's not overly annoying.

I can't really give this site more than an 80 because of the lack of updates, nonHD HD vids, repetitive nature of the shots, search and navigation issues, and some other minor stuff. If you're into actual cougars getting it on (or posing for pics) then I'd recommend the trial. The regular price of $30 a month is too much and unless you have a slow connection you should be able to grab all you want within the trial time.

Now, how come I never meet these women in real life?
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit All Over 30

56. All Over 30 (1)

Pay
Active
50
spacenick (5) 08-09-10  09:43am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I found several of my favorite models on this site and thought maybe this site has sets of them I don't have and so I decided to sign up.

Yes, it’s a website on the Internet that features “Older” Women – the specifics are not really shown on the “Not a member! Come on and see our goods for sale” intro pages.. until I became a member.

Pros: Yes it has mature women, it has many of them, various physical attributes and so forth.

Videos are in WMV and MPEG formats (A Major Plus, this site is download manager friendly - becoming a norm) my settings are 1 video at a time. The newer vids are HD WMV, but if you want to make a DVD collection, the MPEG is easier to work with. HD-WMV is becoming a website Standard now. No DRM.

Zip files are good,on top of the page, there is the resolution, its all packed up and ready to download. Great but again, a "all-in-one" zip file link is becoming a website Standard.

Website layout is fairly easy to use. I can click and navigate around easy.
Cons: I just want to say one thing to the camera-man “Dude! STFU!”

[Camera-woman's voice is okay, no prob there]

Comparing this site to other sites, the other sites typically film the action and that’s that. On this site, basically the some of the videos begin with the cameraman’s dorky voiced commentary and continues throughout the whole video. Gawd man, STFU already. Amatuer, not the content but the people who work this site.

Interviewing and doing some sort of “get to know your” naked lady video is okay now and then, but come on, there’s is a lot of them. Obviously, a porn site is suppose to be that, a porn site with action and if its not part some lonely housewife and mailman theme, then forget it, if I wanted to listen to some sort of psychological profile, interpersonal communication skills and emotional constructs relating to sex, I’d go to an AA meeting. Geesh. I mean seriously.

Less talk more action.
Bottom Line: Good video downloads (the newer vids are more like 320p), Yep, a good sized HD logo stamped on the vids gives me assurance that the vid is shot in alleged "HD" ... good zip file downloads and its download manager friendly (remember I download 1 video at a time), it’s great.
But these things are becoming porn site standards.
It is how the content is being handled, photos that seem to be shot by a man with unsteady hands and a cameraman that will not be quiet, themes that include rubber-cowhide-leather-wetsuit crap that’s supposed to be kinky. But there are some regular “porn” vidoes and photos worth downloading, its hit and miss.

I did find different photo/video sets of the models, I was interested in, that is a plus but other than that, if these models weren’t on this site, I would’ve passed.. Knowing what I know now.

Rebilling, Make sure you cancel or use a temporary prepaid credit card or "Craziescash" will continue to try rebill you.
You'll see your statement "transaction declined. transaction declined. transaction declined. transaction declined. "ahh, two weeks later" transaction approved!" So then, its like Great, I just paid for another month for videos about the camera man that talks and interupts, gives advice to naked people. Woo Hoo, just what I wanted for a Christmas porno present.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Anilos

57. Anilos (0)

Pay
Active
95
spacenick (5) 07-18-10  08:15am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: I found this site by doing some general searches on physical attributes of prospective women I like, Later I found introductory or sample pages of women I liked and these pages were hosted by Anilos.

I decided to sign-up at Anilos (after consulting Porn Users for review input and maybe save money with a PU special deal) After I signed up and what I seen on the sample page does not match what you get when you become a member, there is definitely more content. Good-good.

I clicked on the model page and thats it-one single easy page to navigate in. Near the top, her picture sets are downloadable in Zip formats, large and small sizes & a few sections below that are the the video links, all are on the same page and are downloable in various formats.

Im using a download manager and I have it set on -1- download at a time and there hasnt been a problem with any disconnection. I would say download the girl that perked your interest to this site and afterwards do some looking around.
Cons: Theres a few videos with an interview process going on, I think it would be better if a woman did the interviewing, a good female voice interviewing rather than some dudes voice.

Some videos are 60%-70% strip-o-grams, where the women slowly undress and tease, by the time these when they are naked & are doing something, the video guy changes to gyno-cam mode.

Granted, most of the masturbation videos are good, but several of the videos - I think the video guy should spend 5 minutes on a full body shot missionary, another 5 minutes on a angled full body shot missionary, 5 minutes on gyno-cam, 5 minutes on on a doggie style shot rather than a minute on her face and then he shoots the rest of the video on gyno-cam. Not everyone is a gyno-cam fan.

Hands are Good, I suppose Dildos are okay, Sucking and licking a dildo is... no comment, I guess if she treats a dildo like a disembodied penis, it kind of reminds me of Lorena Bobbit.. Sooo, fingers and hands are better.
Bottom Line: There are other features and other links to other sites on the Anilos site but Ive been just focused on the Anilos women, theres a good number of women but if your use to a site that has thousands of women, you might be disappointed.

I think its a Good Site. Beautiful Mature Women or Mature women that still look young (glass is half full) It is Mostly Solo Masturbation and there some hardcore vids. For me, most importantly its Download Manager friendly (IDM)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 50Plus MILFs

58. 50Plus MILFs (1)

Pay
Active
90
messmer (137) 07-06-10  11:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to the niche. All models are over fifty and most are quite attractive to those of us who like mature women. Models seem to be genuinely enjoying themselves.

Videos available for streaming and download at HD quality at both 720p and 1280p

Excellent streaming at 720p.

Downloads were generally quick for me.

Photo sets come in medium and large sizes, zipped. Large is usually around 1500 px but fluctuates, even within the sets.
Cons: Picture sets are relatively small, 35 - 50 pictures per set in the ones I tested. As in its sister site 40somethingmagazine the watermarks are too garish and huge and tend to spoil the picture.

Watermarks are also quite prominent in the videos but because they take up less of the screen they are easier on the eye.

Download speed was erratic. Some videos downloaded at 1.8 MB/s (single download through DTA) while others barely reached 600 KB/s.

Only one download at a time when using DTA through Firefox. Much slower speed when using regular Browser downloader.

Still a relatively small site with 49 models.

Videos and Picture sets only update once a week, which might not be a bad thing since attractive 50+ models are few and far between and the chance is always there that the quality gets watered down.

Navigation is simple but nevertheless takes a bit of getting used to.
Bottom Line: I love this site and it would have rated well in the nineties if it hadn't been for those accursed big watermarks and the fact that it is still a relatively small site.

The quality of the videos and pictures is excellent. The ladies are confident and at ease with their bodies and sexuality and appear to be having fun at the shoots. I especially enjoy the interviews because it makes the scenes the models appear in later on more "intimate" for some reason.

I would highly recommend this site, for a month, to lovers of truly older women.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Access Matures

59. Access Matures (0)

Network
Active
60
dracken (246) 06-17-10  06:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent amount of images (around 100+ galleries per site each one with about 60-80 images downloadable as zip files, most images at 1024x768)

- Not all image galleries have videos, in fact most sites in the network only have around 30 videos split into clips, no streaming and no sense as to how the videos are named or what format they come in (anything from wmv to avi and one or two mpg's, but on the bright side most of the videos are at 720 x 576 or around there. So you have crystal clear images of girls pretending to have sex...


- Very good download speeds (on a network that couldn't even stream hulu I got my downloads in a few minutes) I am trully impressed

- A few cute models you have to hunt for through the whole network

- Some nice pantyhose scenes, girl eaten out through pantyhose, but nothing I haven't seen on other sites.

- The price is right.
Cons: - Bad/ no updates. I agree with the previous review that their updates are old content re-posted. I joined on June 17th and the latest update is from June 18th...hmm something fishy is going on here.

-Poor organization/ navigation of the site. I found images of white men in the Black and Matures section of the site. Many sites overlap with their content (saw no difference between coed matures and office matures) No way to search for models or a certain category (lesbian, hardcore, etc)

- For most of the scenes there is no penetration and there is a lot of old men giving head to young chicks. The lesbian content is a bit more hardcore, with some actual dildo penetrations. But if you expect more than three images of a cum-shot, or maybe some anal...keep dreaming.

- Overall very disappointing models, compared to the 21sextury's grandpas fuck teens the models here are just disappointing. They look very average and even the MILFs...well I wouldn't put the F there...
Bottom Line: I joined this site because I enjoy seeing teen girls getting fucked by old men. I was part of 21sextury and they left me wanting more. The joining page here promised more teen girls and less MILFS's which is not really my cup of tee anyway so I said, sure sign me up.

However, once I joined I discovered that the whole network could be reduced to three categories: old-men giving head to girls and some lesbian content and young boy on old woman action. Overall a tad bit disappointing for a network that promises "ultimate mature porn."

Then I realized that the videos are broken into clips...I hate putting clips together. As if that wasn't enough once I have my videos I get to see some seriously unrealistic sex scenes (or some men that have enormous penises and can bend them in unbelievable ways) Basically 70% of the content is barely a notch above what you could see on Softcore, late night TV porn.

The rest 30% of the content is either lesbian or young men on old women (they actually have some images of penetration there)

To add injury to the whole thing I can't even search for the one or two cute models that I found. (There is a very cute read-head in the mature co-ed and then in the lick matures section and I feel like she has to be somewhere else...If only the preview thumbnails were more descriptive, or if they had a search function)

So yeah, overall I'm very disappointed with the network and will look to get my money back. But, they do have good speeds, a decent price and if you really like MILF's with young boys it might be worth the one month fee.

I'd look at All over 30 or old and young gangbang or 21sextury...anyway, hope this helped.

My advice? Stick with
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Aunt Judy\'s

60. Aunt Judy's (1)

Pay
Active
70
messmer (137) 05-29-10  09:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A plentiful amount of models or varying ages and looks now that AJ and Older Women have been combined.

Picture sets are HR, 2000 pixels on the long side, zipped.

A movies only section is also part of the deal.

Updates appear to be regular.

Speed was fairly good for me. All you need for, what is basically, a photo site.
Cons: Very awkward way of naming their sets.

No true Hi-Res pictures.

Movies are a disgrace.

Site navigation and viewing are unnecessarily complicated.

Navigation is sticky.

Most photo sets are uninspired.
Bottom Line: Well, they did it to me again. I got a special Memorial Day offer that took ten dollars off their regular price for one month and, as a lover of mature women, how could I resist, despite previous vows never to subscribe again. What can I say? Hope does spring eternal in the human breast! Maybe they improved in the meantime?

This site is still basically second rate when compared to other mature sites. The 2000 pixels long side sets lack the crispness and the ability to count every pore, every hair on a model that is found on just about every other picture site these days. Here, the pictures seem basically enlargements, and that's it.

The naming of the picture sets itself is very awkward and it is incomprehensible to me why they would do things this way.

Let's say you find a favorite model and want to download all of her sets. Well, they are all named Eve.zip (example only).

Your computer will most likely make sure that they are re-named Eve (1).zip, Eve (2). zip etc. however every picture within every set is named exactly the same. Why would they do that? This requires a lot of renaming, and if you ever make the mistake of unzipping all of them at the same time you will find yourself with an unholy mess.

The whole set-up is awkward and hard to navigate. Seeing that Aunt Judys, Older Women and Older Women movies are now one "super site" why not have everything in one spot and just keep listing the various niches.

Want to look at the high res version of a picture in a set? First click on thumbnail of model, then click on thumbnail of the picture you want to look at, within the set. This gives you the small version of the picture you want to study in detail. Now click on that and a new window opens with another small picture you have to click on in order to finally get your so-called HI-RES 2000 pixels long version. So many unnecessary steps.

But I would forgive them for every one of their attempts to make it harder for me to navigate and view, if only their picture sets were not so incredibly stiff, lifeless, unimaginative, dull, inept.

As usual, there are exceptions to the rule, but generally speaking their stable of photographers should be fired wholesale.

The movies are a farce. I cannot find a bit of difference between their DVD quality movies and their so-called HD quality wmv files. I found, to my great disappointment that their "HD" videos were without exception 640x480 px with a total bitrate of approx. 3300.

Now other sites manage to give you a decent picture even with those specifications but trust me, the quality here is really bad. I cannot bear to watch anything I have downloaded so far, especially in full screen.

Low recommendation. They are not ripping you off, but they don't give you top quality either and if you subscribed at their regular price you would pay too much.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mom GFs

61. Mom GFs (0)

Pay
Active
65
Darrow (8) 05-22-10  04:50am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is an amateur site. It is organized as part of a network that focuses on particular kinds of amateurs (Milfs, blondes, legal teens etc). Each photoset is zipped and focusses on one women in various stages of undress and action. The photosets are of various quality. There is video, but it is poor quality (and I don't know whether it is downloadable.)

Lots of sets

The $1.00 trial is a full trial.
Cons: 1) Very poor quality video; not sure whether it is downloadable, and given the quality not sure why you would want to download it.

2) There is some repetition of picture sets amongst the various site.

3) WARNING, THE BILLING IS DODGY. I HAVE NOT FOUND OUT HOW TO CANCEL MY TRIAL MEMBERSHIP. THERE IS NO CUSTOMER SUPPORT LINK WHATSOEVER ON THE MEMBERS PAGE, AND THE MEMBER SUPPORT PAGE ON THE "JOIN" PAGE DOES NOT GET ME TO MY INFORMATION. THEY MAY BE A RIP-OFF SITE THAT WILL TRY AN KEEP BILLING ME BECAUSE THEY DON'T LET ME CANCEL MY MEMBERSHIP.
Bottom Line: Overall if my billing issues can be dealt with without costing me money, then you can look at this as a decent picture site that looks at the amateur niche in a somewhat organized manner.

BEWARE THE BILLING ISSUES; THEY MIGHT BE TRYING TO RIP YOU OFF. I will reply to this review to update on my billing issues.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Unlimited MILFs

62. Unlimited MILFs (0)

Pay
Active
70
BadMrFrosty (56) 04-20-10  06:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Approx 130 videos each with a zipped picture set plus network access

+Full network access costs only 15$ per month

+Updates used to be 2 per week, now slowed to 1 per week. Over the whole network you will be getting daily updates but maybe not the sort of content you are interested in.

+No DRM

+Fast download speeds, averaged at 20 mbits sec per file and multiple concurrent downloads supported (using DownThemAll)

+No regional pricing

+Signup page does contain a cross sell but it is not pre-checked
Cons: -95% of the models are sporting after market "upgrades"

-All content is non exclusive. Lesbian scenes come from "Milfs Lovin Milfs" series of DVDs, straight scenes mainly come from "My Wife Went Black", "Milfs Who Love Black Cock", "Moms Cream Pie", "Cheating Wives Tales", "Milf Fantasy POV", "Milf Date" series.

-Video quality average at best, a mixture of 888 x 480 WS and 640 x 480 FS WMV at a average bitrate of 1400 kbps.

-Photo quality is also average at 1024 x 681.

-The picture sets do not always match the video. Yes the same model is usually present but they could be in a completely different setting wearing different clothes.

-Site navigation is extremely basic. Hardly any search options, really all you have is pages of updates with links to the video / pic sets.
Bottom Line: I don't want to be overly harsh in my review of this site mainly because of the reasonable monthly membership prices. If I would have joined at 30$ per month I would have been a lot more disappointed as the site (and network) is little more than a DVD dump. While I find it hard to recommend, there is little harm in joining for a month if there are a couple of scenes that you are interested in.

The bottom line is this site does not really do anything that wrong but it also does not excel in any area. Average in every way.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cum On Wives

63. Cum On Wives (0)

Pay
Active
50
bacardiancoke (22) 04-07-10  06:34am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Wide selection of videos and pics
- Good download speeds
Cons: - Much looks non-exclusive
- Content doesn't appear to be all amateur (known pornstars are in the sets)
Bottom Line: So, what is the site?

Billed as being run by "Rebecca" a swinger wife from Florida, the content is all "submitted" by visitor and site members.

Now call me cynical, but if me and my wife (also swingers) submitted our content then we'd expect something in return, there's no evidence (although I can be corrected) that any consideration is offered in return for the submission.

Not only that, but I rapidly came across content of pornstars. So either our webmistress hasn't researched the internet and sex industry or doesn't bother to check what "she" is willing to upload and sell to others.

At best this is copyright breaching by sheer ineptitude, at worst this site is one of those despised by those who work hard and at great expense to create their content only for it to be lifted by an opportunist. I do not know which applies here, although I have my suspicions.

The content itself is just as advertised, sets of 50 single cumshot pics in various positions of various quality, and videos of varying quality (well it is "submitted" stuff.)

Bottom line? The best I can say about the site is that it is a TGP that charges you to use it. Sorry, but you really need to get things together here.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 50Plus MILFs

64. 50Plus MILFs (1)

Pay
Active
80
Darrow (8) 03-11-10  06:34am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: I really like Milf sites. However when I go to Milf sites, I see a lot of women who are clearly in their late 20's and early 30's and I really hate that because they are not really Milfs.

You don't have the issue with 50+ Milfs. They are all 50+ and most of them are quite attractive 50+ milfs. All of them are doing hardcore and many of them do anal.

The updates are weekly; the site has a good number of videos.

Some of the models are exclusive to the score group.
Cons: Being a Mac user I prefer MP4's and MOV files. They have them, but they are the inferior quality files.

The navigation could be a little better, but it is O.K. for now.
Bottom Line: Possibly the best hardcore milf site out there. Well worth the purchase price and worth staying for awhile.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lusty Grandmas

65. Lusty Grandmas (0)

Pay
Active
81
pat362 (367) 01-30-10  08:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nearly 200 scenes.
-Authentic Grandma looking performers.
-They have both BG/GG scenes.
-Video download options are among the best on the net with WMV and H.264 both at different levels of quality from low to high.
-Photosets can be downloaded whole in zip format.
-Immediate acess to 30 sites from the 21Sextury
Cons: -The fact that most of their performers truly look like grandmas can be a serious turn off.
-The new network is a little slower than the original (They may still be in the beta stage).
Bottom Line: I didn't join LustyGrandmas but got access with my pix and video membership. I did download a couple of scene, but this truly isn't one of my fetishes. Many of the older performers really look like grandmas. They are much older than a typical cougar, they have higher body fat, many have sagging breast, many have greying hair, and to be honest most are way past their prime and quite a few never had one.

If the above body type appeals to you then this is your site. For the others I'd recommend a quick visit. I'm more of the later so my score is in part because of my lack of interest in this site.

Of course you get quite a few other great sites with your membership so even if this one doesn't appeal to you. The fact that many of the others in the network do might be a great incentive to join. I've noticed that you don't get the same access with each membership so I recommend you always take a look at which site come wqith the mebership and then pick that site knowing you want the other in the network.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Slut Wife Training

66. Slut Wife Training (0)

Pay
Active
80
petefountain (6) 01-20-10  04:52am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great fantasy and fun
Women look like ordinary wives one might know
Great if you want to imagine yourself having swinger sex
Not many condoms and a few creampies for natural sex and creampie lovers
Good price ($14.95) if you know the trick
Video files are about 100 MB and 20 min each, so they do not take up much HD space yet they are good enough for their intended purpose
Cons: I would like it better if the women had orgasms too
Not for you if you want beautiful or young women or porn stars with fake tits
Does have an unknown download limit (called excess bandwidth use) which disables user name for 12 hr
Updates are slow in coming (only 4 in 7 months based on count given by mbaya)
Videos file are about 100 MB and 20 min each, so the quality is definitely NOT HD for those who want HD porn
Bottom Line: Read review by mbaya
I tried to add to his review and not repeat what he has already covered
The trick to get the discounted price: (1) go to "join" page, (2) click "x" to close the page, (3) click on the link in pop-up window offering for you to chat with an advisor to get 50% discount
A few comments about the associated sites
(a) Lots of niche/fetish sites are available
(b) Sites vary in quality
(c) Some sites do not permit downloads
(d) Some sites are recycled material; for example, big creampies is just the the cream of the crop DVD series in streaming format
(e) There are a few hot scenes worth keeping

If you are into the hot wife thing, try hotwivesandgirlfriends, creampiecathy, or jean swing

Hope this helps
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mommy Needs Money

67. Mommy Needs Money (0)

Pay
Active
77
ace of aces (179) 01-17-10  06:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (70), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++nice discount price
++ good video quality
++ much stocking content
+ nice milfs
+ preview pics
+ no dl limit
+ no drm
+ network access
Cons: --- semi exclusive
--- search engine
- only 6 exclusive videos
- not sure about regular updates
--- corrupted videofiles
Bottom Line: the newest site of the porn.com network

the pu discount price with 9,99 € is a good deal.
the video quality with wmv videos and two different download qualitys of 720x540 and 320x210 is quite good. the videos for themselves have preview pics and are with arround 300-400 mb good sized. i do really lilke that rather all of the videos (6!!) have stocking content. the milfs look good, with different boob size, mostly bigger boobs.
there is no dl limit, no drm and the network gives you access to over 130 (70 network sites /differs up to 72 sites, depends on the site you are at, and 60 extra) sites.

the content is semi exclusive. there are the exclusive videos (6) and plenty other not exclusive dvd`s (198).
much more a shame is, thht the good navigation is "killed" by the fact, that you are forced by searching with keywords, you also get the not exclusive content.
6 exclusive videos is nothing, but as a start of a new site, it is not a big con as in the other reviews of the network.
a very big con, which was also there at the beginning of the network is that if you download more then one file simultan, most of the downloaded files are corrupted (broken).

the idea of such a site is nothing new but is rather good presented here. i hope that the video updates will be regular and more then weekly. then i think it`s a good try. seen from today
Might recommend
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cougars In Heat

68. Cougars In Heat (0)

Pay
Active
82
james4096 (126) 01-09-10  05:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The women are hot and look like cougars, and the scenes are hot
- No DRM or download limit
- HD videos look very good
- Download manager friendly. Resumes downloads, multiple connections, queue and download later works
- Zip downloads for the photos. And separate links for soft and hard photos
Cons: - Some of the navigation links don't seem to work. If you click on "models" sometimes nothing happens.
- Also some of the video files in ipod format are missing.
- No actual model pages.
- Ads, including Adult friend Finder, in the member's area
- A little too expensive for a site with no network access
- Only one update a week, and it's late at times
Bottom Line: This is a good one if you like hardcore MILF scenes with pornstars. These are traditional video style scenes with a little scenario and everything, not reality gonzo. These are well known pornstars and they seem to look the part of cougars. I'd say they're all between 35-50, I don't know Nina Hartley is probably the oldest one they have. It's all white women with the exception of one scene and it's exclusively B/G. Most of the content seems exclusive, but I have definitely seen at least one of the scenes elsewhere. There were 163 scenes at the time of this review and updates come once a week, occasionally more. The update schedule is irregular, but they do come.

Four types of files are offered for the video downloads, HD mp4, standard rez mp4 & wmv, and an Ipod size mp4. The wmv's are just average, and they do get blocky at times. Go for the HD mp4s they appear to be 1280x720. There are full scene downloads or split into 10 clips. Like I mentioned in the cons, the ipod format is missing sometimes. Also you'll find 3 qualities of streaming flash.

The top quality still photos are 1077x1616, and screen caps are 960x540. Could be better could be worse. One thing that was strange was that they offer "high quality" photos and "high resolution" photos. The "high resolution" are the better of the two. Pretty dumb naming system if you ask me. One thing I like about the way they did photos was that they have separated hardcore and softcore photos. I usually go for the softcore photos because I have video for hardcore. There are separate zips of hard, soft and screencaps.

I really enjoyed this site, I thought the content was good and I would recommend it. I would add 10 points to the score if the site was either cheaper, or was part of a network. If you are wondering the amount of videos they had worth $30, I say yes. However, Naughty America has several similar sites and over a dozen other niches and I usually only pay $10 for that. My suggestions for improvement would be to lower the price and spice things up a bit. Do an occasional threesome or use a model of a different ethnicity.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Boys Fuck Matures

69. Boys Fuck Matures (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Cristofol (0) 01-04-10  11:07pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good image quality
-Exclusive
Cons: -Only 11 movies
-No bonus sites
-Movies are,more or less, 30min. long and they start having some kind of sex after minute 15. Until that moment all is bla-bla-bla.
-The two guys never will become porn actors: they fuck like you and me.
-The quality, as I sayd, is good,but, on the other hand, movies weight a lot: around 1,5 Gb. each.
Bottom Line: If you want to get angry throwing 21€/30$ to the rubish bin, this is the right place.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Moms Give Ass

70. Moms Give Ass (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
Sandfly (1) 01-01-10  01:30pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Concept not bad
Cons: - Very small site, very repetitive.
- An annoying habit of turning the camera through 90 degrees (actors go from Portrait to Landscape) which makes watching it difficult. I suppose they think this is "arty", but it is just irritating.
- Site poorly designed with no search facility.
- Very small thumbnails which make it hard to distinguish one movie from the next.
- Model names (both male and female) that are laughable considering that they are all Russian.
- All movie downloads are in .avi format regardless, with no user choice
Bottom Line: The 3 day trial is the only thing that makes this in any way worthwhile, don't bother otherwise.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Anilos

71. Anilos (0)

Pay
Active
87
GCode (101) 12-12-09  11:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (58), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of older women doing mostly masturbation with fingers or toys and quite a bit of hardcore mixed in as well.
- No DRM.
- Updates daily with either a photo set or video scene.
- Videos are offered in a lot of different ways including in-browser streaming, in parts, and full scenes offered in mp4, mpeg, and WMV. Best and newest quality is WMV at 1280 X 720 at ~3650 kbps. Older videos are at 640 X 480 at ~1500 kbps.
- Photos are well done and available in two different resolutions (1200 X 800 and 2400 X 1600) with all the option to view in browser or download via zip.
- Solid bio pages for almost all models with a lot of information plus a model stats area for quick facts and info.
- Ability to add your on tags to sets and scenes for easier searches later on.
- Active forum for feedback and discussions.
- Model index for easier navigation.
- Great site design that is easy on the eyes.
- Wallpapers and niche (ass, tits, etc.) photos offered for each model.
Cons: - While most models are certainly considered 'older' women, they are by far not what I would be call true mature models. A lot are in the late 20's and lower 30's which can sometimes look like a model featured at almost any site and not a 'mature' site.
- While many are all natural, there is a solid mix of many models with fake boobs and other minor surgeries. While obviously present because many older models probably feel they need to be more 'tight' so they look more youthful, this can stray many away looking for natural aged bodies.
- I'd say the majority of the captured scenes are great quality but some are obviously the routine solo scene with a toy and there is no emotion present. Just a model sticking it in and out for 10 minutes and a blank stare on her face.
Bottom Line: Anilos is definitely in the forefront when it comes to one of the better sites that provides quality and real mature content to the masses. However, the site cannot be overly praised for this because I feel they have somewhat dropped the ball when it comes to finding true mature models. However, the site showcases extreme quality in a large number of traits that many sites lack. For example, the site design and navigation is awesome, the professional quality of the content is great, and the extra little features exhibits the people running the site care for the site and its future.

The models involved are usually dressed in a range of outfits but are staying within the dolled up glamour niche mostly. Usually a nice dress, lingerie, business suits, and/or everyday wear are featured. However, I'd say the majority are in dresses or business suits. A good amount of make-up is used and most of the hair is stylized. Overall, a good mix of outfits for each model.

The videos provided are well made when it comes to the technical aspects. Overall, Anilos offers a great resolution with great lighting, bright settings, and a decent range of long shots with close ups at the right time. When it comes to footage captured, I think Anilos demonstrates an honest attempt to record scenes that not only include the regular hardcore and solo with toy scenes but add sybian, machine, and bathing footage. However, the majority is still solo play with mixed results. Some models are obviously truly getting themselves off genuinely while others are going through the motions. While obviously this can be expected for most sites, I do believe there are more legit than non-legit. There are quite a few interview scenes as well which include a vocal interview and the model stripping during the scene as well. Overall, the site offers a great amount of mix it ups to create a quality amount of captured footage.

The photography is well done in terms of professionalism as well. Good lighting, a non-intrusive watermark, and range of shots make these photos something to look at. However, I did find a good amount of photoshopping which killed a lot of my favorite models pictures. These models are older and are still human so of course many have 'imperfections'. But, this is what makes someones model their favorite. Therefore, lets keep things natural. Besides that, the photography is extremely well done.

All-in-all, the site is well done and should be visited one time by fans of women in the 'older' range. While every model may not hit what many to think as a true mature model, they do have a lot of them present and they are extremely good looking. Expect plenty of great special features such as wallpapers, interviews, bios, photographer feedback, searches, tags, and dated updates which increase the overall experience. With that and a great mix of solo and hardcore footage with even a bit of lesbian mixed in, the site is above average when it comes to a mature model site.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Amazing Grannies

72. Amazing Grannies (0)

Pay
Active
70
mbaya (356) 12-06-09  08:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -A week is free with a monthly membership. You get 37 days for the one month price.
-Frequent updates. Photo sets are one every 2 days, videos one a week.
-Photos are zipdownloadable.
-Good size photo archives. 829 photo sets. The number of photos is not listed, but almost all sets are between 100 and 200. The photos are mostly of professional models and the rest are homemade and user submitted.
-Some variety of races, ages and body types. Most are Eastern Europeans.
-Mostly fresh faces. Only a few I recognized as older pornstars.
-Comes with three bonus sites-hairypussycuties.com, homemadejunk.com, and vintagecuties.com.
-Nearly all have hairy bushes. The models are very unglam and appear to be natural without boob jobs or tattoos. Many have noticeable imperfections. For me this is a plus.
Cons: -Advertises itself as featuring models at least 40. I don't think that some are that old. Most of the better looking models appear to be younger.
-The videos are not of very good quality. Most are masturbation or b/g, with a few a few lesbian scenes. I considered the videos to be a total waste and deleted them all. Definitely not a site to join for the videos.
Bottom Line: This is billed as a niche site and comes with others that also focus on models with hairy bush. This one focuses on older models within that niche.

The models are mostly in their 40s, with a few that seem a few years younger. The older models are almost all unattractive and overweight. Not much to be found here that promotes sexiness. More to my taste is that the younger models are much better looking. I suspect this is not due to the aging process, but to a much smaller pool of women willing to pose. Most of the older models would not have been hot in their twenties either.

Some of the photosets are very hot, but not enough of them are due to the fact that unfortunately the site seems to focus more on frequent updates than on quality. Many of the photosets feature the same models over and over. Since these are usually the most attractive models, I see this as a plus. In contrast, the photos of the models that are used as previews generally makes you pass by most of the sets. I found at best one in four sets worth checking out. One thing I do appreciate is that the style of the photography is professional, very explict and gets to the point.

Overall worth considering if you find older bush interesting. However, a lot of the content just isn't worth bothering with.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Joy DaBang

73. Joy DaBang (0)

Pay
Newbie
89*
wraith11 (1) 12-04-09  10:47am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Joy is a very sexy real woman the seems to have alot of fun posing for her photos and really seemed to enjoy making her videos, The outdoor photos are a real treat and her variety of locations and hair styles & colors add spice to her content,
Weekly updates of content is good.
Pretty good photography for a amateur site.
She sells DVD's of all here videos and they are really good for amateurs!
Cons: I only have a few cons one is no large format photos, the streaming video quality could be better maybe needs a higher bandwidth
Needs more video content, needs there updates dated.
Bottom Line: JoyDabang.com is a great site if you love to see a real sexy everyday amateur M.I.L.F.housewife,
good content, regular updates,DVD's of all her videos and as a member you get access to bonus sites as well.
I recomend this site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit All Over 30

74. All Over 30 (1)

Pay
Active
95
mr smut (42) 11-30-09  04:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: + 388 models (with >5,700 photo sets and > 1,400 movies) now and still growing even though some models come back by members request
+ 5 updates per day from Monday to Saturday (mostly 3-4 pictures series and 1-2 videos per day)
+ high quality pics in 2400 x 1600 resolution (only older content is in lower res available).
+ ZIP files in 3 different resolutions for all picture series
+ download manager friendly site (max. of 6 simultaneous connections)
+ forums for registered users (the owners, some models and photographers are regular guests)
+ very user friendly all my mails so far have been answered
+ no geo targeted pricing
+ best model search I've seen so far with almost no incorrect data
+ improved navigation now works 100% correct
+ calendar of upcoming updates for the next week
+ newest videos are mostly HD (1280x720 with ~ 4000 kb/s)
+ no download limit
Cons: - still some of the photographers are not using HD equipement for their videos
- only b/g and ladies on ladies movies come in 4 parts or as one large movie
Bottom Line: My first review from end of December 2007 gave AllOver30 95 points which wasn't o.k. at that time - at least I get this impression as far as I can see today. Many things have been improved in the mean time and most of my requests have been taken care of within the last 2 years. Ever since I have been a member of this site and to be honest I'm in loose contact with the owners. But in no way I'm employed there this is only because I want to be honest with my fellow PUs.

HD pix and videos came up end of April 2009 and ever since then new picture series are available with 2400 pixel on the long side. As written above some photographers still upload normal quality videos (640x480 resolution) but as far as I can the owners say they push them to deliver HD for upcoming shots.

Since I made my last review some things have significantly improved:
- pictures sizes are now 1024, 1536 or 2400 pixel on the long side and ZIPs are available for all sizes.
- recent updates now shows thumbs for the updates of the past week
- a calendar of upcoming releases for the next 7 days has been implemented.
- a slideshow feature is now available in the picture section
- by popular demand more models came back for new shootings
- the database for the model search has been updated with more information about older shots

One big shock for me was to see that geo targeted pricing was active when I wanted to re-new my membership in 2008. It took only a few hours after I informed the owners until they made sure this was no longer active.

A few last words … you won't find such rude things as fisting there, anal sex is also rare. Mostly you can see beautiful models in softcore and masturbation scenes. Normal intercourse will of course also be offered.

As far as I can say this is the best site for mature porn I can think of and now the 95 is surely o.k.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lusty Grandmas

75. Lusty Grandmas (0)

Pay
Active
89
mr smut (42) 11-22-09  11:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + exclusive content
+ network access (but limited until you are there for the 3rd month)
+ at the time of review 187 unique scenes are available (1 update on every Wednesday)
+ many old & young scenes (b/g or g/g)
+ model age range from not so MILF to real granny
+ newest videos starting from mid of October 2009 are available in full HD
+ site seems to have no download limit
+ download speed never broke down even with 5 simultaneous donwloads
+ new user interface has a clean layout and lots of nice options
Cons: - pictures are only 1280 pixel on the long side
- you have to enter a captcha code every time you login
- can't use my download manager with the site
- some unneccessary comments can be heard in the videos
- no model bios not even measurements are given
- age description of models in the scene descriptions is not consistent
- new user interface still needs some work
Bottom Line: This site is part of a network that offers mostly exclusive content. Content that is going much further than what can be seen on AllOver 30 or AuntJudys. Fisting, anal sex, fucking machines, light BDSM and rougher sex can be seen there. The real hard stuff seems to be on cumming matures which is available after being a member for more than two months.

That is because you get access to 30 network sites when you join. Additional 10 after one month of membership and another 10 after two months.

The content itself is mostly great. O.k. there are some models I don't like but the majority of them is nice and I like the old & young content most. To see young and petite Bianca Arden (soon on ALS Scan b.t.w.) get into action with GILF Sandora (great body if she's really 65 years old) alone is worth a subscription. Even though there's an impression of overacting especially with Sandora which is a quite common impression with girls from Eastern Europe :-(
If only they would have left out the lengthy introduction to the video.

There are now several download options for videos available with mp4 starting from 640x360, 960x540 up to 1920x1080 and wmv starting from 960x540, 1280x720 up to 1920x1280. If you need further details please feel free to ask me.
The picture section is not that good as 1280 pixel on the long side seems to be not enough compared to the quality they offer in the video section.

I joined through Epoch because I didn't want to make the experience Messmer had with increasing spam in his mailbox. I give 89 points because of the network access. The site alone would get slightly more than 80 points because one update per week wouldn't be enough.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 51-75 of 245 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Mom POV (2)
2. Angie Noir (1)
3. Gabby Quinteros (1)
4. Call Your Husband (1)
5. 60 Plus MILFs (1)
6. Deauxma Live (1)
7. 50Plus MILFs (1)
8. Cuckolds (1)
9. Seduced By A Cougar (1)
10. All Over 30 (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.34 seconds.