Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 243 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Mom POV

26. Mom POV (1)

Robbi81 (4) 12-04-12  09:13am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - A good collection of amatuer MILFs
- Just over 100 scenes
- True amatuer MILFs
- Good quality download
Cons: - No pics available
- No Bios of the girls or when the scenes were taken
- Very basic webpage design
- One downloading option and 3 resolution options for streaming
Bottom Line: An amatuer MILF website that is just getting on its feet. A unique collection of some attractive women that are new to porn and it shows with some. But the setup of the members area was very stale. There is actually more info on the scenes on the public webpage then there is in the members area making it very disappointing.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Diary Of A MILF

27. Diary Of A MILF (0)

marcdc1 (174) 11-15-12  06:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of a huge network with over two dozen sites and more thank 5,050 shoots.
- Terrific organization: it is very easy to find what you're looking for. You can search across the network by action, body type, stars, location, "fantasy". Inside each individual site there is a static list of stars, and keywords.
- keywords include obvious options like "handjob" and "blond" and go to the esoteric: "accent", "glasses"
- save scenes to a favorite list to find them again easily.
- Exclusive content.
- good variety of "set-ups:" not every scene is the same (although it is aimed at mainstream audience so if you have a particular "niche" you'll have trouble finding it here)
- pix available as zip files
- stays true to theme. You won't find a 20 something trying to pull of being a MILF. If anything you may see some that would qualify as GILFs
- About a dozen shoots are in "DVD quality" 720X540 3mbps. The rest are 480X360 512 kbps. Good for when they were done but sub par now.
Cons: - Dead site: Last update was February 2008.
- Smaller site by standards of their network: "only" 120 scenes.
- most girls have implants
- nearly ever scene ends in a facial.
- Seeing some of these performers on other sites I think they suffer from poor direction. A problem that is worse the older the scene is (as a generalization)
Bottom Line: Diary of a MILF is a fine site, but nothing to write home about. If you're a fan of the MILF genre you'll find enough here to justify the entry free. However, if you're not a MILF lover, this site is probably a skip for you. There's not enough over the top hot stuff to make up for something that's out of your preference.

Bottom line: check out the whole network, it is impressive. The preview section does a good job of letting you know what you'll get on the inside. Unless you're a big MILF fan skip this one.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Seduced By A Cougar

28. Seduced By A Cougar (0)

marcdc1 (174) 11-02-12  05:46pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - About 280 shoots on this site alone. More than 5,000 across the entire network at Naughty America.
- Quality lighting and sound - you can see and hear all the action from a top of the line production studio
- About 120 shoots are in "standard definition" (not bad for when they were shooting. In 2007 they started offering "DVD Quality" 720X540 3mbps. That means more thank 280 videos are available in that quality.) About 130 videos are in "HD 1080" 3.5mbps. Streaming (.flv) or download .mp4 or .wmv
- zips for downloading pix (more than 150 pix per shoot)
- good organization with searching by date, stars, location, act, model type (blond, fake tits, tattoos, really more options than I would have thought of)
- a lot of different talent there are "girls" on here that I've never even heard of.
- Some real stand out talent: Raven Black, Brandi Love, Rayveness, Gabby Quintero, I like that they book pro-am girls, as well as pros.
Cons: - mainstream porn: nearly each shoot follows the same action blueprint: BJ, pussy lick, fuck in 2-3 positions, cum shot on face.
- most girls have fake tits
- standard buy is over priced in my opinion, but they often offer discounts so watch for them.
- For my taste their were too many women that were past the cougar stage. That's just my opinion.
Bottom Line: While I like the Naughty America network. This site is not one of my favorites. I guess I'm just not that big a fan of MILFs. I have to give NA credit they recruit great girls for this site. If you're looking for hot cougars that's what they have so you won't be disappointed.

Over the sites on NA this one tends to have more dirty talk (which I love) and more variety in the set-up. Which is also welcome since many of their sites feel like every shoot is exactly the same.

I have to give them credit for creating what they set out to create. While it's not my favorite site. It is what it says it is. And I appreciate that!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Mature.nl

29. Mature.nl (0)

RagingBuddhist (65) 10-27-12  08:41am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (61), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Plenty of content
+ New video and pics are decent quality
+ Network access
+ Model List
+ Search by niche
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Easy cancellation link
+ HD, Streaming and IPOD videos
+ Video available in parts
+ Customized DVDs available
Cons: - 1990s style layout and navigation
- Abysmal download speeds
- Erratic update schedule
- No download acceleration with download manager
- Huge watermarks on just about everything but mature.nl content
- Files not named
- Not Opera compatible
- Blank model pages???
- Only one file type on newer content (wmv)
Bottom Line: There is definitely a ton of mature content here. At the time of this review there are 90 pages of updates, listed in chronological order, spanning 21 sites:
Mature.nl, Mature Retro, Special Mature Movies, Amateur Interracial, Creampie Mature, Mature.eu, Mature Madness, Mature Sexparty, Old and Young Lesbians, Mature Gloryhole, I Love Mature, USA Mature, Teens Love Old Men, Bizarre Mature Sex, Horny Mature Sluts, Mature Toiletsluts, Old and Young Gangbang, Outdoor Mature, Kinky Mature Gangbang, Bizarre Mature Dildo and Grannychannel.

The only search on the site is by niche. 25 categories: Anal, Asslicking, Bigbutt, Biglady, Bigtits, Blowjob, Cum, Facials, Fisting, Gangbang, Groupsex, Hairy, Interracial, Lesbian, Masturbation, MILF, Old & Young, Old & Young Female, Pantyhose,Pissing, Public, Shaved, Solo, Threesome and Toys. Some of the more extreme niches have very few sets.

The model list, which has thousands of models, pops up a thumbnail of each model when pointing to the name. Some models have no video, especially in the oldest sets. With nothing dated outside of the update pages, there's no telling what you're going to find on a particular model.

Click on one of six thumbnails on a model's page and a strip of thumbs appear on the left that have to be scrolled through to get to the page jumps. Found it particularly annoying that clicking on the first thumb didn't always take you to the first picture in the set. Newer pictures are 1440 on the long side, older ones are 1024 long side.
With more than a few blurry shots, poorly lit and oddly framed pictures, there doesn't appear to be much editing on what's posted.

More than adequate quality files - HD: 1280 x 720 @ 4700+ kb/s, Streaming (From one sample): 720 x 406 @ 768 kb/s, Ipod: 320x240 @ 700+ kb/s
Since the download speeds averaged around 250 kb/s, I was surprised that streaming was even possible. Some one gig files took 3 hours to download - with a download manager. No acceleration was allowed and FreeDownloadManager reported that resuming broken files wasn't guaranteed. I never got to the older mpg files mentioned on TBP, so no comment there. The watermarks do get a comment - On most of the niche sites they were excessively large. Yeah - I get it - you've branded your product with a ridiculous distraction. Thanks.

Using a download manager (FDM), all pictures download as showPicture.php, all video as V3GetMovie.php. Right clicking to save video and they're merely numbered. Pictures are still showPicture.php. Utterly ridiculous.

I found several models whose link goes to a page with no content. WTF???

I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but this site seems to shoot anyone who will take her clothes off. You know it's bad when you find yourself on a model's page and you say, "Holy shit!", out loud.

Each scene has a link to add it to a custom DVD. Clicking takes you to a page where it shows you how many minutes of content you can still add. Averaging three scenes each and costing €27.95 (including shipping), they aren't cheap.

I gave this site a 68 based mostly on the amount of content available. Beyond that, it needs a lot of work to bring it up to 2012 specs. The clumsy, flash-based navigation, the lack of proper file names, the S-L-O-W download speeds and the sporadic blank pages are annoying as hell. I don't know that I'd recommend this network to anyone but the most ardent mature fan. For over fifty dollars a month, I expected better than this.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Aunt Judy\'s

30. Aunt Judy's (1)

messmer (137) 09-23-12  12:10pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 11-06-12  12:14pm  (Update History)
Reason: Streaming and DL Managers now possible.
Pros: Vast amount of old Aunt Judys/Older women material stored in the archives.

Very much improved members' page under the new management of ATK.

Much improved quality in Hi-Res picture sets and an even more startling improvement in videos over those offered by “Older Women” in the past. Most updates (except remastered ones) are now in true HD.

Same excellent search engine as in the other ATK sites.

Access to ATK Lounge.

No download restrictions.

Fast download speeds ... however, read below.
Cons: Streaming a video is discouraged, so that more bandwidth is available for downloads. Despite my fast download speeds (max of my modem) navigation within the site was sluggish.***

Download managers are not allowed. I wasn't sure if Firefox' DTA, when downloading one video at a time, was considered to be a true manager and used it consistently without being stopped. If I crossed the line, my apologies to the new managers of the site. ***

*** This was only recommended during the first few days. Streaming and Download Managers are now allowed. Score upgraded by 5.

Updates are a mixture of Aunt Judy and “bonus” picture sets and videos imported from ATK Natural and Hairy (Mature Hairy). This has caused complaints from those who are subscribing to both sites at the same time. I was surprised myself when I downloaded some picture sets and found that I had them already from a previous membership to ATK N&H.
Bottom Line: I must confess that it was a disappointing month for me. I had received an email by the old "Aunt Judys/Older Women” site offering me a membership for $ 9.95 a month (recurring), with the notification that the site was now under new management. I had not liked AJ/OW for a long time because the “tease and erotic factor” had declined dramatically over the past few years, but could not resist .. just to see how ATK would do with one of my formerly favorite sites.

My first impression was and still is: not ready for prime time. Without the imports from “Mature Hairy” their updates would be very skimpy but what saddens me more is that ATK's new content is every bit as bland as that of the former site in its dying years. And no I am not calling for hardcore material, just for more excitement in the solos.

This might appear to be a very unfair assessment when viewed from the “web owner's“ side but I have to repeat once again that any review, especially that of a layman, has to be subjective so take my score with a grain of salt. Not everyone feels the way I do. And I still believe that the new management will eventually create a very attractive site. If it will be for me remains to be seen.

Old AJ (pre 2007 or so): lots and lots of enticing lingerie, or a prolonged strip, on attractive “housewifey” models.

New AJ/OW (until take-over by ATK): most models came with three very basic items of clothing that they would take off within the first few pictures of a set, or within a couple of minutes if it was a video.

New ATK AJ: same thing, which can make a set very boring unless one absolutely loves a model and collects her, no matter how utilitarian and sparse her attire may be.

My old complaint, as in so many other sites, is that the tease factor has disappeared and, without that, so has my libido when it comes to most sets or videos. There are only so many positions you can place a naked body in so, why give them so little to wear and why undress them so quickly. At least if you dressed the women in more than the “bare” essentials there would be a difference from set to set.

I let the subscription lapse (yesterday was my last day) despite the low price because I could not find any picture sets during the past month that truly excited me. I gave some of them high marks because of the model herself, or because of factors like quality and lighting and crispness of picture etc. Or because of the way the photographer posed his models but it was done half-heartedly.

I sincerely hope that the pendulum will eventually swing back to the way things were and that at least one set from a shoot will contain a nice strip or lingerie.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

Visit Aunt Judy\'s

31. Aunt Judy's (1)

bigbobby44 (0) 09-20-12  03:52pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: looks like there are many more (and more voluminous) updates going up (daily now), and the new higher-res videos are cool too.
Cons: the site seems to be slightly underperforming in the "mom next door" type, which had been AuntJudys big strength over the years (though this seems to be getting better with each passing update). i have also seen a few sasquatch types (renee) that were pretty unappealing. there was also an african american model that seemed a bit too "ooga booga"
Bottom Line: if they can really stay true to the AuntJudy mom-next-door-type and keep up the improved update schedule, i think this will be the best mature site on the net.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Call Your Husband

32. Call Your Husband (0)

marcdc1 (174) 09-16-12  05:37am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - "blue ray" quality downloads - I didn't download this file size because my monitor wouldn't support it. Instead I opted for the 1280X720 2.6 mb/s option.
- network includes: dark caravan, Mandy Tyler, cuckolds.com, bizarre insertions, and Barbi Sinclair.
- nice search field to help navigate
- just over twenty scenes on theme about 30 just in this site (most of them with Barbi Sinclair who's site is also part of the network) - when your on the site it pulls in content from their partners so it's a little confusing about what was shot for this exclusively.
-ability to favorite videos to make it easy to come back to.
- While organization isn't perfect it is clear and easy to use
- Quite a bit of interracial, if that's your thing
Cons: - Ads in members area
- despite the "high quality" file size it looks like many of the videos were 1st done in a lower format and then upscaled
- Older content is in 800X450 2.6 mbps -
- keywords are a little limited, there are only about a half dozen categories to separate the content.
- some scenes have screen shots, but there's not stand alone photo content.
- It's a little confusing with scenes coming in from other parts of the network, but it looks like last update was in February on 2012
- .mp4 and .flv only formats available.
Bottom Line: This is a fun site with a cool idea inside the "cuckolding" genre. Sometime the girl calls her guys and pretends she being innocent ("I'm just sucking on an ice pop for example") Other time she id more dominate ("I'm taking him because your not good enough" - Barbi Sinclair). That said the idea get repetitive and boring (in my opinion anyway)

There's not a lot here, but the network looks pretty solid - I'm enjoying seeing all there is to offer.

The talent is ok, not great. There are times when you hear the director coaching her through the scene - which is a little annoying. I have to give them credit though for taking an idea and running with it all the way.

Bottom line - Small site with a limited theme. Some hot gems but probably not worth a membership all on it's own. It does have some great partners so check out the rest of the network to see if there's enough across the network for you. In my opinion the inclusion of solo girls Barbi Sinclair and Mandy Tyler along with dark caravan for IR lovers makes this a solid buy - at least for a month or two. I have no regrets about joining the network.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Cuckolds

33. Cuckolds (0)

marcdc1 (174) 09-11-12  04:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - "blue ray" quality downloads - I didn't download this file size because my monitor wouldn't support it. Instead I opted for the 1280X720 2.6 mb/s option.
- network includes: dark caravan, Mandy Tyler, call your husband, bizarre insertions, and Barbi Sinclair.
- lots of community interaction, amateurs posting their homemade content and stories
- nice search field to help navigate
- just over forty scenes (most of them with Barbi Sinclair who's site is also part of the network)
- variety inside the cuckold theme (husband catching wife, husband forced to watch, husband helping wife score, etc)
- While organization isn't perfect it is clear and easy to use
Cons: - Ads in members area
- despite the "high quality" file size it looks like many of the videos were 1st done in a lower format and then upscaled
- keywords are a little limited, there are only about a half dozen categories to separate the content.
- some scenes have screen shots, but there's not stand alone photo content.
- Updates come in from the rest of the network so there is redundancy across the network - which sometimes confuses navigation
- .mp4 and .flv only formats available.
Bottom Line: Cuckold.com does what it sets out to do. The video quality could be sharper and the talent could be better (it's dominated by Barbi Sinclair). Don't get me wrong Barbi is great, but the point of a site like this is to see a lot of different girls- a little disappointed to see her again and again (especially when her site is also on the network)

I joined the network for Mandy Tyler and was surprised to see cuckold.com included. It was fun to check it out. It might be worth it if they started updating with some different girls and more importantly improved the video clarity.

Cuckold.com is not the raunchiest site in this genera, if you looking for something more intense you may want to look to the stuff on the kickass network, or cuckoldmenow. Cuckold.com stays true to theme so they certainly get credit for that. The talent is good if I would criticize the performance at all I would say they should look at the directors of kink's domination stuff or the guys and cuckold sessions
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Wife Writing

34. Wife Writing (0)

rearadmiral (388) 08-06-12  10:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Interesting and under-served niche
- Part of the Dog Fart Network
- Many options to view / download scenes
- Photos available
- Streaming video available
- Still updating – but slowly with usually just one scene per month
- Many popular porn stars
- Supports download managers (I use Internet Download Manager)
Cons: - Small site
- Scenes are mostly just oral
- Could play the BDSM role more
Bottom Line: This review might be best served if I define the niche first. The focus on the site is that in the course of the scene the male uses a marker to write on the female’s nude body. I’m guessing that the ‘wife’ part of the title is only for alliteration.

I joined Dog Fart Network specifically to get access to this site. This is a very small niche and my interest in it stems mostly from its use as part of BDSM. While the site is interesting and reasonably well done, I was a bit disappointed with the theme since the ‘writing’ is done to highlight the fact that the scenes are interracial rather than specifically as part of BDSM. (So instead of having “Whore” written on her forehead the model might have “Black Cock Lover” instead. I’m probably really splitting hairs here but for anyone into this niche it can make a difference. Still, I’ll take what I can get.)

Two things that any future member may want to know: the male talent is all black. That shouldn’t make a difference, but some may prefer to see a Caucasian male once in a while. The other thing is that actual intercourse is rare; most of the scenes are only oral. I didn’t see any anal in the few scenes where intercourse occurs. The female talent ranges from relative unknowns to popular porn stars.

The site is quite small with only 43 scenes available. It is one of the DFN sites that is still updating though, but the updates are fairly slow only coming in approximately once a month.

The site layout is simple: you open onto a page where six scenes are listed. Each scene has a large screen-cap of the model. One thing I particularly like is that the video and photo options are available right below the model’s name and screen-cap. There’s no need to open a second page just to access the scene. I also like that there is a brief description of the scene too which can provide more information for you to consider before downloading.

Speaking of video download options, the site offers two: WMV and MP4. WMV files are usually offered in two sizes. Interestingly, both sizes come in at 640x480 but the difference in that the larger ones are 4500kb/s while the smaller ones are 1500kb/s. Both play at 30fps. MP4s are usually offered in three sizes. I use WMV so I don’t have the specs on the MP4s. Some of the older videos (but not all) come in at 640x360.

This seems odd in 2012, but the WMV files are also offered in segments for both the lower and higher resolutions. I can’t imagine there are many people out there who would prefer segments when the full video is available too.

The site supports download managers and I had no problem with links dying on me.

I didn’t view the site on a mobile device but there is a separate link for those users where various viewing and downloading options are also available. Surely no member could complain about a lack of viewing options here.

Streaming is also available, but I don’t use that so I can’t really comment on it. The scenes I tested looked okay on a monitor. The resolution of the two available streams seems to be close to the WMV downloads. The streams open in a new page and play on the site’s player.

While the site is really a video site they do offer photos. In keeping with the various options for videos there are options for the photos too. There are separate photos taken of the model during the scene. These are available as singles or zips. The resolution is pretty good at 1067x1600. There are also lower resolution screen-caps available. Then there are “panels” which is a photo made up of four screen-caps fitted per page. Neither the screen-caps nor the panels are available as zips.

As BDSM goes, this site is fairly weak. I think they could improve by playing the Dom/sub roles a bit more. Still, sites that cater to this niche are rare. This is the only one I know of, so if another PU member has some recommendations I’d appreciate getting them.

Even though the site is small and the videos aren’t exactly what I was hoping for, I’d definitely recommend the site for anyone with an interest in this niche. And I’m not just saying that because there is nothing else out there. This site could stand alone and still be a good value at the right price. Admittedly though, unless you’re into this obscure niche like I am the real value of the site is the access to the rest of the Dog Fart Network.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Sharing My Wife

35. Sharing My Wife (0)

marcdc1 (174) 07-26-12  10:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Stays true to it's premise
- hot ladies
- fun cuckold site (seems to be a new trend for porn)
- Even though it's the same premise with each video they do a bunch of different takes so it's fun. - There's no strict formula to get bored with.
- for a cuckolding site it's not a raunchy site as others (cum eating cuckolds for examples); also not a campy as others - (like please bang my wife) - Don't know if this is a "pro" or not
Cons: - Site hasn't been updated in a while seems like it's been abandoned.
- Video quality was good at the time but is now sub-par. Not HD
- Claims exclusive content but it's shared within the network of sites

- No Zip files for pix
Bottom Line: Look at the previews and see if there's some girls there you like. The scenes are defiantly hot. I was happy joining just for Felony Foreplay (who they call Amy), who with Rayvaness were enough to justify a 1 month subscription.

To me I looked at the site and said: "If that were a DVD I'd buy it" - just don't expect any updates - cause they're not coming.

For $30 you see some great content. I wish they were still updating - I'd go right back to them!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Matures Cam

36. Matures Cam (0)

Shakermaker (15) 06-02-12  02:16pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some really good and genuinely nice models

HD quality for many models

Ok variety in models

You can actually have a fun time in free chat with some of the models
Cons: Very expensive

“FRAUD” for EU cities – we have to pay more than the US

Some really, and I mean really bad models (even bad mannered)

The site LIES with the actually number of online models

Preview pictures rarely gives a true impression on how the actually model looks like on cam.

Some online models are obviously recorded playbacks (in the free section)

Even if you register and buys credits, you have to pay even more to become a actually member to watch member chat

The site is bad at explaining the different functions it offers e.g. the above member function mention above
Bottom Line: This is actually a bit difficult to review this kind of site for me, because do you review the site itself, just the models or a combination of the 2. Depending on which one you take, you’ll end up with three different results. I will try the combination.

First of this live cam experience is VERY expensive and in my p.o.v. far too much so. I mean I can actually (and I live Western Europe) hire a real stunning looking call girl for much longer for the same amount of money than for some of the average model on this site. This is just crazy in my book. Futhermore be careful as this website uses the dollar equal the euro policy. For us in Europe this means that we end up paying way more for the same service as the Americans. I really wish the EU would do something about this as it’s not only confided to porn but also other business areas, but for now it seem that immoral businessmen are having a blast because of this.

Moving on: You’ll realize after some tries, that the more expensive models don’t equal a better experience - far from it. I actually found an average looking woman, that gave me some really fantastic cyber sex and even though she didn’t get much for the time I spent with her, she never dragged out time or tried to keep me in the paying area. On the other hand some models would drag out time, so I would become so frustrated that I just ended up leaving, because I could see my money just wasting away.
And that is the real problem with sites like this in my point of view. You never know what you get and some models are amazing while others are just plain bad and you have next to no way of telling or finding out before hand, so most of your money will actually end up being spent on finding a good experience and not the experience itself.

There is of course a free chat with the models were you can get a preview and a little chat with the woman before jumping into a private show with her, but to my experience this again offers next to no insight in the ‘real’ experience behind the private curtain. Most of the models will even press you to go into private before even discussing what you want from the women. This is useless to me and more than once I even find women there just sat there ignoring your question as if I’m wasting their time, because I want to find out if she will fulfil my wishes. Tbh I find this very rude and bad service.

That being said you can actually find a few but generally nice women to have a funny chat with and I ended up with a few friends along the way. Even in real life.

The simple preview photo of the women you get before you click a specified woman to go to the free live chat with her is in 95% of the time a really bad preview photo of how she really looks at live cam. Even more annoying is it that some of the models have multiple ‘accounts’ up, which means that the site lies when it says there’s e.g. 300 models online, when in fact the actually number is smaller, because many of these 300 live models actually points to the same women.

Even worse is it that some of the free live feeds are obviously recorded tapes and not an actually live feed. I don’t know if there’s a real person in the private show with these, but I never dared to try and to find out.
The site ‘offers’ a member within member sections as I see it, but for a new user it is really confusing. I signed up and added some credit and I thought I was now a member of the site and could see the girls in their member chat to avoid the spamming from free users in the free live feed. But no this is apparently a whole feature on it’s own you have to pay even more to get access to it. This would be okay, if the site just explained this better, but it doesn’t and it really seems that the site deliberately tries to keep as much information hidden about such extra features to lure people into a trap, so they can milk you to pay just a little more, as you are now committed as you have already paid what I would now call the initial fee. In my p.o.v. this is a prime example of bad morale business and had the site been based in my country it would without a doubt have been sued for entrapment.


I’m really split in my opinion about this site. About the women: I have had a really good time with a few women here sexaully and I have even made a few friends in real life. On the other hand it’s VERY difficult to find the good experiences and you’ll end up paying A LOT of money to find them as the quality varies so much.

The site facilitating it all is generally bad; it’ll do anything to lure its users into paying just a little bit more. It’s information levels is prime example of this, as it is lacking, confusing and misleading.

I will end up with saying: Be careful with your money if you want to try this site out – especially if you’re from EU.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Mature Erotic

37. Mature Erotic (0)

Mort (5) 05-13-12  04:12am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good idea for content. Unique models (AFAIK), good variety, from soft through to semi-hard solo scenes.
Does include "discounted" membership to two sister sites, mature-underwear.com and cupsclub.com, again, sites with a "good idea" for their content.
Cons: Quality is WAY out of date - videos are small, low quality, and often poorly lit. They are listed as having sizes of small, medium, large, and very large, but "very large" is quite small by today's standards on the main "Mature Erotic" site. On the other two sites it is smaller, and the quality is generally worse.
Navigation is dreadful - models appear in a long list with no names or identifying information, and as videos are posted in parts (and separated by other models) it is put luck as to whether you can get the whole video. Only the main site has a "search" function, and that is only useful after you work out the models name from a video.
Videos all appear in maximized pop ups, and whenever a link is clicked the original page resets to the top, so you lose your place.
From the dates the video files were created (no dates are given on the update page), there is a new segment about every two weeks. Makes it a long time to get a full 4 part movie!
Bottom Line: Good idea for content, and if the quality of the videos and navigation lived up to the "idea" of the videos, it would be great.
As it is, it is more frustrating than satisfying, and the price is too high for the low quality of content and dreadful navigation. Downloading the videos is harder than it needs to be as well.
So, while I would have really liked to have enjoyed this site and passed it on as a place to go for mature amateurs, overall, it is not worth it.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply

Visit Anilos

38. Anilos (0)

standard (23) 04-15-12  07:49pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: **Maybe the best website I've seen from a "collector" standpoint. Well done, owner/webmaster.**

Attractive older women, most in their 30s and 40s.

Good download speeds (can saturate my 6Mbps DSL).

Not only allows but encourages download managers.

Multiple video formats (MPG, MP4, MOV, WMV, and Flash).

Two sizes of photos in downloadable ZIP files or galleries.

Some surprises here and there in models you might not have seen before (we're looking at you, Scarlet).

A fair price with the PU discount for what is possibly considered borderline niche material (older women).
Cons: It's a matter of taste, but most content is masturbation. I'd wager 30% or less is hardcore MF content.

Another matter of taste, but there seems to be quite a few fake boobs.

The HD videos are less sharp than those offered from some other sites, but the reduced sizes seem very reasonable for the quality. Probably a decent tradeoff.

The high-res photos are the same. They don't offer the incredible resolution of some of the artsy softcore sites, but they're still high quality and probably a reasonable tradeoff on size/bandwidth.
Bottom Line: I've never seen a website set up to allow me to grab the pictures and videos of particular models so easily. I used a download manager and could click on the woman's name/image, go to her associated page, and, by using the filter option for downloading specific items, I could right click and add that model's pics and videos links to the download queue simultaneously. No individual clicking on links, no wading through multiple pages to get to each separate set, and no dead links a couple of hours after adding them.

From their FAQs:
"Download as much as you can, we encourage that."

Again, well done, Anilos.

FWIW, and if the webmaster (or other sites' WMs) is reading this, I didn't have much interest in the Nubiles.net sister-site, but this approach encouraging customers to add to their collections will make me join.

Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Mature.nl

39. Mature.nl (0)

Porn User (4) 03-28-12  08:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (3)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: + a lot of scenes with a lot of cool content
+ a lot of girls
+ easy to surf
+ access to a few good mature sites
+ video quality is really good most of the time
Cons: - most solo scenes are BORING
- alot of lesbian scenes are BORING
- some mature ladies are just ugly
- most girls don't seem to enjoy the action at all, while some fake too much
- some new videos come with a shady video quality
Bottom Line: I like this site for it's mature content. Some solo scenes are amazing and same goes for lesbian scenes. The thing is a lot of the girls are either ugly, or don't have any reaction while dildoing themselves. There could be more content with more variety. I registered twice to this site but there are better ones out there.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 50Plus MILFs

40. 50Plus MILFs (0)

shooter (11) 02-17-12  08:32am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good selection of milfs and gilfs.

Streaming video quality is good.
Cons: Can only download recent scenes.

Only two updastes a month.
Bottom Line: This site has a lot of potential but falls short. If you like the type of models they have, older sexy women, then the content is great. Many of those sexy seniors love to take cock. They perform hardcore sex inluding anal, facial, and creampies. The women looks great and are paired up with a younger man. The video quality is good. They are available in dvd quality 6630X380 in wmv and mp4 format. You can also rate the scenes and leave comment on them. There are some nice picture sets available for each scene and model too.

The really bad part about this site is the lack of downloadable content. They only offer the most recent two months to download the scenes. All the other past scenes are available but for streaming only. The other bad part is they only update twice a month so that leaves you with a total of four or five scenes to download from the start. There reason behind this is to stop online piracy of there scenes they stated. The problem with that is the site is run by the Score group and they have other grat sites that don't have this limitation on downloads.

In short with the lack of updates and downloads this site is not very good. You do get access to 60 plus milfs, which is basically the same but with slightly older women. If they updated at least twice a week on both sites and allowed all the content to be downloaded it would be a great site but until then its really not worth it.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Action Matures

41. Action Matures (0)

messmer (137) 01-30-12  02:12pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 268 videos, many in 1280x720p HD 3000 bitrate, wmv format.

Older Videos at 640x480p 2000 bitrate, wmv or avi are not bad considering the advances made in quality over the years.

Many mature ladies, some for every taste, but don't expect glamor.

All contents are hardcore which is a plus for many.
Cons: The typical Ferro minimalism. No search engine, no model base, no scene description.

Lack of co-ordination between the various sites. I just received this one as a bonus and once again had to feed it my awkward generated user name and password. Other sites manage to make navigation between their sites easier, why can't Ferro.

The very strong feeling that the network is on cruise control without anyone at the helm. Last update to this site was in October 2011. It looks as if they have given up and just collect money now for what they have accumulated over the years.

Only one download at a time possible. Attempts to download a second one at the same time will fail.

The same HUGE watermarks as in their other sites. This is especially noticeable in the 640x480p videos with their smaller windows.

No pictures.
Bottom Line: This site might be worth a subscription to you if you like hardcore and reasonably mature women.

The picture quality in most videos is excellent, only spoiled for me by those accursed large watermarks on top and bottom. If you don't mind those then there is enough of what looks to be exclusive material to keep you happy for a while ... especially since one monthly subscription brings four bonus sites with it.

Just be warned that Ferro must be getting ready to leave a sinking ship, judging by the rarity of updates in all sites I have looked at so far, as well as deafening silence when it comes to support.

I won't be back but Ferro might strike a chord with you, so I'll give it a 75. Not great, but tolerable.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Boys Love Matures

42. Boys Love Matures (0)

messmer (137) 01-23-12  12:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Mostly attractive mature women.

Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.

Videos can be streamed.

Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.

Updates are regular.
Cons: Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.

Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.

If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.

Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message.
Bottom Line: I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.

I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.

The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.

In one scene, for instance, a “cougar” is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.

In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised “young” man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.

Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.

One other thing that bothers me is that the “boys” are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.

Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)

General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.

Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to “Stunning Matures.”

As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Stunning Matures

43. Stunning Matures (0)

messmer (137) 01-21-12  04:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Nice looking mature women
+ Latest videos in HD (1280x720p) in wmv., most of them are approx. 10 - 15 minutes long and look nice and crisp.
+ Fair download speed. My normal speed with most sites is at my maximum of 2.3 MB/s while this site gave me 1.2 MB/s. Not too shabby, though and since most files are around 300 - 400 KB it's not really an issue. However, be aware that this was done with Firefox' DownThemAll, while with Firefox' native downloader the speed was more like 250 KB/s.
Cons: - The most "bare minimum" member's page I have ever seen.
- Only updates once every two weeks.
- A total of 90 videos ONLY starting in 2008.
- Huge Watermarks in videos in lower right and upper left of videos! Very distracting and unnecessary.
- Allows only one download at a time.
- No streaming.
- No pictures.
- No search engine.
- No information on videos.
- No model list.
Bottom Line: First let me say that the ugly grandma on their tour page does not represent the majority of the mature women, most of whom are actually quite good looking if you like them a tad older than thirty-five.

Having said that, that's almost the only really positive thing I can say about the site.

The member's page is a joke with four small thumbnails of the latest updates shown plus a section below containing page numbers, if you click on those you are taken to another page featuring another 4 small thumbnails, there's no description of the scenes themselves, simply the names of the actors and that's it ... really, really bare bones navigation.

The earlier videos (and you don't have to go back very far) are in 640x480p avi format at a 2000 bitrate. Actually, in all fairness, they don't look too bad, but could be better.

The videos themselves are typically Ferro and lack heat. They are well lighted and filmed but something is missing. The samples I have watched seemed too posed for my liking.

Upon subscribing you are being given an impossible user name and password. I copied and pasted one and wrote down the other just to get into the site where I was promptly informed that I would need further authorization before I could proceed with downloads. So back to G-Mail to click on the authorization link and I was finally a member in good standing.

One bonus site of your choice (from the Ferro network) can be added at this time, but you are once again asked for your user name and password. If you get a site that also contains picture sets (zipped) you have to sign in to that one separately as well. Awkward to say the least.

In order to encourage you to continue to subscribe you are being given an extra bonus site for every week you are a member.

Stunning matures would get no more than 70 from me*** if it weren't for the extra sites that are being added at the time of subscription and in the weeks to follow.

As I can tell by my first bonus, not all Ferro sites are as poorly set up as this one. That's a relief because this site would never survive on its own.

*** This may look a bit confused but I gave the site originally a seventy-five but reduced it to seventy because of their super-sized water marks. This major change was explained in the bar heading the review but then was wiped out by further small corrections I made to the review.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Rebecca\'s Office

44. Rebecca's Office (1)

lazarus (0) 11-20-11  09:00am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful lady who seems to enjoy what she is doing.
Cons: Very low quality of videos, lighting and sound are very poor in addition to the filming of the action.
Examples : Cannot see any penetration due to poor camera angles and oral sex scenes filmed at a distance in poor lighting and sound.
Very few photos and none available in zip file sets.
Bottom Line: In what seems like a bargain price to be a member of this website, $ 19.95 turned out to be a bad bargain. If you like Rebecca's looks, like I do, your better off saving your money becoming a member of her website and purchase her cd's or dvd's instead which hace much clearer images and better lighting and sound.
As of this writing eache of her cd's and dvd's cost $ 10.00 each, a much better bargain.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Granny Cums Here

45. Granny Cums Here (0)

dufferdude (1) 11-08-11  03:38pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of pictures, large archive
Video clips are clear, no obvious watermarks
Cons: Video clips are just that; a few exceed 10 min., most are about i min. in length. Written descriptions are longer than the video clips.
Bottom Line: You can find longer clips from this site on some free sites.
All in all, a waste of money. Not recommended.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Mature Mega Pass

46. Mature Mega Pass (0)

Antar (1) 10-10-11  09:12am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: A lot of content on this network which covers most niches (solo, lesbian, hardcore...).
Good video and picture quality for recent content.
Daily updates.
Good download speed from Europe.
Cons: Almost no more hardcore content featuring boy/girl action.
Higher subscription cost than most mature oriented sites.
Bottom Line: This network used to be one of the best mature oriented network about 1 or 2 years ago. But since that they only update their sites with solo or lesbian content, they do not deserve this title anymore for all the people that enjoyed their boy/girl movies and photo sets.

So according to me it's quite simple. If you rather like solo or lesbian content with really mature ladies, then it'll be the perfect network for you. but if you re not interested by such content, then you ll have to look elswhere. You ll still have the old hardcore content available and about 1 harcore scene per week from old German/Deutsch movies but that's all.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Lara\'s Playground

47. Lara's Playground (0)

pat362 (375) 08-25-11  06:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +She's a tall red head with a nice all natural body who likes both women and men.
+You also get access to Jim Slip's site.
+Videos can be downloaded in wmv and they offer at least 720x408 and 1280x720 resolution.
+All pics are offered in 1200x900 or 2000x1343 resolution.
+You can search for specific shoots using certain keywords.
+She updates with one new scene each week.
Cons: -The site is tiny with only 10 videos or pic sets.
-All the photosets must be downloaded pic by pic and they all have to be renamed because they use the same name.
-All videos with lara prior to October 2009 are broken into 5 clips.
Bottom Line: *Lara says that she's Jim Slip's wife and that she is the one who's been behind the camera for years and she's decided to get in front of the camera. I don't know if she is Jim's wife but she is definetely the one who was behind the camera because she sometimes makes an appearance in some of Jim's past videos and you hear her voice from time to time.

*She is an excellent performer and brings a lot of heat to her performance whether with men or women. Her site has really only 10 new videos with her but because you get access to Jim' site as well then she actually has a total of 36 videos. it's just that the bulk of her videos can be accessed by joining only Jim's site.

**It's hard to recommend the site at this moment because of the tiny amount available and the cost. You can get access to just Jim's site for 19 Pounds and Lara and Jim together for 29 Pounds. If Lara keeps updating with new content then her site will be worth it within the next 4 months.**
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Tampa Housewives

48. Tampa Housewives (0)

pat362 (375) 07-22-11  08:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -You get access to 12 sites with your membership.
-A couple of the performers aren't bad looking.
-Navigation is the same for all sites so that makes it easier to find your way.
-There are many video clips to download.
-They use CCbill so easy to cancel.
Cons: -Just about everything from these sites is a Con. I'm going the list the bigger ones.
1-There are many videos to download but almost all of them are tiny clips of a larger scene.
2-The same videos appears in more than one site.
3-Resolution is a crappy 320x240. I could give you bit rate but who cares with that resolution.
4-Regardless of what is stated about updates. These sites stopped updating 2008.
5-The clips are tiny but what you can see of the action leaves a lot to be desired.
6-There are photosets but since you have to downlaod them pic by pic and resolution is just as bad as the videos.
Bottom Line: -The only good thing about these sites is that they use CCbill and I got access for 20$ instead of 30$.

***Please stay far away from these sites and I'd even add that if any of these performers are on any other sites then also stay away from those because it's going to be a waste your money. I can vouch for that because two of the sites on this network contain an older lady named Valerie and I got screwed by joining another network with her in it and it was worse than this one.***

I forgot to name the sites included so here is the list:
ambers interracial
ambers sextasy
florida trailer trash
hannahs nasty habits
hannahs hose & toes
julia exposed
julias interracial
kats back porch
pennys passion
valerie exposed
valerie interracial
whore bait hals
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Deauxma Live

49. Deauxma Live (0)

pat362 (375) 07-17-11  11:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Deauxma is a hot 50+ women who loves to have sex on screen and isn't affraid to go hardcore.
-There are 56 videos which can be downloaded in MP4 640x480 765kbps and WMV 720x480 1253kbps.
-All content is dated and they update at least once a week.
-You get access to their cam shows and they have the schedule so that you know when to log in.
-You get access to 7 other sites.
-You can stream past cam shows in a flash player(quality is not the greatest but that may be par with most cam shows)
Cons: -The biggest drawback for Deauxma's site is that you can get most of her videos by joining her other site deauxma.net and for less money. I can't say if quality is similar as on this site.
-Many of the videos are short version of a larger scene. you can purchase the complete scene in her store.
-There are 100 photosets but you can't download them as a complete zip file.
-Deauxma has large implants and that may turn off some people that are looking for a natural looking milf.
Bottom Line: -Here we have another promissing solo model site that does some good things and still manages to screw up some really important things. The first is photosets. If you are going to offer photos them make sure members can download them as a complete zip files. Otherwise you are only alienating possible members. The other is in regards to videos. If you have a site with videos then make sure they are complete scene and not clips. I understand the need to make more money by selling the complete scene seperately but it would be much better to film some scene for the site and some for the dvd's.
This way more people will want to buy the dvd because they know what to expect in the dvd.

-If you are a fan of Deauxma and want to get more than what you ahve found eselwhere then this should be a good deal. Specially if the other peformer whithin this network also appeal to you.

**To be avoided by anyone who's joined Deauxma's other site. There isn't enough new stuff to warrant the investment. I also wonder why she still has 2 sites. All it's doing is splitting the income since almost no one will join both sites and some may pick the les expensive one.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Claudia Marie

50. Claudia Marie (0)

pat362 (375) 07-11-11  12:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Claudia Marie is a super hot 37 yrs old woman with huge breast who loves to have hardcore sex on film.
-All the content is exclusif and most of the videos have a little scenario.
-There are currently 135 videos which can be downloaded or viewd online. The average run time is 20 minutes and more.
-You get access to 17 other sites.
-All content is dated.
-They are still updating with more videos.
-They have a nice interface for searching different types of fetish or sex act.
Cons: -The biggest con has to be Claudia-marie because if you don't like her looks than you certainly won't enjoy any of the videos. She's an above 30 years old woman with huge (now fake) breast who's a little on the chubby side.
-Resolution for downloaded videos is only 368x272.
-The sites offers high resolution photos which are usually 1024x768 or 1152x768 but you can't download them as a single zip file.
Bottom Line: -Claudia Marie is not the type of model that I'm normally attracted to. I'm not a fan of huge breast whether real or fake but Claudia-marie is such an amazing sex performer that I overlooked that aspect and found myself enjoying her videos.

-Her looks is about the only thing that might be an issue for some people. It's for sure that if you prefer younger models with petite figures than you'll never enjoy the site.

-If you like Claudia-marie's looks and enjoy seeing a woman that craves IR, anal and the more intense B/G sex than you'll really enkjoy this site. Anyone interested in teen sites should stay away.

-The only key improvement would be if they could remaster their videos into a higher resolution.

**Please join site through Celeste Fox since her join price is only 24.96$ instead of 29.99$ for Claudia-Marie's site.**
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 243 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Reviews
1. XXX Taylor Ann (1)
2. Kylie Deville (1)
3. Pure Mature (1)
4. Mom POV (1)
5. The Lone Star Angel (1)
6. Rebecca's Office (1)
7. Aunt Judy's (1)
8. MILF Hunter (1)

View All : Most Reviews

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.41 seconds.