Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 245 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Matures Cam

26. Matures Cam (0)

Cams
Active
60
Shakermaker (15) 06-02-12  02:16pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some really good and genuinely nice models

HD quality for many models

Ok variety in models

You can actually have a fun time in free chat with some of the models
Cons: Very expensive

“FRAUD” for EU cities – we have to pay more than the US

Some really, and I mean really bad models (even bad mannered)

The site LIES with the actually number of online models

Preview pictures rarely gives a true impression on how the actually model looks like on cam.

Some online models are obviously recorded playbacks (in the free section)

Even if you register and buys credits, you have to pay even more to become a actually member to watch member chat

The site is bad at explaining the different functions it offers e.g. the above member function mention above
Bottom Line: This is actually a bit difficult to review this kind of site for me, because do you review the site itself, just the models or a combination of the 2. Depending on which one you take, you’ll end up with three different results. I will try the combination.

First of this live cam experience is VERY expensive and in my p.o.v. far too much so. I mean I can actually (and I live Western Europe) hire a real stunning looking call girl for much longer for the same amount of money than for some of the average model on this site. This is just crazy in my book. Futhermore be careful as this website uses the dollar equal the euro policy. For us in Europe this means that we end up paying way more for the same service as the Americans. I really wish the EU would do something about this as it’s not only confided to porn but also other business areas, but for now it seem that immoral businessmen are having a blast because of this.

Moving on: You’ll realize after some tries, that the more expensive models don’t equal a better experience - far from it. I actually found an average looking woman, that gave me some really fantastic cyber sex and even though she didn’t get much for the time I spent with her, she never dragged out time or tried to keep me in the paying area. On the other hand some models would drag out time, so I would become so frustrated that I just ended up leaving, because I could see my money just wasting away.
And that is the real problem with sites like this in my point of view. You never know what you get and some models are amazing while others are just plain bad and you have next to no way of telling or finding out before hand, so most of your money will actually end up being spent on finding a good experience and not the experience itself.

There is of course a free chat with the models were you can get a preview and a little chat with the woman before jumping into a private show with her, but to my experience this again offers next to no insight in the ‘real’ experience behind the private curtain. Most of the models will even press you to go into private before even discussing what you want from the women. This is useless to me and more than once I even find women there just sat there ignoring your question as if I’m wasting their time, because I want to find out if she will fulfil my wishes. Tbh I find this very rude and bad service.

That being said you can actually find a few but generally nice women to have a funny chat with and I ended up with a few friends along the way. Even in real life.

The simple preview photo of the women you get before you click a specified woman to go to the free live chat with her is in 95% of the time a really bad preview photo of how she really looks at live cam. Even more annoying is it that some of the models have multiple ‘accounts’ up, which means that the site lies when it says there’s e.g. 300 models online, when in fact the actually number is smaller, because many of these 300 live models actually points to the same women.

Even worse is it that some of the free live feeds are obviously recorded tapes and not an actually live feed. I don’t know if there’s a real person in the private show with these, but I never dared to try and to find out.
The site ‘offers’ a member within member sections as I see it, but for a new user it is really confusing. I signed up and added some credit and I thought I was now a member of the site and could see the girls in their member chat to avoid the spamming from free users in the free live feed. But no this is apparently a whole feature on it’s own you have to pay even more to get access to it. This would be okay, if the site just explained this better, but it doesn’t and it really seems that the site deliberately tries to keep as much information hidden about such extra features to lure people into a trap, so they can milk you to pay just a little more, as you are now committed as you have already paid what I would now call the initial fee. In my p.o.v. this is a prime example of bad morale business and had the site been based in my country it would without a doubt have been sued for entrapment.

BOTTOMLINE

I’m really split in my opinion about this site. About the women: I have had a really good time with a few women here sexaully and I have even made a few friends in real life. On the other hand it’s VERY difficult to find the good experiences and you’ll end up paying A LOT of money to find them as the quality varies so much.

The site facilitating it all is generally bad; it’ll do anything to lure its users into paying just a little bit more. It’s information levels is prime example of this, as it is lacking, confusing and misleading.

I will end up with saying: Be careful with your money if you want to try this site out – especially if you’re from EU.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mature Erotic

27. Mature Erotic (0)

Pay
Active
60
Mort (5) 05-13-12  04:12am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good idea for content. Unique models (AFAIK), good variety, from soft through to semi-hard solo scenes.
Does include "discounted" membership to two sister sites, mature-underwear.com and cupsclub.com, again, sites with a "good idea" for their content.
Cons: Quality is WAY out of date - videos are small, low quality, and often poorly lit. They are listed as having sizes of small, medium, large, and very large, but "very large" is quite small by today's standards on the main "Mature Erotic" site. On the other two sites it is smaller, and the quality is generally worse.
Navigation is dreadful - models appear in a long list with no names or identifying information, and as videos are posted in parts (and separated by other models) it is put luck as to whether you can get the whole video. Only the main site has a "search" function, and that is only useful after you work out the models name from a video.
Videos all appear in maximized pop ups, and whenever a link is clicked the original page resets to the top, so you lose your place.
From the dates the video files were created (no dates are given on the update page), there is a new segment about every two weeks. Makes it a long time to get a full 4 part movie!
Bottom Line: Good idea for content, and if the quality of the videos and navigation lived up to the "idea" of the videos, it would be great.
As it is, it is more frustrating than satisfying, and the price is too high for the low quality of content and dreadful navigation. Downloading the videos is harder than it needs to be as well.
So, while I would have really liked to have enjoyed this site and passed it on as a place to go for mature amateurs, overall, it is not worth it.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Anilos

28. Anilos (0)

Pay
Active
88
standard (8) 04-15-12  07:49pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: **Maybe the best website I've seen from a "collector" standpoint. Well done, owner/webmaster.**

Attractive older women, most in their 30s and 40s.

Good download speeds (can saturate my 6Mbps DSL).

Not only allows but encourages download managers.

Multiple video formats (MPG, MP4, MOV, WMV, and Flash).

Two sizes of photos in downloadable ZIP files or galleries.

Some surprises here and there in models you might not have seen before (we're looking at you, Scarlet).

A fair price with the PU discount for what is possibly considered borderline niche material (older women).
Cons: It's a matter of taste, but most content is masturbation. I'd wager 30% or less is hardcore MF content.

Another matter of taste, but there seems to be quite a few fake boobs.

The HD videos are less sharp than those offered from some other sites, but the reduced sizes seem very reasonable for the quality. Probably a decent tradeoff.

The high-res photos are the same. They don't offer the incredible resolution of some of the artsy softcore sites, but they're still high quality and probably a reasonable tradeoff on size/bandwidth.
Bottom Line: I've never seen a website set up to allow me to grab the pictures and videos of particular models so easily. I used a download manager and could click on the woman's name/image, go to her associated page, and, by using the filter option for downloading specific items, I could right click and add that model's pics and videos links to the download queue simultaneously. No individual clicking on links, no wading through multiple pages to get to each separate set, and no dead links a couple of hours after adding them.

From their FAQs:
"Download as much as you can, we encourage that."

Again, well done, Anilos.

FWIW, and if the webmaster (or other sites' WMs) is reading this, I didn't have much interest in the Nubiles.net sister-site, but this approach encouraging customers to add to their collections will make me join.

Recommended.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mature.nl

29. Mature.nl (1)

Pay
Newbie
72*
Porn User (4) 03-28-12  08:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (4)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: + a lot of scenes with a lot of cool content
+ a lot of girls
+ easy to surf
+ access to a few good mature sites
+ video quality is really good most of the time
Cons: - most solo scenes are BORING
- alot of lesbian scenes are BORING
- some mature ladies are just ugly
- most girls don't seem to enjoy the action at all, while some fake too much
- some new videos come with a shady video quality
Bottom Line: I like this site for it's mature content. Some solo scenes are amazing and same goes for lesbian scenes. The thing is a lot of the girls are either ugly, or don't have any reaction while dildoing themselves. There could be more content with more variety. I registered twice to this site but there are better ones out there.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 50Plus MILFs

30. 50Plus MILFs (1)

Pay
Active
65
shooter (11) 02-17-12  08:32am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good selection of milfs and gilfs.

Streaming video quality is good.
Cons: Can only download recent scenes.

Only two updastes a month.
Bottom Line: This site has a lot of potential but falls short. If you like the type of models they have, older sexy women, then the content is great. Many of those sexy seniors love to take cock. They perform hardcore sex inluding anal, facial, and creampies. The women looks great and are paired up with a younger man. The video quality is good. They are available in dvd quality 6630X380 in wmv and mp4 format. You can also rate the scenes and leave comment on them. There are some nice picture sets available for each scene and model too.

The really bad part about this site is the lack of downloadable content. They only offer the most recent two months to download the scenes. All the other past scenes are available but for streaming only. The other bad part is they only update twice a month so that leaves you with a total of four or five scenes to download from the start. There reason behind this is to stop online piracy of there scenes they stated. The problem with that is the site is run by the Score group and they have other grat sites that don't have this limitation on downloads.

In short with the lack of updates and downloads this site is not very good. You do get access to 60 plus milfs, which is basically the same but with slightly older women. If they updated at least twice a week on both sites and allowed all the content to be downloaded it would be a great site but until then its really not worth it.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Action Matures

31. Action Matures (0)

Pay
Active
75
messmer (137) 01-30-12  02:12pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 268 videos, many in 1280x720p HD 3000 bitrate, wmv format.

Older Videos at 640x480p 2000 bitrate, wmv or avi are not bad considering the advances made in quality over the years.

Many mature ladies, some for every taste, but don't expect glamor.

All contents are hardcore which is a plus for many.
Cons: The typical Ferro minimalism. No search engine, no model base, no scene description.

Lack of co-ordination between the various sites. I just received this one as a bonus and once again had to feed it my awkward generated user name and password. Other sites manage to make navigation between their sites easier, why can't Ferro.

The very strong feeling that the network is on cruise control without anyone at the helm. Last update to this site was in October 2011. It looks as if they have given up and just collect money now for what they have accumulated over the years.

Only one download at a time possible. Attempts to download a second one at the same time will fail.

The same HUGE watermarks as in their other sites. This is especially noticeable in the 640x480p videos with their smaller windows.

No pictures.
Bottom Line: This site might be worth a subscription to you if you like hardcore and reasonably mature women.

The picture quality in most videos is excellent, only spoiled for me by those accursed large watermarks on top and bottom. If you don't mind those then there is enough of what looks to be exclusive material to keep you happy for a while ... especially since one monthly subscription brings four bonus sites with it.

Just be warned that Ferro must be getting ready to leave a sinking ship, judging by the rarity of updates in all sites I have looked at so far, as well as deafening silence when it comes to support.

I won't be back but Ferro might strike a chord with you, so I'll give it a 75. Not great, but tolerable.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Boys Love Matures

32. Boys Love Matures (0)

Pay
Active
78
messmer (137) 01-23-12  12:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Mostly attractive mature women.

Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.

Videos can be streamed.

Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.

Updates are regular.
Cons: Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.

Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.

If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.

Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message.
Bottom Line: I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.

I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.

The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.

In one scene, for instance, a “cougar” is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.

In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised “young” man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.

Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.

One other thing that bothers me is that the “boys” are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.

Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)

General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.

Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to “Stunning Matures.”

As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Stunning Matures

33. Stunning Matures (0)

Pay
Active
70
messmer (137) 01-21-12  04:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Nice looking mature women
+ Latest videos in HD (1280x720p) in wmv., most of them are approx. 10 - 15 minutes long and look nice and crisp.
+ Fair download speed. My normal speed with most sites is at my maximum of 2.3 MB/s while this site gave me 1.2 MB/s. Not too shabby, though and since most files are around 300 - 400 KB it's not really an issue. However, be aware that this was done with Firefox' DownThemAll, while with Firefox' native downloader the speed was more like 250 KB/s.
Cons: - The most "bare minimum" member's page I have ever seen.
- Only updates once every two weeks.
- A total of 90 videos ONLY starting in 2008.
- Huge Watermarks in videos in lower right and upper left of videos! Very distracting and unnecessary.
- Allows only one download at a time.
- No streaming.
- No pictures.
- No search engine.
- No information on videos.
- No model list.
Bottom Line: First let me say that the ugly grandma on their tour page does not represent the majority of the mature women, most of whom are actually quite good looking if you like them a tad older than thirty-five.

Having said that, that's almost the only really positive thing I can say about the site.

The member's page is a joke with four small thumbnails of the latest updates shown plus a section below containing page numbers, if you click on those you are taken to another page featuring another 4 small thumbnails, there's no description of the scenes themselves, simply the names of the actors and that's it ... really, really bare bones navigation.

The earlier videos (and you don't have to go back very far) are in 640x480p avi format at a 2000 bitrate. Actually, in all fairness, they don't look too bad, but could be better.

The videos themselves are typically Ferro and lack heat. They are well lighted and filmed but something is missing. The samples I have watched seemed too posed for my liking.

Upon subscribing you are being given an impossible user name and password. I copied and pasted one and wrote down the other just to get into the site where I was promptly informed that I would need further authorization before I could proceed with downloads. So back to G-Mail to click on the authorization link and I was finally a member in good standing.

One bonus site of your choice (from the Ferro network) can be added at this time, but you are once again asked for your user name and password. If you get a site that also contains picture sets (zipped) you have to sign in to that one separately as well. Awkward to say the least.

In order to encourage you to continue to subscribe you are being given an extra bonus site for every week you are a member.

Stunning matures would get no more than 70 from me*** if it weren't for the extra sites that are being added at the time of subscription and in the weeks to follow.

As I can tell by my first bonus, not all Ferro sites are as poorly set up as this one. That's a relief because this site would never survive on its own.

*** This may look a bit confused but I gave the site originally a seventy-five but reduced it to seventy because of their super-sized water marks. This major change was explained in the bar heading the review but then was wiped out by further small corrections I made to the review.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rebecca\'s Office

34. Rebecca's Office (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
lazarus (0) 11-20-11  09:00am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful lady who seems to enjoy what she is doing.
Cons: Very low quality of videos, lighting and sound are very poor in addition to the filming of the action.
Examples : Cannot see any penetration due to poor camera angles and oral sex scenes filmed at a distance in poor lighting and sound.
Very few photos and none available in zip file sets.
Bottom Line: In what seems like a bargain price to be a member of this website, $ 19.95 turned out to be a bad bargain. If you like Rebecca's looks, like I do, your better off saving your money becoming a member of her website and purchase her cd's or dvd's instead which hace much clearer images and better lighting and sound.
As of this writing eache of her cd's and dvd's cost $ 10.00 each, a much better bargain.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Granny Cums Here

35. Granny Cums Here (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
dufferdude (1) 11-08-11  03:38pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of pictures, large archive
Video clips are clear, no obvious watermarks
Cons: Video clips are just that; a few exceed 10 min., most are about i min. in length. Written descriptions are longer than the video clips.
Bottom Line: You can find longer clips from this site on some free sites.
All in all, a waste of money. Not recommended.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mature Mega Pass

36. Mature Mega Pass (0)

Network
Newbie
70*
Antar (1) 10-10-11  09:12am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: A lot of content on this network which covers most niches (solo, lesbian, hardcore...).
Good video and picture quality for recent content.
Daily updates.
Good download speed from Europe.
Cons: Almost no more hardcore content featuring boy/girl action.
Higher subscription cost than most mature oriented sites.
Bottom Line: This network used to be one of the best mature oriented network about 1 or 2 years ago. But since that they only update their sites with solo or lesbian content, they do not deserve this title anymore for all the people that enjoyed their boy/girl movies and photo sets.

So according to me it's quite simple. If you rather like solo or lesbian content with really mature ladies, then it'll be the perfect network for you. but if you re not interested by such content, then you ll have to look elswhere. You ll still have the old hardcore content available and about 1 harcore scene per week from old German/Deutsch movies but that's all.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lara\'s Playground

37. Lara's Playground (0)

Pay
Active
75
pat362 (367) 08-25-11  06:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +She's a tall red head with a nice all natural body who likes both women and men.
+You also get access to Jim Slip's site.
+Videos can be downloaded in wmv and they offer at least 720x408 and 1280x720 resolution.
+All pics are offered in 1200x900 or 2000x1343 resolution.
+You can search for specific shoots using certain keywords.
+She updates with one new scene each week.
Cons: -The site is tiny with only 10 videos or pic sets.
-All the photosets must be downloaded pic by pic and they all have to be renamed because they use the same name.
-All videos with lara prior to October 2009 are broken into 5 clips.
Bottom Line: *Lara says that she's Jim Slip's wife and that she is the one who's been behind the camera for years and she's decided to get in front of the camera. I don't know if she is Jim's wife but she is definetely the one who was behind the camera because she sometimes makes an appearance in some of Jim's past videos and you hear her voice from time to time.

*She is an excellent performer and brings a lot of heat to her performance whether with men or women. Her site has really only 10 new videos with her but because you get access to Jim' site as well then she actually has a total of 36 videos. it's just that the bulk of her videos can be accessed by joining only Jim's site.

**It's hard to recommend the site at this moment because of the tiny amount available and the cost. You can get access to just Jim's site for 19 Pounds and Lara and Jim together for 29 Pounds. If Lara keeps updating with new content then her site will be worth it within the next 4 months.**
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mrs. Siren

38. Mrs. Siren (0)

Pay
Active
86
pat362 (367) 08-07-11  03:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +All exclusif content that is dated.
+They update about once a week.
+There are 48 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 720x480 1500kbps.
+They have 53 photosets and they can be dowloaded as complete zip files. The resolution varies from set to set but the lowest I found was 893x1344.
+Unlike most of the other models in the nework. Her content is less extreme.
+You can access videos from the photos section and vice-versa photos from the video section.
+You get access to 8 other sites.
Cons: -The site is less than a year old so not that much content yet. Unless one or more of the other sites interest you than you might be a little disapointed.
-The majority of the pic sets are taken from the video shoot so not alot of variety.
-Site lacks the personality that a solo model should have.
-Although less extreme than most other models. Her content may still be a little more extreme than certain people enjoy.
-No search options available.
-Limited to 2 download at a time.
Bottom Line: *Mrs sirens is a beautiful blond woman in her 30's with an all natural body and some pretty impressive breast. She seems to really like having sex and she's into some pretty intense vaginal and anal penetration. She loves to have more than one patner at the same time and she's willing to offer them all her openings so that there's no waiting.

*She only has one lesbian video but I'd say that she really enjoys women so I hope she'll do more in the future. I didn't find much to complain about except that it would be nice to see more interaction between Mrs Sirens and her members. As it is. All you get are her photosets and videos. The one thing that I enjoyed was that her husband isn't often in the videos and that was a plus for me because he's very tattooed.

*Some may complain that you can't download more than 2 videos at a time but they only take a couple of minutes to download so that wasn't an issue for me.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tampa Housewives

39. Tampa Housewives (0)

Network
Active
50
pat362 (367) 07-22-11  08:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -You get access to 12 sites with your membership.
-A couple of the performers aren't bad looking.
-Navigation is the same for all sites so that makes it easier to find your way.
-There are many video clips to download.
-They use CCbill so easy to cancel.
Cons: -Just about everything from these sites is a Con. I'm going the list the bigger ones.
1-There are many videos to download but almost all of them are tiny clips of a larger scene.
2-The same videos appears in more than one site.
3-Resolution is a crappy 320x240. I could give you bit rate but who cares with that resolution.
4-Regardless of what is stated about updates. These sites stopped updating 2008.
5-The clips are tiny but what you can see of the action leaves a lot to be desired.
6-There are photosets but since you have to downlaod them pic by pic and resolution is just as bad as the videos.
Bottom Line: -The only good thing about these sites is that they use CCbill and I got access for 20$ instead of 30$.

***Please stay far away from these sites and I'd even add that if any of these performers are on any other sites then also stay away from those because it's going to be a waste your money. I can vouch for that because two of the sites on this network contain an older lady named Valerie and I got screwed by joining another network with her in it and it was worse than this one.***

I forgot to name the sites included so here is the list:
ambers interracial
ambers sextasy
florida trailer trash
hannahs nasty habits
hannahs hose & toes
julia exposed
julias interracial
kats back porch
pennys passion
valerie exposed
valerie interracial
whore bait hals
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Deauxma Live

40. Deauxma Live (1)

Pay
Active
81
pat362 (367) 07-17-11  11:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Deauxma is a hot 50+ women who loves to have sex on screen and isn't affraid to go hardcore.
-There are 56 videos which can be downloaded in MP4 640x480 765kbps and WMV 720x480 1253kbps.
-All content is dated and they update at least once a week.
-You get access to their cam shows and they have the schedule so that you know when to log in.
-You get access to 7 other sites.
-You can stream past cam shows in a flash player(quality is not the greatest but that may be par with most cam shows)
Cons: -The biggest drawback for Deauxma's site is that you can get most of her videos by joining her other site deauxma.net and for less money. I can't say if quality is similar as on this site.
-Many of the videos are short version of a larger scene. you can purchase the complete scene in her store.
-There are 100 photosets but you can't download them as a complete zip file.
-Deauxma has large implants and that may turn off some people that are looking for a natural looking milf.
Bottom Line: -Here we have another promissing solo model site that does some good things and still manages to screw up some really important things. The first is photosets. If you are going to offer photos them make sure members can download them as a complete zip files. Otherwise you are only alienating possible members. The other is in regards to videos. If you have a site with videos then make sure they are complete scene and not clips. I understand the need to make more money by selling the complete scene seperately but it would be much better to film some scene for the site and some for the dvd's.
This way more people will want to buy the dvd because they know what to expect in the dvd.

-If you are a fan of Deauxma and want to get more than what you ahve found eselwhere then this should be a good deal. Specially if the other peformer whithin this network also appeal to you.

**To be avoided by anyone who's joined Deauxma's other site. There isn't enough new stuff to warrant the investment. I also wonder why she still has 2 sites. All it's doing is splitting the income since almost no one will join both sites and some may pick the les expensive one.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Claudia Marie

41. Claudia Marie (0)

Pay
Active
88
pat362 (367) 07-11-11  12:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Claudia Marie is a super hot 37 yrs old woman with huge breast who loves to have hardcore sex on film.
-All the content is exclusif and most of the videos have a little scenario.
-There are currently 135 videos which can be downloaded or viewd online. The average run time is 20 minutes and more.
-You get access to 17 other sites.
-All content is dated.
-They are still updating with more videos.
-They have a nice interface for searching different types of fetish or sex act.
-
Cons: -The biggest con has to be Claudia-marie because if you don't like her looks than you certainly won't enjoy any of the videos. She's an above 30 years old woman with huge (now fake) breast who's a little on the chubby side.
-Resolution for downloaded videos is only 368x272.
-The sites offers high resolution photos which are usually 1024x768 or 1152x768 but you can't download them as a single zip file.
Bottom Line: -Claudia Marie is not the type of model that I'm normally attracted to. I'm not a fan of huge breast whether real or fake but Claudia-marie is such an amazing sex performer that I overlooked that aspect and found myself enjoying her videos.

-Her looks is about the only thing that might be an issue for some people. It's for sure that if you prefer younger models with petite figures than you'll never enjoy the site.

-If you like Claudia-marie's looks and enjoy seeing a woman that craves IR, anal and the more intense B/G sex than you'll really enkjoy this site. Anyone interested in teen sites should stay away.

-The only key improvement would be if they could remaster their videos into a higher resolution.

**Please join site through Celeste Fox since her join price is only 24.96$ instead of 29.99$ for Claudia-Marie's site.**
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Slut Wife Training

42. Slut Wife Training (0)

Pay
Active
83
pat362 (367) 07-08-11  08:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The content is all exclusif.
-Most of the models appear to be true unknows so that adds a little to the sites premise.
-They have a good selection of models.
-They have 73 videos and they are at a decent 720x480 resolution.
-You get acccess to 31 other sites.
Cons: -They don't update very often. They have only added 10 videos since mbaya's June 2009 review.
-A large amount of the content on the other sites is leased material and most of it is of poor quality and pretty old.
-The models on this site also appear on a couple of the other sites and they perform similar sex acts so might not be worth downloading.
-The content isn't really dated. It's possible to find the info but it's time consuming research through the update pages.
-They have photos at a 1024x768 resolution but these can only be downloaded individually.
Bottom Line: -This is a decent site with some pretty well shot sex scenes. The premise is that men are sending their wives/girlfriends to Dirty D to be trained in the fine art of satisfying them. The sex is on the raunchy side with a blowbangs in most of them and anal in over a dozen videos.

-There is a lot of material to be found on some of the other sites and most of it is of similar quality as this one.

-My score is in part because you get access to many other sites and I also enjoyed the content on those sites.

**I was able to get access to the network for half the price by visiting skunk riley's site and trying to leave it. There is apop up that appears and offers you a discount. I just wish they would forgo these gimmicks and simply offer it upfront but I won't refuse the discount.**
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Karup\'s Older Women

43. Karup's Older Women (0)

Pay
Active
82
pat362 (367) 06-18-11  08:08pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Over 500 models.
-Over 280 hardcore videos.
-Over 1000 softcore videos.
-Nearly 2300 photosets.
-They have a good search system that allows searches by age, body type, fetish and so forth.
-They update with new content daily and all of it is dated.
Cons: -This may only be me but I find that many of the models don't fall under my understanding of the term older. I guess they are older than models on their other site but not by that many years.
-This is primarily a photoset site with most of that content being softcore.
-Only about half of the movies are in one file.
Bottom Line: -This is another site that has disapointed me because it doesn't really have what I'm looking for in older content. I was hoping for a lot more hardcore videos but that doesn't seem to be karups way. It has the same qualities found on karups PC but not anywhere near the same amount of content. I guess that's normal since porn is often a young girls job.

-I'm not really sure who will really enjoy most of the content found on this site. I guess if you like women over the age of 30 and prefer softcore photosets than you should get your moneys worth. It probably isn't worth staying a long term member.

-It should be avoided by anyone wanting hardcore videos with older women. You're likely to be disatisified with this site.

-My score is based on what the site offers and not what I found to my liking. I in fact did not find one video that I want to keep.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit All Over 30

44. All Over 30 (1)

Pay
Active
82
pat362 (367) 05-29-11  09:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -They have nearly 530 models to choose from.
-They have over 2150 videos.
-They have over 5900 phtosets.
-Movies can be streamed online with flash player
-All the videos can be downloaded as a complete file in either WMV or MPG. They also have some videos.
-All photosets can be downloaded as a complete file. They all offer pics 1024 and 1536 format and some of the newer ones also come in 2400.
-They have an active forum for their members.
-They have a calender showing the updates for the next 7 days.
-Update are a mixture of 5 photosets/videos.
-Content is all dated.
Cons: -The majority of photosets and videos are mostly softcore to midore so very little hardcore to choose from.
-There are nearly 3 times more photosets than videos.
-The majority of models are 41 or less so you might want to look elsewhere if you were looking for older ladies.
-They don't update with the models photoset and corresponding video at the same time.
Bottom Line: -This is an impressive site with a large library of content but I can't help but feel disapointed that there is so little hardcore to be found inside and also that there are so few videos. I may have gottent my hopes up thinking that there would be much more than there really is.

-The site should update with a photoset and the video that goes with it instead of doing it over a certain period of time.

-This is a hard site to recommend because I'm not sure exactly who they are trying to cater to. It's a mature site but since most of the models are in their 30's then that might not be what some of us consider very mature. There is hardcore but again not that much so that might not be enough to satisfy those people. There weren't too many glamour videos or photosets so again that cuts another group. I guess if you want to see women from the age of 30 to 41 do solo shoots and some fetich and hardscore then this might be the site for you. I suspect most others will be a disapointed like me.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit English MILF

45. English MILF (0)

Pay
Active
72
messmer (137) 05-24-11  07:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-09-11  08:06pm  (Update History)
Reason: The longer I am in this site the more I notice its flaws. See update below:
Pros: Surprising amount of pictures and videos for a Solo Model Site

I counted approx. 150 picture sets (1024 px), 110+ movies (720x576), anywhere between 20 and forty minutes long judging by the samples I downloaded. There are over 100 shorter clips for download as well.

Vidcaps

Short sex stories containing pictures of model.

Model is a happy amateur exhibitionist (the site is run by her and her husband) and it shows.

Mostly softcore. Hardcore content is mainly role playing between husband and wife.

2 Bonus sites: Daniella Lycra Ass and Daniella in Pantyhose, great for lovers of either or both.
Cons: No streaming, but because the videos are also offered in very short 1 minute clips with pictures for those with slower speed one can get a good idea what the video contains. Still I miss being able to preview a video.

Large and very obvious watermarks.

Pictures are not offered in zipped form.

No search engine.
Bottom Line: The site is run by a Lady called Daniella English and her husband and it should be everything I hate: no zips for the pictures, large water marks, no streaming, no HD videos.

If I saw this mentioned in anyone else's review I would say, no thanks, yet there is something very appealing to this site and I confess that, despite the above mentioned shortcomings, I like it. Probably because it is not run by professionals which is a welcome switch.

Daniella has an incredible posterior - and be warned that in most videos and picture sets the emphasis is on showing off this large booty. She also has lovely big natural breasts and nipples and you truly get the feeling that she really enjoys showing off both. Those who expect a glamor model will not like this site but those who enjoy an ordinary housewife doing "rude" things for our sexual gratification will be glad they joined.

Because of the above mentioned cons I could not in clear conscience give the site a higher score but I like it nevertheless.

Update 09/06/2011: I was willing to overlook quite a few of the flaws of this site because I was so thrilled to run into a real amateur for a change but the longer I am with it the more I discover its flaws.

Many videos are too formulaic concentrating mostly on the butt of the model while there are very few prolonged frontal shots, or even shots of the English Milf's face.

Updates may be regular but are turning out to be too infrequent for my taste. Some updates (today's) could hardly be called an update at all because it consists of a very inferior series of small vidcaps.

And so, regrettably there's less to this site than I first hoped for and I am reducing my original score accordingly.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot 60 Club

46. Hot 60 Club (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
hawkfan050 (1) 05-23-11  12:36pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Lots of content to see with a variety of different options for different tastes. There are a number of 'bonus sites' that seem to be from the same company under different names. Because of the bonus sites and being the same company some of the same scenes will be found on other sites which is nice because of what will be listed in the con.
Cons: As noted above it seems to be one big company with different 'bonus sites'. But each site is a little bit different and when viewing the pictures some sites are extremely annoying while others are quite nice. For example, on Hot60plus, it only shows 8 pictures at a time and the pictures are essentially video frames so it takes forever to get through. But on other sites it is a page with 60+ pictures (still video frames) allowing for much better viewing. Also, I had difficulty with the flash player working properly, but that may have been on my end and not theirs so take that con with a grain of salt.
Bottom Line: I would recommend the site with some reservations. Make sure you understand what you're getting into. I agree with this websites review of hot60, that you can get through most of the content you will be interested in in a month, 2 at most.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit 40 Something Mag

47. 40 Something Mag (0)

Pay
Active
50
pat362 (367) 04-17-11  06:50pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Decent selection of natural and enhanced models to choose from.
-Photosets can be dowloaded in 800 x 600 and 1600 x 1200 resolution.
-They are still updating.
-Content is dated.
-You can search by models name, body type hair color and type of shoot.
Cons: -The bulk of the videos are streaming only.
-They only have 270 videos.
-They only have 150 photosets.
-They only have 13 magazines.
-There is a large logo on each pic.
-Their preview pages are serioulsy misleading.
-Their pages are clutered with offers from other sites.
Bottom Line: -There must have been some serious changes at 40something since January of this year because TBP gave this site an 82 and claimed that videos were downloadable. In my book 10 downloadable videos out of 270 is not enough to claim that the site allows downloads.

-This is one of the worst case of half truth and lies that I've seen a site do in many years. I joined based on the TBP review and the sites own preview pages. First lie. They claim that you can get access to every 40something magazine ever printed. Yes, you do but you will have to buy them so not free. Second lie: They mention all the videos and pic sets that the model has and they do say x number of videos from other sites but if they aren't availbale on your site then why bring them up. The only conclusion I see is that they know that people like me will assume that these videos are available on their site but content can be also be found on those other sites.

This site belongs to the score group which owns a huge amount of other sites but because of this site I don't think I will ever join any of their otrher sites for fear that they are lying on that site as well.

***This site is to be avoided at all cost or you will regret wasting your 20$ like I am at this very moment.***
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit MILF Soup

48. MILF Soup (0)

Pay
Active
91
elonlybuster (39) 02-26-11  01:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: + Access to 30+ other BangBros affiliates with subscription
+ Pretty attractive girls. No baby scars here
+ Streaming or Download option on most videos
+ Updates weekly without fail
+ Nice screens
+ HD, basic quality, or mobile quality
+ Quick download speeds
+ Director(s) has some pretty interesting ideas sometimes
Cons: - 2 simultaneous downloads max. Can't surf when downloading 2 files
- Some MILFs are a bit young. MILF only by definition.
- A lot of the girls have some silicon
- Not a wide range of ethnicities. Mostly white chicks
Bottom Line: My biggest complaint is that the MILFs are only MILF by definition. "I'm 23 with a kid" kind of MILFs. Some are reaching their 40s, but most are just about or just under 30. About 33% of the women have silicon breasts, which does give them an older look.

Some of the plots are interesting, some are funny, other times they just talk then fuck.

At least one update a week, and they never remove old content. So count on seeming lots of previous content.

Users have the choice of downloading screens (taken about every 20-40seconds), typical quality movie, high quality movie, or a mobile version. Also users can stream in either low, medium, or high quality.

All in all 85 as a stand alone site because alone it doesn't pack lots of content, and the less than 50 videos can be quickly gone through the first week or so of your subscription. Once you factor in the other content BangBros has to offer this site is pushed up to a 91. The other content helps thing mix quite well.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Karup\'s Older Women

49. Karup's Older Women (0)

Pay
Active
80
messmer (137) 01-20-11  01:19pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-28-11  11:08am  (Update History)
Reason: Original score restored. See remarks below and also under comments.
Pros: A huge archive of mature, attractive models.

Picture sets: Older sets display at 1024x680 px, not bad if they are all like the sample set, dated 2005, that I test-downloaded. Newer sets are at 1500x1001px.

Latest videos are in HD at 1280x720, total bitrate close to 4000 kbps. Nice! I could not quite determine when either pictures or videos changed to a higher resolution but it cannot have been too long ago because even early 2010 videos are in 640x480 at 2000 kbps. However it must be stressed that they, as well, are of good quality and quite crisp if one does not insist on watching them full screen.

Excellent search engine.

Excellent basic home page lay out, even though it looks a bit dated, but it makes it very easy to find one's way around.
Cons: Bonus pictures and feeds: Bonus picture sets are from AllOver30 and Anilos. It would be nice if they could be downloaded zipped and in their best resolution. Many of us simply don't feel like downloading a set, one picture at a time.

The bonus "feeds" are even more disappointing because they consist of 1 minute clips of various DVDs only, and are further ruined by a logo running across the picture. Karups would do better not to offer bonuses that aren't really bonuses.

However, in all fairness, one of the bonuses, KarupsPC Content, is a nice little gift because the picture sets are zipped and the quality itself is fine even though they date back to 2005.

Search engine, as much as I like it, should have the additional function of filtering HD content and High Res Picture sets. Many users are no longer content with less than HD quality and don't like to sift through all the updates and models to find what they want.

Too many enhanced breasts.

Cons continued below:
Bottom Line: The term older does not really fit because most models would be called MILFS or Cougars or Mature in other places. There is only a handful of models over 50 and only one over 60.


Bottom Line:

A nice, solid, quality site for lovers of mature women. So far it does not live up to my personal expectations because my preferred niche is erotic lingerie, while most models that are found under "Lingerie" or "Panties" in their advanced search appear to wear daily ho-hum "underwear" that is practical rather than arousing.

Experience has taught me that my taste is not necessarily the generally accepted one so I won't hold this against the site.

I have also found a few videos and picture sets that do come a bit closer to what I want in the short time I have been with this site, so who knows, maybe between the updates and the site's vast store of material I'll be able to dig out a few more erotic nuggets during my month of membership.

Edited Jan. 28, 2011

I received a notice yesterday informing me that my subscription had expired despite the fact that I have still three weeks to go. Access was cut off immediately and two emails to support to correct the situation brought no response. It is impossible to get in touch with their Billing Company because the only link provided is that of KarupsOW support. Because support, when needed, plays such an important part I have downgraded my review by five points.

Edit: Score restored to its original because I got a response to my 3rd email informing me of a glitch in their system and their efforts to correct it. Additional days have been promised for every day lost now.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Karup\'s Older Women

50. Karup's Older Women (0)

Pay
Active
82
otoh (54) 01-07-11  09:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A lot of material
- Daily movie and gallery updates
- Reasonably good navigation options
- Most models in 30s & early 40s, which works for me
- Good movie quality; streaming, download options and screen caps
- Some good/protracted strips from casual and business attire
- Would prefer a camerawoman rather than man for the interview/chat movies
Cons: - Age of models (some under 30) may stretch 'OW' for some
- Slightly retro design (although front end has been updated; am sure member area will follow)
- Very typical lighting/sets/premise for all scenes
- Many models a little too enhanced for my taste, and relatively few unshaved
- Very little girl-girl content
- Could use a few more navigation options
- Older movies are lower quality and split into parts.
- Some daft fake uniforms and hackneyed outfits (newer sets are redressing this, thankfully)
Bottom Line: Looking for girls up to around my own age (40), it was a choice between this, Anilos and All over 30. They all look similar and suspect they offer similar content; the quality of samples I found on TGPs just tipped the scales in favour of Karups OW. (Interestingly, they include bonus content from, and link some models to, the other two sites.)

There is a lot of material here, it's a bit daunting at first! On top of that, they add a new movie AND a new photo set 6 days a week, so it is growing at a good rate. Navigation is fine; 4 categories of pictures and two of movies - although with the amount of material, we could use more, and/or the ability to sort each list by model name or date added.

Most of the material is soft, with maybe a quarter hardcore; the latter isn't really my thing, but actually the scenes are relatively well-positioned and I enjoyed them. Of the softcore, it's probably about 50/50 between toys and fingers; and there are some good strips and teases before getting to that point. Only a handful of girl-girl shoots and movies; I'd like to see more.

Movies are good quality, sharp and well-lit (even if slightly saturated) - 720p and each page shows a few download options and screen caps of the action, which is useful. This format goes back about a year and a half (a bit less for the screen caps); before that, the movies are mostly SD and many are only available in parts. Image quality is OK; available in 1024px and 1500px which is just about acceptable; I'd prefer 2000px.

I was quite disappointed that so many of the models have fake:
- boobs (I'm no expert but could spot these a mile away)
- tans (and the lighting makes them look even more orange)
- smiles (only the minority of models show their personality and a range of expressions)

Natural is always better in my book, but it seems this is endemic in the milf genre. Similarly, I like a mixture of pubic hair arrangements; shaved, trimmed or natural - although I do prefer the latter and there are very few unshaved girls here. Am hoping it tells them something that the hairiest girl I found is their 4th top model! (Am planning to join We Are Hairy at some point to redress the balance.) OTOH, it's a little churlish to complain, given the quantity of material here.

Overall, nothing groundbreaking here but a good site nonetheless. Although I'm only staying one month, I've definitely got my $30 worth; I will likely join again sometime, but will probably try the other two sites beforehand.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 245 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Mom POV (2)
2. Angie Noir (1)
3. Gabby Quinteros (1)
4. Call Your Husband (1)
5. 60 Plus MILFs (1)
6. Deauxma Live (1)
7. 50Plus MILFs (1)
8. Wife Writing (1)
9. Cuckolds (1)
10. Seduced By A Cougar (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.57 seconds.