Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 831 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Chaturbate

1. Chaturbate (2)

Cams
Active
91
Marcus (47) 08-16-15  09:56am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Includes hardcore cam shows
- You can enjoy it for free
- Typically cheaper than MFC
- Models can set their own private rate-per-minute
- Easy to see which models you follow are online
- More refined than MFC with things like video/gallery purchases
Cons: - Some models hold back best stuff for Ďcrazy ticketí shows
- Like all cam sites can be expensive/addictive
- Some cams are poor quality
- A few shows seem to be pre-recorded
- Not as respectful community as MFC
- Not all privates can be recorded
Bottom Line: Iíve been on My Free Cams for a couple of years now, but joined Chaturbate to broaden my horizons and really love how it offers something different.

The biggest difference is that itís not just girls, but guys, transexuals and most importantly COUPLES who can chat.

This is banned on MFC, so on CB you get a lot of live hardcore action ranging from blowjobs to threesomes and everything in between. I have to say some of the modelsí talents are incredible and could hold their own against the pros.

The interface is similar to MFC in that you can filter by region, however it doesnít automatically refresh as it does on MFC, and the thumbnail update frequency isnít as good. However, one huge advantage over MFC is the Ďfollowed modelsí tab which shows thumbnails for models who are online that you follow. This makes it so much easier to browse than MFC.

Once in the rooms there are a few differences. Models can set chosen members as moderators if they wish. This means they can get on with the show rather than have to moderate too. Another difference is that models have certain plug-ins that help them run a room. These include tools to keep track of targets, tip jars, Ďcrazy ticketí shows where you can buy tokens to see a show when it is hidden etc. Many of these tools mean it can be more expensive than MFC if you arenít someone who normally tips, but I think the pros outweigh the cons here.

Another difference is that models can set their private cam rates. This is generally a good thing in that most are cheaper-per-minute that MFC. Iíve seen some models charge as little as 18tpm, and typically the most expensive is 60tpm which is the same as MFC. I have seen a couple of models charge more, though.

One big negative is that the model can also choose whether members can record private shows. This leaves one huge benefit of privates in the hands of models. When you go to start a private, it will tell you their rate and whether you can save the show or not.

All models I have encountered are polite and willing. Like MFC there can sometimes be bit of a language barrier, but itís nothing that use of animated GIF emojis canít overcome! The members on CB seem a lot less respectful than on MFC, however, and seem a lot more inclined to bark orders/instructions at models - and this is despite moderators who can mute and/or boot members out of rooms.

Overall I think I prefer Chaturbate to My Free Cams, although MFCís advantage is the sheer number of models. The interface is more refined, the content is more varied as it includes hardcore, the plug-ins models can use really make a difference and overall it is better value than MFC.

Please let me know if you need any model recommendations or have any questions.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit English MILF

2. English MILF (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
guy7414 (0) 08-04-15  01:44am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: She's sexy, cute and very erotic. Nice big ass, great legs, and a slim waist. The solo picture sets are very erotic, if not a bit short on pictures.
Cons: Not a lot of replay value. In an expired review on this site that was penned by "messmer" he commented on the 150 picture sets. That review was written in June of 2011 and four years later there are still 150 photo sets.

Skimpy sets. I usually praise "economical" sets, which get a lot done without 175 pictures, but these sets are too skimpy. I've already gone through 30 sets, and that was after "pre stimulation" looking at "Busty Brits".

The bonus sites of the same woman, "Daniella In Pantyhose" and "Lycra Ass" are not very good. A lot of screen caps.

The videos are uninspiring, particularly the softcore ones.

The $29.99 premium price tag suggests a lot more, including updates. I will immediately request a refund.
Bottom Line: I like the girl. It's the only reason I'm giving it a 65. They list an update on August 1st, and it's three rehashed "video stills".

There are a lot better sites with unending content out there for $29.99. Avoid this one.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Club Jenna

3. Club Jenna (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
HughJarse (0) 08-02-15  01:49pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: There is a large amount of movies to choose from.
All downloads were fast.
Cons: Not Club Jenna - it's Moviebox who bought the domain name (false advertising).
Most videos are Video on Demand (i.e. you have to pay extra)
Most included videos are 640x480 res, fairly old and probably available elsewhere.
You can buy extra channels at a premium.
Bottom Line: The site is a lie and overpriced for what it is. Best porn should state that Club Jenna's site closed down years ago.
All the other sites they bought resolve to the same place - Moviebox.com.
I would have given a lower score if possible the on principal that there's nothing but a few streaming movies of Jenna.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Catalina Cruz

4. Catalina Cruz (0)

Pay
Newbie
87*
bebelover (4) 05-12-15  03:50pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Gorgeous babes
- easy to navigate
- lots of other bonus site
- Greatly Improved Quality of images
- Videos are good
Cons: Not many, except for older galleries bad quality
Bottom Line: I actually adore Catalina Cruz and love her look. She is a bombshell. I am happy with the improvements that have been made lately. The galleries are nice and images are better quality now. The low price is definitely worth the look
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Elli Nude

5. Elli Nude (1)

Pay
Active
93
marcdc1 (174) 04-01-15  11:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Hot sexy RED HEAD (I do so love gingers!)
- HD video quality 1280X720 8.2 mbps. There were a few older slips that were of lesser quality but almost everything is in stunningly good quality.
- picture sets are all available as .zip files
- Organization is clean. Videos are arranged chronologically with key words to simplify. You can also suggest new keywords to improve the system.
- "You may also like this video" suggestions were very useful
- You can "add to favorites" if there's a video you want to keep easy access too.
- Over 200 picture sets. Each set has 30-90 pictures. Quality is good at 1024X800 pixels.
- About 150 movies. Each movie about 20 minutes long
- Network. Elli is part of the Dreamnet.com network. There are 14 active women (mostly MILFs) and another 50 inactive sites included.
Cons: - This site was very strong so I don't have many cons.
- Lots of Solo content. I'd prefer to see more partner action
- Elli is on the Mom and Pop side of the amateur spectrum. Most of the filming is POV or tripod.
- Some hardcore, some groups (girl-girl), some flashing/public. But most of what you see is solo action or solo into BJ.
Bottom Line: Really fun site. Elli posts a daily life set showing off her vacation and travels - she has a lot of personality.

I really liked this site. I wish I had more time with it. It will join my rotation of sites that I keep checking back into.

Elli has a natural beauty that comes across in all of her shoots. There is some dirty talk, but she's not the foul mouth spit-fire we might want her to be.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XXX Taylor Ann

6. XXX Taylor Ann (1)

Pay
Active
75
marcdc1 (174) 03-30-15  08:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 04-11-15  10:15am  (Update History)
Reason: I wanted to add enough to receive points for my contribution. I see how it was too minimal before.
Pros: - Big Busty MILF. Very attractive eyes. Large breasts
- Picture sets are available as .zip files. About 35 pictures in a set
- Lots of sexy stripping and lingerie sets
- Movies are good quality 960X540 4.3 mbps
- Photos are 1600X1200 pixels
- Hardcore, solo, (mostly) interracial and girl/girl content
- Includes Dreamnet network (faith69.com, rebeccasorrice.com, lodestarangel.com, taylorupton.com, aligned.com). There's plenty of entertainment for your dollar across the network.
Cons: - Small video collection 17 movies
- Small pix collection less than 50 picture sets
- Amateur through and through, so much of the lighting and sound is sub part
- Taylor Ann is a moaner not a talker. I prefer lots of dirty talk.
- Not much scene set up. I like shoots that have some plot (what can I say I'm old fashioned)
Bottom Line: This is was included in the network I bought, so I'm checking it out. Sadly there isn't too much here, so I'm going through it way too quickly. Taylor Ann is very sexy so I hope she adds to what is here very quickly.

I can't recommend this site due to it's lack of content. Although I would endorse the network - which includes
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Kylie Deville

7. Kylie Deville (1)

Pay
Active
92
marcdc1 (174) 03-30-15  08:29am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great amateur, Hot MIL. Kylie is hot for whatever age she is (40s).
- Good mix of content: hardcore, solo, girl-girl, anal, flashing/public, dirty talk, lite (very lite) bondage
- Over 150 picture sets (each with about 50 photos). Quality is good at 1800X960 pixels
- Large video collection with 1280X720 9mbps quality. (Older content: 640X480 3 mbps)
- photos available as .zip download
- Cam network included (not sure what Kylie's schedule is)
- Dreamnet network with plenty of extra content.
Cons: - Poor organization. There's a video tab and a pix tab, but little else to sort through the content.
- Videos have little set up/scenario
- videos don't have any description, just title
Bottom Line: Good solid site that delivers at a fair price.

I liked this site and recommend it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rebecca\'s Office

8. Rebecca's Office (1)

Pay
Active
89
marcdc1 (174) 03-20-15  04:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Sexy Milf who enjoys making content.
- A real woman with curves and large breasts
- vocal sex, threre's nothing sexier then listening to a woman lose control while orgasming
- almost exclusively inter-racial
- about 100 videos (range from 10-20 minutes)
- Over 300 photo sets (about 20 pictures per set)
- picture sets have great set up with a hot sexy story for each set.
- Older material is 640X480 1.17 mbps. Newer material is HD
720X400 3.2 mbps.
- variety: gg, gangbangs, groups, bj, anal, hardcore.
- dreamnet.com network with dozens of other models included.
Cons: - most photos are not available as zips (the newest are zipped)
- navigation is lacking
- for a site with more than a decade of business there's not that much content.
- some pictures are taken out of focus. Most are just fine.
- More than a few videos have lighting problems, either dark room, or night vision, or over exposure. I know I'm buying an amateur site, but some of it could have been easily fixed.
- videos have no set up and no lead in - straight to the action
Bottom Line: I'm enjoying this site more than I thought I would. Rebecca keeps a blog and I found it very erotic to read about this naughty businesswoman.

I wish the updates were a little more often and that she'd put up more video updates, but all in all a good value. I would rejoin this site and recommend it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Colette

9. Colette (1)

Pay
Active
80
BobA (7) 03-17-15  10:55am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + High quality photography/videography
+ Beautiful Models who seem to like what they do
+ Good genre combination leaning to more group sex situations
+ Length of videos seems just right
+ Commentary/Interview videos for a behind the scenes look at the models
Cons: - Relatively small content library (they are new though)
- Details are not attended to:
- inaccurate descriptions by Colette
- sometimes certain downloads don't work
- Every video appears to be 16:03 long because cause they use a boiler-plate header for their videos
- No search capability
- Support staff don't respond to all emails (have to nag)
- Slightly "shady" tactics to make the site seem to have more content and higher ratings than it does:
- new content instantly has lots of 10 star ratings. hmmmm
- comments are overly moderated - have to keep it bright or they don't allow it.
- content will be out for weeks, then suddenly the release date is changed to make it seem like it's "new" again.
Bottom Line: It's basically x-art.com with more of a hardcore porn edge. The quality is high due to very beautiful models, good lighting/production quality but mainly because the models seem to be genuinely enjoying themselves.

I wish they'd realize that it's okay to focus on quality rather than quantity. As far as quantity goes the ste launched in late November and as of March 17, 2015 I count 28 content vids, 13 commentary videos, and 29 photo sets. So roughly that's something to see about every other day (either a photo set or video).

I wanted to give them an 80 or higher - but until they fix some of the "low hanging fruit" - I can't really recommend the site.

They should make their processes streamlined so that model pages have photos and decent content, not just blank. (Kinda sloppy). And one example of a bad description is one where she describes a scene with anal - but there is none in the video. (see "Give in") - However, to their credit, it's still a great video with Caprice and Marcello!

But what rubs me the wrong way is their tactics of changing dates, padding ratings, and overly moderating comments. I mean I understand getting rid of trolling or something harsh towards a model, but they way over do it. I can understand throwing a few 10 star ratings to get the ratings started - but they overdo it, so the ratings I found are pretty much worthless. But changing dates to me seems like a desparate move to try once again to deceive - make it look like there's more activity than there is.

So in summary, if you can see past obvious desperation, lack of good business practices and lack of attention to detail on the site itself - the content is really good. It's a shame because if they gave it to people straight, gave the same level of focus to the site as they do to their actual content - I could really recommend it. I hope things improve or I won't renew.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit The Lone Star Angel

10. The Lone Star Angel (1)

Pay
Active
80
marcdc1 (174) 03-06-15  04:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Fun Amateur Site. Angel has that Texas twang that I just love.
- Angel is a real woman. There nothing fake about her. She has typical breasts and is in her mid-late 30s (I'm guessing)
- Diversity of content. girl-girl,, plenty of blow jobs, solo material, hardcore, and quite a bit of anal for an amateur site. Angel also has some semi-public (outdoor) material
- Lots of Content. Almost a 100 videos and nearly 300 picture sets. Each picture set is approx. 25 images.
- Adequate video/picture quality.
- Most video is 1280X720 6.6 mb/s. Older stuff 360X240 .7 mb/s
- Image quality is good at 1024X680 pixels.
- Regular updates.
- Network. Angel is part of the Dreamnet.com network. There are 14 active women (mostly MILFs) and another 50 inactive sites included.
- Naughty. Angel is not afraid to get naughty with dirty talk or fun toy play. She enjoys herself on camera and brings passion
Cons: - If you are a breast man this is not the site for you. (I love all women, so this was not a problem for me).
- Limited fan interaction. You can email her and there's a blog.
- Liquor and fun. Angel is enjoying herself in her videos and more than sometimes that involves a cocktail. I'm no prude and whatever gets you in the moods is fine with me, but it may be objectionable to you.
Bottom Line: I liked this site. It was part of a network and I don't think I would have joined if it was on its own, but there was certainly enough here to keep me happy. A nice amateur site with a good amount of content. No complaints, but I don't think I'll stick around long.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Faith 69

11. Faith 69 (1)

Pay
Active
90
marcdc1 (174) 03-01-15  02:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great Amateur Site. Older stuff is poorly light, but as things progress the content is pro-am. With good lighting and sound
- Faith is a real woman. In her words she is "curvy" Less so in her younger pictures/videos.
- Diversity of content. I love the flashing material. There is also interracial, girl-girl, gangbang, plenty of blow jobs, solo material, hardcore, anal. The preview section does a good job of showing off all that is inside.
- Lots of Content. Over 100 videos (Sorry I didn't count), and nearly 150 picture sets. Each picture set is approx. 25 images.
- Adequate video/picture quality.
- Most video is 960X540 2.5 mb/s. Newest material is 1280X720 6.6 mb/s. Older stuff 360X240 .7 mb/s
- Image quality is good at 1024X680 pixels.
- Regular updates. After years online Faith is still adding content.
- Network. Faith is part of the Dreamnet.com network. There are 14 active women (mostly MILFs) and another 50 inactive sites included.
Cons: - Older content is in .wmv, newer in .mp4. Usually there is not a choice of format.
- I'm running a mac, and for some reason as soon as I download content using safari, my cpu goes crazy and climbs to over 100%. However switching to chrome doesn't trigger this problem. I don't hold faith responsible for this, just wanted to let you know if you join and have the same problem - switch your browser.
- Organization is a little lacking, there's nothing to help you - each set is added chronologically. I love her flashing stuff and wish I could search or sort to get to it more easily.
- Limited interactions. Faith does a cam show once a week, and you can email her but that's not the experience she's selling. She does offer a blog and does maintain fan interaction via the blog.
Bottom Line: I'm enjoying Faith's site. I've wanted to check it out for a while and I'm glad I finally got around to it.

I like that Faith is not afraid to get naughty and nasty. I particularly enjoy her public hijinks and her dirty talk. Her site is definitely worth the price of admission and you get a lot of bang for your buck.

Other than adding an organizational structure I have no complaints. I'd like to see more fan interaction (maybe a forum?), but that's being nit picky.

Faith delivers everything she promises and that's a lot of delivery.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Abbey Brooks

12. Abbey Brooks (1)

Pay
Active
50
LPee23 (24) 12-01-14  07:48pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site offers very little for your money, and has gotten worse rather than better over the years. It is actually the bare minimum to avoid being called an overt scam, but I feel scammed nonetheless by paying a regular price for such poor content.
-8 photosets
-13 videos
Abbey Brooks is a hot model, but her site has been decimated by poor ownership over the years.
Cons: This site has been nothing but a disappointment and a waste of money.

AbbeyBrooks.com may have been great under it's original ownership, but I will never know for sure. What I can say is that, with 8 photosets and 13 videos, this site gives the bare minimum to say that they gave you something in exchange for your money. What bothers me even more is that this site seems like it once had tons of content, but removed almost all of it when it was acquired by new owners.
Bottom Line: If you go to the TGP pichunter.com you can find hundreds of promotional galleries posted by AbbeyBrooks.com under it's original owners. It is ironic that now, the amount of promotional content available from this site's heyday is orders of magnitude greater than the amount of content available in the member's section.

I am incredibly disappointed with this site, especially since it has suffered a near-total loss of content in it's member's section. This poor upkeep is made all the more shocking by who the site's new owners are. Supposedly it is part of the "OpenLife Network." However, if you scroll to the bottom of the page, you will see that "AbbeyBrooks.com is a site of Gamma Entertainment and its subsidiary Chargepay B.V."

Yes, this is the same company Gamma Entertainment that owns the DDF Network. How could they take such bad care of this site?

I contacted Gamma Support to ask about it. I also told Gamma Support that I would be reviewing the site, so if Gamma sees these comments here, it should not come as a surprise. I basically said, I'm a paying member, I saw a promotional shoot on a TGP that wasn't available on your site anymore, would you be able to send me a full copy? The shoot that I was interested in was the only promo shoot that featured her peeing. Not sure if it was the only peeing shoot she ever did. Anyway, the response that I received from Gamma Support was "we do not currently feature that type of content on our sites."

Oh, really. I pointed out that Gamma owns DDF which produces some of the best peeing shoots online, and I received no reply. I know DDF reads this forum, so if you happen to see this, then know that this was totally remediable if not avoidable, if support had just even replied to my second email. I said up front that I would be reviewing the site, so what did you expect?

This touches on another issue relating to Gamma Entertainment and their ownership of the DDF Network. I hate to digress from AbbeyBrooks.com, and I hate to slam a network that touches on greatness, but I was told by DDF that certain major issues would be resolved in October. I have not brought attention to these issues yet here, and they seem to have been unnoticed so far, but I am losing hope that anything will ever be done.

I really hope that someone from OpenLife or Gamma can reply here. Please explain why you have reduced a site with many hundreds of shoots to 8 photosets and 13 videos. When marcdc1 reviewed the site in 2012 it had 36 photosets and 13 videos, and it had gone backwards since then. Before OpenLife acquired the site, it had hundreds of shoots. Also, the newtork of 15 sites included with membership in 2012 has shrunk to 8.

I don't know what is more troubling, that Gamma has done this to AbbeyBrooks.com, or that they own DDF, and some of the great porn there could likewise be lost some day, perhaps not too far from today.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Lady Sonia

13. Lady Sonia (1)

Pay
Active
78
pat362 (373) 10-26-14  01:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Lady Sonia is an extremely beautiful older woman.
+You can stream or download all her videos.
+Videos are in the preferable MP4 format.
+Lady Sonias has started to add new content.
Cons: -The site design could be improved in key areas and for that reason finding content is made much harder.
-No way of knowing how many videos have been removed and no easy way to count the total number as well. I'd say at least over 300.
-A lot of the content is solo stuff that's mostly softcore to midcore.
-She does shoot with a black male but he wears a stupid mask so that removes a lot of the heat that would have been there otherwise.
-Content is dated but it's clear that some older stuff has been given a more recent date and it's also clear that the order of videos is not based on when it was made or originally uploaded.
-I can't help but feel that the site is now there more for her to book private meetings than to actually shoot porn for the site.
Bottom Line: *I've been aware of Lady Sonia for many years and although I find her very attractive. The content she offers doesn't do anything for me. There are glimpses that look interesting but the execution and final product is somewhat lacking to me. I know she stopped shooting porn but I read that she was at it again and I was curious to know if her new stuff would be like.

*Sadly for me there is very little that was different from past content and therefore not any more enjoyable than her past stuff. I find that a lot of her content gets repetitive rather quickly so buyers beware. You have to be into seeing an older woman play with herself more than seeing her with different partners. There is a certain level of teasing and cuckoldry in many of her videos which is something that may not appeal to everyone.

*I had an offer to join for about 13$ and I took it to satisfy my curiosity. I won't need to join again as I downloaded maybe half a dozen videos which will all wind up in my garbage bin.

**I know that she advertises private meetings for people in the UK and it's a recurring theme in her tweets. To the point where that's basically all they are. That's why I felt like the site is more like advertising for that business than an actual porn site where the model shoots exclusively for it.***
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ashley Doll

14. Ashley Doll (1)

Pay
Active
88
Drooler (220) 10-11-14  05:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Ashley is sweet and beautiful
-content is almost entirely exclusive (exception: one huge Hustler gallery)
-navigation is simple and straightforward
-design is simple with a good color scheme
-ample number of pics in each gallery; varies from approx. 80 to over 200
-videos in 4 formats (WMV low (960x540), WMV high (1440x810), iPhone, and iPad)
-fast-moving downloads (1.5-2.5Mbsp)
-reliable billing company: Epoch
-blog and forum are active with Ashley posting/participating, though the forum isn't terribly active on the member end
Cons: -only one file size for pics in zips: huge (4752x3168; sometimes 5184x3456); FYI: enlarged in galleries 1067x1600
-galleries display no more than 15 thumbs per page
-in gallery section, number of pics per gallery and file sizes not stated; in video section, lengths, file sizes, and dimensions of videos not stated
-updates once a week with a photo gallery or video
-15 videos to date
-41 photo galleries to date
-shoots are "professional," which doesn't always mean great
-monthly membership price of US $29.69 will discourage some from joining
Bottom Line: I really liked this site. It's softcore without toys. I knew it was kind of a splurge given the amount of content, but it hasnít given me any buyerís remorse.

Ashley first came to my attention through David Nudes, where she is "Taylor Ashley." She's also appeared at Hustler, Twistys and Met-Art, and even did a bit of b/g hardcore at Exploited College Girls. As she makes clear in her blog, she does not intend to do any more hardcore with males. However, she is bisexual, so who knows if she'll take the g/g route some time?

More on photos: Ashley definitely has a way with the camera, gushing sweetness with her smile and her eyes. She has a nice, trim frame with lovely all-natural boobs and an ass that will make you glad to be alive just to see it. I only wish that the photos didnít have so much hot streaming sunlight coming over her, especially in the indoor shoots by windows, but thereís enough good stuff after that kind have been pitched out.

More on videos: These are mostly posing and smiling and stripping without any music or talk to speak of. There are just a scant few that have her masturbating and moaning, but they are nice.

Clearly, this is a single-model site for the softcore fan with a few extra bucks to reallocate from the beer fund to something thatís gonna last a while longer. With that in mind, I recommend it.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Her First Fat Girl

15. Her First Fat Girl (0)

Pay
Newbie
79*
thatreview (1) 10-07-14  04:56pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1. Videos are excellent quality

2. Good amount of different girls playing with Mandy
Cons: 1. Organization could be significantly better

2. Hasn't been updated in quite sometime
Bottom Line: If you're not into BBWs then this site is not for you.

To build on con comment number 2 when I joined the site there had been no updates on the site no and updates on Mandy's original site mandysplayhouse.com for nearly a year. I did some searching to see if there was any news related to Mandy. In my search I say a post on a BBW forum asking the same question in which one of the webmasters/model mentioned that she hasn't been active on the site nor on her facebook page.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Roxy Raye

16. Roxy Raye (1)

Pay
Newbie
85*
Cashed (2) 10-05-14  02:29am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: This site has a lot of very hardcore vaginal/anal with some beautiful women that enjoy it.

Quality isn't bad, even on the older videos.

You have access to multiple sites with your membership, which have some good content themselves.

Had no issues with billing, or my cancellation.
Cons: Site could have better navigation, and search options.

Should update content a bit more.
Bottom Line: The women really enjoy what they do and it shows. Roxy Raye always gives it her all. If you are into hardcore vaginal/anal insertions, and peehole play then this site is for you.

I wish the cost was a little cheaper, but I was satisfied with this content, and the other bonus site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Michelle\'s Nylons

17. Michelle's Nylons (1)

Pay
Active
88
mr smut (42) 08-23-14  02:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: + unique amateur MILF content (400+ picture series and >125 HD videos)
+ mostly good picture and video quality
+ no download limit, no DRM but still a clumsy navigation
+ fast server with very good download speed
+ weekly updates on the weekend
Cons: - older picture series may only contain about 50 pics and have 1024 pixels on the long side
- only a few sets together with other girls
- no ZIP files for the picture series
- poor navigation on the member pages
- Billing through CCBILL only but at least no regional pricing
- HD Videos come as WMV only (smaller mp4 are available for mobile devices)
Bottom Line: ***Disclaimer***
First of all I have to point out that I'm a real hardcore fan of Michelle for more than 8 years now. Ever since I saw her for the first time as Sugarbabe on Southern Charms I'm in regular contact with her. Nonetheless I do hope to be professional enough to write an honest review about her second site.

***About Michelle***
Michelle is a 53 year old girl from the UK now living in Spain. She IMHO is a drop dead gorgeous lady with a very pretty face and a killer smile. Her firm 32FF boobs and round ass are so delicious I would never think that she's already that old not to forget her wonderful legs and smooth skin. If someone would ask me for a prototype of a genuine British MILF I could only name her.
In the beginning she was always shaved but it seems to me that she now wears her pubic hair with pride. She wanted just to grow it and do a shaving special for one of her members but that was months ago.
Michelle loves her little hobby and as one can see it did her good the last +8 years as she now looks more sexy and self confident. She enjoys to be watched, to make guys like me crazy about her and to tease.

***About the website***
Michelle started this site in October 2007 until now she made more than 400 picture updates (with more than 300 matching videos) showing her in- and outdoors wearing elegant dresses and of course nylons and girdles. She loves short skirts, elegant heels, playful lingerie, nylons and girdles, oral sex, to masturbate using toys or her fingers alone, posing nude outdoors in the countryside and to tease. The updates are different to what can be seen on Southern Charms she may use the same dresses or lingerie but the content differs.
Only a few sets show her together with some other girls but some g/b content as well.

***About the Pictures***
The preview area gives you a very good idea of what can be found in the member's area. Starting end of 2010 (update 189) the pictures now have 1280 pixels on the long side. The JPG quality is good enough to blow them up even on a very large screen. Sometimes blurry pictures may occur but for an amateur site the quality is absolutely o.k. IMHO.

***About the videos***
Her older videos are mostly 4:3 aspect ratio with 720x576 pixels resolution and come a bit grainy but still enjoyable. I have to sit about 2 metres away from my screen to be able to enjoy her teasing me. The videos show her doing solo teasing, masturbation with fingers and dildos, doing handjobs, blowjobs or having intercourse. The newer HD videos are mostly good quality stuff.

***Conclusion***
This website is recommended for MILF lovers that like to see a nylon lady sharing her passion for sex. The site has some points that would need some improvements but is worth a try I joined several times and always came back with the improved picture quality I'm planning to stay there as I don't want to miss one single update but as written above I'm an addicted fan of sexy Michelle guess that explains a lot!

88 points is an increase of 3 points to my older review but I think the sheer amount of unique amateur content allows me to go higher in my rating. If you love 50+ year old girls wearing elegant dresses and matching lingerie then you should definitely think of joining her site.
Even after so many years she still is the number one hardcore amateur to me and she never failed to surprise me. Yes, I am addicted to her and she knows that. In fact I think she likes me being one of her most faithful fans :-)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit April Hunter

18. April Hunter (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
thatreview (1) 08-09-14  07:18pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1. Simple Design

2. Easy to navigate

3. Pricing discounts for multiple month memberships

4. Recently April has agreed to take orders on custom videos and photos
Cons: Some videos are not available on the site but only through April Hunter's direct clips4sale store.

April updates her site herself so updates are on a irregular basis however that is due to her wrestling and touring.
Bottom Line: It's important to remember that April Hunter is not a porn star. She models nude and will do sexy videos such a strip tease and muscle flexing. You won't see her playing with herself or getting sexually involved with females. She wrestles other females (along with some men) but it doesn't lead to sex.

Her sexy photos; nude, lingerie, fantasy costume and fetish along her flexing and strip tease videos were enough to keep me satisfied. Fans of softcore female muscle would enjoy her.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Latin Sandra

19. Latin Sandra (1)

Pay
Active
85
marcdc1 (174) 07-29-14  04:00pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Sandra is sexy as hell. She points to her ass as being her best feature. For sure she has a great rear end, but she is the complete deal with a fantastic body. Fans of long nipples will find her's poppin'
- Great original content. Sandra is a born performer and constructs a variety of situations. In each shoot she stays in "character" and delivers lines with easy. Some fall apart and begin to giggle - she keeps it fun and sex.
- BIG photo content. Over 100 galleries. The solo content has about 60 pix per set. The hardcore stuff averages 200.
- "Latina" does not mean bi-lingual. Very little of the action is in spanish. So if English is your only language you can enjoy all the great dirty talk.
- Un-cut male talent for those that find that important.
Cons: - Viewing on. You can't download the videos and there are no zips available for the pix. You can "save as" each of the pix - but that's a pain.
- Only access to 35 videos at a time. Content is rotated in and out
- Only shoots with her husband (I'm not upset by it but know some like diverse male talent.
- Little interaction with Sandra. There's a brief bio, and you get her email address, but that's about it. I email her with some questions, she was very sweet and professional.
- No cam shows/live feed/bonus content (non was advertised so I didn't let that detract from my review.)
Bottom Line: I liked the site and planned to stick around for a few months. But all restrictions made me a one time member only.

I like the original content. I think Sandra could really build this site into something amazing if she would reach out. I want to make this site one of my stable go back to's but can't justify it with how hemmed in it is at the moment.

If you find Sandra sexy I think you may be more satisfied by buying ala carte via her clipstore. Sadly this on is a don't recommend, at this time (I really hope that changes).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Christy Marks

20. Christy Marks (1)

Pay
Active
76
Monahan (42) 07-03-14  07:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Christy Marks - Fantastic mammaries and a fun loving attitude
High quality content professionally done
All videos are high def (1280)
Updates once a week or so
Imaginative solo scenes
Christy's an incredible contortionist. Example - she could fuck herself with her nipples. When she squeezes her mams between her legs it sends me off. Her patented "frog" position is unique.
NO INK. A major plus for me.
No broken links.
Cons: No interaction with members
A total of 60 videos* and associated pix
Only two non-Christy videos - both Merilyn Sakova, with tits equal to Christy's
All of Christy's material is 5+ years old and is remastered (very well, by the way).
Some material is also available on one or more of Score's other websites and some is unique to this site.
Hard core material is all SSDG - Same sex different guy. Little imagination in the hard stuff.
The g/g/b and g/g stuff isn't particularly good. (Exception - her scene with Terry Nova with two guys was outstanding)
Slowish downloads

* One scene was taken down before I had a chance to download it. No idea why it was removed.
Bottom Line: The site is $19.95 with the PU/TBP discount and, for horndogs like me who really enjoy watching Christy enjoying her great tits. I was able to drain the entire site in four sessions.

The total amount of video content as of 7/1/14 is just a tad more than 15 Gb.

Thus site is not included as an add on (free or otherwise) with any other Score site so it must be considered a "hot property" by management.

I decided on a point score of 76. It would be higher if the site had more content and included all, not just some, material from other Score sites. It would be lower except they have done a good job of upgrading their catalog to HD.

Bottom line, I recommend the site to huge tit aficionados who like young, seemingly carefree models. It comes to about 33 cents per video scene which, if you enjoy world class huge natural boobs bouncing (flopping) all over the screen, is a great value.

Set aside a few hours a day for four or five days if you plan to download everything on the site.

I plan to cancel about a week before my first month is used up and may, but probably won't, rejoin a year or so from now.

I can't comment on customer service because I had no need to use it during my brief stay.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bree Olson

21. Bree Olson (1)

Pay
Active
91
marcdc1 (174) 04-13-14  06:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - BREE OLSEN: Seriously Bree is one of the top perfumers in the biz.
- Just over 150 scenes available
- Newer stuff looks great with plenty of download options: 1080, 720, 480. The older stuff tops out at 640X360 1.22 mb/s
- About 140 shoots: each photo set is available as a zip and contains over 200 pix
- diversity of content (mmff,ff,ffm, solo, hard/softcore, feature cuts)
- Robust network with access to: Allie Haze, Abby Brooks, Ashley Fires, Dylan Ryder, Cassandra Calogera, Charmane Star, Devon Lee, Hanna Hilton, Teal Conrad, Sunny Leone, and the Lane Sisters).
Cons: - Adds inside member site
- Beware of cross sells at sign up. I was a little too eager and got hit with an extra $2 by being careless.
- Last update was June 2013. (Is Bree retired?)
- No real interaction with Bree (no blog or twitter integration)
- Low end format is 375 kb/s 440X250 and looks awful.
Bottom Line: There' nothing disappointing about this site. There's plenty here to explore and enjoy over your month's membership, and if you stick around the rest of the network will keep you busy.

Many of the girls on the network are retired, so no going in that there may not be any updates to some of the sites (including this one).

Bottom Line: It's a good site for fans of Breee, or anyone who want to see some great work from girls of the late 00s. Bree, Dylan Ryder and Devon Lee were in their hay day then and hot as hell. I wish they were still actively making content.
The new girls here are great and I'm sure only going to get better.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Kelsey Obsession.net

22. Kelsey Obsession.net (0)

Pay
Newbie
52*
kanaka (2) 03-02-14  12:11pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Unique content for those seeking lots of ass play without looking at any dicks. They get down to business. Kelsey, the main model is reasonably cute.
Cons: Models numbers are very limited, and other than Kelsey, most are overweight and unattractive. Video composition is poor and shaky. The site has an archaic 3-tiered membership setup where you can buy an only-streaming membership, or a more expensive streaming membership, or just like the 1990's, you buy "tokens" to download. This isn't as simple as logging in and having easy access. When you buy the streaming +downloads membership, it will not allow download managers or downloading more than one video, and the page gets locked up for 5-10 minutes or longer while the one video spools and buffers to load up. The worst thing is all these levels of membership require a secondary authentication when you download - despite the fact that you logged in as a downloading member. The secondary authentication is touchy, and in 3 weeks I was only able to download 3 videos.
Bottom Line: For an expensive ($40 per month)site, it is slow and frustrating to navigate - and impossible to download videos. For all this money the site should be easier to use, and not full of bugs and lock-ups of the site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Chaturbate

23. Chaturbate (2)

Cams
Active
80
polacrilex (13) 02-25-14  07:59pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 04-04-14  08:03pm  (Update History)
Reason: Rules applied to models have changed impacting the content of the site in a major way.
Pros: *Models are REAL.
*Allows men and women on cam.
*Free (for real).
*Tokens are reasonably priced.
*Video quality is superb (as long as model has a good cam).
*Easy to navigate/can filter by region.
*Lots of "programs" available to models so they don't have to manage tokens/games/prizes for tipping.
*Color coded chat text.
*Ability to have moderators in chat room.
Cons: *Cannot view other avatars/previews when viewing the cam (like on MFC).
*Chat window could be nicer (e.g. bigger/different fonts).
*Billing company does not work with all credit cards (e.g. need Pay Pal option or CCbill).
Bottom Line: This site has come a LONG way since I found it just under a year ago. Yes there are not as many models as MFC, but this site has a lot going for it. I have found myself visiting it more than MFC as time goes on for one reason: IT ALLOWS MEN ON CAM.

Why is this good? No I am not into blow jobs, but what I am into are exhibitionist women--and there are a lot here! Since men can be on cam, you can peep in on girls who are naked around their male friends and roommates. I like casual/public nudity and girls do not get banned or punished for having a male voice or a man walk by. So the models tend to be much more open about their nudity around others, which is great. This makes the voyeur element of cam watching much more exciting...and this means they also have a couples section (an added bonus).

In addition, there is a good selection of women but mostly Thursday-Sunday and at the end of the month (PAYCHECKS!!!). The overall quality of the video feed is very good (for models with nice cams and high bandwidth). Another nice feature of the site is the tokens/tips are managed by programs that models can customize. This means that models spend more time playing/chatting and less time using a calculator or asking what the count is. They can also sell "tickets" to shows, set up tipping games, and set "goals" on the fly. Very intuitive all around and the programmers are adding new features almost every month.

In short, the "feel" of Chaturbate is impressive. True MFC has the premium models, but most are not "real" like they are on Chaturbate. Also, with all the other features they make available (e.g. mods) the experience has the potential to be the best on the internet.

The major downsides are the hoards of people in some rooms (which makes it near difficult to chat) and the fact that the billing companies are not as well known. I had an issue buying tokens, so I just didn't (and missed a good ticket show because of it!). I think that a PayPal option or CCbill would resolve this. Finally, the site operators should try to revamp the layout/graphics a bit. Its too bland and a good graphical overhaul would give this site the shine it deserves.

Bottom Line: Look for Chaturbate to compete more and more with MyFreeCams. I say this because the amount of tipping/private shows has increased dramatically over the last year...this tells me that I am not the only one straying from MFC more and more each moth looking for something more exciting than hoards of solo girls (which can get old).

Definitely worth your time if you are a video voyeur and like to chat with real models--tokens always help.

***UPDATE 4-4-14***
The webmasters at the site instituted a new ban on several practices that hurt the site IMO. 1-No one is allowed to cam outside for any reason. 2-No fisting or "big" toys. This means that I must lower my overall score (from a the original 91).

Some of the most exciting shows were outside! Several models (who had made "camming" outside their thing) have left as a result of the new rules. Also, some of the models who used big toys have left.

I understand enforcing rules to protect models, but their strict enforcement undermines the freedom of the site that I had come to like like so much (and what made it noticeably different from MFC). Now it appears the site is converging toward the MFC autocratic model. I am guessing from the chat rooms that others feel the exact same way, and my guess is that this will impact the site in a negative way in the months to come (especially as spring and summer approach). At least MFC doesnt ban outdoor camming....
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Roxy Raye

24. Roxy Raye (1)

Pay
Active
89
rearadmiral (380) 02-11-14  08:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Provides photos and videos in an under-served niche
- Wide variety of anal-themed videos
- 235 videos
- 185 photo sets
- Updates with a new video every three days or so
- Has live cam shows regularly
- All but a few videos are exclusive
- Part of a small network
- Supports DL managers
- Active webmaster
Cons: - 50GB daily download limit, but there is also a 10GB / hour limit.
- Probably a bit too extreme for many porn viewers
- Streaming begins on opening a scene link
Bottom Line: I seem to start off a lot of reviews with this statement: this site is definitely NOT for everyone. A regional brewery near here used to have a tag line: ďThose who like it, like it a lot.Ē The same might be said of this extreme anal play. Roxy Raye exists in a very narrow niche of extreme anal play. The only other site I know of that is similar is hotkinkyjo, the site featuring the Russian model with an expandable colon. The big difference is that with Roxy Raye you can download the scenes while with HKJ they are streaming only.

I know that any reader who either has no interest in this niche or finds it abhorrent will wonder how I can describe this site as having a broad range of scenes within the extreme anal niche. But Roxy really does cover a broad range of activities, albeit with the common theme of something large going into her ass. There are sex scenes (b/g and g/g), there are IR scenes, there are the large toy insertions, there are pissing videos, there are speculum videos (vaginal and anal), there is fruit and vegetable insertion (hey, sheís looking after her health), there is fisting (vaginal and anal, by self, men and women), there are regular camshows (with downloads available shortly after broadcast), there is some public nudity and there are even rosebuds. And donít ask what that last thing is. If you donít know, do yourself a favor and donít bother learning about it.

The site currently has around 235 videos with a new video being uploaded about every three days. A vast majority of these are exclusive, though there are a few uploads of scenes that sheís done for Evil Angel. Approximately 30 of the scenes are downloadable files of the live camshows that she does regularly. I didnít have an opportunity to take in a live show so I canít comment on those. The only drawback to the live shows is that prior to mid-2012 they are very low resolution. I suspect that this is dictated partly due to file size because the newer ones arenít great resolution (640x480 with some at 960x540) but are still as large as 1.5GB.

Most scenes have some download options with files being offered as both WMV and MP4 formats. More than one resolution is usually offered too. Obviously the options and resolutions improved as the site kept up with evolving industry standards. The newer MP4s come in at 1920x1080, 3000kb/s and 29fps. That seems like a low bitrate, but the scenes look crisp. The other most common resolution for older, non-HD scenes is 960x540, 2500kb/s. These look fine on a 24Ē monitor.

Photos are also offered, with most of the sets being taken as part of the video shoots. Resolutions vary here too, but most are decent at 1225x816. Photos are updated with a new set being added once every ten days or so.

The site layout is relatively simple, and thatís not a bad thing. If youíre familiar with how Hustler looks, it is pretty much the same as that. I canít find any link between Hustler and this site, but they look a lot alike. While there is no search function there are tags that help sort some things out.

The site commits one sin that is too common these days. I may be the only person who dislikes it, but I dislike it a lot: when you open the link to a scene it starts streaming automatically. I really wish that sites would stop this.

There is a download limit of 50GB per day, which is reasonable for a site with so much exclusive material. But there is another limit that is easier to hit. If at any time in a one hour period you exceed 10GB youíll be shut down for a while. I donít know how long, but it seems to be an hour or so.

The site supports download managers for queuing up scenes and I had no obvious problems with links timing out.

The membership includes access to ten sites in total. Normally Iíd provide some information on the other sites but in this case most of them are MILF-oriented and therefore not something I have a lot of interest in, so I didnít spend any time there.

Of note too is that there is an active webmaster who responds to questions here and by email. Thatís rare and appreciated.

The bottom line (pun not intended) is that this is a very good site offering some videos and photos in a rare niche. The site is easy to navigate, the videos are available with some choices, streaming is offered, there are a lot of variations on the main theme and the price is right. The biggest caveat to anyone considering a membership is to make sure you have an interest in this niche. If your porn experience is glamcore then this isnít the site to dabble in something new. This site is an excellent value and Iíd recommend it for anyone interested in the niche.

Maybe the whole site can be summed up in something that Roxy says during a scene. How often do you hear an attractive young lady say ďI think this is the biggest apple Iíve ever put up my assĒ? If youíve ever heard those words spoken for real before, I need to hang out with you.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Eve Angel Official

25. Eve Angel Official (1)

Pay
Active
75
Cybertoad (Disabled) 02-05-14  08:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
HD Content
Video up to 1280x720 6.5Mbps
Photos some HD
Fast site.
No DL
Very Hot Lady
Unique Material
Zipped photo's
Cons:
Not Much in HD Video
Many Pic's low Quality
Misleading Bonus sites.
Very slow updates 1item once a week .
Search engine misleading.
Items miss-matches and dead ends.
Eve has the only Solos
Site says Male Female scenes there are 3
Pic & Vid are not consistent.
Bottom Line:
Over views:

I joined Eve Angel cause she is amazingly hot, and has been for many years. She is part of the DDF network, Not the other way around as is hinted.
The site boast being part of the DDF network and is, if you join via another access for 10.00 more something that is not clear on the site.

Eve is smoking hot with and ass to die for, her older videos why not as good in quality show one tight natural beauty. She has an innocence from her first 2008 Video to her 2014 ones. Just seems she is a 100% natural at knowing what it takes to be sensual and sexxy with a tad whore on the side.


Good Stuff:
As said one hot model, she does Lez and solos on this site. She is seen in many varied places and positions making each scene unique to this site.
Eve is a super star in the industry having won a AVN award in 2009.
She does her scenes flawless, and I only saw one or two scenes that did not seem natural.


The Bad stuff, I hate give a 75 to such a smoking hot model. But the down side is not her, its the site.
The site hints when joined that you have access to the DFF network, not true the DFF network has access to Even Angel's site. Not the other way around and that will cost you 10.00 more dollars.
The site looks amazing, but the search is useless as there is very limited material on site.

Site shows a search for Male and Female scenes, there are three scenes. Hardly need a searching and fancy Male Female button for three scenes. There were 4 and one does not work.
Which brings me to another issues, there are some models shown as included that when clicked are not on the site. That shows poor quality control to say you have a model and do not.

A Huge pet peeve is when sites advertise videos with pictures to match. I'd say the site was just about bold face lying as about 1/2 photo's have no video, or half the videos had no pics.

One last downside to the site is HD, they say HD,
but maybe 10% of the movies are in HD, many are in medium and low resolution until late 2012 they got better. Some older videos look like they were taken on a cell phone just horrible. The photos are about the same very low resolution until last two years.

I am a tad hard on the site, just because it promised allot, and why some of that is sales some is not. The site comments by members is nearly non-existent making one wonder does anyone even come here ?

Closing Toads Take.
This is one of those sites that seems to plague me in the solo market of models. I seldom have ever found a website that is a solo model do what they say. Eve is a dream girl, one who's ass should be in the Smithsonian, she is a model with no plastic and is a natural beauty.
My advice is do not join Eve Angel, instead join DDF network and get all the sites included for 29.95 at TBP ( at the time of this review) it more but you will get much more. Eve Angel was $14.00 and why she is smokin, it was not worth 14.00 if only because the site misleads on many level.

This is a no joiner for me, but would advise the DDF Network join and get more bang for you buck.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 831 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Chaturbate (2)
2. Colette (1)
3. Ashley Doll (1)
4. Latin Sandra (1)
5. XXX Taylor Ann (1)
6. Angie Noir (1)
7. Kylie Deville (1)
8. The Lone Star Angel (1)
9. Roxy Raye (1)
10. Rebecca's Office (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.46 seconds.