Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Gigabytes upon gigabytes of exclusive, high quality images
- Zip files for ALL 7,000+ pictorials
- Thousands of high quality videos, many in HD
- Good selection of niches throughout network so whatever your fetish it can most likely be found here
- Some of the best "money shots" around
- Average download speeds
- Excellent customer service
- DIRT CHEAP price for the quality and quantity of porn
- NO DOWNLOAD LIMIT!
- When membership expires users are still able to watch the videos and unzip any pictorials they've saved
Cons:
- The newer videos will not transfer to DVD for those of us who like to make our own private libraries
- The WMV formatted HD videos do not work in the Windows Media Player
- The newer HD videos require a higher-end computer and/or video card to run properly
- Need A LOT of hard drive space to save the newer videos, which are only available in full movie format (200MB-3GB each depending on what format you use)
- Also need a lot of hard drive space to save zip files since they're only available in high-rez (15-50MB each)
- The high-rez photos are BIG and require really high screen resolution (1600 x 900 or greater) to optimize their exceptional quality
- LOTS of cross-site pictorials, especially the archived material but many of the newer ones as well
- DDF Busty got kind of redundant with 15+ pictorials for the same model
- May cause porn addiction
Bottom Line:
This is a fantastic site that is bursting with fresh, exclusive content not found anywhere else on the web. The DDF network is GARGANTUAN with approximately two thousand of the world's sexiest models to browse through, the amount of high quality content found here is staggering, a porn lovers paradise.
Some don't realize the variety of niches that DDF covers on their network so I'll just name some: Anal, Babes, Panties & Lingerie, Cumshot, Pussy/Anal Gaping, Big Tits, In the Crack, Blowjob, Bondage, Teens, Legs & Feet, Hardcore, Toys, Lesbian, Gangbangs, Dildo Machines, etc. I can keep going but as you can see, whatever your fetish DDF probably has you well covered.
The only problems I had were with the videos, the HD WMVs wouldn't work in my Windows Media Player (the latest version of 11, plus a really good HD video card) so I contacted them and asked them why, they responded that it's a codec problem and I'd have to download the CCCP media player to watch the WMVs. The AVI video format worked fine through the Windows Media Player so this wasn't too big an issue.
Another thing about the videos is that most of the newer HD videos cannot be put onto a DVD using a program such as Nero, there's something embeded in the code that that makes them virtually impossible to copy for it distorts the colors in the videos or makes them play in extreme slow motion. The older non-HD videos will transfer to DVD so at least it's not a total loss.
The videography on this network is outstanding, absolutely top-notch. The models and directors know what they're doing, the lighting is always perfect and the camera focuses good and long on all those delicious female parts we want to see, none of that 10-15 second teasing shit you find on all the other sites can be found here.
The only nuisance this network has is the cross-site content, they can at least inform members that specific pictorial/video is also on their other sites. I noticed that a lot of Only Blowjob pictorials and videos are just the blowjob segments from the full hardcore set found on Hands on Hardcore or 1byDay. And chances are that if a girl/girl pictorial is on 1byDay you'll also find that same one at Euro Girls on Girls, although once in awhile you'll venture across one that isn't. But with the insanely vast amount of content the DDF network offers this is a very minor nuisance.
While I was a member (sept-nov '10) they were putting all their content onto a new server and for 5 days I wasn't able to log onto the network, but to compensate they gave me 2 weeks for free, which is just great customer service. Plus their new server is a little bit faster than the old one so the download times improved, only slightly though.
My bottom line is this: JOIN, you'd be a fool not to. The price is definitely right for I got a $20,000 porn collection for $90; now I'm going to be busy for the next two years sorting through all the zip files, seriously!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Its a new site and has only been online for a month, but $70 for 6 months membership I consider is superb value for money.
Currently over 2gb of video content, so lets see what updates come
Cons:
If you join monthly its a little expensive, however join for 6 months or 12 months and its superb value for money so long as the updates come, but like I said above its a brand new site so we have to give them time
Bottom Line:
The video content is superb if your looking for real genuine british amateur porn, dogging and outside sex videos, some vids are a little short at 5mins, but there are also plenty 20mins and 30mins
$70 for 6 months is bloody superb value for money!!
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Slender teen models
- Lot's of content
- Updates fairly regular
- Recent drop in pricing is a plus
Cons:
- Lists models pictures that appear nowhere on the site. (My personal pet peeve)
- Some of the photography is amatuerish
- A lot of stale stuff still floating from years gone by
Bottom Line:
With three experiences under my belt, I can say that this is a good site, but overrated, IMO. There is a lot of stuff here for sure, but after a year away, by rejoining, I was personally disappointed. Some sets are not original as well and can be found elsewhere. This is one of the original teen sites and thus far it is standing the test of time. I have noticed some deep discount offerings of late, notably a tie in with Met-Art for 29.99 US currency. A good facelift could work wonders for them for their interface is underwhelming at this time. If you have never joined, you should do so once, for there is a sufficient amount of hot babes mixed in with a large data base of models. But those faces which appear in the preview yet have no sets or galleries? Errr....... Mainly Euro models which you have likely seen before with some Americans mixed in as well. Youthful, if not nimble models, but most have done hardcore before so no new discoveries for us who are always looking for the next hot Nubile babe. Several video formats available, some work better than others. if you are a Boob Monster, this site is not for you and is geared towards those of us who prefer their women au natural.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- That feeling you get the very first time you log on as a member to the website of one of the older, classier purveyors of adult material who has shown the ability to combine eroticism, beauty, and proper cinematic techniques to create some of the better adult films in circulation since the '60s.
- Um...
- Not constant login requests like a few other big name sites.
- If a grad student were researching "how companies unintentionally encourage the pirating of their material" then I'd recommend visiting this website. I think it could be an extremely useful example.
Cons:
- 250KB/s max on a 6Mbps DSL connection. ~150KB/s most of the time.
- You're not allowed to queue downloads, so you'll only be able to get whatever you sit and monitor and click (and re-click when it fails) to download. Maybe you'll be able to get 8 scenes per day.. Maybe twelve?
- Constant "503 Service Temporarily Unavailable" errors if you try to look at other pages after beginning a download. The site supposedly allows four connections, but I ran into trouble with less.
- Repeated "size mismatch" errors when using download managers.
- A laughably small collection of movies for a 50 year old company.
- 350 movies wouldn't be so bad if they were decent quality, but most are comparable to early 2000's VCDs. Yep. That poor. I'd estimate only 25% or so are HD.
- You'll be lucky to download the HD movies without the connection failing or the speed dropping to 0kbps, and, when it does, you'll be lucky to resume. If you can, guess what? You start over. Hooray
Bottom Line:
Videobox has almost 300 Private videos available, consistently fast connection speeds (600kbps+), and the .264 quality is better than Private.com's standard quality. Not to mention you can use download managers at VB and queue up dozens of movies to view later. It looks like they offer HD now, too, so there is absolutely no advantage to joining this site. It's a frustrating waste of money.
Seriously, don't do it. You'll be disappointed that the site even exists and you'll think to yourself, "Wow, I just wasted $30" or "I could've put that money towards a _______ membership."
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-12-1306:00am (Update History) Reason: addition of "Privacy Addendum:" section in Bottom Line
Pros:
Price: $14.95 per month.
Updates: 2 - 3 daily sometimes an entire movie.
Site Stats : Scenes: 8069 Movies: 1379 Stars: 2840
Good Navigation
Download WMV (160p, 240p, 360p, 480p) MP4 (same as WMV plus 540p, 720p, 1080p)#
Scene information: Video Front Cover shot, Title and Scene number, Date updated, Length in mins,
Size*, number of Images, number of Views, Who's in the scene**, Tag words, Director's name, Rate the movie, Current rating, Scene description***, Comment Section****, Links to other scenes by participants.
Cons:
* File size listed has nothing to do with file size.
** You are forced to use the IAFD database to sort out who is in a scene.
*** Older postings have no description or relevant tags.
**** You're encouraged to comment. Don't hold your breath that your comment will be posted - ever! Not sure what the webmaster does with these - maybe sprinkles them on his cereal in the morning.
# Video quality of older films are of tubesite quality and will never be improved upon with the 480 being the largest size, yet if you're into a specific babe, it may be your only chance to have her in your collection.
Bottom Line:
John Stagliano provides other directors an opportunity to offer their movies through Evil Angel (EA) without relinquishing ownership or profit participation. Thus, rather than a bunch of themed sites or purchased content, Evil Angel publishes DVD video's, generally released one scene at a time.
The EA website lists 33 directors associated with it at this time, including one couple (Le'Wood), three women (Belladonna, Bobbi Starr & Dana Vespoli), and eleven Europeans working there &/or in the States.
Genres:
Gay/Lesbian - While EA does not have straight up gay porn, Joey Silvera has broached this area by offering Shemale / Tranny (393) scenes (a total of 598 on the site) and "Strap Attack" scenes (234). "Lesbian porn" pretty much happens anytime two women kiss though some directors such as Belladonna, Bobbi Starr and John Stagliano feature plenty of girl girl scenes.
Anal - This has become the mainstay penetration act of the porn industry and EA is no exception. Sometimes I think they feel that if there is no anal there is no porn.
Jay Sin leads the way with his over the top anal DVDs, though Mike Adriano has added prolapse eating to his anal tongue fucking sequences (as opposed to rimming) to his prolific anal penetration videos.
Other notable and prolific directors featuring anal are Euro Rocco Siffredi, Christoph Clark, Raul Cristian & Nacho Vidal.
Manuel Ferrara has always had an ass obsession but also a series of DVD's called "Raw" which have the most authentic interaction of the two participants. Jake Malone also had plenty of anal scenes in his releases.
Oral - Hands down best on the Internet is Jonni Darrko's series of oral themed DVDs. The late John Leslie plus Mike Adriano, Joey Silvera and Belladonna have made oral themed movies too.
BDSM - This is not a specific niche that is specialized in though there are 71 Fem-Dom scenes listed.
Certainly Francesca Le and Mark Wood's (Le'Wood) current offerings, "The LeWood Anal Hazing Crew" and "Facial Vi0lation", has sado masochism well represented.
Thinly Plotted Gonzo Porn - Only three come to mine at the moment. John Stagliano's vampire themed "Voracious" and his 2003, groundbreaking feature "The Fashionistas", which swept the AVN Awards. Rocco Siffredi's "XXX Fucktory - The Parody Italian Style", which is mostly in Italian so who the fuck can understand the plot? Yeah, I know - people who speak Italian.
The directors at Evil Angel do not stay strictly in a specific genre so you will find a lot of cross over.
Bottom Line:
One of the best porn sites available at a great price with a variety of niches where you might find something that you like. Highly recommended.
Privacy Addendum:
It was brought to my attention that the EA website has a horrible Privacy policy. Honestly I'd never really read it before and quite frankly it's rather ugly. You can read it at the following link.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+This large amount of different, great, ok, fine vids in mostly great quality of east-euro material - at this point – is not seen anywhere else.
+25 different sites in this network - most hit the fan, some mediocre, a few less.
+NEW sites keeps coming up - the latest: Tricky Masseur and Beauty Angels, just great. (Take a preview tour at those two sites alone...)
+Models, models and again models: A lot of new ones and some rarely seen anywhere else - AND some just Tops.
+Easy navigation for models, sites and scenes.
+Easy navigation for downloads – both vids and pix sets.
+Most vids have two or three different download-sizes - at your command.
+Pix sets with zip.
+A general "gift" to the member of new models, that's very importent here..
+Fine variation in solo-vids, hc, lez and others.
+Ok price: $ 19.95
+ Easier and better model-name listings for identification
Cons:
Not entirely exclusive – that means: Teen Mega World is for one part of the rather vast Cyprus (Euro)-based Co. S&S Royal Limited that has over 30 sites – and a lot of the material seems licensed.
Repetitive scene-style at most sites (the new Tricky Masseur a fine exception) – and a repetitive use of male models – not that I care much – but it inflicts on the style of scenes, alas. A certain male is participating in an overwhelming amount of scenes, and it has to much influence about lack of variations.
In spite of some great models the scenes could generally be better. Too little focus on the girl model – tease, full body ect. - som scenes you almost forget what model you went for, because of too many close-ups.
Bottom Line:
If your are into fine east euro porn – you can't be without this site/network.
I've been a member on and off for years now (my last review was in April 2009) – and since then the network has gone through some serious changes – for the better. Gave it a 90 back then, but for the first time, I'm close to the 100 in spite of the cons mentioned – and except for one deal: Still too few full body hc scenes – a general problem with most east euro hc vids.
But why? They make great solo scenes in that way – so why not let the style move to hc, too.
Main reason I give this network the top 98 score is:
1)That vast amout of over 2.300 vids of east euro girls.
2)A great/fine variation of known and new models
3)The way the network still keeps giving the member new deals/sites
4)4 And of course: A reasonable price
Maybe, just maybe, this network is a serious competitor to those wellknown sites, like 21Sextury and DDF.
During my stay here, I'm much more content with this network, that I've been for some time at the two others in mention.
Again the variation of NEW models here, just beat the hell out of ”The Big 2”. This is what I've missed in the hunt of new teen material – where ”The Big 2” keeps repeating the same models over and over.
The navigation has gone through some serious changes – for the better. There are 25 sites at the network, but easy to browse, go for that special site and find the model, the download options ect. Now they got an all over model search for all sites – great.
Not all sites are fine, like before – but it's far better now. Out of 25 – maybe 18-20 are worth while.
Downloads:
Apart from the fine videostreams, where you can sort of ”preview” scenes before download, a lot has Low Q, Medium Q and High Q quality for download – a variation of aproxx. 150Mb to 900 Mb – all in .wmv. Some later vids have iPod and Mobile format, too.
You can – NOW – also download short part-scenes.
Bottom line: I'm glad I got back here – been looking for a netwpork like this after being a bid fed up with ”The Big 2”. And my $ 19.95 is just well spend here – a serious recommendation – and for now it looks like I'll stay for more than a month. But take a tour, guys.....
NB:
HAD to downgrade my score. Maybe I was a bit fast here - but 'as times go by' a lot of the material seems a bit stereotypic - in filming, in the way they show the girls - or rather NOT show enough of the girls before the hc act. Still, there are some fine material here and great models...
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Zip file for photosets.
-No download limits.
-No watermark on the videos.
-Videos are short runtime, often split into 5-minute clips.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update January 2007.
-Quality and feel of individual photos is amateur. More like a home-shot photo than a professionally shot photo. Nothing approaching the photo quality available at a glamor site like Metart or MPL Studios.
-Medium sized, obtrusive watermark on photos. Only a true fan of site model would want to keep any of these photos. Or someone who wants a very
complete collection of any of the models that might be a visitor shown in the photos.
-OK to low resolution on the videos, which are shot like amateur videos.
-No search engine.
-Very basic navigation.
Bottom Line:
-This is a small, solo-model type site. A waste of time and effort. If they had kept the site alive with updates and improved the video and photo quality, the site might have had some value, but it's hard to see any value in this site.
Anyone paying a site membership fee for access to this solo site will probably kick himself for stupidity or carelessness.
-This site is basically a waste of time and hard drive space. I didn't save a single video or photo from this site.
Small site.
Videos: 47
Photosets: 73
Short runtime: Videos run 10-20 minutes, often split into 2 clips.
Frame width x height: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps
With that high a bitrate, you would expect much higher definition video and sharp focus. But the camera-man does not take advantage of the large data-size of the file: the focus is not sharp and clear and is not often centered/framed on the action. The lighting is not sharp and crisp.
The site is designed as a solo-model site of a girl who has friends (male and female). The sex action is spread around: The main girl masturbates, has sex with 1 or 2 boys, has sex with some of her female friends. The female friends have male-female sex and female-female sex.
-If you get access to the site through the network, you can glance through the site contents (videos, photos). But it's doubtful you will find
anything of interest. Unless you happen to be a true collector of a few of the models that visit the site briefly (such as Dasha or Lay the Cat). But the visiting models are not clearly identified in each set they appear in, so you have to study many of the sets to guess the identity/name of some of the models in some of the videos and photosets.
The number of visiting models at this site is very small, less than 10. Few of the visiting models are well known.
None of the photos or videos are worth keeping. This site is of slight to no interest. A true collector of some of the visiting models might want to have some photos and videos where their most favorite models appear, but no one else would be interested, except to see an example of the low quality that porn sites have tried to sell online to members.
The site is like a an amateur, home shot photoset and videolog of some amateur girls who are playing at sex. It appears they are having fun at times, and really enjoying the sex as well. If you are a true fan of the girls/models, that would add some interest to viewing the photos/videos. But otherwise, the site is boring.
Very basic navigation. Files are divided into two groups: photosets and videos. The files in each group are listed in descending chronological order, most recent listed first.
A nice-sized thumbnail shows you who the model(s) in the photoset/video are. Many of the models are not specifically listed for many of the photosets and videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+They have exclusif content from a niche that's not well represented on the net.
+They have an very good selection of female European performers.
+The sex scenes are well filmed and the males do a pretty decent job considering their age.
+They have 352 videos but only the last 32 are in a single file. All the others are broken into 2 or more files.
+Video resolution is at least 720x404 for more than 100 videos and the last 32 are now 1280x720.
+They appear to still be updating with new content.
Cons:
-They no longer offer class3some as a bonus site and that is too bad because it was a nice addition considering the high cost of the site.
-They don't offer any model info whatsoever so it requires a lot of research to find the names to go with most videos.
-They don't date their content so it's very hard to know the update schedule.
-They have photos but the quality is mostly poor and they often appear to be out of order. Not to mention that you have to download each pic one by one since they aren't in a complete zip file.
-There is no navigation except the page number or the ability to jump all the way to the beginning or the end of the pages.
-There's music in their videos and that can be a plus but I found at certain times to be distracting.
-The first 100 videos are only offered in Real media so not very good news.
Bottom Line:
*This is a pretty decent site with content that is good to excellent but is dragged down by all the negative things that could easily be fixed if they bothered with it. They don't have a lot of male performers to choose from but the ones they have do a better than average job and there appears to be some good chemistry with the female performers which seems hard to believe when you consider the age difference between the males and the females.
*There's dialogue in some of the videos and it's normally in English. It's more often a miss because English is not the language that these people speak but it's not awful. The music is a little annoying. It's not too loud because that would make it almost impossible to watch the videos with the sound on. Mind you I wouldn't be sad if it disapeared. I think just the natural sounds of the performer is more than enough for the viewers anyway.
*I like that they are now offering their videos in a single file and that the resolution is also increased to 1280x720. Now if someone can start entering the names of the models in the database and put dates on their content then they'll have improved on most key issues.
**If you want to watch old men have sex with much younger women than this is probably the best site for that. They even have a few anal scenes as well so if that is one of your fetishes then you'll find a few videos. Be advised that it may not be in the description of the scene so you'll have to either download all the videos or check out the photos to find those scenes.
***Of course if you don't want to watch old guys have sex with very young women than avoid this site. Especially now since they no longer offer class3some and that site had mostly yojg women with younger men.***
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Met Art going hardcore, kind of, maybe.
- As would be expected, the pictures are excellent quality, but there are some sets with excessive blur, also happens on Met sometimes.
- The videos are romantic takes on sex. Not for sure if I should have put that in the cons or pros. Will further in BL.
- The models are all attractive and especially so if you like the slimmer build models.
- Very good DL speeds.
- Original themed series scenes.
- Navigation is good, but I'm going to guess it's just because the site isn't that big yet. I expect this navigation will be a real pain in the ass in a few years.
- Videos and picture sets combined have at least 1 update per day on average.
Cons:
- Careful what you wish for. Normal sex doesn't always translate into erotic.
- I honestly have trouble keeping up with, figuring out the different series'. Will further this too in BL.
- 2 months as a member and I will be keeping 4 videos and all of the photo sets. Pretty much the same pattern I have on Met-Art.
- Model variety would be a major plus. Pretty, white and slim is good, but it sure gets repetitive.
- Passion is "eh" believable.
Bottom Line:
I was one of the ones with very high expectations on this site and was lucky enough to get the first promo they sent out which gave 2 months access for $19.95. I don't feel ripped off at all, but as my previous comment said, I don't get it.
It's probably the last thing Met-Art wants to hear, but I prefer the photos to videos on Sex Art. I'm going to try and break the site down into sections so it's clear.
They have your basic video scenes. Just like Met, they give each scene a name so this can be a bit confusing when you add in the scenes that make up a series.
There are 60 of these as of 9/14/2012. The types of scenes:
Boy/girl: 18
Girl/girl or all girl: 23
The rest are solo.
My first problem. As you can see, the boy/girl group is the smallest of the three. When I hear hardcore, I still consider it boy/girl. Second problem, some of this goes into a realm of artsy that I couldn't imagine being interested in. The two examples off the top of my head, a man and woman full body-painted like tigers, having sex in a jungle themed room. One with the women in "chrome" from head to toe. You lost me at nude sex covered with paint and chrome.
Second group of scenes are in the series "Girls Love Sex". And just to keep it under some theme, there are 20 scenes in each season. Yep seasons. Like a television show. They have finished season 1 and 2, but season 3 hasn't started. So there are 40 scenes here. Now don't expect these to be much about sex. It's different models talking, some teasing and very light masturbation. Most of these scenes are less than 5 minutes.
Problem here? Watched 10 and swore to never download one again. These remind me more of Behind the Scenes sets on other sites, just repackaged as it might be porn.
Should be noted, August season is listed as "coming soon August". It's mid-September and there's nothing new.
Third group is Kamikaze Love, which is a full movie or a continuous series, hell I don't know, but I do know it says "New episodes every week" but there hasn't been a new scene added in this section since July.
This is a problem to me because I've got two sections of scenes that aren't updating, so I don't know if they just tanked the ideas or what. Either way the Girls Love Sex and Kamikaze Love are both disappointing to me.
So back to the main section of scenes. These scenes are okay. If you like the softer hardcore, you might be into these, but it's all a little too lovey dovey for my taste in porn. I'm all for passion and cutting back on the abusive scenes, but most of this just jumped to the opposite pole of the abusive porn.
The pictures, just like with Met-Art, are the best part. You get three sizes of zips to choose from. I'm basing these numbers off the newest photo set added, 1024x683 (small) 2048x1365 (medium) and 5616x3714 (large).
The videos are HD with decent bitrate and are relatively short in duration, so the files at least aren't huge. The ones I have watched are nice and clear.
It just seems to be trying to be too many different things. Like the old saying, jack of all trades, master of none. I thought for sure there was going to be something kinky in the Girls Love Sex series since some of the titles go into bondage subjects, but it was just the model talking about bondage.
I was expecting something groundbreaking, but I hate saying this, two women or three women being passionate with each other isn't new. The top Euro sites (21Sextury, DDF, Viv Thomas, Sapphic Erotica) have been filming passionate girl/girl scenes and solo scenes for years. This leaves Sex Art with less than 20 of the more rare, but not unheard of passionate boy/girl scenes. These scenes make up 1/5 of their current total videos. Is it possible that Met overhyped this site and built too high of expectations? Sure.
I have 4 close female friends, who are open to porn, but they say they despise the very hardcore scenes on many sites. After watching a few of the scenes from Sex Art, they all, not one, but all four said something to the effect of "It's too soft". I was just making sure I wasn't being a pig. A few of the scenes are really good.
I have no idea why the solo scenes are on here. The models on here aren't noted as top solo models, though Malena Morgan does a good job in her scenes. I don't know, maybe they should consider older female models? I don't remember 18-22 year old girls being very sensual. I also think they could work on the male talent. The most recent male is so effeminate, I had to look at the pictures to make sure it wasn't another girl/girl scene. You're not reinventing the wheel by having obviously sensitive, passionate people have sensitive, passionate sex.
I'll try it again in a year or two and give the 80 as a benefit of the doubt since it's Met, but also notice the numbers, the amount of no longer updating sections and decide if the photos and small amount of boy/girl scenes are enough to warrant a subscription.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
No other site has this huge amount of videos.
Still better/easier navigation - it's plain simple. (not including search)
Nice price.
Custom-clips for downloading shorter previews
A lot of different categories
Ok download-speed
Fine daily updates
DL-manager allowed
Great latin-material
Cons:
Search-machine stinks - search for A and you get B.
Old videos market as new
Too many anal-videos
Quality varies too much
Not much difference in video-quality if you choose the higher price
Too many videos put in here are the ones you can buy for $1
'No personality' - all in here seems pretty 'impersonal'
Pornstar-search is almost useless - see below
Bottom Line:
Most PUs have been at this site several times - and we go back again and again, why?
Maybe because VideoBox has that endless amount of clips where you can hope to find those really special ones.
BUT - most of the times you get dissapointed - mainly because the motherload here consists on DVDs or videos that are for sale at any low-price porndealer out there... but here you get it at home - for - yes, still: a low price.
I do not expect to find the top-material here - but ok, maybe 1 out of a hundred, you still catch up with great videos - after a loooooong search.
Some damn fine latinas are my latest - see Marcellinha Moraes in 'Full Service Fucking' - for one.
And you can get lucky to find some fine videos of some favorites - Get lucky?
Yes, because the search-machine is horrible - for both categories and pornstars:
Categories: Search for Blondes - and you get hundreds of everything else, search for masturbation - and you get hundreds of Gonzos.
Pornstars: They got a major problem here - hire some PU - and it will get them much better help about the right names - AND the right scenes - ok, out of over 64000 videos, it's got to be a job - but still: You find too many models under wrong names - and the same model with up to four different names.
Still VideoBox has its force - when you get fed up with the same deal at more special sites, you can just go browsing and browsing and browsing here.
BUT: Major bottomline is still the lack of top-quality videos - they are too rare here - no matter to which price you choose to join.
The 85-score goes mostly to the vast amount and the - sometimes - joy of an almost endless search (without the search-machine of VideoBox) you got to choose you own speciel way here...
Gave it a 95 in an earlier review - but times are changing and the main cons are that VideoBox does NOT keep up in viewing quality for most videos...
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Sweet TBP/PU rate of $20 to join, eventually dropping to $10 month for ongoing membership
+ Thousands (maybe even 10k) of scenes
+ 25 sites network initially, expands to about 41 after a month
+ Good navigation and the search engine looks amazing and goes across the whole network
+ No DRM and no DL limits
+ Newest vids on the flagship sites (PixandVideo, Club Sandy, etc.) go up to 1900x1080
+ All pic sets have zips
+ Professional effects, lighting and photography on the flagship sites
+ Clearly marked updates
+ No cross sales or advertising
+ Lots of hot euro babes
+ Wide variety of content with multiple daily updates across the network
+ Archive going back to 2003 on the oldest sites; all exclusive content on the flagship sites
Cons:
- For the first month, only SweetSophieMoone, AssholeFever, PixandVideo, ClubSandy, LezCuties, FootsieBabes and BlueAngelLive have anything great to offer. (I refer to these below as the Flagship Sites)
- Scenes aren't tagged real well so the awesome looking search engine can leave stuff out.
- Broken links on some photos and preview thumbs (click the "x", it's probably there) and I got a few bad video downloads.
- DL speeds not so hot (mostly 120 to 500 kps, the more channels I have going the faster it seems to go for me).
- Pic sizes are obsolete for the level of quality they otherwise offer.
- Zips and movie files are not labeled well.
Bottom Line:
I used to love the individual sites but rarely joined in the past because of price. With the sweet PU/TBP deal, I couldn't resist and will probably stay a member for many months, damn near a first for me. Here's the low down:
PICS: All scenes have zip but all pic sizes are limited to 1280x850. WTF? The flagship sites here scream quality but they're still launching 20th century quality with their pic sizes. Most scenes have 100 to 160 pics. Also, when viewing pics individually the horizontal slide bar doesn't automatically appear on landscape shots (again, why?). Once you get past the Flagships, the pics are few and far between but there is plenty to keep you going with the big 6 sites.
VIDS: Awesome size on the newest vids. Most of the stuff within the last few years maxes out at 1280. The oldest content and a lot of the content outside the flagship sites peaks at 640 or even 460. You do get 10 screen caps minimum to see what you're getting. You can DL full scenes or scenes. In browser stream is an option and works well. On the most recent content, you usually have 3 download options, only 1 or 2 on the older. Full scene file sizes range from about 40 mb (low quality) to 2 gigs (best quality). DL speed is an issue as I noted above.
SEARCH: There is a 25 filter search system which looks awesome. As noted, the problem lies in the lack of adequate tags. Thus, the system sort of defeats itself and you're better off just going through the sites you like one by one. There is a central model directory which appears complete but no model bio's are given.
As for "the rest": Some sites have lots of dead links for pics and the like. Just click them, they usually bring something up but it's annoying and a pretty basic problem to overcome. If you liked the old calendar version of the site, the new set up takes a little getting used to. However, after a few days I found it much easier to use, especially on a network this size and found they had lots of options for customizing. It didn't take more than a few clicks to go and get what I wanted.
A big issue for me is why are they adding all this content beyond the flagship sites for the first month. It's obviously 3rd party produced and the models and production values just aren't up to 21stSextury snuff. Apparently they feel the need to keep up with Brazzers or NewSensations and add a bunch of sites to pump up the numbers and add "new" sites with overlapping content. My advice is to keep your standards up and focus on the good sites you already had. I'll take quality over quantity ... especially if you boost your pic sizes.
Lastly, despite the many negatives I pointed out, I'm still scoring this one a "91" simply because of the volume of content on even just the flagship sites, the hot babes and hot videos. With more sites coming to me soon, it can only get better. Well worth a join even if it leaves this picture fan a bit miffed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- about 130 videos and a new one every Tuesday evening. Unfortunately the videos are all different sizes, quality and can either be mpg or wmv, some of them only one or the other.
- some seriously hot girls. Look through the tour to see some very cute girls, and if you look on the porn tubes you can usually find one or two previews to his videos (only the highlights, for the good stuff you have to join)
- the scenes seem very unscripted, it's just a dude with a camera and a girl. Which means that sometime he runs around setting stuff up or he chats with the girl while she lubes herself, if you like that kind of real, pierre woodman-like stuff that you'll love this site. If you prefer perfect light, professional zoom-ins and generally more mainstream stuff, this might put you off. On the other hand seeing a girl hold a camera and then seeing how it shakes as she cums (and either they are incredible actors or they really cum) makes this site very unique.
Cons:
- Download speeds can be slow at times. I got anywhere from 50kb to 900, no clue why or how.
- Whole site is very amateur-ish, just like the content. There is one video were he even says he accidentally forgot to turn on one camera so we just get one angle. I thought it was funny, but other people might feel cheated out.
-Some girls only do solo (only one or two, but still a tag system would have been nice) Unfortunately the site has no search and the descriptions are not always very clear. I remember for one girl he says he can't believe she does anal, well she doesn't :)
-Some girls are not first time on video. Nicole Ray and Chastity are both professional models and I bet a few more of the girls are too, kinda shame really since the amateurs are so much cutter. There is one read head soccer mom who tries anal and her scene is incredibility hot.
- No photos, really a shame.
- No bonus sites. I understand a year or two back the site came in a package, no more
Bottom Line:
This site has two very big bonuses going for it. Hot amateur girls. Many of the models are truly shy and a bit uncomfortable and it shows, also the guy is not a huge douche like other porn models. I think I mentioned this before but he closely resembles Pierre Woodman, he is there to convince these girls to have sex on camera, but he won't abuse them more than they want to be abused and that makes the whole video a lot more enjoyable. Going back to that hot read-head soccer mom I mentioned before, she tries anal and is clearly uncomfortable and he immediately stops the scene instead of pushing it. The whole moment along with the look on her face lets you know this is real, unscripted sex, but with much better camera work than a truly amateur scene.
Oh and there is also the twitter, which the guy uses to posts future interviews and ask for feedback, very nice usage of the web 2.0 media.
Unfortunately, here is where the good things stop and I have to mention the very plain site design, the lack of bonus features, the lack of a decent search button and the fact that we don't get photo-sets. For the same price I pay here I can get a Nubiles or Little Mutt subscription and get three times the content. It's true those sites don't have the interviews and the whole "real" setting, but then again you can join woodmanX and get similar content and a lot more of it (then again woodman is more expensive and not all scenes are in English).
So, the bottom line? I love the site, but I can see how many people wouldn't feel the same way. It lacks in features and if you don't LOVE the pov, interview, reality kinda videos these will leave you feeling a bit cheated. I for one will download a bunch of the videos and probably join back in a year or so for the updates, in the mean time I am following the twitter feed and will enjoy that incredibly hot read-head (did I mention here already ? I feel like I did :).
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Tons of content.
Generally good video and image quality.
New ultra high quality videos are awesome.
Same-old, same-old. Obviously, that's not why I'm here.
Cons:
This site has absolutely the most ATROCIOUS navigation ever conjured up on any web site I have ever experienced.
The ATROCIOUS navigation truly makes it appear that the site has been designed to PREVENT you from accessing the content you are paying for.
In the end, the ATROCIOUS navigation truly PREVENTS you from getting decent value for your money.
Finally, a lot of the content was too "kinky" for my tastes -- if you prefer more "conventional" stuff, spend your money elsewhere.
Bottom Line:
I'm actually in my last couple of months of a year-long subscription to the whole 21Sextury site, but this is the main part of it, so that's what I'll review.
The problem, very simply, is that when you hit the "back" button to go back to where you were, so you can resume working through the models or the dates or whatever you're trying to work through, it doesn't "go back" -- it "goes back to the beginning."
So, there are 2,423 models. 51 pages of them. And every time you hit the back button, you're back to the beginning, starting with the letter "A." Actually, it's not even that easy -- it defaults to the "highest rated" models, so you have to change it back to "alphabetical," and start from the letter "A" again. And so on. Same kind of thing if you try to work through dates, or whatever.
So, you get to a set, download what you want from it, then you spend a half-hour trying to navigate back to where you were, so you can get the next set. And so on.
Yes, there are lots of filters and such that help a bit, but having to "navigate back to where you were from scratch" every time just makes this the most frustrating web site I have ever experienced.
What kind of FREAKING ASSHOLE designs a web site like this??
Even worse, you can't even make your own bookmarks to keep track of where you were -- oh, you can set them, but they won't work the next time you log in. Every single bit of the navigation appears to be designed to PREVENT you from accessing the content you're paying for.
So, if you just want to pay for one month and snag the newest high-definition stuff, by all means go ahead. But if you want to comprehensively go through the site, expect the site's design to prevent you from making much progress.
There are other sites that actually HELP you get the content you want. They provide ALL of their content in an easy-to-access format. They DESERVE your money. But it's completely the opposite for this one. Spend your money on a site that doesn't make you want to toss your computer out the window, just out of the sheer frustration of trying to navigate from one set to another.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Hundreds of models.
-Few fake tits.
-The men keep their mouths shut (No 'You like that prick, huh baby" Or 'Yeah, suck that nut sack')
-Lots of updates
-Near-flawless production values.
Cons:
-Eighty-five or ninety percent of 'Hot Legs and Feet' is devoted to feet.
-'SexVideoCasting' has no vids. When the word 'video' appears in a site's name, I assume there's more than photos to download.
-DDF Network sports roughly the same number of Black/Asian/Hispanic women you'd expect to see at a Idaho gun show or on a roster of Vermont GOP members.
-Many older scenes are spread over 10 to 14 clips.
Bottom Line:
-A major disappointment considering the stellar reviews others have posted.
My machine's AVG warned that Handsonhardcore is riddled with spy ware and phishing.
-Clicking on the vid tab of older scenes at EuroGirlsOnGirls leads to SapphicErotic which is not a member of the DDF Network. That's an unacceptable crock of bait and switch. Examples? Scenes involving Nelly, Adela U. and Layla.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of different models, and plenty of content
Contains both pictures and movies
Ladies seem enthuisiastic and into the scenes
No DRM and decent download speeds
Regular updates and exclusive content
Excellent support desk
Cons:
2 gig download limit per 24 hours
Picture quality "grainy"
Movie quality wildly varies from scene to scene
Far too many movies are oral only
Searching by model brings up the guys as well, I don't want to look at the male performers
Bonus sites a waste of time
Bottom Line:
This is a site that could be great, but falls way short. The picture and movie quality just isn't good enough, the updates aren't steamy or original enough to grab your attention for long, certainly not beyond the original 30 days. The download restriction is annoying, but not as annoying as I thought it would be, simply because I didn't find enough I wanted to download.
On a more positive note, the content is exclusive, and a number of the models are attractive, and caters for all body types and tastes. Download speeds are reasonable, and the support team clearly give a damn about their customers, which makes me feel bad about not scoring this site higher, but I just can't see how I can rate the quality of the content any higher than this
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Exclusive pics and vids
+Occasionally large pics option at 1800px from Nov 2005; from then, this size gradually becomes the norm for large over a few months
+SC and HC pics and vids (more often SC)
+Close to 450 different models now, often HOT
+Improved navigation (see below)
+Many ways to browse and access archives by date or model name or type
+Full length videos in mpg, and sometimes avi and or wmv; or segments that show preview screencap on mouseover
Cons:
-Four to ten "full sized" pics in the 2-3000px range for many models, but why just those?
-Video segments only in mpg
-Videos OK on 1024x768 monitor, but not HiDef great
-Occasionally unappealing models
-Sometimes photos are too bright, too dark, or overly compressed
Bottom Line:
The site has recently undergone a "remodeling job," resulting in better navigation and access to content. Points 1 and 2 in my "Nubiles Quibbles" comments here have been addressed! As for point 3, I haven't hit a bad link in the 2 or so months of update catch-ups I've been doing.
You can now download all small (apprx 1200px) or large (1800px) zips or individual pics straight from gallery pages. They also let you rate the gallery right there while you're in it. And what's more, they've added this feature to EVERY gallery, going right back to their beginnings in March 2004 (at which time, of course, they didn't yet have the larger pics).
Obviously, their webmasters know how to recode masses of pages efficiently, and my hat's off to them.
What's more, the first page a member gets to now displays 10 coming updates followed by 20 current updates and then the 50 most recent models. I do wish they'd put the current updates first, as it's what you'd expect. Still, it's a major improvement over what it was before.
Go further into the site for all of the archives, which are organized in a variety of ways (model names, by yr/month, etc.)
There's also a page of thumbs for the next 80+ coming updates (currently, that's to Sept. 7!)
What the site still needs are better quality & larger images & vids. Why not have 3000 px images as a standard size option instead of just a handful of such pics of each model, none of which are all that special anyway?
Follow-Up:
Just want to add: From the visitor's home page, clicking "updates" leads to ALL of the updates for this site, so you really get a great idea of what's there and some of what's coming. This is an excellent feature that I somehow missed before. Wish every site did this.
Bad news: Toys! Sybians! Vibrators! From the past month, only ONE photoset interested me. I can't see why they are taking this overly worn path. I'm reducing the score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
09-26-0810:31am (Update History) Reason: Eight of the bonus sites no longer update. Main reason for downgrading: I am being flooded with Spam since I subscribed to this site.
Pros:
Site sticks strictly to its niche. Plenty of real grandmas who look the part, each having at least one high quality picture set (1280x857) zipped and one very high quality video just short of HD.
Recent videos are primarily in wmv format and can be downloaded in whole in a zip file or in segments.
No DRM protection.
Download speed is fast at 1.2 MB/s.
Lusty Grandmas is part of a network. With the first month's subscription 34 other sites are now included catering to every taste. The number of bonus sites will be increased by two every additional month one subscribes while the price drops from $ 29,95 to $ 24.95 after the first month. Both are offered as a loyalty bonus. In addition two HD sites are promised down the road if one stays with Lusty Grandmas.
Amazingly enough in the light of past, bad experiences, the 34 bonus sites one receives seem to be of high quality (no time to test all) with lots of good material and not just low grade fillers to make the network look good.
Cons:
The picture sets basically repeat what's on the video. They are of excellent quality but it would still be nice to have a picture set that is different from the video.
Updates come daily but I have problems with them coming in segments over a period of time. It amounts more to one update a week than a daily one, but with so many sites to pick from one never gets bored waiting for the next segment so that's a smallish "con."
Video scenarios are a bit repetitive and hard to understand at times because many of the models are Eastern Europeans whose English is not very good. Some videos even use interpreters.
That dratted security sign-in! Yep, the one that's so hard to make out in most places.
Epoch handles the subscription, which is good, but beware of a pre-checked free trial offer to another site when you sign up. You may not want it!
Bottom Line:
In my efforts to get away from the perfect, powdered or oiled, fake breasted Barbies I strayed into new and unfamiliar territory but I must say that I like it because it is so dramatically different.
The models of Lusty Grandmas are not glamorous, they are not MILFs but rather the mothers of MILFs, most could not be called beautiful by any stretch of the imagination, but I like them .. a lot .. and for those of you who like glamor and glitz and nubile, you can always ignore this site and enjoy the other thirty_four.
There is a wealth of good material in them with at least a couple of sites to suit your taste.
This "mother" or should I say "grandmother" site makes it easy to sample some of the material. Go, have a look at the quality of the videos and pictures for yourself as you take their tour.
What you see is pretty well what you'll get in all (most? because I haven't looked at them all) of the sites when it comes to quality.
Another big plus I couldn't fit in above is the fact that no other sign-in but the first is required to cruise this net of sites.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Obviously there is great quality to be had here at Nubiles. A large amount of HD content of predominantly petite amateurs can be found in both the videos (1280x720) and photos.
No drm, no DL limits, the site is a breeze to navigate
Lots of download options. Photos can be downloaded at three different sizes. The vids are offered at a few different sizes also.
Nubiles offers the unique option of downloading photos based on certain niches. For instance: At the bottom of each models page you can download photos sets that just focus on the ass, face, tits, etc. This didn’t really appeal to me but it’s creative and unique. It also shows how the creators are working hard to provide a quality site!
Cons:
I was disappointed in the lack of diversity/variety of models here. No Asian or ebony models to be found. It’s not as though the models are ugly they’re just all very similar young petite amateur euro and American girls. As a result I lost interest after a week :(
Everything is filmed on a couch or a bed. The model gets interviewed then masturbates or the model does an interview then does light hardcore. Kind of boring.
The photo galleries while great in quality are even less exciting than the videos here. I think this loss of excitement all stems from the models being the same generic type. I felt like I was looking at the same girl wearing the same thing every time.
Bottom Line:
Don’t get me wrong this site is great for fulfilling that everyman’s fantasy of seeing that cute girl next door type just going for it. If that’s what you’re into you won’t be disappointed.
The problem here was a general lack of variety and excitement. A lot of TBP users compare this site to FTV and I have to say FTV does a better job addressing these two issues. Instead of interviewing the girl in a generic studio setting why not interview her outside in public where she can flash or do something to generate excitement? It's just funner that way.
I realize this is not my niche but I also see some room for improvement. Either I’m getting burnt out on porn or having the same type of girl do the same thing on camera every time is just plain boring! I hope it’s the latter!!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Best TEEN site on the web currently!
Excellent for fans cute teen girls getting abused with raw sex.
A lot of deep throat face fucking.
Super hot ANAL penetration of cute teen girl looking pained and screaming.
VERY exciting and pleasing to watch.
Cons:
No zip files
No high rez pictures
No daily updates
Bottom Line:
Fantastic site! No fake acting. Just great if you like the look of a cute teen girl face, down on her knees getting rammed in the ass. The most satisfying ring of sites I have come across. JUST GREAT -a shame that there is not hundreds of sites like this
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
10-05-0908:33am (Update History) Reason: Joined the site again, and looked at the updates. Big improvement
Pros:
FIRST OF ALL this is a very subjective review so keep that in mind as I list my pros and cons for this site.
-nice young looking teenagers (barely legal but all are 18 as far as I could tell) I think the quality of the girls (cute faces, petite) increased significantly.
-nice navigation+ easy downloading
-large amount of content
-a lot of info about the models helping you know them
-members board
- a lot of options for leaving feedback. The webmasters really care about your opinion.
- much more hardcore than before (my main con argument is slowly proving to be a mute point)
Cons:
- there are teens who do hardcore and teens who do softcore and rarely do the two mix. Which means that instead of watching a girl go from solo shots to anal or, something hard like that, you get some newcomers who only do the hard and the cute teens who only do solo and toy scenes. This makes the site actually feel like two different sites, one with good looking solo cute teens and one with random hardcore girls.
Out of the top ten rated girls only four have sex, but wait the four are actually two girls placed in the top rated twice. Which brings me to the website owners attitude. I feel like they are trying to cheat us their approach is just to bring in more hardcore girls instead of getting the cutter teens to do the hardcore and the softcore...
This attitude makes me wish they had made two sites but instead they chose to make one single site that brags it has teens doing both softcore and hardcore.
Bottom Line:
EDIT: I re-joined this site recently and felt I simply HAD to re-view my review. I tried to leave as much of the original review there (the opinion below is from before joining the site again) but damn this site improved a lot since I last visited it. The girls were hot back then, they are awesome now and so many of them do hardcore as well as softcore. Thank you! That was exactly what I wanted from this site a progression of teens going through all the stages from stripping to hardcore. Thank you! This site is a must on my list now. Keep up the good work guys.
I am a fan of hardcore teen porn and I felt cheated by the Nublies team and I disliked their approach to the website as well as the direction they were taking the project. I expected the girls they highlight to go all the way in a nice progression.
If you can look past the difference in hardcore and softcore models the website has a nice, big collection of photos and videos. But if you like hardcore I'd recommend other teen sites before this one, to be honest.
The models are very cute and sexy girls - all in the 18 - 22 age range, the vast majority being 18-20. Both American and East European girls are heavily represented, with an occasional Latina and Canadian.
Very large selection of very hot videos and photos sets - with 3 new models weekly. At least one does hardcore, with the other two doing masturbation scenes or playing with toys.
Nubiles.net is the easiest and most viewer-friendly site.
Everything loads very quickly, the videos and photosets download rapidly and in high quality.
Search features such as the photographic and alphabetic directories of the models make it wonderfully easy to search and navigate. And the search capability by various model characteristics and video/photo features is the easiest and fastest I have come across.
Large amount of content of photos and videos of girls on the site to search and enjoy.
Cons:
For those wishing a great deal of hardcore, the site only adds one new hardcore model per week.
Bottom Line:
I have yet to find another site with so many quality updates per week, very cute and hot models, and with such excellent viewer-friendly and navigation features.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge Library Of Videos
NO DRM
Top Notch Streaming
Categorized Into Decades
Beginning To Digitally Restore Films
Screencap Previews
Cons:
Not All Vids Have Download Option*
Some Vid Labeling Erroneous
Photos Are Mostly Screencaps
Some Films Are Silent
Bottom Line:
This is a difficult site to grade because with the problems mentioned, it has a ton of very hard to get material. The material (meaning video/film) covers the whole 20th Century. Up to the 1940s, the offerings are sparse, but after that increase greatly in volume. Something like 7500 films all told. These are all derived from the mammoth "Blue Vanities" collection, that you may remember from video stores. (By the way, if you go to the Blue Vanities review here, it just redirects to this site).
The 1970s section to me is the most impressive. You have all the "Swedish Erotica" series, "Diamond", "Pretty Girls", "Dirty Movies", "Diverse Industries", "Screw", "Playmate", "Lasse Braun", "Collection", "Pleasure", and a whole lot more. Back in the day, this stuff cost a fortune, if you had a projector. Back then they were released as silents. Soundtracks have been added here (but not all of them). You will only hear the soundtrack after you download---the streaming versions have generic soundtracks, or even a projector sound no doubt because of the copyright infringements! There are so many of these loops, shorts, and stags that a month hardly scratches the surface.
There are problems however. A lot of the videos are streaming only. I solved this easily by downloading them with the latest RealPlayer, and then converting to another format. A bit time consuming, but worth the effort. Another problem I encountered was mislabeled films. Sometimes the film will have the title in the film, so you can label it that way.
The streams here for me have been flawless. A good way to preview what you want to download. The videos are DRM free. Download speed is average (ie:500 kb/s). They are offered in MPEG, with 2 different sizes: 720x480; 320x240. they do not label their video with technical detail. They have a page where digitally restored films are available. Obviously this is a slow process; as of this writing they have 41 done. Look great though. Forget the photo section---pretty much all screencaps.
Updating has slowed down recently, haven't seen one in 3 weeks. Maybe they're on vacation or something. They claim to still be processing the videos to get them online, which is probably true.
I give this site a high score chiefly because of the incredible hard to find content. If you're looking for that cheap porno thrill---move on, you won't like it. If you are a collector of vintage porn, this is the mother lode.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM
-No download limit
-No site timeout
-Exclusive content for about 1/2 of the sites in the network.
-Exclusive content for the teenstarsonly site.
-File download options:
hi, medium, low quality WMV
MP4 ( Portable Devices )
MOV ( Quicktime Video )
-Zip files for the photosets
Cons:
-Limited search options: Can search by name of model, or by date of update. But can't search by description of model, by description of type of sex action.
-Clumsy navigation.
-Going from one of the network sites to another is clumsy.
-Trying to see/search the vid files on a site is clumsy.
-Advertising for other sites on each page.
-Poor file names. Files are named with a number and the suffix "high", "medium", or "low", depending on whether you download the high, medium or low quality file. But if you want to know who the model is, or a short description of the action, you have to manually make up your own file record.
-You need a fast connection to play the flash files. My ISP connection downloads at 150-160 Kb/s, so I could not play the videos by flash. The flash video would stutter and stop, stutter and stop. So to see what the video was like, I had to download the entire video, then play the file.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
-Because I have a slow ISP connection (150-160 Kb/s download speed), it takes almost 2 hours to download a single video in high quality.
-The video files are fairly large size:
One sample movie, 25 minutes runtime:
Full Movie ( High Quality ) - ( 989.56 Mb)
Full Movie ( Medium Quality ) - (500.93 Mb)
Full Movie ( Low Quality ) - (301.81 Mb)
Bottom Line:
Hardcore teen site. Mainly a video site. There is a large photoset for each video, but there is little to no erotic or artistic quality to the
photos, they are more like video captures of the hardcore action. The models can be very attractive: they are young, slender, Eastern European teens, but you can't easily see how attractive they are, it's goddamn hard to see what the faces of these girls are like: the head is often cut out of the picture, the body, even though young, slender and attractive, is not made to look attractive. It's gonzo video and gonzo photography, and there's no erotic value to the photos, little erotic value to the videos, which are hardcore meat factory fuck and suck.
Site is part of a nice-sized network. This site hasn't updated since March 2010, but other sites in the network are updating.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through vxsbill.com. I don't think I ever used them before, but cancelling was easy.
-Video choices are streaming, downloading the whole video or as clips.
-The videos are available as WMV 720x540, 2160 kbps. Not bad, but not HD either.
-A photo set for each video. Not screencaps.
-Photos are about 2000x1333.
-Comes as part of a network of 14 sites, five focus on anal or have a significant amount of it.
Cons:
-The site stopped updating. The last one was 4/30/2009.
-Only 35 videos and photosets.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable.
-Very thin models. Mostly very plain.
-Not much enthusiasm.
-The actual deed is about three minutes of a fifteen minute video. Sometimes they do as little as one minute.
Bottom Line:
The name of the site is a play on words concerning rim jobs, aka salad tossing or analingus. A recent PU poll showed about half personally would never do this, but about a third said they do. I personally would not, but as a kinky fantasy, I find it very erotic. Too bad the poll did not cover that.
If you like rim jobs on video, this site has that, but is not the best by any stretch of the imagination.
The biggest negative is that the site is not updating. Presently there are 35 videos and the most recent is from April of 2009.
The other big negative is that there just isn't enough ass licking on the site. The models seem to do as little as possible. The videos are about fifteen minutes long and the time spent on this ranges from one to maybe four minutes. They rarely seem to show any interest. Believe me, there are several better sites in this niche. There are only a few sites that this can be compared to, about five that focus on it that I know of, and this is the weakest.
These are Eastern European models and that may be the difference, as most sites that I have seen have American models who probably are acting. However, I will take transparently fake enthusiasm over bored going through the motions just to get it over with any day. I appreciate some admitted pretense of interest while performing in my fantasy.
The sex that you do see on the site is a bit of cock sucking in the beginning, almost always anal at some point and some vaginal. Most scenes end with a facial cumshot.I don't recognize any of the faces as well known Eastern European pornstars.
As part of a network it is just ok, but don't join for this site.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Updated:
08-08-1108:00am (Update History) Reason: just thought more relavent info would help.
Pros:
+ Content added daily
+ Video download & Mobile streaming quality can be as high as 720p/MP4 (HD)
+ Streaming quality as high as 540P (Web HD)
+ Large catalog of content
+ Broad range niches
+ Large number of top notch directors
+ 1,072 photo sets available(as of this review)
+ High Value cost through Porn Users
+ Good download & streaming speed
+ A few times a year they have a bonus day where multiple titles are added
Cons:
- Slack online management as in:
- Has "Add Your Comment" link but they NEVER add a comment (have made many personally).
- scene descriptions have "Starring", "Category" & "Director" which on older content is sorely missing or mislabeled.
- MANY older EA titles missing
- Older content isn't HD
- Only 2 formats - wmv & mp4
- My personal bone is the use of the descriptor "deepthroat" on some directors' scenes which do NOT measure to the accepted standard of the word as popularly defined by Ms. Linda Lovalace. To bang the top of the throat because she can't get it further down, due to either her gag reflexes or the size of the instrument (or receptacle), is NOT deep throating. Maybe throat gagging or throat banging but NOT deep throating. Capice?
Bottom Line:
This site has a lot of directors (and their fetishes) from Jay Sin's extreme evil anal (lots of anal on this site) to Jonni Darlko's deepthroat extravaganzas. Yes it does have some kink factor niches, like Joey Silvera's she/male obsession or Belladonna catering to the foot crowd. Plenty of girl/girl, gang bang, anal excretions (no skat), rough sex and Euro romping. Other notable directors include John Stagliano (Buttman), Rocco Siffredi, Jake Malone, Manuel Ferrara, Nacho Vidal, Mike Adriano and, while her titles have not appeared on the site yet, the newly added porn feminist director/actor Bobbi Starr.
One of the things I especially like about some of the directors is their accessibility in interacting with their fans and taking suggestions from them to create new projects (notably Jonni Darkko). [One such example was the inclusion of Rebecca Blue in TF3 when suggested by fans on another (un-named) forum].
Once a member, they will offer you access to Live Shows - and while I have never taken them up on this, I believe some of it to be free and others an extra $ item.
While other people want more for their $10, at a 1/3 the cost of a regular membership, I personally think it's a bargain able to fill the fetish needs of any reasonable person. In looking at their published numbers, they have 4,915 "straight porn" scenes (as of 8/8/2011) and 296 "shemale/tranny" scenes (about 5% of the total scenes available).
One would find that it takes six months or longer for most of the new EA releases to make it from DVD purchase to scene download. For instance, J.Darkko released Suck Balls 11/19/4 2010 but the first scene doesn't appear for download until 8/11/2011.
I recommend it highly which would really give it a 90 but for some reason doesn't seem inline with other reviewers numbers.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
