Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 620 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Wow Girls

26. Wow Girls (4)

Pay
Active
91
elephant (65) 02-09-13  12:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (50), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some very quality shot porn, highest quality seen anywhere with directors being superb on occasion.

Great choices of downloads, no complaints there, they give you choices and not too sill like over 3 gb like you see on some sites which was good to see.

Great photography, not really my bag but with models like Gloria and Stasha, gonna have to see more of these amazing girls.

Easy navigation on the sites and done very modernly.
Cons: Not enough anal scenes for my liking.

Too many toys, would prefer never to see a toy again in a porn video.

Would of liked more group hardcore scenes.

I'm a movie man so don't quite understand having a girl like Stasha come in and only do a photo set of her when she is even more amazing on film, at least offer both would be nice.
Bottom Line: I liked the site don't get me wrong and I'm just saying my preferences in making it even better would be.

Ok first off my fav niche of all is BGG and even better if both girls are also doing anal, this is the ultimate in porn but sadly rare on sites, I dream of a site that just did threesomes with girls like this, doesn't matter if its GBB but I prefer two girls with a guy. Then foursomes are also good. So would of loved more.

More anal one on one scenes. (my second fav)
Lesbian scenes, when done right bloody damn amazing, the Britney and Zoe movies should be a blueprint on erotic lesbian movies the first girl date could and should win lesbian erotica awards, I don't say that lihtly either, both girls are as yummy as you can get and shot to perfection and really beating most lesbian only studios, I love slow, lots of kissing, perfect girls, great camera work. Some scenes I found too many toys, hate toys in my lesbian porn and would of also loved some ass licking in some of the scenes. Some scenes didn't even have pussy licking, which to me I found a little boring I ave to say, watching two girls masturbate with dildos seems a waste of hiring them in my eyes. But then there are scenes like Margot and Millagres and The lesbian scenes in with Gloria, that just tickle my softer lesbian palette.

Solo stuff too, would love much less toy work, love to the see the girls flirt with the camera more like Stasha ,Gloria and Jasmin can do. Stasha in one scene with the bath (sadly no more than two scenes which was painful to find out as she is probably top 5 hottest girl alive) I also have Gloria in there too, who is a natural beauty and doesn't need loads of makeup to look stunning. Anyway back to Stasha, she is looking over top of the camera and flirting down into the camera, such a unique and perfect angle I've never seen done, would of been great to see her or more scene like this with them even kissing the camera, would make for an awesome movie. I also would love to see some dancing to music and doing some naked dancing, its very hot to watch and not many sites have discovered it, not like strippers more fun in a room in the home and have them flirting with the camera, if they are good dancers it can really be amazing eye feast.

I guess the wow porn will grow which I look forward and not going to diss it too much cause it is a new site so doesn't have hundreds of movies yet.

So overall not bad and well worth the money of the deal I got, no complaints. I would join again but looking forward to joining next 18 only girls and if I read right the new network membership coming back this weekend or next, sounds great and I think its awesome if its going to happen, I would for sure be joining back there.

I'm giving it such a high mark cause seen some absolute gems of movies that would be worth the joining fee alone.

Still its probably never going please me fully cause it is more for the softcore fans so could go any higher.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Explicite Art

27. Explicite Art (2)

Pay
Newbie
60*
orgasmation (0) 03-07-10  05:51am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: The videos are available in several formats at good resolutions - no fuzzy edges or blurring. The performers are generally good-looking. Download speeds are generally good.
Cons: On several occasions the site was unavailable or key features of sign-in or download did not work. There was no response from site management to my repeated concerns.
The camerawork can obtrusive and offputting, and emphasizes the feeling that it is all staged.
Last - and maybe a matter of personal taste - very much a French site. I can't get excited about a guy named Titof, or a video named Youplaboum... and in these minimalist times, I prefer girls with visibly pussies, not Afro-style growths between their legs.
Bottom Line: If you like girls with funny names, overgrown pussies, and oversized cameras, go for it. I decided not to renew my subscription because the site owners were not concerned about performance issues.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Digital Desire

28. Digital Desire (1)

Pay
Active
88
IKnoPorn (22) 07-02-08  09:53pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Alot of models, most are extremely hot 9's-10's
+ Among the best solo video content on the web
+ Huge amount of content
+ No DRM
+ High quality images and videos
+ Easy to navigate, alphabetical model index is well organized
+ Only $18 until October 1
Cons: - Too many confusing categories: Dreamgirls, Dreamheat, Creamgirls, Raw Heat, Girlz-on-Girlz, Toi Story, Seasonal Spotlight, ????
- Photo sets tend to be split across categories
- Different mixes of the same video: a very softcore version as well as an "Extreme" version
- Some women look bored or overly posed in the photo sets
- Alot of makeup and airbrushing
Bottom Line: Stephen Hicks has set many standards for photography, and this site illustrates the reasons why. Extremely beautiful, almost surrealistic women perform for your enjoyment. I won't belabor this point, if you haven't checked the site out and you're a glamour or solo model fan, then this site is a must see, for at least 1 month.

Also old news is that this site has dropped the DRM, which is a huge improvement.

Where the site falls apart in a bad way is with the categories and the division of content. The category names I listed above are real (believe it or not) and it is difficult to tell which is which. Perhaps these are just artifacts of when the site was split into an "extreme" section that used to cost extra, and the "normal" (read: softcore) section. What makes no sense at all is with all of the closeups of lubed up women, many of which you can find in the "normal" section, I do not understand why similar content is split off into "extreme" - which often just has more closeups or more "spread-eagle" shots. Don't get me wrong, the photos are hot, but the split up of photo sets and videos into the different confusing categories gets tiresome fast.

However, if you're willing to put up with the categories, and stick to the model index, you can find some excellent content, you just have to piece together the photo sets on your own. Also, the "extreme" solo videos are among the best I've seen.

Bottom line: Very hot solo models, tedious categories.

UPDATE: No major changes to my comments, but a score increase from 84 to 88, and also for continuing to offer the $18/month deal. Compared with other glamour sites, this is one of the best, in spite of the crazy categories.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Digital Desire

29. Digital Desire (1)

Pay
Newbie
79*
Hooliganzo (4) 11-30-12  10:46pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-01-12  02:09am  (Update History)
Reason: Ran into another con.
Pros: -2000x3000 resolution on latest photo sets
-Around 720 of those photosets are 3000px.
-Around 540 720p videos
-Interview videos
-updates once a day video every 5th update.
-Low price
Cons: -Older sets 1600x1024 or under.
-Around 1900 of the photosets are 1600px or under.
-Around 500 videos are 420p.
-Videos have music.
-Majority of pictures are in the outdoors with natural lighting which I'm not a fan of but is personal taste
-Video links expire when using download manager. Makes downloading videos exponentially time consuming.
Bottom Line: Based on the latest 3000px photos, technically the photo sets are well shot and composed. Personally I'm not a fan of the lighting. Most photosets are outdoors and most of the indoor sets have natural lighting from outside through the window. This might be a plus for some but for me it is not my style. I prefer the controlled lighting and indoor scenes.

Based on the latest 720p videos, the videos have a hazy dream sequence look to them. The videos have a music track to them. Both of which are not my style. Aside from that there are interviews with some of the models which are always a plus.

Search is done by broad categories hair color, breast type, shaved/unshaved, styles(wet,girlfriends, backstage, xxx stars etc). You can organize sets by publishing date or rating. There is also a checkbox for hd only so you only see 720p videos.

The models are more playboyesque type of models and they are photographed in that style. If you are looking for this style then this site is worth a try for the price offered. If you are looking for the amateur girl next door style this is not it. Whether or not you like this site depends on what style you like.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Twistys

30. Twistys (4)

Pay
Active
81
Wittyguy (95) 07-25-08  05:07pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (57), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - 10,000+ photo sets with about 1200 hardcore and all have zip function. Newest material is 1600x1070, most is 1280x850 and a few are 800x600.
- 2250 vids with about 1000 hardcore with good download speeds in QT and WMV, most come in 640x480 size
- No DRM
- Small watermarks
- Good trial / discount price through TBP (currently you can join at a 2 day trial for $2.26 through Blue Fantasies and other Twisty's sites)
- Access to about 6 sites with membership
- Very good search function
- Several updates every day
Cons: - Mostly non exclusive material
- Updates dont' keep up with other "mega" sites (see "bottom line" for discussion)
- Most of the other sites available are Twisty's clones with the exception of Blue Fantasies, Naughtystaff and Annette Dawn
- Pics only come in one size
Bottom Line: I've been a member at Twisty's in the past and I rejoined on a two day trial membership through Bluefantasies.

There is a ton of content here so if you're rather newish to the porn surfing world you're going to find a lot to like. The content is mostly centered around pornstars in professional style shoots with some amateurish stuff tossed in. However, if you've been around a while you'll recognize most of the sets. There's a lot of material from Vivthomas and pretty much the same material as the Sexy-babes / Dreambabes sites and a few other mega sites. It's been about a year since I was a member at a mega site and quite honestly I only found about 40 "new to me" hardcore sets -- this includes their bonus sites. A lot of their new updates is stuff that other sites seem to have had for a while now.

I will give them Kudos for having a very good search function and model directory. Also I liked the fact that they have upgraded a lot of their older photo sets from 800x600 (which they used to be) to roughly 1020 by 720 or larger now.

The bonus sights, as mentioned, are almost all clones.

Standing on it's own, I'm giving Twisty's a score of 81. If I included bonus sites I'd bump the score up a couple of points more. While the content is good it is nonexclusive and other mega sites do it better with more up to date content. If you're newish to the porn surfing scene then it is well worth checking out; just don't plan to go back anytime soon
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Twistys

31. Twistys (4)

Pay
Active
81
slutty (111) 03-16-09  07:35pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Attractive women
Huge collection
Zips for all photo sets
Good connection and site organization
Price is reasonable given the size of the site
Cons: Some of the content was not exclusive, you probably have several sets in other places
Most models have several photo sets, but fewer to no videos
Very little of the original content is hardcore. They added a twistys hard section but it doesn't appear to be updated very frequently.
The two bonus sites I looked at had the exact same material as the Twistys main site
Photo quality mediocre
Bottom Line: Honestly I'm not sure why people rate this site so highly. I usually agree with exotics4me's reviews but in this case I must disagree. The models are mostly of the large breasted varietty, which isn't really my cup of tea. I also did not like the style of a lot of the photography (makup, lighting, focus, etc.)
Worth joining if you like softcore pictures of porn stars in soft lighting, otherwise I would look elsewhere. They are good at what they do, I'm just not into a lot of it.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit MPL Studios

32. MPL Studios (2)

Pay
Active
88
tangub (151) 07-27-11  08:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
Exclusive content
Large archive dating back to 2003 featuring 210 models, 2958 photo galleries and 306 videos (168 in HD quality)
Updated 7 days a week, usually 6 photo galleries and 1 video in a typical week.
Photos can be browsed online in up to 4 sizes, typically 600, 1200, 2000 and 3000px for the most recent.
Full zip download in up to 3 size options typically 1200, 2000 and 3000px for the most recent.
Videos available in a choice of 6 download options typically an HD 1280x720 in wmv, avi, and mov, a low res 498x280 wmv, 300x200 m4v for ipod and a 176x144 3gp for mobile.
Preview area identical to members area so you can check out all the models and available content before signing up including 30 second video preview clips.
Content date stamped
File sizes and run times listed for all videos and zips.
Prompt and courteous customer support
Cons: Expensive at $34.95
Download managers not allowed
Download restriction e.g. attempting to download more than 2 zips at once is likely to get you blocked.
Download limit of 300 zips in any 24 hour period
Limited model info, model card only lists country and eye colour. It would be nice to have a little extra info like age and measurements.
Limited search and sort options for such a large photo collection.
Photo set cover not included in the zip as they do at MET.
As to be expected with any site that has been around a number of years you will find the older content to have a lower maximum resolution and fewer download options. Earliest photos often max at 1024 or 1200px and oldest videos only 320x240.
Bottom Line: MPL Studios is another one of those arty nude sites featuring a fine collection of 210 stunning young models over 90% of who originate from Russia and Ukraine. Although the ages are generally not given I would say the majority of them look 18 to early 20s so its really a site for fans of the skinny small to medium breasted Russian teen look. The photo collection is the main emphasis here with the photo sets outnumbering the videos by almost 10 to 1. Some of the most popular models here such as Alisa, Anya and Maria have an incredible amount of content with well over a hundred photo sets each.

The site’s navigation allows you to browse the collection by updates (year and month listing), a separate page for the videos or via the model directory. I have to admit I found the layout of the model directory a little odd. The models are spread over 18 pages and it seems to be in no particular order. There’s no option to sort the directory either alphabetically, by date added or by rating so if like me you like so go through the models alphabetically then the easiest way to browse the site is to select the model you want from the drop down menu in the search engine and from that models page you can browse through to the next model’s page in alphabetical order. There’s also a basic search function allowing you to search the models by country, hair colour, eye colour and breast type but quite honestly I found all the models beautiful here and just wanted to go through the collection and download the photo sets of every one of them. Those who are more selective might bemoan the lack of a more advanced search option allowing you to search the photos by type such as indoor/outdoor location, clothing/plain nude or even the ability to search content by a certain photographer.

The photography here is of a high standard and the photos always look sharp even at the highest 3000px resolution with good colour and excellent lighting and often feature the models in stunning outdoor locations. There’s a variety of shoots ranging from plain nude shoots to partially clothed and also some public flashing in city locations such as St. Petersberg which I really enjoyed.

The videos here are certainly more interesting and erotic than the usual “girl standing around being photographed” type of videos you get on these nude art sites. You’ll find some intimate masturbation scenes and some passionate two girl scenes in amongst the collection. The videos are generally around 5 to 6 minutes long and usually feature some soft background music but you can still generally hear the models moans and groans over the music.

The only other thing worth mentioning is that you also get access to free public live cam shows and if you like one of MPL’s most popular models Liliya there’s a link to join her solo site with a $10 discount.

The only problem I encountered with the site was managing to get myself locked out by day two of my membership despite reading and paying attention to their download restrictions of only 2 zips at a time so I had to email the site like a naughty school boy to find out what I’d done wrong and request to be reinstated. Apparently I had breached their download limit of 300 zips in 24 hours which I knew nothing about because at the time it was not included in their terms of use which I pointed out to the webmaster. Anyway the reply was prompt and courteous and they even added 2 days to my membership for the inconvenience and when I checked back at the terms of use a couple of days ago I noticed they’ve now updated it to include the download limit so at least they are being upfront with potential customers now.

Overall an excellent site for lovers of softcore nude photography which I thoroughly enjoyed and was tempted to score in the 90s but the higher than average price and annoying download limits and restrictions just took the edge off it slightly so I’ll settle for an 88.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pier 999

33. Pier 999 (0)

Pay
Active
87
Denner (233) 09-03-07  10:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (78), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Wauw! Great videos - very crisp.
Exclusive content (maybe a video or two I've seen before (Stacy Silver)
Average amount of videos
Lots of photo-series - better than videos - in amount
OK navigation for photos only
Very sexy strip/solo videos - mostly
Zip
Cons: Wauw! 2 Gb download limit - you download more and you get thrown out for 24 hours. Bad, bad policy!

Poor navigation for videos - you cannot search for a specific model and find her videos. You have to go through all the dates/months - lousy!

Photos - a lot af airbrushing.
Price in general.
Music background
Bottom Line: This is somewhat a difficult site to rate.
I was almost swept away by some of the videos - very fine, very crisp quality. Some of these videos are also extremely sexy if solo/strip/masturbation turns you on.
And mostly very sexy models/actors doing a good job.
They use Victoria Kruz aka Veronica, Vanessa (se eurobabeindex.com) a lot. And fine solo videos of Lenka (here: Kelly Thomas), and a very erotic one with Juliana Sage - wauw.
Fine hc b/g videos and photos.
TBP states an amount of 177 videos - could not find that many.
Pier 999 has a special VIP-lounge for recurring members ONLY - I hate that if you pay $29.95 for full membership.
So along with the 2Gb download limit, the average amount of videos and this VIP-lounge thing, I think these guys should take another look at the site in general.
Keep it growing, keep up the fine videos and get rid of download limit and VIP lounge this could be top.

NB: Just upgraded from 84 to 87. My search into this site keeps getting me more and more good feelings about the videos.....most of them are simply just great!
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Glam Deluxe

34. Glam Deluxe (0)

Pay
Active
73
Drooler (220) 01-03-08  06:47am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (83), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +51 models, predominately Russian, some hot! (188 galleries)
+Photo quality has been improving, especially in 2007
+Most photos are between 2000 and 3500px on the long end
+Good server speed
+Login first requires typing in use-pass and a displayed code, but after that, just clicking the member’s entrance gets you straight in.
+Prompt technical assistance
Cons: -No zips!
-Only about 12 photoset updates per month in 2007
-Photos in only one size
-Some earlier photos as small as 1024px
-Ugly watermark on pics
-Videos? Most links to videos in the models index are inactive.
-Videos? They’re slide shows! (Actually, they’re called “flix” on this site.)
-Only 23 “videos,” 7 of which are of the same model (Nadja)
-Sample file sizes: 16mb (wmv), 18mb (DivX), 124mb (Quicktime). The quality doesn’t seem THAT different.
-Not totally exclusive
Bottom Line: I wonder if the term “flix” here is somehow intended to distinguish them from actual videos. As they are really awful, I also wonder who would want them. They are a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside three video format enigmas, especially Quicktime, which is about 5 times larger than the wmv or avi versions with no discernible improvement in quality.

The pics, on the other hand, are making me happier and happier as the quality is getting better, and some of their recent models are really beautiful and hot, including
Abigail (Anastasia atNubiles)
Darina (Emanuelle at Nubiles)
Francesca G (Olga at JustTeenSite, Ofemija at FemJoy)
June (aka Bianca, Ekaterina, Kamea, Katya, Tatyana)
Kayla
Lea (Masha at TeenDreams)
Victoria (Ira H at MetArt)
Yana, and of course
Helena (of Helen’s Planet).

One set, of their “Abril,” is the same as one on My Precious Virgins (as “Gaby”) – hence the “not totally exclusive.” Could such a thing happen again?

I do wish that the thumbs didn’t cut out part of what is in the actual photos, which sometimes is the case. “What you see is what you get” (WYSIWYG) would be a better approach.

That foamy green-colored watermark looks completely out of place on the pics, too. Yech!

And it’s about time that they at least provided zips (they do at their Helena's Planet) and 2 pic sizes (the current large size and one half that size). That would help the score.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Babelicious

35. Babelicious (0)

Pay
Active
86
tangub (151) 10-31-10  04:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Discount price of $19.95 available through TBP or $9.95 for returning members via email link
Billing by Epoch with no regional variation
12 bonus sites included with membership
Updated most days
Photos available in 3 sizes with zip download for each.
Videos look great
Great navigation and search features
No download limits
Cons: Non Exclusive content
Method of downloading the photo zips is a little annoying as each time you select the size of zip you want from the drop down menu the yellow bar security warning in IE pops up to deny you so you have to click allow download then select the zip again, basically 6 clicks of the mouse just to bring up the save box
Little to interest fans of hardcore here
Bottom Line: As an ex member of the Sexy Babes and Dream Babes sites 4 or 5 years ago I regularly receive emails offering me the chance to rejoin for $9.95 so as they now include their premium sites Babelicious and Babes.tv in the package I decided it’s time to take my first look at these sites. Babelicious is packed with gorgeous babes in high quality photos and videos in mainly solo strip, masturbation and toy scenes. There’s little to interest those looking for G/G or B/G action. Looking through the last 100 video updates I spotted only 1 B/G scene.

The site claims to update daily with 5 photo sets and 2 videos per week but over the last few weeks they’ve been missing a few days with the update count for September being 22 out of 30 days and for October 22 out of 31 days. Latest photo sets are being added in 3 sizes, 1000, 2000 and 3500 px with a zip for each and video updates currently at 1280 x 720 @ 3500k with wmv being the only download option plus a flash streaming option.

The pictures here generally look crisp, colourful and well lit even in the highest resolutions, sometimes a little too much photo shopping. The largest size photos are a little inconsistent and can range from 2500px to 4000px, only exception being a few sets that are were only available in 1000px added around December 09 to January 10.

There’s currently 270 models here dominated by Eastern Europeans with a few British and American girls thrown in including some of my favourites like Georgia Jones and Carli Banks. There’s plenty of search and browse options to help you easily find who you’re looking for and you have the ability to rate every model, scene and photo set out of 10. Current top ranked model by members is a British girl named Sasha with 34 photo sets and 11 videos. I don’t recall coming across her before and I really enjoyed her videos. I loved the way she talks dirty in her British accent while striping and mastubating which you seldom hear on sites these days dominated by Eastern Europeans, such a shame she had to go and ruin her sweet body with those awful implants though.

The biggest negative about the site is the non exclusive content. I recognised many of the sets from sites like Teendreams and ATK Galleria although I found myself downloading the sets again here to get them in the higher resolutions. Now that this site is the main focus in the network with regards to updates maybe they should consider a Babeslicious exclusive section similar to twistys Overall a decent site with updates most days and a ton of content over the network of bonus sites.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Models

36. Teen Models (0)

Pay
Active
93
MargulisAZ (84) 07-22-09  01:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 102 vids already (all with preview clips and all have full download option or can be viewed in parts)
WMV (HD-1280 X 720 or 640 x 360) Quicktime (HD - 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, or 640 x 360) Also Ipod, psp, and iphone options.
186 photo sets (Can download full set in zip files of 3 different quality options, or view in browser)
Frequent updates (1 photo set per day and 3 videos per week)
Ultra fast downloads (2.5-3.0 mb/s)
All content is exclusive.
Access to Silver Sinema videos which also update and are all exclusive (1791 scenes currently)
Site has a great extreme edge with stuff like fisting and large toy use.
Great communication from staff.
Option to rate and comment on models.
Sneak peek area to view upcoming updates.
No unattractive models.
Site is very easy to navigate.
Cons: Web site name is a poor choice as many of these models are not teens and it is just too generic in general.
Most of these models have been seen frequently on other sites.
Extreme updates can be hit or miss as some girls really take a fisting or use a toy well while others just do pseudo fisting or weakly work the toys.
No option to view all picture sets on one page when viewing in browser. Sets are usually split into 5 or more pages you have to cycle through.
A few pic sets that definitely should have had a video as well (see point 5 below)
Bottom Line: I've never seen a site pop onto the scene as high of quality of Teen Models. NEVER. It's brand new and already rivals sites that have been out for 5-10 years. If not in quantity (which is pretty good as it is and will definitely get better over time) then for sure in quality.

1. There are basically two sections of the site. what seems to be the native exclusive content of Teen Models and then the extra stuff that comes from Silver Sinema (this is in a separate section, not mixed in with Teen Models content). The native Teen Model content is the best in my opinion, but it doesn't have near the quantity of Silver Sinema's. Also, you will find your hardcore content in the Silver Sinema section, as Teen Models has only solo and lesbian content. Still, I think there is a good balance because the Silver Sinema content features the same model quality, it's just in a different section, so if you're looking for hardcore just head over there. Silver Sinema section also contains the US models in conjunction with euro models, while Teen Models area is all euro models from what I saw.

2. One of the biggest draws is that this site also has a very nice amount of more extreme content that you don't always see with other sites such as fisting, large toy use, intense anal and so forth. I'm not really an anal fan myself but I'm sure some others will like that. The only complaint I have so far, which was addressed in the cons, is that some of the scenes just don't totally succeed as extreme. Maybe a girl has a huge toy but can barely get it in at all and doesn't really use it, or a fisting scene has a girl with too tight a pussy to really be fisting so the hand barely goes in at all. Keep in mind there are a good amount of really good extreme shoots as well, it would just be nice if ALL of the extreme shoots were full extreme and not just "attempts at extreme". It would also be nice to see a few US models thrown in the mix taking a fist or something since it's rare to see US models doing so with the laws here.

3. The frequent updates on the site is very nice and the other little bonuses are cool too such as being able to comment on particular models and the sneak peek section. I also must note that the download speeds for me were INSANELY fast. I could download a 500 mb file in just a few minutes, which is awesome.

4. The staff seems to be very willing to communicate with the consumer also which is a very big plus. I've sent a few e-mails and received very prompt replies to my questions and comments.

5. One more thing, there were a decent few pic sets that would have been AWESOME with a video to go with it of the scene, but there is just the pic set and no corresponding video which was disappointing.

Overall I highly recommend this site. It's already probably one of the best out there and hopefully will just continue to get better over time.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Joy Mii

37. Joy Mii (1)

Pay
Active
77
Parsnip (12) 11-05-13  10:13am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-25-13  09:41am  (Update History)
Reason: Increasing amount of anal material on the site
Pros: - Very attractive models
- The site corporate style with brightly colored videos is refreshing
- Stunningly beautiful films, the "joy" in the title is well chosen
- All exclusive content, I think.
- Very quick and reliable downloads, always maxes out my internet connection (around 2 MBytes/sec).
- Multiple sizes and resolutions of photos & videos, although I only ever download the highest. Recent videos are true HD.
Cons: - Earlier material had highest video resolution of 720p, but very good quality. EDIT - see below, all available at 1080 now.
- Little variety of models - almost all white, slim, 18 - 25.
- I was going to say that so far Joymii has held the line against including ugly mysoginistic male-oriented material like anal. Sadly, they have just cracked, and are increasing the amount
- As someone else said, the photos don't quite match up
- Well known models, but all seem to be under different names which is irritating
Bottom Line: Joymii is another very good, genuine glamcore/heartcore site. They update pretty much every other day, not quite alternative photo sets & videos, but more or less. Most videos have accompanying photo sets. It features a mixture of BG, GG and solo material, a fairly even mix these days, all shot with the same bright sunny style.
It doesn't have quite the artistic quality and variety of, say, SexArt, but within its limitations, the films are beautiful to watch. There is some fairly wild sex, but it is all bright and happy looking. My wife generally prefers the BG films here to those on SexArt, this site was her favourite. It is simply reliably very good, with very few duds - I kind of prefer the riskier peaks & troughs of SexArt, but I liked both. We had planned on renewing, but have decided to cancel due to the inceasing amount of anal on the site. These sites need to understand that while anal, dp and similar gross-out stuff might appeal to men on their own, it is a HUGE turnoff for most women, and therefore to most couples. Having much of it will drive the site straight down to mainstream porn, it seems really silly of these sites to rob themselves of their USP.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Wow Girls

38. Wow Girls (4)

Pay
Active
90
slutty (111) 08-27-12  11:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -very attractive euro ladies
-decent variety of hardcore, softcore, and lesbian material
-videos are good quality, most up to full HD
-photos are of technically high quality, maximum resolution is 5600 long end, also available in 1000, 2000, and 4000 on most sets.
-multiple video download options, most have 1080p wmv and 1080, 720, 480 and 360 mp4. I typically downloaded the 720p video, as it was good enough for me (720p mp4 is about 3000 kbps and reasonably crisp).
-zip downloads of photosets, custom zips available
-download managers work, I used DTA
-download speeds are good, maxed my 15 Mb connection
-login timeouts are long, I don’t recall ever timing out
-decent price now, at $19.99
-respectable biller, I had ccbill
-updates with decent frequency, about 7 per week, the current photoset to video ratio on the site is 1.8:1, seems typical based on recent history
Cons: -smallish site, 142 videos and 252 photos at time of review. 47 total models.
-no bonus material
-little variety in model type, model ethnicity, the vast majority of the models are of the thin or athletic body types, and almost all are white. Not a good site to join if you are looking for curvier models, or a good mix of model ethnicities.
Bottom Line: Overall I think this is a very good site. I like the variety of hardcore and softcore, the camerawork on the videos is generally acceptable, although not the best. The material is pretty typical of euro sites these days, although production values are probably slightly higher, average model quality is certainly better, and there appears to be some attempt to make the scenes slightly more ‘erotic’. Like many euro sites, the main drawback is the focus is almost always on young, skinny, white girls. This is mostly fine with me, although I wouldn’t mind a little more variety from the site. If you are a fan of large breasts, this is definitely not the site for you, nor is it likely a good site for you if you prefer models with more curves.

It would be nice if this site were merged with the other Deisel media sties, as it uses the exact same interface, pretty much all of the same models, I am not really sure why it isn’t just a part of the network. But I guess it is intended to be a standalone competitor to the likes of orgasms.xxx and x-art, as it certainly has similar themes. The breakdown of material (for videos) is 48 hardcore (11 anal), 31 lesbian, and the remaining 63 videos a mix of softcore and midcore, mostly midcore (toy use and masturbation). These ratios look about the same for photosets.

I enjoyed this site more than I expected to, I figured it would more or less be a clone of sorts of the other Deisel sites that for some reason was split of as a standalone. However, it is a bit more unique, I suppose, than the other Deisel sites. The model quality is definitely top notch (if you are into the skinny athletic girls), and the material has a bit more erotic flair. There isn’t any of that annoying self-shot or POV stuff that appears on many of the other Deisel sites.

Generally, I think it is an excellent site if this is the type of material that you are interested in. It has a softer edge than most euro sites, and I definitely appreciate this style of material. I have grown very tired of gonzo-style sites. The main drawbacks being that it is a newer site, and thus a bit on the small side, and one should not expect a lot of diversity from this site (nor any of the Deisel sites).
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Babes Network.com

39. Babes Network.com (7)

Pay
Active
82
otoh (54) 04-30-13  05:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good interface, easy to navigate
- Good quality videos
- Pictures decent size and well compressed
- (Almost) daily updates - photos and videos
- Photos and videos come in matching sets
- Plenty of undressing
- Camera angles
- No anal (a plus for me!)
Cons: - Some videos have music track throughout - no voice - others have bland music
- $=€=£ regional pricing (use TunnelBear to sign up)
- DMs don't work on videos
- Captcha on login
- Some fake boobs and tans (but not too many)
- Short login timeout
- Bit too much of the guy finishing himself off
- File naming a bit off
Bottom Line: Although I generally prefer softcore sites, I have grown fond of the kind of tender, sharing, intimate and realistic (if somewhat idealised) sex scenes that the relatively new heartcore genre presents, and babes.com was next on my list to join.

Signup is relatively easy, but with the following caveats:
a) signup and cancel is through their own billing, not CCBill etc
b) they are a proponent of the grossly biased $=€=£ regional pricing setup - eg $20 in the US, £20 in the UK, over 50% more, but I am pragmatic and this is avoided with TunnelBear
c) You need to enter a captcha to log in
d) After which they do try to cross-sell to you other sites

But with that in mind, the site is nice, clean and easy to use when you get there.

The site has been around for about a year and updates with one scene daily - both a video and pictures, a setup which I quite like. During my membership this actually changed to 5 per week rather than 7 - but there's still quite a lot of material, about 300 sets & videos with approx 50/30/20 split between couples, solo and girl-girl scenes.

There is the usual browsing by videos, photos and models; and when going into a scene you get:
- For pictures, a browser-based slideshow, and download of approx 100 pics at a fairly respectable 2.5k
- For videos, a responsive streaming player, and downloads in 4 sizes up to 1080p (I went for 720 and they look very good)

Each model/set/video page also has user comments, and you can follow/like them within the site, and - if you are suitably unashamed of your smut proclivities - do so on FB, twitter and the like.

Most models are American, with some popular girls such as Malena Morgan, Lexi Belle and Hayden Winters; and some of the popular European models like Connie and Ariel. Not much ethnic diversity, although there are some nice latina and asian models; but there is a fairly broad range of ages, including some lovely milf-type models like Nikki Daniels and India Summer.

The theme here, as I suggested, is heartcore - like Joymii, X-Art etc, the focus is on couples scenes, but done in a loving, sharing way. The previous reviewer made some good points, but I think was a little unfair in criticising it for not being hardcore enough - you wouldn't join it if you wanted facials, DP and other more typical porn-y content. The scenes are fairly explicit, though, with closeups of penetration and oral sex, so it does deliver on that front.

That said, it's not without its issues. A commenter suggested that this is what Digital Desire would be if it did hardcore - and it's spot on. The girls are beautiful, the scenes are dreamy and idealised, the focus is soft and videos start with mood music, which fades out about a third of the way in to the sounds of the action. (The music is a particular peeve, actually - if you look at the previews, they have some good, brave choices of interesting music; this does not carry over to the actual videos which have more insipid/nondescript soundtracks which they would be better off without).

And, Like Digital Desire, they are fairly formulaic. It's not a bad formula, but most scenes (or at least the couples ones, which I was most interested in) play out the same way; the guy slowly undresses the girl, there's oral from both of them, there's sex with him and her on top. It's good, and well done, but could do with a bit more variety - and ideally, within the constraints of the genre, a bit more raunchiness.

But conversely, they have hung onto some porn tenets that don't really fit the genre. In far too many scenes, the girl ends up naked, apart from the high heels - I quite like heels in a pinup or glam context, but if I'm trying to imagine a realistic encounter, the shoes would definitely go! And similarly, in almost all cases the guy pulls out and finishes on the girl's belly/boobs/ass - again, there's definitely a time and place for a prominent pop shot but it does take away from the believability of the scene. Also see my comment about photoshopping - wholly unnecessary in the genre.

Despite my misgivings, this is still a good site in the heartcore genre and there's plenty of good material. If I were in the US, I would score this maybe 85 or 86; but there is no excuse for their heinous regional pricing policy, which has to cost them at least a couple of points.

But, pricing issues aside, Joymii remains my favourite - they are more creative with scenes, camerawork, and manage a bit more raunch while still being a bit artsy and trendy.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Danni.com

40. Danni.com (0)

Pay
Active
78
ace of aces (179) 08-02-08  02:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + hundreds of videos
+ easy navigation
+ no drm
+ no dl limit
+ exclusive content
+ different dl options :
Windows Media 300k Streaming Download
Windows Media 700k Streaming Download
Windows Media 1000k Streaming Download
Quicktime Download
Flash Player Streaming
+ hughe archive material begining from 2002
Cons: - regular price is to high (tbp special is good)
- content is to similar
- no hardcore
- softcore sometimes to "soft"
- danni isn`t that hot at all
- settings of videos look often the same
- a lot of "bla bla" in the videos
- often music in videos ( a killer, even if i can`t imagine a lapdance without music :) ))
- dl a bit slow
Bottom Line: oh no, one more danni review i was thinking by myself, but sorry i had to write it.

curiosed by the newer reviews and the high ratings i tried that site once again, even i was a member about three years ago, and once again i was sligthly disapointed.

it is hard to discribe why in my opinion this site is average. if you see the videos with all that women it looks at fist good, but seeing a third and a fourth video it is getting boring.

no, or not really action. the softcore makes me sleep.

the features of videos :NAKED JOKE OF THE WEEK, IN BED AT DANNI'S, VIRTUAL LAP DANCE, sounds a little bit boring and what surpise, they are boring.
ok i am not an abby winters fan at all, you all knew it, but i never thought that danni is goning to be abby winters with tits :)

the LIVE EVENTS and weekly 'mini-movie' are the only mini highlight of that site, but they are also a little bit boring. i can really say why, but all in all this site doesn`t get the point.

i don`t recommend that site because of it`s absolutly softcore content and the same looking movies. even if they would offer me that site for 4,95 a month i won`t come back until there is a little bit "harder" sofcore ore real hardcore.
(sorry to all danni fans)
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Danni.com

41. Danni.com (0)

Pay
Active
88
obsessedoverit (8) 10-25-08  06:50pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -Insane amount of content, spanning over a decade. Especially of some of my favorite models i.e. Sandee Westgate, Aria Giovanni, and Nikki Nova.

-Navigation, updates, No DRM, Zip sets are all a plus here.

- Unique and unlike other glamour sites. With years of updates with the same themes such as In Bed with Danni, Model Diaries, and the infamous Naked Joke of the week you are able to get a look into the personalities of the models.
Cons: - A pet peeve for me is the camera work. When watching a video I always get frustrated as the camera rarely goes below the waist especially with the e-zine videos.

- Video quality isn't bad but is in need of an upgrade it's currently at 640x480.This is no longer an acceptable norm for a top site.

- It would be nice If the site was designed with the downloader in mind. I don't really have a suggestion but it can be cumbersome at times when you want to DL an entire collection of one model. I guess thats the problem when you have so much content.
Bottom Line: -Danni.com is a classic site and has set a standard for softcore glamour on the web while at the same time remaining unique.

- This site also contains an enormous catalog of models many of whom have gone on to do hardcore.

- This site has been well reviewed so I can't add anything that hasn't already been written other than to say this is one of my favorites.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Twistys

42. Twistys (4)

Pay
Newbie
95*
Horny Ryan (Disabled) 02-19-07  11:45pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - diverse content
- tons of hot chicks
- high quality pics & vids
Cons: - lots of repeated sets
- videos are all the same
- seen these girls many times
Bottom Line: its a great site to have in your monthly stack. i keep a membership just to see what's new. Nice style and lots of content, even if it doesn't always get me off.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Twistys

43. Twistys (4)

Pay
Active
86
skippy (46) 07-11-12  02:41pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge collection of photos and videos. Good navigation. Good scoring/rating and review system that isn't inflated by webmasters or users, a full decade of material available. Newer videos are excellent quality. Models come in all shapes and sizes. Nearly every big-name model you've ever heard of. Mostly US models who actually speak!
Cons: Waaay to many ads for other sites. Cross selling at sign-up verges on fraudulent. (I unchecked the cross sales, had a problem and clicked submit again and the other offers rechecked themselves and cost me money...really ruined the initial perception of the site.) Also, the log in page is linked to a pay chat site and there is a live front-room chat in progress WITH SOUND! Some smart marketing gu decided to do this to get your attention, but it is annoying as hell!
Bottom Line: Do you remember the original Danni's Hard Drive? You know, before Danni sold it? Well, that site was abused and mismanaged after being sold, but Twisty's is practically an exact replica of the original Danni site. There is a HUGE collection here that spans over a decade. New material is very good. Most of the models are big american names either in nude photography or porn. Wide variety in the sets locations and models. And people seem to be having fun.

All that said, there are a few things that I feel obligated to point out. First, most of the models, though popular are..um..more mature. Among the most highly scored models, you'll notice Kayden Cross, Jana Cova and Heather Vandeven, all looking good in their most recent sets, but probably well into their 30s. Nothing wrong with mature, well endowed models, but the site seems to be pretty heavy with them. To be fair, the site also has some very popular younger models including Malena Morgan, Zoey and Melisa Mendini. One thing about a site that has been around this long is that you can find sets that span a models entire professional career. For example, if you like Sasha Grey, there is a terrific collection here from 2009 and before. But in general you won't really see any knock-out new discoveries here as the stable is mostly pros, many of whom have had more than a little work done. A few of the more popular models are still unaltered, though...thank god.

The sets are generally good. They are not overly staged, there is a decent variety of indoor and outdoor sets, the mix of full-body and close-up shots is good and the lighting is correct. The models are mostly solo, some with toys, but there are a few girl/girl scenes and two and three way sex scenes. One kind of cool thing about some of the videos is that since many of the girls are american, they actually speak! And oh my god what some of them say! Trust me, you WILL be answering out loud when Shawna Lenee, Tori Black or Kasey Chase ask you questions in their videos. This kind of interaction with the audience (ie directly at YOU) is unlike any other site I've seen since...well...the original Danni.com. Very cool!

This is billed as a network, but the other sites that you get free access to are really the same sets that are in the main site, just repackaged into categories like "Euro" and "GirlPlay". There are a couple of other mystery bonus areas that include additional models, most of which are intermediate level ametuers. The site is constantly advertising other sites like Brazzers, Mofos, Wicked and Babes, all available for an additional and sometimes hefty fee. Very distracting and annoying.

They have a girl of the month theme with a series of photo and video shoots released throughout the month.

Overall, this site is well above average with a huge selection of images and videos. The girls are Mmostly mature, large breasted and in many cases enhanced a bit. The images are good but not too glam-ee and, from what I can tell, not overly touched up. I got in on a "Please come back" special rate. Absolutely, positively worth a visit at least one a year.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Playboy Plus

44. Playboy Plus (1)

Pay
Active
68
lk2fireone (194) 03-10-13  10:18pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discount through PU. $14.95 instead of $29.99/month.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Can view photosets as slide show or download the zip set.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Good download speeds. I'm getting 1.3 MB/sec, my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Choice of download version quality: Many videos have a WVGA480, HD720, and a HD1080 version.
Cons: -Uncheck pre-checked cross-sell.
-Search could be better. Search term "Christine Maddox" returns any photoset with the name of "Christine" as first name or last name, instead of specifically returning only photosets with the name of "Christine Maddox" included.
-Also, either they are missing photos of past playmates, or the search does not return all the photos of those playmates. For example, the annual photoguide of past playmates of the year photos are sometimes not included in the search result. There are other past photos of playmates and models that are either not on the site, or not returned by a search of the model's name.
-Some bugs in the navigation or site structure. You play a slide show of Susie Scott, and it only plays a few of the 24 photos in the set, then stops. Can't get it to play/show all the photos in the set.
-Photoset of a playmate does not include the data sheet.
Bottom Line: -Back in the 1960s and 1970s, Playboy was the premier "gentleman's magazine". Penthouse was a close second. Both those magazines were renowned for their nude photography, as well as their articles and fiction and interviews. They were money-making machines that brought their founders vast wealth. Those days are history. Both Playboy and Penthouse have flirted with bankruptcy in recent years.

This is supposed to be a softcore glamor photo and video site. Given the Playboy name, you would expect to find superior, high quality photos and videos of their models.

-I don't know why, but there are superior copies of their onsite photos available elsewhere. Years ago, I belonged to a newsgroup, and I collected the photos of most playmates.
You look at the photos at this Playboy Plus site, and the photos just don't have the same impact as the photos that I collected. The basic image is the same, but the images I collected from the newsgroups were more striking.

-Some photos are mis-labeled. You play a slide show of a photoset, and instead of identifying the model(s) in each photo, the label shows the title of the photoset. So you have to know from other sources (or your own special knowledge) who these models are.

-No choice of download version quality for zip photosets. This is surprising. For a photo-oriented site, the only option I see is for one definition of a zip file download, not the standard 3 definitions that many photo sites have of low, medium, and high quality.

-The quality of the "high definition" video files can be poor. For example, the video for "stacy-fuson-paymate-of-the-month-vid-01.mp4" is 1920x1080, total bitrate is 6049 kbps, which would seem to indicate a high quality, high definition video. But the frame rate is 7 frames/second, which might explain why the video is a poorly defined video picture. I've seen the DVD which this video is made from, and the video is much sharper than the video you download from Playboy Plus.

Let me be clear. Watching the downloaded video is like watching a shitty version of the video you should be watching.

The streaming version of that video is better quality, but nowhere near the quality of Metart, Diesel Access network, or other fine sites. The video quality of a streaming video at Playboy Plus is actually below the quality of the Teen Mega World videos.

That is amazing to me. Don't the people running this site realize the video quality of their videos is so poor, compared to the better sites on the internet?

Maybe they are blind to the poor quality of their photographs, which is not as bad as the quality of their video downloads. But the obvious degradation of their video download files is pathetic, for a site that is supposed to empasize the beauty of the female form.

The site does not use DRM. But the poor quality of the video files I have downloaded, in effect, means you can not save a high quality video file. And I am going to sign up for a new membership to a newsgroup, because I believe I will be able to find better quality photos of past playmates from a newsgroup than I can find at this Playboy Plus pay site.

I don't believe my expectations for this site were too high. But what I've found at this site, in terms of photo image quality, and video image quality, is a massive disappointment.

Not all videos are as bad (poor definition) as these 2 videos of Stacy Fuson. The videos of Erika Eleniak are better. Not great, not as good or defined as high quality sites like Metart or Diesel Access, but still better than the Stacy Fuson videos.


Giving the site a score of 68. I believe the quality of the photos at the site is inferior to what you will find at high-quality sites like Metart and MPL Studios and Femjoy.
And the quality of the videos is even further below what you will find at those other sites.

Comparing the photo and video quality of this site to high grade sites on the internet, you begin to realize the Playboy brand has really fallen from its former quality standards.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad

45. Glamour Models Gone Bad (0)

Pay
Active
83
The Collector (7) 06-16-11  03:54am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Massive selection of models and years of updates
- 16 bonus sites
- Zip files for all picture sets
- Newer content is mostly HD
- Amazing price of 9.95 thanks to TBP
- Updates almost every day
- It does have a site search
Cons: - A lot of the content is old and in low res format
- A lot of the content is non exclusive
- Tho updates are just about daily and are date stamped some does appear to be old or created some time ago and just held for a later release date.
- Most of the content all have the same theme (Girls are in clothes or lingerie, strip, the some go hardcore.) It would be nice to see some fetish latex, classroom fantasy, or out at a club. Mix it up a bit not just all in the same setting.
- Browsing layout is very basic (Nice for some people but I like when the webmaster tries a little bit more to make the lay out look nicer.)
Bottom Line: Bottom line is that the site is nice and I do not regret it, it has a ton of content and lots of extras. The webmaster even has a post on the side of the members home page to keep you updated with site news. And it is mostly "A" or "B" list models, some sites have a vast selection of models but they are crappy, unknown, or unwanted models. This site seems to be full of favorites. However a lot of the content is older and kind of bland, they have yet to evolve with the times like for example Twistys is a very old site that figured out how to stay hot, fresh, and irresistible where GMGB seems to be stuck in the 1990's but for 10 bucks a month its worth joining.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit FEMJOY

46. FEMJOY (1)

Pay
Active
80
adrenalinrush (5) 02-02-10  07:00am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ massive model archive
+++ up to 3 updates per day
++ lot of contributing photographers (+180)
++ big hdv video archive
++ images up to 4000 px
+ functional site
+ Iphone / PSP compatible
Cons: --- download limit & partially slow
--- search function is unhandy
-- just one good photographer (Stefan Soell)
-- bulk photography
- hard to get in the mood
- they make you feel how hard they want your money
Bottom Line: After X-art, I was seeking for another compelling site full of nude teens with a higher rate of updates and a solid archive.

Femjoy looked familiar to a couple of other sites I've seen before, which gave me a "related-to" feeling but didn't care for the moment.

They have a huge archive for galleries and HD videos is an acceptable quality. It was a little hard to get into the right mood by all the functional and plain and passionless presentation of the girls.

Stefan Soell seem to be the best of all contributors there, at least for me.

Femjoy is a good site for outdoor fans and those who like young girls being naturally naked.

Don't expect the girls doing anything fancy, they don't!
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Peachez

47. Real Peachez (1)

Pay
Active
86
Gazette Risque (55) 06-19-07  10:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (36), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: * A lot of content
* Finally a girl that has gone "hardcore" after her "Model-site"
* Pretty high quality content.
* Updates every couple of days
* Split scenes available but also full movies.
* Big webcam videos archive. All these videos are available for download too.
* Easy navigation, most things are on the main page.
* Fun bonus content from her girlfriends.
* Videos are available in split scenes and as full videos.
Cons: * Videos are only available in WMV 640 x 480
* Download manager is not really allowed, it can give problems.
* Could use some more variation in videos.
* Although the navigation is pretty easy, the site could use a make over. On the inside it looks kind of cheap.
* Galleries could use preview thumbs.
* Live show time is only shown in US Time Zones
Bottom Line: RealPeachez.com is a website that features a cute girl that has gone more "hardcore" after her teen modeling website.

The website launched beginning of 2006 and has grown considerably in the last year. It features almost 30 "regular" videos and 85 webcam videos. Also it offers over 150 different galleries filled with High Res. pictures.

The videos are all kind of the same, but they don't bore you as much as you'd think as Peachez changes her outfit in every video. Sure this gets old after the third video but the amount of updates kind of makes up for it.

The only thing they can really improve on is the layout of the website. It looks kind of old, outdated and pretty cheap. And the galleries have no preview thumbs so you need to open every link to see what it is. But other than that the website is pretty much what-you-see-is-what-you-get.

The videos and galleries are all downloadable but a download manager can cause problems.

The live shows she offers are recorded and put on the website every time which are pretty fun but also all kind of the same too. Also it might be kind of a hassle for people outside of the US to watch live shows due to the fact they only give you the times in US time zones.

All in all the website offers a lot of content and can entertain you for about a week or so. They could just use some more variation in the videos. And if you've seen her previous site, chances are you'll like this even better.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Errotica Archives

48. Errotica Archives (0)

Pay
Active
78
graymane (31) 10-18-10  08:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: + No technical or login problems.
+ exceptionally good quality HD pics and videos.
+ Zip files.
+ Ample number beautiful models.
+ Frequent updates.
+ Picture images are done well, with multiple frames and poses.
Cons: + My major compliant is this site is chiefly a nude photo shoot. Models do very little except smile.
Videos, although sexy, are mostly rapid-fire takes of subjects who are too often changing positions. There are also too few videos for the number of models on hand.
Although most media formats were availsble, I found them complicated and download speed to be agonizingly slow. Hardcore is non-existent, as well as a dire shortage of erotic behavier.
Bottom Line: I was given a combo, Met Art and this site for supposedly a discount. However, $29.95 is still too much. I'm getting woefully little I wanted or expected from this deal. For those who fancy superb photography and video of sexy ladies... then this is their bag. But I wouldn't recommend it to guys who want to get a rise out of what they're looking at --- So with that in mind, I wouldn't bother to unzip my fly.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Erotic Beauty

49. Erotic Beauty (0)

Pay
Active
88
Drooler (220) 06-17-07  12:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (83), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: +Very large, exclusive collection
+Professional photography
+Many beautiful models: Evelyn Lory, Jana Horokova (as Lisen), etc.
+Photosets usually 100-200 pics each
+two zip options (“hi” 3-4000 px, or “low” 1200)
+Daily photo updates from May 2005 (1 set per day)
+easy, straightforward navigation
+vids in DivX, WMV, QT264, mpeg (formats available vary by the vid)
+can rate both the model and the photographer on a 1-10 scale
Cons: -sometimes delays updates for a day or two
-max pic sizes vary greatly early in site history (1024px to 40xx 5/05-5/06, but most are 1500 or higher); nearly always 3-4000+ pixel size from 6/06.
-a few unappealing models
-sometimes too little light, too much shadow, blurriness
-a couple of photographers I don’t care for (esp. “Magoo,” who goes too far with the “artistic” effects)
-only 30 vids (the last in July ’06); transition effects sometimes overdone; some vids only 570px long
Bottom Line: Have been a member off/on since Nov. 2005; currently on a one-year membership.

This is a softcore nude photography site, mostly solo (but no toys), with a smattering of girl/girl lite. The vids obviously amount to just a little “extra” -- like sprinkles on ice cream.

For a softcore photo nut like me, it’s pretty close to the right formula. And there’s plenty of delectable ass to be found in the archives. Per diem, it beats 1byDay, W4B, and even Nubiles in the tushy quality/quantity index.

You might think of it as Met-Art’s kid brother or sister, as it costs the same but only offers 1 photoset per day (vs. Met-Art’s typical 3-5 per day). But it does give an option to join for $6.99 for 2 days, and with a good broadband connection, plenty of time, and enough piping hot caffeine, you could certainly make a killing here.

I’d do the same, but I don’t have that kind of self-discipline.

And I actually like the design and navigation here better than at Met-Art. It’s cleaner and less cluttered.

But on the other hand, Met-Art now offers three pic sizes in zips, and their 1024s do just fine and use less space than the 1200’s offered here. But that’s not much of a complaint.

Be sure to check out the browser options in the top right corner (default pic sizes; "enhanced" to show previous and next galleries; slideshow timing).
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Babelicious

50. Babelicious (0)

Pay
Active
88
exotics4me (463) 04-30-07  10:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Very high quality, pics are huge (biggest I've seen, upwards of 4,000), vids are also very high quality.
- Plenty of sexy Euro models
- Decent nagivation, comment section that webmaster also posts on
- Updated daily + bonus sites!
Cons: - Music in vids, no, no, no!
- Not 100% exclusive
Bottom Line: Overall I was happily surprised with with Babelicious. The bonus sites are much better than most network sites have. My biggest problem was that I had seen some of the material on other sites, but I can at least say Babelicious' duplicate material is of higher quality. Kind of like getting your favorite cd in remastered version.

The bonus sites are bonuses for a reason, none look to have a whole lot of work put into them, but really they aren't bad at all. One thing that was a little frustrating was having to sign in on each site, no big deal to most, but I try to use odd screennames and passwords, and sometimes forget them. That is just minor though.

The quality of the pics will really blow you away. Maybe there are bigger pics out there, but I haven't seen them if there are. The bonus sites will give you the b/g sections if you prefer hardcore which is something that I am glad to see more and more of these model (solo, g/g sites offering) it shows that reviews are being read since that is usually a big complaint of lack of b/g content. Now we need to discuss this music though. I probably saw my first porn in the late 80s/early 90s. It was from my uncles porn stash. I still haven't got that music out of my memory, bom-chi-chi-wa-wa. I much prefer hearing the women's sounds than music. Outside of that, I would call this site a site to watch. It is a little confusing at first, but with time you get used to switching from site to site. I recommend it.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 620 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Babes Network.com (7)
2. DDF Network (6)
3. Wow Girls (4)
4. X-Art (4)
5. Twistys (4)
6. Bella Pass (2)
7. Goddess Nudes (2)
8. The Life Erotic (2)
9. Watch 4 Beauty (2)
10. MPL Studios (2)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.34 seconds.