Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-47 of 47 Page :    < Previous Page

Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

26. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
85
messmer (137) 06-19-11  11:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A huge number of "hairy" models, most of them very good looking.

Large daily updates, usually consisting of eight picture sets and two videos.

Immensely improved lay-out. Very pleasing to the eye as well as easy to navigate.

The ability to leave comments on each set, video or model has been added. It is good to be able to voice one's preferences or dislikes.

Pictures since the beginning of 2011 are available in a super large format of 3000px.

Videos are very nice and crisp at 1280x720p.

Good download speeds for me.
Cons: Site has become more extreme, even though ATK owner would probably disagree with my assessment, but the emphasis appears to be more and more on a general fetish for hair rather than on beautiful young, un-enhanced girls who chose to keep their pubic hair. In the past SeanR, as one example, would offer up a hairy leg set now and then but now they are everywhere.
Bottom Line: This is a site in transition because, judging by members' comments and ratings, the membership has shifted dramatically from those who just weren't keen on the shaved look to those who almost worship hair itself: hairy legs, arm hair, pit hair, anal hair etc. They interpret "natural" to mean just that, a body that has never been touched by a razor.

This transition is also confirmed by ATK owner's own remarks, who wrote in connection with some complaints about models being too shaved except for the bush: "We did approach R....e about growing out her armpit and leg hair and she told us the timing was not right for her to do that right now. So possibly later."

I have a black eye and bleeding nose from making some unwelcome noises in the comments section over this change.

The latest one was in connection with my musing as to what a girl (with extremely hairy legs) was doing wearing men's cotton briefs? She appears to be a heavy favorite of many and I was brutally slain by one member for being so audacious as to make this blasphemous remark.

I must stress that this made absolutely no difference when it came to the rating of this site because, as the ATK owner himself pointed out, tolerance is requested in connection with everyone's tastes and who am I to be the arbiter of what's erotic and what isn't.

What does make a difference to me, though, is that so many sets are extremely bland with little imagination shown by the photographer.

The average model basically wears top and skirt with a pair of panties or top and jeans with or without a pair of panties, pretty painful for someone who likes the tease factor and does not like to see a model revealing her all right from the first page.

However there is such a fierce loyalty to the models shown by the hair fetishists that even dull sets are rated highly because of the extreme hair factor.

I have changed my mind about the previous low score I gave this site because it was based on my personal preferences.

This time around I am giving it a higher score by rating it as a TRUE FETISH site that will easily please all those who have a taste for extreme hair.

So I highly recommend it to this growing group of hair lovers, especially in light of the pros. The new lay-out is really nice, clean, impressive. I also like the ability to comment even though I am still nursing my wounds.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

27. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
85
littlejoe (23) 11-06-11  06:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -tons of hair, and good niches as well
-photos are well lit and professional
-generally good looking models
-tons of photos
Cons: -a lot of ugly models
-repetition repetition repetition
-uninteresting movies
-not really HD movies
Bottom Line: i wanted something different so i thought id give this site a try. i joined mainly for the pix, and there are a lot! i started from the oldest where the pix were under 2 mp. unfortunately it seemed they didnt increase the size til 3/4 way thru the content. there are some great treasures in there, i found a fav of mine; Wenona! however, there are a lot of ugly women in there too. also as i said above, the model repetition was annoying. i know this is normal, but it seemed too often. after a while i even was skipping the hottest models

the video section was confusing, a lot of the videos low quality, models seemed bored. there were a few with interviews that were fun tho. also the newest videos listed as HD only download as 960x540, which is disappointing

beyond all my complaints, i joined for the pix and got my $$$s worth. however this is no abby winters quality pix and vids (even tho they seem to be straying for hair)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

28. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
85
graymane (31) 01-21-13  04:02pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1) Hair is paramount. If'un you like hair on broads, then here you won't be disappointed.
2) Site boast of having millions of pictures. Well, bully for them. I'd have to say that might be a bit of a stretch.
3) Claims to be 12 times the size of any other hairy site. Does it also mean 12 times the cost?
4) zip files for downloads. Small watermarks on pics, larger on videos. No DRM.
5) Promotion touts of having 1577 models.
Well, I guess if they say so .....
6) 5,549 videos. Could be, but the 30 days I was there they musta been in hiding.
7) Updates appear to roll in as promoted.
8) HD on more recent shoots.
9) Some very pretty gals are in the lineup, European, Asian, Latina and American; predictably, a lotta plain-Jane's are there, too. Then there are those who're are just plain ugly.
10) You have solo, soft core, toy, boy/girl hardcore, and lesbian.
.
Cons: 1) Sometimes I'd corralled a beauty only to suddenly see her wander off somewhere.
2) Poor selection of medias, having WMV pitted against two other unknowns.
3) Streaming went smoothly, however, Buffering was unceasingly long and tedious.
4) From my viewpoint, I thought the video-shoots and directing sorely lacked the quality subscribers deserved.
5)Same-'olé-same-'olé .....what with too many and long closeups, and particularly ones that dwell on the genitalia. I can only assume The guy shooting just falls asleep at his camera. The man must belong to a damed good union.
6) Small watermarks on pics, bigger ones but none obtrusive on videos
7) Maybe it's my lack of electronic wizardry, but I simply couldn't find the combination to opening pics on a full screen.
Bottom Line: Prepare to stare at a lot of hair.
Hair here, hair there, hair everywhere.
Nary model dare to be hair-bare, and that's fair

(jus' thought I'd throw that in)

I went for this $21 deal because I strongly favor seeing natural hair where it's supposed to be on women. It's sexier, more erotic, and adds that important element of realism to the scenes.

This site does a very good job of giving us that, but sadly, eroticism falls woefully short. For one thing, the girls move around too much. No sooner than I get into a clip than the model jumps up and leaps onto something else. Another erotic spoiler is the over-use of smiles ....I know readers don't share or agree to that, but when a gal is in the throes of sexual release, smiles ought to be minimal.! They're necessary I know, but porn isn't Comedy Central and I just don't find them compatible with serious porn.
Cameramen and directors here tend to follow the same old trend that shooting genital closeups are gold. When, for crying out loud, will these numb-nuts wise up and give us a break, already?..... Thanks to vaginal over-exposure I think I now know more about the female pussies than my x-wife's gynecologist.
In my judgment, I'd recommend this site for all who wants to see hair. Otherwise, it's just plain-old generic porn.
Admittedly, I got a bang-for-my-buck for what I paid, but I don't think I'd opt for thirty.
Respond: 16 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

29. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
83
mudman (36) 01-23-07  03:06pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -volume. Hard to get more bang for your buck overall.
-generally very skilled photogrphers.
-a wide range of women from 18 to 40ish, though the vast majority are in the 18 to 23 range.
-very easy to get around the site. Why others aren't this easy, is beyond me.
Cons: -not the best videos, but they are okay.
-some photographers are questionable. Sean R being one of them. Not good when a member wishes he could buy a new camera for a site photographer.
-mostly smallish photos on the site. Hard to believe that such a standard bearer has waited until this january to increase its photo sizes.
Bottom Line: AtkHairy remains the best hairy site out there in cyberspace. It doesn't mean they don't need to do more, 'cause they do. Their preeminence could quickly evaporate with lacking attention, but they still remain the place to start.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

30. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Active
83
otoh (54) 09-03-13  10:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Frequent updates
Good diversity in models and photographers
Exemplary site layout/features
Live cam shows
Cons: Perhaps too hair-oriented
Mostly amateur themed
Pics often less interesting than videos
Photo sets need tighter editing
Bottom Line: This is a tricky one for me to review, as I'm not necessarily the target market; nevertheless, I'll do my best.

Firstly, compare and contrast: I am very fond of any content featuring panties and nylons - especially tights - the longer they are teased/toyed with the better. I will gladly concede that things I could do with/to them, either on or off their owner, puts this in fetish territory.

OTOH, I also like pubic hair on a model. I think it makes the girls look womanly, sexually mature, and inviting; it is a thrill to catch a glimpse of it, or even to know I will do as the underwear (cf above) comes off; and although I've got used to shaved models, it is still a bit of a disappointment when there's only skin revealed. Pubic hair is natural and sexy thing, and I don't quite see why it's regarded as a fetish; and I do not further fetishise it by way of insisting there is LOTS of it (everywhere), playing with it, or drawing more attention to it than it creates itself. I just prefer it to be there.

Anyway, the above disappointment sent me in search of a suitably themed site; but it appears that there aren't sites for folk like me who just like hair - only for those who worship it... but beggars, choosers etc. The two obvious sites, therefore, are We Are Hairy and ATK Hairy. I looked at both of them and they seem very similar in style, content and even in model roster - WAH seemed a bit more glam, a bit better organised and with a more manageable amount of content to get through within a month's membership.

The mechanics of the site are exemplary; one of the best I've ever joined. There are the usual features:

* Dated updates
* Separate video and pic lists
* Model index
* Browse by category or tag
* Advanced search

As well as novel features like:

* Your own favourites (although oddly you can't favourite a model, only specific sets?)
* Browse by photographer (I tend to follow photograhers more than models)
* Custom zip downloads
* Webcam shows (I never got round to viewing any, but there seem to be a couple a week)
* Forum and comments on sets (albeit with the usual complement of spurious/disrespectful ones)
* Personal settings (how you view pictures, and what tags/categories to exclude if eg you don't like hairy legs etc)

And although not as vast as ATK, there's a good deal of content; generally 4-5 updates per day (3 photo sets and 2 videos), and with about 4 years worth of updates I make approx:

* 400+ models
* 3000+ photo sets, 3K, 100-150 pics each
* 2000+ videos, most 720p, 10-15 mins

Models are reasonably diverse in age - 18-40 and some beyond - and there there is probably just a little more ethnic diversity than on an average site. They can be broadly split - with plenty of exceptions - into 3 groups:

* East European (mostly Russian) account for maybe two-thirds of the updates - most girls are young, with pubic hair and otherwise neatly shaved. Some pretty girls but many do not let their personality or sensuality show; it would be nice to hear them talk more, even if their English was not good, or even in Russian etc.

* UK models - as above, most have pubic hair only - but get more chance to show their personality, with interviews, various dirty talking in masturbation and stripping videos, etc. These were the ones that worked best for me.

* US girls - tend to be more of the hippy type, with many more having hairy armpits, legs, etc. Again, they get interviews and some fun videos; some of the girls are very alluring but the extra hair isn't necessarily for me.

Photo sets are a bit too big for my liking; I prefer them more tightly edited, large sets get a bit repetitive. The style is relatively amateur (and I do mean the style, rather than the quality - which is generally good) - without much in the way of mood or evocative lighting - but still some fun sets.

Likewise for the videos - they are generally plenty explicit enough, most featuring masturbation with/without toys (also some GG and GB videos but much fewer). Many are a bit too samey, but some have a bit more of a theme - eg the very lovely Fawna Latrisch getting predictably wet and soapy when washing a floor; or a couple of models stripping out of some sexy officewear.

So, overall, although a great site, it doesn't quite work for me. It's only this that dictates my slightly lower score; if I was more of a hair and amateur lover this would easily be in the 90s.

I wish there was a site like eg The Life Erotic, or Joymii, that featured more unshaven girls; until that happens, I guess I'll stick to picking and choosing the limited amount of unshaven content such sites have.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

31. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (356) 02-21-10  09:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing through CCBill without regional pricing.
-Hi Def videos
-Super high resolution photo sets
-Custom zips available as an option.
-Helpful and friendly webmaster. Excellent customer service.
-Forum and photoset comments by Capn and Messmer.
Great to see friends from PU.
-Two uploads a day, but mostly photos not videos.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download restrictions.
Cons: -Needs more attractive girls. They are natural but often leave something to be desired.
-Few models are not very thin. Not much variety in size, body shape, or age.
-The site has American models, but not yet a single one that is any race but white. Surely they can be found and photographed.
-The videos are nearly all masturbation. I prefer teasing,stripping, or just about anything but not hands on or inside their pussy,or toys.
Bottom Line: After reading reviews by some PUers that I really respect a lot, I decided to join a site dedicated to bush.

My first experience involved billing and entering. I got immediate helpful answers from the webmaster Basil. Nice first impression.

The site layout is simple and uncomplicated. There are enough options to make navigation easy. The search engine works just fine. There are no broken links and no other problems.

The first section I checked out was the videos. While the quality was great, I just don't care much for masturbation either manually or with toys. Not good. I kept nothing, as the content was not to my taste.

However, I had been expecting the photo sets to be the best part of the site, as it usually is with softcore sites.

Many of the models were of close to legal age. I wouldn't mind that, but with zero or almost no makeup, the acne that many have is just a turnoff. I like natural, but a touch of makeup is fine with me. Acne, no way, sorry. There were a few mature models, but so far very few. There were a few with at least C cups, but not many. Most were A's and B's. That can be attractive, but I also would prefer more with larger size breasts.

I hate tattoos and piercings. While only a few had either or both, I was turned off that any did. At least their bodies were otherwise all natural with no boob jobs.

Most, I felt about 75%, of the women on the site were very ordinary in their attractiveness. That can be ok, but the site definitely needs more of the better looking ones.

While the photos were of high resolution and I love the custom capability of the zipdownloads, I feel the site needs a lot more growth.

With two updates a day, I am sure the site will continue to improve. It definitely has potential. However, the site is not yet ready to get a score better than 80 from me.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

32. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
78
Bacchus (30) 01-11-07  06:11pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: *If you are into hairy girls, this is the site for you.
*The picture library is huge!
*Many videos to choose from.
*You can choose to pick how hairy you want your girls.
*Comprehensive search engine that narrows down your hair desire!
Cons: *The video section is antiquated with a "volume" section that can tend to be a pain.
*The video section female models do not stand up beauty wise against the picture models and tend to be less "pretty" then the girls in the picture library.
*Archived videos are not thumb nailed and you have to just download the video to see what you get.
Bottom Line: One of the most comprehensive hair lover sites around. Tons of pics of beautiful hairy women where you can use a great search engine to narrow that hairy search you desire. If you love women in fur, t his site is for you!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

33. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
75
messmer (137) 09-29-08  11:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of attractive, hirsute models.

Daily updates containing new photo sets as well as video segments.

A way to rate the quality of a picture set as well as the "hotness" (or not) of a given model which is great when the photographer missed in his shoot and the set is rated low. This way one can always mollify the model by going to her page and give her a five (hot) if one loves the model but hates the present set.

Good search engine.
Cons: The quality of the picture sets is wildly uneven.

In today's (Sept. 29, '08) update, for instance, one set is way too dark, one has a bluish tinge throughout, and the one containing one of my favorites is way too saturated with color to be pleasing to the ordinary eye.

I find, in general, that lately the photographers don't show too much imagination and that many of their sets could be clones of one another. I've even seen the same set of underwear on three different models.

There is still no way to download a whole set of pictures with one zip file.

Videos are still ill-lit, lacking color and definition, of early 2000s quality and not up to 2008 standards and generally not worth downloading. A few of the more tolerable ones have a video-grapher who never shuts up, forcing one to watch them with the sound turned off.
Bottom Line: I'm currently on my second subscription (this time a 3 month one) to this site because first time around I was so delighted to find a "natural" (read hairy) site that it blinded me a bit to its shortcomings.

The models are beautiful, but they (the site) desperately need new photographers and new models, a few more mature ones wouldn't hurt and also find a way to treat the picture sets with Photoshop or similar program so the pics will look more natural before they present them to their subscribers.

I really find it appalling that nothing has been done to improve the quality of the videos since I subscribed the first time. I realize that this is primarily a soft core picture site but with the sets getting boring, proof: lower and lower marks by the viewers on many of the sets, it would have been nioe to have decent videos as alternatives.

This is another site that had great success initially and is now resting on its laurels by stubbornly sticking to an outdated formula.

I would still recommend it to hair lovers because sites like this are hard to find these days. I can't even recommend an alternative since the one site that could compete with ATK Natural And Hairy has material of even lesser quality.

Bottom line: ATK's Natural And Hairy leaves me more and more bored in connection with picture sets and videos that never seem to change.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hippie Goddess

34. Hippie Goddess (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
Ryan W (3) 02-02-09  11:08pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - High Res Photos
- Nice Quality Video Content
- CCBill And Epoch Billing - Your Choice
- All Natural And Hairy Girls
Cons: - Videos Are Not Very Long - About 3-5 Minutes
- Way Too Many Nature Shots
- Not Many Spreads Shots Or Hardcore Content
Bottom Line: Hippe Goddess is not a bad site at all. I especially like the girls being all natural and hairy which is actually what the site is about anyways. I also liked the dirty hippie girl look too.

The girls look very natural and amateur. One thing that really dissapoints me though is that most of the site is made up of nature shots. I would like to see more indoor and closeup shots of the girls spreading. Would also be nice to see a little more hardcore content too. The site has nice navigation to it and offers quite a bit of content too. (About 550 Pic Sets).

The videos have a nice quality to them and there are over 45 videos as of now. However, this is mostly a photography based website. The photos are very crisp and clear and are very large as well 2027x1361 - but not all of them are quite this large. Especially many of the older sets -which are actually quite small in size.

All in all, Hippie Goddess is a very nice site and will definately cater towards the hairy bush lovers....especially, the ones that prefer watching girls that are hairy dancing around in the woods and posing nude in a nature setting.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Rodox

35. Rodox (0)

Pay
Active
75
studslut (8) 01-12-07  08:42pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (7)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - FINE SELECTION OF RETRO 70'S SMUT
Cons: - TOO PRICEY!
Bottom Line: I really loved my time on this site and would've probably stayed on longer if it were more afforable, but it's most assuredly not. For what you get, it's highway robbery. But I suspect they knew darn well that only a select few retro connoisseurs would make such an investment and set their price point as high as possible to get as much of a return on their output. I'm clearly one of those insatiable guilty ones, but I took everything I could in the month I was subscribed to the site, and I promptly left thereafter. It didn't seem to be growing at any perpetual rate so I couldn't justify playing the game of wait-and-see. Perhaps in a year or so I'll re-join and catch up on what they updated since my departure.

Like I stated, it's definitely for guys with an appreciation for the gone days when women were on the pill and a creampie wasn't yet a fetish, but the only way to successfully complete coitus. Not that there are a lot of internal shots on here, but do you get the sense that there was some very serious dick gravy being deposited into those rank hirsute cervices.

It's all photos too so don't expect any video or anything. But overall I liked the site a lot. It could obviously be bulked up so much more, especially with those hefty entrance fees, but if you're looking for a singular investment then it's worth the price if you raid their catalogue and abort promptly. That is of course, if you're into the carefree sexual proclivites from your folk's heyday.

75/10
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hairy Pussy Cuties

36. Hairy Pussy Cuties (0)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 11-29-09  09:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through Epoch. CCBill is also an option but the price is higher, $33.74 as compared to $29.95 for Epoch.
-A week is free with a monthly membership. You get 37 days for the one month price.
-Frequent updates. Photo sets are one every 3 days, videos one a week.
-Photos are zipdownloadable.
-Good size photo archives. 275 sets with 5479 photos are homemade, user submitted and another 552 sets with 50,115 photos use professional models.
-Nice variety of races, ages and body types. Many are Eastern Europeans.
-Comes with three bonus sites-amazinggrannies.com, homemadejunk.com, and vintagecuties.com.
-Hairy bush.
Cons: -Videos are old as well as dull. Most are MPEG2 or even older. Some videos look like they were made in the 80's. I saw only b/g.
-The most recent photo set is 768x1152. Ok, but many if not most photo sites do better.
Bottom Line: This is primarily a photo site, even though they do have videos. The videos here are uniformly of low quality and are not at all worth joining for.

The focus is on hairy bush and I must say they do deliver. The photo archive is rather large and worth the price of admission. Nearly all are neatly trimmed and the photos focus on showcasing them.

The models vary quite a bit in attractiveness, age, race, ethnicity and is what you can expect in a site that encourages user submissions. Most of the professional models are very attractive, but only a few are truly outstanding. This isn't penthouse.com. They advertise all exclusive content. While, that may be true, the models are certainly not all exclusive. I recognized quite a few faces that I have seen on other sites. Some I know from porn movies as well. However, most of the faces appear to be exclusive to the site.

Like other sites with photos, most of them are not explicit. However, enough of them are to get my vote. The style is one of straightforward, nonglamour type photography. No overdone makeup, no artsy type nonerotic shots. There is a decent mix of portrait and landscape. Sets average 67 photos.

Overall I would recommend the site if you like photos of hairy bush. The models are mostly very natural and the photography is a serious attempt at the erotic. If only the photos were of better quality than about 800x1200, I could rate the site higher.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hairy Undies

37. Hairy Undies (0)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 08-30-08  02:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing through CCBill.
-Great price through TBP.
-Part of a network of 1368 DVD's, 838 hours and 17405 GB.
-This site has 81 scenes, 51 DVD's, 169 hours and 151 GB. The videos are about a half hour each.
-DVD quality. It should be as they are all from DVD's, mostly the series "Cum on My Hairy Pussy".
-Mostly attractive girls. All hairy and range from a full bush to landing strips plus.
-No DRM or download limits.
Cons: -No usable search engine. You can search by model name or by page and that is all.
-Many of the scenes are also available on the sister websites. All they did was put all the hairy videos in one place. This makes the network bigger without much additional content.
-The sex is mostly nothing out of the ordinary. Few have any plot and are not better than the generic gonzo you can find on any site.
-Not download manager supported.
Bottom Line: I was impressed by the quantity and the video quality. Nice plusses, but without a better ability to search, all you can do is go through the videos one by one for 81 pages. You then download one by one. Too much effort for standard everyday porn.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

38. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
72
rayone (11) 01-31-11  08:26pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge amount of content. Image resolution is now 2000x3000 since early 2011. Images prior to 2007
were at 1024x712 max and after Jan 2007 1024x1546 was the max resolution offered. The video resolution has also improved. They are now offered in 4 formats: stream, HD mp4, SD mp4 and wmv. There are 174 movie galleries as of this writing, with an average of 10 movies per gallery. However, most of the galleries are not at the highest resolution listed above, but are offered in mov or wmv format at 720x480 resolution.
Cons: Many.
1) The site is now plagued with speed problems. They consolidated all sites in one server and as a result, there is a 5-10 seconds delay for images to load on the browser after the thumbnails are clicked. They added extra security (each image now has a key identifier, which changes with customer session). As a result the navigation experience is sluggish and at times frustrating. Request to change go unheard and for the most part they don;t seem to care.
2) The models as of late are a major disappointment. Most sets are boring, girls are not even that attractive (for the most part) or hairy and the quality of the images (even-though they offer them now at 2000x3000) are not well color balanced, i.e there is no quality control here. Just sheer volume of more and more boring stuff. Karupspc and karupsha has about the same type of content but with hotter looking models.
3) there is less of a difference between amkingdom and atkhairy when it comes to models and content as of late
Bottom Line: The ATK Kingdom sites went through a major redesign for --most would agree, the worse for this one. If you have never been a member, ATKHAIRY for the price and content volume is a very good deal. If you have been a member before, say last year, don't bother re-subscribing. ATK really needs to rethink what it is they want to offer in terms of quality and a content which is true to the amateur and hairy niche they were known for in the past. Perhaps they should abandon the 8 updates per day, be more discriminating and at least offer much better quality and truly hairy amateur content. The site is neither amateur nor hairy anymore and there is very little difference between AMKINGDOM and ATKHAIRY content these days. I leave you with this statistic: in 2010 they posted 1600 sets of unshaved models in their "scary" (what a terrible and misleading label) category, of which only 14 or so models (FOURTEEN) could be judged as truly natural and hairy. That is not much content for a site that caters to amateur and hairy lovers.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Hairy Pussy Cuties

39. Hairy Pussy Cuties (0)

Pay
Active
72
mudman (36) 03-19-07  12:16pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -There aren't many here other than the site complies with the premise of being hairy.
-There are some nice models.
Cons: -The photo sizes are odrinary as is the quality. Any self-respecting site these days need to offer 1000X 1500 pix. Anything less is not worth the trouble of looking at. This site offers small, outdated pix.
Bottom Line: This is such an ordinary site. it's not funny. There's nothing to gain by joiing this site. If you want hairy, go to atk, you 'll be loads happier.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

40. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
71
2 Free K (11) 05-24-11  02:00am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Updated: 09-08-11  09:34pm  (Update History)
Reason: Who knew I could become this disinterested in naked chicks? Whatever kind of help this site needs, my money definitely can't provide. Avoid for now.
Pros: - Well organized, easy to navigate
- Massive amounts of content collected over many years
- Wide selection of females, many of which are harder to find on other porn sites
- Wide selection of photographers
- ZIP downloadable image sets
- New, customizable layout
Cons: - Some girls may be too hairy for some
- Lately the hottie-to-bland ratio has gone downhill
Bottom Line: O.K. I've been frequenting this site regularly since 2004 or so, soon after discovering ATK Galleria. I'd say for every 2 months spent at ATK Galleria, I spend one at Natural and Hairy, just to see what's new while letting new sets accumulate at Galleria.

This site is definitely worth joining: there are some serious hotties there, many "bookstore"-type chicks without getting into cartoon makeup territory. I recommend this site way, way, way above Suicide Girls. They're new layout is incredibe, btw.

However, as a longtime fan, I must agree with the recent reviews here - it's in a mild slump. Some of these new girls can be rather uninspiring. I don't care if she has hair - she still needs to be cute and NATURAL. I have pretty chill tastes concerning women (I don't mind tattoos, I LOVE short hair, etc), but freaky doesn't always mean better. Let me add, a lot of people here love the photographer Sean R. I like him, but I prefer BMB, Afterglow, and Atomic W. Sean R gets cuties, but shoots too many contorted crotch shots for my taste.

In summary - I always come back to this site and stock up on the new cuties that don't look like dive bar sailors. I'm usually bored by the time my subscription expires though, at which point I rejoin ATK Galleria and rejoice at the abundance of NATURAL beauty! Call me old-fashioned...
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

41. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
70
mbaya (356) 09-20-09  09:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discount through a link on TBP news from webmasters. TBP should be getting a link sometime soon.
-Very big site. See below.
-Bill through CCBill.
-No download limits, DRM, or other problems with the site functioning properly.
-Easy to use search function, essential for a site of this size.
-Nice variety of model types, with varying ages, ethnicities, and sizes.
Cons: -Far too many models that are plain and unattractive. I see several others made the same criticism. See comments by Drooler and TheRizzo. The review by Capn complains about the older models.
-Although true to the niche of hairy, it includes many who don't shave their legs or under their arms. You can easily download a video of one of these and find out only as you watch it. The reason is that the preview function is not very helpful. This is also a problem regarding tattoos.
-Too many tattoos. The site bills itself as natural, but they mean real breasts. I consider tattoos unnatural.
-MANY videos are too blabby. Too much emphasis on interviews at the expense of the visuals.
-Far too many are old videos that are in low quality clips only. Even the newer videos are not very watchable on an HD television.
Bottom Line: I see the other reviews focus mostly on the photos. While these are plentiful, I am much more into videos. My perspective is a bit different.

The first thing I noticed is that the site statistics vary from what is listed on TBP. The site says there are 1,300 models-TBP states 2,600. The site states 800,000 images but TBP states 1,600,000. In both cases TBP lists double what the site states on the preview page. I cannot truly verify the number as the site is VERY big and not that easy to navigate. In any case the true numbers are extremely big.

However, it is not as big as you may think. If you eliminate the simply unnattractive, the overly bushy, they call them hairy scary, the ones that are excessively blabby, and all the older videos that are available as only unacceptable, low quality clips, then you get maybe 100 to 150 models. That is not a bad number, but that means you have to do a lot of work to find them.

When I took a good look at what they have on these models, I felt the videos were not of 2009 quality. While advertised as 640x480 and over 2600kbps as their best quality, I find them very blurry and unwatchable on my HD television. Statistics make for nice reading, but the truth is that the site is just too far behind the times.

Without a major upgrade to the older material, all of it is useless. The site has been around since 1998, so at least half, if not more, of the site is unwatchably poor quality. The newer material, while quite better, is still not what I look for. What a disappointment.

If you like photos, the quantity is there for you. If you are mostly into videos as I am, not recommended.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

42. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
70
messmer (137) 10-18-10  07:25pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-28-10  07:49pm  (Update History)
Reason: Nope, just couldn't leave the score at 80. I tried to be objective but over 10 days with 8 picture updates a day I have downloaded ONE picture set!
Pros: Huge number of models and pictures.

Picture (around 1600x1065px) files can now be downloaded in one zip file.

Large daily updates.

Fast downloads for me.

Good search engine that really allows you to narrow down your choices.
Cons: I complained about this in my last review: Too little imagination shown by many photographers.

One of them uses the same dress and underwear on too many models. One striped dress in particular should be retired for good because I've seen it on at least four different models over the years.

Greater attention should be shown to the temperature of a picture set. Some are way too warm (too much color, too much of a yellowish, orange tinge).

Quality of models seems to be deteriorating with too many heavily tattooed and pierced ladies on the pay roll. Introduction of hardcore material has not done the site any good either. This was not taken into consideration when scoring because many like hardcore and consider this a plus.

I still don't like the present set-up when it comes to up-dates. To a newcomer it must be very confusing to see previous updates in numbered "volumes."

Videos have improved SOME (854x480px, 2149 TB) but still fall short in days where HD has become standard
Bottom Line: I adjusted my score upward from the 75 I gave this site in my last review because I have already found some quite well done sets of beautiful hairy ladies in my first few days back with this site and with the large daily updates I expect to see enough worthwhile material to make my month's subscription a good deal.

Nov. 13, 2010:

However, now I am forced to downgrade even more because the quality of the updates is truly appalling. The models are lacking, with too many sporting tattoos, piercings, scars etc., the photography, as mentioned above, is consistently dull.

My take is that ATK Natural and Hairy is on its way out and is making a last ditch effort to keep or build its subscriber base by throwing 8 picture updates plus two videos a day at the consumer. This will be fine, of course, by those who like to rip a site but to the discriminating collector the present ATK is a disaster.

Just to show I am not being too subjective: I just counted the past thirteen updates containing 104 picture sets and only five of them were voted as "hot" by the subscribers!

Folks are fed up and it's obvious by the score they give the sets.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hairy Undies

43. Hairy Undies (0)

Pay
Active
70
lk2fireone (194) 07-11-09  10:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Screenshots illustrate the action in the video clips.
-Screenshots also show what the model looks like.
-No DRM
-No download limits
-Easy logon: enter username and password. Occasionally you might have to enter the secret word, but that is easily read, not heavily disguised
-No inactivity timeout from site
Cons: -No photosets for picture lovers (video screenshots only)
-A series can be very repetitious. They follow the same script, the female model appears in the same room you saw a different model in, and does the same movements, then the male actor shows up and the sex is very similar.
-The site contents and site variety is smaller than the main sites in this network. This is a site for "hairy" models, models who have some pubic hair. But the site needs more content and variety in the video clips
-The video quality of the clips is ok to good, but the value of the clips is small. There are clips with more excitement or interest at other sites in the network
-Most content is non-exclusive. You can see most of the video clips at this site on other sites at the same network.
Bottom Line: Site has limited content:
Movies 118
Total size 46 GB
compare the stats above to Devilsfilm:
movies 1,000+
total size 2,400 GB
This site is for those PU members who prefer models with some pubic hair. This is a site in the netFameSolutions network, where you get 19 sites for 1 membership price.
The basic site layout is the same for almost all sites in this network. I personally like pubic hair in the female model, but that was not enough for me to enjoy this site very much, because there are other network sites that have content that is larger and more varied, and the quality is as good or better than what is found here.
The model while having sex often appears as excited as if she is waiting for her pot pie to bake in the oven. Maybe if I moaned and groaned along with the model, it might increase my enjoyment, but then I have to worry what my neighbors might think. They might think I was having a heart attack or some other kind of physical or mental problem.
One way to easily improve the videos at this site would be to shoot the sound editor. Many of the models are continuously moaning and groaning with fake excitement, and it seriously detracts from any enjoyment you might have in watching these video clips. The male actors also tend to make a lot of fake-sounding moans and groans.
My bottom line is that this is a site with ice-cold girls and limited content. Am I being overly harsh? The technical specs/quality of the video clips is mainly ok to good for this site, as is true for most sites in this network. But the excitement factor, the personal enjoyment factor you get from watching the clips at this site, is at the boredom level. Even though a few of the models might be attractive, if they are just going through the motions of sex in a mechanical way, with their obviously fake moans and groans, I don't think the clips have much value.
I've seen clips (at other sites) where the gimmick is that the girl is supposedly sleeping and the guy has sex with her. In those clips, there was more erotic content, more excitement, partially because you didn't hear the obviously fake moans and groans from the "sleeping" girl, and partially because it's simpler for the girl to act like she's asleep than to act like she's enjoying the sex she is having with the guy who is bonking her.
Even though a girl has a pretty face and a nice body, maybe the guy should ignore her and screw the door knob or the keyhole instead.

Better yet, the girl could use the doorknob if she found it more attractive than the guy.
This site is one of the less valuable in the network. Glance through this site only after you've checked out the more important sites such as roccosiffredi, devilsfilm, silverstoneDVD and peternorth.
I am giving this site a score of 70. If the site was not part of a nice network, the score would be much lower.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot Bush

44. Hot Bush (0)

Pay
Active
70
mbaya (356) 03-23-09  07:58am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through Epoch.
-Discounted price through TBP.
-Part of network of 26 sites.
-Emphasis on short skirts, nice legs, trimmed bush. Not overly hairy or just a slight landing strip.
-Supports download managers.
Cons: -Has only 14 videos.
-Updates only twice a month so growth is very slow.
-Daily download limit for the network.
-WMV 720x480, 1462kbps or MP4 for ipod are the only download choices. The WMV is very nice quality but not DVD. I suppose I have gotten spoiled by better sites that offer better quality.
Bottom Line: Since the site just started in November it has only a few videos. They feature a lot of nice legs in short skirts as well as nicely trimmed pussy hair. This has become more and more rare nowadays. Call me old fashioned, but I would prefer more hairy girls in porn. That is a plus here in that the videos feature a lot of angles that show off the pussies and a lot of guys eating out the girls. However, some of the girls are not all that attractive and there are just too few videos. The sex is not all that different from standard porn, but most videos have a tiny bit of plot. Ok site,part of a very big network, but not enough here to give a better score. Maybe with more time, but two updates a month is not a good sign.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

45. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Newbie
70*
monty4321 (3) 02-06-12  07:17pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Clean layout of site.

Has a good proportion of higher resolution pics.
Cons: Hit and miss on the video quality.

No standard in terms of poses. You will not get similar poses from set to set. The thing about that is you will not get the poses that you want.

Focusing issues throughout.

There is rarely any ethnicity on the site.

Not enough models.

Not enough attractive models.
Bottom Line: Overall I was very disappointed with the site mainly due to the quality of the photos.

In my opinion most of the woman on the site are not too attractive. 50 - 75% of the woman is a 5 out of 10. 5 being average. If you like stunning women from time to time - look else where.

If you like a standard among poses from set to set , you will be very frustrated here. You'll be lucky to get a nice boob shot or butt shot on every set let alone the common poses. The poses are very random, because of this, you will never know what you're going to get on the daily updates - I know that some people likes this however. I was disappointed more times than not.

This is a hairy site, therefore, I thought they would be superb when it comes to seeing a clear detailed shot of the vagina. They were just good enough on the closeups. On most of the shots when zoomed out to more of a full body shot - the quality went down the toilet - and the vagina were of pretty bad detail. This was frustrating because the photos were very large, yet they were lacking in detail.

There were terrible lighting issues throughout. Some of the photo shoots were so bright that the details were burned out and blinding. Some of this may be due to photo editing. On many occasions the photo editing ruined detail, such as not being able to see detail of the woman's hair.

There were too many occasions of the hairy extreme, which included hairy legs, hairy asses, and arm pits.

If you like female masturbation videos - stay away from this site. Theses are among the most boring women masturbating that I have ever seen; the females will not utter a word; they rarely make moaning sounds; you could hear a pen drop they're so quiet; the females rarely looks into the camera nor interact; seams like they pull on or play with their pubic hair more than masturbating; the masturbation seems very fake on most videos;

The worse part of the videos is the extreme closeup shots. They stay zoomed for half to 3/4 of the videos in many cases.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

46. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Newbie
69*
critic (2) 03-10-13  05:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Some hairy models are forthcoming and natural. Many are attractive or beautiful. There is no download limit. Videos are mostly solos, which is fine, and there a fair amount of time is devoted to closeups, which I like.
Cons: Files have a different name than they appear in at the site. Thus the site might refer throughout to “This Model playing with hairy pussy on bed” but delivers “ThisModel_HiddenPinkPanties”. This, combined with a URL system that disarms cookies, makes it all but impossible to keep track of which files you’ve downloaded and which you haven’t.

Videos plagued by artificial masturbation with lots of sighs and moans: really irritating. Also the site often instructs women to ‘masturbate’ by snaking their hands around their thighs from behind, a move as artificial and labored as it sounds.

Despite assurances to the contrary, downloads break under any Macintosh download manager I’ve tried.

Too few women of color (or age).

Minor- files are named according to some object in the room, not by date, so there’s no sequence to the files, as is the case at a major competitor.
Bottom Line: Not a naturalistic site, which I prefer, especially for hairy models. If you don't mind very artificial masturbation videos with -lots- of ooooh's and aaaah's for no reason, you'd do fine here.

Hint to somewhat improve your ability to see your download history- delete the nonsense string ahead of "members" in the url and reload before downloading.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Hot Hairy Honies

47. Hot Hairy Honies (0)

Pay
Active
65
dracken (246) 05-28-12  01:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 160 scenes with a somewhat erratic update schedule but it looks like generally they get around 2 scenes up per month. The club 69 network gets an update almost daily though.
- As far as I could tell all exclusive content, a lot of interracial sex with a black male model and mostly European models (some French some Russian good mix)
- All scenes have images but no zip and the quality is only medium (around 525px × 700) They do offer a slideshow option on the site that works moderately well.
- The site does deliver on the hairy promise, all models look very natural
- A mix of models, some mature women, some more overweight girls and several skinny young looking girls. Overall the site seems focused on natural looking women, pretty minimal make-up, not the most flattering light, and pretty standard action
- A lot of stockings, high heels and corsets.
- Good download speeds, no log-outs, no issues streaming content.
Cons: - All videos are only 640x400 resolution, with some less than ideal camera angles (they seem to really like to film stuff sideways here) and rather basic light.
- No real search options. While they provide a search bar looking even for basic stuff like mature or BBW doesn't return anything. They really need a better tagging or content filtering system.
- While it's nice to see a mix of natural looking women, the site is too disorganized. There are 18 yo looking girls as well as very mature MILFS on the same page. It's hard to find the kind of model you're in the mood for.
- Almost all scenes have b/g sex, no anal, no group sex, very little solo or lesbian action. Some older scenes have a bit of a story to them while recent ones are pretty much just gonzo sex that can get a bit boring.
Bottom Line: I joined this site not really because of the hairy aspect as much because of the promise of pretty spectacular creampies and extensive use of corsets and stockings on natural almost amateur looking girls.

On both accounts the site delivers pretty well. All scenes I looked at ended with a creampie or the guy cumming oh her vagina, a nice change to the pretty standard facial at the end of most porn clips.

Also the vast majority of scenes start with the girls in some sort of corset/ bodystocking and a lot of them keep it on the entire time, making for some pretty hot, almost clothed sex scenes.

That being said the technical quality of the videos killed the mood for me. You only get one download option as wmv at 640x400 or you can stream the same quality scene as a flash movie. Even worse the scenes are often not lighted well so you get very dark zoom on the woman's vagina, considering all the girls are hairy/ natural looking and the male model is often black good luck seeing what is going on in the dim lights.

Another disappointment was the lack of a good search option. There is no real way to separate the younger looking models from the older ones. There is no way to select only the handful of lesbian scenes and good luck finding all scenes where the girl does deep-throat.

One telling aspect about the site's technical quality is the fact that the copyright at the bottom of the pages say "materials are © 2009" which is probably the last year the websites were updated.

Bad webdesign, bad video quality, but decent looking models (if you like natural/ amateur looking girls) and pretty okay action.

The one reason I say pretty okay action despite the good cumshots and outfits is that oftentimes the camera work is bizzare. They focus too much on close-ups with several scenes not even showing the girls face until 4-5 minutes into the scene. There are also a lot of strange cuts, one moment she is giving the guy head, the next they are having sex, no transition just a rather strange jump. Add to this tons of side angles and you have some rather odd video choices.

To make things a bit more complicated there are several scenes where this doesn't really apply, the lights are better and the angles less extreme, leading me to believe that they get the content from several directors. However there is no way to tell what is what. Better content tags would have really been helpful here.

The bottomline is that I enjoyed about 30% of the content on the site and the rest of the network did offer some nice action with mature women, but overall the experience was rather disappointing. Higher resolutions and a more modern web design are absolutely necessary for this site, until they make these changes I'd only recommend this to hardcore fans of natural looking women.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-47 of 47 Page :    < Previous Page


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)
2. We Are Hairy (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.14 seconds.