Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 693 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit We Are Hairy

26. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Newbie
69*
critic (2) 03-10-13  05:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Some hairy models are forthcoming and natural. Many are attractive or beautiful. There is no download limit. Videos are mostly solos, which is fine, and there a fair amount of time is devoted to closeups, which I like.
Cons: Files have a different name than they appear in at the site. Thus the site might refer throughout to “This Model playing with hairy pussy on bed” but delivers “ThisModel_HiddenPinkPanties”. This, combined with a URL system that disarms cookies, makes it all but impossible to keep track of which files you’ve downloaded and which you haven’t.

Videos plagued by artificial masturbation with lots of sighs and moans: really irritating. Also the site often instructs women to ‘masturbate’ by snaking their hands around their thighs from behind, a move as artificial and labored as it sounds.

Despite assurances to the contrary, downloads break under any Macintosh download manager I’ve tried.

Too few women of color (or age).

Minor- files are named according to some object in the room, not by date, so there’s no sequence to the files, as is the case at a major competitor.
Bottom Line: Not a naturalistic site, which I prefer, especially for hairy models. If you don't mind very artificial masturbation videos with -lots- of ooooh's and aaaah's for no reason, you'd do fine here.

Hint to somewhat improve your ability to see your download history- delete the nonsense string ahead of "members" in the url and reload before downloading.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Curvy Kitty

27. Curvy Kitty (0)

Pay
Newbie
100*
Bo M (0) 01-18-07  04:11am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (2)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: This chick is SO GREAT !!!. Her skills in pleasing her man is like a dream and her soft body is really wonderful to watch. I especially love the way she gives head and how she deepthroats and keep the dick deep down her throat extremely long and makes me get nutts when imagining myself being treated by her.
Every minute with her must be really terrific !!
Cons: Maybe I would like the albums and vids updated on when they are added so that I know whether I have checked or not. In a way it is easier to identify when related to a time that I can refer to.
Bottom Line: She always keep her site very fresh and up-to-date. Maybe that is why it is a bit difficult to remember what you have checked or not. But the site is wonderful !!
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Society SM

28. Society SM (0)

Pay
Active
65
apoctom (145) 05-15-08  01:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of top models, including Audrey Leigh and Julie Night
- Big archive of scenes dating back to 2004
- All scenes are downloadable& fast downloads (>1MB/sec)
- Zip file option for all picture sets
- No DRM
Cons: - Older videos are 320 x 240 RM and broken into 15 or so clips per update
- All scenes, including newer ones, must be downloaded in parts
- Highest quality for new scenes is 640 x 480 WMV, which is not very high
- High price
- Only weekly updates
Bottom Line: I should probably be used to over-paying for fetish/BDSM content, but it still pains me to fork over $30 a month. In particular, I hoped to have access to the site's archive and download past scenes. This is possible, but after the 5th or 6th RM file, I gave up. These older movies really need to be re-encoded and reposted, especially since new scenes only come 1 per week.

My other complaint deals with the separation of movies and pictures: there isn't any! You have to click through each gallery (often 5-8 per scene) and hunt down the 5 or so movie clips for that scene. If I wanted to download pictures, this makes sense, but if I only want the movies, why make me click through each one? Why not put a movies gallery in each scene?

The site earned its really low rating based on my rating criteria which heavily weights update frequency, ability to download movies in 1 file part, and archive size. While the site scored well on archive size, it really bombed out on update frequency and movie downloads.

If you enjoy BDSM content, I think that there are better sites out there, like Fucked and Bound and Sex and Submission. If you are really tired of those and you have an extra $30 to blow, try Society SM.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

29. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
75
messmer (137) 09-29-08  11:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of attractive, hirsute models.

Daily updates containing new photo sets as well as video segments.

A way to rate the quality of a picture set as well as the "hotness" (or not) of a given model which is great when the photographer missed in his shoot and the set is rated low. This way one can always mollify the model by going to her page and give her a five (hot) if one loves the model but hates the present set.

Good search engine.
Cons: The quality of the picture sets is wildly uneven.

In today's (Sept. 29, '08) update, for instance, one set is way too dark, one has a bluish tinge throughout, and the one containing one of my favorites is way too saturated with color to be pleasing to the ordinary eye.

I find, in general, that lately the photographers don't show too much imagination and that many of their sets could be clones of one another. I've even seen the same set of underwear on three different models.

There is still no way to download a whole set of pictures with one zip file.

Videos are still ill-lit, lacking color and definition, of early 2000s quality and not up to 2008 standards and generally not worth downloading. A few of the more tolerable ones have a video-grapher who never shuts up, forcing one to watch them with the sound turned off.
Bottom Line: I'm currently on my second subscription (this time a 3 month one) to this site because first time around I was so delighted to find a "natural" (read hairy) site that it blinded me a bit to its shortcomings.

The models are beautiful, but they (the site) desperately need new photographers and new models, a few more mature ones wouldn't hurt and also find a way to treat the picture sets with Photoshop or similar program so the pics will look more natural before they present them to their subscribers.

I really find it appalling that nothing has been done to improve the quality of the videos since I subscribed the first time. I realize that this is primarily a soft core picture site but with the sets getting boring, proof: lower and lower marks by the viewers on many of the sets, it would have been nioe to have decent videos as alternatives.

This is another site that had great success initially and is now resting on its laurels by stubbornly sticking to an outdated formula.

I would still recommend it to hair lovers because sites like this are hard to find these days. I can't even recommend an alternative since the one site that could compete with ATK Natural And Hairy has material of even lesser quality.

Bottom line: ATK's Natural And Hairy leaves me more and more bored in connection with picture sets and videos that never seem to change.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Slaves In Love

30. Slaves In Love (0)

Pay
Active
92
picky (6) 11-08-08  02:05pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Slaves are more attractive than any other BDSM site.
High quality Videos.(newer movies only)
Movies have a storyline.
Movies end with sex so you get BDSM and hardcore.
Slaves look as if they are enjoying themselves.
Cons: Older videos are lower quality.
Videos are segmented.
Infrequent updates.
Some updates are pics only.
Bottom Line: One of the best BDSM sites on the net.The tour could be improved but once inside this is a fantastic site for fans of female slaves.The slaves are mostly great looking and always look like the are enjoying themselves.

Updates are a mix of Pics and videos and they update 1 segment of video at a time. With an average of 5 segments per movie this means not many new movies each month.

However this is a site which goes for Quality over quantity and is a must for BDSM fans who enjoy the submission of beautiful women.

This is is a site I join for a month roughly every 6 months to download new material as updates are infrequent.Highly recommended.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sex And Submission

31. Sex And Submission (1)

Pay
Active
95
Jay G (65) 12-05-08  06:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. The quality of videos has improved as time goes by, camerawork is excellent in general.

2. Many beautiful ladies participating in S&M sessions with spanking, bondage, and rough (but smiling) sex.

3. Site goes out of its way with before and after shoots to show that sex was TOTALLY consentual and enjoyed by all parties.

4. Much more creative than other sites, often including more than one girl in a session, something I find much more interesting.
Cons: 1. While I enjoy the site and it does have some outdoor shots, the general dungeon, rusty factory kind of scenes get old. I'd enjoy some hot scenes in more luxurious surroundings.
Bottom Line: I've been enjoying Sex & Submission for a long time (I think I first joined when it was pretty new a few years ago). It now has tons of content for those who enjoy spanking, bondage, and rough sex. At about $30 USD its a bargain for the quality and quantity.

The girls either really enjoy it or are great actresses, smiling and saying how they'd love to come back and do more sessions. I've been coming back periodically for a few years myself.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Machine Sex Slaves

32. Machine Sex Slaves (0)

Pay
Active
80
Pornbro (8) 09-07-09  04:58am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 09-07-09  05:42am  (Update History)
Reason: additonal facts like price and some functions
Pros: - exclusive content
- about 4,000 high quality pictures (download as zip)
- 1 update per week (every monday)
- 47 full-length video clips (one clip = 25min)in different qualities for streaming and downloading (WMV)
- 47 different hot models
- no download limit
- funny latex/rubber monster in some clips
- easy but good navigation (favorites, rating, top voted, comments, find and filter options)
Cons: - there could be more scenes
- similar looking machines and locations (could be more different from scene to scene)
- model informations would be nice
Bottom Line: Machine-Sexslaves.com is one site of the Burning Ticket Network, which consist of 10 Sites (straight and fetish) at the moment, the 11th. page Fuckslut-license-test.com is announced for the 15th. of September.

This crazy site is for the dildo, toy and fuckingmachines loving people, who want to see beautiful looking girls fucked in a futuristic and mechanical looking place by a fast moving dildomachine.

My first impression was, that this content is more amusing than lustful but I am not really into this kind of fetish. So if you like this niche you will be satisfied I think. Anyway I have seen all scenes and always enjoyed them.

The girls are hot and unique dressed, so you can see nice babes in schooluniform, leather, rubber or even in a police uniform.

In few scenes there is also a second person, a crazy looking rubber guy with a gas mask (I wish I could leave a picture here :) ) who helps the girls enjoying the machines.

The Quality of the Vids and Pictures is quiet good but not HD (they are 768 x 576).

Prices: about 25,00$ for 30days recurring or 60,00$ for 3 months, 100,00$ for 1 year

The assessable amount of content is ok (47scenes + 1 per week) but it could always be more if you are just looking for site with this kind of content. For me it's a nice bonus site to the good Burning Ticket network and a welcome change.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

33. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Active
95
messmer (137) 02-06-10  12:28pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Excellent photography and videography.

Gorgeous models (58 at last count), mostly Eastern European (at least the ones I've come across so far). Might be a minus for some but I find videos and photos coming from the East generally more exciting. As an added benefit this leaves out all those annoying male comments because the models and photographers don't speak English.

HD quality videos at 1280x720 at 5000 kbps.

Videos are available in five formats, HD MP4, HD WMV, DVD MP4, DVD WMV plus iPOD/iPHONE MP4.

Recent picture sets are available zipped in Standard Resolution (1024), High Resolution (1600) and Super High Resolution (3000+).

Custom zips. Excellent search capabilities.

Smooth streaming of videos.

Two updates daily!
Cons: Some of the American models are still indulging in the aggravating habit of wearing too little lingerie and getting undressed too quickly, leaving one with three pages of nudes. Blame the photographer though.

A little quirk when it comes to downloads. If I want a video in mp4 I have to right-click to bring up the menu. If I download in WMV I have to left-click.
Bottom Line: In my opinion this new site has made itself the best "hairy" site on the web in one fell swoop. I tell you what it did to me, it re-converted me to a picture fan because most models are gorgeous and the super high resolution pictures are breathtaking. So are the videos, by the way, so I can enjoy both for a change. Most picture places neglect videos and most video places neglect photos. This site does both well.

I would have given this site my highest rating ever if it had had a larger amount of contents, but with two updates a day it shouldn't take long to build.

Maybe in another year, if the webmaster sticks to his present standards I'll give it a 99! :-)
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit St. Mackenzie\'s

34. St. Mackenzie's (0)

Pay
Active
74
Cryton (10) 04-30-10  12:39am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: • Incredibly beautiful models
• Regular updates, usually every other day
• Exclusive content
• High resolution photos, typically 3500×2329px
• Thousands of images currently totalling ~4.95GB (as of 04/30/2010)
• Excellent quality HD videos: 1280×720px, 29.97fps, 5,000Kbps
• No DRM
Cons: • Disappointingly soft-core
• Blurry, out-of-focus photography
• Only 47 videos, of which only 13 are HD (as of 04/30/2010)
• Poor, shaky SD videos: 640×480px, 30fps, 928Kbps
• Excessive audio bandwidth in HD videos: 410Kbps, 96kHz
• Download managers do not work with video clips
• Not all models have video clips
• Content organisation could be improved
• Same video/photos appear in multiple model profiles
Bottom Line: The idea is good, a school full of hot female students and equally hot teachers. It's the porn world's equivalent of St Trinian's, a place where the students wear the typical fantasy uniform of white shirt, short skirt, stockings and heels. They've often been naughty and often need punishing, which usually involves them having to strip. OK, the various scenarios are fairly repetitive and a little contrived, but...

...if you thought Talulah Riley, Gemma Arterton and Tamsin Egerton were something else in the films, then the models of St. Mackenzie's are their equal, and then some. Many are simply gorgeous, in fact it's hard to single out those who aren't. Candice Collyer, Faye Tasker, Holly Newberry, Faye Taylor, Lucy-Anne Brooks, Kate Stroud and Big Brother UK contestant Amy Alexandra are amongst the stand-outs.

The teachers are equally stunning; Miss Elise, Miss Lilly, Miss Millicent, Miss Nicola and Secretary Rachel, who has the most incredible breasts I've ever seen.

All of this has the making of a fantastic site, but for various reasons it's soft-core only and really soft at that. Rarely do photo sets include pussy shots and when they do, usually only fleeting glimpses. Some models have been a little more revealing of late with the occasional open-leg shots, but there's no spreading whatsoever. The site could be exceptionally erotic from a lesbian standpoint, but girls hardly ever kiss let alone get up to anything naughty. Likewise, while most of the teachers are of a similar age to the students, there's also the potential for some hot action between younger/older models set against the taboo background of a boarding school, but the site's owners maintain the notion of such a thing being inappropriate. Clearly, someone needs to realise that St. Mackenzie's isn't a real school.

The lack of more revealing content is a hot topic on the site's forum. The official line: "Most UK models only work to topless/soft nude. So finding 40+ models of a high standard (which you all expect) that do 'girl thingy' shots would be impossible."

Really!?

As for the quality of the content, the video falls into two camps. Horribly shaky, poor quality SD clips and fantastic-looking, steady HD sequences. The latter are a joy to behold because the data rate is sufficient to eliminate blocking and reveal lots of detail. The photos are a different matter; the resolution is huge but many of them are blurry, out-of-focus, or both. The EXIF shows that most were shot using a Nikon D3, but the results are so bad I can only assume it's either faulty or the photographer is really, really hopeless (the use of up to ISO 2000 pointing to the latter).

Personally, I absolutely love the beautiful models but find it totally infuriating that the action and photographs are so tame. The poor standard of photography also detracts from the fantastic-looking teachers and students. The site could be exceptional, but it needs to get more daring and stop taking itself so seriously.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rage Story

35. Rage Story (0)

Pay
Active
69
pat362 (371) 06-19-11  08:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -All exclusif content.
-Videos can be downloaded in 4 different formats which include WMV at 1920x1080, MPG & WMV at 768x432 and MP4 at 480x270.
-All photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and there are over 400 pics per set and the resolution is 1200x800.
-Content is dated.
Cons: -They claim that you get bonus access to their sites mybrosgf.com and meetmysweet.com but in fact you don't have access to any other site. If you click either links then you are brought to their standard join page where you can pick a one day trial for 1$ but you can only download the most recent video.
-1/3 of each models video page is reserved for content available on their other 2 sites but you have to join those to see it.
-There are only 13 videos at the moment and they only uplaod a new video once a month except for the 10 that were available when they went online in late March early April.
-There is a little scenario where the boyfriend is pissed at the girl for whatever reason but most of the dialogue is in Russian and they didn't bother to put subtitles for us to know what they are saying.
-They offer bonus content but it's all leased material from other sites or movies.
-The join price is way too high for the current content.
Bottom Line: The only reason I joined this site was because TBP claimed you got access to 2 other sites with one membership. There's no way I'd have paid 30 dollars for only 13 videos. Whats worse is that the people responsible for this site have a notice at the bottom of the members section that reads: "Don't Forget. Access to this site gives you bonus access to the following sites". Of course if you click on either link then you will get the options mentioned in the Cons.

-You can see that this site has potential but it's difficult to recommend to anyone because there is not enough content available and at the rate of one video per month then you will only have 31 videos by the end of 2012.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bound Gangbangs

36. Bound Gangbangs (1)

Pay
Active
93
pat362 (371) 07-19-11  09:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very well filmed scenes with intense multiple guys on one girl sex.
-All the videos have a little scenario which is explained by the performer during the interview at the beginning of each video.
-They have a good selection of models that cover different body types and age group as well.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV Med or HD as well as MP4 Med or HD.
-The content is dated and they update with one new scene each week.
-There is a calendar for all upcoming Kink site shoots.
-You can use a download manager.
Cons: -The biggest issue with Kink sites as always been in regards to the photos. Kink sites brake photo sets into 3 or more sections. You can still download each section as a complete zip file but it would be nice to offer a complete photoset in one file.
-The site is still pretty small with only 19 videos. Mind you that wasn't a problem for me.
-Videos are all over an hour long so some might find them a little long.
Bottom Line: -This is a departure for Kink and in my opinion a pleasant one. Here they have created a site where the the sex is center and BSDM is almost non-existant. When you couple that with the quality of porn produced by Kink and you have the best gangbang site on the net. The only thing that is holding it back is the size of the site. 19 videos is a tiny number and that might put some people off but the quality of what's availabe should more than satisfy anyone who's into this type of sex.

-The selection of models is about the only place where I`d like to see some improvement. They have a good selection but many of the models have done gangbangs elsewhere so they aren`t necessarily new to this type of sex. Of course it`s not every performer that is willing and able to film these types of scene.

-I highly recommend this site to anyone who loves well filmed multiple guys on girl scenes.

**To be avoided by anyone who's looking for gangbang scenes with a BSDM theme. You won't get enough to satisfy you.**

-My score is only because of the size of the site. I would have given this site an above 95.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

37. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
71
2 Free K (11) 05-24-11  02:00am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Updated: 09-08-11  09:34pm  (Update History)
Reason: Who knew I could become this disinterested in naked chicks? Whatever kind of help this site needs, my money definitely can't provide. Avoid for now.
Pros: - Well organized, easy to navigate
- Massive amounts of content collected over many years
- Wide selection of females, many of which are harder to find on other porn sites
- Wide selection of photographers
- ZIP downloadable image sets
- New, customizable layout
Cons: - Some girls may be too hairy for some
- Lately the hottie-to-bland ratio has gone downhill
Bottom Line: O.K. I've been frequenting this site regularly since 2004 or so, soon after discovering ATK Galleria. I'd say for every 2 months spent at ATK Galleria, I spend one at Natural and Hairy, just to see what's new while letting new sets accumulate at Galleria.

This site is definitely worth joining: there are some serious hotties there, many "bookstore"-type chicks without getting into cartoon makeup territory. I recommend this site way, way, way above Suicide Girls. They're new layout is incredibe, btw.

However, as a longtime fan, I must agree with the recent reviews here - it's in a mild slump. Some of these new girls can be rather uninspiring. I don't care if she has hair - she still needs to be cute and NATURAL. I have pretty chill tastes concerning women (I don't mind tattoos, I LOVE short hair, etc), but freaky doesn't always mean better. Let me add, a lot of people here love the photographer Sean R. I like him, but I prefer BMB, Afterglow, and Atomic W. Sean R gets cuties, but shoots too many contorted crotch shots for my taste.

In summary - I always come back to this site and stock up on the new cuties that don't look like dive bar sailors. I'm usually bored by the time my subscription expires though, at which point I rejoin ATK Galleria and rejoice at the abundance of NATURAL beauty! Call me old-fashioned...
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit The Squirt Instructor

38. The Squirt Instructor (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
chiselman (0) 05-30-12  10:22am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: high res
mice models
other niches
Cons: I subscribed to this website because your website review said all material is downloadable.
dont be fooled, it is only streamable. i send the creditcard processer an enquiry and received this reponse "Dear Customer,

We are in receipt of your inquiry.

Subscription id: 0112151301000001531


We have tested the video content on the website and have verified that only streaming is available. However, the website does not state that you are or will be able to download any video content. If you are having issues streaming the video material, please contact us back."
Bottom Line: good value but no downloads available
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Divine Breasts

39. Divine Breasts (0)

Pay
Active
50
BubbaGump (18) 06-09-12  03:44pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -- Creative photography
-- Unique content.
-- A good number of classic photosets.
-- Site delivers what is advertised--images of women with Large BBW breasts.
Cons: -- Technical quality of images can be hit or miss.
-- Primitive site design and interface.
-- Exceedingly poor streaming speeds of both photos and videos throughout my entire memberhips period.
-- Site is not growing much.
-- Limited content.
-- Vdeos are just a novelty.
-- Site owners play games with content(hold back content and offer to let you view more content if you stick around longer or sign up somewhere else)
--Bandwidth Limit imposed to 550 MEG per day.
Bottom Line: Most of the models at this site are of the BBW variety and most sport large EEE size breasts. There is very little silicone here. These are well-endowed amateur models for the most part, with a few glam types thrown in.

Full nudity is rare and the site is mostly softcore. It's all about catering to those with a breast fetish. The photography, in many caes, is actually quite well done and creative. There are a few poorly done sets but this is the exception. However, the owners skimp on resolution at times and the actual technical quality of the displayed images can vary from fairly decent 1600 resolution to grainy and out-of-focus 1024.

If you are into this genre and natural, large breasts are your thing, you would likely find the photo content here to be interesting. However, that interest will fade pretty quickly, as the amount of content is a bit limited and the site seems to be growing at a snails pace. Unless you view only a few photosets once or twice during a one-month subscription period, you will find the content runs out pretty quickly.

Videos are pretty much a novelty and the main show are the photosets. With very few exceptions, most videos are small 350 clips that run perhaps a minute or two.

The site designers also have a habit of 'padding' the numbers when it comes to overall photosets available. For example, they have created a fair number of photosets for each model. Model X may have twenty photosets available for viewing on her page. However, what they do in most cases is split up a single photo shoot into a number of different sets. For example, a lingerie shoot might be split up into three or four seperate sets. The first set on the page would be perhaps fourteen photos of the model disrobing, the next would show the model reclining while partially disrobed, etc etc. In essence, you are being given ten different photosets for a model, when in reality, they are really just one or two actual photo shoots split up.

This type of presentation is annoying and similar things happen in other areas. There are a lot of cross-sell marketing tools being used. In more than one case, a popular model will only have one or two photosets(or perhaps none at all and a few videos will be in the model area) and a marketing link advises you that "btw..this model has her own page !". Unfortunately, that page requires a seperate memebership.

The owners also let you know that the longer you stick around, the more content you can see. For example, Model X may have only a few photosets or a video that is incomplete and ends with a tease. They will then advise you that the longer you stay past 30 days, the more content you get to see --"Want to see more of her? blah blah blah.."

Given the limited content already available, this may be a good business model to get people to stick around, but the content isn't that great that I would eprsonally pay more just to see a bit more of Model X. IMO, this tactic will simply rub people the wrong way and they will just move on. Also, who says you aren't going to do the same thing if I sign up for Model X's page? I would advise the owners to rethink this strategy. You will more often than not just succeed in ticking off your customer base instead of given them a reasont o want to stay around with knowing they won't get the same treatment for next month's rent.

As far as the site design and layout, it is quite primitive. It gets the job done. However, the menus and navigation tools are primitive. The actual streaming speeds of content is about the worse I have ever experienced at any time with any online service of any kind. Strangely, the quickest way to get content on this site is to download the photosets. Usually, the opposite is true.

Without fail, I could view perhaps one or two images in a gallery, then any subsequent images would take a ridiculous amount of time to simply load. I have a high speed DSL connection and have never experienced anything this bad.

The site also limits you to 500 MEG download per day. You cannot stream or DL past this limit. In short, the strategy of this site seems to be to employ any possible means to get people to stick around longer than thirty days. They make it is hard as possible for you to stream or view the already limited content at the site in a thirty day period. Limiting to 500 MEG download a day and freezing the stream after viewing two photos means it will take six months to get to all of the content that would take a few days of viewing to get to at any other site. The goal is obviously to frustrate you by prolonging the time to to view images via streaming so you download the sets and quickly eat up your daily allotment.

Crooked? Underhanded? Shady? I will leave that for you to judge.

I would give the actual photo content a score of 70 but the experience a 0.05. Since I can only score a minimum of 50, I will give the site an overall score of 50.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit St. Mackenzie\'s

40. St. Mackenzie's (0)

Pay
Active
80
tangub (151) 10-04-12  01:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 82 Gorgeous models
100% Exclusive content
Updates with a new photo set or video every other day
High resolution 2300 x 3500 photos
Zip downloads for all photo sets
Videos available in a choice of HD and Low resolution wmv
All content date stamped
Billing by CCBill with no regional pricing
Cons: Very softcore, mostly topless and some mild nudity
These hi res photos don’t look as sharp as you would expect when blown up to full size, too many look out of focus, blurred or grainy as previous reviewers have mentioned with little sign of any improvement in recent updates.
Every zip download has the file name “photo_zip” so you need to rename everything yourself.
File names of the videos are just a date so will also need renaming if you want to know who is in the video when you come to view it.
No file sizes given.
Around half the videos don’t have download options.
The older videos without the HD option look grainy on full screen.
Only one photo size, no small or medium options.
Primitive site design and navigation
No search tools.
Bottom Line: I received a $9.95 email promo offer to this site and after checking out the tour and spotting some of my favourite Only Tease models here like Hayley Marie and Lucy Anne I couldn’t resist signing up for a month to check it out at that price. St Mackenzie’s describes themselves as the most unruly institute of learning in England where it’s sexy students and equally sexy teachers get up to all sorts of mischievous antics. Only problem is they never really get as naughty as you might have expected or hoped for. This is only really a very softcore teasing site about the same strength as Only Tease where you will see the girls posing in their sexy uniforms, stockings and lingerie before stripping and posing topless or nude. A small minority of the models have some open leg shots but most will only give you the occasional glimpse of pussy. There’s no masturbation or toy play and even though there are lots of sets and videos featuring two, three or more girls there’s no real sexual contact between the models other than removing clothes and occasional touching.

St Mackenzie’s has been online since January 2009 and with consistent updates has grown into a reasonable sized collection already. A new update is added every other day and a typical month’s updates consist of 9 new photo sets and 6 new videos. As of today the site has a total of 382 photo sets (35,304 images) and 222 videos. A word of warning: only 107 of the videos come with download options, the rest can only be viewed online.

The navigation is fairly basic with not many options. You can browse “updates” which lists all the content by year and month starting with the most recent or via the model index which is split in to two parts, “pupils” and “teachers”. The only problem with browsing via the “updates” section is that the videos there have no download links. Going into the pupils and teachers listings on each model’s page you will find her 5 most recent updates listed with a scene description and links to download the picture zip and video download options. Videos and picture sets beyond the 5 most recent are listed below under “more updates”. Click on the picture sets here and they will open in a new window with the zip download link. Click on the videos here and Windows Media Player will open and after a few seconds buffering will stream the video online. They don’t provide any download links for videos beyond those that appear within any model’s 5 most recent updates. You can pretty much see the site layout for yourself prior to joining as the tour has the same site layout as the member’s area with the exception of the download links.

The videos that can be downloaded usually have two options, a HD 1280 x 720 wmv @ 8000 kbps and low res 640 x 480 wmv @ 900+ kbps. A few of the older videos only have the low res option. The videos are usually around 5 minutes long and usually consist of the model’s posing and teasing in their uniforms with some upskirt views and panty flashing before removing their clothes. It’s another one of those sites with mostly silent movies, there’s no background music and the model’s seldom talk, at least not in any of the one’s I’ve watched so far.

As for the photos which is my preferred niche, they look fine when viewing them downsized to monitor size in a slide show but when opening them up and viewing them in their full size resolution you can certainly see some flaws as I mentioned in the cons above. I get the impression this is the work of the same photographer from Breath Takers. The photo shoots are pretty much all taken inside the same house recognisable from Breath Takers and the style of photography is pretty much the same where in most of the shoots the models are stood in front of or close to a window making use of the natural light as it penetrates the window.

Overall I did enjoy the collection of gorgeous British models and their sexy outfits in spite of the site’s flaws and it was certainly helped by the fact I only paid $10 to join so the site just about scrapes a probably over generous 80 from me. It’s an ok site if you have a fetish for girls teasing in uniforms, mini-skirts, stockings, tights with plenty of upskirts and panty flashing but if you require explicit nudity or sexual action then probably best to avoid this site.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hey Little Dick

41. Hey Little Dick (1)

Pay
Active
80
gaypornolover (38) 03-04-13  04:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (33), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Unique concept and content, well done
+ Good quality videos
+ No DRM
+ Free access to two other sites
+ Bills with CCBill
+ Excellent forum which takes suggestions for scenes
+ Regular, dated updates
+ Full photosets including a zip file for each scene
Cons: - Photos are small in size
- Later updates move away from original concept
- I found streaming slow
- Slightly confusing video options - some higher-resolution files are WMV only, some lower-resolutuon are MP4 only
- Same male models are reused over and over, and some aren't really that small
Bottom Line: This is one hell of an unusual site, and I appreciate it's not really aimed at me - though I'm not entirely sure who it is aimed at! Sheer curiosity made me subscribe!

It's basically a kind mild femdom site, in that it focuses on women humiliating men who have a small penis. There's also a CFNM (Clothed Female, Naked Male) element to the majority of the scenes. It's certainly a very specialist niche. I guess it's aimed at anyone who likes to see men humiliated, and perhaps at men who have small penises who enjoy being humiliated.

I have always had a fetish for humiliation, so although I am gay there is not equivalent gay site, and CFNM-type sites, which tend to feature more ordinary-looking straight guys being humiliated by ladies who keep their clothes on, is therefore an interesting niche for me.

Most of the videos are themed around two or three women who get a guy naked on some pretext, then laugh and mock his small cock. They usually masturbate the guy till his comes then laugh at him all the more. The women mainly remained clothed, though often in skimpy outfits, and sometimes flash themselves or get completely naked to turn the guy on. There is the occasional bit of BDSM - the guy might get his balls kicked or his cock abused - but it's fairly mild and infrequent. Occasionally a guy with a larger cock is brought on to humiliate the small-cocked guy further.

The female models, whilst not in my area of expertise, do seem attractive and are mostly in their twenties and slender, though there is a sprinkling of older ladies too. Some remain clothed, some get naked or near-naked.

Later videos though in the last few weeks seem to be moving away from this concept, and feature solo female models who strip off and talk to the male viewer, mocking him for having a tiny penis. Occasionally she might have sex with a man with a big penis and tell the viewer he's a real man and he'd have no chance with her. Obviously this is aimed at heterosexual men who like to be humiliated, but I'm not sure how effective that would be - I've seen similar "humiliate the viewer" style porn myself and it never quite convinces for me. These are all recent videos and reflect a big depature for the site, as all previous videos featured a male model being mocked. Obviously these later videos are of no interest to me, and mean the site is heading in a new direction which may or may not work for you.

This brings me on to a weakness of the site - the repeated use of the same male models. Obviously finding models who are willing to be humiliated on a site like this is not easy - so the same model is often used repeatedly in several scenes. This is great if they have a model you like, but obviously not if you don't like one. The male models vary greatly - some young and cute, but more often in their 30s and 40s, with some quite overweight and not necessarily attractive - though again this kind of goes with the theme of the site. Some of the earlier models actually had quite average or even fairly large dicks, so it kind of didn't work on the realism side, though I still enjoyed them.

Acting is incredibly good - the women are great at dishing out the abuse and most of the male models are great at acting surprised, hurt, turned on etc. though some just kind of sit there a little dazed!

Video is a bit of a mixed bag. You can choose between WMV or MP4 for every scene, which is good, but sometimes the quality is different.

In later videos it seems both types are 1280x720, but one WMV version I tried had a bitrate around 10,000 and 23fps, the MP4 had 30,000 bitrate and 25fps. However, in older videos the MP4 version was the lower-quality, with a 856x480 size, and the WMV tended to be better quality, with a bitrate around 3,000 to the MP4s 1,500. So you'd have to download different file types to get the best quality depending on how old the video is. Quality did seem decent whatever I tried though, and it's all very professionally shot - well-lit and clear.

I found the streaming pretty slow - downloads were about average speed.

Each video has a full photoset, which is good, and a zip file for the photos, but the photos themselves are nothing special at 800x534, and are watermarked.

There is a forum where you can ask questions and even suggest scenes - they say if you suggest one and enough people like it they'll make it for you - I didn't read all the posts so I can't say for sure this does happen, but the administrator does seem to often reply to suggestions.

Overall this is an interesting site which I would recommend if anything about femdom/CFNM/humiliation does it for you - but be aware it is going in a new direction now.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lady Suspender

42. Lady Suspender (0)

Pay
Newbie
100*
kazik (0) 03-09-07  08:30am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: good use of amateur models, especially older women 45 +, excellent vintage underwear, bullet bra's & corselets, FF nylons & pantyhose. the photo galleries are a good mix of nostalgic pics and great live shots of the models taken during filming. totally unposed!! just great
Cons: They should have some black & asian models to make the films more interesting.
Bottom Line: I have been a member for over 12 months and receiving a loyalty discount. More discounts to come in later months. The films I have bought are excellent BBC quality and were delivered within 3 days of order. Customer service is very good and they held my hand in the early days when I was unsure how to download & save their free film clips etc. If vintage underwear worn by amateur hairy mature models is your thing, you certainly wont be disappointed.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bianca\'s Latex Lair

43. Bianca's Latex Lair (0)

Pay
Active
81
BostonPJR (72) 03-22-07  03:23pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Bianca is busty, sexy, just plain awesome.
- Website is slick, well arranged and easy to navigate.
- The photo content is well shot, high quality and professional.
- Bianca's outfits cover a fun and wide variety of fetishwear and themes from flirty favorites (sexy cheerleader, sexy teacher) to hardcore latex.
- Growing number of 2-girl sets. Bianaca has some attractive friends too (whose sites you'll be tempted to also join)
Cons: - A little buggy. Upon first login I often have to right click and open in new window to get to the members section or else it won't let me in.
- Expensive! And you prepay for first two months.
- Video section needs a total overhaul. Too few videos. Most are behind-the-scenes style with terrible audio. Few vids are are of any quality worth talking about.
Bottom Line: Bianca Beauchamp is already practically a household name in the world of fetishwear; and a true beauty. The sheer variety and quality of the pics here combined with the fact that Bianca doesn't look bad in a singe one of them would make this a great site. But the price and the lack of good video content means 1. a waste of some great outfits that would have looked so hot in motion and 2. a site with content that, regrettably doesn't stack up against the price. It hurts to give this low a rating.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Flower Tucci

44. Flower Tucci (0)

Pay
Active
72
badandy400 (103) 08-11-08  06:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Part of good network
Has same model in all videos, hence the name
Fair price, $25...only because of network
Extremely easy, clean navigation
Site does not require daily log in
A lot of hardcore and multiple girl scenes
Photos have zips
Videos are long
Cons: DOWNLOAD LIMIT, same as rest of network
NO LONGER UPDATING, what you see is what you get
Bit rates on videos needs improvement
Photos are of a small size
Not a lot of content
Could use more of the aspects of a model site
Bottom Line: This site is really just a bonus to add to the rest of the network. Unless you really have a thing for Flower Tucci this site does not support its command of $25 a month. Hell with the 15 movie per day limit it would only take you 2 days to download the 28 videos.

The 28 videos are about 50 minutes a piece at 1.2 MBit/s. This quality could use some work, but I would not expect to see anything since they are not even updating. It would take 10.7 GB of your hard drive to get the videos and 1.03 GB to get the zipped photo sets.

The content of the scenes is nice though. They also include some very attractive women for group action. Many times there is three women including Flower.

Of course, Flower herself is a rather good looking woman. So I see absolutely no issue in seeing her in every scene.

Every scene is hardcore, which is good and bad. I know a lot of people like hardcore, and I do too. But, I do like to see some pure lesbian videos especially when it is a site dedicated to a specif model. Or perhaps a solo scene or two.

The site lost points mostly because it is not big enough and it is not updating. I do not hold this against the network though. I understand it is pretty hard to update a specific model site if she does not come back for anymore shoots. The site would get an 85 if it were larger and at least still updating.

It is certainly worth a look at, but mostly on as a secondary to other sites on the network.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Spankings

45. Real Spankings (0)

Pay
Active
83
TheSquirrel (53) 02-27-09  02:52pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There is a model index.
They have an updates calendar.
Most of the models are attractive girl next door types (or would be if the girl next door ever really looked like that).
A massive catalogue of material to choose from.
Old and experienced site with a good reputation, and reliable billing agents, so you shouldn't be risking your money.
They do have photos.
No DRM.
No download limit.
No regional discrimination for subscribers.
Very good value at $21.95.
The clips are quite often filmed in real time, without too many cuts or unnatural breaks.
There are usually 2 camera angles. One for the girl's ass, and one for the face.
Cons: Poor and confusing navigation, although it has improved in the past year.
The videos are even at the highest 700 kb/sec rate, not great quality by today's standards. Some of the old clips are very poor quality.
No WMV, only a choice of Flash Player or Real Media.
The clips have watermarks that can sometimes be obtrusive and annoying.
The best spankers have disappeared. The more recent productions have been weak.
They went nearly 2 years without new material, relying mostly on what had already been shot, while they waited to move to a new studio.
Not that many models, few new ones recently. So you see the same faces, (or whatever) a lot of the time.
Far too many clothed spankings, especially in recent years.
Being American the cane is hardly ever used, and then only very lightly.
The photos are posed, and not from the actual spanking clip.
Too much talking.
Some of the clips are cut up into ridiculously short segments, sometimes straight down the middle of the action.
Bottom Line: Bottom line - very appropriate given the niche.
I was last a member of this site about a year ago. I rejoined because my computer got a virus and all my files were wiped out. I wouldn't have joined for the more modern clips. The best spankers Lady D left long ago, and Mr M is not to be seen, most of the time.
The recent clips I find far too light and usually with the model partially or fully clothed. I find this boring. The old clips are by far the best, but the drawback is the quality is quite poor on a lot of these. They are redoing some of them in a new bit rate of 700kb/sec.
The picture quality and sound has improved over the years as the content quality has decreased IMO.
Here is roughly the bit rate over the years.

2001 - 75kb/sec
2002 - 150 kb/sec. Some clips redone in 750kb/sec or 350 kb/sec from here onwards.
2003 - 225 or 450kb/sec.
2004 - 225 or 450kb/sec.
2005 - 225 or 450kb/sec
2006 - 350/700 kb/sec mostly from here.

Despite all the negatives I would still recommend this site as the No.1 choice for anyone who is interested in spanking but has never joined a spanking website. Some other sites deliver harder spankings, but here they are usually around moderate severity, which is reasonably safe, and almost old fashioned, for those who have an interest in this sort of thing. It is not my favourite spanking site because of all the negatives, but I still find it good value. It is almost the Video Box of the spanking world. It is like finding a 3 story warehouse of spanking clips. If you are looking for a clip in particular, it is quite hard to find. At least they have a reasonable model directory and calendar of updates. Last year I would have said this site has the worst navigation in the known universe, with the one exception of my girlfriend's map reading, but things have improved a little. The site now looks like something from the 21st century. A lot of faults, but is worth a look given the price.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dildo And Fisting

46. Dildo And Fisting (0)

Pay
Active
80
pat362 (371) 06-29-09  08:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Access to a network of 9 sites.
-The models are in their teens to early 20's.
-The model selection is quite good with a wide range of body types to choose from
-Navigation within the site and network is easy.
-The sex is raunchy and quite extreme.
-The talking is mostly or all in English.
-Scenes can be downloaded or streamed.
-The downnloads are either regular definition with a 16:9 aspect ratio, 640x480 and 2000 bitrate while hi def is 16:9 ratio, 1280x720 and 6000bitrate
-Photosets can be downloaded in a zip file.
-They currently have 37 scenes
Cons: -The biggest drawback to this site and all other in the network is that you can only download one scene at a time. You can still navigate but you cannot open any other downloads. The average download time is about 20-30 minutes per scene.

-The sex may be a little too raunchy for some peoples taste.

-The model's name are not necessarily the one we know her under.
Bottom Line: -The score would be much higher if it weren't for the "only one" download at a time.

-I thought that they might have improved that since the last time one of us reviewed them but alas they haven't.

-The content for the site is quite good with an emphasis on anal sex with either toys, penises, hands or all of the above.

-I was rather suprised to see what some of the models did on this site since their prior works was far more softcore. (I'm not complaining).

-The price is reasonable for the full access to the network(32.95US).

-The rest of the network is a mixture of hit and miss, but when thy hit they do a very good job.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Plumper Pass

47. Plumper Pass (0)

Pay
Active
75
messmer (137) 09-20-09  11:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 3321 videos,

+ 41581 pictures,

+ 213 models,

+ True to its niche,

+ Picture sets come zipped,

+ List of Models has them listed with picture.

+ Something for every taste when it comes to BBWs.
Cons: - Claims to be a network of five sites but should be treated as one.

- Videos are in wmv. format for best quality at 640x480 with bitrates ranging from an unorthodox 984 to 1508! Not up to 2009 standards but not bad. Just not crisp enough to deserve a plus.

- The same strange figures are found in connection with their pictures. Latest sets I downloaded had 667x1000 pixels for Portrait and 1500x1000 pixels for Landscape format in the same set. Again not up to par when compared to other sites.

- Very intrusive watermark on videos and pictures, it draws the eye to the logo rather than to the video itself.

- Streaming stops and buffers every few seconds.

- Daily updates are promised but that basically means that each of the five sites is updated once a week and in the short time I've been with the site I've only seen one update in three days.

- Site will be quickly exhausted by the average user (see below).

- Site support was non-responsive in connection with a question I had.
Bottom Line: I must confess that I've developed a liking for BBWs and found some of the videos I downloaded quite appealing, yet at the same time, I have the feeling that I shall be done with this site shortly because they don't have enough contents when it comes to the various body types within the site. BBW is such a large (no pun intended) category and not every BBW video will appeal to every BBW lover.

Those who like "normal (as compared to runway model thin) to slightly plump" will find what they are looking for, those who like "regular BBWs" will find what they are looking for, and those whose taste goes for the "obese to really obese" will find what THEY are looking for, but the site simply does not contain enough material to keep everyone happy for longer than two weeks tops.

Speed, btw, was quite good (1.7 - 1.8 MB/s) with DownloadThemAll through Firefox but I was only allowed two downloads at a time with that download manager and couldn't go anywhere until one of the downloads was complete. Download by ordinary means weighed in at around 450 KB/s.

It is not a bad site by any means and will appeal to lovers of plump women. Not every model will be to everyone's taste, some are prettier than others, some are plumper than some Porn Users' tastes might tolerate, but it is a change from the usual fare, and even with the limited contents that appealed to me I don't think I was cheated in any way by taking out a month's subscription.

An afterthought: The site also refers to 665 scenes, I left this out of the statistics because I find it confusing. They do not have DVDs and scenes usually refer to a part of a DVD, so I put down the 3321 videos they list and let it go at that. Maybe someone can enlighten me on this!
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Orgy Max

48. Orgy Max (0)

Pay
Active
75
slutty (111) 12-01-09  06:21pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The site has some good fetish content.
It looks like all (or at least most) of the content is original
Some very attractive women, doing some crazy shit
Cons: Too expensive
Navigation is bad, it is nice that they have the model directory, but it only lists some of the models.
The scenes are split into several pieces.
Some models listed as appearing in a scene (especially on the orgy sites) only appear in passing.
Download speeds aren't the best.
Video quality is okay (640x480) was the best I saw) and the files can get quite large
Bottom Line: Like my rating suggests, average site. If you have the time to dig through it all or have a specific fetish (clothed sex, for example) this might be a good site for you - but I'd look at all the sites first and make sure it is what you want). Some sites don't appear to update often, if at all. If it were a little cheaper and they greatly improved the navagation (put everything on one site, have a full model index) I would probably recommend it.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mistress Kent

49. Mistress Kent (0)

Pay
Newbie
89*
jodd (1) 07-20-10  09:46am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: As fem dom sites go this is such a refreshing change from the all to glossy hard nosed impersonal Mistress sites that are flooding the web Mistress Kent is truly a Mistress that has the art and clearly loves what she does,this She expresses no better in the anal scenes This Mistress absolutely loves to fuck arse,The scenes though filmed in an amateur style come across as real life, just as a video diary of what goes on in her life and household on a daily basis,personally myself am not into the bi stuff but the other content far out weighs this wathchin Mistress Kent smile and comment whilst she is fucking her slave is priceless.
This site is very much worth a visit with a 7 day introductory offer and a reasonably priced monthly subscription you cannot go wrong,there are many interactive features and it is also possible to chat direct with the Mistress all in all though not as slick of some femdom sites this is one of the most intriguing and addictive sites
Cons: Plenty bad lighting ,camerawork etc This site is not one of them pristine sites from Russia,Some bi but thats a personal thing .
Bottom Line: As Mistress sites go this is one of the best i have been to loads going on lots of information great filming action reasonably priced,Though the real big attraction is Mistress Kent herself, a real domme a real person hey sometimes she appears with out makeup,never seen that before, Mistress Kent clearly loves what She does and this comes across so well She definitely has the art and the definite ability to get right into a subs head,She is incredibly sexy, petite and devastating and if by chance you have a foot fetish she has the most gorgeous size3 feet absolutely perfect.a wicked hummour and a very scary smile.
This is very much a walts and all site which to me is the real essence of the site This is a lady has set up a very alternative lifestyle where real people do real pervy things on camera very much in its infancy though the updates are prolific every day something is up, videos twice a week,all in all great value for money and well worth a visit.
I would fully recommend this site i have been to many and this is by fay the most refreshing site I have seen for a very long time.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Rough 18

50. Rough 18 (0)

Pay
Active
60
lk2fireone (194) 09-18-10  03:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Zip file for each photoset.
-Video download formats:
WMV: high, medium, low quality
MPEG
Quicktime
High quality WMV is 1440x810 (6256kbps)
-Updates once a week video/photoset
-Video runtime : 20 minutes to 60 minutes
-Easy login.
-No DRM.
-Very fast response to an email from tech support. But the response was not helpful.
Cons: -Only 1 size for the photos.
-Photos are a visual record of the video shoot, not an original shoot.
-No streaming option to view the videos.
-Some video files download with no estimate of file size or download time.
-The videos are overly long. A single sex scene should last from 10-20 minutes. There are many sex scenes that last 40-60 minutes, and the action gets boring and repetitious.
-It's strange the female model's face and body are not displayed clearly in the photoshoots.
I want to know what the model looks like, and the screenshots do a lousy job of that.
-Site navigation is poor.
-Search is poor.
-There is no simple listing of the models.
-Videos are large files. The high quality video file can be 1 - 2.3 GB or larger, for a video that runs 20 minutes to 60 minutes.
-Volume on some videos is too low.
-Download problems: on my last 2 video downloads, the download stops after downloading about 1 GB, and won't resume. Currently can't download any videos from this site.
Bottom Line: This is a site for mild BDSM (Bondage,Discipline, Sado-Masochism).
I do not care for the niche.
But even if I did like the niche, I believe the site is not very good.
You can't get a good idea of what
the models look like until you play the video. The photosets should give an excellent idea of what the model looks like, but they mostly don't.
Instead of giving clear photos of the face and body of the model, the photos focus on the "action", the girl being tied or abused or whatever, but you can't see her face or body very clearly in most photos. It's just lousy photography. And in many cases, you are not able to tell the model in 2 different videos is the same girl, because you don't get a clear idea of her face and body.

The videos are too long. A single sex scene can last 20-60 minutes. Beyond 20 minutes, I think people tend to lose interest, find the action boring, repetitive, dull. This is
not a movie with a plot, where you have brief sex scenes along the way. Instead, it's a single sex scene that loses it's impact after you watch
the scene for 10 or 20 minutes.
This is basically dull spanking porn.
My fantasy, to improve the videos, would be to have some guy in a leather costume and mask, come into the scene, and bash the male model who is
doing the spanking, with a metal baseball bat. The girl could jump up and down, screaming, "My hero, my lord", until the spanker is unconscious or dead. Then the girl could give her hero a bj or whatever to finish the scene.
This would serve to add color to the scene (the red blood), plus serve as a break in the dull sex scene, and lead to renewed interest in the next
sex scene (the bj or whatever), and remove the idiot doing the spanking.
I don't usually appreciate watching this type of female abuse, even if it's supposed to be consensual.
On a more realistic note, I have seen a few BDSM scenes that were colorful or interesting or erotic. But not at this site. These vids are just boring and overly long.
The scenes can be 1 boy-1 girl, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 boys-2 girls, 1 boy-2 girls, 2-girls. Most common scene is 1 boy-1 girl and 2 boys-2 girls.
This is a site with a small amount of content. Site just started around middle of 2010. You probably have less than 40 videos, plus 40 photosets. With that small amount of content, you would think the navigation would be extremely simple. But searching through the content is difficult. Trying to look through each video or associated photoshoot is difficult.
The site design is clumsy. Sometimes you can't easily find the photoshoot or video that is supposed to be the mate of a video/photoshoot.

I give the site a score of 60, because of the poor site design, poor navigation, boring videos, stupidity in making the video runtime too long,
and other problems.

This site is a waste of time. And very frustrating. And irritating.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 693 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Milk Enema (2)
2. Infernal Restraints (2)
3. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)
4. VIPissy (1)
5. Puffy Network (1)
6. Sexually Broken (1)
7. Layered Nylons (1)
8. Wet And Pissy (1)
9. Cosplay Erotica (1)
10. Cuckold My Husband (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1 seconds.