Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 51-75 of 676 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Dirty Diablos

51. Dirty Diablos (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
chancler682 (0) 04-28-13  12:01pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: very good quality videos, attractive models.
Cons: full trial is not full. slow downloads a majority of the time. not many updates.
Bottom Line: I tried to join the trial offer which was supposed to be full. It was not full. they do not let trial members download the videos, only stream. so I joined for one month at a discounted price. they only update once a week for 6 sites which is kinda lame. The quality of the videos are very good but also very large in size. A majority of the scenes are over 1gb to download. Downloading speed on this site was extremely inconsistent. One day I would be a 2mbps and the next I would be at 80kbps. Needless to say download a scene of 1.3gb at 80kbps takes a long fucking time.I know it was not my server because I would download from a different site at the same time at very high speeds. If you're going to join be prepared for infrequent updates and dial-up speed downloads. But also be prepared for great looking videos with very attractive models.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wet And Pissy

52. Wet And Pissy (1)

Pay
Newbie
85*
critic (2) 04-07-13  02:20am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Gorgeous models performing exactly as advertised.

Expert videography and photography

High quality files, both video and audio

No download limits

The free membership to the other sites is a real value.
Cons: Most of the sequences are too baroque for my taste: too many odd toys and props.

Ghastly-poor file naming habits: costs the user a lot of time cleaning up.
Bottom Line: ON EDIT, May 2013: I remained a member of this site for several weeks until my membership lapsed. File names were never improved in any way at all. Excepting his public posts here, he owner/webmaster never responded to any of the messages/emails I sent concerning the filenaming problem, or on other topics.

ORIGINAL REVIEW: Wow, this is a fabulous site for those who take an interest in the subject matter. Gorgeous models, excellent images- soaking wet. Most of these models are familiar from other European sites and at times it's a surprising pleasure to see a famous star get down and dirty with herself in this way. While updates are not frequent, given the availability of willing models and the quality of the output this is understandable. Free membership in the sister sites is a major bonus.

(FWIW my very fast late-model Mac can have a hard time playing some of the largest "MP4 HD" videos. I find the .wmv files to be more reliable and of perfectly good quality.)

If it weren’t for the file names I’d give WAP a much higher score than it received here*. However, videos and pictures are so badly named as to require a lot of time at the back-end, so to speak, and this really needs to be corrected.

Image zip files all decode to folders named "Images". Not "Goldilocks - Three Bears": "Images". The images in that folder are named "001.jpg", "002.jpg" and so on. The next zip expands the same way, and the next. You can imagine the mess this creates: a pile of folders named “Images1” “Images2” and so forth, with no idea what's in them.

If all of these "001.jpg" files ever get intermingled by user error (trashed accidentally, for example), it's game over for you. The image files should carry the model's name and shoot title.

It's easy to create a zip file which expands to a folder's real name; perhaps it takes a little more effort. Given the slow rate at which content is produced at WetAndPissy, that effort would be nothing at all.

The net result of this is spending a LOT OF TIME back on the site, figuring out what the real name of what you've downloaded is, so you can file it away correctly. (I just happened to download my files in update sequence and thus had a chance at figuring out the real names of all those "Images" folders from the updates webpages. If I'd chosen any other method (favorite models, random choices), it would have been much much worse.)

As to video files, they are inconsistently named and because of this almost equally hard to square away after downloads.

Prepare to spend a lot of time 'on cleanup' after downloads from this site.

If WAP puts a bit more effort into this one serious problem, they'd be a really fabulous place to visit.

*This is the second site I've joined on the basis of a good TheBestPorn review, and the second where the owners can't be bothered to properly name their files. Given the trouble this can cause, I feel TBP needs to make this matter a review criteria.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Cuckold My Husband

53. Cuckold My Husband (0)

Pay
Active
50
marcdc1 (174) 04-01-13  07:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Candy is a hot MILF who seems to be videoing her playtime. In other words this is a woman who loves sex; not a model who's trying to maximize profit.
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- Each scene has a small description with it.
- Screen shots available for videos (I like this because it helps determining if something is worth downloading).
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what. I can tell the model for this site (Candy Christopher) is also the talent in at least one of the other sites. So it's very confusing what exactly are you getting
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
Cons: - Videos are only available in .wmv
- Most videos are under 10 minutes (only 2 are long; one 20 minutes, one 30 minutes)
- pictures are not available as .zip
- Broken links. All of the dildo shoots were inaccessible. Clicking on them would ask for password, only to have password rejected.
- picture quality is 300X200.
- only 6 dildo videos (which I could get to), and 13 hardcore. For a site that's been up since at least 2000, that's really poor.
- Copyright on the website says 2011 so they haven't done new shoots since at least then
- 480X360 0.3 mbps is got to be the lowest quality video I've ever seen.
- Cinematography is hurting. For example in the longest running video there's a pillow block most of the action - despite the fact that her husband is camera man - this doesn't get fixed
Bottom Line: I've never given such a low score. But between the small number of updates, the password problems, and the abysmal quality I feel there's no choice.

Scenes start in the middle of the action, there are times when the audio cuts out.

Candy is an attractive MILF, there's no doubt about that. I'm really hoping that some of the other sites on this network that feature her are better than this one.

To be fair I have not contact the webmaster about my issues (then again the fact that I will have to speaks about the sites upkeep as well). For $30 for a year's subscription I figure I have time to mess with it if the mood ever strikes me. Right now I'm not impressed enough with the content to be bothered.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit House Of Taboo

54. House Of Taboo (0)

Pay
Active
91
pat362 (373) 03-27-13  05:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +The bulk of their content is exclusif.
+They have an excellent selection of Europeans models.
+All content is dated and they add a new scene every 2-3 days.
+You can download videos in multiple resolutions from 852x480 to at least 1280x720 for almost all the videos.
+They also offer true HD resolution 1920x1080 (over 300).
+All scenes have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Best resolution is 2000x1300.
+They do an excellent job in tagging their scenes with multiple keywords.
+They offer the ability to select the surfing language from 6 possible choices.
+They offer a wide selection of fetishes like latex, watersports, toys and spanking to name a few.
Cons: -Probably my biggest con and this is subjective is that there isn't necessarily a lot of actual penetration sex on the site.
-Most of the scenes are broken into 2 or more long episode.
-The lighting could be better in some of the videos. The action is hard to see because of that.
-The camera work could also be imoroved.
-They could work on their editing because they tend to cut a scene and then restart after the performers have changed position and the camera is setup elsewhere.
Bottom Line: *I have been a member of this site before and I they haven't chnaged much since the last time. I still find that there isn't as much content as I care to save to disk. That's not to say that the content is bad or anything but that it's not my cup of tea.

*These guys tend to offer a lot more fetishes than most similar sites and that is both a good thing and a bad thing. Good if the fetish in question is what you like but bad if you don't because that is a lkot of content that you will never download.

*I really enjoy the fact that they hire not just Eastern European models but British and French one as well. That is a nice because you tend to get some different body types this way. Mind you even if they didn't then they would still offer plenty of amazing models anyway.

*This site is produced by the same people as the other DDF sites so the same issues with editing, camera work and lack of imagination are present. That may not be an issue for most but I found it annoying at times. I highly recommend that you visit the site first to see if the site offers enough of the types of fetishes you like before joining. Many are covered but the quatity varies a lot from fetsih to fetish.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lactation Fantasy

55. Lactation Fantasy (0)

Pay
Active
80
GUY22 (7) 03-19-13  08:12pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Full on Lactation Content.
Lesbian lactation content.
Real Latina amateurs.
Crisp, Sharp, HiDef 720P videos.
High quality photo sets.
Very Passionate webmaster.
Frequent news updates.
Good amount of contents.
Cons: Download speed is awful. Less than 500 KB/s most of the time.
HUGE site banner on the videos.
Updates can be infrequent.
Bottom Line: It's a lactation site. Period. It is exactly what is being advertised. Nothing more and nothing less. One of the few lactation only sites on the web in fact. And Lactation-Fantasy (LF) is TOP notch. It's been around since 2006 and there's no signs of it slowing down anytime soon. In fact the first thing you'll notice is the very passionate webmaster. You're always being informed on what's going on with the site, whether it's maintenance or model updates. Whatever it is you're always in the know.
Almost all videos are shot in 720P (few older ones are not), very high quality videos. All contents are shot in the studio. A bit uninspired at times. Videos are rather straight forward, models come in, does a bit of strip and booty shake, then on with the milking. And the milking action does NOT disappoint. These ladies have milk filled tits like you've never seen. They drip, they leak, they squirt, and before you know it the floors are wet in a pool of milk and the ladies are drenched all over. Got Milk? Indeed. These are REAL moms, real Latino ladies, these are not porn stars. So keep your expectation in check. Some of these ladies are attractive enough but honestly (and I don't want to be mean) some ladies are quite average looking at best. But I guess their swollen milk filled breasts makes up for it. And swollen milk filled breasts are aplenty here. A lot of solo milking action and breast pumps. Lesbian milking scenes feature ladies milking onto each other and sucking each other dry.
This is THE lactation site to go to if you're into it. Lots of content, very professionally made. LF has the most amount of lactation content of any lactation site.
But there was a reason why I left the site. The models aren't really my cup of tea. A lot of these ladies are rather unattractive (for a porn site). But if you like REAL regular women then perhaps you'll enjoy it more than I.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Burning Ticket

56. Burning Ticket (0)

Network
Active
60
stingerxxx (10) 03-16-13  10:25pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Interesting and original themes and some good fetish ones: Berlin Public Bangers (outdoors), Fitness Fuck (Gym), Spin to Swing (Swingers), Ass Bangers' Ball, Nylon Feet Doll, Rubber Penetration

* Good variety of German por nstars that you will not find on other websites
Cons: * Poor-quality videos, only 2K bitrate

* Download mangers don't work: you can only download one video at a time

* Server has throttled the download speed to something ridiculously slow: only about 200 to 300kb

* Download limit, which is not advertised and it's quite a modest allowance; I calculated about 4GB per day

* Customer service - what's that?
Bottom Line: Burning ticket is the website name for the studio Inflagranti and I have some of their DVDs, which are excellent quality. This is a German studio and when you think of German, you usually think of good quality (such as German cars, engineering). Well, forget that here. Unfortunately the owners of this website seem to have gone to quite some length to make this an unpleasant experience.

Inflagranti's DVDs are of high quality, being crystal clear images but it appears that for the website they have downgraded the DVDs to a very low standard: 2000K. The scenes are not very clear and Ass Bangers' Ball and Gangbang Arena are quite bad because of the poor lighting.

However, it doesn't stop there. When downloading a scene, you cannot do anything else on the website: the server locks you out. So, I used my download manager to download at a later time and in the meantime cherry-picked what I wanted to see.

The server has throttled the download speed to a mere 200 to 300Kb and even though the file sizes are quite small (200-300MB due to the poor quality), it still takes about 20-30 minutes to download a scene.

But wait, there's more to add to the customer experience! There is a download limit that's not advertised on their website, which I think is quite despicable. After hitting about 4GB, I kept getting a server error message that my session had timed out. I sent a message to the webmaster - but no reply. I noticed that if you wait after 24 or 48 hours, you can download again.

This is the second time that I have joined this site: the first time was about 4 years' ago and now I remember why I said that I would never join this site after my first experience. I do seem to remember receiving an email from the webmaster the first time when I hit the download limit and the reply confirmed that there was a limit but I can't remember what the exact limit was.

Unfortunately it is difficult to recommend this site because of the quality and technical issues, which in my opinion are a real drawback for this site. Inflagranti do some really good stuff but this is not one of them. I can't help but feel that the website is there simply to point you in the direction of buying their DVDs, where the studio makes better money with better quality scenes.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

57. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Newbie
69*
critic (2) 03-10-13  05:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Some hairy models are forthcoming and natural. Many are attractive or beautiful. There is no download limit. Videos are mostly solos, which is fine, and there a fair amount of time is devoted to closeups, which I like.
Cons: Files have a different name than they appear in at the site. Thus the site might refer throughout to “This Model playing with hairy pussy on bed” but delivers “ThisModel_HiddenPinkPanties”. This, combined with a URL system that disarms cookies, makes it all but impossible to keep track of which files you’ve downloaded and which you haven’t.

Videos plagued by artificial masturbation with lots of sighs and moans: really irritating. Also the site often instructs women to ‘masturbate’ by snaking their hands around their thighs from behind, a move as artificial and labored as it sounds.

Despite assurances to the contrary, downloads break under any Macintosh download manager I’ve tried.

Too few women of color (or age).

Minor- files are named according to some object in the room, not by date, so there’s no sequence to the files, as is the case at a major competitor.
Bottom Line: Not a naturalistic site, which I prefer, especially for hairy models. If you don't mind very artificial masturbation videos with -lots- of ooooh's and aaaah's for no reason, you'd do fine here.

Hint to somewhat improve your ability to see your download history- delete the nonsense string ahead of "members" in the url and reload before downloading.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Dominated Girls

58. Dominated Girls (0)

Pay
Active
87
rearadmiral (368) 03-05-13  03:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the 21 Sextreme Network
- 250 scenes
- Updates regularly
- TBP Discount
- Supports download managers
- Many file choices
- Photos available (singles and zips)
Cons: - Can get a bit repetitive
Bottom Line: This site is part of the 21 Sextreme network that includes this and 13 other sites. The network is sold as the more extreme side of the 21 Sextury network. I’m a new fan of the 21 S1Sextury / 21 Sextreme networks and a long-time fan of good BDSM so I was definitely interested to see if this site met the standards set by many others in the two networks and how it compared to some of the better BDSM sites.

First a bit of a caveat: even if you are a fan of BDSM material you have to admit that it can sometimes get repetitive: girls in bondage can only have so many variations. The same can be said for a lot of other niches too, like massage and old-and-young. This site suffers from a bit of that as well, but I’m still glad I joined and still happy to have a lot of the scenes.

The site currently has 250 scenes and four new ones are added each month, though not necessarily on a weekly cycle.

One common element of most of the scenes is the same as with the other sites on this and the related network: the models are some of the most beautiful on the internet. For me, this increases my interest in the site since many of the models here aren’t true ‘fetish’ models.

The scenes share some other traits too: they all have the models in several different bondage set-ups (almost exclusively using rope), most have some other implements used, like ball gags, clamps or wax, and in most of the scenes there is actually sex, usually while the model is in bondage. This latter point isn’t unique to this site, but it isn’t available on every BDSM site. I suspect that legal concerns mean some sites just don’t take that risk. As a guy who likes watching anal scenes, there are some here but they aren’t in the majority.

One thing that is a bit of a negative for some (and others have commented on the same thing on other BDSM sites) but a probably a legal necessity is an interview at either the beginning or the end of the scene where the model ‘breaks the fourth wall’ and talks about what is about to happen or what just happened. As much as some people don’t like it I accept that given the extreme nature of a BDSM scene that is it probably necessary to keep the soccer-moms away. Personally, I find the interviews interesting and usually watch them.

The site is laid out in the same way as every other site on this and the related network, which is to say that it is simple but effective. There are some improvements coming with the addition of a large number of tags for sorting the scenes. This feature is visible now but not active so I can’t comment on it. If it works as planned though, it will be a great sorting tool.

Each page displays 36 large thumbnails showing the female model in the scene. Rolling your mouse over the thumbnail brings up so data on the scene, including model name and the date it was uploaded.

Clicking a scene’s thumbnail opens a new page where you have options to stream and download the scene. Immediately apparent is that there is an option to download just clips, but there is an option in all cases to download one full file. A trailer is also available. Streaming is available too, but I chose downloads.

There is a big difference in scenes uploaded before October 2009 and those uploaded after that. Prior to that date there were few options for downloads. In most cases those limited choices were a low-res H.264 file and a medium and high-res in WMV. Depending on when the scene was uploaded though, the high-res WMV is excellent. After October 2009 more options were made available, with three resolutions being offered in both H.264 and WMV. I found the mid-range H.264 to be the best compromise between quality and file size so I opted for that in most downloads. Those come in at 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively they look great on a 23” monitor. (In the interests of clarity, there are approximately 170 scenes that have been uploaded since more options were offered.)

Download managers work well and I experienced no time-outs. Download speeds were better than I’m used to with similar sites.

Photos are also available and even though the site is really more of a video site the photos are well done and available in good resolutions. The lowest resolution I saw was 1280x853. Newer uploads offer that and 3504x2336. Zips are available.

The site has no real flaws: it has some great scenes with high production values and stunning models in a simple to use layout that allows download managers. What more could a BDSM fan ask for? I think that this site offers BDSM that is on par with the best out there, like the Kink sites and Society SM.

The bottom line is that if you’re a fan of good BDSM porn you won’t be disappointed by this site. The fact that it is part of a network and also comes with a TBP / PU discount makes this a great deal.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hey Little Dick

59. Hey Little Dick (0)

Pay
Active
80
gaypornolover (38) 03-04-13  04:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Unique concept and content, well done
+ Good quality videos
+ No DRM
+ Free access to two other sites
+ Bills with CCBill
+ Excellent forum which takes suggestions for scenes
+ Regular, dated updates
+ Full photosets including a zip file for each scene
Cons: - Photos are small in size
- Later updates move away from original concept
- I found streaming slow
- Slightly confusing video options - some higher-resolution files are WMV only, some lower-resolutuon are MP4 only
- Same male models are reused over and over, and some aren't really that small
Bottom Line: This is one hell of an unusual site, and I appreciate it's not really aimed at me - though I'm not entirely sure who it is aimed at! Sheer curiosity made me subscribe!

It's basically a kind mild femdom site, in that it focuses on women humiliating men who have a small penis. There's also a CFNM (Clothed Female, Naked Male) element to the majority of the scenes. It's certainly a very specialist niche. I guess it's aimed at anyone who likes to see men humiliated, and perhaps at men who have small penises who enjoy being humiliated.

I have always had a fetish for humiliation, so although I am gay there is not equivalent gay site, and CFNM-type sites, which tend to feature more ordinary-looking straight guys being humiliated by ladies who keep their clothes on, is therefore an interesting niche for me.

Most of the videos are themed around two or three women who get a guy naked on some pretext, then laugh and mock his small cock. They usually masturbate the guy till his comes then laugh at him all the more. The women mainly remained clothed, though often in skimpy outfits, and sometimes flash themselves or get completely naked to turn the guy on. There is the occasional bit of BDSM - the guy might get his balls kicked or his cock abused - but it's fairly mild and infrequent. Occasionally a guy with a larger cock is brought on to humiliate the small-cocked guy further.

The female models, whilst not in my area of expertise, do seem attractive and are mostly in their twenties and slender, though there is a sprinkling of older ladies too. Some remain clothed, some get naked or near-naked.

Later videos though in the last few weeks seem to be moving away from this concept, and feature solo female models who strip off and talk to the male viewer, mocking him for having a tiny penis. Occasionally she might have sex with a man with a big penis and tell the viewer he's a real man and he'd have no chance with her. Obviously this is aimed at heterosexual men who like to be humiliated, but I'm not sure how effective that would be - I've seen similar "humiliate the viewer" style porn myself and it never quite convinces for me. These are all recent videos and reflect a big depature for the site, as all previous videos featured a male model being mocked. Obviously these later videos are of no interest to me, and mean the site is heading in a new direction which may or may not work for you.

This brings me on to a weakness of the site - the repeated use of the same male models. Obviously finding models who are willing to be humiliated on a site like this is not easy - so the same model is often used repeatedly in several scenes. This is great if they have a model you like, but obviously not if you don't like one. The male models vary greatly - some young and cute, but more often in their 30s and 40s, with some quite overweight and not necessarily attractive - though again this kind of goes with the theme of the site. Some of the earlier models actually had quite average or even fairly large dicks, so it kind of didn't work on the realism side, though I still enjoyed them.

Acting is incredibly good - the women are great at dishing out the abuse and most of the male models are great at acting surprised, hurt, turned on etc. though some just kind of sit there a little dazed!

Video is a bit of a mixed bag. You can choose between WMV or MP4 for every scene, which is good, but sometimes the quality is different.

In later videos it seems both types are 1280x720, but one WMV version I tried had a bitrate around 10,000 and 23fps, the MP4 had 30,000 bitrate and 25fps. However, in older videos the MP4 version was the lower-quality, with a 856x480 size, and the WMV tended to be better quality, with a bitrate around 3,000 to the MP4s 1,500. So you'd have to download different file types to get the best quality depending on how old the video is. Quality did seem decent whatever I tried though, and it's all very professionally shot - well-lit and clear.

I found the streaming pretty slow - downloads were about average speed.

Each video has a full photoset, which is good, and a zip file for the photos, but the photos themselves are nothing special at 800x534, and are watermarked.

There is a forum where you can ask questions and even suggest scenes - they say if you suggest one and enough people like it they'll make it for you - I didn't read all the posts so I can't say for sure this does happen, but the administrator does seem to often reply to suggestions.

Overall this is an interesting site which I would recommend if anything about femdom/CFNM/humiliation does it for you - but be aware it is going in a new direction now.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Zoliboy

60. Zoliboy (0)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (368) 03-01-13  06:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 1300+ scenes
- Part of a network
- Four updates per month
- Many download options on newer uploads
- Photos available
- Photo zips offered
- Incredibly beautiful models
- Download managers supported
- TBP / PU discount
- Some hard-to-find niches available here
- Owners seem to be actively working to improve the site
Cons: - Majority of scenes are in clips only
- Relatively conventional for an ‘extreme’ site
Bottom Line: Zoliboy is, I presume, the main site in the 21 Sextreme network. I make that assumption based on the fact that it is the largest site on the network by far. 21 Sextreme is promoted as the more extreme version of 21 Sextury.

The site has over 1300 scenes uploaded and continues to add four per month, though not necessarily one upload each week.

I’m also a member of 21 Sextury and I don’t know that I’d characterize 21 Sextreme as being more ‘extreme.’ Part of this opinion comes from the fact that a lot of the porn on the more ‘tame’ network has a fairly hard edge. That’s definitely not a complaint as I’m on the record as being a huge fan of 21 Sextury. The Zoliboy site certainly has elements that are less common in porn and may be viewed as more extreme by some. There are watersports scenes (and watersports within sex too), and more female on male rimming than occurs in more mainstream porn, but the entire site itself isn’t all that extreme. It isn’t like every scene on the site has an element that is outside the mainstream. There are a lot of scenes here that are fairly conventional and could easily be uploaded to the 21 Sextury network.

The newer videos on the site offer the same options as across the rest of the two networks with streaming and downloads being available. The downloads are available in both WMV and H.264 formats and in multiple resolutions. My go-to resolution was the mid-grade H.264 which came in at 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 30fps. Objectively I know these numbers look low, but subjectively the scenes look better than some with higher numbers from other sites. I did download a few of the highest-resolution H.264 scenes and these come in at 1920x1080 at 6200 kb/s and 50fps. (I don’t think I’ve ever seen 50fps before…). Subjectively these look incredible. They are crisp and clear and will likely look amazing on a big-screen TV. Download managers are supported.

Photos are also offered, with some scenes offering both photos and screenshots. These can be downloaded as singles or as zips. In most of the newer uploads the zips are available in low and high resolutions. The hi-res photos are approximately 3000x4200.

Most of the models on this site are the same that appear throughout this network and 21 Sextury. That’s definitely not a bad thing as so many of the models are incredibly beautiful. The vast majority of them are Russian or eastern European.

One thing I found odd about the site (considering that it is promoted as the main site of an ‘extreme’ network) is that the number of anal scenes here is actually lower than you find on the more ‘tame’ company network. This is both in terms of actual numbers and in proportion to the size of the site. This isn’t necessarily a pro or con – I’m just mentioning it. (Subjectively it is a con but I didn’t take that into account on scoring.)

The site layout is the same as with the rest of this network and the other company network. It is simple and easy to use. It appears that the site owners will be rolling out new filters soon which will (presumably) make it easier to sort scenes by a large number of tags.

The site does have one HUGE flaw, and it is somewhat baffling since this isn’t shared by any other site in this or the related network. The newest scenes offer lots of download options but on scenes uploaded before October 2009 the options are quite different. Prior to October 2009 only WMV files are available. The uploads in September 2009 still have decent resolution (1280x720, 3000kb/s and 30fps) but the problem is that the scenes are no longer available in a single, full scene, format. The best you can get is a two-part scene. Some scenes are in even more clips. I have no idea why the site owners made this choice considering that the scenes are all relatively short (10 minutes, give or take) for the full scene. 2009 wasn’t so long ago that only offering smaller clips made sense. From comments made here at PU it seems that the owners are actively looking to improve their networks. In my opinion making the scenes available as a single download should be high on their list. I’d prefer H.264 but will live happily with WMV but I really dislike having a scene broken down into multiple parts. (In real numbers, approximately 150 scenes are available as single downloads and more than 1000 are in clips only.)

The bottom line is that this is a great site that offers some beautiful models in some hard-edged porn. The newer scenes are available in many different ways but the older scenes are only available in clips. I don’t fully understand the reasoning for spinning off a separate network but given that this is all exclusive material with some of the best production values around I can’t fault the owners for wanting to generate more income so they can continue to make more great porn. When you add in the TBP / PU discount this site and network is a great value and I’d recommend it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Gloryhole Girlz

61. Gloryhole Girlz (0)

Pay
Newbie
64*
knightline (0) 02-19-13  06:10am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of material, hmmm - hard to think of many pros!! It is part of a large network, but the sites on the network share the same problems - unattractive models and poor video quality. Now some sitesd o have decent video quality and a few cute models.
Cons: Quality of videos is absolutely horrible. The women are mostly not very attractive. If they were hot babes I'd overlook the poor video quality.
Bottom Line: This is a waste of money. Don't understand why the site reviews are so positive, other than they make money when people join through them. Still, if you join for a month the wide variety of sites may make it worth it, but there is much better available on the web.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Layered Nylons

62. Layered Nylons (0)

Pay
Active
80
tangub (153) 02-03-13  02:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Choice of CCBill or Epoch for sign up
Exclusive content
Updated 4 times a week (Mon, Wed, Sat, Sun), usually 3 photo sets and 1 video per week.
All content is high res and hd
Photos have a choice of 4 sizes available; standard 711x1066, extra-large 1365x2048, ultra large 2000x3000 and super large 3744x5616.
Downloadable zips in all 4 sizes.
Video download options are hd 1280x720 wmv (20000+ kbps), 640x360 wmv (6000 kbps), 640x360 mp4 (1000 kbps) for smartphone or tablet. There is also a high def and standard def streaming option.
File sizes and run times of videos displayed.
All content date stamped.
Excellent navigation, browse options and search engine
Cons: Regional pricing with CCBill (Epoch was about $2 cheaper for me).
Site has only been online since September 2011 so not a massive amount of content yet; 198 photo sets (26,000 pics) and 53 videos at the time of writing this.
Hardly any full nudity, mostly just topless.
Videos are short, usually only 5-6 minutes.
No model info or bios
Poor preview area; click on a model in the tour pages to try and see what photo sets or videos she has and you are taken straight to the sign up page.
Bottom Line: This site features the unusual theme of girls wearing both stockings and tights (pantyhose) at the same time. I’ve always been a fan of girls wearing stockings and heels but have never really liked tights so couldn’t quite decide where I stand on this unusual niche. This site wasn’t really on my radar but a cheap email offer tempted me to take a look. This site is run by the same company that runs Only All Sites, Only Tease and Art Lingerie so quality was pretty much assured.

There’s currently 79 models on the site, most of them being the same British models that can be found on the other company sites. Many of the popular OT models like Carla, Melanie, Hayley Marie, Lucy Anne and Daisy Watts can be found here. A few Euro models such as Eufrat and Cikita are also present.

The photos are pretty much in the same style you find at Only Tease and have the same natural look to them; thankfully they have avoided the photo-shopped style that was prevalent at Art Lingerie. The photo sets usually start with the model fully clothed before they strip down to their tights and stockings. Those who like a full striptease will be disappointed since the tights, panties and stockings rarely get removed. As a result you will rarely see any full nudity within the site with only occasional glimpses of any pussy and quite often that glimpse is only through sheer tights if the model happens to be wearing them without any panties underneath. To all intents and purposes it’s really just a topless site.

I’m not really interested in videos so only checked out a few. The HD videos look nice and sharp whether downloading or streaming. They provide a screen cap gallery of 18 photos for each video where you can get an idea of the content before deciding if you want to download it. The video style is pretty much the same as I experienced at Art Lingerie. There’s no background music and usually no chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start so they have that same awkward silence. I guess the idea of that is so you can hear the sound of the model running her hand up and down her nylons or twanging her suspender belt.

The navigation is the same as at other “Only” sites, a choice of browsing photos or videos by year and month listing or an alphabetical model index. Under “My LN” you can set your browsing preferences like default photo size, number of thumbnails per page etc as well as managing your favourites. There’s also an extensive search engine with several filters which will be great when the site gets a lot larger but for now it’s hardly needed since the site is still quite small, in fact it only took me 3 or 4 days to download and view everything I wanted here. Overall I enjoyed the high quality content in this unusual niche but I feel the site needs some more growth to make it worth the regular price.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Bare Maidens

63. Bare Maidens (0)

Pay
Newbie
88*
pornstacker (0) 02-03-13  08:43am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: superb picture quality and video quality is excellent in later videos. Mix of formats further back, f4v, wmv. Pics are huge and some pussy shots on full size are delicious...you can see every fold of skin in the most amazing detail!
Cons: slow downloads. some video files can be as much as 1.5gb in size so make sure your hdd can handle it.
Bottom Line: I find this an excellent site with superb quality content for this niche. Beautiful girls outdoors and indoors in a mix of corsets, long skirts and dresses, battle armour and also sack cloth all of which comes off by end of scene, and also a fair few swords and knives too. No lingerie whatsoever!
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit CFNM.net

64. CFNM.net (0)

Pay
Active
60
gaypornolover (38) 01-26-13  04:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + What video content there is, is VERY hot
+ Updates on average 2 - 3 times per week, though not consistently
+ Extensive user forum (though this is flawed)
+ As far I can tell, no regional billing
+ No DRM
+ Choice of two good billers - CCBill or Verotel
+ All-exclusive content
+ The only pure, true CFNM site I have yet found
Cons: - Have gone back to being a picture-only site - as of August 6, 2012 no new videos have been uploaded at the time of this review. NO warning of this in preview, no explanation of why in-site.
- Pictures are good-quality, but downloading is a joke - no zip files, no collections - must download each picture one by one
- Very expensive ($39.95 1st month, $34.95 after), especially now no more videos
- Poorly-designed site with poor search functions, ancient design and a mess of a forum
- Forum is completely ignored by site management, no suggestions seem to be taken on board.
- Downloads and streaming the slowest I've ever seen on any site.
- $1.95 additional joining fee if using Verotel, never found that at any other site.
- Each story is split into many small scenes which constitute each update
- Many videos still unique to a sister-site - see below.
Bottom Line: This is my third review. I am writing it with a heavy heart, because this site has so much potential and could easily be the best CFNM site ever, but it's taken yet another one of its abrupt policy reverses, so it's on entirely the wrong track again.

What I will say is that CFNM.net is, in my opinion, the only true CFNM site on the internet. The scenarios and stories are superb, the models incredible, the acting is good and believable - focusing purely on past content this site should be scoring my first ever 100.

So how did we get to 60 as a score for a site which can produce the best content ever?

Simply - they cannot decide what they want to be - a picture site, or a video site. They change their minds and their policies more often than the guys get naked!

CFNM.net has always described itself more as a picture site, and they have a "sister" site, CFNM.TV, which is supposed to be the video site. Sounds fair and straightforward - you want pictures, you join this site. You want the videos, you join CFNM.TV.

That could work, except CFNM.TV is a lousy video site, and CFNM.net is a lousy picture site.

CFNM.TV, according to the previews, hasn't been updated for months. It doesn't have all the the video content CFNM.net does, even though it's supposed to be the video site, and what is does have (some of which CFNM.net doesn't have) is riddled with the most intrusive, crappy DRM I've ever known which makes you log in to watch each video, won't work unless you use Windows, and means downloads stop working the second your subscription expires - you CANNOT download to keep.

As a picture site, CFNM.net is lousy because although the pictures are high-quality - well-lit and professional - for a so-called picture site they are a joke. You get one size only, the viewer is clunky, and you CANNOT download the photosets as one file - zipped or not. No, you have to click on each individual picture (and each story has hundreds), then click on the "download to computer" link and download each picture manually. This would take you weeks of painstaking work.

When I did my last review, CFNM.net seemed to be improving. CFNM.TV was active but seemed to be abandoned, with no new updates. The video updates were being uploaded to CFNM.net, and they were also uploading old footage previously exclusive to CFNM.TV but WITHOUT the DRM. I was hoping they were going to upload the CFNM.TV-exclusive stuff as "new" updates, then when they'd done it all, quietly close CFNM.TV.

Nope! When I left the site last July, I was almost done downloading the last of a video set. When I rejoined six months later, I downloaded the last couple of updates from that set and then found the entire six months worth of updates after that were photo-only. No mention of this in the preview, nothing on the site I can see about a change in policy - it's just back to photo-only.
However CFNM.TV seems to only have had one update with a video of some old CFNM.net content. So, we're back to two sites which between them have incredibly hot content, but which are so badly designed and run you can't satisfactorily access either.

CFNM.net has an extensive forum where these and my other complaints all as listed above are discussed - but from what I can see, nobody from the site itself ever answers or pays the slightest bit of attention to anything said on the forum. The forum is also practically a seperate site, which its own seperate log-in, no integration to the main site, and ancient layout.

I don't intend to go over the details of the site - it's all in my previous reviews, one of which is still active at the time of writing - and nothing has changed since.

Suffice it to say, if you've never joined this site before then I would strongly recommend you do, as it has some incredibly hot content - but then accept you will never know whether they ever intend to upload more videos again, that the photos are a complete pain in the ass to download, and that CFNM.TV is a joke.

If you have joined before, certainly in the last six months, then you will already have all the video content they're offering and even if you like photos, downloading them will be such a pain I don't think it's worth joining it again.

I will certainly be cancelling before auto-renew and I have already downloaded the two videos I wanted. Nothing else on the site is of interest.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

65. ATK Natural & Hairy (1)

Pay
Active
85
graymane (33) 01-21-13  04:02pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1) Hair is paramount. If'un you like hair on broads, then here you won't be disappointed.
2) Site boast of having millions of pictures. Well, bully for them. I'd have to say that might be a bit of a stretch.
3) Claims to be 12 times the size of any other hairy site. Does it also mean 12 times the cost?
4) zip files for downloads. Small watermarks on pics, larger on videos. No DRM.
5) Promotion touts of having 1577 models.
Well, I guess if they say so .....
6) 5,549 videos. Could be, but the 30 days I was there they musta been in hiding.
7) Updates appear to roll in as promoted.
8) HD on more recent shoots.
9) Some very pretty gals are in the lineup, European, Asian, Latina and American; predictably, a lotta plain-Jane's are there, too. Then there are those who're are just plain ugly.
10) You have solo, soft core, toy, boy/girl hardcore, and lesbian.
.
Cons: 1) Sometimes I'd corralled a beauty only to suddenly see her wander off somewhere.
2) Poor selection of medias, having WMV pitted against two other unknowns.
3) Streaming went smoothly, however, Buffering was unceasingly long and tedious.
4) From my viewpoint, I thought the video-shoots and directing sorely lacked the quality subscribers deserved.
5)Same-'olé-same-'olé .....what with too many and long closeups, and particularly ones that dwell on the genitalia. I can only assume The guy shooting just falls asleep at his camera. The man must belong to a damed good union.
6) Small watermarks on pics, bigger ones but none obtrusive on videos
7) Maybe it's my lack of electronic wizardry, but I simply couldn't find the combination to opening pics on a full screen.
Bottom Line: Prepare to stare at a lot of hair.
Hair here, hair there, hair everywhere.
Nary model dare to be hair-bare, and that's fair

(jus' thought I'd throw that in)

I went for this $21 deal because I strongly favor seeing natural hair where it's supposed to be on women. It's sexier, more erotic, and adds that important element of realism to the scenes.

This site does a very good job of giving us that, but sadly, eroticism falls woefully short. For one thing, the girls move around too much. No sooner than I get into a clip than the model jumps up and leaps onto something else. Another erotic spoiler is the over-use of smiles ....I know readers don't share or agree to that, but when a gal is in the throes of sexual release, smiles ought to be minimal.! They're necessary I know, but porn isn't Comedy Central and I just don't find them compatible with serious porn.
Cameramen and directors here tend to follow the same old trend that shooting genital closeups are gold. When, for crying out loud, will these numb-nuts wise up and give us a break, already?..... Thanks to vaginal over-exposure I think I now know more about the female pussies than my x-wife's gynecologist.
In my judgment, I'd recommend this site for all who wants to see hair. Otherwise, it's just plain-old generic porn.
Admittedly, I got a bang-for-my-buck for what I paid, but I don't think I'd opt for thirty.
Respond: 16 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wasteland

66. Wasteland (0)

Pay
Newbie
63*
Max Ingram (0) 01-17-13  07:49am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Well-made original content.
-Large amount of content.
-Good depiction of the niche in question.
Cons: -Very confusing site navigation.
-Cancellation options are hard to find.
-Too many non-essential options, like fiction, dating resources, lifestyle tutorials, etc.
Bottom Line: The original content on Wasteland is quite good. In fact, I'd say they have some of the best BDSM videos I've seen. However, the site navigation is a confusing mess, bringing together a cobbled and disjointed mix of mid-90's design aesthetics (like endless rows of text-only links) mashed together with an attempt at modern conventions.

Cancelling is harder than it should be, and it took me more than 20 minutes of searching for an automated option, before finally giving up and just emailing support directly. Overall, the frustration level of using the site was so extreme that my whole experience was irreparably marred.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Milk Enema

67. Milk Enema (1)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (368) 12-28-12  08:02pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Some amazing, innovative porn
- Top models
- Many different fetishes and niches
- Access to a lot of the Evil Angel catalogue
- Many options for downloads
- HD available
- Streaming available
Cons: - Short link time-outs make download managers almost useless
- Isn’t really a true network
- No main page for the ‘network’
Bottom Line: My latest membership here has caused me to rethink some of my earlier enthusiasm for the site. (But just slightly…)

First off, while this site is one of 20 in a network I think it is misleading to call this site a true network since the DVDs and scenes are all drawn from the same source and simply distributed in a logical way among the 20 sites. (The 20 sites are listed here: http://www.thebestporn.com/review_included.html?id=milkenema) This isn’t a negative since the material is excellent porn (among the best available, in my opinion), and I admit that in most cases the material is arranged in logical ways: having all the Mike Adriano DVDs on one ‘site’ for example.

Speaking of the porn on offer here, while what is offered here isn’t for everyone, if anal-themed porn with a harder edge is your thing, then this ‘network’ is among the best sites on the ‘net. The scenes have a good mix of fetishes and use top models from the U.S., Europe and Russia but they all share high production values. I look for three factors to be in place for a site to be excellent. The first is that the porn has to be excellent quality and in this case the ‘network’ gets top marks.

Where this group of sites come up short is in my second and third criteria, namely site organization and ease of access. They don’t fail here, but they could do so much better.

Regarding the site organization, I think the fact that they’ve decided to offer this as a collection of ‘sites’ is their waekness. There really is no reason to have organized the site this way. Since the sites all have material from the Evil Angel catalogue I don’t see why the site owners saw the need to parcel it out in the way they have. Unlike a true network, this collection of sites has no main page where a member can quickly see updates. To get access to updates you need to go to each of the 20 sites to see what’s new. But by doing so you’ll also see that several of the sites no longer add material. In those cases I suspect that the ‘site’ has run out of that specific theme in the Evil Angel catalogue. There’s no shame in that, and it certainly wouldn’t be as noticeable if this were just lumped together as one site. (Speaking of updates, there are daily updates spread among the sites.)

To make matters worse, there is some overlap between the ‘sites.’ You may find a scene or two from a specific DVD on one site and the remaining ones on another. On DVD sites I prefer to arrange the scenes in folders named for the DVD where they come from, and in some cases that is made more difficult here because while a majority of scenes are listed as being part of a DVD some aren’t. I really can’t even speculate as to why the site owners made this choice.

That isn’t to say that the ‘sites’ are terribly organized, because they aren’t. You can easily sort by DVD title or by scene (with the caveat being that the ‘orphan’ scenes noted above won’t show up in any DVD search.)

As for ease of access, this is my biggest issue with the site: while they allow download managers, the time-outs on the links are so short that using a manager won’t work. My guess is that the links time out at about 5 minutes – so if you’re downloading an HD file at 2GB it makes no sense to queue up another because by the time your first scene is downloaded the second link is dead.

I’m not sure how the site is owned, but even though it shows as having separate ownership from the Evil Angel site they are both part of Fame Dollars. Whatever the link, to get the most from the Evil Angel catalogue you’ll need to join both sites. That isn’t too bad considering that both offer a TBP discount (though I was sad to read that the full trial is now gone.)

Perhaps the biggest change for me since I last joined is that I now download mp4s rather than WMVs. This is a huge change since the ‘network’ has better choices for mp4s, including 720p and 1080p. The 720 come in at 720x480 at 2400kb/s and the 1080 are 1080x720 at 5000kb/s. Both play at 30fps. Subjectively these are as crisp as the best elsewhere. They really do look great. WMVs continue to be offered but not in HD. Streaming is also offered but I don’t use that so I can’t comment on it.

While most of what I’ve written leans to the site’s shortcomings please don’t consider just these negative comments. Consider it this way: think of your favourite model. Do you like her less when you learn that when she eats broccoli her farts stink? Likely not (assuming that this isn’t a fetish of yours, of course…). Same here. This collection of ‘sites’ offers up some of the most interesting, most innovative, best produced porn with some of the hottest models ever to grace the industry and they offer it all at a great price. I highly recommend joining, and as in the past I will rejoin again and again and again.

Now if you’ll excuse me I have to get back to smelling some farts…
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bound Gangbangs

68. Bound Gangbangs (0)

Pay
Active
88
RustyJ (145) 12-22-12  04:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Kink style, Kink quality. This cannot be emphasized too much as the network is clearly the most dedicated player in BDSM fetish scene
-Regular and reliable as all the Kink sites. It supposedly updates once a week and apparently never fails to do so (until now, see the last part of my comments section)
-Wide selection of models ranging from Americans to Europeans. Personal favorites include Angell Summers, Krissy Lynn, Kristina Rose, Charlotte Vale among others
-All scenes are very hard, sometimes too hard with anal and dp almost always included
-You get the new site HardcoreGangbang with the same subscription
Cons: -Bound and Gangbang do not mix well. The latter is hard here while the former is soft and often nonexistent towards the end of the scene
-Roughly 70 scenes is not that much and during a month of subscription you only get four more
-The rumour that you can see in the comments section of this site here on PU might be true and this site ends up softening even more when it comes to bondage reducing it to quite generic one
-Often a bit too messy. The girls should look good, not smear faced even if fits the scirpt of the scenes. Luckily this site has no messing with food like PublicDisgrace does
-Probably not updating anymore now that they launched HardcoreGangbang as combined subscription. Or "re launched" this site as the blog explains. Anyway, even less bondage in sight as Princess Donna wants the site to focus on "bound by hands of men" stuff
-Pricey and also one of the Kink sites with not that much scenes. Wait for a discount as always
Bottom Line: I think this one's my last Kink.com site review for a while as I don't see myself subscribing to others anytime soon and I feel like something else next. This is a site that features, exactly as the name suggests, scenes with many men and fewer girls, usually one, having sex with some bondage tossed in. Generally the action is sexually very hard with anal and dp in nearly every scene while the bondage part is not in the lead role. Often the bondage is completely forgotten at some point of the scene and I can see how it might get in the way of all the ganging and banging.

As usual the models are interviewed both before and after the scene. I guess this was originally intended to clearly indicate that all the action was voluntary but now it seems more like a feature. Anyway, it's often nice to hear the comments on your favorite scenes. The models are well chosen ones with many big names, both Americans and Europeans. The later scenes also feature quite many younger East European and Russian models often seen on European sites like 21Sextury and DDF.

So far (and now it's final) there's only roughly 70 scenes but they are long and as varied as you can get with this theme with positively high number of models so the boredom doesn't settle in too soon. As with all sites at Kink, this site also has scenes called "features" which on other sites are usually more scripted in some fantasy setting but as all scenes here seem to have some setting (prison, locker room etc.), I'm not quite sure how they differ from regular updates. Sometimes the acting is little too much as I'm not really into fake rape stuff with faked looks of suffering on faces.

All general Kink-site comments from my other reviews apply here too. The sites are basically identical, share a very active forum community and work well unless you want a colorfull and flashy esperience. Download speeds are high enough to max out a 100M connection so no complaints there either. Generally the whole Kink.com seems to me the most respectful adult entertainment company that others should look at as an example.

Note: At the time I was writing this but before I finished my review, this site was sort of discountinued or relaunched as HardcoreGangbang with same kind of content with less bondage.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lovers In Latex

69. Lovers In Latex (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
lyncher (2) 12-16-12  09:13am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Good looking models (including Kloe Kane :-) )
+ Nice outfits (if you like latex)
+ HQ images
Cons: - Video Quality not as promised
- Downloading Images is VERY time-consuming
- No regular Updates
- No answers from Customer Service
Bottom Line: I joined the site 3 weeks ago, because I simple love all videos with Kloe Kane (who is in some of the videos on this site).
The site is quite new and seems to be a partner-site of latexheaven.com.
The site promises on the Join-Page (among other things):
# Latex Girls Fucking Each Other
# Full HD Movies
# Regular Updates

The content so far:
# 20 videos, around 10 - 14 minutes each
# 20 galleries, 1328x2000 pixels

VIDEOS:
The site promises FULL HD (which means 1920x1080). Actually, the videos are 1280x960 and have HUGE black borders. So the actual video-size is around 1200x750, which is far from Full HD.

IMAGES:
The resolution for the images is good, but downloading them is a pain in the ass. There are galleries with around 100 pics each and you have to open each pic seperately to download it. That means you have to open 100 pics, right-click, Save as. You can´t even use a downloadmanager like Flashget. How about zipped galleries?

CONTENT & UPDATES:
The site is quite new, so the content isn´t that much, 20 videos and galleries today. BUT: There hasn´t been a single update since I joined 3 weeks ago. For a site this new you would expect at least one update a week. I don´t think you can call that "Regular Updates".

CUSTOMER SERVICE:
I tried to contact the customer support after joining the site because of these "problems". I never got an answer from them.

SUMMARY:
The site has a lot of potential and I was very happy to see its launch. The models are great and the acting and action in the movies is quite good, but they made so many mistakes with the site, it ruins the overall experience.
Don´t get me wrong, the content so far isn´t bad, but it isn´t fair to charge $29.95 a month for 20 videos and make false promises about the video quality. Please try to fix these points and it could be a fantastic site.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bare Maidens

70. Bare Maidens (0)

Pay
Newbie
86*
Hooliganzo (4) 12-12-12  10:29am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good Quality photos high Resolution 2958x4000, sharp, well lit, rich color, high contrast. One of the best quality photos I've seen. Around 670 sets.

-Videos have the same quality as the photos. Videos range from 720p to 1080p. Later ones being 1080p. Around 60 videos

-Models look great. The way they are photographed and have their hair and makeup done make them look better then on other sites. Using Sara James as an example aka Ara on this site, a model I've seen on other sites like Nubiles, twistys, Alsscan. This site literally present models in their best light.

-Fantasy Theme is nice. The armor pieces and other costumes seem to look authentic. The overall theme gives the models more personality.
Cons: -Not many videos. Site is mainly Photos.

-The Site itself is not the best looking site in the world.

-Models have Pseudonyms.

-Links don't expire but there are times you have to reload the links when downloading.
Bottom Line: This site is mainly a softcore photography site. There are some videos and photos with hardcore content. I would not say it is ultra softcore ie MET art because they do have models masturbating, and with closeup spreads although some photosets are that way.

The photos are some of the best quality I've seen. It would be great if they updated more then 12 times a month.

The videos are mostly masturbation scenes. A couple are hardcore. They usually consist of an intro of the model walking around or doing something . Then it goes into the solo action. Videos are accompanied by music which may not be a plus.

The only thing that is holding this site back is the amount of updates. It would be great if they had daily updates. The quality of the photos are great, rivaling and topping some more well known sites. If you like softcore Photography this site is definitely worth a try.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Everything Butt

71. Everything Butt (0)

Pay
Active
85
exotics4me (463) 12-11-12  06:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The last of the Kink sites on my list to join, Kink's sites, generally speaking are very high quality and are just different enough from the norm to keep most of us from getting bored.
- It's a site about butts, my favorite part of the female, below the neck and they have some of the best butts in porn on here.
- As usual, Kink will do something in at least one or sometimes 20 scenes, that challenges our morality as viewers. I call it pro since I feel like this is done in a safe, controlled, consensual environment and it works to break our boredom with traditional porn, push our limits, etc..
- You get good download speeds here.
- Navigation is as all other Kink sites. I think it's a bit clunky, but if you join enough Kink sites, you start to get the hang of it or you just speed up your mouse scroll wheel.
- Videos have up to 1280x720 resolution and are nice and clear. If a bit dark thanks to setting.
- One update per week is a borderline pro/con.
Cons: - As mentioned in pros, Kink will push your boundaries, they do so on this site with enemas, for me.
- Pictures would have been really good for this site since they could showcase the butts/thighs, and they have them, but I'm nearing Kink burnout on downloading 4-6 zips to get one photoset.
- Maybe more than any of the Kink sites, this one seemed to border on formulaic for me. It could be the Kink burnout, it could just be that most scenes seemed like the same thing. Reminds me a lot of the now dead Give Me Pink site and to a lesser extent, In the Crack.
Bottom Line: I had found myself in a porn rut a few months ago and decided to start trying these Kink sites in succession. I can't recommend a studio higher than Kink when it comes to pushing boundaries...tastefully. I know there are sites that are more hardcore than these, but I don't know if any focus so much on the model as these. Many rely on the male to make the scenes more violent. Kink does seem to let the models work at their own pace.

The quality is here is like any of the new(er) Kink sites. The videos have the 1280x720 option, there is also a 720x480 option, these come in either WMV or MP4 depending on your choosing. I don't want to go too deep into the pictures, but will say this, if you're a picture fan, you most likely won't be happy. Since I've written multiple reviews on Kink sites, I don't want to waste a lot of space on saying the same things I have before. Plain and simple, you can download 20-25 pictures in a zip, 4-6 of these zips per set, just like it was in 1999 or 2000. I downloaded a total of 8 total photo sets, so they're bordering on "why even post them?" I took points off ATK and other sites, over 4 years ago, for doing it. It's unacceptable in almost 2013.

The scenes themselves should be a big selling point to me. I like butts, thighs, and not just curvy, but any that are not toothpick thin or to the point of cottage cheese nightmares. Everything in between those are good.

My first problem was expected. Enemas are just a flat-out no to me. I remember years ago on here, both Denner and I, talking about Give Me Pink having girls shoot milk out of their butt. That was the line this site crossed for me. I still don't like gape videos that much either. There's plenty of gape here. So much in fact, I think a small nation could find their new home. Neither of these are huge complaints, but I am trying to show the extreme the site goes to, for those considering it as a possible join. You sometimes get the feeling the women are in a dare contest, "I can get a stick, a pool cue and a bat in my butt".

This is simply a problem for me because I like the butt. The curves of it. The silhouette of it a shadow. If you're into the extreme insertions and projectile shooting, you will like this site. Nothing wrong with it if you do. That part just isn't for me.

The good part, they do have the less extreme sets. You get a lot of good lesbian strap-on action and I've never had a problem with women being rough with women. I find it erotic even. The models here are more to my liking than some of the Kink sites. You will see a lot more curvy models here than they typically have.

The site has a pretty good sized collection. I'm counting 217 scenes as of 12/11/12. While this a good-sized collection for unique content like this site has, when I figure in the sets I wasn't even considering, it goes down quite a bit and was what caused me to lower the score some. I typed these out in notepad as I was looking through the site for sets I was interested in.

My counts could be off 1-2.
At least 42 scenes involved enemas.
At least 12-15 more involved instruments that are either gynecological, or look gynecological.

So roughly 1/4 of the scenes didn't appeal to me right from the start. If those scenes would appeal to you, then add another 5 points to the score. I found my boundary there.

The rest of it, to the dismay of some, the delight of others, is more straightforward, rough anal sex, be it with a woman or man or group. There's fisting, there's lesbianism, and I mostly enjoyed these scenes. I'm on the indifferent boat when it comes to fisting.

What it adds up to, if the pictures were easy to download in one zip and the enema/gynecological scenes aren't counted, the site would have scored 94 for me, but because it only updates once a week, there's no telling if 3 of my 4 monthly updates will be in the don't appeal or appeal group, so I can't just say "look over" those scenes.

The models save it for me. The regular Kink girls are around, Isis Love, Skin Diamond, Vicki Chase, would love to see more Kelly Divine and Francesca Le. It leaves me feeling the same way as i have about the other Kink sites. By the 30th day of my membership, I'm usually thinking "time to move on to another niche". It definitely teeters on repetitive, but I don't think that would sit in for those who only join for a month at a time. Way too many puns in this.

I would recommend it most for fans of In the Crack and Give Me Pink. The one big difference, both of those sites excel or excelled in Give Me Pink's case, at high quality photos too. Some of this action is better watched in a still photograph than in real-time movement.

It definitely is good for breaking the monotony of mainstream porn. I would recommend it to most people. One other note is the ass-worship, I do like these and first saw this type of porn on Evil Angel, so if you're a fan of those there is something here for you too.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Men In Pain

72. Men In Pain (0)

Pay
Active
82
RustyJ (145) 12-07-12  04:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -It's a freebie you get when subscribing to DivineBitches. Or vice versa. If you can think anything really is free...
-A good 400 scenes or so is quite impressive backlog on this network
-Most scenes available in very nice 720p mp4
-Quite wide variety of talent, both female and male. Some big star female actresses while the guys are mostly ordinary looking men, not the stereotypes you see too often on femdom sites
-As the name says, stuff here looks often quite painful. If that works for you, then you'll be happy. Personally it's a bit of a con for me
Cons: -Not updating anymore. They hace removed release dates from the old scenes but you can see from the comments when they were originally relesed. The old scenes are then recycled to the top.
-The excessive pegging is present here too
-Sometimes these scenes get maybe too intense to some tastes. Personally all the bloody marks, cock torture and stomping makes me feel little sick
-Even less real male to female sex than on DivineBitches
Bottom Line: I'm not 100% sure how it was when DivineBitches started and MenInPain stopped updating but I'd guess the former simply took the place of the latter with MiP added as a bonus to the DB subscribers. The reason for this is beyond me as the sites share quite a lot even if the genral feeling of DB now is a bit different from MiP then. My rough feeling would be that this site had more pain and torture and way less fucking (I mean man fucking woman here) going on.

Personally I find the material here a bit too much for my likings as it's even further away from my elusive femdom ideal of men being bound and "forced" to have sex with dominating ladies with maybe some SM on the side. There is too much strapon but that was maybe one of the selling points of the site. Also I must skip videos when there's too many and too tight ropes bound to some poor fellows cock with a bucket load of weights and stuff hanging from it. Ouch. What I cannot find here (and think it's good) is the forced feminization, cuckold and forced gay stuff. Besides that, bondage, whipping, face sitting, some fetish wear and such are the things to expect.

I guess the women are mostly American models with some of the same names as you can find on other Kink.com sites. Aiden Starr, Maitresse Madeleine, Sandra Romain and few other dominating porn stars appear a lot with a wide selection of others, some well known. The guys are bit more average and with more variaition than on DivineBitches but some stereotypical "twinks" appear every now and then. It never gets too acted looking so the feeling and the credibility is there. I guess production and enthusiasm is the Kink.com's strong side, some of the stuff here would be hard to act if the models weren't really into it.

I've commented on Kink.com's technical side many times and the sites are identical in that sense so there is not much new to tell. It's fast, it's clean, no dirty tricks like pre checked sales or regional pricing. The prices might feel high but the reductions come often if you just hang on their mailing list. Videos are very nice but not FullHD, the photography is in side role. The preview mode on the whole network is very comprehensive and gives you very good idea what to expect when subscribing to each site so I recommend one takes his time to get to know the sites.

All in all it's another mixed bag. While on some scenes I hardly find anything watchable, the best of them are seriously hot. Maybe it helps that I'm not easily offended by the stuff that doesn't turn me on. If one is strongly turned off by anything male ass, then they should definitely avoid this site. Far from ideal site for me but it's all executed so well that little issues can be forgotten.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Public Disgrace

73. Public Disgrace (0)

Pay
Active
93
RustyJ (145) 12-04-12  04:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -High Kink.com production values and dedication
-Well over 200 scenes to date with weekly update
-A wide selection of female talent, likely partly due to split production between San Francisco and Eastern Europe
-Hardcore enough. Bondage does not always come with sex, here it does
-Creative scenes and setups. Various kinds of bondage, abuse etc.
-Technically well working site with high server speeds
-Easy to manage your subscriptions and hassle free cancels
Cons: -No 1080p here either. Or high quality photography
-Relatively pricey, it's just one site for the price of many a network. Wait for a discount
-Outdoors scenes are not credible really (how could they be?) which might distract you
-Disgracing stuff itself might do nothing for many. It's not sex nor you getting disgraced so you have to get your kicks from somebody else being disgraced, often not too credibly
-Might be too much for some. There are "failed" scenes where the lady could not do it to the end
Bottom Line: Certainly one of the best sites offered by Kink.com and that's saying a lot. The site has been going from mid 2008 without interruptions and updates weekly with content that is a mix of BDSM and public sex. While it all seems to have started as outdoors sex in different East European cities, eventually they also started adding less public US indoors scenes, often shot in their San Francisco Armory building to what I'm made to believe is an audience of the subscribers. Well, that would at least explain some of the rather high prices of these sites, subsidizing some SM parties half the world away ;)

Outdoors scenes include a lot of walking around in public in light bondage, random sexual acts in semi hidden spots and eventually more sex in better hidden place, a bar or a supposedly public bus or something like that. Reactions of public vary from quite credible staring and laughing to actually participating which is a bit too much to swallow. Also no accidental under age people, police or such are ever spotted in these scenes leading me to believe in carefully planned routes and audiences. The US scenes are more hardcore in nature with heavier bondage, SM and group of people humiliating, whipping etc. the female talent. Many of those scenes are made to look like parties for the members but some are shot in pubs, sex shops and other closed off locations.

Great thing about this site is that they do not really over use same models all the time. There is lots of variation and the models also come quite equally from Europe and US and not only split between the scene types. European girls have also been featured in US shoots.

If you can live with all the make believe and do not easily feel awkward when the girls are made to walk around naked in public, this is really great site to join at least once. The price of nearly 30$ without discount can be a bit too steep with only one weekly update to join more frequently but at the moment there is enough backlog to make most feel happy. Technical side works exactly like on other Kink.com sites, no real issues there unless you want your sites looking flashy.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Divine Bitches

74. Divine Bitches (0)

Pay
Active
85
RustyJ (145) 12-03-12  04:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Quite unique content from a rare niche
-Access to MenInPain site for same price. Though it's no longer updating, there's a lot of stuff for new members
-Almost 200 scenes with a weekly update
-Very high production values. If you know Kink.com, you know what to expect
-Nice setups, fetish clothing, props and all the dungeon equipment
-Maitresse Madeleine (too bad she never goes into actual sex), Lorelei Lee and Aiden Starr are all great and often featured!
-HD video at 720p from the very beginning wmv or mp4
Cons: -Comparatively pricey. Other networks give yo ua newtwork membership with a dozen weekly updates for one you get here. Production values on Kink are top notch however
-Way too much strapon for my tastes
-Male models are obviously of the anything goes kind. Wimpy or bald hairy type
-I know it's not the main focus of this site but I really would like to see actual sex in every scene. Denial or teasing is just frustrating and I'm not sure if it's supposed to frustrate viewers too
-Still no 1080p and the photography is not that great. It's clearly a video site however so I can live with that
-Forced gay and cuckold stuff might be a serious turn off for some. Me, I just don't really care either way and skip that
Bottom Line: I don't really get this whole femdom thing. What I'd like to see would be stuff like SexAndSubmission or BoundGangbangs with female side as the dominating one. I guess little SM stuff always goes with porn like this but the idea would be that there is actual sex involved too. It seems that most sites however seem to focus on sissy men (or the hairy bear types) fucked with strapons, dressed as little girls or forced to suck each other, and all to often not getting to any real f/m sex at all. This site is a borderline case with little of the good and some of the bad.

Generally these scenes feature any number of men and women with men humiliated in different ways, some SM themes ranging from mild to quite painfull looking ones, strap on sex and either tease/denial or the ladies actually having sex with their often bound partners. Sometimes there's also forced gay content but not that often. The female talent is very high class, this site features some of my favorites I mentioned above regularly even if some of them seem to not actually ever have sex with males. The guys on the other hand are not your regular studs you see in more generic stuff but seem to often be either stereoptypical wimps or the hairy types. I guess there isn't too much talent willing to do these scenes so they get reused a lot and you see same guys in many scenes.

The setups are great with lots of effort put into the gear and clothing like Kink.com always seems to do. Nothing half assed here in terms of sticking to the niche either, it is quite credible. Scenes are long with kind of split into multiple different parts.

Technically everything still works great. The site is a bit plaing but everything functions and the servers are very fast. 11-12 megabytes per second is where my connection maxed out on this site. If you are really a photography freak, this site isn't necessarily for you. The photos are there but they are nothing special in terms of quality.

Like all the sites at Kink.com, this one too must be individually subscribed to with the exception that MenInPain is included. It's got quite similar themed content but is no longer updating. Like with other sites, you can stay as a Kink member and just wait for a good price offer, they come regularly.

I recommend this site with some reservations. There's a lot of stuff that is certain to put many potential viewers off and for example, strapon stuff is basically in every scene. However, I cannot think of any site that is closer to what I'm looking for. It seems that femdom just doesn't come in vanilla, so to say. There's always certain things included.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Burning Angel

75. Burning Angel (1)

Pay
Active
88
rearadmiral (368) 11-24-12  10:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - There is a cross-sell on the sign up page but it isn’t pre-checked
- Bills through CCBill
- Great chance to see some new models
- Many familiar porn models appear
- Many download options for newer videos
- Supports download managers
Cons: - No zips on pics
- Pics relatively low resolution
- No search function
- No specific tags
Bottom Line: I have to confess that I never expected to be writing a review of a site featuring models with tattoos and piercings, Goth models, punk models and others along that theme. I’m as anti-tattoo as the next guy, except that it turns out I’m not. I’m still anti-tattoo and piercing unless the model goes all the way.

The biggest surprise for me was how conventional the porn here actually is. I don’t know what I was expecting, but whatever it was I was wrong. This is a typical porn network that just happens to showcase models with a look that is slightly out of mainstream.

The main page is laid out as you’d expect with any network: there are tabs for going to pictures, videos, the individual sites, or sorting by model. One choice conspicuous by its absence is a search function. If it exists on the network I haven’t found it yet. (This lack of search is further worsened by the lack of scene tags. Tags exist, but are too broad to be of a lot of use in specific searches.)

The network is made up of eight individual sites. (Cum on My Tattoo, Fuck me in the Bathroom, Heavy Metal Pussy Party, Joanna Angel, POV Punx, Punk Porn, Punk Schoolgirls and Big Boobs are Cool – I’ll post some stats as a comment on each site’s PU page.) While several of the sites have a reason for being stand-alone, several others could just as easily be grouped together. This is neither positive or negative, it’s just a fact.

Each site is laid out in the same way: the site opens into a page where there are thumbnails for 20 scenes per page. Under each thumbnail is some basic information about the scene, including a scene name, the genre (girl/boy, solo, etc.), the running length, user ratings and the female star.

When you select a scene you get a larger thumbnail and four small thumbnails to give you some idea of what’s in store. Each scene has multiple options for downloads. You can download a trailer, the full scene or the full scene broken down into parts. I have to question the value of offering the scene in parts in 2012, but maybe there are still people with slow internet connections. For each of those options there are usually some choices for file type and resolution. MPEGs are offered (in resolutions up to 1400x800 – 5000kb/s and 24fps – depending on the upload date, of course), as are WMVs in high and low resolutions and a mobile version. These options decrease as you get into older files. Prior to 2010 MPEGs weren’t offered but Quicktime files were. The oldest scenes on the network, which date back to 2007, are often only available in one resolution and only in WMV. The resolution on the oldest scenes is low at 480x360, 1800kb/s and 30fps.

This is being a bit picky, but the way the download options are laid out with the trailer as the first option made it too easy to select that instead of the full scene. It didn’t happen to me, but it required that I pay more attention than I’d normally do when just downloading porn. Even having a trailer as a download option seems odd to me, but at least they could put it lower in the option list.

The site supports download managers and I had no problem with the links timing out.

The network bills through CCBill so you have confidence in that. There is a cross-sell, but it isn’t pre-checked.

If the site has a major flaw it is how they provide pictures. I don’t normally download photos but in this case I was looking forward to doing so. I had flagged several models that I really liked that are rare on more mainstream sites and wanted photos too. I was disappointed to see that zips aren’t available and that even if they were, the resolution isn’t great. The newest photos are 1080x720. I know that isn’t bad, but they could be better. Older photos are obviously a lower resolution. I gave up on getting photos since having to save each one individually seems like too much work for porn. The lack of zips really needs to be addressed.

I know this is highly subjective, but I found most of the models on the site to be very attractive. I do question why some models appear on the site though. Katie St. Ives has a few scenes here and I’d not normally think of her when I think tattoos, piercings, Goth or punk. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll take any of Katie’s scenes when I can get them, but it just doesn’t seem to be a good fit.

Dracken posted a comment back in ’09 that the network appeared to be a ‘community’ site for people who like the Goth / Punk / etc. look and lifestyle. That is true. There are blogs and forums for the look, the music and the life. I’m only interested in the naked chicks so I really can’t comment on the non-porn parts of the network.

The bottom line is that this is an excellent network. It is well laid out, easy to use and offers some great porn. If you’re like me and want to push your porn boundaries a bit then I’d highly recommend starting with Burning Angel. The models are beautiful and the scenes are hot.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 51-75 of 676 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Stiffia.com (1)
2. Kink University (1)
3. Fake Hub (1)
4. VIPissy (1)
5. Puffy Network (1)
6. Sexually Broken (1)
7. Wet And Pissy (1)
8. Cosplay Erotica (1)
9. Milk Enema (1)
10. Roxy Raye (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.87 seconds.