Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
The most beautiful, gorgeous Women on the Internet, or anywhere for that matter. Humiliatrix.com is by far the best FemDom Humiliation site on the web. They have countless videos, pictures, and audio files of beautiful Women emasculating and humiliating sissies, losers, and dorks. The content includes everything from sissy feminization, forced bi, cuckolding, foot worship, strap-on fucking, small penis humiliation, and more!
Cons:
None
Bottom Line:
If you're a submissive male who gets off on sexual humiliation, you owe it to yourself to sign up for Humiliatrix.com right away!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 190 movies and photo sets with the last update on 29.05.2012 (it seems like the site updates very infrequently and the quality of the updates can vary a lot. Everything seems to have stopped in 2009 and they are only now resuming updates)
- Videos are around 382x240 resolution and only available as WMV full-length or clips.
- The images are more interesting with 864px × 1,296px high resolution options. Zip archives are also present.
- The site needs a bit more web design love but is workable.
- A nice idea was that each item used in a scene is presented in a separate photo with a description.
- Some cute female models and a lot of corsets and stockings. Also the action varies a lot from scenes where a guy is forced to pleasure a woman to scenes where the male is pissed on or his genitalia is punished in all sorts of odd ways.
- There seems to be a strong focus on heels and feet.
- Decent download speeds
Cons:
- Video resolution is a huge downside. Also several images are not really timed well (expect many shots of models blinking or being caught with a goofy look on their faces)Images where the models just sit around without any action are also abundant.
- Updates are sporadic. They promised several new scenes for March and May but so far nothing. All of 2012 saw 3 updates, the last one before that was in 2009. I'm hesitant to call the site completely dead, but they need to show more involvement.
- No search features, also some of the models on the model page are not available on the actual site. Overall the webdesign feels dated and could use a face-lift.
- A personal thing here, but most of the male models didn't seem very interested in what was going on. Most of the time they are completely flaccid and have "far-away" looks on their faces.
- There are some ads in the member's section. Nothing to major, but they are there.
Bottom Line:
I'm not normally into bondage, but what attracted me to this site were some of the cute models and the promise of corsets, high heals and stockings. I also liked the idea of a site where the girls would do whatever turned them on and get satisfied by using the guys as basically walking toys.
On one hand the site does have several good looking models, although they tend to skew more towards the mature MILF area than I'd like. They also wear some very exciting outfits and the girls wear clothes in most scenes, even in several scenes where they have sex with the guy, making for some pretty decent shots.
Unfortunately the action is not really what I was hoping for. I had hoped that the women would be at least pretending to have orgasms, instead if anyone comes in the scene it's the guy, while the woman tries to look mean as she is jerking him off. A bit of a let down were also the lesbian scenes where the girls don't interact with each other very much. The entire focus of the scenes here are the males who get analy probed and have clamps placed on their balls... both of which don't really seem to be very pleasing to the girls, but I guess that's the spiel here.
Combine this with what I believe was a complete lack of interest on the part of the male models and the whole site doesn't really sell me on the femdom fantasy. Overall I was left feeling like everyone involved was just there for the money.
Now don't get me wrong, there are a few shots that are interesting. Seeing a girl blow a guy who is suspended upside down is rather hot, especially since she's wearing a very hot red corset, but the scene just ends. I wish she would have masturbated to a climax or otherwise used him to pleasure herself.
Maybe it's just me and my expectations though so I won't doc points to heaving because of this.
What I will take points off for is the lack of better videos. The majority are low resolution and rather short. Sure the images are hot but the lack of better clips is really disappointing.
Also there is no really easy way to navigate the site. There are a few categories such as Bondage, Other sex, Femdom, but only Female Domination has more than a handful of scenes under it. There is also no search for anal or pee or lesbian scenes. Even worse several of the models are not present on the model page and in return some girls on the model page are not available on the site. Someone needs to update some links.
Overall I feel like there have to be better femdom sites out there or at least ones that update regularly, however if you like photos and the models in the tour look really hot there are some great images in here. As long as you don't expect anything mind blowing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This is part of the Kink.com network of sites, so you can generally expect pretty high quality from them. Their videos range (depending on ho wold they are) in size and quality, but most are HD videos, or near that quality for some of the oldest stuff. Most everything I downloaded was around 300mb or higher mark, 640x360 mp4s. You have a choice between low, med, and high quality video downloads. Streaming is pretty solid here as well. Even when I have several video pages opening up the streams all come in pretty quick (faster than videobox).
Probably the biggest selling point is the star power. People like Bobbi and Aiden Starr are the standard at Kink.com. I am always amazed at the range of talent these women have. Very talented, very attractive stars in all their videos. There really isn't such a thing as a "bad" video at their site.
When I joined they were offering two for one specials and I also got a membership at meninpain.com.
Cons:
The search within the Divine Bitches website works fine, but if you click on a star's name to see everything he/she has done it takes you to a listing of all of their kink.com work. If you click on a video from this page even for something they shot for Divine Bitches, it takes you a pay-per-view page rather than the actual Divine Bitches site. So that's a little annoying. You can still type Aiden Starr into the search in Divine Bitches and pull up her DB videos only and download them.
Kink.com likes to link to their other sites a lot. There no real chance of actually ordering something by accident in the pay-per-view, but they really do like to hype their other sites. It was a little alarming to me the first time I joined a kink.com site and it made me a little paranoid that I might accidentally join another site. This is not the case, I assure you.
They throw a lot at you on the start page. It can be a little overwhelming at times.
Bottom Line:
Kink.com is a group you can usually trust, and also a group that seems to be setting the standards for fetish videos such as these (BDSM, femdom, latex, etc.). I scored Divine Bitches a 94 because a) there is always room for improvement and b) they could do soemthing to make navigation a little easier, mainly indexing the videos by star within the individual site, rather than all of kink.com. If they did that I could easily see myself giving this site a 98 (I can't ever see a site going much higher than that).
As far as recommendation goes, I have been a member in other kink.com sites and I can say they all seem to be pretty good. This site was one I hadn't really looked at before, and frankly I think it is one of their better sites. You get a nice range of femdom BDSM here that covers a variety of subjects (cuckolding, BDSM,ball torture, teasing, masturbation instruction, so on and so forth), whereas some of their other sites are more specific or focused in terms of the niche. I think if you are interested in any of the kink.com sites and don't know which one to try, this might be the safest bet.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I rarely can't find anything positive to say about a site, but this site was really so bad it doesn't have any pros
Cons:
Video quality is not quality at all. The average wmv file size at this site is around 20mb or less with many falling around 6mb. Even a large file I downloaded (83mb) was still in a 720x480 frame, was not HD, and it still looked like the picture was getting stretched when you maximized the video window. The smaller files are clearly designed for an old school site and to be played in a very small window (320x240).
The design of the site really looks outdated. I have talked in the past about sites that hearken back to the nineties. In this case, if I didn't know better, I would say the site was designed somewhere around 1979. It actually reminds me of an old Adam and Eve catalog from the 1970s. Basically a page which a bunch of thumbnails, no titles or descriptions for videos, and you don't even get any clue as to the size and quality until you open the page that has the video on it.
Absolutely no search capability or indexing whatsoever.
I have run out of room to keep complaining
Bottom Line:
This site is probably the biggest ripoff I have ever personally encountered. I went for it basically because they also included a membership to Romanvideoarchives.com. That turned out be an even worse selling point.
Basically I think a lot of these videos actually do date back to the late seventies or eighties. At least they look like they do. The quality is sub-par, even by 1970s standards. There are times when you can tell they just put the camera there, hit record, and that's the only shot your going to see the whole time, even when the actors move out of frame. It really is pretty bad quality just at the most basic, point-and-shoot level.
This site doesn't seem to be updating, though they claim they are. If they are they are only updating with old videos from the archive, because I have yet to see anything that looks like it was even shot within the last five years. Even webcams have better video quality now than what they were using.
The bottom line here is that if you waste a single cent on this site you're getting burned. I am trying to post this ASAP in the hopes I can prevent some of you from making the same mistake I did. If you are looking for cuckold videos there are far better sites like Cuckoldcream that will cost you about the same amount. They have clearly designed this site for low bandwith users, and file size (and quality) designed for streaming or downloading through a 56k modem (remember those days). I guess if you're feeling nostalgic for a five or ten min video that has been broken down into 2min videos meant to be played in about a four inch window, then this is the site for you. Otherwise, I would avoid this site like the plague.
P.S. Don't let the "tour" or "start page" windows fool you. The page shown above (or for this site here) is not the actual "members" page. Once you click "members" it takes you to the page from the 1970s.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Adding 1 new video about every 5 days.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Videos cab be streamed and also downloaded.
-There are multiple choices for download: high quality, medium quality, and MP4 for portable devices.
-You can use a download manager such as DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds.
-Easy logon.
-Long time before site time-out.
Cons:
-There is a link to live chats. But the free chats that I saw were a waste of time.
-Tiny site. only 14 videos so far.
-The acting is amateur.
-The plot is unbelievable. An older doctor examines a teenager's vagina. Then he sticks his penis in her mouth. Then he fucks her. She is
supposedly so aroused by the examination that the sex follows naturally. But the sex that is shown has all the passion of a soggy French Fry.
-The doctor and the model speak in a foreign language. Possibly Russian.
No subtitles.
Bottom Line:
This is the newest offering from the Royal Cash network. The site is tiny. It only has 14 videos so far.
The site theme is teenage girls visiting a doctor, who examines them. He uses a speculum to examine their vagina. He stimulates the vagina with his finger. Also uses a stethoscope to listen to the vagina. Somehow, the girl is supposedly turned on by the doctor stimulating her vagina with his finger and his tongue. He then puts his penis in her mouth. She then sucks on his penis, and they fuck.
The action is completely unrealistic. The niche where a guy gives a girl a massage and turns her on and they then have sex is a much more believable fantasy. But this theme, of a doctor examining a girl and turning her on, is done in a completely amateur way.
Instead of adding videos to this site, it would be more valuable if they updated the Tricky Masseur or the Squirting Virgin sites. The models they feature at those sites are more attractive. And the plot is more believable. And the models put more passion into their sex.
You have about 14 models at this site, but they are not up to the average attractiveness of the Royal Cash network. The network has a lot of
attractive models, some of which are really good looking. But the models at this site are, so far, just OK looking.
A lot of the models have a backpack. This is supposed to demonstrate the girls are teenagers, in school.
But the girls look like they actually are teens, anyway, and the backpack as a prop is unconvincing. Maybe they could suck on a lollipop, or wear multicolored stockings, which are the normal porn props to show the models
are young.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. That's because you get this site with access to much better sites in the Royal Cash network. But if this was a standalone site, I would give it a score in the 50s.
One last point. If you join this site directly, you pay $29.95/month. Join through Teen Mega World and you pay $19.95/month.
I don't know if access to Dirty Doctor is included with a Teen Mega World membership. But Teen Mega World gives you access to a number of hardcore teen sites: The network has a boatload of good quality hardcore videos, a huge number of very attractive models. And a very low price for all that content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Low(ish) monthly price
+ Lots of extra bonus material
+ Latest Rob and Jill scenes are a decent size
+ Fairly unique theme with a real married couple
+ Very creative variations on a theme
+ Bills with CCBill
+ Lots of videos going back a long time.
Cons:
- Site is messy and very difficult to navigate
- Site looks poor - very basic design, lots of misspelt words
- Most videos only available in one of several file types and size/quality
- Regional pricing, which isn't made clear (I was charged the equivalent of $20.26 rather than $17.95)
- Not all videos are available to stream - those that are, are in a completely different section
- Main content gets samey - there's only so much variation you can fit into a single concept & one couple
- Not all videos are as described.
- Some extra material doesn't really fit in with theme of site, doesn't seem to be exclusive and is poor quality.
- Download managers are forbidden from the site.
Bottom Line:
I do want to say that I do understand that this is an amateur site, and I did try and take that somewhat into account when I wrote my review - but they do still charge for it, and whilst it's still at the cheaper end of the market, a recent price increase, and extra charges for non-Americans thanks to regional billing, it's creeping to the territory of much more professional sites.
I also do understand that as a gay man the site is not really aimed at me, but I joined it because I do enjoy other CFNM/Femdom sites. I feel bad giving this site a low score for these reason, but I have tried to be fair and my score reflects the above factors.
Rob and Jill is an amateur site run by a real-life married couple. The theme of the site is her controlling when and how Rob is allowed to ejaculate, mainly via handjobs. Jill comes up with a massive variety of games and scenarios for them to act out, including gameshows, chastity, all sorts of devices, "ruined" (minimised) orgasms, etc. I find Rob very attractive, and the site has been going for so long that there's a LOT of videos.
Jill is very good at acting out the scenes and gives lots of verbal commands to Rob, but also describes what she's doing for her audience very well. She likes to instruct other wives and husbands in the best techniques for this kind of sexual lifestyle. Rob puts up with it all stoically, rarely speaking but obviously enjoys every moment of it.
There's also a fair amount of bonus material of very variable quality - the best is user-submitted by other femdom women, the rest seems to be fairly generic, non-exclusive and low-quality porn.
Rob and Jill make a great and sexy couple and the scenarios are very creative. They've made a unique site and it's a privilege to share their intimate life.
However it's just so sad the way the site itself is, as it really lets things down. Only the latest material offers video which is of a high enough resolution and quality to be worth watching - and this is from someone who isn't fussy about demanding hi-def resolution or glossy production values.
Until recently the videos were so small in size and resolution that's it's just a small image in the middle of your screen - it's just barely worth watching. The videos are presented in at least 4 formats - WMV, RN (RealPlayer), MPEG, AVI. However there is no consistently at all - each movie is generally only available as one file type and it's completely random which one you'll get for each video. Most of the videos are low resolution. I found the sound quality often poor too. The last few update videos are much better - she seems to have settled on WMV files in a larger format.
The site layout is overwhelming when you first join but whilst you get used to it, it's so badly organised it's frustrating. This isn't usually one of my main issues, but here it's difficult to ignore. If you find a scene you like the sound of, you can't immediately stream it - you have to remember the title, go back to the main page, find the streaming section, and then try and find it there. It may or may not be there. Then if you do like it (having waited for the sluggish video to get going, with lots of stops for buffering - forget trying to pause and jump and forth during streaming) you have to go back to the main screen, back to the download section and try and find it again. There are no search options to speak of - videos are simply presented per section on one large page in date order - that's it.
Often I found the videos didn't match up to the hot descriptions. For example in one video she promises to feed Rob his own cum - but you don't see her actually do it - his face remains out of shot.
I think from then on video quality will be acceptable quality and worthwhile. However the vast majority of the material remains in the other formats at resolutions which are simply too low for me to find them of any real use.
Overall an interesting concept but to me, the site just doesn't work overall.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
§ Sexy,Erotic,Titillating themes,Passionate Stories
§ Low Membership Price,Large Bonus Site Access
§ Login,Ease of Access,Stable Site Design,Quality
§ Movie Stream Option is fast,steady & reliable
§ Multiple Movie Formats-Fair HD,WMV,MKV,IPod,Mobile
§ Excellent Membership Option - 3M/6M/12M Discounted
§ Fast/ Access/Response by Customer/Tech Support
Cons:
§ Older videos not HD & latest not real HD Formats
§ Erratic/Unpredictable Update Schedule,No support
§ Streaming in Non-HD,poor quality in full screen
§ Model/s quality is abysmal,new faces are absent
§ 90% Bonus Sites Non-Updating;Discontinued Sites
§ Reduced Footage/Bad Story lines/Quality Suffers
§ Comments section untutored,clutter, death match
Bottom Line:
TM started out as an excellent site over 3 years ago but with all that's happened,it's hard to say what went wrong! When sites start to compromise on one thing, it affects other things & leads to an overall disaster in the offerings.This is true for many but it's a site worth trying out if you like fetish & bizarre themes. However be warned as bonus scenes are with themes like Anal, Solo, Masturbation, Toys. The themes are strongly European though but the site is taking a beating. Go for it if you wish to see some cheap thrills!
Only the older content scores
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It's hard to come up with pros for this site. Is it a "pro" if they are simply performing the most basic duties of a website?
The site is stable. I have never had much trouble logging in or connecting to pages.
I have never found a dead link.
I find their font sizes to be legible without my glasses.
The appearance and layout is functional.
Yes, this is sarcasm, but I am really having a hard time finding a lot to put in this category for them. Here's some stuff about their videos.
You get a choice between "High" and "Low" quality mp4s, or you can stream. The high res stuff isn't bad. Some of it is even HD, but not much.
They do have a pretty impressive selection of categories: BDSM, spanking, femdom, smothering, fisting, smoking, nylon/lingerie, jerkoff instruction, lesbian, and mixed kink (see cons about this).
Cons:
The one thing that annoys me the most is that there is no cross-listing or networking taking place here, and it is literally called the "Fetish Network." You have no real search capability, and if you do happen to find someone you think was really hot in something, there is no way to either find out who they are, or to easily find other videos with them on the site. In fact, the entire interface is definitely a 1990s design. Basically each "Site" under their network opens into a index of thumbnails for videos. The titles are fairly descriptive, but there is no way of knowing what will actually take place in the video. Arguably, this can make the videos more fun or exciting, but in dealing with subject matters such as this (BDSM generally) you kind of want to know what you're in for.
Aside from that, there is a distinct lack of variety. For as many videos as they have, they all just seem to be the same dozen or so, fat, middle-aged men, or whoever, doing the same stuff to girls.
Bottom Line:
This is a site that could be awesome for you if you are really into seeing all sorts of women get spanked, caned, whipped, or titty twisted. That seems to be about 75% of the material. The models are a mixed bag of nuts, some are pretty and young, others are amateurish and/or fugly. The girls doing the jerkoff instruction are all pretty hot, and jerkoff instruction isn't exactly a really prevalent niche, so I thought it was going to be awesome having so many of these videos. Instead, they are all pretty lame, a few of the girls actually know who to do it, but most just kind of model their pantyhose and don't talk that much. So, you can see where something like this may be very tricky. Looking at clips or a thumbnail of videos like these make it seem like they are a lot higher quality than what you get with the entire product. It's kind of like getting duped into paying $15.00 to see Prometheus.
This site doesn't offer much to anyone who isn't really, really, really into spanking, caning and whipping. Beyond that subject matter, it is very shallow. There is a lot of bondage, but you don't get to see a lot of the actual binding. The girl or guy just appears bound. The machine sex is pretty cheap stuff, and they are still really into putting dildos on the end of pool cues. Even when there are hot models involved, the production values are still very low rent.
Not all of the material is original, and stuff like the Rick Savage videos may have been around for awhile already. It is possible you have seen some of this stuff elsewhere. It is also possible that it is just so plain and generic that you think you've seen it elsewhere. They also tend to include duplicates of videos in the various sites.
I don't think a site should get any accolades for basically doing the bare minimum. Clearly someone updates the site, but no one seems to even try get organized. The videos are not enough to carry this site alone. They aren't horrible, but they aren't great either. Some customer consideration could go a long way into at least making the customer not feel as if they have just been scammed. But, unfortunately, once you shell out the money, you are immediately introduced to a site layout that screams "We got your money, what do we care?"
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some (not all) of the models are very busty
Cons:
Poor design makes it difficult to navigate. Only low def video. Poorly shot. There is a hidden download limit which cuts you off very quickly and makes it very difficult to access most of the video.
Bottom Line:
Poor quality material and badly designed. The download limit on this site makes it a complete rip off. I have had to rate it 50/100 but the real score should be much, much lower for this complete pile of ****!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-- Creative photography
-- Unique content.
-- A good number of classic photosets.
-- Site delivers what is advertised--images of women with Large BBW breasts.
Cons:
-- Technical quality of images can be hit or miss.
-- Primitive site design and interface.
-- Exceedingly poor streaming speeds of both photos and videos throughout my entire memberhips period.
-- Site is not growing much.
-- Limited content.
-- Vdeos are just a novelty.
-- Site owners play games with content(hold back content and offer to let you view more content if you stick around longer or sign up somewhere else)
--Bandwidth Limit imposed to 550 MEG per day.
Bottom Line:
Most of the models at this site are of the BBW variety and most sport large EEE size breasts. There is very little silicone here. These are well-endowed amateur models for the most part, with a few glam types thrown in.
Full nudity is rare and the site is mostly softcore. It's all about catering to those with a breast fetish. The photography, in many caes, is actually quite well done and creative. There are a few poorly done sets but this is the exception. However, the owners skimp on resolution at times and the actual technical quality of the displayed images can vary from fairly decent 1600 resolution to grainy and out-of-focus 1024.
If you are into this genre and natural, large breasts are your thing, you would likely find the photo content here to be interesting. However, that interest will fade pretty quickly, as the amount of content is a bit limited and the site seems to be growing at a snails pace. Unless you view only a few photosets once or twice during a one-month subscription period, you will find the content runs out pretty quickly.
Videos are pretty much a novelty and the main show are the photosets. With very few exceptions, most videos are small 350 clips that run perhaps a minute or two.
The site designers also have a habit of 'padding' the numbers when it comes to overall photosets available. For example, they have created a fair number of photosets for each model. Model X may have twenty photosets available for viewing on her page. However, what they do in most cases is split up a single photo shoot into a number of different sets. For example, a lingerie shoot might be split up into three or four seperate sets. The first set on the page would be perhaps fourteen photos of the model disrobing, the next would show the model reclining while partially disrobed, etc etc. In essence, you are being given ten different photosets for a model, when in reality, they are really just one or two actual photo shoots split up.
This type of presentation is annoying and similar things happen in other areas. There are a lot of cross-sell marketing tools being used. In more than one case, a popular model will only have one or two photosets(or perhaps none at all and a few videos will be in the model area) and a marketing link advises you that "btw..this model has her own page !". Unfortunately, that page requires a seperate memebership.
The owners also let you know that the longer you stick around, the more content you can see. For example, Model X may have only a few photosets or a video that is incomplete and ends with a tease. They will then advise you that the longer you stay past 30 days, the more content you get to see --"Want to see more of her? blah blah blah.."
Given the limited content already available, this may be a good business model to get people to stick around, but the content isn't that great that I would eprsonally pay more just to see a bit more of Model X. IMO, this tactic will simply rub people the wrong way and they will just move on. Also, who says you aren't going to do the same thing if I sign up for Model X's page? I would advise the owners to rethink this strategy. You will more often than not just succeed in ticking off your customer base instead of given them a reasont o want to stay around with knowing they won't get the same treatment for next month's rent.
As far as the site design and layout, it is quite primitive. It gets the job done. However, the menus and navigation tools are primitive. The actual streaming speeds of content is about the worse I have ever experienced at any time with any online service of any kind. Strangely, the quickest way to get content on this site is to download the photosets. Usually, the opposite is true.
Without fail, I could view perhaps one or two images in a gallery, then any subsequent images would take a ridiculous amount of time to simply load. I have a high speed DSL connection and have never experienced anything this bad.
The site also limits you to 500 MEG download per day. You cannot stream or DL past this limit. In short, the strategy of this site seems to be to employ any possible means to get people to stick around longer than thirty days. They make it is hard as possible for you to stream or view the already limited content at the site in a thirty day period. Limiting to 500 MEG download a day and freezing the stream after viewing two photos means it will take six months to get to all of the content that would take a few days of viewing to get to at any other site. The goal is obviously to frustrate you by prolonging the time to to view images via streaming so you download the sets and quickly eat up your daily allotment.
Crooked? Underhanded? Shady? I will leave that for you to judge.
I would give the actual photo content a score of 70 but the experience a 0.05. Since I can only score a minimum of 50, I will give the site an overall score of 50.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-unique fetish content (squirting strapons, pantyhose, latex, solo, anal, creampie, fantasy costumes (ballerina, school girl,...) etc.)
-models are young and exceptionally beautiful and could as well model for a teenie site
-newer videos come in HD, there are always mobile versions available and streaming, the camera work is professional and steady, the sets are very decent and comfy looking
-counting a total of 106 videos
-galleries are well shot with high resolutions of 1920x1278 and nice lighting; they look very crisp and clean and come in .zips
-videos are labelled by fetish content
-newer watermarks in the videos and galleries have been reduced in size and changed to the letters "straponcum.com" in the lower right corners (compared to the bigger logos from older shoots)
Cons:
-content is not dated (I hate that)
-updates are nearly suspended, I was a member for one month now and there was only one update
-customer support responds quickly but is not effective; I complained that the comment function doesn't work anymore and they promised to fix it but never did
-initial personal feedback from the director ceased to exist which I really appreciated in the "early days"
-wouldn't hurt to offer some more formats like .mp4 instead of .wmv only
-34.95$ per month is too pricey
Bottom Line:
I already mentioned that I didn't regret to join again (just for a month though). The main reason was to obtain the newer stuff, which, from my point of view, is pretty awesome.
There has been a steady development from clumsy handling of the strapons by the girls to really hot scenes with experienced and scorching hot screwing action.
The second improvement is the more sophisticated acting of the girls. I always mocked their exaggerated behavior in their 2008-2010thish time, like already faking an orgasm when in reality nothing serious has happened. The newer videos are far more authentic. I was surprised that I even like their solo scenes now.
Personally, I like the nice combination of fetishes with the hot strapon action. You get to see gallons of goo spurting from inside a pantyhose for example, even some creampies with the artificial goo. You will see it splashing on naked hot bodies covered with latex, into high heels, on feet and on stockings. I especially love the reactions of the girls being splashed, mostly starting to laugh after the 10th or so spurt with this amazing amount of goo.
The bottom line is that this site is not well suited for porn users who expect a huge buttload of content which is updated every day so it can justify a long term membership.
I am torn to give a fair rating because the new content really blew me away. The update schedule and the other cons cannot be rationalised away though. Because there are real gems to be found here I rate it in the upper region of the average rating, just below very good.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Official site of Russian-born US-resident alt model Mosh.
- No tattoos, nipples pierced, hair bleached white.
- 350+ photo sets. 90% at 1200x800px. 40 images per set.
- Sets have info on photographer, designer, make up artist, venue, ...
- Lots of unusual poses. More artistic than erotic
- Latex, vintage stockings and clothing, high heels.
- 40 videos. 50% at 640x480, 25% at 320x240, 25% at 720x400 or higher.
- Lots of information on the model's live and career.
- Modeling tips section. Infrequent diary with pictures.
- 6-8 new photo sets per month.
- ccbill. No regional pricing.
Cons:
- Few videos and at very low resolution.
- No zip files. Photos open in a page of their own.
- Sets are only grouped by year of release. No categories.
- Content engine needs a makeover.
- Smallish pictures.
- Interaction limited to email. No member chats, phased out forum.
- Site is somewhat slow. Downloading and browsing.
- Hard to read the texts: center justified and tiny font.
Bottom Line:
I believe there is a big gap between alt modeling and my tastes. Latex fetish, stockings, garters, vintage clothes, burlesque or pin up style are not my thing. The Mosh Room is the solo site of an alt model that has lots of things that are not my cup of tea and, yet, I liked this site quite a lot and I’d recommend anyone to at least take a look at the free tour.
The alt adjective doesn’t come from her body modifications: she has a very unique look but no tattoos at all and just some discrete nipple and ear piercings. She does have extremely pale skin and hair bleached white. I guess the alt adjective comes from a mix of her looks, her taste in style (pin up, vintage stockings, latex, extremely high heels) and the unusual, yet jawdropping, poses she bends herself into for pictures.
According to the very detailed about me section, Mosh trained as a gymnast since childhood. Saying merely that she is flexible would be a huge understatement. She has a perfect control of her body: every pose is different but every pose is a winner. For instance, I'm in awe of how she uses her hands, how she manages to bring something more to already extraordinary poses by the way her hands are placed and tensed. It’s difficult to put in words the uniqueness of the end results.
The photos come from many different photographers but, even though, I got the feeling that she has a lot to say on how she gets shot so all sets end up having some sort of “Mosh style”. Unfortunately, the 350+ photo sets are dumped into a single huge listing sorted by release date. Apart from adding listings for categories (latex, nude, stockings, ...) it would make a lot of sense to group or, at least, make sets searchable by the metadata that is shown when you open them: photographer, garments designer and so on.
The site has much more text pages than the usual solo site: tips, diaries, biography, faqs but interaction seems to be limited to email. She periodically posts publicly replies to emails she gets, specially when it’s other models asking for advice. Looks like there were some webcam chats at some point and also a forum of some sorts but nothing seem to be going on in that direction currently.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Content is dated.
-Because it's a small site, easy to navigate.
-The nylons the girls wear add dash of color to their costumes.
-Member pages are relatively ad free.
-Can watch videos streaming or download.
-Download speeds are good. I regularly get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Has a link to "free" live cam shows. But these are mainly a waste of time.
Cons:
-Small site. Only 25 videos.
-No regular updates. Last update was 2012-04-05. So it's more like a small archive site.
-Needs more stunt cocks. Only 3 or 4 stunt cocks featured.
-Videos can be streamed, but only one definition: no choice of high, medium or low quality.
-Videos can be downloaded, in high or medium quality. No low quality option. Also, judging from the file size of the download videos, the
quality of the "high quality" files is really more like a medium quality video at other sites. And the file size of the "medium quality" videos is more like a low quality video at other sites.
For example, a video with a run time of 15 minutes has a high quality file size of 558 MB. And the medium quality file size is 170 MB.
-Only one file size for the photos. And since the photosets are a record of the video shoot, the photos themselves have little artistic or erotic
value. But if all you want is photos of naked girls, the pics will do the job.
Bottom Line:
CONS (continued):
-Photos have a medium-sized watermark on lower right side.
-No biograhical data on the models except for age. But the age given is not tied to any date or video the model appears in.
BOTTOM LINE:
-Theme is girls wearing nylons having sex.
-Small site catering to people with a fetish for nylons.
There is the normal variety of sex shown: masturbation, boy-girl vaginal and anal sex, blowjobs.
Site stats:
Videos: 25
Photosets: 25
The photosets are a record of the video shoot.
Most of the sites in the Teen Mega World network are integrated. So can search for a single model, and the results will include her appearances at all the network sites. Can also search by top rated scenes, your personal favorite scenes, type of sex scene (lesbian, anal, group, squirting, toys, etc.).
Join through the Teen Mega World site for $19.95/month, with the PU discount, which gives access to the NylonsX site.
Joining directly through the NylonsX site costs $29.95/month, and does not give you anything more than the Teen Mega World membership.
-Most valuable feature is that access to this site is included with a Teen Mega World membership. Teen Mega World, with a PU discount of 19.95/month, recurring, offers a huge network of hardcore teen videos. Many of the videos are good quality, and the network has hundreds of Eastern European teen models, many of which are very attractive.
Giving this site a score of 83. Site deserves that score because it's part of the Teen Mega World network. If the site was a standalone site, the score would be much lower, maybe 70 or less.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-) Downloadable content (!)
-) many file formats
-) photo sets available as Zip file
-) site layout is attractive and effective
-) lots of content
-) frequent updates
-) many types of women
Cons:
-) I get low download speeds (I am based in Europe)
Bottom Line:
Needless to say: This is a BBW website. If you don't like chubby women in your porn, you don't join.
It took me a long while to get myself to sign up to this site. Not because I was hesitant, but because I wanted to wait until lots of content was available. When my favorite model was added, I was thrilled and joined.
Site layout works like this: You can browse content by "website" and then by model. You can then select the various videos - download (many formats: wmv, mp4, hi quality, lo quality for mobile devices) or streaming are available. Most scenes also feature many photos (available as a single zip!).
I also liked - and this I would like to really emphasize - that you can download all video scenes as MP4 or wmv to your harddrive to view whenever you please (as I hate streaming). I heard some websites stopped providing downloadable videos.
Website content is plentiful with frequent updates. Video quality of the fresh updates is decent (720P mp4/wmv) - as is photo quality. Older content is of course lower in resolution, yet still ok.
they lose a few points because download speeds are not that fast for me here in Europe. However, USA/Canada/American-continent customers might not have this problem.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
high res
mice models
other niches
Cons:
I subscribed to this website because your website review said all material is downloadable.
dont be fooled, it is only streamable. i send the creditcard processer an enquiry and received this reponse "Dear Customer,
We are in receipt of your inquiry.
Subscription id: 0112151301000001531
We have tested the video content on the website and have verified that only streaming is available. However, the website does not state that you are or will be able to download any video content. If you are having issues streaming the video material, please contact us back."
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 160 scenes with a somewhat erratic update schedule but it looks like generally they get around 2 scenes up per month. The club 69 network gets an update almost daily though.
- As far as I could tell all exclusive content, a lot of interracial sex with a black male model and mostly European models (some French some Russian good mix)
- All scenes have images but no zip and the quality is only medium (around 525px × 700) They do offer a slideshow option on the site that works moderately well.
- The site does deliver on the hairy promise, all models look very natural
- A mix of models, some mature women, some more overweight girls and several skinny young looking girls. Overall the site seems focused on natural looking women, pretty minimal make-up, not the most flattering light, and pretty standard action
- A lot of stockings, high heels and corsets.
- Good download speeds, no log-outs, no issues streaming content.
Cons:
- All videos are only 640x400 resolution, with some less than ideal camera angles (they seem to really like to film stuff sideways here) and rather basic light.
- No real search options. While they provide a search bar looking even for basic stuff like mature or BBW doesn't return anything. They really need a better tagging or content filtering system.
- While it's nice to see a mix of natural looking women, the site is too disorganized. There are 18 yo looking girls as well as very mature MILFS on the same page. It's hard to find the kind of model you're in the mood for.
- Almost all scenes have b/g sex, no anal, no group sex, very little solo or lesbian action. Some older scenes have a bit of a story to them while recent ones are pretty much just gonzo sex that can get a bit boring.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site not really because of the hairy aspect as much because of the promise of pretty spectacular creampies and extensive use of corsets and stockings on natural almost amateur looking girls.
On both accounts the site delivers pretty well. All scenes I looked at ended with a creampie or the guy cumming oh her vagina, a nice change to the pretty standard facial at the end of most porn clips.
Also the vast majority of scenes start with the girls in some sort of corset/ bodystocking and a lot of them keep it on the entire time, making for some pretty hot, almost clothed sex scenes.
That being said the technical quality of the videos killed the mood for me. You only get one download option as wmv at 640x400 or you can stream the same quality scene as a flash movie. Even worse the scenes are often not lighted well so you get very dark zoom on the woman's vagina, considering all the girls are hairy/ natural looking and the male model is often black good luck seeing what is going on in the dim lights.
Another disappointment was the lack of a good search option. There is no real way to separate the younger looking models from the older ones. There is no way to select only the handful of lesbian scenes and good luck finding all scenes where the girl does deep-throat.
Bad webdesign, bad video quality, but decent looking models (if you like natural/ amateur looking girls) and pretty okay action.
The one reason I say pretty okay action despite the good cumshots and outfits is that oftentimes the camera work is bizzare. They focus too much on close-ups with several scenes not even showing the girls face until 4-5 minutes into the scene. There are also a lot of strange cuts, one moment she is giving the guy head, the next they are having sex, no transition just a rather strange jump. Add to this tons of side angles and you have some rather odd video choices.
To make things a bit more complicated there are several scenes where this doesn't really apply, the lights are better and the angles less extreme, leading me to believe that they get the content from several directors. However there is no way to tell what is what. Better content tags would have really been helpful here.
The bottomline is that I enjoyed about 30% of the content on the site and the rest of the network did offer some nice action with mature women, but overall the experience was rather disappointing. Higher resolutions and a more modern web design are absolutely necessary for this site, until they make these changes I'd only recommend this to hardcore fans of natural looking women.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-1530 silicone-free, hairy pussy models, 19300 photo sets, 4900 videos.
-Committed, engaged, involved, enthusiastic, confident, joyful models.
-10 softcore photo sets per model per photographer per shoot. 100% exclusive.
-Photosets in three resolutions: 1024, 1500-1600, 3000. (Not all on older sets).
-Updates: 8 photosets (80-250pics each) and 3 (ave 15min each) videos daily.
-Model's photosets uploaded just a week apart.
-Full and custom zips for all sets and sizes.
-Videos several formats, inc "HD mp4" (1280x720 @ 6Mbps ) and streaming.
-Good model directory and search facility.
-Opt-in for newsletter and promos.
-Set preferences for viewing sizes etc.
-Works well with Firefox and DownThemAll. Tested OK with FDM and Getright.
-Download links stay current for several hours.
-Webmaster responds very fast to emails.
Cons:
-Links time out after a few hours (Karups' last for membership duration).
-Some photographers produce technically flawed colour (but most are good).
-Videos at 1280x720 6mbps possibly not high enough for video-philes but I am no judge of video.
-Very old photosets (say older than 6 years) moved off to ATK Archives (separate site); I wish they would leave it all here as some of it was excellent, judging by content I downloaded 5 to 10 years ago and still retain.
-Lower proportion of attractive models than ATK Galleria (but some OMG hotties).
-Pages can be very slow to load, but zip download speeds are good.
-Some old videos may count multiparts towards the 4900. If 3000 complete videos would not be enough, do not join! And maybe only half of those are as high as 1280x720. Again, if you need more than 1500 of them, stay clear. Figures are indicative. I have not downloaded 4900 videos to check the sizes.
Bottom Line:
ATK Hairy (ATKH) is the largest and most complete site in the niche of women with natural breasts and hairy pussies. But there is little competition in this niche. We Are Hairy (WAH) is the only serious contender, though some other sites include some hairy models.
ATKH's women cover a large age range from 18 to 50s. Most are Caucasian girl-next-door types in the 18-35 range. They have hairy pussies and natural tits. There is no silicone here at all. ATKH does not claim that all, most or even any of its models have hairy legs, hairy armpits or any other body hair, though some have. The site does not appear to be much, if at all, influenced by the very vociferous group of members on the ATKH forums who demand hair everywhere. Bear in mind that modern girls in real life increasingly have tattoos or piercings. You see this in shops and offices everywhere. Do not expect ATKH to exclude them. Even MET has them. Sites do not beget their models nor control them.
Amongst the many tens of sites I have ever joined, including WAH, Nubiles, DDF, MET, Diesel and others, I have never found one where I like more than 10% of the models. ATKH is no exception; I leave 95% of their content behind.
I greatly enjoy the style of the photography at ATKH. Much of that is due to the content from one photographer, Sean R. He has 282 models on ATKH. You either love or hate his work. I absolutely love it. It has a raunchiness that no other photographer on any site, hairy or not, has ever achieved, in my opinion. His girls have the filthiest facial expressions imaginable and they clearly have huge fun on his shoots. His shoots are very repetitive within each set but many viewers do not realise that he is almost unique in varying his plane of focus. You may get 15 consecutive shots that look very similar but they will have different focus. And many have enough DOF to have all in focus. He uses a lot of makeup, which I like, and it is very tarty and slutty, as are the costumes his girls wear and I love all that. Sean R does not photograph with toys and many of his models do not do video. Some use a toy in video.
I also love the work of Riley Williams who has 87 models represented here. His style is classy, with much less makeup than Sean R but sharp, beautifully lit, perfectly colour balanced and capturing the whole personality of his models, who clearly enjoy working with him. BMB is another photographer producing quality results with 88 models here.
I cannot list all of ATKH's over 100 photographers, shooting models from US, UK, Europe, Russia, Ukraine and elsewhere. Most, if not all, produce work which is hotter, more raunchy, in a softcore photo niche, than anything I have seen elsewhere. Models here are involved, committed, engaged, passionate, joyful and have a lot of fun. The much smaller WAH tends to have a softer style, with a greater proportion of photo sets involving little or no makeup. But ATKH includes plenty of sets in that style too.
In ATKH's 10 softcore photo sets per model per photographer per shoot, there will be usually no more than two or three with toys. If there is any bg hardcore, it is in addition to the 10 softcore sets. But it is not really a hardcore site. There are 340 hardcore videos, 560 hardcore photosets and even less gg. This could be more than some dedicated hardcore sites though. As I am not interested in bg, gg or video, it is hard for me to evaluate the quality of that content.
A model's photo sets are added about a week apart but videos are less predictable and not all models do them.
Older sets might be only in 1024 and 1600 or only 1024. But I find the photos tend to have more detail and clarity than many of the 5000 pixel offerings from sites such as MET. The photosets here are in a completely different style. They are shot in normal rooms with normal furniture. There is some outdoor stuff but (mercifully!) not much. Photos are usually well lit. Most are properly colour balanced but there are a lot of exceptions and some photographers consistently produce poor colour that does not match the technical perfection which Riley Williams and Sean R deliver on each and every photo shoot. ATKH photos are not works of art and are not meant to be. They are overtly sexual and mainly highly pornographic within the context of softcore.
Most if not all sets start fully clothed and include extremely explicit open leg shots with pussy spreads and great detail.
I thoroughly recommend this site to lovers of natural girl-next-door women, with hairy pussies and no silicone, in good quality, very explicit softcore solo photo-sets in domestic, non-glam and mainly indoor locations. If your primary interest is video, take 5 points off my score. If it is hardcore, deduct a further 10 points. ATKH has a harder, edgier softcore style than WeAreHairy but I recommend joining both. I have been re-joining ATKH regularly for 10 years. "member < 1 month" applies just to current join.
See "reply #17" re DLMs.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large selection of models
- Site is simple and easy to navigate
- Photos appear to be well shot
- Photos come in 3 different sizes - described as Small (800px), Medium (1024px) and Large (2000px)
- One update every 3 days (2 updates per week)
- Members get half price on joining the sister site which deals with videos (Latex Heaven Video)
Cons:
- Some models look like they aren't all that into latex.
- No download options for sets
- No videos available, available on a separate sister site (Latex Heaven Video)
- Lack of variety in outfits shown.
- No model biographies
Bottom Line:
OK, So I've been a member of this site several times for a total of about 8 months now and when I first joined it (after closure of old Latexotica) I was excited at the opening of a site with apparently similar ethos.
The site continues to stick to those ethos however the site is starting to become a bit tired for a couple of reasons.
Over the last few months a sizeable percentage of sets made available were of one particular model who goes by the name Natalia K.
Whilst Natalia is decent enough model, at times it felt like she was the only model working for the site.
Second is the outfits, whilst all the outfits are very nice, for the most part they all come from the same designer and a lot of the outfits they have are identical in design but differently coloured.
It would appear that there is little originality left when it comes to investment in new outfits, choosing not to take a risk on new kinds of outfits.
With regards to outfits, for the most part it's a top, pair of hotpants and a pair of stockings, sometimes with a pair of capri pants and the odd dress making an appearance.
I am also sometimes a bit baffled by the choice of models, Latex looks best on a girl with curves. There are several models on the site who have virtually no curves, with parts of outfits hanging loose and most certainly not giving a second skin effect.
The site does a few good things though, it offers high resolution images, has 2 updates per week and isn't overly expensive
It's also pretty easy to navigate, featuring a model page (so that one may view all of a certain girls sets) as well as the normal update page. The standard update pages feature 6 updates per page and a bit at the bottom where you can go to the previous/next page.
I originally intended to give this site an 80, but after careful consideration I have instead awarded it a 70.
I am a fan of this site, but if I'm honest, I would only recommend this site to someone who liked latex along with a number of other things.
I would not recommend this site to someone who has a serious latex fetish, as this site does not cater to those who are serious about latex.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Plenty of content to choose from (395 sets available in various categories)
Pics are very good quality and very well shot. Latest sets all feature High Resolution images.
Decent selection of videos.
Sets always show a great deal of creativity.
Frequent updates (3 new set/month, split to 4/5 parts)
Visible update schedule
Good mix of heavy and glamour-type latex shoots
Relatively easy and straightforward to navigate
Cons:
Expensive
Only 74 video clips (small when compared to number of sets available)
Videos generally quite short.
No download options for sets
Bottom Line:
First off I'd like to say that site is a bit over priced normally, however from time to time there are periods when initial membership fee is lower.
Every time I have joined I have been sure to join during one of these periods. The current period has been ongoing since January at least (last time I signed up, prior to this time).
So when considering singing up for this site, do not be immediately put off by the information provided with regards to the first charge, check the join page and see if there is a reduction in price.
Now as for the actual bottom line, I'll say this, this site is very good, especially when you get cut-price membership, the sets are incredible and often very sexy, very creative and each has a story behind it.
Sets have on average 100 pics, some sets might have more, others less but you will get at least 80 pics with each set.
There are unfortunately no download options for the sets so you are probably going to have to go through each set downloading each pic individually.
There are videos, more than 70 of them, however they are mostly just clips and aren't particularly long. Most of the videos available are about 640x480 in terms of resolution with a small number being bigger or smaller overall resolution. Videos can vary in terms of length with most recent videos rarely being longer than 5 minutes.
With regards to videos there is no apparent standard, and only one file type on offer for each one, with MPG, AVI, WMV and MP4 all making appearances.
This is a good site that could be improved upon by reducing the price of membership as it is currently too high for most to consider.
Improvement could also be had with regards to videos, featuring videos more often (every couple of months would be perfect), making those videos at least 5 minutes long and standardising the video format and upgrading them to at least 720p HDV.
I'd also like to see a zip download option for each set as that would mean that users don't have to spend a large amount of time downloading each pic individually or have to rely on programs such as Bulk Image Downloader to do all the leg work instead.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
No more DRM-ed videos! The site formerly used DRM on all it's videos however they now appear to be free of DRM.
HD Videos
Lots of hot models (some well known) and Eva
Regular updates
HQ Galleries in Zip format
Scenes show some fantastic creativity
Long scenes
Lots of content
No download limits
Cons:
Uncommon flash video format (f4v) that is not easily converted to more common video formats (.wmv, .avi, etc.)
Segmented scenes and galleries are spread out over one long page. Heavy Rubber element may not be to most peoples liking.
Navigation can be tricky on some pages due to number of items available for download.
Bottom Line:
The bottom line with RubberEva.com is that this site has improved a lot from what it used to be.
I have been a member of the site several times, and in the past I have found myself being disappointed
by the site due to the use of DRM in videos.
The videos now no longer feature DRM but are still in the uncommon format .f4v which is not easily converted to more common formats for easier viewing which is a slight negative.
This site is similar to Rubber Eva's other site The Rubber Clinic in that all scenes and galleries are segmented and split into multiple parts.
However unlike the aforementioned other site, the sets and scenes share a common title only distinguishable by the fact that it features a suffix which displays the part of the series within. The sets and scenes also feature a date of publishing to further aid identification.
The sets and scenes often show a great degree of creativity in a variety of settings, from outdoors to the clean white tiles of a clinic with many different kinds of latex outfits in a variety of colours.
Although the scenes are segmented once an entire set has been released then the sets can last up to an hour sometimes longer than that.
Overall this site is very good, and maybe a little bit on the expensive side at nearly €30 per month but now that the DRM-ed videos of old are gone the value for money has gone up in my eyes.
Things that this site could improve on are:
1) Changing videos to a more common video format
2) Releasing parts of videos and scenes one after the other instead of being released over course of several months.
3) Improving navigation by making several pages of content split by year/month rather than one long page or by
If all of these improvements I have suggested were implemented then in my opinion this would probably be the perfect site. It's a damn good site as it is but a few improvements would be gladly welcomed.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Close to 400 scenes with video and photoset all the way from 2005 to this day
-Weekly update with a long scene
-720p HD from 2006 already. Most of the scenes are 720p
-These guys are the pioneers of sex in bondage kind of material. There is lots of variation and little bit for everyone as long as you like the subject
-Active community on site with forums and commenting
-Well known models as well as total amateurs
-Good download speeds, works well with DL manager, no timeout on login that I've noticed. Technical side works
-Kink.com membership is not tied to any subscription. You can stay and subscribe what and when you feel like it waiting for possible special price offers
Cons:
-Site could use some work. No relevant search or any kind of tagging to find scenes, instead of preview page you are thrown into streaming video when you click on a scene etc.
-Strongly subjective but I prefer European models which this site doesn't feature that often. I'd also prefer even more hardware and less ropes
-Acting too much (I guess it is acting). Screaming, shouting, stupid dirty talk about masters, asking for permission to cum, rolling eyes and making faces etc.
-Relatively pricey unless you wait for a discount either on Kink.com or on some other site
-Not really for photography freaks. Pictures look like non flash pics taken during action or even screenshots
-No 1080p although 720p in mp4 is very good
Bottom Line:
Without any doubt, this is the most significant sex in bondage site around with strong take on topic and no filler scenes in between. You can see the whole history of them tiptoeing around US legislation in 2005 and quite quickly starting to produce full action in bondage instead of the "catch and release" stuff they were probably forced to do for first few dozen scenes. There is probably no need telling that the site is part of the Kink.com which offers various sites in different fetish themes. However all sites must be individual subscribed to and there is no kind of network pass, only other option being buying overpriced on site currency one can use to unlock scenes.
The content of this site is simply put sex in bondage with various forms of light to semi hard SM with whips, electric prods and such, acting and role play included. There is always at least some kind of master/slave set up in place but occassionally the plots are more elaborate with scifi, medical or some other acting with props and all. The acting is the general porn quality and luckily the focus is still on the action. Sometimes I wish there was a little less of the "Yes master!" shouting as I find it awkward. These people have probably the best shooting locations and hardware for this kind of stuff available in their San Francisco Armory. Personally I think it's still a bit too rope heavy but of course they have a separate site for even more hardware bondage.
Models are the quality factor that varies a lot on this site and it too is of course all subjective. Many of them are American or big name international stars. The most glaring lack is my favorite group, East Europeans. The models aren't all that young or fit and some of them are total amateurs too which is actually cool. The strong American presence leads to lots of awkward dirty talking, shouting and screaming which I personally find a bit too much. There is one particularly frightening case called Chloe Camilla. She looks cute in photos and before the action starts but then it turns into one huge epileptic fit where she makes scary noises and rolls her eyes. Impossible to look for prolonged times.
Video quality is very good, especially if one is willing to download 720p mp4 which can end up in huge files way over three gigabytes. 1080p is a glaring omission by todays standards but I'm not sure if there'd be much to gain with it compared to already very good 720p. The only complaint is that most of the scenes are shot in quite dark conditions although lighting is good. Photo sets are available for every scene but they aren't anywhere near the offerings of sites with more focus on photography and appear to be non flash snapshots taken while filming the scene.
Technically the site itself leaves me little cold. Searching is not happening, there are no tagging on the scenes and the overall appearance is (probably intentionally) dark and minimalistic. The scene links lead directly to streaming scene so be aware of your speaker level. Personally I think they should change it to take user to the site preview.
This site is quite slow updater by today's standards. One scene per week is all you get so prolonged membership might end up not being the most attractive choice. However almost 400 past scenes is certainly a lot and probably takes up to one terabyte of HD space if downloaded at the best 720p mp4 quality so there is a lot for your money. Also once you have made a Kink.com account, you can watch for special offers to join varying sites while leaving others behind. Still I wish they had some system in place where you'd gain credits while subscribing to any of theire sites that you'd be able to buy occassional scene from another one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-updates are currently quite frequent (about once every 2-5 days)
-high definition videos (.f4v, 1920x1080), version for mobile devices (.flv), sreaming option
-the models are very pretty with nice firm bodies
-vast range of different fetish outfits and settings
Cons:
-only 5 galleries with pretty old sets
-no model list or background infos whatsoever
-only one video format, streaming option shows the whole picture only in full screen mode (strange)
-videos are split into many parts, unfortunately the video names are just numbers which makes it impossible to find the matching parts afterwards
-plain site with not much to explore
Bottom Line:
At first I was impressed by their humongous range of fetish wear they are using in the shoots. They obviously use made to measure catsuits which fit the models perfectly (and are pricey), bizarre suits like the doll suit with condoms for each orifice, realistic doll masks, masks with dental dams, piss masks, gas masks, nurse outfits etc. It's also nice to see some of the girls dress up in the suits (from naked to completely rubberized). The scenes are usually two or three girls licking or caressing each other or using dildoes or strapons. There are also two pissing scenes if I am not mistaken.
Up to here it's all fine and I am quite happy that I have seen these beautiful girls dress up and polish their hot bodies. But there are some downsides which piled up after watching the videos.
First of all the splitting of the videos is awful. It feels like they did it to manipulate the update schedule since it naturally leads to more frequent updates. And, as I said, the videos are numbered so you have to sort them carefully by hand. I have already mentioned that the models usually look gorgeous but I have some problems with the shoots. I will give some representative examples.
First, most of the licking scenes are exhausting for the viewer because the active woman (mostly) BARELY touches the pussy with her tongue which in turn produces pre-orgasmic noises from the other woman. I don't exaggerate here. In one scene I was on the verge of a heart attack watching a string of saliva going back and forth but the tongue never touching anything.
Second, the slowness...usually I like shoots which are sensous and build up the tension with some steamy ending but in some scenes you have the feeling the video runs in slow-motion and (which is most problematic) the climax is missing. There is this huge contradiction between the kinky settings and the relatively tame action. If I have a smoking hot girl in the most kinky rubber outfit which sucks on a strapon I want her to deep throat it and not just lick the tip and pretend it's her most exciting moment. If I have a piss mask I want to see all the piss going in and give the girl some trouble breathing and not dribble out mostly at the sides.
I really missed the element of exhausted and satisfied girls after an orgy of ecstatic flesh (or rubber) here. All the ingredients are there but they are not combined in the right way. I had no problem with this if they would have stayed softcore but doing it like this it's neither flesh or fowl. I don't really blame the girls which appear to be amateurs and not pros, so maybe it's just a consequence of their inexperience or shyness. Maybe I had the wrong expectations here.
In conclusion if you want to watch some awesome girls dressing up in slick rubber and don't care if the action is limited and there are nearly no galleries or options this site could be for you. Since the site is very young it may turn out to be really great in the future. With these girls at hand I surely hope so. Until then I think "might recommend" is a fair rating.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Updating more or less regularly like all the main attractions at Porn Pros Network with 96 current scenes
-Scenes and girls are both really hot in very erotic but still hardcore way, especially the new Passion HD style ones
-Unique topic like most sites here have although I've noticed that there are others in massage niche too
-Relatively good quality of video. The oldest scenes are from late 2009 and already 720p
-Oil in many scenes. The only thing that really makes massage genre in my opinion
-Working POV content
-As spouse/girlfriend friendly as it gets. Although she might end up wanting a massage instead of what you were suggesting ;)
Cons:
-In some scenes warmup/massage might take a bit too long for ones tastes. There are however other sites on this network for more immediate action
-General Porn Pros cons apply here too. No really relevant search engine, browsing is the way to find scenes. No indication of video resolution next to download buttons. 1080p missing. Mediocre photography. No big deals though
-If you were looking for anal, this is about last site to find it on this network. I've spotted one scene which is a very hot one with Anissa Kate, by the way
-Some unneeded editing in newer scenes where clothes or towels just "disappear"
Bottom Line:
This site like most of the others on Porn Pros Network falls into a very specific niche which here is massage. Specifically guys massaging girls with oil in situations that start out usually as rather innocent (if naked) massage with the guys hands slowly creeping (I guess hence the name) into more and more private parts and eventual sex. Sometimes the massage takes longer, sometimes the girls is supposedly so horny that the sex starts quite soon and sometimes there's even kissing/fondling before the massage part. There's also the odd scene with the male actor receiving the massage.
They've got a very nice selection of models on these 96 scenes with little or no repetition so every scene offers something fresh (if not in theme). Models are young and hot and while this site has no teen theme, there are no wannabe MILF's here eihter.
I cannot really comment well on the credibility of the scenes on this site if someone is particularly into the supposed reality aspect of what's going on. Being no real fan of body massage, I have no idea if the guys are doing the real thing. However it looks hot, there is lots of oil involved and that's all I need to enjoy from this site.
As I've mentioned on my reviews of Porn Pros Network and Disgraced18, the whole network is now updating with scenes from their site that one has to subsribe to separately, Passion HD, and this is where those scenes really shine. On many sites they have a feeling of being bit out of place since the action is nowhere near as goofy or strange as one might be used to on those sites. Here however they are the best of the whole bunch. Better lit, girls looking better, every bit of action is very faithful to the site's niche with added touch of class. There's roughly 10 of those newer scenes at the moment but I certainly hope to see more.
Technically there's not much to be said that I already didn't give overview when reviewing Porn Pros Network. All works acceptably even if the site design and search function could use little work.
I can imagine this is one of the main reasons to join this network for those who are not into the trademark stuff of colorful bondage and joke sites. Luckily this one seems to get even better. Normally I'm into bit rougher stuff but this is so well excecuted that I cannot help returning to these scenes.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Exclusive content
- Very well drawn graphic art
- Message board for updates and suggestions
- A few animated art pieces
Cons:
- Small number of pics
- Bland web design
- Limited need for recurring membership
Bottom Line:
This website contains some very well draw art work from John Persons and other artists. There is also collaborations with some authors (most notably Stormbringer) to bring out a storyline for the artworks and vice versa. On the downside, the artwork is limited in number and you can easily go through it in less than a month. On the preview pages of "The Pit", it leads the person to believe that there are more graphic novels inside than there actually are.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Access to the Teen Mega World network.
-Low membership price of $20/month with PU discount.
-Large number of attractive models.
-The models speak in Russian or similar language, but there are subtitles to show what they are saying.
_No DRM.
-Easy site login.
-Long period before site timeout.
-Update rate: 1 video and 1 photoset weekly.
-Good download speeds. I get around 1.34 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Good site design. There is a listing of all the site models, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the model looks like. And there is a listing of all the videos of that model at the network. By clicking on the image for any video of that model, you bring up the video itself, without having to re-enter your login information. So the models and videos of each model are integrated, and you don't have to search each network site separately.
-Zip files for photosets.
Cons:
The cons are minor.
-The zip files for photosets only have one size-quality. Can not choose between low, medium and high quality photos.
-In some of the early videos at this site, the stunt cock gives a massage that is completely amateurish. The stunt cock is supposedly a real
masseur, and his performance as a masseur is just unbelievable.
-The script/sex action is basically the same foe each video. It would be nice if there was some variety in the action.
Bottom Line:
-Site statistics:
-Videos:
-92 videos.
-Video runtime about 25 - 35 minutes.
-High quality file size about 900MB - 1.2GB.
-Photos:
-92 matching photosets-one for each video shoot.
-The photosets are screenshots of each video shoot.
The photosets can be used to show what the model looks like, and what the action of the video will show. But there is no erotic value to the photos, in comparison to a photo site like Metart or MPL Studios.
The theme of the site is a stunt cock giving a professional massage to a teenage girl. And during the massage, because the masseur is so expert, the girl becomes aroused and the stunt cock has sex with the girl.
The videos are professionally shot. The videos are shot inside a room, which gives good control over the lighting and sound. So the lighting is good, there are no random noises intruding on the soundtrack. The model is in focus, not a lot of blurry images. The camera-work shows the sexual action clearly.
This site is an excellent addition to the Teen Mega World network. Over the past year, since my last review, they have added 52 videos, which averages out to 1 video per week. So the site is definitely growing. And some of the girls are not just attractive, but really cute.
I gave this site a score of 67 last year, because I couldn't stand the acting and arrogance of one of their main stunt cocks. But reviewing the site this time, the site has grown so much, and that particular stunt cock has improved his acting/massage skills, that I am giving the site a score of 91 this time. Not only is that stunt cock less annoying, but they are also using new stunt cocks. And some of the girls are just yummy.
The site score reflects the value of this site, but also reflects having access to the Teen Mega World network. In my opinion, the Teen Mega World network is one of the best networks for hardcore teen videos, because of the large number of attractive models, good quality videos, good site design, good download speeds, and low membership price (using the PU discount).
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
