Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 669 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

26. ATK Natural & Hairy (1)

Pay
Newbie
95*
mrsensual (0) 01-30-14  12:36pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge archive of natural women.
Huge variety of women in different shapes, sizes and colors.
Cons: Some of the models don't wash before sets.
Some sets are repetitive.
Bottom Line: Definitely the best hirsute/hairy website out there. I wish some of the models took a shower before sets. I like them natural, but seeing some things is a big too natural, if you know what I mean.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Plumper Pass

27. Plumper Pass (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
mrsensual (0) 01-30-14  12:27pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: A great selection in the archive
Cons: Comments are never posted
Only what they deem as high ratings are accepted
Images are now photoshopped and unfocused
Bottom Line: There's hardly a better site to find a good selection of bbws. But over the past year, they've changed what made their site so great. I won't be renewing my membership. I'm sure there's far better quality out there.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit CJ Wright XXX

28. CJ Wright XXX (1)

Pay
Active
55
Bletch (10) 01-25-14  11:51pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Those into BBW will undoubtedly have a good time.. but maybe these models can be found elsewhere on bigger, better, fatter sites.

There's now 6 sites in the network for you to browse...and they are all dead. Benji-Strokes is the latest and that only contains 7 movies. It's still dead though.

Since the network only died in November last year, there's no smell yet.

I downloaded everything in 4 days, including 3, 24 hour bans.

The picture sizes are 1200x798. Too small? Well they don't do the models any justice ;) (yeah they are on my 27" Dell but each to their own).

I did like some of the set ups... boxing ring, twister game and especially the scene with the floor covered in candles.

Around 50 models with a movie and most with a photoset.
Cons: After downloading 4-5 movies and a few photo sets, you get hit with the 24 hour ban for exceeding the daily amount (whatever that is).

Remember your username and password, you need it every time you change your download quality options (a new-never-before-seen irritation for me).

Most of the photosets are numbered wrong, spoiling the sets - Karla Lane, Ice Cold & CJ Wright for example are suddenly dressed half way through their scene. Several other sex scenes just end - there's no cum shot.

The quality on some of the movies is terrible. I particularly wanted to see Tyung Lee doing a double vag, but this looked like one of the older scenes coming in at highly compressed 640x352/200mb file.
Bottom Line: A 'waist' of money, go find another BBW site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wetscape

29. Wetscape (1)

Pay
Active
85
LPee23 (22) 01-20-14  12:18pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: Wetscape.com is a site with history. It is the undisputed, original large pee site. Launched in 1998, Wetscape.com was the most prolific pee site in the early years. They paved the way for all pee sites that followed, and shot almost every type of peeing scene - solo, golden showers, indoors, outdoors, bondage peeing, wetting, naughty peeing, and drinking.
Their members section only seems to have a handful of videos from TheArtofPee.com, making it easy to think they are a site clone. There is a small link there for the Archives section - this is where basically the entire Wetscape site is located!
-great for photo fans
-523 photo sets with over 18,000 photos
-resolution is good for the era at mostly 600x800
-444 videos in 720x526 resolution
Cons: This site is only for a sub-set of porn users. You have to either be a dedicated photo fan, or have a real urge to see the original, classic pee site. Those of you who may have surfed the net for pee pics in the early 2000's will recognize a lot of these pics, even if you never joined Wetscape.com. Wetscape.com was so heavily pirated, they all but populated UseNet with pee pics. Those who do not realize this history may look at Wetscape.com and think it has a bunch of non-exclusive UseNet pics, but it is the other way around. These pics actually started off exclusive at Wetscape, but they totally lost control of their content. More than UseNet, there were entire paysites, some of which still exist, that based their content in part or exclusively on Wetscape.com pics. You will still get much more at Wetscape.com than you ever did on UseNet. Other cons:
-no zips
-there are scattered videos that are truly non-exclusive (less than 5%)
Bottom Line: Wetscape.com is one of a kind, and there will never be another site like it. It's creators were pioneers to put together the first large pee site. This is the type of site that you can't criticize for not updating - it is a work in completion. You can't criticize the 800x600 size of the photos - it was part of the era. As a photo lover I think 800x600 is not bad at all, and even with our 3000x2000 photos nowadays, I can still get a lot of enjoyment out of these older pics. No doubt, pee sites since have looked at these photos and had some inspiration.
I remember the first time I was a member at Wetscape.com back in 2002. I spent a month downloading all of their pics, and when I was finished, there was this great sense of accomplishment. Wetscape.com pics made up such a huge chunk of the free pics and even pics at other paysites that that time, that I felt like I had just downloaded a good chunk of all the peeing pics online. Wetscape.com did not watermark their pics, so it was only if you looked at their entire site that you would realize that a huge chunk of those early unidentifiable peeing pics without watermarks started out as exclusive content on Wetscape.com.
Unfortunately, I lost my original porn collection, so where was the first place I went to rebuild it? Wetscape. More bad fortune, I lost my collection a second time, but this time, in 2009, Wetscape.com had closed. If there was any doubt about it in 2008, their closure signified that the era of the first generation pee sites was over. This was a terrible disappointment, because I felt like my collection could literally never be complete without it.
Then, in 2013, something amazing happened. Wetscape.com was back up and running again, thanks to Tramp Stamp Studios! It is so rare for a site to come back from the dead, and for Wetscape.com to come back after 5 years, it seemed too good to be true! As I joined, I just hoped that it wouldn't be a thinned down version of the original, but I was not disappointed! It was all basically there. 98% of their sets were totally intact. Their oldest sets - absolute classics - were reduced to 1 photo each and complied by model into new sets so that a single model that originally had 20 sets would now have one set of 20 photos, each from a different original set. The amazing thing is that Wetscape.com was so heavily copied, that I can still today point anyone who is interested to other peeing paysites that still do have all of the classic Wetscape.com sets that were thinned down! So you can still in the year 2014 have all of the original photos from Wetscape, dating back to 1998!
So you can see from my review that I love this site. I would personally give it a score close to 100%, but in taking into account the general tastes of others and what I know people look for in a site, I had to give it an 85%. What brought it down a bit? The majority of users are looking for video over pictures, and Wetscape.com videos were never among the best - also some truly non-exclusive videos. In addition to that, while the site is 98% complete, and the other 2% can still be found elsewhere, I have to take some points from any site that removes their old stuff as a matter of principle. Also, the lack of zips makes this a time consuming site to visit. It was still totally worth it for me though. The bottom line is this - if you like pictures, peeing, and classic early 2000's material - this is the site for you. Wetscape.com was the first, there will never be another one, and I am glad to have it back!
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Art Of Pee

30. The Art Of Pee (1)

Pay
Active
55
LPee23 (22) 01-20-14  11:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site seems to have started off promising, but never really look flight. They have a total of 13 clips and 13 photosets available for members. They have not been removing content, these are the only ones they ever posted. The scenes are all solo girl peeing.
-models include Clara G, Zafira, and Adrianna Russo
-video resolution: 720x408
-photo resolution: 1500x1000
-membership comes with access to 13 other sites in network
Cons: There is a minimal amount of content. They don't ever seem to have updated after posting their original 13 scenes. There is just not much more to say here. Also, while Wetscape.com is a Tramp Stamp Studios site, it is not included in the network of sites that come with TheArtofPee.com.
Bottom Line: I don't think 13 scenes are worth the price of membership no matter how you cut it. They are decent quality scenes, with recognizable European models, but just way to little to make up a site. The only way I could recommend joining this site is if you were also interested in one or more of the 13 other sites in the network.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit SickPuppy

31. SickPuppy (1)

Pay
Active
50
LPee23 (22) 01-16-14  06:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: This site has very little to offer now. They have a combined total of about 30 unremarkable photo sets and videos. The greatness of old is gone. What were their pros in their heyday? They were one of the first sites to ever experiment with catheters and female pee-hole insertions, all in a dark setting. Also tons of peeing, speculums, fisting, anal fisting, and BD/SM. Unfortunately, it's all gone now.
Cons: They have removed all of their original content - the thousands of pics and videos that once made them great. Their current portfolio of content is only enough so that they can say they gave you something for your money. It is not even a thinned down sampling of their old stuff, which was high quality, instead it is new, generic filler. The webmasters were totally unreachable.
Bottom Line: I'm writing this review so that you can hopefully avoid my mistake. Maybe you once got a taste of the great, classic content from SickPuppy.com. Don't bother to join their site, because it is all gone. The original SickPuppy.com was one of a kind, and would have scored high, but the current site is nothing but a disappointment.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Puffy Network

32. Puffy Network (1)

Network
Active
84
RagingBuddhist (65) 01-05-14  03:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (61), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 3 site access
+ Files types: wmv 1080p, mp4 in 320p, 480p, 720p &1080p
+ Bonus material from other sites
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Searches with category filters and keywords
+ In browser flash for video
+ Live cams available
Cons: - Seriously quirky flash based picture viewing
- Inconsistent download speeds
- Some might like larger pictures
- Pictures need renaming
Bottom Line: This network started out with Wet and Puffy in April 2009 with We Like To Suck added at the end of May 2011 and Wet and Pissy the end of March 2012.

Wet & Puffy is basically the solo portion of their network. The girls start out clothed, get into a bit of tease as they shed their outfits, then it's on to plenty of showing off, fingering and insertions of toys and other objects. WeLikeToSuck is the hardcore portion of the show. Surprise! It all centers around blowjobs, with more than a few of the girls giving it all up for full penetration sex. Wet&Pissy, also not surprisingly, is the pissing fetish site. All solo action, including toys and insertions.

They added high definition video starting in February 2010. The videos are clear and sharp across the board and the camerawork is what I'd call above average. There are plenty of full body shots and closeups with a fair minimum of the can't-hold-still camera that I find distracting as hell. The choice of file types and sizes make it easy to get video that suits your needs.

As far as the pictures go, I'll start by saying that they're 2800 pixels long side and it does appear that the sets were handpicked to avoid too much repetition and out of focus shots. But that's where the good stops. I've never been a fan of flash based picture viewing because there always seems to be some issues that make the navigation slow and clunky. That's definitely the case here. Some of the newest sets pop up pictures that are smaller than what's available in the zip files. Some sets have the option to enlarge to full size, some don't. There are also times when the individual pictures don't give the option to right click and save. As I moved from page to page, the worst part of it was clicking on a pic, closing the popup and winding back on the first page. The last issue with the pictures is in the naming. Saving individual pictures (when possible!) all have the same name. The zip files don't include the name of the set and they all open to a folder named Images, with the pictures themselves simply numbered (001, 002, etc.) That required a lot of renaming work.

You get the typical tabbed browsing here so getting around the sites is pretty easy and intuitive. Nothing new with that. It's an easy jump from videos to pictures to the bonus content and on to anywhere on the site. The filters do a good job of narrowing things down to get you to just what you're looking for.

Download speeds were all over the place. Using a download manager, I got speeds that ranged from around 350 to 3200 kb/s. That meant that some of the one gig+ files took almost halh an hour to download.

The bonus content here is better than most I've seen. A dozen or more scenes from 7 well-known sites updated weekly. They're in 720p mp4 - decidedly better than the 1990's resolution flash seen on countless other sites.

Advertising is kept hidden behind it's own tab and behind a button on each page. Always nice to see that.

As always, I can't say too much about the live cams because I don't care for 'em. It appears you have to sign up separately to access them and that some are free and some require you to pony up some extra cash.

All in all, I really like the site and would recommend checking it out. The videos get a 92 from me and the pictures a 75. I averaged that out to come up with 83.5 rounded up to my score of 84
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit VIPissy

33. VIPissy (1)

Pay
Newbie
85*
Cum Play John (3) 01-02-14  12:33pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: An intense and beautiful exploration of peeing into gorgeous woman's mouths and on their faces and bodies. Videos unlike anything else on the web.

Have you ever imagined being able to pee into a supermodel's mouth?

This is the place.

There are no unattractive women on this site.
Cons: In its earliest stages, this site suffers from not nearly enough content, hence my 85 out of 100.

Also, they haven't yet figured out that if they're going to get gorgeous women to receive pee orally, most male viewers would just assume prefer that pee coming from the tip of a penis and not from another woman. (And POV style, please. Not so many side shots!) Whereas about half their videos involve women-on-women.

There's also the whole moral dilemma about is material this hardcore too transgressive? I always feel conflicted on viewing it... (But it is truly spectacular, at its best.)
Bottom Line: VIPissy is the cutting edge for some of the hardest hardcore out there, but still in its early beginnings as a fairly small site.

It is more selective than other peeing sites in choosing only gorgeous models.

If they focused more on male-female POV scenes almost exclusively, they would gain more members.

It's a great concept, pushing golden showers to new limits, but will need time.

A 3-month sign-up deal for 49.90 is not a bad offering price.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wasteland

34. Wasteland (0)

Pay
Newbie
64*
pornpundit (3) 12-12-13  10:27am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Strictly for those fans of BDSM who are not much interested in hard core action but strictly ( I crack myself up lol)enjoy light whipping, spanking, and light restraint.
Cons: The couples have NO sexual contact outside of the role play. For me, if there is no fucking or sucking don't take my porn dollar. Perhaps this is not fair as the site claims only to be BDSM but tough titty. Look for much more B@D then any S@M which is fine as far as I'm concerned but..."Where's the beef" Site organization is a mess! If this is blog style they can keep it, if I had wanted a blog I would have sought one out and not had to shell out bucks
Bottom Line: Save your bucks!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

35. ATK Natural & Hairy (1)

Pay
Active
93
Loki (7) 12-10-13  02:48am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -the site claims over 1,500 models, 3 million photos and 5,500 videos and it is likely true
-8 photo and 3 video updates daily
-recent (after 2011) photos in 3 formats: standard (682 x 1024), Medium (1064 x 1600) and High (2000 x 3000)
-recent videos (after 2011?) in multiple download formats: Flash, WMV, HD MP4, SD MP4, and Mobile
-all natural-breasted models
-hairy models ranging from pubic hair only to hair grown out everywhere
-a range of photographers with different styles
-both soft and hard core content, but mostly soft core
-tour is very good in representing the content within the site
-custom downloads of photo sets available
-few toys (good to me)
Cons: -the quality of photography varies (some use too little or too much light, an out of focus shot in a set, etc.)
-most models are white, amateur girls (see bottom line)
-sets are repetitive
-some unattractive models (to each their own)
-some photographers talk during the videos (not just during the interviews)
Bottom Line: A site I keep coming back to time and again for quality hairy porn. The stable of photographers with their different styles and models (Argentinian, British, Russian, and American are common) means there is generally something for every type of fan of hairy women. The exception is ethnic women. They have an ethnic section, with at least one set a day, but compared to the other 7 photo updates a day, it seems slim. Models run the gamut from "WOW!" to "Woof" but that is a personal preference for each porn user.

The delivery of content is first rate. There are multiple formats, and with custom downloads, I have no complaints there. I can't say if it supports Download Management software as I don't use it, but downloads were quick for me. Sorry folks.

Some photographers are repetitive in their sets. LIL uses the same white and black background that drives me up a wall over and over again. Sean R is a fan favorite on the site and a major contributing photographer who specializes in gynocological spread shots. But there is a photographer for most tastes among those whose work appears on the site.

Like all ATK sites, ATK Natural & Hairy is focused on teen and amateur girls in largely indoor solo shoots. Some lesbian and some hardcore B/G shoots are on the site, But mostly it is girls stripping naked and masturbating with or, more commonly, without, a toy.

In all it is a good site for anyone looking for cute, hairy models with minimal toy usage, and lots of them.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Subby Hubby

36. Subby Hubby (0)

Pay
Newbie
55*
KeiraFx (2) 11-05-13  11:14am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are only a few Pros: this site delves into the submissive male scene, which is very underrepresented. The stories and "plots" are interesting and occasionally exciting, and the actors are pretty good at their craft. The girls are very sexy with varied body types and ethnicities, and their presence is always commanding and dominating, as you'd expect.
Cons: Many Cons: even the newest films are poor visual quality, & they are ALL broken up into small files of individual scenes which do not even link to the movie, making it horribly difficult to grab movies. There is heavy emphasis on foot worship & verbal humiliation, with many cumshots done after a break, making you wonder if the scene is faked. This distracts heavily from the erotica this genre is based upon. The girls seem to follow the same humiliation script, and the photos appear to be completely random and miss virtually all the domination action!
Bottom Line: This site is heavily dated, unorganized and felt disappointing to me. I had hoped for so much more considering the $25/month fee- I love this genre and feel it is grossly uncovered, but even my low expectations were not met. I was able to d/l only a few whole movies, the rest are individual scenes- this provides a very poor movie viewing experience. I used a data monitor to remain under the pathetic daily limit of 5gb but went over twice, suffering the automatic 24 hour block. By the end of the month I realized there is not even that much worthwhile to d/l here- the site is 32 pages of seemingly random movie clips that I grabbed in under 3 weeks. There is literally nothing else to be had here, since the photos are equally disappointing. I do not expect "free" companion sites when I signup anywhere but this site should give access to a dozen others to make up for the poor value it provides.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit CL Erotic

37. CL Erotic (1)

Pay
Active
74
skippy (52) 10-26-13  10:58am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attractive, fit and flexible models
Images and videos all the way back to 2000
About 65 models
5-30 sets per model
Exclusive content
All sets are dated
Probably 60+ HD video clips
Sets are nicely done (all studio)
CCBill generates a random username and password, (at sites request) but the site allows it to be saved.
Best site that I know of for the genre
Good honest site in a tiny niche
Minimal cross-selling
Cons: In order:
Image size is 800x1200 MAX!!??
No image size options. What you click is what you get.
Navigation is truly awful!
No zip files of sets!!!??
File numbering is 001.jpg, 002.jpg (making file management diffcult)
Older vids are tiny
Older images are REALLY tiny (800x524)
Many of the models are only partially nude
Some are not nude at all
Updates maybe 2 times a week with partial sets.
Simply too expensive for quantity of material.
Bottom Line: I tripped over a video from this site on Dailymotion.com and, after looking and leaving several times because of the high price, finally decided to see what was there. I was not really disappointed, but it was immediately apparent that this site is not run by any of the big players.
All of the girls are fit, which I suppose they have to be to be flexible like they are. Many are very attractive...some even beautiful The sets are all very similar, with the model starting out clothed in a dance outfit or something similar and then paring down to whatever their personal minimum is. Some of the sets start out with the girl nude. The sets are well done and the girls seem to interact well with the photographer. (suggestion: get a ladder! A full-body straight-down shot of some of these girls would be amazing!) Sets are generally between 25 and 50 images. These are all Eastern European girls, I think, and I have never seen any of them on any other site that I can recall. Kudos to the talent scouts for that.

This site does not have any sex, insertion, masturbation, etc. The models simply flex in incredible ways and give you a nice view. This webmaster has another site called perfectflex.com where there are toys and insertions. Personally, I'm more into the view, but I may and up over at the other site at some point. Clearly he's got models that are willing to pose nude. He needs to up the volume with those models here.

It looks as though there are a few "regular" models that have 20 or more sets. It looks as though this is the "stable" now, as the updates are dominated by these girls but I can't tell for sure because updates only come twice a week.

Now....on the down side...
That collection of 60 mnodels dates all the way back to 2000, so you can get some idea of the volume and frequency of updates.

The images on this site are much too small for today's monitors. I'm downloading 4k images from other sites, so 800x570 is really unacceptable. And as good as some of the older sets are, I'm going to have a hard time keeping images that only fill 1/5 of my screen and are grainy at full-screen. The webmaster really needs to go back and post the larger master images.

Navigation is pretty basic. Click a model, click a set, click an image, click "page back" to go back to set, click another image. No forward or backward, etc.

No zip files???? Come on, really? That makes no sense whatsoever...unless the server can't handle it...

Bottom line: I really like the type and quality of content, but the site really needs a lot of work to attract and keep subscribers in this 2-updates-a-day for $20 world. $39 to sign up? Somebody needs to take a marketing class to learn about elasticity in marking, not just modeling. I would be recommending the site like crazy if it were $19..but have a hard time telling anyone to check it out for $39.

So....my apologies to the webmaster...but if you are interested in this site, keep your money until the price comes down or they offer a mega-pass for all of the super-flexi sites for $39. After this month, that is probably the only thing that will get me back.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Lady Sonia

38. Lady Sonia (1)

Pay
Newbie
75*
bogglez (1) 10-23-13  11:27am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 11-08-13  07:17am  (Update History)
Reason: Legacy Hardcore content has been brought back and appears to be getting added back in the form of updates.
Pros: -Good Quality Video & Pics
-Nice mix of Mature Models
Cons: -Limited Scope of content
-Size of site reduced (But appears to be increasing by adding back the legacy Hardcore Content. YA!)
Bottom Line: Being a frequent member over the years, I can say that the site is a shadow of what it once was. To be fair, the tag line on the site is now “Britain’s most unfaithful wife”, and no longer advertises herself as a “Masturbatrix”. Her twitter page indicates that she is an Ex-Porn start as of 2009. I guess everyone changes as life goes on, and it would appear that Gill Ellis (Lady Sonia’s real name she has revealed) is no exception. If you had been a member of past years and enjoyed the rich fetish content that she became famous for, and are looking for more, then you should know that this content is no longer being produced. The Legacy content that had been removed when I recently joined appears to be getting added back into the site. Ya!
That said, the new content is of the same quality (which has always been really good). New content is mostly of models fingering, some insertions, and a small amount of penis play. All downloadable.
Sad to see the change, and best of luck to Gill with her new direction…. (And thanks for bring back the legacy hardcore content!)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Piss Bank

39. Piss Bank (1)

Pay
Active
99
LPee23 (22) 10-11-13  08:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: I am giving Piss Bank a 99% rating on my first review ever fully knowing that a 99% review is rare. What makes Piss Bank so different? While it is a very large and high quality peeing site with many models, it is run like the best of the smaller sites, where individual member feedback is actually valued and acted upon. It features many "girls next door", so if you want to see new girls, you will be pleased.
Also, you can email the producer directly, she is happy to talk with members, and she is a true pee fetishist!
-over 860 photo sets of large, sharp photos
-over 1,100 videos
-all except oldest videos in HD, many in 3D too
-plenty of content - hope you have 150 Gb free
-unique European girls not seen in other sites
-all pics have zip files now
Cons: When a site is the best in their niche, and they're doing everything so right, it's hard to come up with cons. Here are two minor points:
1. I had difficulty with some links once, but Piss Bank was very responsive and solved the problem fast.
2. Log-in system occasionally asks you to re-enter your password.
Bottom Line: This site is a must-have for pee lovers, and I would rank it first in its class! Tons of unique, high quality peeing content at the cutting edge of video with lots of HD and the most 3D I've seen. Tens of thousands of high quality peeing pics, taken by great photographers, and many are so sharp you can see every drop of pee without any blur. The only question I had after looking through this site was, why didn't I join earlier? How did I let myself miss out on this for so long? It's absolutely great!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Burning Angel

40. Burning Angel (1)

Pay
Active
93
rearadmiral (376) 10-08-13  04:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large site
- Updates regularly
- Good variation in body types
- Variation in level of tattoos and piercings
- Class-leading video quality in newer videos
- Many download options
- Streaming available (with options)
- Supports download managers
- Fans of Joanna Angel should definitely join – lots to see
- TBP discount
Cons: - No zips for pics
Bottom Line: The first time I joined this site I surprised even myself as I’m not a big fan of tattoos and piercings. Or so I thought.

The site seems to be quite a bit different now than the last time I reviewed it. Back in 2009 when dracken commented on it, and even as recently as a year ago when I reviewed it, the site had a ‘community’ feel to it, like it wasn’t necessarily a professional porn site but a site owned and run by people into this lifestyle. (That was and still is highlighted by the obvious connection that Joanna Angel has with this site. Any of her fans NEED to get a membership here.) The site still has that feel to it with the blogs, a forum, event listings and chats, but it is clearly more ‘professional’ now.

The last time I reviewed the site it was broken down into several sub-sites. Those are listed in my previous review if you’re interested in seeing what those were. Those divisions seem to be gone now in favor of putting all the videos up on the main page and relying on a pull-down menu to sort by niche. This may be a personal thing, but I prefer the new way: all the scenes are right there and there are convenient ways to sort by star or niche.

The site is part of the Fame Digital family of sites. In my opinion, Fame has the porn Midas touch in that they nail the Holy Trinity for porn sites: the porn is incredibly hot with high production values, the site is well organized, and the porn is easy to access for streaming or downloads. The only caveat with Fame is that you need to track which of their billing companies you paid through because you’ll need to know that when it comes time to cancel.

Another way the site is different now is that they use a look more common to other Fame sites: the scene thumbnail opens into a page where all your options for streaming and downloads are in sub-menus. If you’re familiar with any of Fame’s sites you’ll realize that this is both intuitive and easy to use. Also like other Fame sites, this one offers some of the widest choices for streaming and downloads. Other porn companies need to copy this. The oldest videos on the site date from 2008 and are available for download in either WMV or MP4 in 160p, 240p, 360p and 480p. Obviously these aren’t great, but they look okay and they were great when they were uploaded. The really good news, however, is that like most Fame sites, this site jumped into HD early: videos uploaded as early as mid-2009 offer both 720p and 1080p in MP4 format. This was way ahead of the curve for most adult sites in 2009. The icing on the cake is that however fame encodes its scenes, in either 720 or 1080 they look amazing. Some sites offer 1080 that still looks pixilated. Please Fame, if you’re reading this please offer encoding lessons to other sites. Or just buy them out.

I downloaded the 1080p versions and those come in at 1980x1280 and 6800kb/s bitrate.

The site currently has 719 scenes of varying length. The scenes run the gamut from solo, POV, b/g, group, g/g, anal; in other words, just what you’d expect from an adult site. The models also have some variation so depending on the look you like you’re apt to find lots to satisfy you. The site updates frequently and regularly with several scenes being added weekly.

If the site has one glaring fault it’s that pics are still not offered in zips. I know this is primarily a video site, but for those who like to collect photos of their favorite models it would be a good idea to offer zips.

Download managers are supported and like other Fame sites this one has resolved the issue of short-duration time-outs. Links don’t last forever, but they will last about an hour and that is a huge improvement over what was offered even a year ago.

So that leaves dealing with the 800lb gorilla in the room: that the models don’t sport a mainstream look. If that is an absolute deal-breaker for you, then there is no way you’d like this site. If, however, you have even a remote interest in this niche then I highly recommend checking this site out. The models are all really beautiful and but for the tattoos and piercings they look like the beautiful models that work in other parts of the porn industry. There are varying levels of body modifications too: not all the models are heavily tattooed and pierced; some are very light on both. Katie St. Ives, for example, is on this site and I doubt many would consider her a niche model.

The bottom line is that just in the past year this site has made some changes that, while subtle, have made a great site even better. It’s a large and growing site that offers excellent quality (in production values and in how they look on your monitor or TV) at a discounted price and features unique-but-beautiful models. What’s not to like? I highly recommend joining.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Milk Enema

41. Milk Enema (1)

Pay
Active
82
TheSquirrel (53) 09-28-13  08:55am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (50), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: No DRM or download restrictions.
No pre checked cross sales.
High Quality videos, professionally shot, lit, and performed.
Large choice of mp4 and wmv download options.
Good streaming facilities.
Good offers available either through PU/TBP or if you sign up for their emails.
Great if you're an ass man.
Lack of condoms.
Some very different unusual content.
Cons: Regional discrimination
Sometimes the scenes can be too gross for mainstream taste.
Too many tats and fake breasts.
Too many gynaecological close ups.
Poor for photo fans. Pics from the scenes look like screencaps, and not particularly good ones, with no zips.
Content can be too samey.
Bottom Line: I joined through a $5 offer by mail, which was changed into pounds as I am from the UK. I stay away from those who practice regional discrimination, but at that price I decided it's virtually giving the material away, so I took them up on it.

Even though this is a Milk Enema review because I joined through that site, I am looking at this from the perspective of what the entire network has to offer. In fact it isn't really a genuine network at all, more an Evil Angel dvd site, and so has more in common with VideoBox.

When you first go to the home pages, you see clips spread out by scene from the dvd's they are taken from. Anal Overdose 1 Scene 5, Anal Overdose 1 Scene 4 and so on, with a picture from each, then on to the next dvd split up in the same way. Personally I prefer to choose the dvd option then look at the individual scenes if they appeal, so I pressed "Movies," which shows the dvd cover for each available title. There are pull down menus for series, pornstar, and movies. Unlike others I didn't have much problem with navigation. Scenes are dated, and home pages are inviting. I didn't use the pornstar search, so can't vouch for it.

The 24 site network is divided mostly by individual director. The majority of the material is hardcore anal, although they have some transsexual/shemale, lesbian, and enema content. Models are of the seasoned, professional, glossy, tanned, curvy type, rather than thin, natural, amateur. I would describe it as hard mainstream, bordering on fetish, and may be too much for some people. If you know and are a fan of this type of material, the obvious advantage over other dvd sites like VideoBox or VideosZ, is there is little filler material. You wont have to search far to find plenty of stuff that you like. For me the biggest weakness is the continual presence of tats and fake breasts.

The content focuses on the anal, for me too often literally focussing on the anal, and therefore has the biggest collection of arseholes in one place since the last Republican Convention. It's possible that on occasions you will find the vids too over the top if you have mainstream taste, and at times the scenes have the erotic appeal of an overweight senior citizen having an anal swab. Taking one example, for me, turning the bowel inside out in a swimming pool and letting sperm flow into the water isn't a big turn on. One thing I have heard about and don't want to see is a model licking a prolapsed bowel. I'll pass on that one.

I do have some sympathy with them however, because they are trying to keep ahead by doing something different and exciting with gusto. They are on the border of mainstream taste and getting it right, given the diverse tastes and demands of porn users is very hard, so it doesn't particularly bother me if it isn't occasionally to my taste.

There is a good choice of mp4 streaming resolutions, with a picture box enabling you to instantly jump forwards or backwards and see where you are. On most sites there are a good variety of mp4 and wmv download options. Unfortunately the pictures are a weakness, looking mainly like screencaps, and have no zip facilities available. Here in the UK, I find the site slow to respond and quite often the streaming is slow and jerky, especially at peak hours, but downloads have good speeds, which is just as well as the scenes are generally lengthy, often being over an hour, resulting in the files being large.

When I cancelled, I didn't receive a confirmation mail. I notified them through their system but still didn't a receive a reply. After 24 hours I went to the cancellation page and was able to talk live to a representative who was helpful, and sent me a confirmation mail straight away. Keep your sign up details, otherwise cancelling could be tricky. If you need it, on the support page there is a small live chat box towards the top right of your screen marked "Need Help, We're Online."

For the definitive review of this network take a look at the rearadmiral reviews of Mike Adriano and Milk Enema, which are as informative and accurate as you can get.

For me this place is well worth a visit, but not at full price, where I would boycott anyway due to regional discrimination.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

42. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Active
83
otoh (54) 09-03-13  10:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Frequent updates
Good diversity in models and photographers
Exemplary site layout/features
Live cam shows
Cons: Perhaps too hair-oriented
Mostly amateur themed
Pics often less interesting than videos
Photo sets need tighter editing
Bottom Line: This is a tricky one for me to review, as I'm not necessarily the target market; nevertheless, I'll do my best.

Firstly, compare and contrast: I am very fond of any content featuring panties and nylons - especially tights - the longer they are teased/toyed with the better. I will gladly concede that things I could do with/to them, either on or off their owner, puts this in fetish territory.

OTOH, I also like pubic hair on a model. I think it makes the girls look womanly, sexually mature, and inviting; it is a thrill to catch a glimpse of it, or even to know I will do as the underwear (cf above) comes off; and although I've got used to shaved models, it is still a bit of a disappointment when there's only skin revealed. Pubic hair is natural and sexy thing, and I don't quite see why it's regarded as a fetish; and I do not further fetishise it by way of insisting there is LOTS of it (everywhere), playing with it, or drawing more attention to it than it creates itself. I just prefer it to be there.

Anyway, the above disappointment sent me in search of a suitably themed site; but it appears that there aren't sites for folk like me who just like hair - only for those who worship it... but beggars, choosers etc. The two obvious sites, therefore, are We Are Hairy and ATK Hairy. I looked at both of them and they seem very similar in style, content and even in model roster - WAH seemed a bit more glam, a bit better organised and with a more manageable amount of content to get through within a month's membership.

The mechanics of the site are exemplary; one of the best I've ever joined. There are the usual features:

* Dated updates
* Separate video and pic lists
* Model index
* Browse by category or tag
* Advanced search

As well as novel features like:

* Your own favourites (although oddly you can't favourite a model, only specific sets?)
* Browse by photographer (I tend to follow photograhers more than models)
* Custom zip downloads
* Webcam shows (I never got round to viewing any, but there seem to be a couple a week)
* Forum and comments on sets (albeit with the usual complement of spurious/disrespectful ones)
* Personal settings (how you view pictures, and what tags/categories to exclude if eg you don't like hairy legs etc)

And although not as vast as ATK, there's a good deal of content; generally 4-5 updates per day (3 photo sets and 2 videos), and with about 4 years worth of updates I make approx:

* 400+ models
* 3000+ photo sets, 3K, 100-150 pics each
* 2000+ videos, most 720p, 10-15 mins

Models are reasonably diverse in age - 18-40 and some beyond - and there there is probably just a little more ethnic diversity than on an average site. They can be broadly split - with plenty of exceptions - into 3 groups:

* East European (mostly Russian) account for maybe two-thirds of the updates - most girls are young, with pubic hair and otherwise neatly shaved. Some pretty girls but many do not let their personality or sensuality show; it would be nice to hear them talk more, even if their English was not good, or even in Russian etc.

* UK models - as above, most have pubic hair only - but get more chance to show their personality, with interviews, various dirty talking in masturbation and stripping videos, etc. These were the ones that worked best for me.

* US girls - tend to be more of the hippy type, with many more having hairy armpits, legs, etc. Again, they get interviews and some fun videos; some of the girls are very alluring but the extra hair isn't necessarily for me.

Photo sets are a bit too big for my liking; I prefer them more tightly edited, large sets get a bit repetitive. The style is relatively amateur (and I do mean the style, rather than the quality - which is generally good) - without much in the way of mood or evocative lighting - but still some fun sets.

Likewise for the videos - they are generally plenty explicit enough, most featuring masturbation with/without toys (also some GG and GB videos but much fewer). Many are a bit too samey, but some have a bit more of a theme - eg the very lovely Fawna Latrisch getting predictably wet and soapy when washing a floor; or a couple of models stripping out of some sexy officewear.

So, overall, although a great site, it doesn't quite work for me. It's only this that dictates my slightly lower score; if I was more of a hair and amateur lover this would easily be in the 90s.

I wish there was a site like eg The Life Erotic, or Joymii, that featured more unshaven girls; until that happens, I guess I'll stick to picking and choosing the limited amount of unshaven content such sites have.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panty Fantasies

43. Panty Fantasies (0)

Pay
Newbie
59*
alan19851 (2) 08-23-13  11:05pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -A handful of okay panty content, maybe about 20 medium-low quality videos (640x480) of the "Playtime Panty" series, otherwise most videos are much lower quality and are random hardcore scenes with a little more panty in the beginning.
-One or two pic galleries with medium quality pics
-No apparent download limit
Cons: -Overall mediocre panties content. Video count is probably under 70 videos, over half of which are of very low resolution (320x240?? come on!).
-No exclusive content. The best feature was from the "Playtime Panty" series, but there are only a handful of vids like this, and mostly everything else are intro scenes to general hardcore movies.
-Navigation is confusing. The Panty page has about 20 links, all of which open a pop-up window that leads to the videos.
-Picture selection was also mediocre, with the majority of pictures out-dated (90's thongs hiked up to the waist), and overall very low resolution.
-Broken links. Three to four of the links in the Panty section were broken.
Bottom Line: I joined this site with the $1.99 membership to check it out, and realized that it's actually easier to spend the time finding panty content for free on bing.

The navigation of the site was confusing, and the content was even worse. Their "high quality" videos are 640x480, which is very outdated.

Definitely join a panties paysite that provides exclusive content. Someone who truly understands why we search for panties sites! This site is 100% generic, and maybe would have been a good site 10 years ago.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rubber Eva

44. Rubber Eva (1)

Pay
Active
89
LatexRyan (17) 08-11-13  06:28pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *Videos are now fully DRM-free
*Vidoes can be viewed by freely available open-source media players
*Choice of resolution for videos (1920x1080/1280x720/640x360)
*Updates every 3 days (appears to alternate between pics and vids for each update)
*Galleries available for download as zip files
*Large variety of latex outfits worn
*Site now includes Boy/Girl content
*Large amount of videos and sets to download
*No download limits
*Site design is much improved compared to past
Cons: *Videos and galleries are split into multiple parts
*The download pages for the multiple parts of each video or gallery do not feature links to other parts of the scene or gallery
Bottom Line: It has been a while since I was last a member of this site, but it would appear that this site is much improved compared to what it was like the last time I was there.

First of all, the site has undergone a complete redesign, with all videos and all photos going into their respective sections, without any subsections as there were previously.

The video and set lists are now spread out over multiple pages compared with the single long page that was there the last time.

I do realise that I have given the site a lower score than I did the last time (I feel now that the figure I gave last time was not what was truly deserved). A score of 89 is fair considering that there are perhaps a few small things that could be improved upon that would boost the sites score into the 90s.

I'll state it again now for everyone, all videos on this site are DRM free, yep, no DRM what so ever. The site even recommends users use VLC media player to watch the videos, and I know that VLC cannot handle DRM encoded videos at all.

The site now also features proper Boy/Girl hardcore content in it's sets and videos, something I found odd considering the sister site The Rubber Clinic featured Boy/Girl for quite some time.

Now as for things that the site could improve upon:

1) I feel that finding different parts of sets and videos would be easier if the download pages for sets and videos also featured links to other parts (and it doesn't even have to be all parts, maybe just a small text link saying 'Next Part' and another saying 'Previous Part') so as to help the user find what they are looking for without having to search through several pages to find what they are looking for.

2) I would personally quite like to see an upload schedule featured somewhere on the site, it doesn't even have to give a specific date, maybe just have the previous 3 updates and a list of the next 3 updates to come so that we can look forward to what is coming.

In short the site is much improved compared to a year ago, and with a few small tweaks this site could realise it's full potential.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Desyra Noir

45. Desyra Noir (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
PantyhoseAddict (0) 08-03-13  12:58pm
Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content
- Movie size up to 1280x720 pixel (wmv)
- 240+ picture galleries
- 230+ videos
- Mostly good quality on new sets
Cons: - Download limit per day (10 GB) then 6h banning
- Picture size up to 1120x1680 pixel (jpg)
Bottom Line: Desyra is a kinky german milf with a preference for nylon pantyhose and stockings, anal play and insertions. So if this matches your fetish, you're right there. Because this is a single model site, it's clear that there is mainly that one woman (sometimes with a male or a female partner) in the movies and pictures. But if you like her, you'll get nice content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Anal Pantyhose

46. Anal Pantyhose (0)

Pay
Active
72
pat362 (373) 06-30-13  11:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Full access 3 day trial for 8$
+A nice selection of Eastern European models.
+Content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+There are 165 videos which can be viewed online of downloaded a single file. Resolution is 640x480.
+There are 236 photo sets which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution seems to be 1024x768 for all pics.
Cons: -They update with one scene per week but it's either a video file or a photo file so you never actually get both at the same time. Actually it's more common to get only one type of file.
-Some of the models have multiple scenes butthey are all with the same male talent.
-There are two seperate watermarks on the videos. One of the top left of the screen and one on the bottom right.
-The videos are a little grainy and lighting is sometimes an issue.
-The makeup on some of the models does not enhance their appearance but makes them look less appealing than they are.
-Videos are quite short since they rarely get above 15 minutes and many are below that.
-There is a search by model name but you actually get the names of the models for all Ferro sites and not just this one.
(cons continued below)
Bottom Line: (cons continue)
-There is a useless search box where you can enter a model's name and find all her videos or photosets based on the different Ferro sites but you can do the same by simply searching through the models page.
-You can only download 3 videos at the same time.
-The names of the model are not the ones they are known elsewhere on the net.

Bottom Line:
*This is not a bad site but only if you are taking the trial membership. Otherwise I think most people will be disapointed. The overall site design looks dated and could use a facelift. This is nothing new since the site looks about the same as it was when I was last a member a few years ago.

*The premise for the all the scenes is basically that females wear pantyhose and have anal sex. The bulk of the scenes are b/g but there are a couple of g/g scenes with toys or strapons.

*I was actually quite surprised to see that the videos are all quite grainy which is unusual since I have plenty of videos at 640x480 resolution and they don't have that grainy look to them. That mes a lower resolution video look worse than it should. When you add the two large watermarks on oppostite sides of the screen then you compound the problem. At least if they had picked some more discreet ones then I might not be as annoyed with them but these aren't small or discreet.

**I guess if you aren't too picky about video quality and you have 10$ floating in your pocket then you could give this site a try.**
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Michelle\'s Nylons

47. Michelle's Nylons (1)

Pay
Newbie
87*
Richard Negus (Disabled) 06-24-13  01:26am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-24-13  01:54am  (Update History)
Reason: More fair review
Pros: Great pics
Good quality updates at regular intervals
Emails subscribers back after request and let's you share videos with her
good quality lingerie pics for an armature site
Cons: The only con I can think of is that her updates can seem to be on random days and times and I would like them in 1080p. I agree with other reviews about the small videos but 720 is okay for me at the moment. Would be great for larger and longer videos in the future
Bottom Line: I would really recommend giving Michelle a try. I have been subscribed for 12 months and simply down to her feedback with me has kept me subscribed for so long. Really good for an armature site in my opinion
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sexually Broken

48. Sexually Broken (1)

Pay
Active
92
mbaya (358) 05-26-13  01:27pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-147 MP4 HD videos 1280x720, 6000k. Simply beautiful quality.
-Photo sets(1200x675)of each shoot are zip downloadable.
-Each update comes with a few sample photos and a fairly complete description of the action. For me a huge plus.
-Updates every Monday , Wednesday and Friday for three updates a week
-Nice variety of models: Black, Asian, Latina, blondes, brunettes, redheads. Some very petite, such as under 5 feet tall. Some are large, but not plus size. A few have tattoos or piercing, but most do not. Some have implants, but most do not. Most are well known porn stars, but many are not.
-Unusually high level of attractive models.
-Genuine enthusiasm. The models love the action as each one has multiple intense orgasms.
-Extremely creative content.
Cons: -The photo sets are split into two parts. One is Directors Picks and the other is called Scene Photography. Since both have scenes from the video, I have no idea why they are split into two sections.
-The videos have interviews, both before and after the scenes. The pre shoot interview may be at the beginning or at the end. In some videos the sex starts first, then the post then the pre shoot interview. Comes across as unpredictable and random. The rest of the site and its contents show a lot of thought, so why?
-Only two male models. One is Matt, who runs the site and an unnamed Black man with a huge penis.
-Neither male model cums, except in only one scene. This is hard to believe and I suspect has been edited out. In the forum Matt explained that cumming reduces his sexual energy. I think that scenes can end with a cum shot without taking anything away from the overall quality.
-Updates listed in date order only. There is a way to search by name, but no search engine.
Bottom Line: This site features a combination of bondage and sex. I am not into bondage or BDSM of any kind, but I like forceful, even rough sex. Everyone has biases, so you should know where I am coming from. This site is definitely different from plain vanilla porn and is not for everybody. The action can be quite intense, but not over the top crazy like many BDSM sites.

Honestly, I was thinking about joining a few weeks ago, but the recent events in Cleveland turned me off big time. What those women endured was more than enough to make me think I should not join. But I am glad that I did. The reality was disgusting, but the fantasy presented here is very, very different.

What this site features are very attractive models who get very intense multiple orgasms in every scene. The enthusiasm is genuine. Interestingly , the male talent and site owner Matt cums in only one scene. It is not focused on him and his pleasure. There are no misogynistic insults and no verbal disrespect. He asks them about their sexual preferences and that is what they get.

Scenes start with the model getting tied up and then they pleasure Matt orally. There may be vaginal penetration, but anal is uncommon. He encourages them to perform well with nice words and the promise of a reward soon-usually an orgasm by vibrator or a sybian. Multiple, very intense orgasms are the norm. Matt goes all out to please, although he never performs cunnilingus. I guess we all have our limits.

The models are generally attractive porn stars. Some are well known, some less so. Some models are former dancers or athletes with nice bodies. There is a lot of ethnic variety, as well as by body type.

The inevitable comparison is with Sex and Submission. While that site focuses on a scenario and has a few different locations, this site is more like gonzo. There is only one video with a story and the location is always the same. I like a little bit of story and a little bit of acting. I enjoyed this site a lot, but it is clear that there is room for improvement.

With three updates a week, this site is a solid A+ in my book.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Infernal Restraints

49. Infernal Restraints (1)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (376) 05-12-13  02:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 290 scenes
- Updates weekly with the addition of one scene
- Innovative BDSM ‘tools’
- Good mix of mainstream and fetish models
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Photos available
Cons: - Very expensive
- ‘Captcha’ on signup can be annoying
- Need more file resolution options
Bottom Line: This site is definitely NOT for the faint-hearted for three reasons: first, this is probably among the most intense BDSM sites available today, second, the price has to make it one of the most expensive porn memberships today, and third, some of the newest scenes come in at over 3GB in size.

If you like BDSM and are familiar with the Kink.com sites, then think of this as a mashup of Device Bondage and Sex and Submission with the ‘nasty’ factor turned up. The site uses a lot of innovative bondage tools and devices, many of which appear to be made rather than bought. Each scene is between 30 minutes and an hour long and has several ‘chapters’ where the bondage is changed. (Like other BDSM sites, the scenes also include an interview where the model makes it clear that she consents and can stop the scene.) Most of the scenes occur indoors in a dungeon setting, though there are also some scenes shot outdoors. Production values are very good. Many, but still a minority of the scenes, feature some kind of sex act, either oral or vaginal. There is some anal play, but I’ve yet to find a scene with anal intercourse. Since the site is about BDSM I accept that the sex is secondary.

The site has a mix of mainstream models who dabble in fetish stuff (Sasha Knox and Hailey Young, for example) and models who specialize in fetish scenes (Wenona, for example). The models are all under 25, most are petite and with very few exceptions all are Caucasian. One good sign as to how the site treats the models is that there are several who make repeat visits to get abused.

The site currently has 290 scenes available with one new scene being added weekly. As should be expected, the oldest scenes (uploaded in 2006) don’t have the same video quality as the newer scenes. Most scenes have download options for resolution and a few offer different file types too. The most common file type is mp4 though a lot of the older files that say they’re mp4 come in as .rm. The newest uploads have two options for resolutions. I went with the highest which is 1280x720, 7500kb/s and 23fps. An issue that many may have is the file size, which with some of the newer uploads can exceed 3GB. That’s a lot of data if your ISP imposes a limit. The lower resolution is intended for mobile devices and comes in at 480x270, 1400kb/s and 23fps. The obvious problem with this is that there is a wide chasm between the two sizes that really should be bridged with a third option.

Photos are also available as zips but not as singles. New photos are 1200x785 while the older ones are obviously smaller.

Site layout is simple but effective. It looks and functions a lot like a Kink.com site if you’re familiar with them. You can either have a ‘full’ or ‘brief’ view of the scenes on the page and selecting a scene opens a page where you can stream or download the scene and download the photos. There is also a fairly detailed description of each scene which is useful.

The site allows download managers and doesn’t appear to have any download limits. Download speeds were good.

Logging in requires the username and password be entered each time as well as a two-word captcha. I found one of those ‘words’ was always easy to read, but the second was much more difficult and often caused me to fail to enter it properly. When that happens you go back for a second try but you need to enter your username and password again.

The 800lb gorilla in the room is whether the site is worth the $65 price. Part of me says that it is because the production costs here have to be much higher than a more usual hardcore site. With the more mainstream site you hire a woman and a man and pull out an old leather couch and you can make a porno. No so here. I’m guessing that the models here get paid a premium to do this work and the bondage equipment can't be cheap to buy or make. So in that sense, it might be worth the exceptionally high price. Arguing against the high price is that other BDSM sites must have similar costs and can manage a more reasonable price. Sites like Kink probably have better economies of scale, but this site can’t justify a price that’s double what the competitors are charging. Also, this site has some ‘sister’ sites (Sexually Broken, for example) which appear to use many of the same models, sets and equipment but charge less than half what this site charges.

I know this is a personal thing for me that others don’t share, and I didn’t include this as a con or include it in the score, but I really wish fetish sites put up more behind-the-scenes videos. With so many of the bondage setups used on this site being innovative I’d like to see some of the technical bits of getting the model into them.

If you’re into BDSM that pushes the limits and can justify spending the money, this is site that is worth a visit. With the price as high as it is though, this won’t be a site that I join once in a while to get updates.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit The Training Of O

50. The Training Of O (0)

Pay
Active
93
RustyJ (145) 05-09-13  03:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Almost 350 scenes to date. The site has been running since 2007
-Very high quality company in general, they seem to be the good guys in porn if you can look past that one non voluntary bruising of a model case that was reported a while back
-Armory in San Francisco proveides for a great site to shoot this kind of material
-Very high production and innovative bdsm ideas
-Great selection and variety of models
-Good amount of hardcore sex included
-Makes a creative mix of the different niches on various Kink sites
Cons: -Scenes are sort of splitted into "days". That means you get usually 3-4 updates from the same model in similar settings. However the are full length each so this might turn out to be pro when you particularly like the model in question
-Humiliating, slave training, doing chores and so on might not be to everyones tastes even if they are generally into bdsm niche. Often a bit too non sexual in my opinion
-Always the same with Kink: No kind of network subscription or ability to mix between sites available
-Dedicated photo sessions would be nice touch but obviously they'd require lot of extra effort
-On the pricier side when it comes to cost per update
Bottom Line: The Training of O is a themed site on Kink.com network that focuses on slave training. The material is divided into "training days" of each individual slave trainee where they are tested for different skills like pain tolerance, anal
sex, cleaning the toilet and what not. Usually there is up to four days of each slave's training. Occassionally they throw in an auditioning scene where they are selecting candidates fo their training that are made to look like slave market of some sort. In the end of the training they might be presented to the master of the Armory in their "Upper Floor" setting.

There is lot of role playing and acting involved. Scenes or days may start with the slave waking up with some kind of diary writing, instruction or grade giving and such activity that is nice touch for those who really can get into make believe. Personally I'm more int the actual sex in this scenes so there is quite much overhead in these videos.

When you look past the make believe, you'll find that this site is quite nice mix of much of the non gay niches found on this network in general. There are scenes that look like Hogtied or Device Bondage with some Sex And Submission thrown in. The only difference is that especially lately the penetrating male performer tends to be a gimp kind of guy, usually in bondage himself too and wearing some full body latex suit. Lots of whipping, caning, forced bj's too. Fetishwear, stocks, wooden boxes over the girls's heads, you name it, they probably got it.

The site and it's functionality really doesn't need another round of praise from me. It all works flawlessly and smoothly with download speeds exceeding what most can get through their broadbands. DL managers work fine. Photos are zipped but as with other sites here, the photos are more like a side product taken during shooting video. The sites are not really cheap if you consider the once a week update rate but you can always sign in and wait for a 19,99$ rebate. Higly recommendable site, especially for the variety.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 669 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Stiffia.com (1)
2. Kink University (1)
3. Fake Hub (1)
4. VIPissy (1)
5. Puffy Network (1)
6. Sexually Broken (1)
7. Wet And Pissy (1)
8. Cosplay Erotica (1)
9. Milk Enema (1)
10. Roxy Raye (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.7 seconds.