Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 703 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit We Are Hairy

26. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Active
83
otoh (54) 09-03-13  10:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (41), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Frequent updates
Good diversity in models and photographers
Exemplary site layout/features
Live cam shows
Cons: Perhaps too hair-oriented
Mostly amateur themed
Pics often less interesting than videos
Photo sets need tighter editing
Bottom Line: This is a tricky one for me to review, as I'm not necessarily the target market; nevertheless, I'll do my best.

Firstly, compare and contrast: I am very fond of any content featuring panties and nylons - especially tights - the longer they are teased/toyed with the better. I will gladly concede that things I could do with/to them, either on or off their owner, puts this in fetish territory.

OTOH, I also like pubic hair on a model. I think it makes the girls look womanly, sexually mature, and inviting; it is a thrill to catch a glimpse of it, or even to know I will do as the underwear (cf above) comes off; and although I've got used to shaved models, it is still a bit of a disappointment when there's only skin revealed. Pubic hair is natural and sexy thing, and I don't quite see why it's regarded as a fetish; and I do not further fetishise it by way of insisting there is LOTS of it (everywhere), playing with it, or drawing more attention to it than it creates itself. I just prefer it to be there.

Anyway, the above disappointment sent me in search of a suitably themed site; but it appears that there aren't sites for folk like me who just like hair - only for those who worship it... but beggars, choosers etc. The two obvious sites, therefore, are We Are Hairy and ATK Hairy. I looked at both of them and they seem very similar in style, content and even in model roster - WAH seemed a bit more glam, a bit better organised and with a more manageable amount of content to get through within a month's membership.

The mechanics of the site are exemplary; one of the best I've ever joined. There are the usual features:

* Dated updates
* Separate video and pic lists
* Model index
* Browse by category or tag
* Advanced search

As well as novel features like:

* Your own favourites (although oddly you can't favourite a model, only specific sets?)
* Browse by photographer (I tend to follow photograhers more than models)
* Custom zip downloads
* Webcam shows (I never got round to viewing any, but there seem to be a couple a week)
* Forum and comments on sets (albeit with the usual complement of spurious/disrespectful ones)
* Personal settings (how you view pictures, and what tags/categories to exclude if eg you don't like hairy legs etc)

And although not as vast as ATK, there's a good deal of content; generally 4-5 updates per day (3 photo sets and 2 videos), and with about 4 years worth of updates I make approx:

* 400+ models
* 3000+ photo sets, 3K, 100-150 pics each
* 2000+ videos, most 720p, 10-15 mins

Models are reasonably diverse in age - 18-40 and some beyond - and there there is probably just a little more ethnic diversity than on an average site. They can be broadly split - with plenty of exceptions - into 3 groups:

* East European (mostly Russian) account for maybe two-thirds of the updates - most girls are young, with pubic hair and otherwise neatly shaved. Some pretty girls but many do not let their personality or sensuality show; it would be nice to hear them talk more, even if their English was not good, or even in Russian etc.

* UK models - as above, most have pubic hair only - but get more chance to show their personality, with interviews, various dirty talking in masturbation and stripping videos, etc. These were the ones that worked best for me.

* US girls - tend to be more of the hippy type, with many more having hairy armpits, legs, etc. Again, they get interviews and some fun videos; some of the girls are very alluring but the extra hair isn't necessarily for me.

Photo sets are a bit too big for my liking; I prefer them more tightly edited, large sets get a bit repetitive. The style is relatively amateur (and I do mean the style, rather than the quality - which is generally good) - without much in the way of mood or evocative lighting - but still some fun sets.

Likewise for the videos - they are generally plenty explicit enough, most featuring masturbation with/without toys (also some GG and GB videos but much fewer). Many are a bit too samey, but some have a bit more of a theme - eg the very lovely Fawna Latrisch getting predictably wet and soapy when washing a floor; or a couple of models stripping out of some sexy officewear.

So, overall, although a great site, it doesn't quite work for me. It's only this that dictates my slightly lower score; if I was more of a hair and amateur lover this would easily be in the 90s.

I wish there was a site like eg The Life Erotic, or Joymii, that featured more unshaven girls; until that happens, I guess I'll stick to picking and choosing the limited amount of unshaven content such sites have.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panty Fantasies

27. Panty Fantasies (0)

Pay
Newbie
59*
alan19851 (2) 08-23-13  11:05pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -A handful of okay panty content, maybe about 20 medium-low quality videos (640x480) of the "Playtime Panty" series, otherwise most videos are much lower quality and are random hardcore scenes with a little more panty in the beginning.
-One or two pic galleries with medium quality pics
-No apparent download limit
Cons: -Overall mediocre panties content. Video count is probably under 70 videos, over half of which are of very low resolution (320x240?? come on!).
-No exclusive content. The best feature was from the "Playtime Panty" series, but there are only a handful of vids like this, and mostly everything else are intro scenes to general hardcore movies.
-Navigation is confusing. The Panty page has about 20 links, all of which open a pop-up window that leads to the videos.
-Picture selection was also mediocre, with the majority of pictures out-dated (90's thongs hiked up to the waist), and overall very low resolution.
-Broken links. Three to four of the links in the Panty section were broken.
Bottom Line: I joined this site with the $1.99 membership to check it out, and realized that it's actually easier to spend the time finding panty content for free on bing.

The navigation of the site was confusing, and the content was even worse. Their "high quality" videos are 640x480, which is very outdated.

Definitely join a panties paysite that provides exclusive content. Someone who truly understands why we search for panties sites! This site is 100% generic, and maybe would have been a good site 10 years ago.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rubber Eva

28. Rubber Eva (1)

Pay
Active
89
LatexRyan (17) 08-11-13  06:28pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *Videos are now fully DRM-free
*Vidoes can be viewed by freely available open-source media players
*Choice of resolution for videos (1920x1080/1280x720/640x360)
*Updates every 3 days (appears to alternate between pics and vids for each update)
*Galleries available for download as zip files
*Large variety of latex outfits worn
*Site now includes Boy/Girl content
*Large amount of videos and sets to download
*No download limits
*Site design is much improved compared to past
Cons: *Videos and galleries are split into multiple parts
*The download pages for the multiple parts of each video or gallery do not feature links to other parts of the scene or gallery
Bottom Line: It has been a while since I was last a member of this site, but it would appear that this site is much improved compared to what it was like the last time I was there.

First of all, the site has undergone a complete redesign, with all videos and all photos going into their respective sections, without any subsections as there were previously.

The video and set lists are now spread out over multiple pages compared with the single long page that was there the last time.

I do realise that I have given the site a lower score than I did the last time (I feel now that the figure I gave last time was not what was truly deserved). A score of 89 is fair considering that there are perhaps a few small things that could be improved upon that would boost the sites score into the 90s.

I'll state it again now for everyone, all videos on this site are DRM free, yep, no DRM what so ever. The site even recommends users use VLC media player to watch the videos, and I know that VLC cannot handle DRM encoded videos at all.

The site now also features proper Boy/Girl hardcore content in it's sets and videos, something I found odd considering the sister site The Rubber Clinic featured Boy/Girl for quite some time.

Now as for things that the site could improve upon:

1) I feel that finding different parts of sets and videos would be easier if the download pages for sets and videos also featured links to other parts (and it doesn't even have to be all parts, maybe just a small text link saying 'Next Part' and another saying 'Previous Part') so as to help the user find what they are looking for without having to search through several pages to find what they are looking for.

2) I would personally quite like to see an upload schedule featured somewhere on the site, it doesn't even have to give a specific date, maybe just have the previous 3 updates and a list of the next 3 updates to come so that we can look forward to what is coming.

In short the site is much improved compared to a year ago, and with a few small tweaks this site could realise it's full potential.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Desyra Noir

29. Desyra Noir (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
PantyhoseAddict (0) 08-03-13  12:58pm
Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content
- Movie size up to 1280x720 pixel (wmv)
- 240+ picture galleries
- 230+ videos
- Mostly good quality on new sets
Cons: - Download limit per day (10 GB) then 6h banning
- Picture size up to 1120x1680 pixel (jpg)
Bottom Line: Desyra is a kinky german milf with a preference for nylon pantyhose and stockings, anal play and insertions. So if this matches your fetish, you're right there. Because this is a single model site, it's clear that there is mainly that one woman (sometimes with a male or a female partner) in the movies and pictures. But if you like her, you'll get nice content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Anal Pantyhose

30. Anal Pantyhose (1)

Pay
Active
72
pat362 (367) 06-30-13  11:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Full access 3 day trial for 8$
+A nice selection of Eastern European models.
+Content is dated and they add one new scene per week.
+There are 165 videos which can be viewed online of downloaded a single file. Resolution is 640x480.
+There are 236 photo sets which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution seems to be 1024x768 for all pics.
Cons: -They update with one scene per week but it's either a video file or a photo file so you never actually get both at the same time. Actually it's more common to get only one type of file.
-Some of the models have multiple scenes butthey are all with the same male talent.
-There are two seperate watermarks on the videos. One of the top left of the screen and one on the bottom right.
-The videos are a little grainy and lighting is sometimes an issue.
-The makeup on some of the models does not enhance their appearance but makes them look less appealing than they are.
-Videos are quite short since they rarely get above 15 minutes and many are below that.
-There is a search by model name but you actually get the names of the models for all Ferro sites and not just this one.
(cons continued below)
Bottom Line: (cons continue)
-There is a useless search box where you can enter a model's name and find all her videos or photosets based on the different Ferro sites but you can do the same by simply searching through the models page.
-You can only download 3 videos at the same time.
-The names of the model are not the ones they are known elsewhere on the net.

Bottom Line:
*This is not a bad site but only if you are taking the trial membership. Otherwise I think most people will be disapointed. The overall site design looks dated and could use a facelift. This is nothing new since the site looks about the same as it was when I was last a member a few years ago.

*The premise for the all the scenes is basically that females wear pantyhose and have anal sex. The bulk of the scenes are b/g but there are a couple of g/g scenes with toys or strapons.

*I was actually quite surprised to see that the videos are all quite grainy which is unusual since I have plenty of videos at 640x480 resolution and they don't have that grainy look to them. That mes a lower resolution video look worse than it should. When you add the two large watermarks on oppostite sides of the screen then you compound the problem. At least if they had picked some more discreet ones then I might not be as annoyed with them but these aren't small or discreet.

**I guess if you aren't too picky about video quality and you have 10$ floating in your pocket then you could give this site a try.**
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Fucked And Bound

31. Fucked And Bound (1)

Pay
Active
83
pat362 (367) 06-24-13  09:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Content is all exclusif.
+They update with one new scene each week and the content is dated.
+They show the next 3 updates and when they will be added.
+A decent variety of models to choose from (over 120).
+The sex scenes are all well shot and they offer a variety of positions and angles.
+Over 135 scenes.
Cons: -The dates on a portion of the content is nor really accurate.
-Some of the videos can only be streamed and that problem is not one the webmaster is willing or able to fix.
-There is more extreme bondage in some of the older videos which may be a negative for some.
-Some of the models are more on the fringe of the industry so their overall appearance may not be for everyone.
Bottom Line: *I've been aware of this site for many years now and I was sort of sad when they stopped updating. I'm not sure if Kink bought them or they partnered with them but there does seem to be some kind of relationship. The good news is that they are now back online and updating on a regular basis.

*The closest equivalent to this site is Kink's sex and submission. If you aren't aware then it's basically b/g porn with a mix of bsdm. The level of the bsdm varies but it's more on the lighter side than for most of the videos. At least all the newer ones.

**This may be an issue for some but only the more recent dates are accurate because the site went dead for a few years and when they became active again then they simply changed the dates on their older videos to match the time when they became active again.

**I was also a little peeved to discover that although they offer some download options for certain videos. They actually don't work and based on the time since the video was released then they probably never will.
On a side note. I did contact their service department and they were willing to offer me some kind of discount. I didn't take them up on it because I don't feel it's fair to ask for a discount when the vast majority of the videos are fine.

***I didn't put this in the con but I think it's important to mention that the site is 35$ which makes it quite expensive. There is a possibility to get access to the entire Twisted Factory network for only 45$. The problem with this offer is that one of the two sites you get access to is dead so all you are getting is old content and the other site is a male domination site so I'm not too sure if people who like f and b will also like that kind of stuff.***
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Michelle\'s Nylons

32. Michelle's Nylons (0)

Pay
Newbie
87*
Richard Negus (Disabled) 06-24-13  01:26am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-24-13  01:54am  (Update History)
Reason: More fair review
Pros: Great pics
Good quality updates at regular intervals
Emails subscribers back after request and let's you share videos with her
good quality lingerie pics for an armature site
Cons: The only con I can think of is that her updates can seem to be on random days and times and I would like them in 1080p. I agree with other reviews about the small videos but 720 is okay for me at the moment. Would be great for larger and longer videos in the future
Bottom Line: I would really recommend giving Michelle a try. I have been subscribed for 12 months and simply down to her feedback with me has kept me subscribed for so long. Really good for an armature site in my opinion
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sexually Broken

33. Sexually Broken (1)

Pay
Active
92
mbaya (356) 05-26-13  01:27pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-147 MP4 HD videos 1280x720, 6000k. Simply beautiful quality.
-Photo sets(1200x675)of each shoot are zip downloadable.
-Each update comes with a few sample photos and a fairly complete description of the action. For me a huge plus.
-Updates every Monday , Wednesday and Friday for three updates a week
-Nice variety of models: Black, Asian, Latina, blondes, brunettes, redheads. Some very petite, such as under 5 feet tall. Some are large, but not plus size. A few have tattoos or piercing, but most do not. Some have implants, but most do not. Most are well known porn stars, but many are not.
-Unusually high level of attractive models.
-Genuine enthusiasm. The models love the action as each one has multiple intense orgasms.
-Extremely creative content.
Cons: -The photo sets are split into two parts. One is Directors Picks and the other is called Scene Photography. Since both have scenes from the video, I have no idea why they are split into two sections.
-The videos have interviews, both before and after the scenes. The pre shoot interview may be at the beginning or at the end. In some videos the sex starts first, then the post then the pre shoot interview. Comes across as unpredictable and random. The rest of the site and its contents show a lot of thought, so why?
-Only two male models. One is Matt, who runs the site and an unnamed Black man with a huge penis.
-Neither male model cums, except in only one scene. This is hard to believe and I suspect has been edited out. In the forum Matt explained that cumming reduces his sexual energy. I think that scenes can end with a cum shot without taking anything away from the overall quality.
-Updates listed in date order only. There is a way to search by name, but no search engine.
Bottom Line: This site features a combination of bondage and sex. I am not into bondage or BDSM of any kind, but I like forceful, even rough sex. Everyone has biases, so you should know where I am coming from. This site is definitely different from plain vanilla porn and is not for everybody. The action can be quite intense, but not over the top crazy like many BDSM sites.

Honestly, I was thinking about joining a few weeks ago, but the recent events in Cleveland turned me off big time. What those women endured was more than enough to make me think I should not join. But I am glad that I did. The reality was disgusting, but the fantasy presented here is very, very different.

What this site features are very attractive models who get very intense multiple orgasms in every scene. The enthusiasm is genuine. Interestingly , the male talent and site owner Matt cums in only one scene. It is not focused on him and his pleasure. There are no misogynistic insults and no verbal disrespect. He asks them about their sexual preferences and that is what they get.

Scenes start with the model getting tied up and then they pleasure Matt orally. There may be vaginal penetration, but anal is uncommon. He encourages them to perform well with nice words and the promise of a reward soon-usually an orgasm by vibrator or a sybian. Multiple, very intense orgasms are the norm. Matt goes all out to please, although he never performs cunnilingus. I guess we all have our limits.

The models are generally attractive porn stars. Some are well known, some less so. Some models are former dancers or athletes with nice bodies. There is a lot of ethnic variety, as well as by body type.

The inevitable comparison is with Sex and Submission. While that site focuses on a scenario and has a few different locations, this site is more like gonzo. There is only one video with a story and the location is always the same. I like a little bit of story and a little bit of acting. I enjoyed this site a lot, but it is clear that there is room for improvement.

With three updates a week, this site is a solid A+ in my book.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Infernal Restraints

34. Infernal Restraints (1)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (316) 05-12-13  02:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 290 scenes
- Updates weekly with the addition of one scene
- Innovative BDSM ‘tools’
- Good mix of mainstream and fetish models
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Photos available
Cons: - Very expensive
- ‘Captcha’ on signup can be annoying
- Need more file resolution options
Bottom Line: This site is definitely NOT for the faint-hearted for three reasons: first, this is probably among the most intense BDSM sites available today, second, the price has to make it one of the most expensive porn memberships today, and third, some of the newest scenes come in at over 3GB in size.

If you like BDSM and are familiar with the Kink.com sites, then think of this as a mashup of Device Bondage and Sex and Submission with the ‘nasty’ factor turned up. The site uses a lot of innovative bondage tools and devices, many of which appear to be made rather than bought. Each scene is between 30 minutes and an hour long and has several ‘chapters’ where the bondage is changed. (Like other BDSM sites, the scenes also include an interview where the model makes it clear that she consents and can stop the scene.) Most of the scenes occur indoors in a dungeon setting, though there are also some scenes shot outdoors. Production values are very good. Many, but still a minority of the scenes, feature some kind of sex act, either oral or vaginal. There is some anal play, but I’ve yet to find a scene with anal intercourse. Since the site is about BDSM I accept that the sex is secondary.

The site has a mix of mainstream models who dabble in fetish stuff (Sasha Knox and Hailey Young, for example) and models who specialize in fetish scenes (Wenona, for example). The models are all under 25, most are petite and with very few exceptions all are Caucasian. One good sign as to how the site treats the models is that there are several who make repeat visits to get abused.

The site currently has 290 scenes available with one new scene being added weekly. As should be expected, the oldest scenes (uploaded in 2006) don’t have the same video quality as the newer scenes. Most scenes have download options for resolution and a few offer different file types too. The most common file type is mp4 though a lot of the older files that say they’re mp4 come in as .rm. The newest uploads have two options for resolutions. I went with the highest which is 1280x720, 7500kb/s and 23fps. An issue that many may have is the file size, which with some of the newer uploads can exceed 3GB. That’s a lot of data if your ISP imposes a limit. The lower resolution is intended for mobile devices and comes in at 480x270, 1400kb/s and 23fps. The obvious problem with this is that there is a wide chasm between the two sizes that really should be bridged with a third option.

Photos are also available as zips but not as singles. New photos are 1200x785 while the older ones are obviously smaller.

Site layout is simple but effective. It looks and functions a lot like a Kink.com site if you’re familiar with them. You can either have a ‘full’ or ‘brief’ view of the scenes on the page and selecting a scene opens a page where you can stream or download the scene and download the photos. There is also a fairly detailed description of each scene which is useful.

The site allows download managers and doesn’t appear to have any download limits. Download speeds were good.

Logging in requires the username and password be entered each time as well as a two-word captcha. I found one of those ‘words’ was always easy to read, but the second was much more difficult and often caused me to fail to enter it properly. When that happens you go back for a second try but you need to enter your username and password again.

The 800lb gorilla in the room is whether the site is worth the $65 price. Part of me says that it is because the production costs here have to be much higher than a more usual hardcore site. With the more mainstream site you hire a woman and a man and pull out an old leather couch and you can make a porno. No so here. I’m guessing that the models here get paid a premium to do this work and the bondage equipment can't be cheap to buy or make. So in that sense, it might be worth the exceptionally high price. Arguing against the high price is that other BDSM sites must have similar costs and can manage a more reasonable price. Sites like Kink probably have better economies of scale, but this site can’t justify a price that’s double what the competitors are charging. Also, this site has some ‘sister’ sites (Sexually Broken, for example) which appear to use many of the same models, sets and equipment but charge less than half what this site charges.

I know this is a personal thing for me that others don’t share, and I didn’t include this as a con or include it in the score, but I really wish fetish sites put up more behind-the-scenes videos. With so many of the bondage setups used on this site being innovative I’d like to see some of the technical bits of getting the model into them.

If you’re into BDSM that pushes the limits and can justify spending the money, this is site that is worth a visit. With the price as high as it is though, this won’t be a site that I join once in a while to get updates.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit The Training Of O

35. The Training Of O (2)

Pay
Active
93
RustyJ (145) 05-09-13  03:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Almost 350 scenes to date. The site has been running since 2007
-Very high quality company in general, they seem to be the good guys in porn if you can look past that one non voluntary bruising of a model case that was reported a while back
-Armory in San Francisco proveides for a great site to shoot this kind of material
-Very high production and innovative bdsm ideas
-Great selection and variety of models
-Good amount of hardcore sex included
-Makes a creative mix of the different niches on various Kink sites
Cons: -Scenes are sort of splitted into "days". That means you get usually 3-4 updates from the same model in similar settings. However the are full length each so this might turn out to be pro when you particularly like the model in question
-Humiliating, slave training, doing chores and so on might not be to everyones tastes even if they are generally into bdsm niche. Often a bit too non sexual in my opinion
-Always the same with Kink: No kind of network subscription or ability to mix between sites available
-Dedicated photo sessions would be nice touch but obviously they'd require lot of extra effort
-On the pricier side when it comes to cost per update
Bottom Line: The Training of O is a themed site on Kink.com network that focuses on slave training. The material is divided into "training days" of each individual slave trainee where they are tested for different skills like pain tolerance, anal
sex, cleaning the toilet and what not. Usually there is up to four days of each slave's training. Occassionally they throw in an auditioning scene where they are selecting candidates fo their training that are made to look like slave market of some sort. In the end of the training they might be presented to the master of the Armory in their "Upper Floor" setting.

There is lot of role playing and acting involved. Scenes or days may start with the slave waking up with some kind of diary writing, instruction or grade giving and such activity that is nice touch for those who really can get into make believe. Personally I'm more int the actual sex in this scenes so there is quite much overhead in these videos.

When you look past the make believe, you'll find that this site is quite nice mix of much of the non gay niches found on this network in general. There are scenes that look like Hogtied or Device Bondage with some Sex And Submission thrown in. The only difference is that especially lately the penetrating male performer tends to be a gimp kind of guy, usually in bondage himself too and wearing some full body latex suit. Lots of whipping, caning, forced bj's too. Fetishwear, stocks, wooden boxes over the girls's heads, you name it, they probably got it.

The site and it's functionality really doesn't need another round of praise from me. It all works flawlessly and smoothly with download speeds exceeding what most can get through their broadbands. DL managers work fine. Photos are zipped but as with other sites here, the photos are more like a side product taken during shooting video. The sites are not really cheap if you consider the once a week update rate but you can always sign in and wait for a 19,99$ rebate. Higly recommendable site, especially for the variety.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit All Panty Pass

36. All Panty Pass (1)

Network
Active
68
luv lickn clit (19) 05-02-13  05:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: --The 15 different sites on this network try to cover all the sub-niches of panty fetish (up-skirt, young girls, shiny panties, UK panties, etc).

--All but one of the sites have both photos and videos.

--Site navigation is simple, in part because there is not a huge amount of content.

--Some of the material is pretty good--in particular some of the photo sets on Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys

--The flash player gets the job done.

--Photosets have zip files, and are small and download fast (usually in seconds).
Cons: --One of the biggest problems I had with this site was the generally low resolution of the material, with photos ranging from 900 to 1280 pixels on the long dimension, and as many as one third of the videos below 640 x 480 resolution.

--Many of the photo sets and videos are named using a name that consists only of numbers and letters (e.g. 008ch). To make matters worse, on many of the sites, the models don't even have names. There are no model pages with links to all of a model's sets and videos--you have to find them among the single list of photo sets and/or videos.

--This is archival material that is really starting to show its age (older hairstyles, etc).

--Roughly 50% of the material is non-nude or non-fully-nude.

--The sites have updates, but the total number of photo sets and videos doesn't change, so it certainly appears that they use some type of content rotation system.
Bottom Line: As a guy who loves to see a hot girl in a sexy pair of panties, I am often disappointed by the lack of attention paid to them on many standard softcore porn sites. So I decided to look around and join a panty site. I don't really like the British approach to "knickers", so I settled on All Panty Pass.

This is a collection of 15 individual sites, each of which focuses on a different sub-niche of panties. The sites are listed below, each followed by 2 numbers: the first being the number of photo sets they had when I was a member, and the second being the number of videos they had (my membership expired about a month ago).

Cute Panty Girls 925/154
Panty Honeys 267/66
Panties Next Door 281/44
Legwear Passion 159/63
Shiny Knickers 152/14
Best Nylon Girls 106/46
Jeans and Panties 101/101
90s Panties 128/0
Wet Panty Lickers 82/74
Skirts and Panties 54/42
Kitty's Panties 58/53
Panty Girls UK 47/23
Only Shiny 36/27
Sexy Soccer Panties 32/32
Virtual Panty Girls 151/22

I'll just cut to the chase and say that the site was really disappointing. This is archival material that is starting to show its age. Overall photo/video resolution is low, the file naming system and lack of model names is ridiculous, and the general quality of the panty content is good but not great.

The first thing I discovered when I entered the site and went to Panty Honeys was that a significant number of videos are low resolution. The first 3 I clicked on were all 320 by 240--so small as to be basically worthless. Just as I was starting to think I had been totally screwed, I clicked on one that was 640 by 480. The resolution of the videos is actually quite variable (Panty Honeys had 10 different resolutions among the 66 videos), both within an individual site, and across sites. The best site for video was Jeans and Panties, where they were all 720p. Most of the sites have some 720p, but the amount varies. The 2 biggest sites (Cute Panty Girls and Panty Honeys) each had a significant number of videos that were below 640 by 480 (20 out 66 on Panty Honeys). The videos are all downloadable with no DRM. The flash player works well and let's you scan through quickly.

The photo sets are the best feature of the sites. They are generally well lit and focused. However, the resolution is low (usually 1280 or 1024 pixels on the long dimension), and many are non-nude. Because of the small size, many zip files are less than 10 MB, and download within seconds.

The weirdest site was the Virtual Panty Girls, which consists of animated photo sets and a few animated videos. It must have taken a lot of time to create this material, but I didn't find it erotic at all.

Navigation is simple, and each of the sites has the same layout. The opening page shows the latest updates and upcoming updates, and has links to pages for all photo sets and all videos. When you go to the photo or video pages, there is a row of thumbnails across the top for individual photo sets or videos (varying from about 5 to 9 thunbnails). There is also a list of number links for the next page of photoset/video thumbnails. Because there are so few thumbnails on each page, there are more pages and clicking than there need to be. Each site also has a link to the main All Panty Pass page, which has links to the individual sites.

As noted above, many of the models are not given a name, and there are no model pages where you can find all of girl's photo sets and videos on each site. This along with the number/letter filenames means that once you've downloaded the material to your hard drive, you really don't know what is what. Forget about a search feature on the sites and network...they don't have one.

About one-third to one-half of the material is non-nude, or non-fully nude. Even though the focus is panties, I do want to see what's underneath, so this was very disappointing.

With the low resolution, aging material, and plain Jane site navigation, the site has the look and feel of a site that is 10 years old. The price was $21 and change for a month, and while I didn't feel screwed, I think they would generate more revenue if they lowered that to $10 or $15 a month.

Bottom Line: There is some content here worth downloading, but the cons outweigh the pros, and I find it difficult to recommend this site.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dirty Diablos

37. Dirty Diablos (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
chancler682 (0) 04-28-13  12:01pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: very good quality videos, attractive models.
Cons: full trial is not full. slow downloads a majority of the time. not many updates.
Bottom Line: I tried to join the trial offer which was supposed to be full. It was not full. they do not let trial members download the videos, only stream. so I joined for one month at a discounted price. they only update once a week for 6 sites which is kinda lame. The quality of the videos are very good but also very large in size. A majority of the scenes are over 1gb to download. Downloading speed on this site was extremely inconsistent. One day I would be a 2mbps and the next I would be at 80kbps. Needless to say download a scene of 1.3gb at 80kbps takes a long fucking time.I know it was not my server because I would download from a different site at the same time at very high speeds. If you're going to join be prepared for infrequent updates and dial-up speed downloads. But also be prepared for great looking videos with very attractive models.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wet And Pissy

38. Wet And Pissy (1)

Pay
Newbie
85*
critic (2) 04-07-13  02:20am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Gorgeous models performing exactly as advertised.

Expert videography and photography

High quality files, both video and audio

No download limits

The free membership to the other sites is a real value.
Cons: Most of the sequences are too baroque for my taste: too many odd toys and props.

Ghastly-poor file naming habits: costs the user a lot of time cleaning up.
Bottom Line: ON EDIT, May 2013: I remained a member of this site for several weeks until my membership lapsed. File names were never improved in any way at all. Excepting his public posts here, he owner/webmaster never responded to any of the messages/emails I sent concerning the filenaming problem, or on other topics.

ORIGINAL REVIEW: Wow, this is a fabulous site for those who take an interest in the subject matter. Gorgeous models, excellent images- soaking wet. Most of these models are familiar from other European sites and at times it's a surprising pleasure to see a famous star get down and dirty with herself in this way. While updates are not frequent, given the availability of willing models and the quality of the output this is understandable. Free membership in the sister sites is a major bonus.

(FWIW my very fast late-model Mac can have a hard time playing some of the largest "MP4 HD" videos. I find the .wmv files to be more reliable and of perfectly good quality.)

If it weren’t for the file names I’d give WAP a much higher score than it received here*. However, videos and pictures are so badly named as to require a lot of time at the back-end, so to speak, and this really needs to be corrected.

Image zip files all decode to folders named "Images". Not "Goldilocks - Three Bears": "Images". The images in that folder are named "001.jpg", "002.jpg" and so on. The next zip expands the same way, and the next. You can imagine the mess this creates: a pile of folders named “Images1” “Images2” and so forth, with no idea what's in them.

If all of these "001.jpg" files ever get intermingled by user error (trashed accidentally, for example), it's game over for you. The image files should carry the model's name and shoot title.

It's easy to create a zip file which expands to a folder's real name; perhaps it takes a little more effort. Given the slow rate at which content is produced at WetAndPissy, that effort would be nothing at all.

The net result of this is spending a LOT OF TIME back on the site, figuring out what the real name of what you've downloaded is, so you can file it away correctly. (I just happened to download my files in update sequence and thus had a chance at figuring out the real names of all those "Images" folders from the updates webpages. If I'd chosen any other method (favorite models, random choices), it would have been much much worse.)

As to video files, they are inconsistently named and because of this almost equally hard to square away after downloads.

Prepare to spend a lot of time 'on cleanup' after downloads from this site.

If WAP puts a bit more effort into this one serious problem, they'd be a really fabulous place to visit.

*This is the second site I've joined on the basis of a good TheBestPorn review, and the second where the owners can't be bothered to properly name their files. Given the trouble this can cause, I feel TBP needs to make this matter a review criteria.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Cuckold My Husband

39. Cuckold My Husband (1)

Pay
Active
50
marcdc1 (163) 04-01-13  07:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Candy is a hot MILF who seems to be videoing her playtime. In other words this is a woman who loves sex; not a model who's trying to maximize profit.
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- Each scene has a small description with it.
- Screen shots available for videos (I like this because it helps determining if something is worth downloading).
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what. I can tell the model for this site (Candy Christopher) is also the talent in at least one of the other sites. So it's very confusing what exactly are you getting
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
Cons: - Videos are only available in .wmv
- Most videos are under 10 minutes (only 2 are long; one 20 minutes, one 30 minutes)
- pictures are not available as .zip
- Broken links. All of the dildo shoots were inaccessible. Clicking on them would ask for password, only to have password rejected.
- picture quality is 300X200.
- only 6 dildo videos (which I could get to), and 13 hardcore. For a site that's been up since at least 2000, that's really poor.
- Copyright on the website says 2011 so they haven't done new shoots since at least then
- 480X360 0.3 mbps is got to be the lowest quality video I've ever seen.
- Cinematography is hurting. For example in the longest running video there's a pillow block most of the action - despite the fact that her husband is camera man - this doesn't get fixed
Bottom Line: I've never given such a low score. But between the small number of updates, the password problems, and the abysmal quality I feel there's no choice.

Scenes start in the middle of the action, there are times when the audio cuts out.

Candy is an attractive MILF, there's no doubt about that. I'm really hoping that some of the other sites on this network that feature her are better than this one.

To be fair I have not contact the webmaster about my issues (then again the fact that I will have to speaks about the sites upkeep as well). For $30 for a year's subscription I figure I have time to mess with it if the mood ever strikes me. Right now I'm not impressed enough with the content to be bothered.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit House Of Taboo

40. House Of Taboo (1)

Pay
Active
91
pat362 (367) 03-27-13  05:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +The bulk of their content is exclusif.
+They have an excellent selection of Europeans models.
+All content is dated and they add a new scene every 2-3 days.
+You can download videos in multiple resolutions from 852x480 to at least 1280x720 for almost all the videos.
+They also offer true HD resolution 1920x1080 (over 300).
+All scenes have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Best resolution is 2000x1300.
+They do an excellent job in tagging their scenes with multiple keywords.
+They offer the ability to select the surfing language from 6 possible choices.
+They offer a wide selection of fetishes like latex, watersports, toys and spanking to name a few.
Cons: -Probably my biggest con and this is subjective is that there isn't necessarily a lot of actual penetration sex on the site.
-Most of the scenes are broken into 2 or more long episode.
-The lighting could be better in some of the videos. The action is hard to see because of that.
-The camera work could also be imoroved.
-They could work on their editing because they tend to cut a scene and then restart after the performers have changed position and the camera is setup elsewhere.
Bottom Line: *I have been a member of this site before and I they haven't chnaged much since the last time. I still find that there isn't as much content as I care to save to disk. That's not to say that the content is bad or anything but that it's not my cup of tea.

*These guys tend to offer a lot more fetishes than most similar sites and that is both a good thing and a bad thing. Good if the fetish in question is what you like but bad if you don't because that is a lkot of content that you will never download.

*I really enjoy the fact that they hire not just Eastern European models but British and French one as well. That is a nice because you tend to get some different body types this way. Mind you even if they didn't then they would still offer plenty of amazing models anyway.

*This site is produced by the same people as the other DDF sites so the same issues with editing, camera work and lack of imagination are present. That may not be an issue for most but I found it annoying at times. I highly recommend that you visit the site first to see if the site offers enough of the types of fetishes you like before joining. Many are covered but the quatity varies a lot from fetsih to fetish.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lactation Fantasy

41. Lactation Fantasy (1)

Pay
Active
80
GUY22 (7) 03-19-13  08:12pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Full on Lactation Content.
Lesbian lactation content.
Real Latina amateurs.
Crisp, Sharp, HiDef 720P videos.
High quality photo sets.
Very Passionate webmaster.
Frequent news updates.
Good amount of contents.
Cons: Download speed is awful. Less than 500 KB/s most of the time.
HUGE site banner on the videos.
Updates can be infrequent.
Bottom Line: It's a lactation site. Period. It is exactly what is being advertised. Nothing more and nothing less. One of the few lactation only sites on the web in fact. And Lactation-Fantasy (LF) is TOP notch. It's been around since 2006 and there's no signs of it slowing down anytime soon. In fact the first thing you'll notice is the very passionate webmaster. You're always being informed on what's going on with the site, whether it's maintenance or model updates. Whatever it is you're always in the know.
Almost all videos are shot in 720P (few older ones are not), very high quality videos. All contents are shot in the studio. A bit uninspired at times. Videos are rather straight forward, models come in, does a bit of strip and booty shake, then on with the milking. And the milking action does NOT disappoint. These ladies have milk filled tits like you've never seen. They drip, they leak, they squirt, and before you know it the floors are wet in a pool of milk and the ladies are drenched all over. Got Milk? Indeed. These are REAL moms, real Latino ladies, these are not porn stars. So keep your expectation in check. Some of these ladies are attractive enough but honestly (and I don't want to be mean) some ladies are quite average looking at best. But I guess their swollen milk filled breasts makes up for it. And swollen milk filled breasts are aplenty here. A lot of solo milking action and breast pumps. Lesbian milking scenes feature ladies milking onto each other and sucking each other dry.
This is THE lactation site to go to if you're into it. Lots of content, very professionally made. LF has the most amount of lactation content of any lactation site.
But there was a reason why I left the site. The models aren't really my cup of tea. A lot of these ladies are rather unattractive (for a porn site). But if you like REAL regular women then perhaps you'll enjoy it more than I.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Burning Ticket

42. Burning Ticket (1)

Network
Active
60
stingerxxx (10) 03-16-13  10:25pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Interesting and original themes and some good fetish ones: Berlin Public Bangers (outdoors), Fitness Fuck (Gym), Spin to Swing (Swingers), Ass Bangers' Ball, Nylon Feet Doll, Rubber Penetration

* Good variety of German por nstars that you will not find on other websites
Cons: * Poor-quality videos, only 2K bitrate

* Download mangers don't work: you can only download one video at a time

* Server has throttled the download speed to something ridiculously slow: only about 200 to 300kb

* Download limit, which is not advertised and it's quite a modest allowance; I calculated about 4GB per day

* Customer service - what's that?
Bottom Line: Burning ticket is the website name for the studio Inflagranti and I have some of their DVDs, which are excellent quality. This is a German studio and when you think of German, you usually think of good quality (such as German cars, engineering). Well, forget that here. Unfortunately the owners of this website seem to have gone to quite some length to make this an unpleasant experience.

Inflagranti's DVDs are of high quality, being crystal clear images but it appears that for the website they have downgraded the DVDs to a very low standard: 2000K. The scenes are not very clear and Ass Bangers' Ball and Gangbang Arena are quite bad because of the poor lighting.

However, it doesn't stop there. When downloading a scene, you cannot do anything else on the website: the server locks you out. So, I used my download manager to download at a later time and in the meantime cherry-picked what I wanted to see.

The server has throttled the download speed to a mere 200 to 300Kb and even though the file sizes are quite small (200-300MB due to the poor quality), it still takes about 20-30 minutes to download a scene.

But wait, there's more to add to the customer experience! There is a download limit that's not advertised on their website, which I think is quite despicable. After hitting about 4GB, I kept getting a server error message that my session had timed out. I sent a message to the webmaster - but no reply. I noticed that if you wait after 24 or 48 hours, you can download again.

This is the second time that I have joined this site: the first time was about 4 years' ago and now I remember why I said that I would never join this site after my first experience. I do seem to remember receiving an email from the webmaster the first time when I hit the download limit and the reply confirmed that there was a limit but I can't remember what the exact limit was.

Unfortunately it is difficult to recommend this site because of the quality and technical issues, which in my opinion are a real drawback for this site. Inflagranti do some really good stuff but this is not one of them. I can't help but feel that the website is there simply to point you in the direction of buying their DVDs, where the studio makes better money with better quality scenes.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit We Are Hairy

43. We Are Hairy (1)

Pay
Newbie
69*
critic (2) 03-10-13  05:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Some hairy models are forthcoming and natural. Many are attractive or beautiful. There is no download limit. Videos are mostly solos, which is fine, and there a fair amount of time is devoted to closeups, which I like.
Cons: Files have a different name than they appear in at the site. Thus the site might refer throughout to “This Model playing with hairy pussy on bed” but delivers “ThisModel_HiddenPinkPanties”. This, combined with a URL system that disarms cookies, makes it all but impossible to keep track of which files you’ve downloaded and which you haven’t.

Videos plagued by artificial masturbation with lots of sighs and moans: really irritating. Also the site often instructs women to ‘masturbate’ by snaking their hands around their thighs from behind, a move as artificial and labored as it sounds.

Despite assurances to the contrary, downloads break under any Macintosh download manager I’ve tried.

Too few women of color (or age).

Minor- files are named according to some object in the room, not by date, so there’s no sequence to the files, as is the case at a major competitor.
Bottom Line: Not a naturalistic site, which I prefer, especially for hairy models. If you don't mind very artificial masturbation videos with -lots- of ooooh's and aaaah's for no reason, you'd do fine here.

Hint to somewhat improve your ability to see your download history- delete the nonsense string ahead of "members" in the url and reload before downloading.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Dominated Girls

44. Dominated Girls (1)

Pay
Active
87
rearadmiral (316) 03-05-13  03:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the 21 Sextreme Network
- 250 scenes
- Updates regularly
- TBP Discount
- Supports download managers
- Many file choices
- Photos available (singles and zips)
Cons: - Can get a bit repetitive
Bottom Line: This site is part of the 21 Sextreme network that includes this and 13 other sites. The network is sold as the more extreme side of the 21 Sextury network. I’m a new fan of the 21 S1Sextury / 21 Sextreme networks and a long-time fan of good BDSM so I was definitely interested to see if this site met the standards set by many others in the two networks and how it compared to some of the better BDSM sites.

First a bit of a caveat: even if you are a fan of BDSM material you have to admit that it can sometimes get repetitive: girls in bondage can only have so many variations. The same can be said for a lot of other niches too, like massage and old-and-young. This site suffers from a bit of that as well, but I’m still glad I joined and still happy to have a lot of the scenes.

The site currently has 250 scenes and four new ones are added each month, though not necessarily on a weekly cycle.

One common element of most of the scenes is the same as with the other sites on this and the related network: the models are some of the most beautiful on the internet. For me, this increases my interest in the site since many of the models here aren’t true ‘fetish’ models.

The scenes share some other traits too: they all have the models in several different bondage set-ups (almost exclusively using rope), most have some other implements used, like ball gags, clamps or wax, and in most of the scenes there is actually sex, usually while the model is in bondage. This latter point isn’t unique to this site, but it isn’t available on every BDSM site. I suspect that legal concerns mean some sites just don’t take that risk. As a guy who likes watching anal scenes, there are some here but they aren’t in the majority.

One thing that is a bit of a negative for some (and others have commented on the same thing on other BDSM sites) but a probably a legal necessity is an interview at either the beginning or the end of the scene where the model ‘breaks the fourth wall’ and talks about what is about to happen or what just happened. As much as some people don’t like it I accept that given the extreme nature of a BDSM scene that is it probably necessary to keep the soccer-moms away. Personally, I find the interviews interesting and usually watch them.

The site is laid out in the same way as every other site on this and the related network, which is to say that it is simple but effective. There are some improvements coming with the addition of a large number of tags for sorting the scenes. This feature is visible now but not active so I can’t comment on it. If it works as planned though, it will be a great sorting tool.

Each page displays 36 large thumbnails showing the female model in the scene. Rolling your mouse over the thumbnail brings up so data on the scene, including model name and the date it was uploaded.

Clicking a scene’s thumbnail opens a new page where you have options to stream and download the scene. Immediately apparent is that there is an option to download just clips, but there is an option in all cases to download one full file. A trailer is also available. Streaming is available too, but I chose downloads.

There is a big difference in scenes uploaded before October 2009 and those uploaded after that. Prior to that date there were few options for downloads. In most cases those limited choices were a low-res H.264 file and a medium and high-res in WMV. Depending on when the scene was uploaded though, the high-res WMV is excellent. After October 2009 more options were made available, with three resolutions being offered in both H.264 and WMV. I found the mid-range H.264 to be the best compromise between quality and file size so I opted for that in most downloads. Those come in at 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively they look great on a 23” monitor. (In the interests of clarity, there are approximately 170 scenes that have been uploaded since more options were offered.)

Download managers work well and I experienced no time-outs. Download speeds were better than I’m used to with similar sites.

Photos are also available and even though the site is really more of a video site the photos are well done and available in good resolutions. The lowest resolution I saw was 1280x853. Newer uploads offer that and 3504x2336. Zips are available.

The site has no real flaws: it has some great scenes with high production values and stunning models in a simple to use layout that allows download managers. What more could a BDSM fan ask for? I think that this site offers BDSM that is on par with the best out there, like the Kink sites and Society SM.

The bottom line is that if you’re a fan of good BDSM porn you won’t be disappointed by this site. The fact that it is part of a network and also comes with a TBP / PU discount makes this a great deal.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hey Little Dick

45. Hey Little Dick (1)

Pay
Active
80
gaypornolover (38) 03-04-13  04:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (33), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Unique concept and content, well done
+ Good quality videos
+ No DRM
+ Free access to two other sites
+ Bills with CCBill
+ Excellent forum which takes suggestions for scenes
+ Regular, dated updates
+ Full photosets including a zip file for each scene
Cons: - Photos are small in size
- Later updates move away from original concept
- I found streaming slow
- Slightly confusing video options - some higher-resolution files are WMV only, some lower-resolutuon are MP4 only
- Same male models are reused over and over, and some aren't really that small
Bottom Line: This is one hell of an unusual site, and I appreciate it's not really aimed at me - though I'm not entirely sure who it is aimed at! Sheer curiosity made me subscribe!

It's basically a kind mild femdom site, in that it focuses on women humiliating men who have a small penis. There's also a CFNM (Clothed Female, Naked Male) element to the majority of the scenes. It's certainly a very specialist niche. I guess it's aimed at anyone who likes to see men humiliated, and perhaps at men who have small penises who enjoy being humiliated.

I have always had a fetish for humiliation, so although I am gay there is not equivalent gay site, and CFNM-type sites, which tend to feature more ordinary-looking straight guys being humiliated by ladies who keep their clothes on, is therefore an interesting niche for me.

Most of the videos are themed around two or three women who get a guy naked on some pretext, then laugh and mock his small cock. They usually masturbate the guy till his comes then laugh at him all the more. The women mainly remained clothed, though often in skimpy outfits, and sometimes flash themselves or get completely naked to turn the guy on. There is the occasional bit of BDSM - the guy might get his balls kicked or his cock abused - but it's fairly mild and infrequent. Occasionally a guy with a larger cock is brought on to humiliate the small-cocked guy further.

The female models, whilst not in my area of expertise, do seem attractive and are mostly in their twenties and slender, though there is a sprinkling of older ladies too. Some remain clothed, some get naked or near-naked.

Later videos though in the last few weeks seem to be moving away from this concept, and feature solo female models who strip off and talk to the male viewer, mocking him for having a tiny penis. Occasionally she might have sex with a man with a big penis and tell the viewer he's a real man and he'd have no chance with her. Obviously this is aimed at heterosexual men who like to be humiliated, but I'm not sure how effective that would be - I've seen similar "humiliate the viewer" style porn myself and it never quite convinces for me. These are all recent videos and reflect a big depature for the site, as all previous videos featured a male model being mocked. Obviously these later videos are of no interest to me, and mean the site is heading in a new direction which may or may not work for you.

This brings me on to a weakness of the site - the repeated use of the same male models. Obviously finding models who are willing to be humiliated on a site like this is not easy - so the same model is often used repeatedly in several scenes. This is great if they have a model you like, but obviously not if you don't like one. The male models vary greatly - some young and cute, but more often in their 30s and 40s, with some quite overweight and not necessarily attractive - though again this kind of goes with the theme of the site. Some of the earlier models actually had quite average or even fairly large dicks, so it kind of didn't work on the realism side, though I still enjoyed them.

Acting is incredibly good - the women are great at dishing out the abuse and most of the male models are great at acting surprised, hurt, turned on etc. though some just kind of sit there a little dazed!

Video is a bit of a mixed bag. You can choose between WMV or MP4 for every scene, which is good, but sometimes the quality is different.

In later videos it seems both types are 1280x720, but one WMV version I tried had a bitrate around 10,000 and 23fps, the MP4 had 30,000 bitrate and 25fps. However, in older videos the MP4 version was the lower-quality, with a 856x480 size, and the WMV tended to be better quality, with a bitrate around 3,000 to the MP4s 1,500. So you'd have to download different file types to get the best quality depending on how old the video is. Quality did seem decent whatever I tried though, and it's all very professionally shot - well-lit and clear.

I found the streaming pretty slow - downloads were about average speed.

Each video has a full photoset, which is good, and a zip file for the photos, but the photos themselves are nothing special at 800x534, and are watermarked.

There is a forum where you can ask questions and even suggest scenes - they say if you suggest one and enough people like it they'll make it for you - I didn't read all the posts so I can't say for sure this does happen, but the administrator does seem to often reply to suggestions.

Overall this is an interesting site which I would recommend if anything about femdom/CFNM/humiliation does it for you - but be aware it is going in a new direction now.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Zoliboy

46. Zoliboy (1)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (316) 03-01-13  06:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 1300+ scenes
- Part of a network
- Four updates per month
- Many download options on newer uploads
- Photos available
- Photo zips offered
- Incredibly beautiful models
- Download managers supported
- TBP / PU discount
- Some hard-to-find niches available here
- Owners seem to be actively working to improve the site
Cons: - Majority of scenes are in clips only
- Relatively conventional for an ‘extreme’ site
Bottom Line: Zoliboy is, I presume, the main site in the 21 Sextreme network. I make that assumption based on the fact that it is the largest site on the network by far. 21 Sextreme is promoted as the more extreme version of 21 Sextury.

The site has over 1300 scenes uploaded and continues to add four per month, though not necessarily one upload each week.

I’m also a member of 21 Sextury and I don’t know that I’d characterize 21 Sextreme as being more ‘extreme.’ Part of this opinion comes from the fact that a lot of the porn on the more ‘tame’ network has a fairly hard edge. That’s definitely not a complaint as I’m on the record as being a huge fan of 21 Sextury. The Zoliboy site certainly has elements that are less common in porn and may be viewed as more extreme by some. There are watersports scenes (and watersports within sex too), and more female on male rimming than occurs in more mainstream porn, but the entire site itself isn’t all that extreme. It isn’t like every scene on the site has an element that is outside the mainstream. There are a lot of scenes here that are fairly conventional and could easily be uploaded to the 21 Sextury network.

The newer videos on the site offer the same options as across the rest of the two networks with streaming and downloads being available. The downloads are available in both WMV and H.264 formats and in multiple resolutions. My go-to resolution was the mid-grade H.264 which came in at 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 30fps. Objectively I know these numbers look low, but subjectively the scenes look better than some with higher numbers from other sites. I did download a few of the highest-resolution H.264 scenes and these come in at 1920x1080 at 6200 kb/s and 50fps. (I don’t think I’ve ever seen 50fps before…). Subjectively these look incredible. They are crisp and clear and will likely look amazing on a big-screen TV. Download managers are supported.

Photos are also offered, with some scenes offering both photos and screenshots. These can be downloaded as singles or as zips. In most of the newer uploads the zips are available in low and high resolutions. The hi-res photos are approximately 3000x4200.

Most of the models on this site are the same that appear throughout this network and 21 Sextury. That’s definitely not a bad thing as so many of the models are incredibly beautiful. The vast majority of them are Russian or eastern European.

One thing I found odd about the site (considering that it is promoted as the main site of an ‘extreme’ network) is that the number of anal scenes here is actually lower than you find on the more ‘tame’ company network. This is both in terms of actual numbers and in proportion to the size of the site. This isn’t necessarily a pro or con – I’m just mentioning it. (Subjectively it is a con but I didn’t take that into account on scoring.)

The site layout is the same as with the rest of this network and the other company network. It is simple and easy to use. It appears that the site owners will be rolling out new filters soon which will (presumably) make it easier to sort scenes by a large number of tags.

The site does have one HUGE flaw, and it is somewhat baffling since this isn’t shared by any other site in this or the related network. The newest scenes offer lots of download options but on scenes uploaded before October 2009 the options are quite different. Prior to October 2009 only WMV files are available. The uploads in September 2009 still have decent resolution (1280x720, 3000kb/s and 30fps) but the problem is that the scenes are no longer available in a single, full scene, format. The best you can get is a two-part scene. Some scenes are in even more clips. I have no idea why the site owners made this choice considering that the scenes are all relatively short (10 minutes, give or take) for the full scene. 2009 wasn’t so long ago that only offering smaller clips made sense. From comments made here at PU it seems that the owners are actively looking to improve their networks. In my opinion making the scenes available as a single download should be high on their list. I’d prefer H.264 but will live happily with WMV but I really dislike having a scene broken down into multiple parts. (In real numbers, approximately 150 scenes are available as single downloads and more than 1000 are in clips only.)

The bottom line is that this is a great site that offers some beautiful models in some hard-edged porn. The newer scenes are available in many different ways but the older scenes are only available in clips. I don’t fully understand the reasoning for spinning off a separate network but given that this is all exclusive material with some of the best production values around I can’t fault the owners for wanting to generate more income so they can continue to make more great porn. When you add in the TBP / PU discount this site and network is a great value and I’d recommend it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Gloryhole Girlz

47. Gloryhole Girlz (0)

Pay
Newbie
64*
knightline (0) 02-19-13  06:10am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of material, hmmm - hard to think of many pros!! It is part of a large network, but the sites on the network share the same problems - unattractive models and poor video quality. Now some sitesd o have decent video quality and a few cute models.
Cons: Quality of videos is absolutely horrible. The women are mostly not very attractive. If they were hot babes I'd overlook the poor video quality.
Bottom Line: This is a waste of money. Don't understand why the site reviews are so positive, other than they make money when people join through them. Still, if you join for a month the wide variety of sites may make it worth it, but there is much better available on the web.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Layered Nylons

48. Layered Nylons (1)

Pay
Active
80
tangub (151) 02-03-13  02:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Choice of CCBill or Epoch for sign up
Exclusive content
Updated 4 times a week (Mon, Wed, Sat, Sun), usually 3 photo sets and 1 video per week.
All content is high res and hd
Photos have a choice of 4 sizes available; standard 711x1066, extra-large 1365x2048, ultra large 2000x3000 and super large 3744x5616.
Downloadable zips in all 4 sizes.
Video download options are hd 1280x720 wmv (20000+ kbps), 640x360 wmv (6000 kbps), 640x360 mp4 (1000 kbps) for smartphone or tablet. There is also a high def and standard def streaming option.
File sizes and run times of videos displayed.
All content date stamped.
Excellent navigation, browse options and search engine
Cons: Regional pricing with CCBill (Epoch was about $2 cheaper for me).
Site has only been online since September 2011 so not a massive amount of content yet; 198 photo sets (26,000 pics) and 53 videos at the time of writing this.
Hardly any full nudity, mostly just topless.
Videos are short, usually only 5-6 minutes.
No model info or bios
Poor preview area; click on a model in the tour pages to try and see what photo sets or videos she has and you are taken straight to the sign up page.
Bottom Line: This site features the unusual theme of girls wearing both stockings and tights (pantyhose) at the same time. I’ve always been a fan of girls wearing stockings and heels but have never really liked tights so couldn’t quite decide where I stand on this unusual niche. This site wasn’t really on my radar but a cheap email offer tempted me to take a look. This site is run by the same company that runs Only All Sites, Only Tease and Art Lingerie so quality was pretty much assured.

There’s currently 79 models on the site, most of them being the same British models that can be found on the other company sites. Many of the popular OT models like Carla, Melanie, Hayley Marie, Lucy Anne and Daisy Watts can be found here. A few Euro models such as Eufrat and Cikita are also present.

The photos are pretty much in the same style you find at Only Tease and have the same natural look to them; thankfully they have avoided the photo-shopped style that was prevalent at Art Lingerie. The photo sets usually start with the model fully clothed before they strip down to their tights and stockings. Those who like a full striptease will be disappointed since the tights, panties and stockings rarely get removed. As a result you will rarely see any full nudity within the site with only occasional glimpses of any pussy and quite often that glimpse is only through sheer tights if the model happens to be wearing them without any panties underneath. To all intents and purposes it’s really just a topless site.

I’m not really interested in videos so only checked out a few. The HD videos look nice and sharp whether downloading or streaming. They provide a screen cap gallery of 18 photos for each video where you can get an idea of the content before deciding if you want to download it. The video style is pretty much the same as I experienced at Art Lingerie. There’s no background music and usually no chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start so they have that same awkward silence. I guess the idea of that is so you can hear the sound of the model running her hand up and down her nylons or twanging her suspender belt.

The navigation is the same as at other “Only” sites, a choice of browsing photos or videos by year and month listing or an alphabetical model index. Under “My LN” you can set your browsing preferences like default photo size, number of thumbnails per page etc as well as managing your favourites. There’s also an extensive search engine with several filters which will be great when the site gets a lot larger but for now it’s hardly needed since the site is still quite small, in fact it only took me 3 or 4 days to download and view everything I wanted here. Overall I enjoyed the high quality content in this unusual niche but I feel the site needs some more growth to make it worth the regular price.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Bare Maidens

49. Bare Maidens (0)

Pay
Newbie
88*
pornstacker (0) 02-03-13  08:43am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: superb picture quality and video quality is excellent in later videos. Mix of formats further back, f4v, wmv. Pics are huge and some pussy shots on full size are delicious...you can see every fold of skin in the most amazing detail!
Cons: slow downloads. some video files can be as much as 1.5gb in size so make sure your hdd can handle it.
Bottom Line: I find this an excellent site with superb quality content for this niche. Beautiful girls outdoors and indoors in a mix of corsets, long skirts and dresses, battle armour and also sack cloth all of which comes off by end of scene, and also a fair few swords and knives too. No lingerie whatsoever!
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit CFNM.net

50. CFNM.net (1)

Pay
Active
60
gaypornolover (38) 01-26-13  04:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (33), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + What video content there is, is VERY hot
+ Updates on average 2 - 3 times per week, though not consistently
+ Extensive user forum (though this is flawed)
+ As far I can tell, no regional billing
+ No DRM
+ Choice of two good billers - CCBill or Verotel
+ All-exclusive content
+ The only pure, true CFNM site I have yet found
Cons: - Have gone back to being a picture-only site - as of August 6, 2012 no new videos have been uploaded at the time of this review. NO warning of this in preview, no explanation of why in-site.
- Pictures are good-quality, but downloading is a joke - no zip files, no collections - must download each picture one by one
- Very expensive ($39.95 1st month, $34.95 after), especially now no more videos
- Poorly-designed site with poor search functions, ancient design and a mess of a forum
- Forum is completely ignored by site management, no suggestions seem to be taken on board.
- Downloads and streaming the slowest I've ever seen on any site.
- $1.95 additional joining fee if using Verotel, never found that at any other site.
- Each story is split into many small scenes which constitute each update
- Many videos still unique to a sister-site - see below.
Bottom Line: This is my third review. I am writing it with a heavy heart, because this site has so much potential and could easily be the best CFNM site ever, but it's taken yet another one of its abrupt policy reverses, so it's on entirely the wrong track again.

What I will say is that CFNM.net is, in my opinion, the only true CFNM site on the internet. The scenarios and stories are superb, the models incredible, the acting is good and believable - focusing purely on past content this site should be scoring my first ever 100.

So how did we get to 60 as a score for a site which can produce the best content ever?

Simply - they cannot decide what they want to be - a picture site, or a video site. They change their minds and their policies more often than the guys get naked!

CFNM.net has always described itself more as a picture site, and they have a "sister" site, CFNM.TV, which is supposed to be the video site. Sounds fair and straightforward - you want pictures, you join this site. You want the videos, you join CFNM.TV.

That could work, except CFNM.TV is a lousy video site, and CFNM.net is a lousy picture site.

CFNM.TV, according to the previews, hasn't been updated for months. It doesn't have all the the video content CFNM.net does, even though it's supposed to be the video site, and what is does have (some of which CFNM.net doesn't have) is riddled with the most intrusive, crappy DRM I've ever known which makes you log in to watch each video, won't work unless you use Windows, and means downloads stop working the second your subscription expires - you CANNOT download to keep.

As a picture site, CFNM.net is lousy because although the pictures are high-quality - well-lit and professional - for a so-called picture site they are a joke. You get one size only, the viewer is clunky, and you CANNOT download the photosets as one file - zipped or not. No, you have to click on each individual picture (and each story has hundreds), then click on the "download to computer" link and download each picture manually. This would take you weeks of painstaking work.

When I did my last review, CFNM.net seemed to be improving. CFNM.TV was active but seemed to be abandoned, with no new updates. The video updates were being uploaded to CFNM.net, and they were also uploading old footage previously exclusive to CFNM.TV but WITHOUT the DRM. I was hoping they were going to upload the CFNM.TV-exclusive stuff as "new" updates, then when they'd done it all, quietly close CFNM.TV.

Nope! When I left the site last July, I was almost done downloading the last of a video set. When I rejoined six months later, I downloaded the last couple of updates from that set and then found the entire six months worth of updates after that were photo-only. No mention of this in the preview, nothing on the site I can see about a change in policy - it's just back to photo-only.
However CFNM.TV seems to only have had one update with a video of some old CFNM.net content. So, we're back to two sites which between them have incredibly hot content, but which are so badly designed and run you can't satisfactorily access either.

CFNM.net has an extensive forum where these and my other complaints all as listed above are discussed - but from what I can see, nobody from the site itself ever answers or pays the slightest bit of attention to anything said on the forum. The forum is also practically a seperate site, which its own seperate log-in, no integration to the main site, and ancient layout.

I don't intend to go over the details of the site - it's all in my previous reviews, one of which is still active at the time of writing - and nothing has changed since.

Suffice it to say, if you've never joined this site before then I would strongly recommend you do, as it has some incredibly hot content - but then accept you will never know whether they ever intend to upload more videos again, that the photos are a complete pain in the ass to download, and that CFNM.TV is a joke.

If you have joined before, certainly in the last six months, then you will already have all the video content they're offering and even if you like photos, downloading them will be such a pain I don't think it's worth joining it again.

I will certainly be cancelling before auto-renew and I have already downloaded the two videos I wanted. Nothing else on the site is of interest.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 703 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Milk Enema (2)
2. Divine Bitches (2)
3. Public Disgrace (2)
4. The Training Of O (2)
5. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)
6. Puffy Network (1)
7. Emily Addison.net (1)
8. Sexually Broken (1)
9. Dirty Doctor (1)
10. Layered Nylons (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.44 seconds.