Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site focus on "slut wives" and keeps the content dirty: writing all over her in lip stick, spit-roast, etc.
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what.
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick u the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps.
Cons:
- No posted update schedule :( Since new posts are undated I can't even guess.
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- videos are chunked in 3 minute clips.
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200. (From the view I bothered to look through, mostly screen shots of videos.
- only 6 (for Nikki) 5 (for Carmen) picture sets (about 75-125 images in a set)
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- there isn't a lot of content. 5 videos of Nikki; 4 for Carmen. Each video about 35 minutes long
- video chunks are added one at a time; so some videos look incomplete.
- Copyright on the website says 2011 so they haven't done new shoots since at least then (maybe earlier).
Bottom Line:
I know I have a long list of negative for such a high score. I have to explanations for that: 1 I'm an easy grader, I think many other reviewers would have been more harsh. 2. I'm factoring in the low price of membership. I'm getting 12 months of content for what I normally spend on 1. (Then again it will probably only take me a month to look at all the content across this network).
This site features two girls in their video section and about 30 in the pix section. I haven't commented much on the pictures because I found them so underwhelming.
Carmen is a hot 20s brunet. Who says she was hooked on BBC b her aunt (gives you a flavor for the videos). Nikki is in the MILF category - maybe in her 40s? For both the chemistry of the scene is 1 (usually more) black guys get to do whatever they want to her. Hot stuff if you like your sex dirty
There's very little if any setup in the videos. If you've a fan og getting right to the hardcore, this site excels in that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gabrielle is a hot model. She is one of the best looking amateur models I've ever seen.
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site is on the raunchier side (as the name implies) and is hitting the "cuckold" market.
- updates every monday (but it looks like they put up material that has been shot long ago. In addition video/pix are put up in parts so you will wait a LONG time before you get all the set).
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what.
- Attractive price (I know my friend Pat362 will disagree), but when you're spending between $15-20 a month or in the case of their special $30 for year, how high can your expectations be?
Cons:
I hate having a con list longer than a pro list - but this time I really don't think it can be avoided.
- This site seems like it was made 10-15 years ago and just left. I can't imagine there shooting new. Everything about this site screams 1997.
- Terrible quality 480 X 300 0.7 mbps.
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is poor 420X640 pixels. ("older stuff" is 300X200).
- only about 20 picture sets (about 75-125 images in a set)
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- there isn't a lot of content. 6 videos of Gab (but since each video is sliced into a 1 minute chunk, it's a pain to work with). There are other videos available but those are content shares from the rest of the network.
Bottom Line:
I'm glad I check out this site and satisfied my curiosity. And having a year long membership will allow me to take my time and explore every corner (of their rather poorly designed network).
But I would not recommend spending your money her. Gabby is smokin' hot and I wish she pick up working for some studios. She has an amazing body and can get dirty on a set (I love dirty).
But the abysmal quality, the slicing of all the content into tiny pieces, and waiting weeks to get the full length video is too much to bear.
Find someplace else to spend your money. If this content is what you'r looking for try myhotwife.com (I haven't joined yet but it's one of my next ones) or Leslie Grey (I was a member of her previous site lustcouple.com and enjoyed it).
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+There are so many photosets that I couldn't count them all but there are at least 2500 that star Kelly and countless more that star a variety of different models.
+All the photosets can be donwloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from set to set but 1728x1152 is common.
+The videos and photosets are a mixture of b/g, g/g and solo sex scenes, some glamour shots and a variety of other types.
+There is a rather small logo located on the top left of the screen which I found easy to overlook.
+You can get a full access 3 dat trial for 9$ so a real bargain
Cons:
-The biggest con against the site is in regards to desgn.
1-A 1/4 of the screens are used up by a blue background that serves no purpose and limits the viewing options.
2-There is a search window to find content but there are only a few pre-selected keywords and the same scene will come up under more than one of those words.
3-The only way to know what is inside the videos is if you go through the pic section.
-Many of the videos are broken into 2 or more clips/sections.
-Kelly only has b/g sex with her husband(not a con for me but maybe for others).
-There are multplie phototsets and videos of other female performers but no search options so you have to go page by page to find the ones you want.
Bottom Line:
*The first thing I noticed when I got on the site is how badly designed it is and how different it looks from the preview sections. That was quite a shock for me because Kelly's other two sites which are Porn Fidelity and Teen Fidelity are some amazing sites that I was sure her's would be just as good. It isn't and that is too bad because there is some excellent content here and Kelly is one hot looking 40+ years old woman with large all natural breast and an amazing sexual appetite.
*I don't know if they plan on improving the site but if they aren't then they really should. It's not like they don't already have two great sites to use as template. Even some some basic tweaking would be an improvement. Especially if they fix that stupid 1/4 section of the screen wasted on a blue background and also if they work on the video setion of the site.
*This is an easy site to recomment to anyone who thinks Kelly is hot and is more into sofcore to midcore porn and can overlook the design.
*You may want to avoide joining if you are only interested in kelly's hardcore scenes because you may be disapointed. There is some great stuff but maybe not enough to satisfy your needs.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Excellent balance of photos, videos and bonus content
- Consistent quality of content throughout the sites
- Membership to 7 solo sites, 5 of which are regularly updated
- Updates are dated (including recent updates in Preview area)
- Good mix of girls – huge, buxom babes and more petite girls too
- Easy navigation, whether across whole network or by site
- You seem to stay logged in without username/password prompts
- CCBill with no pre-checked cross-sells
- Outstanding softcore content, and Bryci now does hardcore
- Webmaster is very ‘hands on’ and keen to listen to feedback
Cons:
Mostly minor. Points marked with * don't personally bother me:
- Video previews are a bit limited
- Regional pricing
- No ZIP files for photo galleries
- Most updates biased towards Bryci, Katie and Talia
- Automatically generated username/password*
- Download limit of 20gb per 24 hour hour period*
- Some might find content a bit samey as mostly softcore*
- 6 of the 7 models appear to have fake boobs*
- Very strict piracy policy that might catch out innocent members
Bottom Line:
This is a huge network of high quality solo websites. You can either join via the girls’ individual website, or direct via Bella Pass – either way you get instant access to every site in the network.
Content is all dated and downloadable. The network takes a hard line against piracy – there’s a download limit of 20gb per 24 hour, and they’re clear and transparent about their policies with warnings before and after you join, and in the confirmation email you receive.
Browsing the network, you have the following categories across the top:
Photos, Candids, Videos, Behind the Scenes, Archives, Babechat, Vlogs, Our Sites, Our Models, Wallpapers and Bella Webcams.
There is also a very well designed search function where you can also search by category (eg, masturbation, hardcore etc) and by site. You can also view just a single site using a drop-down menu.
VITAL STATS:
Bella Pass currently has 52,006 photos, and 941 videos, of which:
All sites have categories for photos and videos. In addition to this:
- Bryci, Katie, Talia, Monroe and Ava also have webcam archives
- Bryci, Katie, Talia and Ava have behind the scenes content
- Bryci, Katie and Talia have regularly updated blogs
- Bryci and Katie have in-depth bios and also wallpapers
Video content is downloadable in the following formats:
(WMV doesn’t appear to be available for Bryci’s newer hardcore content)
Photos are normally 4000px on their widest side, although 1500px on candid galleries.
SUMMARY OF EACH SITE/GIRL:
BRYCI is the most popular girl on the network on the basis of content alone. She is absolutely stunning and has an incredible body. Her boobs are fake but despite being gigantic don’t appear disproportionately large.
Her site is mainly stripteasing and softcore such as masturbation/toys, but she is making her first moves into hardcore with two videos already posted within the last week. Both have been artistically shot, but it’s the perfect tease as they introduce us to hardcore Bryci, and future videos will show everything, including POV.
In addition to this, there is lots and lots of behind the scenes footage, candids and a regularly updated blog. Bryci’s site on its own is one of the finest solo sites out there.
KATIE BANKS is a curvy but slim big-boobed babe with bags of confidence. Her site is the second-largest on the network with a great mix of videos, photos and bonus content. You can read more about Katie Banks in my review.
TALIA SHEPARD is cast from the same mould as Katie and Bryci. Her site is packed with photos, videos but also candids and behind the scenes footage. Like Katie and Bryci, she has substantial fake boobs, but unlike those two, she got hers mid-way through the site. Approximately 70% of the galleries include her fake boobs, the rest feature her more natural (and rather lovely!) cleavage.
LEXI MASON is, unlike the other models here, petite and all natural. She is an absolute stunner with a gorgeous complexion, perky boobs and is a refreshing change from her less natural colleagues. Unfortunately her site shows up one of the weaknesses with Bella Pass in that it seems a bit overlooked compared to the ‘big three’ – her site is relatively new, and regularly updated (once a week), but not quite with the regularity of the others.
HUNTER LEIGH is also a relatively new model to the network. The content is softer (no toys/masturbation/spreading), but she's stunning,. Her website doesn't have much content yet, and lacks the bonus features from the other sites. You can read more about Hunter Leigh in my review.
MONROE LEE is a pretty blonde with a massively curvy body and fake boobs. Although her site includes pictures and videos, it is no longer being updated and quality isn’t up to the standard of other sites in the network. It’s not bad, but it feels a lot more amateur, and although this is a great bonus site, it’s hard to be too enthusiastic about a model when the site is no longer updating.
AVA DAWN is another big-breasted babe. Her site is no longer updating but there is a good amount of great quality content available, including webcam archives and behind the scenes footage. Like Monroe’s site, this is a great bonus site on top of five that are regularly being updated.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Well known, established web model, now doing hardcore
- Lots of outdoors scenes in risqué outfits in very public places
- Billing by CCBill with no pre-checked cross-sells
- Discounts on softcore site ($15.95 recurring instead of $34.57)
- Good interaction via website comments system, Twitter etc
- All content is downloadable
Cons:
Points marked * don’t personally bother me:
- The amount of content doesn't currently justify the price
- Hardcore scenes in a minority and seem incomplete
- Sure that a lot of content is recycled from her old site
- Preview section shows 'live' webcam... this is fake
- Slow download speeds compared to other sites
- Navigation is not very refined and rather inconsistent
- Most galleries don’t have downloadable zip files
- Some galleries you have to download the zip to get all pics
- Lack of download options on videos (one format, one size)
- Large watermarks on images
- Excessive Photoshop filters on images
- Automatically generated username/password*
Bottom Line:
I’ve followed Ann since before she even went topless, so to say I was excited by the prospect of her going hardcore would be an understatement. Sadly, at the moment her website is currently pretty disappointing.
Joining is simple. They warn you to make sure your phone number is correct as they will call to verify you’re a ‘real person’ with the call possibly coming from Ann herself. At no stage is there even the option to provide your phone number, nor (of course) do you get any call.
NAVIGATION:
Unlike her old site, navigation is inconsistent and cluttered. It uses a Wordpress template, and the member’s homepage has the most recent updates featured. You can view photo updates by clicking ‘gallery’ at the top, but to view video updates you have to go and find them – easiest way is clicking ‘updates’ then clicking the ‘videos’ tag on the right.
Other options at the top include news (not updated since November 2012), contacts (web form), webcam (LiveCamNetwork video chat) and her Amazon wish list. Updates are tagged with keywords such as blowjob, toys, video, etc, but the layout isn’t as intuitive or straight-forward as you’d expect. To give a few examples of inconsistency:
Not all galleries have zips. Those that do are only ‘preview galleries’ meaning you have to download the zip. To get into galleries on some pages you can click the thumbnail, but on others this pops up with a preview of the gallery, and you have to click the gallery title instead.
Also, some galleries clicking the photo thumbnail doesn’t take you to the high-res picture, you have to click the thumbnail, then a slightly larger thumbnail to get into the full-size image. So that’s two clicks per photo just to get the high-res image.
It just seems quite cluttered, a problem that will surely get worse as the amount of content increases.
CONTENT:
Currently, there are 44 galleries of around 100 pictures. They’re arranged 12-to-a-page with a thumbnail and gallery number. Photos are downloadable and are 2048px on their longest side and are good quality. Some seem to have been overly Photoshoppedd, and there’s a pretty big (1000px wide) watermark in the bottom right of images regardless of whether it covers anything.
Content-wise, many galleries are shot outside, but the lighting is good and I love the sense of danger this gives. Ann has always been amazing in this aspect, and galleries are shot in broad daylight in extremely racy outfits in public (albeit quiet) parks.
Ann is a confident, charismatic and engaging performer. She has a great body, and her solo stuff is still her strength as her webmaster/photographer/videographer can do her justice in this respect as he’s also the stunt dick which limits his ability to film the action.
Videos are shot from multiple angles, normally from a single fixed camera angle, and then a POV. Although the POV angle is shot with an iPhone, I have to say the quality isn’t too bad.
All are downloadable, and the video is embedded onto the download page as a Flash video which you can skip to any point in while it still loads. The only downloadable format is M4V, and there’s no options for quality which is a bitter pill to swallow when some are over 1.5gb and download speeds are slow at best (150kbps)
THE HARDCORE ASPECT:
Obviously, the selling point of this site is the fact it’s Ann’s gone hardcore.
At the moment, the ratio of hardcore content is pretty disappointing. Gallery-wise, around 10% features hardcore, and there’s three videos on top of this. More disappointing than this is that the hardcore content even in the hardcore galleries is pretty minimal.
Most start off pretty conventionally with her posing, before a few dick-in-mouth style pictures towards the end. The most recent hardcore gallery, for example, has 109 pictures, only 5 feature a dick, then 11 of a few spots of cum on her stomach.
The hardcore aspect seems a bit half-hearted at best. Most of the videos don’t ever really end in a money shot or really any conclusion at all, they just peter out. It’s not even really a case of them teasing us, it just all feels a bit rushed and lackadaisical, although I have to say the most recent video, Street Walker, is a definite stride in the right direction. But one good hardcore video does not a hardcore site make.
UPDATES:
There doesn’t appear to be a published update schedule. In the main, updates are pretty regular and reliable, but at times it can be flaky. All updates are dated, and you’ll normally get at least one or two updates a week, although there have been periods where there haven’t any updates for a ten-or-so day period, and promised updates have been late by several days.
SUMMARY:
Beyond the excitement of Ann going hardcore, the site is bit of a letdown. Recent updates hints that things might get better, but the hardcore content is largely disappointing and makes up a tiny percentage of content. The cluttered navigation and limited download options also frustrate.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some very attractive models
-I can't recall having seen any of these models elsewhere
-Download managers work (DTA)
-Good download speeds (2MB/s)
-I like the concept
-Reputable biller (I had CCBill)
-Long site timeouts, it doesn't appear to ever timeout
-Few if any fake breasts
Cons:
-Camerawork is not the best
-Lighting is not the best
-Scenes are repetitive, almost all progress in the same fashion
-Navigation is very basic, just a page with 6 scenes on it, many scenes aren't even really labelled (no model names?!)
-Site is sort of small for the price (200 scenes at the time of review)
-Video encoding on many scenes is poor (see BL)
-HD only available after 30 days, a stupid gimmick given the size/update rate of the site
-They say one update per week, seems right for as long as I have been a member, but since scenes aren't dated it is hard to tell
-No photos
-Some videos are zipped, is this 2001? Zip a wmv all you want, you ain't saving any space.
-Some odd stuff in a few of the videos (showing a girl go buy Plan B)
-No bonus material
-Streaming starts instantly when you go to a page (to all webmasters: please stop doing this)
Bottom Line:
I like the idea of this site, and it is nice to see some new faces, but I will admit I joined primarily due to the Miss Teen Delaware thing intriguing me enough to give it a look. Generally I think the models are attractive. Typically athletic, skinny, and generally on the smaller breasted side - no fake breasts that I could tell. My type of woman, so I figured 'what the hell' and joined.
The main negative for me with the site is the camerawork, lots of stationary shots as though it were filmed on a tripod, and shots I am not particularly fond of (long stretches of showing cowgirl from behind, which an ass man might appreciate I suppose, but I find it boring and a poor angle choice). The lighting can be a bit iffy at times, but they do appear to have put in some effort by bringing in some of their own lighting gear as seen in many of the shots, but all scenes are shot in a hotel room, so obviously not the best.
My second main gripe is the video encoding on this site, encoding a video that is filmed in 16:9 in 4:3 is unacceptable, and it hasn't been for several years. Basically forces you to have black bars on all sides. On widescreen monitors this will leave half or so of your screen as black space. This is particularly egregious since it is FILMED in 16:9. My only guess for why anyone would do this is that it was easier for them to do with their 30 days for HD policy. Perhaps these videos are encoded properly if you hang around for this period, but given their update schedule that is a tough pill to swallow. I used avidemux to crop the videos properly, but this is not something one should have to do at a pay site.
The scenes themselves are very repetitive, generally an interview, fully clothed oral, fully clothed doggy, naked cowgirl or reverse cowgirl, doggy, end. I have no idea why they spend so long on almost every film showing the girl from behind when she is on top, I prefer to see the girl not her back.
Overall, I think the site is a good concept, with some quite attractive original women, but the execution is too poor for me to recommend it. If they got rid of their HD policy, filmed scenes better, encoded the videos properly, and updated their navigation to at least include model names it would be a step in the right direction.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+The content is all exclusif.
+You get a discount in Janet's store for her dvd's and other articles.
+The site is still updating(more or less).
+You have about 170 different video scenes.
+This is the only place where you can see Janet do anal or a dp.
Cons:
-Most of the videos are broken into 2 or more clips and way too many of them have 4 clips and more.
-The photosets are mostly stills from the videos and they are also broken into 2 or more sets. Not to mention that you can't actually download them as a single zip file.
-Navigation basically consist of choosing video page, photo page or store page and then scrolling up or down those pages to see what's on them.
-There is no page break on the video page so you have to scroll a very long way up or down to see all of the available videos.
Bottom Line:
*Janet is a hot red head older woman who simply loves hardcore interracial sex and creampies but unless you want to download most of her videos in multiple clips then you are mostly going to be joining this site to get the discount in her store.
*You would think that anyone who has a personal site would actually have some personal stuff in it but this where you would be very wrong. This is basically a promotional site where you get to sample what is available in Janet's store. That would be fine if the site was free but it is 25$ to join and the only advantage is that you can download her videos in multiple clip format and where the older stuff looks awfull. You don't even get the chance to download complete photosets.
*I wish I could say that there is one single thing that makes joining this site worthwhile but I honestly can't. The 20% off her dvd's is not bad but unless you plan on buying more than 5 dvd's than it's cheaper to simply go on the guest part of her site and purchase her dvd's for 25$ instead of 20$.
*I can't really recommend this site to anyone except anyone that falls under the above comment*
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Unique concept and content, well done
+ Good quality videos
+ No DRM
+ Free access to two other sites
+ Bills with CCBill
+ Excellent forum which takes suggestions for scenes
+ Regular, dated updates
+ Full photosets including a zip file for each scene
Cons:
- Photos are small in size
- Later updates move away from original concept
- I found streaming slow
- Slightly confusing video options - some higher-resolution files are WMV only, some lower-resolutuon are MP4 only
- Same male models are reused over and over, and some aren't really that small
Bottom Line:
This is one hell of an unusual site, and I appreciate it's not really aimed at me - though I'm not entirely sure who it is aimed at! Sheer curiosity made me subscribe!
It's basically a kind mild femdom site, in that it focuses on women humiliating men who have a small penis. There's also a CFNM (Clothed Female, Naked Male) element to the majority of the scenes. It's certainly a very specialist niche. I guess it's aimed at anyone who likes to see men humiliated, and perhaps at men who have small penises who enjoy being humiliated.
I have always had a fetish for humiliation, so although I am gay there is not equivalent gay site, and CFNM-type sites, which tend to feature more ordinary-looking straight guys being humiliated by ladies who keep their clothes on, is therefore an interesting niche for me.
Most of the videos are themed around two or three women who get a guy naked on some pretext, then laugh and mock his small cock. They usually masturbate the guy till his comes then laugh at him all the more. The women mainly remained clothed, though often in skimpy outfits, and sometimes flash themselves or get completely naked to turn the guy on. There is the occasional bit of BDSM - the guy might get his balls kicked or his cock abused - but it's fairly mild and infrequent. Occasionally a guy with a larger cock is brought on to humiliate the small-cocked guy further.
The female models, whilst not in my area of expertise, do seem attractive and are mostly in their twenties and slender, though there is a sprinkling of older ladies too. Some remain clothed, some get naked or near-naked.
Later videos though in the last few weeks seem to be moving away from this concept, and feature solo female models who strip off and talk to the male viewer, mocking him for having a tiny penis. Occasionally she might have sex with a man with a big penis and tell the viewer he's a real man and he'd have no chance with her. Obviously this is aimed at heterosexual men who like to be humiliated, but I'm not sure how effective that would be - I've seen similar "humiliate the viewer" style porn myself and it never quite convinces for me. These are all recent videos and reflect a big depature for the site, as all previous videos featured a male model being mocked. Obviously these later videos are of no interest to me, and mean the site is heading in a new direction which may or may not work for you.
This brings me on to a weakness of the site - the repeated use of the same male models. Obviously finding models who are willing to be humiliated on a site like this is not easy - so the same model is often used repeatedly in several scenes. This is great if they have a model you like, but obviously not if you don't like one. The male models vary greatly - some young and cute, but more often in their 30s and 40s, with some quite overweight and not necessarily attractive - though again this kind of goes with the theme of the site. Some of the earlier models actually had quite average or even fairly large dicks, so it kind of didn't work on the realism side, though I still enjoyed them.
Acting is incredibly good - the women are great at dishing out the abuse and most of the male models are great at acting surprised, hurt, turned on etc. though some just kind of sit there a little dazed!
Video is a bit of a mixed bag. You can choose between WMV or MP4 for every scene, which is good, but sometimes the quality is different.
In later videos it seems both types are 1280x720, but one WMV version I tried had a bitrate around 10,000 and 23fps, the MP4 had 30,000 bitrate and 25fps. However, in older videos the MP4 version was the lower-quality, with a 856x480 size, and the WMV tended to be better quality, with a bitrate around 3,000 to the MP4s 1,500. So you'd have to download different file types to get the best quality depending on how old the video is. Quality did seem decent whatever I tried though, and it's all very professionally shot - well-lit and clear.
I found the streaming pretty slow - downloads were about average speed.
Each video has a full photoset, which is good, and a zip file for the photos, but the photos themselves are nothing special at 800x534, and are watermarked.
There is a forum where you can ask questions and even suggest scenes - they say if you suggest one and enough people like it they'll make it for you - I didn't read all the posts so I can't say for sure this does happen, but the administrator does seem to often reply to suggestions.
Overall this is an interesting site which I would recommend if anything about femdom/CFNM/humiliation does it for you - but be aware it is going in a new direction now.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
RK supports Roku. This is a big plus for Roku users.
Thousands of high quality scenes and movies.
No hang-ups or lockups downloading scenes to Roku.
Weekly updates to most content.
Exclusive content can't find elsewhere.
Many channels and interests served.
Average price/month, not too expensive.
Can rate movies/scenes. I like this feature.
Cons:
Ads bombard you when you first sign on. A serious pain. You will have to navigate through these before getting to main site. They try to up sell their other websites. Too easy to accidentally join something you don't want.
I wish there were more frequent updates.
I would like a category for vampire films.
Lots of content only available on web. To get to Roku, needed to add to favorites to see.
Some scenes shown, only available if you subscribe to that other channel RK offers, like Girlfriends Revenge.
Bottom Line:
With all the competition out there, RK needs to focus more on providing a better customer experience. Their ads and cross selling distract and confuse customers looking for their content. The ads are really distracting.
Updates once a week are nice, but offering them daily would be preferred. Their competition offers more frequent updates.
Still, if you don't mind the ads, you can't go wrong with RK. The site offers exclusive content, lots of young stars and has been a top performer over the years. The high quality videos are the icing on this cake. I would recommend them.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fairly good range of images and videos, many have a "real" amateur appearance, which I like - that was what prompted me to join, originally.
Cons:
Quality of pics and videos is not up to current standards. Lighting and production are often so amateur as to make it hard to appreciate the content.
Recently (actually, for some months now), all the "updates" have been regurgitated content from some time ago - I had a few videos saved, and when I went to download what looked like interesting new ones found they were identical, but are being promoted on the front page as "latest updates".
Bottom Line:
OK, but that's all I could say in fairness to all the other members here who have steered me right in the past. After I went to cancel was offered the opportunity to continue membership at a 96% discount (down to $1.96 per month, I think), which is about all it is worth now that there are no new updates. My memory isn't perfect, but I think the "NEW" headlines on the home page have been the same since I first joined nearly 12 months ago.
Sad to say, no longer worth it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Good quality photography
* Most girls are attractive and display a good attitude
* Good connection speed
* Navigation will mostly be familiar to users of other sites on Met-Art's network.
Cons:
* Streaming videos seem buggy if you want to do anything other than watch them from beginning to end without pauses or skips.
* Lots of strange insertions and weird borderline-BDSM pussy play (may be a pro to some)
* Very little, and mostly mediocre, boy/girl content
* Some videos are basically just the photo sets with a camcorder running (can hear posing instructions etc)
* Navigation options are very lacking and search often turns up irrelevant results. Has a tag system but searches seem to mostly ignore it.
* Model names aren't consistent with other sites, even other sites on the same network.
Bottom Line:
This is a site whose name I've been seeing for a LONG time. If it's not older than some of the girls in its newest sets, I'm pretty sure it's close - I'm fairly sure it debuted in the 90s, though it only specifically shows shoots back to 2005 at the moment, with selected older content relegated to an undated "archives" section.
I've liked a lot of the bits of content I've seen from them over the years, but never felt compelled to join until now. It seems to have recently been taken over by Met-Art. Like many other sites in their orbit of late, they're marketing it pretty aggressively, with a good discount available through PornUsers and an even better one having recently been e-mailed to current and former members of other sites in this network. On the basis of this, I signed up. Unfortunately I have just canceled after only four days (as always, the membership will still run for a total of a month, it just won't renew).
Partly this is because I mostly want boy/girl content and ALS has only recently started (or resumed - I could have sworn they had some in their early days?) shooting such content. I'd say well under a quarter of their recent updates (which occur once a day) have featured straight sex, and this content only dates back a few months.
However, it's hard to say for sure because there is no option to zero in on a particular type of content, other than a search box that seems to mostly pay attention to the (rather arbitrary) set titles. You'll look in vain for a list of categories on which you can click "boy/girl" and get a list of all the b/g content. Search for "boy/girl" and you'll get every set with "girl" in the title, which as you can imagine, is a LOT of them. This needs a rethink.
Once you've found what you're looking for, it's usually... good but not great. Nearly everything about this site is good but not great, actually (except the navigation which is downright bad). The looks of the models are good but not great, the creativity of the sets and shot choices is good but not great, technical aspects like connection speed are good but not great. Unfortunately with the number of sites competing for my dollar, "good but not great" isn't going to cut it. I certainly don't regret signing up, especially at the price they were offering as of a few days ago, but I don't see anything that compels me to renew.
As with network-mate Sexart (for which I would now want to revise my glowing review downwards a little), it seems to promise something amazing and groundbreaking but deliver something that's merely above-average.
Overall, I can honestly say this is a site I'd recommend, but only weakly so. It's definitely worth it at the very low prices on offer in various places lately. You might like it better than I did if you prefer solo or girl-girl action or if you're into things like a cute girl clipping a dream-catcher to her labia. (That kind of weird borderline-BDSM stuff is only in a minority of their sets, but it's conspicuous by the mere fact that it's there at all.) I can't say that's my thing; while I appreciate a more creative approach to porn, that isn't the direction in which I'd prefer to look for it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Perfect balance of picture and video content
- Immediate access to Bella Network including six solo sites
- Consistent quality of content throughout the site
- Updates are dated (including recent updates in Preview area)
- Additional content including blog, candids, behind the scenes
- Katie has an phenominal body, and seems to love modelling
- Easy navigation either via Bella Network or her own site
- You seem to stay logged in without username/password prompts
- CCBill with no pre-checked cross-sells
Cons:
Points marked with * don't bother me personally:
- Video previews are a bit limited
- Regional pricing
- No ZIP files for photo galleries
- Automatically generated username/password*
- Download limit of 12gb per 24 hour hour period*
- Katie has fake boobs*
- Photoshopping of her moles in photo updates
A note on Bella Network's piracy policy: Bella Network has a very strict piracy policy. They are extremely clear with this and spell it out in black and white prior to joining, in the confirmation email, and on the site. Occasionally legitimate members MIGHT get blocked - Bella have listened to member feedback and have made improvements to their customer service so that this can easily be investigated and rectified.
Bottom Line:
Katie has an incredible body, lots of enthusiasm and her site, like all in the Bella Network, is slick, high quality but still has the character of a amateur solo model site.
Once you're in the member's area, you see content and updates across the whole Network. You can filter by photos, videos, behind the scenes and archives, and sort by date or name.
You can also choose to view updates from a single site (ie, just Katie's) and there's also a search function where you can filter by category, or search by site. It's the same navigation style as Tia Ling's website, but it has been set up properly with content correctly categorised.
Currently the site advertises 13,738 photos, and 287 videos (51,445 photos and 935 videos across the network). On average, there's at least an update a day across the whole network, a consistent history of updates, and probably on average an update every 2-3 days on Katie's site alone including bonus content.
Bella Network is the best network of solo websites I have ever been a member of.
Katie is a softcore model. Most content is shot in and around the Bella Network house, so often in the bedroom, bathroom etc. Content includes masturbation, extreme close-ups of her tits, between her legs etc. Often sets will be a strip tease and masturbation from normal outfits or lingerie, but there's also themed sets such as Wonderwoman, Mistress etc.
Across the top are the following options:
VIDEOS: Currently 117 videos. When you click into 'videos', there are 20 updates per page with a short description, running time, date added, member's rating and an animated thumbnail when you hover over it. Click into the update, and there is a very short and rather generic description with the option to add to favourites or view comments.
You can watch the video as a Flash video (which you can skip to any point in, even when loading), or can download in many, many different formats, including:
Video size ranges from around 100-500mb - a superb range of options. Most follow the usual striptease then play formula, but there's a lot of more specialised videos such as focusing on her (ample!) boobs.
The most annoying aspect of the animated thumbnails is that they only reflect the first few minutes, so don't really show you much about the video. The best way to preview the video is with the Flash video, but of course that involves extra clicks which all add up when you consider the amount of content.
The video section also includes behind the scenes videos.
ARCHIVE: Currently 138 webcam videos. Most a decent, if slightly grainy quality and have approximately an hour's running time. Videos are downloadable in Flash format (approximately 250mb).
PHOTOS: Currently 179 galleries, averaging around 100 photos. Galleries are arranged as 20 per page with a thumbnail, description and date. The thumbnail animates when you hover over it so you can get a gist of the gallery.
Click into a gallery, and pictures are arranged as thumbnails with 20 per page, a short description and the option to view photos as 1500px- or 4000px-wide when you click on thumbnails.
Zips aren't available due to piracy concerns, and you can't right-click thumbnails and 'save target as' because the full-size photo is on a webpage, not just a JPG on its own. There is a medium-sized translucent watermark on full size images.
This might seem an unusual complaint, but Katie has a large mole under on her left boob. From what I can tell this is photoshopped out of all photos, but obviously appears in vids.
BIO: Vital stats and a very impressive and in-depth, 800-word biography - not the usual banal "I like sex" (although of course this is touched upon).
BLOG: Frequently updated, and as far as I can tell, by Katie herself. This is also very in-depth, features previews and personal thoughts.
CANDIDS: Currently 139 galleries of varying sizes. Features trips to zoos etc, flashing in public and self-shoot topless/nude pics. Very impressive.
BABECHAT: Chatroom for Bella models. Katie Banks and Bryci both take part in chats every couple of days, normally at either 7pm or 9pm EST.
Also included is WALLPAPERS/FAN ART and BELLA WEBCAMS (live sex chat webcams).
BELLA NETWORK: If you like Katie, you'll love the other sites:
Bryci - biggest site on the network, comparable to Katie Hunter Leigh - beautiful model, relatively new to Bella Lexi Mason - extremely petite, relatively new to Bella
Talia Shephard - similar to Katie again, frequent updates Ava Dawn - site no longer updating but has over 50 videos Monroe Lee - super-curvy but site no longer updating
This is a fantastic site, part of a fantastic network. Some might find some of the content network-wide a bit samey, but this is a high quality network with high quality models and a great mix of content, including great peeks into the model's lives via candids/BTS.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Exclusive Content
1280X720 about 3 mbps. For Husband wife team, video looks great (see note in cons)
Over 225 videos
- Weekly cam show, with archived shows in flash format
- Big network: you also get Nikki Benz, Gabby Quinteros,Puma Swede, Deauxma, Angelina Castro, Francesca, Sunny Lane, Julia Ann, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Bobbie Eden, Charlee Chase
Good variety: pegging (a rare find, especially in the pro-am segment), anal, lots of BJs, Hardcore and tit fucking, feet, lots of boy and girl ass play.
- pix are available in zip format. Over 200 sets.
- fun extras like a blog and wall paper
Cam network has as many as 6 girls on a day! Gotta love that
Cons:
Boob job (not a down side for me, but not everyone is me).
Husband/wife team, most shooting is tripod based
- many scenes are missing a description so you need to download to see if you like it.
Back catalog is poorly encoded, they really should re-encode
Organization is hurting. There are no tools at all just chronological setup. (pix organization isn’t much better with few categories to guide you (ie: friends, panties, outside)
The earliest videos are true amateur with loud music and 480X360 1.33 mbps quality (don’t worry things get better fast)
According to TBP, daily limit is 5 gigs. With modern file sizes pushing 700 mb, it’s very easy to hit that cap when you’re checking out content across the network. I know they need to fight piracy, but perhaps a better balance needs to be struck. (2/23: 10 gig limit - no warning when you get close :( )
- no g/g action (that I noticed anyway). I don't object (really not my favorite anyway) but I know some highly value that content.
Bottom Line:
Shandra is not afraid to get dirty, and I love that about her! She does talk in a bit of a high pitch some might say “little girl” voice. Some might love that, I’m rather indifferent and prefer genuine above all else.
That said if you’re looking for a hot, big titted (recently even bigger) MILF, this is the site for that. She has enough production value that you will be happy with the quality (especially the newer stuff), while still filling that Amateur) niche. I joined this network largely for Filthycuteonline, and stayed due to all the other great content. Shandra Fay is a real gem her. Great work. I highly recommend.
Shandra Fay has a great combination. She is dirty (as if the pegging and public flashing wasn’t enough to show that)! She as great personality that shines through. She has posted a number of “joke” videos and keeps a comedy section. She’s one of those people that has a contagious laugh and energy. The kind of person you can’t help wishing the best things find her.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Amateur fans should like the lack of "names"
+ WMV 320 and 720, Flash 720, iPod/iPhone, Quicktime files (oldest episodes still in RealMedia :chuckle:)
+ Access to 7 sites
+ Zip files for pictures
+ $15.95 discount offer at cancellation
+ Offer for $5.95 access to 2 more sites
Cons:
- Confusing navigation
- Just about all video files aren't properly named - Everything but zip files and pictures download as "1"
- 7 gig per day download limit per site (Per the webmaster)
- Individual pictures are small - 800 long side
- Larger pictures (1600 long side) only available in zip files
- One picture and one video update per week
- Some incomplete videos
- Video resolution not HD
Bottom Line:
Don't look for a slick production here - it's all about the content and there's plenty of it, dating back to 2007. Signing up to NDA gets you access to West Coast Gangbangs, Hot Wives and Girlfriends, Creampie Ebony, DP Amateurs, Creampie X, Elizabeth del Mar, Misty Parks, Tanya's Web and the Yahoo Club. Some of those, most notably the solo model sites, are very small, with small pics and low quality video. The Yahoo Club is where you can evidently hook up with women. It's moderated by Rick, the webmaster, and he says that he can "certify many of the sluts there". Personally, I didn't want to know what that means and can't comment further because I didn't click the link to find out.
I'd been here years ago and I can't say that the site looks any different than my last time in. Unfortunately, there's a lot of confusion in the mix. For example, files in Next Door Amateurs (NDA) and Amateur Creampies (AC) are intermixed, meaning you get files from both sites while browsing either one. Seems to me they could just put everything together in one huge site and be done with it. On top of that, there are models who have different videos on both NDA and AC, so you have to check the thumbnail and playing time to make sure the files are actually different. Next little issue - clicking a link for a picture set or a video takes you to another page where you choose another link for video, pictures or zip files. Clicking for video, you then choose file type and resolution. Unnecessary steps and needlessly confusing. But wait! There's more! Except for a few here and there, the video files all have the name "1". You have to rename each download and hop back and forth between sites to check for duplicates, making file organization very time consuming.
One surprise that sort of stands out in my mind is that, for some reason, there are a couple of files that are incomplete. The guy goes back in for a second time but we never get to see the money shot. Fade to black mid-stroke? Not sure what to make of that.
Much to the site's credit is Rick. He's super quick to respond to emails, most surprisingly to include requests to unblock you after you hit the download limit. It seems to me that, as long as you aren't hitting him every day to unblock you, he'll usually oblige. I have to make it known that I'm probably in the minority now when it comes to limits. As long as the file sizes aren't huge and the limit too restrictive, I understand that the sites are in it to make money and don't want their entire site downloaded in a week - especially one that's been around since 2007. I average about 30 files per 7 gigs here. Not bad when you figure what all you can get in 30 days.
Now here's the funny part (at least to me it is) After hitting this site with all the criticisms, I'll still say that diehard creampie and amateur fans should like this site. Just don't expect smooth going. There are lots of girl next door types, some hot, some not so much, but none that I had to pass on downloading. Especially for a first time join, there's a lot of content to be had. I give it a 78 based on three strengths - it's true to its niche, the amount of content to be had and Rick's attention to his subscribers. I wouldn't mind seeing them smooth out the navigation and put HD video on the menu, but I still like it enough to go back once in a while.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of material, hmmm - hard to think of many pros!! It is part of a large network, but the sites on the network share the same problems - unattractive models and poor video quality. Now some sitesd o have decent video quality and a few cute models.
Cons:
Quality of videos is absolutely horrible. The women are mostly not very attractive. If they were hot babes I'd overlook the poor video quality.
Bottom Line:
This is a waste of money. Don't understand why the site reviews are so positive, other than they make money when people join through them. Still, if you join for a month the wide variety of sites may make it worth it, but there is much better available on the web.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very unique, playful style - a true "indie" web site
Unique look and feel
Fairly exclusive European models
57 of the girls are French according to site
A few popular models
True High resolution images to 4000k- crisp images
HD videos for most models
Newer site so no old low res material!
Great search options
Model mouseover summary and "exposure limits" very helpful
Newer models/sets are very good
Coolest "Shop" area I'v ever seen.
A good deal for the price!
Cons:
Collection is not that large, but growing
Information is sparce once at the model pages
Rating system is confusing (model or set?)
Can't search by model score.
Many Models are not very engaging
Many models are pretty but not knockouts
Many models/sets are not nude
Navigation/viewing options are limited
(i.e. 10 models per page, 18 sets per page)
There are a few minor navigation issues (page back does not work so you have to reload a lot)
A few broken/incorrect links (might be in the middle of upgrading )
Set dates are not universally available.
Bottom Line:
This is the type of site that reminds me how incredibly difficult it must be to run a popular, successful porn site. They do many, many things really well here, but the overall package falls a little short, overall score-wise, of the big players.
This is currently a nude and non-nude modeling site. mostly passive, candid, single model, photography. No sex, nothing kinky in any way with the exception of a very small number of VERY light B&D sets. In this regard, it is kind of like the local strip club....the girls you WANT to see more of are not the girls you ARE seeing more of, if you catch my drift. If you have an appetite for sex scenes, toys, bondage, close-ups, spread legs, anything more than passaive nude modeling photogrpahy, this may not be the site for you at the moment, but check back as it looks like the folks here are making some very positive improvements in both the site and the collection. If you are the type who likes passive scenes, dressing room shots, that kind of thing, then this may be an EXCELLENT site for you. Frankly, there is a lot of variety here and my tastes, admittedly, run toward more engaging solo scenes.
Here are some basics from what I can tell...
About 100 models
About 350 sets
1 new set every 2-3 days
Sets have between 30 and 60 images
Models all seem to be 18-24
Model are, as the name implies, petite.
Most sets are in studio.
The design of this site makes it fun and different. I think the webmasters were trying to incorporate a Moulin Rouge kind of feel, and they came very close to pulling it off. Model thumbnails are shown full sized and they go nude with a mouse-over. Saw the technique in a french body study years ago and it is VERY effective here at showing you exactly what the models look like. Clicking on a model brings a pop-up that shows all of her sets. Once you select a set, you get about 36 images per page, a "stars" score, and a thumbnail slider that allows you to go to other sets of the same model. Very nice concept. In execution, though, the name of the model does not show up on the model page anywhere, only in the hard-to-read thumbnails, the stars scoring is not immediately clear (model or set? SET!), the model bio is not available from here, the sets are not dated here, the cover images are included for sets scheduled for up to a month away (so you click on a model and a set and THEN find that the set isn't on the site yet). Some navigation options are missing, but don't hit back-page here (or ANYWHERE) or you will have to reload your browser. (I also clicked on something once or twice and got dropped into a shell directory where I shouldn't have been...looks like they are in the middle of upgrades.) I love the navigation style here, but it could be much better with a few small tweaks.
When you first look at the site, it really does give a Moulin Rouge feel. The sample images are representatative, so you honestly see what you get.
The photography, though competent, is sometimes a little weak. There are some excellent studio sets, but many sets are passive, so you feel like you are following the model around through her apartment or something. There is a little model interaction with the photographer (and therefore the viewer), but not much. This may be more about the models,as the more popular models are more interactive (it is part of what makes them popular) than the neophytes. But the incongruity between the playful feel of the site and the passive feel of many of the sets is what makes things a little...off here. They need a little more of the sexual energy you find at Twisty's or ALSscan...you usually only get that with the hyper-confident pro-models or with a photographer/shoot team that is ungodly talented. I noticed that many commenters like the passive stuff and frankly have no idea how one would balance the two styles. I have to say, though, that the newer photography is much, much better in terms of interaction and content than the older stuff, so clearly somebody here gets it.
I really want this site to be a success. It is different. It is unique. It is not a formula web site. It deserves to be successful. I could easily and rightfully compare it to an Indie in the movie industry. But the problem with indies is that, although they are often critically acclaimed, they just as often don't get the popular vote simply because they are not following the popular formula or because of one or two faults. This site COULD be a Kill Bill, a Pulp Fiction, A Quentin Tarantino kick-ass example of a web site. Unfortunately, it isn't quite there....yet. Clearly, I am rooting for it, though.
Bottom line: A very unique site that is worthy of a look. With a few tweaks in the site and content, this could be among the top players and it seems as though the webmasters here are figuring that out. I will absolutely be back in a year or so to see how things have progressed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Discounted price of $17.95 available through PU/TBP
Aaliyah is a real doll with a great personality.
Part of a network of 15 solo model sites others of which include Dylan Ryder, Hanna Hilton, Cherry Petite, Abbey Brooks, Monica Mayhem plus many more
Aaliyah’s site has been online 5 years and has a good amount of content for a solo site with 276 photo sets and 228 movies. There are also 80+ archived cam shows available for streaming.
Site is still updating, seems to be about one new scene a week at the moment.
Videos offered in multiple formats and resolutions including 1080p hd.
Most photo sets are 1000 x 1500 px with a slide show and zip download.
Lots of info provided, date content posted, file sizes and run times along with nice scene descriptions
Some model interaction, Aaliyah has a blog, some personal photos and pods, wallpapers, a question and answer feature and she usually replies to comments on movies and photos.
Only log in once to access entire network.
Cons:
Pre-checked cross sells
Only about 3 of the network sites appear to be still updating.
Some of the bonus sites only have a small amount of content.
Those looking for boy/girl hardcore action won’t find any in Aaliyah’s site but there is plenty across the other network sites.
Very basic navigation across the network, no search or tags, just very general categories like movies, image sets, solo, hardcore and girl/girl,
Videos released prior to 2010 generally max at 640x360
Aaliyah’s cam shows which were previously a feature of the site seem to have fallen by the wayside, there has been nothing scheduled during my time here and the last archived show was dated 19 July 2012 so perhaps a sign that she is losing interest in the site and moving on to other things.
Bottom Line:
For me Aaliyah Love is the star in this network of solo sites and is the site I specifically joined the network for. She’s just the kind of model I like, I would guess around early to mid-20s with cute girl next door looks, long blonde hair, petite frame and small natural breasts. She has a small tattoo on her left shoulder blade which didn’t bother me too much.
Aaliyah was a hit with me since her content is geared primarily towards my niche interest of solo girls dressed in cute outfits with striptease leading to explicit nudity and masturbation with and without toys. Aaliyah also seems well in to girls and gets up to plenty of naughty lesbian action with various girl friends as well as a few scenes with three or more girls. Overall I would estimate the content to be about 80% solo to 20% lesbian.
The photos at 1500px on the long end while not as big as I would ideally have liked were none the less of excellent quality and very professionally done. I actually found the photographer here quite creative and the selection of outfits, locations and scenarios varied enough to keep me interested and prevent that feeling of repetitiveness creeping in which you sometimes get when going through over 200 photo sets of the same model. Aaliyah always looks like she’s enjoying herself and her personality really shines through in the photos.
Likewise in the videos I found Aaliyah’s bubbly, chatty personality added to the entertainment value of her solo vids and delayed the onset of boredom which usually comes quickly for me when watching videos. I particularly liked her collection of masturbation instruction videos. The solo videos usually lasted around 10-15 minutes and the lesbian ones 20 minutes plus. Latest video releases have 4 flash streaming options (1920x1080 5Mbps,1280x720 3Mbps, 854x480 2Mbps and 480x270 1Mbps) and up to 11 different download options (1920x1080 8Mbps, 1280x720 5Mbps, 854x480 3Mbps and 480x270 1Mbps in both wmv and mp4, 480x270 1Mbps in mpeg, iphone/mobile and ipod/psp formats). Going back through the archives to 2010 and beyond you will start to lose the hd options.
I’ve seen a lot of solo model sites over the years and this is definitely one of the better ones, highly recommended if Aaliyah is your kind of girl.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the models are really beautiful
Most are at least good looking
Most are natural, not enhanced.
100% original content
Exclusive models as far as I can tell
Reasonable variety of body dimensions
Cons:
Well....
Sets are not dated.
Unknown update frequency.
Can't tell if sets are recycled.
No HD found so far
Images and zips are 1600x1067 MAX!!
Navigation is a little clunky
Site is mostly bathing suit and lingerie shots.
Models are not very animated (most just standing)
Softer than soft core...really a bikini site with extras.
Not a particularly good value at $29.95.
Bottom Line:
About 210 models and 1475 sets.
Very few videos but all are decent quality.
Sets have between 30 and 120 images.
Vast majority of sets are bikini/lingerie sets.
This is an odd, sort of misidentified site and I just can't understand why they didn't define it better. (Sorry TBP...) Probably 97% of the girls are NOT NUDE! This would be a classic tease or bikini site if it were not for the occasional nude set. Even the nude sets, most of them anyway, are not particularly revealing. I've seen more on the Chive, Maxim or free web sites. Much more. But then, oh wait, there are two or three models that get naked and provide extreme close-ups. Waaaat? What's THAT about? No wonder TBP had such a hard time defining the site. It's like the sock drawer of nude sites! Most things in there match up with a specific genre ou would expect, but rogue loners to make you wonder what's going on....
Maybe the next best way I can define this site, besides as a tease site, is outdated. Navigation is good but not ideal. You can filter the models by odd preferences like "wet" (as in water),"fishnet", "see-thru", "blond" and, oh yea, "nude" and even "extreme close up" which is just wierd compared to the rest of the site. You can't select multiples, so no way to see wet blonds, etc. And "see-thru" applies to a top worn over a bathing suit as often as something you can actually see parts through.
When you select a model, you get a list of her sets. The sets have tags like "fishnet", bathing suit", "nude", etc. that match the search parameters. These are site defined. Select a set and you get the first batch of 30 thumbnails. If there is nudity, it is often very late in the set. Some sets have over 300 images, so you have to go through 10 pages or more to see everything. You can also navigate directly to a page. Or you can download the entire set in a zip file.
The sets are not dated, so you have no idea how old they are. You also don't know how many images are in a set until you look. The image or file sizes are also not listed. The tags are helpful, but "nude" in this case might mean a nip slip. Ad if the model is nude, chances are pretty good that they superglued her legs together. Many of the girls that are nude are all crossed up like they have to pee! Some are only topless. One kind of interesting thing is that the girls may go nude but cover up everything with thier hands....until they turn around. That all of a sudden you'll get this beautiful standing rear view. The photographer seems to have a knack for these rearview shots as they occur pretty consistently in clothed and nude models.
Oh, yeah. The photography. Competent. Nothing special. No photoshopping. Some studio sets. Since most of the girls are clothed, it looks like the photographer often takes the models to a local hotel pool or maybe some gardens someplace. You can tell that many of the model sets were shot on the same day with the same locale. Nothing even remotely exotic in the locations.
Now if you are LOOKING for a bikini site, this one is probably not bad, but the occasional rogue naked close-up model kind of messes up that niche.
If this were my site, I would probably break it up into a "network" of three sites that might include bikini, lingere and nude sites. The price I paid, $29.00 was probably about $10.00-15.00 high considering comparable sites with tens of thousands of high-resolution images and HD videos.
Bottom line? If you are looking for some exclusve non-nude photography and don't mind a little nudity mixed in, this is a good site for you. If you are used to the top softcore sites, pass on this one...at least until the price comes down.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Thousands of scenes (in excess of 5200) dating back to at least to 2004
They update between one and three a day.
Some of the updates are ReMastered older material but since they put update as the current date, it is impossible to tell how old it is.
$9.95 for first month
Newer scenes (2012) in HD (1080p & 720p)
Vanilla porn
Cons:
Older scenes (2007 and earlier) are of the quality equal to the worst tube sites.
Nothing changes except the players putting out Vanilla Porn.
A lot of their scenes in 2011 & 2012 have downloads of 1080p & 720p in a format of f4v which means another player (I think - I didn't pursue it much)
Very little wet oral or anal sex (less than 10% of all videos have anal sex) .
Bottom Line:
"Nobody" "Nobody" "Nobody Does it Better"
If you like your porn vanilla by the numbers porn then you need go no further than this site. There is nothing wet or slippery about this site. While each scene is set up as a fantasy, it's nothing more than a set up for the same Old Routine.
Scene setup, oral, reverse cowboy, doggy, missionary, oral, cowboy, pop shot. The only thing that differs are the players. (Without ever joining, SexArt has better fantasy, production quality and looks so much better - and this just from doing the tour.)
The enthusiasm of the players is non existent. No heat. Even though they get a good line up of mainstream performers they don't let them loose.
Frankly I got bored real quick. I downloaded 3 scenes that interested me. The reason I went there to begin with was a scene with Rachel Milan with two guys and that was an anomaly cause that seldom happened - actually 4 times was there any DP.
And of course, for me and my niche, while they claim over 1200 scenes of deepthroating, they are very delusional in making such claims. I found only one worthy of beat material (Kitty Bella & Randy Spears). And, they had some outstanding deep throaters in attendance.
A lot of times I found the camera work wretched - like when the oral is going on, the camera operator pans down away from the action to look at something and back up rather than pulling out from the close up. The perfect example of this is Katsumi throating Bruce Venture and the operator pans down for a shot of her tits. Like, wtf dude?
I quit the site after this continually happened as I found it extremely irritating and totally unprofessional.
That about sums it up. My rating is subjective to my tastes and though I am open to evaluating different sex scenes outside of my niche, I'm parched after spending a couple of weeks on this site.
There might be something for some of our readers (I highly recommend Slutty's review below), but not for me and thus I can't even give it a "might recommend" score.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Broad range of model types
- Logically laid out
- Good mix of amateur and pro models
- High quality photos
- Low annual price
Cons:
- Photos only, no videos
- No zip options
- Multiple clicks to get to high-res pics
- Some overlap with their free site
- Some topless, none nude
- No monthly membership, annual only
Bottom Line:
This isn’t a porn site in the traditional sense. I’m merely stating an objective fact for prospective members rather than making a subjective judgment. Whether the site is worth joining is probably up to how much you like what they have to offer, which, I guess, is one way that this is definitely like a porn site.
Microminimus is the ‘community’ site for Wicked Weasel Bikinis. WW is an Australian swimwear company known for making ‘barely there’ swimwear like micro-thongs. They also offer swimwear made of see-through material. There are also some accessories, but the overall theme of the company is skimpy swimwear. This site offers photos of WW’s professional models as well as submissions from their happy customers.
The site is logically laid out. Photos can be sorted by newly added, updated, popular and wallpapers. Also on offer are photo sets from ‘competitions.’ These are set around a theme, Christmas, for example, and users submit photos and members vote on them. I find these are a great mix and so far I’ve spent a lot of my time on the site here. There are also archives for Cover Girls (seems that this can be a pro or amateur) and contributor archives. Another advantage is that they offer archives of the photos of their professional models that they use at their main site where they sell their bikinis.
There does appear to be some overlap between what is available for free at the commercial site and this ‘community’ site though I really have no idea how extensive that overlap is. There is a difference though: on the free site you only get lower-res photos while on the paid site you get access to higher-res photos. That may not be such a big deal though as the low-res photos on the free site are close and in some cases larger than the low-res photos on the paid site. (The low-res on both free and pay are approximately 950x663.) The higher resolution photos come in at 853x1280. That’s not much of a difference and it might not be a big enough difference to counter the work you have to go through to get the higher-res photos. The only lure for spending the $25 annual fee to join will probably be access to more photos, not higher-res photos.
The way the site is laid out and the overlap among how the galleries are organized it is pretty much impossible for me to say with any certainty how many galleries and photos there are here. There are certainly hundreds of photos, and more likely well over a thousand. Ten thousand? I doubt it.
Because the site relies so much on user-submitted photos there are a broad range of model types here. There are models who look like they could easily get modelling work at legitimate fashion shoots, models who could easily get work on adult sets, and models who probably shouldn’t model. I realize that may seem harsh, but some women shouldn’t wear WW bikinis. You don’t see me flaunting my 46-year-old body in a speedo. (Photos available upon request…)
The photo types themselves vary, but there is one certainty: this site doesn’t have full nudity. Some of the models go topless, some don’t. Some of the photo competitions specifically prohibit topless submissions. I find this very odd. Why make that choice? My guess is that the photos can then be used as marketing on their public site to drive sales. Even with the ban on nudity many of the photos can be pretty risqué. We are, after all, seeing photos of women in micro-mini bikinis that are often made out of translucent material. Some of us older guys can still draw on the days when our imaginations played a role in arousal.
If the site has a major flaw (and it DOES have a major flaw) it is that there are no gallery zips offered. So if you like a particular model or theme then be prepared to work to get what you want. To make matters worse, clicking on a photo opens the lower-res version. To get the higher-res version you have to go near the upper-left corner of the screen a click an icon which will then open the high-res photo in a new window. Then you can save it. And close the new window. And go back on the original page to click on another photo to start the labourious process all over again. If I wanted a hobby that required work I’d take up cabinetry.
So can I recommend this site? No, I can’t, but I don’t feel too bad about that since this really isn’t a site that fits well here either. I think the target market for this site is someone who’s girlfriend posts pics here and you want to show those off. If they offered zips I might lean to recommending it (but probably still wouldn’t). If they offered video I might think about recommending it, but they don’t. The good news is that it isn’t expensive at $25 per year. The bad news is that I now have to remember to cancel the membership in 11 months.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Some really cute girls have featured here over the years
Lots of material gathered of teen cuties
Not bad little setups to make it seem more real
Quite a lot of dirty talk so I liked that element.
Good fair valued price for the network.
Cons:
Huge downloads that are far to big to be practical then you are down to low quality, nothing inbetween.
Sadly very few girls here do anal, would of loved to of seen more of this.
Also very few group scenes, I'm a massive fan of the girl/girl/boy scenes and seen a couple on here but not seen many, would of been nice to of seen more of these. There was a nice one however with Karina White and Lily Carter.
Few too many tattoos, really un-feminine I find tat, so was put off by the amount of tats too these young girls have, I'll never understand the logic in making yourself get caked in these permanent things.
The network does bombard you lots now with ads for other site, becoming a trend amongst sites these days, can get annoying, cause I paid for this site, shouldn't in updates have updates from other sites I'm not a member of, I don't wanna see them.
Bottom Line:
I like Reality Kings mainly for this site, We Live Together and Moms Bang Teens. One thing I really didn't like though was the file sizes, they are huge beyond belief with the new movies they make. some 4gb or 5gb even I think I came across, I don't have that sort of room on my hard drive for movies that I think are only average, but then the next one down can be 400mb or less which is the other end of the spectrum and too lower quality for me. So I found a great tool free make video converter, it was free hence the name but was great for cutting down videos to a decent quality and size, I was downloading the big files and then putting them through this converter, took a while but you get a movie 720p which I find fine for me and weighed in at 1gb to 1.5gb which I could live with, if it looked like a movie I wasn't all that into I would go for the lower quality one.
I join this site's network probably once a year and this time there was some good movies that had been on site, some real hot girls and on a whole I'd say it has improved this last 6 months along with the other sites I like so I was pleased with that.
Overall I really like Pure18 and think its a great addition to the network and makes a change from the big butt obsession and VIP parties this network is fond of. It now has a nice mix with something for everyone, which is good, would be better if everything was exactly to my taste lol but you can't have everything.
Yeah I'd join again and always keep a close eyes on what updates they have here.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Desirae is a hot wife (now ex-wife) who specializes in pulling cum from old pervs watching on the web. I was a member for one year and felt that the product was worth the price.
She has a few lesbian scenes which, IMHO, are much more realistic than the standard issue porn release with a Barbie and a hot Latina going at it with a groan every five seconds.
Some of the plot lines of her vids are very erotic, such as taking the virginity of a friend's son.
Access to many other channels are available in the subscription.
I had no major problems with this site.
Cons:
-Daily download limit
-Mostly POV; earier vids only one cock (husband)
-The procedure to download vids is confusing, i.e., hit-or-miss, learn as you go.
-Not all vids available for download
-Extra channels mostly low def, older content
-Some of her earlier work no longer available and I have to ask... Why?
Bottom Line:
I first saw this site advertised on WifeysWorld and thought it would be a good porn venue... I was correct; worth the money. Some of her earlier vids are major hot when her husband was the stunt cock.
After her divorce, seems like the "hotness" ratings started to go south.
Desirae is aging very well; still a fucking hot older woman. I would recommend Naughty at Home. I am thinking about another year subscription myself.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Fairly large network of 6 solo model sites and 1 multi-model site.
- High quality on nearly all sites.
- Network is an even better value if you like the models that have a high amount of content. I will list amounts of content for each site in the BL.
- Seems to be quite a bit of interaction with the models.
- Download speeds will vary from site to site, but never drops to a bad level.
- Navigation is excellent for a network, it includes and easy to use drop-down box that allows you to move from site to site without the hassle of signing in on each.
- I personally find all of the models attractive.
- No cross-sales on registration and ads are non-existent in members area as well. It's one of those sites that should get some bonus points for clean site design without annoyances.
- There is some, though not a lot, more hardcore scenes on the sites. So it's not all just softcore or just masturbation.
Cons:
- The webmaster explained in replies of my Bryci review. There are no photo zips. If nothing else, I feel like it should be mentioned since photo collectors will see that as a dealbreaker.
- Download limit has been raised to 12 GB per day and I really don't see it as that bad unless you download the 1920x1080 files. I've somehow found moderation in my downloading over the years and am having no trouble with the download limit.
Bottom Line:
I did a separate review for the Bryci site which is included in this network. I felt like it was quite a bit better than the other sites and deserved it's own standalone review. First thing I'm going to do is list the numbers for each site. I will count these numbers by using a manual method of X amount of scenes per page multiplied by number of pages. I will use this method of describing them (standard video = masturbation/tease. BTS = Behind the Scenes. Webcam = webcam archive)
Ava Dawn - 32 standard videos, 15 BTS, 4 Webcam, 42 photo sets.
Bella Girlfriends - 7 standard videos, 61 photo sets Bryci - See my separate review. This is by far the largest site in the network. The numbers are for combined types of videos (329) and photo sets (280) candid photo sets (62) Hunter Leigh - 24 photo sets, 0 videos. Katie Banks - standard videos (112), Webcam (127), photo sets (172), candid photo sets (131) Lexi Mason - standard videos (16), photo sets (28) Monroe Lee - standard videos (18), webcam (25), photo sets (111). candid photo sets (5) Talia Shepard - standard videos (49), BTS (19), Webcam (112), Photo sets (118), candid photo sets (38).
If you notice one model missing, Renna Ryan, the content was up the first few days I was a member, now the site is giving me a "content not available" message when I sign in. She also is no longer listed in the BellaGirls, so I guess that was just bad timing since it was there just a few days ago.
I bring this up because Renna was an extra selling point for me since I have always liked her. On the other hand, the site was relatively small and the last 6-8 videos were during her pregnancy. Overall, her site was a disappointment so I don't think you're going to miss it much.
If you will also notice, several of the models have more webcam archived videos than anything else. I do like these, but there's no way, short of watching everyone of them to say what percentage is just talking or teasing or masturbation.
I was not familiar with any of these models except the aforementioned Renna Ryan and Talia Shepard. Talia's site is above average, so if you like her it's worth noting that it's one of the bigger sites on the network. I even found a new one I'll be watching for more content of, Ava Dawn, who I wasn't the least bit familiar with.
I went to the oldest videos on each site and it looks like all standard videos have the full selection of video options. I'll list them again:
MP4 - 1920x1080, 1280x720, 640x360
WMV - 1920x1080, 1280x720, 640x360
Flash - 900x506
3GP - 352x288
As I mentioned in the Bryci review, I prefer the Flash ones for the combination of good quality and the files are not overly large. If anyone has trouble playing Flash videos, I use either VLC or Windows Media Classic Home Cinema.
The content mostly follows the same path from site to site. It's mostly softcore teasing and masturbation. I'm not for sure if the hardcore number is high since several of the hardcore scenes I had seen on here were on the Renna Ryan site.
Picture sets have a viewing option of 1500x933 or vice versa and 4000x26xx or vice versa. These pictures are very good, look to be professional shot so without zips, you're going to need to be ready to right click, save as on the ones you like.
The webcam videos are decent quality, look to be in the 360-480p range and are entertaining.
It's worth noting that several of these models, Bryci, Talia especially, have very good personalities and can pull off these 40ish minute webcam shows without a hitch. I still haven't seen a live webcam show, but it's more based on me never having a chance to sit down and watch one, so these archived ones are a nice addition.
As a whole, the network averages over 1 update per day. In the most recent months, there are these numbers.
January 1-28: 39 updates.
December 2012: 47 updates.
November 2012: 39 updates.
So it's an active network as you can see. I will touch on the no zips one last time since I think the Hunter Leigh site shows the downside of no zips. It has no videos, 24 photo sets and no zip downloads. She's a very pretty/cute model, but without anything to download, I probably won't visit it for more than a few views of pictures with nothing left to show for the membership to it.
I do think this network as a whole is good though. It helps that I really like Bryci and Talia Shepard. Having their videos in a high number like the network has offsets the cons. I don't think Renna's site would have helped or hurt the score any since it did look to be relatively small. If memory serves me right it only had 2 pages of videos, 2 of photos and maybe with her pregnancy she didn't want the content posted anymore.
I'm going a bit high on the score based on liking the Bryci site so much. The network is worth a join if you like solo models and especially if you prefer videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Bryci is a sensual, brunette model who excels at posing, teasing and may be the best solo masturbation model I've seen in a few years.
- The site itself is pretty big, but not all scenes are masturbation, quite a few BTS, non-nude talking, will list the numbers in BL.
- Archive has webcam archived videos.
- From what I can see, all videos on the site are available in 1980x1080. Multiple video download options on all videos except webcam archives.
- Download speed is relatively good, but you will occasionally run into a slower moving file. I can max out at 3.8 MB/s, most will download around 3.0 MB/s, but a few were in the 1.6-1.9 MB/s range.
- Pictures are nice, but I had a few problems with them which will be in cons.
- Comes with 7 other similarly themed sites, the size of each greatly varies and I will do a review of the overall network separately to get all the numbers in.
- Price isn't too bad for the quality and especially if you like the models.
Cons:
- Pictures aren't zipped. This could be a major con to picture lovers since they have very high quality pictures 2662x4000.
- Download limit. Normally this would annoy the hell out of me, but I don't download near as much as I used to. It's listed as 9 GB per day, Webmaster says 10 GB, the most I've downloaded in a day is 5 GB, so I've had no problems with it. And since the terms say no scripts are allowed, I'm guessing you can't use a bulk image downloader for the pictures. It isn't being a problem for me though I thought it should be mentioned. One workaround without breaking the rules is to download the smaller quality videos, which I will get to in the BL.
Bottom Line:
Bryci has to be considered a serious contender for top solo model. The one negative some will find is she has implants, but I've never minded those either unless they are badly out of proportion. Hers aren't. The site is full of high quality content as well. I'm going to focus this next part on the numbers and qualities available since there is a download limit.
I'm counting 329 video scenes as of 1/27/13. There are 5 types of video scenes. Standard masturbation, Behind the Scenes, teasing, talking, webcam archive. The BTS and talking ones aren't something I'm going to download since there is a download limit, so those can be taken out of the equation. Her teasing scenes are short in length, 4-6 minutes usually, but if the attire she has on it is your thing, these are worth downloading. She has one scene in a white thin dress, in the shower, that is great as well as a workout tease scene that I loved.
The scenes I downloaded were masturbation, some teasing and the webcam archive. There's roughly 110 masturbation and/or tease scenes, it's hard to put a number on the webcam scenes that involve masturbation or nudity without watching them all, but several I've watched do have masturbation in them. It almost looks like Bryci may have started out as a tease type model. The videos date back to January 2009, so that's 4 years of content and plenty of time for her to have evolved from tease to masturbation. Most of the first year of updates are of the tease and BTS variety.
I know there are people who like the talking videos, but I'm sticking with my standard on those, I don't want to pay for a video of a woman answering questions. It seems to be a whole section of "Ask Bryci" videos. There also is an Amazon button so you can buy presents for Bryci, which I've laughed at dating back to Raven Riley. One more time, I pay to see your porn, not to have an option to pay for your gifts.
The video download options do vary since 1/5, maybe 1/4 are webcam, these are in Flash only, but you can download them.
The other videos have:
MP4 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 640x360.
WMV 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 640x360.
Flash 900x506
3GP 352x288
As you can see, the downloading options are very good and I personally download the Flash ones since it limits the size of the file, while giving me still good quality. From what I see in the members area you have all these options on all videos except the webcam archives.
The pictures are overall a disappointment. I've always removed points for no zip files and have removed 5 points from this review for it since I think the pictures add a lot to a solo site. I guess it's okay to download one at a time if you want to make you own set, but I would much prefer a zip option to download the whole set. It seems to go into a hollow debate of why have 4000 high end pictures if the members can't download the whole set. While I'm sure there are some who wouldn't want to download an entire set of photos at that high of quality since it would be a fairly big file. I like the option of having the option to download if I want them though.
Navigation is very easy, site design is nice and clean. There also are webcam shows, but I haven't watched any. Each thing you would need from navigation is in a toolbar towards the top of the screen, the only thing I would add is an option to filter out BTS scenes and separate webcam archive, but those are minor complaints since the title of each video says, "BTS" or "Webcam" so you don't have to guess at them.
Where Bryci earns the high score is in her performances. She's quite confident, seems to love teasing and works the camera as well as dare I say, a young Eve Angel. The eye contact with the camera, the "I know you're watching" expressions, is the best I've seen since 2006 Eve Angel. That alone keeps me interested in her content. She also seems to be pretty natural in her poses unlike a lot of Euro glam models. She shows a fun and playful side as well.
You do get access to Bella Pass Network which includes 6 other solo models and one other site that is a multi-model site. I won't go into those since I want to review the network as a whole, separately, but Bryci does seem to be the star of the network.
Bryci's site itself seems to update with video or photos 10 times a month. There also is a blog if you're interested in that and it is very active from what I saw of it. In January alone, there were 11 new entries in the blog.
One last part on the download limit. Downloading Flash files, I downloaded 12 videos earlier for a total of 2 GB. So considering I don't want the BTS or talking videos, I should be able to get most of the scenes I want without breaking the download limit.
Overall, download limits and no picture zips, notwithstanding, I would highly recommend it to solo fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ What video content there is, is VERY hot
+ Updates on average 2 - 3 times per week, though not consistently
+ Extensive user forum (though this is flawed)
+ As far I can tell, no regional billing
+ No DRM
+ Choice of two good billers - CCBill or Verotel
+ All-exclusive content
+ The only pure, true CFNM site I have yet found
Cons:
- Have gone back to being a picture-only site - as of August 6, 2012 no new videos have been uploaded at the time of this review. NO warning of this in preview, no explanation of why in-site.
- Pictures are good-quality, but downloading is a joke - no zip files, no collections - must download each picture one by one
- Very expensive ($39.95 1st month, $34.95 after), especially now no more videos
- Poorly-designed site with poor search functions, ancient design and a mess of a forum
- Forum is completely ignored by site management, no suggestions seem to be taken on board.
- Downloads and streaming the slowest I've ever seen on any site.
- $1.95 additional joining fee if using Verotel, never found that at any other site.
- Each story is split into many small scenes which constitute each update
- Many videos still unique to a sister-site - see below.
Bottom Line:
This is my third review. I am writing it with a heavy heart, because this site has so much potential and could easily be the best CFNM site ever, but it's taken yet another one of its abrupt policy reverses, so it's on entirely the wrong track again.
What I will say is that CFNM.net is, in my opinion, the only true CFNM site on the internet. The scenarios and stories are superb, the models incredible, the acting is good and believable - focusing purely on past content this site should be scoring my first ever 100.
So how did we get to 60 as a score for a site which can produce the best content ever?
Simply - they cannot decide what they want to be - a picture site, or a video site. They change their minds and their policies more often than the guys get naked!
CFNM.net has always described itself more as a picture site, and they have a "sister" site, CFNM.TV, which is supposed to be the video site. Sounds fair and straightforward - you want pictures, you join this site. You want the videos, you join CFNM.TV.
That could work, except CFNM.TV is a lousy video site, and CFNM.net is a lousy picture site.
CFNM.TV, according to the previews, hasn't been updated for months. It doesn't have all the the video content CFNM.net does, even though it's supposed to be the video site, and what is does have (some of which CFNM.net doesn't have) is riddled with the most intrusive, crappy DRM I've ever known which makes you log in to watch each video, won't work unless you use Windows, and means downloads stop working the second your subscription expires - you CANNOT download to keep.
As a picture site, CFNM.net is lousy because although the pictures are high-quality - well-lit and professional - for a so-called picture site they are a joke. You get one size only, the viewer is clunky, and you CANNOT download the photosets as one file - zipped or not. No, you have to click on each individual picture (and each story has hundreds), then click on the "download to computer" link and download each picture manually. This would take you weeks of painstaking work.
When I did my last review, CFNM.net seemed to be improving. CFNM.TV was active but seemed to be abandoned, with no new updates. The video updates were being uploaded to CFNM.net, and they were also uploading old footage previously exclusive to CFNM.TV but WITHOUT the DRM. I was hoping they were going to upload the CFNM.TV-exclusive stuff as "new" updates, then when they'd done it all, quietly close CFNM.TV.
Nope! When I left the site last July, I was almost done downloading the last of a video set. When I rejoined six months later, I downloaded the last couple of updates from that set and then found the entire six months worth of updates after that were photo-only. No mention of this in the preview, nothing on the site I can see about a change in policy - it's just back to photo-only.
However CFNM.TV seems to only have had one update with a video of some old CFNM.net content. So, we're back to two sites which between them have incredibly hot content, but which are so badly designed and run you can't satisfactorily access either.
CFNM.net has an extensive forum where these and my other complaints all as listed above are discussed - but from what I can see, nobody from the site itself ever answers or pays the slightest bit of attention to anything said on the forum. The forum is also practically a seperate site, which its own seperate log-in, no integration to the main site, and ancient layout.
I don't intend to go over the details of the site - it's all in my previous reviews, one of which is still active at the time of writing - and nothing has changed since.
Suffice it to say, if you've never joined this site before then I would strongly recommend you do, as it has some incredibly hot content - but then accept you will never know whether they ever intend to upload more videos again, that the photos are a complete pain in the ass to download, and that CFNM.TV is a joke.
If you have joined before, certainly in the last six months, then you will already have all the video content they're offering and even if you like photos, downloading them will be such a pain I don't think it's worth joining it again.
I will certainly be cancelling before auto-renew and I have already downloaded the two videos I wanted. Nothing else on the site is of interest.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
