Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 1720 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Cam With Her

26. Cam With Her (0)

Cams
Newbie
89*
TheDen (1) 08-20-13  07:42pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: *A lot of free clips, and they can go topless in the clips.
*The models are fun, and beautiful..... Unlike some other sites... Just sayin.
*Members get discounts on live shows. 20% off.
*Mchats are all archived. So you can re-watch them.
*The members area has tons of picture, and videos to watch.
*The staff is helpful, if you have any problems.
*Models on CWH that have their own sites, allow CWH members to access them; without any extra fees.
Cons: *Forum could be a bit more active, but most people don't go to cams site for forums; obviously.
Bottom Line: Camwithher was the first caming site, Iíve ever been too. And, to this day, itís the only one that I still go to. I usually just frequent the forum. But, when I was a mod, I attended Mchats, and all the good stuff.

The girls are friendly, and so are the other members. The staff are always eager to help you, when you need it. The members area is PACKED with photo sets, and videos to keep you entertained. The Mchats are my favorite part. The models are always eager to have fun, and give the members a great show.

The forum used to be packed with members, but the last few years itís been pretty dead. But, itís been getting a bit more active, then it has been; the last few years.

Like all websites, there is room for improvement. But, itís one of the most solid cam sites, out there.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Black Owned Wives

27. Black Owned Wives (2)

Pay
Active
50
pat362 (365) 08-19-13  05:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +You get access to 21 sites.
+The processor is CC Bill
+Cancellation was a piece of cake
+Join price was cheaper than for some of the other sites.
-Site design is simple so it's easy to find everything you are looking for(Of course you won't be looking long since there is nothing worth finding).
Cons: -The content is not exclusif and can be found on other sites.
-I don't think a single one of these sites has updated in many years.
-All the videos associated with the network are broken into multiple clips. Some of which number in the high 30's.
-The quality of the vids is bad to awful and is also getting older all the time.
-The only single file videos are leased from other sites.
-The vast majority of the videos exist as single files on sites like clip4sale so why not make them available for their own sites.
Bottom Line: *I'm going to make this short and sweet. If these sites were only a dollar then it would still be one dollar too many. There is nothing that can be found on these sites that is worth looking at or let alone download to your computer. That's not to say that there aren't some decent videos because I saw some of them on clip4sale and they looked a 100 times better than anything that can be found here but the awful business practice all of these sites perpetrate is why some people say Tube sites is the way to go.

*I Googled some of the videos and I found some of them on a few Tube Sites and I even checked part of one of them and the quality was better than what I paid for with these sites.

*Here is the list of sites you get with your membership so that if you're ever in the mood for some interracial porn then you'll know which sites not to pick.

-Black man's cum dump(what a great name...Not).

-I cuckold my husband.(He wasn't the only one who got cuckoled here).

-Whoring out my wife(I'm sure she would prefer to be called something else than a whore).

-Black owned wife(Yeah who doesn't like that)

-Black men's use my wife(I'm seeing a pattern forming with these titles).

-Black man's whore(white mean's angel).

-Black cock whore(Yeah I'm definitely seeing a pattern).

-Florida Mandigos (I wonder what kind of bird this is).

-Wife's sloppy seconds(Mmm who doesn't like that?)

-Mandigo mama. (Is that the mother of the bird?)

-Black owned wives(I guess they found more women so they needed a new site).

-Black magic xxx(Nope same old shity magic).

-Mandigo blonde(bird with bleached feathers).

-Brooke Lauren(I guess she didn't want to be part of the wives group).

-Alice in blacland(It has to be because this is no wonderland).

-Mandigo Candi (I don't think bird flavored candy is all that appealing).

-Florida Domme(They tried to copy the astrodome but they were sued and had to change the name).

-Mandigo redhead (bird on fire)

-Mandigo max(maximum crap more like it).

-Hubby humiliates me(paying for this crap humiliated me).

-Gerri's darkside(we told her to put some pants on and now it's hidden from view).

***If you ever see any of these sites or any with similar names then please stay away. It's your money and you can do what you want with it but don't come complaining to me that you were cheated because I bite the bullet so you didn't have to.***
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit GF Revenge

28. GF Revenge (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
perv (0) 08-17-13  10:37am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Updates weekly - you get 4 vids a month so you might get something interesting the following week, if you didn't find anything you liked previously.
Cons: The content sucks big time. All the chicks are stoners with more tats than the tattooed chick at a carnival.

The guys look like total douchebags and the chicks don't seem to really like it. Sure, the concept is that it's supposed to be amateurish, but this is just horrible.
Bottom Line: You like ugly chicks with douchebag boyfriends, this is your site. I am sure that they must have some decent submissions somewhere with hot girls, but it just didn't do it for me.

Guys - go check out other sites in your group - there has to be someone there that looks good... you struck out!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Exploited College Girls

29. Exploited College Girls (2)

Pay
Active
88
rearadmiral (306) 08-12-13  04:28pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large site
- Mostly unknown models
- Models very good looking
- Lots of opportunity to see the modelís personality
- Includes two other sites
- Supports download managers
- No obvious time-outs
- Scenes are available as a single download or as clips
Cons: - Could offer more HD
- Could offer niche tags
Bottom Line: This site is a recipe for disaster in many ways: it is simplistic, formulaic, mostly POV-based and uses only one male talent. But in this case the site is much greater than the sum of its parts. The simple layout works in this case since the site is based around the female talent, the formula may be the same in every scene but I found that formula added to the heat in the scenes. While POV can be annoying, the male talent here must have some serious practice because this is some of the best POV work Iíve ever seen, and finally, that male talent doesnít fall into the trap that so many other one-man-shows do Ė he doesnít ever lose site of the fact that members are joining to see the girls, not him.

The glue that holds this site together is the quality of models that get recruited. While there isnít a lot of variety, the choice of model is something that aims for the biggest chunk of the market: young, fit, petite, and usually Caucasian. Iím one of those people who like the siteís choice of models and I really like what the site has to offer. To further the appeal, the models are never caked with heavy makeup and dressed in slutty clothes. The site accentuates each modelís natural beauty rather than covering it.

A sharp contrast between this site and the sites I normally join is that the sites I normally join use the better known porn models working at the time. I have little experience with amateur sites but with very rare exceptions these are models Iíve never seen before or since. I have no idea how the site recruits the models, but whatever theyíre doing they should keep doing it because it works.

The scenes all have a common theme: a Ďcollege girlí is enticed to dip her toes into the world of porn. The girlís youth and appearance certainly lends credibility to the overall theme. A viewer could really get lost in the fantasy that this is an otherwise innocent college student who is about to do something nasty for our viewing pleasure.

Many of the scenes start with the cameraman / male talent picking the model up. As they drive an interview in conducted which is usually pretty interesting. In many of these scenes the interview progresses to some nudity in the car and is often followed by some road head. In rare cases the girl will actually ride the guy while he drives. Sure, itís dangerous, but itís great to watch!

Other scenes begin in a hotel room but there is still an interview process.

The scenes then transition to some posing, usually some oral on the girl, oral on the guy, sex in multiple positions and finally a money shot, usually on the face. Most of the scenes then have some footage shot after the scene, which is also interesting to watch.

The site layout is simple, but simple works here. The scenes all have the same theme so the biggest difference is the model herself. I do wish that there were some tags offered, though there really wouldnít be many. A tag for anal scenes (there are a few) would be great, and maybe even a tag to sort by the modelís age would be a good addition.

One feature that I like a lot is that while a lot of the camera work is POV, there are also two or three fixed cameras set up too. Thatís good to provide some variety but the site uses split-screens to capture two views at once. Half the screen might be a shot of the model getting fucked in the doggy position while the other half is a close-up of her face. This is a great effect and really works well.

Iím not sure if this is a pro or a con, but many of the older shoots arenít edited to vary the shots between POV and the fixed camera. Instead, they offer the full scene from either viewpoint. Iím glad they dropped this practice and started editing, but it does offer an option for viewers who prefer one or the other.

The site is large, offering about 320 scenes and it updates with one scene being added per week. Each scene is available as a single download or in clips if youíre only interested in a segment. The site supports download managers with no obvious time-outs.

Download resolutions vary. The best is 1280x720, 3000kb/s, many are 768x432 at 1800kb/s and the lowest are 640x360 at 1800. All are 30 fps. The older scenes donít look great by todayís standards, but they arenít bad. The medium resolution looks pretty good even though the specs would suggest otherwise. I think the biggest flaw is that the site could offer higher resolutions. Also, WMVs are pretty much all that are available.

Photos are available as singles or zips. I didnít download much, but what I saw was relatively low resolution at 1400x788.

The bottom line is that this site could have been a total mess if any part of it was badly done, but since all the elements are well done the site is very good on the technical bits. Once you factor in the newness and apparent innocence of the models this is an amazing site that I both highly recommend and have already added to my list of sites to come back to regularly.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Habib Show

30. The Habib Show (1)

Pay
Active
70
BabyGetReal (32) 08-01-13  03:38pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Unique content with real pay for play street/bar girls, no faking, no acting.
- Fun party atmosphere. Some street scenes during pickups.
- Wide range of female body types, some young and gorgeous.
- All videos are downloadable.
- Videos can be sorted by most popular or latest.
- I reported a bad download link and they replied within 24 hours saying they fixed it (I didn't verify that).
Cons: - Horrible, very jerky, amateurish camera work is hard to watch and often misses the best parts.
- Large annoying watermark often blocks what you most want to see!
- Video resolution varies from poor to excellent.
- Video format seems to depend randomly on which camera they used. Each video is available in only one format: wmv, mp4, divx.
- Bulk of each video is conversation, undressing, showering. Sex is typically just a few minutes.
- Guys make little or no effort to pleasure the girls.
- Trailers are mixed in with full length videos.
- Stills are lo-res screenshots from the videos with no artistry whatsoever.
- Occasionally they use fake semen ("big willie").
- Download speed was sometimes very good but sometimes very poor -- varies widely.
- Downloaded video files have unique names but those names are often hard to relate to the title of the video -- so you may not be able to find it again.
- Bonus sites are very poor.
Bottom Line: I was disappointed with these videos. I joined for one month and will never re-join.

They are mildly interesting documentary but just not very erotic. It is sort of fun to see these guys pick up pay for play street/bar girls in various countries and what the girls say when they get back in the hotel room. Basically Habib just videos hotel rooms where he brings pay for play girls, and most of the videos are her arriving, undressing, horsing around, maybe some smoking, showering, just a few minutes of sex. A rare few of these girls managed to get off and enjoy themselves, but not because the guys made much effort. I don't like it when the guys bang away forever -- I prefer that they show some excitement and enjoyment and shoot their load in a natural amount of time -- but these guys mostly have no stamina at all -- no real attention to arousing the woman, then a couple of minutes in and out and they are done. The men often have trouble even getting hard. Too much booze and too little sleep? Nothing exciting about that either.

Condoms are used in nearly all of these videos. Under the circumstances of what they are doing, I applaud that. However it doesn't increase the erotic value of the videos.

Due to very amateurish videography with really no effort being made to produce a watchable video, the video quality is horrible. Lighting is often poor.

There are no cancellation links on the site so keep your subscription email info! Canceling was straightforward by going directly to the billing site.

I downloaded and watched 47 videos. There are probably over 100 full length videos on the site but it is hard to estimate. Only about 10 seemed worth keeping to watch again someday, and only about 5 of those were somewhat erotic and had orgasms (a couple from rubbing their own clits while being fucked).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Fidelity

31. Teen Fidelity (1)

Pay
Newbie
93*
FuzzyBunny (4) 07-31-13  06:59pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -80 scenes, plus access to 500 more at pornfidelity.com
-production quality is as good as it gets
-gorgeous 1080 HD video on all the newer stuff
-large, high-quality photo sets
-women are hot, and in many cases, drop-dead gorgeous
-male talent Ryan often ends scenes with not just one orgasm but two or three orgasms (how does he do that?!)
-scenes often feel like cutting-edge of porn: innovative set-ups, pleasingly unusual camera angles, etc.
-full-access 2-day trial available for $8.95 -- and mine actually lasted for 4 days
-fast, no-hassle downloading
Cons: -same male (Ryan) in every scene, which might bug some viewers
-several scenes include male talent putting a hand or hands around girl's neck as if strangling, which turns me off. Less of this would be better.
-too many scenes, like maybe 25%, go even further than strangling with an all-out BDSM theme, another big turn-off for me. I didn't even bother viewing these scenes -- a damn shame, especially because the girls are usually gorgeous
-the set-up of several scenes is meant to suggest that the girl's character is underage -- with teddy bears in the room, or school buses in the opening shots, et cetera. This makes the scene tasteless in my book, and contributes to porn's bad rep
-Kelly Madison herself joins a small portion of the scenes (maybe 25%), which seemed great at first, as I love MILF+teen 3-ways -- but I actually found myself tending to prefer the scenes Kelly's not in. Her mood is more "goofing-off" than "turned-on" and can distract from action
Bottom Line: This is definitely some top-notch porn -- some of the best production quality anywhere -- and I highly recommend for any enthusiast -- between this and the included membership to pornfidelity.com, there is plenty of terrific content

I'd give a rating of 100 if there was less prevalence of BDSM scenes and simulated-underage scenes
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Dreams

32. Teen Dreams (1)

Pay
Active
79
RLane (16) 07-30-13  01:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Lots of models
+Zip (large size only)
+Updates weekley
+HD videos
+Quick download speed
Cons: -Not a popular billing company
-few low resolution images for newer sets
-okay site navigation
-slow navigation
Bottom Line: First of all this was a pretty good site a few years ago, but now they haven't given the same effort as before. The site has an okay navigation with very poor loading times at certain times of the day. I like the favorite and rating system on the site, but when you have to dislike something it takes you back to the main members page and then you have to go back to the favs page.

There are about 2000 models on the site with an update weekly. They update at three times a week with about three or four new content every update. The download speed is quite fast including a download of a 500MB video. Now the billing company is Pure Web Power, but I haven't contacted them yet but when I do I'll add to my review. You do have access to their bonus sites using your TeenDreams login, but I think the majority is the same content on TDs

For the videos they do offer HD for NEW content. They only offer MP4 with no other type of media. The sizes they offer vary between old to new, the new offers 1080 (Full HD), 720 HD), 360 (med) and 180 (mobile) with the old videos vary but most of them only have the medium size. The videos download pretty quick with an average of 200MB for HD videos. There are about 1800 videos on the site.

For the galleries, there are about 7000+ sets ranging from solo, lesbian to boy/girl. The quality of most of the images are quite good ranging from 2013 to 2006. For the sizes, they do vary from year to year, but for recent sets their largest I've seen is 2040 for tall images and for long there is 1360x907 which is a huge disappointment; although, the quality of them are great. Most of the older images are usually 1728px and sometimes 2046px or 2000px from 2007 to 2012. Images in 2005 are usually 1752px. As for the zips they only offer Large size with no other sizes to select and when you also select an image it gives you the large without any other size.

Bottom line, this is a good mega site with tons of content with great quality, but is very slow at times and is a little bit hard to navigate. Overall this is a site I would recommend.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Girls Next Door Club

33. Girls Next Door Club (1)

Pay
Active
74
RLane (16) 07-18-13  02:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Zips (full, large, med, small)
+HD videos (1080 & 720)
+Fast download speed
+Small watermark on images and no marks on videos
+Gorgeous models
+CCBill
Cons: -Poor site set-up
-No rating system
-Image quality is okay
-Not much model bio
-Only 17 models
-No extras
Bottom Line: This is a fairly new site; although, they have updates since May 20, 2012. Last update was July 14, 2013 and seems like they update a couple times a week. As of this review there is only 17 models.

As for the videos on this site, I counted about 38 videos. The quality of the videos are quite good and are offered in: 1080, 720 and 540. They also offer HD streaming, WMV, Quicktime and Mobile in 1080. The average time of the video vary but are usually around 10mins.

For the pictures there are about 11,142 images. The quality of the images are okay and seems to be not that great when you zoom in. All image sets are in Zip in which you can download either: Full (5184x3456 or 4272x2848), Large (3000x2000), Medium (2000x1333) and Small (1000x666). Average images per set vary around 30-150. They also have a small watermark on the bottom right and left with some images have a dark transparent bar also on the bottom.

Bottom line is, this is a good hardcore site and I would recommend this. I only noticed one M/F sex scene with a few F/F scenes. Videos look better then the most of the images. The site has a very poor navigation set-up, there are only "Home", "Updates", "Girls" and "Live Cams" tabs to chose from. Also there isn't any rating system to rate the models or sets and there isn't an area to look at your profile. I would've liked to see a favorite like thing along with a profile and I would've loved to comment on a few sets, but they didn't provided that extra. By the way all scenes are indoors and there isn't no model bio for some models. Now this is a good site, but it needs improvement.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lustful Goddess

34. Lustful Goddess (0)

Pay
Newbie
55*
critic (2) 07-15-13  05:56pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The site appears to be a sex-positive countercultural one with an emphasis on empowerment and a very amateur, natural approach. Much bodyhair if that appeals to you.
Cons: This site has been nothing but trouble for me. 2 of the 3 browsers I used were unable to download any videos. Safari worked. I downloaded 12 videos and was suddenly denied any further access to the site. (TBP says there's no download limit.) They havenít contacted me.

The ďsupportĒ link leads to a site (Zombaio) which denied any knowledge of my account. CCBill handled billing, and when I contacted them they reset my user name and PW. Access is still denied. I am requesting a refund.

Other stuff: the ďModelsĒ and ďTerms & ConditionsĒ pages are both empty. Search is all but broken: very primitive (you canít search for models). I had to re-enter my user name and pw for EVERY VIDEO downloaded. A very large number of the zip files I managed to download for image sets refused to decompress, even after repeated download attempts.

Videos seem to cap off at 640x480 WMV's. Images were generally 1200 pixels on the long side (or smaller)
Bottom Line: I cannot reccomend this site. I would not have joined if I knew I would spend the next day massaging and pleading with it to download content, only to be cut off arbitrarily twice, without warning. (It appears that there IS a download limit, in contrast to TheBestPorn's writeup.) I have requested a refund from CCBill.

I would suggest staying away from lustfulgoddess, a real shame given the nature of their content and the fact I (was) a serious fan of Oksana/Carmen/Gypsy Taub.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Janet Exposed

35. Janet Exposed (1)

Pay
Newbie
55*
Bdot (3) 07-12-13  11:22am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Exclusive content
-No apparent download limit
-Discounts available on Janet's clips4sale videos
Cons: -Extremely high membership price based on content
-Site navigation is very poor
-Many many fragmented videos, even the latest stuff, released in 3 or more parts
-Overall site appearance is cheaply done
-Most content in average to very low quality
-No diversity of video format download options
-Pictures are mostly in average to low quality
-Use of download manager may result in blocked IP address
-Although the site advertises itself as a personal journey into Janet, it's anything but.
-Extremely poor site support - Her husband is listed as the webmaster and doesn't reply to emails
Bottom Line: If you're a huge fan of Janet Mason, this site might be worth your $25, but don't expect much at all in the way of quality and don't consider that a recommendation. Honestly, the site feels like a rip off. I consider myself a big fan of Janet, but this site experience has made me lose a measure of respect. Most of the material on the site is old and only available in mpg format, and the most current pic sets and videos are presented in segmented offerings. So getting a complete video might take you more than a month of membership to get. It's insulting. I noticed that on some of the videos, they didn't even bother to post parts 3 and/or 4, and so unless you go to her clip store, you are left with half of a vid. I'll echo another reviewer's sentiment and say that this site is basically a tease to get fans to pay for the individual clips in the clip store. And at 25 bucks, that is downright ridiculous. I also attempted to use a download manager to grab a few clips, and noticed that my ip address became instantly blocked. I was forced to have my access to the site reset and issued another password by CCBill customer support. This after attempting to contact the webmaster, who is (judging by the email address) her husband, Steve. The bottom line is that I wouldn't recommend this site to ANY serious pornuser, fan of Janet or not. Not when you compare it to some of the more serious wife/milf/cuckold sites out there, and DEFINITELY not at the ridiculous entry price.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Glam Worship

36. Glam Worship (0)

Pay
Newbie
58*
spyttla (2) 07-08-13  12:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Some very hot girls

+OK amount of material

+Seems to be adding new material often

+Possible to order custom videos (no membership required)
Cons: -When browsing this site before registering I glimpsed at the content in their clip store. On the frontpage they say "premium membership" "want access to all our videos?" Well guess what they DO NOT give you access to all of their videos. Most of the videos I found most interesting in the clipstore are not to be found in the members section.

-No organization of material, as this is a fetish site there is obvious a great need. The videos in the clipstore are sorted in an acceptable way, why the members section is not the same seems strange.

-Only streaming. Bad streaming solution with very poor preloading it seems, on my wifi I often give up due to long pauses coming frequently.

-No HD. On their clipstore some clips are in HD, these clips are if they at all are available for streaming then only in SD.

-The video quality varies a lot, some have inadequate lightning and lots of background noises.

-Picture sets are very small.
Bottom Line: The premium membership section of this site could easily be improved a lot. They have a lot of interesting material in their clipstore and it should be possible to copy the organization from the clipstore as well. As of now I would not recommend and I regret I signed up.

If the site had not been such a headache with it`s poor organization and left me feeling fooled by the missing videos I would probably have ordered a custom video by now. Instead I will try to forget this site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brandi Love

37. Brandi Love (2)

Pay
Active
69
pat362 (365) 07-06-13  10:47am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Exclusif site of Brandi Love.
+460 videos of which 250 are of Brandi herself.
+Over a 1000 photosets of which 650 are of Brandi.
+You get some content from 20 other models.
+There are plenty of links for swingers.
+You can get a full access 3 day trial for 5$.
+The CC processor is Epoch(so cancellation was easy).
Cons: -Overall site design is really bad (see bottom line for more info).
-A pretty large percentage of the content is not exclusif and that includes Brandi's stuff.
-A couple of the videos are interviews and/or tv appearances.
-A good portion of the content is rather old.
-The video quality is on the poor side, some of them have pretty bad lighting and way too much is POV style.
-Photosets cannot be downloaded as a single zip file so you have to download them pic by pic.
Bottom Line: *I've been tempted to join this site for quite a long time but for some reason I never did and after joining then I know why I waited so long. Now it's quite possible that my expectations were too high or maybe it's my standards but I don't understand how this site can score in the 80's. There are so many things wrong that it's hard to find the positive.

*I have to start somewhere so here goes. The most obvious one is that this site doesn't know what it wants to be. Is it a swinger site that just happens to also have some solo model content or is it a solo model site that wants to promote a swinger lifestyle. If it's the first then why charge any money? If it's the other than why have so much of the site cluttered with swinger info? There are so many swinger related links and third party advertising that you almost wonder why they even bothered adding the solo model stuff. There is so much content on each pages that you have to scroll down to actually see it all and one way too many of them it requires you to scroll quite a distance down.

*Then there's the fact that there isn't really all that much content. I mean this site has been active since 2004 and Brandi has only 250 or so videos. That comes out to about 2 per month. Many of the videos are taken from shoots Brandi did for other studios so not exclusive and a portion is mostly solo cam stuff. There are videos from other models but again you have non-exclsuive content and most if not all is quite old.

*Some of the videos have tag words attached to them but there is no search box to use those keywords and clicking on them does not actually bring you to the proper results.

*There is a blog section but it's so seldom used that it borders on the ridiculous. I mean there are only 4 post this year and it's basically advertising for her appearances at strip clubs and possible ways for guys to meet her in private.

**I'm glad some people enjoyed her site but I didn't. I can only recommend this to fans of Brandi who want to get as much as possible from her and don't necessarily want to join other sites to get access to their content of Brandi.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit I Feel Myself

38. I Feel Myself (0)

Pay
Newbie
100*
WLV612 (1) 06-25-13  05:50am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: High production values.
Great contributors.
Forum interaction.
Well moderated.
Cons: Like most sites, the older contributors aren't in HD but that's not a con, just a limitation of the time when the earlier vids were filmed.
Bottom Line: IFM is geared toward the female orgasm so hardcore fans would be left wanting. For me, the reward is in the site's honest effort to produce something a bit more artistic and personal.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit My Hot Wife

39. My Hot Wife (1)

Pay
Active
73
pat362 (365) 06-22-13  06:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +The content is all exclusif.
+The sex scenes are rather well done for an amateur site and there is a decent amount of hardcore sex.
+Jackie is a hot looking older woman.
Cons: -Navigation is a mess because you are never too sure where to go to find something.
-Many of the videos are in more than one file.
-Video resolution is 640x 480 at best and it's not that unusual to see some 320 x 240.
-Content is not dated so no way to be sure when it was done but the site appears to be more or less dead now.
-There isn't much here. I counted less than 60 videos.
-It take at least 20 minutes to download a single video file.
Bottom Line: *I'm a returning member to this site and very little has changed. That's neither good nor is it bad. It looks the same and the content is in the same location. I even found some videos that I don't remember from my last time but I'm hard pressed to say if that's because they are new or because I didn't see them the last time I was here. Her appearance changes from one video to the next but I think that has more to do with the way they are set up on their different pages rather than because of any chronological order.

*This is an amateur site that a husband and wife started over a decade ago and I guess they get enough members to keep it alive. Not sure if Jackie still does porn but I doubt it. Mind you my score is not that high but I'm not too disappointed in my membership. My only real disapointment is that I wish Jackie was still doing porn because she is(or was) quite good at it.

*I suspect that if you don't care too much about video resolution, large libraries of content and professionally shot porn then you might be happy with this site. Otherwise stay away because you definitely won't be.

**I kept my old score because there is still some decent stuff here.**
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit USA Mature

40. USA Mature (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
pornpundit (3) 06-20-13  11:40am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Unlike many mature sites the women here are all doing their first video and, for 9 out of ten, their last. While not exactly ugly these are women you might see every day in the market, many are on the heavy side.
All the women have a story to tell and these are more often then not, truly interesting, many times sorta sad. The one thing in common is that these mature gals absolutely do there very very best and are not just "going through the motions" If anything can be called "reality" this is it.
Cons: Duh, the insane price lol. Also, I haven't found any truly Hi -def type quality and with the strange resolution of 720x406. In other words "nuttin special".
Bottom Line: The fact that these matures are truly star struck "one hit wonders" makes these vids unique to this site. (I"ve seen over 1000 ). what a shame that there aren't more vids! Would pay twenty bucks all day long.
If you have money to burn and crave true "reality" go for it! 88 without regard to cost 65 when money is a factor
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Exploited College Girls

41. Exploited College Girls (2)

Pay
Active
84
TheSquirrel (53) 06-19-13  06:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: No DRM, download limits, or pre checked cross selling.
Beautiful amateur girls in a good variety of shape size and colour.
Genuinely amateur and individual content with its own style.
Exclusive material and most of the girls will not be seen elsewhere.
Good lighting considering the niche.
Good streaming.
Good download speed.
Zipped pics.
Named files.
Girls listed chronological and alphabetically.
Inviting home pages and easy navigation.
Still updating.
Easy log in, site remembers your details, with only an easy to see word to copy.
Good customer oriented feel.
Cons: Poor rip off exchange rate with CCBill sign up.
Male lead can be a bit irritating at times.
One type of material.
No network of bonus sites.
A few too many fake breasts, and especially tattoos.
Condoms becoming more common.
Blurred face of male can sometimes spoil action.
Some bad camerawork and views at times. Can be amateurish.
New pics look like screencaps.
A polarised niche, you either love it or hate it.
Bottom Line: It's just an opinion but Exploited College Girls, takes this niche and nails it brilliantly. The girl next door types are the type you wish really were living next door instead of that rottweiler, but you know you'll never get that lucky.

There is a real amateur feel here and a lack of gloss, but the girls are so beautiful they don't need much gloss, they just need someone competent enough not to fuck up capturing them on video, and merely need to look their natural gorgeous best. This is where ECG scores. It is professionally lit, edited, and photographed well enough to be erotic, with the girls looking stunning. For me it's an excellent blend of professionalism and DIY amateurism, which isn't easy to do, because so many times you see beautiful girls being made to look unbelievably unsexy, by lousy lighting, bad excessive makeup, awful camerawork with awful unflattering angles, shot by morons you wouldn't trust to shoot a rock without blurring the picture.

The recent shoots are dated and I counted 286 girls a few weeks ago. Membership gives bonus access to Backroom Casting Couch, (on a quality par with ECG), and Net Video Girls plus some free movies. This isn't a network, it's a standalone DIY site, with quality material, and beautiful girls. Given the one man and his camera thing, it's done in a professional enough way to show off the girls to maximum effect, plus you get plenty of build up, dressing, undressing, and walking around naked and semi naked.

This is just my opinion, but I think the guy does a great job, even though he may not win any humanitarian, or upstanding church goer of the month awards...or maybe he might, we don't know who he is, as his face is blurred out, something that is annoying and can detract from the action. Backroom Casting Couch is the same.

New video spec is 768x432 at 4000-6000 kbps and slightly older ones are 640x360 at 3000-5000 kbps, with the oldest being 576x324, but this isn't about HD pristine quality with models looking like they've been dipped in bronze, it's about one man and a camera, and at it's most high tech, one man and two cameras, with occasional help from a mate.

Old pictures sometimes look better than the new ones, because the new ones are screencaps rather than genuine photos. Old ones are genuine photos, and some of the bonus video footage was behind the scenes, where you could see these being taken. I love that sort of stuff, but sadly newer updates don't have any of that, although the main videos always have a certain behind the scenes flavour due to the nature of the content.

If you're a pic fan, this is not the strongest side of ECG. Examples of picture spec are 1400x930, 1600x1200, 1280x857, 1280x720, and 1400x788.

Some PU'ers have referred to the male lead as a douch bag, but given the abuse, both verbal and physical, some girls receive on mainstream sites, this is relatively mild by comparison, and there are no dirty tricks on sign up or cancellation, no drm, dl limits, regional discrimination, or pre checked cross selling. What you see and are led to expect is very much what you get. In fact the whole site is easy to use and is customer friendly. You can't say that about many.

The login is easy, and your membership details plus password are remembered, with an easy to see simple word to copy. Models are listed both chronologically and alphabetically and navigation is easy, with quite detailed previews of what an update is like, plus a long written summary about the shoot. You may not like the main man's tone, but you can't say he doesn't put in the effort. Photos are zippped, download speeds are fast, and files are numbered.

I found streaming facilities to be excellent even at peak times, when on other sites (VideoBox for instance) it's impossible to get a picture. A recent addition is the split screen view, where you see both the model's face and the other end at the same time, which is okay, but sometimes the two screens seem to get in the way of one another. There are a few scenes with condoms which are becoming more common.

When I recently visited the sign up page then closed the window, I received a $5 off offer if I joined now. That worked out at £17.44 for 30 days, which I accepted. When I went to cancel my subscription I received another cut price offer, which I was unable to accept as I currently don't have the time to download.

If this is the future of porn, with semi amateur girls, and semi professional shooting, done on a budget, I would be happy with that. I don't think it is, but what he is doing, with the niche, style of shooting, reality behind the scenes feel, lighting, camerawork, number of updates, price, and personalisation of site, works for him, and for me too as a customer. This is very close to how I would want to see reality porn with sexy looking amateur girls, I don't believe for one moment that is easy to do. Even the pros get it wrong more often than not, so hats off to ECG.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Kiss Me Girl

42. Kiss Me Girl (0)

Pay
Newbie
92*
Bdot (3) 06-08-13  12:22pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Amazing scenes. You simply won't find raw girl-girl passion like this anywhere.
-Lots of content. The scene count has grown immensely since the last reviews noted here.
-Great variety of girls. Could definitely use more blacks and european girls, but not really a complaint.
-Great quality. Scenes available in HQ (mp4) or standard (wmv). Standard scenes are 1280x720 as well while being significantly smaller than mp4s.
-Solid download times. 4mb per second seems average but I've noted up to 7mb per second.
-Bonus to Sloppygirl.com (spit kissing/play) comes at half price ($12.95). It appears that most of the girls that film a scene at kissmegirl simply film an extra scene filled with lots of spit kissing and play. Amazing stuff.
-The site seems to pay attention to suggestions made by users on its forum, such as pairing one popular girl with another.
-Each clip comes with behind the scenes interviews with the girls involved.
Cons: -While I didn't notice a download limit, I was kicked off the site after dl'ing about 20 scenes (22gb). Access was restored later.
-It's niche, as the site's name suggests. While the kissing is beyond hot and heavy, everything else is pretty softcore.
-Would like to see an option to download segments of scenes. File size can be rather large, especially for the mp4s, sometimes over 2gb per file.
Bottom Line: There seriously needs to be a site update on this site. The number of vids has grown immensely (probably between 10-15 pages with 20 scenes per page) as has the quality and girl count. If you can't resist beautiful women kissing each other passionately, holding nothing back, sucking tongues and tons of deep deep kissing, this site will be nothing short of a dream for you. The variety of girl matchups is simply awesome, as is the quality of the material and video. There's just not much acting possible in a format like this - these girls love what they're doing and seem totally into each moment - the realism is perfect. For those that love spit kissing and spit play, sloppygirl.com comes at half price (or vice-versa) and involve many of the same scenes from kissmegirl. No hardcore on this site, but the uninhibited kissing along with the stripping and beautiful naked bodies all over each other is amazing. One of the best niche sites I've ever joined.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dare Dorm

43. Dare Dorm (1)

Pay
Active
80
BabyGetReal (32) 06-03-13  06:48pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Most videos seem to be real students, not porn actors.
-Never the same people in any two videos.
-Couples unashamed to lick, suck, fuck and sometimes have orgasms while being watched and cheered by their peers. Wonderful openness and acceptance of sexuality -- perhaps the greatest feature of this site.
-Variety of female breast sizes (almost none enhanced) and body types, all very attractive.
-About 95 videos.
-Updates about twice a month.
-Fake passion/moaning is quite rare.
-No director telling them to run thru set positions without regard to their responses. For the most part they do what feels good.
-Mix of creampies, squirt over tummy or butt, and facials.
-A few BJ with CIM and spit or swallow.
-Lighting and resolution are generally fine.
-Good tech support with live chat that actually works.
-Videos can be sorted by most viewed, highest rated, or newest.
Cons: -Streaming only. No download mechanism offered. I would give it a higher numeric score except for this. The mechanism to skip to another part of a video does work.
-Very amateurish videography, often blurry, jerky, too close. Well, its taken by one of the students. Sometimes a girl cums loudly off camera.
-Most of the sex is not very passionate -- but hey, its done in front of friends by amateurs while being videoed. And it is young person down-to-business hard sex, not much foreplay.
Bottom Line: I was very pleasantly surprised. I expected to see passionless porn pros in a dorm, or possibly porn actresses with real student men (which could be very hot -- haven't found such a site but wish I could). A few of the videos seem like strippers who aren't interested in sex making out with guys with big cocks -- as expected. But most seem to be geniune submissions by groups of student friends/peers. I suspect that some of the girls are strippers when they're not in class. There isn't a lot of passion, but there's a lot of openly shared, enthusiastic sex.

Condoms are used about half the time.

The first half or more of each video (they run 30-70 min in general) is conversation and partying -- often with spin the bottle and truth or dare games. Some of the conversations among groups of girls is quite interesting, about their sexual experiences and preferences. Towards the last half or third of each video, usually a few of the girls don't mind taking their clothes off and then having sex in front of a bunch of friends who still have their clothes on and are cheering them on. Possibly they are having sex with their boyfriends, tho in some cases there are 3somes.

The one thing that seemed possibly unrealistic to me is that almost without exception, the boys last a very long time. I would expect some college men to cum quickly and then maybe again later, or 3 times. There are some that, realisticaly, seem to have trouble getting hard with a blow job (in front of 5-10 onlookers and while being videoed -- not sure I could!).

Here are some of my favorites:

-Bed Buddies. Charming and hot. A black girl films two white couples going at it.

-Birthday Wishes. Tiny girl fucks 2 guys alternately. The only video where the guys cum in short order. She orgasms about 36 min.

-Fooling Around. Nothing special in the first 63 min. Then a lovely slim tan brunette really gets into it and has several orgasms.

-Get a Head. A lot of real excitement, one orgasm around 45 min.

-Kiss Thiz. Nice foreplay and several orgasms.

-Pants Off Dance Off. One of the best orgy videos.

-Pleasure Pak. Gorgeous brown girl rides cowgirl a long time, has two orgasms around 33, 35 min.

-Pledge Fuck. One of the best with 3 couples fucking for a long time, enthusiastically. Brunette on bottom of bunk beds cums several times. 2 guys jizz at the end.

-Sleep Over. Girl-girl but sweet and hot, girls getting each other off.

-That's So. First half is a single couple with night vision. Tall slim brunette with real passion and trembling orgasms. Last half is forgettable.

-The Best Gift. Girlfriend invites her very hot roommate to trade off fucking her boyfriend. The roommate and the boy seem a bit shy about it which makes the whole thing more realistic and hotter.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Girls Out West

44. Girls Out West (2)

Pay
Active
60
RagingBuddhist (63) 06-01-13  12:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Lots of amateur content
+ Different file types available
+ Tabbed navigation
+ Pictures: 1026, 1280, 1600 pixels long side, Some available @ 2000
+ In browser flash video
+ Bonus material from Yanks and ATK Hairy
Cons: - File types are ridiculous to figure out
- File naming is another pain
- Split files in 2013?
- Minimal previews/ descriptions on videos
- Picture/video quality varies, often for the worse
- Site crashes while using Opera browser
- Not compatible with FreeDownloadManager
Bottom Line: I'll preface this by saying that this will be, without a doubt, the most disjointed bottom line I've ever written. I'm just going to call it, "Issues". Joining this site was a major disappointment and what follows might tell the story.

I will say that the speed issue I commented on was somewhat resolved. I still can't use FreeDownloadManager, but the "Save As" speed is up to 1.2 mb. Not great, but certainly better than the 200kb I saw in the beginning. Other than this being a strictly amateur site which I absolutely love, that pretty much ends the positives. Here we go...

Normally, I would go into detail about the various file types. GOW seems to go out of their way to make that confusing as hell. You get columns labeled mp4, mpg+wmv and wmv. Then, quite often, you face a cryptic list like this: Source MP4 1080p, Source MP4 720p, High (1024x576 @ 3200k), High (1024x576 @ 3200k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), Low (512x288 @ 600K), Low (512x288 @ 600K). On top of that, there are sometimes 5 links that say the same exact thing (e.g. Medium (1920x1080 @ 1500K)) Seemingly duplicate links that link to different files? Same file with slightly different names? I have no clue. I'll just leave it as this - I tried to download only the highest resolution video and was frequently disappointed in the quality of even the newest scenes. Lighting quality, especially on the outdoor scenes was hit or miss.

File naming. Fine on pictures as the name of the model and the set are used. On video? Another nightmare. A lot of the B/G and G/G videos download using the couple's names with no mention of the scene/episode. So, even though a couple has done more than one video, each one has to be renamed so you can download the different videos.

Opened a solo girl video that showed it was the second of 3 parts. Went to the model index to get the other two parts and there were only two videos listed. WHERE'S THE THIRD? Guess I can browse the entire site to see if it's there.

Clicked on the thumbnail for part 3 of a video and the flash preview shows part 2

Picture sets showing up in the video section.

Thinking there might be a browser issue in how the site was displayed, I tried Opera. That kept crashing so I went back to Firefox.

It's pretty bad when the bonus sets are better quality than most of the host site's material - higher resolution and better lighting.

Preview thumbnails for several full length videos open to a page with no download links.

*********************
I actually got a headache trying to figure out how to write all of this, so I'm going to stop writing and just leave it at this - For such a well known site, it's a mess. If you really like amateurs, in all their non-glamorous glory, and don't mind digging for files and renaming almost every video, go for it. Otherwise, avoid this site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Brick Yates

45. Brick Yates (0)

Pay
Newbie
93*
Jackthecommon (2) 05-29-13  04:42pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - content seems to be exclusive (I haven't seen it anywhere else)
- the girls and guys both wear their work uniforms
- the uniforms are real
- most of the girls are real, and the ones that have been in other videos, he explained why he uses them
- it seems to be true reality porn
- guys and girls seem to be actual employees
Cons: - not as much pics as I would like in some of the sets
- still low on content (new site so I understand for now)
- site functionability is ok, but still working out some kinks
- I wish there were a few more partner sites you could have access to, but I guess I can't complain too much when it. Comes to true fetish/ reality sites
Bottom Line: I was debating on a subscription, but I went ahead and got one. Even though there isn't a lot of content yet (5-29-2013) I still give it a high rating because it seems to me to be true reality porn and real local girls in their uniforms. I looked a few of the girls up, and the conversation he has with them in the beginning of the video seems to be legitimate. And he has a news section and put out a bullion saying there should be another 9 videos up by Sunday . So I am kind of letting the low content volume slide for now because the site just went up this month and he seems to be pretty adimate about getting more content. I recommend it so far, hopefully it stays quality.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Teen Fidelity

46. Teen Fidelity (1)

Pay
Active
96
pat362 (365) 05-28-13  03:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Content is all exclusif.
+They add one new scene per week and they are all dated.
+They hire the more popular teen models in North America.
+They shoot some best porn scenes I've ever seen and they know about lighting, camera angles and the proper way to apply makeup to their performers.
+All the videos can be downloaded in 3 resoolution. You have 480 or 540, then 720 and finally 1080.
+They offer a BTS video for all of their scenes.
+Their photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and these are the sets for both the sex scene as well as the bts content.
+They have an in-browser playlist editor that allows the user to edit all the videos.
+You get access to porn fidelity with your membership.
Cons: -This isn't an issue for me because I enjoy his work but the only male to appear with the girls is Kelly's husband Ryan.
-The site has only 76 videos which is a decent amount considering that it's barely 3 years old but I'd love it if there was more content.
-There is no lesbian only content and that would be nice to have a few of those.
Bottom Line: *I honestly had a hard time thinking of cons to write because the site is near perfect. The ones I wrote are less cons for me and more general observations. Mind you since I'm a huge fan of porn fidelity and this is basically an off-shoot of that site but here the performers are all teens to very young women and they are all natural.
*If you seen some porn fidelity videos then you know that they understand how to properly light a scene, handle a camera to shoot from multiple angles and offer great views of the action and the performers and they know how to edit so that there is flow and rhythm to their scenes. The same is true for teen fidelity scenes.
*The only two things that I'd love to see more of is lesbian content and anal. Both of these are rather lacking.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Amateur Allure

47. Amateur Allure (4)

Pay
Active
87
marcdc1 (163) 05-27-13  05:05pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - great production value. He uses a wireless mic on the girls and tons of lighting so you can see everything.
- A unique light is used which makes a model's eyes "pop" it's very drawing and striking.
- giant catalog with over 500 videos
- great quality 1440X1080 7.5 mbps
- .wmv and .mp4 available
- all exclusive content
- pictures available with zips
Cons: - Every shoot follows the same linear progression. The girls may be smokin' hot - but even I have to say it gets boring.
- some anal, 3ways, handjobs etc. but there really is no variety to speak of.
- Girls shoot under different names for this site. So you may have a favorite and won't be able to find her.
- Pricy especially considering there's no partnering sites.
- preview section is a highlight reel. I like to see inside a few scenes to get a better sense of the action. I CAN NOT say I was in any way deceived. This is a quality site.
Bottom Line: Each shoot has the same routine. Hot girl in a nice dress (like what she wore to the prom or something). She blows him, he takes her in a couple o f different positions. She takes is load in her mouth. They go at it again; he usually finishes with a facial.

The quality on this site is top notch - but the same thing over and over is dull.

This is a good site. They could sure mix it up a little bit, or reach out so some partners so there's more variety.

Every shoot is a winner, (but here you quickly get the feeling "seen one seen them all")
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Peachez

48. Real Peachez (1)

Pay
Active
67
Marcus (45) 05-25-13  05:15am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Gorgeous petite model who has been active for many years
- Decent balance of videos, candids and videos
- Incredible performer, doing just about my favourite amateur BJs
- Billing by CCBill with option to choose own username/password
- Lots of download options (quality/dimension/format) for videos
- Zips of some galleries available in various dimensions
- Recent galleries have direct link to corresponding video update
- Many galleries divided into HQ photos and screengrabs
- Discount membership to Club Jenni (not pre-checked)
Cons: Points marked with * don't bother me personally:

- Regional pricing. Very expensive for the amount of content
- Tour promises daily updates Ė nothing new since March
- Tour also advertises monthly contest Ė doesnít seem to exist
- Although some content is new, a lot appears to be rotated
- Archives seem incomplete as a lot of videos missing/removed
- Store, FAQ, and Girlfriends inaccessible/not working
- Video aspect ratios donít work properly
- Blog, Journal, and Our Models no longer appear to be updated
- Sort options donít work properly (eg, sorting by Ďmost recentí)
- Basic navigation Ė vauge titles and no option to filter by genre
- Zips not available for around half of albums
- Chronically slow download speeds (approx 150kbs)
- Flash video auto-plays on page load*
Bottom Line: This could be an amazing site, but the woeful navigation, lack of updates and missing content all contribute towards a pretty scrappy website at best.

Peachez is a superb performer, particularly since she started doing blowjobs which has added an extra dimension to a site that was previously fairly repetitive. She looks gorgeous with a slim figure, tiny, perky little boobs and a beautiful pair of legs topped by the perfect bum.

The majority of content is strip tease, masturbation and insertion, but there are a lot of blowjob videos now too. Most content is shot indoors, but there are a few galleries of her flashing in public or posing poolside. There are also a lot of candids from her trips to various adult conferences/awards which are worth looking at.

The website is divided into several sections across the top: Photos, Movies, Our Models*, Webcams, About Me, Girlfriends**, Journal*, Blogs*, Forums**, Store** and FAQ**. A lot of sections are no longer updated (*) or donít work (**).

PHOTOS:

Currently 186 galleries, averaging around 100 photos each. Galleries are displayed as thumbnails which animate on mouse-over to show a sample of images, along with the gallery title, number of photos, number of screencaps, date added and memberís rating.

The majority of albums have the option to view images at different dimensions (1024px, 1280px and 1600px). Around a half of galleries have the option to download zips of images in these dimensions. A handful of galleries also link you directly to the corresponding video. There doesnít seem to be any pattern as to what features are/arenít available as the oldest gallery I could find had zips available, but a newer one didnít.

MOVIES:

79 movies with animated thumbnails giving a gist of the video, title, running time and date added. Once you click into the movie thereís a short (often generic) description and a flash video that auto-plays (annoying).

There are plenty of viewing and download options for movies:

- Mobile: 3GP 352x288 and MP4 320
- 1500k and 3000k MP4, Quicktime and WMV

I have a big problem with aspect ratios from videos that Iíve downloaded. Most seem to display in VLC as a perfect square, so you have to set the aspect ratio manually. This seems to be a problem in post-production as the video watermark actually extends beyond the right-hand side of the video into the black bars on the side meaning the video doesnít fill the screen at fullscreen.

THE CONTENT:

Peachez is an experienced performer and has been online for something like ten years. For collectors, though, youíll be frustrated to find that this isnít a full archive of Sarahís work. There is a lot of missing content, including more recent blowjobs. The site just seems to be coasting along doing the bear minimum it can to keep subscriptions up. A lot of content is new (one of her recent BJ videos mentioned it being 2013), but it appears a lot of the content is rotated. Updates are also incredibly sporadic Ė several updates from 12-13 March, but nothing since.

THE WEBSITE:

The website is massively buggy/incomplete with lots of features that donít work or arenít being used properly. Hereís a few examples:

NAVIGATION: You can only sort updates by name, date or popularity. Sorting by date doesnít seem to work as, for example, when you sort movies the most recent is 2012, but then thereís a few from 2010, 2009 and then 2013.

There is no way to filter by genre because keywords havenít been set up. So if you want to view her blowjob videos, you have to go through every page. Worse still, sometimes itís not obvious what videos are blowjobs and what are not because they have such vague names (eg, Ď4th of Julyí). The search box at the top hasnít been configured properly as it contains irrelevant categories like ĎMILFí, ĎBustyí etc (not relevant for Peachez).

BROKEN FEATURES: Girlfriends comes up with an error saying Ďinsert code hereí, My Store redirects to a domain holding page, Forums redirects to the RealPeachez home page and FAQ is blank.

There is also an alphabetized navigation bar across the top which, whatever letter you click on, takes you to the same update. Obviously itís just a website template that hasnít been set up properly. Even on the preview side of the site thereís a few broken links (including the Ďjoiní link in several places).

NO LONGER UPDATING: The following pages no longer seem to be updated: Our Models (last updated February 2013), Journal (last updated April 2012), and Blog (last updated January 2013). Site-wide, there hasnít been an update since March 2013 (not even rotated content)

SUMMARY:

If youíre new to Sarah, you could do worse things than join her website, but if you have followed her work for any number of years, her site is buggy, incomplete, poorly updated and rather disappointing. The amount of new, unseen content and lack of updates do nothing to justify the price.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Amateur Key Club

49. Amateur Key Club (1)

AVS
Active
62
marcdc1 (163) 05-20-13  06:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - About a dozen sites to enjoy
- Almost all interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- sites all focus on slut wives and has a raunchy focus.
The girls are amateur and attractive. There's a range of ages and body weight so I'm sure lovers of hot wives/cuckolding will find someone they like.
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps.
- quite a bit of content for a low, low price
Cons: - Not all site have .zip downloads.
- They claim to still be updating. They're not.
- picture quality is 300X200.
- organization is not consistent across network sites.
- videos are only in .wmv
- they claim to give access to 28 sites. I can't get into everything the show on the home page (I still need to contact customer service about that, but I'm real reluctant based on my current experience).
- By all right I should put this score lower, but I feel that fact that there is so much here for such a ridiculously low price deserves some consideration.
Bottom Line: I didn't pay a lot for this network so I'm trying to be generous, but i can't lie and say I'm satisfied. I'm not.

The potential is so high, and the delivery so bad. Bad production, bad UI, bad marketing (don't tell me you update if you don't). Some of the sites have videos that were started and not finished (or the rest of the video is slowly being dolled out with 1 minute long updates. To be honest I haven't even bothered to check that claim cause it's too much of a pain. Who want to wait a month to see the next minute of video?)

This whole network is stuck in 2001, and it's not pretty.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Interracial Video.net

50. Interracial Video.net (1)

Network
Active
65
marcdc1 (163) 05-20-13  06:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - you get access to over 20 sites with membership
- Sites are almost exclusively interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site focus on "slut wives" and has a raunchy focus.
The gils are amateur and attractive
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps.
Cons: - The sites are inconsistent in terms of layout, so you have to learn the ins and outs of each.
- models range from smokin' hot (whoring out my wife) to GILFs (not a big draw for me).
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- some sites offer zip pictures, some don't there's no rhyme or reason.
- claims of new updates are lies (hate to say it but I'm calling BS on this one)
Bottom Line: This is the most confusing network I've ever joined. I like to think of myself as reasonable intelligent, but this experience challenged that assumption.

Granted i got the network for a fantastic price ($30/year is probably the cheapest porn I've ever bought), but I didn't get much for my money and probably would have gotten more enjoyment if I'd just hit the preview pages of the dogfart network.

While I can't say it was from this, I did notice an uptick in the spam to my email associated with this membership. It may be a coincidence - or it may be they sold my email address.

I've had this membership for almost 5 months and I still haven't checked out all the sites. Not because there's so much content (there isn't) but because it's not that compelling. I love raunchy sex (and there's some of that here) but the production quality is so low and the navigation is so hamstrung it's not worth the trouble.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 1720 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Amateur Allure (4)
2. My Free Cams (3)
3. ATK Natural & Hairy (3)
4. Casting Couch X (2)
5. Ann Angel XXX (2)
6. Chaturbate (2)
7. Czech AV (2)
8. ATK Galleria (2)
9. Black Owned Wives (2)
10. Bella Pass (2)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.38 seconds.