Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 255 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Mommy Got Boobs

1. Mommy Got Boobs (0)

Pay
Active
95
Cybertoad (104) 06-18-08  10:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Lots of content
- Part of a giant network
-Pics and videos are typically very nice quality-wise.
Download speed consistent in network
Really Attractive models
Good Reasonable price
Pretty Frequent updates
Cons: Some of the older content isn't the best quality and in poor quality format for some reason.
Action seems pretty repetitive.
The site is not the best in the network one would venture its weakest link.
I found that this site in the network was the worst acting just didnt click for me in most scenes wise.
But thats just my own opinion, these are just small knit picks.
Bottom Line: What saves this site from a lower score is the scenes are hot for this type and a good size content.

This isn't the best site within this network, but it is good with potential in the long run. The site features a awkward design I see throughout the network so surfin is ok.
The price is awesome with all of the other sites that you can access.

Older video quality keeps me rating the site higher.
But being part of a huge network keeps its rating high.

The daily updates for the network are awesome and several new sites have been added to the network over the past few months.
As with the network its worth joining two months min.
I may rejoin just because of all the new content.

Well Done
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Christy Marks

2. Christy Marks (1)

Pay
Active
85
atrapat (112) 10-12-08  11:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Natural 36H model "SCORE Newcomer of the Year 2008" official site.
-Really good website design.
-TBP facts are right except for video maximum resolution.
-1280x720 wmv (2100 kbps), 854x480 wmv, 640x360 wmv / mp4. ipod, psp, windows mobile.
-All formats also available to download in 5-minute segments.
-Flash streaming: high bandwidth, low bandwidth and trailer.
-Scripts and scenarios are usually quite elaborate.
-There's music during videos but model can be heard when she moans or speaks.
-Zip files for small (800x600 H / 400x600 V) and large (1600x1200 H / 800x1200 V) pics.
-50-100 pictures per set.
-Scenes usually shot at a studio but good amount of outdoors.
-Current update rate: 1 new scene per week (video and photos).
-Most content is solo but they have been releasing more boy-girl and girl-girl recently.
-Solo videos usually focus on boob playing (jiggle, lick, squeeze, ...) with some masturbation.
-Model is very flexible which makes for many interesting positions.
Cons: -You enter CC details at their site and don't know what payment processor will charge you.
-I was billed by a processor I had never heard of.
-There is no link between photos and videos page from same set.
-Large portrait pictures are not 1200x1600 but 800x1200.
-Poor interaction: you only get a weekly blog entry with pictures.
-Must solve a CAPTCHA to login every time.
-Extras section is currently just two videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more.
-Long in-depth text interview without video: missed opportunity.
-Website sub-domain name changes periodically: hard to use download managers.
-She sports four weird belly-button piercings in her latest scenes.
Bottom Line: If you like the model's looks and her huge assets, you should not hesitate about joining (as long as you agree to give your CC details to a little known payment processor). For a solo model site, the update rate is more than OK. Video quality is great and they come up with interesting ideas to make the scenes different, even the solo ones.

The current lack of content (site was launched recently) and the little interaction with the model are what refrains me from rating the site higher. There are weekly blog entries with a few pictures but they are a bit of a letdown: the model seems to have an interesting personality but the most remarkable events during last month's entries were that she was sick for a couple weeks and that she played guitar hero and ate popcorn with some friends. I don't know why they didn't tape the long text interview they have posted.

I liked most of the scenes but keep in mind that there's usually a playful attitude that might not be every one's cup of tea. Specially in the solo videos: playing strip space invaders (banging the buttons with her boobs), squeezing lemons between the tits to make lemonade or a bra fitting session are some examples. Scenes always have some kind of script but it can feel somewhat cheesy at times. I'm not familiar with Score Group content but I believe these kind of things aren't that unusual with them.

During the last couple months, they have been releasing a BG or hardcore GG scene every other week with solo scenes in between. Her hardcore performances aren't bad at all and there's always lots of tit fucking, handjobs and positions that showcase her boobs. There's a BBG scene coming next week and there was a BGG tit fucking scene recently where Janet Jade stole the show: what a RACK!, give that girl a site of her own.

Technically, the site is quite spectacular. The plethora of available resolutions is a real treat. Site design is really good and you are even offered two views while browsing the updates list: large thumbnails with scene description or smaller thumbnails with less info but more updates per page. I didn't pay much attention to photos but they seem to be good enough. It was a bit annoying to always get the smaller 800x600 galleries by default.

Needs growth and a bit more of interaction but I feel it's already a very good site.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XL Girls

3. XL Girls (0)

Pay
Active
80
BubbaGump (18) 01-15-12  03:12pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Large number of models.
-- Easier to naviagte and find content than Scoreland master site.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons: -- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- For some reason, the DL speed and streaming was slower than at Scoreland.
-- Probably not enough updates to keep long-term subscribers used to large volume. Best for one-month subscriptions.
-- Should be part of Scoreland main subscription.
Bottom Line: Background:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.

--Navigatiuon and menus are a bit simplified from the information-overload present at Scoreland.

-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.

-- Streaming and DL speeds are not as quick as at the master site Scoreland.
-- The site will likely not keep long-term interest. Site should probably be included with a Scoreland subscription and not exist as a seperate pay-site.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Summary:
I added this site when signing up for a one-month subscription to Scoreland. The cost was $19.99 for one month, non-recurring.

BBW stands for Big Beautful Women.

The first two two terms here are relative. I have had an erotic interest in this genre over the years.. I have discovered that 'Big' can mean anything from slightly plump to to morbidly obese. The women shown at XL girls generally falls somewhere in the middle. One characteristic all the models have is that that they all sport large, natural-looking breasts. Most appear to be young, twenty-somethings, althought there are a few MILF models. Pretty faces are the norm.

Beauty is also in the eye of the beholder and this genre won't be for everyone. It is refreshing, however, to see more natural-looking women in this industry--the kind you are likely to encounter on the street. Also, in the photosets, the models will actually smile and don't look irritated or annoyed.

The photos at the site are much more profresinal-looking than most BBW images I have come accross in the past, The photographers could tone down the airburhsing a bit, however.

I guess this genre is defined by anything that does not fit the cookie cutter mold of what the average man would find appealing in terms of physcique. The women at XLGirls look like natural women on the plump side, all with motherly figures.Silicone appears to be used sparingly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conclusion:

This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of plump, rubenesque women one would find in classic paintings, albeit with large chests.

The site is a mix of photos and videos. There is not a large amount of XX action here and most videos are solo or girl-girl.

IMO, who would like this site:

Photo lovers and those with a fetish for plump, rubenesque, motherly women or those who have a breast fetish. Also, this site will appeal to those who enjoy a more classic, conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.

IMO, who won't like this site:

Those who are looking for the cookie-cutter, well-toned models who spend most of their days in the gym and count their calories. Also, those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Grades(obviously subjective):

Site Navgigation: B
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: C
Quantity: B
XXX Action: D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions for improvement:

Addf this site to the standard Scoreland subscription.

More creativity in photos. Diversify the photosets to include more angles and perspectives. Photosets tend to stick to a classic script.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 18 And Busty

4. 18 And Busty (0)

Pay
Active
77
BradlyH (Disabled) 09-19-11  10:25pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Easy upfront Cancelling.

- Unique videos

- Free half decent Bonus site

- Site lay out colour is pleasant

- Updated every 3-4 days with more then one set/vid

- Exclusive sets with well known Models.

-Videos offered in different players
Cons: - Some Zips are broken and the working ones are not labeled.

- One set advertised i couldn't find! :(

- Sets all seem to revolve around Hotel bed, Shower, Window and Couch

- Tiny Resolutions in some sets.

- Photo quality seems to fade during old sets.

- Some sets are in the Minus 25 pics range.
Bottom Line: Ok I'll admit it... the reason why i joined this site was 75% because of one model. I found her on a free site which instantly brought me in, after Looking into the model list i was sold.

18 And busty has some Great models, A very high point for this site. 4 or 5 of the models specifically were complete Sirens that i would probably forget to breath around in their presence, and were zipped right away. Not a common practice with me Until the nearing of my cancellation.

Speaking of zipping, the sites many down falls are it's zipping, I was having difficulty most of the time and when the files were fully downloaded the majority were not Labeled. Absolute hell for some one who likes his Erotica neat, organized and filed !

I can see how some Webmasters/Photographers wouldn't have the time to Individually name and label The pictures within a set but the first one to actually label a set like (to my standards) of "model name- Set name" will get a automatic 100 from me on here. It's such a pain zipping and trying to make folders look the same.

Back to the initial Impression of the site: When i first got to the Members area i was greeted with the standard title screen with Site options below and under that was model names alphabetically listed in a cluster, presented on a nice Pinky purple coloured background. The site at first has tricky Navigating, The list you see when you first get in is a no picture alphabetical list but until you scroll down that's when you get a model card, a card like box which contains a picture of the model with her name and a little bio and viewing options, But is not alphabetical.

I was quite confused at this point looking for the new material,the updates and most importantly the main reason why i joined, i needed her sets pronto !

It turns out they have it set up as a special link in the Updates and Bonus button, all new models and sets are posted there and stay there until bumped off the page by new material, thus leading the now "old" sets to the profile cards and alphabetical order. Confusing ? At first, yes.
The Updates and Bonus button also link you to the bonus site, Quite obvious now....

It seems the download cap Of 6 Gb a day that plagued this site is now lifted. I was downloading heavily from the site and never hit a cap.

After download at least half the site I Found the earlier videos and shots were Lacking quality. Videos were shaky and you could tell when the camera man went down on one knee to get a different angel, almost like some type of Blair Witch erotica. But the good news with all that is that the new videos are in great quality and Very very hot. Some are humorous too which is a nice break, not many sites offer this.

The biggest draw back to this site is its earlier material more specifically the sets. Earlier sets are all over, one set will only have 8 pics in it, zipping in low res and newer pics will be high res some not with a zip option or zip is broken. A few sets seem weird, almost as if they were just the warm up shots or initial ideas...one set was 500x333. It hurt my feelings.

The set i really wanted finally came to me TWO DAYS before my subscription was up. So in my cons of some sets advertised i couldn't find still applies even though i got it at the end. That has to be the worst thing (besides credit card fraud) for any porn user- When you see a model or set you really like and you sign up just for that reason JUST to find out she is no where to be found.

Strangely with all the little problems and disappointments i feel satisfied with this site and would probably join again in a year, since it has a nack for finding extremely sexy Women.

Bottom Line: The models are not 18 and this site is far from finely tuned, but it is a good one for anyone who likes busty girls who have slim to curvy figures. Would i recommend this site ? Ya i would, but not with out a i told you so after.


One more thing, Seriously.... how many models can have the same name as "Anna" ?!?
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Scoreland

5. Scoreland (0)

Pay
Active
80
BubbaGump (18) 01-15-12  12:04pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Huge amount of content.
-- Large variety of model types within the 'big-boob' genre.
-- Fairly decent DL speeds.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons: -- Not the most user-friendly site when it comes to navigation or finding content.
-- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- A little pricey compared to competition.
--- Although the content amount is huge, it is easy to become a bit overwhelmed by it when trying to decide on selections.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- No HD Video Download Option--Only Streaming.
Bottom Line: Background:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Pros and Cons:

-- The amount of content here is huge. I used to subscribe to Voluptuous and Score back in the 90's. The models represent the type of women I find attractive. You can find content dating back to the 90's on the site.

-- Streaming and DL speeds seem to be up to par and there are no problems to report here, so far.

-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.

-- It can be a bit difficult at first to navigate around the huge of amount of content in the archives. More user-friendly options would be nice.

-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.

-- Subscription rates also seem to be a little bit higher in cost than the typical site.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Conclusion:

This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of large-breasted women, especially of the voluptuous and/or curvy variety. Models can range from thin-and-stacked to soft and voluptuous.

The site is a mix of photos and videos. If viewing softcore images of chesty, well-endowed women is your thing, you won't be dissapointed. There is a fair amount of xxx video action to be found, but the majority of presentations, both photo and video, are softcore solo or girl-girl.

Update 1/24/12-- HD Video Downloading is NOT an option. One can only stream HD videos. I discovered this recently. One must subscribe to Score HD to download HD.

IMO, who would like this site:

Photo lovers and those with a breast fetish who enjoy a variety of body types and those who enjoy a more classic conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.

Who won't like this site:

Those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Grades(obviously subjective):

Site Navgigation: C-
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B+
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: A
Quantity: A+
XXX Action: C

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Suggestions for improvement:

Improve the site navigation utility and add options to make the user experience a bit easier.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jugg Master

6. Jugg Master (0)

Pay
Active
85
BubbaGump (18) 01-29-12  01:34pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Unique fetish content.
+ Creative photography.
+ Good nostalgic value.
+ Low subscription price.
+ One-month non-reccuring costs the same as ongoing monthly subscription rates.
Cons: - Low resolution images only.
- Primitive site navigation and layout.
- Site does not appear to be growing much.
- Videos are just a novelty.
Bottom Line: I can give all the reasons why you might or might not find this site attractive. However, If you know who hese models are without Googling, my guess is that there is a high probabilty that you would enjoy viewing the models at this site--Maria Moore, Denise Davies, Bunny De La Cruz.

If you don't know these names but have a breast fetish or enjoy viewing images of women with truly oversized and natural breasts, meaty nipples, and saucer-sized areola, this site would also be worth a one-month subscription.

If none of the above is true, you should look elsewhere. That's it in a nuthsell. This is a very simple site oriented towards photography. There are videos, but they are simply small low-resolution clips. The videos serve more as a novelty of sorts and really are not worth commenting on.

The site is entirely sofcore. Most of the photosets are of the slow tease variety. They start with the model fully clothed and proceed to various states of undress, with the emphasis always placed on the breasts. You see a lot of images of huge boobs jutting through bras, dangling in the air, or spilling out of clothing items. Many of the sets were taken in natural lighting, outdoors and in pools.

I did come across some full nudes, but this is the exception, not the norm. This is conservative, old-school erotic photography. It is the opposite of today's in-your-face erotica, although there is a section called juggs-eye view, where there are many images of breasts dangling in front of the camera, as if in your face.

IMO, the photographer does a wonderful job with posing. You can tell that he is into the subject. He is just not going through the motions. The photographer has a talent for bringing out the best features of the models and does a good job with angles. The natural lighting and the lack of intense post-processing adds to the natrual appeal of the models. Many of the churn-it-and-burn photographers in this genre simply have the model strip nude and take straigh-on shots of breasts. Post-processing is overused and images suffer from harsh artifical lighting. The approach is very forumlatic. If you've seen one photo, you've seen them all. The photographer here is always creative and uses various angles to capture and profile the breasts-- from the side. the rear, the front, arms in the air, etc.. These won't be the most professional-looking images in terms of lighting and studio backdrops. However, this is more than made up for with the way that the photographer deals with the models.

You will see many of the mdoels elsewhere at the classic breast sites. The sets themselves are all unique, howeve. I know many of the models well from my years of viewing this genre and have never come across these images. Many of the photo sets contain images of popular Big Breast models in their younger years-- Maria Moore, Denise Davies, etc. If you are a fan of these models, you might think this is worth the cost of admission, simply for their nostalgic value.

Where content starts to drop in quality is in image resolution, and this is my only beef about the galleries. This content represents a very unique and sometimes nostalgic cdollection. The photographer should offer these images at higher resolutions. They appear to max out at around 11100x710 and many of the older sets appear to be old chrome scans of low resolution around 700x400. As this is primnarily a photo site, there should be high-resoltion images available.

The site design and navigation is very primitive and has an amateur look to it. I never had any trouble getting to content I wanted to view but the site should be cleaned up a bit to supply it with a more modern interface.

This site obviously wont be for everyone. Unless you can find a way to place natural-looking, ten-pound each breasts on the frame of a ninety-pound runway model, you are left with finding them on women of the voluptuous and BBW variety. If this turns you off, you will likely not find the content appealing. Also, if you cannnot live without high resolution images, you also will be dissapointed.

It was somehwat difficult to provide a score as this site doesn't claim to be a slick and professional studio and is basicallty the work of a single photographer displaying a photo collection that has been accumulated throughout the years. Please take this into consideration when viewing the score. I ended up rating it based on what it meant to me as someone with a breast feitsh and lover of voluptuous women. I would rate it even higher if the not for the relatively low resolution galleries. As a one-month only quick stop for those with a fetish for oversized breasts, its worth a try, especially given the modest price and the unique content.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Flashy Babes

7. Flashy Babes (0)

Pay
Active
70
nadiencendia (83) 08-06-10  07:20am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 08-13-10  03:53am  (Update History)
Reason: Horrible customer service
Pros: -Very professional-looking site, with a personal touch
-Very artistic pictures
-Some really cute girls
-Around 480 video scenes and many more picture sets
-Full trial
Cons: -Very few search options
-No zip files for pictures
-Some models are just not that hot
-Extremely softcore content: solo scenes, sometimes not even nude scenes
-Most videos are backstage clips, which are really not that hot
Bottom Line: I have to say that I joined this site with a trial membership of just 1$ for 2 days, as an ex-member of Twistys. And it's a good thing that I did, because if I had paid the whole 14.95$ to join it, I would probably be very dissapointed right now (and most probably, my rating for this site would have been lower too).

In general, I would say that this site has more cons than pros: although the photography and video direction are good, and the clips and pics look classy enough, they are just too softcore for my taste, being all solo sets, and not even masturbation sets: just the girls posing and teasing, sometimes without even taking all their clothes off.

Also, the navigation of the site could use some improvement, by adding some search options or classifying the sets by category (posing, teasing, stripping, backstage, for example), or offering the girls in alfabethical order, as well as in order of preference and order of appearance.

Another major con for this site, as other reviewers have pointed out already, is that they don't offer .zip files for pictures. I am not a picture fan myself, but for a site that, like this one, seems to depend so much on pictures, it's a really big mistake.

The girls featured in this site are, generally speaking, quite regular, and most of them are complete strangers to me (the only exception being Sunny Leone, who in any case is not one of my favorites). Some girls are really cute; others are not. I feel as if the site was missing at least half a dozen extra-hot models (American or European) to make up for a complete catalogue: the famous ones, the cute unknown ones and the fillers.

All in all, I am not truly satisfied with this site: although the photographer and director does a good, professional job, I don't feel like this site excels at anything in particular. Only if you are into softcore (and I mean, really soft), you may enjoy the treats that this site has to offer.

Update: I have downgraded this site from 78 to 70 due to their horrible (and I mean abysmal) customer support. I joined with a trial membership, and cancelled it (three times!!!)during the first two days; however, I was charged for the whole next month. I have emailed them four or five times, and still no response. I am wondering if this is just a coincidence, or if it's a premeditated strategy to lure you with the trial membership and then charge you the whole month no matter what... Anyway, I would recommend staying away for this site unless you really, really don't mind paying for a one month membership.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit DDF Busty

8. DDF Busty (0)

Pay
Active
96
sullivan (32) 06-15-07  08:49am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (21), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Every model is gorgeous and hot as hell
- Movies are hi-res and hi-rate; new material has super hi-res DivX
- Great production values - steady cameras, good lighting, no cheesy music
- Lots of updates, as in 15 min. worth of movies every three days, and tons of photos
- Extensive back catalog
- Variety of Solo, Lesbian, Fetish, and Hardcore shoots
- Fast downloads
Cons: - the majority of the models are bleach blondes w/ tight bodies; I'd prefer to see more brunettes and redheads with a tad more meat on them
- this is glamour porn, very serious and highly stylized; there are no 'natural' scenes, and the girls don't speak (but they moan!)
- could use a few more American models
- files are huge! which is great, of course, but you'll need another hard-drive if you want to save everything they have
- early material in the back catalog not as hi quali
Bottom Line: This is top-of-the-line big bust porn, and probably the best European site. It's expensive, but you get your money's worth. I only wish all porn sites were this good!

Follow-Up:
6/26/2007 Aria Giovanni! A gorgeous movie + pics of the famous Penthouse Pet has just been added!
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Divine Breasts

9. Divine Breasts (0)

Pay
Active
50
BubbaGump (18) 06-09-12  03:44pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -- Creative photography
-- Unique content.
-- A good number of classic photosets.
-- Site delivers what is advertised--images of women with Large BBW breasts.
Cons: -- Technical quality of images can be hit or miss.
-- Primitive site design and interface.
-- Exceedingly poor streaming speeds of both photos and videos throughout my entire memberhips period.
-- Site is not growing much.
-- Limited content.
-- Vdeos are just a novelty.
-- Site owners play games with content(hold back content and offer to let you view more content if you stick around longer or sign up somewhere else)
--Bandwidth Limit imposed to 550 MEG per day.
Bottom Line: Most of the models at this site are of the BBW variety and most sport large EEE size breasts. There is very little silicone here. These are well-endowed amateur models for the most part, with a few glam types thrown in.

Full nudity is rare and the site is mostly softcore. It's all about catering to those with a breast fetish. The photography, in many caes, is actually quite well done and creative. There are a few poorly done sets but this is the exception. However, the owners skimp on resolution at times and the actual technical quality of the displayed images can vary from fairly decent 1600 resolution to grainy and out-of-focus 1024.

If you are into this genre and natural, large breasts are your thing, you would likely find the photo content here to be interesting. However, that interest will fade pretty quickly, as the amount of content is a bit limited and the site seems to be growing at a snails pace. Unless you view only a few photosets once or twice during a one-month subscription period, you will find the content runs out pretty quickly.

Videos are pretty much a novelty and the main show are the photosets. With very few exceptions, most videos are small 350 clips that run perhaps a minute or two.

The site designers also have a habit of 'padding' the numbers when it comes to overall photosets available. For example, they have created a fair number of photosets for each model. Model X may have twenty photosets available for viewing on her page. However, what they do in most cases is split up a single photo shoot into a number of different sets. For example, a lingerie shoot might be split up into three or four seperate sets. The first set on the page would be perhaps fourteen photos of the model disrobing, the next would show the model reclining while partially disrobed, etc etc. In essence, you are being given ten different photosets for a model, when in reality, they are really just one or two actual photo shoots split up.

This type of presentation is annoying and similar things happen in other areas. There are a lot of cross-sell marketing tools being used. In more than one case, a popular model will only have one or two photosets(or perhaps none at all and a few videos will be in the model area) and a marketing link advises you that "btw..this model has her own page !". Unfortunately, that page requires a seperate memebership.

The owners also let you know that the longer you stick around, the more content you can see. For example, Model X may have only a few photosets or a video that is incomplete and ends with a tease. They will then advise you that the longer you stay past 30 days, the more content you get to see --"Want to see more of her? blah blah blah.."

Given the limited content already available, this may be a good business model to get people to stick around, but the content isn't that great that I would eprsonally pay more just to see a bit more of Model X. IMO, this tactic will simply rub people the wrong way and they will just move on. Also, who says you aren't going to do the same thing if I sign up for Model X's page? I would advise the owners to rethink this strategy. You will more often than not just succeed in ticking off your customer base instead of given them a reasont o want to stay around with knowing they won't get the same treatment for next month's rent.

As far as the site design and layout, it is quite primitive. It gets the job done. However, the menus and navigation tools are primitive. The actual streaming speeds of content is about the worse I have ever experienced at any time with any online service of any kind. Strangely, the quickest way to get content on this site is to download the photosets. Usually, the opposite is true.

Without fail, I could view perhaps one or two images in a gallery, then any subsequent images would take a ridiculous amount of time to simply load. I have a high speed DSL connection and have never experienced anything this bad.

The site also limits you to 500 MEG download per day. You cannot stream or DL past this limit. In short, the strategy of this site seems to be to employ any possible means to get people to stick around longer than thirty days. They make it is hard as possible for you to stream or view the already limited content at the site in a thirty day period. Limiting to 500 MEG download a day and freezing the stream after viewing two photos means it will take six months to get to all of the content that would take a few days of viewing to get to at any other site. The goal is obviously to frustrate you by prolonging the time to to view images via streaming so you download the sets and quickly eat up your daily allotment.

Crooked? Underhanded? Shady? I will leave that for you to judge.

I would give the actual photo content a score of 70 but the experience a 0.05. Since I can only score a minimum of 50, I will give the site an overall score of 50.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Young Busty

10. Young Busty (0)

Pay
Active
85
badandy400 (103) 12-01-10  08:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -The breasts are NATURAL!
-Price not bad, although in euros so it changes for us on this side of the lake
-Can search by model
-Still updating frequently
-Finally has zips for pictures
-Several download options for videos
-Speed is okay, but not great
-Navigation fairly easy
-Picture pass word very easy to read
-Can download multiple files at once
-Video file names are okay, at least have model name included
-Can but sets into a "favorites" section
-Variety in scenes, solo, bg, gg
Cons: -Log in every hour or so
-Need picture password, these annoy me
-Absolutely no download resuming
-Picture zip file has horrible naming, all are "bonus" so need manual renaming
-Most lesbian scenes very short
-Not all photo sets have zips, seemingly no logic to which do and do not
-Not HD, a little behind par on quality of media
Bottom Line: Young Busty does well to live up to its name. Most of the girls are young and their certainly are some very busty ones. The trick is that they are mostly not over weight. Best of all, the breasts are natural! You will find girls that are attractive here other than in breast size.

This was the second time I joined the site and found it to overall be the same way it was a few years ago. They have been updating the whole time. I was very pleased to find they had added zip files for the pictures sets, even to sets that existed before the zips were introduced.

The three most significant complaints about the site is the lack of media quality, no download resume, and the extremely frequent log in. You have to log in every hour or so and when you do it takes you to the page you intended on navigating to, but if you push "back" to get to the model index or whatever it takes you back to the log in screen. You have to re-navigate to where you were initially.

Secondly, the no resume on downloads is terrible. I had to download the same file on so many occasions and often more than once. My internet has be bad lately so I got hit with this harder than most. I can typically find a way to resume, but was not able to here.

Finally, and most importantly, the video quality was not what it should be. Newer videos are not bad, but slightly older stuff is very notable. Newer videos are 5 MBit/s, a few at 6, at 1280x720 which sounds good, but somehow it just does not look as crisp as one might expect. As the videos get older the quality drops in increments down to 640x480 at 2 MBit/s.

Pictures are not huge but not small. 2000x1331 and 1600x106 are common sizes for the larger files, which are also found in the zip files. While the dimensions are not as large as on many sites they still look crisp.

Quicky Rundown
383 Videos
125 GB of videos
Videos up to 6 MBit at 1280x720
Video size range from 36 MB to 1.4 GB
2-40 minutes in duration

Would I recommend this site?

Yes I would. If you have a thing for naturally busty teens and young 20's this site should be on the top of your list. The girls look good and most have D's or larger. The site does require some patience to download but it worth the trouble. I have been there twice and will definitely return in the future to see what updates they have.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Terri Jane Official

11. Terri Jane Official (0)

Pay
Newbie
99*
hobsgrg (0) 12-12-12  09:27am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Really high quality photo sets, professionally done. Videos are also of excellent quality in high definition (720P). Photos are also made available in a single zip for each set, videos can also be downloaded with no DRM and are in a convenient MP4 format that will play on a variety of devices (unlike Windows Media for example). Website is also updated daily with either a new video of photo set so something new every day.
Cons: The site is very much sexy but classy with the photos although the videos are more playful. However she doesn't get "dirty" so you will see her oiling her boobs but you won't see her using any sex toys on herself. Although there is full frontal nudity there are no closeups of her pussy and you never see her doing anything with it, it's all about the big boobs. Also bizarrely at present if you go for the monthly option the first month is cheaper than the recurring amount which encourages you to keep cancelling and rejoin to save a little bit of money
Bottom Line: After requests from her twitter followers for her own website she has finally done exactly that and she has done an amazing job, far exceeding expectations. Even though it's a new site it has an impressive amount of content, the amount of content I would expect from a far more established website and clearly it had been in the works for a while and not put live until there was lots of stuff to enjoy. Unlike some websites where they try to make it difficult or impossible for you to save the photos and videos whenever and wherever you want her website makes this as easy as possible. She seems to be very keen to give the guys what they want to see and takes suggestion on twitter for future shoots. I've been member of other websites that model has setup themselves and this website blows them out of the water, lack of content, too infrequent updates, inability to save content were all frustrations I've had in the past, happy to report you'll have none of those with this website :) If you enjoy pretty ladies with big boobs you'll be extremely happy indeed on this website. It's pretty much close to perfect for the boob lover, however if you like seeing pussy then the score would be significantly lower.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Vanessa Montagne

12. Vanessa Montagne (0)

Pay
Active
98
roseman (253) 02-28-07  08:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Excellent quality photosets available in multiple download formats (small, medium, large photos size).
- Very good quality videos available in multiple download formats as clips or full length movies.
- ZIP downloads.
- Excellent website design.
- Pretty easy navigation.
- Lots of extra content.
- Fast downloading.
- Updates come pretty fast.
- Site has its own personality and Vanessa does WebCam shows to please her members.
Cons: - Some old photosets quality is average.
- Some videos are not available in full length movies for download.
Bottom Line: This site has the best design and the easiest navigation that I have seen on such a site so far, plus there is lots of personality on it. It is pretty well organised and there are tones of content available for download. Vanessa is gorgeous and very friendly, she seems to care about her site and her members. If you like to have interaction with the model or models when you join an adult website then here you are. Excellent work, I am amazed.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit DDF Busty

13. DDF Busty (0)

Pay
Active
95
WeeWillyWinky (88) 01-19-09  02:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Top-notch videos in multiple DL options.
- Top-notch pics in variety of sizes.
- Zips for all pic sets.
- Beautiful, professional models.
- Picture sets are well-edited, not fifty shots of same pose.
- Vids can be sampled in streaming format, with two quality options.
- Model index.
Cons: - Navigation is a bit odd. You can't get to video content without seeing at least the first page of the accompanying picture set.
- Pics are hyper-glamorous, with models in full make-up, and pics seem touched-up. This could be a pro for some.
- Not a huge amount of content for the price.
- Older pics are smallish.
- Some vids contain cheesy music.
- Set backgrounds are often unappealing, with some highly questionable "art" on the walls.
Bottom Line: A lot of websites could stand to learn a great deal about customer service by perusing the DDF site. User-friendly features abound, such as pics and vids in a variety of formats, and streaming video for sampling the video prior to download. The streaming feature alone can potentially save on tons of frustration, boredom, wasted time, and wasted disk space.

I haven't seen a site with more video options. Various levels of quality in WMV, DivX, and Quicktime, plus low quality mpeg for slow connections. I opted for the 2026k, 852x480 WMV, since I can't view a bigger size, but this was very satisfactory.

The picture sets are very well-done, well-edited, and come in two to three sizes, and all zipped. My tastes do not tend toward the glamorous, and I actually prefer amateur models, but objectively speaking you would find it hard to beat this site for what it offers.

A site like this, which is willing to put in the extra work in order to make things more convenient for paying customers, makes me wonder how some of the truly lame competition can survive for very long.

I highly recommend this site, particularly for those who have a bent for busty models, but even for those who don't.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Busty And Real

14. Busty And Real (0)

Pay
Active
100
roseman (253) 01-15-07  01:16pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Network access.
- Large variety of big boob babes.
- Daily network update.
- Low price.
- High resolution photo sets.
- Fast downloading.
- Videos avaliable in two formats MPEG and
Windows.
- Exclusive content.
- Network growing every day.
Cons: - Video quality could be better on some videos.
Bottom Line: A '' must '' site for those who like big boobs and want lot of content at a low price.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Big Boob Pass

15. Big Boob Pass (0)

Network
Active
86
King (27) 06-24-07  03:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (34), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Huge amount of video content
+ Good quality of videos - 2000kbit for MPEGS
+ Great selections of girls with big boobs
+ Very good download speeds
+ One of the best web designs
+ Content dated
+ Rating system
+ Good price
Cons: - Video quality still could be improved and they are oversized (see below)
- Some not exclusive content
- Limited trial access
- Cannot resume downloads after longer inactivity
- Repetitive models
Bottom Line: I joined mainly because of BigTitsAtWork content but later found out that other sites have also some interesting stuff. I cannot judge company for scenarios or work behind the camera because I am not sure which content is exlusive and which not. Still they seem to put more efforts for the new sites like Big Tits@ Work (School). If the content is bought, well...newer better than older :).

Don't come here for pictures. Each episode contains photos but there are too many of them and it seems like they are not sorted. Lots of them are blury. Don't look here for high photo resolution either.

Now some stats for BT@W
40 min mpg movie - 680MB
30 min mpg movie - 980MB
30 min mpg movie - 530MB
See the point? All same resolution and bitrate. My disk space is being wasted :(

Video lovings fan site with girls having round shapes.

PS: I concentrate more on technical apsects, than on artistic side so forgive my ignorance to that part.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Young Busty

16. Young Busty (0)

Pay
Active
83
pat362 (369) 04-10-11  10:11am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -A wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-Models all appear to have natural breast.
-Over 470 videos and 950 photosets.
-All videos can be dowloaded as a single file in either low, medium or high quality.
-Very good navigation system that allows search by models name, body type and a wide selection of other niches.
-They update with new content approximately every 2 days
Cons: -Not all the models have both video & photosets.
-Not all the scene are properlly tagged so that negates the very good search system.
-Not all the videos have accompanying photoset and vice versa not all the photosets have a video.
-Searching by models name is difficult at best because the names given to some of them are not the ones we know them by.
-It's very Difficult to say if all the content is exclusive but I know that some of it had to have been done for Seventeen because some of the models sometime have a tee-shirt with their logo on it.
Bottom Line: -The first thing you need to know is that the name of the site is a little misleading because not all the models are what I would consider busty but that should only be a problem if you like only large breasted women. That's not my case so I was quite pleased with the various cup size to be found inside.

-This site belong to the same people who own my sexy kitten but at least all the videos here are in a single file.

-I was pleasntly surpsied by how good the videos were and my only issue is that I wish they had all the videos to match the photosets because I much prefer video to photos.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XL Girls

17. XL Girls (0)

Pay
Active
78
Jutti24 (12) 07-14-12  01:15am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -) Updates with videos/photos multiple times a week
-) Large variety of models
-) Easy navigation, appealing design
-) Zipped photosets are downloadable (although not with a unique filename)
-) Video and photo quality of new sets is very good (720p and 1200x800 pixels) - i like the colors and contrast and detail in the photos. Makeup is used on the models
-) Plenty of content and variety
-) Download speed was decent for me
Cons: -) Videos are downloadable ONLY for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you can watch it streaming only.
-) Zipped photosets for download have no unique filename.
-) old content (and that's a big part of the content) is not so great in quality - mostly low-resolution photos.
Bottom Line: As always, this is a BBW-site and as such anybody looking for something else should go elsewhere.

But those who enjoy this kind of content (and you can preview the featured models as a non-member quite well), will definitely like the content inside. You'll find many models in great videos. Video quality of new videos is good (720p) and so is the photography. The overall styling of the model is stylish with makeup - so not as natural as some others might like. Content is exclusive as far as I could see.

However there is one MAJOR ISSUE with the site: Videos are only downloadable for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you'll have to be happy with streaming (so no viewing later on). To be frank, this sucks. All websites that restrict downloading of videos suck and this is the reason why I didn't give it a 90+ point rating. I'd be happy to pay a premium to download all videos as I please. Nothing during sign-up tells you about that restriction.

Site navigation is easy and straightforward, so is downloading of videos (if they are downloadable) and photos. One minor glitch with photoset downloading: the file naming is "Modelname.zip" so your photosets aren't named to matching videos - you'll have to rename (or auto-rename) the file during download so you don't overwrite existing zip-sets.

Important during signup: They try to screw you when signing up by offering a 19,90 one-month recurring option and a 29,90 one-month NON-recurring option. Be aware what you choose.

Verdict: The action and the models are excellent and I'd somewaht recommend the site. The downloading restriction is downright ugly, hence a big fine in rating-points.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Breast

18. Only Breast (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
blahman2 (0) 09-02-11  09:38am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: No reviews!?? Seems this is the ONLY site featuring naked voluptuous east european big breasted women working out. HD quality - non professional bodybuilders. Girls are really hot.
Cons: I think they dont add more videos of naked workouts... That will kill the site.
Bottom Line: This is exclusive content. If your fantasy is next door naked mature women exercising - this is it. Im surprised that there are actually no sites out there with such simple content out there. Most have weird (but hardworking) bodybuilder types or lazy teenager contortionist type girls expecting us to be excited at their presumptuous "beauty".
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Prime Cups

19. Prime Cups (0)

Pay
Active
92
ace of aces (179) 06-14-08  08:15am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (69), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + no dl limit
+ no drm
+ exclusive content
+ 4 types of video dl
+ streaming video possible
+ 320*240 MPEG arround 200 MB
+ 640*480 WMV arround 400 MB
+ 960*540 WMV arround 800 MB
+ 1920*1080 WMV arround 2 GB
+ very nice boops
+ dl manager is supported
+ dl speed 670 KB/s
+ different content (mastrubation, hc. e.g.)
+ 135 videos
+ easy navigation
Cons: - price is to high
- no real extras
- all other sites from that company are separated
- older videos have only low-medium quality (but that quality is even real good)
- dvd`s are only byable
- login system (pw is automaticly given)
Bottom Line: so folks, that is a site which is at the top of the sex sites, and also at the top of the boops sites.

the content is great!

you got plenty nice girls with sometimes real and sometimes not real hugh and nice tits.

the content deals with mastrubation, dildo play, hardcore, lesbian, two girls one boy, ore two/three boys and one girl therfore it`s for every taste something in it.

Sadly you got "only" 135 videos but that is, compared to the other reviewed sites from me like brazzers e.g. very less.

the content of download possibilitys is good, and i don`t really know why the download speed should be slow. ok i have a 6000 connection speed. But this is totally used by making one download!

what can i say tho the hd videos.
ok, who needs a video with 2GB on his hd? i just even prefer the download of the medium videos. at the one hand site i have mass videos with semi space needed, on the other hand site i have even good video quality.
i have to say that the hd quality videos looks even greater then the medium videos, but i am not that hot for such a high quality. and belive me the medium videos are still excellent.

the bad news is the price.
it is, like ever, for every european 29,95 ! That is quite expansive.

reduce the price and make one or two sites even joinable and i would raise my points close to 100.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sabrina Meloni

20. Sabrina Meloni (0)

Pay
Active
55
jonesyboy (23) 01-13-07  05:02am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Among the biggest nautral breasts on the 'Net
-Sabrina has a certain charm about her
Cons: -Sets are too similar in style and poses
-Many sets are non-nude
-Updates are small (few pics short vids)
-Terrible video quality
-Many poses don't offer much erotic appeal
-Ethical (join link says 16.95 a month, but that's after the first month which costs 19.95. Of course, there's no mention of that on the site).
Bottom Line: If anyone's read my gigantischebrueste (gigantic natural tits) review, this site is part of that stable and seems to be run by the same yahoo (note the cons sections are very similar).

Quite simply, the person who runs these two sites (and there's a couple others as well) just doesn't know how to create a pleasing, customer-friendly environment where you feel you get your money's worth.

To put this in perspective, I've seen two different sets where Sabrina is playing -- non-nude mind you -- with her dog...her dog.

If that wasn't bad enough, the photographer seemed to think that in itself would have enough erotic appeal, because the pictures do nothing to focus on her spectacular natural attributes (her body's blocked by the dog, her back's to us, she has a loose fitting t-shirt on, etc., etc.).

But what annoys me most is this penchant (and both sites do this) to break up the sets and locations among the updates. What I mean by that is one week will be pics featuring a certain shoot (bathroom, outdoors and so on) and poses, and the next week, or two, will finish that shoot.

The result of this is each update will be small, and, for two or three weeks in a row you will be seeing updates that are virtually the same from the last week's.

Go's back to the ethics issue I mentioned. I'm quite sure this is being done to save money, but as a result anyone who pays for the sites are getting severely short-changed.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nadine Jansen

21. Nadine Jansen (1)

Pay
Active
90
GUY22 (7) 03-18-13  10:15pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-20-13  10:20am  (Update History)
Reason: Overhauled the entire review.
Pros: All original content.
All softcore content.
Lactation content.
Lesbian lactation content.
High quality models.
High quality videos (native 720P) and high quality photos.
Very unique and well produced materials.
iPod playable videos available.
Cons: No update schedule.
Updates can be sporadic.
Only three videos per month.
Only three photo sets per month.
Few exclusive models.
Bottom Line: Nadine has made many improvements to her site since I was there in early 2012;first, there are a lot more lactation content now;second, the videos and photos are in true HD (iPod/iPhone version also available);third, the number of models and contents have slowly increased since. And the new lactation contents are a fantastic addition.
Nadine is well know for her humongous all natural breasts and that goes for all her other models as well.
Being a softcore site you won't find any explicit contents here. Most models only do topless scenes but a few are fully nude.
Some of these ladies are porn stars so you might recognize them from other sites, but their scenes are exclusive to this site.
These are exclusive and wholly unique videos featuring busty ladies playing and massaging their breasts in all sorts of scenarios.
All videos are well produced, well directed, and shot in very high quality. None of the videos are studio made. All videos have a slight voyeuristic feel. And for the same reason these models give a very intimate and sometimes very playful performance.
The new lactation contents are second to none. This site has become the best softcore lactation site on the web.
Lactation videos feature very busty ladies milking themselves, being milked, drinking their own milk, and using milk pumps.
Lesbian lactation contents have girls milking each other, milking onto each other, and sucking each other dry.
These are all completely original exclusive scenes that are incredibly erotic and are passionately made.
The lactating models are entirely exclusive to Nadine's site, you won't find these lactating models anywhere else.
Videos are shot in true 720P and they look incredible on a 40 inch LCD TV. The iPod versions are made available along with the HD versions and they look just as sharp on the iPod Touch 5.
There are 3 video updates per month. No DRM, no download limits. Very small banner on the corner.
The photos are of very high quality, between 1600x1600 resolution. Each set contains about 60 photos. Photo sets are separated into two updates and they're updated several days apart. All files are zipped. There are three photo sets per month.
Nadine's site has grown beyond Nadine herself. If you were fan of Nadine or have a breast/lactation fetish, you won't be disappointed and you'll find much more.
I whole heartedly recommend this site to all lovers of creative and passionately made porn. This is like the IfeelMySelf of all breasts sites.
It's intimate, sexy, creative, unique, and wholesome.
All the latest video updates can be seen on the News/Diary section and all the photo updates are on the Models section on the welcome page.
For lactation fans out there this is a must sign up site. You've never seen such well made lactation content with such beautiful ladies anywhere. One small downside is that there are only three ladies who are lactating but these three ladies are absolutely gorgeous with huge swollen breasts like you've never seen. And the ladies are clearly enjoying milking themselves.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XX Cel

22. XX Cel (1)

Pay
Active
85
WeeWillyWinky (88) 10-17-08  05:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Fair collection of very natural busty models.
- Zip files for pics.
- Total fidelity to niche. The site is about breasts and nothing but breasts.
- Excellent picture quality.
- Excellent editing of photo-sets.
- A few beautiful pregnant models. This could be a con for some but why simply baffles me.
Cons: - Several models are much too large (all around, not just breasts) for my tastes. This is a purely subjective con and for some it will be a pro.
- Breast-sucking videos are useless. This is also a subjective con. No hairy faces in the way of the good stuff, please.
- Videos are hit and miss as far as quality both physically and esthetically.
- Amount of content, and number of models, needs to grow.
Bottom Line: This is one instance where one's subjective tastes will certainly factor in to how one responds to the site and how one rates it.

For instance I would rather not see so many large women, but some guys will want more of them. Some men will love the inclusion of pregnant women, as I do, but some men will find this a turn-off. And finally, some guys might actually like to see another man suckle away at a big pair of breasts, but to my mind unless this occurs during an actual sex scene it's less than useless. It's obnoxiously useless.

And once again we have a website wherein the vid section is not up to par with the photo section. As for specs, these vids are all over the map. For some reason I am seeing higher bitrates in vids with smaller dimensions. For instance, one vid is 720x576, 764k; another is 640x480, 1339k; and a third is 320x240, 1519k. Could it be that the VLC media player is innacurate, or is this a normal thing? In my experience it is not normal.

Be that as it may, the content of the vids is also all over the map. There are far too many tit-sucking vids; some vids have cheesy music set to them; some are tediously long and some are dreadfully short; and still others are dynamite, as is one featuring a young pregnant model named Lucie. There are a few lactation vids. One I looked at showed nothing but the model squirting milk. That got boring after about ten seconds.

As for the photo-sets, I believe they are some of the best in the genre, or any genre. The pics are mostly 1600x1064, though some are smaller, and Cel has a definite skill in this area. The sets often contain more than a hundred pics and yet they are nicely edited so that you don't get fifty shots from the same angle. Even though it's a breast-fixated site there is total nudity and plenty of spread shots as well as awesome booty shots. I would put Cel in the top 5 percentile in regard to pictures. And for those of us who like our monitors crammed full with beautiful female goodness, Cel makes optimal use of the landscape format.

Bottom line: if you are primarily a pic collector and like big breasts in a softcore format, I believe you will find this site a decent value, although there is not a huge amount of content up.


If you are into hardcore, forget it. And if you are coming here mainly for the videos, you might want to save your money this time around.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Busty Romina Lopez

23. Busty Romina Lopez (0)

Pay
Active
88
careylowell (18) 09-03-08  02:21pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -G cup Romina has a just arrived from the farm, I've-never-done-this-kinda-thing look refreshing to porn purveyors used to jaded American tramps.
-First nude web model from Paraguay! (My guess).
-Her chum Paola, seen in nine or ten sets, is a hottie with an even bigger bow.
-Low renewal rate.
-No attempt to hide rolls of flesh.
-Many sets shot outdoors in glorious South American sunlight
Cons: -Roughly two-thirds of the videos have fair to middling sound.
-When the gals speak, the lanaguage is strictly Spanish with a very few sporting English subtitles.
-Lopez's looks are a few rungs down the beauty ladder compared to sites I normally pay for.
-No hardcore.
-Romina and Paola attempt some tit kissing & grabbing, but clearly they don't know what they're doing. Very awkward.
Bottom Line: Not for those desiring Met-Art grade models or Scoreland style web design. Photography is from the aw-shucks school with themes like bra fittings, jump rope, strip tease, oh let me rub that lotion on you. No DP here. Best photo sets are those of Lopez sporting lots of make-up. Usually not my thing, but the stuff softens her mannish features.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Big Tits In Sports

24. Big Tits In Sports (0)

Pay
Active
92
roseman (253) 11-15-08  01:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - Network access (22+ adult websites).
- Huge collection (network).
- Good website design.
- Navigation is very easy.
- No DRM videos protection.
- No download limit.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Nice monthly subscription price (US customers).
- Very good trial option.
- Multiple download format for videos.
- Streaming option for videos offered.
- ZIP download option for photosets & screencaps available.
- Content is exclusive.
- Daited content and frequent updates.
- Cool non Brazzers adult websites special offers for members.
- Nice girl / scenes rating system and cool members forum.
Cons: - Needs growth.
- No HD quality videos.
- Photosets & screencaps quality could be better.
- Site could update faster to help it grow faster.
- Expensive mothly sub price for EU customers.
- Some network sites doesn't update anymore.
- Search feature can be inappropriate some times.
- Few annoying adds in members area.
Bottom Line: Big Tits In Sports is another great adult website by the best (at my opinion) adult network on the net.

First of all, currently there are only 22 scenes available for download but I believe that these scenes are very carefully selected one by one and they are very very cool. Brazzers Network is huge so don't worry about this specific site's collection.

Website design is very good and navigation is easy, so I don't think that you will face any problems with that. You can search for your favourite model's scene by using search feature, which can be inappropriate some times, or easily by her name's letter.

Photosets and screencaps can be downloaded in ZIP format, making it simple and easy but their quality surely needs improvement in comparison with other adult websites. Videos can be streamed or downloaded. There are 4 formats offered (.wmv, .mpeg1, .mpeg4, iPod/PSP). Quality is very good but I would prefer HD.

There is no DRM videos protection or download limit plus downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). Content is daited and exclusive and site updates weekly though there are daily network updates.

Brazzers team offer some great adult websites special offers for their members (for example access to RealityKings Network with 60% off).
Moreover, there is a nice girl and scenes rating system and a cool members forum.

Monthly subscription price is very good for US customers something that I can not say for EU ones as price is higher. Trial option is definitely good.

Big Tits In Sports scenes are surely not lacking of creativity and models look very good.

An awesome adult website which is a must especially with network access offered.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Big Melons

25. Only Big Melons (0)

Pay
Active
75
BadMrFrosty (56) 12-14-10  05:18am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Approx 185 videos on this site plus network access to a couple of other boobie sites.
+ Solid weekly updates with almost no missed weeks.
+ Zipped screenshots
+ No DRM.
+ No download limits
+ Decent download speeds (upwards of 40mbit sec)
+ Supports download managers and multiple concurrent downloads
+ Good mix of models from European to American, known faces to newbie's, teens to milfs. All generally very attractive.
+ Decent value and NO regional pricing.
Cons: - Site is blocked for me in the Czech Republic, have to download my server elsewhere.

- Videos are 640 x 480 MPG or WMV (~1mbit/sec) which is not at all good by today's standards. I downloaded several scenes in both formats to compare. MPG is twice the file size than WMV and both look almost identical to my eyes. Stick to the WMV.

- Vast majority of the scenes do not have photosets, just screen caps. I have browsed the first half of the available content and found only 2 picture sets.

- Most scenes are under 10 mins in length
Bottom Line: This site can be summed up pretty easily with one word.

Average.

While there are no major issues with the site they really don't excel at anything either. Yes there is plenty of content but hardly any picture sets and the video quality for 2010 is not good. In fact they have been using exactly the same video format since the site launched in 2007.

There is a mix match of soft and hard action but no way to filter on either and in some cases you can't tell without downloading the scene. Usually the scene length is a bit of a giveaway, soft scenes usually run only 8 - 10 minutes while the hardcore scenes are closer to 30 mins.

The price is reasonable, the content plentiful and exclusive, models attractive I don't regret purchasing a membership. If they were to improve the video quality and provide picture sets they might be able to compete in the busty market. As it stands I find no reason to recommend them over someone like DDFBusty who do everything so much better than these guys.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 255 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Porn Megaload (1)
2. Christy Marks (1)
3. XX Cel (1)
4. Nadine Jansen (1)
5. Cassandra Calogera (1)
6. Sara Jay (1)
7. Nicole Peters (1)
8. Milena Velba (1)
9. Catalina Cruz (1)
10. Busty Brits (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.2 seconds.