Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 253 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Christy Marks

1. Christy Marks (1)

Pay
Active
76
Monahan (40) 07-03-14  07:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Christy Marks - Fantastic mammaries and a fun loving attitude
High quality content professionally done
All videos are high def (1280)
Updates once a week or so
Imaginative solo scenes
Christy's an incredible contortionist. Example - she could fuck herself with her nipples. When she squeezes her mams between her legs it sends me off. Her patented "frog" position is unique.
NO INK. A major plus for me.
No broken links.
Cons: No interaction with members
A total of 60 videos* and associated pix
Only two non-Christy videos - both Merilyn Sakova, with tits equal to Christy's
All of Christy's material is 5+ years old and is remastered (very well, by the way).
Some material is also available on one or more of Score's other websites and some is unique to this site.
Hard core material is all SSDG - Same sex different guy. Little imagination in the hard stuff.
The g/g/b and g/g stuff isn't particularly good. (Exception - her scene with Terry Nova with two guys was outstanding)
Slowish downloads

* One scene was taken down before I had a chance to download it. No idea why it was removed.
Bottom Line: The site is $19.95 with the PU/TBP discount and, for horndogs like me who really enjoy watching Christy enjoying her great tits. I was able to drain the entire site in four sessions.

The total amount of video content as of 7/1/14 is just a tad more than 15 Gb.

Thus site is not included as an add on (free or otherwise) with any other Score site so it must be considered a "hot property" by management.

I decided on a point score of 76. It would be higher if the site had more content and included all, not just some, material from other Score sites. It would be lower except they have done a good job of upgrading their catalog to HD.

Bottom line, I recommend the site to huge tit aficionados who like young, seemingly carefree models. It comes to about 33 cents per video scene which, if you enjoy world class huge natural boobs bouncing (flopping) all over the screen, is a great value.

Set aside a few hours a day for four or five days if you plan to download everything on the site.

I plan to cancel about a week before my first month is used up and may, but probably won't, rejoin a year or so from now.

I can't comment on customer service because I had no need to use it during my brief stay.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Overdeveloped Amateurs

2. Overdeveloped Amateurs (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
nomas23 (1) 06-07-14  07:45pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: interesting girls .. when you can see them
Cons: After calling up ccbill I finally got access. Still a pain.

Website navigation is awful .. circa 1990s
content is delivered monthly and changed weekly
but you can only see whats presented that week/month the videos are broken up in parts and although you get parts 6-10 this week/month
you cannot see 1-5 (anymore) as they are not available ? The archive pics area is just a compilation of 1350 pics no particular order nor grouping. You can't find content on any particular girl. There is no search, nor a menu to be found. They give you what they give you this week/month and thats it. You can't find content on any particular girl. There is no search, nor a menu to be found. They give you what they give you this week/month and thats it. I was thru all the content in like 25 mins. I found a strange link to older archived sites (ex. MAY 2003) but I could not use my current login ?
I guess they send you a new login monthly or something?
Bottom Line: Overall a horrible designed site that should be passed on .. it's not worth the $$
Some of the girls are unique .. and I'd like to see more of some of them ..
but apparently buying a membership will not let you see more of them !
atleast not until next week/month.
Look elsewhere (unfortunately)
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Nicole Peters

3. Nicole Peters (1)

Pay
Active
69
Monahan (40) 05-05-13  10:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nicole Peters has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets.

Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.

The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.

That's about it for the "Pros" list.
Cons: Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.

No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don't recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.

Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It's conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.

It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain't worth it.
Bottom Line: This site is a "throw-in" site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That's how I became a member.

If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you'll like Nicole, but as with many "throw-in" sites this one definitely isn't worth the TBP discounted price of $18.

The four videos available on the parent site, Scoreland, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with Scoreland and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.

The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.

The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Milena Velba

4. Milena Velba (1)

Pay
Active
86
GUY22 (7) 03-31-13  07:19pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Exclusively Milena (with guests models).
Lactation Contents.
Lesbian Lactation Contents.
High quality photos.
High quality HD videos.
IPod versions available.
Cons: Very few guest models.
Only two photo sets a month.
Only two videos a month.
No zipped archives for photo sets.
Strictly softcore.
Only topless materials.
Bottom Line: Milena's site has been unchanged since it's inception in 2004.
And Milena herself doesn't seem to have aged either, her massive all natural J CUP breasts are just as amazing as they ever were.
Milena did her first photo shoot in NadineJansen's site. She got so popular she began her own site.
The site had grown gradually in content over the years.
And it has stood the test of time. It's still very much exclusively about Milena.
She also features a few guest models in lesbian shoots.
Guest models are other naturally well endowed busty porn stars, you might recognize them from bigger sites.
She also features a few amateur busty models as well.
The site began with Milena lactating. But unfortunately that was short lived.
So there isn't a lot of lactation content of Milena.
She mostly does solo videos of her playing and massaging her breasts in various outfits and scenarios.
The lesbian shoots are much more fun. But again they're only softcore breasts play videos.
Lots of massaging, nipple play, and some fun role playing as well.
The photo sets come in two sizes;750x520 and the higher quality 1600x1100.
Each set is seprated into two part, they're updated about a week apart.
Unfortunately they're not zipped. You need to save each photo by itself or with a download manager.
Videos come in several formats;WMV and QuickTime (640x360);in HD MP4/H.264 (1280x720);and in iPod Touch/iPhone (480x272).
Milena and Nadine's site share the same models (and the same webmaster I believe) but Milena's site is still an independent site regardless.
The difference is that Nadine's site features more guest models and less of Nadine.
Recently there's been a surge of new lactation content with fresh new amateur models.
And it's a welcome change for this lactation fan.
If you were a fan of Milena then you'll find much of the same and some new contents.
Don't expect a dozen different models, it's Milena's site and it's about Milena.
This is a very well done individual site. I would say it's one of the better individual sites out there.
The contents are well put together. The photos and video are fun and creative.
Very few individual sites last this long. Not only has the site lasted this long but it has improved and grown steadily.
If you want something different and new give this site a try.
And one of the few sites on the internet that features lactation content.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XX Cel

5. XX Cel (1)

Pay
Active
90
GUY22 (7) 03-19-13  09:09pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Lactation Content.
Pregnant Content.
Many types of models.
HUGE natural breasts.
Great photo sets.
Good Amount of videos.
Full nudity.
Cons: No regular update schedule (that I know of).
Older videos are rather low quality. (Newer ones are much better though.)
Videos are not true HD.
His fat ugly face shows up in the videos.
Bottom Line: One of the few lactation/pregnant sites on the web.
There are a good amount of vids and photos here. Each model has their own page.
There are a GREAT variety of ladies of all shapes and sizes. Some thick, some chubby, some thin. They're ALL gorgeous. They all have huge natural breasts. Some of these ladies you might recognize from other sites (Candy Alexa, Domino, Lucy Love etc etc) and some of them looks to be real amateurs.
The pregnant/lactating models are on a separate section. These mom-to-be's are absolutely gorgeous;round full bellies, swollen milk filled breasts, thick thighs, swollen butts, you get to see their femininity at full bloom. The photos sets are what really shines in this site. These models are photographed from every angle. Some of these ladies do a bit of masturbation as well. The lactation videos are as sexy and erotic as they come. These ladies spray and squirt their milk all over the place. I find this extremely sexy. And there's a good amount of lactation videos here.
However, I have one complaint;this guy shows up in his videos WAY too often. I don't want to see his fat face. I don't want to see him slobbering all over these ladies. He ruins the scenes for me. He can help with the milking but get away from the camera and stay behind.
Other than his fat ugly face, this is actually a very well done site. Not very professional looking but well done nonetheless. This guy knows what he's doing and he's been doing a great job. If you have a pregnant/lactation/breast fetish you can't go wrong with this site. It's worth the monthly subscription. I've been a member on and off for many years, and even though the site hasn't really changed much in terms of layout, the contents have been accumulating at a steady rate.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Catalina Cruz

6. Catalina Cruz (1)

Pay
Active
74
Cybertoad (104) 03-19-13  08:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: New Look and Feel to site.
Fast Downloads
Average Quality
Live Show
Extra Sites
Cons: Old Material.
Extra Sites Not Updated.
Navigation is poor.
Pricey for content
Bottom Line: Over view :

This site has been around along time, I think I have been a member some 6-7 times. The site has gone through many transformations and not good ones.
They try new things and do it ok.

Pro's :
Catalina is still in great shape, having been a workout instructor before porn she does well at staying very toned. The sites graphics are nice to look at and the site is pretty good about the updates.


Cons:
The site is haunted by old material both on the main site and its bonus sites. Many bonus sites have not been updates since I was a member in 2010 wow. They have other sites like License To Blow who also has update issues one never knows when it will be updated. My pet peeve is Catalina is a knock out and has obvious fake boobies. But as of late they look like two salad bowls taped on. I hate to sound so cruel, but I went wow what did she do? I am not sure if she did a lift or what but they do not even resemble any natural aspects.


Toads Take :

Disappointment, the site is pricey at 25.00 and you can down load the entire sites and bonus sites in a day and a half with little effort.
The site has old material still there, very old and quality obviously is not good. She focuses allot on her webcam, twitter and blogs. Talks allot about what she is doing but this never reflects much on the site itself.
I liked the site a few years ago and just can not score anywhere near that. The site is just not what it used to be.


Should you join? If you have never seen her, perhaps for a month and is why I gave it a 74 average rating. Catalina has a sultry soft voice that comes out well in her scenes. The $25.00 may be a deal breaker the site is not much more a 12.00 site. She is often the Director in guest scenes and nice to hear a female directing wish more did.
The other bonus sites as ok, and loaded with old poor resolution material. Hard site to rate, its not a horrible site, it is just ok.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nadine Jansen

7. Nadine Jansen (1)

Pay
Active
90
GUY22 (7) 03-18-13  10:15pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-20-13  10:20am  (Update History)
Reason: Overhauled the entire review.
Pros: All original content.
All softcore content.
Lactation content.
Lesbian lactation content.
High quality models.
High quality videos (native 720P) and high quality photos.
Very unique and well produced materials.
iPod playable videos available.
Cons: No update schedule.
Updates can be sporadic.
Only three videos per month.
Only three photo sets per month.
Few exclusive models.
Bottom Line: Nadine has made many improvements to her site since I was there in early 2012;first, there are a lot more lactation content now;second, the videos and photos are in true HD (iPod/iPhone version also available);third, the number of models and contents have slowly increased since. And the new lactation contents are a fantastic addition.
Nadine is well know for her humongous all natural breasts and that goes for all her other models as well.
Being a softcore site you won't find any explicit contents here. Most models only do topless scenes but a few are fully nude.
Some of these ladies are porn stars so you might recognize them from other sites, but their scenes are exclusive to this site.
These are exclusive and wholly unique videos featuring busty ladies playing and massaging their breasts in all sorts of scenarios.
All videos are well produced, well directed, and shot in very high quality. None of the videos are studio made. All videos have a slight voyeuristic feel. And for the same reason these models give a very intimate and sometimes very playful performance.
The new lactation contents are second to none. This site has become the best softcore lactation site on the web.
Lactation videos feature very busty ladies milking themselves, being milked, drinking their own milk, and using milk pumps.
Lesbian lactation contents have girls milking each other, milking onto each other, and sucking each other dry.
These are all completely original exclusive scenes that are incredibly erotic and are passionately made.
The lactating models are entirely exclusive to Nadine's site, you won't find these lactating models anywhere else.
Videos are shot in true 720P and they look incredible on a 40 inch LCD TV. The iPod versions are made available along with the HD versions and they look just as sharp on the iPod Touch 5.
There are 3 video updates per month. No DRM, no download limits. Very small banner on the corner.
The photos are of very high quality, between 1600x1600 resolution. Each set contains about 60 photos. Photo sets are separated into two updates and they're updated several days apart. All files are zipped. There are three photo sets per month.
Nadine's site has grown beyond Nadine herself. If you were fan of Nadine or have a breast/lactation fetish, you won't be disappointed and you'll find much more.
I whole heartedly recommend this site to all lovers of creative and passionately made porn. This is like the IfeelMySelf of all breasts sites.
It's intimate, sexy, creative, unique, and wholesome.
All the latest video updates can be seen on the News/Diary section and all the photo updates are on the Models section on the welcome page.
For lactation fans out there this is a must sign up site. You've never seen such well made lactation content with such beautiful ladies anywhere. One small downside is that there are only three ladies who are lactating but these three ladies are absolutely gorgeous with huge swollen breasts like you've never seen. And the ladies are clearly enjoying milking themselves.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cassandra Calogera

8. Cassandra Calogera (1)

Pay
Active
76
tangub (151) 02-27-13  08:25am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (55), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Only $17.95 with PU/TBP discount
Part of a network of 15 solo model sites including Aaliyah Love, Dylan Ryder, Ashley Fires, Hanna Hilton, Monica Mayhem plus more.
Nice quality photo sets. Over half the sets I downloaded were 1200x1800px and the rest 1000x1500px
Slideshow feature and zip downloads for the photos.
Multiple streaming and download options for the videos (flash, wmv, mp4, mpeg, ipod & psp) including a small number in hd.
Other network sites easily accessible without further logging in required.
Content date stamped.
Cons: A smallish site with only 33 videos and 70 photo sets.
The last update was February 2012 and the one before that December 2010..
Most of the videos have a maximum resolution of 640x480 @1000-1500 kbps, only 4 of the videos come with an hd 720p & 1080p option.
Basic navigation categories, photos, movies, solo, hardcore, girl/girl with no search or tags
No recent model interaction, no cam shows, last blog entry was December 2011
Bottom Line: This site is part of a network of solo sites that I joined primarily for Aaliyah Love. Id never come across Cassandra Calogera before that I can recall but ended up pleasantly surprised by this site and quite enjoyed much of her content. Cassandra has cute girl next door looks with her most striking assets being a huge pair of natural DD tits. She mostly appears as a brunette but also has some content here with her hair dyed black.

The best part of the site for me was that she had a nice collection of sexy solo photo shoots with much of it in a nice 1800px resolution. 45 of the 70 sets were solo including spreading and toy insertions with the other 25 a mixture of b/g and g/g.

I had a quick scan through most of the videos and they do seem to contain more bg hardcore action than solo content. Quite a bit of it seems to be shot in POV style and it also includes some b/g/g threesomes

Cassandra has a few extras like some private photos and podcasts, a blog and questions and answers section but none of it has seen any recent activity and the site has only had 1 new update since 2010. It does say a new update coming soon 18 March 2013 but I dont intend to stick around to find out if it will materialise. It only takes an evening or two to download everything of Cassandra but the network overall should keep anyone busy for a month and is good value for money with the PU discount.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sara Jay

9. Sara Jay (1)

Pay
Active
81
marcdc1 (165) 01-16-13  12:42pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - photo shoots available in zip format. Each set has over 100 pix in it. There are over 450 picture sets available
- Weekly cam show with Sara. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- Also sells one-on-one cam shows to members.
- Over 300 videos with good range: interracial, light bdsm, anal, group sex, cougar, cuckold/hotwife, girl/girl, foot fetish
- High energy; Sara dives into her scenes making them fun and nasty. Gentle love-making is not her specialty.
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay (of filtycuteonline), Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Curious Gabby, Bobbi Eden, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Angelina Castro, Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- cam shows are achieved (everything in the network) - but it's not organized, and is only available in flash
- lots of hot guest stars
Cons: -big boob job. If you're a natural purist, you will not like the Sara's implants.
- video quality ranges from 8450X480 4.1 mbps, 740X480 1.3 mbps to 640X480 1.5. At this point I really expect at least newest content to have an HD option.
- Terrible organization: the photo and video sections are given broad sub-categories: hardcore, interracial, girl/girl dvds. and solo. There's also a BTS section
- Much of the content comes from other sources (I don't care but know some want to know this ahead of time).
- the video section is all in little GIFs, which drove my older laptop to a grinding pace (serves me right for not upgrading, and skimping when I bought it).
- the lack of organization and HD make the site look like it hasn't moved out of the 90s.
Bottom Line: Sara is a hot curvy MILF. If that's your thing you're getting it here. She's definitely on the dirty side of hot. There was a poll question on PU about dirty talk. Sara does dirty talk but tend to be the repetitive: "Oh baby" variety. There isn't a lot of imagination in her performance. That said she's still a great performer - just not one of the best in class.

Bottom Bottom Line:
I'd have liked Sara much better if she wasn't in the network she is. What I mean by that is: I can't help but compare her to the other memberships I'm getting, and when I do, they're better than she is. Sara's enjoyable, but I'm finding I'm spending a lot more time enjoying the other members of the network.

Buy or Not? Fence. Look at her other work - she makes the rounds with the big studios - if you like her work this site gives you your money's worth. If you're into MILFs, look at the rest of this network, it's their specialty. If you're into curvy MILFs this is a fine site to get your fix.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Terri Jane Official

10. Terri Jane Official (0)

Pay
Newbie
99*
hobsgrg (0) 12-12-12  09:27am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Really high quality photo sets, professionally done. Videos are also of excellent quality in high definition (720P). Photos are also made available in a single zip for each set, videos can also be downloaded with no DRM and are in a convenient MP4 format that will play on a variety of devices (unlike Windows Media for example). Website is also updated daily with either a new video of photo set so something new every day.
Cons: The site is very much sexy but classy with the photos although the videos are more playful. However she doesn't get "dirty" so you will see her oiling her boobs but you won't see her using any sex toys on herself. Although there is full frontal nudity there are no closeups of her pussy and you never see her doing anything with it, it's all about the big boobs. Also bizarrely at present if you go for the monthly option the first month is cheaper than the recurring amount which encourages you to keep cancelling and rejoin to save a little bit of money
Bottom Line: After requests from her twitter followers for her own website she has finally done exactly that and she has done an amazing job, far exceeding expectations. Even though it's a new site it has an impressive amount of content, the amount of content I would expect from a far more established website and clearly it had been in the works for a while and not put live until there was lots of stuff to enjoy. Unlike some websites where they try to make it difficult or impossible for you to save the photos and videos whenever and wherever you want her website makes this as easy as possible. She seems to be very keen to give the guys what they want to see and takes suggestion on twitter for future shoots. I've been member of other websites that model has setup themselves and this website blows them out of the water, lack of content, too infrequent updates, inability to save content were all frustrations I've had in the past, happy to report you'll have none of those with this website :) If you enjoy pretty ladies with big boobs you'll be extremely happy indeed on this website. It's pretty much close to perfect for the boob lover, however if you like seeing pussy then the score would be significantly lower.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Score Videos

11. Score Videos (1)

Pay
Active
81
pat362 (367) 11-18-12  07:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +You get access to Score HD as well as Score to Go.
+There are over 2000 videos to choose from.
+You can download the videos in MP4 and WMV and basic resolution is 854x480.
+They truly have a variety of models to choose from which are based on age and body type.
+Their content goes back at least a decade and further for some models so that could be a plus for some fans.
+They update with about 2 new scenes per week.
Cons: -None of the scenes are tagged so you can't do a search by keyword.
-They have a lot of older content that hasn't aged well.
-A portion of their content is also availbale on Score HD and the quality is better on that site than here.
-Many of their models that may be your type.
-You can only see the dates of the updates on selected pages so a search by model name will not tell you when the scene was shot or when it was uploaded.
-Part of the content as a synopsis but another part is phtotsets of the scene so you ahev to scroll through a bunch of pages to see what's inside the video.
Bottom Line: *I can see the logic for why Score chose to combine this site with Score HD but in some ways that is a disadvantage to this site because the quality is superior at Score HD and since they both share content then that makes this site's content obsolete. That's only part of their problem because they have a large percentage of older content (production wise) where the quality is rather poor and that clashes even more with their newer stuff. I mean it's kind of nice to offer members stuff made in 90's but if you don't remaster it then it's almost worthless to download except for nostalgia sake.

*There are still a lot of decent suff here but it won't be in HD and you'll have to do a lot of digging to find it. Mind you that is part of the fun so I didn't really mind all that much. Of course I might have had a different opinion if the site had many thousands of videos to go through.

*There are plenty of things they could do to improve the site but the first one is that they should have only one site called Score videos where all the sites send their stuff once it's no longer available for download on these sites. Having two sites offering identical stuff is redundant as well as time consumming. Of course having only one site would mean that the site would have a lot more content and since they don't tag their scenes and navigation is almost non-existant then that would require them to serioulsy improve this new site or suffer the conseqences of displeased customers. Having only one site would require that they have both an HD section as well as a regular one so that membes only intereested in HD content wouldn't wase their time going through content they never plan to view or download.

**The bottom line is that this would probably be a better stand alone site but would anyone join this site if it didn't also offer HD content?**
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Josh Girls

12. Josh Girls (1)

Pay
Active
80
littlejoe (23) 10-02-12  02:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -bouncing boobs
-mostly good video quality
-some hot models
-uses ccbill
Cons: -worst site design ive ever seen
-inconsistent download speeds
-some not so hot models
-slow updates
-no HD
Bottom Line: this site is truly an eyesore. my webpage in high school was better then this. all it consists of is a thumbnail of a model and then links for the videos with generic keywords saying what the video is of, ex. "jumping jacks" or "jump rope". no picture preview, no description, no filesize or length. i thought maybe my browser wasnt loading it correctly. nope, just abysmal.

no pictures other then a small thumbnail. odd since the preview page before i joined had a MUCH better layout then the members area...

the videos are 720x480, and some havent been deinterlaced, so you see the rough edges. they are of good quality tho. the clips are 2-5 minutes each and each girl has several videos. they are from the same shoot, just broken up. i count 234 clips from 25 girls

i have also joined boobiemovies.com and it appears josh girls is a continuation of that site. same girls tho the video quality is better on josh girls

looks like the site updates 1 clip per week, except that stopped in july. now its 1 clip a month! i got a good chuckle how throught the links it says more clips coming soon, sorry i broke my promise blah blah blah. also keep in mind that the girls clips are strewn along over several years. i doubt hes shot anything for 3 years, he just has these sitting somewhere waiting to release it

so many bad things how did it still get a 80? easy, the videos are amazing. i joined this site to see girls with bouncing boobs, and i was not disappointed. jumping, running in place, trampolines, different views, all spectacular! too bad its not in HD

i recommend a 1 time membership to the site, and never look back. also i think it should be $20 not $25
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Cassandra Calogera

13. Cassandra Calogera (1)

Pay
Active
78
marcdc1 (165) 08-31-12  12:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - "Full Figure" girl. I wouldn't call her heavy or big (sorry if that's you thing_, but she's no twig. She's the 1950-60s ideal body type. Natural Tits (as far as I can tell)
- Hot scenes covering a lot of different styles, interracial, anal, FFM, lesbian.
- Multiple formats (wmv, flash, iOS, PSP, mp4, mpeg)
- zip downloads for pix
- Includes network of about 15 girls including: Dylan Ryder, Devon Lee, Ashley Fires, Abbey Brooks, Sweet Lea Luv, Tara Lynn Foxx, Bruno B)
- Some real hot pix sets from her work with kink.com
Cons: - Irregular updates. There was one this June. The ones before that come from 2010.
- Says live shows are achieved, I could not find them :(
- Network focuses on interaction little of it is available on this site. There was an answer to "ask me a question" feature in 2012 - the answer promised squirting and gangbang updates in the future. The future isn't here yet (in videos).
- Ads inside member section.
- most content is 640X480 1mbps this is the highest encoding available. Very little (about a half dozen) are 1920X1080 5mbps
- about 72 image sets
- about 36 video shoots
Bottom Line: Nice site. Unfortunately like much of the network it's not updated enough, nor does it have a significant enough backlog.

Cassandra is hot (in my opinion) and is not afraid to get dirty (another plus in my book). There's plenty of shoots with her in sexy fishnets or other hot outfits.

The streaming videos of her "personal life" include some nice squirting vids - for those who like that.

Bottom Bottom line: It's a fine site that is not updated enough and doesn't have a significant enough backlog to be worth the price. That said the network has some real gems I would recommend Ashley Fires and Dylan Ryder (both of whom are still updated).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dylan Ryder

14. Dylan Ryder (0)

Pay
Active
88
marcdc1 (165) 08-09-12  06:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - It's DYLAN RYDER. I'm a big fan of hers if you haven't checker her out you should. There's enough in her preview area to give you a good idea of how hot she is!
- Big network (15 sites included with stars like: Puma Swede, Monica Mayhem, Devon Lee, and the fantastic Ashley Fires)
- Good (not over the top like Lelu Love) fan interaction (more about this in the bottom line section).
- Tailored content to the site. Exclusive BTS and pix of her day.
- HD versions of videos.
- Many different options for downloading including iOS and PSP.
- zip download of picture sets sets
- Nice "favorites" ability. You can select content that you want to be able to find again by making it a "favorite"
Cons: - Ads included in member site (I don't care, but have seen some complaints form others)
- Only updated monthly
- Organization could be improved. Site is organized chronologically, with only broad categories to help (for example: g/g, hardcore, solo).
- Not exclusive material (some of it may be but others of it certainly is not)
- About 60 movies in the site; About 112 picture sets. I expect more than that for a $30 site - then again with 15 different sites included I shouldn't complain.
Bottom Line: Does it's job well. This is a site for fans of Dylan Ryder. If you're looking for just a great porn site - you should move on. If you love Dylan Ryder this site does a great job of presenting her. There's unique goodies like pix and videos from her day and a good level of interaction with her.

While not all of her material is here (how could it be?). If you looking to collect a lot of her scenes this might be the perfect way to do it. Her stuff from Bonnie and Clyde and Cuckold Club are here (looks like a lot of her stuff from Bluebird films) But other things she's done are not (imagine the obtaining the rights would be a nightmare)

She has a nice ask me a question feature which I took advantage of. Here's the conversation:

marcdc2112 asks: Hi Dylan, I thought I saw on your twitter that you're retired. But, obviously there are new updates here. Can you explain. Is dylanryder.com for re-releasing previous stuff? Are you only shooting for this site now? Or do I have everything all wrong? Thanks for a great site!?

Dylan Says: Yes I am retired! There are still plenty of updates to come on my site....Lots of never before seen stuff updating monthly!

So I don't know where these updates come from but you can be assured from her herself, that there will be monthly updates consistently.

BOTTOM LINE: It is what it is:
a) A great site for fans of Dylan Ryder to get her content and have some interactions with her.
b) A great network of hot girls. For $30/month there's plenty to explore and enjoy. I'm happy I joined.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XX Cel

15. XX Cel (1)

Pay
Newbie
99*
magrury (1) 08-01-12  09:41am
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Girls vary in size, country, dress and attitude.
they are all Huge breasted, and if they're not,Cel will tell them, and they'll STILL let him grope them.
He speaks MANY launguages but mostly converses in English. Cel puts the girls at ease and that makes them do anything for him. Video and Photo options
New vids are labeled as such
Cons: the available girls are shown but you cant open their boxes in new tabs, you have to click on each girls pic and go from there. Many of the clips appear to be in FLV format, which sucks. Real Player is buggy. Cel whould really start ANOTHER site. With the videos he takes AFTER the groping's over, if you know what i mean
Bottom Line: I am Such a fan of this guy Cel. Which i guess his name is. I joined a few years ago and loved it then too. Only now, it's different. years ago he would photograph a model and have her try on clothes, jump up and down and play with their own tits. I was amazed then that he got amateur girls to just do this for him. Now Cel is a lot more confident. He often gets in the shot with the models and even starts to make out with them. Holy Shit and these girls LOVE him. It is Amazing to watch. He's an average looking guy, even a bit , well, overweight, but these hot chesty girls can't WAIT for him to start kissing them. He's found the secret to dealing with good looking girls, i don't know if it's telling them they're nice, cute, have good manners or what, but they are his. He is everyman and that's all right with us. I wish he had a Facebook Page or something. He needs to Know that he's appreciated
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XL Girls

16. XL Girls (0)

Pay
Active
78
Jutti24 (12) 07-14-12  01:15am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -) Updates with videos/photos multiple times a week
-) Large variety of models
-) Easy navigation, appealing design
-) Zipped photosets are downloadable (although not with a unique filename)
-) Video and photo quality of new sets is very good (720p and 1200x800 pixels) - i like the colors and contrast and detail in the photos. Makeup is used on the models
-) Plenty of content and variety
-) Download speed was decent for me
Cons: -) Videos are downloadable ONLY for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you can watch it streaming only.
-) Zipped photosets for download have no unique filename.
-) old content (and that's a big part of the content) is not so great in quality - mostly low-resolution photos.
Bottom Line: As always, this is a BBW-site and as such anybody looking for something else should go elsewhere.

But those who enjoy this kind of content (and you can preview the featured models as a non-member quite well), will definitely like the content inside. You'll find many models in great videos. Video quality of new videos is good (720p) and so is the photography. The overall styling of the model is stylish with makeup - so not as natural as some others might like. Content is exclusive as far as I could see.

However there is one MAJOR ISSUE with the site: Videos are only downloadable for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you'll have to be happy with streaming (so no viewing later on). To be frank, this sucks. All websites that restrict downloading of videos suck and this is the reason why I didn't give it a 90+ point rating. I'd be happy to pay a premium to download all videos as I please. Nothing during sign-up tells you about that restriction.

Site navigation is easy and straightforward, so is downloading of videos (if they are downloadable) and photos. One minor glitch with photoset downloading: the file naming is "Modelname.zip" so your photosets aren't named to matching videos - you'll have to rename (or auto-rename) the file during download so you don't overwrite existing zip-sets.

Important during signup: They try to screw you when signing up by offering a 19,90 one-month recurring option and a 29,90 one-month NON-recurring option. Be aware what you choose.

Verdict: The action and the models are excellent and I'd somewaht recommend the site. The downloading restriction is downright ugly, hence a big fine in rating-points.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Divine Breasts

17. Divine Breasts (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
mememe (0) 06-17-12  07:05am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some (not all) of the models are very busty
Cons: Poor design makes it difficult to navigate. Only low def video. Poorly shot. There is a hidden download limit which cuts you off very quickly and makes it very difficult to access most of the video.
Bottom Line: Poor quality material and badly designed. The download limit on this site makes it a complete rip off. I have had to rate it 50/100 but the real score should be much, much lower for this complete pile of ****!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Divine Breasts

18. Divine Breasts (0)

Pay
Active
50
BubbaGump (18) 06-09-12  03:44pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -- Creative photography
-- Unique content.
-- A good number of classic photosets.
-- Site delivers what is advertised--images of women with Large BBW breasts.
Cons: -- Technical quality of images can be hit or miss.
-- Primitive site design and interface.
-- Exceedingly poor streaming speeds of both photos and videos throughout my entire memberhips period.
-- Site is not growing much.
-- Limited content.
-- Vdeos are just a novelty.
-- Site owners play games with content(hold back content and offer to let you view more content if you stick around longer or sign up somewhere else)
--Bandwidth Limit imposed to 550 MEG per day.
Bottom Line: Most of the models at this site are of the BBW variety and most sport large EEE size breasts. There is very little silicone here. These are well-endowed amateur models for the most part, with a few glam types thrown in.

Full nudity is rare and the site is mostly softcore. It's all about catering to those with a breast fetish. The photography, in many caes, is actually quite well done and creative. There are a few poorly done sets but this is the exception. However, the owners skimp on resolution at times and the actual technical quality of the displayed images can vary from fairly decent 1600 resolution to grainy and out-of-focus 1024.

If you are into this genre and natural, large breasts are your thing, you would likely find the photo content here to be interesting. However, that interest will fade pretty quickly, as the amount of content is a bit limited and the site seems to be growing at a snails pace. Unless you view only a few photosets once or twice during a one-month subscription period, you will find the content runs out pretty quickly.

Videos are pretty much a novelty and the main show are the photosets. With very few exceptions, most videos are small 350 clips that run perhaps a minute or two.

The site designers also have a habit of 'padding' the numbers when it comes to overall photosets available. For example, they have created a fair number of photosets for each model. Model X may have twenty photosets available for viewing on her page. However, what they do in most cases is split up a single photo shoot into a number of different sets. For example, a lingerie shoot might be split up into three or four seperate sets. The first set on the page would be perhaps fourteen photos of the model disrobing, the next would show the model reclining while partially disrobed, etc etc. In essence, you are being given ten different photosets for a model, when in reality, they are really just one or two actual photo shoots split up.

This type of presentation is annoying and similar things happen in other areas. There are a lot of cross-sell marketing tools being used. In more than one case, a popular model will only have one or two photosets(or perhaps none at all and a few videos will be in the model area) and a marketing link advises you that "btw..this model has her own page !". Unfortunately, that page requires a seperate memebership.

The owners also let you know that the longer you stick around, the more content you can see. For example, Model X may have only a few photosets or a video that is incomplete and ends with a tease. They will then advise you that the longer you stay past 30 days, the more content you get to see --"Want to see more of her? blah blah blah.."

Given the limited content already available, this may be a good business model to get people to stick around, but the content isn't that great that I would eprsonally pay more just to see a bit more of Model X. IMO, this tactic will simply rub people the wrong way and they will just move on. Also, who says you aren't going to do the same thing if I sign up for Model X's page? I would advise the owners to rethink this strategy. You will more often than not just succeed in ticking off your customer base instead of given them a reasont o want to stay around with knowing they won't get the same treatment for next month's rent.

As far as the site design and layout, it is quite primitive. It gets the job done. However, the menus and navigation tools are primitive. The actual streaming speeds of content is about the worse I have ever experienced at any time with any online service of any kind. Strangely, the quickest way to get content on this site is to download the photosets. Usually, the opposite is true.

Without fail, I could view perhaps one or two images in a gallery, then any subsequent images would take a ridiculous amount of time to simply load. I have a high speed DSL connection and have never experienced anything this bad.

The site also limits you to 500 MEG download per day. You cannot stream or DL past this limit. In short, the strategy of this site seems to be to employ any possible means to get people to stick around longer than thirty days. They make it is hard as possible for you to stream or view the already limited content at the site in a thirty day period. Limiting to 500 MEG download a day and freezing the stream after viewing two photos means it will take six months to get to all of the content that would take a few days of viewing to get to at any other site. The goal is obviously to frustrate you by prolonging the time to to view images via streaming so you download the sets and quickly eat up your daily allotment.

Crooked? Underhanded? Shady? I will leave that for you to judge.

I would give the actual photo content a score of 70 but the experience a 0.05. Since I can only score a minimum of 50, I will give the site an overall score of 50.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Top Heavy Amateurs

19. Top Heavy Amateurs (0)

Pay
Active
50
BubbaGump (18) 06-01-12  01:01pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: None
Cons: -- Photo quality is abysmal.
-- Photosets are largely screen captures of grainy videos and are saved with high JPEG compression.
-- Video quality is even worse.
-- Site frequently freezes.
-- Advertusing bares no resemblence to actual site content.
Bottom Line: Anyone who has read my reviews in the past knows I am pretty fair and impartial. In an effort to maintain this reputation, I will limit my comments to the facts.

I am hard-pressed to say anything positive regarding my experience at this site.

The site design and layout is extremely primitive. When I was able to access the content, I was exceedingly dissapointed with the content and quality of images and videos.

The vast majority of images are small resolution photos that are saved with extremely high JPEG compression. The Pixelation is severe in the majority of images. Sets that are displayed as HD image quality consists of one or two images saved with 1400x800 resolution, with the remainder at 700x400 or below. I did not come across an image that did not contain compression artifiacts. More than half the images are blurry enough to be useless and appear to be nothing more than screen captures of videos.

The video quality is, in many cases, worse than the photo image quality and at times appears to be video captured with an older cell phone.

Connecting to the site is problematic. I frequently locked up and often could not access video content.

The advertising images are high-quality, but this kind of content is nowherre to be found in any of the actual content in the members area.

In short, I could not in good faith reccomend this site to anyone interested in this genre, whether it be photos or videos. I would even go so far as to supply an entirely subjective opinion, which is that sites like this give online porn a bad name.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Busty Cafe

20. Busty Cafe (0)

Pay
Active
65
BadMrFrosty (56) 04-29-12  03:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Close to 400 videos.
+ Huge range of models including todays stars as well as stars going back to the 80's
+ Videos can be downloaded as clips or as a full scene.
+ Almost 1700 picture sets
+ Picture sets are available zipped
+ Later picture sets are very nice quality at 1660x2500
+ Regular updates but unpredictable. On average 1 video and 2 photo sets are added per week.
+ Download managers and concurrent downloads supported
+ Basic but functional interface with model index, the ability to sort updates by date, model or rating.
+ No download limits
+ No DRM
+ No regional pricing (Unless its in favour of us Euros as I paid $24.95 instead of the $29.95 listed on TBP)
Cons: - The network is a total, utter and complete shambles
- I would say 99% of the content is not exclusive
- Video quality is unpredictable, one update would be 640x480 and the next 720P.
- Single download streams are hard limited to ~5mbit/sec
- No search. This problem is compounded by the fact so much content is available.
Bottom Line: At first glance you seem to get 12 sites included in your membership. For me, being a lover of the boob, having access to "Busty Cafe", "Busty Milly" and "Honey Chest" seemed to be great value. The cracks start to show as you explore what is available. "Busty Milly" and "Honey Chest" were a lot smaller content wise and also seemed to feature more of my favourite models so I started by downloading everything from those 2 sites. As I then began looking at the other sites I started to get a sense of Deja Vu. Looking at "Hungarian Honeys" I noticed scenes that looked familiar. If the model was Hungarian and owning of a large pair tits, the same video/photoset would appear on "Busty Cafe", "Honey Chest" and "Hungarian Honeys". I then thought, Milly Morris from the ""Busty Milly" site has big tits, I wonder if she is on multiple sites too. Low and behold, I discovered that the boobie content is duplicated all over the place with "Busty Cafe" seeming to contain all the big boob material from the other sites. Not only that, the vintage themed sites duplicate each other, the handjob themed sites duplicate each other and the "Babes Cartel" seems to duplicate absolutely everything. So if a scene featured a 80's porn star with big tits giving a handjob, the same scene could appear on 6 or 7 separate sites!

I dont understand why they would do this as it makes organising your collection a complete nightmare and figuring out what you have already downloaded a chore. Its not exactly like they are lacking in content, with hundreds of videos and well over a thousand picture sets, it looks like they maybe started with 2 sites and wanted to create a network without actually creating any more content. If they had created new sites and split up the content so that it was all unique to one site then I could have lived with it. The fact that I didn't notice the duplication until later meant I had wasted god knows how much of both mine and their bandwidth and my time downloading loads of stuff twice or more times. I knocked 10 points off the score for this mess of content duplication and wont be joining again because of it. Being a collector, any site that goes out of its way to make organising my collection more difficult than it should be goes onto my blacklist.

Its a shame that I had to have this frustraiting experience as the content is decent and very plentiful but the network management is just awful. If you are not a collector and just want to look at boobies then I'm sure you will like this but for me I just hate having my time wasted. For that reason I wont be coming back to this site, this network or any of the other networks managed by this company.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Beshine

21. Beshine (0)

Pay
Active
60
BadMrFrosty (56) 03-08-12  08:06am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very nice technical video quality 1080P WMV @ 8Mbits / Sec.

Photos not high res at ~1000x1333 but use very little compression resulting in images ~1MB in size that look great.

71 videos sets and 90 profesional photo sets

79 diary style photo sets showing her going about her daily life shopping, at the hairdressers etc

Updates are irregular but normally 1 video plus 1 photo set a week.

Good members forum where Mayra takes an active role.

Very fast download speeds

No DRM, no download limits, no regional pricing, multiple payment processors including CCbill.
Cons: Expensive at $30 per month.

The video encoding profile used is NOT DXVA compliant meaning you will need a beefy CPU to decode the 1080P video without frame drops.

Photo sets contain on average only 50 photos.

A zip option for photo sets is available but it seems the server compresses them on demand and it takes AGES before the download even starts.

Videos are on average only 4 minutes long.

REALLY lacking in variety of the content.

Very, very, very soft-core. Topless only.

See bottom line for my own biggest problem
Bottom Line: As Beshine.com no longer really exists and my old review was based on her old site before the re-design I thought its about time I posted a updated one. If you have seen my previous reviews it should be pretty clear that I like big tits. Real or enhanced I like them both equally. I used to think "the bigger the better" with Beshine ahem Mayra Hills having the biggest around she would be the obvious choice for a huge boob connoisseur.

When I last reviewed her site back in June 2010 Mayra's tits, while absolutely massive, still looked like tits with nipples and all. In that time both herself and her site have undergone massive change, she is leaner and more toned, more professional make-up and hair and as far as her face and body are concerned looks better than ever. Also the amateurish feel to her main photo sets and video are gone and both are now of really good quality.

Then we arrive at the thorny issue of her USP. I never thought I would be saying this about a woman but her boobs are now too big. After countless more operations Mayra Hills does not look like a attractive woman to me any more, the boobs are just far, far too big, her nipples seem to have disappeared making them look like big round flesh coloured balls with little resemblance to boobs. So much so that if you were to tell me they were strap-on prosthetics I would believe you.

With the only appeal of this site being her boobs and my dislike of said boobs there is nothing left for me here. The score I have given is my most subjective yet. If you can look at those monsters and are attracted to what you see and want more then technically you will be in for a treat. The videos are plentiful and of great quality as are the photo sets, she updates regularly and is a active member of the forum. In that case the site would be worth a solid 75/100. As for me, I'm going to find who has the second largest boobs in the world and give their site a try.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Josh Girls

22. Josh Girls (1)

Pay
Newbie
83*
foxtails (1) 02-10-12  10:03am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - lots of beautiful energetic fun women who are having fun
- lots of creative exorcises that the women perform
- simple site and simple navigation
- original
- Josh is a cool webmaster who responds to emails
Cons: - could use more consistency in introducing the women (more stretching and up-close shots please)
- just a tad bit pricey as I would like to see more girls
Bottom Line: Joshgirls is a recent favorite of mine as it's very original in what it offers. While there have been many athletic sites out there that show girls performing more complex exorcises in the buff none have zeroed in on the hot and fun simplicity that Joshgirls offers.

So first of all, what exactly are Joshgirls? They're simply women who have big breasts that can really really bounce. Which is also one of the two key elements that separates Joshgirls from other slightly similiar athletic sites. Every single one of girls on the site has large breasts.

And the second fun element is that Joshgirl's simply intends to show them bouncing in literally almost every imaginable way possible. Whether it be on a trampoline, oiled up, or while the women is using a hippity hop. And it's all hot. There's no exercise performed that will not show these beautiful breasts bouncing as god intended.

There are only two complaints I have. First is while the site has a decent amount of videos now as of feb 10,2012, 205 +, the amount of girls is still relatively low in comparison to other athletic sites. But it's not that big of an issue because of the quality content that is there.

My second complaint is the consistency in how Josh introduces the girls is a bit of a letdown. A few girls before getting started get some amazing intimate up-close views of everything they got while most don't. A standard stretching and up-close intro would be nice from now on.

Also I just want to let people know that this is strictly a video site. There are no pictures to speak of. It's a non-issue for me and really should be for most as pictures cannot capture breasts bouncing that well. ;)

Overall, this is a fun and hot site that carves out its own niche in this repetitive copy and paste world of porn. And its only negative for me is that there's not enough of this and that in a few areas. I give it a 83. I highly recommend it for anyone looking for something that's just fun and hot and almost even seemingly innocent - almost.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jugg Master

23. Jugg Master (0)

Pay
Active
85
BubbaGump (18) 01-29-12  01:34pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (30), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Unique fetish content.
+ Creative photography.
+ Good nostalgic value.
+ Low subscription price.
+ One-month non-reccuring costs the same as ongoing monthly subscription rates.
Cons: - Low resolution images only.
- Primitive site navigation and layout.
- Site does not appear to be growing much.
- Videos are just a novelty.
Bottom Line: I can give all the reasons why you might or might not find this site attractive. However, If you know who hese models are without Googling, my guess is that there is a high probabilty that you would enjoy viewing the models at this site--Maria Moore, Denise Davies, Bunny De La Cruz.

If you don't know these names but have a breast fetish or enjoy viewing images of women with truly oversized and natural breasts, meaty nipples, and saucer-sized areola, this site would also be worth a one-month subscription.

If none of the above is true, you should look elsewhere. That's it in a nuthsell. This is a very simple site oriented towards photography. There are videos, but they are simply small low-resolution clips. The videos serve more as a novelty of sorts and really are not worth commenting on.

The site is entirely sofcore. Most of the photosets are of the slow tease variety. They start with the model fully clothed and proceed to various states of undress, with the emphasis always placed on the breasts. You see a lot of images of huge boobs jutting through bras, dangling in the air, or spilling out of clothing items. Many of the sets were taken in natural lighting, outdoors and in pools.

I did come across some full nudes, but this is the exception, not the norm. This is conservative, old-school erotic photography. It is the opposite of today's in-your-face erotica, although there is a section called juggs-eye view, where there are many images of breasts dangling in front of the camera, as if in your face.

IMO, the photographer does a wonderful job with posing. You can tell that he is into the subject. He is just not going through the motions. The photographer has a talent for bringing out the best features of the models and does a good job with angles. The natural lighting and the lack of intense post-processing adds to the natrual appeal of the models. Many of the churn-it-and-burn photographers in this genre simply have the model strip nude and take straigh-on shots of breasts. Post-processing is overused and images suffer from harsh artifical lighting. The approach is very forumlatic. If you've seen one photo, you've seen them all. The photographer here is always creative and uses various angles to capture and profile the breasts-- from the side. the rear, the front, arms in the air, etc.. These won't be the most professional-looking images in terms of lighting and studio backdrops. However, this is more than made up for with the way that the photographer deals with the models.

You will see many of the mdoels elsewhere at the classic breast sites. The sets themselves are all unique, howeve. I know many of the models well from my years of viewing this genre and have never come across these images. Many of the photo sets contain images of popular Big Breast models in their younger years-- Maria Moore, Denise Davies, etc. If you are a fan of these models, you might think this is worth the cost of admission, simply for their nostalgic value.

Where content starts to drop in quality is in image resolution, and this is my only beef about the galleries. This content represents a very unique and sometimes nostalgic cdollection. The photographer should offer these images at higher resolutions. They appear to max out at around 11100x710 and many of the older sets appear to be old chrome scans of low resolution around 700x400. As this is primnarily a photo site, there should be high-resoltion images available.

The site design and navigation is very primitive and has an amateur look to it. I never had any trouble getting to content I wanted to view but the site should be cleaned up a bit to supply it with a more modern interface.

This site obviously wont be for everyone. Unless you can find a way to place natural-looking, ten-pound each breasts on the frame of a ninety-pound runway model, you are left with finding them on women of the voluptuous and BBW variety. If this turns you off, you will likely not find the content appealing. Also, if you cannnot live without high resolution images, you also will be dissapointed.

It was somehwat difficult to provide a score as this site doesn't claim to be a slick and professional studio and is basicallty the work of a single photographer displaying a photo collection that has been accumulated throughout the years. Please take this into consideration when viewing the score. I ended up rating it based on what it meant to me as someone with a breast feitsh and lover of voluptuous women. I would rate it even higher if the not for the relatively low resolution galleries. As a one-month only quick stop for those with a fetish for oversized breasts, its worth a try, especially given the modest price and the unique content.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Busty Madison Blush

24. Busty Madison Blush (0)

Pay
Active
76
Jutti24 (12) 01-26-12  04:02am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -) Straightforward browsing and layout

-) Has the unique Madison Blush as the only model

-) Bonus access to other solo-woman sites.

-) Image resolution is decent.

-) Image downloading using download-managers is straightforward and easy.
Cons: -) Server sometimes crashed while I was browsing the site once.

-) Softcore only - be aware of that.

-) Major fault: very very little content considering the hefty membership fee. As of late Januay '12 there are 22 photosets of Madison Blush.

-) about 29 USD for a month

-) no idea how frequent updates are.
Bottom Line: All in all I am less excited about this website. While I admire the model and try to collect all the content that's around on the web of her, this website should be avoided. 29 USD is a lot for solo softcore content with only 22 photosets so far.

Maybe if the price would be about 19USD and with more content the score would be a lot better.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jugg Master

25. Jugg Master (0)

Pay
Active
84
Jutti24 (12) 01-26-12  03:56am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of different women - the non-membership page shows a lot of what you will be able to watch in the members-area

Affordable and cheap!

Lots of content.

Easy to download sets or videos using download-managers
Cons: Old image content isn't very high-res. (but new content is OK!)

Old videos aren't in particularly high quality (but new content is OK!)

Site navigation is a little bit "creative" but OK overall. No surprises.
Bottom Line: Very enjoyable considering that the membership fee is in the sub-20 USD range and there is lots of content.
Although keep in mind: there's only softcore, so don't expect more.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 253 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Josh Girls (1)
2. Christy Marks (1)
3. XX Cel (1)
4. Nadine Jansen (1)
5. Cassandra Calogera (1)
6. Sara Jay (1)
7. Nicole Peters (1)
8. Milena Velba (1)
9. Catalina Cruz (1)
10. Score Videos (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.52 seconds.