Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 182 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit The Art Of Blow Job

26. The Art Of Blow Job (0)

Pay
Active
69
whowho (7) 12-12-11  02:11pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Videos come in a fair quality with 720p and about 6000 kb/s, at least for the updates since 1 year (MP4 is high, WMV and AVI lower resolution. Older Videos as MOV)

- Pictures come as JPG usually with a 4288 x 2848 resolution, size from 1 to 1.4 MB. Set can be downloaded as one ZIP File. Pictures are shoot separately from the videos (no screencaps).

- Regular updates

- The scenes have a very intimate and private atmosphere
Cons: - This site comes with a highly limited variety of content: You will basically always see the same woman and the same man (whose face is never shown) doing a blowjob in almost exactly the same way. The differences between the scenes mostly will be, what the woman wears or how she styled her hair that day.

- Excessive use of focus techniques (Depth of field): While this might give pictures/videos a more artistic touch, in many of the scenes you will be limited to see the penis and the womans lips/nose in detail, while everything else is blurred out. Maybe this is up to personal taste, but i felt like watching porn through a magnifier most of the times.

- This also might be up to personal taste, but *every* scene plays the same style of lounge music, and original sound from the scene is muted at times (e.g. seeing the woman say something without hearing her).

- While i'm sure that the blowjobs that woman gives are enjoyable, you will watch her applying the same bj over and over.
Bottom Line: Basically, you only need to see 1 scene from this site to be able to know how all the other ones are.

While i can understand, that the site owner puts some effort to present something different from the usual mainstream porn, it appears to me quite overdone. Each video ends with the message "We want to spread the message of the beautiful side of porn!", making me wonder if in their opinion that "beauty" is decided by applying focus blur on the video camera and playing lounge music (did they actually licence all those tracks?).

I can recommend that site to people, who have a strong preference on oral sex and don't mind watching the same woman applying the same way to perform a blowjob on the same man in every scene.

Otherwise, this site is highly overpriced for what it has to offer (this being the main reason for my score).

Some minor details:
- Everything is offered as a ZIP File, even a video. Site owner uses a Mac, so you will have annoying "_MACOSX" and ".DS_Store" Systemfolders/files included.
- Almost every scene contains cuts (mostly to change the angle, i guess, since there is no camera operator), you don't see the whole sexual act throughout from beginning to end.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit The Art Of Blow Job

27. The Art Of Blow Job (0)

Pay
Active
81
hodayathink (18) 11-21-11  10:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (33), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Well shot content, looks great

Very accessible webmaster (especially on social media)

Multiple download options (wmv, avi, mp4) for each video

4 years of updates (230+ and counting), and it consistently updates every week
Cons: Only basic search function (can only search title and description, no tags)

No cam shows/live shows (many, many single model sites now feature this, so it's a little negative to see one without any)

There are picture sets, but they're infrequent, so you never know if a video is going to have corresponding pictures or not

It's a minor thing, but I have to list the lack of variety as a con. You should expect it given the name of the site, but pretty much every video is just a blowjob. As long as you aren't expecting anything else, it's not really a big deal
Bottom Line: The site's layout is pretty basic, with updates presented in a blog-style layout ordered by date. The site has been around for a few years now, so there's a good amount on content here (about 140 videos and 90 photo sets). There are separate headers for if you want to view only photo sets or only video shoots. The video shoots are basically once a week, and have been for at least the past couple years. The photo sets seem to come about one every couple months on average, but there doesn't seem to be any pattern as to when they'll come out. For example, in the last 10 picture sets, there's one from last week, 2 from July, 1 from April, 2 from March, 1 from last November, and 3 from last October. And, generally speaking, they're pictures from a video shoot that was released around the same time. Videos are in three different formats (wmv, avi, mp4), and newest videos are in 720p HD. Pictures are decently sized, but not big enough to be blown up or anything like that, and can be downloaded in a zip file or individually. The search functionality is a little bit lacking, IMO. There's a basic search box that lets you search scene titles and descriptions, but it can sometimes be hard to find something specific because you don't know how to search for it (for example, to find the videos with masturbation, I had to search the word "touch"). A tagging system for the scenes would help a lot with this.

As far as the actual content of the videos, if you like watching blowjobs, then it's really good. But you have to like just watching blowjobs (and various other jobs), because that's all the vast majority of the scenes are. There's a few videos where she masturbates a little, and 2 recent updates that contain a little bit of full-on intercourse, but everything else is pretty much just mouth and member. All of the scenes I've watched were very well shot, with good lighting and camera positioning so that you can see everything clearly. Most of the videos have some music playing in/over them, but not to the point where you can't hear the action going on in the scene. The HD videos look like you would expect HD videos to, and the older ones are definitely still watchable. The best way I could probably describe the scenes is that they have an X-Art kind of feel to them, which is a very good thing.

On the right hand part of the site, Camille has links to her accounts on many different social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr), as well as a link to her own blog. All of them are pretty active, and do a good job of giving you a sense of the person behind the site. Which is why I'm a little (but not totally) suprised at the lack of any type of live-streaming/cam shows. I do understand that it doesn't really fit well with the theme of the site (since the site is really about the act more than the girl giving it), I think it'd be nice if she did something even as simple as a weekly chat with members, possibly capped off with a b/j that would become come out at some point in the future as a video scene.

In the end, I would say that if you're someone that enjoys watching blowjobs specifically, this site should be a must-join for you at some point in time. But even if you're not, it's still a very good site that's worthy of at least a look.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Granny Cums Here

28. Granny Cums Here (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
dufferdude (1) 11-08-11  03:38pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of pictures, large archive
Video clips are clear, no obvious watermarks
Cons: Video clips are just that; a few exceed 10 min., most are about i min. in length. Written descriptions are longer than the video clips.
Bottom Line: You can find longer clips from this site on some free sites.
All in all, a waste of money. Not recommended.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Deep Throat Love

29. Deep Throat Love (0)

Pay
Active
85
dracken (246) 10-23-11  06:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Around 145 scenes now and updating regularly (almost weekly, although they do miss a week or two here and there). Most scenes come in a range of formats including HD (1250x700) as well as standard sizes and small clips. They also have HD images for each set at 3,000px × 2,000px (zip archives available). Older stuff is of course in lower resolutions, but for the most part stuff looks great.

-Download speeds were incredible at around 1 mb per video. No issues with log-out or missing links or anything like that. Overall the technical aspects of the site work well. However, I do wish they had a way to show all models on this site alone as opposed to models in the entire network.

- The scenes have good camerawork, but they tend to focus a bit too much on close-ups. Good light and hot models.

- Although the site is called Deepthroat love I believe all scenes have some regular sex as well, and we even get some threesomes (not too much anal though)

- Overall fun scenes with cute girls
Cons: - I mentioned this in almost every one of my reviews for Porn pros but it's a pretty huge mistake and it's very obvious here: they need a better thumbnail system. Right now as you navigate the site you get to see the scenes name and the models in it, but the picture for it is always hard to make out (you often see more of the cock and the girl's forehead than her actual face.)

- Each scene starts with an interview that can get ridiculous. The camera guy asks the girl to deepthroat a dance wand, or a banana or some candy marshmallows. One one hand it can be funny, but then again it takes 5 minutes away from 30 minute scenes. Depends on you if it's a bonus or a con. For me it got repetitive and the girls weren't interesting enough to make it fun.

- Although they do deepthroat none of the scenes are as anywhere as intense as FacialAbuse or Gagfactor or even Teencoreclub. The girl's make-up doesn't get ruined and they don't end up with spit on their faces.
Bottom Line: It's been a while since I last visited Pornpros and the network has improved in many areas, while maintaining some of the positive stuff that attracted me to them in the first place.

They still get some good looking models and many of them are exclusive. The girls do hardcore (including some impressive deep throating on this site), but it never feels forced or abusive. In fact the whole vibe of the site and the network is fun, ridiculous and over the top fun.

Let me give you some examples of the kind of scenes you can get inside. In one video the girl tries to stuff 24 marshmallows in her mouth and looks like she's about to explode into laughter at how ridiculous the whole thing is. In another scene the girl tries to deepthroat twizlers and almost gets the hickups. It all feels funny and while it can get a bit repetitive if you like the vibe this site is great. (I think at some point or another you get to see girls try to deepthroat bottles of water, sausages, almost all kinds of candy imaginable, bananas, corn, asparagus and celery, oh and cucumbers, how could I forget cucumbers)

Once the interview and the attempt at stuffing ridiculous food down your throat is done the girl goes down on the male model with a lot of closeups of the action. This depends a bit from scene to scene but overall I'd say you get too see everything, even a bit too close for my preference. The BJ sessions are interrupted by sex usually at least twice. Most videos have doggy, reverse cow and some sort of missionary with her legs over her head.

What I found interesting was that most girls really seem to get into the sex and many of then bounce on the guys cock as opposed to him doing all the work. This can be very hot if you like to see a girls round ass as she bounces on a dude in doggy style. I, personally found it extremely hot and different from a lot of sites where the girl just sits there taking it very passively.

The content is pretty similar all throughout the site and most models fit the same mold (big breasts, round asses, a lot of them have tattoos and piercings and although they all say they are 18 or 20 they seem to be somewhere in that 25-ish nebulous porn starlet age)

Some of the cons are that it's not as intense as you'd expect from a site named Deepthroatlove and most action feels too mainstream, no DP, no runny make-up, no really gagging or intense face fucking. In fact very much of the content feels like a pretty standard porn DVD. While this is fine, it does feel like they should get at least some scenes with more umph. Right now I felt like half the scenes here could have been on any other one of the sites in the network. Then again if you just want straight sex with good looking very well made-up girls this will be perfect.

Anyhow, combined with the network access (which gives you more scenes than you'll ever be able to watch) the site is a great deal if you're not looking for very niche porn. For anyone that wants to replace DVD's with the convenience of a major network this site is perfect. It offers enough hardcore action to satisfy most people, stays fun and has consistently high quality.

If they would improve their thumbnail system and get some more unique looking models I'd declare this a perfect site. As it stands this site just didn't fit my personal taste and while I do recommend it, make sure you like their type of content before committing to a membership.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Gag Factor

30. Gag Factor (1)

Pay
Active
80
dracken (246) 10-01-11  10:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Many, many scenes. I lost track of count around 200, but they probably have more. The site started uploading on August 20, 2003 and doesn't seem to have missed a month yet, with several months having multiple scenes uploaded. September and August this year have 3 scenes each so hopefully they'll get up to weekly updates.
- Some gorgeous girls (Chastity Lynn, Nicole Ray, Capri Anderson) along a bunch more girls I didn't recognize, and a few very nice behind the scenes videos
- Videos from 2008 onwards are available in 640x340 WMV. Images are available as 750px × 500px, but no zipped archives and there are only around 50 or so per scene. The site is clearly focused on video.
- Access to Americanbukkake.com, OverStuffedHoles.com, GhettoSwarm.com & HardcoreFuckMachines.com
- Some of the most intense deep throat action out there. They focus on getting the girls covered in semen and spit and face fuck them intensely. A lot of very nice variation in videos, content and models.
Cons: - Older videos are only available as 320x240.
- Images are pretty hard to download and are not as detailed as the videos(some are just the girl striping then a few shots of the ending).
- The site's navigation need a serious face lift. Right now it's just one long page with all the scenes presented with one thumbnail and the models name. There are some lesbian scenes, but no way to find them, no way to sort by model or type of action in the scene.
- The scenes feel a bit to short with some clocking under 8 minutes (The one with Chastity Lynn is literally just a guy walking in, fucking her mouth for 7 minutes and fade-out). I understand it's just a more intense BJ, but I'd like an interview with each model, maybe a bit of stripping, something to add a bit more fore-play to the scene (that way if you want just the action you can always fast forward. )
Bottom Line: As both previous reviews on here mention, most of the content here is also available on DVD's and especially for older stuff that is probably a better option as the 320x240 resolution is not that good. That being said, I still found this network a good value.

First of all I have to say that I loved the videos, they are intense and fun with all the girls seeming to enjoy the scene or at least tolerate it fairly well. The compassion with Facialabuse is inevitable and I found the scenes here just as intense with great deep- throating spiting and cumshots, however for the most part the models here seem to have a much better time and the cameraman doesn't insult them/ treat them as sluts. This site feels a lot like good old video porn if you remember stuff from around the 2000 when it was all about a few well known stars who would do over the top, fun and ridiculous porn.

Notice how above I said "for the most part" because the older videos are a bit more similar to the facialabuse model. The male model walks in, sometimes slaps the girl or calls her a cock-hungry slut then facefucks her. That is the older stuff, almost everything since 2008 is either a brief interview followed by a hardcore BJ or a small scene with maybe a minute of set-up before the BJ. Either-way, everything feels over the top and fun, giving the site a nice vibe (with no excessive vomit, name calling, confused looking amateurs or abuse)

I also really enjoyed their choice of models, with a lot of good looking girls getting their faces covered in spit ans semen. There is tons of ruined make-up, choking and swallowing and this site probably has some of the most intense deep throat for many well known models. Furthermore, there are a ton of cool outfits, stockings, corsets as well as high heels and cute skirts. Overall a nice variation in locations, outfits, models and types of scenes.

Another nice feature are the Behind the scenes videos and I only wish they were longer. They capture some great moments with the girls, including candid interviews and little mistakes. Overall some of the best behind the scenes videos I've seen in a long while (I remember one particular scene where the girl is telling the cameraman how she is engaged to the male model and wants to plan the wedding when the guy just walks in, pushes her back and starts fucking her mouth. Priceless stuff.).

Now a big downside is that each scene is just a blow job, no stripping, the girl doesn't masturbate or fool around. They get to the blow job pretty quick, which on one hand makes the site feel less like just another porn site and more unique (No BS, just blow jobs here). On the other hand it's hard to feel like you're getting your money's worth when you don't even get some good views of the girls vagina. In fact there are some scenes where the girl keeps her clothes on the whole time. I wasn't expecting sex (although that would be nice) but at least a bit more than a face fuck would be cool.

Of course better quality videos would be great. Zipped archives of the images are a must and a better site design is needed (Also more of a description of each scene on the preview page would be nice, right now we get the model name, the date it was added and one single thumbnail that is not very representative).

So overall the site has some serious flaws and it feels like whoever designed this was way more concerned with getting cool videos than having a good webdesign, but the scenes make up for these issues and considering how much fun they are I'd say a month membership is not a bad deal. (Did I mention they have a scene with a girl in mime make-up? How can you say no to a site that has a girl in mime make-up? :)

Even more, the bonus sites are a nice value with a lot more good looking models in pretty hardcore action.

So the bottom line: If you like blowjobs, fun scenes and don't mind seeing mostly well known pornstars this site is for you. However, if you want more than intense blow jobs and need HD scenes you should probably look somewhere else (Facialabuse, Teencoreclub, Gagngape are all a good alternative choice.).
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Gag Factor

31. Gag Factor (1)

Pay
Active
65
rearadmiral (328) 09-26-11  04:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (70), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of a network (five sites in total)
- I only paid $13.95 when I joined through Jerkoff Zone (but read that review before you decide on whether this is a good way for you to join)
- Pics available
- Free Download Manager works well
- Updates (one scene per week)
- Streaming available
- Downloads available
- Supports download managers (no obvious time-out issues)
- Bills through CCBill
Cons: - Not great value for the full membership price ($29.95)
- Low quality videos for newer uploads
- Very low quality videos for older uploads
- Scenes arenít associated with the DVD title and number
- No zips for pics
- Only one video file option
- A lot of overlap with other JM Productions sites
- No search function
- Very basic layout
Bottom Line: I joined this site because it was offered to me at a discount when I joined Jerkoff Zone. Both are from the porn studio JM Productions (JMP). I donít know if this is a standard offer, but even at the discounted price the site isnít a great value so I wouldnít recommend paying full price.

If youíre not familiar with JMP or Gag Factor, think of Facial Abuse or Max Hardcore turned down to 9. Itís still very rough, but not as rough as Max or FA. The series uses well known porn models and face fucks them. There is lots of gagging, runny noses and eyes and general unpleasantness. At least the guys arenít as misogynistic as the ones at Facial Abuse.

JMP made about 30 volumes of the Gag Factor series and most of those had about 10 scenes in them. The site has most of what was produced, with a total of just under 340 scenes. 29 of the scenes are BTS material. I canít fault the site for lack of material (though I do wish JMP brought that thoroughness to other seriesí offered online).

What I can fault JMP for is the lack of quality in the material. The newest scenes are posted in one version only Ė wmv at 640x480 and 2100kbps. This resolution has been available since February 2008, which means that about one-third of the scenes are in this Ďhighí res format. In 2008 this resolution wouldnít have been impressive, and it certainly isnít now. What that also means, then, is that two-thirds of the scenes are only available in resolutions lower than the Ďhigh resí files now being offered. Many of the oldest scenes are available at 320x240 with 360kbps. By todayís standards, these are virtually unwatchable. I doubt that they were state-of-the-art when they were posted in 2003.

A lesser complaint is the very basic layout of the site. The main member page is one long page with all the scenes listed. You get basic information on the scene and one small thumbnail. You get the star name, number of pics in the set, length of the video and the date the scene was added. What you donít get is the volume number from the series for those looking to catalogue the scenes that way. With each scene description there is a link that takes you to a separate page. From there you can see and download the pictures (no zips are available) and stream or download the video. More recent videos have only the option of downloading the full video, while older postings have that and the option to break it down into segments. There is no search function, but since the site itself is relatively small and the niche is narrow there really is no need for one.

The pictures arenít stellar in quality with a resolution of 750x500. That holds for the oldest and newest pics on the site. The number of pics per scene varies but ranges between 20 and 70 with the average in the 50s.

A membership here gives you free access to four other JMP sites, but that isnít obvious right away. From Gag Factor you get access to two sites, and itís only when you go to one of those that you see access to two further sites. The extra sites are:

ē American Bukkake Ė scenes from American Bukkake, American Gokkun, Lesbian Bukkake and Reverse Bukkake seriesí
ē Hardcore Fuck Machines Ė scenes from Fuck Machines series
ē Overstuffed Holes Ė scenes from Over Stuffed series
ē Ghetto Swarm Ė scenes from White Trash Whore series

The additional sites donít merit a full review each, but I will post some specific details as a comment on each siteís page here.

One problem with these sites is that there is some overlap with the main JMP site, Jerkoff Zone. The same scene may be posted twice but in vastly different qualities. But since the scenes arenít easily associated with the DVD title and volume it is difficult to know this before you download anything. What that means is that youíll likely download duplicates of several scenes and delete the lowest resolution.

I canít fault the site for the quantity because it appears theyíve made a lot of their Gag Factor scenes available here. But as a stand-alone site 300 scenes isnít a lot, and not worth $30. The bigger problem, as I noted in my review of Jerkoff Zone, is that the site just doesnít live up to the standard that I expected from JMP. JMP stuff may not be for everyone, but what they do, they do it well. And the website doesnít do it any justice.

This site, even with the add-ons isnít a good value for the full price. Itís not a lot better at the discounted price either. So unless youíre a huge JMP fan and are looking for an obscure scene that you canít get elsewhere, Iíd stay away. It bothers me to say that too, because I like JMP and would love to see them offer a great product at a decent price that would allow them to continue making great product. Their intended market must be elsewhere, because they arenít looking for it on the internet.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Net Video Girls

32. Net Video Girls (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
hogboy (1) 09-18-11  10:38am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The premise is great; get naive girls into your 'studio' to pose for a calendar, and gradually persuade them to take their clothes off and have sex. There are a lot of scenes, most of the girls are cute, and their reactions look genuine. Plus, the camera man isn't your usual overweight sleezebag. Although you don't see him often, on the few occasions when you do he looks normal enough, and you can believe that the girls would want to fuck him.
Cons: The site design is antiquated. There's no search facility, no photo sets, and the video quality is terrible by today's standard. The site goes back to 2000, and you could forgive the quality on some of the early movies, but to be turning out poor-looking 480x360 and calling that "high quality" is a joke. The other real issue is that a large number of the download links simply don't work. I did report this, although there were way too many to report individually (I'd guess at about 30% of the total number). I did get a swift response, but the issue itself wasn't resolved.
Bottom Line: It's still one of my favourite sites from the last few years, but to get a good score the broken links would need to be fixed and the video quality would need to improve - if not HD, then good quality SD should easily be possible. I enjoy netvideogirls, but the bottom line is "buyer beware."
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit First Class POV

33. First Class POV (0)

Pay
Active
81
exotics4me (463) 09-14-11  11:21pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The one site in this group of sites that doesn't focus on one main model, instead focusing on point of view style hardcore scenes.
- Quality is really good. Scenes are in standard HD quality 1280x720, three downloadable options, WMV, AVI and FLV.
- Wasn't expecting photo sets, but they have a photo set with every scene and these photo sets are not just screencaps, if they are, they've got a trick camera! The pictures are good quality as well, up to 2300 long end resolution and come zipped.
- Updates regularly, averages out to once a week with a video and photo set. I do think the content is exclusive too.
- Simple navigation of clicking "scenes" then just going through them.
- For a POV site, the cameraman does a pretty good job of filming. I didn't get seasick.
- Comes with four solo model sites with the Jessica Jaymes one being the best of the sites.
Cons: - Not a lot bad here, the site isn't real big, but they are updating. When Spencer reviewed it for the TBP review, he listed 26 scenes, they are now up to 47.
- Probably a little sharing with the Jessica Jaymes site, there are sets here that have Jessica in them and those also appear on her site.
- If you're not careful you will miss the photo sets since they are listed as "HD gallery" on each scene. Not really a con, but thought I would mention it in case anyone joins and misses the photos.
Bottom Line: This is a bonus site that comes with four other solo model sites. In trying to be fair, I've reviewed each of those since they didn't have any current active reviews on them. Three of the solo sites are okay if you're a fan of the model, nothing spectacular though. Jessica Jaymes solo site is very good. As a whole, this group of sites is recommended and especially recommended for fans of Jessica.

This site First Class POV is good. The models are top-tier, from Tiffany Brookes to Brandy Aniston to Annie Cruz to an old favorite London Keyes to one of my all-time favorites Mariah Milano.

The quality here is also very good, all 47 scenes are shot in 1280x720. Looking at the update schedule, they have averaged right at one scene (picture set and video) per week. The site's first update was on 9/26/10, the newest update is 9/15/11 and there are 47 scenes, so there were a few that were a day or two off, but weekly seems to be the standard they are going for now.

Some of the content is shared within the group of sites, but I'm going to estimate it's at 10% or less.

It's hard to find much fault in a site that has HD videos and nearly 2500 long end zipped photo sets. It's even harder to find fault if you're a fan of the solo models they have, making this a really nice bonus site.

I should mention that my download speeds on all these sites has been very high. The POV content ranges from some just being blowjobs, others being full sex and the filming is better than the average POV scene.

Overall, it's a good POV site that just needs some growth in amount of content to match its very good quality of videos and photos. Recommended as a bonus site to those solo model sites, but wouldn't just recommend it to POV only fans since you would be paying $30 for 47 scenes.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Fried Rice Fuckers

34. Fried Rice Fuckers (0)

Pay
Active
65
pat362 (369) 08-21-11  08:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Access to 25 other sites.
+There are 421 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files. Most sets have over 100 pics.
+Resolution varies from set to set but 898x1440 seems to be the lowest one. Many of them are 1000x1333.
+A nice selection of asian models.
+They have 76 videos which can be downloaded in WMV and resolution is 640x480.
Cons: -The bulk of their content is not exclusif.
-The bulk of their content is solo models only.
-The majority of the models are unidentified.
-The majority of the content is quite old.
Bottom Line: *The only major advantage for this site is the multiple site access because I can't imagine that any asian fan will find sufficient content to satisafy his or her needs. Not too mention that the content is pretty old and more than likely available elsewhere. Add the fact that most models aren't identified so you will never if you have that pic set or not.

*There are a couple of other nice sites within the network but they aren't asian based so might not appeal to someone looking for that type of content.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Throated

35. Throated (1)

Pay
Active
82
BadMrFrosty (56) 08-13-11  02:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Later updates have very nice quality video and truly excellent photo sets.
- 99% of scenes have a matching photo set which are available as zips or as a browsable gallery
- Very fast download speeds maxes my 100mbit connection
- Download manager supported, multiple concurrent downloads are no problems
- Aside from a few issues the interface is simple yet effective
- Access to a decent size network with exclusive content.
- Newer videos have a wide range of download options from 1080P WMV or MP4 down to MPG1 and mobile formats.
- 100% exclusive content
- No regional pricing
- No download limits
- No DRM
- Updates dated
Cons: - The oldest videos are of unwatchable quality
- Some of the early models are downright nasty
- Navigation needs some work, all updates page is a little hidden away
- Little variation in the action
- Generally the ugliness of the girl seems to be proportional to her ability (or willingness to try) to get balls deep.
Bottom Line: I was in 2 minds about posting this review mainly because my views are a similar to those expressed by mbaya in his excellent review below me. On balance I thought I can add at least some additional info so here we are.

While there is a lot of content on the site, unfortunately of the 360 or so videos, about 75 are 320x240 res at a low bit rate. These are pretty much unwatchabl low quality and the matching pictures sets seem to be a mix of a few snaps from a poor camera and video caps. I have written these off and not bothered to download any more due to the quality. Also it seems the cameraman and the photographer are the same person as a lot of the sets contain a few snaps of the model on her own then jump to her with a load on her face skipping over the act itself.

The next 170 videos are 640x480 which are average quality but at least watchable and the quality of the photos also drastically improved. That leaves over 100 videos that are full HD which is a good solid amount.

This is a great site no doubt about it. A membership here will not leave the average punter disappointed. Disregarding the older content, the quality is great, the models look good and usually the action does not disappoint. As others have said, don't come here expecting rough face fucking and you will be happy. But 'Frosty you mean bastard', I here you cry, 'if its a such a great site, why did you only give it a 82!!!??!!'. Well I'm glad you asked. For me it ticks all the boxes but does not have that certain 'je ne sais quoi' that turns a great site into a excellent site. That is not to say I don't recommend it, I do, I just don't think it does anything extra special.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Net Video Girls

36. Net Video Girls (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
nastytodd (1) 07-11-11  03:09pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: I enjoy that many of the amateur young ladies are not in the profession. There may be a few that eventually went on into the profession. But the huge majority did not.
The idea of innocent young ladies coming for interviews are seduce into sex seem very real with this site. They all seem to really enjoy the sex. Great to see a teen in heat to get fucked or to suck a cock.
Cons: The format of the model is confusing. Would have like to see the model listed with their video. Gets confusing when a model has more than one video and they are returning and not know when was the first time they appear.
Schedule of new video also seems confusing.
The video themselves are sometimes confusing when u view one and the models on screen doesn't start with the model that u choose.
Bottom Line: I really like the site. Will go back there soon and be a member. I find that the sex is hot and the babes are hot. If u like the seducing bit of innocent young babes this site is for you.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Only Blowjob

37. Only Blowjob (0)

Pay
Active
87
RustyJ (145) 06-22-11  01:16am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge archive of well over 1000 scenes all the way from 2002
-Beautiful models, great production values and excellent photography
-New updates are partly very good quality 1080p FullHD although the highest resolution is available ony as wmv. I'd rather take mp4
-The earlier scenes don't always keep to the theme and include other sex too. Wonder if this site used to have a different name then? This might of course be a con to someone who wants only what the title says
-Early hardcore scenes with Sophie Moone!
-The newer scenes appear as if they have been shot and staged for this site specially and exclusive. Some older ones make you wonder if the action has just been clipped short for use on multiple sites in the network
-POV updates rlately (every 3rd to 5th). About the only genre where I find them working. They are not FullHD though
-Updates every few days
Cons: -The early scenes are understandably of not so high definition even if the quality of the production was high also back then. 320x240 video doesn't cut it anymore and photos are quite small
-Some shared content across the other sites in DDF Prod network
-The only blowjob theme can get a bit boring when you easily expect and have seen more from the same models
Bottom Line: This one's another site within the DDF Prod network that could be a network of it's own. There's a huge archive of material from the days when the network packages weren't the norm so the content is also a bit mixed in the early years and sticks more closely to the title in the latter ones.

The site is one of the more regular updaters on the network with new scene every 2-3 days. The updates are a mixed bag of new 1080p material, slightly older (I guess) 720p videos and probably older and hopefully unreleased scenes in 720x404 resolution. There are also regular POV updates coming these days. All the scenes except the POV ones come with a very nice set of high quality photographs available in thre sizes and also zipped.

The site works technically very well. The scene searching and broswing work very well with tags and site categories so it's easy to find what one is lookign for amongst all these scenes.

The theme is blowjob only and the most scenes lately stick to it. Some feature oral sex both ways and sometimes they are more like standard sex scenes. The newer scenes look like they are exclusive not only to the network but to the site as well. In the older ones you can find also those that are clearly shot and edited in the same staging and props only to be uploaded on many sub sites.

There are many good oldies to be found here with European girls of the early 2000's (Sophie Moone on her hardcore days just to name an example). The video quality of these may not be that great but even the lower resolution photos on DDF sites are fine. It's funny noticing that no matter how nostalgic feeling those girls from ten years back rise in you, the male performers are the same guys, looking the same as they do today.

A very nice site all in all. Just makes me ask one question: Is the only blowjob niche (with no other special fetishes like fully clothed or such) so popular that it's a good idea to build a huge site around it?
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Amateur Allure

38. Amateur Allure (2)

Pay
Active
76
HeatherMcXxx (10) 05-18-11  09:56am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models, though in the two years since I last subscribed the quality has fallen somewhat. Thomas recruits some impressive girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, many models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene.
Cons: Thomas seems like a fairly likable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can get rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay caramba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model typically doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials. Finally, the girl-next-door trope is often an illusion, since so many of the models are porn starlets pretending to be unknowns.
Bottom Line: Look, if oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long. (I'm surprised this site keeps going, frankly.)

In that month, you'll enjoy lots of attractive girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, although it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) You'll get lots of awkward smiles from the models as they respond to Thomas' dumb and obvious queries. (Thomas: "What are you going to do now?" Model on her knees: "Suck your cock?")

Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.

The music fascinates me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and youthful personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they can be a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Glory Hole City

39. Glory Hole City (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
danner013 (0) 05-08-11  03:01pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some of the models are good looking.
The content (amateur gloryhole girls) is promising.
Cons: Website access is very spotty. It seems to be down over 50% of the time. Content limited, videos very short and low resolution (320 x 240). Navigation is a pain and keeps sending you to additional pay places. Very difficult to download any videos from the site - the download will start, but then it times out as the website drops.
Bottom Line: I feel like I wasted $20. If the access problems get resolved, this site would rate 65, but as it is I cannot recommend it. Avoid this site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Amateur Allure

40. Amateur Allure (2)

Pay
Active
80
haagar (13) 05-02-11  01:15pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: + This site features the most incredible attractive girls (around twenties). I don't know how they do it, but all of them cooperate as if they were under a powerful pleasure spell or somekind (must have something to do with that sinister background tune and the bright ring lighting).
Among the latest killer blond models feature: Sophia (spelled as Sofia) Sutra and Samantha Saint. What an enjoyable feast to see them perform in perfect glamourous lighting! Thats that 'allure' thing. They'd do it all with full devotion: Tease, smile, undress, suck cock on their knees, be fucked hard from behind, drooling into the camera and even swallow (multiple times) as if they were having their best meal ever! Truly Amazing!

+ What else? Great make-up and setting.
+ Large archive: I count 240+ scenes
+ Among these archived scenes, precious gems can be found like Samantha Sin and Courtney (yeah!).
Cons: - Only one update per week (on friday). No HD - but it's still ok: 800x450 @ 8Mbit/s (but nowadays we'd appreciate HD badly, right?)
- Only two formats: WMV and MOV.
- Old clips are still around - but with ancient formats (320x240) and so on.
- Expensive on single month base (better price with 3 months or more)
- The site owner is struggling with time and resources (yes, playing with glamour girls can be exhausting - I am sure): news items have not been updated. But hey? as long as the updates are coming, it's fine by me.
Bottom Line: Quality and originality comes with a price.
Quality also cost energy and resources to make it.
This relatively small site is amazing with regard to original high quality content. The downside is: it is so addictive, you need more - but you only get one update a week :)

As with the term 'amateur', I don't actually care whether the girls are amateurs or not... My dick can't tell the difference ;) The girls are hot!!

My advice to the site owner:
+ Hire an intern to upgrade the old content to high res (800x450) to provide better value with minimum effort
+ Upgrade to HD if possible
+ Roll longer POV shots while she is on her back (these are really addictive scenes to enjoy!)

Or... sell the formula to a bigger site / network :)

I give amateurallure a big recommendation, although a bit expensive on monthly base. European members might want to switch to the 'netcash' option, since this will quote the same amount in USD.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Chicki Porn

41. Chicki Porn (0)

Pay
Active
78
RustyJ (145) 02-10-11  10:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Totally new amateur models to me. I don't think there was one in all the scenes that I recognized
-Nice 1280x720 resolution in the latest videos in mkv format. Unfortunately there are not many of those
-Compared to the other sites in this network, the videos are properly edited, all action and no bloopers and messing around included
Cons: -Hard to say if it's updating and if so, how often as there are no dates and even when you list by date added, they are listed obviously in wrong order
-Camera work can be quite bad. There are scenes where it appears to be all shot from either a tripod or handheld by the male actor
-Very slow download speeds during evening time in Europe
-Even if these girls had more production, you couldn't find it with the fake names they use on this site
Bottom Line: This is a site I'd consider more a bonus site when the major part of the deal are sites like StudentSexParties and HardFuckTales.

The sites consists of 62 scenes that are mostly 1 on 1 b/g with some b/b/g and b/g/g thrown in. It's very amateur focused content with stockings, high heels and such props in some scenes. Usually action includes anal and deep throating and even a rare dp in few scenes. The scenes are around 15 minutes long each and unlike on the other sites of this network, they are all dedicated to the action without any talking or fooling around going on.

The site is supposed to have some kind of theme of girls being fucked in their boyfriends houses by someone else but that idea isn't exactly taken to the clips themselves. Also I have no idea what the site name or the fried egg image are trying to say.

Considering this was a site I had no expectations for, it's a nice addition to the main sites. With 62 fifteen minute scenes it only adds up to maybe a 10 DVDs worth of content so it's not going to keep you entertained for too long. Still I must say I'm always happy to see new talent in this adult entertainment world where every face that gets popular gets overused within years.

UPDATE:

During just one month this site has added nearly 20 scenes that are far better in quality than the former content. These scenes are all high definition and 25-30 minutes long each featuring hot Russian models in full hc action. This site is no longer a mere bonus but more like the premium content of this network. I'm raising my rating from 70 to 78 and if this quality and pace keeps up, I'm going to raise it even higher. Good work!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Amateur Throats

42. Amateur Throats (0)

Pay
Active
70
jberryl69 (12) 01-13-11  07:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 10 sites to choose from when you sign up

Different categories to choose from

Video quality ranges from 496 x 380 to 1920 x1080 depending on the age of the video

Shot in POV style - owner operator - you can see the still camera remote in his hand taking stills.
Cons: 3 of the 10 sites have been updated in the last year
Of the current sites that are active.

Only one of these site updates on a regular basis (and it's not Amateur Throats)

Amateur Throats has only 21 vids on it currently

Paid $29.95 to join the site - not much value for the content.

Not all vids have photos

Not all vids have throats explored
Bottom Line: Currently Updated Content -

Latina Abuse - dating back to 2005 - 20 updates in 2010.

Sperm Suckers - dating back to 2005 - 50 updates in 2010 (this site uses the same setting as Facial Abuse but FA is not one of the bonus sites)

Amateur Throats - started in 2010 - only 21 videos

I chose to join this site solely on the fact that it had a Kasey Chase vid in Amateur Throats.
Off all the vids I looked at, only about 5 held any interest for me.

Old Old content for the majority of the bonus sites - Amateur Throats still has to prove it's merit.

If I had to guess, this is a trial site for the guy running Amateur Throats and we will see if it lasts.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Deep Throat Frenzy

43. Deep Throat Frenzy (0)

Pay
Active
75
RustyJ (145) 01-13-11  05:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Original and exclusive content
-Despite the slightly aged content, excellent photosets that are same quality as other 21Sextury premium site's offering until they started releasing those highdef sets
-Scenes are shot for this site in their entirety, not clipped off some other scenes or made while making the exact same scene with different focus for some other site (like DDF Prod do)
-In most scenes the video is DVD resolution but quality is good. Some old ones have smaller image
-Hot euro models in almost every scene
Cons: -No updates since April 2008, meaning this site is an archive only
-It only got to 84 scenes before being archived
-Despite the name, there isn't always deepthroating and even less frenzy in these scenes. You'd expect rougher stuff and gang action with that name
-21Sextury general woes. The server issues have never bothered me on these non HD videos though
-Content might be monotonous and it doesn't exactly fit any fetish like fully clothed girls in action
Bottom Line: This site can be considered a bonus only to the subscribers of 21Sextury even though the material is original and very high quality if one can get over the fact it's not in HD. They shot 84 scenes all in all between 2006 and 2008.

The scenes themselves are all focused on oral action, mostly blowjobs. Despite the name, there may or may not be deepthroating or some blow bang kind of action. All of it however is shot for this exact purpose so you won't see any of that thing they do over at DDF Prod where they shoot a scene from one site and edit a blowjob only version for their site Only Blowjob.

Some of the scenes are very hot and the models are all top class. If you are looking for some fetish content though where the girl is fully dressed, you won't find it here though. The content is quite vanilla with the main difference from other sites being that no actual intercourse happens here. That being said, I can well see why this site was discountinued. It doesn't probably cost much more to do a proper hardcore scene once you've shipped a young lady from Russia, Czech Republic or Romania over to Budapest and since this site didn't really cater to any special niche and focus on the deepthroat and group action was light, this was probably reduntant.

All in all a very nice bonus and if you look at photos more often than videos like I do, this doesn't shy at all from their active premium sites content.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Throated

44. Throated (1)

Pay
Active
85
mbaya (356) 01-12-11  09:39am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discount through TBP.
-Part of a network of 11 sites. Comes with 3 other sites with a similar blow job theme-1,000facials.com, onlyteenblowjobs.com, and mommyblowsbest.com.
-Weekly updates.
-Archive of 313 videos going back to 2004.
-Videos are about 25 minutes to a half hour each.
-Videos have 5 download options in addition to flash. The best is WMV in true HD at 1920x1080, 5MBPS. There are also lesser quality downloads available so you can get smaller file sizes.
-Photos are zipdownloadable, not screenshots and the most recent are 1500x1000.
-Nice mix of portrait and landscape. Average about 200 photos per set.
-Easy navigation including a search function for scenes across the network.
Cons: -HD option started in September of 2009. Therefore only 70 of the 313 videos are in HD. Most of the site is in WMV 640x480 2MBPS. This is not a serious negative as the lesser quality videos are still very watchable.
-Mostly, if not all American pornstars. Slick and polished productions. I prefer more natural and more amateurs or at least a few more new faces.
Bottom Line: This site bills itself as "the number one deepthroat site on the net". "Since 2003 Throated.com has faithfully delivered the best in deepthroat blowjobs. No other site offers as many exclusive updates and new girls going balls-deep on massive cocks." It also mentions that you get to see the models take the deepthroat challenge, but never really elaborates as to what exactly that is.

The models try to deepthroat and take the cocks balls deep. They don't always succeed and if they do it usually is only once and for a few seconds at most. The plus here is that they usually show a good level of enthusiasm.

The blow jobs are not the most forceful I have ever seen. The guys often are somewhat assertive, but not aggressive, though. In this genre, I would put facialabuse.com as the hardest, gagfactor.com at a somewhat lower level and facefuckinginc.com next. This site is about the level of facefuckinginc.com- fairly nonabusive. There is no insulting the models, vomiting, or even much in the way of tears or smeared makeup. It is face fucking lite, if I can coin a phrase. I am not sure if I would rate it the number one deepthroat site on the net, but it was very enjoyable and worthwhile.

As part of a network of 11 sites, the deal here is quite attractive. The other three sites that focus on blow jobs are nice, but nothing terribly unusual. The models on the teen site were mostly very cute, but often you can see their inexperience. You can decide if that is a plus or minus. When you get the network you get a lot of HD quality porn at a quite reasonable price.

Definitely recommended.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Deep Throat Frenzy

45. Deep Throat Frenzy (0)

Pay
Active
65
nadiencendia (83) 01-09-11  08:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of 21st Sextury network
-Models are cute and sexy in general
-Different video options (streaming and download; low, medium and high quality)
-Pictures are downloadable as a zip file
Cons: -It was last updated in 2008
-Archive has only 84 scenes
-You won't find models such as Sophie Moone, Blue Angel, Sandy or Eve Angel here
-Videos are strictly focused on blowjobs (see bottom line)
Bottom Line: I am not a great fan of blowjobs, so this site is not essentially my ideal type; I decided to write this review because I wrote a previous one when the site was still alive, and there are no active member reviews for it.

This site is another one of those that 21st Sextury offers in its bundle, to fill it and increase the number of "offered sites": it's basically a dead site, last updated in 2008, with a fairly small archive (84 video+pictures sets), focused exclusively on blowjobs.

Models in the site are usually ok, although, being slightly more kinky than other 21sextury sites (such as Clubsandy or Pixandvideo) you won't find here some of the stars that we have all come to love: Sophie Moone, Eve Angel, Sandy, Blue Angel...

As for the technical details, the same pros and cons as for other 21sextury sites apply: quality of videos and pictures is good, they offer several download options, pictures in .zip files, etc. Bonus content is non-existant, unless you consider like that the 21st Sextury network in which this site is included.

To sum up, this is a very limited site, placed in a very specific niche, and no longer updated. You really have to love blowjobs to like this site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Throated

46. Throated (1)

Pay
Active
90
jberryl69 (12) 11-27-10  09:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Updates every two weeks
- Everyday updates for other associate sites
- HD quality (1080) downloads
- Downloads in several different forms and sizes
- Streaming content available
- Scenes are broken down to be streamed
- Nothing but oral content
- Starting to expand out of POV to having a camera person
- Starting to add male actors (as in Chris "the Boner" Strokes - a great choice for length
- Had model move between two guys like workout stations - very hot.
- Has a review section for site and an internal e-mail link for suggestions/questions. A+ for that.
- Primary actor works well with models, from patient to forceful.
- Good pricing.
Cons: - Well, not all the performers can throat.
- Throating might only be one time down to the balls.
- Up until recently the non-variance of the views got a little boring - mostly cause it was shot POV only, so older content will have that.
- Guys almost always have to jerk off for the money shot - ruins it in the end. So her mouth was just used as a fluffer so he can masturbate. Not what most guys have in mind watching.
Bottom Line: Highly recommend for the Throating fan. Content, updating, older content, positive changes and pricing make this site a high value for the money site. Part of the XXXpass group of sites there are lots of other options to view.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Load My Mouth

47. Load My Mouth (0)

Pay
Active
80
dracken (246) 11-08-10  09:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 616 videos and 53 picture sets, most of the videos are from 320x240 MPGs to 720x480 WMV (the images are 1600x1200 and most scenes have screencaps which are pretty crappy)

- A lot of variance in the scenes, although the focus is on oral and cumshots . Most scenes are POV with some quick interviews followed by hardcore action which ends in a cumshot.

- Some of the actions are a little more interesting with girls licking their feet, giving footjobs (including a nice footjob from Sandy Sweet) and there are some threesomes and anal scenes.

- Very quick downloads

- Streaming worked flawlessly

-The navigation and the whole network are easy to access and it's easy to look for specific scenes.

-None of the girls seem abused or humiliated, although the sex is a bit rough. Most of the girls seem to have a good time and the site feels pretty professional yet fun.
Cons: - The models could be cuter, there are many girls that look a bit on the trashy side and occasionally the make-up and lighting doesn't help. It's interesting that the same model on other sites in this network looks better (the close-up POV might be to blame as it gives a pretty amateur, close-up and personal feel)

-The site loads a pop-up in the back for a review network.

- There are three levels of membership, be careful when joining that you select the one membership level that you want. The moviez+ should give you everything you want, but it could be a bit pricey. Unfortunately it sucks when you have a lower level membership and you see a video you really want that is only moviez+

-The whole site feels a bit more amateurish than the rest of the network, which can be a bonus or a downside, for me it was more of a downside, the light in many scenes was disappointing, but maybe it was just me...
Bottom Line: Overall the site is a decent collection of oral sex, although many scenes also have some sex or at least the girl stripping and playing with herself.
Most models look very natural, with little make-up to the point where it was almost too minimal for me. The natural look of the Pierre woodman network, but with somewhat less cute models.

This doesn't mean the site doesn't have some cute girls like Kara Mynor and Sandy Sweet. Overall the feel was similar to teenyboppers, where the girl comes in and after a quick interview is blowing the guy, pretty standard although the footjob scenes break the mold.

Hmm, I am noticing that almost every paragraph I write contains a positive and a con, which is probably the best way to describe the site, some people will love the natural, amateur feel, but unless you love oral and have a thing for feet it might leave you disappointed.

On it's own I don't think it would stand, but as part of the larger pornstarnetwork it's a pretty decent deal. What is also nice is that the network is very well designed so very soon you can find yourself on a completely different part of the site browsing some obscure model. I wish more sites would use this kind of powerful cross-site integration, beats the model where you have to log into each site individually.

Either way, the bottom line of the whole review is that this site doesn't make this network, but ads some spice and matches the feel of sites like Firstsexvideos and Bruno B Reloaded. If you like amateurs and natural looking girls give this network a chance and if you get the premium moviez+ membership you will have a pleasant experience.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Splat Bukkake

48. Splat Bukkake (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
Farang (0) 10-24-10  02:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (3)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site is definitely worth a punt if you are already a lover of or interested in getting into the UK gangbang and bukkake porn scene. The site is easy to navigate and functuality works well. It certainly does what it says on the tin without a hitch and is safe and secure.

Some real dirty girls here who obviously enjoy what they doing including some gifted amateurs, some established and some up and coming British porn stars. Emma Butt, Angelzhalo and Cloverx being some of my recent favourites.New material and frequent updates make it decent value for money.
Cons: Lack of HD.
Bottom Line: Splat Bukkake is definitely the place to see the spunk fly over beautiful girls faces and then for them to get gangbanged by a bunch of horny dudes.
All the info about the site content is on the front page and it does what it says on the tin, no bullshit and you won,t get your credit card ripped off guaranteed.Updates at least once a week and there is large back catalogue of videos and stills.If u are into UK gangbangs and bukkake then you will like this site
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Wifey\'s World

49. Wifey's World (0)

Pay
Active
70
GCode (101) 10-22-10  01:37pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (57), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of a well endowed women aptly named 'Wifey' who shares content of herself and her 'Hubby' in mostly blowjob or handjob scenes. However, actual sex and masturbation is available as well.
- No DRM.
- Updates are sporadic, usually an actual new update of her once a week with other updates of her 'friends' included as well.
- Videos in 2003 are WMV at 320 X 240, 522 kbps. Videos in 2006 are WMV at 384 X 288, 522 kbps. Videos in 2010 are WMV or MP4 at 720 X 480, ~1, 650 kbps. Some are available in flash and/or streaming.
- Photos in 2010 are around 1160 X 775 resolution. In 2006, resolution is around 720 X 540. In 2003, resolution is around 720 X 540 as well.
- Blog is updated every two days with all sorts of info and interesting stuff.
- Wifey is somewhat interactive with members by responding to comments sometimes.
- Site design is good enough but navigation is a bit poor (see cons).
- Dated updates with proper filenames for easy downloads.
Cons: - Navigation is a bit awkward. Updates are not on the main page but on top under "Wifey Galleries", then dated by year. However, when you go to the 'Updates' section, it has both wifey and friends updates, as well as 'classics'. It's just awkward to have both of these sections.
- Photos are not available to download via zip and their in-browser viewer does not open the images at the highest possible resolution.
- This kind of site would be awesome with a forum.
- Live shows would probably make this site even more interactive and appealing to the Wifey fans.
- Some videos are only available in parts.
- There appear to be polls but I'm not sure it's updated ever. The same poll has been up for awhile.
- Given the specs in the pros, they are actually quite poor for viewing. While the couple is more 'amateur' than pro and do the shooting themselves, over the years an HD camera should be a fine investment for a site up for over 7 years. Photos are small and sometimes vid caps as well.
Bottom Line: Wifey's World is a breath of fresh air for a solo model site. The site is quite interactive and you can view Wifey age like a fine wine over the years of captured footage. She has natural and large tits with a cute face. To add to this, she is quite kinky when it comes to her footage. She enjoys swallowing cum and cumshots, provides plenty of sensual blowjobs and/or handjobs, and truly enjoys what she does. However, there are some negatives involved as well.

The largest quirk I have witnessed with the content is her ability to orgasm. She is doing all her scenes with her 'Hubby' and it's very awkward to see that she appears to not orgasm through sex with him. Usually, after he is 'done', she has to masturbate either through self stimulation or having him use a vibrator on her. It's just strange that she cannot appear to truly enjoy sex with her Hubby. However, she does have plenty of footage of sex and the addition to masturbation scenes actually creates a wide array of captured footage that caters to most viewers.

The content does change quite a bit with different locations, themes, outfits, and type of scene captured. She usually gives a nice description of the scene through her words on the update page and you know what you are getting due to this. Plus, you can leave comments and she or hubby usually responds. Overall, the videos are the cream of the crop here. The lighting is well enough and some gimmicks from the editor are sometimes available like showing her face in a seperate frame while orgasming or different angles of the scene.

The pictures are quite lackluster IMHO. The largest being the photos are not available via zip download. However, the sets are usually under 40 photos so downloading them is easier than most sites which may have hundreds. Plus, the photo browser is not to my personal liking, as described in the cons. But, the actual photos themselves, while being a bit on the small side, are usually quite well in terms of clarity and lighting when they are proper photos. All-in-all, improvements in this area could be made.

The site as a whole has a lot of content to offer and usually varies a bit. However, as with most solo sites around this long, it can get the repetitive aura. To get around this a bit, Wifey offers updates of various 'friends' to add in some difference. Usually, these sets and videos are random and various Amateur or pro models from all sorts of sites. With that, there is usually 2-3 updates a week with only 1 being of Wifey. The site is basically an Amateur model doing mostly blowjob and handjobs with a real fetish for cum. She usually ends up with a facial, eats it, or has him blow his load on to something where she licks or drinks it up. While sex and masturbation are available, they are not the true vision of the site and model. Overall, if you want to join the site, you will want to like the model a lot, enjoy blowjob/handjobs, and expect some low quality content. May be worth it for some.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Splat Bukkake

50. Splat Bukkake (0)

Pay
Newbie
90*
thehoody (0) 10-17-10  02:58pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (3)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: A variety of girls (something for everyone). New content is uploaded two or three times a week.
Mostly bukkake footage but does include gang bang footage as well. Most updates were only shot a week or two before uploading so content is fresh and not dated.
Cons: Site is new so not as much content as some others but its updated more often so should soon catch up
Bottom Line: A relatively new site so not the biggest of its kind but has huge potential
Girls are a mixture of pornstars, upcoming girls and amateurs from UK and europe featuring in very messy bukkake and gangbang shoots.
Site is easy to use and find your way round.
Highly recommend a giving it a try even if you are a member of a similar site.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 182 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Amateur Allure (2)
2. Gloryhole Swallow (1)
3. The Dick Suckers (1)
4. Gag Factor (1)
5. Only Teen Blowjobs (1)
6. Throated (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.18 seconds.