Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 64 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Oldje

1. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
80
pat362 (367) 05-07-12  06:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They have exclusif content from a niche that's not well represented on the net.
+They have an very good selection of female European performers.
+The sex scenes are well filmed and the males do a pretty decent job considering their age.
+They have 352 videos but only the last 32 are in a single file. All the others are broken into 2 or more files.
+Video resolution is at least 720x404 for more than 100 videos and the last 32 are now 1280x720.
+They appear to still be updating with new content.
Cons: -They no longer offer class3some as a bonus site and that is too bad because it was a nice addition considering the high cost of the site.
-They don't offer any model info whatsoever so it requires a lot of research to find the names to go with most videos.
-They don't date their content so it's very hard to know the update schedule.
-They have photos but the quality is mostly poor and they often appear to be out of order. Not to mention that you have to download each pic one by one since they aren't in a complete zip file.
-There is no navigation except the page number or the ability to jump all the way to the beginning or the end of the pages.
-There's music in their videos and that can be a plus but I found at certain times to be distracting.
-The first 100 videos are only offered in Real media so not very good news.
Bottom Line: *This is a pretty decent site with content that is good to excellent but is dragged down by all the negative things that could easily be fixed if they bothered with it. They don't have a lot of male performers to choose from but the ones they have do a better than average job and there appears to be some good chemistry with the female performers which seems hard to believe when you consider the age difference between the males and the females.

*There's dialogue in some of the videos and it's normally in English. It's more often a miss because English is not the language that these people speak but it's not awful. The music is a little annoying. It's not too loud because that would make it almost impossible to watch the videos with the sound on. Mind you I wouldn't be sad if it disapeared. I think just the natural sounds of the performer is more than enough for the viewers anyway.

*I like that they are now offering their videos in a single file and that the resolution is also increased to 1280x720. Now if someone can start entering the names of the models in the database and put dates on their content then they'll have improved on most key issues.

**If you want to watch old men have sex with much younger women than this is probably the best site for that. They even have a few anal scenes as well so if that is one of your fetishes then you'll find a few videos. Be advised that it may not be in the description of the scene so you'll have to either download all the videos or check out the photos to find those scenes.

***Of course if you don't want to watch old guys have sex with very young women than avoid this site. Especially now since they no longer offer class3some and that site had mostly yojg women with younger men.***
Respond: 13 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Lusty Grandmas

2. Lusty Grandmas (0)

Pay
Active
80
messmer (137) 03-28-08  11:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 09-26-08  10:31am  (Update History)
Reason: Eight of the bonus sites no longer update. Main reason for downgrading: I am being flooded with Spam since I subscribed to this site.
Pros: Site sticks strictly to its niche. Plenty of real grandmas who look the part, each having at least one high quality picture set (1280x857) zipped and one very high quality video just short of HD.
Recent videos are primarily in wmv format and can be downloaded in whole in a zip file or in segments.

No DRM protection.

Download speed is fast at 1.2 MB/s.

Lusty Grandmas is part of a network. With the first month's subscription 34 other sites are now included catering to every taste. The number of bonus sites will be increased by two every additional month one subscribes while the price drops from $ 29,95 to $ 24.95 after the first month. Both are offered as a loyalty bonus. In addition two HD sites are promised down the road if one stays with Lusty Grandmas.

Amazingly enough in the light of past, bad experiences, the 34 bonus sites one receives seem to be of high quality (no time to test all) with lots of good material and not just low grade fillers to make the network look good.
Cons: The picture sets basically repeat what's on the video. They are of excellent quality but it would still be nice to have a picture set that is different from the video.

Updates come daily but I have problems with them coming in segments over a period of time. It amounts more to one update a week than a daily one, but with so many sites to pick from one never gets bored waiting for the next segment so that's a smallish "con."

Video scenarios are a bit repetitive and hard to understand at times because many of the models are Eastern Europeans whose English is not very good. Some videos even use interpreters.

That dratted security sign-in! Yep, the one that's so hard to make out in most places.

Epoch handles the subscription, which is good, but beware of a pre-checked free trial offer to another site when you sign up. You may not want it!
Bottom Line: In my efforts to get away from the perfect, powdered or oiled, fake breasted Barbies I strayed into new and unfamiliar territory but I must say that I like it because it is so dramatically different.

The models of Lusty Grandmas are not glamorous, they are not MILFs but rather the mothers of MILFs, most could not be called beautiful by any stretch of the imagination, but I like them .. a lot .. and for those of you who like glamor and glitz and nubile, you can always ignore this site and enjoy the other thirty_four.

There is a wealth of good material in them with at least a couple of sites to suit your taste.

This "mother" or should I say "grandmother" site makes it easy to sample some of the material. Go, have a look at the quality of the videos and pictures for yourself as you take their tour.

What you see is pretty well what you'll get in all (most? because I haven't looked at them all) of the sites when it comes to quality.

Another big plus I couldn't fit in above is the fact that no other sign-in but the first is required to cruise this net of sites.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

3. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
77
pat362 (367) 11-22-10  08:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 11-22-10  01:50pm  (Update History)
Reason: I forgot to add the bonus site info
Pros: -There appears to be genuine heat between the performers with lots of deep kissing, good BJ and the sex is also well done.
-They have some super cute teen girls.
-The age difference between the girls and men is significant so that adds to the fetish aspect.
-They currently have over 300 videos.
-Bonus site included with membership.
-You can use a download manager.
-They appear to still be updating but since they don't date their updates so that makes it hard to say the frequency.
-They speak in English ins ome of the vieos.
-There is some scenario to the scenes.
Cons: -By far my biggest issue with what would have been a great site is the background music that is so annoying that you almost have to watch the videos with the sound off.
-Movies are all broken down in sections of 2 to 4 pieces.
-Little to no model info means you'll have to be familiar with Eastern Europeans models or do a lot of research to identify them.
-Photo cannot be downloaded in a complete set but then again they are pretty useless so it's not worth bothering with.
Bottom Line: -This site has the potential to be in the high 80's and even in the 90's but the soundtrack has to go, they have to offer their videos as one file, they have to put a time stamp on their content and they need a models index. If they are able to do that then I'd gladly return more often.

I wasn't thrilled about the split videos but the content is so great that I would still have given the site a score of above 80 but I found the soundtrack to be so distracting that I had to drop my score. It's till worth seeing if you like the old and young fetish.

They offer a bonus site called class3some and it's basically the same girls that appear on oldje but here it's at least 2 girls with one guy. The men are much younger that those at oldje. The videos are also broken in 2 sections and there is no model info. They currently have over 40 videos. You can download photosets in a zip format but frankly it would also be a waste of time. Oldje should have added a second site but with multiple older men with one or two women
and that would have been a better fit than what we get with class3some.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

4. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
66
BabyGetReal (32) 05-21-10  07:08pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Creative scenarios, very unusual.
Gorgeous slim women, many very cute.
Mostly natural breasts.
As a 70 year old, the fantasy of a beautiful young woman coming onto me is very attractive.
Dialog, when there is any, is in English.
Guys don't walk on already hard.
Normal sized dicks.
No brainless rough hard banging away.
No fake moaning.
Cons: Boring, repetitive, passionless sex.
Apparently no interest in arousing the women.
Sometimes it appears that the men coming is the girls mouths is faked, with fake semen preloaded in the girls mouths.
The price is WAY WAY too high ($38/month).
Early vids very low res; later ones low res or OK; a few very recent ones are stunningly hires.
Too many long closeups.
Downloads all have the same names so you have to rename every one.
There is usually annoyingly loud music that doesn't fade out -- but it doesn't matter because nobody ever really gets aroused.
Bottom Line: A couple of the very recent very high resolution videos are in beautiful outdoor settings. They move slowly and sensuously, with a lot of kissing. About half of the videos are scripted with the guys taking advantage of the girls (I can do without that). In the other half, the girls tease and come onto the guys -- which I love. So I had high anticipation about this site -- but it turned out to be one of the least arousing sites to which I've subscribed.

The creativity and variety of the scenarios is really unusual and is the best thing about this site. Also the lack of hard banging and rushed sex. The slow sensuous approach is refreshing. Unfortunately, this is coupled with terrible directing and editing -- if the goal is to be erotic.

The director/editor seems to insist on so many minutes each for a series of positions, without any concern for what is actually happening. There is no chemistry between any of the couples. They show no evidence of having fun, being playful, or getting aroused. There is no spontaneity. Apparently they are just doing what the director told them to do. Even if a little spark starts to grow, they are told to change positions and it kills any spark that started.

In only one or maybe two of all the 30 videos that I watched, the girls actually got aroused and maybe orgasmed. This was not respected, featured, emphasized -- the director/editor did not seem to notice or care that this happened -- it was incidental -- and it was not erotic to watch.

The emphasis is on the girl pleasuring the man. Most have very brief cunnilingus or finger fucking, but only to please the man, and it stops after a moment, regardless of whether the woman might show a little spark of excitement. All videos end with a blow job and the guy (supposedly) coming in the girl's mouth. In some cases the guy jacks off and really comes; in others, the girl blows him and maybe he really comes, or it is faked.

A give away about the attitude in this site is that in all the preview stills that label each video, very few if any show the girl with an expression of actual enjoyment or arousal. Instead, she is always looking at the camera with her mouth open, a sure sign that she is not aroused.

For what this site offers, the price is WAY WAY too high (30 euros, about $38/month). Actresses names are not given. There is no search mechanism. There are no dates for the "updates". Most of the videos have poor resolution.

The bonus site (class-3some) is even worse.

It is unusual that I download 30 videos from a site and don't find a single one that I want to keep, but that is what happened here. They seemed to have a good idea and some real creativity, but the direction/editing kills any eroticism.

Sometimes they show outtakes at the end, and in these, often the actors are laughing and having fun -- unlike in the main video!

CONTINUED IN A "REPLY"
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

5. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
85
pat362 (367) 02-02-13  10:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +They offer exclusif content from a niche that is not well represented.
+They add about one new scene per week.
+Almost 380 scenes to download.
+The 50 or so most recent videos are now offered in multiple download fomats and resolution is as high as 1280x720.
+They appear to have remastered some of their more recent upates as well.
+There is some decent chemistry between the performers.
+They offer class3some, nude art and classic blowjob with your membership.
Cons: -They still do not offer any model info so you have to do some serious research to frind their name from other sources.
-The bonus sites may be nice for some people but only class3some has similar content.
-class3some has stopped updating last year so you are not getting new stuff.
-Navigation is basically picking a page number and there are no search options.
-They have photos but the quantity is tiny and is mostly there so that you get an idea of what is happening in the video.
Bottom Line: *I decided to join Oldje one more time in part because they decided to add clas3some to their membership. That was one of my cons the last time I joined. Sadly I got excited for nothing because the site isn't updating anymore. They also give you access to two other sites but since they do not exactly offer the same type of content then I didn't bother looking at them. Mind you someone into oral sex or nudes might be happy with those additions.

*I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are now offering the videos in higher resolution as well as motre stndard ones. They still don't bother putting the models name on the videos and that really sucks. I can begin to tell you how annoying it is to do research on a model so that I can properlly file the video.

*I recently commented on the fact that none of the performers in the Score 50 and Score 60 videos kiss and that it was too bad because it made the scenes a lot less fun to watch. This is not the case with Oldje because there is some serious kissing between the young girls and the old men. The sex is never raunchy. It is more soft and romantic. Now some could argue that the guys being older couldn't do super hardcore but I think that the producers prefer the softer stuff and I agree with their choice.

**This is such a rare niche that unless you are a fan then you should stay away**.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Old And Young Gangbang

6. Old And Young Gangbang (0)

Pay
Active
95
mbaya (356) 04-22-10  07:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of large network of 17 sites. Most focus on mature women, not mature men though.
-No download limit.
-Most recent updates are WMV 1280x720, 4730kbps. Very sharp and appear to be DVD like in quality.
-Can download as clips or as whole videos. Streaming is also an option. With slow downloads and each scene going over 1GB, I used the clip option.
-Photo sets for each video. Most recent updates are 1260x1890, over 400kb. Very clear and crisp.
-Attractive, natural looking young women. Not overly made up, just being themselves as nature made them. They couldn't be less glamour or gonzo.
Cons: -Very expensive. However, I felt it was a good value for the money when you look at the whole network, not just this one site.
-Slow downloads. I got not more than 500kbps.
-Most videos included scenes involving piss. For me a real turn off.
-Infrequent updates. The site opened in February of 2007 with 13 updates. In the rest of 2007 there were 7, in 2008 7, in 2009 only 5, and in 2010 so far only 2.
Bottom Line: This site focuses on the niche of gangbangs involving old men and much younger women. I have been a member of beautyandthesenior.com, grandpasfuckteens.com, as well as oldfartsyoungtarts.com. Scenes of gangbangs within this already specialized niche are very rare on those sites. I feel this is the best and most interesting site of old and young porn.

When comparing all these sites, the first thing I noticed is that all of them are from the same country, the Netherlands. The male talent is very often the same few. Somehow that is not really surprising as I would expect very few men of that age group are capable of making a porn video, let alone be from the same small country. They do the job adequately, which I believe is saying a lot. They are very enthusiastic in their scenes on all these sites that I mentioned, but on this one they appear to be enjoying themselves the most.

The women also seem to enjoy the scenes here more than on the other sites. The sex is definitely more extreme, with camera work that is excellent for the most part. In scenes going over a half hour, you see everything imaginable. You get peeing, which I don't care for, but you also get oral, anal and vaginal galore. They often have long sections of ass licking. If you like this, which I do, you will not be able to take your eyes from the screen. You may find yourself not being able to believe your eyes. That great looking girl is doing WHAT to WHO?

If you like this niche, I highly recommend you give it a try. If they would update more often and lower the price, it would be a 99 in my book.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Girls For Matures

7. Girls For Matures (0)

Pay
Active
87
SnowDude (214) 02-02-07  12:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Excellent video quality (Divx/mp4)
-Large number of exclusive clips with no restrictions on downloads
-A wide variety of girls and matures
-Video archive isn't limited to pairs who only appear with each other; most women have multiple partners in different clips
-If you remain a member after the trial, you can add other mature sites to your membership for free
Cons: -Videos are cut into segments and some are very short
-All clips only feature one girl and one mature at a time
-No other content besides the videos
-Site design is plain and uninspired
Bottom Line: I signed up for the trial and although I did cancel after the 3 days, I was able to download a TON of content with minimal effort and was very pleased. The site is VERY bare bones without frills, but that's not necessarily a bad thing since it is also straightforward and easy to use.

The videos are cut into segments which is easier for dial up users, but makes downloading for high speed a bit of a pain. There aren't any pictures and only one vidcap per set, and nothing about the girls themselves. One drawback is that the girls don't speak english and the setup for each scene is a bit campy. In one video they are trying to create the idea of a dressing room at a salon when it's clearly just a room in a big house they rented with a curtain hung at one end.

Despite the setup, however, I found many of the scenes very erotic and the majority of the girls to be sexy. I find women in their 30s and 40s with imperfect bodies to be very sexy as long as they know how to use them, which these girls do. Some videos are much shorter than 25 minutes which is noted on the TBP review, but as you look through the site you'll see that the same two girls have multiple videos together with different setups and roles.

Bottom Line: If you are only into big breasts, blondes, and tight bodies then this site is not for you. However, if you want a lot of downloadable content without DRM and the idea of young and older lesbians together gets you going, I would definitely recommend the site
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Grandpas Fuck Teens

8. Grandpas Fuck Teens (0)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (356) 03-03-10  09:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-03-10  10:36am  (Update History)
Reason: rethought score
Pros: -Nice size archive.
-Part of large network, 21st Sextury. Get 30 other sites with one membership.
-Very sharp quality videos. Available downloads are parts as well as whole videos.
-Sharp large photosets. Not very high resolution, but very good quality.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets.
-Mostly attractive models, but not consistent.
-Nice discount through TBP.
Cons: -Photo sets not custom zipdownloadable.
-No choices regarding resolution quality.
-I don't care for the network policy where we do not have any choices regarding which sites are included in the membership. You get what they decide.
-Basically the European version of gonzo. Very standard and predictable action and models, despite this being a niche site.
-Confusing search engine. If you click by model, you get hits on every site in the network, even those you are not subscribed to.
Bottom Line: I am so glad I was a member of Beautyandthe senior first. The contrast between the two is quite stark, despite the fact that they share some of the same male talent and are both representative of an unusual niche.

In many ways this site is superior. Some examples of why I say this are the better quality of the videos, faster download speeds, the option to download whole videos, as well as superior photo sets that are zipdownloadable.

In BATS the models are consistently better looking. Many here are overdone with stripper clothes, excessive makeup, tattoos, fake breasts and in general look like they all came from the same factory. Very predictable, very standard, but not very creative or fun.

More importantly, the differences between the two sites are the intangibles that are not easy to quantify. BATS is about fantasy; this site is very standard in ways that most sites are. BATS scenes are focused and short. In contrast these scenes are much longer, with the types of sex that are common on the internet. For example most scenes focus on a long vaginal section. Many scenes have anal as well as analingus. You may like this, and I do, but how is this different from most sites that are not in this niche? Here they use older men to do the same things that you see on other sites done by younger men. At BATS the feeling is that these older guys need all the oral stimulation possible. In this they seem to be hard for about a half hour of vigorous action focusing on penetration. Nice, but you see that on all kinds of sites that are not in the niche.

I greatly appreciate BATS use of highly creative fantasy and an uncommon approach to porn that includes a lot of kissing and foreplay. BATS has unlikely, dreamlike scenes and the scenes here feel like you have seen them before.

This site is interesting, but nowhere near as unique or as much fun as BATS.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Beauty And The Senior

9. Beauty And The Senior (0)

Pay
Active
90
mbaya (356) 12-23-09  07:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Inexpensive clone of Oldje. The price is half.
-Pretty good size archive. There are 160 videos and a photo set of screenshots for each.
-Extremely creative. Some of the most interesting fantasies I have ever seen. Imagine you have a submissive maid who does whatever you want or you are walking in the park and a gorgeous girl notices you and basically rapes you.
-Great editing. I am sure guys this age take a lot longer to cum than in these videos. Barely a wasted moment made it to the final cut.
-The heat may be a testimonial to viagra, but I think the natural beauty of the women was equally important. There are consistently great looking women. Hardly a plain one on the entire site. Some are so attractive that they have to be seen to be believed.
-No download limits, DRM or dead links. Everything works-even these old guys!
Cons: -Photo sets are not zipdownloadable.
-Photo sets often do not show much of the action of the video. Small sets of about 24 photos each.
-Videos come split into 2 or 3 parts. This is too small as the videos run to only 10 to 15 minutes.
-No HD or other options for downloading. The best videos are 740x540, 2156kbps. Nice but not what I hope for.
-Has very few connections for downloading. You have to wait for connections to open. It makes for very tedious downloads. I can get 2.5MB on Verizon Fios. Here I get at best about 500kbps.
-The guys are often repulsively ugly. However, I like the contrast with the gorgeous females. The fantasy here is that this could be you. If these guys could get these girls to do these things, so could you. I wish!
Bottom Line: Thanks to PU, I saw that Oldje.com has a clone site. This is it, but with an interesting twist-the price is half. Since I was never a member of Oldje, I cannot know if it may have better quality or more videos. However, there is plenty to see here with 160 videos and photosets. The quality is fine at 740x540, 2156kbps, but I would love to see these videos in HD.

What you get here are great looking models with guys that are really old. They advertise them as starting in their fifties, but most look a lot older. While the guys may look old, the girls are not. Mostly in their early twenties, I cannot believe they agreed to do this stuff with these guys.

Like other sites, there is a lot of nude eye candy, a lot, and I mean a lot of oral. I have not seen one scene that was not mostly blow jobs with oral cum shots inside the girl's mouth. The guys don't jerk into their mouth, the girls suck them off until they cum and they then show it to the camera. These guys I am sure need a lot of oral stimulation from these girls and they do provide it in spades. There is only a small amount of vaginal in each scene, but they all have some. I didn't see any anal though. However, there is some cunt licking as well as ass licking by the guys. Some of the scenes have the girls licking the guy's ass as well.

The fantasies are great. They have so many scenarios, ranging from scenes where the guy is dreaming, one where the guy died and a female angel wants his cock, to others where he just is talking to a girl and she just starts to undress him. There are many scenes where the woman is the instigator. Very hot, considering I would never expect this in real life.

As a guy not yet as old as most of the male performers, it was a truly unique experience to be a member here. I would highly recommend the site to anyone who may find this type of content interesting. I would have gone even higher on my score if they had HD and better downloading.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tricky Old Teacher

10. Tricky Old Teacher (0)

Pay
Active
75
pat362 (367) 01-17-11  09:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -All exclusive material.
-They update with 2-3 new videos each month.
-A very good selection of Eastern Europeans teen girls.(most are well know porn performers)
-There is a little scenario with a much older teacher coercing the teen into having sex with him.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format (1200x800).
Cons: -There is only one video download option (WMV) and no choice in the possible resolution.
-The dialogue is all in Russian and that's too bad because it would add a major element to the scenes.
-They could use a little more foreplay with some added kissing between the players.
-It would be nice if they gave the players the correct name and even more so if they gave her the same one for all of their sites.
-They have a search by model option but because of the above issue with names then I wonder why they offer it.
Bottom Line: -This is probably the one site in this network that has the potential to be much better and I don't think they need to make too many changes for that to happen.

They could offer some English dialogue or at the very least subtitles so that we can get into the little scenarios. As it is you can only guess at what is said(unless you speak Russian) and please make sure that the same model doesn't have a different names from site to site.

-If you like the older/younger fetish and can overlook the Russian dialogue then you should enjoy this site.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

11. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
83
Drooler (218) 02-28-09  04:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Many of those hot Euro girls – Cayenne, Stracey, Leanna Sweet, Rachel Evans, Julie Silver, Lucky, etc. – enjoying sex with older men.
+All exclusive content
+Total of about 268 scenes to date
+The most recent 116 scenes available in WMV 720x404.
+Scenes split into usually 2 vids means you can just get the best action in scene 2 if you like (though sometimes the first blowjob is in scene 1)
+Creativity in storylines and a sense of humor as well as sex
+Arranged with 10 updates/scenes per page; 27 pages to date
+Follows your browsing, so after you finish with a scene and then click “Updates,” it takes you back to the updates page you were on.
+Good visitor’s preview of the content
Cons: -Slow downloads (for me anyway): around 140Kbps (“20 Mbps” connection. Maybe my ISP is lying.)
-The first 152 scenes are only in Real Player and those vids aren’t so good
-Model name not mentioned in some of the scenes
-“Medium-sized” watermark on the vids; prefer “small” or none
-No all-in-one vids; scenes are split into 2 or 3 segments (usually 2)
-No streaming, should you prefer that
-Action in vids starts before the “Oldje” branding graphics have disappeared
-Some vids have “slow motion” parts you may or may not like
-Photos are only 960x640; screenshots are 720x576
-No zips of screenshots or photos
-Found a few screenshot or photo pages with missing links
-Priced in Euros, so dollar-buyers will pay more than $29.95
-Only updates about 1x per wk
-Some of the oldsters have big guts that block the view
Bottom Line: The first time I joined this, over two years ago, I was disappointed. The babes were hot, but those RealPlayer vids were skimpy in quality and the screen dimensions were small.

Funny how I quit just before they started offering the much better WMV’s. At this transition phrase, on their page 16, they even redid a few choice vids that I’d only been able to get in Real Player: Lucky in “Backstage with the Director” and Sarah in “Who’s the Boss” are among my faves, if only for fleeting minutes of the “belly-down flat.”

As for the men here, as an old Playboy cartoon once said: “There may be snow on the roof, but there’s still fire in the furnace.” Enter Big Pharma. I mean, PU’s have complained about some younger porn actors having trouble keeping Johnny at attention. Doesn’t seem to happen here.

A lot of these geezers appear over and over. They range from the middle-aged to the octogenarian. Some are in good shape, and some sport ample “table muscles.” One of them reminds me of gay Mr. Kidd from the old Bond movies; don’t think it’s the same guy, though.

But this isn’t your run-of-the-mill gonzo porn. Just check out the visitor’s area. What imaginations these people have! But the sex is still pretty much by the numbers, with a facial at the end.

I rather doubt that the more bright-eyed and bushy tailed of the PU community would much care for a site like this, but I’m getting up in years and this site helps. Hell, it could be ME on this one! With languid Leanna Sweet or foxy Cayenne! Mmmmmmm!

NB: BeautyandtheSenior is a clone. I've never been to that one. At least one PU member has provided a detailed comment on this.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cougars In Heat

12. Cougars In Heat (0)

Pay
Active
82
james4096 (126) 01-09-10  05:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The women are hot and look like cougars, and the scenes are hot
- No DRM or download limit
- HD videos look very good
- Download manager friendly. Resumes downloads, multiple connections, queue and download later works
- Zip downloads for the photos. And separate links for soft and hard photos
Cons: - Some of the navigation links don't seem to work. If you click on "models" sometimes nothing happens.
- Also some of the video files in ipod format are missing.
- No actual model pages.
- Ads, including Adult friend Finder, in the member's area
- A little too expensive for a site with no network access
- Only one update a week, and it's late at times
Bottom Line: This is a good one if you like hardcore MILF scenes with pornstars. These are traditional video style scenes with a little scenario and everything, not reality gonzo. These are well known pornstars and they seem to look the part of cougars. I'd say they're all between 35-50, I don't know Nina Hartley is probably the oldest one they have. It's all white women with the exception of one scene and it's exclusively B/G. Most of the content seems exclusive, but I have definitely seen at least one of the scenes elsewhere. There were 163 scenes at the time of this review and updates come once a week, occasionally more. The update schedule is irregular, but they do come.

Four types of files are offered for the video downloads, HD mp4, standard rez mp4 & wmv, and an Ipod size mp4. The wmv's are just average, and they do get blocky at times. Go for the HD mp4s they appear to be 1280x720. There are full scene downloads or split into 10 clips. Like I mentioned in the cons, the ipod format is missing sometimes. Also you'll find 3 qualities of streaming flash.

The top quality still photos are 1077x1616, and screen caps are 960x540. Could be better could be worse. One thing that was strange was that they offer "high quality" photos and "high resolution" photos. The "high resolution" are the better of the two. Pretty dumb naming system if you ask me. One thing I like about the way they did photos was that they have separated hardcore and softcore photos. I usually go for the softcore photos because I have video for hardcore. There are separate zips of hard, soft and screencaps.

I really enjoyed this site, I thought the content was good and I would recommend it. I would add 10 points to the score if the site was either cheaper, or was part of a network. If you are wondering the amount of videos they had worth $30, I say yes. However, Naughty America has several similar sites and over a dozen other niches and I usually only pay $10 for that. My suggestions for improvement would be to lower the price and spice things up a bit. Do an occasional threesome or use a model of a different ethnicity.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Boys Love Matures

13. Boys Love Matures (0)

Pay
Active
78
messmer (137) 01-23-12  12:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Mostly attractive mature women.

Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.

Videos can be streamed.

Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.

Updates are regular.
Cons: Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.

Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.

If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.

Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message.
Bottom Line: I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.

I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.

The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.

In one scene, for instance, a “cougar” is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.

In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised “young” man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.

Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.

One other thing that bothers me is that the “boys” are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.

Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)

General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.

Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to “Stunning Matures.”

As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit My Friend\'s Hot Mom

14. My Friend's Hot Mom (1)

Pay
Active
76
SnowDude (214) 06-01-07  11:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -You get over 135 videos going back to December of '03, most with a "mom" and a "friend", but some occasionally have more than one girl
-Each video comes with a picture set and since '05 they have been real digital shots with zip downloads at two different quality settings
-If you enjoy mature pornstars who are glam and not amateur, this site may be just the thing you're looking for
-Included with the site is full network access to Naughty America's 10 "Tier 1" sites all for under $25 a month
Cons: -The scenarios are incredibly lame and the acting is absolutley terrible with little variation from one vid to the next
-Most of the "Moms" are pornstars way past their prime and I doubt any of them were someone's mom when they were filmed
-The highest kbps of the oldest videos (WMVs) is around 750 and they've only offered 1000 and 2000kbps since sometime in March of '07
-Before the end of '05 all pic sets are vidcaps and only offer zip options intermitently with no apparent rhyme or reason
Bottom Line: This is the third site I'd reviewed for the Naughty America network and probably the last I specifically wanted to see. While I had mixed reviews on the first two, I was happy with the video quality. Unfortunately, that takes a real turn for the worse here.

The site offers over 135 videos that are "Mom" themed, but besides that use the same lame scripts as the other network sites. Basically, you have a mother who somehow runs into her son's best friend and through the miracle of reality porn they end up having sex.

The site appears to have started around the end of '03, but until the middle of '05 most pics sets are vidcaps without zip options and it's amazing to see what passed for "high quality" just 4 years ago. Until the last few months, the highest quality setting for the WMV files was around 750kbps, but is now as high as 2000kbps. Those newer vids are pretty good quality, but the previous lower resolution WNV files are very fuzzy and the MPEGs are even worse.

I wasn't cracked up about the first two network sites I reviewed and am even less so with this one. The scenes all seem to have been written and filmed by someone's 13 year old brother and with many performers repeating (some as many as 7 times) it just never allows you to escape into the fantasy. If you want quick sex scenes with young guys and aged pornstars this is your lucky day. If you didn't get full network access I'd say pass because this one definitely misses the mark and not by a small margin.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

15. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
68
selphy (15) 02-05-12  04:13am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Fantastic and Beautiful Girls (nice and young famous pornstars but also semi pro models)
- New videos are in HD 1280 (most of them are not in HD but the format is acceptable, 720x404)
-There are photo and screen cap of the videos
Original and exclusive content that combine romantic sex and a little fetish (old and fat man- with young and beautiful girls)
Cons: -There are about 350 videos but 150 of them are in real media and their quality are poor (about 200x100; I've deleted those files...)
-No model info
-Old files are divided in two or three parts
-The files you downloaded are not named, so you have to renamed them (boring)
-No update info (1 new episode per week)
-Navigation is plan and the login is boring (userid, pwd and captcha).
-The server timeout is too short; it's about 2 hours, and at the and you have to re-log in
-No bonus site (I thought that the other Class3some site was included)
-The are music inside the video and often you can't hear the "voice" of the performers.
Bottom Line: I was intersting in this particular content, most of all because the preview of the site showed a lot of beautiful girls.
So I become a member a couple of weeks ago. But after two days of surfing this site I was not satisfied at all.
I think that if you have such girls who perform and that especially have performed in the past in your site, you have to re-mastered old videos and offer (about 30 euros a month) to your customer a good quality. Not surely the quality of a 15 Mb video in .rm format !!
Otherwise you had to offer one or two quality bonus site !
The same company has also Class3some: it appears a good site (the same girls of Oldje) with only about 50 video.
Why does not offer the two site at the same price ?
Oldje is expensive if you think that 1/3 of its content is not usable, but if the Company offers Class3some togheter with Oldje, I think the 30 euro price is correct.

Well, If you are interersting in old-young sex the new video of Oldje are really good ! But remember that only about 200 video (the new ones) are really usable (not less than 720 x 404)
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lusty Grandmas

16. Lusty Grandmas (0)

Pay
Active
89
mr smut (40) 11-22-09  11:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + exclusive content
+ network access (but limited until you are there for the 3rd month)
+ at the time of review 187 unique scenes are available (1 update on every Wednesday)
+ many old & young scenes (b/g or g/g)
+ model age range from not so MILF to real granny
+ newest videos starting from mid of October 2009 are available in full HD
+ site seems to have no download limit
+ download speed never broke down even with 5 simultaneous donwloads
+ new user interface has a clean layout and lots of nice options
Cons: - pictures are only 1280 pixel on the long side
- you have to enter a captcha code every time you login
- can't use my download manager with the site
- some unneccessary comments can be heard in the videos
- no model bios not even measurements are given
- age description of models in the scene descriptions is not consistent
- new user interface still needs some work
Bottom Line: This site is part of a network that offers mostly exclusive content. Content that is going much further than what can be seen on AllOver 30 or AuntJudys. Fisting, anal sex, fucking machines, light BDSM and rougher sex can be seen there. The real hard stuff seems to be on cumming matures which is available after being a member for more than two months.

That is because you get access to 30 network sites when you join. Additional 10 after one month of membership and another 10 after two months.

The content itself is mostly great. O.k. there are some models I don't like but the majority of them is nice and I like the old & young content most. To see young and petite Bianca Arden (soon on ALS Scan b.t.w.) get into action with GILF Sandora (great body if she's really 65 years old) alone is worth a subscription. Even though there's an impression of overacting especially with Sandora which is a quite common impression with girls from Eastern Europe :-(
If only they would have left out the lengthy introduction to the video.

There are now several download options for videos available with mp4 starting from 640x360, 960x540 up to 1920x1080 and wmv starting from 960x540, 1280x720 up to 1920x1280. If you need further details please feel free to ask me.
The picture section is not that good as 1280 pixel on the long side seems to be not enough compared to the quality they offer in the video section.

I joined through Epoch because I didn't want to make the experience Messmer had with increasing spam in his mailbox. I give 89 points because of the network access. The site alone would get slightly more than 80 points because one update per week wouldn't be enough.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Grandpas Fuck Teens

17. Grandpas Fuck Teens (0)

Pay
Active
90
pat362 (367) 01-30-10  10:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Over 170 scenes.
-Many of 21Sextury's top young models appear on this site.
-Videos can be downloaded in WMV or H.264 as a whole or in sections. The vids come in low to high quality.
-You get immediate access to 30 other sites and half of these are decent or great.
-Photosets can be downloaded zip format
Cons: -The new network is rather slow and the design takes time to get used.
-Navigation on the new site is annoying because the back button often brings you back to the first page rather than previous one. Not so bad when you're on page 2 but annoying when your on page 8 and the number son screnn stop at page 3.
Bottom Line: I prefered the content in this site rather than Lustygrandmas but this site also suffers from a similar problem. The girls are super hot but some of the male talent isn't. That's not such a bad thing but you have to be aware of it.

If you like to see young women getting fucked by much older men and don't care too much about how they look than you'll love this site. There is some anal and DP mixed into the mix as well.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Beauty And The Senior

18. Beauty And The Senior (0)

Pay
Active
65
Rotterdam854 (Disabled) 02-01-11  08:37am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: § Quaint,Exciting,Erotic, Romantic & Cute Content
§ Small & Medium Video Sizes (100Mb~200Mb) maximum
§ Streaming is easy as videos hived into 3 parts
§ Famous European Models, learnt art of porn here
§ Eclectic Mix of Old Men with good libido,stamina
§ Creative scene locations,themes,action & endings
§ Updates come weekly with both video & photo sets
§ Reputed Biller/Easy Sign-Up/Login & Site Access
§ Photo sets are good quality,compact,concise kind
§ Nice Archive (Approx 150~200);Photo+Videos
Cons: § Site works very poorly with DM's; Single Channel
§ WMV format videos;Portable devices format absent
§ Long waiting times to download(45min on average)
§ Some videos are broken into 2-3 parts download
§ Impossible to search for models & scenes by type
§ Monotony theme(Hardcore/Anal/Facial/CIM/Bukake)
§ Bonus sites of no significance,promising content
§ High price~$19 for low quality video,solo site
§ Older males are recycled from video to video
§ Not a customer interactive or friendly site
Bottom Line: This site is clearly meant for those who crave sex between a young woman and a much older man,those who qualify as granddads! There's an interesting mix of themes like newbie maids fucking landlords, director enjoying his muse, same for a painter & a doctor giving his ward a thorough examination.Even though these are common European themes which is a great attribute of the site, it has not grown or metamorphosed into something bigger & better like 21sextury or DDF Productions which carry similar content. Here it falls woefully short by no HD Videos,H 264 videos or even MP4/Quicktime.It seems like an archaic or
monolithic site caught in the crossfire of modern day. Be that as it may, if you're looking for very simple themes like straight sex, creampie, facials & swallows it just might be the site that you are waiting. Some episodes are truly great as the girls are well established models who may have
had their first scene here. It's worth trying once if you like to see good European models, or fantasize about what it would be like to get a good BJ or lay a nice sweet virgin one day in your old age. Most of the themes are centered upon
fantasy & the satiation of a hot enriching story
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit My Friend\'s Hot Mom

19. My Friend's Hot Mom (1)

Pay
Active
83
marcdc1 (163) 01-01-13  08:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - True to theme. these are hot MILFs. You won't find a 25 year old model in a apron posing.
- great quality post-late2009 1080p, 720p,480 3 mbps is available (about 90 shoots) after early 2007 "dvd" quality 720X540 2mbps is available (about 120 shoots) oldest quality is 480X360 512 kbps (about 80)
- pix available as zip files (over 150 pix per shoot)
- clean easy to use organization. Every tool I've ever seen for keeping things organized is available here. You have keywords, date, model searches. You can use their cool "fine my fantasy" feature to narrow down what you're interested in.
- BIG collection: almost 550 scenes! Plus as part of the naughty america network you have access to the over 5,100 shoots
- There are updates on the network every day. This site puts out about 3 shoots a week. (in December '12 there were 13 scenes).
Cons: - annoying cross sells every time you log in
- almost every shoot ends in a facial.
- formulaic mainstream focus (set-up, bj, eat her, missionary, doggy, cowgirl, wildcard, facial) the formula is too rigid for my taste. (then again it's good enough that I've stuck around for more than 3 months).
- They dropped the great live shows they used to run. (although you can download the previous shows).
Bottom Line: Naughty America is a big tent, mainstream network. They shoot fantasy themed content for a traditional fan. You don't find much kink in this place.

That said they have a very good product. The quality and quantity are good and they frequently run discounts on their mailing list and twitter feed. I've seen it as low as $5 for 1 month and renews at $10.

I'm not a huge 40+ fan, so thankfully they do a good job of mixing up the models. You will find women from say 35-60, although most are 38-42 (my unscientific guestimate)

I didn't join the network for this site - but have found enough here to keep me looking. I was frequently pleasantly surprised with this site.

Bottom Bottom Line: Good MILF site, although not the best in the biz. When you put together the bang for you buck, ya can't argue with NA - it's one of the best deals in porn.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

20. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
89
Denner (233) 06-01-09  06:29am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Young easteuro-models at their best.
+ Fine style in videos - fine style of fantasy.
+ Video-quality is almost crisp (the newer ones) and even some of the .rm-files are ok.
+ Young girls being very seducive - thanks to a good working editor, I guess.
+ Entirely exclusive.
+ Ok/fine number of video-scenes (almost 300)
+ Well done for a special kind af fantasies.
Cons: Price a bit high - euro 29.95 - but at TBP the $-price seems much to high compared to the price in euros. Compared the price in $ should be about 35. Guess this one is the other way around with those infamous currency-problems.
No "real" photosets - the photos in each set are way too few and the quality (960x640) are not that great.
Could not find any zip for those sets.
Very simple navigation/browsing - no search engines or name-search for girl-models. You nhave to browse through the now 27 pages with aproxx 10 videos pr page.
Most videos in split files. (But they are joinable).
No bonus sites.
Couold not find any update-schedule - now it looks like one or two pr week.
Repeated login.
Very early videos (2-3 years old or more) not worth much.
Bottom Line: I have quite a few cons for this site - BUT still it's as close to a 90 in score as it gets.
Foremost this is a site with a very speciel fantasy for older porn-lovers and lovers of teens.
This is a dutch site with a slogan for their videos:
"The fantasy you deserve" - pretty good marketing, because it tends to older guys (like this user close to 50) with the everlasting dream of sweet young things - but well married and no more ideas about trying to catch/or cheat with an 18-19 years old girl.
Here you get it on videoclips. Must scenes are definitely fantasy, because the main theme is the teen seducing the 50-65 year old guy.
See the fine previews - and you'll get the idea.
The videos are (almost) all set in different ways - and thats a fine plus. Not much stereotype here.
And once in a while you get a little surprise with some minuttes slow-motion of the best blowjob/fuck in the middle of the scene.
A little over half of the aproxx 300 videos comes in both wmv and Real Media (I normally dislike rm-files) - the wmv quality is FINE - 720x404.
BUT most of the rm-files are certainly not bad in quality either - I'm just not crazy about the only way to play them.
The models are simply great here - for most of them. Fine looking young teen - blondes, brunettes and redhairs - and the way they act here seems much sweeter ( and somewhat sexier) than at some other productions.
Some are well known: Sharka Blue, Black Angelica, Jenny/Wibeke or Bijou ect. (man, just watching that natural-titted Bijou-brunette seducing this old guy....)
Others are quite rare/almost never seen at other sites.
But the way the seduction of older guys are done here makes this site - probably - the best of its kind.
Visited the site some years ago - today it's simply way better.
More regular updates - and I'd stay here (for some time, anyway).
To be recommended.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cougars In Heat

21. Cougars In Heat (0)

Pay
Active
80
Wittyguy (95) 09-16-10  04:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ $3 for a 3 day full access trial membership through TBP
+++ Lots of actual American MILFs (no 25 yr olds)
++ Lots of good hardcore action
++ Multiple viewing and DL options for vids plus all vids have accompanying screen cap shots.
++ Exclusive content.
+ Each set has a softcore photo shoot (no softcore vids though)
+ No DRM or DL limits, supports DL manager
+ About 175 scenes, all with pics and vids
+ No watermarks on pics or vids.
+ Pic size comes in at 1600 x 1070, all have zips
+ Good DL speeds (500 to 700 KB/sec for me)
+ Updates are dated so you if you rejoin later you know where to start.
+ No cross sales on sign-up
Cons: --- Down to 1 update a month.
-- Most every scene is shot the same (especially the pics), it gets repetitive.
-- HD videos aren't HD and the best "non HD" files still come out blurry when viewed full screen.
-- No scene tags or real search function.
- Many of the video trailers for the sets don't work.
- Photo closeup shots are out of focus on body parts (get a camera man who knows how to shoot stills).
- About half the models have boob jobs.
- No model directory or model info.
- Bonus sites didn't work for me.
- Advertising on main page.
- Navigation needs some work.
- Canceling membership a bit of a pain.
Bottom Line: It's just about time for hunting season around here so thought I try a change of pace and check out some cougars on the prowl. What you get here is actual cougar material (women in their 30's to 50's) with the stretch marks, wrinkles and the occasional hairy bush pouncing on younger porn dudes for some basic sex (no anal, toys or bizaare stuff). The price was right for the trial so I signed up and here's what you get:

PHOTOS: Best quality pics are 1600 x 1070 and each set has zips. Most scenes have about 120 to 150 HC pics. The lighting and production value is pretty good with minimal airbrushing. One beef I had was that on shots closer than full body, something is always out of focus ... get a better camera or someone who knows how to use it. The softcore sets had more pictures than the HC and they're pretty good, no toys used - just posing, gradually stripping and maybe some fingering. For those who like older women stripping and posing, this would be a good site to try. My biggest complaint here is that every freakin' set is shot the same. Couple fully clothed, cougar gets half undressed for sex on back, side and cowgirl. Girl gets naked for reverse cowgirl and doggie. Every set, every time. Apparently imagination is not one of this site's strong suits. There are screen caps for each scene too.

VIDEOS: Lots of viewing options, DL in different sizes, stream in different speeds with the inscreen browser or one of yours, and there's an i-pod option too. The problem here is that even though I have a small computer screen, even at full screen only the "HD" vids weren't grainy. The best nonHD vids come in at about 300 mb for a 30 minute video so you can see why. The HD is good but it's not true HD, just big files (1.5 gigs for a 30 min. vid) and the HD only is available in the MP4 format. DL speeds were good. Many of the trailers for the vids didn't actually show the vid so that's a bit of a pain. The vid production was pretty good with only a few sets having the annoying cameraman yakkin' it up.

THE REST: No model info or directory. Navigation is a bit of pain, lots of forward and back clicking and it took a few minutes to figure out the DL functions. The site itself is pretty plain. The bonus sites didn't work but that maybe because I was on a trial membership. Updates have really slowed but the quality of the material is generally pretty good. The advertising is on the main pages or at the bottom of the screen but it's not overly annoying.

I can't really give this site more than an 80 because of the lack of updates, nonHD HD vids, repetitive nature of the shots, search and navigation issues, and some other minor stuff. If you're into actual cougars getting it on (or posing for pics) then I'd recommend the trial. The regular price of $30 a month is too much and unless you have a slow connection you should be able to grab all you want within the trial time.

Now, how come I never meet these women in real life?
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Old Young Lesbian Love

22. Old Young Lesbian Love (0)

Pay
Active
82
messmer (137) 11-01-10  03:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to its Lesbian Theme.

Original contents with mostly attractive elderly and young ladies.

Updates regularly.

Excellent quality in newer videos, going as high as 1920 x 1080p in wmv and h264 format, with a total bitrate of over 8000 kbps.

Excellent picture quality, now in High Resolution
4288 x 2848px. The sets usually follow the action of the video but are NOT vidcaps. There are also many solo shots of the individual models included.

Excellent download speed for me at 3.5 MB/s.

Part of a large network (21Sextury).
Cons: At present only 55 scenes are listed. The site was established in May 2010 and while updates are regular they come only once a week.

Only 62 models, young and old.

Some of the older scenes listed in this site were originally published in "Lusty Grandmas."
Bottom Line: Quite frankly I am enjoying sites like these with its mature ladies who would not win a beauty contest but give me the feeling instead that they could be my elderly neighbor next door. Anyone who likes glamor and glitz would not enjoy this site. Anyone for whom forty years old is ancient, might as well stay away but I enjoy the company of my peers!

In the past I had taken 21Sextury to task for being so neglectful when it came to their sites that featured very mature women, because most hadn't been updated in years, which left me with only "Lusty Grandmas."

But now I am willing to give this site a score over 80, not only for its quality material, but also as a thank you to 21Sextury for adding it to my line up of sites.

The "Lusty Grandmas" are glad to finally have company.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Old Man Tales

23. Old Man Tales (0)

Pay
Active
70
Shakermaker (15) 08-15-07  06:20pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Trial grants access to 10 other sites in the old vs. young niche
- Video and picture quality is fine
- No DRM
- Exclusive content
- Large picture archieve
- stays true to the niche
- Nice site layout
- Easy navigation
Cons: - Updates comes VERY slowly
- Big video file sizes
- No preview option for movies
- Simulated sex in some scenes
- Too few videos
- Too little focus on maintaining the site
Bottom Line: I’ve been a trial member of this site up to several times. 3-4 months apart each time.

Why keep signing up you might ask: Well the site stays true to the niche older men vs. young girls and there are some very nice exclusive content exploring this niche available, however the site updates far too slowly. Only a new video is added every 3 month. Pictures come at faster intervals though.

The site offers access to 10 other sites, which almost all explores the same niche - a new site is being added every 4 month or so. However the sites are very similar, and hard to tell them apart. It does leave one wondering why the sites creators did not just make one big site, and focus their expenses in updating it regularly, like other sites.

Another point of criticism is that for some of the movies, action is kept to a minimum and some even contains what obvious is simulated sex.

Movie quality is great, but only come in big chunks, 3-4 pr. scence ~60 MB each. There is no preview option.

Bottom-line: This site could have been one of the greatest sites in the old vs. young niche, however the update interval for the movies, the fact that the creators puts their energy and in launching new similar sites, instead of maintaining the existing sites and lastly that some scenes lacks action, just doesn’t justify signing up for more. I therefore recommend that you do what I do: sign up for the trial, download what you like, and return some months later to get the new content.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

24. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
85
DutchDoctor (8) 04-11-07  04:08am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Actors are old indeed and the girls are around 20;
2. Beautiful European girls, mostly without terrible tatoos;
3. Nice settings;
4. Excellent high-resolution photo's.
Cons: 1. Scenes could have more 'exciting' sex;
2. Only in Real Media, which I don't like;
3. The oldest movies are not so good.
Bottom Line: This is a quality-site with Old&Young stuff, which is quite rare to find. It has been produced in The Netherlands and Belgium, so without the 'barbie-looking' US-porn-stars or the East-European wallpapers with flowers.

When this is your 'cup-of-tea', this site is well worth to visit!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

25. Oldje (1)

Pay
Newbie
90*
tikkit (3) 05-19-09  01:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + The girls here are more attractive than other Euro Old & Young sites such as Old Farts & Young Tarts, and Grandpas Fuck Teens
+ Cinematography - Yes, you can laugh but much thought and work goes into the art side of things, with style, slo-mo's, zooming, and such
+ I love oldje's style of video, the videos are Unique, stories are not repeated very often, I geniually look foward to the updates
+ tour provides an accurate representation of what will be available when/if you subscribe
Cons: - scenes are short
- the amount of sex in scenes is SHORT, though the more recent videos have improved upon this.
- Expensive for American Subscribers, may be only worth it to join for one month and thats it.
- No full scene files, though this really does not bother me much
- the actors in the scenes try to speak english, just speak in your native language, who cares!
- Updates come every two weeks on Friday, not that often but understandable
- no zip picture files, Beauty and the senior has much better picture sets
- Older videos are of Real Player Only and BAD quality
Bottom Line: Oldje is great, but has flaws, why don't they combine Oldje and B&TS for one really great site with pictures and videos.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 64 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Oldje (1)
2. My Friend's Hot Mom (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.16 seconds.