Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-48 of 48 Page :    < Previous Page

Visit Josh Girls

26. Josh Girls (1)

Pay
Newbie
83*
foxtails (1) 02-10-12  10:03am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - lots of beautiful energetic fun women who are having fun
- lots of creative exorcises that the women perform
- simple site and simple navigation
- original
- Josh is a cool webmaster who responds to emails
Cons: - could use more consistency in introducing the women (more stretching and up-close shots please)
- just a tad bit pricey as I would like to see more girls
Bottom Line: Joshgirls is a recent favorite of mine as it's very original in what it offers. While there have been many athletic sites out there that show girls performing more complex exorcises in the buff none have zeroed in on the hot and fun simplicity that Joshgirls offers.

So first of all, what exactly are Joshgirls? They're simply women who have big breasts that can really really bounce. Which is also one of the two key elements that separates Joshgirls from other slightly similiar athletic sites. Every single one of girls on the site has large breasts.

And the second fun element is that Joshgirl's simply intends to show them bouncing in literally almost every imaginable way possible. Whether it be on a trampoline, oiled up, or while the women is using a hippity hop. And it's all hot. There's no exercise performed that will not show these beautiful breasts bouncing as god intended.

There are only two complaints I have. First is while the site has a decent amount of videos now as of feb 10,2012, 205 +, the amount of girls is still relatively low in comparison to other athletic sites. But it's not that big of an issue because of the quality content that is there.

My second complaint is the consistency in how Josh introduces the girls is a bit of a letdown. A few girls before getting started get some amazing intimate up-close views of everything they got while most don't. A standard stretching and up-close intro would be nice from now on.

Also I just want to let people know that this is strictly a video site. There are no pictures to speak of. It's a non-issue for me and really should be for most as pictures cannot capture breasts bouncing that well. ;)

Overall, this is a fun and hot site that carves out its own niche in this repetitive copy and paste world of porn. And its only negative for me is that there's not enough of this and that in a few areas. I give it a 83. I highly recommend it for anyone looking for something that's just fun and hot and almost even seemingly innocent - almost.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ultimate Surrender

27. Ultimate Surrender (1)

Pay
Active
82
dumpington (5) 05-04-07  01:55pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Winner fucks the loser idea is awesome!!!
Excellent sub/dom feel!
Pretty women ass up and being taken doggy-style by dominant lezzies is excellent!
Occasionally great acting by dominant winners!
Cons: Occasionally weak acting by dominant winners!
The wrestling is stupid and boring!
The wrestling judge actually takes it seriously!
Nobody gives a crap about who is winning.
Viewers only want to see wrestling aftermath!
Bottom Line: This is a great idea, but somebody needs to tell whoever produces these things that the wrestling goes on too long. The BEST PART of these videos is watching the winning girl enslave the loser. I really love it when the winning girl slaps the losing girl on her pretty ass and demands her submission before doing her doggy style. But I hate it when she seems uninterested and it becomes mechanical and boring, which happens too much for my taste.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ultimate Surrender

28. Ultimate Surrender (1)

Pay
Active
82
pat362 (367) 11-22-10  07:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -The concept is orginal and that's pretty rare in porn.
-They have many of the regular Kink performers.
-You can use a download manager.
-Videos come in WMV or MP4 and both offer regular quality or HD.
-They update with one new video every 3-4 days.
-They have over 420 videos.
Cons: -I found the rules for the wrestling somewhat hard to figure out.
-They will pan to the audience and that tends to distract from the action.
-I found that most of the sex was too cold and lack any kind of passion and heat.
-The setting is always on the mat and in the same room.
-Lighting is a little on the dark side of things.
Bottom Line: -I'm not sure if Kink wanted to make a wrestling site with added to it or make a sex site that had wrestling in it. No matter what they wanted to achieve I certainly didn't really enjoy it.

It could be that they were thinking that after watching a couple of girls fight each other for a while that we'd be thrilled to see the winner really give it to the loser but if that's the case then it didn't work for me. I downloaded a couple of videos but I can't say that more then 2-3 are worth watching more than once.

The site is still updating so I assume that I'm not the customer they cater to.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ultimate Surrender

29. Ultimate Surrender (1)

Pay
Active
80
The Clyde (26) 09-24-08  03:01pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Great idea
- Attractive Models and Participants
- Video Quality is Better
- Believable Action
Cons: - Repetitive in Nature
- Better Photos
- Large Files - not segmented
Bottom Line: This is a very cool idea and it may be great for those into this type of action. It was decent at first, but really missed on the editing and action. There was way too much holding and not enough take downs and action.

The penalty phase at the end of the match didn't seem to be much of penalty. It may have been better if losing the match actually cost the participants a true "hardship" not sure what would work, but getting drilled by a strap on didn't seem to much of a penalty.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Monica Martin

30. Monica Martin (0)

Pay
Active
80
badandy400 (103) 11-17-08  12:32pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Unique content, not many women have her look
-Content is exclusive
-Updates frequently
-Very easy navigation
-Updates are dated
Cons: -Definitely needs growth
-Extremely limited amount of nudity
-No bottomless videos or photos
-Inconsistent file types for videos
-Videos are non nude
-Pricing is confusing
-Video and photo quality need work
Bottom Line: NOT A PORN SITE

There is very limited amount of nudity here and what there is topless only. The site is mainly about Monica posting photo shoots from previous years.

There is some new stuff being posted that seems more like what you expect from a web site. The newer videos are much better quality as well.

Older videos, well not that there is that many anyway, can be of fairly low quality. New is better but still needs work. The resolution is low at 320x240 for all of them. The photos are not high res either. They go up to about 800x1100.

The site is very small. There is 70 photo sets equaling 1.55 GB and 2.17 GB of videos.

Most of the photo shoot are actual posing and some of them are pretty hot an several are topless. The videos are a lot of Monica working out with a hot blonde, wrestling, and some posing. They really are noting elaborate or special.

I would like to see some nude modeling and perhaps some of her friends as well. And definitely going bottomless too. I doubt we will ever see any hardcore from her site, that is not what it is about, but I believe more shoots showing her whole body would be great. That, and just more shoots in general, there is no reason this site could not grow faster.

If this had been a site featuring just any woman I would give it a much lower score. But this is not a niche that any woman can be in, so she gets a handful of points just for being different. hell, a lot of women (and men) are doing good to go to the gym more than a few times a year and that is usually just for a week right after the new years.

For this site to be worth your money you really need to be into buff chicks. If that is not your thing than you will not be happy here. Of course if you are a fan of Monica Martin or of bodybuilding than this site would be worth at least checkout out the tour pages.

Again, NOT A PORN SITE in the traditional sense.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nude Fight Club

31. Nude Fight Club (1)

Pay
Active
80
nadiencendia (83) 01-18-11  06:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (43), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good to High quality videos and several download and streaming options
-Good quality pictures, downloadable as a .zip file
-They have convinced some of their top stars (Blue Angel, Sophie Moone...) to be part of this site
-Updated twice a week (aprox.)
-Part of the 21st Sextury site network (offered as a loyalty bonus)
Cons: -Action and setting are always the same (boring!)
-Not all models are equally good looking (although average is high)-
-Archive is still small to medium-sized (77 sets right now, some of them backstage sets)
Bottom Line: I was one of the people who "meh-ed" when I saw that they were opening this site and adding it to the 21st Sextury network. Well, after tree months I have got access to the site thanks to the loyalty bonus, and my opinion is, well... meh.

I should clarify that I am not that much into catfights and nude wrestling. It's not one of my favorite niche. It can be hot, if it is well done; but it can also get quite boring. That is the case, in my opinion, with this site. The reason is that the setting of the videos is always the same (a boxing ring, always the same boxing ring), and the action are also more or less the same: the two girls fight more or less passionately for a while, they take each others' clothes off, and they end by licking each other or rubbing against each other. This last part is sometimes hot; but it's not much different from what we get in other sites.

I wouldn't say this sit is bad, specialy considering that it is offered as a loyalty bonus; but it lacks any imagination or variety. Why not change the setting, add some oil, water or mud from time to time, tell the girls to do other stuff (I don't know what, something, anything).

Also, another thing that I don't quite like are the backstage sets. I have spoken against them in other sites as well; here, they don't take so much space from "real" updates, but the problem is, they are too similar to the actual scenes that are posted separately: they are, basically, just the same scenes, filmed with a different camera from a differente (wider) angle. A cheap way of having two sets for the price of one.

Bottom line: not a bad site if you get it as a bonus; if you are really into female nude wrestling, I would bet that you can find better stuff out there -although I haven't checked.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Josh Girls

32. Josh Girls (1)

Pay
Active
80
littlejoe (23) 10-02-12  02:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (26), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -bouncing boobs
-mostly good video quality
-some hot models
-uses ccbill
Cons: -worst site design ive ever seen
-inconsistent download speeds
-some not so hot models
-slow updates
-no HD
Bottom Line: this site is truly an eyesore. my webpage in high school was better then this. all it consists of is a thumbnail of a model and then links for the videos with generic keywords saying what the video is of, ex. "jumping jacks" or "jump rope". no picture preview, no description, no filesize or length. i thought maybe my browser wasnt loading it correctly. nope, just abysmal.

no pictures other then a small thumbnail. odd since the preview page before i joined had a MUCH better layout then the members area...

the videos are 720x480, and some havent been deinterlaced, so you see the rough edges. they are of good quality tho. the clips are 2-5 minutes each and each girl has several videos. they are from the same shoot, just broken up. i count 234 clips from 25 girls

i have also joined boobiemovies.com and it appears josh girls is a continuation of that site. same girls tho the video quality is better on josh girls

looks like the site updates 1 clip per week, except that stopped in july. now its 1 clip a month! i got a good chuckle how throught the links it says more clips coming soon, sorry i broke my promise blah blah blah. also keep in mind that the girls clips are strewn along over several years. i doubt hes shot anything for 3 years, he just has these sitting somewhere waiting to release it

so many bad things how did it still get a 80? easy, the videos are amazing. i joined this site to see girls with bouncing boobs, and i was not disappointed. jumping, running in place, trampolines, different views, all spectacular! too bad its not in HD

i recommend a 1 time membership to the site, and never look back. also i think it should be $20 not $25
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Aziani Iron

33. Aziani Iron (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
TrepaNation (2) 06-21-14  09:21pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Easy navigation/access to content, like any other Aziani site.

-Pertinence. With only 1 or 2 exceptions, the women featured here are dedicated bodybuilders.

-Updates. 8 videos and 4 photo sets for April 2014, 4 videos and 6 photo sets for May. I consider that to be pretty decent for such a niche site.
Cons: -Only 26 models featured as of right now. Unfortunately that's just the nature of the beast, as there are only a handful of women in the bodybuilding scene who are willing to shoot porn.

-Streaming video quality is poor; noticeably blocky.

-Membership does NOT grant access to the rest of the Aziani network; only to Jewels Jade's personal site.
Bottom Line: I want to re-emphasize that this is a niche site.

I've given the score that I've given with consideration of the fact that beauty is in the eye of the beholder... If you don't consider Amazonian women with exaggerated genitalia to be attractive, then you should definitely skip this one. On the other hand, if that sort of porn model turns you on, the site is worth a peek.

There's dirty talk, muscle flexing, striptease, clit pumping and enthusiastic masturbation. A few hardcore shoots as well.

Everything appears to be fully downloadable -- picture sets are available as .zip archives, and videos are available in .MP4 at various resolutions up to 1080. The bitrate on the 1080 versions is ~6000, which isn't the best, but it's acceptable. Scenes seem to be between 8 and 11 minutes in length on average.

Bottom Line: The site is actually quite decent if muscle-bound, trash-talking, huge-clitted women jilling themselves off makes your dick hard. I would simply like higher res photos and a better bitrate on the videos, and perhaps less exagerrated descriptions of the action... something that's all too common.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Real Workout

34. The Real Workout (0)

Pay
Active
78
james4096 (126) 04-23-09  04:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - zip downloads of photos, and hands-free slide shows
- Access to 6 bonus sites
- The scenes are hot and so are the girls
- They give you a lot of options for video formats
- 100% exclusive
Cons: - Small amount of content, only 32 video shoots
- They spread one update out throughout the week
- Video quality could be better
- Photos are not Hi-Rez
Bottom Line: If your fantasy is to be a personal trainer or athletic instructor who seduces his hot female client, then you'll love The Real Workout. In each scene you'll see a hot porn star in tight workout gear and sneakers stretching, lifting weights or practicing a sport and then getting fucked by a dude. Not bad at all. There are 32 scenes and they do try to make things interesting each time.

One new scene is added a week, but here's the kicker, they spread it out. So maybe the pictures and part one come on Monday, and then the full movie and part 2 come out on Wednesday and then part 3 comes out on Friday.

The videos are 640x360 in their top quality, and they didn't seem very clear to me. You get lots of choices as to what format you want to download the video in. Full scenes are available for download in 3 sizes of wmv, and also high quality in both mov and mpg, or you could stream it. Then they have it split up into 3 parts in either wmv or mpg, and then also one minute clips and finally a 10 minute "best of" version for each scene.

The still photos are 700×1050 and the screen caps are 720x405. You can download the photos in zip files, and both are watchable in hands free slideshows on the site.

Joining gives you access to six bonus sites. Of the six, three of them are still updated and feature full scene videos. The sites which are still alive are are: Solo Interviews, Innocent High, and Oye Loca. Don't expect much from the others: This Girl Sucks, Trailer Trash Cuties and Euro City life.

I enjoyed the site, and I think if you include the bonus sites it's worth $24.87 for 1 month. But I have to admit I only joined because I wanted the Jayden Jaymes scene. This site is fine, but if you really want to see this kind of scene I would recommend Naughty America's Naughty Athletics or Brazzers Big Tits In Sports. Both of those sites have comparable content, but more scenes and are part of bigger networks.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Flexible Positions

35. Flexible Positions (0)

Pay
Active
77
atrapat (112) 08-08-08  04:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Scenes shot at a couple different private gyms.
-Models are dressed in work out clothes.
-Focuses more on the workout theme than flexibility.
-10 scenes so far. Launched recently.
-All models are well known USA porn stars. Big fake boobs on all of them.
-If you want flexibility, check Angelina Valentine or Maya Gates' scenes. Little flexibility in other scenes.
-Audrey Bitoni or Rachel Roxxx aren't that flexible but put up very naughty performances.
-Accessible from Porn Pros Network. Check my review there for further pros and cons.
Cons: -Scene structure and the type of workout are always the same. It can get repetitive.
-Last scene was released almost a month ago.
-Most models aren't flexible at all. Most don't know how to use the gym machines.
-Viewer should be flexible too. The camera is often rotated 90 degrees.
-Lots of attention to boobs, little to asses. Strange for a workout site.
-Cameraman/director talks a lot and gives instructions aloud during the scene.
-Male performer (Anthony Rosano) is the same in 90% of the scenes. He does OK but he's all over this network.
-Check Porn Pros Network site tour for a quick list of scenes with dates.
-The usual drawbacks of Porn Pros Network.
Bottom Line: This site is somewhat of a misnomer. The Flexible Positions are rarely little more than a leg in the air or laying on a big soft gym ball during the sex. The scenes aren't that bad, though. The models are top porn stars and they look great. But the sex in most scenes wouldn't look out of place in a different setting: instead of fucking on a couch, they do it on the bench of a gym machine. A gym floor is just like any other floor. The big soft ball is probably the only unique element and certainly makes for a couple new and interesting positions.

The scene structure is always the same:
1) Girl works out alone on various gym machines; usually while talking to cameraman.
2) The "trainer" joins in and shows her "how to do it", groping and licking a bit more than a real trainer would.
3) Regular sex scene using the gym elements and a few more flexible than usual positions. The big soft ball is quite a find.

Parts 1 and 2 take up usually a third of the scene and are what set apart the site. You get to see several of the models running for a short while with their tits flying free. Quite a nice and unusual view. They also seem to do it for real getting to pant and sweat a bit. They also work on other machines trying to showcase their best assets (tits, mainly; why not the asses too?). Nice use of the thighmaster. When the male performer enters the stage, they often repeat some of the exercises while he gropes or directly licks them as they work out. There's no kind of script at all. Scenes usually get stuck in a middle point between acting and not acting. The male performer is always introduced as a trainer and he uses lots of gym jargon but the girls never pretend to be surprised when he goes straight to lick their tits or pussy. They know from the start what they are here for. They should script their scenes a little more or leave aside this trainer fallacy.

The site would be much more interesting if the scenes were more like the one with Angelina Valentine. She displays her usual enthusiasm and pulls some nice tricks: she does splits to the guys cock, gives him head while hanging upside down from one of the machines or gets licked while doing a back bent. Maya Gates has never done if for me, but she puts up what's probably the most remarkable scene: a very flexible performance with lots of different positions; she and her "trainer" make good use of her ability to sustain a back bent.

I have a soft spot for Audrey Bitoni and Rachel Roxxx. Both aren't that flexible but they put up some pretty good scenes here. It would make sense if they got their own Deep Throat Love scene (very recommendable site in this same network) as they show here they have what it takes to be there. Just as Deep Throat Love only hires models who can deep throat, maybe Flexible Positions should consider hiring models who can honor the site's name.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Land of Venus

36. Land of Venus (0)

Pay
Active
75
careylowell (18) 05-22-08  08:59pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Her real first name is posted in the bio's newspaper clippings (Or did when I was a member, circa 2004).
Venus has a world class, ripped body that makes most men stare without apology.
The site has branched out considerably since I left, with some models posing, others in hardcore action.
Cons: When I signed on, nearly all pages were devoted to its namesake: Venus, former military brat and winner of bodybuilding and wrestling trophys during her late teens. Lots of fake tits on display and the monthly price tag is too steep. Venus remains an alluring doll, but others here have gone too far down the bodybuilding highway, leaving outward hints of feminity several exits back.
The site has been up for 11 years but still has a raw, just thrown together look by a webmaster with limited experience.
Bottom Line: For a select crowd desiring bodybuilders getting fucked or posing nude in (mostly)non-glamorous settings.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nude Sport Videos

37. Nude Sport Videos (0)

Pay
Active
75
ace of aces (179) 02-19-09  04:13am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (70), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + arround 250 videos
+ next door russians
+ newer videos have better quality
+ one extra site
+ nice idea of posing
Cons: -inconsistent download speed
-slow download speed 27-2100 kbit/s
-medium video quality
- music in videos (a no go!)
-sometimes unmotivated exercises from the girls
- body shape is to similar
-expansive trial price 8,95
-Expansive regular price 29,95
Bottom Line: I am not that in voyeur sites, but seeing a 90 in the purating i had to check it out.

I can`t really say that i am disappointed, but all in all the site is only an average site form e.

You got plenty videos of every kind of duration. The videos content is, as the sitename says so sportive. that`s for itself, a good idea. you got all kind of exercises. The quality of the videos is all in all medium, something what in theses times isn`t better then standard. The newer ones have better quality, but there are to less videos i that quality.
As an extra you get the site Voyeur Realm which is like that site, only from the voyeuristic point of view.

The cons are in my opinion massive.
The downloadspeed was totally inconsitent. While downloading a single file the speed varies from 27-2100 kbit/s which takes a small video clip a long download time. If you use a downloadmanager the total speed increases, so you can download simultaniously e.g. 5-6 videos. All in all the downloadtime stays even very long.
The girls do there exercises rather very unmotivated and getting the lousy backkground music also, some of the videos aren`t worth to download them. The girls also look rather the same. Body slim, tits none, pubic hair shavedÖthat bores even if they stretch every part of the body.
Last but not least, the price is in regular and as a trial much to expansive for what you get. A price arround 10Ä would be fitting.

All in all
Might recommend
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nude Fight Club

38. Nude Fight Club (1)

Pay
Active
75
RustyJ (145) 03-18-11  03:07am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -High definition video that is among the best in business in quality and has no DRM
-90 very niche specific scenes all in full HD
-Lots of photographs in zips, lately in high definition
-Very good looking models
-Comes as a part of 21Sextury.com that is arguably the better half deal after the network was split
-Excellent transfer speeds with no limits, four concurrent downloads with download manager
-Sometimes it looks like they are actually focused in winning whatever that might require
Cons: -This is VERY niche site
-Content is repetitive
-Sometimes the girls appear totally clueless and flail around aimlessly. This can be fun watching though
-Actual sex takes a fraction of the clips length so if girl/girl wrestling with progressive nudity does nothing for you, you might as well use your time on some better material
-Lately they have focused 100% on backstage scenes
Bottom Line: This is certainly a niche site. I don't know if this is a very pupular fetish or not but I know of only one other site with this kind of focus and that'd be Kink's UltimateSurrender.

All the scenes are pretty much the same here. They may have some talking and interviewing in the beginning but English is not the native language here so it's not very fluent. After that the wrestling starts, sometimes with some training clothes on, sometimes naked right away, with or without oil thrown in. Whether this looks convincing or just ridiculous depends a lot on the scene and the models. Some appear to have some goal in their mind while others just flail aimlessly around. Three girl free for all's are quite a mess.

Eventually one of the girls "wins" (or they just stop wrestling) and by that point they tend to be naked. Some oral sex and fingering follows. Some scenes may have strapon sex and fisting but other than that it's quite plain.

Presentation is spotless as is the way with this network. The 21Sextury.com was recently split into new 21Sextury.com and 21Sextreme.com. This site comes as a part of 21Sextury.com network which in my opinion is the stronger one of the two by far.

I'm personally not into this niche and the score reflects what this site gives to a person without being really much into this. If you find this kind of action attractive, this might be a goldmine to you. I wish they had some way of introducing sex to these scenes in earlier stage.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nude Fight Club

39. Nude Fight Club (1)

Pay
Active
75
asmith12 (124) 04-13-11  08:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: ++ beautiful girls
++ most likely unscripted fight
+ progressive undressing
++ very good video quality (up to Full HD 1920x1080)
++ access to 21sextury network
+ many billing options
+ no pre-checked cross-sales
Cons: --- pretty much pointless, girls do not know what they're really doing
-- no real rules, no winner or loser
Bottom Line: When reviewing such a site, it is very difficult to avoid comparing it all the time with UltimateSurrender (which is BTW at the very top of my personal ratings). All the time I was a bit confused: if comparing NudeFightClub to UltimateSurrender, it IMHO doesn't stand a chance, but if comparing it to "average site out there" it isn't too bad.

First of all, NudeFightClub clearly loses to UltimateSurrender in the overall concept. It looks that the authors of NudeFightClub got the main idea of "show how girls fight and then fuck", but didn't make it look anywhere real. Unlike UltimateSurrender, on NudeFightClub there are no rules, no judge, and no real competition. It just shows two girls wandering around the ring and hitting each other without apparent reason. Probably "fight" is not scripted, but as there is no real reasons for girls to fight, it is not really competitive. The "fight" starts with girls dressed, and they undress as the action goes, and in the end girls are usually completely nude. There is no judge, and no score, so in the end, there is no winner or loser, girls just move from nude fighting into some lesbian action.

On the positive side, girls in NudeFightClub are usually very beautiful, so watching them is a pleasure. Video quality is one of the best in the industry (up to 8MBit/s 1920x1080, both in WMV and MP4). Download speeds are good. And last but not least - it provides access to 21Sextury network (and IMHO there are much better sites within 21Sextury than this one).

Bottom line: if you like UltimateSurrender because it is real and competitive - probably you shouldn't bother with NudeFightClub, you're likely to be very disappointed. But if all you want is nude girls wandering around in some sport-like action - it might be worth a try, especially considering bonus access to 21Sextury network.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Josh Girls

40. Josh Girls (1)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 01-26-11  02:02pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Beautiful all natural breasts and no tattoos.
-Some gorgeous models. Brittany from Brittanysbod.com is a standout, but they also have Honey DeJour, Daphne Rosen, Alexis Silver and Africa.
-Updates every five days.
-Very simple site navigation.
Cons: -The site is too small for the price. There are 153 videos that are less than five minutes long. At $25 that is expensive.
-No photos at all.
-Only one download option-MP4.
-My computer did not provide video specs, but on another review site they listed the videos as 720 x 480 at 1600K. That sounds about right, as the quality is just ok.
Bottom Line: Josh loves models with huge natural breasts. This site is very, very softcore as some of the models are only topless. Most appear nude in their full natural glory though. No tattoos and no hair down below either.

Josh should have included photo sets, but the site appears to be a one man show. His function is to tape videos of the models. Sometimes he talks to them while he is taping and gives them directions. Another blabby director that hurts his videos. In contrast, many times there is annoying background music instead.

Most of the videos are of the models bouncing their breasts. He has them do jumping jacks, bounce on a ball, jog in place, sometimes holding a bar behind their head, or bounce on a trampoline. He loves to record their breasts making slapping sounds, twirling or just simply bouncing up and down. I found these to be entertaining, as well as unusual, but most definitely repetitious. As videos under five minutes each, they work just fine.

There also are a few, about five, videos that I liked a lot more. They were of the models either stretching and showing everything or a few were of stripping while they bounced their breasts.

Pretty much I liked the content, but the site was very far from perfect. My biggest gripe is that there just wasn't enough here. I had no trouble going through the site at a leisurely pace in only two days. The vid count stands at 153, but they are all very short. Updates come every five days, but that is not much when you get only a few minutes in each. There were no download options and no photos. These are serious drawbacks in my book.

I also did not get any customer service. One of the videos broke up and pixielated just at the right moment in a strip video. I checked the site and guess what? No link for customer service or to contact the site about anything. I sent an email through TBP, but no answer more than a week later. No service, just take your money.

I liked the content, but the site is too narrowly focused to attract at the $25 price. It should be no more than $15.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Perfect Flex

41. Perfect Flex (0)

Pay
Active
74
exotics4me (463) 08-20-07  12:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Some incredibly flexible models
- Vid quality is decent but could be better, at most 500 on high end. Does have decent 1000+ bitrate
- The old fetish has kind of been satisfied, what was it that I saw up those cheerleaders skirts, if that was ever a fetish for you, this does a good job on it.
- Women are very free with their bodies, fists, dildos, all while wrapping their legs around their neck.
- Has something of an erotic artsy feel in a good way.
Cons: - Let me get this out first, this site is not only featuring incredibly flexible women, it is also incredibly boring.
- Overpriced for amount of content, should be $14.95, instead it is $34.95.
- Videos are grainy in full screen
- Pics are useless, they take up about 1/4th of my monitor screen, below 1000 on the high end.
- Very repetitive sets
Bottom Line: These women are real gymnast/ballet dancers/contortionists. The erotic side of this site is very high. You almost feel like you are watching these women stretch, get themselves turned on, then masturbating for you to watch. The only problem and is something I should have listed in the cons is that a good portion of these models do wear masks or half masks, which takes the fantasy of watching an unknowing woman away.

I used to get samples on TGP sites from Perfect Flex, and often thought, "I bet the site shows much more" I was wrong. They do masturbate and even fist, but I'm telling you if you are like me you are going to start feeling like, "Well, they are just doing that for the money". While I agree most models are, at least make me think that isn't true.

I believe most of the models are probably from Russia, very pretty women, if you like toned and fit women. The navigation is about as good as I would expect since I don't believe any of these models are actual porn stars. If you've ever seen the model, Veronika Simon's body, that is the bodies these models have. It still comes off as boring. I really don't have any major complaints except with the price. Videos could be better, pics definitely need to be better, but I could deal with both if they lowered the price and got the models more into what they are doing. Recommended only for those people who have a fetish of a nude woman stretching. Just keep in mind, they all do the same poses, it is just a dull site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Flexy Teens

42. Flexy Teens (0)

Pay
Active
72
visor (7) 03-12-08  10:14am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Does what it says on the tin. Ballerinas and gymnasts pose doing their thing. Wide extensions etc and etc.
Good quality photography and videos - I mean here technical quality..it's clear and decent sized.
Cons: Videos shot in front of stills photographer (with flash occasionally)
All chat in Russian? OK, but if you're not fluent...
All shaved
All (except one) softcore
Bottom Line: If you want to see basically lissom, shaved athletes stretch and pose this site is for you - as long as you're not too fussy about seeking either liveliness of video or variation in stills
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Special Exercises

43. Special Exercises (0)

Pay
Active
70
KodiakCS (7) 11-06-07  01:21pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: All originial content
Some nice (if rather skinny) eurogirls
Unique idea
At this time the site seems to update rather regularily (once in a week)
OK video quality
Cons: Boring scenes
No "real" bondage
Softcore (almost no sex)
Nudity does not focus on erotic views
Low production value (bad lighting, bad camera-angels)
Poor site design (no browsing)
Bottom Line: I'd say: great idea - lousy realization...
The site contains around 45 scenes (with photos of about 25 of the older ones in the preview area) of "forced" - nude - exercises.
The scenes are very softcore and the force or bondage level is very low as is the exercise/stress level (where is the sweat, girls?).
Some of the girls are hot (many are average) but you won't see much... the level of nudity is low and open legs are an exception...
In addition the camerawork is lacking skill and focus: you could at least try to put the girls in focus and try to catch a glimpse of their sexuality (so that at least the voyeuristic part of the viewer is satisfied).

The bottom line:
There is much work to do before this site gets interesting for the crowd! At this time it seems to be more an experiment with a special fetish than a sexy site.
At least there are regular updates - and the producers are honest and let you comment on any photo/videoshoot (boring is a word you'll often read there).
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Nude Sport Videos

44. Nude Sport Videos (0)

Pay
Active
69
LAmahogany (33) 08-16-09  12:45am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Watching hot girls work out naked is a turn on and I'm surprised how rare this concept is in adult video
- Many of the models are extremely attractive
- Older videos have more masturbation
- Newer videos are higher in quality
- Lots of videos
- Lots of stills
- DRM-free files that play on anything
- Nice 3-day trial option
Cons: - "Exercises" can be highly distracting due to the lack of a passable attempt at aerobics, calisthenics, yoga, etc.
- Unenthusiastic athletic activity (i.e., girls giving up half way through routines, apparently "walking" through their sets, etc)
- Rare sex acts
- Some models look very homely
- No interview or other information present about the model (not a deal breaker, but is aesthetically pleasing)
- Don't bother with the audio soundtrack
- Files can take a while to download
- Stills appear to be just screen grabs from the video and are, therefore, lo-fi in quality.
- Relatively expensive - there are cheaper hardcore sites
Bottom Line: I've been orbiting this site for a year, toying with the idea of slapping down $30 for a subscription until finally getting it done while I getting my home all to myself and I was slightly disappointed. The previews seem hot enough, but there is very little variety between the videos. On the one hand, many of the girls are pretty enough, with some masturbation, some outdoor action, and gyrations as part of an exercise or dance with plenty of appealing camera angles (without the annoying wide angle lens and zooming to which San Fernando valley-based porn is thoroughly addicted). If you're into Euro-Russian girls, this site can be particularly appealing. Nevertheless, there are big problems like the girls seem to be half-assing the exercises and while I shouldn't care, it's more of a distraction than it is erotic if they're just phoning it in. Don't bother with the sound. Some of the videos look like they were shot onto VHS and then dubbed off using a vid-cap card. Some of these ladies are rather plain looking and there is no play/interaction with the camera, so there's a somewhat cold feel to the videos. Overall, I would recommend (trying) to download as much as you can with their iffy bandwidth in a 3-day trial and moving on. Hopefully someone really executes their idea to a much higher level or they someday elevate their own standards.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naked Gym Girls

45. Naked Gym Girls (1)

Pay
Active
69
rearadmiral (316) 02-18-14  03:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 9 videos, 7 picture sets
- Unique niche
- $20 membership
- Videos in three resolutions
- Photos in zips or singles
- Photos in two resolutions
- High-res photos look amazing
- Supports download managers for queuing files
- Definitely all exclusive
Cons: - Small site
- No obvious update schedule
- Music replaces sound
- Would be much better value packaged as part of a network
Bottom Line: Leave it to the folks at The Best Porn to expose me to a niche I neither knew existed or liked it: girls getting naked while working out. There is really only one reason why I joined, and thatís to get access to a scene by a model I like who has only done a small amount of stuff. The fact that the site isnít terribly expensive at $20 and billed through CC Bill sealed the deal.

The site is very small, with only nine videos and seven photo sets offered. While thatís definitely small, you need to keep in mind that many of the scenes are well over an hour long and one falls just short of two hours.

The site has a very narrow (and unique) focus: girls at a gym, solo, who begin a workout, strip off their clothes while working out and complete the workout while naked. There is little variation: there is one scene with two girls with some sex, and one scene is shot outdoors, but other than that it follows the same formula. Consider this more a nudist site than a sex site.

The scenes are undated so I canít determine what update schedule, if any, exists. The site allows member comments on the scenes and the most recent scene has comments. Yesterday when I checked the comments the most recent said it was posted three months ago. Today it says it was posted on December 2, but doesnít give a year. I think it is safe to assume that if the site is updating there is no set schedule beyond glacial.

The site offers videos in three resolutions: 1920x1080 (9000 kb/s), 1080x720 and 640x360. While I found most of the video to be crisp and clear, I did find in some of the videos that where there is fast movement the edges become slightly pixilated. I donít understand the tech side of this so I donít know if this is something the site could even avoid.

A unique feature is that you can download an ISO version that can be burned to a DVD to watch on TV.

The site permits download managers for queuing scenes and zips.

The photos are available as singles or zips and in two resolutions: 3744x5616 and 1200x800. The high-res pics look incredibly good. If youíre a photo collector these might be worth joining to get. Photo sets range from 100+ photos to 800+ photos.

My biggest complaint about the scenes may be subjective, but I suspect that many others will agree with me. Iíll let any potential members decide on their own. The site has chosen to overdub the sounds of the workout with music. This isnít that there is music playing over top of the sounds; the sounds are gone and completely replaced by music. To make matters worse, in my opinion, is that the music is that techno-shit that seems to be overplayed in gyms. You might be able to convince me that this crappy music belongs in a gym (but donít bet on it) but youíll never convince me that it belongs in a porn video. Even a solo video where the intention may be to create a sort of gym atmosphere. Iíd rather hear the interaction with the crew than the music.

This site is one of ten that was added to TBP recently from a company called David Weisenbarger (David Nudes, HD Studio Nudes and more). I do not have memberships at any other of these sites but it appears that they are all relatively small (though some are fairly big), that they feature mostly solo models with rare g/g sex. My role in the porn biz is as a customer, and as a customer I am unlikely to join any of their other sites simply because they arenít a good value at $20 to $25 per site. (And keep in mind that production costs here are at the low end of the spectrum: no expensive locations, solo nude, no sex, no masturbation.) All the sites added together would make a fair-sized network and by charging a fair price theyíd probably generate exponentially more business. This has nothing to do with the review, and Iím obviously only speculating.

The bottom line? the site is small, but it is relatively inexpensive at $20. It bills through CC Bill so you can join in confidence. If this is a niche you like or there is a model here that you want to see then you may be willing to spend the $20 to join. For everyone else, the site is too small with no predictable growth to make this a good choice. As it stands now, and with no obvious changes coming, this site isnít a good value. If this site ever becomes part of a network or package deal Iíd reconsider my opinion.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Sex Flex Video

46. Sex Flex Video (0)

Pay
Active
61
visor (7) 03-12-08  10:22am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The models are flexible and get in fascinating positions.
There is anal and pussy fisting, and many toys.
Models are attractive.
Cons: Video quality ranges from absolutely awful (like RM at 240x140 sapping from virtually bxw to yellow tones) to alright (wmv @ 640x480)
Few models, all masked with repetitive sets
Dreadful techno music, and large idents at front and back of all videos - these are short
Enough.
Bottom Line: Don't go there unless you are prepared to put up with marginal quality and noisy music for videos. They do flex, and there is hardcore...but...
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Ultimate Surrender

47. Ultimate Surrender (1)

Pay
Active
60
ramscrota (12) 12-28-08  01:23am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Lovely models (mostly)
- HQ pics & vids
- Site well organized
Cons: - Too much the same formual
- Fight rounds too long, hence total shoots FAR too long. Should be cut by half and spent more time on final round where trhe victor has her way with the loser.
- Too many scene have rough sex, I understand that this is a BDSM site, but for me, gagging, sudden spinal jolting, hair pulling, has no erotic appeal. Spanking is fine, but anything which endangers the sub's spinal alignment or her airway is a no-np
- Instead of the current MC (Matt), I would prefer to see one (or two) super-fit, leanly built mean-looking guys, dressed up to the nines.
Bottom Line: Site has good potential, but makes serious and pnvious blunders, which rob it of real erptic spice.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Babes Fight

48. Babes Fight (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
vlad (0) 07-04-07  09:19pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: If you liked apartment wrestling and big hair from the '80s, you might remember some of this stuff
Cons: Unfortunately, the movies are mostly '80s quality.
They have "extras" which are simply advertising for other sites.
The sound for the movies is often unrelated to the action, I think some is not even from the same movie
Tech support is unresponsive
Bottom Line: This is the worst site I have ever seen. I can't believe I signed up for this junk; This is why I signed up for Pornusers, both to warn people about this site, and to do better research so I don't get taken again.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-48 of 48 Page :    < Previous Page


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Ultimate Surrender (1)
2. Naked Gym Girls (1)
3. Naughty Athletics (1)
4. Nude Fight Club (1)
5. Josh Girls (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.11 seconds.