Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 6409 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Pegas Productions

1. Pegas Productions (1)

Network
Active
75
rearadmiral (382) 08-31-15  04:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Stunning Quebec models
- A true network with niche sites
- Large site
- Excellent outdoor nudity/sex site
- Supports download managers
- Updates regularly
Cons: - Outdated scene bitrates
- Some of the updates are streaming only
- Server constantly stopped responding and required logging in again
- Dialogue is in French only (but that really doesnít detract from the scenes)
Bottom Line: Iím aware that Quebec has a homegrown porn industry but Iíve never really gone looking for any Quebec porn until I saw this site listed on TBP.

The site is what I would consider to be a true network in that there are 13 sites serving some distinct niches. I contrast this with other sites that sell themselves as a network but have Ďsitesí that are all basically the same. The sites (with current number of videos) are:

ē 3Way Porn: 43
ē Blow me POV: 17
ē Cutie Pussies: 29 (solo)
ē Fresh and Innocent: 39
ē Fun Size Teen: 14
ē Just Eden: 37 (billed as an X-Art style site)
ē Let's Fuck Outside: 37
ē Lezzie BFF: 46
ē Nasty Rookies: 27 (auditions)
ē Samantha Ardente: 11
ē Shake the Snake: 66 (no specific niche)
ē Spice My Sex Life: 14 (mild kink)
ē Straight in the Ass: 15

The number of videos Iíve listed is less than what the TBP page lists because many of the videos are listed on an Ďupdatesí page that has some unreleased stuff and some bloopers mixed in. I have no idea why the site doesnít add the unreleased scenes to an existing site and create a separate bloopers page. I did find a lot of scenes on the update page that were streaming only.

Depending on the age of the scene the file resolution can be fairly low. Iíve seen as low as 640x480. The newer stuff is available for mobile devices and in 1280x720. The real flaw is that the bitrates are quite low. The newest scenes are 2500kb/s which is far less than what other sites are using and it shows. There are scenes with bitrates as low as 1400. Itís possible that all of the material is quite old and theyíre just slowly releasing it on the internet. There are some indications that this could be exactly whatís going on.

The site adds a new scene every two days. While that sounds great, consider that the August 30 update is a three-minute, streaming-only video. To make matters worse, the thumbnail shows it as a public nudity scene but none of that footage is in the upload.

The site allows download managers. Download speeds are quite fast.

I want to single out one site for specific mention. Iím a big fan of outdoor scenes and a big fan of public nudity so I was happy to see a site that catered to this. What I wasnít expecting was how over-the-top some of the scenes are. Many of the scenes are far in excess of American public nudity sites and even surpass many European sites. One scene is shot in a busy commercial area in Quebec City on a stairwell with full nudity. The scene is shot at dusk but this is a well-known and heavily travelled tourist area so this was pretty risky. Another, perhaps even more risky scene, is shot on the boardwalk at the Quebec City harbour next door to the iconic Frontenac hotel. Full nudity happens here too. And these arenít short scenes either. Still another is recorded with a couple in the back of a horse-drawn carriage through old Quebec City on a busy day. This isnít as risky because there are lots of people around but there is some oral sex, nudity and fingering. All three of these scenes are with the Quebec model named Candy Kiss who is young and beautiful. She has many scenes on this specific site. The other models who do risky outdoor public scenes are hot too. If you share my love of these kinds of scenes you really should consider a membership here regardless of some of the flaws. The only stuff Iíve seen that comes close are the European scenes at Public Disgrace. The scenes here at Pegas arenít BDSM though; theyíre a lot more playful than the PD scenes.

The site appears to have an annoying technical flaw. Every time (and I mean EVERY TIME) I downloaded a few videos the server would stop responding and Iíd have to leave the site, go back to it and log in again. I tried different browsers and the problem was the same. I donít know if the site times out or if itís just a flaw, but if you join I hope you donít have the same issue.

Many of the models here are really beautiful, though that shouldnít be a surprise since Quebec women are known for this trait. Some of these models could have easily been A-list models in the U.S.

In a vast majority of the scenes the interaction between the models is in French. For those with no exposure to the language you may not like this. Some newer scenes have a download option with subtitles.

So do I recommend this network? I do, but I also have some reservations in that while a lot of the porn is really hot and features some stunning models, the site itself leaves a lot to be desired. Iím often left wondering why studios put so much effort into making great porn and then sell it to customers in resolutions that are far out of date. If, however, youíre a fan of risky outdoor sex in public places then my recommendation goes way up. Let's Fuck Outside offers some amazing stuff in this rare niche. And at $25 itís a good value and worth having a look at.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mofos Network

2. Mofos Network (2)

Network
Newbie
50*
Wraith0711 (0) 08-30-15  03:23pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The only plus is the model selection. Since discontinuing the downloading (there is nothing mentioned of streaming only even though they still say "Join now to download full scene") there are no other pros .
Cons: Most scenes are just horribly shot amateur junk. They are blurry(out of focus) camera rattling (sound) and shaky. Also, I'm sorry but just because it's sized 720 or 1080 doesn't make it HD video. At least half of the videos are blown up and as a result are very grainy.
Bottom Line: This site was just a huge disappointment. Straight up, save your money. The downloading option was the only good thing about this site. Without it, it's a outright ripoff. The fact that they are leading people to believe you still can to sign up is just fraud.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Desperate Pleasures

3. Desperate Pleasures (1)

Pay
Active
87
rearadmiral (382) 08-29-15  04:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Unique site
- Large site (600+ videos)
- Broad range of fetishes
- Good mix of model types
- Supports download managers
- Bills through CC Bill
- Some A-list models
- Good mix of body types and ages, amateur and pro
Cons: - Outdated website
- No download options
Bottom Line: I wasnít aware that this site and studio existed and only discovered it when looking for some older man / younger girl porn. This site offers a lot of that but since it was marketed as a fetish site it also offers a lot of other stuff too.

The site claims that its origins come out of the 2008 recession when the site owner turned to porn to make a living. The interesting part of that decision is that if the owner is the guy who is in most of the videos, heís the last person youíd expect to be in porn videos. Heís a typical middle-aged guy with a bit of a belly and an average dick. And he might be the luckiest man alive.

For a fetish site it has a broad range of niches that it caters to. In the early days (around 2012) the scenes were frequently bondage with tickling. This isn't a hardcore BDSM site as with Kink or sites like that; itís much tamer and more playful. As the site progressed there are videos uploaded with footjobs. There are a few biting videos and a few balloon videos (I didnít know those were porn things). The more recent scenes seem to have more young girl / old guy (with the guy being the site owner, presumably). Many of these push the limits by having an incest theme but unlike the major studios that do these scenes with a stepfather/step-daughter, this site goes right for the daddy/daughter thing. To make this even creepier, many of these scenes are what Iíd guess youíd call the impregnation niche. Throughout the site youíll also find regular updates with MILFs and lesbians. Sex with pregnant models is also fairly common.

The site has a good mix of known pornstars and lesser knowns (to me, at least). Some of the models may be fetish models and some of them may be genuine amateurs. With a broad range of models you also have a broad range of looks and body types so there is likely something here for everyone.

Both the scenes and the site have a very amateur feel to them. The site is about as simple as youíd expect from a Ďstudioí that appears to be run by a couple of people who run the whole operation. Remember what sites looked like in the 1990s? Thatís what this site looks like. Navigation is simple as it is all laid out on 28 pages of videos. Each scene has a medium-sized thumbnail which plays a gif so you can get a sense of what the scene offers. There is a search function but I didnít find it to be accurate.

The camerawork and editing aren't up to major studio standards, but that really isn't a pro or a con, it just is. I like the amateur feel that the camerawork brings to the scenes and it isn't bad enough that it detracts from the scene or distracts the viewer unless youíre really fussy.

The site doesnít offer any download options. You get what they offer. All of the videos are in WMV format and all of them are in 1280x720 resolution. The big variable is that the older scenes have bitrates of 1500kb/s while the newer scenes have bitrates of up to 6000kb/s. They all have a framerate of 29fps. Obviously the newer scenes look better.

The site has approximately 600+ videos. It does update but the updates aren't dated (the older ones are) so I canít really say for sure what the update schedule is. The most recent update saw six new videos added at once and it looks like they do a bulk upload approximately once a week.

The site does offer photos but only as a standalone set. The video shoots usually donít have a photo option and the photo sets donít usually offer video. The site is much more heavily skewed to video so if youíre a photo collector you may want to think carefully before joining. The photos are 1200x800 so certainly not high resolution.

The bottom line? Thatís sort of hard to say. Arguing against a recommendation is the fact that the site is pretty amateurish and the video quality isn't up to standard. On the pro side, however, this is some good porn in some unusual niches. I joined to get access to the older guy/younger girl scenes and these are really well done. Iím not into tickling so I canít really comment on those but I have no reason to think that a person with a tickling fetish wouldnít like the site as much as I do. So with the caveat that you need to know what youíre getting Iíd say this is a definite recommendation if any of the fetishes are to your liking. If youíre into couples oriented artcore then you likely wonít be happy here. But if you like your dirty movies with an extra dose of dirty, you should check this site out. This site is definitely on my list to rejoin regularly.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Anal Euro

4. Anal Euro (1)

Pay
Active
95
mbaya (364) 08-27-15  06:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Bill through Epoch
-Full access one day trial is only $1
-HD quality videos are 1280x720, about a half hour long
-Photo sets are zip downloadable
-Very attractive models
Cons: -Only 18 videos. Preview page shows 32
-Anal is not the focus, but is in every scene
-Only one download option for videos, two for photos.
-Photos are screenshots
-Photos are 1050 x590 low quality
-Photos are only landscapes with no portraits
Bottom Line: This review is of the one day trial for only $1. At that price this website is a steal. In stark contrast, I would not recommend joining at the full price of $24.87. As it is a standalone site with no network access, I would never pay that much for so few videos.

The videos are made by the same people as Team Skeet, yet it is not part of that network. The quality is very nice at 1280x720, but there are no other download options. I would hope for 1920x1080 or even 4K.

The photo sets are mere screenshots and seem to be an afterthought. At 1050x590, the quality is not there and they did not think that a few portrait photos would have been a plus.

The models are uniformly attractive and are late teens to early twenties in appearance. The site does not list or tell their ages nor does it tell you where they are from. They appear to be Eastern European, maybe Russian. There is zero dialog in any of the scenes. There is no way to do any searching.

I suspect that the site is stripped down from what you would get at the full join price. I found only 18 videos, but the preview page shows 32, as well as additional download options. The May 13th review by ďThe PaysitesĒ mentions 35 videos. The preview page mentions that discounts were available for other sites, but I did not see any.

It mentions that there are weekly updates, but the ones that I saw were undated.

For $1 you get 18 well done videos of very attractive young ladies doing anal. There were no circus tricks and nothing extreme or rough. I would not have minded if they had scenes like this, but yet this site was well worth the join price. For $1 I can overlook some minor criticisms.

Since there was no download limit, I got all the videos in less than the one day access that I paid for.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Piss Domination

5. Piss Domination (1)

Pay
Active
90
LPee23 (24) 08-23-15  12:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Finally a site dedicated exclusively to POV femdom piss videos!
-brand new site
-weekly updates
-videos in 1080P
-many well known pornstars and dominatrixes
-scenes are consistently great
-zips for photo downloads
Cons: -new site so only 38 videos so far
-"photos" are really screenshots
-occasional slips with the camera work
Bottom Line: I was actually thinking how great it would be to have a site dedicated to POV femdom piss videos and now here it is! This is an excellent site with so much potential!

The clips are generally 5-15 minutes long, and they all follow a similar format. The camera is placed beneath a commode, looking up through the seat. The model opens the lid and spends the majority of the clip talking to the camera, then finishes it off with a pee at the end. These clips are as much about the verbal domination as they are about the actual piss.

Examples of scenarios they play out include the model using you the sub as her toilet, getting caught spying in the bathroom, and being punished by having to drink the model's piss. It's really interesting to see how the different models and dominatrixes play out these scenes. Some like Delilah, who is a career dominatrix, lay on the verbal abuse in such a spectacularly devious way that it is mind blowing. Her scenes with other dominatrixes such as the super-hot Mistress Tangent have a lot of spontaneity. Maybe the scenes on the site are loosely scripted, who knows, but these girls clearly make the scenes their own, improvise, and really let their personality come across.

The porn models vary more in the way they approach these clips, and that is cool to see. Some of them lay on the verbal abuse just as thick as the dominatrixes. Many go a bit lighter as they play out the scenarios, some tend to be more degrading, while others tend to be more seductive. Arianna stands alone at the opposite end of the spectrum from the dominatrixes, and her clips are incredible! She is all smiles and she seems to have a soft spot for the viewer. In one clip she can't help but slip her subtly trembling fingers inside her piss covered pussy to take pleasure in what she had just done. She says, "I hope you enjoyed that as much as I did."

Anyway, like I said before, seeing these girls pee is amazing, but the best part is seeing their personalities and the way they feel about pissing come out as they talk to the camera.

Despite this being a new site with a long way to go to build an extensive content library, I was generous with my score. This type of site so badly needed to be made, I am glad someone finally did it!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Fucking Machines

6. Fucking Machines (1)

Pay
Active
95
mbaya (364) 08-23-15  09:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Top notch models. Many are well known porn stars. Some others are doing their very first porn scene here.
-HD 1280x720 quality videos for an incredible past eight years worth of updates.
- 1029 videos and a photo set for each one.
-Nice mix of ages and ethnicities.
-Excellent camerawork
-Easy cancellation through the website.
Cons: -Photo sets are not zip downloadable.
-Photos donít capture the action well.
-Photos from the most recent update are only 1200x800
-No 4K quality video downloads
Bottom Line: This is a website from Kink.com, which puts out some of the highest quality porn. The video quality, attractiveness of the female models and camerawork are consistently top notch.

This site is one that I have never joined before, although I have been a member of most of their other ones.

I was not sure if I would enjoy videos of solo action, as that really does not appeal to me. My major complaint about other solo action sites is that the models are acting and do masturbation by the numbers. This type of scene would be totally too fake for my taste.

In contrast, this site is real, and I mean VERY real and there is no acting. The models cannot fake what goes on here. Porn stars are generally very jaded from doing so many scenes and not much gets them off. This site does that and more and in spades. Even the most skeptical viewers will find the videos focus on genuinely getting the models off.

They end up drenched in perspiration from the intensity of the action and are literally shaking. Most times they have multiple orgasms. Believe it or not, one scene is advertised as having 57! It is true as I counted them. No acting even in that scene and definitely no attempt at faking it.

What exactly do you get here? The videos show a kind of machine similar to a power drill, but with various sized dildos mounted on them. Sometimes they use two or three of them at a time. One scene even has four. There are several different machines and various sizes of dildos, ranging from normal size to huge. There is mostly vaginal penetration, but some scenes are anal only and many are of double penetration. There is even a scene or two with penetration vaginally, anally and one going in and out of her mouth.

Often niche sites tend to be formulaic and that can be a turn off here too. However, there are scenes that involve light bondage and feature more than one model. A few scenes were shot in Japan and have a different feel to them. Most of the models are familiar porn stars, but some are newbies who have never done porn before. There is a nice mix of ethnicities and ages. The site does not get stale as much as you might think.

The site started in 2000 and updates every seven days, so there is plenty to see here. I counted a massive total of 1029 videos. The oldest are of lesser quality as you would have expected, but are still watchable. The photo sets are not zip downloadable and not very interesting, as they do not capture the action well. Oh well, no site is perfect.

I was pleasantly surprised that I really enjoyed the action here.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Passion HD

7. Passion HD (1)

Pay
Active
70
Pyrenees (26) 08-18-15  08:20pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are some pros for this site.

1) 124,000 + HD photos usually 200+ per scene
2) The photos can be downloaded all at once in a zip
3) 302 + scenes
4) Updates multiple times a week
5) Some of the greatest talent in the industry
6) Each scene has a nice trailer and screen caps
7) Multiple site discount savings of over 50% this is a great deal if you want all their material.
Cons: This site has some cons.

1) Can be hard to log in the first time.
2) Only 31.4% of the scenes are in 1080p MP4 HD. Those scenes are up to 2 GB in size but average 1.20 GB.
3) Does not take advantage of Talent
4) Some scenes have washed out look
5) Massage scenes and bondage scenes are very brief on the massage and bondage.
6) Only 4% of the scenes have anal.
7) About 20% of the scenes are threesomes with only a couple of DP's (Featuring Holly Michaels).
8) I hope you like Holly Micheals she is in 46 scenes or over 15% of the site.
9) A lot of the material here is from the site PornPros only it is not in nearly as good of HD. You may consider just going to PornPros.
Bottom Line: So this site (And its entire network) have been on my radar for a long time. I know what your thinking but you like brutal sex. Well I enjoy Heart core as well =). I was excited to join but had log in problems as soon as I attempted to log in. Then I was blocked for multiple log in attempts. I had to contact support but in fairness they responded very fast fixing the issue.

I am one of those people who like to download for my own collection. I was very excited because of the level of talent on this site. I was instantly disappointed in Passion HD. Even their most recent scenes are only 1.4 GB large in 1080p MP4 HD. This is a far cry from the quality I am used to. The greatest sin of this site is BOTH Sensi Pearl scenes (The MAIN reason I joined) are only in 480p MP4. This is one of the biggest let downs I have ever experienced. Combined her solo scenes are 450 MB ... I am horrified.

I mentioned earlier they have some of the best Heart core talent ever assembled. This includes August Ames, Riley Reid, Sensi Pearl, Alexis Adams just to name a few. But the problem is they do not direct them properly to show off their talents. There are scenes with super flexible girls but you would NEVER know it after watching the scene, likewise with big breasted girls they usually do not let em get shown properly in doggy style and that is a crime against humanity. About 10% of the scenes on this site are massage but it is the briefest massage you ever saw. This site could have been so much more.

Lets talk about scene quality. I downloaded all of their quality options for their 68.6% of scenes that are not in 1080p MP4 HD. The 1080p WMV and MPG options may as well not exist. They are much more bleached than the original scenes, slightly grainy and have periods of terrible pixelation caused by HORRIBLE encoding. On top of that these scenes have visual lag and distortion when you skip.

In my conclusion I cannot at this time suggest anyone place membership here. I even turned down the exceptional discount offer to their other sites which tells you just how disappointed I am in their work. I got in for $9 and the bottom line is it was not worth it.

Now if you just want to stream or enjoy pictures you may be VERY happy with this site.

What needs to change before I can suggest this site?

1) Release ALL of the content in 1080p MP4 HD. Even if it is only 1.25 GB in size I want that HD MP4 file.

2) In the future make use of the talented performers known assets. If they love anal DP those ladies, if they are flexible then highlight that for 10 mins in every position if they have great tata's then show them bounce in multiple positions. Use what is right in front of the camera.

3) I would like for every scene to be re-encoded to at least 3 GB of quality especially the Sensi Pearl scenes but I know this will never happen.

For a site with so much potential it is all for naught if none of these changes are made.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brutal Castings

8. Brutal Castings (1)

Pay
Active
70
mbaya (364) 08-17-15  03:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The best quality video download option is 4320p 8000k. This is considerably better than the usual 1080 HD.
- Photos come in at 1920x2880 Exceptionally sharp and clear. There is a photoset for each video.
-Updates are once a week, which is fine for a specialty niche site.
-There is a discounted monthly join price of $14.95 through the TBP link. This is not mentioned on TBP.
-Part of a network of 46 BDSM/spanking/fetish websites.
Cons: -Very repetitious. Each scene is a clone and all that changes is the model. A few times the male talent changes, but mostly it is the same man over and over. The same set, the same dialog, the same action.
-There are so far only 20 videos. A year from now this site will be MUCH bigger.
-The photos are screen caps and there is no zip download option.
-Nearly every model has tattoos and some have a lot. This is a major turnoff for me.
-Much of the network is no longer updating. Those sites have been dormant for some time and have very low, unwatchable quality videos. I found the network of little value.
Bottom Line: Before I say anything further, I want to thank fellow PUer Pyrenees for mentioning this site. Without him I would not have known that this site existed. He is truly a man of vast knowledge about porn.

Just so it is clear where I am coming from, I am not a fan of BDSM or fetishes. I do like forceful sex though. The BDSM seen here is no comparison in roughness to some sites, in fact it is BDSM done rather lightly. Kink does much harder scenes. As far as rough sex I would say it is at the mid level and no comparison to many harder sites, for example Face Fucking/Facial Abuse.

Every scene follows the same scenario, even at times the same script. The model comes for an interview. There is a very tame casting tape and then there is a lengthy discussion as to what she wants for her future in modeling. She is asked to strip down to her bra and panties. At that point she refuses to take those off and the casting agent gets agitated and ties her hands with rope he conveniently has in his back pocket. He then takes off her bra and panties, He fingers her and forces her to suck his cock, followed by vaginal. There is never any anal on this site.

The scenes are generally quite passionless. In the PU website review by AK he states that ďThose concerned with the reality aspects will be happy to hear that the acting isnít good enough to make anyone think that the scenes arenít completely choreographedĒ. The models never act surprised and generally just go with the flow as events unfold.

The reason that I mention this is that Ava Taylor has stated that her scene here convinced her to leave porn. In that scene, she shows a degree of discomfort, but never surprise. She has claimed that she was lied to by the site ownership and that it was to be a simple blow job scene. This may be true, as I just donít know. All I see is a scene where she is passively just very accepting of whatever is happening. Next issue. If they lied to her then what about the other models? In some other scenes the models sometimes seem into the action, agreeing by saying ďYes MasterĒ and ďOk I will do what you wantď. In some scenes the models seem emotionally uninvolved and passive. Do they lie to models as to what to expect during their scenes? It is unclear. Apparently they told them something about what to do as the scenes are virtually choreographed clones.

I would have given the site a higher score, but there are two major negatives. With only 20 videos it is simply too small. The other negative is the number of tattoos to be found here. There is enough ink to write a book.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Chaturbate

9. Chaturbate (2)

Cams
Active
91
Marcus (47) 08-16-15  09:56am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Includes hardcore cam shows
- You can enjoy it for free
- Typically cheaper than MFC
- Models can set their own private rate-per-minute
- Easy to see which models you follow are online
- More refined than MFC with things like video/gallery purchases
Cons: - Some models hold back best stuff for Ďcrazy ticketí shows
- Like all cam sites can be expensive/addictive
- Some cams are poor quality
- A few shows seem to be pre-recorded
- Not as respectful community as MFC
- Not all privates can be recorded
Bottom Line: Iíve been on My Free Cams for a couple of years now, but joined Chaturbate to broaden my horizons and really love how it offers something different.

The biggest difference is that itís not just girls, but guys, transexuals and most importantly COUPLES who can chat.

This is banned on MFC, so on CB you get a lot of live hardcore action ranging from blowjobs to threesomes and everything in between. I have to say some of the modelsí talents are incredible and could hold their own against the pros.

The interface is similar to MFC in that you can filter by region, however it doesnít automatically refresh as it does on MFC, and the thumbnail update frequency isnít as good. However, one huge advantage over MFC is the Ďfollowed modelsí tab which shows thumbnails for models who are online that you follow. This makes it so much easier to browse than MFC.

Once in the rooms there are a few differences. Models can set chosen members as moderators if they wish. This means they can get on with the show rather than have to moderate too. Another difference is that models have certain plug-ins that help them run a room. These include tools to keep track of targets, tip jars, Ďcrazy ticketí shows where you can buy tokens to see a show when it is hidden etc. Many of these tools mean it can be more expensive than MFC if you arenít someone who normally tips, but I think the pros outweigh the cons here.

Another difference is that models can set their private cam rates. This is generally a good thing in that most are cheaper-per-minute that MFC. Iíve seen some models charge as little as 18tpm, and typically the most expensive is 60tpm which is the same as MFC. I have seen a couple of models charge more, though.

One big negative is that the model can also choose whether members can record private shows. This leaves one huge benefit of privates in the hands of models. When you go to start a private, it will tell you their rate and whether you can save the show or not.

All models I have encountered are polite and willing. Like MFC there can sometimes be bit of a language barrier, but itís nothing that use of animated GIF emojis canít overcome! The members on CB seem a lot less respectful than on MFC, however, and seem a lot more inclined to bark orders/instructions at models - and this is despite moderators who can mute and/or boot members out of rooms.

Overall I think I prefer Chaturbate to My Free Cams, although MFCís advantage is the sheer number of models. The interface is more refined, the content is more varied as it includes hardcore, the plug-ins models can use really make a difference and overall it is better value than MFC.

Please let me know if you need any model recommendations or have any questions.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit 1,000 Facials

10. 1,000 Facials (1)

Pay
Active
80
bkreidercrhl (7) 08-12-15  07:18am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: The women featured on 1,000 Facials are typically young (20's), consistently attractive and eager to get their faces jizzed. They are exciting facial targets to bust a nut over. The girls are generally good cock suckers who capably prepare a dick for their facial cum shot.

Since the scenes are shot in POV, when the girl take a big load it inspires excellent you are the man fantasy. Johnny Fender consistently delivers a face full of guy gravy. He typically delivers heavy wads to the girls forehead, commonly extending into her hair, followed by spews to both checks starting from the corner of her mouth. His gunk is thick and paste like which leaves every drop to be admired
Cons: All too frequently the male talent, outside of Johnny Fender, deliver feeble loads. Since I would not be proud to serve it up, the fantasy is destroyed and leaves me limp. With exciting exceptions,Johnny avoids the girls eyes. Although his thick goo leaves the entire load on the girls face for admiration, the downside is you rarely enjoy eyebrow or chin hangers.

I would prefer to see more MILFs and GILFs getting their faces creamed. The fantasy works with the girls, but more age appropriate facial cum targets is preferred stimulation for doing the deed.

1000 Facials appears to have stopped updating as of May 2015.
Bottom Line: I am a collector of facial cum porn and have subscribed to 1,000 Facials multiple times through the years. My evaluation is highly focused upon facial cum shots. Since this is the claimed porn niche, I believe this to be appropriate.

The site features consistently attractive young women, getting their faces creamed in POV. When the lady takes a big load it makes for excellent stimulation for doing the deed.

Johnny Fender consistently delivers a massive load and his scenes are among my favorite. I have numerous scenes featuring other studs in my collection (through the years) delivering big spews often including eye cum. Unfortunately the load volumes of many scenes are feeble. It destroys the fantasy, if I would be disappointed to bust it.

There are numerous scenes with quality facial cum shots that satisfy even the most demanding critics. You need to search for them. 1000 Facials appears to have stopped updating as of May 2015.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Drone Hunter

11. Drone Hunter (1)

Pay
Active
75
rearadmiral (382) 08-10-15  11:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Mofos network
- Innovative and unique concept
- Most scenes have an outdoor theme
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Small site
- Hasnít updated in four months
- Typical Mofos / Brazzers model look
- Site will log you off after an hour
Bottom Line: I suppose that with the popularity of drones it was only a matter of time before someone started using them in porn. The concept is unique and it does add to the scenes but for whatever reason the concept seems to have died since the site hasnít added a new scene since April 2015.

In all of the scenes the drone footage is just edited into footage shot by a regular camera. The one possible exception to that is the one lesbian scene which may be all drone footage. In all of the scenes the drone is played up as being surreptitious video that the female model doesnít know of.

The most common scene setup is where the male talent is bringing a girl back to his place and he contacts the Ďdrone hunterí to shoot some secret video of them having sex. There is usually some fake communication between the male talent and the drone operator. A few of the scenes use the scenario where neither the male or female talent know theyíre being viewed by the drone.

The site is quite small with only nine videos uploaded and it looks like it will stay small because it hasnít updated in months. Given that each scene has to be set up to allow access for the drone there is an outdoor or voyeur element to each scene. Perhaps that part of it caused some problems in filming. It seems reasonable to think that a drone hovering over a rooftop patio or looking in a hotel window might attract some unwanted attention. On the other hand, if you like outdoor or public scenes this site certainly has that.

The biggest advantage to the site is the fact that itís part of the Mofos network so youíll have access to a lot of other sites. Also, because Mofos is one of the leading porn sites you can expect their level of quality in the site. There are tags on the scenes but with only nine scenes that really doesnít add anything.

The downside to this being part of the Mofos network is that many of the scenes feature models with the signature Mofos/Brazzers look: big breasts (often fake) and other body mods. One of the models had enough collagen injected into her lips that she looked pretty silly, and to my eyes anyway, not very sexy.

The scenes can be streamed and downloaded. The streaming is available in three resolutions (up to 1080p) and there are six options for downloads: 272p, 368p, 480p, 720p and 1080p in MP4 format and a 480p in WMV. I downloaded the 720p and those come in at 1280x720 at 8000kb/s and 29fps. With those specs youíd expect them to look good and they do, on both a 24Ē monitor and a 50Ē TV.

I used Internet Download Manager and didnít have any issues with the links timing out. If they do time-out that happens after a reasonable delay. One annoyance is that the site itself will kick you out approximately once per hour and require that you sign in again.

I canít say that Iíd recommend this site unless you really have a thing for drones because itís just too small and looks to have gone dormant already. But if youíre interested in the site and you join the network to get it then the real value is in the network itself which has over 2000 videos available. When you consider that you get 2000 scenes for the low TBP discount price of $15USD it really is a good deal.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit English MILF

12. English MILF (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
guy7414 (0) 08-04-15  01:44am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: She's sexy, cute and very erotic. Nice big ass, great legs, and a slim waist. The solo picture sets are very erotic, if not a bit short on pictures.
Cons: Not a lot of replay value. In an expired review on this site that was penned by "messmer" he commented on the 150 picture sets. That review was written in June of 2011 and four years later there are still 150 photo sets.

Skimpy sets. I usually praise "economical" sets, which get a lot done without 175 pictures, but these sets are too skimpy. I've already gone through 30 sets, and that was after "pre stimulation" looking at "Busty Brits".

The bonus sites of the same woman, "Daniella In Pantyhose" and "Lycra Ass" are not very good. A lot of screen caps.

The videos are uninspiring, particularly the softcore ones.

The $29.99 premium price tag suggests a lot more, including updates. I will immediately request a refund.
Bottom Line: I like the girl. It's the only reason I'm giving it a 65. They list an update on August 1st, and it's three rehashed "video stills".

There are a lot better sites with unending content out there for $29.99. Avoid this one.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Erotica X

13. Erotica X (2)

Pay
Newbie
80*
hugow (4) 08-03-15  12:54pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attractive women
Quality photography and videos.
"Women-friendly"
Cons: Performances are ultimately rather ho-hum.
Website navigation and UI is so bad that I felt that I was back at some Russian site 10-15 years ago, but with bigger, prettier photos. ie. Lipstick on a pig. It was so bad that it hastened my departure from this site.

Examples include not being able to go back to search results once you click on one of the results; losing your place in the model pages if you click on any particular model, etc.; baffling dead-ends.
Bottom Line: In the scheme of pornsites, I suppose this one rates a "Very Good." However, I found it quite disappointing compared to other top shelf erotic sites like X-Art. The models are beautiful and the quality of the photos and videos is technically good, but the performances themselves were, for the most part, pretty ho-hum standard fare. Overall, disappointing considering the good press this site has received elsewhere.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Girls Do Porn

14. Girls Do Porn (1)

Pay
Active
75
rearadmiral (382) 08-03-15  06:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (73), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateurs
- Many stunning young models
- Nearly 300 scenes
- Multiple viewing options
- Fast downloads
- Bill through reputable billers
Cons: - Terrible site design
- Expensive if you want HD
- No model names or info
- No unique identifiers for scenes
- Site defaults back to page one
- Better porn options are available
Bottom Line: GDP is a site that reviewers either love or hate. Itís a site that has squandered its potential. The problem with the site is that it has some beautiful amateurs in some pretty good porn let down by one of the worst site layouts on the internet. If anyone can learn anything from this site itís how not to design a webpage.

The real value of the site is in the models themselves: they are true amateurs and most of them are really quite beautiful. That depends on a bit of a subjective assessment of course since most of the models are Caucasian, young (18-22) and fairly petite. The porn itself is very good, if somewhat formulaic. Most of the scenes follow the same formula of interview, blowjob with the model clothed, some sex in specific positions, more oral, usually more sex and finally finishing with the guy jerking off on the modelís face as she kneels in front of him.

There are currently close to 300 scenes available and the site does update. I canít be specific about the update schedule because the scenes aren't dated but it appears that at least one new scene is added per week.

The scenes are available in streaming at resolutions called high, medium, low and mobile. The downloads are available in 720x405, 1280x720 and mobile. Paying for a premium membership adds downloads in 1920x1280 and 4K on the newer scenes. I downloaded the 1280x720 versions and they come in at 6000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good on a 24Ē monitor and 50Ē TV.

Where things start to fall apart for the site is the site design itself. Describing the issues that the site has seems a bit overwhelming because there are just so many but Iíll hit the highlights:
ē The models aren't named and there is no biography given
ē The scenes have no unique identifier at all. Iíve read on other forums where members will refer to a scene by a shoot number but Iíve never seen any unique information for a scene.
ē Scenes canít be opened in a new tab so you have to open them in your main browser window, but when you click to go back you get taken to the first page again and have to re-select the page you were on. To make matters worse, when you do finally get back to the page you just left the eight thumbnails are all in different order. I ended up downloading several scenes more than once.
ē Only eight anal scenes.

The membership options aren't simple either. In the past you were required to stay for a second month to download HD files but now you can just pay to get the additional access immediately. I opted for the base membership because Iím happy with the 1280x720 files but to access the behind-the-scenes and Ďdeletedí scenes you need pay the additional amount. I figured it would be worth it but there are only 38 BTS scenes and five deleted scenes.

The site bills through Epoch or CC Bill so you can join with confidence that your information will be secure and you can cancel easily.

The site had some of the fastest download speeds that Iíve seen from porn sites. It was rare for me to see less that 20MB/s and most times I was seeing 25MB/s. I downloaded a lot in my first few days and if there is a download limit (which I donít think there is) itís high enough that only a serious porn glutton would hit it.

So is it worth joining or not? The site itself is deeply flawed and could be easily improved; the improvements would be like picking low-hanging fruit so that leads me to the conclusion that the site owners aren't really interested in improving things. To be fair to the site owners though, they might be putting their efforts into recruiting the models. The models are really the true value of this site: most of them are true amateurs and are really good looking. They appear to be having fun too. So when I balance the good and the bad I have to give this site a cautious recommendation: the porn is very good but the site is very bad. But, if you go into the deal with your eyes open armed with knowledge of the flaws youíll be okay. Unless you absolutely must have HD or 4K or have a big thing for BTS or deleted scenes you can save yourself some money and take only the basic membership. So the recommendation is a definite maybe. I likely wonít rejoin and hereís something Iíve never done in a review before; Iíll suggest a better alternative: you can get very similar porn on a much better site at Exploited College Girls.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit DDF Network

15. DDF Network (3)

Network
Newbie
95*
HughJarse (0) 08-02-15  01:54pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Lots of great content
-Big archive
-Several niches
-Regular updates
Cons: -Can too much content be a con?
-It will take a while to download
-Quite expensive
Bottom Line: I was a member for 3 months last time and a few years ago 7 months!
There's loads of great content to check.
Most of my favorite Euro babes are regulars there. And there's plenty of great new girls now.
Just what you crave from a porn site.
I particularly like HotLegsAndFeet.com and HouseOfTaboo.com. 1byDay is also great and features photo shoots going back to when I bought magazines!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Club Jenna

16. Club Jenna (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
HughJarse (0) 08-02-15  01:49pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: There is a large amount of movies to choose from.
All downloads were fast.
Cons: Not Club Jenna - it's Moviebox who bought the domain name (false advertising).
Most videos are Video on Demand (i.e. you have to pay extra)
Most included videos are 640x480 res, fairly old and probably available elsewhere.
You can buy extra channels at a premium.
Bottom Line: The site is a lie and overpriced for what it is. Best porn should state that Club Jenna's site closed down years ago.
All the other sites they bought resolve to the same place - Moviebox.com.
I would have given a lower score if possible the on principal that there's nothing but a few streaming movies of Jenna.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit BBW Secret

17. BBW Secret (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
bbwadmirer (0) 07-29-15  10:34am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ???
Cons: Accd. to MY experience (7-28-2015), the bonus site access for BBW Secret does NOT belong in the "Other Good Stuff" category!

The bonus site access is NOT free, you have to pay an additional $0.95 for ONE DAY's access to EACH of the 2 bonus sites (BBW Pickup & Busty Work), then the full $30 (or thereabouts) for the 1st month to each of them...so if I wanted all 3 sites for ONE month, I would have had to pay close to $80 - 90!

Maybe my computer is slow (it's DSL), but I tried to download ONE movie, & my Firefox downloader told me that it was going to take almost FOUR HOURS to do it! Why are the movies so damn large? All of them were well over 500Mb, & that doesn't include their HD stuff. I don't need anything THAT large & fancy, I can tolerate low def movies, in fact, I would prefer them. I eventually gave up after a few hours & 2 failed attempts at downloading a single movie.
Bottom Line: BEWARE -- you do NOT get what is currently advertised: I was led to believe that I was getting full access to 3 sites for the price of subscribing to BBW Secret. Look at the very bottom of the introductory page & you will see what I mean.

I FEEL CHEATED!!!

I am VERY disappointed in what BBW Secret had to offer. I haven't checked out the other 2 sites that they say come with it (BBW Pickup & Busty Work), but after what I went through w/ BBW Secret &'m not going to waste my time nor my $ on them. either.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Old And Young Lesbians

18. Old And Young Lesbians (0)

Pay
Newbie
97*
asseaterjs (0) 07-25-15  05:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Awesome niche site for exclusive old and young lesbian sex video and pictures. The site offer a variety of ages with concentration on girls in their later teens through early twenties and older ladies in their fifties and sixties.

A huge plus is the majority of newer scenes include lesbian asslicking, my personal favorite!

The ladies come across as sexy amateurs, not the cheesy pornstars that look like their acting and not very well. The lesbians look like their actually just enjoying each others bodies and the cameras just happen to be there.

The site has frequent updates and, one or two per week is common. There is a huge archive of their films and other mature content available.
Cons: The price is high (but worth it)

The search function will not catch all the content so if you want to see everything you're best bet is to watch them all and scan them.

It would be nice to have more info on the ladies and the scenes before watching them.
Bottom Line: If you can get past the price and enjoy old and young lesbians there is no better site, by a long shot.

You will have all the content you want for a long time and more coming all the time.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Casting Couch X

19. Casting Couch X (1)

Pay
Newbie
75*
pornymike (0) 07-25-15  11:09am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A great conveyor belt of really fresh & cute porn starlets put through their paces for our enjoyment. One of my likes is 'getting to know the girl' before the action starts and this is well done with the interview. My next like is getting to know the body and again this is well delivered as she is asked to strip off and we get to see her in all her natural glory. Yum!
Then as above, she's put through her paces before having a full face splattering of boy batter
Cons: Really, really evil and utterly dishonest cross selling. If you click on one of the (far too many) cross selling ads and try one of the options thinking it's a trailer, you'll get billed for a month of access at a stupidly high rate.
No kidding
Happened to me & when you look in to it, they have a warning on their 'customer service' (good joke) page about people fraudulently trying to get out of accounts they'd 'signed up to'. Ignore it and contact your credit card company for a refund. I did and got just that.
Bottom Line: Good site but beware of the scamming
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Babes Network.com

20. Babes Network.com (6)

Network
Active
80
Pyrenees (26) 07-21-15  02:29am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are many pros to this site.

1) There are 750 videos.

2) There is a update 3-5 times a week.

3) The videos are ALL in 1080p. Yes every single video going back to 2012. So you can see they update often. A very alive site. There are multiple download options.

4) Every Scene has a ZIP file for HD picture and a individual picture gallery if you want to just look and hand pick a few.

5) This site features THE top porn actresses from all over the world. Such as Madison Ivy, Mia Malkova, Dillion Harper and Stoya.

6) This site has a great variety of content. Most of the scenes are 1 on 1. But there is also Threesomes (GGB), Lesbian, solo and recently added IR.

7) The women on this site dress to the nines, the lighting is amazing and the scenes are professionally produced.
Cons: There are some cons to this site.

1) The Navigation is a nightmare. You will have to go page by page to find what you want. If you try to apply a filter it will also filter out what you want. This is unacceptable.

2) The sex is passionate but can seem tame when you compare it to what the majority of porn encompasses today.
Bottom Line: I remember when Vivid first came out it was so revolutionary. Because the sex had such high production quality I would have to compare Babes to Vivid in its heyday. If you like that kind of action then this is the site for you.

My overall personal opinion is if you can get a month for $9 like I did then it is well worth your dime.

One of the things worth mentioning is that they allow comments on the scenes and they seem to even keep the bad comments. That level of transparency is endearing. Hopefully they read them and make changes accordingly.

Things I would like to see to become a year round member.

1) Contract stars who produce more than 2 videos then we never see them again. I think there is a opportunity here to cater to your fan base.

2) Special content that only a year long member has access too. Maybe something with contract stars a little harder (Anal, DP, Deep throat Etc). Imagine having August Ames as a contract star producing 1 exclusive scene a week with harder content. Now that would be reason to join for a year.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Team Skeet

21. Team Skeet (3)

Network
Active
75
Pyrenees (26) 07-20-15  11:30pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are some pros to this site.

1) Some of the top porn stars are on this site, especially the more teenage looking ones.

2) This site updates every single day.

3) This is a Gonzo style site centered on Teenage girls. Each Site associated focuses on a Porn Niche involving teenage girls. Small Girls, Buxom girls, Clothed girls, Curvy girls, sporty girls etc etc.

4) The videos are decent quality. They range 1.5GB to 3 GB in file size.

5) The site offers a lot of discounts to sister sites.

6) If you like POV, clothed sex, average looking models (Real life type), unique camera angles and tattoos then you will like this site.
Cons: There are a few cons to this site.

1) Yes it has top porn stars. I personally feel like the Kelsi Monroe, Keisha Grey, Cassidy Banks and even Piper Peri scenes are lackluster. Its the lack of Lighting, the odd angle sexual positions.

2) I personally only found 20 scenes out of a thousand I wanted. While 90% of their content is HD the specs might be different than what you are used to collecting.

3) After joining I immediately got 28 spam emails. But their customer service is strong and they jumped at the chance to stop this in its tracks.

4) I personally had trouble with their video player but it is possible it was on my side. Even though this was the only site I ever had trouble on.

5) They auto sign you up for another service you might possibly use and have to pay for. I really wish I had to personally apply to join that service.

6) I personally was put off by some of the lighting, camera angles and demeanor of the actors and actresses. A preference thing.
Bottom Line: Of all the sites I gave a score this one has been the most problematic for me personally. But the great communication from the website helped explain to me certain things and as a result I feel we have arrived at a more fair score.

So in summary collectors of teenage looking girl porn may really like this mega site. My personal tastes prevent me from giving it my seal of approval. But I can see how someone would like what they offer (Lots of PoV, lots of Clothed teen sex). Also I doubt you will ever find a business that cares as much about feedback as they do. They have a 100% money back policy. But more importantly they care enough to listen and respond. That is rare!

I was personally let down by the Keisha Grey scenes and I did not download a single one. But you know I have a very specific type of taste so please take that with a grain of salt.

There are some things I would personally like to see change before I can give this site the thumbs up.

1) Stop the spam emails.
2) Stop the auto sign up for things we do not specifically want to possibly join (Advertising is fine).
3) I would prefer a different lighting, directing of sexual positions angles. But this is my own personal taste. When I see a teen with huge Taters I want to see em swinging towards me in doggy. When I see a small girl who can do a split I want to see that split 3-4 ways during coitus. Some girls have a few specific set of skills and like the line from "Taken" I want to see them used vigorously without reservation.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Bangbros Network

22. Bangbros Network (4)

Network
Newbie
100*
bobby23 (2) 07-20-15  02:28am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: I would recommend this site to everyone!! Content is awesome with so much it's impossible to get through. Download speeds were always excellent!! (guess they fixed the problems from a yr ago) Quality is excellent and they somehow manage to keep the file size smaller than both Naughty America and PornPros.
Cons: None of those women are doing it with me.
Bottom Line: Great content, fast downloads and their downloads are small for 1080P. I don't know how they manage, but I hope they keep it up!!! Didn't check out their billing practices, good call with the secondary billing trick.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Porn Pros Network

23. Porn Pros Network (0)

Network
Newbie
97*
bobby23 (2) 07-20-15  02:02am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: I had a three month membership to this site a year ago. It was so good I had to go back. I rarely do that with sites considering there is so much free stuff out there plus I like to try out different pay sites if I'm going to go that route. This site has incredible women, consistent updates and a ton of different content!! They also get tons of women just starting out before they start popping up on other sites.
Cons: It's a shame they make you pay for their other sites, passion/fantasy HD, casting couch-x, etc. They could make them available after a certain length of time the way 21st Sextury makes a new site or two available the longer you're a member. It gives you some incentive to stick around. The biggest problem they have, however, is bandwidth and dropped connections. I know it wasn't on my end bc when they dropped I still had great connections from the bangbros network.
Bottom Line: Great content and a lot of it!! But they could really use some work on the IT side of things. Still one of my personal favorites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naughty America

24. Naughty America (2)

Network
Newbie
70*
bobby23 (2) 07-20-15  01:21am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great content. Women are beautiful, scenes are shot very well, huge selection. Offers Ultra HD, only porn site I've seen that does.
Cons: The site has major bandwidth problems, except for 3 am, thank you insomnia. Connections are constantly dropped, so it would be impossible without a download manager. Some of the older movies are missing photo galleries entirely. The file size is wayyy too large!! I downloaded a 1080 movie from PornPros that was 32 mins and 1.8 GB, another from Bangbros which was 32 mins 1.05 GB. A 33 min 1080 from NA was 2.88 GB!! No noticeable difference between the three on my HD processor, in fact the other two looked a little better (pretty sure it wasn't just the girls lol). So what's with the extra gig?
Bottom Line: You gotta love NA's $5 special, but Bangbros is your best bet for this type of content. Plus it offers some of the harder stuff, but nothing too crazy. It won't fill up your hard drive with it's HD files and it has much better connections and download speeds. PornPros is good too but also has slower speeds and bad connections sometimes. Still it's not nearly as bad as NA. However, all three have great content and lots of it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Porn Hub Premium

25. Porn Hub Premium (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Eugine103 (0) 07-16-15  11:47pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Content is fed by MovieBox, a very old company that I thought died more than 15 years ago.HD content is less than 480 resolution. Navigation is fine and you'd expect it in 2015. Lots of videos, sort of. Download speed is excellent, only because the files are so small from low res.
Cons: Avoid a membership! It does not allow you to download from PornHub! What you get is a membership to a very old website with very old content. HD content plays at less than 480 resolution. There's a large selection but MOST videos are labeled "VOD" which means that you will have to buy credit to watch them!!!! I paid an extra $1 dollar to block ads. Unclear on how to cancel membership.
Bottom Line: The regular pornhub site is free and provides a lot of value even if you have to pay for it. Unfortunately, PornHub Premium is the opposite. You get old video and poor resolution and you'll have to pay for credit to watch most of the videos. Avoid this site. On a scale of 1-10, this site makes videobox a 1000! I'm truly disappointed.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 6409 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Babes Network.com (6)
2. 21Sextury.com (6)
3. 18X Girls (4)
4. Bangbros Network (4)
5. Twistys (4)
6. Blacked.com (3)
7. Wow Girls (3)
8. Team Skeet (3)
9. DDF Network (3)
10. X-Art (3)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.11 seconds.