Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 6444 Page :    Next Page >

Visit The Life Erotic

1. The Life Erotic (2)

Pay
Active
80
skippy (50) 07-02-15  01:22pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Generally high quality material
Beautiful, natural models
Wide variety of sets, locations and models
Very "artsy" site
Good range of image sizes to view/download
Generally good video options
Navigation is generally good
Fast download speeds
Many popular European models
Good navigation
Cons: Very "artsy" site.
Very little eye contact with camera
Creative edge takes precedent over practicality
Landing page focus is on cross-selling live site
Entire site including all sets are very dark!
Many sets in black and white or oddly tinted
Many shorter sets
Many models only have a set or two
There are more tattoos here than other Met-art sites. (not always bad, but not good on otherwise beautiful models)
Seems like some is B-roll from other sites
Bottom Line: Stats (Deduced):
About 1500 photo sets
About 500 videos
About 320 models
1 new update a day
Some older sets are not exclusive
The site has been around since 2009 but some of the sets pre-date that.
The models are generally young and all shapes, sizes, ethnicity, hair color, some hairy, some tattoos, etc.

This site is, to a large extent, sort of an evolution of the "girl in the woods" theme with the idea that you are observing a model in a more natural environment instead of a studio environment. Often the idea is that the model doesn't really know you are there or doesn't pay much attention to you, the viewer. About 50% of the sets are solo girl in a straight modeling scenario. Many of these sets are of very, very attractive girls that are just standing or in other conservative poses. Another 40% are female masturbation sets that range from boring to pretty interesting. And the remaining 10% are girl/girl scenes. I need to say that the majority of these are very conservative sets with few money or close-up shots. (There are some Oh My God models, but they are not necessarily doing OMG things....) There are notable exceptions, though. It depends on the model, I guess. There also is a wide mix of eye contact. Some sets have models that never make any eye contact with the camera at all. Earlier sets are better, but the quality of those sets is not as good. Oh, most of the sets start out with the model(s) clothed. I noticed some models remained clothed for 75% or more of some sets.

The first thing that strikes me about this site is how dark it is. Everything is dark. The site, the sets, the lighting, the videos, EVERYTHING! Older sets are a little better in this regard, but you will generally think there is something wrong with your display. Newer images are dark, contrasty, very shadowy. Distracting. Annoying. Generally awful. I batched a couple of sets through Photoshop and auto-adjust increased the brightness in most images by 50% or more. That is a heck of a lot and it is not accidental. They are deliberately turning down the brightness on these sets. You have to work to make images this dark. Really work.

The second thing I noticed was how hard the webmasters are trying to get you to go to the live site. When you get to the landing page, you don't see a single girl on the site you are paying for. instead you get a full page of images from the two live-cam sites that seem to be taking over the Met-Art network. You have to scroll down to see the contents of the site you already paid for. The webmasters are apparently experimenting with where best to put these live-cam ads as they can be found in different places on the various Met-Art sites. This is the most intrusive placement, right at the top of the main page and present on every page on the site. Stop it! Really. Just stop.

Another thing is the almost complete lack of playfulness, compassion or interaction with the viewer in many of the sets. Some of these models have all of the expressions of a check-out girl at K-Mart, meaning none. Even models that normally shine are somehow less expressive here. This is not in any way erotic as the name implies.

And the last thing to note is how inconsistent many of the sets are. More recent sets seem to follow that dark theme for the most part, but some sets are not like that at all. Some sets are very short, some are filled with close-ups, some are not. Some girls are almost entirely fully clothed for the whole set, some are not clothed at all. Some have eye-contact, many do not. You can tell if you are familiar with other Met-Art sets that some of these sets seem like they might have been B-roll or too weird to put on Met-Art. For example, there is an outdoor set of Lorena, beautiful Met-Art regular, where she is entirely covered in red mud in every single image. Really? Has to be a B-roll.

Navigation is generally good. There is an options section that allows you to set defaults for image size, number of thumbnails on a page, etc. like some other Met Art sites. The search function has user defined tags, which helps if you are looking for a particular trait that others are likely to define, like ginger or spread. But it could be better.

Bottom line? Good site to visit once, I guess. I personally don't like it anywhere near as much as other Met Art sites like Met-Art itself or Errotica Archives. You can actually see the weird evolution/devolution from a site similar to Met Art in the beginning to a site that now looks more like a bad graphic novel than a soft-core porn site. There is a decent amount of material here and some of it is pretty good, but be prepared to sift through a lot of dark, odd and often slightly off pictures to find things that really float your boat.

I wish I could be more enthusiastic, but this site just doesn't live up to Met-Art standards.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bopping Babes

2. Bopping Babes (1)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (358) 06-28-15  10:42am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (86), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -New updates every other day.
-561 videos, about 7 minutes each. The site is decent size and actively growing.
-The 2015 videos have 5 download choices with the best quality being 4K.
-The biller is CCBill. Trusted and reliable.
-The models talk to you, but not while they are actually stripping.
-No download limits.
Cons: -The 4K videos did not play in Windows Media Player. They did play using VLC, but with severe stuttering.
-All videos have music that is either hip hop or techno crap. I found this distracting as well as too loud.
-All videos have the same sequence: blouse, skirt, bra, panties. Too formulaic.
-The photos are 1600x900 low quality screenshots. Only 103 photosets compared to over five times as many videos. I saw only landscapes and no portraits. Very uncreative.
-Far too many models are either fake blonds or have excessive tattoos.
-Zero ethnic variety, with only white British models. Other UK based websites include black or Indian models. None from any other European countries either.
Bottom Line: As I discovered ďBoppingĒ means dancing. This website specializes in videos of British women stripping while dancing. Most if not all are porn stars.

The models are all white, with no ethnic variety. On other UK based sites, I have seen black or Indian models and I would expect the same here. There arenít any from other European countries either.

Far too many of the models have tattoos, which is most definitely not to my taste. In some cases the tats are small and not distracting, but there are many that have so many that it is a major deal breaker. Not hot in my book. There are also a pretty fair number of fake blonds, also not my taste. When you factor in that there are other models that I simply donít find appealing, you start with 146 models and only about half interest me at all. There are 561 seven minute videos so that leaves about 250 to 300 or so that I like. That is a good number that includes some knockout models who know how to make stripping truly erotic.

The videos are very sharp, with the most recent coming in at 4K. Unfortunately, I could not get these 4K videos to play on Windows Media Player, but they did using VLC, but with stuttering. In all fairness, HD 1920x1080 works for me so I did not care much.

The photos are zip downloadable, but are only screenshots at 1900x600. Only landscapes and not worth saving.

The models strip out of costumes such as nurse, flight attendant, policewoman, construction worker, student, cheerleader, maid, or office worker. Some strip out of ordinary everyday clothes too. Only a very small number strip out of a bikini or other stereotypical stripper clothes. I liked the choices of costumes.

However, the sequence is always the same: Top or blouse, bottom or skirt, bra, panties. An occasional other sequence would have been hotter. There are very few videos that offer any teasing previews, such as showing panties while still wearing a skirt. Too formulaic and the videos could have easily been improved. Typical problem with porn as they get a great idea, in this case stripping, and then the creative process stops.

I like that the models talk to you and even give jerk off encouragement. Nice interaction wit the viewer. I love hearing them talk as you get a break from the music, which is mostly hip hop or techno crap and played too loud.

For me the bottom line here is that the videos that work are excellent, but could be a little more explicit. In spite of the many videos that do nothing for me, many are quite excellent. With updates every other day the site is growing and I would recommend joining in spite of some glaring weaknesses.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pure Mature

3. Pure Mature (1)

Pay
Active
79
Wittyguy (105) 06-25-15  05:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (57), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + About 215 scenes of exclusive milf / mature hardcore action featuring mostly attractive gals.
+ All scenes have vids and about 98% have pic sets with zips.
+ Multiple download options on vids and vid quality is good. All vids have at least one HD download option.
+ Good download speeds for me (about 3-4 MB/sec).
+ Decent price of $18 month through TBP.
+ Bills through Epoch.
+ The inbrowser video player works well.
+ Good production values across the board.
+ Model directory seems complete.
Cons: - Not really a picture site (see below).
- Downloaded files and vids poorly labelled (just numbers).
- Too much music in the earlier produced vids.
- No real search function or tags. No model information.
- Pretty much M/F hardcore, not much anal or 3 way and zero solo or lesbian if you're into that.
- A bit too "heartcore" for my tastes.
- Updates only once a week.
- As one sort of expects with the older actresses, there is a lot of silicone to look at.
Bottom Line: Wasn't really sure what I'd be getting here when I signed up other than a more mature line of starlets. Overall, it's pretty much a straight M/F hardcore site featuring pornstars in their late 20's to late 40's. The girls are mostly attractive pornstars (no BBW) and the production value is good to excellent across the board (no amateur feel to it). Here's the specs:

PICS: Like I said this isn't really a picture site. The pics dating from the beginning to late 2014 have portrait resolution of 1500x2700 but only have landscape resolution of 1500x840. What went wrong there? Others are a hodge podge of different sizes (a lot of 1000x1500 though). The most recent pics are all 1000x1500. The pics mostly look like HD screen grabs so there is some blurriness and cropping is questionable at times. A lot of scenes are shot in bright light or white backgrounds which causes some pixelation and washout. Most of my downloads were done in hopes that I could salvage some stuff that would look good on my monitor as opposed to looking forward to editing the sets later.

VIDS: Download speeds were good for me. With earlier vids you get options 1080 mpeg or wmv or 480. Starting in 2014 you also get 720 resolution options. This mostly a "heartcore" site which means lots of bright background lighting. The older vids show a bit of pixelation because of this but it improves over time. Also, through late 2013, the theme was "heartcore" (aka - porn for mimes) meaning that no one in the scene makes any real sex noises. Apparently the producers noticed that and thus incorporated random porn synthesizer music into various parts of the scenes to take it down another notch. The music goes away for the later vids (late 2013 onward) and the action gets more heated but there are no real story lines or conversation in the vids. The camera work is decent though and you do get some nonstandard views which is welcome.

NAV: As noted, it's pretty basic. You can only search according to model, date or ranking. If you are looking for something specific in a scene then you'll have wade through everything to find it because nothing is tagged.

MISC: There is a fair amount of POV style shooting here (run by remote or a cameraman, not the herky jerky hand held stuff done by the guy). The scene shifts in the vids can be a bit choppy at times too. Otherwise, the main theme is heartcore or heartcore with a slight edge. No real slapping or spitting here which is fine by me but it's almost too tame, especially if you've seen some of the actresses other work. As a comedian once said, "If the sex ain't dirty, you ain't doing it right."

If you're looking to add to your mature video collection it's worth taking a look at. Otherwise I'd say it's OK. If you're into pics then I'd say move along. Average is the site so average be my score.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Porn Fidelity

4. Porn Fidelity (1)

Pay
Active
95
Pyrenees (14) 06-24-15  09:21pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There are many pros.

1) The scenes are shot in such a high quality it is hard for me to compare it to anything else in the industry. Maybe a High Gonzo with passionate sex like you would see from sweet sinner. It is truly spectacular to watch one of their scenes.

2) There are a TON of scenes and you get access to two websites. For 2$ more you get access to a third long enough to download every scene. The first site is Artistic sex scenes, the second site features frisky teens and the third features husband and wife lovemaking with a well endowed lady.

3) There is a wide variety of fetish scenes and even some romantic scenes. There is a little bit for everyone. Including choking, deep throat, lactation, pregnancy, threesomes, bondage, spanking. But somehow they pull it off in a high handed manner that lets you know everyone is enjoying themselves.

4) The porn industry has given them several awards for their produced material (Like "Get my belt" series).
Cons: There are some very minor things.

1) Since the subject matter is broad you may not find every scene following the same formula you are interested in. I loved the flexibility of the women, the good doggy styles shots, the cream pies and how he likes to finish in missionary.

2) There are a lot of threesome videos if that is not your thing. I would say about 20%.

3) The older videos are not in 1080p but they still look nice if you consider how old they are. The Teens site has all 1080p.
Bottom Line: The bottom line is that Porn fidelity has been one of the best websites I have become a member of in years. I was blown away by the content, the directors touch and the scripting of the scenes. It feels like how Vivid should be in modern times to be honest. Simply amazing stuff. This site is amazing. Why are you not a member yet?
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Web Young

5. Web Young (0)

Pay
Newbie
76*
drbart (3) 06-20-15  02:05pm
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Hi Quality videos with very good cinematography. "Tasteful" girl girl sex scenes (in other words not the makeup smeared screaming freaky sex you see on julesjordan or evil angel) . Lots of the top talent here. Website is very polished though navigation could be better. Joined here for 9.95 as a fathers day special price which was not bad at all.
Cons: The usual upsell. Fameassist is the one that did the billing and not as good to manage as with ccbill or epoch. Videos here are polished but also a bit overdone with schmaltzy music, soft focus scenes much like penthouse from the 80s90s. One of the keys to erotica videos is letting the talent be the star. Just get out of their way and let us watch. No need for the overdone schmaltz. (though still better than sites with blurry scenes etc) . content is low here which is strange as I thought webyoung was site I joined back around 201 or so. Maybe its different or maybe cleared out the old stuff. In any case not alot here. I ran out of favs to download after a day. There were about 4 sites in my memberships but still not a lot. They should hook up with more sites.
Bottom Line: Nice for the niche market of girl girl sex scenes (clearly a need and demand for that!) . But the music and lighting got a little too sappy for me. Olus content is low so this would best work with network of sites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit JAV Model

6. JAV Model (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
drbart (3) 06-19-15  10:52am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: This is one of the few japanese adult video sites with at least some of the videos in hi def. If you like pretty asian women you wont be disapointed here. Some are truly stunning (Emiri Okazaki, Rina Rakuwa and of course Tina Yuzuki). There are lots of different themes and fetishes. Though they dont show genitalia, they can get into some really wild kinky acts here (sometimes a bit shocking for some). And the ladies work hard here performing numerous times in each feature. If you are into the asian ladies prepare to have about 70 gigabytes ready at least. If you are less choosy it could get close to a terrabyte in downloads here. I am a bit picky and it was still about 50gigs in a few weeks
Cons: Videos are very long (1 or 2 hours) and no choices I saw for just getting the sections of each. No photosets. Videos are the same as available on other JAV sites and as such the style of filmaking is ok. Lots of build up to sex with fellatio being the main thing. Models often only take off some of their clothes. If you are looking to admire their beautiful form it doesnt happen that often. Navigation is ok but its hard to find out if a favorite model has new videos.
Bottom Line: top shelf JAV site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Watch 4 Beauty

7. Watch 4 Beauty (2)

Pay
Newbie
90*
drbart (3) 06-19-15  10:06am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some extremely beautiful models (eg: Sapphira), Hi Def images, great photography, locations (lots of outdoor shoots).
Also currently joined via Epoch which is easy to cancel and manage membership.
This is mostly solo nude modeling but they do spice it up with some wild ideas (peeing, toys etc.) so its not like met art where the sets get repetitive. The videos are very nice quality plus they are not superlong ones that are mostly filler. Not short either but not so long that most of what you download is filler.
Their forums are managed well and you will get responses on requests or comments.
Cons: Updates about every other day which would be ok but they dont seem to have too many models. Most are very good looking but not a lot of variety.
limited video download size and formats.
Bottom Line: For nude modeling site still one of the best. All you have to do is compare Sapphiras images here with hers on playboy (or for that matter on met art)and there is no comparison.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Cum Perfection

8. Cum Perfection (1)

Pay
Active
95
bkreidercrhl (7) 06-17-15  07:56pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful women get cum blasted and high definition photography examining each wad and drip. Almost all of the women are facially beautiful and glammed with lip stick, eye makeup, commonly extended lashes, earrings, ponytailed, garters, stocking and heals. The guys commonly spew close up right below the lady's nostril, all too often the nostril becomes the destination of the blast, the majority of the spew is through her eyes and into their hair. I am surprised that the girls consistently handle nostril shots and bubbles. The extended eye lashes although unnatural make for exciting photography when caked in goo. Close up video of the girls face, hair and tits with dripping goo is amongst the best facial porn on the market.
Cons: The sister site included is called "Cum for Chloe". Chloe is a blonde cutie with a great attitude for taking facial cum. Unfortunately the male paring does not work. This dude pops pitiful loads that do not do her justice.

Ironically blow bangs are not at the same standards as the one or two on one. The guys uncork frequently marginal loads and even when someone unleashes a gem, the closeup video does not compare with the rest of the site.

Condom swallows do not push my button.
Bottom Line: A small site that is growing featuring beautiful women getting their faces creamed. The close up video surveying each wad on their face, hair and tits is amongst the finest in facial cum porn.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Driver XXX

9. Driver XXX (1)

Pay
Active
80
rearadmiral (370) 06-08-15  01:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Nubiles.net group
- A-list models
- Many download options
- Supports download managers
- Rare niche
Cons: - Small site
- Updates irregularly
Bottom Line: Iím a big fan of car-themed porn so when I saw this site listed at TBP I signed up. I didnít realize that it was bundled with Nubiles.net at the time I subscribed but that worked out well because this site is quite small so having access to Nubiles made the membership worth it.

The main theme of the site turned out to be a little different than I had expected. I like watching road-head scenes and I expected that here but didnít get that. While most of the scenes take place in cars they mostly occur in the back seat when the car is parked. Some of the scenes have the model outside leaning up against the car.

The site is quite small and wouldnít be a good value if it wasnít bundled with a bigger site. There are currently only 11 videos available. To make things worse, the last update was three weeks ago. It appears that it is in an update cycle that feeds into Nubiles-Porn, the Nubiles site where they separate out all of their hardcore scenes for those of us who prefer those.

While the site is currently quite small it is fair to say that the porn on offer is very high quality. The models are the biggest A-list girls working Ė but itís important to note that since this site is affiliated with Nubiles that you can only expect models who fit into that category. The models are all young (18-20) and petite.

As with other Nubiles sites, there are many download options. There are five MP4 choices (1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360, 480x270) and a lone WMV offering at 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4s and they look great. If you normally download the highest resolution available you may want to check the 1280x720 first because they look really good.

Pictures are also available and aren't just an afterthought. The photos can be downloaded as singles or as zips. There are three resolutions available for the zips: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800

Apart from the small size and irregular updates there aren't any serious problems with the site. One minor quibble I have with a couple of the scenes is that they end to reveal that the girl has been tricked and used for sex. I find that adds nothing to the scene. It reminds me of early Captain Stabbin videos where the scene closed with the girl going for a swim, being tossed a life ring and then the boat sailing away. Only two of the scenes here use that closing and I hope that future scenes avoid it.

Iíd recommend the site but suggest that if youíre interested in a membership you consider that what youíre buying is access to the Nubiles.net network and youíll also happen to get access to this site with a fairly rare niche.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jock Foot Fantasy

10. Jock Foot Fantasy (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
jusblkdk (0) 06-02-15  12:50pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: GREAT CONTENT
Cons: VERY SMALL PICTURE GALLERY. PICTURES ARE VERY SMALL. POOR VIDEO QUALITY. VIDEOS STILL IN 4:3. YOU CANNOT FULLSCREEN VIDEOS FROM THE WEBPAGE. VIDEOS ARE IN SEGMENTS. BEFORE DOWNLOADING ALL THE SEGMENTS TO ONE VIDEO, YOU ARE BLOCKED BY A "BANDWIDTH CONTROLLER". THEN YOU CANNOT ACCESS YOUR ACCOUNT. WASTE OF MONEY. ADMINISTRATOR FROM THE "CONTACT" DOES NOT REPLY BACK TO EMAILS.
Bottom Line: The website needs a major layout update. The videos are low quality and are chopped up in segments. After figuring out how to make the video play in the browser without downloading, the video is very small and you cannot make the video full screen. Videos are broken into 5-15 segments of 3 min video. After like 7 downloads you are blocked from the website. The administrator says the "bandwidth control" locks you out. So you get banned from your own account that you paid money for. After being blocked, the site is useless. Im still blocked, and the aministrator is NOT answering emails. So you basically just giving money away. I DON'T RECOMMEND THIS SITE TO ANYONE. Unless you have money to just give away. Today is only my 2nd day of the membership and i have no access. when i login, its says its invalid.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Reality Kings

11. Reality Kings (2)

Network
Newbie
85*
Arouser (1) 05-31-15  01:44am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Well organised site. Everything works as it should in my experience. Site's search facility works well. You can accurately search by model name.

Selection of video formats for downloads.

Streaming player works well if you have good internet connection.

Ability to pay via Paypal/Epoch which I like.
Cons: Download limit of 10gb or thereabouts per day. The site's owners should really consider either upping this or doing away with it altogether. I've never before come across another site that imposes such a limit.

(see edit in Bottom Line below) Download Manager does NOT work (Freedownloadmanager is the one I am using). Windows download speeds available much slower than those available with my download manager. Annoying.

Supposedly high-res pics are I'm afraid not and are in fact 900x600 in my experience. Their game needs to be upped in this area.

As with most other sites that have been going for a while the older scenes are not available in HD.
Bottom Line: I am currently in my 2nd month of membership here having joined primarily for the content available in the We Live Together section of the site. They have some really hot scenes here if you like girl-girl action. I have also found some nice scenes from other parts of the network.

As mentioned above I really don't like the 10gb download limit per day and the fact that my download manager does not work on the site. As a result I feel somewhat cheated and being a member here has left something of a sour taste in my mouth.

(edit I decided to try Internet Download Manager instead and am glad to say that I have been able to use this to download. There have been timeout issues however - where I've left IDM to download clips and the site has timed out the download manager and prevented it from finishing the downloads. I've therefore resorted to downloading one or two clips at a time (to maximize download and completion speeds) and making sure that I come back to my pc and click on something on the site to avoid this problem)
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit All Kinds Of Girls

12. All Kinds Of Girls (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
snugglefuck (3) 05-26-15  08:11am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: * Gorgeous real women, highly sexual amateur MILF/Housewife models
*Intense, responsive, orgasmic sex, including some of the hottest anal sex I have seen ANYWHERE else in 30 years of experience.
*Great variety of models, ranging from young to mature, and fit to obese (mostly BBW). Good ethnic variety too.
*TAFFY! (see below)
*Decent download speeds
*Great preview section with lots of pics
Cons: * Rarely updated - only once per month (sometimes less) as of 2015
* No kissing (except one instance)
* No creampies
* No cunnilingus
* No smoking fetish (boo!)
Bottom Line: Along with its partner site, this is by far at the top of my list of gonzo amateur MILF sites. I honestly haven't found anything else which comes close. Searches for similar sites come up with nothing.

If, like me, you love seeing ordinary everyday, mature(ish - 20s to 30s mostly) housewives engaging in the most intense, sensual, sexual, uninhibited, no-holes barred sex, THIS IS IT. This is some pure, raw, high quality material.

Their reactions at having someone showing them sexual arousal and affection is spectacular. Real orgasms, some even squirt, moans and groans of ecstasy... love it!

I love the interaction the guy has with the models. There's a total and implicit trust between the players, the women let him penetrate whichever hole he likes. Beautiful reactions and genuine responses. It really doesn't matter to me that the scenes are formulaic - they work, and it's more about the extensive number of women this guy gets to pair up with.

Thoroughly recommend, even if it's only to download the content and watch over and over. My personal faves are Autumn (gorgeous BBW), Brooke (awesome), Jenna (happy and eager), Lala (great boobs and mummy tummy), Pixie (submissive), and Vanessa (super sexy).

The standout by far, though, has to be Taffy. An absolute must-watch, her performances are mesmerising to watch over the course of her first appearance to her last. The chemistry between these two is bottled lightning. Well worth one month's membership just to download her performances alone - they really are THAT awesome. The only one to sneak a kiss from him.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Where Is Your Wife

13. Where Is Your Wife (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
snugglefuck (3) 05-26-15  07:39am
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: * Gorgeously ordinary but highly sexual amateur MILF/Housewife models
*Intense, responsive, orgasmic sex, including some of the hottest anal sex I have seen ANYWHERE else in 30 years of experience.
*Great variety of models, ranging from young to mature, and fit to obese. Good ethnic range also
*Great preview section with lots of pics
Cons: * Rarely updated - only once per month (sometimes less) as of 2015
* No kissing
* No creampies
* No cunnilingus
* No smoking fetish (boo!)
Bottom Line: Along with its partner site, this is by far at the top of my list of gonzo amateur MILF sites. I honestly haven't found anything else which comes close. Searches for similar sites come up with nothing.

If, like me, you love seeing ordinary everyday, mature(ish - 20s to 30s mostly) housewives engaging in the most intense, sensual, sexual, uninhibited, no-holes barred sex, THIS IS IT. This is some pure, raw, high quality material.

Their reactions at having someone showing them sexual arousal and affection is spectacular. Real orgasms, some even squirt, moans and groans of ecstasy... love it!

I love the interaction the guy has with the models. There's a total and implicit trust between the players, the women let him penetrate whichever hole he likes. Beautiful reactions and genuine responses. It really doesn't matter to me that the scenes are formulaic - they work, and it's more about the extensive number of women this guy gets to pair up with.

Thoroughly recommend, even if it's only to download the content and watch over and over. My personal faves are Addison (gorgeous), Jennifer (sweet submissive), Kat (young anal wife), Rayanne (complete sexpot!), Roxanne (cuddly young wife), and Tarah (responsive).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 21Sextury.com

14. 21Sextury.com (6)

Network
Active
92
pinkerton (39) 05-26-15  05:59am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Very good value at $14.99 per month for PU members.
Lots of content covering a wide range of mostly Euro porn, including lez, solo and trannie.
Lots of beautiful girls, mostly natural with not so many boob jobs to be found.
Generally high-quality professionally done content with good angles and lighting.
Content can be streamed and navigated using scene film-strip thumbnails - great for previewing before deciding to download.
Fast download speeds (I was getting around 5Mbit/sec average on my 50Mbit broadband connection) and works with download managers.
Good navigation and site design (although see cons below) with the ability to filter the lists of scenes and models by tag and can also filter by network name.
My Favorites facility allows you to keep a list of favourite scenes and favourite models.
Fast download speeds (I was getting around 5Mbit/sec average on my 50Mbit broadband connection) and works with download managers.
Home page shows remaining membership period to nearest hour.
Cons: Cross-selling each time you log-in gets a bit annoying.
Not all content is included, everything in 21Sextreme and 21Naturals networks is extra.
Some of the sites are dead with no updates for a long time.
File names are just a number, though video files do have the resolution/size (1080, 720, 540 etc) as a suffix in the filename.
The search facility returns matching items in a drop-down list that updates as you type so you can't see all matches at once and isn't usable if you're using a mobile device. It would be better if the search allowed you to just type in part of a model name or a scene name and then present the matches in a list of models and/or scenes for you to browse and click.
Some older content is available in 540p only, with no HD option. Also, some HD content is only available as 1080p with no 720p, which is a pain for those happy with 720p who don't relish filling up their hard drives with 1080p content.
Bottom Line: For me this site was an itch waiting to be scratched - so many of my fave Eurobabes on this site and more I didn't know about, the PU member discount meant that I just had to try it out. With all that content and limited time, I basically just searched for my favourite porn stars, browsed their scenes and just worked from there, looking at the recommendations and suggestions that I guess were generated from my favourites and likes. I also used the tags to search for stuff like "brunette lingerie" in order to find brunettes in stockings, for example. The site navigation is generally very good, but some pages showed scenes from earlier pages and the tags aren't always consistent.

A request to 21Sextury: please add "stockings" to the list of tags to filter by. Also, allow users to remove tags that don't apply to a model or scene, that way the tags will become more accurate.

There's lots of anal and DP on this site so if you're a fan then you'll be very happy, otherwise you won't, but it is worth saying that in most boy-girl scenes, the guy nearly always ends up fucking the girl's asshole after he's fucked her mouth and pussy. I don't mind anal and DP but if you dislike it then this site may not be for you.

For downloading content, FireFox with DownThemAll add-in worked perfectly for me with simple right-clicking on download links.

HD content downloads available at 1920x1080p and 1280x720p, with standard-def 960x540p - all with no download limit.

Can also download content for mobile devices at 480p and 272p and full site works well enough to be usable on a smartphone.

The credits system allows you to buy some content for keeps and you get given some credits as a loyalty thing, a month membership of this site earned me over 300 credits, enough to buy a few interviews with models scenes - great if you like free stuff.

Billing option includes PayPal which makes cancelling easier. You still have access to the site when membership expires, you just can't view content without paying.

Overall a great site that's well worth the price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Petite HD Porn

15. Petite HD Porn (1)

Pay
Active
90
rearadmiral (370) 05-25-15  03:22pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A great site in an under-served niche
- A-list models
- Part of the Nubiles.net network
- 85 exclusive scenes
- Streaming and downloads
- Lots of download options
- Photos available in multiple resolutions
Cons: - Nothing without sounding petty
Bottom Line: Iím not sure how I missed this being listed as a new site at TBP back 18 months ago as this is something I should have noticed. The Ďpetiteí niche a favorite of mine and since this is part of the Nubiles.net family I had a lot of confidence in joining knowing that Nubiles makes some great porn and of the many times Iíve joined there Iíve always been a satisfied customer.

Given the name of the site it isn't hard to figure out that they feature some of the more petite models in the industry. When the site first launched in late 2013 they featured mostly European and Russian models but fairly quickly moved to featuring more American models. Iím not biased against European and Russian models but porn is a lot about Ďcollectingí for me and since so many European and Russian models seem to work under multiple stage names itís harder to collect scenes from my favorites.

The site is a whoís who of petite models. Dakota (or Kota) Skye, Emily Grey, Halle Von, Mary Jane Johnson, Riley Reid and Sarah Luvv all have scenes here. (And if youíll allow a moment of obvious subjectivity, thereís a Dakota Skye scene that will likely make it to my all-time favorite scenes list.)

Apart from using petite models there is no common theme in the scenes. Most of the scene set-ups are fairly standard.

The site currently has 85 exclusive scenes uploaded. The site doesnít update on a regular schedule, but it definitely is updating. Some weeks there can be two or three updates and then the site goes two weeks without one.

The site offers streaming but I donít use that so I really canít comment.

Downloads are available in five MP4 resolutions (1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360, 480x270) and in WMV format at 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4s and those have a bitrate of 4500kb/s and a framerate of 59fps. Those are better specs than I see at many similar sites but Iíve learned to expect Nubiles to be better than most sites. Subjectively the scenes look great and I recommend that if you normally download only the highest resolution try the 1280x720 because you may be happy and save some disk space.

As with other Nubiles sites photos aren't just an afterthought. Photos are available as singles or in a zip. There are three zipped options: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800.

The site supports download managers. I had no issue with the links timing out but part of that could be attributed to the download speeds being very fast.

There really aren't any serious negatives to mention here. The only one that I can think of is that when I selected for anal scenes using the anal tag, some of the scenes had no anal sex in them. Thatís hardly a deal-breaker. (For the record, there are about eight anal scenes here, one being the above-mentioned scene with Dakota Skye.)

I definitely recommend this site for anyone who likes petite models. Youíll get access to the A-list of petite models in some well-shot and edited scenes. Youíll have lots of options to download the scenes too. If this were a stand-alone site I might think that it is a good, but not great, value, but since itís part of the Nubiles.net family it is definitely a great value even at full price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit X-Art

16. X-Art (3)

Pay
Newbie
85*
Artie Fufkin (0) 05-24-15  01:03pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -absolutely beautiful natural girls who appear to be enthusiastic and well looked after
-well presented site with multiple streaming/download options
-good value for money compared to some others
-high quality shoots, excellent production values
-good mix of established and unknown girls
-Angelica's "Goodnight Kiss" is almost worth the subscription alone!
Cons: -very little variation in themes/scenes/styles/locations. if you're looking for anything other than two people having tasteful sex in a white room with white sheets then maybe try elsewhere
-website could be improved with a better tags and filters system
-sister site colette.com is now being heavily promoted and standards on x-art seem to have gone down slightly since its launch
-it's definitely more "x" than "art" these days, I'd like to see a little more artistic license being used
Bottom Line: If you are looking for high quality content with stunning, natural girls then I would recommend this all day long.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Perv City

17. Perv City (1)

Network
Active
89
rearadmiral (370) 05-23-15  09:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 300 scenes
- 30+ are exclusive to this site
- Supports download managers (but links time out in 10-15 minutes)
- High production values
- Top models in the business
- Not misogynistic, the models are obviously having fun
- Tons of ass play and anal sex
Cons: - Very large file sizes
- Some may see his work as repetitive, formulaic
- 90% of the scenes here aren't exclusive
- Scene links time out (10-15 minutes)
Bottom Line: Most readers here will know Mike Adrianoís work and those who do will either have a solidly pro or con opinion of it. Heís not polarizing because his work is like Max Hardcore, because it certainly isnít, but his work isn't for everyone.

For those who donít know Adrianoís work, itís fair to say that he has a signature look and feel to his scenes. Most of his scenes are shot in a combination of an outdoor setup and an indoor room. He only shoots the biggest stars in the business, and his scenes all have a definite ass theme to them. Even those rare Adriano scenes that donít feature anal sex are still ass-focused. Other things youíll see a lot of are sloppy blowjobs, lots of drool, ball-licking, male-on-female rimming, many scenes have female-on-male rimming and tons of anal sex. Itís important to note that while some sites could treat these sex acts in a way that was degrading to the female models that doesnít happen here. There is no hint of D/s or misogyny here; the models really look to be having fun and Mike Adriano is truly an ass worshipper. Some may find fault that most of his scenes follow a formula but my thought is that since he found a formula that works thereís nothing wrong with sticking to it.

The site is broken down into five Ďsitesí Ė Anal Overdose, Chocolate BJs, Oral Overdose, Banging Beauties, Up Her Asshole Ė but the main site has all the scenes. The sub-sites are great as filters but donít go into this thinking youíre getting access to several distinct sites.

There are currently about 300 scenes available but a prospective member needs to know that only about 30 of these are exclusive. Adriano is a prolific director and performer and is one of the leading directors at Evil Angel. He also shoots for Bang Bros. A member here will find a lot of the same EA scenes on this site too. The good news is that this lack of exclusivity is factored into the price. In my opinion the price of the membership is fair even if all you want are the exclusive scenes.

Each scene opens into a separate page with only one option to stream and three download options, all of which are MP4: 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 704x480. Iím not sure how theyíre encoded but the file sizes are a lot larger than Iím used to seeing for similar specs. The 720p files are all around 3GB each and the 1080p files can top out at more than 5GB. The file sizes may be an issue for some users but given the quality of the porn I didnít find it an issue. The file sizes may also be a reflection of the fact that most of the scenes are near an hour long and many are over an hour long.

The site supports download managers but the links do time out after 10 or 15 minutes. The download speeds varied from okay to great, but given the size of many of the files it wasnít possible to queue up more than two or three 720p scenes at a time.

The site updates with a new scene being added approximately every three days. An important point, however, is that only one exclusive scene is added per month.

I didnít look all that hard, but if there are photos on the site they aren't obvious. Itís fair to say that Adrianoís work is geared to video collectors anyway.

The bottom line is that this is an excellent site that is definitely worth joining. If you like high-quality videos of the top names in the business doing some nasty things and enjoying it, then this site is for you. If youíre already a Mike Adriano fan you just need to be aware that 90% of the scenes here are available elsewhere, mostly on Evil Angel. But if you are truly a Mike Adriano fan the membership fee is still worth it for the exclusive scenes.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Babes Network.com

18. Babes Network.com (5)

Network
Newbie
80*
Artie Fufkin (0) 05-22-15  01:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: stunning girls, videos are well shot. like the option of streaming at different bandwidths
Cons: not a huge selection, only a couple of updates a week. website is not great.
Bottom Line: they've spent the money on the girls and the videos, rather than the website, which I suppose is the right way. good value as subscriptions are relatively cheap
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Digital Playground

19. Digital Playground (2)

Pay
Newbie
70*
Artie Fufkin (0) 05-22-15  01:17pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: massive library, some classic girls and scenes. website design and layout is excellent, probably the best I've seen, particularly grateful for the low bandwidth streaming option. HUGE bonus content section featuring hundreds of dvds from other studios
Cons: download option has only just been introduced, 9 months into my year membership. not good enough. the new content is nowhere near as good as the older stuff and feels cheap. great selection of girls, but heavy on fake boobs and not much anal
Bottom Line: great website, massive selection, newer material is not as good as the old
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Stiffia.com

20. Stiffia.com (1)

Network
Active
62
standard (21) 05-22-15  09:32am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (15), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent selection of genres/movies/scenes. Lots of euro stars.

- Magma and Pinko were pretty much the entire reason I joined.

- They claim you'll get access to another site after each month of your membership.
Cons: - Can't tell too much of a difference beyond size between HD and non-HD clips, and I suspect they're all just DVD rips by someone who doesn't know/care.

- Logs you out every half hour and you fill out a captcha to login. Every. Single. Time. And 50% of the time the captcha will tell you it was wrong even if you know you entered it correctly.

- PITA to use overall.

- Slow and unresponsive.

- Every downloaded clip is named something like "scene_hd" or "scene_sd_high". No numbers, no nothing. You will have no idea which movie, scene, or actress is involved.

- Broken or missing links.

- Actresses show up as having X number of scenes, but that's apparently over the network as a whole (and it doesn't point you in the direction of the other sites/scenes). A site showing six scenes for a particular actress may just have one clip available.
Bottom Line: Possibly the most irritating and poorly conceived and executed pay site/network I've ever joined.

Captcha login requirements every twenty minutes or so.

Random dead links.

Download links missing entirely for some scenes.

Frequent "Site down for maintenance" and 503 errors when trying to login. Then the site is immediately available upon refresh.

Download managers won't work because download links change rapidly. If it took 15 minutes to download one movie the next one will give you an error message because the link no longer works or the system has already logged you out.

Quite a few movies wouldn't finish downloading because link was apparently killed *during* the download.

Every picture ZIP file I downloaded was corrupted and would not unzip.

Some download links downloaded entire movies that the scene was pulled from (but note there is no option anywhere to download the whole movie), and some scenes were missing download links for the scene entirely.

Out of a dozen or so pages of actresses listings on the individual sites, the last half (or more) won't even have photos associated with the name. Just the same blank silhouette for everyone. If you're lucky you can click on it and wait for the really unresponsive website to load and maybe show a thumbnail of a scene showing her face, though.

-------

This network has tremendous potential, but it's too much trouble to use. It *may*, might, maybe, POSSIBLY be worth the $36 annual special I've seen offered, but even then you're going to be constantly irritated unless the site owners make some major changes to make things more user friendly.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hippie Goddess

21. Hippie Goddess (0)

Pay
Newbie
63*
guy7414 (0) 05-22-15  09:13am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Fine looking Hippie Bodies. Great tits.
Cons: Too many outdoor shots showing the girls running around doing a "new age" type of dance. The girls seem oblivious, but they don't seem turned on. They're expressing themselves soulfully, but it's not erotic.
That's not the case in a minority of sets, which show the girls super turned on writhing on the ground in very realistic LUST. Unfortunately, these gems are few and far between. NOT ENOUGH INDOOR SHOTS.
Bottom Line: Not enough turn on for the buck. Some of the best sets I've ever seen, but they occur infrequently. Some really sexy, fine girls are reduced to some not so hot movements outdoors.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Premium Pass

22. Premium Pass (1)

Network
Active
63
rearadmiral (370) 05-20-15  05:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Tens of thousands of videos
- Some of videos appear to be exclusive
- Some videos have decent resolutions
Cons: - Few and irregular updates
- Most sites not updating
- A lot of overlap between sites
- The one main site uses low-quality updates
- Almost a clone of Pornstar Network
Bottom Line: This review may be a lot more ambiguous than what I normally write but I seem to have more questions than answers about this site (these sites?).

The network is made up of 25 pornstar sites, a mega-site, a Ďmeduim-sizedí site and four niche sites. I canít even give an educated guess as to how many DVDs or scenes are available here because there is a lot of overlap between the Ďsites,í but it would be safe to say that there are tens of thousands of videos here. Sounds enticing, doesnít it?

Of the 25 pornstar sites only four are updating and the update schedules of those can be generously described as sporadic. There can be two updates in a week and then eight months until the next one. The niche sites no longer update. The medium-sized site, called Premium Pass also doesnít update. The mega-site, Premium Vids, updates with a new DVD being added almost daily. That sounds okay doesnít it?

But maybe not. I havenít been a member at Pornstar Network in a while, but having had a membership at PSN a couple of years ago I was immediately struck that Premium Vids is exactly the same as PSN. Comparing the PSN tour pages to PV shows that PSN says they have a lot more videos though, but that may be a result of PSN requiring an upgrade to access all their videos. This is just speculation, but maybe PSN minus the upgrade-required vids equals Premium Vids.

If that isn't a big enough issue, the mega-site relies heavily, and perhaps exclusively, on lower-tier studios with unknown models. Many of these are also very old so the video quality is pretty bad too.

I did check the video quality on some of the later updates on the pornstar sites and those are not bad at 1280x720. I suspect the proportion of videos with that resolution is quite low.

I canít say for certain, but a lot of the videos on the pornstar sites seem to be exclusive (with the possible exception of Pornstar Network).

Perhaps the strangest thing I experienced with this site is that as an avid porn collector I downloaded exactly zero videos from this site (other than a couple of samples to check resolutions Ė which were then deleted). This occurs so rarely that Iím not even sure if it has happened to me.

So would I recommend this site? Only to a narrow group of collectors who find that a favorite model has some scenes here and he just has to get them. Other than that Iíd stay away from this site. Itís mostly a collection of older videos, many of them from low-grade studios with unknown models. If you have $20 to spend on a porn membership you can do a lot better than this.

I think high praise of a site is to tell readers that I liked it so much thatís Iíll definitely be rejoining it again. In this case, itís fair to say that Iíll never join Premium Pass again.

(Luckily, cancelling my membership was easy.)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Showy Beauty

23. Showy Beauty (1)

Pay
Active
89
luv lickn clit (23) 05-20-15  05:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: --Gorgeous models! Many of the girls are unique to this network. There are a couple dozen girls I recognize from other sites, but for the most part they are "new" to me. Almost all are Eastern Euro girls in the 18 to 23 age range.

--High quality photos and videos! The photos come in 3 resolutions, with the upper end usually 5200 pixels on the long end, sometimes more. The newest videos are 1080p, and I think all are 720p or higher. All are generally well light and photographed. All photo sets have zips, and the videos are available in AVI, MP4, and WMV.

--The photos and videos are explicit (meaning almost all have pussy close-ups), but tasteful.

--Easy site navigation. Nothing too complicated here. There is a main updates page, separate pages for videos and photosets, and a model directory (alphabetical listing).

--The site has other features, such as voting for models, photosets, and videos, a basic search feature, and marking models and sets as favorites.
Cons: --Updates only once every 2 days.

--Many of the models have only 1 set or at most a few.

--Videos are few and sometimes far between (1 to 3 per month).

--Some of the photoset zips are a bit large for the highest res (up to and even over 1 gig), although that's really a minor quibble for me.

--The download speeds are sometimes a bit low, but that may be on my end.
Bottom Line: Showy Beauty is a smallish site run by the same folks who run Amour Angels and several other sites. It is primarily a photo site with some video (videos are mostly solo, some girl-girl). As of today, I counted 412 models. The site was launched in August of 2011. A number of my favs were there, along with a dozen or so really hot girls I'd never seen before, so I went ahead and joined up about a week ago.

The beauty of girls and quality of the photos and videos is right up there with best sites like Met-Art, MPL, and Femjoy. And many of the models are exclusive to this site and the "parent site" Amour Angels.

The only real drawback is the low frequency of updates (every other day), and the relatively small size of the site. It's not a site I will stay joined to, but I'll definitely put it in my rotation. The site preview allows you to see the cover page of all sets by every model, but no actual content.

If you like quality photos and the occasional video of gorgeous young women, then you will like this site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit DDF Network

24. DDF Network (4)

Network
Active
82
skippy (50) 05-15-15  05:53pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge collection
Several niches
14 "sites" plus 2 pay sites
Models are generally attractive
Reasonable variety of girls
Lots of nice looking porn starlets
Sets go back to 2001!
Good navigation
Cons: lots of overdone porn stars
Many, many enhanced body parts
Average model age is late 20's early 30's
Ads on every page
Image download options could be better
Had a fairly hard time with logins and customer support (they require a captcha for EVERYTHING)
The regular price is insanely expensive.
Bottom Line: I've been around long enough to remember when DDF was owned by Dennis De Franco, a European photographer who shot for magazines and made Sandy famous. His work was simply spectacular. That was nearly 20 years ago. Since then, DDF has gone from his name, to DDF productions to DDF network. Dennis has either sold the site or no longer has very much to do with it. That's a shame because whoever runs things now is trying to be all things to all potential customers.
The site feels a lot like Twisty's or the long gone Danni's Hard Drive. The collection is huge but the girls are...let's just say many of them have moved a little too far down the porn star path to be really attractive. There are a LOT of enhancements, tons of porn moans and the percentage of anal is far above my threshold of tolerance. (Why so many beautiful or once beautiful girls subject themselves to anal is completely beyond me. And what is with all the gaping asses? If you are into anal and gaping asses, sign up now! You won't be disappointed!)
But I digress, let me tell you a bit more about the sites:
"1 by day" is one of the original sites that provides one video/photo set a day. You know many of these models, but it could be from years ago. Zafira (current), Peaches (last set in 2008) and Eufrat (2013) are among the most popular. Almost every set starts with the girl clothed, then a strip, then maybe a few straight nude shots, then come the fingers and toys. Lots and lots of toys. (If you like toys, then sign up now!) Many of the newer sets look truly new and are of girls I have not seen before. But the formula is generally the same with every set including (simulated moaning) masturbation or insertion. The oldest sets in 1 by day go back to 2001 and the old ones look almost exactly like the new ones except there are no anal shots and not as much insertion in the older sets. With 15 years of sets, you WILL get lost in here if you aren't careful.
DDF Busty is a site full of...huge, huge boobs! These are mostly double-Fs at least. Some look pretty good but many are clearly not well done and a lot of the girls have the full figure to support that mass up front. This is more of a full porn site with sex, fisting, blow-jobs and boob sex, with the obvious feature up front. If you are into truly ginormous boobs, you will get your fill of them here. DDF Busty goes back to about 2005 with a set every two or three days for that entire time.
Hands on hard core is pretty much as it sounds. These sets go back to 2003 with SV videos and images in each older set. I can't quite tell when these went HD but I see some 720 as far back as 2005. This is the site that is...um...filled with anal and there is some double penetration and multi-way stuff as well.
Hot Legs and Feet is a fetish site for stockings, shoes and feet. Most of the sets are regular porn with the camera or video emphasizing the feet. Lots of shoe heel insertions... If you are into that stuff, the sets are not bad. The sets go all the way back to 2001 with a few sets a week for that entire time but there are a lot of duplicates to the other sites.
One other site I want to mention is House of Taboo. This is supposed to be a B&D and kink site but if you have ever seen any of the better commercial sites of that genre, you will be pretty disappointed here. Maybe 1 scene in 15 looks even remotely genuine. There are some pee scenes if you are into that, though.
There are several other much smaller sites including "only blowjobs", "Euro Girls on Girls", "Euro Teen Erotica"(6 sets with Anjelica here), "Hairy Twatter" and "Sex Video Casting" which is a collection of casting videos. There are also a handful of one-girl sites like Sandy and Cherry Jul.

So, the bottom line is that there is a LOT of stuff here and there are micro-sites that look like they fill most niches. The quality is decent, the models are mostly popular porn stars and the navigation is consistent and fairly intuitive. But the problem is that they try to fill so many niches that the site doesn't really excel at any of them. I'm not really into hairy twats, feet, peeing, fake bondage, watching blowjobs, fake orgasm moans, bolt-on F-cups, massive insertions, double penetration, anal or gaping. So the sites that feature those things are not something I want to pay for. Fortunately, there is a reasonable amount of good quality solo and straight material spanning a decade and a half. is it worth the $44 or so regular rate? Well, sorry, no. I waited and finally got an intro deal for $25. If you see it for $29.95, go ahead and try it.

If you are into a wide variety of different niches I mention above, sign up now. If you aren't into some of those things, look around for discounts and sign up when you find one. But if you are into any of these niches exclusively, you should probably sign up for one of the many other niche sites out there.

I hope you found this review useful!
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Kink University

25. Kink University (1)

Pay
Active
88
rearadmiral (370) 05-13-15  04:19pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (72), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Interesting and rare niche
- Part of the well-known Kink family of sites
- Good looking models
- Great production values
- 51 scenes
- Updates weekly
- Supports download managers
- Low price for admission to the Kink world
Cons: - Likely too narrow a niche to attract many viewers
- New site design is less user-friendly
- Download speeds can be slower than average
- Wide gap in file sizes between highest and next-highest resolutions
Bottom Line: BDSM and D/s is a porn niche that I enjoy. Iíve always found that Kink.com offers some of the best BDSM and D/s videos available anywhere. One of my wishes was they would show more behind-the-scenes or Ďhow toí videos since in most of their videos the model is shown already tied up, suspended or whatever without ever showing how she got there. Then thereís just the basic stuff of a BDSM or D/s relationship dynamic that seems fascinating. Members to any of Kinkís sites didnít usually get to peek behind the curtains. And then along comes Kink University and that niche is filled.

Itís important to note that Kink isn't a traditional hardcore sex site, though there is sex here. It isn't a typical BDSM, D/s site either. All of the videos have an instructional element to them regarding the BDSM and D/s activities seen throughout Kink sites. Youíll find videos on rope tying for beginners and for more advanced couples, videos on how to safely use some toys, how to build a home dungeon and how to have anal sex. There are also videos on how to get into the lifestyle, how to use positions and protocols. In short, if you can see it on a Kink site there is probably a video at KU giving you advice on how to bring that home.

If youíre a Kink regular the models here are those youíll be familiar with. Kink seems to have a group of semi-mainstream-porn models who do a lot of fetish work and those models appear here too.

Production values like lighting, sound and editing are all typical of Kink sites, which is to say that they are among the best in the industry. Kink obviously cares about putting out good videos.

The site is currently fairly small but given the uniqueness of the niche I canít fault it for that. There are currently 51 videos available and a new one is added each week.

Clicking on a thumbnail for a scene opens another page where you have the option to stream or download it. I didnít see any resolution options for streaming. Downloads are mostly offered in MP4 version with four resolutions being offered, those being listed as hi, med, low and Ďfullí which is HD. Because of the nature of the videos I opted for the Ďhií files since they were the best compromise between file size and resolution. Those come in at a fairly low (by todayís standards) resolution of 960x540 and 1300kb/s. They donít look bad on a 24Ē monitor or a 32Ē TV. I avoided the full HD downloads because they tended to be up to three times the size of the next lower file. I did download one HD file to be able to compare the specs and it came in at 1280x720 and 5000kb/s. Those specs aren't bad but Iíd expect better in a 50 minute video that is close to 2GB in size. I wish the gap between the files wasnít so big.

The site allows download managers and I had no trouble with the links timing out too quickly. I havenít had any Kink memberships in a while but I donít recall download speeds being this slow in the past. In the past I donít recall download speeds being remarkable for being slow or fast, but my experience with this site is that they are far slower than Iím used to seeing elsewhere. But maybe Iím just hitting the site at the wrong times.

Other Kink sites Iíve been a member at have offered photos but I donít see any photos here. Maybe Iím missing them.

I know some of my comments here have seemed a bit inconclusive and thereís a reason for that: it appears that starting a few days ago Kink has started to roll out a new look for all of their sites. I found their old look to be simple, effective and easy to use. Maybe itís just that the look is new and will take some getting used to. Right now though, the site redesign looks like it was done just to give it a fresh look. For all I know maybe members were complaining that the site looked stale, but Iíll always be opposed to change for the sake of change.

One spin-off advantage to having a membership here is that it is among the lowest priced Kink sites. Thatís important since once you are a member to one site you get a discounted price to all their other sites. I usually join through the cheapest site Iím interested in and then over a period of a few months rejoin other Kink sites that I like at a discount. I can save a lot of money this way.

Like so many other sites any recommendation has to be objective. This site offers 51 scenes (and growing) in a niche that isn't found anywhere else (that Iím aware of), the models are good looking and the production values are high. Objectively I can definitely recommend this site. Subjectively, well thatís your call obviously. BDSM and D/s videos are still considered outside the mainstream for porn so the market isn't huge, and the market for this site is further reduced because not everyone into BDSM and D/s would be into these Ďinstructionalí videos. But if you do have even a passing interest in this kind of video I recommend giving it a try.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 6444 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (6)
2. Babes Network.com (5)
3. 18X Girls (4)
4. DDF Network (4)
5. Bangbros Network (4)
6. Twistys (4)
7. Blacked.com (3)
8. Wow Girls (3)
9. X-Art (3)
10. Brazzers (3)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.56 seconds.