Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
+ Unique Content
+ Reasonable download speeds @ >500 kb/s (see bottom line)
+ Newest files in high resolution (see cons)
+ Choice of four resolutions for newest video - FHD @ 1920x1080, HQ & HR @ 720x576 and LQ @ 352x288
+ No upsells splashed all over the site
+ Trial at $16.95 for ten days, renewing at $9.95 a month until cancelled. Regular $29.95 sub also renews at $9.95
+ Easy join and cancel through CCBill
- Somewhat haphazard navigation
- Erratic and slow in coming updates
- Picture quality roughly that of a dated point and shoot camera
- One format - mp4 - except for a few oldest files in divx avi format
- Search function lacks categories - search by keyword without a list to choose from
- Motion blur in Full HD video
Always on the prowl for new amateur content, this seemed like a novel concept, so I took the plunge. I'll have to say that I was entertained for a bit but not completely happy I joined. It's rare when I don't stay on a site almost constantly after I join to download all I can. I did save most of the higher resolution video but didn't bother with the older stuff and the pictures. As of the date of my trial subscription there were 10 Full HD, 32 HiDef, 11 High Res videos, the rest being 1990 looking files. By the time I got down to the low resolution videos, I stopped downloading. There are also 92 Picture sets running from ~60 to ~100 pics. Zip files for SOME picture sets are available, but removed after a year. As I said in my earlier comment, I just don't understand a site, especially a smaller one, removing their better material, or worse yet, completely removing something they've put up.
The Member home page brings you to links for eight sections, all of which are pictures, except videos, of course (Item count in parentheses): Games(92), Videos(174*), Auditions(51), Girls(28), Ranking(16), Clothed and Naked(10), Best Pics Gallery(48) and Zip Files(14) *Counting different resolutions of the same file.
> "Games" - Links to all pic sets
> "Videos" - With only nine videos per page and ony one file format, I see no need for a click to get to the download link. For picture sets of a game, there are only six thumbnails, thankfully large, but centered on the page with wide wasted borders on both sides. Navigation would be greatly simplified by using the open area to decrease the number of page clicks needed to view an entire gallery.
> "Auditions" - Links to 51 picture sets
> "Girls" - Expecting links to her photos and videos, and got a thumbnail pic of her face. A wasted page, in my opinion, considering the home page has a list of the players with all of her links.
> "Ranking" - 16 models thumbnails, linking to five SMALL (500px) pictures of her face, breasts, pussy, legs and bottom.
> "Clothed and Naked" - Ten thumbnails that link to ten pics - on two pages?
> "Best Pics" - 48 pics (1280px) on 6 pages
> "Zip Files" - Links to 15 zip files from recent updates, removed after one year
Download speeds are adequate considering the amount of content and size of the files. There's not much here that doesn't take but a minute or two to download.
I noticed some motion blur in the Full HD movies. The GSpot codec appliance seems to indicate that files have been upscaled from 1440x1080 to 1920x1080, resulting in the blurring.
With no ability to arrange updates in order of date, there's no way to get a fix on what resolution picture you're going to get. Most pics I saw were 1280 pixels on the long side.
The bottom line for me is that this site needs a lot of work to bring it up to speed. There haven't been any updates in the week I've been on the site, the pictures are small by today's standards and the video quality is average. All that, with the navigation sitting on the haphazard side and the removing of content, I wouldn't re-join until I saw news of major changes here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Niche content of ladies taking the journey from fully clothed to naked.
10+ updates per month
Photos at 2048 with zips for all photosets.
MP4 Videos HQ & LQ for download
Not a lot of material of any one model.
Older content, especially video, understandably not quite of the current quality.
Photosets are well edited and usually cover the ground required well.
They are not overly long.
Typically 30 - 40 photos.
A pleasant change from the current norm of over 200 photos with 6 duplicates of every pose.
Currently about 1 in 4 updates are video
They are MP4 HQ whatever that may mean.
There is a MP4 LQ version as well.
Suffice to say they are all quite watchable once you have them downloaded.
Usually they are around 3 - 4 minute duration.
Whilst the content is definitely softcore, full nudity of at least one lady is always guaranteed.
There are stories, often featuring 3 girls one or more of whom will end up naked before long.
I do mean properly naked, not the 'naked' you often get which includes wearing some clothing! Huummmph! ;0)
There are solo strips & 'auditions' where one girl is stripped for the camera by another model.
Occasionally a man but usually a woman.
You will see full frontal nudity, but no open leg explicit shots or anything harder.
Typically the 'strippee' will be made to perform a twirl for a better view, sometimes at underwear stage as well, but often full nude at the end.
The member area is basic, clean & functional.
It is quite straight forward.
You may find it a little quirky at first, but you soon learn how to navigate the site.
Members of the old site will find quite a lot of the old material here, but in higher resolution than they will have seen before.
Updates are a mixture of new & improved older material.
If you haven't seen it before, which most folk won't, you will find it very much on topic for the woefully underserved 'full strip' niche.
Those that have, well... you will see it bigger & better. ;0)
It certainly isn't a huge site, but it is growing & staying faithful to the niche.
If the idea appeals, for the entrance fee, you shouldn't be disappointed.
What I would really like to see is more return visits from models, using different outfits.
'OK, so I have seen her strip the once.
I don't need to see her do it again' you might say.
Fans of this niche will counter that by saying.
It is not just the destination, it is the anticipation & the enjoyment of the journey there.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Interesting storyline feature (but see below)
Site now static
Model population too unstable, which undermined third point, above.
A measure of curiosity was an idea to portray young women losing their clothes in various situations, from solo striptease sets, through 'audition' sets (involving mostly being undressed by someone else), to photosets with a story line. A small amount of stripping games were included and these evolved into AMOC's sister site, stripgame central.
For the most part, the models were Eastern European and many were very attractive (quite a few familiar faces in there if you are familiar with sites such as Andy's Collection and DDF productions). As with Stripgame Central, the girls wore their own clothes and these were often relevant to specific settings (eg shorts and tee-shirts outside in Summertime and so on).
A personal favourite of mine were the stories, which involved a large picture set with a simple narrative, involving things like pranks, gang strippings and strip searches by security guards and the like. More than once those who had lost their clothes often turned the tables on their would be tormentors - my particular fetish!
In keeping with the moderator's 'Keep it Nice' ethos the action was always sexy and cheeky (think the old Carrie cartoons in Mayfair magazine) but never dark, threatening nor of course hardcore.
There were a very few videos with most of the content in picture form.
The site did suffer from the same supply difficulties as stripgame central did a few years ago and for this reason some of the content might be considered patchy in terms of picture quality and models being used.
That said, I was a member of this site for pretty much its whole history. Even though the site is no longer updated, I would recommend giving it a look if you like your erotica naughty and nice!
Ed is taking the genre of stripping or being stripped, particularly in unusual situations along a slightly different route with his video only website Naked Experiment.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
-Bill through CCBill.
-Creative, possibly unique focus within the niche of nude softcore.
-Most girls quite attractive, about 70%. The other 30% don't belong on any site, nude or nonude.
-Inexpensive join price and rebills. However, see below.
-No DRM or download limits, but that is hardly an issue on such a small site.
-The site has 20 videos and three of them are under a minute.
-There are far more photo sets at 316.
-The quality at its best is only average. The best quality is MP4, 720x576. The other option is 352x288. Some older videos are AVI, but still low quality. No choice of other video formats and no streaming.
-Photos are low quality. An older one was 720x960 and a recent one was 480x640.
-Better quality videos previous to this months available for an extra fee.
-Although the girls speak British English, they are often incomprehensible. Their witty banter is wasted.
Several years ago I bought the package that they offered of downloadable videos. They were not bad considering how softcore the site is. There is a degree of creativity and tease in that the girls strip while playing games such as spin the bottle, strip darts, high card, rock, paper, scissors etc. I liked the videos for what they were, but I would prefer more explicit. This is teasing fun, not exactly inthecrack.com.
I saw listed in the site news that they have again started adding videos, after a very long break. What I wasn't expecting was just how expensive a site can be.
The monthly join and rebill prices are just fine. They post high resolution videos, 720x576 only during the month they are added. After that, you can buy them separately. If you bought all the high resolution videos, you would pay $182 for 16 videos, a total of 143 minutes.
When I joined there were 6 recent update videos at the best quality. The older ones were 352x288. What I saw was in no way worth buying individually just so I could get better quality.
Obviously buying videos individually is not a reasonable option. But, at the rebill of $11.99 a month you can get 4 new videos each month. Wow, $3 each for softcore videos that average 9 minutes each. Are they kidding?
I cannot justify the pricing on the site or the reasoning behind making better quality videos more expensive. However, the part I really can't get is making photo sets zipdownloadable for one month and then removing that feature. After they do that, you can't get the zipdownload even if you want to pay for it. Huh?
In the member forum the webmaster responded to complaints about these policies by saying that they have many more members staying longer periods of time and that in the past members who did no re-signup were not paying their fair share. I cannot agree with this business model.
Although the videos and pictures are interesting as a tease site, I cannot recommend joining.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
- original concept; pretends to be "real reality" (with no script) but frankly I'm not 100% convinced
- variety of games
- quality is ok
- cameraguy work is quite good
- I'm not 100% convinced that it is not scripted;
- undressing only
- photos only
- site design is pretty poor
These guys seem to promote the idea of softcore specifically distancing themselves from hardcore; they're part of a bigger initiative to promote softcore (but "NO PORN") described on KeepItNice.com.
Overall, the site produces very mixed feelings; while the concept is very good, you need to be a really big fan of girls undressing and playing games while half-dressed or in nude to overcome 'undressing only' and 'stills only' issues. On the other hand, if they would add videos, personally I could try to join them back.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.