Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Some of the models are really beautiful
Most are at least good looking
Most are natural, not enhanced.
100% original content
Exclusive models as far as I can tell
Reasonable variety of body dimensions
Sets are not dated.
Unknown update frequency.
Can't tell if sets are recycled.
No HD found so far
Images and zips are 1600x1067 MAX!!
Navigation is a little clunky
Site is mostly bathing suit and lingerie shots.
Models are not very animated (most just standing)
Softer than soft core...really a bikini site with extras.
Not a particularly good value at $29.95.
About 210 models and 1475 sets.
Very few videos but all are decent quality.
Sets have between 30 and 120 images.
Vast majority of sets are bikini/lingerie sets.
This is an odd, sort of misidentified site and I just can't understand why they didn't define it better. (Sorry TBP...) Probably 97% of the girls are NOT NUDE! This would be a classic tease or bikini site if it were not for the occasional nude set. Even the nude sets, most of them anyway, are not particularly revealing. I've seen more on the Chive, Maxim or free web sites. Much more. But then, oh wait, there are two or three models that get naked and provide extreme close-ups. Waaaat? What's THAT about? No wonder TBP had such a hard time defining the site. It's like the sock drawer of nude sites! Most things in there match up with a specific genre ou would expect, but rogue loners to make you wonder what's going on....
Maybe the next best way I can define this site, besides as a tease site, is outdated. Navigation is good but not ideal. You can filter the models by odd preferences like "wet" (as in water),"fishnet", "see-thru", "blond" and, oh yea, "nude" and even "extreme close up" which is just wierd compared to the rest of the site. You can't select multiples, so no way to see wet blonds, etc. And "see-thru" applies to a top worn over a bathing suit as often as something you can actually see parts through.
When you select a model, you get a list of her sets. The sets have tags like "fishnet", bathing suit", "nude", etc. that match the search parameters. These are site defined. Select a set and you get the first batch of 30 thumbnails. If there is nudity, it is often very late in the set. Some sets have over 300 images, so you have to go through 10 pages or more to see everything. You can also navigate directly to a page. Or you can download the entire set in a zip file.
The sets are not dated, so you have no idea how old they are. You also don't know how many images are in a set until you look. The image or file sizes are also not listed. The tags are helpful, but "nude" in this case might mean a nip slip. Ad if the model is nude, chances are pretty good that they superglued her legs together. Many of the girls that are nude are all crossed up like they have to pee! Some are only topless. One kind of interesting thing is that the girls may go nude but cover up everything with thier hands....until they turn around. That all of a sudden you'll get this beautiful standing rear view. The photographer seems to have a knack for these rearview shots as they occur pretty consistently in clothed and nude models.
Oh, yeah. The photography. Competent. Nothing special. No photoshopping. Some studio sets. Since most of the girls are clothed, it looks like the photographer often takes the models to a local hotel pool or maybe some gardens someplace. You can tell that many of the model sets were shot on the same day with the same locale. Nothing even remotely exotic in the locations.
Now if you are LOOKING for a bikini site, this one is probably not bad, but the occasional rogue naked close-up model kind of messes up that niche.
If this were my site, I would probably break it up into a "network" of three sites that might include bikini, lingere and nude sites. The price I paid, $29.00 was probably about $10.00-15.00 high considering comparable sites with tens of thousands of high-resolution images and HD videos.
Bottom line? If you are looking for some exclusve non-nude photography and don't mind a little nudity mixed in, this is a good site for you. If you are used to the top softcore sites, pass on this one...at least until the price comes down.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
A Different format to most other sites, but honest about what it has and the girls you see when you click the link in www.pornusers.com are the girls on the site. This site was a one off visit for me because i loved the look of Adrienne, claimed on their link page to have 43 Galleries, hey I counted them so I could tell you she has 46, out of date slightly but the right reason, because they have added galleries. If you take their promotion page at face value and are happy to see girls scantily clad, in sexy girl-next door poses you will get exactly what you've asked for. There are some real exclusive gems, REALLY sexy bikinis, outfits. You get a sense of this being prudish respectable porn. My fav's are Adrienne, Desiree (looks a bit of a slut, we like), Katie (a cracker), Whitney (Boy oh Boy, sexy beyond sexy), Rachael (sexy wet see-thru green onepiece swimsuit) and Bari (please live next door to me)
There are only 69 Girls, of which approx. 15 are very dull both in looks and photoshoots, and probably do live next door to you, and you've never noticed. After a few days (i'm being kind) you navigated the simple site (2 dimensional) and seen/got what you wanted. Don't get me wrong, most of the girls are beautiful, but their shoots just don't quite make the grade compared to other sites in their category. The largest photos are 1000 x 1504. The navigation is so basic. Now, let me tell you about the real disappointment. WHERE ARE THE VIDEOS. All the videos here (and there aren't many) are suited to be played on cell/mobile phone. I think the large file I found was 60Mb. If they put the equivalent of all their photoshoots in HD-DVD quality format as 500MB-1GB sizes, they would be worthy of a High score and large memberships. They must have these videos, come on. Dissapointing overall.
Do I regret joining. Not really, I wanted the photoshoots for the girls named above. Don't be enticed by the Amy Reid content 4 galleries in total (and they are so tame for Amy Reid, she probably felt like she was at church, I love Amy but when someone like her can do REALLY FILTHY and you know she loves it, what's the point of doing photoshoots like this, it's like buying a ferrari but never driving it). you know the only reason they have her there is because she will get them membership, when really they best selling point is the fact that most of the girls are Next-Door types, and you'll find it hard to see them anywhere else. Can't get over the lack of Video Quality. Can't understand that a site like this, whilst they only have 69 Girls, has the chance to be superb because of its format, but hasn't taken the opportunity to give us high-bandwidth users what we want.
Would I become a member again. If they put the HD-DVD on, YES, absolutely. caveat, for all the Girls shoots, (you know they have it stored somewhere).
Finally, This is NOT a hardcore site. It is honest about telling you if there 10 Galleries there will be at least that number. GCF. Good Clean Fun.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.