Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company Crystal Lizard
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Visit CL Erotic

1. CL Erotic (1)

Pay
Active
74
skippy (42) 10-26-13  10:58am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attractive, fit and flexible models
Images and videos all the way back to 2000
About 65 models
5-30 sets per model
Exclusive content
All sets are dated
Probably 60+ HD video clips
Sets are nicely done (all studio)
CCBill generates a random username and password, (at sites request) but the site allows it to be saved.
Best site that I know of for the genre
Good honest site in a tiny niche
Minimal cross-selling
Cons: In order:
Image size is 800x1200 MAX!!??
No image size options. What you click is what you get.
Navigation is truly awful!
No zip files of sets!!!??
File numbering is 001.jpg, 002.jpg (making file management diffcult)
Older vids are tiny
Older images are REALLY tiny (800x524)
Many of the models are only partially nude
Some are not nude at all
Updates maybe 2 times a week with partial sets.
Simply too expensive for quantity of material.
Bottom Line: I tripped over a video from this site on Dailymotion.com and, after looking and leaving several times because of the high price, finally decided to see what was there. I was not really disappointed, but it was immediately apparent that this site is not run by any of the big players.
All of the girls are fit, which I suppose they have to be to be flexible like they are. Many are very attractive...some even beautiful The sets are all very similar, with the model starting out clothed in a dance outfit or something similar and then paring down to whatever their personal minimum is. Some of the sets start out with the girl nude. The sets are well done and the girls seem to interact well with the photographer. (suggestion: get a ladder! A full-body straight-down shot of some of these girls would be amazing!) Sets are generally between 25 and 50 images. These are all Eastern European girls, I think, and I have never seen any of them on any other site that I can recall. Kudos to the talent scouts for that.

This site does not have any sex, insertion, masturbation, etc. The models simply flex in incredible ways and give you a nice view. This webmaster has another site called perfectflex.com where there are toys and insertions. Personally, I'm more into the view, but I may and up over at the other site at some point. Clearly he's got models that are willing to pose nude. He needs to up the volume with those models here.

It looks as though there are a few "regular" models that have 20 or more sets. It looks as though this is the "stable" now, as the updates are dominated by these girls but I can't tell for sure because updates only come twice a week.

Now....on the down side...
That collection of 60 mnodels dates all the way back to 2000, so you can get some idea of the volume and frequency of updates.

The images on this site are much too small for today's monitors. I'm downloading 4k images from other sites, so 800x570 is really unacceptable. And as good as some of the older sets are, I'm going to have a hard time keeping images that only fill 1/5 of my screen and are grainy at full-screen. The webmaster really needs to go back and post the larger master images.

Navigation is pretty basic. Click a model, click a set, click an image, click "page back" to go back to set, click another image. No forward or backward, etc.

No zip files???? Come on, really? That makes no sense whatsoever...unless the server can't handle it...

Bottom line: I really like the type and quality of content, but the site really needs a lot of work to attract and keep subscribers in this 2-updates-a-day for $20 world. $39 to sign up? Somebody needs to take a marketing class to learn about elasticity in marking, not just modeling. I would be recommending the site like crazy if it were $19..but have a hard time telling anyone to check it out for $39.

So....my apologies to the webmaster...but if you are interested in this site, keep your money until the price comes down or they offer a mega-pass for all of the super-flexi sites for $39. After this month, that is probably the only thing that will get me back.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit CL Pass

2. CL Pass (0)

Network
Active
78
JBDICK (20) 04-06-08  01:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Entrypoint to 4 sites, content from one studio so treat as 1 site. Click on thebestporn.com link, girls in the banner/logo are two prettiest girls on site. You might think they're not pretty. That wont matter. After 3 seconds girls faces are no longer inframe. If camera goes for wide shots you wont be looking at their faces. Girls do not need expressions, your eyes will be elsewhere.
Under Welcome message an exact description of what you get, read it, you'll know to decide to join.
Downloads are quick. Didn't use downloader but if you do you'll get the whole site in a few hours.
Girls are not slapped up with makeup like Porn Stars. They actually look innocent. The positions are incredible. I love the fact, take a Gymnast and make her wear PornStar Heels. So corrupt. Second biggest turn on for me.
First is the only thing seperating you from Heaven is a stretched piece of lycra with the gusset under strain and you can see every crease underneath. If only for HD-DVD.
Cons: Too Expensive, should be $19.99. For $39.99 you need HD, and buy some new leotoards for the girls. I think the leotards are shared.
Sasha's squint is annoying & sexy, a bit Rabbit caught in the headlights, but whose car?
Don't bother with archive site. Archive Photos struggle to fill a cell/mobile screen.
There are only a few Hi(ish)-Res videos, 100MB+. I seem to remember finding 3 over 150MB. Most 10-16Mb chunk files, approx 6-12 each set. Indicates most of content is old. Photosets not high-res. at most 1024px.
Repeating theme is boring. Like watching adverts on TV, Sitting there waiting for the main feature and eventually you realise there isn't one. Mind you it took me 8 days to work it out. I only went back once a week to pick up infrequent updates until my membership expired.
Loads of Girls but some mingers. Navigation basic but works.
Studio environment. You feel like its shot in someones house. Unfortunately it's not my neighbours otherwise I'd become a window cleaner.
Bottom Line: I couldn't work out was in most shoots they pose next to a camera tripod. Weird, what are they saying, Hey! we have two cameras?
If you like girls who suspend their bodies between two wooden chairs aka Golden Gate Bridge, you'll like this site. Where's the toll gate please.
How did that come about anyway, the chairs? Limited props? They look like old school chairs. creepy.
A few Girls look innocent. Having said that there are some shots where you can tell either the photographers jaw is on the floor, he's drooling or he's got a boner because the girl looks off camera and smiles. They know you're undressing them where the sun shines.
There is something very erotic about these girls. The problem is there's something missing. The poses are too posed, you feel like you're watching girls turn themselves into Rubik's Cubes...they never get to show us who they are. It is almost like they aren't there either.
I've got it. This is how women feel like when they go to the gynaecologists. It's like, please warm that up while I look over here because you look creepy drooling all over my 2nd hand leotard with your camera.
If you got these girls into a studio like inthecrack.com, gave them Estee Lauder makeup, not Avon, film them in HD DVD, I'd pay $39.99. (need to do nude though). Sad thing, none of them will get to the Olympics so this is it for them in Mother Russia / Eastern Block
Don't pay this much. Hate to say it. It's my money and I don't like being ripped off.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Perfect Teen Movies

3. Perfect Teen Movies (0)

Pay
Active
70
MargulisAZ (84) 03-01-08  12:04pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (44), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Caters to the solo and lesbian niches well.
All scenes have video and pics.
Quite a bit of fisting and pussy stretching.
Some of the models are good looking.
Cons: Updates are very random and not consistent at all.
The highest video size is 640 X 480.
Many models are just reshot over and over.
More unattractive models than I would like to see.
Not a lot of scene variety if one is looking for it.
Not that much content.
Expensive.
Bottom Line: This is my second go round with this site and not much has changed. Many of the updates since I left originally are just of the same old models. You can expect most of the models to have at least 3 scenes, and some upwards of 8. The reason this is such a problem is because there really isn't that much content in the site in the first place, so when you just have a bunch of reshoots it seems there is even less content than what there already is.

For fans of fisting/insertions/pussy stretching you will get what you're looking for, however, since almost every scene has this to a certain degree. Still, while I am a fan of that content, I still didn't leave with much copied onto my hard drive at all.

Also, contents are super random it seems. The latest update was on 1-22-08 and I haven't seen one since. Definitely disappointed with that.

Overall it's a fair site, nothing great, nothing horrible.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Perfect Flex

4. Perfect Flex (0)

Pay
Active
74
exotics4me (463) 08-20-07  12:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Some incredibly flexible models
- Vid quality is decent but could be better, at most 500 on high end. Does have decent 1000+ bitrate
- The old fetish has kind of been satisfied, what was it that I saw up those cheerleaders skirts, if that was ever a fetish for you, this does a good job on it.
- Women are very free with their bodies, fists, dildos, all while wrapping their legs around their neck.
- Has something of an erotic artsy feel in a good way.
Cons: - Let me get this out first, this site is not only featuring incredibly flexible women, it is also incredibly boring.
- Overpriced for amount of content, should be $14.95, instead it is $34.95.
- Videos are grainy in full screen
- Pics are useless, they take up about 1/4th of my monitor screen, below 1000 on the high end.
- Very repetitive sets
Bottom Line: These women are real gymnast/ballet dancers/contortionists. The erotic side of this site is very high. You almost feel like you are watching these women stretch, get themselves turned on, then masturbating for you to watch. The only problem and is something I should have listed in the cons is that a good portion of these models do wear masks or half masks, which takes the fantasy of watching an unknowing woman away.

I used to get samples on TGP sites from Perfect Flex, and often thought, "I bet the site shows much more" I was wrong. They do masturbate and even fist, but I'm telling you if you are like me you are going to start feeling like, "Well, they are just doing that for the money". While I agree most models are, at least make me think that isn't true.

I believe most of the models are probably from Russia, very pretty women, if you like toned and fit women. The navigation is about as good as I would expect since I don't believe any of these models are actual porn stars. If you've ever seen the model, Veronika Simon's body, that is the bodies these models have. It still comes off as boring. I really don't have any major complaints except with the price. Videos could be better, pics definitely need to be better, but I could deal with both if they lowered the price and got the models more into what they are doing. Recommended only for those people who have a fetish of a nude woman stretching. Just keep in mind, they all do the same poses, it is just a dull site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Perfect Flex

5. Perfect Flex (0)

Pay
Active
85
Gonzo84 (Disabled) 06-22-07  04:11pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Do you like bendy flexy girls? Anal gaping? Fisting? Serious stretching and hole abuse?
Cons: I could be cold and list quite a few too many...
Bottom Line: You definitely need to have a leaning toward this to begin with, this site is pretty expensive for what you actually get, I personally am a fan of contortionism, add stockings, fists, and damn stunning women and I'll be warm to it forever though... ;-)
This site is actually pretty poor, the image quality is not so good, well, images are small (800x533 all the way through) and most sets have this horrible border photo-shopped in, which bugs me, the navigation leaves little to the imagination, although the updates go all the way back to the beginning there is also no .zip facility and the site looks and feels extrememly dated, but a site like this is all about content, and catering for those who dig it...
The subject matter doesn't appeal to all, but it's definitely worth a look at the preview pages just to see if it floats your boat...
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-5 of 5  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (9)
2. Babes Network.com (7)
3. DDF Network (6)
4. VideoBox (6)
5. Naughty America (6)
6. Bangbros Network (5)
7. Evil Angel (5)
8. FTV Girls (5)
9. Wow Girls (4)
10. Team Skeet (4)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.