Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company TonyBucks Co.
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-20 of 20  

Visit 18 Stream

1. 18 Stream (0)

Pay
Active
79
Wittyguy (95) 04-25-11  07:22pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: ++ $1, 1 day full access trial (bills thru Segpay)
++ Big pictures (up to 4300 pixels, but most sets are still in the 2500 pixel range) with zips
++ Exclusive content (for me anyways, other reviewers have said different but I don't know and haven't seen it elsewhere)
+ Good sized vids (720x540 on most, a few are bigger) and d/l options (wmv, mpeg and quicktime as well as flash streaming)
+ Movies have screen caps to see what you're getting
+ No DRM
+ No cross sales on signup
+ About 680 vids and 300 pic sets
Cons: -- Pretty amateur in terms of quality and performances
- Picture sets don't offer a lot
- Slowish download speeds (1 gig = 1 hour of download time on my highspeed connection)
- Search and navigation need work
- No scene downloads, all or nothing
- Cannot jump around within the scene while using the streaming video option
- Camera work could be better (too often the guy seems glued to one spot or has a few focus issues)
- Page often has to refresh when going back and forth from it.
- No model info, just the name
- A couple of video updates a week, pics don't update anymore
Bottom Line: I checked this one out on the el cheapo trial to see some exclusive Eastern Euro puntang. That's what I got but it didn't exactly leave me with that "Charlie Sheen drinking tiger blood with the goddesses winning" feeling. This site is focused on hardcore younger girl porn and that's what most of the scenes are. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: All pics have zips and they are pretty big. The problem is that there isn't much content. At most a couple of positions and because the photographer won't move it isn't uncommon to get no view of the old "in and out". When your getting almost 200 pics per set and only a handful are good, that ain't good. The newest stuff can be slow download (can you say a half hour for one zip set) because of the large files. Some pics were out of focus too. Lighting and quality varies a lot. If you're into pics, this place won't satisfy you.

VIDS: All the vids were good sized and I didn't have any sections that were garbled from the download like some other reviewers did. The quality, angles (again, sometimes you just see bodies rubbing with no visible action) and lighting varies a lot from scene to scene. While the girls are exclusive they are also pretty amateur and it shows in the performance, not much excitement from most of them. Yes, it beats gonzo screamers but this is pushing it towards the other extreme. You do get screen caps and you'll need them because the stream option can only run from beginning to end, no jumping. Download times, as mentioned, need some help.

NAV: No real navigation other than the pics and vids home pages. No tags, no search engine, no model info. It is more of an amateur site but it is getting a bit big to have non of this info and still be functional.

OTHER: They do have some social networking functionality within the site which I never bothered with. Overall, I wasn't all that impressed. The girls are mostly cute but many of them don't put much into their performances. All the scenes are in Russian so you don't know what they're saying when the vids start but I bet you can use your imagination to figure out where it's heading. The camera work needs help and kills most of the picture sets. The volume of content is what keeps it in the high 70's for my scoring system.

You also get access to Spunkybee and Rough18 but the same issues I had with this site follow to those as well.

I had no problem finding what I wanted with my 1 day membership even with the slow download speeds. Certainly not worth the full $35 a month. So, I guess it's a good diversion for a day but don't expect a ton of good stuff here. Be happy with what you can still get for a buck I guess.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 18 Stream

2. 18 Stream (0)

Pay
Active
83
slategrey (13) 04-09-11  05:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Full trail for a dollar
+Great looking models
+Get To Choose own log in name/pass
+Fast and easy streaming options
+Nice Pic Sets
Cons: -Downloaded videos have lots of distortions during playback
-search functions (not a lot)
-Wish they had subs so i can no what there talking about
-no partial downloading of the scenes
Bottom Line: This is an okay site overall. All the female models look fantastic. Most of there content is either boy girl with a few group scenes of like 3-four people. Also they have hand full of solos and 2-3 lesbian scene. Depending on ones taste is whether or not you would like the site. If you like all the screaming, dirty talk and flailing around by the women this isn't the site for you.

Video quality is good in most cases but the downloading can be greatly improved. When i downloaded the videos from the site almost every scene was distorted in some part of the video.

There is nearly no searching options at all. You can search by models name but thats about all. Some of the scenes are tag by what type of scene they are but not all.

It is well Worth the dollar trial but not the 30 dollar recurring fee.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 18 Stream

3. 18 Stream (0)

Pay
Active
82
pat362 (367) 03-21-11  09:21am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -You get access 2 2 other sites.
-You get a large part of the content from the sites owned by tony bucks CO.(see Cons)
-Videos can be dowloaded in quicktime, mpeg and WMV but only the wmv allows low, medium or high quality videos.
-Phototsets can be downloaded as a complete zip file.
Cons: -Their navigation system has many holes in it from some models name not being listed or some files being misleading. They have to do some major clean up because it's a mess.
-Their dating system makes no sense because they claissify their scenes by the number of days, weeks or months when it was added.
-The content of this site is almost exclusively taken from all the other sites under the tony bucks Co banner so why join this site when you can get it all with the spunky bee membership?
Bottom Line: -This site is the perfect example of what annoys me about some internet companies. They created this site so that customers could get access to a large of the content on their other sites without having to join another site but you aren't really getting anu exclusif material. you simply have it under one roof.

-Since the navigation is such a mess and I have access to almost all the content with my membership to spunky bee then it was really hard for me to give a proper score.

-There is plenty of content to be had so many people will be satisfied but avoid this site if you have been a past member of any of the other sites under the tony bucks banner or better yet just join spunky bee and you'll get it all.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Spunky Bee

4. Spunky Bee (0)

Pay
Active
80
pat362 (367) 03-20-11  09:43am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -All exclusif content.
-You get access to 9 other sites.
-Content is dated.
-Videos can be downloaded in quicktime, mpeg and WMV.
-You can stream videos in low, medium or high quality flash.
-Photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file. (res: 2464 x 1643) over 100 pics per set
Cons: -Site is tiny with only about 30 videos and photosets.
-They update about once a week but one week you get the photoset and the next week you get the video.
-The sites other than this one all use the same models but the name may be different from site to site and the action is often similar for each model so it can get repetitious.
Bottom Line: -I've had my eye on Abigaile which is the name spunky bee is more commonly known under, since she first came onto the porn scene in 2009. She has worked for a couple of other sites but this is the only site that offers so much content.

-The only reason I joined this site is because it's the only one that offers so many sites under the tonybucks banner. This would be a poor stand alone site and frankly all of them would be in this category. There simply isn't enough content to justify such a high join price.

-My score is based on the fact that you get access to so many other sites but I found that the content on the other sites to be similar from one site to the next and they all use the same models in each of the other sites.

-Be advised that the content for most sites is your typical boyfriend/girlfriend type of sex with pussy penetration only. Very few models do anal so anal fans might want to avoid joining.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Burg

5. Teen Burg (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
mlanminh (2) 01-30-11  12:41pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: All girls are young, natural body (no silicone), most girls are beautiful.

No download limit. Download Manager is allowed.

There are about 400 videos on the site, may be more than 100 girls.

If you join the site, expect to be able to log in other major sites in the Tony Bucks network. The number of sites you can log in depends on which site you sign up with. I found spunkybee gives access to the most sites

It's a bonus if you're not really into anal sex
Cons: Poor choice of camera angles in many videos. It's rare to see the girls' pussy from behind.Some videos do not show the girl (and guy) genital during intercourse. You almost rarely get to see the girl's behind during doggy scene. It gets a bit frustrated after a while. However, it is not as bad as some other sites in the same network. The worst site in the network is teendorf.
Bottom Line: You find young and pretty, natural girls here. However, camera work can be boring, if not annoying sometimes. However, many videos are worth watching.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Sex Reality

6. Teen Sex Reality (0)

Pay
Active
78
lk2fireone (194) 11-23-10  11:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large amount of site contents: About 275 video clips.
-Models listed for each clip.
-Content is dated.
-Updates: Currently 1 video about every 10 days.
-DRM: no.
-Easy login.
-Site timeout: no.
-Models are real teens: a number of attractive teen girls, and the boys are clean-cut teens (few tattoos or piercings).
-Multiple choices for download formats:
--WMV: high, medium, low quality.
--MPEG.
--QuickTime.
Cons: -No streaming option.
-No photosets.
-Only 4 tiny thumbnails and a larger thumbnail to illustrate each video. And the thumbnails are not enlargeable.
-No bios for models.
-Limited amount of information on video clips: does not show runtime, file size.
-Watermark: Yes, small to medium sized watermark bottom right corner on videos.
-Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites.
-Basic, limited search: can search by name of model, or by date video was posted.
Bottom Line: The site theme: Hidden cameras capture the hardcore action of real teen sluts.
The idea of spying on teens having sex is supposed to add spice to the sex. What you get is videos that could be improved by better camera work (better lighting, better control of the colors). Some black and white parts of the videos are supposed to suggest real-time video capture, but I would prefer good colors for skintones and background, instead.
You also have portions where the teens are supposed to be videotaping themselves. This is also supposed to add to the "reality" of the
experience. So the teens are kissing, and glancing at the camera, and fucking, and glancing at the camera, and it's distracting. It doesn't add to the realism or excitement. They would be better off dropping the idea of "hidden cameras" and "self video-taping" and just get a good cameraman who can take good videos. Because they are using a cameraman anyway, but the video product is supposed to be showing an amateur real-life capture of teens having sex, and that theme is not really working.
This is a good-sized site for hardcore teen.
Currently 275 video clips.
Clip run about 20 to 30 minutes.
Most of the action is boy-girl.
-Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites.
I click on the thumbnail of "Top Rated Videos", and I get a full page of thumbnails of videos. But when I click on any of the video thumbnails, it turns out these videos are all from Young Libertines, a different site that I would have to join to see any of their videos. So I have to hit the "back button" on my browser twice, to get back to the Teen Sex Reality site. I didn't even realize I had left the Teen Sex Reality site until I saw the signup page for Young Libertines.

There are many ads for other sites on each page, but most ads you can guess are ads, and not videos at the Teen Sex Reality site. But it would make the page far less cluttered if they removed the ads, so you can see (and focus on) what this site has to offer.
This site is one of many hardcore teen video sites. The sex is gentle and not abusive. But it's also not very exciting. Maybe the girls (and guys) that are having sex are having a good time, but it certainly doesn't come through. It's more like they are having sex because it's something to pass the time. No real passion or excitement or enjoyment.
My belief is they are having sex because they are getting paid for it. Which is, unfortunately, not a joke.
The video quality is ok to good. The quality would be improved if they dropped the "hidden cameras" idea and concentrated on making good, sexy videos.
When you join this site, which is part of the TonyBucks network, you currently get access to a number of the other TonyBucks sites. How many
sites you get access to, and which specific sites, depends on which site you join through. Most of the sites you join through have the same
membership fee, but some sites give you a greater number of "bonus" sites.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tin Seks

7. Tin Seks (0)

Pay
Active
78
lk2fireone (194) 11-14-10  09:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Download limits: none.
-DRM: none.
-Currently updates: 1 update about every 10 days recently.
One week you post a post a photoset which is a record of a video shoot, 10 days later you post the video made during the photoshoot.
-To view individual photos in a set, click on the thumbnail, and you get an enlarged picture. This is easy and fast and wonderful compared to the
slow, clunky software viewing system used at most of the other TonyBucks sites. All the sites in this network should use this simple system, and
get rid of the fancy software that makes viewing individual photos a slow and laborious process.
-Easy login. There is a captcha, but it's easily read, not the messy squiggles that make you wonder what the letters or numbers are supposed to be. I dislike the messy squiggles, and even when I guess them right, I feel irritated that I have to pass a test that I believe is unfair and
stupid. And when I fail to guess right, I am even more irritated.
Cons: -Streaming: Not available.
-Zips for photosets: Not available.
-Photos available in 1 size only.
-Models: less attractive than most of the TonyBucks models. On the plus side, there are few tattoos or body piercings on the girls.
-Thumbnail ads clutter the listing page of site contents. The thumbnail ads are not identified as ads, you have to figure out which thumbnails show you the site contents, and which thumbnails are ads for other sites.
-Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Can search by type of content (video or photoset). Can also search by date the content was posted, which is basically useless.
Bottom Line: Tinseks is part of the TonyBucks network, a small network of 11 sites that focus on hardcore teen.
The sites have both videos and photosets. The photosets can be from ok to good quality regarding photo size, focus, lighting, skin tone, etc. But the photos have little erotic quality. The photos are mainly a capture of a video shoot.
It's cheaper to have one session where you do both the photoshoot and the videoshoot. But the results, for the photoset, would be better if you had a separate session for the photoshoot. You would get better pictures (more erotic, more interesting, better posed, etc.). That is assuming the photographer was competent.
So the main value of the photos is to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and maybe an idea of what the video action will be.
But the main value of the sites is in the videos. The photos can be of good quality, but the eroticism does not approach the photo sites like Metart. The videos are a different matter: The
TonyBucks videos are mainly well shot, feature a number of ok looking models, and are hardcore. Metart and most major photo sites are
mainly softcore, and their videos are usually more boring than erotic. At TonyBucks it's the other way around: the value is in the videos, the
photos are a minor addition (even though the photosets have a large number of photos per set, and there is usually the same number of photosets and videos). So a lot of effort was put into making the photosets, but the effort was basically wasted.
Unless otherwise noted, what follows refers specifically to the tinseks site:
The tinseks theme is European college students having great sex.
-Site contents:
94 videos
94 photosets
-Videos can be downloaded in different formats:
WMV: low, medium, high resolution
MPG
MOV

The videos are large files, 580-765 MB for a 20-30 minute clip for high quality WMV file:
Frame width x frame height: 720x576
Total bitrate: 4128kbps

The figures shown are as high or higher than what some sites advertise as high definition. There are other TonyBucks sites where the total bitrate
can be as high as 6300kbps for some videos, but even 4128 is extremely good or "high" definition, as far as I can tell from watching the videos.
The videos are very sharp and clear, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone.
The sound is pretty good. A little annoying random background noise, but they usually don't bother with a music soundtrack, which is a plus.
I personally didn't find many pretty models at this site. This site has a lot of hardcore videos. The action is not rough. It's a boy and a girl getting a lot of enjoyment from sex. Or they are certainly trying to. I just find the action slightly boring. I want a connection,
something erotic to stimulate the imagination. Even if the model were pretty, I still want
something beyond her getting banged.
I'm giving the site a score of 78, because access to the bonus sites raises the value of this site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teenamite

8. Teenamite (0)

Pay
Active
83
lk2fireone (194) 11-09-10  01:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Multiple download formats:
--WMV: low, medium, high quality.
--MPG.
--MOV.
-Streaming: low, medium, high quality.
-Videos and photosets are paired.
-Content is dated.
-Screenshots and a photoset to illustrate each video.
-Zip files for photosets.
-No site timeout. Edit: there is a site timeout, but it takes hours of inactivity before you have to re-login.
-Videos are very high definition: Size 1GB+. But you get high clarity.
Cons: -Last update is dated 05 September, 2010. That's 2 months ago. Before that, they were updating about every 5 days with a video or photoset.
-Only 1 size for photos.
-Slow-loading system for viewing photos.
-The members page listing the site contents is cluttered with advertising for other sites.
-Models not listed for some videos and photosets.
-No model bios.
-Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Other search parameters are fairly useless (date added, title, top rated, most viewed).
Bottom Line: This site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. About a year ago I posted a comment that joining this site made little economic sense because you only gained access to this single site, and not to any of the other sites in this network, for a price of $29.95/month. And the contents of this site, by itself, did not justify a price of $29.95/month. A year later, for the same price, you can get access to up to 10 of the sites in this network, depending on which site you join through.
The TonyBucks network is teen sites. What makes this site different from the other sites in the network? I don't know. Many of the sites are interchangeable. But as a marketing ploy, they put some videos in this site, some in a different site, and each site is supposed to have a different theme. You could put most of the TonyBucks videos into one giant site, but then it would be much harder to search through all the videos. So separating the videos into different sites makes good consumer sense, except when they rename a video clip and put it into more than one site. But the duplicated videos are not very common.

There are around 73 videos and 73 photosets at this site.

Sample data for a high definition video:
runtime: 25 minutes 14 seconds
size: 1.12 GB
frame width x height: 1600 x 900
total bitrate: 6336 kbps
frame rate: 25 frames/sec

Type of content:
Sex in most normal varieties: vaginal, anal, bj, cunnilingus.
Mainly boy-girl. Some scenes where you have "group" sex, but it's not very groupy: you have a boy-girl having sex, and maybe 1 or more other people watching them, or maybe the other people are having boy-girl sex. A limited amount of 2 guys on a single girl. A few scenes of solo female masturbation or 2-girl lesbian action. But the basic theme is one couple (boy-girl) sex.

The sex is not rough or abusive. It's friendly sex between two horny teens.

The site is your basic hardcore teen site, with high definition videos that are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good colors.

The photosets are basically a record of the video shoot. But the photos are high quality, not screencaps, and worth viewing for themselves. This site has the best quality photos of the entire network. I don't know who the photographer is, but he should have been hired to do all the photos at this network. The photos are large size (about 400-1,000 KB each).

You are not getting the glamor-style videos of X-art or the glamor photos of Met-Art. But the quality is very good at this site.
On the other hand, the sex action is your basic sex, with less roughness than at many hardcore sites, but it doesn't grab your interest, or impress you.
I'm giving this site a score of 83, for the value of the site contents, and the network contents. The site would be very expensive to join if it didn't include network access.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Springtime Beauties

9. Springtime Beauties (0)

Pay
Active
69
lk2fireone (194) 11-07-10  08:55am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -DRM: no.
-Download limits: no.
-Most models will be present at more than one TonyBucks network, but most of the models are not found at a large number of other sites. So the faces you see here are mainly fresh faces, at least until you have gone through the TonyBucks network.
-There are some models that are really cute or outstanding, that you will probably have seen at one or more other major sites.
-Multiple download formats:
--High, medium or low resolution WMV.
--MPG.
--QuickTime.
-Easy login.
-No site timeout.
Cons: -The biggest con is that the site is not updating. The most recent update I saw was from January 2009.
-So this is an archive site. Some of the content is ok, but once you have downloaded the material you want, there is little reason to come back again. A shame, because they chose some nice models at this site, and you want to find more material on them, and that won't happen at this site.
-No zip file for photosets.
-1 size only for photos.
-No streaming option for videos.
-Watermark, bottom right corner of photos. Not large, but could be smaller, less noticeable.
-Download problems? I was downloading 2 videos from the site using DownThemAll download manager. Both videos stopped downloading, giving me a
"timeout" error message. Each download re-started from the beginning of the download. I do not know why each download stopped, or why each download could not resume from the point that it stopped.
Bottom Line: This is part of the TonyBucks network. Joining any site in the network can give you access to 10 or less sites in the network, depending on when you
join and which site you join through. There are currently 11 sites in the TonyBucks network.
At this site the photosets outnumber the videos by a large margin. At most TonyBucks sites the photosets and videos are close in number, and several sites have each video paired with a photoset. Not here.
The size of a single photo (up to 250 KB) indicates high definition. But you don't get the "professional quality" you will find at top photo sites like Met Art or MPL Studios. The photos are "ok", but not high quality regarding colors, clarity, etc. There are some attractive Eastern European models, but they could look much better with professional photography.
The content is softcore teen nudity, with some masturbation. Even though the site was
launched in late 2008 and stopped updating a few months later, the photo quality seems more like something from the 1990s: some very pretty models, but the quality is not high. If you know Teen Stars Magazine, the photography style is very similar: more skin is shown at SpringTimeBeauties, there is some mild solo masturbation at SpringTimeBeauties(no masturbation that I can remember at Teen Stars
Magazine), but the photography is better at Teen Stars Magazine: the colors are better, the models look better.
With the large file size for the "high quality" videos, you expect high quality playback, but you don't get it. The first video I saw had a tiny jittery effect that creates eyestrain. The second video I watched did not have the jittery effect, but the video picture is not crisp. 572 MB for a 15 minute clip, so the video picture should be extremely sharp, but it's not: it's like you're watching the scene through a very faint fog.
You do get the impression you are watching amateur teen models who are just starting their porn modelling career, these girls are young and fresh. I just wish they were presented better (better photography).
The soundtrack of the videos I saw was music from a radio (music mixed with talking from an announcer). The volume level of the music is low, which is better than loud, but it would be better to have no background music at all. The music
is a minor distraction that does not really fit the video.
If you like softcore striptease videos, this would be a nice site, except:
1. The site is not updating.
2. The videos are just ok.
3. The photography is not excellent.
By itself, I don't think the site is worth joining. The videos I saw had some attractive models, but the video quality is just ok in spite of the large file size.
If you like this style of photography, I would choose a site like Teen Stars Magazine, which is a site that doesn't update, but the photos are
nicer, and they have zip files. Or choose the My Precious Virgins site, which has a similar photo style, and is supposed to be currently updating.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Burg

10. Teen Burg (0)

Pay
Active
85
lk2fireone (194) 10-26-10  05:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large amount of videos for a site of this type.
-Site advertises more than 500 videos, more than 300 photosets.
-Note: TBP update 09-20-10 states 296+ videos, 37+photosets.
Why the big difference in the numbers, I don't know.
Looking at the site, without actually counting the separate videos, it seems the site contents is much smaller.
-Site advertises daily updates. The update rate is actually about 1 update every 7 days.
-Free live cams with models. You pay USD $2.95 (EUR € 2.30) for 30 days of access to several hours per day of nude public shows. Private chats are optional and cost extra.
-There is also a separate "Models online" service that offers a xxx webcam live show.
-Large number of cute models.
-Search engine: can search by model's name, month and year, video or photoset.
-Content is dated.
-Model's name is clearly listed for each video.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
Cons: -No streaming.
-A simple text list of the models at this site, with a nice-sized thumbnail of each model, would be very helpful.
-Single size for photos. No choice of low, medium or high resolution.
-No biography. Models identified by name only.
-Basic search. Can search by model's name or when video/photoset was posted. But can't search by description of model, type of sex, or any other factors.
-A faq page would be helpful, listing basic site facts: number of videos, number of photosets, number of photos, total size (GB) of videos, total size of photos, number of male models, number of female models.
-No text on the site identifies which videos are high definition. The HD videos are the ones that are 1 GB+ when you download them.
Bottom Line: Photos are 1643 x 2464 pixels
Videos 720x576 (1100kbps)
File Sizes (HQ):
WMV = 200MB-1GB

This is the town where I should have grown up. Lovely, nubile chicks that fuck at the drop of a hat. Or the glance of an eye.

This is a hardcore teen video site. The videos far outnumber the photosets. Most of the videos are a boy and a girl.
Each video/photoset has a few thumbnails to show what's inside the file. It is difficult to get a clear idea of what the model looks like from the thumbnails that are actually furnished by the site. A much better system would be to have a nice-sized photo of the model that shows her clearly, plus 4 thumbnails that clearly show the model from the video/photoset.
The videos are good quality.
The technical factors are handled well: lighting, focus, action, a lot of good looking teens.
The photos are high quality: the size of a single photo is around 300-500 KB. I was surprised the photo size is so large, because the photos sure don't look high quality to me.I am not talking about the attractiveness of the model, or her makeup or costume. I am talking about the extreme clarity that photos can have, which is not found here. The colors are not brilliant or sharp. I just find the photos at major softcore glamor sites so much more appealing than the photos at this site.
If you are into hardcore teen action, this site has a lot of videos. The videos are good quality. The sex is gentler than the gonzo sites, and the teens actually talk and kiss before getting down to the action. The teens are ok to nice looking, very little tattoos or piercings.
The site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. Membership in any one site will normally give you access to some of the other sites. How many bonus sites you get, and what those bonus sites are, varies depending on which site you join through. It definitely pays to check each site for the bonus details. One site will offer 2 bonus sites, a different site might offer 6 bonus sites, another might offer 9 bonus sites.
I joined through Spunky Bee, which charged me the same or lower price for the membership, as joining a different TonyBucks site. And I got access to 9 bonus sites (10 sites total).
I am giving the site a score of 85, because it's part of a network that has a number of attractive models, and a large number of good quality videos.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Dorf

11. Teen Dorf (0)

Pay
Active
69
lk2fireone (194) 10-18-10  01:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Content is dated.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Easy login: username, password, captcha (easily read letters).
-No site timeout.
-Streaming options: low, medium, high quality.
-Download options: low, medium, high quality WMV.
: MPEG.
: QuickTime.
-Little or no photoshopping in the photos.
-No download limits.
-Updates 1 photoset or video approximately every 10 days.
Cons: -Only 1 size for photos.
-If you want to download individual photos instead of the full zip, you sometimes get a "show.php" file instead of the photo file you are trying to download.
-In some videos and photosets, it can be hard to see what the face or body of the model is like. This is true for outdoor scenes, where the
cameraman/photographer does a poorer job than if the scene is indoors.
-The index listing pages are cluttered with thumbnail photos advertising other sites.
-I found very few cute teen models at this site.
Bottom Line: The theme of the site is interesting: young teen couples having sex in a natural way. But many photosets and videos are lacking. They are shot in an amateur way, especially the outdoor scenes.
The best way to improve this site would be to fire the photographer and video man and get someone who knows how to take a photograph, how to shoot a video. If you're shooting outdoor scenes, get a shooter who knows how to take a photo, how to shoot a video so the model is shown clearly and attractively.
In some outdoor photosets and videos, the face and body of the model is hard to see clearly. The camera is only a few feet away, but the model's face is not shown clearly, because of focus or lighting or shadows or some other reason.
-How a photographer shoots a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. There is no effort to make these girls look more
attractive (from lighting, makeup, costumes, whatever). Even the two models I've seen at other sites that I thought are attractive, did not seem special in their appearances at this site.
The audio track is often poor. A boy and girl are in a meadow, nothing but plants and dirt around, and you hear loud microphone noises, you also hear what sounds like a jet plane overhead, but the sky is clear except for clouds. Maybe it's the wind you hear, because it's windy, and the
microphone noises are loud to begin with. But when you hear the couple speaking, it's not loud enough to make out the actual words. You can often hear the camera clicking in the background for a photoshoot of the video, and the cameraman and photographer walking behind the couple that are being shot can be making noises as well (footsteps).
The lighting outdoors is hard to control, and the model is in and out of shadow, it's distracting.
The indoor scenes are better shot than the outdoor scenes. You have less noise from the microphone, better closeups of the model and the sex action, better control of the lighting. The outdoor scenes are a nice idea in theory, but the photographer/cameraman need to improve his technique to make the outdoor scenes work well.
In a few scenes, where the boy and girl are playfully teasing each other before they start kissing and getting down to business, their acting is good enough that the scene is interesting, even though you can't
understand the actual words they are speaking(German, maybe?). But in other scenes, the prologue to the sex is just wasted time. Porn actors are not often noted for their acting ability, especially in low-budget shoots like these.
The site theme is "natural teens, natural love". This translates to teens making love in outdoor scenes: in a field or meadow, by a lake. If you've been a member of femjoy or zemani, you will have seen videos where, in addition to a lovely nude model, you also see some great outdoor scenery. At this site, the scenery is there, but it's not shown to advantage.
Bottom line: I found no photos worth saving, and only a few videos to save.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Spunky Bee

12. Spunky Bee (0)

Pay
Active
78
lk2fireone (194) 10-12-10  03:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing agent: SegPayEU
-No pre-checked sales agreements on the signup page
-Access to this site was immediate after signup
-No DRM.
-No site timeout.
-No download limits.
-Easy to read captcha.
-Screenshots to illustrate videos.
-Zipfile available for each photoset.
-Content is dated.
-Very little photoshopping in the photos. You see model's freckles and scratch marks clearly on her face and body.
Cons: -No streaming
-Updates irregular
Site advertises 3 new updates every week (on one of the signup pages), but that was a goal, not a reality.
Updates stopped on July 26. Then on Sep 28 1 photoset and 1 video were added. Nothing added since then.
-Photos are available in only 1 size.
-Large watermark in bottom right corner of photos.
-Navigation is very basic.
-There is no search function.
-Preview page says, "Join now and find out what I do on weekends!" That
implies some kind of blog or diary inside the members area, but I can't find one.
The preview page has a hot link to a blog. Unfortunately, the blog has a few entries for May 11, 2010 and June 06, 2010, and that is the entire blog.
-"I love to naughty chat with my members". Quote from a page advertising her site. But I find no place to chat with her inside the members area. Perhaps the forum was supposed to furnish contact with the model, but the forum is "coming soon..."
Bottom Line: Site statistics:
Currently about 25 videos and matching photosets.
Video file formats:
high, medium, low quality WMV
MPG (high quality)
QuickTime format
Video specs: (for the mpg file format):
Videos are very high quality and run about 11-30 minutes.
total bitrate: 6,488 kbps
frame width x height: 1600 x 912
Photo specs: Most individual photos are 300-550 KB. 2464x1643 pixels.
The site contents is small. Someone with a fast connection can download the entire site in 1 or 2 days. Anyone with faster than dialup can
download the entire site in 30 days with no problem.
This is a solo teen site.
This is not a site where you go to watch hardcore action. The theme is more like you are watching a cute girl who is playful and friendly. The
video "plot" varies with each episode or clip: She is being playful with a boyfriend, with a girlfriend, showing off her body, whatever. The "action" can be softcore, midcore, or hardcore, but the overall impression is more that you are watching a cute and friendly girl who is enjoying her sexuality. This is entirely different from the hardcore teen video sites where 1 or 2 guys are banging away on 1 or 2 girls.
You put the SpunkyBee model in a video, and she performs with charm and attraction. The videos and photos have good clarity, focus, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone. There is no talking from the cameraman, and the girl herself usually says very little. No bothersome background music.
SpunkyBee appears at many sites under different names:
Abigaile, Abigaile Johnson,Abby, Spunky Bee, Veronika.
I am listing the different names because pat362 recently brought eurobabeindex to my attention again.
If you can get this site along with a bunch of other sites in the network as a special offer, it's definitely worth checking this site out.
Giving this site a 78. If they increase the updates, add the forum that is "coming soon", have the girl blog more often, the site value would go up.
By itself, the site would be very expensive. But as part of a network, where you join this site and get bonus sites as part of your membership,
the site makes a nice addition.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Sex Fusion

13. Teen Sex Fusion (0)

Pay
Active
85
lk2fireone (194) 09-20-10  12:17pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM.
-Some attractive models.
-Photosets are a visual record of a video shoot.
-Captcha very easy to read, and can be entered in either uppercase or lowercase.
-Site is currently updating.
-Have high quality videos (nice, clear definition, good lighting, etc.)
-Access to public chats, paid private chats
-Planning on making blu-ray DVDs of scenes available
Cons: -Only 1 size picture for the photoset.
-No zip file for photosets.
-No streaming option for videos.
-A small amount of duplicate files from other TonyBucks network sites.
-High quality videos are large, 1-2GB+
Bottom Line: This is a teen hardcore site.
Apparently 1 video a and matching photoset for each session. The photoset is apparently photos taken during a video shoot.
Most of the action is 1 boy-1 girl, or 2 boys-2 girls. But there is also some 2 boys-1 girl.
Video download options:
WMV: high, medium, low quality
MPEG
QuickTime
WMV high quality: 1440x1080, 8256 kbps
1920x1080, 6256 kbps
The videos are mainly crisp definition, good lighting, good skin tones on the models, little background noise (no music track, not a lot of random noise from the street as sirens or car sounds or whatever). The sets are simple: bedroom or living room. The models are all late teen or very early 20s. Very little tattoos on the female models, very little piercings.

Denner mentioned in a reply there is duplication of video files at different TonyBucks sites. He stated that some of these videos can be also be found at non-TonyBucks sites as well, such as TeenMegaWorld sites. I've seen some videos which were posted at more than one TonyBucks site.
But even though I've been a member of TeenMegaWorld a couple of times, there is material I never bothered to look through, and Denner's hardcore experience is far greater than mine. Does that make him a porn hound? Is that a compliment? Perhaps we should rather call him a connoisseur of hardcore porn. But he seems to slurp it down in large quantities. You only have to look at his PU score (currently 208), and realize his devotion to porn is extremely serious. Denner claims to be Danish, but his enthusiasm seems to be Teutonic. I always thought the Danes were supposed to be laid back and casual, but he is hardcore to the core. (Either I am channeling Wittyguy's PU Forum Awards, or some evil spirit has overcome me momentarily.) :)

As a pro feature, I mentioned there is access to public and private chats. I got away from chats a few years ago. I was spending too much time
watching the girls at Met-art chats. Public chats were free. There were some very attractive, friendly girls at Met-art chats. I was just spending too much time at the public shows. But here is another entry to those chats: some very pretty girls put on softcore shows. It's easy to get addicted to these shows and spend hours watching the girls. Some people find the chats boring, since they are softcore. But I enjoy them too much, and don't want to get hooked again.
There is a current bonus offer that allows you access to differing numbers of bonus sites, depending on which site you join through.

Use the SpunkyBee site to join through:
$29.95 for 30 days membership
10 sites included in your membership (including 18Stream)

Use the 18Stream site to join through:
$34.95/month for 30 days membership
3 sites in your membership

If the site were a solo offering, it would be extemely expensive. But with the current bonus offer of up to 10 of the TonyBucks sites for the price of one, this is a worthwhile network to join.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rough 18

14. Rough 18 (0)

Pay
Active
60
lk2fireone (194) 09-18-10  03:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Zip file for each photoset.
-Video download formats:
WMV: high, medium, low quality
MPEG
Quicktime
High quality WMV is 1440x810 (6256kbps)
-Updates once a week video/photoset
-Video runtime : 20 minutes to 60 minutes
-Easy login.
-No DRM.
-Very fast response to an email from tech support. But the response was not helpful.
Cons: -Only 1 size for the photos.
-Photos are a visual record of the video shoot, not an original shoot.
-No streaming option to view the videos.
-Some video files download with no estimate of file size or download time.
-The videos are overly long. A single sex scene should last from 10-20 minutes. There are many sex scenes that last 40-60 minutes, and the action gets boring and repetitious.
-It's strange the female model's face and body are not displayed clearly in the photoshoots.
I want to know what the model looks like, and the screenshots do a lousy job of that.
-Site navigation is poor.
-Search is poor.
-There is no simple listing of the models.
-Videos are large files. The high quality video file can be 1 - 2.3 GB or larger, for a video that runs 20 minutes to 60 minutes.
-Volume on some videos is too low.
-Download problems: on my last 2 video downloads, the download stops after downloading about 1 GB, and won't resume. Currently can't download any videos from this site.
Bottom Line: This is a site for mild BDSM (Bondage,Discipline, Sado-Masochism).
I do not care for the niche.
But even if I did like the niche, I believe the site is not very good.
You can't get a good idea of what
the models look like until you play the video. The photosets should give an excellent idea of what the model looks like, but they mostly don't.
Instead of giving clear photos of the face and body of the model, the photos focus on the "action", the girl being tied or abused or whatever, but you can't see her face or body very clearly in most photos. It's just lousy photography. And in many cases, you are not able to tell the model in 2 different videos is the same girl, because you don't get a clear idea of her face and body.

The videos are too long. A single sex scene can last 20-60 minutes. Beyond 20 minutes, I think people tend to lose interest, find the action boring, repetitive, dull. This is
not a movie with a plot, where you have brief sex scenes along the way. Instead, it's a single sex scene that loses it's impact after you watch
the scene for 10 or 20 minutes.
This is basically dull spanking porn.
My fantasy, to improve the videos, would be to have some guy in a leather costume and mask, come into the scene, and bash the male model who is
doing the spanking, with a metal baseball bat. The girl could jump up and down, screaming, "My hero, my lord", until the spanker is unconscious or dead. Then the girl could give her hero a bj or whatever to finish the scene.
This would serve to add color to the scene (the red blood), plus serve as a break in the dull sex scene, and lead to renewed interest in the next
sex scene (the bj or whatever), and remove the idiot doing the spanking.
I don't usually appreciate watching this type of female abuse, even if it's supposed to be consensual.
On a more realistic note, I have seen a few BDSM scenes that were colorful or interesting or erotic. But not at this site. These vids are just boring and overly long.
The scenes can be 1 boy-1 girl, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 boys-2 girls, 1 boy-2 girls, 2-girls. Most common scene is 1 boy-1 girl and 2 boys-2 girls.
This is a site with a small amount of content. Site just started around middle of 2010. You probably have less than 40 videos, plus 40 photosets. With that small amount of content, you would think the navigation would be extremely simple. But searching through the content is difficult. Trying to look through each video or associated photoshoot is difficult.
The site design is clumsy. Sometimes you can't easily find the photoshoot or video that is supposed to be the mate of a video/photoshoot.

I give the site a score of 60, because of the poor site design, poor navigation, boring videos, stupidity in making the video runtime too long,
and other problems.

This site is a waste of time. And very frustrating. And irritating.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 18 Stream

15. 18 Stream (0)

Pay
Active
90
lk2fireone (194) 09-16-10  05:53pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The best site design of this network I've seen so far.
-Nice-sized thumbnail for each model, giving you a good idea of what the model looks like. Many of the network sites have no nice-sized thumbnail of the model, so you have to play the streaming video or download the complete video before you get an idea of what the model looks like.
-Multiple viewing/downloading options:
Steaming: in low, medium, high quality
Screenshots: good sized, blurry to nice quality, to illustrate the video, could be downloaded as individual photos, but mainly useful to see what
the model looks like and to get an idea of the action.
Download options:
WMV, low, medium, high quality
MPEG
MOV
-Advertises daily updates of videos.
-No DRM
-Easy login to site.
-I don't like captcha, but this site has the easiest to read captcha that I've seen.
Search is basic but functional: search by model name returns model's videos and thumbnail of model.
Cons: Mostly minor:
-There is a site timeout. But login is easy.
-Advertises 500+ teen porn videos. My sense is there are far less videos at the site, but since there is no simple txt listing of videos, I won't take the time and effort to count the videos.
-A high-speed connection is really helpful. A high quality 30 minute video file is about 1.3 GB. To download that file takes 2 hours 30 minutes for a download speed of 150 KB/s. I can't watch the videos in streaming, because they stutter and stop. But I believe most PU members have fast Internet connections so watching a
streaming video would be no problem.
-Search is basic: Can't search by description of model, or by type of sexual activity.
-Need to manually create your own listing for the videos you download. Files are named as 342.wmv, 201.wmv, 199.wmv. Write your own description of model, and whatever else you want to know, with the file name/number.
-Watermark-bottom right corner, larger than needed.
Bottom Line: Excellent hardcore teen video site.
The videos are crystal clear for hardcore. Great definition, good lighting. There is actually foreplay and cuddling and kissing before the
sex in many scenes. Many of the girls are extremely attractive, and even the male teens are good-looking. Good camera work on the videos. Instead of gonzo sex, you get scenes of guys and girls making out and having sex. And during the sex, instead of just shots of 2 or more bodies banging away, you actually get to look at some lovely girls enjoying a sexual experience.
The lighting is generally ok to good. The skin color and skin tone of the models is generally ok to good.
At most of the Euro teen sites, the models are almost all small breasted, which I like. There are some models here with medium-sized or larger
breasts. But all the breasts appear natural. No fake plastic boobies, almost no tattoos on the female models, very little piercing (some belly
button or ear-rings, but that is minor). It's really nice the girls are so young and clean-looking.
Obviously not all videos are going to have good lighting and good skin tone color and good everything else, but the general level of the videos is very high for a hardcore video site.
Most of the videos are 1 boy-1 girl, which is what I prefer.
There are a few vids with 2 boys-2 girls.
I saw 1 lesbian scene.
I saw 1 female solo masturbation scene.
Models take a less gonzo style approach to sex. There is actually some tenderness and cuddling and stroking before getting down to hardcore sex. No strip tease, but a big improvement over the wham-bam-fuck-the-slut approach.
Female models don't give out with a lot of fake moans and groans. They do make some sounds expressing enjoyment and excitement, but these are more believable, natural sounds instead of the show-boaty expressions of American porn where the females start screaming: "GOD", "FUCK THAT CUNT", "OOOHHHWHEEEE!!!" as soon as the male gets within 25 1/2 inches of their body. (Slight exaggeration, possibly, or maybe not. :))
The male models are young, fresh, mainly good-looking teens. In some cases the boys look as good or better than the females.
The male actors treat the females, in general, with liking and respect.
There is little to no humiliation or abuse of the female models.

Bottom Line: This is a hardcore video site that makes a nice change of pace from gonzo sex.

I am giving the site a score of 90, because it's the one of the better hardcore video sites I've seen (not to be compared to DVD sites like
VideoBox or VideosZ) treating the models with respect, affection, gentle sex, whatever.
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 18 Stream

16. 18 Stream (0)

Pay
Active
91
Tom22 (6) 07-31-10  01:37pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: * Camera work better than 90% of Sites (but see problem below)
* Camera is kept back so you can see all of the girl most of the time, with the occasional close-up (that's the way it should be and most sites do it the opposite way, which is dead-wrong in my opinion)
* Very attractive Russian Girls
* Easy Navigation, list of all models with links to their videos
* Excellent still photo Previews
* Currently more than 470 videos, No DRM
* Video quality very good (but see problem below)
* Fast download speeds, no problem using download manager and downloads almost never "drop"
* Great (high quality) Still Photos with zip files
* Logo on videos acceptable & well placed at extreme lower right. (but could still be smaller)
* Tin Seks, Teen Sex Fusion, Teen Burg, Teen Dorf and other network sites represented on 18_Stream
* At this writing, FULL trial access for 3 days, for five bucks - a very good deal in my opinion
* Videos available in Full HD, or medium or low quality
Cons: * Very Bad choice of video Codec, Microsoft (Mime Type: video/x-ms-asf) (see comment below)

* Cameraman goofs-off with the camera sometimes (see comment below)

* Most girls have pretty big boobs, which is not my favorite thing. (more petite girls please!!) (but this is a personal preference and does not detract from the site)

* Site uses "SegPay Billing" and their "find transaction" web page does not work, or at lease it didn't work for me. Had to email SegPay to stop the re-bill.

* One strange problem was that none of the Logon links for members worked for me except the one on the "Join Page." There are members' logon links on all of their preview pages, but not a one of them worked except the one on the "Join Page." It worked fine after I learned this trick. (sorry, I had to come back and add this, I forgot to put it in the original post)
Bottom Line: I highly recommend this site, especially for the Full Trial price of only five bucks, but don't know how long that will last. I would still recommend the site at full price, but of courses not as highly.

I was very impressed with the site, they did nearly everything exactly right. Great previews for the videos and full streaming, great still photos, great videos, some very sexy girls and good download speed. I downloaded dozens of videos and only had the connection drop one time. That's a fantastic connection, their server is very well tuned.

My only two big problems with the site is that, (1) I wish they would have used a more generic video codec. The Microsoft codec doesn't work so well on older systems like mine. You have to use VLC player to make the videos work. And the problem is that when you go to "index" (move the slider bar to advance) the video, there is distortion that can last for several seconds. If you are running the latest software you may not have this problem.

My only other problem with the site is that the cameraman goofs-off with the camera sometimes. No kidding --- in some scenes he rotates the camera left and right at the beginning of the scene for no reason at all. That is really stupid and annoying, the cameraman needs to knock off the goofy stuff and do his job. Thankfully, he doesn't do it too often. But it should NEVER happen. The idea is to keep the camera steady, at the correct distance and focused (which he does for the most part) --- just do that and you are doing your job Mr. Cameraman. Stop all the nonsense, its distracting and makes for a poorer quality video.

Other than that, its a great site. Wish they had more of the very slim girls, but you can't have everything, I guess.

Highly recommend! Get it while its cheap. I'm sure the trial will not last very long. But even at full price, I would have been very happy with the site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teenamite

17. Teenamite (0)

Pay
Active
78
Willard (12) 07-03-10  10:01am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: Women with natural body.

Big size movie.

Sharp photograph.

Natural sex like lover.
Cons: There are not a lot of works now.
Bottom Line: I am a fan of Teen Burg.
Because the same company is producing, this site looks like. However, there are not a lot of numbers of works of these sites compared with Teen Burg. Because it is a new site, it is natural. I became a member on this site however because there is a very lovely girl.
She is Adela. She has the movie also in MY Sexy Kittens and ATK Natural & Hariy. However, she in the movie on this site is lovelier than the movie on other sites. She kisses a man named Kristof in kitchen. She makes the stain of the cunt juice in the panty. It can be seen in the photograph.
I thought that photographers were having her relax. It is wonderful. I saw a lot of movies of excessive production on other tedious sites in the past. I do not want to see them any longer. There are her four movies. I like all. There is a scene to which she recollects past sex in the movie. I think that it is an edit of elaborate. I had good feeling.
Additionally, Izabella is lovely.
Her sex is intense. However, it is not unnatural. It is very good.

It is recommended to become the member before it becomes a member on this site if you are not a member of Teen Burg.
If you like Teen Burg, and girls on this site like it, this site is recommended.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Burg

18. Teen Burg (0)

Pay
Active
80
Willard (12) 09-28-09  10:49am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: There are a lot of sex videos like the lover.

One model has gone out to some videos.

There is a girl who did not see on other sites.
Cons: The speed of download is a little slow.

There are a lot of advertisements in member's page.

The photograph cannot be downloaded.
Bottom Line: Almost all are videos of sex like the lover.
The majority of the girl have what seen on other sites, and have some girls whom I do not know either.
There is a feature of the video depending on the produced time.
My favorite video was produced in the first half of 2009 in 2008.
The video by which Viktoria makes love in the bathroom is my loved video.
She and the boy are relaxing very much.
She does a lot of kisses to the boy.
Vicktoria caressed by the boy looks very happy.
Klara is a girl also in other sites who often sees.
It is very lovely that she kisses the boy.
I like this site.
It doesn't recommend it to the person who likes macro photography of genitals and video of anal sex.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Springtime Beauties

19. Springtime Beauties (0)

Pay
Active
76
Drooler (218) 10-25-08  06:24pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Lots of never-before-seen content
+2 updates per day, 7 days a week
+Members get a preview of the next 3 updates.
+53 models; many beautiful, sexy teen-like girls (look Russian and/or Ukrainian)
+406 photosets to date
+Photosets are at least 1232 pixels. Some are 1536, and some are 3456.
+Photos are generally acceptable, overall good quality; varies a bit.
+82 videos to date
+All videos in 5 versions: WMV hi (720x480), med, or low; mpg; and Quicktime.
+Can browse all, only by photos, or only by videos
+Allows use of DownloadThemAll in Firefox
+Search engine finds all content of a model in lieu of a models index
+Visitors can preview all content (representative pics or screenshots)
+Not much toy content, at least so far.
Cons: -NO ZIPS for photos
-Even recent photo updates are sometimes only 1232 px. You never know what size they'll be.
-32 updates per page (photos or videos) means a lot of scrolling
-More variety in models would be helpful. (There’s way too much of their “Iveta” if you ask me.)
-One girl, Lusy (50 photosets), is very beautiful but never gets fully nude (panties stay on)
-Video downloads are too slow. 360Kbps on a 510MB download (20Mbps connection).
-Videos are usually solo and “quiet,” (no music). (Probably a pro for some.) But one of Roxy had the tinny sound of techno music being picked up by the cam mic. And the frame rate was choppy on it and on another, too, making the wicker couch "come alive" like some LSD-induced hallucination. And that was at 720x480.
-Seven of the videos are in black & white (?)
-Not all content is exclusive, though most is new to me.
-Watermark usually not intrusive, but its style is sometimes in odd contrast to the photo content.
Bottom Line: PornUsers familiar with MetArt, MetModels, Nubiles, TeenDreams, HegreArt, ATK Galleria and/or Amour Angels will recognize some of these girls.

One standout is “Andrea,” (Shannon at Nubiles; Lena at MetModels). Would some think she’s too skinny? Well, it’s a healthy, firm-toned skinny, and she’s got good-sized natural breasts for her frame and a very cute mouth. And playful eyes. About half of her 33 photosets are at 1536 pixels; the others are at 1232. Too bad that the one video of her solo is also choppy with the frame rate!

Another is Nella (Anastasia at Nubiles; Martina at MetModels). Cute face. VERY cute butt. There are about 6 photosets of her and 1 video, which was nice! All of her pics are at 3456. One set, in a sauna, is also at TeenDreams, where she’s “Kate.”

Then there’s Roxy, who is really sexy and nicely round in the back. Same goes for Monica. But the thinner Ally and Sindy deserve mention, too.

Stephanie has a lovely, serene face. Might be the most truly beautiful girl on this site. Also has appeared at Nubiles as Aimee.

Finally, I’ll mention “Koika” as she’s known here. One of the cutest blonds anywhere. She’s been at some of the other sites, too. There are several vids of her here, where it looks like she’s been in an accident (stitches on her shoulder and arm). But the charm still comes through.

So yes, the models here are for the most part a feast for the eyes. And though the pros do add up, especially in the amount and freshness of the content, the cons still bring the score down under 80. Number one is of course no zips. Number two: The slow vid downloads.

Just the same, fans of these kinds of models and this kind of content would probably enjoy the site -- at least for the photos. I can’t say that I regret joining it myself. But if I were more of a video fan, I'd avoid it because too many of the videos are poor in quality.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Burg

20. Teen Burg (0)

Pay
Newbie
88*
Chipster (3) 05-31-08  09:23pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (3)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Natural Girls, Natural Breast
- Good sex
- Some girl-girl action in the group scenes, mostly kissing
- Most of the girls are attractive and have nice racks and rumps
Cons: - NO model names
- No model searches
- No scene descriptions
- Girls seem to strip out of the same outfits in all of their scenes, except for towels
- Only one lesbian scene
- Some amateurish video editing
Bottom Line: TBP says the content is not exclusive, but have not seen any of these models any other sites. There are some great outdoor scenes, some exciting group scenes, and the girls are really toned. Plus they make some noise when fucking, unlike some of the russian lay back and enjoy it sites. 30 bucks is worth it , and there have been several updates as I have been a member. A nice site
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-20 of 20  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (11)
2. VideoBox (8)
3. X-Art (7)
4. Naughty America (7)
5. Babes Network.com (6)
6. DDF Network (6)
7. Wow Girls (5)
8. Reality Kings (5)
9. Bangbros Network (5)
10. Evil Angel (5)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.14 seconds.