Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company Class Media
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-16 of 16  

Visit Oldje

1. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
85
pat362 (365) 02-02-13  10:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +They offer exclusif content from a niche that is not well represented.
+They add about one new scene per week.
+Almost 380 scenes to download.
+The 50 or so most recent videos are now offered in multiple download fomats and resolution is as high as 1280x720.
+They appear to have remastered some of their more recent upates as well.
+There is some decent chemistry between the performers.
+They offer class3some, nude art and classic blowjob with your membership.
Cons: -They still do not offer any model info so you have to do some serious research to frind their name from other sources.
-The bonus sites may be nice for some people but only class3some has similar content.
-class3some has stopped updating last year so you are not getting new stuff.
-Navigation is basically picking a page number and there are no search options.
-They have photos but the quantity is tiny and is mostly there so that you get an idea of what is happening in the video.
Bottom Line: *I decided to join Oldje one more time in part because they decided to add clas3some to their membership. That was one of my cons the last time I joined. Sadly I got excited for nothing because the site isn't updating anymore. They also give you access to two other sites but since they do not exactly offer the same type of content then I didn't bother looking at them. Mind you someone into oral sex or nudes might be happy with those additions.

*I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are now offering the videos in higher resolution as well as motre stndard ones. They still don't bother putting the models name on the videos and that really sucks. I can begin to tell you how annoying it is to do research on a model so that I can properlly file the video.

*I recently commented on the fact that none of the performers in the Score 50 and Score 60 videos kiss and that it was too bad because it made the scenes a lot less fun to watch. This is not the case with Oldje because there is some serious kissing between the young girls and the old men. The sex is never raunchy. It is more soft and romantic. Now some could argue that the guys being older couldn't do super hardcore but I think that the producers prefer the softer stuff and I agree with their choice.

**This is such a rare niche that unless you are a fan then you should stay away**.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Oldje

2. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
80
pat362 (365) 05-07-12  06:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They have exclusif content from a niche that's not well represented on the net.
+They have an very good selection of female European performers.
+The sex scenes are well filmed and the males do a pretty decent job considering their age.
+They have 352 videos but only the last 32 are in a single file. All the others are broken into 2 or more files.
+Video resolution is at least 720x404 for more than 100 videos and the last 32 are now 1280x720.
+They appear to still be updating with new content.
Cons: -They no longer offer class3some as a bonus site and that is too bad because it was a nice addition considering the high cost of the site.
-They don't offer any model info whatsoever so it requires a lot of research to find the names to go with most videos.
-They don't date their content so it's very hard to know the update schedule.
-They have photos but the quality is mostly poor and they often appear to be out of order. Not to mention that you have to download each pic one by one since they aren't in a complete zip file.
-There is no navigation except the page number or the ability to jump all the way to the beginning or the end of the pages.
-There's music in their videos and that can be a plus but I found at certain times to be distracting.
-The first 100 videos are only offered in Real media so not very good news.
Bottom Line: *This is a pretty decent site with content that is good to excellent but is dragged down by all the negative things that could easily be fixed if they bothered with it. They don't have a lot of male performers to choose from but the ones they have do a better than average job and there appears to be some good chemistry with the female performers which seems hard to believe when you consider the age difference between the males and the females.

*There's dialogue in some of the videos and it's normally in English. It's more often a miss because English is not the language that these people speak but it's not awful. The music is a little annoying. It's not too loud because that would make it almost impossible to watch the videos with the sound on. Mind you I wouldn't be sad if it disapeared. I think just the natural sounds of the performer is more than enough for the viewers anyway.

*I like that they are now offering their videos in a single file and that the resolution is also increased to 1280x720. Now if someone can start entering the names of the models in the database and put dates on their content then they'll have improved on most key issues.

**If you want to watch old men have sex with much younger women than this is probably the best site for that. They even have a few anal scenes as well so if that is one of your fetishes then you'll find a few videos. Be advised that it may not be in the description of the scene so you'll have to either download all the videos or check out the photos to find those scenes.

***Of course if you don't want to watch old guys have sex with very young women than avoid this site. Especially now since they no longer offer class3some and that site had mostly yojg women with younger men.***
Respond: 13 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Oldje

3. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
68
selphy (15) 02-05-12  04:13am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Fantastic and Beautiful Girls (nice and young famous pornstars but also semi pro models)
- New videos are in HD 1280 (most of them are not in HD but the format is acceptable, 720x404)
-There are photo and screen cap of the videos
Original and exclusive content that combine romantic sex and a little fetish (old and fat man- with young and beautiful girls)
Cons: -There are about 350 videos but 150 of them are in real media and their quality are poor (about 200x100; I've deleted those files...)
-No model info
-Old files are divided in two or three parts
-The files you downloaded are not named, so you have to renamed them (boring)
-No update info (1 new episode per week)
-Navigation is plan and the login is boring (userid, pwd and captcha).
-The server timeout is too short; it's about 2 hours, and at the and you have to re-log in
-No bonus site (I thought that the other Class3some site was included)
-The are music inside the video and often you can't hear the "voice" of the performers.
Bottom Line: I was intersting in this particular content, most of all because the preview of the site showed a lot of beautiful girls.
So I become a member a couple of weeks ago. But after two days of surfing this site I was not satisfied at all.
I think that if you have such girls who perform and that especially have performed in the past in your site, you have to re-mastered old videos and offer (about 30 euros a month) to your customer a good quality. Not surely the quality of a 15 Mb video in .rm format !!
Otherwise you had to offer one or two quality bonus site !
The same company has also Class3some: it appears a good site (the same girls of Oldje) with only about 50 video.
Why does not offer the two site at the same price ?
Oldje is expensive if you think that 1/3 of its content is not usable, but if the Company offers Class3some togheter with Oldje, I think the 30 euro price is correct.

Well, If you are interersting in old-young sex the new video of Oldje are really good ! But remember that only about 200 video (the new ones) are really usable (not less than 720 x 404)
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Class 3Some

4. Class 3Some (0)

Pay
Active
65
slutty (111) 11-23-10  01:34pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -some very attractive, i believe euro ladies
-no DRM
-download managers work
-zip downloads of photosets
-photo quality is good (3000x2000)
-video quality is good (1280x720, 8000 kbps was the best i saw)
-content appears to be exclusive
Cons: -expensive
-only 43 scenes at the time of this review
-some scenes are a little odd, there are a few where there are like 4 small scenes within the one video
-download speeds are inconsitent
-many scenes are in parts, usually 2
-wmv is only video option i saw
-no real update schedule
-navigation is poor - no model index, search, etc. just a list of scenes
Bottom Line: As a bonus site, this site is pretty decent, however if you were ever to join it as a standalone, I don't see the value. while there is some decent material here, especially if you are a fan of 1 guy with 2 or more girls, it just has too many cons to make it worth it, not to mention the size and price of the site.

I did find many of the scenes to be pretty good, the camerawork is generally better than usual and the video quality is reasonably crisp. There are definitely some scenes here that I will add to my favorites.

The content appears to be original from what I can tell, and they do have some models I haven't seen anywhere else (they have probably worked for other sites, but I haven't seen them).

Overall, an okay site as a bonus for joining oldje, but if this deal ever goes away I would probably not join unless they drop the price and/or increase the size of the site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

5. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
77
pat362 (365) 11-22-10  08:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 11-22-10  01:50pm  (Update History)
Reason: I forgot to add the bonus site info
Pros: -There appears to be genuine heat between the performers with lots of deep kissing, good BJ and the sex is also well done.
-They have some super cute teen girls.
-The age difference between the girls and men is significant so that adds to the fetish aspect.
-They currently have over 300 videos.
-Bonus site included with membership.
-You can use a download manager.
-They appear to still be updating but since they don't date their updates so that makes it hard to say the frequency.
-They speak in English ins ome of the vieos.
-There is some scenario to the scenes.
Cons: -By far my biggest issue with what would have been a great site is the background music that is so annoying that you almost have to watch the videos with the sound off.
-Movies are all broken down in sections of 2 to 4 pieces.
-Little to no model info means you'll have to be familiar with Eastern Europeans models or do a lot of research to identify them.
-Photo cannot be downloaded in a complete set but then again they are pretty useless so it's not worth bothering with.
Bottom Line: -This site has the potential to be in the high 80's and even in the 90's but the soundtrack has to go, they have to offer their videos as one file, they have to put a time stamp on their content and they need a models index. If they are able to do that then I'd gladly return more often.

I wasn't thrilled about the split videos but the content is so great that I would still have given the site a score of above 80 but I found the soundtrack to be so distracting that I had to drop my score. It's till worth seeing if you like the old and young fetish.

They offer a bonus site called class3some and it's basically the same girls that appear on oldje but here it's at least 2 girls with one guy. The men are much younger that those at oldje. The videos are also broken in 2 sections and there is no model info. They currently have over 40 videos. You can download photosets in a zip format but frankly it would also be a waste of time. Oldje should have added a second site but with multiple older men with one or two women
and that would have been a better fit than what we get with class3some.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brutal Catfight

6. Brutal Catfight (0)

Pay
Newbie
69*
enigma (2) 11-18-10  04:23am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: * Interesting concept
Cons: * Too expensive
* Too few films
* Updates have no date so it is very difficult to find out if the site has been updated and when.
* It seems that the site has not been updated for a long time
Bottom Line: I have checked the site a couple of times within the last 12 months.
Since it seems that the site does not update its content I would recommend not to join. To me the site is too expensive if you look at the content compared to other sites like ultimatesurrender.com
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

7. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
78
slutty (111) 11-06-10  12:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Attractive euro women
-Reasonably well filmed scenes
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although mine did have some timeout problems (I tried DTA and GetRight)
-Looks to be all original content
-Scenes have a "plot" to some extent
-Zip downloads of some photosets (in rar)
-Photo quality is variable, newer material is good
-Bonus site is pretty interesting (class3-some), although has most of the same cons as this site
-Decent sized archive (300+ scenes), although about half of it is poor quality.
-Newer video quality is pretty good, 1280x720 8000 kbps was the best I saw, although the video doesn't look as good as the specs might suggest.
-The mid-aged material was decent at 720x400 3000 kbps. I don't have specs on the RM material, but the file sizes are very small and look very poor.
Cons: -Poor navigation
-Logins timeout relatively fast
-Expensive, about $40 US at current exchange rate
-Slowish download speeds, best I saw was 400 KB/s using DTA
-Poor navigation, no model index, no search function, etc.
-Older videos are RealMedia, and very poor quality.
-Some sets don't have photosets associated with them, only screencaps, and some sets don't have zips.
-Most videos are in multiple parts, between 2 and 4 was typical.
-Video quality on newer material is pretty good, older material is quite poor.
-Limited download options, newer material is wmv (high or low) older material is realmedia only (high or dialup - neither are "high")
-I have no idea what the update schedule is, no dates on the scenes, but I somehow doubt it is frequent
Bottom Line: The material on this site is pretty decent, there are certainly some attractive ladies. Personally I am not a fan of the young/old fetish, I joined mostly because of the attractive ladies.

It is a pity that the site makes it so hard to get at their content. The navigation is poor, most of the scenes do not even give the model a name. A model index would be nice, just for sorting purposes. The navigation pretty much consists of a list of scenes with some preview pictures, with 5 scenes on each page. Pretty much nothing else.

The scenes themselves are pretty good, although the editing can be a bit odd. Most of the scenes I downloaded have quite loud background music that pretty much drowns out everything else. This is one of the only sites I can think of that uses slow motion during sex scenes, and the slow motion is a bit odd to me.

I did not have any experience with customer support, so I can't comment on that. There is no user forum or anything of that nature.

I actually very much liked the bonus content. Although some of the scenes are a bit weird (like a guy has sex with two ladies, then two other ladies, etc.).

Overall I think this site is decent, it would be nice to see them provide a model index and fix some of their many download and navigation issues. Given the price, it is hard to recommend unless there are specific models you like in the preview (or you are really fond of old/young niche). The bonus site is nice, but certainly doesn't make it worth the price for me. If you like to see "attractive men" in scenes, this is most definitely not the site for you, as many are fat, old and hairy (not that there is anything wrong with that...)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Class 3Some

8. Class 3Some (0)

Pay
Active
50
BabyGetReal (32) 05-21-10  07:24pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The men are younger than in oldje (but not young).
Two or more girls per scene (if you like that -- I don't because it makes real arousal of the women even less likely).
Sometimes the cameraman roams over the women's bodies in a pleasing way.
Normal sized dicks.
Some creativity in scenarios.
Cons: No fun, chemistry, arousal, and very rarely any female orgasms.
Long boring passionless sex (but at least it isn't rushed).
Only about 20 videos total at this site!
Way overpriced for what it offers.
Video resolution is poor.
The girls rarely if ever touch each other or their own clits.
Bottom Line: This is a bonus site for oldje. See my review of oldje -- for my tastes, it is a loser. Class-3some is even worse. It suffers from all the same limitations.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

9. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
66
BabyGetReal (32) 05-21-10  07:08pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Creative scenarios, very unusual.
Gorgeous slim women, many very cute.
Mostly natural breasts.
As a 70 year old, the fantasy of a beautiful young woman coming onto me is very attractive.
Dialog, when there is any, is in English.
Guys don't walk on already hard.
Normal sized dicks.
No brainless rough hard banging away.
No fake moaning.
Cons: Boring, repetitive, passionless sex.
Apparently no interest in arousing the women.
Sometimes it appears that the men coming is the girls mouths is faked, with fake semen preloaded in the girls mouths.
The price is WAY WAY too high ($38/month).
Early vids very low res; later ones low res or OK; a few very recent ones are stunningly hires.
Too many long closeups.
Downloads all have the same names so you have to rename every one.
There is usually annoyingly loud music that doesn't fade out -- but it doesn't matter because nobody ever really gets aroused.
Bottom Line: A couple of the very recent very high resolution videos are in beautiful outdoor settings. They move slowly and sensuously, with a lot of kissing. About half of the videos are scripted with the guys taking advantage of the girls (I can do without that). In the other half, the girls tease and come onto the guys -- which I love. So I had high anticipation about this site -- but it turned out to be one of the least arousing sites to which I've subscribed.

The creativity and variety of the scenarios is really unusual and is the best thing about this site. Also the lack of hard banging and rushed sex. The slow sensuous approach is refreshing. Unfortunately, this is coupled with terrible directing and editing -- if the goal is to be erotic.

The director/editor seems to insist on so many minutes each for a series of positions, without any concern for what is actually happening. There is no chemistry between any of the couples. They show no evidence of having fun, being playful, or getting aroused. There is no spontaneity. Apparently they are just doing what the director told them to do. Even if a little spark starts to grow, they are told to change positions and it kills any spark that started.

In only one or maybe two of all the 30 videos that I watched, the girls actually got aroused and maybe orgasmed. This was not respected, featured, emphasized -- the director/editor did not seem to notice or care that this happened -- it was incidental -- and it was not erotic to watch.

The emphasis is on the girl pleasuring the man. Most have very brief cunnilingus or finger fucking, but only to please the man, and it stops after a moment, regardless of whether the woman might show a little spark of excitement. All videos end with a blow job and the guy (supposedly) coming in the girl's mouth. In some cases the guy jacks off and really comes; in others, the girl blows him and maybe he really comes, or it is faked.

A give away about the attitude in this site is that in all the preview stills that label each video, very few if any show the girl with an expression of actual enjoyment or arousal. Instead, she is always looking at the camera with her mouth open, a sure sign that she is not aroused.

For what this site offers, the price is WAY WAY too high (30 euros, about $38/month). Actresses names are not given. There is no search mechanism. There are no dates for the "updates". Most of the videos have poor resolution.

The bonus site (class-3some) is even worse.

It is unusual that I download 30 videos from a site and don't find a single one that I want to keep, but that is what happened here. They seemed to have a good idea and some real creativity, but the direction/editing kills any eroticism.

Sometimes they show outtakes at the end, and in these, often the actors are laughing and having fun -- unlike in the main video!

CONTINUED IN A "REPLY"
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

10. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
89
Denner (233) 06-01-09  06:29am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Young easteuro-models at their best.
+ Fine style in videos - fine style of fantasy.
+ Video-quality is almost crisp (the newer ones) and even some of the .rm-files are ok.
+ Young girls being very seducive - thanks to a good working editor, I guess.
+ Entirely exclusive.
+ Ok/fine number of video-scenes (almost 300)
+ Well done for a special kind af fantasies.
Cons: Price a bit high - euro 29.95 - but at TBP the $-price seems much to high compared to the price in euros. Compared the price in $ should be about 35. Guess this one is the other way around with those infamous currency-problems.
No "real" photosets - the photos in each set are way too few and the quality (960x640) are not that great.
Could not find any zip for those sets.
Very simple navigation/browsing - no search engines or name-search for girl-models. You nhave to browse through the now 27 pages with aproxx 10 videos pr page.
Most videos in split files. (But they are joinable).
No bonus sites.
Couold not find any update-schedule - now it looks like one or two pr week.
Repeated login.
Very early videos (2-3 years old or more) not worth much.
Bottom Line: I have quite a few cons for this site - BUT still it's as close to a 90 in score as it gets.
Foremost this is a site with a very speciel fantasy for older porn-lovers and lovers of teens.
This is a dutch site with a slogan for their videos:
"The fantasy you deserve" - pretty good marketing, because it tends to older guys (like this user close to 50) with the everlasting dream of sweet young things - but well married and no more ideas about trying to catch/or cheat with an 18-19 years old girl.
Here you get it on videoclips. Must scenes are definitely fantasy, because the main theme is the teen seducing the 50-65 year old guy.
See the fine previews - and you'll get the idea.
The videos are (almost) all set in different ways - and thats a fine plus. Not much stereotype here.
And once in a while you get a little surprise with some minuttes slow-motion of the best blowjob/fuck in the middle of the scene.
A little over half of the aproxx 300 videos comes in both wmv and Real Media (I normally dislike rm-files) - the wmv quality is FINE - 720x404.
BUT most of the rm-files are certainly not bad in quality either - I'm just not crazy about the only way to play them.
The models are simply great here - for most of them. Fine looking young teen - blondes, brunettes and redhairs - and the way they act here seems much sweeter ( and somewhat sexier) than at some other productions.
Some are well known: Sharka Blue, Black Angelica, Jenny/Wibeke or Bijou ect. (man, just watching that natural-titted Bijou-brunette seducing this old guy....)
Others are quite rare/almost never seen at other sites.
But the way the seduction of older guys are done here makes this site - probably - the best of its kind.
Visited the site some years ago - today it's simply way better.
More regular updates - and I'd stay here (for some time, anyway).
To be recommended.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

11. Oldje (1)

Pay
Newbie
90*
tikkit (3) 05-19-09  01:31am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + The girls here are more attractive than other Euro Old & Young sites such as Old Farts & Young Tarts, and Grandpas Fuck Teens
+ Cinematography - Yes, you can laugh but much thought and work goes into the art side of things, with style, slo-mo's, zooming, and such
+ I love oldje's style of video, the videos are Unique, stories are not repeated very often, I geniually look foward to the updates
+ tour provides an accurate representation of what will be available when/if you subscribe
Cons: - scenes are short
- the amount of sex in scenes is SHORT, though the more recent videos have improved upon this.
- Expensive for American Subscribers, may be only worth it to join for one month and thats it.
- No full scene files, though this really does not bother me much
- the actors in the scenes try to speak english, just speak in your native language, who cares!
- Updates come every two weeks on Friday, not that often but understandable
- no zip picture files, Beauty and the senior has much better picture sets
- Older videos are of Real Player Only and BAD quality
Bottom Line: Oldje is great, but has flaws, why don't they combine Oldje and B&TS for one really great site with pictures and videos.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

12. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
83
Drooler (218) 02-28-09  04:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Many of those hot Euro girls – Cayenne, Stracey, Leanna Sweet, Rachel Evans, Julie Silver, Lucky, etc. – enjoying sex with older men.
+All exclusive content
+Total of about 268 scenes to date
+The most recent 116 scenes available in WMV 720x404.
+Scenes split into usually 2 vids means you can just get the best action in scene 2 if you like (though sometimes the first blowjob is in scene 1)
+Creativity in storylines and a sense of humor as well as sex
+Arranged with 10 updates/scenes per page; 27 pages to date
+Follows your browsing, so after you finish with a scene and then click “Updates,” it takes you back to the updates page you were on.
+Good visitor’s preview of the content
Cons: -Slow downloads (for me anyway): around 140Kbps (“20 Mbps” connection. Maybe my ISP is lying.)
-The first 152 scenes are only in Real Player and those vids aren’t so good
-Model name not mentioned in some of the scenes
-“Medium-sized” watermark on the vids; prefer “small” or none
-No all-in-one vids; scenes are split into 2 or 3 segments (usually 2)
-No streaming, should you prefer that
-Action in vids starts before the “Oldje” branding graphics have disappeared
-Some vids have “slow motion” parts you may or may not like
-Photos are only 960x640; screenshots are 720x576
-No zips of screenshots or photos
-Found a few screenshot or photo pages with missing links
-Priced in Euros, so dollar-buyers will pay more than $29.95
-Only updates about 1x per wk
-Some of the oldsters have big guts that block the view
Bottom Line: The first time I joined this, over two years ago, I was disappointed. The babes were hot, but those RealPlayer vids were skimpy in quality and the screen dimensions were small.

Funny how I quit just before they started offering the much better WMV’s. At this transition phrase, on their page 16, they even redid a few choice vids that I’d only been able to get in Real Player: Lucky in “Backstage with the Director” and Sarah in “Who’s the Boss” are among my faves, if only for fleeting minutes of the “belly-down flat.”

As for the men here, as an old Playboy cartoon once said: “There may be snow on the roof, but there’s still fire in the furnace.” Enter Big Pharma. I mean, PU’s have complained about some younger porn actors having trouble keeping Johnny at attention. Doesn’t seem to happen here.

A lot of these geezers appear over and over. They range from the middle-aged to the octogenarian. Some are in good shape, and some sport ample “table muscles.” One of them reminds me of gay Mr. Kidd from the old Bond movies; don’t think it’s the same guy, though.

But this isn’t your run-of-the-mill gonzo porn. Just check out the visitor’s area. What imaginations these people have! But the sex is still pretty much by the numbers, with a facial at the end.

I rather doubt that the more bright-eyed and bushy tailed of the PU community would much care for a site like this, but I’m getting up in years and this site helps. Hell, it could be ME on this one! With languid Leanna Sweet or foxy Cayenne! Mmmmmmm!

NB: BeautyandtheSenior is a clone. I've never been to that one. At least one PU member has provided a detailed comment on this.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

13. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
87
djwolf (61) 12-29-07  03:22pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - No other site around like this
- Exclusive content
- Hot young women (genuine)
- Looks realistic
- Good video quality
- Option to preview video pictures
- Updated regularly
Cons: - Fairly expensive
- Some scenes are oral only
- Picture quality could be better
- Videos are split up
- Basic menu with no search facility
Bottom Line: Oldje is a one-off site where young girls are getting it on with older men. It's all genuine and looks pretty realistic (occasional poor acting in certain scenes).
The girls are mostly hot with nice tight bodies on show, most scenes show them naked. The men are not particularly nice to look at though!
There is a fair amount of content which is updated weekly. There are pictures available for recent shoots with around 40-50 in each set. The quality could be improved. The videos are the best part of the site with at least 150 on offer. The videos are split into 2 or 3 real media clips which last about 6-8 minutes each. You can see preview pictures of the videos which is very useful. The video quality is good with a nice amateur feel to it.
The site itself looks good but the menu system is rather basic. The video and picture sets are not sorted into any categories or dated. There is also no way to search for a specific girl.
This is a very good site which charges a high price but offers exclusive quality content and pretty girls.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

14. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
85
igolli (6) 08-10-07  05:25am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -beautuful ladies & old ugly guys
- new videos are crystal clear quality
- fast downloads
Cons: - some cumshots seems to be fake
- only real player files
Bottom Line: Rare stuff coz at this site are really beautiful girls hangíng around with old guys. psp vids would be nice. If you like this niche the site is a must see
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

15. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
85
DutchDoctor (8) 04-11-07  04:08am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Actors are old indeed and the girls are around 20;
2. Beautiful European girls, mostly without terrible tatoos;
3. Nice settings;
4. Excellent high-resolution photo's.
Cons: 1. Scenes could have more 'exciting' sex;
2. Only in Real Media, which I don't like;
3. The oldest movies are not so good.
Bottom Line: This is a quality-site with Old&Young stuff, which is quite rare to find. It has been produced in The Netherlands and Belgium, so without the 'barbie-looking' US-porn-stars or the East-European wallpapers with flowers.

When this is your 'cup-of-tea', this site is well worth to visit!
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

16. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
60
DpornGuy (36) 01-08-07  09:56pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (4)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Exclusive content and models
Fresh faces, mostly young too
good layout and concepts
Cons: content very similar
Video quality not jaw dropping
RealMedia Format only downloads
Bottom Line: An original Old on Young site, with european hotties, but sadly the sex at times is very dull or similar to previous scenes, with very little variety..

The girls are very hot though, and you won't find many sites that offer exclusive content that is only hardcore.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-16 of 16  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (11)
2. X-Art (10)
3. Naughty America (9)
4. VideoBox (8)
5. Reality Kings (7)
6. Twistys (7)
7. Bangbros Network (6)
8. Evil Angel (6)
9. Babes Network.com (5)
10. Wow Girls (5)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.1 seconds.