Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company The SCORE Group
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 50 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Porn Megaload

1. Porn Megaload (1)

Pay
Active
85
pat362 (369) 10-05-14  11:02am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-07-14  03:23pm  (Update History)
Reason: issue with cancellation was a major technical issue and seems to be fixed for everyone
Pros: +There are currently nearly 1560 scenes to choose from.
+All the content is dated and they update with 1-4 new videos each day.
+You can download all the videos in 4 different resolution:320x240, 640x360, 854x480 and 1280x720 but some of the newer ones can also be downloaded in true HD 1920x1080.
+They offer a huge variety of models from teens to older milfs and with body types from petite all the way to BBW.
+There is no third party advertising on the site and advertising for it`s other sites isn`t too intense either.
Cons: -They borrow/steal content from many of their other Score sites so it`s very important for past members to make sure they don`t already have those scenes.
-They offer the ability to search by keywords but the scenes don't have actual keywords tagged to them so the results you get aren`t all the ones you should if it worked properly.
-There is no way of knowing which videos are in WMV and which ones are in MP4. You would think that all the recent ones would be in MP4 but they are not.
-I don't normally use cost as a con but the join price for this site is 50$ which is more than twice the cost of any of their other sites and since the content is mostly all from SCoreHD than why make it so much more expensive?
-There is no kissing between the men and women but there is in the g/g stuff.
Bottom Line: *This is basically the same site as ScoreHD but with some content taken from their other sites that was not offered when it was called ScoreHD. I think it's basically stuff from Score 50 plus that has been added. That's a plus for some people because that was one of my complaints but you aren't getting much of Score50 content and you are paying twice as much as you did for any of their other Score sites

*I notice that TBP's review list 1749 videos but I only counted 1555 while TBP says there are 1749 so what happened to those 200 scenes that I did not see? I counted using the latest scene icon so maybe there are really 1749 videos if you use another option.

*The videos are all top notch with some very good camera angles, excellent lighting and a nice flow to the scenes. The downside is that there's no kissing between the men and women which removes a lot of the chemistry that would be there with some kissing. The strange thing is that there is kissing in the g/g stuff.

*Scene breakdown is: 662 solo only scenes, 18 are g/g only and the rest are hardcore b/g. There are 328 scenes starring BBW and 159 starring MILFs.

I have amended my review by removing anything to do with the difficulty in cancelling because I truly believe that it was never intentional on their part to make it next to impossible to cancel. I received what I consider to be the best support anybody could hope to get and I am very impressed with Score. I have also increased my score as a large part of the low score was about cancellation issues.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Christy Marks

2. Christy Marks (1)

Pay
Active
76
Monahan (42) 07-03-14  07:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Christy Marks - Fantastic mammaries and a fun loving attitude
High quality content professionally done
All videos are high def (1280)
Updates once a week or so
Imaginative solo scenes
Christy's an incredible contortionist. Example - she could fuck herself with her nipples. When she squeezes her mams between her legs it sends me off. Her patented "frog" position is unique.
NO INK. A major plus for me.
No broken links.
Cons: No interaction with members
A total of 60 videos* and associated pix
Only two non-Christy videos - both Merilyn Sakova, with tits equal to Christy's
All of Christy's material is 5+ years old and is remastered (very well, by the way).
Some material is also available on one or more of Score's other websites and some is unique to this site.
Hard core material is all SSDG - Same sex different guy. Little imagination in the hard stuff.
The g/g/b and g/g stuff isn't particularly good. (Exception - her scene with Terry Nova with two guys was outstanding)
Slowish downloads

* One scene was taken down before I had a chance to download it. No idea why it was removed.
Bottom Line: The site is $19.95 with the PU/TBP discount and, for horndogs like me who really enjoy watching Christy enjoying her great tits. I was able to drain the entire site in four sessions.

The total amount of video content as of 7/1/14 is just a tad more than 15 Gb.

Thus site is not included as an add on (free or otherwise) with any other Score site so it must be considered a "hot property" by management.

I decided on a point score of 76. It would be higher if the site had more content and included all, not just some, material from other Score sites. It would be lower except they have done a good job of upgrading their catalog to HD.

Bottom line, I recommend the site to huge tit aficionados who like young, seemingly carefree models. It comes to about 33 cents per video scene which, if you enjoy world class huge natural boobs bouncing (flopping) all over the screen, is a great value.

Set aside a few hours a day for four or five days if you plan to download everything on the site.

I plan to cancel about a week before my first month is used up and may, but probably won't, rejoin a year or so from now.

I can't comment on customer service because I had no need to use it during my brief stay.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Nicole Peters

3. Nicole Peters (1)

Pay
Active
69
Monahan (42) 05-05-13  10:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nicole Peters has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets.

Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.

The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.

That's about it for the "Pros" list.
Cons: Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.

No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don't recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.

Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It's conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.

It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain't worth it.
Bottom Line: This site is a "throw-in" site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That's how I became a member.

If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you'll like Nicole, but as with many "throw-in" sites this one definitely isn't worth the TBP discounted price of $18.

The four videos available on the parent site, Scoreland, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with Scoreland and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.

The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.

The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit 60 Plus MILFs

4. 60 Plus MILFs (1)

Pay
Active
72
pat362 (369) 12-27-12  06:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They offer content that is rare to see on the net and even more so when you consider that it stars North American women.
+The sex is surprisingly good considering the age of the performers.
+Content is dated and they appear to still be updating.
+Many of the performers look good for their age and seem to still be all natural. Not too mention that they appear to be mostly unknowns.
+You can see the age of each performer in the photo section of the site.
+You can download the photosets of each video as a single zip file and resolution is minimum 1200x800(but many of the pics are 1600x1063).
+You also get access to 50plus milfs.
Cons: -This site like it's sister site 50plus does not allow members to download videos that are older than 6 weeks.
-The site is quite tiny with only 72 videos and they don't update regularly or with any kind of schedule so that number does not grow by much each year.
-Many of their performers have more than one video on this site and on 50 plus so you are getting some similar content.
-Since these women are in their 60's then they don't look like women under 40 or let alone under 30.
Bottom Line: *I debated whether I should do a seperate review of this site or simply add the info on my 50plus review since the transition from both site is seemless to members but I decided to do a seperate one just in case Score decides to split the sites. This way each site will have it's own review and that is important because this site is so much smaller than the olther one.

*The thing to know about this site is that it's women in their 60's having hardcore sex with men that are definetely half their age or younger and don't let the gray ins ome of their hair fool you because they can give as good as they take. Sadly the site also doesn't have any kissing between the performers which is too bad because that would add a lot more passion and heat to the scenes.

*They don't allow downloads other than those released in the last six weeks but because they don't update as often as their 50plus site then you actually get less for your money.

**Bottom line is that there are almost no sites that cater to this type of fetish so even though it's mostly a streaming only site then it could be worth joining at least once to see what it offers and since you get access to 50plus milfs then that's not a bad deal. Of course if they seperate both sites then it will probably take years before they have enough content to make a visit worth it. that is unless more 60 years old start doing porn.**
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 50Plus MILFs

5. 50Plus MILFs (1)

Pay
Active
78
pat362 (369) 12-27-12  08:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They offer content from a niche that is rare to find on the net.
+They offer all exclusif content.
+They have a surprisingly wide selection of models who for the most part look natural.
+These women handle some pretty huge dicks and a fair amount of them even do anal with said dicks.
+The sex is often quite good but(see con).
+There are 133 videos that can be streamed online with a resolution of 480p and 720p.
+All the videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is at least 1200x800.
+They are still updating and it appears that it's anything from two to four updates per month.
+All content is dated.
+Many of the performers are unknowns so this is probably the only place you'll see them do this kind of stuff.
+You also get access to 60plus milfs.
Cons: -The biggest con against this site is that it's for all intense and purposes a streaming only site. You can only download videos released in the last six weeks.
-The sex is hardcore and quite good but there is no kissing at all which I found disapointing.
-The navigation could be improved with the addition of keywords but then again the site is so small that this isn't such a problem.
-The load time for streaming is inconsistent so that it will sometime load quickly and stream well and other times it takes a while for the video to load and you can forget skipping ahead or suffer slow load time.
-The same performer will sometime have more than one scene so that may or may not be a problem for some.
-These women are in their 50's and although they don't always look their age. They also don't look like young women anymore.
-Videos can only be downloaded in one resolution which is 640x360.
Bottom Line: *This site offers content that is badly underrepresented and therefore it is nice that it exist. It would be a lot nicer if all the videos were made available for download. They have their reason why they aren't but I've never really understood them.

*The important thing to know about this site is that you are watching women in their 50's have hardcore sex with men that are often half their ages and who plow into them like there is no tomorrow. This is not vanilla porn so if that is what you want then you'll want to stear clear because hard pounding vaginal and often anal sex is on the menu on this site. A significant amount of the male performers are Latino and African American so if interracial isn't your thing then you'll also want to stay away.

*The one thing that I wanted to see and which is lacking is kissing before and during the scene and strangely there isn't a single instance where you see this. Kissing would go a long way in increasing the heat factor and since there isn't any then that's make the scene less appealng than it could be.

**Of course making videos available for download would be nice and they lose points because they don't but not as many as some other sites might because their content is too rare to excessively penalize them for a business decision.** They probably already lose customers due to their no download policy anyway.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Score Videos

6. Score Videos (1)

Pay
Active
81
pat362 (369) 11-18-12  07:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +You get access to Score HD as well as Score to Go.
+There are over 2000 videos to choose from.
+You can download the videos in MP4 and WMV and basic resolution is 854x480.
+They truly have a variety of models to choose from which are based on age and body type.
+Their content goes back at least a decade and further for some models so that could be a plus for some fans.
+They update with about 2 new scenes per week.
Cons: -None of the scenes are tagged so you can't do a search by keyword.
-They have a lot of older content that hasn't aged well.
-A portion of their content is also availbale on Score HD and the quality is better on that site than here.
-Many of their models that may be your type.
-You can only see the dates of the updates on selected pages so a search by model name will not tell you when the scene was shot or when it was uploaded.
-Part of the content as a synopsis but another part is phtotsets of the scene so you ahev to scroll through a bunch of pages to see what's inside the video.
Bottom Line: *I can see the logic for why Score chose to combine this site with Score HD but in some ways that is a disadvantage to this site because the quality is superior at Score HD and since they both share content then that makes this site's content obsolete. That's only part of their problem because they have a large percentage of older content (production wise) where the quality is rather poor and that clashes even more with their newer stuff. I mean it's kind of nice to offer members stuff made in 90's but if you don't remaster it then it's almost worthless to download except for nostalgia sake.

*There are still a lot of decent suff here but it won't be in HD and you'll have to do a lot of digging to find it. Mind you that is part of the fun so I didn't really mind all that much. Of course I might have had a different opinion if the site had many thousands of videos to go through.

*There are plenty of things they could do to improve the site but the first one is that they should have only one site called Score videos where all the sites send their stuff once it's no longer available for download on these sites. Having two sites offering identical stuff is redundant as well as time consumming. Of course having only one site would mean that the site would have a lot more content and since they don't tag their scenes and navigation is almost non-existant then that would require them to serioulsy improve this new site or suffer the conseqences of displeased customers. Having only one site would require that they have both an HD section as well as a regular one so that membes only intereested in HD content wouldn't wase their time going through content they never plan to view or download.

**The bottom line is that this would probably be a better stand alone site but would anyone join this site if it didn't also offer HD content?**
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XL Girls

7. XL Girls (0)

Pay
Active
78
Jutti24 (12) 07-14-12  01:15am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -) Updates with videos/photos multiple times a week
-) Large variety of models
-) Easy navigation, appealing design
-) Zipped photosets are downloadable (although not with a unique filename)
-) Video and photo quality of new sets is very good (720p and 1200x800 pixels) - i like the colors and contrast and detail in the photos. Makeup is used on the models
-) Plenty of content and variety
-) Download speed was decent for me
Cons: -) Videos are downloadable ONLY for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you can watch it streaming only.
-) Zipped photosets for download have no unique filename.
-) old content (and that's a big part of the content) is not so great in quality - mostly low-resolution photos.
Bottom Line: As always, this is a BBW-site and as such anybody looking for something else should go elsewhere.

But those who enjoy this kind of content (and you can preview the featured models as a non-member quite well), will definitely like the content inside. You'll find many models in great videos. Video quality of new videos is good (720p) and so is the photography. The overall styling of the model is stylish with makeup - so not as natural as some others might like. Content is exclusive as far as I could see.

However there is one MAJOR ISSUE with the site: Videos are only downloadable for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you'll have to be happy with streaming (so no viewing later on). To be frank, this sucks. All websites that restrict downloading of videos suck and this is the reason why I didn't give it a 90+ point rating. I'd be happy to pay a premium to download all videos as I please. Nothing during sign-up tells you about that restriction.

Site navigation is easy and straightforward, so is downloading of videos (if they are downloadable) and photos. One minor glitch with photoset downloading: the file naming is "Modelname.zip" so your photosets aren't named to matching videos - you'll have to rename (or auto-rename) the file during download so you don't overwrite existing zip-sets.

Important during signup: They try to screw you when signing up by offering a 19,90 one-month recurring option and a 29,90 one-month NON-recurring option. Be aware what you choose.

Verdict: The action and the models are excellent and I'd somewaht recommend the site. The downloading restriction is downright ugly, hence a big fine in rating-points.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 50Plus MILFs

8. 50Plus MILFs (1)

Pay
Active
65
shooter (11) 02-17-12  08:32am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good selection of milfs and gilfs.

Streaming video quality is good.
Cons: Can only download recent scenes.

Only two updastes a month.
Bottom Line: This site has a lot of potential but falls short. If you like the type of models they have, older sexy women, then the content is great. Many of those sexy seniors love to take cock. They perform hardcore sex inluding anal, facial, and creampies. The women looks great and are paired up with a younger man. The video quality is good. They are available in dvd quality 6630X380 in wmv and mp4 format. You can also rate the scenes and leave comment on them. There are some nice picture sets available for each scene and model too.

The really bad part about this site is the lack of downloadable content. They only offer the most recent two months to download the scenes. All the other past scenes are available but for streaming only. The other bad part is they only update twice a month so that leaves you with a total of four or five scenes to download from the start. There reason behind this is to stop online piracy of there scenes they stated. The problem with that is the site is run by the Score group and they have other grat sites that don't have this limitation on downloads.

In short with the lack of updates and downloads this site is not very good. You do get access to 60 plus milfs, which is basically the same but with slightly older women. If they updated at least twice a week on both sites and allowed all the content to be downloaded it would be a great site but until then its really not worth it.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XL Girls

9. XL Girls (0)

Pay
Active
80
BubbaGump (18) 01-15-12  03:12pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Large number of models.
-- Easier to naviagte and find content than Scoreland master site.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons: -- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- For some reason, the DL speed and streaming was slower than at Scoreland.
-- Probably not enough updates to keep long-term subscribers used to large volume. Best for one-month subscriptions.
-- Should be part of Scoreland main subscription.
Bottom Line: Background:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.

--Navigatiuon and menus are a bit simplified from the information-overload present at Scoreland.

-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.

-- Streaming and DL speeds are not as quick as at the master site Scoreland.
-- The site will likely not keep long-term interest. Site should probably be included with a Scoreland subscription and not exist as a seperate pay-site.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Summary:
I added this site when signing up for a one-month subscription to Scoreland. The cost was $19.99 for one month, non-recurring.

BBW stands for Big Beautful Women.

The first two two terms here are relative. I have had an erotic interest in this genre over the years.. I have discovered that 'Big' can mean anything from slightly plump to to morbidly obese. The women shown at XL girls generally falls somewhere in the middle. One characteristic all the models have is that that they all sport large, natural-looking breasts. Most appear to be young, twenty-somethings, althought there are a few MILF models. Pretty faces are the norm.

Beauty is also in the eye of the beholder and this genre won't be for everyone. It is refreshing, however, to see more natural-looking women in this industry--the kind you are likely to encounter on the street. Also, in the photosets, the models will actually smile and don't look irritated or annoyed.

The photos at the site are much more profresinal-looking than most BBW images I have come accross in the past, The photographers could tone down the airburhsing a bit, however.

I guess this genre is defined by anything that does not fit the cookie cutter mold of what the average man would find appealing in terms of physcique. The women at XLGirls look like natural women on the plump side, all with motherly figures.Silicone appears to be used sparingly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conclusion:

This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of plump, rubenesque women one would find in classic paintings, albeit with large chests.

The site is a mix of photos and videos. There is not a large amount of XX action here and most videos are solo or girl-girl.

IMO, who would like this site:

Photo lovers and those with a fetish for plump, rubenesque, motherly women or those who have a breast fetish. Also, this site will appeal to those who enjoy a more classic, conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.

IMO, who won't like this site:

Those who are looking for the cookie-cutter, well-toned models who spend most of their days in the gym and count their calories. Also, those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Grades(obviously subjective):

Site Navgigation: B
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: C
Quantity: B
XXX Action: D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions for improvement:

Addf this site to the standard Scoreland subscription.

More creativity in photos. Diversify the photosets to include more angles and perspectives. Photosets tend to stick to a classic script.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Scoreland

10. Scoreland (0)

Pay
Active
80
BubbaGump (18) 01-15-12  12:04pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Huge amount of content.
-- Large variety of model types within the 'big-boob' genre.
-- Fairly decent DL speeds.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons: -- Not the most user-friendly site when it comes to navigation or finding content.
-- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- A little pricey compared to competition.
--- Although the content amount is huge, it is easy to become a bit overwhelmed by it when trying to decide on selections.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- No HD Video Download Option--Only Streaming.
Bottom Line: Background:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Pros and Cons:

-- The amount of content here is huge. I used to subscribe to Voluptuous and Score back in the 90's. The models represent the type of women I find attractive. You can find content dating back to the 90's on the site.

-- Streaming and DL speeds seem to be up to par and there are no problems to report here, so far.

-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.

-- It can be a bit difficult at first to navigate around the huge of amount of content in the archives. More user-friendly options would be nice.

-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.

-- Subscription rates also seem to be a little bit higher in cost than the typical site.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Conclusion:

This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of large-breasted women, especially of the voluptuous and/or curvy variety. Models can range from thin-and-stacked to soft and voluptuous.

The site is a mix of photos and videos. If viewing softcore images of chesty, well-endowed women is your thing, you won't be dissapointed. There is a fair amount of xxx video action to be found, but the majority of presentations, both photo and video, are softcore solo or girl-girl.

Update 1/24/12-- HD Video Downloading is NOT an option. One can only stream HD videos. I discovered this recently. One must subscribe to Score HD to download HD.

IMO, who would like this site:

Photo lovers and those with a breast fetish who enjoy a variety of body types and those who enjoy a more classic conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.

Who won't like this site:

Those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Grades(obviously subjective):

Site Navgigation: C-
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B+
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: A
Quantity: A+
XXX Action: C

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Suggestions for improvement:

Improve the site navigation utility and add options to make the user experience a bit easier.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 40 Something Mag

11. 40 Something Mag (0)

Pay
Active
50
pat362 (369) 04-17-11  06:50pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Decent selection of natural and enhanced models to choose from.
-Photosets can be dowloaded in 800 x 600 and 1600 x 1200 resolution.
-They are still updating.
-Content is dated.
-You can search by models name, body type hair color and type of shoot.
Cons: -The bulk of the videos are streaming only.
-They only have 270 videos.
-They only have 150 photosets.
-They only have 13 magazines.
-There is a large logo on each pic.
-Their preview pages are serioulsy misleading.
-Their pages are clutered with offers from other sites.
Bottom Line: -There must have been some serious changes at 40something since January of this year because TBP gave this site an 82 and claimed that videos were downloadable. In my book 10 downloadable videos out of 270 is not enough to claim that the site allows downloads.

-This is one of the worst case of half truth and lies that I've seen a site do in many years. I joined based on the TBP review and the sites own preview pages. First lie. They claim that you can get access to every 40something magazine ever printed. Yes, you do but you will have to buy them so not free. Second lie: They mention all the videos and pic sets that the model has and they do say x number of videos from other sites but if they aren't availbale on your site then why bring them up. The only conclusion I see is that they know that people like me will assume that these videos are available on their site but content can be also be found on those other sites.

This site belongs to the score group which owns a huge amount of other sites but because of this site I don't think I will ever join any of their otrher sites for fear that they are lying on that site as well.

***This site is to be avoided at all cost or you will regret wasting your 20$ like I am at this very moment.***
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 18 Eighteen

12. 18 Eighteen (0)

Pay
Active
81
TheSquirrel (53) 02-01-11  10:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: No DRM/DL limits.
A variety of download options with good download speed.
Sites still updating.
Lack of irritating things Porn Users hate like pulling hair, spitting, slapping, insulting the models, mucking about on camera etc.
Good customer service, and no pre checked cross sells.
No regional discrimination.
$10 discount for 18 Eighteen through TBP/PU.
Easy sign in procedure.
Good quality video and zipped pics.
Mostly no contraceptives.
Models are young, attractive, have girl next door looks, and there are mercifully few fake breasts.
Cons: Navigation is difficult, not least because there are far too many links and adverts for trying to sell members material outside the membership.
Far too many tattoos and piercings.
To use a perfect Drooler phrase - "pussy fixated" sums up the photography and camerawork, which is a shame because they are professionally done, with both the videos and pics looking good. It's just there are far too many close up groin shots, and three quarter shots, especially in the videos, where you don't see the whole model.
Very little anal.
Suprisingly few videos compared to some sites, especially long serving ones. Less than half the material on 18 Eighteen is hardcore.
Bottom Line: TNA Tryouts and Picking Up Pussy are included with membership. You get a 10 dollar discount through TPB/PU. I was more interested in TNA and PUP than 18 Eighteen as they specialise more in hardcore, but I joined through 18 because of the discount. Less than half of the 18 Eighteen material is hardcore.

Pics come in downloadable zips or you can watch them as slideshows. Videos can be streamed or downloaded. Specs are as follows-:

Pics 1600 high or 800 medium resolution. TNA only has around 16-30 in each set whereas PUP and 18 Eighteen have 50-80.

Full downloadable videos in HD wmv at 1280x720 and medium HD wmv at 854x480. Medium wmv at 640x360 and mp4 at 640x360. There are also 5 minute segments in wmv at 640x360 and 360x240, or mp4 at 640x360. Unfortunately 18 Eighteen does not have the high 1280x720 downloadable videos. They do have 720 HD streaming. Full videos or 5 minute clips are available for mobile devices.

The videos on TNA Tryouts take the form of a girl coming to the door and pretending to be a newcomer. She takes part in a short interview before doing a strip and having sex. On Picking Up Pussy the build up takes the form of a girl being picked up by a driver or on a street/in a park. On 18 Eighteen the sex starts a little quicker. You see the same girls on all three sites, so the build up is just a bit of acting to get the scene going. Camera work and pics are good quality, but once again there is far to too much groin/pussy oriented and three quarter close ups for my taste.

On TNA Tryouts and Picking Up Pussy the videos and photo sets are dated, so although they are kept separate you can match up the pics to the video. On 18 Eighteen it's horrible. Very little is dated so in most cases you have to find either the photo set or video, then go to the model directory to match up the videos and pics. In fact there are so many bits and pieces, which are usually not great quality, that trying to find anything is very time consuming and annoying, because it's all mixed up with the upsells. Some of the material comes with the membership, some of it doesn't, and it's really tedious trying to sort out which is which. In the end I spent most of my time on the two bonus sites.

As on all sites, the older material is poorer quality. Given how long 18 Eighteen has been going I was surprised at how little high spec material was available. There was not a lot of hardcore avavailable on 18 Eighteen, but the other two sites are purely hardcore. Today I have counted 15 videos and photo sets on TNA, with 5 of them being 2011 updates. On PUP there are 30 videos and photo sets, with 5 being 2011 updates.

On cancellation there was an offer to remain for five pounds. If navigation was not so hard I'd have probably taken the offer.

However, I consider the money well spent, and good value. This is another site that I find to be almost old fashioned, and better for it, because of the lack of those annoying cons that we all hate.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 40 Something Mag

13. 40 Something Mag (0)

Pay
Active
62
messmer (137) 11-06-10  10:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large and exclusive amount of content.

Mostly attractive models.

Good picture quality ... however ...
Cons: ... let me start with the biggest con. Pictures should be their strength. That's what the magazine is all about however they manage to ruin every single set (latest ones zipped and around 1600px) with an oversized, intrusive, aggravating watermark that's been placed in the wrong spot. So for many collectors pictures are out.

As to the videos, they are woeful, with the newest ones in 640x360 wmv format with a total bitrate between 1500 and 2500. Older ones are even tinier in 320x240 mpg format. I had to get my info re. the latter by taking a peak at TBPs review because, as the previous reviewer stated, my browser crashed every time I attempted to download an older video.

Homepage is hopelessly cluttered with sales offers and other extraneous material. Preview pictures of recent updates are ridiculously tiny.

Way too much hardcore material. This might be a plus for some but with the material coming from a magazine this disappointed me, personally.
Bottom Line: I didn't check my personal statistics but this must be the lowest rating I've ever given anyone.

I see no redeeming value in this site because between picture sets that are being ruined by the watermark, and videos that are only available in yesterday's outdated quality, plus the browser crashes, as well as the crass and obvious attempts to make some extra sales to their members there's absolutely nothing for me here.

I had always had my quarrels with these folks about the watermarks (see my previous comments) but was tempted to subscribe because sister sites 50plus MILF and 60plus MILF finally gave me some lingerie I liked and I was hoping for the same here, at least in the videos.

A bitter disappointment and waste of my money.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 50Plus MILFs

14. 50Plus MILFs (1)

Pay
Active
90
messmer (137) 07-06-10  11:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (75), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to the niche. All models are over fifty and most are quite attractive to those of us who like mature women. Models seem to be genuinely enjoying themselves.

Videos available for streaming and download at HD quality at both 720p and 1280p

Excellent streaming at 720p.

Downloads were generally quick for me.

Photo sets come in medium and large sizes, zipped. Large is usually around 1500 px but fluctuates, even within the sets.
Cons: Picture sets are relatively small, 35 - 50 pictures per set in the ones I tested. As in its sister site 40somethingmagazine the watermarks are too garish and huge and tend to spoil the picture.

Watermarks are also quite prominent in the videos but because they take up less of the screen they are easier on the eye.

Download speed was erratic. Some videos downloaded at 1.8 MB/s (single download through DTA) while others barely reached 600 KB/s.

Only one download at a time when using DTA through Firefox. Much slower speed when using regular Browser downloader.

Still a relatively small site with 49 models.

Videos and Picture sets only update once a week, which might not be a bad thing since attractive 50+ models are few and far between and the chance is always there that the quality gets watered down.

Navigation is simple but nevertheless takes a bit of getting used to.
Bottom Line: I love this site and it would have rated well in the nineties if it hadn't been for those accursed big watermarks and the fact that it is still a relatively small site.

The quality of the videos and pictures is excellent. The ladies are confident and at ease with their bodies and sexuality and appear to be having fun at the shoots. I especially enjoy the interviews because it makes the scenes the models appear in later on more "intimate" for some reason.

I would highly recommend this site, for a month, to lovers of truly older women.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply


Visit XL Girls

15. XL Girls (0)

Pay
Active
80
Darrow (8) 06-10-10  04:49am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: 1) This site features all natural, large breasted, really heavy women. There are no skinny women here, but I like women with curves and there are lots of curves here. Most, if not all of these overweight woman are very beautiful.

2)It has a really large selection of photos. There are around 1500 sets; each of them are zipped for easy downloading and there is a good mix of hardcore and softcore material.

3) The video streams since about November 2009 have been decent quality: 480p and 720p.
Cons: 1) The streaming video content since November 2009 is not uniformly high quality. About 6 or 7 are lower quality streams (including two in June 2010).

2) The quality of downloadable videos is quite bad. They are 640 x 360 for both WMV and MP4 files that are somewhat grainy. Not a bother for me as I like streaming, but this would be an issue for others.

3)The older videos are utterly crappy in terms of quality and there has been no move to replace them.

4) The price: TBP lists the price as 39.99 per month recurring and it may be 29.99. This is fairly high for what this site offers. This is a bonus site when you are a member of scoreland for more than one (or maybe two) months. I find scoreland to be worthwhile to keep as a site for extended periods of time, so I get XL girls for free.

5) Updates are a bit slow. You get two or three a week.
Bottom Line: Really good site if you like your women heavy. This is an excellent photosite for looking at pictures and downloading them. In the last year, the site has become excellent for streaming video, but it is still mediocre for donwloadable videos.

Not worth the price as a stand-alone site, however as part of the Scoreland loyalty package it is excellent.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 50Plus MILFs

16. 50Plus MILFs (1)

Pay
Active
80
Darrow (8) 03-11-10  06:34am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: I really like Milf sites. However when I go to Milf sites, I see a lot of women who are clearly in their late 20's and early 30's and I really hate that because they are not really Milfs.

You don't have the issue with 50+ Milfs. They are all 50+ and most of them are quite attractive 50+ milfs. All of them are doing hardcore and many of them do anal.

The updates are weekly; the site has a good number of videos.

Some of the models are exclusive to the score group.
Cons: Being a Mac user I prefer MP4's and MOV files. They have them, but they are the inferior quality files.

The navigation could be a little better, but it is O.K. for now.
Bottom Line: Possibly the best hardcore milf site out there. Well worth the purchase price and worth staying for awhile.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tits And Tugs

17. Tits And Tugs (0)

Pay
Active
70
james4096 (126) 08-03-09  12:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Nice HD quality videos
- Several video options to choose from
- No DRM
- Zip Photoset downloads
Cons: - Small Library(but growing)
- Already repeating models
- A little bit pricey
- not all exclusive content
- image rez could be better
- Site design isn't great
Bottom Line: What we have here is your basic titty fucking and handjob site. You might also see a little bit of penetration. The models are all pornstars and are attractive with big breasts. The videos are mostly shot in POV. Scenes end with the man unloading on the girl's boobs. The content okay if you like big tit titty fucking.

There are only 31 scenes and the site adds a new scene every Friday. So it's going to be a while before this site is worth the money. One suggestion that I have is that they make sure to try to repeat models as little as possible. I've noticed girls already reappearing in scenes for the site, and for an niche that is so specific and repetitive that can be a bad thing. I was pleased that they had 5 or so different black girls on the site. Some sites seem to be afraid to have black too many black girls.

They do offer quite a few video options. First you have the regular 640x360 in wmv and mp4. The HD videos are 1280x720(2100kbps) wmv. There is also a "medium HD" that is 854x480 wmv. Any of the above mentioned are come in full scene or split into clips. They also have full scene downloads specifically for 3 different mobile devices, Ipod/iPhone, PSP and Windows Mobile. Lastly, you can stream it in flash in your browser.

I was not extremely impressed by the resolution of the images. The were 800x1200, and don't ask me why but you can also download them in 400x600. I don't know what they were thinking. Anyway, you can download either in a zip. At least these are actual still photos, not screen caps.

This isn't a terrible site just a small one, and in time it will grow and get better. I got this site as a bonus from Score HD. I could not imagine nor would I recommend anyone pay 29.95 for this site alone. Though I cannot suggest any at this time, there has to be some cheaper or bigger titty fucking sites out there. If you can get it from Score HD via loyalty bonus do that, but don't pay. IMHO, a site this small and specific belongs in a network, not standalone.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Leg Sex

18. Leg Sex (0)

Pay
Active
81
cucuta (6) 05-24-09  05:28pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A good sized archive of pictures. Probably 400-700 models
- A large variety of model types from every category (young/old, vanilla/ethinic, skinny/voluptous etc.
- picture sets are sorted by either model or by "specialty sets" including peeping Tom, Socks, Panty pudding, undercurrent, hose beast etc.
- There is a real paper and ink magazine (remember those) that goes with the site and you can also navigate that way.
- Models go from good to excellent
- Content also has a large variety including sets featuring generic stripping, toys, and boy/girl, girl/girl scenerios.
- There are sets with slow peeling of clothes and many photos in various stages of undress.
- Well maintained site - includes forum, frequent updates, what's new, etc.
Videos are presented by model or directly in video window. There are both short and long videos and most can be either downloaded or viewed streaming.
- Got in on the 19.95 special
-Picutres are avaiable in medium or large size (800 vs 1600)
Cons: - Picture quality was not always up to current standards. Many pictures are small and washed out looking.
- Also many pictures look highly air brushed. Others have white clothes on white background which lose definition.
- Many models have only a single 20 picture photo set. Others have only a single 60 picture photo set. Very few have more than one or two photo sets, so when you find a model you really like you don't have the quantity of her to go after.

-Pictures appear out of sequence. The girl many strip down and the next ten photos have her with here clothes on again.

- I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights/
Bottom Line: I am not sure what a leg fetish sight is. I was looking for a little harder edged version of the "only tease" type sights and came away a bit disappointed. I am a photo guy not a video guy and about half the pictures are too old and washed out to be useful. The most recent content is much better and there are about 5 or 6 models that hit it right on the nail - Extravagant lingerie or tight clothing, slow stripping, nice posing in clothes and out.

My bottom line is I think in this age of specialization, this sight is too broad based. Are they a lingerie/glamour sight? Are they a foot fetish sight? (What is a leg fetish anyway)
Are they a standard photo sight? Are they a pantyhose sight?

I don't want to trash LEGSEX because I got some really good photos out of it - just not enough.
For example I am just about done with my membership and I have downloaded 403 pictures from LEGSEX. I went to my Only Tease directory and the total from there was 1,919.

I think it is worth the discounted price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Big Boobs POV

19. Big Boobs POV (0)

Pay
Active
75
roseman (253) 04-06-09  02:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - HD videos.
- ZIP download option available for photosets.
- Multiple download formats for videos.
- No DRM video protection.
- No download limit.
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
- Exclusive content.
- Good looking models.
- Regular updates (weekly).
- Bonus videos offered (Just 3).
Cons: - Very expensive for the content offered.
- Needs growth.
- Website design could be better.
- Navigation needs improvement.
- Not enough bonus content offered.
- Download manager use not allowed.
- Downloading problems.
- Slow updates.
- Limited trial option.
Bottom Line: Big Boobs Pov is an interesting adult website that surely needs improvement.
First of all, it's collection is small at the moment about 30 scenes available for download and 3 bonus ones.
Website design is simple and surely needs improvement. Navigation is not hard but has room for improvements as well.
Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format and quality is very good. Videos have no DRM video protection and can be downloaded in multiple formats or can be streamed online, quality is very good. There is no download limit and downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). At this point, I have to say that download managers use is not allowed and I had a few downloading problems.
Monthly subscription price is expensive for the content offered. Site updates slowly once per week with a new scene and content is exclusive. Trial option gives only limited access.
In conclusion, I believe that this sites content is interesting but it's monthly subscription price is very expensive. Your decision.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Leg Sex

20. Leg Sex (0)

Pay
Active
65
TrashMan (Disabled) 03-05-09  12:46pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: +ZIP downloads of both 800 and 1600px versions of the galleries offered
+A lot of models
+Star directory with headshots
+There is a model search but it is only accessed on the model directory page
+They have all the picture sets categorized by model, yes, but they also categorize them by magazine issue, going all the way back to their 2001 series.
+Good mix of American and Non-American models
+All updates are archived back to 2004, retaining their addition date (however that date is not displayed on the actual page for the update)
+A little fun addition - feet around the office. A few feet pics every couple of days. This is a leg/feet site.
+Downloads work with download managers
Cons: -A good portion of the galleries are small...very small
-All images watermarked
-All videos watermarked
-Because LegSex has been around for a while (in magazine form, not so much for the website) they feature girls before their prime, and as such the girls use very old aliases (or other unknown ones). Maxxx=Brooke Stone, Scotti Andrews=Clare, Sheila Rossi=Tina.
-Most models are one-and-done, meaning only one update.
-They have movies, but they are so hard to find. You click the section titled "Move it!". Nope, its not called "videos" or "movies"..."Move it!"
-Downloads have generic file names (scene.wmv, 1600.zip)
-Videos offered only in WMV
-Solo content outnumbers hardcore content by a wide margin
-Update schedule stinks...2-3 updates per week, most are just image updates, not many video updates
-The tour page looks better than the actual members page.
Bottom Line: Just another porn site...put it that way. Not enough is offered to put it in the same league as DDF Productions' HotLegsAndFeet.

There are some old models on here who I certainly like and were looking for (Sheila aka Tina, Brooke aka Maxxx, Scotti aka Clare, etc.) but the site does not offer much OF THEM. It is one gallery here, one gallery there...and all the galleries are 20 pictures, standard. I think the pictorals are more, but there aren't many pictorals...most galleries are just the pics which were featured in their magazine, in other words, 20 pictures :P.

It says a lot when the TOUR page looks better than the MEMBERS page. The TOUR model directory looks so much better than the MEMBERS model directory.

It also is a pain in the neck that everything is so hard to find. I spend quite some time looking for the movies, briefly going so far as just assuming there were none. Everything is not named properly...Videos section is called "Move it", pictorals are called "Pic-toe-rals". Quit the fancy and just stick with what works.

If you want a Legs and Feet site, stick with HotLegsAndFeet from DDF Productions...its a hell of a lot better.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bootylicious Mag

21. Bootylicious Mag (0)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 01-05-09  06:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted price through TBP.
-Download managers supported.
-The most recent videos can be downloaded WMV 640x360, 2000 kbps or MP4 640x360.
-Videos can streamed or downloaded, in parts or as a whole video.
-No DRM or download restrictions. I did get the message a few times that I was exceeding their bandwidth restrictions while downloading.
-Nice mix of masturbation, softcore and hardcore videos. Most picture sets were not hardcore.
-Photos can be zipdownloaded.
-Photos are 1600x1063.
Cons: -No access to other websites in the network. Discounts available for multiple signups though.
-Full archive available only by scrolling through the list of models. The video and picture sections were dreadfully incomplete. The archives contain nothing before October 2007, although the site started in December 2005.
-I suspect that some of the material is no longer on the site. I counted 85 models, 70 videos, and 147 photo sets. Compare this to the TBP facts update as of 8/24/8 which has 73 videos and 263 picture sets. I see that new material has been added, yet the site is smaller.
Bottom Line: The site specializes in big asses and generally has larger women as a result. As such it can be compared to other sites such as XLGirls and Roundandbrown. I found the videos generally more interesting here than on either of these sites. The others focus more exclusively on body parts such as breasts in XLgirls and ass in roundandbrown. This site is more whole girl with an emphasis on the part as a secondary matter. I prefer whole girl to parts. XLgirls is mostly white girls. In contrast, roundandbrown and this site have mostly black and latina girls. More than half are black, probably two thirds. What I also preferred here was that there is some anal, which was sadly lacking in roundandbrown. Overall I liked the sex, but it was not greatly different from what you could find on a site featuring ordinary gonzo style porn. There were many well known pornstars, but some of the models were strippers and not the most common names and faces you could find anywhere. I did not appreciate the lack of any easy way to find the content or the fact that apparently some of the material is no longer on the site. Good value for a discounted site, but I would feel disappointed at full price.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Linsey\'s World

22. Linsey's World (0)

Pay
Active
70
EroticShot (18) 12-21-08  11:39am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Given no reviews - though I would add - I had been a member of Linsey's site a while back as part of the Scoreland.com membership loyalty program. Her videos here are actually very good - there are a good number of them. Worth it for those who are into her. Nothing tremende here - vids are 150-200 megs in size. Quality is decent - probably most is lifted straight from the Score archives and film crew.
Cons: a storefront for her work - not a true amateur / solo model site.
Bottom Line: Join the Scoreland.com group and pick this up as a bonus (added 1 site per month).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Scoreland

23. Scoreland (0)

Pay
Active
85
EroticShot (18) 12-21-08  08:09am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: I was a member of this site for 6-8 months - the key is here is their loyalty program. I got in at a promotional pricing of $14.95 or $19.95 (not sure) - each month I would get access to 1 more site. You can't choose just any site - they give you 5 or 6 choices each month - the site you really, really want may not be on that list until the following month.

ScoreLand is a huge site. It's a large part of the Score Group's archive of content - which like Big Top Cinema or Pussyman, vivid, etc - shot and filmed a lot, a lot of content. The focus here is on large-bust models. You have video content in all their subdivisions like Naughty Newbies, Voluptuous (large women), etc. You can spend days on end here and not get through all the content.

Videos easily number into the hundreds - perhaps 300+ at 100megs all in all. Photoshoots are extensive as well - I don't remember particularly easy downloads for any of it. Not sure about zip files for images.
Cons: Layout, organization is poor. Downloads can be slow and are not easy to do en-masse. You have to work a bit to get the content down.
Bottom Line: Go for the loyalty program.
Go because there are a few models that you love and want to see their work here.
You can look up most content on Scoreland by model (or go to google and play around with xx model and scoreland.com in the search) - you can see most of the specific content before signing up.

Scoreland is unique in that this is THEIR content from 2-3 decades of filming and work. It doesn't get better if you like big bust.

Want higher quality - Go to danni.com (HOTBOX) or Suze.net (Suze Randall). Danni has the big bust queens as well.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Score Videos

24. Score Videos (1)

Pay
Active
80
EroticShot (18) 12-21-08  08:01am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Join this site if you want the largest database online of the VIDEOS of the Score models. That's it. The layout as others have said is 1990's esque - it's bad. The site usually updates daily - 1 new video per day. There are vids here that you can't find anywhere else.
Cons: Site allows a limited number of simulataneous downloads. Navigation is bad. You only get some content - sometimes you'll see the vid you want is on scoreland.com and not scorevideos.com.
Bottom Line: Fan of Score's models, big jugs, 90's type quality, plus all their fun - Boob Cruise and all the others???? JOIN! Download as much as you can...cancel!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Busty Merilyn

25. Busty Merilyn (0)

Pay
Active
75
EroticShot (18) 12-21-08  07:57am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: If you like Merilyn, aka Anya, this is her main website. BustyMerilyn is part of the Score network and is included in Score's membership rewards program - you must sign up through scoreland or similar for this. If you sign up here, there are no freebies (just Merilyn's site).

The site is currently updating - about 2 videos per month - not much. The vids are absolutely decent quality - 100-200meg files. Some appear to be HD (not certain). There were 37 total different videos as of this review - all different outfits. This is a great collection if you are a Merilyn fan, as I am.

There are about 50 photoshoots, the majority of which are shot by pro photographers (possible the Score.com crew).
Cons: Minimum updates. No interaction with Merilyn. No perks.
Bottom Line: Like Merilyn - want most of her videos and photos in 1 place? Sign up for a month.

No download limit that I can tell.

I absolutely loved the videos on her site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 50 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (9)
2. Babes Network.com (7)
3. DDF Network (6)
4. VideoBox (6)
5. Naughty America (6)
6. Bangbros Network (5)
7. Evil Angel (5)
8. FTV Girls (5)
9. Wow Girls (4)
10. Team Skeet (4)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.3 seconds.