Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company SSC Group LLC
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 55 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Tiny 4K

1. Tiny 4K (1)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (316) 07-15-14  05:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A small collection of scenes featuring some of the most petite U.S.-based models working today
- Ultra HD for those who want it
- TBP Discount
- Supports download managers
- Options for downloads
- Simple and effective site layout
- Photos available (single and zip)
Cons: - ‘Tiny’ doesn’t just describe the models
- 4K may be the answer to a question few are asking
- Updates are irregular
- Could / should be bundled with other sites until it grows
Bottom Line: I’ll get this out of the way first: I have no need for 4K videos so I didn’t download any to keep. I view most of my porn on a 24” monitor so going that large just doesn’t give me any advantage. When you factor in the file size the negligible benefit for me in viewing is offset by the extra space needed on a hard drive. For those who are interested though, the 4K files come in at 4096x2160, 10,000kb/s and 23fps.

And I’ll get the site’s main drawback out of the way now too: ‘tiny’ doesn’t just describe the models on the site. There are currently only 12 videos uploaded as I write this. A secondary drawback is that the update schedule is irregular so I can’t give any indication of how quickly the site will grow. The site started in early May and by the end of May eight scenes were available. No scenes were uploaded in June and they have since added four scenes in July (as of the 15th). But since the site is affiliated with a large online porn company I suspect that they will continue to grow.

The scenes they do have are very well shot and presented with excellent production values. The models are all mainstream porn models and they’re a who’s who of petite models working today. These are: Ava Taylor, Chloe Amour, Chloe Foster, Dakota Skye, Dillion Harper, Emma Stoned, Jenna J Ross, Kacey Jordan and Kacy Lane. Eleven of the scenes are b/g and one is b/g/g.

All of the scenes are vaginal only. I’m not sure what constitutes couples porn, but it is fair to say that these are not rough scenes where the model endures some hard sex, though some may see it this way since the site does flaunt petite models with large men, so it isn’t true artcore either. The scenes range from approximately 20 minutes to about 35 minutes.

The site is simple and effective, which it should be since it is this small. There are search functions which may prove useful as the site grows. Each scene opens into a separate page where a trailer is available, as are screencaps and photos. The photos are available as a zip but the screencaps aren’t. There is streaming available in SD and HD, and downloads are available in MP4 format (4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p), in 480p MPG1 and as WMV in 720p. There is some way to view the scenes that will satisfy most users. I downloaded the 720p MP4 which aren’t exactly that. They come in at 1280x674 and 23fps. Oddly, the bitrates vary widely from scene to scene with some being as low as 3,000 kb/s and some being as high as 10,000. Subjectively they look great even though the numbers are a bit lower than competitor sites.

The site supports download managers and I had no issue with links timing out in an unreasonably short time.

The site offers a TBP discount which is a good thing because until it grows it would be a poor value at the full price. The same company has 61 other sites listed here (Casting Couch X being the only one I’m familiar with) and it would be a good idea to bundle it with other company sites until it grows.

The bottom line is that at $18 for 12 scenes (with more to be added, presumably) the site likely isn’t a good enough value for the casual user. I think it represents fair value at the discounted price since this is a niche I like and many of the models here are those who are on my list of current favorites. I think the real measure of value here will be how quickly the site grows and how close they are able to stick to their premise of petite models while growing the site at a reasonable pace.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit POVD

2. POVD (1)

Pay
Active
75
skippy (40) 05-18-14  12:42pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very nice high quality videos
Generally very nice looking models
Good lighting and sets
A few minutes of amazing POV footage in every scene
Navigation is simple
Nice layout
Mostly US models that sometimes talk a little
Considerable variety of girls
Cons: Very little content
Some video is very distorted (think go-pro)
Many links to other sites you have to pay for
A few videos FROM other sites.
Infrequent updates
Inconsistent access and download speeds
Bottom Line: On the face of it, this is a pretty interesting site and I joined because of their amazing POV videos peppered around the Internet. I knew the content would be small, but not THIS small. There are only about 40 videos TOTAL that are native to this site as of 5/15/2014. Fortunately, the site owners take pity on you and give you limited, rather inconsistent access to a few other sites.

This site is actually part of a network, but you don't have full access to the rest of the network. Instead, you occasionally get to watch one of the other-site videos and maybe download that content, but you don't always have access to the other sites...maybe there is a view limit to external material or something...I'm not sure. I am thankful, though, that the site owners recognize that giving away some content from their other sites is a good idea, but there really isn't enough content within this whole network to compete with some of the bigger sites out there. If you DO want to join the whole network, it will set you back $69.00 a month or so for a monthly subscription. Thanks, but no thanks. I've been a member of some of the other sites, and they are also very small (Passion-HD, Casting Couch-X, Fantasy-HD, Pure Mature and ExGF) although the video quality is usually very good. I get that these guys have to make money, but Geeez.... explain the rules to me, please.

This site is a video site so the images are secondary and mostly just from the video shoot. Some are screen-caps but it seems that there is somebody taking pictures as well and many of these are not bad.

Download times seem a lot slower than average and downloads time out a LOT and once stopped cannot be restarted. I can't tell if this is due to a download limit or something else. Again, it would really help to know the rules.

The videos themselves are generally very good and all are 720 or 1080p. I have no idea why it has taken so long for POV videos to take off. There is nothing quite like a virtual scene where you are looking down at a totally naked girl who is on her back with her legs in the air as your virtual dick rams into her. And you get to see it from your POV for pretty much every sexual position. There is one scene where "you" are lying on a bed and a girl sits on your face, but then as the camera angle changes (you tilt your virtual head a little), you see another girl bouncing on your dick. That just seems like the pinnacle of virtual sex to me....at least until they start creating porn for an Oculus Rift!

There are a few nitpicks that I am not fond of, but other people may really like. For one, the male actor in many of the scenes is into licking assholes. A POV close-up of somebody licking a girls asshole is something you can't really un-see and I prefer not to see another tongue going into an asshole from that close....ever again. Also, there are a couple of girls that, although generally very attractive, just are not ready for their close-ups when you are talking about being a couple of inches away from their snatch in the glory of high-def. Fortunately, only a few girls fall into this category. But the most disturbing oddity is that occasionally the POV switches to that of the woman. It is sometimes interesting when the girl is in the shower or something, but this is really, really weird when the girl is getting fucked. There you are drawn into an amazing scene imagining you are screwing the lights out of this awesome girl and suddenly, the POV perspective changes, you are the girl and YOU are getting screwed! Sorry. HUGE NOPE! Same thing happens occasionally while the guy is getting head. I suppose when it comes to POV, there is "give and take", but I am not a taker in this regard. Some Day I'll fire up my Adobe Suite and edit all the junk out of these...some day...maybe. My suggestion to the camera crew and website owners is to take that stuff and create a separate girls POV site. One hetero and one lesbian, even. How about gay POV? You never know who might show up....well, except it won't be me. Sorry.

Bottom line? There are a few OMG videos here that make it worth it to visit, but try to do it at a discount and don't sign up for more than the minimum time-frame....at least until they get their video count up quite a bit. The quality is great, but the quantity is just too low for now.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Casting Couch X

3. Casting Couch X (2)

Pay
Active
89
rearadmiral (316) 10-24-13  06:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 74 scenes posted
- All scenes in HD
- Stunning models
- Large majority of models are fresh and unknown
- The male talent is rather ‘talented’ if you like big facials
- Updates regularly
- Screenshots and photos available
- TBP / PU discount
Cons: Major cons:
- Links time out after approximately 10 minutes
- Limited options for members with slower connections

Nitpicky cons:
- I had trouble with the MPG files (may just be me though)
- Scenes may be repetitive
- LOTS of ads
- Meaningless file names
- No tags or ability to sort by scene type

Subjective cons:
- 3 anal scenes?? Is that it??
- They’re affiliated with BangBros so watch out.
Bottom Line: Lately I’ve had a thing for ‘casting’ sites and have been joining anything that looks decent. A week ago that led me to this site. And in case you’re wondering, yes, I know that these are staged, but they’re staged so well that a viewer can get lost in the fantasy.

The site dates back to just over a year ago and not much has changed in the way the scenes are shot except for the location being much more upscale in newer scenes. The scenes follow a set formula and rarely deviate from that. Girl walks in, presents her ID, is interviewed, stands and undresses, girl poses nude and fingers herself a bit on the couch, guy standing/girl kneeling blowjob, occasionally becomes guy sitting on couch / girl kneeling blowjob (in some rare scenes with rimming), sex starts with girl standing bent over desk, girl on back on desk, guy laying on back on couch with girl riding, then switch back to girl on knees oral with a damn good facial. Most of the scenes stick pretty close to that formula. Some may find that repetitive, and it is, but it’s saved by the hot female models.

You could argue that even the models are formulaic in that they are all in their late teens or early twenties, all are petite (but not skinny) and all but a few have B or C cup breasts. Given the age group, tattoos and piercings are common but not overwhelming. Most of the models are new to me, though I did recognize a few faces that I have seen before. To say that all the models are good looking is either an understatement or an exaggeration depending on your preference. I say the former, but if you prefer larger or older models, then this site may not be for you.

The site has a very simple layout that is easy to use. On each page there are 12 scenes shown by a large thumbnail with the model’s name and the date of the upload. There are currently 74 scenes uploaded and it appears that a new scene is added every six days. Each scene is approximately 50 mins long.

Opening that thumbnail brings you to a page to access the scene. I’m a big fan of HD material and always download it when it is available, so it may seem odd for me to complain that there aren’t many download options. The choice is HD in MPG or WMV and an MP4 in 750x422. File sizes for the HD files averages 3GB, so this might not work for members with slower internet speeds. I downloaded the WMV version and all of those came in at 1920x1280, 9000kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively, they aren’t bad, but they aren’t the best I’ve seen either. The MP4s look pretty good so they may be a good compromise for slower connections. Still, more choices are better.

One problem I had that may be unique to me is that the MPG files stuttered badly. I tried multiple scenes on two computers and used two players and had the same result each time. This may not happen to you, but before you download a lot in MPG you should test them on your computer.

Photos and screencaps are available too. The photos are 1500x1000 and the screencaps are 1920x1280. The big difference is that the screencaps aren’t available as zips.

The site does support download managers, but the links time out after about 10 mins. Given the file sizes this means that lining up more than three scenes probably won’t work. Also, prepare to rename each file before you download it – they all use the same generic, meaningless name.

One annoyance that I can live with is the number of ads on the site. I don’t mind ads if they help keep the site going, but I had one big problem here. Given that the site is affiliated with BangBros, and BB has a reputation for some pretty unethical subscription and billing practices, I avoided even going near the ads for sites I otherwise might be interested in for fear of getting burned with an unwanted subscription.

I realize that not everyone will share my opinion on this, but I was disappointed to find only three anal scenes on the site. Many other ‘casting’ sites have a lot of anal because the genre lends itself to that sex act. “But honey, the big money is in anal…” This actually leads me to another problem that may not be a problem, and that’s that there are no tags or meaningful ways to sort the scenes. Why this really isn’t a problem is that with each scene closely following a formula tags are probably unnecessary: look at the model. Do you like her? If yes, you know exactly what she’ll be doing in the scene so download it.

The pros far outweigh the cons here when you consider the merits of the site. You have access to over 60 hours of HD porn at a discounted price. The scenes all have some hot, young and fresh models. The production values are high and the scenes all look great. What more could you ask for? I definitely recommend this site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Passion HD

4. Passion HD (2)

Pay
Newbie
72*
metem (4) 08-12-13  05:22pm
Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Video quality is good and plays back smoothly
-Some scenes are very nicely done and passionate
-Downloads work well and run at max speed
Cons: -Preview images and trailers don't always accurately portray content
-A lot of the content feels very similar
-A lot of the performances feel boring/mechanical
-No individual file names
-Picture sets are quantity over quality
Bottom Line: This site is... well, just okay. It pretty much does what it says on the tin, and the preview allows you to see pretty much what's on it (although video previews are somewhat limited). It seems to have about 3 to 4 updates a week, each on about 25-40 minutes in length. Current videos are in 1920x1080, although about half from the back catalog are 1280x720. Each video page has a selection of features, including the trailer, streaming video, screencaps from the video for a quick preview, and a photoset for the shoot. Content is boy-girl, with some three- and foursomes, and girl/girl only as an intro to a threesome+ scene.

Overall, the quality and fidelity of the photos and videos seems quite good, although it seems like they take a bunch of rapid-fire photos to get the perfect shot - and then just dump them all in to the archive, leaving you to sort out the decent ones. Cinematography on the videos is about average, with static shots that sometimes linger for too long.

The general quality is better than most, with decent locations and okay lighting. Male models are okay to dubious, with a couple of decent-looking (albeit heavily tatted) ones. Female models range from moderately attractive to not so much, and plenty of fake tits to go along with the real ones. At no point will you be under the illusion that you are watching anything other than career porn actors trying to shoot a "softer hardcore" version of porn.

I suppose the main problem is that for a site called Passion-HD, the passion itself is somewhat lacking. You don't get a real sense of passion or connection between the actors at all, and the camera-work doesn't help that much, giving you a lot of static scenes that go on for just a bit too long. The sex itself is very mechanical and doesn't feel spontaneous or dynamic at all, just people going through the motions. There are a few videos where things "click" and the passion shines through, but unfortunately they are few and far between. And as the site is pretty much boy-girl scenes shot in similar locations with similar models, there's no real variety to change things up, with the result being scenes that look fine in short clips, but come across as very boring overall. Intro, oral, handful of positions, creampie/facial, done. Yes, it's classier than most (there's not much anal at all, mostly oral/vaginal without anything more extreme than very light bondage or sex that's a little rough), but it feels very much like a traditional hardcore production trying to make the transition to "glamcore" or whatever you want to call it without really understanding what people are actually attracted to in the genre and changing their models, direction and production methods to match.

So, if you want to watch a bunch of people who look very much like porn-stars have very staid (but fairly classy and not gross) porn-star sex, with an occasional standout performance, you might enjoy it. However, if you're looking for anything with an even passing resemblance to passion, you may want to look elsewhere.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Passion HD

5. Passion HD (2)

Pay
Active
83
bibo (13) 12-28-12  01:52am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *aesthetic glam core
*top US models
*simple site navigation
*good value for money
*steady updates (every 2-3 days)
Cons: *lack of variety can get repetitive
*no individual filenames
*pretty low res picture sets
Bottom Line: Passion-HS is another representative of the new wave of glamcore or, as they are also called, heart core sites. The site is dedicated to featuring stylish sex scenes with a focus on asethetics and, well, passion instead of mechanical hard core. The scenes are mainly b/g with a few thee- or foursome scenes splashed in. The presentation of the scenes is quite simple and easy. All you get is a screenshot and a more or less creative scene name, such as "Country Girl" or "Dirty Diary". No boring scene descriptions that nobody wants to read anyways. In addition, all scenes are coming with a release date and a rating, (hopefully) generated by the users. Users can also leave a comment, which leads to the usual mix of "Great scene, more of her!" and "Boring. I'm quitting!"type of statements. I sometimes wonder why sites even bother with that kind of user feedback options.
Each video you download comes with the same filename, leaving it up to you to rename them (or have an army of wmv-original(24).wmv files on your hdd). Webmasters, who are too lazy to supply their content with individual file names should be sentenced to using Internet Explorer for the rest of their lives. No judge, no jury.


Technical standard of the videos is quite high, although not as crisp and clear as some other sites are offering. I guess that's the tribute you have to pay when you want a certain level of artsyness.
Each scene is about 25 minutes long.

Scenes can be downloaded in:

mpg 1920x1080 @9000kBit/s (about 1,2-1,5 GB)
wmv 1920x1080 @9000kBit/s (about 1,2-1,5 GB)
mp4 750x422

As you can see, there are no options between 1920 and 750, so that might scare off people who want higher resolution and yet have to keep an eye on their bandwidth.

Picture sets are about 200 pictures per shot and can be downloaded in one zip file, although a picture collector probably won't be satisfied with 1500px images.

You have the choice from 72 different models and 159 scenes. It doesn't take a degree in higher maths to figure out, that some models are appearing more than once. Esecially Holly (Michaels) and Anissa (Kate) seem to be some ssort of living inventory on the set. Apart from that, the model pool is filled with AAA models from the US.

Navigating the site is as easy as it can get. The site is clear, intuitive and well done.

Bottom line:
Passion-HD is a solid glam core site with a steady grow rate and high quality scenes. For the decent price, you'll get a lot of content. If you like glam core, you can't go wrong with this site.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Casting Couch X

6. Casting Couch X (2)

Pay
Active
82
bibo (13) 12-07-12  01:14pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (22), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - High quality hdtv scenes
- Hot, fresh girls with a semi-amateur charme
- Decent download speeds
- Special deals for the sister sites (passionhd etc)
- Straight and simple navigation
Cons: - Repetitive scenes
- Infrequent updates
- No filename specification
- Still pretty small collection
Bottom Line: Movies are coming in:

1920x1080 mpeg (about 2,5-3 GB per scene)
1920x1080 wmv (about 2,5-3 GB per scene)
750x422 mp4

Streaming:
HD and LD

Pictures are coming in

Screencaps (single download only)
HD Pics (appr. 300 per scene, 1500x100px, download in one ZIP file)


Castingcouchx.com is one of the new BangBros "we're-going-stylish-boys!" spin off's, along with passionhd and puremature. The theme is pretty straight forward: young girls who want to enter the porn business are being casted in a 1 on 1 session. Fortunately, it usually doesn't take much to convince the girl, that taking off her clothes and go for a trial sex scene is THE way to achieve this goal. Been there, seen that, got the .mpeg.

Casting videos are probably as old as internet porn (probably even older), and this site doesn't elevate this noble setting to a new level or something. It's plain and simple and the subscriber knows exactly what to expect, which - given the usual standards - is quite good in my books.

Site navigation is simple but ok. The scenes are sorted by release date, each scene comes with a screencap, date and first name of the girl, as well as the obligatory user rating. You can also browse the girls by name, which is currently a rather useless feature, because there are so few scenes available that it's kinda hard to lose track or get lost in the ammount of content. There are currently 23 scenes available (as of 12-07-2012).

Each scene is about 40 minutes long with 5-10 minutes of chatting, a couple of minutes of undressing and the rest is hardcore. This, I have to admit, is also the biggest weakness of the site in my opinion. It's quite repetitive. Almost every scene is a blueprint, the camera angles, the positions, the final facial, it all looks quite the same. Variety is definitely not the center of competence of this site. But otoh, that's not really neccessary, because the scenes are well done and very entertaining.

The girls are all good looking, there's not much silicone (I think I've spotted just one case of plastic boobs) nor tattoo madness. 10 Points to Gryfindor here.
A minor drawback is, that all the girls are just listed with their first names, which emphasizes the pseudo-amateur factor, but doesn't really help the collector.

Technically, the scenes are of a pretty high standard. However, apparently each scene is shot with two different cameras, a head-cam and a static cam. Those cameras are producing notably different pictures, which means a lot of changing during a scene. This is not a drama though, just some high-level-moaning.

One thing that really annoys me is the fact that all videos are coming with the same filename. Please, site admins of the world, it's not THAT hard to come up with separate filenames for each of your scenes!

Another negative aspect is the infrequent update history. Sometimes, there is a new update every day (sometimes even two, according to the history), sometimes, there is a 1 week gap between two updates. I know, quality over quantity and everything, but I still prefer a fixed update schedule.

The servers seem to be quite stable. I downloaded a couple of videos and always had my full cable bandwidth available.

Bottom line:
This is a promising site! If they manage to get a bit larger and keep up the standards, I'll certainly come back. If you are into the casting scenario thing and like your girls fresh and natural, give it a try.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mobile Pornpros

7. Mobile Pornpros (0)

Pay
Newbie
87*
AngelLiwetUK (0) 10-10-12  04:42am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: a Great selection of Movies in all formats to download and to play
MP3 mpg wmv
all sorts of tasts
a good network meaning you can find what you want..
Cons: i went for the trail to see how it was
didnt want to go any more on so cancelled it
was offered the site at a reduced rate of 6.95
compaired to the £25.95 (cheaper in US$)
and they charged my CREDIT CARD £25.95
now fighting with the company to get my money back

VENDO the MONEY side AVOID
Bottom Line: Great site .. sham about the STEALING of MONEY
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Passion HD

8. Passion HD (2)

Pay
Active
68
skippy (40) 09-18-12  08:32pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Videos are available in a variety of formats including HD. Models are generally very attractive. A few well known models.
Cons: The advertising seems a little deceptive. There are only about 120 videos on the site, with Videos dating back only to November of 2011. That would be 1-3 videos a week since inception. Videos rarely depict the same imagery as the teaser images they are linked to (in any quantity at least..10 minute video, 5 seconds of a particular angle or shot and that's what they tease you with.).
Bottom Line: Nope, sorry. Stay away from this one until it gets a LOT more content and they tweak the formule a bit. The advertising showing slick scenes, awesome couples or groups and amazing "first person" angles does not really reflect what is on the site.

This site includes some Porn Pro-like footage with the objective of selling it in more of an X-Art.com format. It almost works, but very, very little of the material is...artsy enough to pull it off and only a few of the participants look like they are enjoying themselves or their partners. Look at the images depicting the scenes and you think holy crap this is going to be hot! What you get when you watch are a lot of OK, moderaately dissapointing sex scenes in very similar bright white settings with entirely too much footage from the same angle (across the bed on the side). It is almost clinical! Several of the videos look like they take place in the same rented villa in Arizona or California someplace. When there are several videos of the same girl, they are all pretty clearly from the same day no matter how hard they try to change things up. And much of the sex, which should be OMG hot, ends up looking like acting...mediocre acting...not that the industry has any really great acting, but the couples should at least be into each other.

There are a few models you would recognize; Zoey and Jessie, for example. I have NEVER seen Jessie or Zoey, two young, vibrant, energetic and attractive models, not entirely enjoying themselves...except here. Here the sex looks like work. (Jessie has a scene where 90% of the time she is getting screwed on a piano bench with her head slamming against a baby grand piano. That So did not look comfortable or fun!)

I rarely find a site that I can't recommend. Unfortunately, I can't recommend this one.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Real Ex Girlfriends

9. Real Ex Girlfriends (0)

Pay
Active
85
dracken (246) 06-03-12  12:22pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 265 scenes available as mpg mp4 and wmv The more recent stuff it at around 1280x720, while older scenes are sadly at around 600x400 .
- Frequent updates, this seems to be one of the most updated sites in the Porn Pros network right now with at least one update per week and 6 updates during the month of May.
- Photos available for each scene in zip files (around 1500x800 for the more recent scenes and around 200 images per set, the older stuff is around 800x600 and more like 170 per set)
- Very fast downloads (regularly maxed my internet connection while using Downloadthemall for firefox)
- Access to the entire porn pros network which has a lot of similar content (several of the girls have scenes on other sites like disgraced18)
- Almost all the models are incredibly hot porn stars, big boobs, cute faces, lots of make-up and sexy lingerie.
- A lot of the scenes are focused on long POV blow jobs with some great close-ups. Not many wide angles.
Cons: Porn pros has been around for a while and is a major network with a lot of positive stuff and cons which are mostly subjective stuff. For example none of the girls here are actually amateurs or unknown girls (almost all have at least another video on the network) For some people that's a deal breaker, for me it doesn't really matter that much. Anyhow, the following cons are some minor stuff that could be improved in my opinion

- Some older videos are not lit very well and a sever of the older POV scenes are filmed with a shaky hand-held.
- Streaming while fine most of the time can be a bit slow if you're downloading a video already.
- Navigation is a bit clumsy at time, although all the major tag searches, model pages and the basics are there, somehow the site is not 100% user friendly, it just takes a bit of getting used to.
- The photos could be a bit better several images were blurry or showing the girl from a very unflattering angle (half closed eyes etc.)
Bottom Line: Porn pros is a huge network with tons and tons of content. Even though several of their sites don't update anymore they still have enough videos here to keep you busy for quite a while. Real ex-girlfriends, Disgraced 18, Cumshot surprise and 18 year olds are some of the site that still update frequently and the content here is still high quality classic porn.

I say classic porn because the girls look a lot like old fashioned porn stars, big boobs, make up, high heels and corsets, the whole nine yards. Also the action is not fetish stuff or rough, nasty sex with crazy DP, anal or insane deep throating, here you get just regular vagina, bj sex that reminds one of the early 2000 porn boom. Which is great if that's what you're looking for.

The scenes are roughly divided into POV shots where the "girlfriend" has a surprise birthday party for the guy or just got out of the shower or she gets caught looking for a vibrator. Some quick 5 minute set-up followed by a quick strip show and a long POV blow job scene, sex and facial or creampie.

These are mostly the older videos on the site and some are in lower resolution and a bit darker, but in most of these videos the BJ shots are really hot and well done. There is minimal talking, no interviews, no talking during the sex, and pretty long action (most older scenes are over 30 minutes but some go as long as 60 minutes)

On the other hand a lot of the more recent scenes on the site are shot from a somewhat wider angle, no talking whatsoever, the girl and guy just walk in and have sex. These scenes tend to be a bit shorter, usually around 20 min, but are available in higher resolution, good light and a mix of wider angles and close-ups. Also there is no real set-up and very little stripping. The scenes usually start as the guy walks in and starts giving head to the girl, with some very good close ups of the action. Some of the best guy giving oral to a girl I've seen in a while, mostly because they often manage to get her face as well as the action in the same shot.

Of course there are some scenes that don't really fall in either category, but the point here is that there is a lot of variation and with several settings (kitchen, several hotel rooms, even one or two outdoor scenes) you won't get bored quickly. They even have a scene( Tiffany Brookes I believe) where she is getting fucked on a glass balcony of sorts and several minutes of the action are shot from underneath, really interesting and different stuff.

Overall the content doesn't get stale and between the great looking girls, the different angles and settings the site is a great deal.

One of the biggest downsides for me was that the navigation is functional, but a bit clumsy. For example you can't really see the most popular scenes on just one site, it will show you the most popular scenes on the entire network. There are tags and categories, but again they work for the entire network so I can't really see all scenes tagged "big tits" on real ex girlfriends, I get too see the scenes tagged like that on the entire network. Then again all the girls here have big tits so no big loss :)

Another somewhat strange trend is that fact that some scenes are labeled MILF when the girls clearly look young, or amateur when the girls are clearly no amateurs. Speaking of which, there is at least one scene where they show a 1 minute interview with the girl where she is asked if her agent informed her why she's there today "to have sex, duh!" she answers, then they try to pretend the whole video is an amateur scene shot by a jealous boyfriend because she cheated on him or something like that...a bit of mixed messages here.

Anyhow, don't expect the girls from backroomcastingcouch or woodmancasting to show up here.

But these are mostly subjective complaints and if you like porn stars, classic sex in some fun and different locations/ outfits (do you want to see a girl wear her ugg boots through the entire shoot?) This site will be a nice compilation of videos. Add in the massive network and I wholeheartedly recommend this to anyone that's never tried it before, but don't expect very niche material, this is all pretty much mainstream porn here.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Massage Creep

10. Massage Creep (0)

Pay
Active
90
RustyJ (145) 04-13-12  06:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Updating more or less regularly like all the main attractions at Porn Pros Network with 96 current scenes
-Scenes and girls are both really hot in very erotic but still hardcore way, especially the new Passion HD style ones
-Unique topic like most sites here have although I've noticed that there are others in massage niche too
-Relatively good quality of video. The oldest scenes are from late 2009 and already 720p
-Oil in many scenes. The only thing that really makes massage genre in my opinion
-Working POV content
-As spouse/girlfriend friendly as it gets. Although she might end up wanting a massage instead of what you were suggesting ;)
Cons: -In some scenes warmup/massage might take a bit too long for ones tastes. There are however other sites on this network for more immediate action
-General Porn Pros cons apply here too. No really relevant search engine, browsing is the way to find scenes. No indication of video resolution next to download buttons. 1080p missing. Mediocre photography. No big deals though
-If you were looking for anal, this is about last site to find it on this network. I've spotted one scene which is a very hot one with Anissa Kate, by the way
-Some unneeded editing in newer scenes where clothes or towels just "disappear"
Bottom Line: This site like most of the others on Porn Pros Network falls into a very specific niche which here is massage. Specifically guys massaging girls with oil in situations that start out usually as rather innocent (if naked) massage with the guys hands slowly creeping (I guess hence the name) into more and more private parts and eventual sex. Sometimes the massage takes longer, sometimes the girls is supposedly so horny that the sex starts quite soon and sometimes there's even kissing/fondling before the massage part. There's also the odd scene with the male actor receiving the massage.

They've got a very nice selection of models on these 96 scenes with little or no repetition so every scene offers something fresh (if not in theme). Models are young and hot and while this site has no teen theme, there are no wannabe MILF's here eihter.

I cannot really comment well on the credibility of the scenes on this site if someone is particularly into the supposed reality aspect of what's going on. Being no real fan of body massage, I have no idea if the guys are doing the real thing. However it looks hot, there is lots of oil involved and that's all I need to enjoy from this site.

As I've mentioned on my reviews of Porn Pros Network and Disgraced18, the whole network is now updating with scenes from their site that one has to subsribe to separately, Passion HD, and this is where those scenes really shine. On many sites they have a feeling of being bit out of place since the action is nowhere near as goofy or strange as one might be used to on those sites. Here however they are the best of the whole bunch. Better lit, girls looking better, every bit of action is very faithful to the site's niche with added touch of class. There's roughly 10 of those newer scenes at the moment but I certainly hope to see more.

Technically there's not much to be said that I already didn't give overview when reviewing Porn Pros Network. All works acceptably even if the site design and search function could use little work.

I can imagine this is one of the main reasons to join this network for those who are not into the trademark stuff of colorful bondage and joke sites. Luckily this one seems to get even better. Normally I'm into bit rougher stuff but this is so well excecuted that I cannot help returning to these scenes.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Carmen Cocks

11. Carmen Cocks (0)

Pay
Active
69
Marcus (45) 04-12-12  12:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Carmen is super-hot with a great body
- Good balance of photos and videos
- Nice mix of content, mainly blowjobs and sex
- Two good bonus sites which you'll love if you like Carmen
- Everything is downloadable with no apparent restrictions
Cons: - Trial is limited to just photos (no videos)
- Site is no longer updating
- 'HD' videos aren't HD
- Navigation is pretty basic, not a huge problem because...
- ...Not much content relatively speaking
- Bonus sites also not updating
- No ZIPs of photos, and pics aren't huge
Bottom Line: Carmen looks incredible, but the site is dead and honestly, there's not much to it. It's definitely frozen in time in most respects - quality of content, size of member's area etc.

The preview area claims that she 'posts new HD videos every week' which is a false claim in two respects; the videos aren't HD, and the website is no longer updating.

There's a one-day trial available for $0.95 which is what I chose, and despite what dubya says in his review, it is no longer full access and limits you to just the photo galleries. Clicking onto the video pages will prompt you to upgrade your membership.

To do so is pretty easy, and within 30 minutes, you have full access to Carmen's site.

The two main sections once in the member's area are Pictures and Movies.

There's also links to: Personal Email, Forum (not posted in since 2010), Store (just a link to vivid.com), Friends (just links to Melissa Midwest and Sweet Adri) and Bonus Content.

Bonus Content includes links to feeds/content from: Black on White Adventures, Creampie Virgin, Day in the Hood, Lesbian Hookups, Milf Banged, Parties Exposed, Throat Banged, Munch My Ass, Perfect Round Asses, My Favourite Hand Job, Nice Round Boobs and Booty Like That - frankly, all pretty trashy in my opinion.

Pictures:

There are 54 galleries, all navigatable from one page with a thumbnail preview for each (and no description).

The pictures are decent quality, normally cataloguing a sex scene, masturbation scene, lesbian posing or a blowjob. Some start off candid style photos of her at an arcade or something, before cutting to a BJ/sex scene etc later with her in the same outfit.

Pictures are 1161 pixels on their longest side and have a medium-sized (about 300x50px) watermark. The quality of photos seems consistent throughout the size.

The galleries are all decent sized, ranging from 100 to (in some cases) over 400 images. Unfortunately there's no ZIP downloads available.

Movies:

The navigation page for movies is identical to the gallery page in that exactly the same thumbnails are used for the 54 movies available from her site.

The thumbnails are obviously images from the galleries, so although the content is roughly the same, don't rely on that 'money shot' necessarily being part of the video. Likewise, some thumbnails imply the video will be a candid style video but are just a solo video etc of her in the same outfit as in the thumbnail. It's not a huge deal, but it's a bit annoying sometimes to download a video you're not expecting.

All videos are WMV format. There's no way to preview prior to downloading, and all videos are 448x252 pixels in size. The quality is not too bad, and the content is much the same as the photos. She's a pretty good performer, and great to watch.

Bonus Sites:

You also get full membership to Hailey Hardcore and Candy Skye. If you like Carmen, you will like both of these sites too, particularly Hailey Hardcore who's basically a brunette version of Carmen.

Bottom Line:

Overall it's not a bad site so long as you know what you're getting for your money. The content is basic, there are no updates, but Carmen is *hot as*, and Hailey Hardcore is definitely a huge bonus and equally as hot as Carmen.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Disgraced 18

12. Disgraced 18 (0)

Pay
Active
88
RustyJ (145) 04-09-12  07:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -120 scenes with more or less frequent updates every week or every two weeks
-New updates include very classy stuff from the Passion HD style of production. Nice ladies in white bright light and clothes
-Really unique stuff. Wacky bondage with bright colored tape, ropes, ball gags, toys and other stuff. Luckily they haven't decided to use too much childish props either. Creative use of all kinds of stuff in bondage from shopping carts to garden chairs
-A good selection of hot young models without using the same ones over and over. International big names but also ones I've never heard of
-Almost all the videos are in quite nice quality, close to 720p in MPG format
-Good download speeds, fast working web site
Cons: -New updates include very classy stuff from the Passion HD style of production. If you were a fan of their former very unique content, this material in shades of white with bondage limited to handcuffs may not really be what you wanted
-Only a scene or two with anal action
-Occassionally the goofiness just goes a little too far. A girl with a bunch of sausages taped into her mouth? A girl covered with spray serpentine?
-Bondage is sometimes really half assed with the girl almost holding up the stuff that is supposedly holding her
-Video quality can get pixelated at times even in a clip that looks good most of the time
Bottom Line: One of the more active sites on Porn Pros Network and for me one of their main attractions. Yet another part of the network that probably divides opinions strongly so all the ratings are quite subjective I guess.

The topic is sex in bondage with teen niche added on top of it and the whole thing is given a strange twist that results in quite wacky brightly colored combination of (probably) unintended humor and hot sex. Basic recipe is a girl getting interviewed and then bound with ropes, bars, gags, colorful ropes, tape and so on and had sex with. Often there is additional colorful stuff mixed in like spray serpentine, laundry pins etc. for often quite messy results. Lot of action with toys also, ranging from dildoes to nipple clamps and different kinds of pumps.

With only a handful of exceptions, the scenes are one on one and the sex the regular vaginal variant. Irritatingly there are also some helping hands (not to mention the camera mans hands on the girl) visible on the background at the times with little or no editing done to remove those. The bondage is quite light in contrast to sites like ones offered by Kink.com and often it actually appears that the girls are struggling to support the stuff they are bound to. Personally I like it the other way but it's excuseable on the site that isn't apparently taking itself too seriously.

Technical side of the things is exactly like on any other site on Porn Pros Network. Like on many networks these days, the sites are just another category filter inside a unified website. Searching and filtering content inside this site alone makes not much sense since browsing through 120 scenes is quite quickly done so the search functions do not really matter within a sub site. Video is available mostly in HD that is close to or exactly 720p. 1080p advertised on the site header is apparently somewhere else and not here. The formats are offered without info about quality so it's a bit of a hit or miss until you find out what you like. For me it's MPG but some say WMV is less pixelated. Photos aren't really a focus of this site and I quickly forgot about them.

The network also offers two other quite similar sites which I don't really see point in giving a separate reviews. Squirt Disgrace could be probably combined with this site without too many noticing, having only 15 scenes and last updating 2009. The content is basically the same kind with the difference that the girls squirt during the scenes. MILF Humiliation has 42 scenes of similar action with slightly older ladies and hasn't seen new additions since 2010. The scenes are somewhat harder with anal sex included every now and then and not quite that much bright colors but the general messing around with household items and gardening tools is there. All fun sites if you can enjoy this kind of stuff.

Bondage with sex isn't still very well presented in pay site scene and I don't really know why. Many old big names are still pushing material for DVD releases and I wonder if they really can sell them. These sites offer a one take on the topic and while it's probably nothing for real hard core enthuaiasts, I say they certainly help fill the gap and I'm happy that they are putting out their own unique take on this niche.

Your mileage may vary, as they say. If the subject does not interest you and the wackiness puts you off, this site may totally suck in your opinion. If you are not that serious about little messing around and find bondage and models hot, it's a rare gem.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Porn Pros Network

13. Porn Pros Network (0)

Network
Active
91
RustyJ (145) 04-06-12  03:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large number of subsites with various niches and themes that are hard to find elsewhere
-These guys understand that most of the guys want to see more girls than other guys. The scenes are often packed with both genders but usually there seems to be more girls around
-Quite nice image quality in most of the videos. Especially the new Passion HD content is very nice. Up to roughly 720p in MPEG and WMV
-Large archive of scenes for quite decent price
-Models are almost always really hot on their major sites
-MassageCreep, Disgraced18, MilfHumiliation, TeenBFF, CrueltyParty and even CumshotSurprise and CumDisgrace are innovative and cool sites with uique content. Sometimes too unique ;)
-Technically works well, good download speeds with DL manager running up to four simultaneous downloads at 10+ megabytes per second
Cons: -Site navigation is quite awkward. Search doesn't really help and tag words are way too common and often mistaken. What good is tag "Ass" that 99% of scenes have?
-Not much for fans of photography. What they call high quality image sets are to me like low res screen caps
-Video options are unclear. You can usually choose MPEG, MP4 or WMV but there is no indication what resolution they are. Generally it appears that MP4 is the smallest one in image size and MPEG and WMV are the same while 1080p promised on the site is missing altogether
-Some kind of regional pricing. You get the actual price when you are to give the cc info, until that you are shown the USD price that is lower. I made a mental note to always check these things to the very end with a fake email address
-Some joke sites with plastic fake cocks and bucket loads of fake cum are quite ridiculous
-Scenes could use better preview images
-Relatively few anal scenes
Bottom Line: Well, this one is a mixed bag for sure. It has everything from boyfriend/girlfriend like gentle scenes to not-quite-milfs being bound to household appliances with colorful paper serpentine to ridiculously huge plastic dongs spraying fake cum all over groups of oiled ladies. Something for everyone I'd say as long as you are not looking for strictly girl/girl scenes or solo content. The production varies from overly goofy and ridiculous to the very smooth low sunlight lit scenes in different shades of white clothing and props.

Examples of the goofy side are Disgraced18 which stages younger ladies in scenes where they are loosely bound in ropes and cuffs in all the shades of rainbow and had sex with. MilfHumiliation which is almost like the aforementioned but the ladies vary from what I guess are teen mothers to older cougars. CockCompetition is a kind of a wheel of fortune game show where a guy with diamond studded teeth fucks competitors with half a meter long plastic dong. CumDisgrace is bondage gang banging with fake cum and a strange looking muscular guy wanking off on the background. CumshotSurprise is quite regular group sex with fake cumshots in the beginning and end.

On the classier side they have sites like MassageCreep which features massage scenes turned eventually into sex. TeenBFF has scenes which start out as lesbian action with a "boyfriend" joining in later. CrueltyParty is supposedly group of firls dominating one guy, a male stripper or whatever but with the exception of first few scenes is quite tame. 18YearsOld is quite regular one on one action.

In addition to the regular content of their sites, they have also added scenes from site Passion HD. Those are more X-Art kind of scenes with soft focus, low light, white clothes and slightly dreamy overall feeling. These scenes are very high quality in my opinion, feature hot ladies and are a nice distraction from general content on the site. The only problem is that they do not always quite match the theme of the sub site where they are placed. For example they don't have much disgracing when placed on Disgraced18 and on the CrueltyParty they lack the femdom theme.

Everyone doesn't necessarily agree with me but I could use more anal action on this whole network. There are many models on these scenes who are almost known for their performance on that aspect so let's have it all! Other minor nitpickings include photographers and other crew seen in background and corners of picture on sites like CrueltyParty etc. Nothing too bad production wise as long as one likes the theme of the content.

Technical side is a bit mixed case as well. Video is quite good when it is good but older scenes and indoor ones can be quite grainy and pixelated. Photo sets are just a side thought in my opinion, this is clearly a video site. Downloads work fast and videos are easy to dl once you figure out which version you want and find the scenes you like. The only effective way I found is to manually browse the site based on subsites and video download options have no indication of resolution. The 1080p promised on the header of the site seems to be missing.

The site updates roughly once a day with new material or remastered old scenes. While this is slightly slower than some of the most active sites, the rate is still perfectly acceptable.

As a bottom line, this site is certainly worth a subscription every now and then, especialy now that the new Passion HD content is being added. Backlog is decent, not huge like on some sites so it may not entertain for prolonged periods but is certainly worth going through. Somewhat clearer site design with better search and tagging might help as well as the advertised 1080p although the resolution itself doesn't always add to anything but file size.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Webcam Hackers

14. Webcam Hackers (0)

Pay
Active
70
dracken (246) 10-29-11  04:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Around 50 videos with updates pretty regularly (every 7 days it seems).
- The scenes are supposedly in HD (1250x720), but in my opinion even the HD looks grainy and rather poor quality (I guess it's all part of the webcam look, but to me they took it a step too far with some scenes looking as bad as a live cam strip show)
- As the title suggests this site is all about girls with webcams. Some of them strip in front of said webcam, some get fucked (sadly only one camera angle) and a few masturbate solo.
- They have the same high quality of models the rest of the site has and I believe all "amateurs" on here have scenes on other sites in the network.
- Most scenes have a bit of a story. A girl talks to her boyfriend and strips for him, a foreign exchange student has sex with her boyfriend, etc. Nothing too crazy, but it all stays in the same theme of a webcam hack and it's rather hot.
- Access to the network is included (tons and tons of good sex scenes here.)
Cons: - Like I mentioned above the videos although good resolution are still a bit on the grainy side and several of them have the webcam specific delay, which really makes the scene hard to get into. Also some scenes have serious color issues (when a girl's vagina looks purple something is seriously wrong)
- Some scenes are very short (5 minutes) and there are some scenes that feel like they belong together in one video but were split into two in order to make the site look bigger. (There is one Madison Ivy scene where she masturbates then another scene where has sex in the exact same place).
- The entire network needs a better way to preview videos. Right now their thumbnails are not very clear.
- Some girls are really not that interesting in solo action. There is one scene where a girl pulls on her labia and asks if we can tell which one she pulls on more. Titillating stuff indeed.
Bottom Line: Overall this site suffers from some limitations that are inherent in the type of content it's trying to produce. When you're trying to generate amateur content you pretty much force yourself to have rather poor camera work, only one angle and sometimes awkward interactions (like I mentioned above some girls do well alone with a camera and some are just weird)

Also they have a scene where two girls get into adult diapers and pretend to be sumo wrestlers. I guess that fits the site and it's rather funny, but I'm not sure if it's content that I want to pay 25 bucks for. I guess you have to look at this site as a bonus along with the much, much better sites like Massage Creep and 18 Years Old.

Aside from the sometimes questionable content I would have loved longer scenes. The average video is around 10 minutes with many running under that. Give the girls some more toys and more outfits and there should be no issue making longer videos.

So, we have rather poor action, short scenes and bad camerawork. So far the site manages to fail on every count possible. We do have several hot models, but why bother trying to watch the scenes here when a click away they are showing off with good lighting and multiple camera angles?

Now don't get me wrong, the premise of the site is good, we need more amateur content even if amateur means pornstar paid to masturbate in front of an expert camera crew. But for the love of God don't settle with actual webcam footage. That is never going to look good, it's just a waste of time and money.

Bottom line: the latest updates on here show improvement. Maybe it's just my hopeful optimism but the camera work seems cleaner and they are starting to focus on sex scenes as opposed to solo masturbation. Also the u8pdates are coming regularly and they seem to really want to push this amateur-like content, which is great.

More HD updates, more hot models and longer scenes and we should have a great site with a unique premise. (please no more adult diapers though... there is no need for that.)

P.S. The score reflects mu hope that the site will improve, right now I would not join this network just for the violation series of sites.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Amateur Violations

15. Amateur Violations (0)

Pay
Active
60
dracken (246) 10-23-11  07:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Around 48 scenes and they seem to update every 10 days or so.
- Videos are available in multiple formats including HD (1250x700) and smaller formats (640x320 and I believe even 320x). They have streaming, a trailer for the scene as well as HD images (3,000px × 2,000px and zip files available) and screencaps.
- The whole network has some cute, exclusive models and this site in particular has a few hot girls (check out Eve Evans and Lexi bloom)
- The theme of this site (as far as I can tell) is weird amateur-looking stuff that didn't really fit anywhere else. As such you have a scene where a girl is on the phone while getting fucked, a gloryhole scene, a girl with a bag over her head and a scene where the actors get "caught" by an angry parent. Overall I'd rate this site funny, rather than hot. Good for a chuckle and some scenes have a few good POV BJ moments, but overall a bit of a mixed bag.
Cons: -As mentioned above the site really feels like an odds and ends closet, this doesn't fit anywhere else so let's put it here. This could explain why there are several scenes that seem to have been split up to make it appear as if they have more content updates. Overall there are actually only around 20 or so scenes here.
- They have ads both to live cams and other sites. Install adblock and you should be good to go, otherwise it can be a bit of a pain.
- Several of the scenes are much shorter than described (5 minutes as opposed to 36) I assume if you grabbed both videos for one scene and merged them you'd get the full time length. Anyhow, it feels cheap of them to pad the site like this
Bottom Line: Don't get me wrong, I love the Pornpros network. Their stuff is consistently both funny and sexy. They somehow manage to get some good looking exclusive girls and they have some great scenes with little funny interviews and stories. However I don't understand why this particular site exists. It feels like a complete hodgepodge of random scenes that don't fit together and for the most part aren't even particularly hot or interesting.

I guess the idea was to have a bunch of amateur scenes with random funny stories behind them. One girl takes revenge on her boyfriend and calls him while getting fucked by another dude. Another girl doesn't realize when the condom breaks and is mad after the dude cums inside her. Two lovers get caught in the act by an angry parent, a gloryhole and a girl who gets a bag over her head.

In theory all these sound kinda funny, maybe interesting, but I fail to see why we need an entire site of such scripted "funny" porn stories. To make things worse many of these stories are broken up into two updates for no apparent reason other than to make it look like they have a lot more updates than they do.

The Pornpros network always had a frat house vibe of "Bro, let me tell you this crazy story while we drink cheap beer and pop our collars." For the most part this doesn't bother me, in fact I enjoy it once in a while (as corny as it is this vibe is much better in my opinion than abusing girls on film and calling that porn) However this site along with the public violations one always felt out of place on a porn site; they are almost more at home on a jackass reality show than on a porn site, in my opinion.

I mean I enjoy a funny story behind my porn, but what is the point of doing an entire scene where the girl has a bag on her face? Or why have a scene that ends up with 3 minutes of the girl spiting the cum in anger and saying it tastes fucking weird? These are funny stories that you'd share with friends not porn you jack off too.

To add to the disappointment most of the scenes look like they were filmed in a very dark room with a cell-phone. The camera work is not nearly as good as most of the network and while I understand that they wanted to go for an "amateur" feel, in the end, when I can barely see a girl's vagina, I just feel cheated. Not to mention that now I suspect several of these scenes are old stuff they ripped from somewhere else and are just recycling. (I hope I am wrong but I am suspicious of some of these older looking grainy films)

Anyhow, once you get past the mixed content there are some nice scenes here. Some of the girls are cute (again, if you join check out Eve Evans)and they do have sex or at least give BJ's. My recommendation is to see if you like a girl and then check out her scenes on the rest of the network since they are always better.

That being said I have to say that in the end this is a very subjective review. Maybe some people really like this kind of funny story porn, I for one just felt confused and disappointed at the poor video quality.

Now please don't judge this whole network based on this review. They have some great content, just check out 18 year olds or disgraced 18 or any of the other great sites they have. This is just a small weird site that I don't think is really reflective of the network as a hole.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Deep Throat Love

16. Deep Throat Love (0)

Pay
Active
85
dracken (246) 10-23-11  06:59pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Around 145 scenes now and updating regularly (almost weekly, although they do miss a week or two here and there). Most scenes come in a range of formats including HD (1250x700) as well as standard sizes and small clips. They also have HD images for each set at 3,000px × 2,000px (zip archives available). Older stuff is of course in lower resolutions, but for the most part stuff looks great.

-Download speeds were incredible at around 1 mb per video. No issues with log-out or missing links or anything like that. Overall the technical aspects of the site work well. However, I do wish they had a way to show all models on this site alone as opposed to models in the entire network.

- The scenes have good camerawork, but they tend to focus a bit too much on close-ups. Good light and hot models.

- Although the site is called Deepthroat love I believe all scenes have some regular sex as well, and we even get some threesomes (not too much anal though)

- Overall fun scenes with cute girls
Cons: - I mentioned this in almost every one of my reviews for Porn pros but it's a pretty huge mistake and it's very obvious here: they need a better thumbnail system. Right now as you navigate the site you get to see the scenes name and the models in it, but the picture for it is always hard to make out (you often see more of the cock and the girl's forehead than her actual face.)

- Each scene starts with an interview that can get ridiculous. The camera guy asks the girl to deepthroat a dance wand, or a banana or some candy marshmallows. One one hand it can be funny, but then again it takes 5 minutes away from 30 minute scenes. Depends on you if it's a bonus or a con. For me it got repetitive and the girls weren't interesting enough to make it fun.

- Although they do deepthroat none of the scenes are as anywhere as intense as FacialAbuse or Gagfactor or even Teencoreclub. The girl's make-up doesn't get ruined and they don't end up with spit on their faces.
Bottom Line: It's been a while since I last visited Pornpros and the network has improved in many areas, while maintaining some of the positive stuff that attracted me to them in the first place.

They still get some good looking models and many of them are exclusive. The girls do hardcore (including some impressive deep throating on this site), but it never feels forced or abusive. In fact the whole vibe of the site and the network is fun, ridiculous and over the top fun.

Let me give you some examples of the kind of scenes you can get inside. In one video the girl tries to stuff 24 marshmallows in her mouth and looks like she's about to explode into laughter at how ridiculous the whole thing is. In another scene the girl tries to deepthroat twizlers and almost gets the hickups. It all feels funny and while it can get a bit repetitive if you like the vibe this site is great. (I think at some point or another you get to see girls try to deepthroat bottles of water, sausages, almost all kinds of candy imaginable, bananas, corn, asparagus and celery, oh and cucumbers, how could I forget cucumbers)

Once the interview and the attempt at stuffing ridiculous food down your throat is done the girl goes down on the male model with a lot of closeups of the action. This depends a bit from scene to scene but overall I'd say you get too see everything, even a bit too close for my preference. The BJ sessions are interrupted by sex usually at least twice. Most videos have doggy, reverse cow and some sort of missionary with her legs over her head.

What I found interesting was that most girls really seem to get into the sex and many of then bounce on the guys cock as opposed to him doing all the work. This can be very hot if you like to see a girls round ass as she bounces on a dude in doggy style. I, personally found it extremely hot and different from a lot of sites where the girl just sits there taking it very passively.

The content is pretty similar all throughout the site and most models fit the same mold (big breasts, round asses, a lot of them have tattoos and piercings and although they all say they are 18 or 20 they seem to be somewhere in that 25-ish nebulous porn starlet age)

Some of the cons are that it's not as intense as you'd expect from a site named Deepthroatlove and most action feels too mainstream, no DP, no runny make-up, no really gagging or intense face fucking. In fact very much of the content feels like a pretty standard porn DVD. While this is fine, it does feel like they should get at least some scenes with more umph. Right now I felt like half the scenes here could have been on any other one of the sites in the network. Then again if you just want straight sex with good looking very well made-up girls this will be perfect.

Anyhow, combined with the network access (which gives you more scenes than you'll ever be able to watch) the site is a great deal if you're not looking for very niche porn. For anyone that wants to replace DVD's with the convenience of a major network this site is perfect. It offers enough hardcore action to satisfy most people, stays fun and has consistently high quality.

If they would improve their thumbnail system and get some more unique looking models I'd declare this a perfect site. As it stands this site just didn't fit my personal taste and while I do recommend it, make sure you like their type of content before committing to a membership.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Massage Creep

17. Massage Creep (0)

Pay
Active
80
dracken (246) 10-08-11  08:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 100 scenes and updates seem to come every 7 days or so.
- Just like the rest of the network they offer the scenes in a range of formats including very nice looking HD (1250x700) as well as standard sizes and small clips (MP4 and MPG for smaller resolution asn WMV for HD). They also offer HD images for each set at 3,000px × 2,000px (zip archives available).
- Great download speeds, no issues with time-outs or auto-log out
- Good network navigation and similar videos on the rest of the affiliated sites (see my network review for more details for all sites)
- Interesting concept and pretty well executed with some nice banter and good looking models. It's definitely not your regular gonzo, no set up porn, but it's not really the small scene porn from old DVD's
- There is a lot of focus on the girl's body (the guy rubs her with oil all over and you get a lot of nice close-ups)
- Well filmed, good mix of close-up and far away shots, overall the scenes look good
Cons: - They need a better thumbnail system. Right now the one image they show for each scene is not indicative at all of how the model looks or what will happen in the scene. They also need a way to see all models involved in the site so you could easily browse them (there is a bit too much focus on network wide navigation)
- Some fake cumshots (not many, and the newer stuff seems to be all natural facials, but just a heads up)
- In some scenes the sex doesn't start until minute 20 or so. If you like a good set-up then this site will work well for you, but if you want quick sex this site might be too slow to get to the "good stuff"
- Some scenes are not edited very well (see bellow for more details)
- The download links don't automatically start the download, you have to use a right click save as (no big deal, but really this whole network only had small issues if you like their type of content)
Bottom Line: I listed several cons up there, but if you read through them you'll see they are mostly cosmetic stuff. They need a better site navigation system, a better preview system for each scene, fixing a link. Stuff that could easily and probably will be fixed in the future. For the most part, the network is strong and there are no big negative aspects, as long as you like their type of content.

I talked a bit in my Pornpros review how the entire network has a unique vibe to it. That is very true for this site as well. The models all look more or less similar (big boobs, young-ish, probably around 20 or so, American and Caucasian)
There is a set up, that feels a lot more natural than the old DVDs where the models were all stiff and unbelievable, but it's a set up nonetheless.
And finally we get about 20 minutes of good old fashioned plain sex (no anal, no ass to mouth, deepthroats, threesomes or other crazy stuff.)

The whole site feels fun and light hearten. A masseur visit some young girl, oils her up then cums on her face and tells her to let it soak in for 5 minutes.

During the massage he talks to her and we hear all about what the girl is studying in school or how she is working out to stay in shape or how loosened up she feels. Around halfway through the video the guy uses a vibrator on her, or gives her head (It's nice to see a site where the guy pleases the girl a bit before the sex) Then we get the sex scene and a facial ending.

Nothing incredibly revolutionary, but nonetheless the scenes are fun to watch and due to the intro we get to know the model better than many other sites. In fact I'd say that is the main strength of this site, instead of just throwing you into a sex scene you get to see the girl, the set-up of the table, the foreplay and you get to hear her talk while her breasts are massaged. In a way it's like an pre-scene interview, but a lot more interesting.

Another strong point is the way a lot of the scenes are filmed with many angles, good close-ups of the girl's breasts (a lot of focus on breasts on this site) some close-ups of the sex as well as interesting sex furniture pillows (they often use these triangle foam shapes that perk the girl's ass into the air and make doggy style look more interesting)

The only issue with the whole idea is that there are some awkward editing mistakes that make some scenes awkward. I remember in the Brooke Adams scene you can hear her moan while her mouth is closed and the guy cums gallons of fake semen on her face. In another scene the director interrupts the actors to give some directions and then calls "Action". We get too see the filming crew in mirrors. Sometimes the male models face is censored (to protect his anonymity I guess) but a few minutes later you can see him clearly.

I know these are not big issues, but when you're trying to create a certain vibe for your scene continuity errors can make it all feel completely fake and kill the mood.

The other downside for me is the quality of the models. I couldn't help but compare this to Fuckedhard18, which has the exact same set-up (massage girls then fuck them :) but Fucked hard has much, much hotter girls. Massage Creep seems to focus mostly on big breasts/big booty regardless of how cute the girl is (a bit too much MILF and tattoos on Massage Creep for my taste), whereas the Fucked hard site is almost entirely young models that look stunning with the oil on their body (maybe it's the way they film as well, as some scenes on Massage Creep could have used a bit more organized light)

I guess it's more of a personal choice really, and I believe the preview pages for each site shows pretty well what kind of girls are on each network so you can draw your own conclusions. Nonetheless Fuckedhard wins over Massage Creep in my book.

Overall, at this point if I had to choose one massage site to join I'd go with FuckedHard18 since the content is very similar, but they have better looking models and more scenes.
However, joining Massage Creep means access to the Porn Pros network, which has a ton more similar videos, some much more attractive girls and a bunch of different content.

I guess as far as bang for you buck Porn pros is the winner, but if you really, really love massage sites FuckedHard is the way to go.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Porn Pros Network

18. Porn Pros Network (0)

Network
Active
90
dracken (246) 10-05-11  08:00pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Tons and tons of videos, (they seem to have more than 6000 scenes and are uploading 2 per day)
- Videos are available in a range of formats including very nice looking HD (1250x700) as well as standard sizes and small clips. They also offer HD images for each set at 3,000px × 2,000px (zip archives available). Even nicer they offer a trailer for each scene, so you get a quick impression of what will go down.
- Streaming was excellent, downloads are incredibly fast, navigation is easy and the main network site allows quick access to all member sites. Overall the technical aspects of the site look okay.
- Fixed their billing/ spam issues (see bottom line for more details, but a great improvement)
- A lot of different sites that fit many niches including BDSM, cum-shots, MILF, African American, Latino, old on young etc. Focus on young looking girls and hardcore sex (not a ton of anal, DP or deepthroat)
- Some very hot models that seem exclusive (and new to the industry)
Cons: - Some of the sites in the network don't update very often or at all, the main focus right now seem to be the disgraced and violation sites (which are light BSDM/ a random guy supposedly running up to girls and cumming on them or pulling their clothes off in public) The real ex-girlfriend/ amateur sites and the 18/ Jurassic cock sites.
- Some of the navigation features could still be improved. The models index is a bit wonky especially with girls that appeared in older videos (some links don't work, lead to wrong videos etc.) Nothing big, but still would be nice to see everything work.
- The fake cum shots/ public violation can be either a pro or a con. If you hate over the top videos this network probably has a few sites that might put you off. Overall they have a very specific vibe to the site and some people will love it others will hate it.
- They still have some adds in the member section (Adblocker on Mozilla should take care of everything)
Bottom Line: This is one of the first networks that I joined years ago and I have to say they have been improving constantly. I remember about a year back when they used to spam your e-mail and I had serious trouble canceling my billing with them. They finally seem to have cleaned up their act and are now focusing on creating some awesome porn. I had no trouble canceling and no spam from them.

They also created a new members page which looks better than before and seems to have fewer bad links. This doesn't mean it's perfect, but it's a good step in the right direction.

Better previews of the scenes would help (right now they have only one image a few categories and a verbal description, unless you click on the scene), as would a way to find all anal scenes from one model for example. Right now they don't have any way to do this kind of cross tab search. Nonetheless, they offer category search, model search, site specific search... overall unless you want a very specific video you shouldn't have trouble finding good content.

Another improvement would be if they offered more hardcore scenes. Don't get me wrong the disgraced series is pretty fun and intense (want to see a girl get tied up and fucked in a swing or while clothespins are stretching her pussy out? This site has it) However the site has almost no anal scenes (a lot that are labeled anal are actually light ass play) and almost no true deepthroats (although the deepthroatlove site is changing that don't expect to see too many girls with smeared make-up or spit/ semen on their faces)

Right now the site focuses on having good looking young girls (even the MILF, look young) doing regular sex scenes. And I believe they have some of the best straight sex scenes out there. A ton of new girls, along with several better known models, but all of them with awesome bodies, great make-up, good lighting, good camera work and some pretty well hung male models.

Almost all scenes start with a bit of an interview so you get a feel for the girl, then we get to the action which can be pretty varied (they have several threesomes, POV, the light bondage series as well as more traditional little scenes).

Sometimes they use fake cocks and fake cum, which seems to disagree with many people, but I'd say that maybe only one site that is still updating does that (cum-shot surprise). So it's pretty easy to ignore those scenes, especially when you get over 6000 other videos to choose from.

In the sections above I mentioned that the site has a specific vibe to it. I'd like to talk a bit about this. The Porn Pros network always had a strong fun, classic porn identity. They don't do the whole innocent Lolita or the abuse the female model spiel. With this network you get good old fashioned porn. Hot girls that look like they are having fun and a lot of regular sex in over the top situations. This is not Facialabuse or Met-art, this is the kind of almost mainstream porn that used to be all over the DVD market, except Porn Pros makes it look even better and offers a ton of variations so you won't get bored.

The Disgraced series isn't really that disgraceful or abusive, but for someone that doesn't care for intense, humiliating BDSM they are just the right amount of deviant to be fun.

The amateur sites they offer follow the same model. Sure we get a bunch of shots of the girl in the mirror and POV shots, but the quality is still miles above anything a true amateur could produce and just different enough to keep me entertained.

That feels like the key to this network, they aim to entertain. Even the fake cum falls into that model, sure it's fake, but it's entertaining to stuff squirting on them. It's all meant to be light hearted fun and form some people that works (I love their vibe, their fun scenes and the hot models).

Bottom line: Don't expect this network to fit into a narrow niche. If you want only intense BDSM or truly amateur scenes or would rather see all anal sex, then I believe there are many other better sites for you. However for 18 bucks, considering the amount of content you get and the high quality of the models it's a shame not to give this network a try.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen BFF

19. Teen BFF (0)

Pay
Active
85
exotics4me (463) 06-13-11  07:18pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Porn Pros network, one of the more creative uses of reality porn.
- Has 42 sets overall, videos are near HD quality, but are a little grainy, I'm thinking for that "authentic amateur" feel.
- All 42 scenes are ones I will keep and really think this reality niche has been missed by most networks.
- Download speeds are very good with a DL manager, terrible without a DL manager.
- Has a good believability factor going for it. Even though you will probably know these models are porn stars, they do a good enough job of making it seem realistic to convince me with a little help from my imagination.
- Biggest pictures go up to 3000 long end, but some, keeping to that amateur theme are much smaller like a cellphone picture, 800 long end.
- Still updating, but the updates are now only once every two weeks, instead of weekly as they were in Duke's TBP review.
- All the models are cute, some stunners like Melanie Rios, quite a few Latinas on this site.
Cons: - There are only 42 scenes. Of course, you get the network access to offset that, but really think Porn Pros has hit on a niche here that they should be really pushing.
- Some bad camera angles, could add more to the amateur feel, but bad camerawork is frustrating nonetheless.
Bottom Line: I've seen these "hacked" sites for years, ex-girlfriend revenge, dorm room parties. While it's not really believable that someone hacked someone's social networking site and stole their near HD videos of hardcore sex, which wouldn't be allowed on those sites anyway, I think this one does a good job of making it just believable enough.

Though this site does follow a certain formula in the videos, it's one that we don't see much in porn these days. Every scene I've watched so far starts with the women clothed, trying on clothes, doing all the things us perverted men like to believe goes on, though the pillow fight goes a little far. They have been able to put models on this site that I could see doing these things. As the silliness, which is good in this case, slows, the girls start kissing and you get pretty much a lesbian scene, then a guy shows up and gets in on the fun.

The picture sets take this one further by having the girls taking pictures of themselves in the mirror. Flashing each other, these create a real feeling of playfulness when looking at them. Maybe there's a deep concept going on here or maybe they just got lucky by filming it this way, but I did find these scenes to be as believable as any reality scenes in porn.

The bad camera angles are annoying, but I do think they add to the amateur feel of it.

Now, this site gave me fits without a DL manager, I actually downloaded one scene, the newest update, Veronica and Mandy, in all 3 formats, twice each and still didn't get a full download without it breaking. Nearly every scene had 404 file not found on download links through the browser. Once I used a download manager with username and password stored in it, everything downloaded fine and no 404 files.

The videos are an odd 1240x702 resolution, I don't mind that's it not exactly 720p. The selling point here are the pictures that create a realistic feel to the scenes. You're onto something here Porn Pros. The pictures probably have the first 10 minutes of the girls just coming home from a party or clubbing, changing clothes, being frisky with each other, then the video picks up with the action. I like it.

The photos in the mirrors also seem better than your standard, "pose this way" photos on porn sites, since the girls are being silly in them.

The action is generally very good. A few of the models that really shine here are Gigi Rivera, Melanie Rios and Tanner Mayes. Though my favorite scene has Lynn and Ella in it, the Latina one does some serious ride 'em cowboy on the guy. The site has a lot of personality to it.

Though small in size, I've been on sites that have 1,000 videos that I don't keep 42 scenes from, so I think this site was worthy of a review and is one of the reasons that I ended up liking the Porn Pros network.

All very good models, good, fun and original concept with younger, cute models. Can't beat that. Very nice site with a lot of network content to back it up!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Porn Pros Network

20. Porn Pros Network (0)

Network
Active
88
exotics4me (463) 06-13-11  06:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Big network with some unusual niches in it and a love of fake cumshots, not as bad as it sounds.
- Any concern with billing shouldn't be, they made me a very good "stay" offer of more than half off, when declined, got the email saying canceled within seconds.
- Video tech specs are good, close to standard HD, but videos are shot in a more amateurish way, not saying the cameramen aren't good, but the videos seem to try to have a homemade look to them.
- Photo quality is very good,
- Definitely looks to be exclusive
- Major pro here, this site seems to love the use of download managers, will explain in BL. 3000 long end resolution and come zipped.
- Some of the sites, Massage Creep, Flexible Positions, are as good as most sites in those niches and would say Massage Creep is the best Massage site I've seen.
- Some interesting ideas where porn stars do things women on social sites do, like photos in mirror, to give the amateur feel to it and pull it off pretty well.

-
Cons: - Navigation is frustrating. My first example is that some models just aren't listed, Stephani Moretti as example, clicked her name, instead of seeing her updates, I got all the new updates from all models. Can't find her in the model list either and she has multiple sets on their various sites. Works pretty good on most and maybe this is just one rare case, but seeing that she's one of the models I really like that they have it stuck out to me.
- The fake sites are just silly. I'm sure it was funny the first few times, but they really should stick with the other sites they have and let those fake dicks and gallons of fake cum sites die off.
- Not always a con for me, but there are quite a lot of implants and tattoos here, that Freak Boobs site is just bad.
- Download speeds without a manager were bad, had broken files, sets not showing up 404 errors, but the download manager seems to have cured that problem.
Bottom Line: If I hadn't went back to using a download manager, Free Download Manager, I would have knocked at least 20 points off this network's score. I haven't been using DL manager lately on any sites. So when I started downloading from this site through my browser, the right click on the link would either give me a 404 error or start trying to stream the video, left click, save as worked better, but probably half of the files would stop downloading around 70% finished. Then there was the problem with the DL speed through the browser, I usually can get near or slightly above 2 MB/s or for better comparison 2000 KB/s instead, I was receiving 400 KB/s through the browser.

FDM saved the month though, using it, the site works really good and the download speeds are almost as high as I can receive from any site.

These fake sites on this network are a waste in my opinion. And it's not just one fake dick, fake cum sites, I'm counting five, though it looks like all have stopped updating except one and that one only updates once a month. Good move in my opinion.

The bad thing with one navigation problem, like with trying to find Stephani Moretti, is that I now don't know if the navigation for other models is showing all their content.

The good news is, they have some ideas going on in this network that I really liked. The Teen BFF site, though porn stars, brings a very amateur feel with the girls doing the mirror photos, the silly photos, that's pretty good for any of potential members that are used to seeing similar pictures on the social networking sites.

The technical quality is very good. The videos say HD, but from looking at the codec info, it's a little lower than 720p, I'm seeing 1250x702. The pictures are as good as you will see on a network, nice to see the clothed pictures in the zips too, 3000 long end on those.

Some unusual niches like Public Violations where you watch a video to see, a guy run up behind a woman and pull her shirt up or pants down or runs up and pulls his dick out. Video over. A few scenes on this site are public sex, so those are pretty good.

Massage Creep, Teen BFF, Flexible Positions, Real Ex-Girlfriends, 18 Years Old, Disgraced 18, Amateur Violations, Webcam Hackers, Jurassic Cock and Cruelty Party are all still updating, I think, one may just be a monthly update since its last update was in May, these sites are all very good. Those sites to me really boost this network with some interesting niches and plays on reality porn. Most of the models are well-known and most in these scenes are models I like, even if implanted and tattooed. Loved the Isis Taylor scenes.

Once past the download problems through browser and away from the fake cum sites, Freaks of Cock, Freaks of Boobs sites, this became a very good network. Nice quality, I don't mind that it's not 1080p as the files are big enough as it is. Overall, I would recommend it with the warning of the fake cum and Freaks sites and use of DL manager.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Massage Creep

21. Massage Creep (0)

Pay
Active
90
rearadmiral (316) 05-17-11  08:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of PornPros Network
- Discount through TBP / PU
- Multiple download options
- Streaming available
- No DRM
- Watermark is small enough to be ignored
- Pics available (both separate and screecaps)
- Pics available as a zip
- Supports download managers
- 60 exclusive scenes (as of review date)
- Site updates weekly
Cons: - “HD” doesn’t look like true HD
Bottom Line: I wouldn’t normally review two sites within the same network, but I have to make an exception here because of the quality of this site. I recently reviewed Jurassic Cock from the same network but think Massage Creep deserves a specific review.

I’m not normally a big fan of sites that use a narrow and limiting set-up. I find that the repetition gets boring. With a site featuring a male massaging a female, how much innovation and difference can you bring to each scene? Not much.

But… even with the limiting set-up, the scenes on this site just seem to work well. I’ve never had a membership to a massage site and I didn’t join this network for this site, but it was a pleasant surprise to find to be as good as it is.

The set-up is predictable: the male masseur brings his equipment to a scheduled appointment at a girl’s house or apartment. He sets up and instructs the girl to undress and slip under the sheet on the table. The camera gives the viewer a ‘hidden camera’ perspective as the model undresses and gets under the sheet. Then the massage begins, with lots of baby oil being used. The massage eventually progresses to where the sheet is removed and towel placed over the model – with camera angles giving the viewer some nice views. Eventually the model rolls over, with towels being strategically placed for modesty. Eventually the naughty bits get massaged with oil, and then the “deep tissue” massage begins. And in a bit of marketing genius, the masseur always includes a “free facial” at the end of the session.

While using the same set-up over and over again for all of the 60 scenes sounds boring and repetitive, it still works. In my opinion, it works for two reasons: the acting is good and models are stunning. There isn’t a lot of variety in the types of models, so this could be a deal-breaker if you like older (25+) or fuller-figured models since the majority of the models are young and petite.

This site is part of the PornPros network and the technical bits are the same as I listed in my review of Jurassic Cock. The highlights of the technical stuff are that there is streaming and download available. Downloads are available in MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. I’m not convinced that the HD is true HD. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate.) Photos are available (both actual photos and screencaps) and zips are available. The photos are hi-res and look great.

One complaint I have that is purely subjective is that the entire network, including this site has very little anal sex. There is one scene listed as including anal, but I think that’s in error. I didn’t see any buggery in the scene.

If you’re interested in a massage site I can definitely recommend this one. I don’t have experience with any other massage sites, but this one is definitely worth the price of admission. Joining through TBP/PU gets you a discount too. Plus you get access to the rest of the network with some other excellent sites.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jurassic Cock

22. Jurassic Cock (0)

Pay
Active
90
rearadmiral (316) 05-14-11  09:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of PornPros Network
- Discount through TBP / PU
- Multiple download options
- Streaming available
- No DRM
- Watermark is small enough to be ignored
- Pics available (both separate and screecaps)
- Pics available as a zip
- Supports download managers
- 77 exclusive scenes (as of review date)
- Site updates weekly
Cons: - “HD” doesn’t look like true HD
- Not enough anal. (Yes, I know that’s very subjective.)
Bottom Line: I realize that the niche of having old guys fuck young women is not for everyone, but if it is something you like to watch, this site is definitely worth checking out.

Many of the girls on this site are a “who’s who” of A-list porn starlets today, and the format is one that definitely accentuates their youthful appearances. Girls such as Ashlii Orion, Jaelyn Fox, Amai Lui and Jada Stevens all make appearances. Some lesser known (but hopefully up-‘n’-coming) girls like Cheyenne Cooper are also here. Each scene is approximately 30 minutes long and there is usually a stereotypical setup for a scene with a young girl and an older guy: teacher, supervisor, driving instructor or something similar to further accentuate the age difference between the girl and the guy.

The guys are obviously a bigger part of the scene than would be acceptable in most porn scenes, BUT they never really get in the way of scene like many younger, self-indulgent male models do. The guys seem to know that they’re there to help show off the girl. And they should know that since the guys have a lot of experience in the business. Since there aren’t too many geezers still actually working in porn today, the talent pool is pretty shallow. Rod Fontana is here, as are a few other ‘seniors’ who I can’t name. One of them looks like Adolf Hitler and another looks like a slightly younger version of Col. Sanders. Perhaps the biggest male name here is also the most polarizing: Ron Jeremy. You either love him or hate him. Ron appears in a large number of the scenes. That may be a testament to his reliability.

As for the technical bits, the site is pretty standard for a good porn site. There are 77 scenes posted (with updates being added). Each scene offers a trailer to get an idea if you want to download the scene. If you do want to download, you have three options: MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. The HD doesn’t appear to be true HD though. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate. I’m not sure if that qualifies as HD, but it doesn’t look as sharp as I’m used to with other HD stuff.)

The site also offers photos. Both screencaps and actual photos are available, either individually or as a zipped set. The photos I looked at were high-resolution and looked great (3000x1996).

This is purely subjective, but there aren’t enough anal scenes here. Anal sex is a turn-off for some, but it is pretty mainstream and it is apparent in its absence here. It may be that most of the models don’t do anal (yet!), but of the 77 scenes there are only 4 or 5 anal, which seems low.

This site is part of a network that offers some interesting and innovative other sites, though for the $17.95 TBP discount price, this site alone is worth it. The network and individual sites are fairly simple and straightforward to use. There is no reliance on gimmicks. The search function is limited, but simple to use and effective.

If you like this kind of niche, I’d highly recommend this.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Massage Creep

23. Massage Creep (0)

Pay
Active
95
Rotterdam854 (Disabled) 01-03-11  06:33am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: • HD Video Quality is sharp,adaptable to players
• Initial Episodes were good,hot & enjoyable
• Great Storylines,Video Lengths, Great Sex
• Great Models,Sexy Chicks & Good MILF's also
• Logging In,Access & Navigation are alright
• Being Part of Porn Pros,good bonus sites
• Pics,Screencaps look great in viewing/download
Cons: • Busty Moms/MILF's,Big Tits are more common now
• Infrequent Updates,usually in 10/30/45 days
• Some issues with password & login, no FAQ section
• Suggestions can't be handled by chat only email
• Site seems to be having a burnout,nothing new
• Only one of the masseur's gets the best subjects
• Suggestions aren't taken up seriously at all
Bottom Line: Highly recommended as older content (2009) still remains the best ever.Was a time when it could no wrong & was better than other sites in the massage category, probably could give Fucked Hard18 a real run for its money. MC is priced well for such video content & quality, other sites are all $30 plus, viewers get a great deal from TBP
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jurassic Cock

24. Jurassic Cock (0)

Pay
Active
80
Harry Kuntz (12) 09-15-10  03:55pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: -RON JEREMY!!!
-A-1 quality MPEG & WINDOWS media formatting
-56 video/picture sets
-Geriatric theme A new twist.
-Bonus access to PORN PROS network
Cons: -Updates slower than a chess game at the Special Olympics.
-Old guys aren't really that old.
-Same cast over and over and over...and over.
-Prevalent amount of pitches for other porn sites(or in English...too many fucking advertisements)
Bottom Line: Some young girls prefer to have their first sexual liaisons with older, more experienced men who are wise in the ways of the world.The very thought of getting broken in by some gawky, acne riddled,two pump teenage chump is horror enough to make any girl want to join the convent and renounce sex.The teen tramps at JURASSIC COCK have taken the May-December romance conundrum one step further and set their sights on penises attached to men old enough to have been present at the invention of fire.The old dogs at JURASSIC COCK have some new tricks to teach these scrumptious young sex kittens.

Porn legend Ron Jeremy leads this cast of dirty old men as they get every last drop of their cocks milked by A pack of ripe & ready juvenile jezebels.These long in the tooth beau hunks bend,twist,and pound those tight young pussies until they're as supple as A jar of play-doh.

The rest of the cast is made up of such tantalizing porn tarts as LEXI DIAMOND,TANNER MAYES,and TESSA TAYLOR.They purr,coo,and moan as they take these geezers fossilized fuck wands in every possible hole.The old fogey's at JC are taking these bitches to school!

You have to take JURASSIC COCK with A grain of salt.The story lines are inane if not completely ludicrous.As in most skin flicks,the acting is atrocious and borders on down right embarrassing.The stunt cocks in these videos are in their mid to late 50's.Hardly what I would consider Jurassic.It would've been much more sick & depraved to watch these bimbos get worked over by some decrepit ass mummy looking mother fuckers than these middle aged pretenders.

All in all I think this is A funny twist on the regular old teen genre.If you're A dirty old man looking to live vicariously through RON JEREMY and the rest of this gang of grandpas,then the price is reasonable enough to not eat away your whole social security check.The bonus sites included in the PORN PROS package is worth the price alone.Whoever said retirement had to be A drag obviously has never seen JURASSIC COCK.STEVEN SPIELBERG and his CGI dinosaurs ain't got nothing on this site!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hailey Hardcore

25. Hailey Hardcore (0)

Pay
Active
70
nygiants03 (162) 08-25-10  09:43pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (65), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Hott natural beauty

-12 Bonus Hardcore sites

-Access to CarmenCocks, and Candy Skye

-1024 x 680 pixel pictures

-Each picture set ranges from about 100- 300 pics
Cons: -Only 22 Videos
-Only full video download
-Slow Streaming videos
-Video quality is not the best
-Only WMV video format
-22 picture sets
-The picture sets are only of the movies
-No updates
Bottom Line: Description Of Videos( ALL 1000k)
-(Jenga Dildo, Virtual Baby Oil, Ping Pong, Shower, Bathroom Masturbation, Orange Couch Dildo, Gamer Masturbation, Kitchen Masturbation, DDS strip, Baby Oil, Workout, Movie Dildo, Arcade day, Blue Rug Masturbation, CandyDildo, Boxing Dildo, and 6 Hardcore Videos)

-The girl is hott, but there is just not enough material for it to be worth the price. If it was updating still it would have a lot of potential to be a good site.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 55 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (10)
2. VideoBox (8)
3. X-Art (7)
4. Naughty America (7)
5. Babes Network.com (6)
6. DDF Network (6)
7. Wow Girls (5)
8. Reality Kings (5)
9. Bangbros Network (5)
10. Evil Angel (5)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.16 seconds.