Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
By Company 393Media Group, LLC
[ Remove ]
Option only available from company page.
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Visit Public Flash

1. Public Flash (0)

Pay
Active
85
mbaya (356) 12-03-10  01:10pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount for joining through TBP.
-Nice balance of attractive models of all ethnicities, ages and body types.
-Constantly adding new clips. About an entire video per week.
-A very large archive at 205 videos.
-Some pornstars. Besides those that Rearadmirable recognized there is a great scene with one of my favorites, Laurie Vargas. She started in porn scenes three years before she appeared here and Amber Rayne one year before she appeared here. Neither has this sites videos listed in their video histories that I read about online.
Cons: -All videos come as clips only. There should be an option for downloading the entire video.
-Low quality non zipdownloadable photos.
-Many older videos are of such low quality that they are not worth downloading.
Bottom Line: Thanks to Rearadmiral's review I decided to go back to this site. His review is a very complete and accurate description, so I will try to avoid repeating what he said. I was last a member in August 2008. I liked the content, but the videos were not up to the quality I wanted. On an HD screen they were quite grainy.

Since March of 2010, the newest videos are shot in 1280x720, 4220kbps. Those are the specs for HD, but they aren't very sharp. There is a poll question on the site about an upgrade to 1920x1080. They have upgraded the older videos, but they could be much better.

What I really like here is the sense of fun on the site. The camera woman Kyndra, or Special K as she also calls herself, is unabashedly a lesbian and loves her work. She makes her models feel sexy by continuously complimenting them throughout the videos. Her style is much more that of a facilitator than of a director. She doesn't really tell the models what to do; she suggests in a way that makes them feel that they are daringly having naughty, exhilirating fun. They seem to get a natural high, a special thrill from showing off. The level of joking, smiling and laughing makes the site stand out from other flash sites. She makes them want to ever do more by continuously interacting with them. You get the feel that the two are having a conversation. The danger is that sometimes Kyndra is at the point of saying too much. A blabby camerawoman can get as dull as any blabby cameraman. However, she generally seems to say just enough to make the videos a hot experience for us viewers.

The videos range from flashing in secluded locations to opening up in front of total strangers who give their consent. Sometimes the models enter into work locations such as repair shops, stores , etc. The lighting there can be hit or miss. I feel that most of the best videos are shot outdoors. While there is a lot to be said about the daring spontaneous nature of the content, you also have some downsides. Lighting may prevent the viewer from getting details in closeups and sometimes the camerawork is a bit of a drawback. Kyndra is holding the camera in her hands, not a stationary tripod. The videos reflect her being unsteady, especially if she gets enthusiastic or nervous about getting caught. Flashing in public is illegal, as I am sure you know. . This leads to too much camera movement with not enough focus. Sometimes there is a lot of wasted video until a good location is found, so you may find yourself fast forwarding a bit.

As far as the photos, most are not at all related to the videos. As best as I can tell, none have been added since I was a member over two years ago and the lack of quality is evident. They are not zipdownloadable and come in at about 600x800.

My general impression is that the site is REAL reality television at its best. These videos surely beat the usual garbage that gets that title. At the TBP discounted price it definitely is worth a membership.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Flash

2. Public Flash (0)

Pay
Active
85
rearadmiral (328) 11-24-10  06:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (70), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Among the best in the niche
- Mostly amateurs with a few well-known porn stars
- Updates regularly
- Exclusive content with U.S. flashing
- Some European flashing (which likely isnít exclusive)
- Wide variety of body types, from full-figured, to large-breasted to petite
- Some variation in race and age, though most are younger white models
- Two options for file size
- Currently 105 full scenes
- Pictures available
- Excellent value for price ($14.95 USD per month)
Cons: - Videos broken down into smaller segments
- No option to download complete videos
- Some models are a bit too tame
- Highest resolution video isnít up current standards (the best is now 1280x720 which compares well to the older videos at 630x470)
- Pictures not available in zip format
- Picture resolution is average (1024x768)
- Site isnít well organized
Bottom Line: Iím a big fan of public flashing and nudity and there are few sites that do it like I like it. There are sites that offer European public nudity that offer more videos and are better organized, and there are sites that have American public nudity that are more risqué (Nude in L.A. comes to mind). This is a personal opinion, but those sites lack or donít show the models being nervous and excited at the same time. Those sites treat public nudity as being an everyday occurrence. Not so with Public Flash. This site has a bit of a corny set-up for each and then moves into various open or public venues. Panties and bras are slipped off and then the model walks through various locations and flashes. Full nudity happens, but is rare. This may sound simple, and it is, but for fans of public flashing and nudity this is a site worth looking at.

As for the models, there is a decent variety. Most fit the typical porn mold by being young (18-25) white and petite. But there are some models who are fuller-figured, larger-breasted, older or different skin tones. Most of the models are amateurs (or at least that I havenít seen before) but there are a few big name porn stars who appear, presumably early in their careers. This includes Aubrey Addams, Amber Rayne and Faye Runaway.

The site, like the models, is fairly amateur. Searching isnít really an option, but since each segment has a big thumbnail you can see whether that model might be to your liking on the main page before you click the link. My biggest complaint is that there are no full length videos: each of the scenes is divided up into smaller segments. I realize why they do this for updating purposes, but once all the segments are posted I wish theyíd offer a link for the full video.

The videos are offered in two resolutions, but only in wmv format. The best format isnít bad, but it isnít HD. The current best is 1280x720, though older videos haven't been updated and are still at 630x470. There are pictures available too, but they are not available in a zip format for easy capture.

Updates are fairly regular Ė appearing every few days Ė but each update is only two segments of the full video. It takes a couple of weeks for an entire video to be posted.

Still, for all the flaws, Iím willing to cut this site some slack. I may be wrong, but I suspect that this is one of the hardest niches to work in due to the risk. This isnít filming sex in the back of a panel van or on a set in someoneís living room: these scenes put the models and crew at some legal risk in our Puritanical culture. The outcome is some fun video to watch as nervous young women flash in public.

This site offers decent value for the monthly fee if you like this niche.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Flash

3. Public Flash (0)

Pay
Active
74
bacardiancoke (22) 09-10-09  03:19am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Models seem to know what they're doing
- Site created by people who understand the niche
- Good range of models / situations
- Appears natural (not forced or heavily scripted)
Cons: - Photos cannot be downloaded in .zip format
- Vids have to be watched/downloaded in clips only
- Appears to be no recently update photo sections
- Average number of shoots
- Get impression of recycled content
- Some content non-exclusive
- Site needs some work to bring it up to the standards that other sites have adopted as they have evolved over the years.
Bottom Line: As a brand new user (not a former site member who's returned) this content all looks new to me, although the odd shoot with 1999/2000 imprinted on it is a bit of a give away with a lot of video quality and a few other artefacts in the background.

If you are a previous member, my advice, stay away there is a very good chance that you've seen all this material already and would be wasting your money reinvesting. This is no Met-Art when it comes to purity of archiving.

For new members though; I'm glad to say that the site is what it sets out to be, with a broad section of models and the producers make the most of the fairly limited number of variables that you can have in public exposure.

However, the site does then begin to let itself down in its presentation.

The design of the site tells you that it has seen little updating to code etc in the years that it has been live. Navigation is reasonable with a rudimentary gallery for each section.

Picture and vid quality then begins to show the age of both the site and shoots, and the lack of .zip downloads for photo galleries and only being able to view vids as clips leaves the site out there with other turn of the millenium businesses that have failed to move on. It is a shame really as with a few basic updates and more shoots this could be a great site that is already aiming well at a niche category.

Overall quality of shoots (other than viewing quality) is good, although it is bizarre that on some shoots where a model has clearly been out for about an hour there are only about 12 pics???? With basic flashing, maturbation, public participation and even oral sex/facials so plenty to go round and the site producers know exactly where to be aiming (unlike some sites who aim for a niche and completely miss as they've no idea or interest in it themselves, so well done there.

My view. Not bad; with a bit of work it could be great, but not bad.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Flash

4. Public Flash (0)

Pay
Active
84
mbaya (356) 08-08-08  11:04am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Newer videos 720x480, many older ones 640x480.
-Nice archive, presently 117 video shoots.
-Many natural, attractive girls who seem to really enjoy flashing. Most of them are very enthusiastic.
-Attractive price through the link from TBP.
-Member forum. Provides news about future updates and you can post suggestions and comments.
Cons: -Many videos do not have photo shoots and many photo shoots do not have videos.
-Videos do not have a link to download the entire video at once. In the member forum the webmaster recently promised to add a link.
-Updates may take as long as two weeks for an entire shoot. Updates a few clips at a time.
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file. Many photos poor quality. Apparantly not adding new photo shoots.
-May not be all exclusive as the main photographer has videos on other flashing websites.
-Bonus sites streaming only with poor quality videos.
Bottom Line: Most of the videos were a lot of fun and better than I expected. I counted three with oral sex and a few with a little masturbation, so not only skin. A lot of the videos were quite explicit. A variety of races and ethnicities as well as body types, although most were thin. Most appear to be amateurs, although the shoot of Hannah Hilton was good. I would definitely sign up again in a few months.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Public Flash

5. Public Flash (0)

Pay
Active
70
exotics4me (463) 04-19-07  08:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (87), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Flashing looks to be 100% real and in locations that I have seen in person.
- Some of the girls are really cute, some are pretty, some are average.
- Models walk up to strangers and talk to them while flashing.
- Everything is average quality or better, pics and vids
Cons: - There really isn't a whole lot to see on here
- Extreme softcore, very little touching, just quick flash, stop, start over.
- Person videoing talks through the whole thing
- 3rd party content wasn't interesting either
Bottom Line: I've always been intrigued by exhibitionism and voyeurism, and had saw some samples from this site. I was expecting much more. The samples I saw were the most hardcore parts of the site, and those were even tame. I only downloaded maybe 4 of the girls' videos and pictures, but have never went back to them since downloading them. I would rate it lower, but it does say public flash, not public sex or public masturbation. It just left a lot to be desired for me. If they added maybe 1-2 more clips furthering the tease, then it would rate higher.

My best way to describe my feelings towards the site would be to say I feel like I was in a gym with nothing but women and I walked into the dressing room only to get the door slammed in my face at the last minute!

Definitely need more content and more skin for me and more touching. To put it plainly, it is a very vanilla site. Not recommended if you are wanting more than just basic flashing.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-5 of 5  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. 21Sextury.com (9)
2. Babes Network.com (7)
3. DDF Network (6)
4. VideoBox (6)
5. Naughty America (6)
6. Bangbros Network (5)
7. Evil Angel (5)
8. FTV Girls (5)
9. Wow Girls (4)
10. Team Skeet (4)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.