Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 1698 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit Pacino\'s Adventures

26. Pacino's Adventures (1)

Pay
Active
90
jook (11) 12-29-13  05:13am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - drop dead gorgeous teens
- all exclusive, I think
- incredibly helpful customer service
- excellent production
Cons: - poor searching features
- no categories, you choose a model and get to see the movies she's, though the photos pretty much tell you what you can expect
- the majority of videos are masturbation scenes and lesbian scenes, which many might take as a plus or a pro
Bottom Line: I should preface my review that I have a preference for South American young wimmin. I emailed them to ask if this what the site was all about and I was told about 80% are filmed in SA. Based on that, I joined. To my dismay, there was no searching tool to pick out the SA videos, and the hard core, i.e., non-masturbation or lesbo videos.

I emailed to ask about this and incredibly, the CSR send me a list of links, about 70, that fit my description. Wow, I never expected such service!

They upload a few videos a week, not worth it for a recurring membership, but definitely worthwhile if you like gorgeous amateur teens.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Trike Patrol

27. Trike Patrol (1)

Pay
Active
90
jook (11) 12-23-13  03:29am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Women are young and mostly gorgeous
-Although most seem to be pros, many still seem like the gal next door (in the PI) - shy and amateurish. [this may be a con for some.]
-no San Fernando glitz or overproduction
-generally good quality and production
Cons: - a recurring membership is not worth it
- scenes generally follow the same pattern (only a few guys) and it gets tiresome
- just a handful of anal scenes
- group scenes, FFM, seem forced
Bottom Line: Reality filipino porn shot by Swedish guys. The premise is to go around in a trike (a filipino taxi) and pick up girls off the street... mostly. Although it seems to be entirely shot in Angeles City, known for its pickup bars and prostitution, the girls are mostly pros, and they seem to enjoy what they are doing with little acting.

There are a decent number of videos, all about 25 minutes, which I managed to download in a month. There's only 1 upload per week, so it doesn't pay to shell out roughly $30/mo. for 4 or 5 downloads. I suggested restructuring their pricing but I was told they have tried different billing models and full price each month works best for them.

Which leads me to - they are very approachable and support is excellent. Highly recommended.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

28. ATK Natural & Hairy (2)

Pay
Active
93
Loki (5) 12-10-13  02:48am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -the site claims over 1,500 models, 3 million photos and 5,500 videos and it is likely true
-8 photo and 3 video updates daily
-recent (after 2011) photos in 3 formats: standard (682 x 1024), Medium (1064 x 1600) and High (2000 x 3000)
-recent videos (after 2011?) in multiple download formats: Flash, WMV, HD MP4, SD MP4, and Mobile
-all natural-breasted models
-hairy models ranging from pubic hair only to hair grown out everywhere
-a range of photographers with different styles
-both soft and hard core content, but mostly soft core
-tour is very good in representing the content within the site
-custom downloads of photo sets available
-few toys (good to me)
Cons: -the quality of photography varies (some use too little or too much light, an out of focus shot in a set, etc.)
-most models are white, amateur girls (see bottom line)
-sets are repetitive
-some unattractive models (to each their own)
-some photographers talk during the videos (not just during the interviews)
Bottom Line: A site I keep coming back to time and again for quality hairy porn. The stable of photographers with their different styles and models (Argentinian, British, Russian, and American are common) means there is generally something for every type of fan of hairy women. The exception is ethnic women. They have an ethnic section, with at least one set a day, but compared to the other 7 photo updates a day, it seems slim. Models run the gamut from "WOW!" to "Woof" but that is a personal preference for each porn user.

The delivery of content is first rate. There are multiple formats, and with custom downloads, I have no complaints there. I can't say if it supports Download Management software as I don't use it, but downloads were quick for me. Sorry folks.

Some photographers are repetitive in their sets. LIL uses the same white and black background that drives me up a wall over and over again. Sean R is a fan favorite on the site and a major contributing photographer who specializes in gynocological spread shots. But there is a photographer for most tastes among those whose work appears on the site.

Like all ATK sites, ATK Natural & Hairy is focused on teen and amateur girls in largely indoor solo shoots. Some lesbian and some hardcore B/G shoots are on the site, But mostly it is girls stripping naked and masturbating with or, more commonly, without, a toy.

In all it is a good site for anyone looking for cute, hairy models with minimal toy usage, and lots of them.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mouth Target

29. Mouth Target (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
NoHagsHere (Disabled) 12-05-13  08:00pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Some of the girls are very cute and even natural.
Cons: The videos are tiny (320 X 240), which is laughable in this day and age but I have a feeling this is all very old content that they are milking for revenue. Many of the girls in the videos are fairly skanky and some fairly ugly. The male component in the videos talks too much.
Bottom Line: I only signed up because I have a hardon for one girl on their site. I certainly will not be renewing my subscription.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Chaturbate

30. Chaturbate (1)

Cams
Newbie
95*
fairguy112 (1) 12-03-13  02:42am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: I would like to recommend this site to all webcam viewers. There is an excellent selection of models on the site and the pricing is very reasonable. This is a site where you can spend the whole without spending a cent. However you do more have when you are tipping.
Cons: I dont think there are many cons i am into couples and there could be more of them. But on Friday and Saturday night US time its like prime time. Some of the cams are average quality but once again most are pretty good.
Bottom Line: On a personal note I had a problem with a performer not doing what they said they would do. Chaturbate fixed this up straight away. Their billing systems are fair and are not out to rob from you. I think it is the best and most honest site on the Net. I would strongly recommend a visit to this site you will love it.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Casting Couch X

31. Casting Couch X (2)

Pay
Active
89
rearadmiral (320) 10-24-13  06:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 74 scenes posted
- All scenes in HD
- Stunning models
- Large majority of models are fresh and unknown
- The male talent is rather Ďtalentedí if you like big facials
- Updates regularly
- Screenshots and photos available
- TBP / PU discount
Cons: Major cons:
- Links time out after approximately 10 minutes
- Limited options for members with slower connections

Nitpicky cons:
- I had trouble with the MPG files (may just be me though)
- Scenes may be repetitive
- LOTS of ads
- Meaningless file names
- No tags or ability to sort by scene type

Subjective cons:
- 3 anal scenes?? Is that it??
- Theyíre affiliated with BangBros so watch out.
Bottom Line: Lately Iíve had a thing for Ďcastingí sites and have been joining anything that looks decent. A week ago that led me to this site. And in case youíre wondering, yes, I know that these are staged, but theyíre staged so well that a viewer can get lost in the fantasy.

The site dates back to just over a year ago and not much has changed in the way the scenes are shot except for the location being much more upscale in newer scenes. The scenes follow a set formula and rarely deviate from that. Girl walks in, presents her ID, is interviewed, stands and undresses, girl poses nude and fingers herself a bit on the couch, guy standing/girl kneeling blowjob, occasionally becomes guy sitting on couch / girl kneeling blowjob (in some rare scenes with rimming), sex starts with girl standing bent over desk, girl on back on desk, guy laying on back on couch with girl riding, then switch back to girl on knees oral with a damn good facial. Most of the scenes stick pretty close to that formula. Some may find that repetitive, and it is, but itís saved by the hot female models.

You could argue that even the models are formulaic in that they are all in their late teens or early twenties, all are petite (but not skinny) and all but a few have B or C cup breasts. Given the age group, tattoos and piercings are common but not overwhelming. Most of the models are new to me, though I did recognize a few faces that I have seen before. To say that all the models are good looking is either an understatement or an exaggeration depending on your preference. I say the former, but if you prefer larger or older models, then this site may not be for you.

The site has a very simple layout that is easy to use. On each page there are 12 scenes shown by a large thumbnail with the modelís name and the date of the upload. There are currently 74 scenes uploaded and it appears that a new scene is added every six days. Each scene is approximately 50 mins long.

Opening that thumbnail brings you to a page to access the scene. Iím a big fan of HD material and always download it when it is available, so it may seem odd for me to complain that there arenít many download options. The choice is HD in MPG or WMV and an MP4 in 750x422. File sizes for the HD files averages 3GB, so this might not work for members with slower internet speeds. I downloaded the WMV version and all of those came in at 1920x1280, 9000kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively, they arenít bad, but they arenít the best Iíve seen either. The MP4s look pretty good so they may be a good compromise for slower connections. Still, more choices are better.

One problem I had that may be unique to me is that the MPG files stuttered badly. I tried multiple scenes on two computers and used two players and had the same result each time. This may not happen to you, but before you download a lot in MPG you should test them on your computer.

Photos and screencaps are available too. The photos are 1500x1000 and the screencaps are 1920x1280. The big difference is that the screencaps arenít available as zips.

The site does support download managers, but the links time out after about 10 mins. Given the file sizes this means that lining up more than three scenes probably wonít work. Also, prepare to rename each file before you download it Ė they all use the same generic, meaningless name.

One annoyance that I can live with is the number of ads on the site. I donít mind ads if they help keep the site going, but I had one big problem here. Given that the site is affiliated with BangBros, and BB has a reputation for some pretty unethical subscription and billing practices, I avoided even going near the ads for sites I otherwise might be interested in for fear of getting burned with an unwanted subscription.

I realize that not everyone will share my opinion on this, but I was disappointed to find only three anal scenes on the site. Many other Ďcastingí sites have a lot of anal because the genre lends itself to that sex act. ďBut honey, the big money is in analÖĒ This actually leads me to another problem that may not be a problem, and thatís that there are no tags or meaningful ways to sort the scenes. Why this really isnít a problem is that with each scene closely following a formula tags are probably unnecessary: look at the model. Do you like her? If yes, you know exactly what sheíll be doing in the scene so download it.

The pros far outweigh the cons here when you consider the merits of the site. You have access to over 60 hours of HD porn at a discounted price. The scenes all have some hot, young and fresh models. The production values are high and the scenes all look great. What more could you ask for? I definitely recommend this site.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Broke Amateurs

32. Broke Amateurs (1)

Pay
Active
65
rearadmiral (320) 10-03-13  06:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent sized site (135 scenes)
- Some attractive women
- Supports download managers
- Streaming available
- Lots of rimming (yes, I consider this a pro)
- Scenes are hard without being abusive
- Updates
Cons: - No HD
- Highest resolution is barely industry standard
- Seems to be using even lower resolution now
- Many broken links
- Some scenes are streaming only
- No customer support
- Some women not attractive
Bottom Line: I recently discovered that I like Ďamateurí porn. The qualifier for that is that I like porn that uses models that obviously have some interest in the adult industry and are now trying video, as opposed to a couple who record themselves and post it on the Ďnet.

The setup here is pretty much the same as used on similar sites like Exploited College Girls: the scene begins with an interview of the model, she gets naked, there is oral and then sex. I think this formula works so I donít find it repetitive, but I can see that some might. Most of the sex is vaginal, but there are several scenes that feature anal too, but not enough that Iíd consider this an anal site. One controversial sex act that does occur often is female on male rimming, which occurs in a majority of the scenes. I like watching that, so I find it a positive, but I understand that Iím probably in a minority.

Most of the scenes are around 45-50 minutes long. While the female models are asked to do things they probably wouldnít do in real life, the scenes are in no way abusive as can occur on other sites. There is no face fucking or other extreme acts like that.

Most of the models are quite attractive and there is a decent variety among body types so that most members can say they found a lot of models that suit their tastes. As with Ďamateurí sites though, there can be some models who are questionable. I swear that one of the models looks like a younger Geddy Lee. And as a Rush fan, it pains me to say that. It could have been worse though: the model could have looked like Neil Peart or Alex Lifeson.

Unfortunately the bad outweighs the good on this site. The material itself is well shot (while there is a lot of POV it is well done), lighted and edited. Most of the women are attractive and most of the sex is fun to watch. The site is let down by the web design itself and what is actually made available to members.

The site is simple and I have no problem with that. It is a small site with 135 scenes available so there is no need for a fancy layout and powerful search function. It would be nice to see some tags but I can live without those. Of the problems on the site, one of them is that the 135 scenes are only theoretically available. I didnít count them, but there are many dead links for pages and more for downloads.

Speaking of downloads, this is the biggest problem with the site: all of the older material is offered in only 320x240 resolution. (Only one download choice is offered per scene. Or, if you prefer, the only option is take it or leave it.) I canít be convinced that they were anywhere near state-of-the-art even when they were uploaded. The site did improve that when they upgraded the downloads to 720x480. Those are passable and look pretty good on a 24Ē monitor, but get pretty grainy on a large TV. More options would be better, including an HD download choice.

But wait! It gets worse!

It appears that the site may have made a choice to actually revert back to the 320x240 size. I say this for three reasons: 1) the newest update is low resolution, 2) a blog update in late August reported that the site would be only using low resolution downloads to thwart theft, and 3) a couple of emails to the site to ask if my suspicions were true went unanswered.

If itís true that the site has reverted to low res for downloads, this alone will cause me to not recommend the site and not rejoin. I get that piracy is hurting porn, and probably hurting smaller sites more than big sites, but surely there is a better way to curb piracy than kicking your customers in the balls. Iím an active porn buyer and I frequently rejoin sites, but if this is what I get, I wonít be back.

Two relatively minor issues too: 1) if you have an option for members to contact you, you should read your email and respond. If you donít respond, then donít make the option available, and 2) the third most recent update features a stunning young lass who puts on a great performance, but for some reason it is only offered in streaming. This really cheesed me off, and my reasonable question on future availability went unanswered.

As for some technical stuff, the site updates with approximately one new scene being added weekly. It also supports download managers with no obvious timeouts or download limits.

This is some decent amateur porn that is let down by a too-amateur site. I could live with that but if my suspicions are correct that they are making things even worse for members I canít recommend the site. If the site responds to this review or to my email with some information on better downloads then Iíll reconsider my refusal to recommend and the score.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naughty Webcams

33. Naughty Webcams (0)

Cams
Newbie
80*
NoHagsHere (Disabled) 09-27-13  09:26am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: The site itself is very well engineered and laid out, so functionality is easy (as it should be). Payment setup, searching, notating favorites, and even sometimes tweaks to the video stream are all easy to accomplish. They also have a "gold" button which allows you to throw more money at the ladies if you decide to.
Cons: I frequent this site about least 3 or 4 times a week and find "success" is pretty hit or miss (not even 50/50) due to girls who either want to talk for an hour or girls who just start ramming dildos in their orifices.

I still have a problem with my webcam working on the site. The dialog box just freezes up when I attempt to select settings to have cam to cam and their online chat support was absolutely useless in helping me fix this issue, just copying/pasting a bit of verbiage that didn't help and then signing off immediately.

They started using a larger default player window which often exceeds what the stream originates as (by quite a bit) so the image quality can often be soft.

Many of the prettier ladies use a trick to entice a viewer into paying to see them in that as soon as you load their stream they switch into "in session" mode so you have to then pay to see them.
Bottom Line: It's easy and I haven't found an alternative that I like better (livejasmin or onhercam), so I feel like there is value in it.
Respond: 20 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jack Off To Me

34. Jack Off To Me (0)

Pay
Newbie
65*
NoHagsHere (Disabled) 09-03-13  06:27am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lola is hot as fuck; I would pay a lot of money for an hour alone with her, so that says something. It's nice to see a naturally thin performer who looks healthy and doesn't have unnatural breast balloons. The quality of the video footage is high.
Cons: Lola is one of my top 10 favorite porn ladies but the technical aspects of the jack off to me work is marginal (as with most porn). The camera work is awkward (complete with handling noise) and draws way too much attention to itself. The audio quality is marginal and almost always features annoying AC noise. The lighting often features a nasty blue cast due to use of cheap LED lighting.

Regarding performance, Lola doesn't talk nearly enough. She really needs to work on her dirty talk and throw out some more sexy and titillating banter. "Oh, oh, oh, oh," and "mmmmmmm" doesn't count as good dirty talk.

Also, the whole cock stroking thing is ludicrous. Please stop.
Bottom Line: I would renew my subscription beyond the recent Labor Day special rate if Lola had at least one good new video up per month, but I don't see that happening. And I couldn't care less about the other performers on the site except the demeaning blond from September 1st 2012. I would pay money to see her talk dirty without the nasty mistress bullshit.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cam With Her

35. Cam With Her (0)

Cams
Newbie
89*
TheDen (1) 08-20-13  07:42pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: *A lot of free clips, and they can go topless in the clips.
*The models are fun, and beautiful..... Unlike some other sites... Just sayin.
*Members get discounts on live shows. 20% off.
*Mchats are all archived. So you can re-watch them.
*The members area has tons of picture, and videos to watch.
*The staff is helpful, if you have any problems.
*Models on CWH that have their own sites, allow CWH members to access them; without any extra fees.
Cons: *Forum could be a bit more active, but most people don't go to cams site for forums; obviously.
Bottom Line: Camwithher was the first caming site, Iíve ever been too. And, to this day, itís the only one that I still go to. I usually just frequent the forum. But, when I was a mod, I attended Mchats, and all the good stuff.

The girls are friendly, and so are the other members. The staff are always eager to help you, when you need it. The members area is PACKED with photo sets, and videos to keep you entertained. The Mchats are my favorite part. The models are always eager to have fun, and give the members a great show.

The forum used to be packed with members, but the last few years itís been pretty dead. But, itís been getting a bit more active, then it has been; the last few years.

Like all websites, there is room for improvement. But, itís one of the most solid cam sites, out there.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Black Owned Wives

36. Black Owned Wives (2)

Pay
Active
50
pat362 (367) 08-19-13  05:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +You get access to 21 sites.
+The processor is CC Bill
+Cancellation was a piece of cake
+Join price was cheaper than for some of the other sites.
-Site design is simple so it's easy to find everything you are looking for(Of course you won't be looking long since there is nothing worth finding).
Cons: -The content is not exclusif and can be found on other sites.
-I don't think a single one of these sites has updated in many years.
-All the videos associated with the network are broken into multiple clips. Some of which number in the high 30's.
-The quality of the vids is bad to awful and is also getting older all the time.
-The only single file videos are leased from other sites.
-The vast majority of the videos exist as single files on sites like clip4sale so why not make them available for their own sites.
Bottom Line: *I'm going to make this short and sweet. If these sites were only a dollar then it would still be one dollar too many. There is nothing that can be found on these sites that is worth looking at or let alone download to your computer. That's not to say that there aren't some decent videos because I saw some of them on clip4sale and they looked a 100 times better than anything that can be found here but the awful business practice all of these sites perpetrate is why some people say Tube sites is the way to go.

*I Googled some of the videos and I found some of them on a few Tube Sites and I even checked part of one of them and the quality was better than what I paid for with these sites.

*Here is the list of sites you get with your membership so that if you're ever in the mood for some interracial porn then you'll know which sites not to pick.

-Black man's cum dump(what a great name...Not).

-I cuckold my husband.(He wasn't the only one who got cuckoled here).

-Whoring out my wife(I'm sure she would prefer to be called something else than a whore).

-Black owned wife(Yeah who doesn't like that)

-Black men's use my wife(I'm seeing a pattern forming with these titles).

-Black man's whore(white mean's angel).

-Black cock whore(Yeah I'm definitely seeing a pattern).

-Florida Mandigos (I wonder what kind of bird this is).

-Wife's sloppy seconds(Mmm who doesn't like that?)

-Mandigo mama. (Is that the mother of the bird?)

-Black owned wives(I guess they found more women so they needed a new site).

-Black magic xxx(Nope same old shity magic).

-Mandigo blonde(bird with bleached feathers).

-Brooke Lauren(I guess she didn't want to be part of the wives group).

-Alice in blacland(It has to be because this is no wonderland).

-Mandigo Candi (I don't think bird flavored candy is all that appealing).

-Florida Domme(They tried to copy the astrodome but they were sued and had to change the name).

-Mandigo redhead (bird on fire)

-Mandigo max(maximum crap more like it).

-Hubby humiliates me(paying for this crap humiliated me).

-Gerri's darkside(we told her to put some pants on and now it's hidden from view).

***If you ever see any of these sites or any with similar names then please stay away. It's your money and you can do what you want with it but don't come complaining to me that you were cheated because I bite the bullet so you didn't have to.***
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit GF Revenge

37. GF Revenge (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
perv (0) 08-17-13  10:37am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Updates weekly - you get 4 vids a month so you might get something interesting the following week, if you didn't find anything you liked previously.
Cons: The content sucks big time. All the chicks are stoners with more tats than the tattooed chick at a carnival.

The guys look like total douchebags and the chicks don't seem to really like it. Sure, the concept is that it's supposed to be amateurish, but this is just horrible.
Bottom Line: You like ugly chicks with douchebag boyfriends, this is your site. I am sure that they must have some decent submissions somewhere with hot girls, but it just didn't do it for me.

Guys - go check out other sites in your group - there has to be someone there that looks good... you struck out!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Exploited College Girls

38. Exploited College Girls (2)

Pay
Active
88
rearadmiral (320) 08-12-13  04:28pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large site
- Mostly unknown models
- Models very good looking
- Lots of opportunity to see the modelís personality
- Includes two other sites
- Supports download managers
- No obvious time-outs
- Scenes are available as a single download or as clips
Cons: - Could offer more HD
- Could offer niche tags
Bottom Line: This site is a recipe for disaster in many ways: it is simplistic, formulaic, mostly POV-based and uses only one male talent. But in this case the site is much greater than the sum of its parts. The simple layout works in this case since the site is based around the female talent, the formula may be the same in every scene but I found that formula added to the heat in the scenes. While POV can be annoying, the male talent here must have some serious practice because this is some of the best POV work Iíve ever seen, and finally, that male talent doesnít fall into the trap that so many other one-man-shows do Ė he doesnít ever lose site of the fact that members are joining to see the girls, not him.

The glue that holds this site together is the quality of models that get recruited. While there isnít a lot of variety, the choice of model is something that aims for the biggest chunk of the market: young, fit, petite, and usually Caucasian. Iím one of those people who like the siteís choice of models and I really like what the site has to offer. To further the appeal, the models are never caked with heavy makeup and dressed in slutty clothes. The site accentuates each modelís natural beauty rather than covering it.

A sharp contrast between this site and the sites I normally join is that the sites I normally join use the better known porn models working at the time. I have little experience with amateur sites but with very rare exceptions these are models Iíve never seen before or since. I have no idea how the site recruits the models, but whatever theyíre doing they should keep doing it because it works.

The scenes all have a common theme: a Ďcollege girlí is enticed to dip her toes into the world of porn. The girlís youth and appearance certainly lends credibility to the overall theme. A viewer could really get lost in the fantasy that this is an otherwise innocent college student who is about to do something nasty for our viewing pleasure.

Many of the scenes start with the cameraman / male talent picking the model up. As they drive an interview in conducted which is usually pretty interesting. In many of these scenes the interview progresses to some nudity in the car and is often followed by some road head. In rare cases the girl will actually ride the guy while he drives. Sure, itís dangerous, but itís great to watch!

Other scenes begin in a hotel room but there is still an interview process.

The scenes then transition to some posing, usually some oral on the girl, oral on the guy, sex in multiple positions and finally a money shot, usually on the face. Most of the scenes then have some footage shot after the scene, which is also interesting to watch.

The site layout is simple, but simple works here. The scenes all have the same theme so the biggest difference is the model herself. I do wish that there were some tags offered, though there really wouldnít be many. A tag for anal scenes (there are a few) would be great, and maybe even a tag to sort by the modelís age would be a good addition.

One feature that I like a lot is that while a lot of the camera work is POV, there are also two or three fixed cameras set up too. Thatís good to provide some variety but the site uses split-screens to capture two views at once. Half the screen might be a shot of the model getting fucked in the doggy position while the other half is a close-up of her face. This is a great effect and really works well.

Iím not sure if this is a pro or a con, but many of the older shoots arenít edited to vary the shots between POV and the fixed camera. Instead, they offer the full scene from either viewpoint. Iím glad they dropped this practice and started editing, but it does offer an option for viewers who prefer one or the other.

The site is large, offering about 320 scenes and it updates with one scene being added per week. Each scene is available as a single download or in clips if youíre only interested in a segment. The site supports download managers with no obvious time-outs.

Download resolutions vary. The best is 1280x720, 3000kb/s, many are 768x432 at 1800kb/s and the lowest are 640x360 at 1800. All are 30 fps. The older scenes donít look great by todayís standards, but they arenít bad. The medium resolution looks pretty good even though the specs would suggest otherwise. I think the biggest flaw is that the site could offer higher resolutions. Also, WMVs are pretty much all that are available.

Photos are available as singles or zips. I didnít download much, but what I saw was relatively low resolution at 1400x788.

The bottom line is that this site could have been a total mess if any part of it was badly done, but since all the elements are well done the site is very good on the technical bits. Once you factor in the newness and apparent innocence of the models this is an amazing site that I both highly recommend and have already added to my list of sites to come back to regularly.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Habib Show

39. The Habib Show (1)

Pay
Active
70
BabyGetReal (32) 08-01-13  03:38pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Unique content with real pay for play street/bar girls, no faking, no acting.
- Fun party atmosphere. Some street scenes during pickups.
- Wide range of female body types, some young and gorgeous.
- All videos are downloadable.
- Videos can be sorted by most popular or latest.
- I reported a bad download link and they replied within 24 hours saying they fixed it (I didn't verify that).
Cons: - Horrible, very jerky, amateurish camera work is hard to watch and often misses the best parts.
- Large annoying watermark often blocks what you most want to see!
- Video resolution varies from poor to excellent.
- Video format seems to depend randomly on which camera they used. Each video is available in only one format: wmv, mp4, divx.
- Bulk of each video is conversation, undressing, showering. Sex is typically just a few minutes.
- Guys make little or no effort to pleasure the girls.
- Trailers are mixed in with full length videos.
- Stills are lo-res screenshots from the videos with no artistry whatsoever.
- Occasionally they use fake semen ("big willie").
- Download speed was sometimes very good but sometimes very poor -- varies widely.
- Downloaded video files have unique names but those names are often hard to relate to the title of the video -- so you may not be able to find it again.
- Bonus sites are very poor.
Bottom Line: I was disappointed with these videos. I joined for one month and will never re-join.

They are mildly interesting documentary but just not very erotic. It is sort of fun to see these guys pick up pay for play street/bar girls in various countries and what the girls say when they get back in the hotel room. Basically Habib just videos hotel rooms where he brings pay for play girls, and most of the videos are her arriving, undressing, horsing around, maybe some smoking, showering, just a few minutes of sex. A rare few of these girls managed to get off and enjoy themselves, but not because the guys made much effort. I don't like it when the guys bang away forever -- I prefer that they show some excitement and enjoyment and shoot their load in a natural amount of time -- but these guys mostly have no stamina at all -- no real attention to arousing the woman, then a couple of minutes in and out and they are done. The men often have trouble even getting hard. Too much booze and too little sleep? Nothing exciting about that either.

Condoms are used in nearly all of these videos. Under the circumstances of what they are doing, I applaud that. However it doesn't increase the erotic value of the videos.

Due to very amateurish videography with really no effort being made to produce a watchable video, the video quality is horrible. Lighting is often poor.

There are no cancellation links on the site so keep your subscription email info! Canceling was straightforward by going directly to the billing site.

I downloaded and watched 47 videos. There are probably over 100 full length videos on the site but it is hard to estimate. Only about 10 seemed worth keeping to watch again someday, and only about 5 of those were somewhat erotic and had orgasms (a couple from rubbing their own clits while being fucked).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Fidelity

40. Teen Fidelity (1)

Pay
Newbie
93*
FuzzyBunny (4) 07-31-13  06:59pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -80 scenes, plus access to 500 more at pornfidelity.com
-production quality is as good as it gets
-gorgeous 1080 HD video on all the newer stuff
-large, high-quality photo sets
-women are hot, and in many cases, drop-dead gorgeous
-male talent Ryan often ends scenes with not just one orgasm but two or three orgasms (how does he do that?!)
-scenes often feel like cutting-edge of porn: innovative set-ups, pleasingly unusual camera angles, etc.
-full-access 2-day trial available for $8.95 -- and mine actually lasted for 4 days
-fast, no-hassle downloading
Cons: -same male (Ryan) in every scene, which might bug some viewers
-several scenes include male talent putting a hand or hands around girl's neck as if strangling, which turns me off. Less of this would be better.
-too many scenes, like maybe 25%, go even further than strangling with an all-out BDSM theme, another big turn-off for me. I didn't even bother viewing these scenes -- a damn shame, especially because the girls are usually gorgeous
-the set-up of several scenes is meant to suggest that the girl's character is underage -- with teddy bears in the room, or school buses in the opening shots, et cetera. This makes the scene tasteless in my book, and contributes to porn's bad rep
-Kelly Madison herself joins a small portion of the scenes (maybe 25%), which seemed great at first, as I love MILF+teen 3-ways -- but I actually found myself tending to prefer the scenes Kelly's not in. Her mood is more "goofing-off" than "turned-on" and can distract from action
Bottom Line: This is definitely some top-notch porn -- some of the best production quality anywhere -- and I highly recommend for any enthusiast -- between this and the included membership to pornfidelity.com, there is plenty of terrific content

I'd give a rating of 100 if there was less prevalence of BDSM scenes and simulated-underage scenes
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Dreams

41. Teen Dreams (1)

Pay
Active
79
RLane (16) 07-30-13  01:31pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Lots of models
+Zip (large size only)
+Updates weekley
+HD videos
+Quick download speed
Cons: -Not a popular billing company
-few low resolution images for newer sets
-okay site navigation
-slow navigation
Bottom Line: First of all this was a pretty good site a few years ago, but now they haven't given the same effort as before. The site has an okay navigation with very poor loading times at certain times of the day. I like the favorite and rating system on the site, but when you have to dislike something it takes you back to the main members page and then you have to go back to the favs page.

There are about 2000 models on the site with an update weekly. They update at three times a week with about three or four new content every update. The download speed is quite fast including a download of a 500MB video. Now the billing company is Pure Web Power, but I haven't contacted them yet but when I do I'll add to my review. You do have access to their bonus sites using your TeenDreams login, but I think the majority is the same content on TDs

For the videos they do offer HD for NEW content. They only offer MP4 with no other type of media. The sizes they offer vary between old to new, the new offers 1080 (Full HD), 720 HD), 360 (med) and 180 (mobile) with the old videos vary but most of them only have the medium size. The videos download pretty quick with an average of 200MB for HD videos. There are about 1800 videos on the site.

For the galleries, there are about 7000+ sets ranging from solo, lesbian to boy/girl. The quality of most of the images are quite good ranging from 2013 to 2006. For the sizes, they do vary from year to year, but for recent sets their largest I've seen is 2040 for tall images and for long there is 1360x907 which is a huge disappointment; although, the quality of them are great. Most of the older images are usually 1728px and sometimes 2046px or 2000px from 2007 to 2012. Images in 2005 are usually 1752px. As for the zips they only offer Large size with no other sizes to select and when you also select an image it gives you the large without any other size.

Bottom line, this is a good mega site with tons of content with great quality, but is very slow at times and is a little bit hard to navigate. Overall this is a site I would recommend.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Girls Next Door Club

42. Girls Next Door Club (1)

Pay
Active
74
RLane (16) 07-18-13  02:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Zips (full, large, med, small)
+HD videos (1080 & 720)
+Fast download speed
+Small watermark on images and no marks on videos
+Gorgeous models
+CCBill
Cons: -Poor site set-up
-No rating system
-Image quality is okay
-Not much model bio
-Only 17 models
-No extras
Bottom Line: This is a fairly new site; although, they have updates since May 20, 2012. Last update was July 14, 2013 and seems like they update a couple times a week. As of this review there is only 17 models.

As for the videos on this site, I counted about 38 videos. The quality of the videos are quite good and are offered in: 1080, 720 and 540. They also offer HD streaming, WMV, Quicktime and Mobile in 1080. The average time of the video vary but are usually around 10mins.

For the pictures there are about 11,142 images. The quality of the images are okay and seems to be not that great when you zoom in. All image sets are in Zip in which you can download either: Full (5184x3456 or 4272x2848), Large (3000x2000), Medium (2000x1333) and Small (1000x666). Average images per set vary around 30-150. They also have a small watermark on the bottom right and left with some images have a dark transparent bar also on the bottom.

Bottom line is, this is a good hardcore site and I would recommend this. I only noticed one M/F sex scene with a few F/F scenes. Videos look better then the most of the images. The site has a very poor navigation set-up, there are only "Home", "Updates", "Girls" and "Live Cams" tabs to chose from. Also there isn't any rating system to rate the models or sets and there isn't an area to look at your profile. I would've liked to see a favorite like thing along with a profile and I would've loved to comment on a few sets, but they didn't provided that extra. By the way all scenes are indoors and there isn't no model bio for some models. Now this is a good site, but it needs improvement.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Lustful Goddess

43. Lustful Goddess (0)

Pay
Newbie
55*
critic (2) 07-15-13  05:56pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The site appears to be a sex-positive countercultural one with an emphasis on empowerment and a very amateur, natural approach. Much bodyhair if that appeals to you.
Cons: This site has been nothing but trouble for me. 2 of the 3 browsers I used were unable to download any videos. Safari worked. I downloaded 12 videos and was suddenly denied any further access to the site. (TBP says there's no download limit.) They havenít contacted me.

The ďsupportĒ link leads to a site (Zombaio) which denied any knowledge of my account. CCBill handled billing, and when I contacted them they reset my user name and PW. Access is still denied. I am requesting a refund.

Other stuff: the ďModelsĒ and ďTerms & ConditionsĒ pages are both empty. Search is all but broken: very primitive (you canít search for models). I had to re-enter my user name and pw for EVERY VIDEO downloaded. A very large number of the zip files I managed to download for image sets refused to decompress, even after repeated download attempts.

Videos seem to cap off at 640x480 WMV's. Images were generally 1200 pixels on the long side (or smaller)
Bottom Line: I cannot reccomend this site. I would not have joined if I knew I would spend the next day massaging and pleading with it to download content, only to be cut off arbitrarily twice, without warning. (It appears that there IS a download limit, in contrast to TheBestPorn's writeup.) I have requested a refund from CCBill.

I would suggest staying away from lustfulgoddess, a real shame given the nature of their content and the fact I (was) a serious fan of Oksana/Carmen/Gypsy Taub.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Janet Exposed

44. Janet Exposed (1)

Pay
Newbie
55*
Bdot (3) 07-12-13  11:22am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Exclusive content
-No apparent download limit
-Discounts available on Janet's clips4sale videos
Cons: -Extremely high membership price based on content
-Site navigation is very poor
-Many many fragmented videos, even the latest stuff, released in 3 or more parts
-Overall site appearance is cheaply done
-Most content in average to very low quality
-No diversity of video format download options
-Pictures are mostly in average to low quality
-Use of download manager may result in blocked IP address
-Although the site advertises itself as a personal journey into Janet, it's anything but.
-Extremely poor site support - Her husband is listed as the webmaster and doesn't reply to emails
Bottom Line: If you're a huge fan of Janet Mason, this site might be worth your $25, but don't expect much at all in the way of quality and don't consider that a recommendation. Honestly, the site feels like a rip off. I consider myself a big fan of Janet, but this site experience has made me lose a measure of respect. Most of the material on the site is old and only available in mpg format, and the most current pic sets and videos are presented in segmented offerings. So getting a complete video might take you more than a month of membership to get. It's insulting. I noticed that on some of the videos, they didn't even bother to post parts 3 and/or 4, and so unless you go to her clip store, you are left with half of a vid. I'll echo another reviewer's sentiment and say that this site is basically a tease to get fans to pay for the individual clips in the clip store. And at 25 bucks, that is downright ridiculous. I also attempted to use a download manager to grab a few clips, and noticed that my ip address became instantly blocked. I was forced to have my access to the site reset and issued another password by CCBill customer support. This after attempting to contact the webmaster, who is (judging by the email address) her husband, Steve. The bottom line is that I wouldn't recommend this site to ANY serious pornuser, fan of Janet or not. Not when you compare it to some of the more serious wife/milf/cuckold sites out there, and DEFINITELY not at the ridiculous entry price.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Glam Worship

45. Glam Worship (0)

Pay
Newbie
58*
spyttla (3) 07-08-13  12:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Some very hot girls

+OK amount of material

+Seems to be adding new material often

+Possible to order custom videos (no membership required)
Cons: -When browsing this site before registering I glimpsed at the content in their clip store. On the frontpage they say "premium membership" "want access to all our videos?" Well guess what they DO NOT give you access to all of their videos. Most of the videos I found most interesting in the clipstore are not to be found in the members section.

-No organization of material, as this is a fetish site there is obvious a great need. The videos in the clipstore are sorted in an acceptable way, why the members section is not the same seems strange.

-Only streaming. Bad streaming solution with very poor preloading it seems, on my wifi I often give up due to long pauses coming frequently.

-No HD. On their clipstore some clips are in HD, these clips are if they at all are available for streaming then only in SD.

-The video quality varies a lot, some have inadequate lightning and lots of background noises.

-Picture sets are very small.
Bottom Line: The premium membership section of this site could easily be improved a lot. They have a lot of interesting material in their clipstore and it should be possible to copy the organization from the clipstore as well. As of now I would not recommend and I regret I signed up.

If the site had not been such a headache with it`s poor organization and left me feeling fooled by the missing videos I would probably have ordered a custom video by now. Instead I will try to forget this site.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brandi Love

46. Brandi Love (2)

Pay
Active
69
pat362 (367) 07-06-13  10:47am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Exclusif site of Brandi Love.
+460 videos of which 250 are of Brandi herself.
+Over a 1000 photosets of which 650 are of Brandi.
+You get some content from 20 other models.
+There are plenty of links for swingers.
+You can get a full access 3 day trial for 5$.
+The CC processor is Epoch(so cancellation was easy).
Cons: -Overall site design is really bad (see bottom line for more info).
-A pretty large percentage of the content is not exclusif and that includes Brandi's stuff.
-A couple of the videos are interviews and/or tv appearances.
-A good portion of the content is rather old.
-The video quality is on the poor side, some of them have pretty bad lighting and way too much is POV style.
-Photosets cannot be downloaded as a single zip file so you have to download them pic by pic.
Bottom Line: *I've been tempted to join this site for quite a long time but for some reason I never did and after joining then I know why I waited so long. Now it's quite possible that my expectations were too high or maybe it's my standards but I don't understand how this site can score in the 80's. There are so many things wrong that it's hard to find the positive.

*I have to start somewhere so here goes. The most obvious one is that this site doesn't know what it wants to be. Is it a swinger site that just happens to also have some solo model content or is it a solo model site that wants to promote a swinger lifestyle. If it's the first then why charge any money? If it's the other than why have so much of the site cluttered with swinger info? There are so many swinger related links and third party advertising that you almost wonder why they even bothered adding the solo model stuff. There is so much content on each pages that you have to scroll down to actually see it all and one way too many of them it requires you to scroll quite a distance down.

*Then there's the fact that there isn't really all that much content. I mean this site has been active since 2004 and Brandi has only 250 or so videos. That comes out to about 2 per month. Many of the videos are taken from shoots Brandi did for other studios so not exclusive and a portion is mostly solo cam stuff. There are videos from other models but again you have non-exclsuive content and most if not all is quite old.

*Some of the videos have tag words attached to them but there is no search box to use those keywords and clicking on them does not actually bring you to the proper results.

*There is a blog section but it's so seldom used that it borders on the ridiculous. I mean there are only 4 post this year and it's basically advertising for her appearances at strip clubs and possible ways for guys to meet her in private.

**I'm glad some people enjoyed her site but I didn't. I can only recommend this to fans of Brandi who want to get as much as possible from her and don't necessarily want to join other sites to get access to their content of Brandi.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit I Feel Myself

47. I Feel Myself (0)

Pay
Newbie
100*
WLV612 (1) 06-25-13  05:50am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: High production values.
Great contributors.
Forum interaction.
Well moderated.
Cons: Like most sites, the older contributors aren't in HD but that's not a con, just a limitation of the time when the earlier vids were filmed.
Bottom Line: IFM is geared toward the female orgasm so hardcore fans would be left wanting. For me, the reward is in the site's honest effort to produce something a bit more artistic and personal.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit My Hot Wife

48. My Hot Wife (1)

Pay
Active
73
pat362 (367) 06-22-13  06:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +The content is all exclusif.
+The sex scenes are rather well done for an amateur site and there is a decent amount of hardcore sex.
+Jackie is a hot looking older woman.
Cons: -Navigation is a mess because you are never too sure where to go to find something.
-Many of the videos are in more than one file.
-Video resolution is 640x 480 at best and it's not that unusual to see some 320 x 240.
-Content is not dated so no way to be sure when it was done but the site appears to be more or less dead now.
-There isn't much here. I counted less than 60 videos.
-It take at least 20 minutes to download a single video file.
Bottom Line: *I'm a returning member to this site and very little has changed. That's neither good nor is it bad. It looks the same and the content is in the same location. I even found some videos that I don't remember from my last time but I'm hard pressed to say if that's because they are new or because I didn't see them the last time I was here. Her appearance changes from one video to the next but I think that has more to do with the way they are set up on their different pages rather than because of any chronological order.

*This is an amateur site that a husband and wife started over a decade ago and I guess they get enough members to keep it alive. Not sure if Jackie still does porn but I doubt it. Mind you my score is not that high but I'm not too disappointed in my membership. My only real disapointment is that I wish Jackie was still doing porn because she is(or was) quite good at it.

*I suspect that if you don't care too much about video resolution, large libraries of content and professionally shot porn then you might be happy with this site. Otherwise stay away because you definitely won't be.

**I kept my old score because there is still some decent stuff here.**
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit USA Mature

49. USA Mature (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
pornpundit (3) 06-20-13  11:40am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Unlike many mature sites the women here are all doing their first video and, for 9 out of ten, their last. While not exactly ugly these are women you might see every day in the market, many are on the heavy side.
All the women have a story to tell and these are more often then not, truly interesting, many times sorta sad. The one thing in common is that these mature gals absolutely do there very very best and are not just "going through the motions" If anything can be called "reality" this is it.
Cons: Duh, the insane price lol. Also, I haven't found any truly Hi -def type quality and with the strange resolution of 720x406. In other words "nuttin special".
Bottom Line: The fact that these matures are truly star struck "one hit wonders" makes these vids unique to this site. (I"ve seen over 1000 ). what a shame that there aren't more vids! Would pay twenty bucks all day long.
If you have money to burn and crave true "reality" go for it! 88 without regard to cost 65 when money is a factor
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Exploited College Girls

50. Exploited College Girls (2)

Pay
Active
84
TheSquirrel (53) 06-19-13  06:23pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: No DRM, download limits, or pre checked cross selling.
Beautiful amateur girls in a good variety of shape size and colour.
Genuinely amateur and individual content with its own style.
Exclusive material and most of the girls will not be seen elsewhere.
Good lighting considering the niche.
Good streaming.
Good download speed.
Zipped pics.
Named files.
Girls listed chronological and alphabetically.
Inviting home pages and easy navigation.
Still updating.
Easy log in, site remembers your details, with only an easy to see word to copy.
Good customer oriented feel.
Cons: Poor rip off exchange rate with CCBill sign up.
Male lead can be a bit irritating at times.
One type of material.
No network of bonus sites.
A few too many fake breasts, and especially tattoos.
Condoms becoming more common.
Blurred face of male can sometimes spoil action.
Some bad camerawork and views at times. Can be amateurish.
New pics look like screencaps.
A polarised niche, you either love it or hate it.
Bottom Line: It's just an opinion but Exploited College Girls, takes this niche and nails it brilliantly. The girl next door types are the type you wish really were living next door instead of that rottweiler, but you know you'll never get that lucky.

There is a real amateur feel here and a lack of gloss, but the girls are so beautiful they don't need much gloss, they just need someone competent enough not to fuck up capturing them on video, and merely need to look their natural gorgeous best. This is where ECG scores. It is professionally lit, edited, and photographed well enough to be erotic, with the girls looking stunning. For me it's an excellent blend of professionalism and DIY amateurism, which isn't easy to do, because so many times you see beautiful girls being made to look unbelievably unsexy, by lousy lighting, bad excessive makeup, awful camerawork with awful unflattering angles, shot by morons you wouldn't trust to shoot a rock without blurring the picture.

The recent shoots are dated and I counted 286 girls a few weeks ago. Membership gives bonus access to Backroom Casting Couch, (on a quality par with ECG), and Net Video Girls plus some free movies. This isn't a network, it's a standalone DIY site, with quality material, and beautiful girls. Given the one man and his camera thing, it's done in a professional enough way to show off the girls to maximum effect, plus you get plenty of build up, dressing, undressing, and walking around naked and semi naked.

This is just my opinion, but I think the guy does a great job, even though he may not win any humanitarian, or upstanding church goer of the month awards...or maybe he might, we don't know who he is, as his face is blurred out, something that is annoying and can detract from the action. Backroom Casting Couch is the same.

New video spec is 768x432 at 4000-6000 kbps and slightly older ones are 640x360 at 3000-5000 kbps, with the oldest being 576x324, but this isn't about HD pristine quality with models looking like they've been dipped in bronze, it's about one man and a camera, and at it's most high tech, one man and two cameras, with occasional help from a mate.

Old pictures sometimes look better than the new ones, because the new ones are screencaps rather than genuine photos. Old ones are genuine photos, and some of the bonus video footage was behind the scenes, where you could see these being taken. I love that sort of stuff, but sadly newer updates don't have any of that, although the main videos always have a certain behind the scenes flavour due to the nature of the content.

If you're a pic fan, this is not the strongest side of ECG. Examples of picture spec are 1400x930, 1600x1200, 1280x857, 1280x720, and 1400x788.

Some PU'ers have referred to the male lead as a douch bag, but given the abuse, both verbal and physical, some girls receive on mainstream sites, this is relatively mild by comparison, and there are no dirty tricks on sign up or cancellation, no drm, dl limits, regional discrimination, or pre checked cross selling. What you see and are led to expect is very much what you get. In fact the whole site is easy to use and is customer friendly. You can't say that about many.

The login is easy, and your membership details plus password are remembered, with an easy to see simple word to copy. Models are listed both chronologically and alphabetically and navigation is easy, with quite detailed previews of what an update is like, plus a long written summary about the shoot. You may not like the main man's tone, but you can't say he doesn't put in the effort. Photos are zippped, download speeds are fast, and files are numbered.

I found streaming facilities to be excellent even at peak times, when on other sites (VideoBox for instance) it's impossible to get a picture. A recent addition is the split screen view, where you see both the model's face and the other end at the same time, which is okay, but sometimes the two screens seem to get in the way of one another. There are a few scenes with condoms which are becoming more common.

When I recently visited the sign up page then closed the window, I received a $5 off offer if I joined now. That worked out at £17.44 for 30 days, which I accepted. When I went to cancel my subscription I received another cut price offer, which I was unable to accept as I currently don't have the time to download.

If this is the future of porn, with semi amateur girls, and semi professional shooting, done on a budget, I would be happy with that. I don't think it is, but what he is doing, with the niche, style of shooting, reality behind the scenes feel, lighting, camerawork, number of updates, price, and personalisation of site, works for him, and for me too as a customer. This is very close to how I would want to see reality porn with sexy looking amateur girls, I don't believe for one moment that is easy to do. Even the pros get it wrong more often than not, so hats off to ECG.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 1698 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. My Free Cams (3)
2. Amateur Allure (3)
3. Casting Couch X (2)
4. Ann Angel XXX (2)
5. Czech AV (2)
6. Black Owned Wives (2)
7. Bella Pass (2)
8. Bryci (2)
9. Housewife Kelly (2)
10. Exploited College Girls (2)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.4 seconds.