Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 221 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Southern Bukkake

1. Southern Bukkake (1)

Pay
Active
80
shooter (11) 07-15-14  08:01am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: New vids are good quality.

Exclusive content.

Fun videos of amateur girls getting bukkake.
Cons: No set updates though there is about one update a week.

Not a lot of variety.

Site design is basic but no good search system.
Bottom Line: Southern Bukkake is a site for some nice amateur bukkake set in the US unlike European and Japanese bukkake. Bukkake is just a term for a girl getting multiple loads of jizz on her face from anywhere from 3 to 50 guys.

The girls on the site are amateurs and most are exclusive to the site. The set up is filmed with usually one girl and a bunch of guys in a room. The atmosphere is amateur and relaxed with everyone having fun and a lot of fun banter and joking among the participants. The girls get naked and suck the cocks of the various men. Numbers of guys varies from 8 to about 20 a video. Some videos the girls have sex with the guys, though there are few of those. After about 20 minutes of cock sucking she gets her bukkake. Most the loads are big and impressive and the girls end up a sticky mess. the girls have fun and its nice seeing these amateur ladies get cum covered.

The are downloadable picture galleries and some you can view which are just stills from the video. New video's are in HD. Older videos are not as high quality though they do remaster many of the old videos. There are about 60 videos on the sire. The down side is you only get one new scene a month and some are remastered older vids.

Prince is $29 a month but goes down $5 a month to $24 if you stay longer than one month. You get all access to the scenes and all are downloadable. Newer vides in mp4 hd format. Unable to comment or rate scenes though.

Certainly a unique site. Nice fun amateur girls getting blasted with loads of jizz in a fun atmosphere. Worth checking out, but without a update schedule and more frequent updates not worth a long investment.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hard X

2. Hard X (2)

Pay
Active
90
pat362 (367) 07-12-14  10:22am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Content is all exclusive and is dated.
+You can stream or download all the videos.
+Videos can be downloaded in multiple resolution from tiny 160p all the way to true 1080p HD.
+Download speeds are decent and you can use a download manager.
+They have photos of each scene.
+They have the first and sometime only anal scenes of some very popular models.
Cons: -The site is rather small with only 48 videos and little chances of increasing that number by more than 4 per month(if that).
-The photos are all taken from the videos and you can`t download them as a single zip file.
-They have an upcoming video section but it only shows one upcoming video so not very reassuring.
Bottom Line: *This is the site of the Hard-X studio so instead of buying their dvd you can now join and download their scenes individually. That's great news for fans of the female director Mason who was with Elegant Angel before it`s demise. They don't have many scenes but the ones that are here are quite good and well worth a membership.

*I think one of the biggest selling point for anal fans is that you get to download 3 of Allie Haze`s anal scenes. On a related not. Those that aren`t fans of anal might want to think before joining because half of the videos include anal in them. It`s worse if you want lesbian porn because there is only one lesbian scene.

*This is all gonzo porn but not the too extreme kind. It`s well lit, well shot and offers a wide variety of angles and views. The acting from all between the different performers as well.

*I got a special 5$ offer but I don`t think that 25$ or in our case 15 is an outrageous amount considering what you get for your money.

**Now some may think that my score is a little high for what is still a rather small site but I believe that it's better to have only a few great videos than a huge amount of less than stellar ones.***
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit ALS Scan

3. ALS Scan (1)

Pay
Active
100
LPee23 (13) 04-21-14  06:21pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: ALS has been setting the bar high for years.
-all models are shaved and otherwise natural
-over 500,000 pics in zips
-resolution 2000x3000
-overall amount of content is overwhelming
-lost count of videos, but I'd guess over 3000
-most videos in 1080P
-mostly solo and g/g
-subjects also include b/g, peeing, dildos, speculums, fisting, anal insertions, anal fisting and lots of outdoors and BTS
-newly redesigned and searchable website with tags (90% of peeing content was tagged correctly, I looked at everything on their site and tagged the remaining 10%. You are welcome.)
-one, sometimes two updates daily
They are remastering lots of their older stuff. How cool is it to see those favorite pics of yours from years ago in more detail than ever before? This is one of the coolest things going on at ALS right now. I give them so much credit for staying true to their roots, and for putting in the real effort and investment that it takes to do this.
Cons: I honestly can't come up with any cons here.
Some past reviews have mentioned their introduction of b/g content as a con, while other have considered it a plus. I'm pretty neutral on it personally. To those who feel that ALS is straying from their roots with b/g content, I will say that is not true. ALS has done b/g content in their early days too, including one video with Mia that I'm thinking of, it was just rare back then.
The merger with Met Art was totally a good thing, all concerns regarding that have not played out, and they have kept everything that made them unique and great while totally modernizing their site.
You may notice some of the oldest archived sets appear thinned out. This is not new, they were thinned out on their old site too, actually those old archived sets were just samples of what was once available on CDGirlsOnline.com. As part of their renovation with Met Art, ALS had actually brought more pics back online than they had before.
Bottom Line: ALS - All Ladies Shaved. I obviously love this site, because I have given it my top score. If you look at all of the sites that I have scored close to 100%, they all have one thing in common - they are large, high quality networks that are run like the best of the small operations. This could not be more true of ALS - they go to every length possible to please their customers. Usually, the "Bottom Line" is the section where I go into objective detail about a site. With ALS, I will ask you to forgive me for being a bit subjective, because I would rather tell you the story of my own personal experience. ALS is a site that dates back to 1996, just about my earliest days ever seeing online porn. I didn't find them in the 1990's though, they first came to my attention in the early 2000's. I remember that ALS's pics were the first that I ever saw in 1200x800 resolution back around 2003, and I knew they had just raised the bar on everyone else. Those 1200x800 ALS pics still look amazing today. Back in those early days, I got what ALS pics I could from TGP's and the like because I was not in a position to get a full membership. Over the years, I lost many files, first due to an ill conceived idea to delete my collection, and later to a hard drive crash, but ALS's pics were among the ones that I remembered the most.
So I finally joined ALS a few months ago, hoping to rebuild my old collection and check out all of their new stuff too. I was impressed with the amount of content on ALS's site. They are one of those sites that you really can just get lost in, due to the overwhelming amount of pics and videos. ALS has a very distinctive style. It goes much beyond just having all of their models shaved. They love to do shoots at the beach and by the pool on bright, sunny days. Their models are young and slender with natural breasts and few if any tattoos. They always look like they're having a lot of fun too, and you can see lots of behind the scenes videos where the models are just having a good time with each other and with the staff. At the same time, with all of this lighthearted fun going on, ALS can really push the boundaries. ALS is the only site I can think of where the models seem to be having such a fun time while doing things as extreme as fisting, using speculums, and putting clamps (the ALS "dreamcatcher") on their pussies. Of course, there is lots of peeing too. So, there I was, downloading all of this great stuff from ALS, when I realized that something was missing.
I had some pics from the earliest days of ALS that I just couldn't find anymore. Actually, as I would later learn, the pics that I couldn't find were shot and watermarked by ALS, but they were never on alsscan.com or alsangels.com. They were only released on CD by CDGirlsOnline.com, a site that is long gone. CDGirlsOnlines.com was a site that sold CD's of pics via mail with exclusive ALS pics that couldn't be found on their websites. I was let down, thinking that I might miss out ALS's original, earliest work.
So, I contacted support, and they were incredibly helpful! Support passed my email along to several other employees, each of who were remarkably helpful, until it ended up with ALS's content manager. We compared notes about ALS's pics from it's earliest days, and we looked over the really old stuff that I had in my collection. Almost all of the stuff that couldn't be found anymore was from CDGirlsOnline.com. Despite the fact that they had closed CDGirlsOnline.com years ago, he went the extra mile to help me out. So far, he has found thousands of rare, old pics from CDGirlsOnline.com. The ones that he has found so far were released only for a limited time as bonuses, bloopers, and outtakes on the ALS sites and then removed. Out of incredible generosity, he has made these classic ALS pics from CDGirlsOnline.com available to me. Some people feel inclined to guard and keep secret the rare things that they come across. I would rather as many of you as possible enjoy ALS's pics, so that is why I am sharing this information with you, with ALS's permission. These old pics - bonuses, bloopers, and outtakes - are available to you as well, if you sign up as a member and ask politely. ALS has made no announcement that they will be remastering these pics, posting them on their sites, or making them available indefinitely, but they are available right now by special request. They are not up to current ALS quality standards, they range from 400x600 to 1200x800 in resolution, but they are the sharpest 400x600 pics I have ever seen. It's also really cool to have ALS pics with watermarks dating back to 1996, even if the resolution is low by today's standards. What's more, ALS tells me that they still have everything that they ever shot, some in RAW files, and the earliest content on analog color film, all saved in a storage locker somewhere. Isn't that the stuff of legends?
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hard X

4. Hard X (2)

Pay
Active
88
rearadmiral (316) 03-29-14  10:40am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - New studio site
- Affiliated with Open Life and Erotica X
- All scenes directed by Mason
- Supports download managers
- Many choices for viewing scenes
- TBP / PU discount
- Several Ďfirstsí
Cons: - Small site for now
- Videos arenít associated with the DVDs they appear in
Bottom Line: Hard X is both a new studio and new website that features videos from the studio. The studio (and site) feature scenes directed by Mason, formerly from the Elegant Angel studio. Itís also a sister site to Masonís other studio/site Erotica X. Obviously the scenes at Hard X have a much harder edge than those at Erotica X. In my opinion, Mason is one of the best directors in the business. She brings a unique feel to her scenes and brings out the best in her performers.

One of the reasons Iíve been waiting impatiently for this site to go live was that Mason has brought a number of Ďfirstsí here. Iím a big fan of anal scenes and Hard X made a (justifiably) big deal over the first anal scenes for Maddy OíReilly and Annika Albrite. The site promises more in the future too.

Iíll deal with the major negative element first, since it will likely be a deal-breaker for some potential members. Because the studio is new they donít have a big catalogue yet, so the site is small too. There are currently only 30 scenes available. Since the site only launched last week I canít verify an update schedule, though the site itself has an Ďupcomingí tab and that shows a new scene being added per week. Yes, I know that seems slow, but this is a new studio and they donít have a lot to offer yet. A potential member will have to make his or her own decision on value, but with the TBP / PU discount I think this is a great value. I think that this isnít Ďcommodity porní but is unique and uses A-list models in scenes with high production values. I like to think of sites like this (and Erotica X too) as high-end steakhouses in a world of greasy buffets. (And yes, I realize that my analogy is unflattering.) TBP reports that the site also offers a full 2-day trial. This would be an incredible value for someone who just wanted to check out what the site has to offer.

The other negative is probably more subjective, but when Iím on a studio site I prefer that the videos be grouped by DVD title or capable of being sorted that way. For some reason, Hard X doesnít do that. I hope as the site grows they add a ďDVDĒ tab.

The site is well laid out with four scene per page, each with one large screenshot and two smaller ones. The scenes are titled with the modelís name in the title. There are tags for specific niches and the modelís name is a tag too. Each scene opens into its own page where you have all of the same information and brief description of the scene too.

As with all Open Life sites, there are a range of options for viewing and downloading the scenes. Streaming is available in seven resolutions ranging from 160p to 1080p. Downloads are available in WMV format (160p, 240p, 360p and 480p) and MP4 format (160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p). I downloaded the 720p and those are 1080x720 at 4800kb/s and 29fps. They look crisp and show no pixilation. Those files are, on average, about 1.3GB in size.

I had no problems using a download manager to queue up the scenes I wanted. There were no unreasonable time-outs on the links and my downloads hit and sustained the maximum speed that my manager allows (11mb/s).

The bottom line is that I highly recommend that you check this site out of you like hardcore porn with a slightly rough edge. This contrasts well with its sister site where the hardcore is softer and more couples-oriented. The site offers some excellent porn with some of the biggest names in adult these days. The site is well organized and logical. There are lots of options for viewing or downloading the scene too. When you add it up and apply the TBP discount I think this is a great value. As the site grows, it will become an even better value.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Facial Abuse

5. Facial Abuse (1)

Pay
Active
83
EverNight (12) 01-27-14  11:11am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Clear Hi-Res videos
100% Exclusive content
Good download speed
Unique amateur content
Cons: No Zipped images
Bonus sites aren't much of a bonus
Download limit (Though not too harsh)
Basic/minimalistic site design
Slow updates.
Bottom Line: Facial Abuse does indeed focus on the *abuse* of its (mostly) amateur models.

Each scene starts with a short interview of sorts and then the girl will be made to perform the most extreme blowjob possible on 1 or 2 guys. It's not unusual for the girl to vomit, in fact they encourage it. Frequently there is slapping, spitting, & choking. That + the interview usually takes 60% of the video time. (They average about 40min) Occasionally it's too much for the girl (they "Tap out") and the video is cut short with a facial. But most often they then move on to vaginal/anal sex for the rest of the video followed by the facial. So that's the basic format & makes up the "physical abuse" in front of the camera.

The 2nd part of the abuse comes in verbal form from the guy filming the scene. From the moment each scene starts his goal is generally to insult, humiliate, and basically soul crush the girl verbally while the people in front of the camera attempt to do it physically. It's often the verbal abuse that is more upsetting to the girls than anything physical going on. Some girls are fine with it, even returning multiple times, others definitely would not want to go thru it again.

You may find it hard to watch, offensive, or it might be just what you're looking for. But that's basically what it is.

Many of the girls are amateur but you will see porn stars (usually at the end or start of their career). Some of the models are very pretty and others are really...not. It runs the gamut.

The site is dead simple. There are currently 375 scenes. Each page shows a thumbnail of 30 scenes. Clicking a video takes you to a page with an in-browser player and the following download links:
1080p WMV
720p MP4
480p MP4

Below that are the individual images. No zip is available.

The videos definitely have an amateur look, but are very sharp and clear. There's nothing glamorous about the setting or presentation, but the video is technically excellent. The vast majority is 1080p 5000-26000kbps. It mostly looks great. Only the very oldest stuff is of poor quality.

Download managers work, but I did run into a download limit. I couldn't figure out the specifics of it, but I believe after 20-30GB it made you wait 6-8 hours before being able to continue. It's an annoyance, but I was still able to download all I wanted inside a month easily. Download speeds were always good.

Some bonus sites are included but I felt they were not worth much. And don't be fooled into thinking it includes their other "abuse" sites such as Latina Abuse, it does not. If you join it's really just for Facial Abuse.
Personal Exception: There's a girl on "ThePantyhosesite" named Addison I thought was beautiful. Please comment if you know of anything else she's been in.

I consider the updates to be slow. Typically the site adds one scene each week, but they're not religious about it. As I write this its been 12 days without an update.

This site has major room for improvement but I'm unaware of anything else out there quite like it.

With the discount thru TBP/PU 1 month currently costs $19.95. If you've not been a member before, and are interested in their content, I believe it is worth a 1 month membership.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit House Of Taboo

6. House Of Taboo (1)

Pay
Active
91
pat362 (367) 03-27-13  05:55pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +The bulk of their content is exclusif.
+They have an excellent selection of Europeans models.
+All content is dated and they add a new scene every 2-3 days.
+You can download videos in multiple resolutions from 852x480 to at least 1280x720 for almost all the videos.
+They also offer true HD resolution 1920x1080 (over 300).
+All scenes have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Best resolution is 2000x1300.
+They do an excellent job in tagging their scenes with multiple keywords.
+They offer the ability to select the surfing language from 6 possible choices.
+They offer a wide selection of fetishes like latex, watersports, toys and spanking to name a few.
Cons: -Probably my biggest con and this is subjective is that there isn't necessarily a lot of actual penetration sex on the site.
-Most of the scenes are broken into 2 or more long episode.
-The lighting could be better in some of the videos. The action is hard to see because of that.
-The camera work could also be imoroved.
-They could work on their editing because they tend to cut a scene and then restart after the performers have changed position and the camera is setup elsewhere.
Bottom Line: *I have been a member of this site before and I they haven't chnaged much since the last time. I still find that there isn't as much content as I care to save to disk. That's not to say that the content is bad or anything but that it's not my cup of tea.

*These guys tend to offer a lot more fetishes than most similar sites and that is both a good thing and a bad thing. Good if the fetish in question is what you like but bad if you don't because that is a lkot of content that you will never download.

*I really enjoy the fact that they hire not just Eastern European models but British and French one as well. That is a nice because you tend to get some different body types this way. Mind you even if they didn't then they would still offer plenty of amazing models anyway.

*This site is produced by the same people as the other DDF sites so the same issues with editing, camera work and lack of imagination are present. That may not be an issue for most but I found it annoying at times. I highly recommend that you visit the site first to see if the site offers enough of the types of fetishes you like before joining. Many are covered but the quatity varies a lot from fetsih to fetish.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dominated Girls

7. Dominated Girls (1)

Pay
Active
87
rearadmiral (316) 03-05-13  03:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the 21 Sextreme Network
- 250 scenes
- Updates regularly
- TBP Discount
- Supports download managers
- Many file choices
- Photos available (singles and zips)
Cons: - Can get a bit repetitive
Bottom Line: This site is part of the 21 Sextreme network that includes this and 13 other sites. The network is sold as the more extreme side of the 21 Sextury network. Iím a new fan of the 21 S1Sextury / 21 Sextreme networks and a long-time fan of good BDSM so I was definitely interested to see if this site met the standards set by many others in the two networks and how it compared to some of the better BDSM sites.

First a bit of a caveat: even if you are a fan of BDSM material you have to admit that it can sometimes get repetitive: girls in bondage can only have so many variations. The same can be said for a lot of other niches too, like massage and old-and-young. This site suffers from a bit of that as well, but Iím still glad I joined and still happy to have a lot of the scenes.

The site currently has 250 scenes and four new ones are added each month, though not necessarily on a weekly cycle.

One common element of most of the scenes is the same as with the other sites on this and the related network: the models are some of the most beautiful on the internet. For me, this increases my interest in the site since many of the models here arenít true Ďfetishí models.

The scenes share some other traits too: they all have the models in several different bondage set-ups (almost exclusively using rope), most have some other implements used, like ball gags, clamps or wax, and in most of the scenes there is actually sex, usually while the model is in bondage. This latter point isnít unique to this site, but it isnít available on every BDSM site. I suspect that legal concerns mean some sites just donít take that risk. As a guy who likes watching anal scenes, there are some here but they arenít in the majority.

One thing that is a bit of a negative for some (and others have commented on the same thing on other BDSM sites) but a probably a legal necessity is an interview at either the beginning or the end of the scene where the model Ďbreaks the fourth wallí and talks about what is about to happen or what just happened. As much as some people donít like it I accept that given the extreme nature of a BDSM scene that is it probably necessary to keep the soccer-moms away. Personally, I find the interviews interesting and usually watch them.

The site is laid out in the same way as every other site on this and the related network, which is to say that it is simple but effective. There are some improvements coming with the addition of a large number of tags for sorting the scenes. This feature is visible now but not active so I canít comment on it. If it works as planned though, it will be a great sorting tool.

Each page displays 36 large thumbnails showing the female model in the scene. Rolling your mouse over the thumbnail brings up so data on the scene, including model name and the date it was uploaded.

Clicking a sceneís thumbnail opens a new page where you have options to stream and download the scene. Immediately apparent is that there is an option to download just clips, but there is an option in all cases to download one full file. A trailer is also available. Streaming is available too, but I chose downloads.

There is a big difference in scenes uploaded before October 2009 and those uploaded after that. Prior to that date there were few options for downloads. In most cases those limited choices were a low-res H.264 file and a medium and high-res in WMV. Depending on when the scene was uploaded though, the high-res WMV is excellent. After October 2009 more options were made available, with three resolutions being offered in both H.264 and WMV. I found the mid-range H.264 to be the best compromise between quality and file size so I opted for that in most downloads. Those come in at 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively they look great on a 23Ē monitor. (In the interests of clarity, there are approximately 170 scenes that have been uploaded since more options were offered.)

Download managers work well and I experienced no time-outs. Download speeds were better than Iím used to with similar sites.

Photos are also available and even though the site is really more of a video site the photos are well done and available in good resolutions. The lowest resolution I saw was 1280x853. Newer uploads offer that and 3504x2336. Zips are available.

The site has no real flaws: it has some great scenes with high production values and stunning models in a simple to use layout that allows download managers. What more could a BDSM fan ask for? I think that this site offers BDSM that is on par with the best out there, like the Kink sites and Society SM.

The bottom line is that if youíre a fan of good BDSM porn you wonít be disappointed by this site. The fact that it is part of a network and also comes with a TBP / PU discount makes this a great deal.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ALS Scan

8. ALS Scan (1)

Pay
Newbie
81*
Abel Semen (3) 03-02-13  10:09am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Good quality photography
* Most girls are attractive and display a good attitude
* Good connection speed
* Navigation will mostly be familiar to users of other sites on Met-Art's network.
Cons: * Streaming videos seem buggy if you want to do anything other than watch them from beginning to end without pauses or skips.
* Lots of strange insertions and weird borderline-BDSM pussy play (may be a pro to some)
* Very little, and mostly mediocre, boy/girl content
* Some videos are basically just the photo sets with a camcorder running (can hear posing instructions etc)
* Navigation options are very lacking and search often turns up irrelevant results. Has a tag system but searches seem to mostly ignore it.
* Model names aren't consistent with other sites, even other sites on the same network.
Bottom Line: This is a site whose name I've been seeing for a LONG time. If it's not older than some of the girls in its newest sets, I'm pretty sure it's close - I'm fairly sure it debuted in the 90s, though it only specifically shows shoots back to 2005 at the moment, with selected older content relegated to an undated "archives" section.

I've liked a lot of the bits of content I've seen from them over the years, but never felt compelled to join until now. It seems to have recently been taken over by Met-Art. Like many other sites in their orbit of late, they're marketing it pretty aggressively, with a good discount available through PornUsers and an even better one having recently been e-mailed to current and former members of other sites in this network. On the basis of this, I signed up. Unfortunately I have just canceled after only four days (as always, the membership will still run for a total of a month, it just won't renew).

Partly this is because I mostly want boy/girl content and ALS has only recently started (or resumed - I could have sworn they had some in their early days?) shooting such content. I'd say well under a quarter of their recent updates (which occur once a day) have featured straight sex, and this content only dates back a few months.

However, it's hard to say for sure because there is no option to zero in on a particular type of content, other than a search box that seems to mostly pay attention to the (rather arbitrary) set titles. You'll look in vain for a list of categories on which you can click "boy/girl" and get a list of all the b/g content. Search for "boy/girl" and you'll get every set with "girl" in the title, which as you can imagine, is a LOT of them. This needs a rethink.

Once you've found what you're looking for, it's usually... good but not great. Nearly everything about this site is good but not great, actually (except the navigation which is downright bad). The looks of the models are good but not great, the creativity of the sets and shot choices is good but not great, technical aspects like connection speed are good but not great. Unfortunately with the number of sites competing for my dollar, "good but not great" isn't going to cut it. I certainly don't regret signing up, especially at the price they were offering as of a few days ago, but I don't see anything that compels me to renew.

As with network-mate Sexart (for which I would now want to revise my glowing review downwards a little), it seems to promise something amazing and groundbreaking but deliver something that's merely above-average.

Overall, I can honestly say this is a site I'd recommend, but only weakly so. It's definitely worth it at the very low prices on offer in various places lately. You might like it better than I did if you prefer solo or girl-girl action or if you're into things like a cute girl clipping a dream-catcher to her labia. (That kind of weird borderline-BDSM stuff is only in a minority of their sets, but it's conspicuous by the mere fact that it's there at all.) I can't say that's my thing; while I appreciate a more creative approach to porn, that isn't the direction in which I'd prefer to look for it.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Southern Bukkake

9. Southern Bukkake (1)

Pay
Newbie
85*
bkreidercrhl (3) 12-01-12  03:51am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Fun site where a pretty girl offers her face to a group of eager guys to spew. The end result is a serious glazing. The women are predominantly amateurs and attractive instead of the hard plastic appearance in many porn sites. I highly recommend this site to collectors of facial cum shots.
Cons: The site is no longer updating. The site does very little editing, which adds to the realism of the experience. However, way to much time is spent watching the dude yanking his crank while the girl awaits the goo. The lack of editing includes failed pops or pitifully small loads. I recommend downloading the video and splitting and merging the hottest moments and the best cum blasts. A typical reduction will result in a 3 to 5 minute video of sensational face blasting for your collection.
Bottom Line: Worth a months visit to download videos. After editing you will have an outstanding collection of facial cum shots.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Rocco Siffredi

10. Rocco Siffredi (1)

Pay
Active
80
lk2fireone (194) 11-20-12  03:54am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (74), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Can stream or download videos.
-They have links to porn review sites, including TheBestPorn.
-They have a short bio for Rocco Siffredi, the male star of the site. It lists his favorite drink (Vodka Martini, just like James Bond), and other facts that his fans might find interesting.
-There is an online store, where you can buy the latest DVDs featuring Rocco Siffredi, the Italian stallion (he was born in Italy, but now resides in Hungary).
-Easy login. Just need username and password, which can be saved. No captcha required.
-Can easily switch between sites in the network. Do not have to re-enter your username and password.
-PU discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. You get over 20 sites included with membership.
Some of the bonus sites are small, niche sites.
Cons: PROS (CONTINUED):
But there are at least 5 major sites with a lot of good content. By good, I mean OK DVD quality videos, that are much lower in quality than videos at X-Art or 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn.
-Good download speeds. I regularly get about 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Can search for a model across all their sites. But the search will return the sites that the model's name appears at, whether that name represents a single model, or different models using that same name.
-The videos and photosets have the date they were posted to the site.
-Get a wide range of videos Rocco Siffredi has appeared in during his career, which spans more than 20 years. You don't get all of his work, but this guy has been in more than 450 porn films.
-Site updates with 1, 2, or 3 videos per week, along with matching photosets.
==================
CONS
-Many times they don't list some or all of the models in a video.
Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED):
-Many models don't have a thumbnail to show what they look like.
-For many videos, only choice is 240p or 480p. Some videos have a 720p or 1080p option.
-The video lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art.
-The prices for videos at the online store, whether you purchase the DVD, or download to own, are expensive: DVDs cost about $60; a download of the DVD is about $50 (you own the file for your own personal playback).
A much cheaper alternative would be to join a pay site, and download the DVDs at that site.
-Watermark at bottom right corner of videos is large and very visible.
-They appear to rotate content. I've been a member at this site several times before, and there are videos that I used to see here that are no longer posted. They were Rocco videos, so there shouldn't have been any problem with the ownership. I guess they just drop some videos over time. I wish they wouldn't.
-They have a photoset accompanying each video. But the photos in many of the sets are screencaps.

=========================
BOTTOM LINE

Site Stats:
Movies: 1373
DVDs: 266
Pornstars: 1318
Pictures: 8214
HD movies: 413 (out of 1373 total movies)

Videos can be downloaded in 240p and 480p. Choice of MP4 or WMV download. Most videos do not have a higher definition download choice available. Some videos have a 720p and 1080p choice for download.

They have a photoset accompanying each video. But many of the sets are screencaps. I see little value in most photos, because they are not posed or framed by a professional photographer, not lighted by a professional photographer, the colors (skin tones, background sets) are ok to tell what is happening, but nothing to appreciate or respond to in an erotic way.

Some photosets at Rocco Siffredi are better than screen caps. An actual photographer took the photos. The photos are framed, they have good lighting, good colors, etc. They aren't the high quality you would find at a photo site like Met-Art or MPL Studios, but they are definitely better than screencaps. If you are a fan of Rocco
Siffredi, these photosets could have value for you as an addition to the video of the same shoot.

But again, I think the photosets based on videos posted at sites like X-Art, 18 Only Girls, or Young Legal Porn have higher quality, actual eroticism, much greater appeal, than any of the photos posted at Rocco Siffredi. The photosets posted at the other sites could be collected. But only a fan would appreciate or collect even the better photos posted at Rocco Siffredi.

There are tranny/she-male videos at Rocco Siffredi.I don't remember seeing them before at this site.

The WMV file is 30%+ or more larger than the MP4 version of the same video. I can't tell if the increased size gives a better definition or increased clarity. Both versions are supposed to be the same definition. So download the MP4 version, because it takes less space.

As I already mentioned, the videos are just OK in quality. These are taken from DVDs. The lighting and colors and camera work are OK, but far below what you can get at sites like the 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn or X-Art. You look at videos from 18 Only Girls from the last few years, and even the 480p videos just look so much better (better camera work, better focus, better lighting, better colors, etc.) than the videos at Rocco Siffredi.

Maybe some of the sloppiness is deliberate: maybe they are trying to create an effect that you are viewing scenes that are unscripted. But I much prefer videos that show they are professionally shot, that look sharp and well-lit with good to excellent skin tones.

The main sites in the netFameSolutions network include:
Devils Film
Peter North DVD
Rocco Siffredi
Silverstone DVD
Silvia Saint

Each of those sites contain a massive number of videos. A large portion of those videos are hot. The videos are OK in quality, but below what you will find at sites like X-Art. The videos are more like the quality you will find at Teen Mega World. Except that at Teen Mega World, I believe that camera work (focus, lighting, steadiness of camera, framing, skin tones, etc.) is actually slightly better than the videos at Rocco Siffredi.

In addition to the massive number of videos in many different categories you find at the 5 main sites, you also get access to a large number of videos in niche categories at other sites: including: lesbian, creampie, tranny, hairy, etc.

I'm giving the site a score of 80, because of the massive amount of video content and the wide range of categories you get access to. If they improved the video quality, improved the search to make the site easier to use, and put nice-sized thumbnails of all the models so you know what the models look like, and listed the
models in all their videos so you can tell what models appear in what videos, and did a few other upgrades to make the site easier to use, then the score would improve.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ALS Scan

11. ALS Scan (1)

Pay
Newbie
95*
etomi (1) 11-18-12  03:16pm
Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1-Great quality content and download options.

2-Huge selection of models.

3-Girl/Girl pairings that I watched seemed very authentic and unforced.

4-Great attitude from models in all the scenes I watches. They all seemed to really enjoy themselves and showing off for us.

5-Lots of good toy play.

6-Fast DL speeds.
Cons: 1-Navigation could be improved a bit.

2-Some scene types got a bit repetitive or had a lot of posing instructions from camera operators.

3-Nothing major here, almost feel like the points above are nitpicking.
Bottom Line: Great quality site with lots of attractive ladies. If you want hardcore action go elsewhere, but if beautiful shaved young women sharing the enjoyment of their bodies is your thing, check this site out. I thought it was well worth joining and definitely earned its reputation as one of the best.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Facial Abuse

12. Facial Abuse (1)

Pay
Newbie
89*
Stukowitz (3) 11-10-12  10:03pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Extremely abusive content, if that's your kind of thing. Slapping, spitting, and of course gagging, with some of the girls breaking down in tears.
- One new vid every week.
- Hundreds of vids in archive.
- All vids from the past few years available in 1080p.
- D/L speeds are above-average on my connection.
Cons: - Extremely abusive content, if that's not your kind of thing.
- Many of the girls, especially the newer ones, aren't very good looking. Some are so old or fat, I'm not even sure why they would bother.
- Very basic interface. No ability to search by category or keyword. No ability to arrange the vids by popularity or rating.
Bottom Line: If you want to see models treated with respect, this is not a site for you. If you want to see the exact opposite, it's a huge library of very extreme content in HD.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit In Focus Girls

13. In Focus Girls (2)

Pay
Active
93
Cybertoad (102) 11-05-12  01:21pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nice new clean look.
MP4 HDV UP To - 1280 x 720 @ 4Mbit (MP4)
Unique Material to this site.
Streaming Material is fast smooth
Many Vids have matching Photosets.
Navigation is good.
Very professional looking site.
Cons: Older Movies SDV - 640 x 480 @ 964Kbit (MP4)
Photos not accessed on video page.
Search engine did not accurately search.
Downloads on my 50MB connection was average not impressed.
Sameness in shoots.
Bottom Line: Toads over view:

The site has improved greatly since my last review in 2008. I did notice PU icon is not accurate to the new site format makes one think the site has not updated the look.
I found joining was easy and accessed with no problem. Girls are stunning and very nice bodies.
I was disappointed that most all the girls appeared under 24 and looked award when dressed in clothes for a person in their 30's. But were good non-the less.

Conerns I had:
I disliked the older material, some as old as 2005 and did not look or feel fresh. The newer
material was great and very high quality.
I was troubled by the poor results from a well designed search engine. The look of the search engine looked intuitive and clean but gave bad results. A search for blonds would bring up black hair and blond. Other niches did the same.
I ran a check on my PC and connection several times and took longer per movie then it should on this site.

Toads take:
This is one of the best overall sites out there, the search engine and old material are bothersome but the site over all is clean fresh and feel right. Those issues are the only reasons that kept me in the mid 90's score wise. If the search worked well I would have bumped my score up to 96.
The girls are amazing with many niches this is a girl only site there is some hardcore solo activity and some Lesbian shoots by over all is mostly solo. Allot more outside shoots then I would like, and would not make not of it but the search engine did not omit these well and added to the confusing finding the idea user material.
If you join any solo site make sure you do not miss this one. The unique material alone makes this a high mark site and quality is great except on older material which in my opinion should be archived and not included as total videos the site offers. I was also impressed that each video had picture sets. However in the video section there was " UNCLICKABLE" photos icon and access to the photo was done by a almost missed link. The link is fine but pictures should be clickble to the set. Just some small annoyances but the the site is great and worth the join.

CT
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Facial Abuse

14. Facial Abuse (1)

Pay
Newbie
90*
Anth (4) 10-07-12  02:19am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A Wicked Sense of Humour of the guy behind the camera; Believe me you will be laughing out loud at the quips.
- The only site, that I know of, that does full on face fucking.
- The girls all look like girl next door and natural.
- They actually say if the girl is a porn star and not try to pretend she is a newcommer off the street as other sites will do.
- The reviewer it seems tries to always get the girls to try out anal too which for me is a bonus to just a video of Face Fucking and nothing more.
- Nice selection of videos on their newer offerings allowing you to download full 1080p videos and offering the videos in multiple formats, MP4, WMV and MPEG.
Cons: The website navigation is terrible. My initial thoughts were to put it as an 85 score solely due to the navigation. But then looking at the score system gave it 90 as it seemed more fitting. They need to totally redesign the site layout as the one they have now is awful.

-Such as offer a search.
-Offer a clear reasonably sized headshot of the girl on the main page before clicking to watch the video.
-Have the option of more video links per page as clicking page after page hunting through them all is annoying.
-Also date the videos on the main page as it seems there are odd layouts often not showing the latest videos first in the list.

-The girls on the site are sometimes very unattractive.
Bottom Line: This site has a wicked sense of humour. This I can say is the only site I have joined more so for a laugh than the actual porn. I first heard and joined Facial Abuse due to watching a video on Efukt called "The Trolling Of Wannabe Pornstars" and laughing non stop through it.

I let my subscription lapse after about 7/8 months from getting tired of the same format and the often general unattractiveness of many of the girls added. But then seen another hilarious video on there so signed up again.

The videos themselves are always keeping to the niche of the site well; Extreme Face Fucking. And the multiple format offerings all the way up to a 1080p download is great.

Updates seem to be very sporadic. And without any dating of the videos it is hard to see when the videos were added to the site and how far apart from each other (Probably done intentionally as the website creators know this too).

Overall I think this is the only extreme face fucking website. The girls are a mixed bag from attractive to downright unattractive; But given the ribbing the unattractive ones get I actually still like watching those videos. The navigation is probably the worst on any porn site I have been to. But the uniqueness of the niche offered, the quality of the videos in terms of the offer of full 1080p and the outright brilliant humour of the cameraman means this is definitely worth a signup.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit In Focus Girls

15. In Focus Girls (2)

Pay
Active
96
Denner (233) 08-19-12  11:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (80), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Top-of-the-Pops in solo girls videos (only solo girls)
+ Exclusive content
+ Vast amount of material Ė vids and pix sets
+ Several different scenes of the same girl for the major part of models
+ Fine, great video quality Ė among others: top MP4.
+ Most of older vids are now reedited to up-to-date quality, nice!
+ Daily updates Ė one day video, next pics ect.
+ Several download options
+ Great download speed - mostly
+ No DRM, no download limits.
+ Zip for pics
+ Easy navigation/download Ė except update browsing
+ Nice price Ė except: see below
Cons: - Regional pricing
- Somewhat repetitive style in video scenes - but what exclusive site does not have that.
- A bit troublesome update-search (see below)
- A little too much going for outdoor scenes
- Confusing model names
- Poor preview (see below)
Bottom Line: In Focus Girls is probably the best solo-girl-video-site, I've joined for a long, long time. It reminds me a bit of the enthusiasm, I had when first joining the DDF, 1 By Day several years ago.

This site offers a vast amount (1300) of great videos of especially euro girls Ė the majority well known from other sites. But here you get exclusive scenes, exclusive shots.....oh, yes Ė some, a few of these scenes are placed elsewhere Ė but to my knowledge from this site.

And the best deal is, that most Ė far most Ė of the girls/models Ė have more than one scene. Most/some two or three, some even up to 12 different video scenes with the same model Ė that's really a collectors item.
And the older videos for those well known , favorite models have now been re-edited:
So you get vids from 2006/2007/2008 in fine, fine quality, too. Still a few, very few (2005) are not updated and in low quality.

The navigation is mostly very easy Ė especially when browsing models Ė the name, akas are confusing, though. Only about half are using a well know name...so if you want to browse for your favorites, you'll have problems Ė still they all have fine, big thumbs, so......

The video downloads are in 5 choices:
Four in the fine MP4 (my favorite):
1280x720 - 4Mbit
854x480 - 2Mbit
640x360 - 964Kbit
480x272 - 664Kbit
In PSP
And MPG in parts

And Ė you get 4 streaming options, too.

At the moment there is almost 1300 videos here Ė a lot of nice browsing and downloading.
Generally I get a very fine download speed here Ė 1700-2000 Kb/sec Ė sometimes (rarely) it's somewhat slower.

It's a little annoying browsing updates: It now goes in pages from 1-108...and if you what like page 66 Ė you got to have patience clicking and clicking..
The models browsing is much easier: Alphabetic.

Preview: It's miserable and not informative Ė Strange with such a fine site, so do not let it fool you

Not much into pics Ė but you get three seizes Ė and of course zip Ė best is:
2000x1333.

I hate that regional pricing, but overcame my principals here Ė and joined Ė and happy, I did.

This is truly a great site...and seems like the best around when it come to fine looking solo girls. Highly recommended.
Respond: 13 Replies - Add Reply


Visit hotkinkyjo

16. hotkinkyjo (0)

Pay
Active
79
rearadmiral (316) 07-23-12  05:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Nothing else quite like it
- Pushes the boundaries on extreme insertions
- Very rare male on female anal fisting
- Exclusive material
- Photos and Videos
- Resolutions on even mid-grade videos look great
- Updates regularly
Cons: - Streaming only
- true HD stutters a lot even with a high-speed connection
- Insertions only Ė no actual sex
- Expensive for whatís offered
Bottom Line: First, please let me introduce you to an 800lb. gorilla in the room because readers will definitely notice it: yes, this is an EXTREME site. It isnít for everyone. Heck, Iím pretty sure that a lot of it isnít even for me, and Iím a fan of extreme anal stuff. So, readers, please remember that even if you donít like this niche, Iím wearing my reviewerís hat as much as my pervertís hat, so please keep the comments civil.

The other 800lb. gorilla in the room is the fact that the site offers no downloads at all. That goes for photos and videos. The site explains and justifies that by noting the risk of piracy if we, people who actively support pay sites, are allowed to keep what we see. I have no doubt that piracy is probably the biggest problem in the online porn industry today and Iím sure it hurts small sites like this much more than big sites, but I am not convinced that penalizing supportive paying customers is the solution. I really hope that the site re-thinks this policy.

Hot Kinky Jo is an attractive Russian model who speaks good English and appears to be in her mid-20s. Sheís petite and has looks more common in mainstream porn rather than the often rough, hard look of a model who pushes the limits in extreme fetish porn. According to an interview she gave to Jay Sin in Anal Acrobats she got her start doing webcam work and discovered she has a particular Ďtalentí for being able to insert large objects into her ass. Iím not sure if there is such a title, but if there is then Jo deserves to be labeled the Queen of Extreme Anal Insertions. In fact, I suspect that if the title comes with a crown then she could easily insert that into her bum.

The videos all feature some sort of extreme anal play. There are solo scenes where Jo anally fists herself, scenes where she uses huge dildos in her ass, including one where she takes more of a horse-dick dildo than would seem possible. There are scenes where she is with one or more women where there is more extreme insertion and usually female on female anal fisting. There are even a few scenes with male on female anal fisting. Iím not aware of any other site that offers this. In several scenes Jo actually takes more than one fist in her: three go in during one scene. I warned you that this was extreme stuff. One thing you will not see is actual anal sex, but that isnít the theme here anyway.

One niche that the site promotes is prolapse or ďrosebudĒ porn. I am most definitely NOT a fan of this and I know this sounds weird, but I have no stomach for prolapse stuff in the middle of a fisting video.

The site is very small, which is likely because itís so new. There are only 17 videos and 15 photo shoots available as of this writing. To make matters worse, the videos are short, all coming in at just under eight minutes long. But Iím guessing that if youíre having your ass fisted, eight minutes could seem like an eternityÖ

The photo sets all have 100+ photos. Many of the photos shoots appear to be shot at the same time as the videos.

The site, which only began last month, currently updates every two or three days. Video updates seem more frequent than photo updates.

I canít give full specs on the videos or photos because I donít know how to do that for streams. The videos are offered in three resolutions, low (1.5MB/s), medium (5)MB/s) and HD (10MB/s). I have a 60MB/s fibre op connection and I found the HD stuff unwatchable due to stuttering and long and frequent buffering delays. But when the HD stuff played, it did look good. The medium looks excellent too and didnít suffer the same problems. The photos also offer three resolutions. Both videos and pictures open into a viewer on the page. I really canít give much more technical detail because I donít normally use streaming.

Not that this is relevant, but this site is the first Iíve noticed that uses the new ďxxxĒ top-level domain. Until I noticed that I couldnít figure out why I couldnít find the site by simply googling ďhotkinkyjo.Ē

Iíll usually base a recommendation on value. And for me, cost is only one factor in deciding on value. Given the uniqueness of this site Iíd normally be willing to say it provides decent value even though it costs $30 per month and only has a small amount of material. But Ė and this is only my opinion Ė the lack of downloads means I just canít recommend this. Until they offer downloads I wonít be back and Iíd only recommend the site to someone who really likes this niche and understands that it is streaming only.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ALS Scan

17. ALS Scan (1)

Pay
Active
97
rearadmiral (316) 07-20-12  10:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge collection dating back five years
- One of the few sites available that photo fans and video fans can both enjoy
- Standard-setting production values
- Site has a Ďpersonalí feel thanks to the models and staff
- Site is simple, but user-friendly
- Exclusive content (not found elsewhere)
- Unique content (nothing else like it on the Ďnet)
- Bills through CC Bill
- Excellent value
- Allows download managers with no obvious timeouts
- Offers HD in multiple formats
Cons: - None. Seriously, none.
Bottom Line: ALS Scan is a site that I shouldnít like because I generally have little interest in solo girl, masturbation scenes and girl-girl scenes. But even though thatís all that ALS Scan offers, the site is certainly in my top-five favourite sites and a site that I go back to regularly.

I wonít go into a lot of detail about the technical specs of the site because those have been addressed before by me and others in earlier reviews. The site continues to offer HD video in both MP4 and WMV. I didnít bother to comment on that in a previous review because I didnít realize how rare that is. Due to size restrictions, many sites only offer HD in MP4 format and leave those of us who still prefer WMV to live with a lower-resolution file or go with MP4. This would appear to show the level of customer support that the site has if they take this extra step to keep a few of us happy.

Iíve said before that for me to really like a site it has to excel at three things: 1) the content has to be good, 2) the site design needs to be effective and user-friendly, and 3) the material needs to be easily accessed by the members either by streaming or download. A lot of sites score high on two of those, but few score high on all three of those. ALS is one of the sites that does well on all three. They certainly knock two of them out of the park and do better than average on another.

First the content: like any site, if you donít like the content youíre not going to like the site regardless of how great the technical aspects are. In this respect prospective members really need to know that ALS Scan isnít a Ďnormalí porn site. There is no hardcore b/g here at all. Thereís no b/g stuff period. There is mostly solo and g/g material. If youíre not into that, the site might seem a bit dull, but they add some unique character by having lots of behind-the-scenes stuff too. I call it BTS, but only because I canít think of a better term for it. Some people donít like this, but some like me do, and thatís having the camera rolling during a photo shoot. Iím not sure why I like it, but I do and this stuff is very well done. ALS Scan may be best known, however, for their location shoots in the Caribbean, which seem to occur annually. These are a lot of fun to watch and take place at a villa and on the beach. For a site that shoots so much outdoor material the production values are incredible. These guys have the technical aspects of lighting, sound, camerawork and editing down solid. They should teach others these skills. The site offers hundreds, perhaps thousands of exclusive videos and all of them have a unique and personal feel to them. Itís like the staff are making porn that they like with no concerns about commercial value Ė except that what they make is so good it has exceptional value.

In terms of content, one thing that hasnít been posted in several years and I really wish theyíd shoot more of is European public nudity and body painting. Iím a big fan of this stuff and when the staff at ALS Scan did it they applied their usual high standards and made some of the best public nudity scenes available on the Ďnet. (So if an ALS Scan staffer happens to read this, please, please, please shoot more public nudity!)

As for site design, it can be best described as Ďprimitive.í But while that might be a problem for many other sites it really isnít here. Given the narrow focus of the site having a search function really wouldnít add a lot of value. As it is, you can sort for photos or videos and you can sort by model. Beyond that not much is really needed. I think a fair contrast with the site design here might be to Videobox which had a simple, effective and plain-looking site. Then the marketers decided to make it look pretty to attract new members but in doing so they made it less user-friendly. The ALS Scan site probably looks like it did way back when they started, and since it works I hope they donít see the need to make the site flashier at the expense of utility.

As for accessibility the site scores high here too. Downloads are fast, the site allows download managers, there appears to be no timeouts on downloads and there are no download limits. It seems that the site owners sat down and thought what theyíd like if they were the customer and then did it.

Another rare attribute is that the site caters to both photo and video collectors. They offer high quality regardless of what youíre looking for. Iím not normally a photo collector, but this is one site that I make an exception. The photo quality is incredible.

Obviously I highly recommend ALS Scan, with the caveat on content. Even if you really have limited interest in the stuff they offer Iíd still recommend giving them a try. The content is playful, personal and erotic thanks to the models and staff and the site lets you access it easily. That makes the site an excellent value.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Defiled 18

18. Defiled 18 (0)

Pay
Active
71
pat362 (367) 07-03-12  04:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +You get access to 13 other sites.
+The models are all cute Eastern European.
+Videos are in HD.
Cons: -The site is tiny with only 16 videos and they've only added 6 videos in a year. Worse one of the recent update is leased content.
-Only 4 of the other sites were more or less still updating with new content.
-Only one download video option if you want a single file.
-They don't offer the ability to stream content online on a flash player.
-The sex scenes aren't very good and the BSDM is at best described as amateurish.
-Content is not dated and I think the entire network may now be dead.
-They have pics but you have to download them one by one so why bother.
Bottom Line: *This site was added to the teen core club network sometime in 2011 but I'm not sure why. It's certainly wasn't because they wanted to add new models to their roster since the bulk of the models have scenes on some of the network's other sites. One could say that they wanted to reach a different group of customers with their BSDM style content but frankly the BSDM is so amateurish and gimmicky that it's almost not worth mentioning. I mean you basically get one or two guys wearing ski mask who take a girl out of a dog cage and then they use a paddle for a little while, use different toys on her and finally have sex with her. The action may be a little different from the rest of the networks content but it's so amateurish and badly done that they shouldn't have bothered doing it.

*The site added only 6 videos since July of last year and one of those was leased material so the setup on that one is different from all the other videos. Mind you this site isn't the only one to have added very little content in the last 12 months. My big fear is that the entire network is now dead. They added a brand new site called teen anal casting last month and they have already stopped updating it. Not to mention that they used an update meant for that site to update try teens. Another reason why I think the network may be dead is that they always advertised upcoming updates but there are no current upcoming updates on the main network.

*I don't think this type of content will appeal to many people. The only ones that might like this are those looking to get all the videos a model has done. It certainly won't appeal to people looking for BSDM style porn because it's pretty badly done.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit ALS Scan

19. ALS Scan (1)

Pay
Active
85
skippy (40) 06-23-12  01:24am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Fantastic quantity of material. The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are excellent and in HD. Newer photo sets come in high resolution. The girls appear to be having genuine fun. They use ample amounts of oil, lotion, various types of fruits and vegtables and many, many types of battery operated devices. Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2006.
Cons: Navigation is not as good as other sites. (For example, you can't scroll through the images in a set but have to page back out to the set menu and select the next image.) About 1 in 4 releases are actually re-releases of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not if you are back for the 2nd or 3rd time. The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while. The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here. Many of the newer models are not as attractive as models from prior years.
Bottom Line: OK, bottom line? This is a lesbian and fetish site that is interesting to visit once just to see the show, but it caters to a relatively narrow taste. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. On the surface, that's not at all bad. Many of the girls from older sets and a few from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up. But the majority of recent girls are not particularly memorable and at best rate a notch above amatuer. Maybe after years of visiting this site I'm a little jaded. I apologize in advance if what I'm about to say seems harsh. The success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide. Here are a few of those signature items:
1. There are NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though.
2. Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paraadise.
3. There is an odd fascination with the inside of otherwise unviewable areas on the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uturus looks like. Many models agree to use what looks like an ambroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it niether sexy, nor flattering. In a word, it makes the models clinical.
4. Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that is.
5. Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that here!
6. The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was interesting and might be tasty. That was about 100 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the odd color lollipop they use is.
7. This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
8. Allsscan has a sister site called allsangels. The webmaster/owner has no qualms with showing you a set of girls from auditions in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership in that site much smaller for $25 a month. Sorry, all it does for me is piss me of that these better looking girls should have been but aren't on the site I'm a member of.

Ok, before you send me a nasty email, let me put a thought in your head. ALSSCAN is a bit of a sideshow. Sideshows have an odd combination of allure and freakiness that makes you want to go in to see what is there. I've seen this particular show about 5 times since the late 1990s and every few years I find myself wandering back in to see what the next big thing is going to be. (This time I think it is those emroidery hoop-clothespin things....)

Now, it is clear that the photographers have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having tremendous fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camers.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment. Some of the best photo sets and videos come from annual outings where a dozen or so girls are chosen to go to a tropical island. Once there, they can run around naked and generally have sex with any girl they want...and they do.

So, again, bottom line...interesting place to visit but you might not want to stay for more than a month.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Fetish Network

20. Fetish Network (0)

Network
Active
79
xexbot (36) 06-21-12  10:45am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: It's hard to come up with pros for this site. Is it a "pro" if they are simply performing the most basic duties of a website?

The site is stable. I have never had much trouble logging in or connecting to pages.

I have never found a dead link.

I find their font sizes to be legible without my glasses.

The appearance and layout is functional.

Yes, this is sarcasm, but I am really having a hard time finding a lot to put in this category for them. Here's some stuff about their videos.

You get a choice between "High" and "Low" quality mp4s, or you can stream. The high res stuff isn't bad. Some of it is even HD, but not much.

They do have a pretty impressive selection of categories: BDSM, spanking, femdom, smothering, fisting, smoking, nylon/lingerie, jerkoff instruction, lesbian, and mixed kink (see cons about this).
Cons: The one thing that annoys me the most is that there is no cross-listing or networking taking place here, and it is literally called the "Fetish Network." You have no real search capability, and if you do happen to find someone you think was really hot in something, there is no way to either find out who they are, or to easily find other videos with them on the site. In fact, the entire interface is definitely a 1990s design. Basically each "Site" under their network opens into a index of thumbnails for videos. The titles are fairly descriptive, but there is no way of knowing what will actually take place in the video. Arguably, this can make the videos more fun or exciting, but in dealing with subject matters such as this (BDSM generally) you kind of want to know what you're in for.

Aside from that, there is a distinct lack of variety. For as many videos as they have, they all just seem to be the same dozen or so, fat, middle-aged men, or whoever, doing the same stuff to girls.
Bottom Line: This is a site that could be awesome for you if you are really into seeing all sorts of women get spanked, caned, whipped, or titty twisted. That seems to be about 75% of the material. The models are a mixed bag of nuts, some are pretty and young, others are amateurish and/or fugly. The girls doing the jerkoff instruction are all pretty hot, and jerkoff instruction isn't exactly a really prevalent niche, so I thought it was going to be awesome having so many of these videos. Instead, they are all pretty lame, a few of the girls actually know who to do it, but most just kind of model their pantyhose and don't talk that much. So, you can see where something like this may be very tricky. Looking at clips or a thumbnail of videos like these make it seem like they are a lot higher quality than what you get with the entire product. It's kind of like getting duped into paying $15.00 to see Prometheus.

This site doesn't offer much to anyone who isn't really, really, really into spanking, caning and whipping. Beyond that subject matter, it is very shallow. There is a lot of bondage, but you don't get to see a lot of the actual binding. The girl or guy just appears bound. The machine sex is pretty cheap stuff, and they are still really into putting dildos on the end of pool cues. Even when there are hot models involved, the production values are still very low rent.

Not all of the material is original, and stuff like the Rick Savage videos may have been around for awhile already. It is possible you have seen some of this stuff elsewhere. It is also possible that it is just so plain and generic that you think you've seen it elsewhere. They also tend to include duplicates of videos in the various sites.

I don't think a site should get any accolades for basically doing the bare minimum. Clearly someone updates the site, but no one seems to even try get organized. The videos are not enough to carry this site alone. They aren't horrible, but they aren't great either. Some customer consideration could go a long way into at least making the customer not feel as if they have just been scammed. But, unfortunately, once you shell out the money, you are immediately introduced to a site layout that screams "We got your money, what do we care?"
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Meat Members

21. Meat Members (0)

Network
Newbie
67*
Stukowitz (3) 06-04-12  05:52pm
Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - lots of content; I count more than 3000 videos
- all content appears for be original and exclusive
- many sites with a general throat-fucking and rough-sex focus
- search by keyword or category
Cons: - poor resolution for most videos (~640 × 480)
- site ostensibly updates daily, though all updates appear to be old content recycled
- downloads frequently fail
- a lack of specific tags attached to the videos render the search functionality insufficient to effectively navigate the massive library
- site is generally glitchy, with pages and videos failing to load
- some sites and videos appear to have been removed or renamed. "Cock Brutality" and "Bitches in Training", for example, are advertised on the main page but are not available in the members area.
- d/l speed for me was ~250 kb/s, while on most others sites my connection gives me up to 2.5 mb/s
Bottom Line: Technical issues and the sketchy quality of the videos undermine the experience, despite the great quantity of content.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Stretched Out Snatch

22. Stretched Out Snatch (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Porn User (4) 03-30-12  06:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (4)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + none
Cons: - NO HD even for new scenes...size is maximum 600mb must most of the times the vids have a total size of 230mb so don't expect any hd on any of the free sites either
- all videos come in very bad pixeled quality
- did I mention all videos have bad quality
- movies are boring
- most site have not posted updates for years
Bottom Line: I was looking for a dildo site with beautiful girls and stumbles upon Stretchedoutsnatch . They advertise having ALOT of videos and the quality seemed really good. WRONG. Once registering I realised the quality is really bad. I'll probably end up deleting what I have downloaded because there is better porn out there that is worth my hard disc space. Most videos are years old, even the new ones look as if they were from 6 years ago. They post new updates but in some cases the so called updates were shot years ago, which makes no sense at all. It does come with a variety of sites like mr biggz / Shane Diesel's banging babes / nacho killer pussy / papa loads / lil' latinas / jizzbomb / internal violations / heavy handfuls. The problem is most sites don't post new updates. It also looks as if all those sites bought movies film from other companies, only they bought the ones that were not good enough to be posted on the original site. The movies are bad, really bad.

I wanted to like the site so bad but the quality of its content is just too bad for me to be wasting time with it. This is the kind of site that makes you want to go back to those free porn site with free hd samples because those site just offer better pron even though it's just sample. I'm canceling my membership today, after 4 days of membership. BOO@stretchedoutsnatch. Do NOT REGISTER
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Layla Extreme

23. Layla Extreme (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Porn User (4) 03-28-12  07:40pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (4)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + sexy girl with insertions scenes
+ easy to cancel membership
Cons: - the quality of most videos is bad
- not many different scenes; it's always the same thing
- site would be better if you didn't see the guy in every scene with his hairy arm going into Layla...it's a major turn off
- I found the girl boring even though she is sexy
- boring content
- no extra sites
Bottom Line: I wanted to like this site so much but it fails. The video quality is very bad even though the girl is sexy. I didn't find that many interesting scenes, the interesting ones were of bad video quality. I didn't like seeing the guy in every video. I canceled my account maybe 2 days after I had registered. There are better sites out there with the same niche, with more quality and quantity.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brutal Dildos

24. Brutal Dildos (0)

Pay
Newbie
79*
Porn User (4) 03-28-12  07:33pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (4)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + great if you're into girls and huge dildos
+ A LOT of sexy girls
+ Videos in HD = great quality
+ user friendly/you can add scenes to your favorites allowing for easy follow up and dload
+ dload the whole movie or parts of it
+ vaginal and anal
+ free extra sites : Mother Teaching Teens, Huge Strapon Lesbians, Brutal Fisting are amongst the best
Cons: - older videos are of poor quality
- not updated frequently
- alot of women lack emotions and/or don't seem to enjoy what they are doing
- too many close ups; it's almost always the same camera angles
- for feet lovers, you barely see any feet for they are always out of the camera range
Bottom Line: I really enjoyed my membership with Brutal Dildos. I in fact registered twice. Site is ultra easy to navigate, the scenes are super easy to preview, easy download, easy acces to the free sites, GREAT content, HD files range between 1go to 3go. A lot of quality content. I just wish there were more updates, and maybe a little more known pornstars. Good billing practise and easy to cancel. Enjoy! =)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brutal Fisting

25. Brutal Fisting (0)

Pay
Active
80
pat362 (367) 03-27-12  10:46am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +All exclusif content.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV or MP4 and they offer HD 1920x1080 content for all of them.
+You can download all photosets as a complete zip file and resolution is 1200x800.
+You get access to 8 other sites
+They have a good selection of models and this is the only place you'll see them do this type of content.
+Content is all dated.
Cons: -They only update about twice per month so it's still a small site with only 44 videos.
-Only two of the other sites are still updating.
-They have a pretty awful preview section and that makes it hard to get a good feeling of what's available inside.
Bottom Line: *This is a pretty extreme fetish so the number of performers willing to do it is rare but these guys still manage to hire certain girls that you wouldn't expect to be doing this and to appear like they enjoy it. Even more when you consider that 15 of them also do anal fisting which is even more extreme.

*The videos are well shot so you aren't limited to only a few angles during the action. That's appreciated during the penetration because you get to see the face of the performer and that adds to the heat of the scene. They also like to shoot from various positions and that's a plus.

*The one thing they need to work on is updating more often.*

**Since this type of fetish is pretty exteme then I can only recommend it to those that are into it. If you enjoy teach me fisting then you should enjoy this one.**
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 221 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Hard X (2)
2. In Focus Girls (2)
3. Dominated Girls (1)
4. House Of Taboo (1)
5. Rocco Siffredi (1)
6. Southern Bukkake (1)
7. Facial Abuse (1)
8. ALS Scan (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.22 seconds.