Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 144 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Aziani

1. Aziani (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
joseboy07 (1) 07-27-14  01:26pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Loads of updates from new sites like Aziani Iron, if you're into that. Loads of unique content from Rachel from recent to years back so if you're a new member and haven't seen any of her previous stuff then you plenty to look through.
Cons: New updates from Rachel herself are scarce. Seem to be paying for blog updates and the occasional member cam show, which time wise doesn't suit UK residents. Previously there were weekly updates and a calendar, now it's a matter of hoping and waiting. Over the past 6 months this has been the case. and at times only one Rachel update in a month. It seems to be more of a glamour/softcore network now.
Bottom Line: There was a time when I was a religious member of this site but wouldn't contemplate a membership now. I was always in it for Rachel's updates but the others are poor in comparison. Maybe she is slowly moving to retirement, who knows.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Teen Models

2. Teen Models (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
badamsiosllc (0) 07-18-14  02:35pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Pretty girls, no doubt about it. All movies are HD.
Cons: 4 out or 10 girls have NO pictures OR movies. Downloads are horrible. 300K when I usually get 2000K. (Or 2 MB) Streaming it a JOKE! They all stop and start all the way through the movie.
Bottom Line: Don't waste your time. What did they say, 260 girls? 40% have 0 pictures and 0 video. That's actually 156 girls.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit GF Sex Toys

3. GF Sex Toys (1)

Pay
Active
70
wally (6) 04-19-14  02:03pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of videos

Lots of unknown amateurs, most very appealing

Fun content if you like solo webcam videos

File sizes are small, so lots of downloads for little hard-drive space

Part of AllofGFs network, so other content themes available

One of few sites I've found where non-pornstar webcam shows can be downloaded
Cons: Video quality ranges from bad to atrocious

Video count is inflated - duplicate videos

Browse tools almost nonexistent
Bottom Line: My score is a compromise between my subjective reaction (higher) and a more objective view (lower). Whether or not this site is worth your time depends very much on whether or not you enjoy videos captured from webcam shows. There are few things I enjoy more than a well done webcam show, so when another review site warned readers that some of the videos appeared to be webcam captures I jumped with the TBP discount. Sure enough, near as I can tell virtually ALL the videos are pulled from webcam shows from sites like Flirt4Free.

Pornstar solo sites are often including archive versions of their star's weekly camshows, but this is the first site I have found offering downloadable versions of webshows by the kind of everyday unknown amateurs you would find on a cam site (if anyone knows of another I'd love to hear about it). It's a question of taste, of course, but I love the informal feel of these videos, and their often "let's get down to business" directness. I'm probably much in the minority about this.

The downside to this is that webcam video quality is generally terrible, with fuzzy images and herky-jerky movement (I suppose if all webcam models started broadcasting HD then the bandwidth demands would crash the internet). Of course, this means the video files tend to be quite small also - rarely as much as 100Mb and often less than 50Mb. You could download hours of these videos for the space you'd need for one 10minute HD video.

I don't know for sure if these are supposed to be viewer submitted, if so that might explain why the videos have next to no information - no performer name, date etc. - making almost any attempt to sort/search the content futile. The only sort options available are one you would see on a tube site: Most recent, Most viewed, Best rated, Longest, Popularity.

Also, I noticed a sizable number of videos that appear to have been submitted multiple times - title may be different but the videos are identical, two, three and sometimes four entries of the same video. So the thousand+ videos they advertise are clearly overstated, by how much I don't know, though even allowing for this the quantity of material is impressive.

You do have access to other AllofGFs sites, so you can find a fair amount of boy/girl sex and some all too rare girl-girl, but all the same drawbacks are here - video quality is about the same, these also seem to pulled from camshows

So bottom line: worth a join for a month for someone of my taste, a lot less likely for anyone else.

The big head says "This site is really low quality" but the little head says "Show me more!"
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Puffy Network

4. Puffy Network (1)

Network
Active
84
RagingBuddhist (63) 01-05-14  03:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 3 site access
+ Files types: wmv 1080p, mp4 in 320p, 480p, 720p &1080p
+ Bonus material from other sites
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Searches with category filters and keywords
+ In browser flash for video
+ Live cams available
Cons: - Seriously quirky flash based picture viewing
- Inconsistent download speeds
- Some might like larger pictures
- Pictures need renaming
Bottom Line: This network started out with Wet and Puffy in April 2009 with We Like To Suck added at the end of May 2011 and Wet and Pissy the end of March 2012.

Wet & Puffy is basically the solo portion of their network. The girls start out clothed, get into a bit of tease as they shed their outfits, then it's on to plenty of showing off, fingering and insertions of toys and other objects. WeLikeToSuck is the hardcore portion of the show. Surprise! It all centers around blowjobs, with more than a few of the girls giving it all up for full penetration sex. Wet&Pissy, also not surprisingly, is the pissing fetish site. All solo action, including toys and insertions.

They added high definition video starting in February 2010. The videos are clear and sharp across the board and the camerawork is what I'd call above average. There are plenty of full body shots and closeups with a fair minimum of the can't-hold-still camera that I find distracting as hell. The choice of file types and sizes make it easy to get video that suits your needs.

As far as the pictures go, I'll start by saying that they're 2800 pixels long side and it does appear that the sets were handpicked to avoid too much repetition and out of focus shots. But that's where the good stops. I've never been a fan of flash based picture viewing because there always seems to be some issues that make the navigation slow and clunky. That's definitely the case here. Some of the newest sets pop up pictures that are smaller than what's available in the zip files. Some sets have the option to enlarge to full size, some don't. There are also times when the individual pictures don't give the option to right click and save. As I moved from page to page, the worst part of it was clicking on a pic, closing the popup and winding back on the first page. The last issue with the pictures is in the naming. Saving individual pictures (when possible!) all have the same name. The zip files don't include the name of the set and they all open to a folder named Images, with the pictures themselves simply numbered (001, 002, etc.) That required a lot of renaming work.

You get the typical tabbed browsing here so getting around the sites is pretty easy and intuitive. Nothing new with that. It's an easy jump from videos to pictures to the bonus content and on to anywhere on the site. The filters do a good job of narrowing things down to get you to just what you're looking for.

Download speeds were all over the place. Using a download manager, I got speeds that ranged from around 350 to 3200 kb/s. That meant that some of the one gig+ files took almost halh an hour to download.

The bonus content here is better than most I've seen. A dozen or more scenes from 7 well-known sites updated weekly. They're in 720p mp4 - decidedly better than the 1990's resolution flash seen on countless other sites.

Advertising is kept hidden behind it's own tab and behind a button on each page. Always nice to see that.

As always, I can't say too much about the live cams because I don't care for 'em. It appears you have to sign up separately to access them and that some are free and some require you to pony up some extra cash.

All in all, I really like the site and would recommend checking it out. The videos get a 92 from me and the pictures a 75. I averaged that out to come up with 83.5 rounded up to my score of 84
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Yanks.com

5. Yanks.com (1)

Pay
Active
75
RagingBuddhist (63) 03-29-13  01:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ***Edited Review to lower the score - see replies***

+ Video quality is good
+ Flash preview
+ Model index
+ Search by category
+ Advanced search by key tags
+ Screen cap preview for video
+ Zips for both picture sizes
+ Comment section on all updates
+ Download speeds very good with a download manager
+ No apparent download limit
+ PU discount
+ Extra sites (see bottom line)
Cons: - Layout looks dated and cluttered
- Page to page speeds very slow
- Random order updates
- Picture quality seriously lacking - especially the large
- Some serious tattoos showing up (Yes, a personal dislike)
- Bonus video links not valid
- Signed out seemingly at random
Bottom Line: TECHNICALS:
> Video is available in 5 downloadable formats MP4 HD 1280x720 @ 4500 kbps, MP4 720x406 @ 755, WMV 1024x576 @ 3100, 3GP 704x576 @ 1500 and 3GP Low 352x288 @ 1200. The in browser flash player features similar resolutions & files sizes.

> The pictures are available in two sizes and both in zip files - 1280 and 2826 long side. But the quality isn't up to today's standards. The larger pics look grainy, like they were upscaled with a basic photo editor. Now including a few Girls Out West picture sets, they're only available as small 1000 pixels long side.

> It's hard to get a fix on the update schedule or figure out how to explain it in print. Sometimes there are two releases on the same day with any mix of masturbation video, an interview, a "cum face" clip or a biography, sometimes it's any one by itself.

> The page-to-page speed looks like it's hampered by some sort of security. Clicking back or forward, I noticed seemingly random numbers preceding the page URLs. I think that also has something to do with my getting logged out at times. That caused some of the downloads I had in queue on my download manager to download to 35 kilobytes, meaning they had to be downloaded again.

EXTRAS:
Whispering Lily is one of the extra access sites listed as a masturbation social network and a place to chat with other members and browse personals. I'm not too interested in that sort of thing but tried to check it out for the sake of this review. Unfortunately, I kept getting logged out and getting a server error when I tried to get back in. I stopped trying.

ClubStroke.net is a masturbation site featuring guys. Not my thing, so no comments forthcoming. :grin:

SoloTouch.com is the place for masturbation stories - with referral links to still more sites. STOP WITH THE ADS!

The 31 bonus videos all date back to 2004-2007 and haven't changed since my last signup.

The bonus videos feeds show this message: "The website that brought you here is not authorized to link to this video feed". A real WTF moment.

THE BOTTOM LINE:
It seems I didn't wait long enough to sign up here again. The updates still include biographies, "cum face" short 20-30 second videos (like those on Beautiful Agony), and non-nude interviews. While I'm sure there are fans of these, I still don't call them update material - especially the bios which aren't called an update on any other site I've seen. They're still just four pages of questions and answers. It's a masturbation site and that's what I want to see. I'm not interested in knowing what her first time masturbating was like or about the waterfalls in Oregon. I also wasn't too thrilled with having to figure out whether a video was an interview or a full episode. They do list the time of each video, but you have to watch the animated gif preview or go to the screen caps to see what's what.

One of the biggest things that had drawn me to this site in the first place was the girl next door look to the models. I don't like glam, I like average looking. Tattoos, piercings and fake tits were almost non-existent. The latest models are now putting that to rest. Girls with full sleeves, large skull tattoos, nipple and body piercings are distractions I can do without.

I don't know if they've changed or I just didn't notice it my last time in, but the layout and navigation definitely need streamlining. If you can, picture this: The home page shows three columns, "Cumming Soon" preview thumbs on the left. In the middle are Recent Updates, Social Network links, What's Hot, Member Poll and some ads. On the right, Social network links (again), Most Popular Girls, another ad, Most Viewed and Most Popular updates and support links. Way too busy for my taste. There are too many links that jump you to different parts of their network - and far too often they link you to yet another offer to join another site. One minute you're in Yanks, the next you're in WhisperingLily. And damn if there aren't ads on every page. Stop trying to sell me something and give me what I signed up for! And that's what I see as the biggest shortcoming of the site. After over a year since my last time in, I only downloaded about a hundred masturbation episodes. That might sound like a lot, but they're about 10-minute average length and over a full year's worth of content. If the pictures were clearer, I might have saved a few more of those sets as well, but the quality just isn't there. As was noted in another review, this site has a lot of potential but somehow manages to fall short. Even with all the positive aspects I see, the cons really hurt the overall experience. The core material is really good, with (unlike another well-known masturbation site) well-lit, "see-it-all" scenes. I would only recommend this site to a first time subscriber or someone who doesn't mind waiting a long time for the full scenes to build up.

(Continued in replies)
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wet And Puffy

6. Wet And Puffy (3)

Pay
Active
95
RagingBuddhist (63) 03-03-13  12:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (64), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + PU discount
+ Excellent video and picture quality
+ Clear and easy navigation
+ Access to 2 new W&P sites - wetandpissy.com and weliketosuck.com
+ Good download speed
+ Models categorized by Puffy Peach, Big Taco or Juicy Cherry
+ Offered $19.99 nubiles at signup
Cons: - Music intro and outro on video override natural sound
- Lack of variety in settings
(Yes, only two cons!)
Bottom Line: LAYOUT:
Home page has typical tabbed navigation
Models - list of models in no apparent order with "Models by letter" option
Updates - Episodes in order of release
Requests - User feedback form
Extras - A small mix of picture sets, videos and monthly highlights
Bonus - The usual flash videos, these from various sites. Count at time of membership: 20
Cams - The usual free vids with option to buy private time.
Interviews - Short Q&A with models, averaging 2-5 questions each
Search - By Name, Pussy Type, Action (Anal, Blowjob, Lesbians, etc.) and Galleries or Video
Contact - Not surprisingly, contact info for the site

TECHNICALS:
Video:
HD MP4 1440x810 Average Bitrate 5700+ kb/s
WMV 1440x810 ~4800+ kb/s
MP4 720x406 ~1200 kb/s
FLV 640x360 ~1600 kb/s
Clicking on file type shows file size - nice!

Pictures:
Each set available in 2 sizes. Newest up to 2800x1867, oldest around 1600x1064. All are also available at 1024x769.
Watermarks on pictures are subdued and gray - not distracting at all
Zip files available

Miscellaneous:
Homepage lists number of models, scenes, pictures, videos as well as the hours of video online.
Download speeds seemed to range from 1 to 3MB/sec without download manager, moderate improvement over Save As downloads.

For as good as it is, there's really not much to say about this site. I think it's top notch in most respects. A fairly clean layout, simple navigation and quality video and pictures. My first impression was that it looks a lot like InTheCrack with less closeups and more girl next door type models. That was a nice touch for people like me who prefer amateurs to professionals. It features mostly solo action with heavy accent on toys, insertions and watersports. There are also a few lesbian scenes, some blowjob scenes and a couple of hardcore scenes. Most models have only one video with an associated picture set, a few have more. The only major issue I see is their having a music intro that plays into a video for about a couple of minutes then fading out. Same issue at the end of some video, with music starting in before the video ends. Once I got past the music intro issue, I was really impressed with the quality of the video - about as clear as I've seen anywhere. A lesser quibble is the lack of variety in their settings - everything looks like it's shot in the same house. A NICE house with a lot of rooms, but still the same house.

Something else that grabbed my attention was the watermark on the pictures. They stood out because they DON'T stand out. They're grayed out and don't detract from the picture at all. That's something I wish more sites would do. There's nothing that ruins a picture more than a bright splash of color to take away from the subject matter. Definitely not the case here.

So, with not much to criticize, it's obvious that I highly recommend the site. Solo action fans and watersport fans should definitely take a look at this one!
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wet And Puffy

7. Wet And Puffy (3)

Pay
Active
85
skippy (42) 02-28-13  08:06pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Many top-notch and popular models
Excellent quality videos
Most videos are full 1080 HD
Good photo sets
Good navigation
Wide variety of models
Lets and lots of masturbation...
Pussy classification system is a hoot!
Lots of details about many of the models
Cons: Not much variety of activities or sets
5 point voting system seems a bit off
Sort order on many pages seems random
no extra large images (2800x1867 max)
Not much depth (i.e. most models in only one set)
Models are often a little...un-made-up.
Many models don't interact with the camera much
Bottom Line: Well, the best way to describe this site might be "Forget the foreplay, let's get to it!"
There is very little posing, no glam photography (i.e. not much make-up), not a single "naked girl in the woods" just a whole lot of "Here's a girl. Watch her masturbate!" And masturbate they do! Every single girl! Usually with multiple devices in each photo or video set.

This is also one of those sites where you are so drawn in by the masturbation scenes that you won't notice some of the other features right away. There are a lot of interview transcripts that seem reasonably genuine, but the translation from Russian seems a little too perfect to be 100% correct. They are entertaining, though. There are both "bonus" and an "extras" sections that contain additional sets, some of which are from other sites. Ah, yes, there is a LOT of cross selling advertising going on, but thankfully the webmasters have kept the ads to small banners except at the very bottom of some of the pages. The sites that are advertised are all quality sites and a few have "special offers" that one would not get if one were to go straight to, say, Twisty's. (The offers are about the same as the discounts the PU.com...)

There are a couple of bonus sites: "We like to Suck" and "Wet and Pissy". If that doesn't paint a picture for you, quit sniffing glue. Thay have basically the same layout and quality but are a little more specialized. Not really my cup of....whatever.

The webmaster and photo teams do a really good job of creating a genre and sticking to it. The scenes are well lit, well focused and generally good quality. They are all entirely indoors, apparently in a hotel bedroom or bathroom with a few scenes in a home someplace. In some of the sets, one of the videographers, who I'm pretty sure is not exclusive to this site, gets into the action a little by putting a finger in various orafices of the models. I'm not sure I like this style and can't tell if the models do either.

The models are for the most part, right out of ALScan or Twisty's. The top models here are on those other sites, too. Generally pretty, with maybe a few that are not. Oh, and the "real factor" is pretty high here. Make-up is minimal. Lot's of very shiny faces and plenty of pimples visible just about everywhere you can imagine. One girl has a boot shaped bruise right across her butt! If you like "real" this is the place for you!

The "acting" is OK. Female orgasms in porn is like watching professional wrestling. Is it real? Who cares! It's entertainment!

The stats, curiously posted across the top on th ehome page to make it really easy for me to reference, are:

Models: 507
Scenes: 640
Videos: 622
Pics: 39,138

That is not a lot of material compared to some other sites and it doesn't take a math wiz to see that over three quarters of the models only have one photo set and one video. The price isn't bad, though, so I would say it is worth it.

Navigation is pretty straightforward. You can sort models alphatically or on popularity...but the order of the models seems to change and the ranking system, wich goes to 5, seems a little narrow and somewhat inaccurate. There are two image download sizes and a handful of video format options. There are also a few page preferences like number of thumnails on a page. I would like to see larger image options and the ability to download things directly from the model or scene summary page.

OK, bottom line: If you are into solo mastubation videos, this site is certainly worth a visit.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 18 Pussy Club

8. 18 Pussy Club (1)

Pay
Active
65
pat362 (367) 01-20-13  09:35am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +A nice selection of 251 Eastern European models between the ages of 18 and 20 years old.
+Nearly 950 photosets to view online or dowloand.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution varies from 800x1200 to 1067x1600.
+All the content is dated.
Cons: -Only 195 videos and most of these are broken up into 3 or more small clips.
-The vast majority of the content is solo with the odd toy use and a few b/g scenes.
-Site is now dead because the last update is in 2008.
-I'm not sure how much of the content is exclusif (if any) but I know that some of it is leased.
-Most of the models are given a name that is not the one they are usually known under.
-There is a search box but I tried different things and the results were not very good.
-Some of the models have only photosets while others have only videos.
Bottom Line: *Let me first say that I got access to this site through my teens analyzed membership and I am glad that I didn't actually fork any money over for this unimpressive site.

*Here are the things they do right. They have a wide selection of mostly teen models that should please most peoples taste. The bulk of the content is solo teasing with a very nice mix of clothed to all nude with an emphasis on showing the entire body rather than concentrating on just a few parts. Some of the models have more than one set or video so that can be great if she is one of your favorites.

*Here are the things they do wrong. Most of the models only have one or two phototsets and/or videos so unless you luck in then you are not going to get much out of this site. Part of the content is leased material and quite old now. Renaming models is so annoying because it makes finding their more common name much harder.

**The bottom line is that this is a very poor stand alone site even for the most ardent fan of softcore porn and this is made worse by the fact that it's pretty old and contains some leased material.

**I can't recommend to anyone unless the content from the other sites you get appeals to you and my score is based on that reason.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wet And Puffy

9. Wet And Puffy (3)

Pay
Active
88
luv lickn clit (19) 12-18-12  12:49am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: The video quality is excellent, especially with the newer videos! Models are very attractive and young (18 to 25). Photo sets are very good quality, and do not appear to be vid caps. Site navigation is good. Updates with 2 new models a week on average. The site is a little different than most porn sites. They claim to be the only pussy classification site on the web, which is probably true, although I think maybe there should be more than 3 types (LOL). The 3 categories they have are the "puffy peach" (model has fat labia majoria that hide her clit and labia, and create "pussy cleavage"), the "big taco" (model's clit and labia are visible in a standing pose), and the "juicy cherry" (model's clit and labia are long and hang down). Each model starts out with one video and one or two photo sets. The videos involve a sexy strip and then some pussy play, either with fingers or toys. I had no problem logging into the two bonus sites.
Cons: Many models have only one video and one photo set. I don't understand why--maybe they dont book them for a full days shoot. I would definitely like to see more sets of many of their models shot in their style. The videos do seem to get a bit repetitive and similar after a while. It would be nice to see more of the girls masturbating to orgasm. There is a little more pissing than I like--thats not something I'm into.
Bottom Line: Excellent video quality with attractive young models. A lot of archived content. Some of the bigger names in Euro porn stars can be found here including the gorgeous Caprice. A few of the things you will find here with regularity are pussy close ups, pussy pumps, camel toe panty play, labia stretching, anal beads used up and down on the pussy, and pissing. A pussy focused site that is pleasantly different from the standard photo/video porn site. That along with the beautiful girls and high video/photo quality make Wet and Puffy definitely worth joining for a month. The free tour is pretty good if you've never been there before.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Strapon Cum

10. Strapon Cum (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
povViewer (2) 09-06-12  05:15pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Models are all mostly young, thin and hot european girls.
* Videos are available in three formats: streaming, mobile and HD.
* Login page drops right onto the updates.
* Videos tagged and searchable by performer.
* Good server speeds, no issues.
Cons: * Limited quantity of content.
* Perforners sometimes seem bored or uninterested in the action.
* HD video files are zipped into the zip file format.
* Mobile video downloads are a bit pixelated.
Bottom Line: Not all of the content on this site is worth viewing. Sometimes it seems like the models think the shooting they are doing is a joke or unsexy. This makes enjoying a good quantity of the videos harder. But, there are a handful of really excellent scenes which in some ways justifies the access cost. All in all you can probably skip this site unless your specific interest is this type of content.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Wet And Puffy

11. Wet And Puffy (3)

Pay
Active
85
oldfizzywig (8) 08-26-12  05:43am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Provides what it advertises.
- Video download formats: FLV, MP4, WMV, MP4-HQ
- Video download example: 17'46": FLV 301mb 720x406, MP4 225mb, WMV 806mb 1280x720, MP4-HQ 1035mb 1920x1080.
- Picture downloads - ZIP file. Usually two sizes 1027x769 or 2800x1867, but sizes do vary.
- Crisp clear images and videos
- Statistics 418 Models, 540 scenes, 547 videos, 28458 pictures
- Natural breasts - many are A or B cup.
- Non-Member intro shows a full face picture (topless with small pussy insert) of each model.
- Trusted billing - CCBill or Epoch.
- Appears to update 3 times per week.
Cons: - All videos seem to follow same theme: Musical background, model strips, model plays with pussy, may use toys
- Sort by Newest or "most popular", Select by All or "pussy type", most videos have tags but one can not select or sort by tags
- Older videos are 640x480 WMV
- Some of the Girls seem uninterested
- Interview section is very says almost nothing, and is text not video/audio.
- There is a tab on most pages for "CAMS" but it is a dead link.
Bottom Line: Good clear images and videos. Lots of closeups.

Most models are Eastern European. Of the 24 most recent updates the Country of Origins are: England 1, Czech Republic 10, USA 1, Poland 2, Hungary 2, Romania 1, Austrira 2, France 2, Netherlands 1, Switzerland 1, Greece 1. Models appear to be in the 18 to 25 year age range.

Lots of Dildo play. Many Pussy pumps, I suspect this may be why its "puffy". Most girls either use a lotion or spit on their fingers, this must be the "wet" part of the name.

There are a number of videos of the girls pissing. For fans of this, like me, it will be a turn on, as these are often closeups.

This is part of a three site network consisting of: WetandPuffy.com, WeLikeToSuck.com, WetandPissy.com

Works well with Free Download Manager.

Lower price for linking from PornUsers.com is 19.95 USD, normal advertised price is 29.95/mth.

This is my first review - please provide constructive criticism and I will do my best to improve.
Respond: 15 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Strapon Cum

12. Strapon Cum (0)

Pay
Active
77
Ergo Proxy (21) 06-06-12  01:37pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -unique fetish content (squirting strapons, pantyhose, latex, solo, anal, creampie, fantasy costumes (ballerina, school girl,...) etc.)

-models are young and exceptionally beautiful and could as well model for a teenie site

-newer videos come in HD, there are always mobile versions available and streaming, the camera work is professional and steady, the sets are very decent and comfy looking

-counting a total of 106 videos

-galleries are well shot with high resolutions of 1920x1278 and nice lighting; they look very crisp and clean and come in .zips

-videos are labelled by fetish content

-newer watermarks in the videos and galleries have been reduced in size and changed to the letters "straponcum.com" in the lower right corners (compared to the bigger logos from older shoots)
Cons: -content is not dated (I hate that)

-updates are nearly suspended, I was a member for one month now and there was only one update

-customer support responds quickly but is not effective; I complained that the comment function doesn't work anymore and they promised to fix it but never did

-initial personal feedback from the director ceased to exist which I really appreciated in the "early days"

-wouldn't hurt to offer some more formats like .mp4 instead of .wmv only

-34.95$ per month is too pricey
Bottom Line: I already mentioned that I didn't regret to join again (just for a month though). The main reason was to obtain the newer stuff, which, from my point of view, is pretty awesome.

There has been a steady development from clumsy handling of the strapons by the girls to really hot scenes with experienced and scorching hot screwing action.

The second improvement is the more sophisticated acting of the girls. I always mocked their exaggerated behavior in their 2008-2010thish time, like already faking an orgasm when in reality nothing serious has happened. The newer videos are far more authentic. I was surprised that I even like their solo scenes now.

Personally, I like the nice combination of fetishes with the hot strapon action. You get to see gallons of goo spurting from inside a pantyhose for example, even some creampies with the artificial goo. You will see it splashing on naked hot bodies covered with latex, into high heels, on feet and on stockings. I especially love the reactions of the girls being splashed, mostly starting to laugh after the 10th or so spurt with this amazing amount of goo.

The bottom line is that this site is not well suited for porn users who expect a huge buttload of content which is updated every day so it can justify a long term membership.

I am torn to give a fair rating because the new content really blew me away. The update schedule and the other cons cannot be rationalised away though. Because there are real gems to be found here I rate it in the upper region of the average rating, just below very good.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Fucking Machines

13. Fucking Machines (0)

Pay
Active
88
qualsite34 (33) 06-05-12  01:27am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (2)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Video quality is outstanding
Large selection of videos and photos going back several years
Girls are very attractive, friendly, intelligent, and well adjusted.
Interview of the girls before using the machines allows viewer to get to know the each girl and how they feel about their experience. In virtually all cases, the girls are eager to get started and seem very happy afterwards.
Membership cost is very reasonable
Trial memberships with full access are available making this an even greater bargain.

Regular updates
Cons: The format of a girl getting pleased by an electronic dildo can get boring after a while. There are over a dozen other sites on the Kink network that are more interesting.
Photo quality is not emphasized on this site.
No extra sites included in membership
Download files are extremely large. You will need a fast connection to avoid waiting.
Bottom Line: If I had to name the top five networks on the internet right now, Kink would definitely be included on the list. It features an amazing assortment of high quality bondage sites, featuring top notch production quality, and gorgeous extremely positive and motivated amateurs. Fucking Machines is one the sites included in the Kink network. Unfortunately, when you subscribe to one you do not get access to the others. However, this should not deter you from joining the site. The quality here is unsurpassed by virtually any other porn site of any other kind on the net. The only downside to this particular site is that watching video after video of a girl getting plugged by an electronic machine can get boring after a while.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Yanks.com

14. Yanks.com (1)

Pay
Active
92
qualsite34 (33) 06-04-12  05:29pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: One of the best collections of authentic looking amateurs on the net.
Most girls are extremely attractive, intelligent, articulate, and very likable.
Huge selection of videos. Most have both interviews and individual masturbation scenes.
Excellent value
Site features written biographies of each model, similar to Abby Winters.
Site is very active and updated regularly
Cons: Video quality could use some improvement although it is totally acceptable. As with most sights that have been around for a long time, the quality improves as you go along.
Bottom Line: This site is a hidden gem. I would rank it up there as one of the top amateurs sites on the net today. Here you have a very large collection of authentic looking college intellectual bohemian co-ed types primarily from the Northwest usually performing their first porn shot. Believe me, these are not the type of girls you expect to be doing a porn! In any case, The girls are usually very positive about the experience and it shows. The typical format is to open with an interview of the model in street clothes with no makeup, conducted by a very cool laid back female who really knows how to relax the girls and get them to open up about themselves. This serves as a warmup to one or more masturbation scenes. If ever there was a site that fit the term "Organic porn" this would be it. Very highly recommended!!!!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Panda Fuck

15. Panda Fuck (0)

Pay
Active
72
pat362 (367) 05-29-12  11:14am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +You get access to a total of 9 sites.
+All videos can be downloaded in WMV, MP4 and they offer versions for smartphone and Ipads.
+All videos come in multiple resolution but 720P at 50fps is the highest possible.
+You can stream the videos in a flash player.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file. Resolution is 1600x1067.
+They have a good selection of well known Eastern European models in their late teens early 20`s.
+Content is in a fetish category not well represented so that can be a major plus for fans.
+You get a special priceof 19.99$ through TBP/PU
Cons: -The premise may seem a creepy to some.
-A giant man in a panda suit doesn`t make for great sex scenes.
-The name given to the performers is rarely the one they are normally known under.
-There are only 26 scenes to choose from and they update about twice a month.
Bottom Line: *This would be a pretty awful stand alone site because I don't know if the content can really appeal to more than plushie fans. You have a man dressed as a giant panda who entices a young woman normally dressed as a young girl or semi-pretends to be a young girl into having sex with him. The sex often involves a dildo of varying size and color. I know that some may find the content slightly creepy but I mostly found it stupid. I might have had a different view if the man in the suit didn't grunt like a bear through most of the scene. I laughed the first time I heard him and didn't stop laughing since the grunting is through most of the video. It makes it hard to get turned on while you are laughing.

*Another huge problem is that since the guy is wearing a full panda suit then he can't see much, can't feel anything, and can't properly use the strap on either because of these two limtations. The girl is normally the one doing most of the work. What you wind up with is a little scenario with very little dialogue except for the grunting, a lot of finger pointing, not very good sex, and limited shots of the action because the suit is often in the way.

*I honestly don't know if this type of content can appeal to anyone other than flushie fans so if you aren't one of these than you'll probably want to staw away.

**Normally I would give a bigger score simply because you get access to much better sites but since most of the girls on this site have scenes on the other sutes than I'm treating this one more as a stand alone.**
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Massage Creep

16. Massage Creep (0)

Pay
Active
90
RustyJ (145) 04-13-12  06:30am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Updating more or less regularly like all the main attractions at Porn Pros Network with 96 current scenes
-Scenes and girls are both really hot in very erotic but still hardcore way, especially the new Passion HD style ones
-Unique topic like most sites here have although I've noticed that there are others in massage niche too
-Relatively good quality of video. The oldest scenes are from late 2009 and already 720p
-Oil in many scenes. The only thing that really makes massage genre in my opinion
-Working POV content
-As spouse/girlfriend friendly as it gets. Although she might end up wanting a massage instead of what you were suggesting ;)
Cons: -In some scenes warmup/massage might take a bit too long for ones tastes. There are however other sites on this network for more immediate action
-General Porn Pros cons apply here too. No really relevant search engine, browsing is the way to find scenes. No indication of video resolution next to download buttons. 1080p missing. Mediocre photography. No big deals though
-If you were looking for anal, this is about last site to find it on this network. I've spotted one scene which is a very hot one with Anissa Kate, by the way
-Some unneeded editing in newer scenes where clothes or towels just "disappear"
Bottom Line: This site like most of the others on Porn Pros Network falls into a very specific niche which here is massage. Specifically guys massaging girls with oil in situations that start out usually as rather innocent (if naked) massage with the guys hands slowly creeping (I guess hence the name) into more and more private parts and eventual sex. Sometimes the massage takes longer, sometimes the girls is supposedly so horny that the sex starts quite soon and sometimes there's even kissing/fondling before the massage part. There's also the odd scene with the male actor receiving the massage.

They've got a very nice selection of models on these 96 scenes with little or no repetition so every scene offers something fresh (if not in theme). Models are young and hot and while this site has no teen theme, there are no wannabe MILF's here eihter.

I cannot really comment well on the credibility of the scenes on this site if someone is particularly into the supposed reality aspect of what's going on. Being no real fan of body massage, I have no idea if the guys are doing the real thing. However it looks hot, there is lots of oil involved and that's all I need to enjoy from this site.

As I've mentioned on my reviews of Porn Pros Network and Disgraced18, the whole network is now updating with scenes from their site that one has to subsribe to separately, Passion HD, and this is where those scenes really shine. On many sites they have a feeling of being bit out of place since the action is nowhere near as goofy or strange as one might be used to on those sites. Here however they are the best of the whole bunch. Better lit, girls looking better, every bit of action is very faithful to the site's niche with added touch of class. There's roughly 10 of those newer scenes at the moment but I certainly hope to see more.

Technically there's not much to be said that I already didn't give overview when reviewing Porn Pros Network. All works acceptably even if the site design and search function could use little work.

I can imagine this is one of the main reasons to join this network for those who are not into the trademark stuff of colorful bondage and joke sites. Luckily this one seems to get even better. Normally I'm into bit rougher stuff but this is so well excecuted that I cannot help returning to these scenes.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Stretched Out Snatch

17. Stretched Out Snatch (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Porn User (4) 03-30-12  06:28pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (4)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + none
Cons: - NO HD even for new scenes...size is maximum 600mb must most of the times the vids have a total size of 230mb so don't expect any hd on any of the free sites either
- all videos come in very bad pixeled quality
- did I mention all videos have bad quality
- movies are boring
- most site have not posted updates for years
Bottom Line: I was looking for a dildo site with beautiful girls and stumbles upon Stretchedoutsnatch . They advertise having ALOT of videos and the quality seemed really good. WRONG. Once registering I realised the quality is really bad. I'll probably end up deleting what I have downloaded because there is better porn out there that is worth my hard disc space. Most videos are years old, even the new ones look as if they were from 6 years ago. They post new updates but in some cases the so called updates were shot years ago, which makes no sense at all. It does come with a variety of sites like mr biggz / Shane Diesel's banging babes / nacho killer pussy / papa loads / lil' latinas / jizzbomb / internal violations / heavy handfuls. The problem is most sites don't post new updates. It also looks as if all those sites bought movies film from other companies, only they bought the ones that were not good enough to be posted on the original site. The movies are bad, really bad.

I wanted to like the site so bad but the quality of its content is just too bad for me to be wasting time with it. This is the kind of site that makes you want to go back to those free porn site with free hd samples because those site just offer better pron even though it's just sample. I'm canceling my membership today, after 4 days of membership. BOO@stretchedoutsnatch. Do NOT REGISTER
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brutal Dildos

18. Brutal Dildos (0)

Pay
Newbie
79*
Porn User (4) 03-28-12  07:33pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (4)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + great if you're into girls and huge dildos
+ A LOT of sexy girls
+ Videos in HD = great quality
+ user friendly/you can add scenes to your favorites allowing for easy follow up and dload
+ dload the whole movie or parts of it
+ vaginal and anal
+ free extra sites : Mother Teaching Teens, Huge Strapon Lesbians, Brutal Fisting are amongst the best
Cons: - older videos are of poor quality
- not updated frequently
- alot of women lack emotions and/or don't seem to enjoy what they are doing
- too many close ups; it's almost always the same camera angles
- for feet lovers, you barely see any feet for they are always out of the camera range
Bottom Line: I really enjoyed my membership with Brutal Dildos. I in fact registered twice. Site is ultra easy to navigate, the scenes are super easy to preview, easy download, easy acces to the free sites, GREAT content, HD files range between 1go to 3go. A lot of quality content. I just wish there were more updates, and maybe a little more known pornstars. Good billing practise and easy to cancel. Enjoy! =)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brutal Dildos

19. Brutal Dildos (0)

Pay
Active
85
pat362 (367) 03-26-12  09:01am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +414 videos and they add a new one each week.
+All videos can be dowloaded in multiple formats like WMV and MP4 and resolution is at least 640x360.
+They started offering HD quality videos in 2010 so you can now download the 100 most recent ones in 1920x1080.
+They have 414 photosets and they can all be downloaded as a complete zip file. Resolution for the last 100 sets is 1200x800.
+They have a surprisingly wide variety of models.
+You get access to 8 other sites.
+Content for this site appears to be all exclusif.
Cons: -Resoution for 300 of their videos is at best 640x360.
-Resolution for 300 of their phototsets is 560x840.
-Although you get access to 9 other sites. Only 3 of them are still updating.
**Many of the toys are huge so less a con and more a warning for anyone looking for midcore style penetration.**
Bottom Line: *I got a special offer to join for 20$ so it was hard to pass up. It's not that 30$ is a high price to pay but the content is on the extreme side of things and I'm not always in the mood for that kind of porn.

*The most surprising thing about this site and some of the other in the network is that you don't expect all of their models to do such extreme penetration and I'm not just talking about vaginal either. They use some really big toys which is a plus for me but I have to be in the mood otherwise the content is too extreme and I don't enjoy it. The only sites that are still updating are brutal fisting and huge strapon lesbians. These sites share many of the same models so it's not unusual to see a model on all 3 sites. I'm also pretty sure that the content on the sites that are no longer updating is not exclusif.

*If you are in the mood for extreme penetration than this site and 2 of the other in the network should more than satisfy your needs but if you like midcore style penetration then stay away because you will really hate what you see.*

**I think they should really work on the preview sections because this would greatly help anyone visiting for the first time to see that they are still upodating and what you get for your money.**
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Panda Fuck

20. Panda Fuck (0)

Pay
Active
69
Gazette Risque (55) 03-04-12  10:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-04-12  10:54am  (Update History)
Reason: Added pro: frame rates, specified as well.
Pros: * Slightly better than average looking girls (matter of taste)

* Higher than usual frame rates, this results in smoother and sometimes more lively videos

* Really adds to the WTF in the WTF network

* Rather easy navigation. On the verge of being too simplistic

* Good rating and commenting system

* Plenty of information given with every video

* MANY different formats and frame rates to choose from

* Mobile phones and tablets are supported with their own files.
Cons: * Most of the info given with every video is only on the page of the video itself.

* Not many people rate the videos

* might be too strange for most as it's an, let's say, acquired taste.

* Galleries are not really interesting but are downloadable in ZIP files.

* Could use some diversity, even though it's quite strange the novelty wears off quite fast.

* Doesn't add much to the network if you're really not into this sort of thing.

* Not much content yet. 21 videos at time of writing this review.
Bottom Line: This is something different. I will try to be as objective and normal about it as possible though it's quite a task...

All right. So, this website is about cute girls (mostly eastern European) having sex with a guy in a panda-suit. I'm not sure if it's supposed to seem like the panda is a stuffed animal or an actual panda but does that really matter? No.
It's still strange. Unless of course, you are into "furries".

So, the scenes don't differ that much from each other, which is a shame because the novelty wears off quite fast because of this and thus doesn't really add much to the already existing WTF network.

However, the website is solid and easy to navigate. Something even a bit simplistic.
18 Screenshots per page to click on. Each one will take you to the designated download page for that specific video.

This is where it becomes interesting. The download options seem infinite as you may choose not only between different formats but also between different frame rates.

These are the options:

Windows 7:
720p 50fps
720p 25fps
576p
432p

Win XP / Vista:
576p

MacOS (same for AppleTV):
720p 50fps
720p 25fps
432p
320p

iPad / iPad 2 (same for iPhone4):
720p 25fps
432p
320p

iPhone3 / iPod:
320p

Android:
720p 25fps
432p
320p

Though, these are just suggestions. As you can probably imagine you can play the different formats on different platforms. But they are good suggestions.



The galleries, which are offered with each video, are not really worth mentioning. Which is the only thing worth mentioning.

Downloads are fast and managers are allowed. The average speed I got was about 7 Megabytes per second.
Also, the videos are DRM-free. So that's always a big plus.

The comments and ratings have a solid system as well, though like with most websites, is often overlooked and not used. This is really up to the users but the they could create a little more incentive to get people to start rating and commenting more. You just have to go by the screenshots and descriptions now.

A fun and more recurring thing you see is the tagging system. They add tags to the description of the video so you can click on that tag, like Big Boobs, and are shown more videos with this tag. It's an easy way of navigating through many videos.

All in all the website is a solid one which offers something strange to the already existing WTF network. The WTF network can finally (sort of)
live up to it's name.

Would I recommend getting a subscription with the network over this website? No. But if there are other websites within the network that caught your eye, it's fun to try it out.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Strapon Dreamer

21. Strapon Dreamer (0)

Pay
Active
95
xexbot (36) 02-06-12  08:48pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (24), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The level of porn here is clearly in the upper echelons compared to most sites. Simply put, this place is really top notch. The girls are all pretty gorgeous, and the production value is good quality. They are catering to a few kinks here as well as the strapon femdom. There are occasionally cuckold fantasies, lesbian bondage, and generally something that will cater to your edgier whims. This is not a full blown BDSM site, though there's plenty of it, but it focuses more on the domination angle and ass fucking men with strapons than the whips and chains (though a few are about 50/50).

They actually have a unique feature that seems to be very popular in that that let you write your own fantasies on a message board and if they pick it they will model their shoot after it. They also have some social networking dedicated to these types of interests. So, all in all it has actually turned out to be one of those sites I spend quite a bit of time at. Plenty to do.
Cons: Unfortunately they are a niche site with a very specific niche, so the amount of videos to date is limited. The selection of formats is limited, but that isn't a real huge issue. It's still quality video, most of it being HV or HD. Where they lack in volume they more than make up for in content and quality.
Bottom Line: Yes, it's a little more expensive, but it is a niche site. I thought I would pay my dues and leave in a month, but I'm still there. Will I keep it for a full year, probably not. Will I give it at least a three or four months, definitely.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Massage Creep

22. Massage Creep (0)

Pay
Active
80
dracken (246) 10-08-11  08:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 100 scenes and updates seem to come every 7 days or so.
- Just like the rest of the network they offer the scenes in a range of formats including very nice looking HD (1250x700) as well as standard sizes and small clips (MP4 and MPG for smaller resolution asn WMV for HD). They also offer HD images for each set at 3,000px × 2,000px (zip archives available).
- Great download speeds, no issues with time-outs or auto-log out
- Good network navigation and similar videos on the rest of the affiliated sites (see my network review for more details for all sites)
- Interesting concept and pretty well executed with some nice banter and good looking models. It's definitely not your regular gonzo, no set up porn, but it's not really the small scene porn from old DVD's
- There is a lot of focus on the girl's body (the guy rubs her with oil all over and you get a lot of nice close-ups)
- Well filmed, good mix of close-up and far away shots, overall the scenes look good
Cons: - They need a better thumbnail system. Right now the one image they show for each scene is not indicative at all of how the model looks or what will happen in the scene. They also need a way to see all models involved in the site so you could easily browse them (there is a bit too much focus on network wide navigation)
- Some fake cumshots (not many, and the newer stuff seems to be all natural facials, but just a heads up)
- In some scenes the sex doesn't start until minute 20 or so. If you like a good set-up then this site will work well for you, but if you want quick sex this site might be too slow to get to the "good stuff"
- Some scenes are not edited very well (see bellow for more details)
- The download links don't automatically start the download, you have to use a right click save as (no big deal, but really this whole network only had small issues if you like their type of content)
Bottom Line: I listed several cons up there, but if you read through them you'll see they are mostly cosmetic stuff. They need a better site navigation system, a better preview system for each scene, fixing a link. Stuff that could easily and probably will be fixed in the future. For the most part, the network is strong and there are no big negative aspects, as long as you like their type of content.

I talked a bit in my Pornpros review how the entire network has a unique vibe to it. That is very true for this site as well. The models all look more or less similar (big boobs, young-ish, probably around 20 or so, American and Caucasian)
There is a set up, that feels a lot more natural than the old DVDs where the models were all stiff and unbelievable, but it's a set up nonetheless.
And finally we get about 20 minutes of good old fashioned plain sex (no anal, no ass to mouth, deepthroats, threesomes or other crazy stuff.)

The whole site feels fun and light hearten. A masseur visit some young girl, oils her up then cums on her face and tells her to let it soak in for 5 minutes.

During the massage he talks to her and we hear all about what the girl is studying in school or how she is working out to stay in shape or how loosened up she feels. Around halfway through the video the guy uses a vibrator on her, or gives her head (It's nice to see a site where the guy pleases the girl a bit before the sex) Then we get the sex scene and a facial ending.

Nothing incredibly revolutionary, but nonetheless the scenes are fun to watch and due to the intro we get to know the model better than many other sites. In fact I'd say that is the main strength of this site, instead of just throwing you into a sex scene you get to see the girl, the set-up of the table, the foreplay and you get to hear her talk while her breasts are massaged. In a way it's like an pre-scene interview, but a lot more interesting.

Another strong point is the way a lot of the scenes are filmed with many angles, good close-ups of the girl's breasts (a lot of focus on breasts on this site) some close-ups of the sex as well as interesting sex furniture pillows (they often use these triangle foam shapes that perk the girl's ass into the air and make doggy style look more interesting)

The only issue with the whole idea is that there are some awkward editing mistakes that make some scenes awkward. I remember in the Brooke Adams scene you can hear her moan while her mouth is closed and the guy cums gallons of fake semen on her face. In another scene the director interrupts the actors to give some directions and then calls "Action". We get too see the filming crew in mirrors. Sometimes the male models face is censored (to protect his anonymity I guess) but a few minutes later you can see him clearly.

I know these are not big issues, but when you're trying to create a certain vibe for your scene continuity errors can make it all feel completely fake and kill the mood.

The other downside for me is the quality of the models. I couldn't help but compare this to Fuckedhard18, which has the exact same set-up (massage girls then fuck them :) but Fucked hard has much, much hotter girls. Massage Creep seems to focus mostly on big breasts/big booty regardless of how cute the girl is (a bit too much MILF and tattoos on Massage Creep for my taste), whereas the Fucked hard site is almost entirely young models that look stunning with the oil on their body (maybe it's the way they film as well, as some scenes on Massage Creep could have used a bit more organized light)

I guess it's more of a personal choice really, and I believe the preview pages for each site shows pretty well what kind of girls are on each network so you can draw your own conclusions. Nonetheless Fuckedhard wins over Massage Creep in my book.

Overall, at this point if I had to choose one massage site to join I'd go with FuckedHard18 since the content is very similar, but they have better looking models and more scenes.
However, joining Massage Creep means access to the Porn Pros network, which has a ton more similar videos, some much more attractive girls and a bunch of different content.

I guess as far as bang for you buck Porn pros is the winner, but if you really, really love massage sites FuckedHard is the way to go.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Fucking Machines

23. Fucking Machines (0)

Pay
Active
95
Cybertoad (104) 09-21-11  05:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
HD Videos
Updates with HD 2x per week.
Pictures & Video
Real Orgasms and Pleasure.
Very Original Content.
Fast Downloads.
Famous Stars.
Cons:
Navigation and Search could be better.
Wow 29.90 per month price a tad steep.
Watch for checked boxes at sign up.
Bottom Line: Hey there:
Let me explain Fucking Machines, this site takes mechanical pleasure to a "hole" new level ( misspelling on purpose)They have machines that will suck, lick, rub, penetrate, tickle and is called " Fuck Machines for a reason.
FuckingMachines, the woman getting "well"? fucked; holds the controls, so you always know that the hot girls is getting off for real. Anal, Vaginal,and any-other hole they can find.

Whether it's hardcore anal fucking, pussy fucking, deep probing G-spot fucking or explosive female ejaculation, the woman's pleasure is genuine. You'll know when she screams in pleasured orgasms she's cumming hard. I really found this exciting to watch. Great Show!

These girls are hot,I mean smoking hot. At first it seemed staged cause it is, but once they get going the phony acting goes away as you see sweat pouring down necks and thighs. Did I say they have smoking hot women ?

Toads Take:

This is a different site, I have never joined a site like this. But wow.
Before you join imagine something a actress would get penetrated by ? And its there.
LOL, even Alien Tentacles, ya it can get weird thats for sure.

The quality is amazing and the HD you can see beads of sweat and perky breast.

Be prepared this is hardcore at a new level, and pricy too. Is it worth the 29.90. Put it this way why it is pricey I would pay 40.00 to see this as it original and amazing real porn. Not the fake stuff we see sometimes.

The nice thing is its raw sex, and no guy talking
through it or getting in the way was huge reason for high rating I gave. I joined for three months and have two weeks left about.

Sorry for the long explanation of the site, but was a site you can not put into few words.

Specs:
400+ Videos
About 120,000 picture.
Many Videos have pics.
Updates 2x week in HD
4 Live shows every month
Amateur Girls & Professionals
Members Forum too ( maybe see ya there)
( note):
There are other links to pay for view so be aware they are an extra cost.

CT
Respond: 7 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Backdoor Lesbians

24. Backdoor Lesbians (0)

Pay
Active
89
PornoPro (10) 09-13-11  06:18am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Crystal clear picture quality! A lot of attention to detail went into the sets the ladies were performing on, as well as their dress and makeup. Very stylishly done. I know that sounds strange, we look at adult entertainment for the nookie, right? But its nice to see such attention to detail in a WWW that seems full of grunge sites. This means a lot to me as a customer. It tells me the creators of the site and the photographers care about their quality work more than just making a fast buck. Its a little something called work integrity.

Galleries are easy to navigate through, though I wish the thumbnails were a little bigger in both the picture and movie galleries.

Movies are also of excellent quality, though I wish the movie galleries displayed more than just four microscopic thumbnails per page. Just be aware that you have to download a driver first before you can view the movies at your pleasure.

Downloading of ZIP files is also nice
Cons: Originally I was unable to get any of the movies to play after I downloaded them. Then I figured out you have to download a driver first. (Don't worry, its safe). But even then the movies would not play.

The next day I realized that after I downloaded and installed the driver, you should reboot your machine for the driver to work. (At least that was my case).

My only other con is the size of the thumbnail samples in the Photo and Movie galleries. They are literally the size of a postage stamp.
Bottom Line: Overall a very attractive site. Very impressed with picture quality, except for the thumbs. Sets that actresses played on are very clean and detail oriented. Models themselves are very clean and attractive and actually seem to enjoy their work.
Some may think the makeup is a little heavy on some of the models, but it reminded me of the classic old Color Climax of the 1970's. (Dating myself a bit there!)
Roughly 180 picture galleries with an average of 80 pictures per. A lot of these pictures are already floating around out on freebie sites, but most are not. Most definitely worth their 3-day trial at $7.95, and even the full month membership.
A quality site that has some issues, but worth a visit. And, well, who doesn't like watching sexy women anal-bop one another? :-)
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Brutal Dildos

25. Brutal Dildos (0)

Pay
Active
80
dracken (246) 09-09-11  11:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 390 scenes (120 anal an the rest lesbian or vaginal) (Potentially way more videos with the network membership but had some errors, see bellow)
- Both American and Russian models of good quality :) What other site offers Aspen and Chastity on the same page?
- Earliest content is from 2005, but there seem to be a lot more recent updates, with several videos posted this year (07 of 2011 seems to have been a great time for them) (However the updates seem completely random)
- Very hot and very extreme action. I wouldn't say they are better than anal acrobats, but the site is up there. Great close-ups of massive gape, a lot of ass to mouth and indeed brutal dildos
- Very good looking models who truly seem to enjoy the action.
-Decent options when it comes to downloads (1920 WMV to 640 mp4 or mpg, although older content is just 640 and 320) Overall all the scenes I looked at were very decently lit and played well. Photos are zipped and good quality
Cons: - The main issue I had with the site was in the network area. For example the lesbian section of the site actually leads to huge strap-on lesbians site. This doesn't mean that brutal dildos doesn't have lesbian content it's just categorized under the solo archive. This would be fine if the links worked properly, but half the time trying to go to a different site in the network lead to me getting a big error and having to log back in. Which also meant that all the downloads I had going were canceled. In the end the webmaster was nice about it, but so far the issue is still not really fixed.

- Speaking of content being categorized wrong, there is no real way to sort through the scenes. You get a vaginal or anal dildo checkbox but that is it. No way to select the age of the model (which ranges quite a lot) or if she's Russian or American

- To make things worse the bonus pics and movies are a joke. Old content that looks dated and is hard to navigate.
Bottom Line: So what is the bottom line? The site promises brutal dildo action and delivers it plenty. Sure there are some quirks with the network and sure some of the models might not be the hottest girls on the planet (especially the older updates have some really questionable girls) but damn the site delivers.

Each video is about 20 minutes and they tend to start with the girls stripping a bit, playing with themselves and generally getting ready. Then we get one or two huge novelty dildos and depending on the video we get to see some incredible vaginal stretching or some massive anal gape. For the most part the girls seem really into it and suck the dildos periodically, play with themselves and look into the camera often enough. Also it's nice to see them riding the dildos and look really excited.
The enthusiasm of the girls is what really sells this site. I've been a member of many hardcore and anal sites and very often you get a girl that looks bored or uncomfortable, not here sir. This is one of those few sites where the models all seem into it and the fact that they do the insertions themselves seems to make most girls a lot more comfortable and open. Great job in that aspect.

So far the site seems great, enthusiasm, great action, decent videos, hot models (again, the more recent ones are great, with a few hidden gems in the archive) however there are several flaws that bring the score down.

One of the flaws inherent in a dildo site is that some scenes will simply look fake, when a girl kisses the balls of the dildo, trying to look sexy it sadly seems mostly stupid. I get that they should lick the dildos but why do they have to pretend it's a real cock? Also since no one is really cumming in these shots most scenes kinda just end. Some girls try to seem satisfied, but some just look the same and the video cuts to black. A bit more acting towards the end could really help some of these scenes.

Also for a site that is all about extreme insertions you get a surprisingly little amount of DP or variety among the toys (I swear I started to recognize the dildos from one scene to the other) I guess I'm a bit spoiled by Analacrobats, the ultimate when it comes to anal and dildos, but it just felt like this site could benefit from a bit of creativity. At least many of the models have stockings and cute outfits so that somewhat redeems things.

Finally one other thing that bothered me about content was that some "recent" updates are clearly older material (given away by both in the way the models look and act as well as the lack of a HD version of the video) I guess that is bound to happen but I still felt a bit cheated. To make things just a bit worse I found one or two videos from other sites. No big deal but a bit of a shame really.

I already mentioned that I had some connectivity issues with some sites in the network not automatically logging me in (most worked fine, but once it a while I'd get a bad cookie or something) Also, like I mentioned the bonus pic and movie section is mostly some very poor quality jpegs and some old DVD's that are really a let down.

But enough with the negative stuff. Like I said for the most part the site delivers and the network helps make it a decent deal, especially if you're bored with boy girl hardcore sex and you have most of Anal Acrobats already. There are some great scenes here and while you're bound to recognize many of the models they are still cute and willing to do some pretty crazy stuff for your entertainment.

Before you join do make sure you're okay with extreme dildo action. If you're troubled by girls gaping orifices, ass to mouth and other generally intense sex this is not for you.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 144 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Wet And Puffy (3)
2. Puffy Network (1)
3. GF Sex Toys (1)
4. 18 Pussy Club (1)
5. Yanks.com (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.18 seconds.