Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 100 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Used White Wives

1. Used White Wives (1)

Pay
Active
55
marcdc1 (151) 05-06-13  06:15pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site focus on "slut wives" and has a raunchy focus.
The gils are amateur and attractive
- network has about a dozen sites in it, but much of the content is shared between them.
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps.
Cons: - Small number of models.
- No posted update schedule :( Since new posts are undated I can't even guess. It seems to me they're taking content that was shoot 10 years ago and claiming it's new updates
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200. (From the view I bothered to look through, mostly screen shots of videos.
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- video chunks are added one at a time; so some videos look incomplete.
Bottom Line: This whole network has been one long disappointment. I didn't have high hopes (with $30/year I wasn't expected the world't best website). That said they managed to fall below my low expectations.

The girls on the site are plenty hot, and the content itself is raunchy (I do so love raunchy porn). But the quality is poor, the updates are lacking, the organization is nearly non-existent. When I look for good things to say - I have a hard tie coming up with anything.

If interracial is your thing you should look somewhere else - there just isn't enough her to be bothered. Even with the ridiculously low price the frustrations don't make it worth it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dog Fart Network

2. Dog Fart Network (2)

Network
Active
94
pat362 (332) 05-06-13  06:01pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +The content is all exclusif and they fill a niche that is poorly represented.
+You get access to 20 hetero/lesbian sites and also 2 gay sites.
+They are remastering their older content.
+You can search by model name to find all the videos she shot for the different sites.
+They now update their Blacks on Blonde site with 2 videos per week as oppose to just one.
+They update with about 3 videos per week.
+They list the upcoming updates for each site and give the date on which content will be uploaded.
+They still manage to hire some really hot looking performers who always do great scenes.
Cons: -Only about half a dozen of the 20 or so sites are still regularly updating with brand new content.
-They started to offer some older content in HD (their term) but the source material is of a lower resolution and the finish product is not really HD and they had to reduce to size of the video in the process.
-This is Interracial porn so if you aren't into this then that is amajor con for you.
-They do not tag their scenes and the synopsis is not always accurate so you may have to view part of the video prior to downloading.
Bottom Line: *I keep returning to this network of sites and I'm never disapointed with the content. I'd be happier if the join price was lower and they may have to drop their price one day or suffer a drop in paid members. If they had multiple sites all updating with actual brand new content then I could understand why they charge a lot more than many other sites but the reality is that only a couple of sites are still updating on a weekly basis while most of the others offer remastered content. You still get the never before seen video but those are getting to be rare for me and I suspect the same for any returning members.

*In case some of you have never read another review and don't plan to do so then this network is dedicated to interracial porn. In this case it's almsot exclusively black men/women with white men/Women. It would be nice to see some white men with black women and maybe that will happen but if thats what you want then skip this network.

**The one great new thing that's different from the last time I was a member is that their site Blacks on Blondes is now updating twice a week as opposed to only once per week. I'm adding an extra point to my score this time for that reason. I don't know if that will be enough for people interested in this type of content but it was for me.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Mandingo Mama

3. Mandingo Mama (1)

Pay
Active
55
marcdc1 (151) 04-22-13  03:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lady D operates another site and there she says she's in her early 60s. On this site there's no reference, but she is very attractive no matter how old she is
- Weekly updates to pix and videos. A commentator said other wise in March, but as of this review there is newly posted content 1/week.
- good mix of group, one-on-one, interracial, girl/girl and solo action, cuckolding, gangbangs.
- dedicated camera man so you go where the action is
- network of sites included (however most of them are small and suffer from the same poor quality video/pictures)
Cons: - Only about 30 videos. Many videos are incomplete they start well into the action and finish with obvious content not included.
- About 100 picture sets with about 15 pix in each set.
- organization is only chronological and layout is poor (reminds me of late 90s web development.)
- videos are 480X360 1.5 mbps; which makes me thing all this was filmed a while ago and just doled out weekly.
- no real way to interact with Lady D (just email)
- no zip downloads available.
- videos are only .wmv
Bottom Line: This site is part of a network but it's really not very good. The same models maintain multiple sites with different content in them - so it looks like you're getting more than you are. Finding all of the videos you like by a model is a pain.

The other site Lady D operates mature sex heaven is much better (it's also included with a membership to whoringoutmywife.com). But I haven't found much her to like. The sex is hot, I really wish they'd put some resources into this site - maybe even go back and re-encode some of it, but right now it is not worth a membership. The lack of quality and quantity are abysmal. Granted I got a year membership to the network for $30, but I hardly spend any time looking around because the quality is so poor and the navigation is worse.

Lady D is hot no doubt about that. She has great sex on camera that would burn up your screen, if you could see it that is :(
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cuckold My Husband

4. Cuckold My Husband (1)

Pay
Active
50
marcdc1 (151) 04-01-13  07:27am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Candy is a hot MILF who seems to be videoing her playtime. In other words this is a woman who loves sex; not a model who's trying to maximize profit.
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- Each scene has a small description with it.
- Screen shots available for videos (I like this because it helps determining if something is worth downloading).
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what. I can tell the model for this site (Candy Christopher) is also the talent in at least one of the other sites. So it's very confusing what exactly are you getting
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
Cons: - Videos are only available in .wmv
- Most videos are under 10 minutes (only 2 are long; one 20 minutes, one 30 minutes)
- pictures are not available as .zip
- Broken links. All of the dildo shoots were inaccessible. Clicking on them would ask for password, only to have password rejected.
- picture quality is 300X200.
- only 6 dildo videos (which I could get to), and 13 hardcore. For a site that's been up since at least 2000, that's really poor.
- Copyright on the website says 2011 so they haven't done new shoots since at least then
- 480X360 0.3 mbps is got to be the lowest quality video I've ever seen.
- Cinematography is hurting. For example in the longest running video there's a pillow block most of the action - despite the fact that her husband is camera man - this doesn't get fixed
Bottom Line: I've never given such a low score. But between the small number of updates, the password problems, and the abysmal quality I feel there's no choice.

Scenes start in the middle of the action, there are times when the audio cuts out.

Candy is an attractive MILF, there's no doubt about that. I'm really hoping that some of the other sites on this network that feature her are better than this one.

To be fair I have not contact the webmaster about my issues (then again the fact that I will have to speaks about the sites upkeep as well). For $30 for a year's subscription I figure I have time to mess with it if the mood ever strikes me. Right now I'm not impressed enough with the content to be bothered.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Black Owned Wives

5. Black Owned Wives (1)

Pay
Active
70
marcdc1 (151) 03-19-13  11:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site focus on "slut wives" and keeps the content dirty: writing all over her in lip stick, spit-roast, etc.
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what.
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick u the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps.
Cons: - No posted update schedule :( Since new posts are undated I can't even guess.
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- videos are chunked in 3 minute clips.
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200. (From the view I bothered to look through, mostly screen shots of videos.
- only 6 (for Nikki) 5 (for Carmen) picture sets (about 75-125 images in a set)
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- there isn't a lot of content. 5 videos of Nikki; 4 for Carmen. Each video about 35 minutes long
- video chunks are added one at a time; so some videos look incomplete.
- Copyright on the website says 2011 so they haven't done new shoots since at least then (maybe earlier).
Bottom Line: I know I have a long list of negative for such a high score. I have to explanations for that: 1 I'm an easy grader, I think many other reviewers would have been more harsh. 2. I'm factoring in the low price of membership. I'm getting 12 months of content for what I normally spend on 1. (Then again it will probably only take me a month to look at all the content across this network).

This site features two girls in their video section and about 30 in the pix section. I haven't commented much on the pictures because I found them so underwhelming.

Carmen is a hot 20s brunet. Who says she was hooked on BBC b her aunt (gives you a flavor for the videos). Nikki is in the MILF category - maybe in her 40s? For both the chemistry of the scene is 1 (usually more) black guys get to do whatever they want to her. Hot stuff if you like your sex dirty


There's very little if any setup in the videos. If you've a fan og getting right to the hardcore, this site excels in that.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Whoring Out My Wife

6. Whoring Out My Wife (1)

Pay
Active
59
marcdc1 (151) 03-19-13  08:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Gabrielle is a hot model. She is one of the best looking amateur models I've ever seen.
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site is on the raunchier side (as the name implies) and is hitting the "cuckold" market.
- updates every monday (but it looks like they put up material that has been shot long ago. In addition video/pix are put up in parts so you will wait a LONG time before you get all the set).
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what.
- Attractive price (I know my friend Pat362 will disagree), but when you're spending between $15-20 a month or in the case of their special $30 for year, how high can your expectations be?
Cons: I hate having a con list longer than a pro list - but this time I really don't think it can be avoided.
- This site seems like it was made 10-15 years ago and just left. I can't imagine there shooting new. Everything about this site screams 1997.
- Terrible quality 480 X 300 0.7 mbps.
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is poor 420X640 pixels. ("older stuff" is 300X200).
- only about 20 picture sets (about 75-125 images in a set)
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- there isn't a lot of content. 6 videos of Gab (but since each video is sliced into a 1 minute chunk, it's a pain to work with). There are other videos available but those are content shares from the rest of the network.
Bottom Line: I'm glad I check out this site and satisfied my curiosity. And having a year long membership will allow me to take my time and explore every corner (of their rather poorly designed network).

But I would not recommend spending your money her. Gabby is smokin' hot and I wish she pick up working for some studios. She has an amazing body and can get dirty on a set (I love dirty).

But the abysmal quality, the slicing of all the content into tiny pieces, and waiting weeks to get the full length video is too much to bear.

Find someplace else to spend your money. If this content is what you'r looking for try myhotwife.com (I haven't joined yet but it's one of my next ones) or Leslie Grey (I was a member of her previous site lustcouple.com and enjoyed it).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dog Fart Network

7. Dog Fart Network (2)

Network
Newbie
96*
Lurker421 (1) 01-03-13  08:24am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: This is my favorite Porn Site bar none, and has been for years. Excellent niche Interracial content and some really good unique fetish variations as well (Interracial Cuckolding, Interracial Lesbian, Watching My Mom Go Black, Watching My Daughter Go Black, and even Interracial Lesbian) as well as the more standard gang-bang and glory-hole variations. High quality content overall. Frequent Updates for most of the sites. Zip-file downloads of photos, high quality streaming content and fast downloads. Models are professional and the site is constantly updating and trying new things which is a really good thing. New user interface in late 2012 makes navigation even easier. Future Network Updates posted in a list. New Models are always well chosen. The women are gorgeous and the black men well-hung. What more could you ask for??
Cons: Not many cons! Some Sites don't update as frequently as others. Cuckold Sessions is so good that I wish they could update every single day, but that's really because the quality of the content is so darn good.
Bottom Line: It's worth repeating that this is my favorite Porn Site bar none, and has been for years. I keep coming back because of the high quality content and because the fetish and niche-fetish content is right up my alley, the models are gorgeous, and the variety is kept fresh. I love it! Highly Recommended!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Black Bachelor

8. Black Bachelor (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
VT71 (0) 12-11-12  01:24pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (9), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Content has 'potential' but not realized at all

Some of the models are attractive...(some)
Cons: The purpose of this review is to warn all potential customers: the navigation of this site is ABYSMAL. Its really awful. Not user friendly and a total mess

I joined this site years ago, and the navigation has not improved one bit. Just awful in every regard.
Bottom Line: Avoid this site at all costs, if you are a fan of non headache-inducing site navigation.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dog Fart Network

9. Dog Fart Network (2)

Network
Newbie
100*
tonguey (1) 12-06-12  01:53am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (4), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -This network is a must for people that enjoy interracial porn.
-You get access to different sub genres of interracial interests that cater to specific fetishes. There is hetero, gay/lesbian, some scenes blur those boundaries. Some very hardcore fetish acts and some tame scenes.
-Their signature site is 'Blacks on blondes' but you will find sites within the network that will appeal to you specifically, then you can branch out and check something out that is new to you. -The Actors are the best in the biz and all the greats come through.
-If you can't find what you are looking for, just ask. I wrote them and the next update, it was like they used my letter for their script.
-The site works great and looks great. I was a member for years and had only great experiences with their many various sites. They are worth every penny!
- It is Massive!!You will love it! something for everybody into interracial!
Cons: -I give the great dogfart network a 100 according to this chart that says there is LITTLE to improve. I guess they could improve their search tags some, but it still works, or maybe it was just that they improved it. Even if they didn't there is so much to enjoy or discover that you really don't need to search.
-They have great pictures too BUT they could add a slide show feature to it to make it extra rad!
Bottom Line: I think it's a must see network. Definitely a must for interracial fans.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dog Fart Network

10. Dog Fart Network (2)

Network
Newbie
100*
Spin (1) 11-15-12  02:57pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: With all the sites accessible on the network now, there's something for everyone. They've really done a great job of catering to everyone's tastes and do their best to seperate content into those categories.

THey have a library of materials dating back many years. There might even be girls on the network that you were a fan of who had scenes you didn't know existed. Some of the earlier stuff is amazing as well.

Very easy to navigate and now that they added the search function, you can find anything youwant fast and easy.

They listen to suggestions from fans and book girls you want to see.
Cons: Every now and then they havea boring girl on, but, that's not their fault. Like in life, they can't all be winners.
Bottom Line: They update Blacksonblondes every week and the other sites a minimum of once every 6 weeks. There's enough content here to keep you occupied for years. Do yourself a favor and sign up.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dog Fart Network

11. Dog Fart Network (2)

Network
Active
93
pat362 (332) 10-11-12  11:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +The best interracial porn site on the net.
+You get a total of 22 sites.
+You can download the videos in wmv format and they have started to offer them in the MP4 format as well. The resolution is at least 640x480 but you now have a large amount of content being offered in 768x432 and even in HD.
+You can stream all the videos online.
+They remastered most of their older content so that you can now get them in the MP4and WMV format and in a higher resolution.
+All content is dated and they update with new content once a week.
+They have 2 sites dedicated to the gay male market.
+Many of the sites offer scenario driven porn.
+They hire some esxcellent performers and there is no lack of hardcore here.
+They advertised the upcoming updates 2 weeks in advance.
Cons: -Only about 6-7 sites are really updating with brand new content. All of the others seem to offer remastered scenes or might be rotating their older content.
-Some of the sites are meant for a very pecific market so unless you're into that type of fetish then you won't be saving their content.
-They do seem to enjoy facials, blowbangs so if you aren't a fan then that may be a problem.
-It would be nice if they added a black female to white male site.
-They do not tag their scenes so you have to read the synopsis to find out what's happening.
-There is no real search options except name of the model.
-It would be nice if they could drop their price to 30$.
Bottom Line: **This is the best interracial porn network on the net and if I'm not mistaken, then the only one still updating with new content. If you like to see white women having hardcore sex with well hung black men then this is the place to come. They manage to get some very well known performers to appear on this site and they even get many of them to do anal which is impressive when you consider the size of the equipment some of these guys have.

**I was planning on joining the newtork sometime this year but I got a special offer to join for 20$ so it was a no brainer. I normally join about twice a year mostly because the network is 35$ and they only update about once or twice a month with the kind of porn that I like.

**Aside from maybe adding tags to their scenes and then revamping their search engine too help members find a specific fetish then I can't see anything else they need to do to improve the network.

**The one thing that I'd love to see but I asked and it doesn't seem to be possible in todays porn world is a site like Spring Thomas or Katie Thomas. THose were really great sites because they were dedicated to really cute teens girls having a variety of sexual encounters with black men. The great thing is that these women were mostly known for the stuff they did on their site and didn't do much on other sites or in movies and in the case of Spring. She never appeared elsewhere except here.

**Anyone who doesn't like interracial porn should avoid this network because this is the only type of porn you will find here.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dark Cavern

12. Dark Cavern (1)

Pay
Active
70
marcdc1 (151) 09-27-12  10:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Full service interracial site: video, pix, amateur pix/vid/stories, community board, (ads to other content)
- plenty of the amateur stuff is hot (really liked some of the stories) but finding stuff I liked was tough.
- Looks like they bought content for "cheaters" I see Kelly Wells here and some other recognizable names
- Membership includes Mandytayler, Barbisinclair, Call your husband, cuckolds, interriacialsex, and bazaar insertions
- stream or download content (flv or .mp4)
- the professional shoots are well done with clear sound and good lighting
Cons: - The site is too large for the navigation it has. Finding this is a pain, also many link bring up a window in a window, so you need to make sure you pull down the current bar to scroll down.
- Many of the amateur girls are people I'd rather not see naked. If you like chubby amateurs this site has a good number. Don't get me wrong some of these girls are stunning
- Most recent update was 2011! (And I don't think it was exclusive content)
- 720X480 2.6 mbps video quality
- There are about 50 professional videos, but most of them are pro-am star barbi sinclair. (I'd rather just download her stuff from her site which is part of the network)
- Ads in members area
-2001 feel - there's a resource section where you can download screen savers with instructions for what must be windows 2000.
Bottom Line: I've seen this site around for a while, so I'm glad I had the chance to check it out with the network I joined. While interracial isn't really my think I love slutty wives.

Anyway - I'm glad I didn't join for this. I was disappointed and now mark dark caravan as a skip in my book. Between the difficulty of navigation, the relatively small content, it's just not worth it.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Interracial Sex.com

13. Interracial Sex.com (1)

Pay
Active
70
marcdc1 (151) 09-19-12  09:10am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - I think some of this content comes from an old site "cheaters" that's gone dark. I never got around to joining so it's nice that I did get to check it out (without realizing I would).
- Barbi Sinclair provides much of the content and she is awesome. You also get her site as part of the network.
- Darkcaravan, Mandytyler, cuckolds.com, Barbisinclair, call your husband, bizarre insertions all included.
- ability to favorite videos to make it easy to come back to.
- Content that can be maxs out at 1280X720 2.6 mbps.
Cons: - Not to many names you've heard of. While amateur and up and coming talent is fine, production/acting/quality is sub par.
- Content come in from the entire network so it looks like their are more scenes available than there really are. Also the filter isn't perfect so included in this site are solo materbation clips from Barbi Sinclair's site. The Navigation really should be better in this day and age.
- .mp4 and .flv only formats available. Some scenes would only load as streaming .flv for me (with poor quality too boot - being .flv I'm sorry I can't quantify "poor")
- Looks like many of the videos were 1st done in a lower format and then upscaled.
- Some of the content was uploaded recently so it might make you think it was shoot recently - I know some of this content has been on other sites years ago.
Bottom Line: It's a site that says what it is. Yes the quality could be improved, and yes they need to either hire better actresses or give them better direction, but I give them credit for being what they say they are.

I'm not a big time interracial fan (I got this membership with the network I joined). As my score reflects, I don't think this is the best bet if this is what you're into. From the little bit I know about this genre I would say check out black on blonds, or maybe i need it black.

What I can recommend is the content of Barbi Sinclair - the stuff from her website that was cross promoted was hot. Good mix of scenario development and a chick that is really into making hot videos.

If you're just looking for a general interracial site, I would say pass this one by
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dog Fart Network

14. Dog Fart Network (2)

Network
Active
80
rearadmiral (238) 08-12-12  01:42pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (62), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large network
- 21 sites (including a relatively new BTS site)
- All interracial
- Some unusual niches
- Older scenes are being remastered
- Easy to use network
- Supports download managers (IDM)
- Easy access to download and viewing options
- Streaming is available
Cons: - Not all sites are updating
- Older remastered scenes may be dated and posted as a new update
- No effective search function
- No (that I could find) high-res or HD scenes
- More expensive than comparable sites
Bottom Line: Dog Fart Network (DFN) isn’t a network that I’d normally have joined, but I’m glad I did. I joined specifically to access one of their unique sites but I found many of the other sites quite good too.

DFN has 21 sites that cover a wide range of niches. The overall theme that runs through the network is interracial sex, specifically black men with white women. One site does feature white men and black women. The sites range from fairly standard porn, straight b/g, b/b/g, anal, etc., legal teen oriented sites, cougar sites, through sites that feature glory holes, and a couple of sites with some unique themes – Wife Writing and The Minion. Both of these are unique sites.

The network is simple in layout and operation: the homepage shows all 21 sites. You enter each site through that link and all the sites share the same simple layout: five scenes are listed per page and there is easy access to all the pages. One thing I particularly like about the sites is that on each page, beneath a large thumbnail of each scene, all the viewing and downloading options are available. So many other sites require the users to click through several pages before getting to the download or viewing links; DFN’s choice to keep it simple is appreciated.

Speaking of the downloading and viewing options, DFN has more than most other sites. While only two formats are offered (WMV and MP4) those are usually offered in more than one size. I download WMVs and those are offered in two ‘sizes’ – both come in at 640x480 with the only difference being that the larger ones are 4500kb/s versus the smaller ones at 1500kb/s. Both play at 30fps. Some of the older videos are a lower resolution. Oddly, for 2012, the site still allows users to download the videos in segments. While I’m sure that few people still need to do this, I’m sure that those who do appreciate this option.

While the resolutions are somewhat below standards, they still look crisp.

Streaming is also available in two resolutions that appear to be similar to the WMV downloads.

Speaking of older videos, DFN appears to be moving to remaster a lot of their older scenes. This is both good and bad, depending on how you look at it. The ‘bad’ is that they seem to use the remastered videos as updates rather than posting new videos as often. I don’t hold the opinion that this is necessarily bad because it gives access to fairly decent quality videos of stars from the past decade. I consider that to be good.

The site also offers photos, and like the videos there are several options. Interestingly, the options are for good resolution photos (1067x1600) taken during the video shoot, lower resolution screencaps and these things they call ‘panels’ which are photos that contain four smaller photos. The higher resolution photos are available as zips but the other two sets are singles only.

The site supports download managers. I use Internet Download Manager and had no problem with links dying on me over a period of over an hour.

One glaring problem with the network is the lack of an effective search function or the use of tags. There is a search function, but it has serious flaws. It allows you to search for a word or words in the title or description of the scene but that can be a rather blunt tool. For example, I searched the term “anal” and got a number of hits but many of the scenes had no anal sex in them. The site producers frequently refer to a woman’s “birth canal” in the scene descriptions and that phrase was captured in a search for anal scenes. This could be solved by a smarter search engine, but it would probably be better solved by tagging scenes with niches.

Any potential member is obviously going to make their own decision on value, but in DFN’s case some people may jump to a conclusion based solely on price. The issue is that DFN charges $35 per month, which is more than most comparable sites. Is it worth $35? My opinion is that it is. I think we’ve become accustomed to lower prices but the market has changed and we all may need to rethink the value equation. In this case, you get access to over a thousand exclusive scenes with decent production values and fast downloads (with no obvious limits, I might add). I think that’s good value. (As an aside, I’m not sure where the upper limit on pricing is, but I note that last week TBP posted a review of a BDSM site, Infernal Restraints, that commands $65 per month. I’m a BDSM fan, but that seems a bit steep.)

One potential concern that has been expressed before is that several of the sites do not appear to be actively updating with new material. I’m fine with this as long as the network is updating and the remastering continues.

The bottom line is that I certainly recommend DFN. Its top-quality porn, and specifically interracial porn, with top porn stars that’s well produced and easy to access at a fair price.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wife Writing

15. Wife Writing (1)

Pay
Active
82
rearadmiral (238) 08-06-12  10:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (62), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Interesting and under-served niche
- Part of the Dog Fart Network
- Many options to view / download scenes
- Photos available
- Streaming video available
- Still updating – but slowly with usually just one scene per month
- Many popular porn stars
- Supports download managers (I use Internet Download Manager)
Cons: - Small site
- Scenes are mostly just oral
- Could play the BDSM role more
Bottom Line: This review might be best served if I define the niche first. The focus on the site is that in the course of the scene the male uses a marker to write on the female’s nude body. I’m guessing that the ‘wife’ part of the title is only for alliteration.

I joined Dog Fart Network specifically to get access to this site. This is a very small niche and my interest in it stems mostly from its use as part of BDSM. While the site is interesting and reasonably well done, I was a bit disappointed with the theme since the ‘writing’ is done to highlight the fact that the scenes are interracial rather than specifically as part of BDSM. (So instead of having “Whore” written on her forehead the model might have “Black Cock Lover” instead. I’m probably really splitting hairs here but for anyone into this niche it can make a difference. Still, I’ll take what I can get.)

Two things that any future member may want to know: the male talent is all black. That shouldn’t make a difference, but some may prefer to see a Caucasian male once in a while. The other thing is that actual intercourse is rare; most of the scenes are only oral. I didn’t see any anal in the few scenes where intercourse occurs. The female talent ranges from relative unknowns to popular porn stars.

The site is quite small with only 43 scenes available. It is one of the DFN sites that is still updating though, but the updates are fairly slow only coming in approximately once a month.

The site layout is simple: you open onto a page where six scenes are listed. Each scene has a large screen-cap of the model. One thing I particularly like is that the video and photo options are available right below the model’s name and screen-cap. There’s no need to open a second page just to access the scene. I also like that there is a brief description of the scene too which can provide more information for you to consider before downloading.

Speaking of video download options, the site offers two: WMV and MP4. WMV files are usually offered in two sizes. Interestingly, both sizes come in at 640x480 but the difference in that the larger ones are 4500kb/s while the smaller ones are 1500kb/s. Both play at 30fps. MP4s are usually offered in three sizes. I use WMV so I don’t have the specs on the MP4s. Some of the older videos (but not all) come in at 640x360.

This seems odd in 2012, but the WMV files are also offered in segments for both the lower and higher resolutions. I can’t imagine there are many people out there who would prefer segments when the full video is available too.

The site supports download managers and I had no problem with links dying on me.

I didn’t view the site on a mobile device but there is a separate link for those users where various viewing and downloading options are also available. Surely no member could complain about a lack of viewing options here.

Streaming is also available, but I don’t use that so I can’t really comment on it. The scenes I tested looked okay on a monitor. The resolution of the two available streams seems to be close to the WMV downloads. The streams open in a new page and play on the site’s player.

While the site is really a video site they do offer photos. In keeping with the various options for videos there are options for the photos too. There are separate photos taken of the model during the scene. These are available as singles or zips. The resolution is pretty good at 1067x1600. There are also lower resolution screen-caps available. Then there are “panels” which is a photo made up of four screen-caps fitted per page. Neither the screen-caps nor the panels are available as zips.

As BDSM goes, this site is fairly weak. I think they could improve by playing the Dom/sub roles a bit more. Still, sites that cater to this niche are rare. This is the only one I know of, so if another PU member has some recommendations I’d appreciate getting them.

Even though the site is small and the videos aren’t exactly what I was hoping for, I’d definitely recommend the site for anyone with an interest in this niche. And I’m not just saying that because there is nothing else out there. This site could stand alone and still be a good value at the right price. Admittedly though, unless you’re into this obscure niche like I am the real value of the site is the access to the rest of the Dog Fart Network.
Respond: 10 Replies - Add Reply


Visit White Teens Black Cocks

16. White Teens Black Cocks (2)

Pay
Active
85
dracken (246) 05-20-12  05:47pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 146 scenes and this, along with Try Teens and Hardcore Youth seems to be one of the few sites the Teencoreclub network still seems to update periodically (about 1 scene a month) For more info on updates look at the Teencoreclub main page.
- Great looking girls and the majority of them do anal and deepthroat (older scenes have more regular, vaginal sex but for the past two years or so almost every scene has some anal action).
- Scenes look good with varied camera angles, good light, good combination of wide shots and close-ups
- The last two or three scenes feature a very brief interview and the girl playing with herself before the actual sex, otherwise the action is a bit formulaic with BJ, vagina sex, some anal, back to BJ and cumshot
- Some very very hot girls, including several that don't show up anywhere else on the network (or even on-line as far as I can tell)
- Ever scene has very good quality images, although no zip (I recommend using neodownloader to get the images)
Cons: - Just like the entire teencoreclub network this site suffers from simplistic webdesign, very strange update schedule and no search features.
- Hot models doing anal but pretty much everything else here is a con starting with the price and going all the way to lack of choices when it comes to downloads.
- This is the only site in the network that for me had strange download speeds. Sometimes it would max my internet connection, sometimes it would go as slow as 20kb or time-out. Not sure why or how.
- Price is pretty restrictive
Bottom Line: I always find it tough to review a site from the Teencore club network. On one hand they have incredible models often well before they show up anywhere else on the internet (I believe Isabella Clark and Aspen Richardsen started on this network) but at the same time everything else about the network is barely worth mentioning.

The web design is basic, reminding me of the first porn sites that were available on-line. Customer support is very basic, there are no extras worth mentioning, no different options when downloading a scene (you get WMV and that's it) The pictures don't have zip archives. There is no model search or even content type search. For example on this site about a third of the scenes are only vaginal sex, but there is no way to filter them out.

The list of complaints can go on and on, but in the end this is a network that has great looking girls and not much else going on for it. Still I find myself coming back for them again and again for brief periods of time. I use image grabbers to get all the images and periodically download the updates but in all honesty I wouldn't stay a member for long periods of times.

Now that being said about the network itself I have a few comments on this site in particular.

The scenes here seem to run a bit longer than the rest of the network, most of them 30 minutes or a bit more. The angles of the action seem more varied here and the guy goes from anal to vaginal, back to anal pretty often in many different positions. In fact I'd say this is the most varied site on the whole network, aside from HardcoreYouth (which is compete different in vibe and more similar to firstanalquest or 21 sextury).

Another interesting aspect for me was that many of the scenes seem more realistic with some the girls struggling to accept the male model into their buts. Maybe they film the girls first on this site or the guy is significantly bigger than they experienced before but there are not many massive gapes here, something I was actually pretty pleased with.

Overall, I'd recommend this network to anyone who hasn't been a member before and enjoys young girls doing real hardcore stuff. Try it for a month or two, get all the DRM free content you can get and wait a few months until they get some new content then pay them another visit if you like their type of content.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit John Persons

17. John Persons (0)

Pay
Newbie
70*
Robbi81 (4) 04-10-12  10:01pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive content
- Very well drawn graphic art
- Message board for updates and suggestions
- A few animated art pieces
Cons: - Small number of pics
- Bland web design
- Limited need for recurring membership
Bottom Line: This website contains some very well draw art work from John Persons and other artists. There is also collaborations with some authors (most notably Stormbringer) to bring out a storyline for the artworks and vice versa. On the downside, the artwork is limited in number and you can easily go through it in less than a month. On the preview pages of "The Pit", it leads the person to believe that there are more graphic novels inside than there actually are.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Blacks on Blondes

18. Blacks on Blondes (0)

Pay
Newbie
86*
madcow1957 (0) 03-29-12  12:39pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: This sight has all exclusive updates. Most of the new stuff is in HD a lot of the older stuff has been re posted in HD. The main sight updates like clock work every week. The episodes are well done with zipped photos for easy down load. Search options are easy. Episodes are in order but, there is a search and model index.
Cons: The one main weakness is that some of the themed sights only update once every two months. Most of the individual sights such as Spring Thomas say they update but just run recycled episodes as new.
Very dishonest!!!
Bottom Line: Great sight over all if your looking for interracial
and can accept its shortcomings.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Dog Fart Network

19. Dog Fart Network (2)

Network
Newbie
89*
Porn User (4) 03-28-12  08:52pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (4)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: + GREAT content if watching girls get banged by huge dicks is your cup of tea
+ girls are extremly sexy and seem to enjoy the scenes
+ lots of scenes
+ user friendly
+ membership comes with various sites like cuckold sessions / watching my mom go black / watching my daughter go black / gloryhole sessions / blacks on blondes / blacks on cougars / candy monroe / spring thomas / ruth blackwell, etc...
Cons: - older vids offer poor video quality
- the cuckhold site would be better, in my opinion, if there were more pussy eating and creampie eating
Bottom Line: All in all this was a terrific web site. I enjoyed most of it's content. New content comes with a great quality. Older vids are somewhat meh as in image quality but the content is always great. It comes with tons of sites, most of them being worth a few downloads. In a month you won't have the time to see everything you wish you could have. I loved this site and will try it again. =)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit White Teens Black Cocks

20. White Teens Black Cocks (2)

Pay
Active
85
joekramer08 (12) 12-30-11  02:26pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - The scenes have spectacular camera angles. They keep the camera nice and zoomed out so you can see the girl's whole body and face. It's so refreshing to find a site where the camera man zooms out and lets you get a good view of the girl's entire body.

I find the camera work on most sites annoying because they focus too much on closeups. It's a shame when you have a beautiful girl but never get to see her body because the camera man just wants to zoom in on her ass and vag. Not a problem on this site.

- The girls are amazing...tight, young, and natural. I didn't find a girl on this site that looked over 19. They use girls who have the look I like - thin, petite, tight bodies with perky tits.

- Spectacular lighting. They really know how to light a porn scene. They film every scene in a very brightly-lit room, so there are no annoying shadows concealing the action.

- Nice slow sex. No hardcore pounding.
Cons: - The frame rate on their downloadable WMV's is 25 frames per second. This is lower than the standard 29 fps that other modern sites offer.

- The site design is fairly simplistic and out-dated. I know this is a big problem for a lot of others who have reviewed sites in this network, but it doesn't bother me that much. As long as the scenes feature hot girls and good camera work, I'm willing to overlook site design issues.

- A drawback to this site is that it seems to update a lot less than the other sites on this network. During the month I was a member, they did not add any new scenes.

- unfortunately it appears in their more recent scenes they started changing their filming style to be more "gonzo" like major studios. this is a bad thing in my opinion. in their older scenes they kept the camera nice and zoomed out, but in the newer scenes they move the camera around too much waste too much time on closeups which crop out the girl's body.
Bottom Line: This site is part of the Teen Core Club network. There are various ways to access the Teen Core Club sites. The package I went with gives you access to 3 main sites for 30 bucks: tryteens.com, whiteteensblackcocks.com, and hardcoreyouth.com. They offer another set of sites that you can join separately, also for 30 bucks per month (with the other package you get their other sites like maketeengape.com, girlsgotcream.com, assteenmouth.com, etc). The package I chose offers fewer sites, but I really wanted access to whiteteensblackcocks.com, so I went with this option. You can also get access to all of the Teen Core Club network sites at once for the higher price of 50 bucks a month.

I have been intrigued by the style of the scenes from Teen Core Club for a while, and I'm glad I finally joined. What has always drawn me to their scenes is the excellent camera work and lighting. I just love how they shoot their scenes. The girls are also spectacular. Very young and tight with perfect bodies. This site uses one male actor in all of the scenes, but he does a great job...keeps his dick hard and doesn't go limp. That's about all you can ask for from a male porn actor.

The older scenes from this network are unique for their great "zoomed out" camera angles....but they recently made some slight changes their filming style at this network, so their newer scenes lack the awesome camera angles that made their older stuff so great. The newer scenes are still good, but now they move the camera around too much and waste too much time on closeups (It appears they are now trying to emulate the style of other European sites like firstanalquest.com - meaning more closeup and less far shots). This sucks, because the Teen Core Club sites were to only sites that had the kind of camera work I liked. When I watch porn, I want to get a good view of girl's entire body...I don't just want to watch a closeup of her ass. The newer scenes are still good, but the camera angles just aren't quite as good as they were in their older scenes. The best scenes are the ones from around 2009-2010.

In addition to this new filming style, they have also also recently started filming on different sets. They stopped using their typical set, which used to be a white room with a low bed. In the new scenes they use a couch rather than a bed. I liked their old set better because it allowed them to get great "high" camera angles where you were looking down on the girl...so, maybe these changes are a sign that there was some kind of leadership change at the Teen Core Club network. Perhaps they are now being run by a different crew...I wonder if they are now being run by the same crew that runs various other European teen sites like firstanalquest.com, because in their recent scenes they are using the same female actors from those other sites, as well as a similar style of camera work.

The video files may not be "HD" or whatever, but they are plenty big for me. I don't like huge video files anyway, because they take up too much hard drive space. The newer scenes are 950 x 540 and are about 600-700 MB in size. This is a good size for me...big enough, but not too big. It also kind of sucks that the videos are only 25 fps (frames per second). This causes the motion in the videos to appear slightly less smooth than the usual 29 fps file...but it's not too noticeable.

The hot, young girls and great lighting make the Teen Core Club network definitely worth checking out...they don't update whiteteensblackcocks.com very often, but there are still almost 100 good scenes available. Since they don't have many scenes and don't update very often, I recommend joining for just one month. That is plenty of time to check out all of the scenes here. Another note: about half the scenes feature anal.

Despite some slight changes in their set and camera angles in their newer scenes, I still consider the scenes from Teen Core Club to be the best out there. Their scenes offer great zoomed out camera angles that other sites don't...these zoomed out camera angles really give you a good view of the girl's body, as opposed to other sites where they will annoyingly zoom in on the ass and vag the whole time. They are one of the only sites out there that utilizes good camera angles - that alone makes them a precious and rare commodity in the world of online porn.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Follow CJ Wright

21. Follow CJ Wright (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
MsApril (4) 12-24-11  11:36pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The photo galleries are wonderful, and the quality of the videos is great. Many are HD with some lower definitions available.
Cons: The site can be hard to download from. I have high speed cable internet and can download a GB in a matter of minutes, yet almost every file I tried to download was reset by the site. Even one that was only 300MB. After less than 1 minute. From "Right-click Save" to 4 different download managers, it took luck & multiple tries to save a complete video.

There is also a new male being updated on the site. He's the last 4 updates. I don't know if you can "Follow CJ Wright" if he's not on his own site.

The photos are plentiful, but many galleries are non-nude. Almost 1/4 of them. Also not every photo shoot have a corresponding video.

There is also a download limit, which I exceeded many times, trying to download 1 or 2 files in a few hours.
Bottom Line: If you're a fan of CJ Wright, the site is wonderful. Over 25 videos, more than 1/2 of them in HD, about 30 photo galleries.

The downloading experience and download limit will make this a tough site to rejoin, but I'm loving the content I downloaded.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Blacks on Blondes

22. Blacks on Blondes (0)

Pay
Newbie
79*
Robbi81 (4) 09-27-11  01:43am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Well known stars
- Good quality video
- downloadable scenes
- network
Cons: - expensive for the number of sites
- older scenes are not compressed in single scenes
- older scenes are of poor quality
- In the solo girl sites, the scenes are recycled and dead
- plain design
Bottom Line: It has some really good quality recent scenes and stars. And a good network for the interracial fans. Unfortunately the price will stop some people. The design of the website is rather plain and much to be desired. A major thing for me is that the girl sites(Spring Thomas, Candy Monroe,etc.) the scenes have been recycled (older scenes are redated to appear recent). They have been dead for a while now. This practice is never good for a website to continue to do.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Redhead In Heat

23. Redhead In Heat (1)

Pay
Active
50
pat362 (332) 08-25-11  06:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +There are 64 videos which can be downloaded in WMV.
+There are 94 photosets which can be downloaded as complete zip files.
+CCbill is the CC processor.
Cons: -The videos all fall under bad with crappy 320x240 resolution, bad camera angles, bad lighting, and even a few out of focus shots.
-All the phototsets are 640x480 resolution.
-I'm pretty sure the content is identical to the one found on mandingogirl.
-There is very little info about the videos or phototsets so you have to open the file to find out what you'll get.
-They are still updating with new content but quality is so bad that I'd be willing to bet that it's just recylced content from years ago.
Bottom Line: *Dawn is not your typical bone thin young woman but is instead a pretty chubby all natural red head woman who has a southern accent and likes enjoy having sex with multiple partners at the same time. She seems to favor IR perfromers.

*This site could have been something good but the videos are so bad that tube sites wouldn' bother using them. There is no reason for anyone else to get taken in by their less than honest preview. Videos in 320x240 resolution should not exist today and any site that offers only this type of resolution should close shop right now instead of stealing money from fools like me.

**I'll post a comment about mandingogirl as well because I suspect that they share content or may even have the exact same content. I can't be 100% sure and I'm not joining them to find out. One bad decision is enough for me. Neddless to say avoid mandingogirl because it's not going to be any better than this one**
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Susan Reno

24. Susan Reno (0)

Pay
Active
75
pat362 (332) 03-27-11  07:33am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (67), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -You get access to the content from 13 other amateur sites.
-There are over 100 videos.
-They now offer many of the videos in longer clips and there are less of them as well.
-The action is pretty good for an amateur site.
-Susan appears to still be updating with new content(see Cons).
-You can use a download manager.
Cons: -I don't believe that Susan is still doing porn because all the content appears to be remastered or never released videos.
-None of the content is dated.
-You can't get any videos on a single file so you have to attach 2 or more to get the complete videos.
-Photos can only be downloaded individually.
-Many of the videos have similar action in them so you get pretty much the same type of sex scene but with different male performers.
-Quality of the videos is hit and miss on many of the videos.
Bottom Line: -Susan is an attactive 40yrs old blond MILF that really enjoys her IR, Anal and ganbangs sex and doesn't mind us seeing it. Her site is the best one out of all the others you get access to and she also has the most content.

-I was able to find a couple of pretty good videos on her site and some of the other sites in this network but the quality is average for most of them because this is still amateur porn.

-I found the 24.95$ price a little high but I didn't use that in my score because you still get a lot of content for that kind of money. It's not their fault if I didn't has much as I thought I would.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Blacks on Blondes

25. Blacks on Blondes (0)

Pay
Active
70
Tom22 (6) 03-05-11  11:56am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: * Good quality (but not super high-res) pictures in Zip files
* Full download speed for cable connection
* No problem using download manager
* Server seems well tuned, never ‘dropped’ a download
* Easy Navigation, old style but no problems with site set-up
* Almost all male stars have huge tools and are often matched with petite girls
* Very large network, you will probably need all 30 days to select and download
* Network includes 19 sites
* Video quality is ‘only’ good (camerawork is not so good, resolution is too low)
* Several very cute girls, Kitty, Kennedy Kressler, Alexia Skye, Amai Liu and others
* Good Lighting in most scenes
Cons: * Poor camerawork, face & ass style, hardly ever see action from proper distance
* Video resolution is too low, best quality is only 640x360
* Logo/watermark too big, very obstructive of view, badly placed and distracting
* Almost every video is about 70% nonsense, 30% action worth viewing
* Way too much emphasis on oral sex, leans toward being a BJ site
* Far too many unnecessary “fades” and shifting to different angles
* Camera movements are mostly way too fast, zooming is at warp speed
* Cameraman sometimes tries to be the star, talks too much
* Girl’s movements into new positions often edited out --- why?
* At $34.99 the membership price is too high considering the competition
Bottom Line: Seldom have I seen a site that focuses on the face as much as this site. This is supposed to be a porn site --- right? I can see girls faces at the grocery store, I don’t need to pay money and join a site for that.

I, like many here at Porn Users, like to see a girl’s entire body, NOT just her face and her ass. But this is the old porn paradigm that refuses to die. I notice that sites that finally figure it out and break away from this type of camerawork consistently get much better ratings, (from the users anyway).

In my opinion, this type of camerawork is the curse of modern porn, they are still doing it just like they did in the 1970’s. Wake up guys, move the camera back and keep the camera steady. I know YOU can see everything YOU want to, but WE can only see what comes through the camera lens. It’s not that there is never a time for a close-up --- but that time is NOT all the time. And it should not be nearly all the time either.

One silver lining with sites that practice the face & ass camerawork style, is that you at least get a full length glimpse of the girl’s body when they move into another position. But not at this site, they normally edit that part out.

The best thing about this site is it has a good number of petite girls staring with some of the most well endowed men in porn. Its a shame they don’t back the camera up so WE the viewers can see it. Oh well, I guess this old paradigm will never die in the American and Euro porn industries, so I’m off to the Russian sites again where most of them know how to run a camera, like Teen Mega World for example.

Porn camerawork is not rocket science but considering the small percentage of sites that get it right, you would think it was.

1) This site lost 20 points for poor camerawork and editing

2) And lost another 10 points due to a large logo, cameraman won’t shut-up, too much nonsense, too much oral, not enough action and the video resolution is too low

If these things were fixed, it would be an awesome site, as it stands now, its pretty much run of the mill.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 100 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Dog Fart Network (2)
2. White Teens Black Cocks (2)
3. Whoring Out My Wife (1)
4. Interracial Sex.com (1)
5. Redhead In Heat (1)
6. Used White Wives (1)
7. Black Owned Wives (1)
8. Cuckold My Husband (1)
9. Wife Writing (1)
10. Mandingo Mama (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.15 seconds.