Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-25 of 64 Page :    Next Page >

Visit Oldje

1. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
85
pat362 (367) 02-02-13  10:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +They offer exclusif content from a niche that is not well represented.
+They add about one new scene per week.
+Almost 380 scenes to download.
+The 50 or so most recent videos are now offered in multiple download fomats and resolution is as high as 1280x720.
+They appear to have remastered some of their more recent upates as well.
+There is some decent chemistry between the performers.
+They offer class3some, nude art and classic blowjob with your membership.
Cons: -They still do not offer any model info so you have to do some serious research to frind their name from other sources.
-The bonus sites may be nice for some people but only class3some has similar content.
-class3some has stopped updating last year so you are not getting new stuff.
-Navigation is basically picking a page number and there are no search options.
-They have photos but the quantity is tiny and is mostly there so that you get an idea of what is happening in the video.
Bottom Line: *I decided to join Oldje one more time in part because they decided to add clas3some to their membership. That was one of my cons the last time I joined. Sadly I got excited for nothing because the site isn't updating anymore. They also give you access to two other sites but since they do not exactly offer the same type of content then I didn't bother looking at them. Mind you someone into oral sex or nudes might be happy with those additions.

*I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are now offering the videos in higher resolution as well as motre stndard ones. They still don't bother putting the models name on the videos and that really sucks. I can begin to tell you how annoying it is to do research on a model so that I can properlly file the video.

*I recently commented on the fact that none of the performers in the Score 50 and Score 60 videos kiss and that it was too bad because it made the scenes a lot less fun to watch. This is not the case with Oldje because there is some serious kissing between the young girls and the old men. The sex is never raunchy. It is more soft and romantic. Now some could argue that the guys being older couldn't do super hardcore but I think that the producers prefer the softer stuff and I agree with their choice.

**This is such a rare niche that unless you are a fan then you should stay away**.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit My Friend\'s Hot Mom

2. My Friend's Hot Mom (1)

Pay
Active
83
marcdc1 (165) 01-01-13  08:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (40), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - True to theme. these are hot MILFs. You won't find a 25 year old model in a apron posing.
- great quality post-late2009 1080p, 720p,480 3 mbps is available (about 90 shoots) after early 2007 "dvd" quality 720X540 2mbps is available (about 120 shoots) oldest quality is 480X360 512 kbps (about 80)
- pix available as zip files (over 150 pix per shoot)
- clean easy to use organization. Every tool I've ever seen for keeping things organized is available here. You have keywords, date, model searches. You can use their cool "fine my fantasy" feature to narrow down what you're interested in.
- BIG collection: almost 550 scenes! Plus as part of the naughty america network you have access to the over 5,100 shoots
- There are updates on the network every day. This site puts out about 3 shoots a week. (in December '12 there were 13 scenes).
Cons: - annoying cross sells every time you log in
- almost every shoot ends in a facial.
- formulaic mainstream focus (set-up, bj, eat her, missionary, doggy, cowgirl, wildcard, facial) the formula is too rigid for my taste. (then again it's good enough that I've stuck around for more than 3 months).
- They dropped the great live shows they used to run. (although you can download the previous shows).
Bottom Line: Naughty America is a big tent, mainstream network. They shoot fantasy themed content for a traditional fan. You don't find much kink in this place.

That said they have a very good product. The quality and quantity are good and they frequently run discounts on their mailing list and twitter feed. I've seen it as low as $5 for 1 month and renews at $10.

I'm not a huge 40+ fan, so thankfully they do a good job of mixing up the models. You will find women from say 35-60, although most are 38-42 (my unscientific guestimate)

I didn't join the network for this site - but have found enough here to keep me looking. I was frequently pleasantly surprised with this site.

Bottom Bottom Line: Good MILF site, although not the best in the biz. When you put together the bang for you buck, ya can't argue with NA - it's one of the best deals in porn.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

3. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
80
pat362 (367) 05-07-12  06:57am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They have exclusif content from a niche that's not well represented on the net.
+They have an very good selection of female European performers.
+The sex scenes are well filmed and the males do a pretty decent job considering their age.
+They have 352 videos but only the last 32 are in a single file. All the others are broken into 2 or more files.
+Video resolution is at least 720x404 for more than 100 videos and the last 32 are now 1280x720.
+They appear to still be updating with new content.
Cons: -They no longer offer class3some as a bonus site and that is too bad because it was a nice addition considering the high cost of the site.
-They don't offer any model info whatsoever so it requires a lot of research to find the names to go with most videos.
-They don't date their content so it's very hard to know the update schedule.
-They have photos but the quality is mostly poor and they often appear to be out of order. Not to mention that you have to download each pic one by one since they aren't in a complete zip file.
-There is no navigation except the page number or the ability to jump all the way to the beginning or the end of the pages.
-There's music in their videos and that can be a plus but I found at certain times to be distracting.
-The first 100 videos are only offered in Real media so not very good news.
Bottom Line: *This is a pretty decent site with content that is good to excellent but is dragged down by all the negative things that could easily be fixed if they bothered with it. They don't have a lot of male performers to choose from but the ones they have do a better than average job and there appears to be some good chemistry with the female performers which seems hard to believe when you consider the age difference between the males and the females.

*There's dialogue in some of the videos and it's normally in English. It's more often a miss because English is not the language that these people speak but it's not awful. The music is a little annoying. It's not too loud because that would make it almost impossible to watch the videos with the sound on. Mind you I wouldn't be sad if it disapeared. I think just the natural sounds of the performer is more than enough for the viewers anyway.

*I like that they are now offering their videos in a single file and that the resolution is also increased to 1280x720. Now if someone can start entering the names of the models in the database and put dates on their content then they'll have improved on most key issues.

**If you want to watch old men have sex with much younger women than this is probably the best site for that. They even have a few anal scenes as well so if that is one of your fetishes then you'll find a few videos. Be advised that it may not be in the description of the scene so you'll have to either download all the videos or check out the photos to find those scenes.

***Of course if you don't want to watch old guys have sex with very young women than avoid this site. Especially now since they no longer offer class3some and that site had mostly yojg women with younger men.***
Respond: 13 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Oldje

4. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
68
selphy (15) 02-05-12  04:13am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Fantastic and Beautiful Girls (nice and young famous pornstars but also semi pro models)
- New videos are in HD 1280 (most of them are not in HD but the format is acceptable, 720x404)
-There are photo and screen cap of the videos
Original and exclusive content that combine romantic sex and a little fetish (old and fat man- with young and beautiful girls)
Cons: -There are about 350 videos but 150 of them are in real media and their quality are poor (about 200x100; I've deleted those files...)
-No model info
-Old files are divided in two or three parts
-The files you downloaded are not named, so you have to renamed them (boring)
-No update info (1 new episode per week)
-Navigation is plan and the login is boring (userid, pwd and captcha).
-The server timeout is too short; it's about 2 hours, and at the and you have to re-log in
-No bonus site (I thought that the other Class3some site was included)
-The are music inside the video and often you can't hear the "voice" of the performers.
Bottom Line: I was intersting in this particular content, most of all because the preview of the site showed a lot of beautiful girls.
So I become a member a couple of weeks ago. But after two days of surfing this site I was not satisfied at all.
I think that if you have such girls who perform and that especially have performed in the past in your site, you have to re-mastered old videos and offer (about 30 euros a month) to your customer a good quality. Not surely the quality of a 15 Mb video in .rm format !!
Otherwise you had to offer one or two quality bonus site !
The same company has also Class3some: it appears a good site (the same girls of Oldje) with only about 50 video.
Why does not offer the two site at the same price ?
Oldje is expensive if you think that 1/3 of its content is not usable, but if the Company offers Class3some togheter with Oldje, I think the 30 euro price is correct.

Well, If you are interersting in old-young sex the new video of Oldje are really good ! But remember that only about 200 video (the new ones) are really usable (not less than 720 x 404)
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Boys Love Matures

5. Boys Love Matures (0)

Pay
Active
78
messmer (137) 01-23-12  12:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Mostly attractive mature women.

Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.

Videos can be streamed.

Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.

Updates are regular.
Cons: Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.

Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.

If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.

Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message.
Bottom Line: I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.

I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.

The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.

In one scene, for instance, a “cougar” is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.

In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised “young” man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.

Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.

One other thing that bothers me is that the “boys” are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.

Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)

General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.

Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to “Stunning Matures.”

As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hot 60 Club

6. Hot 60 Club (0)

Pay
Newbie
80*
hawkfan050 (1) 05-23-11  12:36pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Lots of content to see with a variety of different options for different tastes. There are a number of 'bonus sites' that seem to be from the same company under different names. Because of the bonus sites and being the same company some of the same scenes will be found on other sites which is nice because of what will be listed in the con.
Cons: As noted above it seems to be one big company with different 'bonus sites'. But each site is a little bit different and when viewing the pictures some sites are extremely annoying while others are quite nice. For example, on Hot60plus, it only shows 8 pictures at a time and the pictures are essentially video frames so it takes forever to get through. But on other sites it is a page with 60+ pictures (still video frames) allowing for much better viewing. Also, I had difficulty with the flash player working properly, but that may have been on my end and not theirs so take that con with a grain of salt.
Bottom Line: I would recommend the site with some reservations. Make sure you understand what you're getting into. I agree with this websites review of hot60, that you can get through most of the content you will be interested in in a month, 2 at most.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Jurassic Cock

7. Jurassic Cock (0)

Pay
Active
90
rearadmiral (320) 05-14-11  09:09pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of PornPros Network
- Discount through TBP / PU
- Multiple download options
- Streaming available
- No DRM
- Watermark is small enough to be ignored
- Pics available (both separate and screecaps)
- Pics available as a zip
- Supports download managers
- 77 exclusive scenes (as of review date)
- Site updates weekly
Cons: - “HD” doesn’t look like true HD
- Not enough anal. (Yes, I know that’s very subjective.)
Bottom Line: I realize that the niche of having old guys fuck young women is not for everyone, but if it is something you like to watch, this site is definitely worth checking out.

Many of the girls on this site are a “who’s who” of A-list porn starlets today, and the format is one that definitely accentuates their youthful appearances. Girls such as Ashlii Orion, Jaelyn Fox, Amai Lui and Jada Stevens all make appearances. Some lesser known (but hopefully up-‘n’-coming) girls like Cheyenne Cooper are also here. Each scene is approximately 30 minutes long and there is usually a stereotypical setup for a scene with a young girl and an older guy: teacher, supervisor, driving instructor or something similar to further accentuate the age difference between the girl and the guy.

The guys are obviously a bigger part of the scene than would be acceptable in most porn scenes, BUT they never really get in the way of scene like many younger, self-indulgent male models do. The guys seem to know that they’re there to help show off the girl. And they should know that since the guys have a lot of experience in the business. Since there aren’t too many geezers still actually working in porn today, the talent pool is pretty shallow. Rod Fontana is here, as are a few other ‘seniors’ who I can’t name. One of them looks like Adolf Hitler and another looks like a slightly younger version of Col. Sanders. Perhaps the biggest male name here is also the most polarizing: Ron Jeremy. You either love him or hate him. Ron appears in a large number of the scenes. That may be a testament to his reliability.

As for the technical bits, the site is pretty standard for a good porn site. There are 77 scenes posted (with updates being added). Each scene offers a trailer to get an idea if you want to download the scene. If you do want to download, you have three options: MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. The HD doesn’t appear to be true HD though. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate. I’m not sure if that qualifies as HD, but it doesn’t look as sharp as I’m used to with other HD stuff.)

The site also offers photos. Both screencaps and actual photos are available, either individually or as a zipped set. The photos I looked at were high-resolution and looked great (3000x1996).

This is purely subjective, but there aren’t enough anal scenes here. Anal sex is a turn-off for some, but it is pretty mainstream and it is apparent in its absence here. It may be that most of the models don’t do anal (yet!), but of the 77 scenes there are only 4 or 5 anal, which seems low.

This site is part of a network that offers some interesting and innovative other sites, though for the $17.95 TBP discount price, this site alone is worth it. The network and individual sites are fairly simple and straightforward to use. There is no reliance on gimmicks. The search function is limited, but simple to use and effective.

If you like this kind of niche, I’d highly recommend this.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Grandpas Fuck Teens

8. Grandpas Fuck Teens (0)

Pay
Active
80
Maines Own (6) 04-04-11  10:36pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: + Solid niche site with 233+ scenes
+ weekly update
+ top quality technical specifications of content (see bottom line)
+ part of a vast network
+ content can be filtered, ordered and searched
+ user can chose between three formats for streaming and up to six formats for downloading videos (see bottom line)
+ HighQuality photo shootings for every scene, available in two formats and ZIP-folders
Cons: - Scenes might become repetitive after a while
- not many different male actors (for those who care about them)
- need of getting used to the looks of some actresses, but matter of personal taste
- older content does not have the same amount of different quality choices
- some actresses, even with a lot of good will, do not qualify as 'teen'
Bottom Line: We are looking at a themed site from the vast, content-rich and sometimes overly complex network of 21Sextury-sites. With signature websites such as assholefever.com, dpfanatics.com, analteenangels.com and lately gapeland.com, this network, as you as the porn geek of course are well aware of, for some years now sets the standard for high quality European porn.

Does this niche site live up to this reputation? Yes and no. Looking at it from a solo-site point of view, you get a nice mix of different and sometimes well known models who perform professional porn scenes (at least no amateur-faking for the most part) of highest technical standards. On the downside, the scene's setups are more than repetitive and iterative, there are no surprises, except maybe the question whether there will be anal sex or not (if you did nor care to study the scene's specifics before).

At the date of this review, we are looking at 233 scenes (with weekly updates coming) of the "old and young"-niche, as the title of the site already tells you, we are solely concentrating on the "old male, young female"-aspect. The vast majority are straight sex one-on-one scenes (15 of 233 anal; only 3 of 233 w/DP).

On the strong side, you fully benefit from 21Sextury's latest network design with fairly well working filters, search features and all kinds of fancy things you might want to wish for (or at least had wished for in the past).

Talking tech and specifics, the numbers are rock solid as expected:
Videos come in three different qualities for streaming and even six different qualities for download (older scenes might have fewer options). Formats are MP4 and WMV and the newer "Full HD"-scenes feature a screen resolution of rocking 1920x1088 px. File sizes vary between 200MB and 1GB. All videos are (still and for whatever good reason) optionally accessable as split parts of approx. 2 minutes.
Every scene features an own photo shooting with pro-shots in two different resolutions (standard with 1.200 px on the long side and HQ with 4.000+ px on the long side) and *of course* are those shootings available as zipped folders.

Bottom line
-----------
If you are into this niche, this site alone sets some sort of standard for what you are looking for.
As a part of a growing network of 40+ HQ-sites, it's a nice addition to the mix.

You do not ever will have to worry about lack of content or bad-quality videos, that's for sure.

So it's actually quite a challenge to name a few things on the downside because as a part of a network, you might as well say 'so what, then I just leave this one out and have fun with 30 other sites!'. True. However, if you *do* care about this niche, you might want to see a little bit more diversity in scene setups and storylines. Some actresses would not necessarily qualify as "top looking" but then again, the beauty lies in the eye of the beholder (and I drop five bucks into the money box for overused empty phrases).
----
Recommended.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Freddie\'s World

9. Freddie's World (0)

Pay
Active
75
pat362 (367) 03-19-11  11:12am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -All exclusive.
-Over 150 videos.
-Most of the models appear to be unknows rather than professionals so this adds an amateur feel to the videos.
-They update with one new video a week.
Cons: -Many of the scenes lack decent lighting so the action is often hard to see properly.
-The scenes star almost exclusively Freddie so that can be a plus if you enjoy him and major negative if he annoys you.
-I found that the same performers are in too many videos.
-Navigation on the site is annoying because you can only move forward or backward by scolling one page at a time and no way to skip a page or pages. That's a pian when you want to see the updates on page 15 because you'll still have to scroll through the first 14.
Bottom Line: -This is a simple site of a an older gentleman who has sex with a variety of women ranging in age from late teens to early 40's and films it for us to see. The camera angles aren't too bad and the action is pretty good. The only thing that hurts this site is that the lighting could be better but I guess you'd lose the amateur feel to some of the scenes.

The other big thing that hurts it is the fact that too many of the videos star the same 2 women
Angel and Tracy Lain.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Old And Young Lesbians

10. Old And Young Lesbians (0)

Pay
Newbie
89*
Bluesurfer (0) 03-09-11  11:02am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very very good Mature Young Lesbo Site.
Many Videos & Pic > 270 in HD.
The models a looking good (for matures :-).
All Amateur Models from ? I dont know. I think easteurope and British. Long kisses with tongue.
Some Video the models talking bevor they having sex (oh what are you doing:-), other are not talking.
FDM is working on this site. One Movie has 1,3 GB for HD or 400 for SD. There are no DL Limits.

I like this site, because I love lesbo sex. And Mature Young is a very good combi.
Cons: Just i can no found cons.
Oh yes, the price is too expensive.
Bottom Line: For Mature Young and Lesbo Fans: Get a Member!!!!
This site is very good.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Grandpas Fuck Teens

11. Grandpas Fuck Teens (0)

Pay
Active
78
RustyJ (145) 03-01-11  08:50am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Great quiality video, pictures and production, at least lately
-230 scenes with a weekly update guarantees you don't run out of material too fast
-Over 70 of the scenes are FullHD
-Very good looking European and Russian models
-Grandpas are not too old lately
-No limits or DRM, very fast downloads. Comes as a part of a large and cheap network
Cons: -Quite vanilla action with little special themes or even anal and such. It's the age difference that is the only specialty here
-Some scenes are ruined (at least to me) by the hairy, overweight "grandpas"
-Due to the different membership packages this might be only a bonus site after two months to some
Bottom Line: I guess these old/young, MILF and other sites featuring elderly people are either loved or hated by the most. While MILF's seem to start from anywhere around 25 years and up, this site features men that appear to be in their 50's and 60's. Mostly they don't look too old to really disturb me and sometimes they are even the same guys that appear on the other sites of this network like Zoliboy. The female talent is the same standard as rest of the sites meaning very good in my books.

There's a lot of content on this site, few hundred sites with most of it either FullHD or the standard HD resolution. Quality is very good and after the photo sets were enhanced to high definition, there really isn't much to complain about.

Action could be a bit harder in my opinion but since this is a niche site, I understand their style well. It's dedicated to what the name implies and that's it.

My average score should be taken with the fact that this is not really my favorite content. For me the girls save a lot in most scenes but some just don't make it. If you are into this age difference thing, you can easily add 10-15 points. Without wanting to sound sexist or ageist, I must admit that this setting works much better for me than the opposite. There are actually multiple sites dedicated to old ladies in this network (way older than your average adult entertainment MILF). I just cannot bring myself to get deep enough into those sites to write a review ;)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Beauty And The Senior

12. Beauty And The Senior (0)

Pay
Active
65
Rotterdam854 (Disabled) 02-01-11  08:37am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: § Quaint,Exciting,Erotic, Romantic & Cute Content
§ Small & Medium Video Sizes (100Mb~200Mb) maximum
§ Streaming is easy as videos hived into 3 parts
§ Famous European Models, learnt art of porn here
§ Eclectic Mix of Old Men with good libido,stamina
§ Creative scene locations,themes,action & endings
§ Updates come weekly with both video & photo sets
§ Reputed Biller/Easy Sign-Up/Login & Site Access
§ Photo sets are good quality,compact,concise kind
§ Nice Archive (Approx 150~200);Photo+Videos
Cons: § Site works very poorly with DM's; Single Channel
§ WMV format videos;Portable devices format absent
§ Long waiting times to download(45min on average)
§ Some videos are broken into 2-3 parts download
§ Impossible to search for models & scenes by type
§ Monotony theme(Hardcore/Anal/Facial/CIM/Bukake)
§ Bonus sites of no significance,promising content
§ High price~$19 for low quality video,solo site
§ Older males are recycled from video to video
§ Not a customer interactive or friendly site
Bottom Line: This site is clearly meant for those who crave sex between a young woman and a much older man,those who qualify as granddads! There's an interesting mix of themes like newbie maids fucking landlords, director enjoying his muse, same for a painter & a doctor giving his ward a thorough examination.Even though these are common European themes which is a great attribute of the site, it has not grown or metamorphosed into something bigger & better like 21sextury or DDF Productions which carry similar content. Here it falls woefully short by no HD Videos,H 264 videos or even MP4/Quicktime.It seems like an archaic or
monolithic site caught in the crossfire of modern day. Be that as it may, if you're looking for very simple themes like straight sex, creampie, facials & swallows it just might be the site that you are waiting. Some episodes are truly great as the girls are well established models who may have
had their first scene here. It's worth trying once if you like to see good European models, or fantasize about what it would be like to get a good BJ or lay a nice sweet virgin one day in your old age. Most of the themes are centered upon
fantasy & the satiation of a hot enriching story
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Tricky Old Teacher

13. Tricky Old Teacher (0)

Pay
Active
75
pat362 (367) 01-17-11  09:52am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -All exclusive material.
-They update with 2-3 new videos each month.
-A very good selection of Eastern Europeans teen girls.(most are well know porn performers)
-There is a little scenario with a much older teacher coercing the teen into having sex with him.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format (1200x800).
Cons: -There is only one video download option (WMV) and no choice in the possible resolution.
-The dialogue is all in Russian and that's too bad because it would add a major element to the scenes.
-They could use a little more foreplay with some added kissing between the players.
-It would be nice if they gave the players the correct name and even more so if they gave her the same one for all of their sites.
-They have a search by model option but because of the above issue with names then I wonder why they offer it.
Bottom Line: -This is probably the one site in this network that has the potential to be much better and I don't think they need to make too many changes for that to happen.

They could offer some English dialogue or at the very least subtitles so that we can get into the little scenarios. As it is you can only guess at what is said(unless you speak Russian) and please make sure that the same model doesn't have a different names from site to site.

-If you like the older/younger fetish and can overlook the Russian dialogue then you should enjoy this site.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply


Visit She Made Us Lesbians

14. She Made Us Lesbians (0)

Pay
Active
69
pat362 (367) 01-17-11  09:15am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Exclusive material.
-They have some really cute teens that most will know if you are familiar with Eastern European performers.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format. The resolution is 800x1200.
-Access to a network of 29 sites.
Cons: -This is a tiny site with only 22 videos.
-They only update once a month.
-There is only one video option(wmv).
-You can stream the videos in Flash or WMV but they are cut-up in sections so no way of seeing the entire video.
-There is a little scenario with dialogue but it's in Russian so no way of knowing what they say..Unless you understand Russian(I don't).
-The videos are similar with 2 teens and 1 older lady but most of the interaction is between the teens.
-Most of the models are given a name that is not the one they are more commonly known under.
Bottom Line: -This site could never survive as a stand alone because it doesn't update often enough and their lack of choice in the possible download videos formats doesn't help.

-It's not a terrible bonus site but I can't help to feel that they missed the boat on the premise for their videos. If you are going to have two teens with an older woman than you'd think that she should be a more active player rather than be regalated to sideline coach.

-I don't recommend you join this site unless the content on the other sites appeals to you.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

15. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
77
pat362 (367) 11-22-10  08:51am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 11-22-10  01:50pm  (Update History)
Reason: I forgot to add the bonus site info
Pros: -There appears to be genuine heat between the performers with lots of deep kissing, good BJ and the sex is also well done.
-They have some super cute teen girls.
-The age difference between the girls and men is significant so that adds to the fetish aspect.
-They currently have over 300 videos.
-Bonus site included with membership.
-You can use a download manager.
-They appear to still be updating but since they don't date their updates so that makes it hard to say the frequency.
-They speak in English ins ome of the vieos.
-There is some scenario to the scenes.
Cons: -By far my biggest issue with what would have been a great site is the background music that is so annoying that you almost have to watch the videos with the sound off.
-Movies are all broken down in sections of 2 to 4 pieces.
-Little to no model info means you'll have to be familiar with Eastern Europeans models or do a lot of research to identify them.
-Photo cannot be downloaded in a complete set but then again they are pretty useless so it's not worth bothering with.
Bottom Line: -This site has the potential to be in the high 80's and even in the 90's but the soundtrack has to go, they have to offer their videos as one file, they have to put a time stamp on their content and they need a models index. If they are able to do that then I'd gladly return more often.

I wasn't thrilled about the split videos but the content is so great that I would still have given the site a score of above 80 but I found the soundtrack to be so distracting that I had to drop my score. It's till worth seeing if you like the old and young fetish.

They offer a bonus site called class3some and it's basically the same girls that appear on oldje but here it's at least 2 girls with one guy. The men are much younger that those at oldje. The videos are also broken in 2 sections and there is no model info. They currently have over 40 videos. You can download photosets in a zip format but frankly it would also be a waste of time. Oldje should have added a second site but with multiple older men with one or two women
and that would have been a better fit than what we get with class3some.
Respond: 9 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

16. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
78
slutty (111) 11-06-10  12:00am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (49), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Attractive euro women
-Reasonably well filmed scenes
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although mine did have some timeout problems (I tried DTA and GetRight)
-Looks to be all original content
-Scenes have a "plot" to some extent
-Zip downloads of some photosets (in rar)
-Photo quality is variable, newer material is good
-Bonus site is pretty interesting (class3-some), although has most of the same cons as this site
-Decent sized archive (300+ scenes), although about half of it is poor quality.
-Newer video quality is pretty good, 1280x720 8000 kbps was the best I saw, although the video doesn't look as good as the specs might suggest.
-The mid-aged material was decent at 720x400 3000 kbps. I don't have specs on the RM material, but the file sizes are very small and look very poor.
Cons: -Poor navigation
-Logins timeout relatively fast
-Expensive, about $40 US at current exchange rate
-Slowish download speeds, best I saw was 400 KB/s using DTA
-Poor navigation, no model index, no search function, etc.
-Older videos are RealMedia, and very poor quality.
-Some sets don't have photosets associated with them, only screencaps, and some sets don't have zips.
-Most videos are in multiple parts, between 2 and 4 was typical.
-Video quality on newer material is pretty good, older material is quite poor.
-Limited download options, newer material is wmv (high or low) older material is realmedia only (high or dialup - neither are "high")
-I have no idea what the update schedule is, no dates on the scenes, but I somehow doubt it is frequent
Bottom Line: The material on this site is pretty decent, there are certainly some attractive ladies. Personally I am not a fan of the young/old fetish, I joined mostly because of the attractive ladies.

It is a pity that the site makes it so hard to get at their content. The navigation is poor, most of the scenes do not even give the model a name. A model index would be nice, just for sorting purposes. The navigation pretty much consists of a list of scenes with some preview pictures, with 5 scenes on each page. Pretty much nothing else.

The scenes themselves are pretty good, although the editing can be a bit odd. Most of the scenes I downloaded have quite loud background music that pretty much drowns out everything else. This is one of the only sites I can think of that uses slow motion during sex scenes, and the slow motion is a bit odd to me.

I did not have any experience with customer support, so I can't comment on that. There is no user forum or anything of that nature.

I actually very much liked the bonus content. Although some of the scenes are a bit weird (like a guy has sex with two ladies, then two other ladies, etc.).

Overall I think this site is decent, it would be nice to see them provide a model index and fix some of their many download and navigation issues. Given the price, it is hard to recommend unless there are specific models you like in the preview (or you are really fond of old/young niche). The bonus site is nice, but certainly doesn't make it worth the price for me. If you like to see "attractive men" in scenes, this is most definitely not the site for you, as many are fat, old and hairy (not that there is anything wrong with that...)
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Old Young Lesbian Love

17. Old Young Lesbian Love (0)

Pay
Active
82
messmer (137) 11-01-10  03:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (76), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to its Lesbian Theme.

Original contents with mostly attractive elderly and young ladies.

Updates regularly.

Excellent quality in newer videos, going as high as 1920 x 1080p in wmv and h264 format, with a total bitrate of over 8000 kbps.

Excellent picture quality, now in High Resolution
4288 x 2848px. The sets usually follow the action of the video but are NOT vidcaps. There are also many solo shots of the individual models included.

Excellent download speed for me at 3.5 MB/s.

Part of a large network (21Sextury).
Cons: At present only 55 scenes are listed. The site was established in May 2010 and while updates are regular they come only once a week.

Only 62 models, young and old.

Some of the older scenes listed in this site were originally published in "Lusty Grandmas."
Bottom Line: Quite frankly I am enjoying sites like these with its mature ladies who would not win a beauty contest but give me the feeling instead that they could be my elderly neighbor next door. Anyone who likes glamor and glitz would not enjoy this site. Anyone for whom forty years old is ancient, might as well stay away but I enjoy the company of my peers!

In the past I had taken 21Sextury to task for being so neglectful when it came to their sites that featured very mature women, because most hadn't been updated in years, which left me with only "Lusty Grandmas."

But now I am willing to give this site a score over 80, not only for its quality material, but also as a thank you to 21Sextury for adding it to my line up of sites.

The "Lusty Grandmas" are glad to finally have company.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Freddie\'s World

18. Freddie's World (0)

Pay
Active
80
Serpent (5) 10-11-10  12:24pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Lots of videos.
UK girls.
Plenty of hardcore sex.
Really fast downloads.
Cons: Some video quality is poor.
Girls not always amateurs.
Bottom Line: I like this site. It has over 100 full length videos oand a good majority of them are good solid hardcore, with plenty of sex, usually one on one, but sometimes threesomes. Lots of different positions are tried. They virtually all feature older guy Freddie, a sex obsessed British bloke who loves picking up girls and taking them back to his place. My only complaint is that some of the films cut off too quickly at the end; one even ends before the guy has finished coming!

They are filmed in a cheesy style which is quite funny at times, but can grate after a while, especially when you see that the "amateur" that is being picked up on the sea front is a porn star you have seen in a load of other films. Thankfully, there were also quite a few girls I hadn't seen before.

The videos are of varying quality. Some are very poor; for instance there are a couple of videos that are filmed in bright sunlit rooms and you can barely see what is going on. Some are the opposite and are too dark, but overall the quality is ok.

Downloads were really fast, which is a pleasant change. I got 800kb/sec pretty much all the time, which is excellent. As the videos were only available to download in one file, this was very important.

I would recommend this site to fans of British girls.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Cougars In Heat

19. Cougars In Heat (0)

Pay
Active
80
Wittyguy (95) 09-16-10  04:30pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ $3 for a 3 day full access trial membership through TBP
+++ Lots of actual American MILFs (no 25 yr olds)
++ Lots of good hardcore action
++ Multiple viewing and DL options for vids plus all vids have accompanying screen cap shots.
++ Exclusive content.
+ Each set has a softcore photo shoot (no softcore vids though)
+ No DRM or DL limits, supports DL manager
+ About 175 scenes, all with pics and vids
+ No watermarks on pics or vids.
+ Pic size comes in at 1600 x 1070, all have zips
+ Good DL speeds (500 to 700 KB/sec for me)
+ Updates are dated so you if you rejoin later you know where to start.
+ No cross sales on sign-up
Cons: --- Down to 1 update a month.
-- Most every scene is shot the same (especially the pics), it gets repetitive.
-- HD videos aren't HD and the best "non HD" files still come out blurry when viewed full screen.
-- No scene tags or real search function.
- Many of the video trailers for the sets don't work.
- Photo closeup shots are out of focus on body parts (get a camera man who knows how to shoot stills).
- About half the models have boob jobs.
- No model directory or model info.
- Bonus sites didn't work for me.
- Advertising on main page.
- Navigation needs some work.
- Canceling membership a bit of a pain.
Bottom Line: It's just about time for hunting season around here so thought I try a change of pace and check out some cougars on the prowl. What you get here is actual cougar material (women in their 30's to 50's) with the stretch marks, wrinkles and the occasional hairy bush pouncing on younger porn dudes for some basic sex (no anal, toys or bizaare stuff). The price was right for the trial so I signed up and here's what you get:

PHOTOS: Best quality pics are 1600 x 1070 and each set has zips. Most scenes have about 120 to 150 HC pics. The lighting and production value is pretty good with minimal airbrushing. One beef I had was that on shots closer than full body, something is always out of focus ... get a better camera or someone who knows how to use it. The softcore sets had more pictures than the HC and they're pretty good, no toys used - just posing, gradually stripping and maybe some fingering. For those who like older women stripping and posing, this would be a good site to try. My biggest complaint here is that every freakin' set is shot the same. Couple fully clothed, cougar gets half undressed for sex on back, side and cowgirl. Girl gets naked for reverse cowgirl and doggie. Every set, every time. Apparently imagination is not one of this site's strong suits. There are screen caps for each scene too.

VIDEOS: Lots of viewing options, DL in different sizes, stream in different speeds with the inscreen browser or one of yours, and there's an i-pod option too. The problem here is that even though I have a small computer screen, even at full screen only the "HD" vids weren't grainy. The best nonHD vids come in at about 300 mb for a 30 minute video so you can see why. The HD is good but it's not true HD, just big files (1.5 gigs for a 30 min. vid) and the HD only is available in the MP4 format. DL speeds were good. Many of the trailers for the vids didn't actually show the vid so that's a bit of a pain. The vid production was pretty good with only a few sets having the annoying cameraman yakkin' it up.

THE REST: No model info or directory. Navigation is a bit of pain, lots of forward and back clicking and it took a few minutes to figure out the DL functions. The site itself is pretty plain. The bonus sites didn't work but that maybe because I was on a trial membership. Updates have really slowed but the quality of the material is generally pretty good. The advertising is on the main pages or at the bottom of the screen but it's not overly annoying.

I can't really give this site more than an 80 because of the lack of updates, nonHD HD vids, repetitive nature of the shots, search and navigation issues, and some other minor stuff. If you're into actual cougars getting it on (or posing for pics) then I'd recommend the trial. The regular price of $30 a month is too much and unless you have a slow connection you should be able to grab all you want within the trial time.

Now, how come I never meet these women in real life?
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jurassic Cock

20. Jurassic Cock (0)

Pay
Active
80
Harry Kuntz (12) 09-15-10  03:55pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: -RON JEREMY!!!
-A-1 quality MPEG & WINDOWS media formatting
-56 video/picture sets
-Geriatric theme A new twist.
-Bonus access to PORN PROS network
Cons: -Updates slower than a chess game at the Special Olympics.
-Old guys aren't really that old.
-Same cast over and over and over...and over.
-Prevalent amount of pitches for other porn sites(or in English...too many fucking advertisements)
Bottom Line: Some young girls prefer to have their first sexual liaisons with older, more experienced men who are wise in the ways of the world.The very thought of getting broken in by some gawky, acne riddled,two pump teenage chump is horror enough to make any girl want to join the convent and renounce sex.The teen tramps at JURASSIC COCK have taken the May-December romance conundrum one step further and set their sights on penises attached to men old enough to have been present at the invention of fire.The old dogs at JURASSIC COCK have some new tricks to teach these scrumptious young sex kittens.

Porn legend Ron Jeremy leads this cast of dirty old men as they get every last drop of their cocks milked by A pack of ripe & ready juvenile jezebels.These long in the tooth beau hunks bend,twist,and pound those tight young pussies until they're as supple as A jar of play-doh.

The rest of the cast is made up of such tantalizing porn tarts as LEXI DIAMOND,TANNER MAYES,and TESSA TAYLOR.They purr,coo,and moan as they take these geezers fossilized fuck wands in every possible hole.The old fogey's at JC are taking these bitches to school!

You have to take JURASSIC COCK with A grain of salt.The story lines are inane if not completely ludicrous.As in most skin flicks,the acting is atrocious and borders on down right embarrassing.The stunt cocks in these videos are in their mid to late 50's.Hardly what I would consider Jurassic.It would've been much more sick & depraved to watch these bimbos get worked over by some decrepit ass mummy looking mother fuckers than these middle aged pretenders.

All in all I think this is A funny twist on the regular old teen genre.If you're A dirty old man looking to live vicariously through RON JEREMY and the rest of this gang of grandpas,then the price is reasonable enough to not eat away your whole social security check.The bonus sites included in the PORN PROS package is worth the price alone.Whoever said retirement had to be A drag obviously has never seen JURASSIC COCK.STEVEN SPIELBERG and his CGI dinosaurs ain't got nothing on this site!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Access Matures

21. Access Matures (0)

Network
Active
60
dracken (246) 06-17-10  06:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent amount of images (around 100+ galleries per site each one with about 60-80 images downloadable as zip files, most images at 1024x768)

- Not all image galleries have videos, in fact most sites in the network only have around 30 videos split into clips, no streaming and no sense as to how the videos are named or what format they come in (anything from wmv to avi and one or two mpg's, but on the bright side most of the videos are at 720 x 576 or around there. So you have crystal clear images of girls pretending to have sex...


- Very good download speeds (on a network that couldn't even stream hulu I got my downloads in a few minutes) I am trully impressed

- A few cute models you have to hunt for through the whole network

- Some nice pantyhose scenes, girl eaten out through pantyhose, but nothing I haven't seen on other sites.

- The price is right.
Cons: - Bad/ no updates. I agree with the previous review that their updates are old content re-posted. I joined on June 17th and the latest update is from June 18th...hmm something fishy is going on here.

-Poor organization/ navigation of the site. I found images of white men in the Black and Matures section of the site. Many sites overlap with their content (saw no difference between coed matures and office matures) No way to search for models or a certain category (lesbian, hardcore, etc)

- For most of the scenes there is no penetration and there is a lot of old men giving head to young chicks. The lesbian content is a bit more hardcore, with some actual dildo penetrations. But if you expect more than three images of a cum-shot, or maybe some anal...keep dreaming.

- Overall very disappointing models, compared to the 21sextury's grandpas fuck teens the models here are just disappointing. They look very average and even the MILFs...well I wouldn't put the F there...
Bottom Line: I joined this site because I enjoy seeing teen girls getting fucked by old men. I was part of 21sextury and they left me wanting more. The joining page here promised more teen girls and less MILFS's which is not really my cup of tee anyway so I said, sure sign me up.

However, once I joined I discovered that the whole network could be reduced to three categories: old-men giving head to girls and some lesbian content and young boy on old woman action. Overall a tad bit disappointing for a network that promises "ultimate mature porn."

Then I realized that the videos are broken into clips...I hate putting clips together. As if that wasn't enough once I have my videos I get to see some seriously unrealistic sex scenes (or some men that have enormous penises and can bend them in unbelievable ways) Basically 70% of the content is barely a notch above what you could see on Softcore, late night TV porn.

The rest 30% of the content is either lesbian or young men on old women (they actually have some images of penetration there)

To add injury to the whole thing I can't even search for the one or two cute models that I found. (There is a very cute read-head in the mature co-ed and then in the lick matures section and I feel like she has to be somewhere else...If only the preview thumbnails were more descriptive, or if they had a search function)

So yeah, overall I'm very disappointed with the network and will look to get my money back. But, they do have good speeds, a decent price and if you really like MILF's with young boys it might be worth the one month fee.

I'd look at All over 30 or old and young gangbang or 21sextury...anyway, hope this helped.

My advice? Stick with
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Oldje

22. Oldje (1)

Pay
Active
66
BabyGetReal (32) 05-21-10  07:08pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (31), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Creative scenarios, very unusual.
Gorgeous slim women, many very cute.
Mostly natural breasts.
As a 70 year old, the fantasy of a beautiful young woman coming onto me is very attractive.
Dialog, when there is any, is in English.
Guys don't walk on already hard.
Normal sized dicks.
No brainless rough hard banging away.
No fake moaning.
Cons: Boring, repetitive, passionless sex.
Apparently no interest in arousing the women.
Sometimes it appears that the men coming is the girls mouths is faked, with fake semen preloaded in the girls mouths.
The price is WAY WAY too high ($38/month).
Early vids very low res; later ones low res or OK; a few very recent ones are stunningly hires.
Too many long closeups.
Downloads all have the same names so you have to rename every one.
There is usually annoyingly loud music that doesn't fade out -- but it doesn't matter because nobody ever really gets aroused.
Bottom Line: A couple of the very recent very high resolution videos are in beautiful outdoor settings. They move slowly and sensuously, with a lot of kissing. About half of the videos are scripted with the guys taking advantage of the girls (I can do without that). In the other half, the girls tease and come onto the guys -- which I love. So I had high anticipation about this site -- but it turned out to be one of the least arousing sites to which I've subscribed.

The creativity and variety of the scenarios is really unusual and is the best thing about this site. Also the lack of hard banging and rushed sex. The slow sensuous approach is refreshing. Unfortunately, this is coupled with terrible directing and editing -- if the goal is to be erotic.

The director/editor seems to insist on so many minutes each for a series of positions, without any concern for what is actually happening. There is no chemistry between any of the couples. They show no evidence of having fun, being playful, or getting aroused. There is no spontaneity. Apparently they are just doing what the director told them to do. Even if a little spark starts to grow, they are told to change positions and it kills any spark that started.

In only one or maybe two of all the 30 videos that I watched, the girls actually got aroused and maybe orgasmed. This was not respected, featured, emphasized -- the director/editor did not seem to notice or care that this happened -- it was incidental -- and it was not erotic to watch.

The emphasis is on the girl pleasuring the man. Most have very brief cunnilingus or finger fucking, but only to please the man, and it stops after a moment, regardless of whether the woman might show a little spark of excitement. All videos end with a blow job and the guy (supposedly) coming in the girl's mouth. In some cases the guy jacks off and really comes; in others, the girl blows him and maybe he really comes, or it is faked.

A give away about the attitude in this site is that in all the preview stills that label each video, very few if any show the girl with an expression of actual enjoyment or arousal. Instead, she is always looking at the camera with her mouth open, a sure sign that she is not aroused.

For what this site offers, the price is WAY WAY too high (30 euros, about $38/month). Actresses names are not given. There is no search mechanism. There are no dates for the "updates". Most of the videos have poor resolution.

The bonus site (class-3some) is even worse.

It is unusual that I download 30 videos from a site and don't find a single one that I want to keep, but that is what happened here. They seemed to have a good idea and some real creativity, but the direction/editing kills any eroticism.

Sometimes they show outtakes at the end, and in these, often the actors are laughing and having fun -- unlike in the main video!

CONTINUED IN A "REPLY"
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Jurassic Cock

23. Jurassic Cock (0)

Pay
Active
72
Gazette Risque (55) 05-07-10  11:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Pretty famous teen pornstars
* A pretty special niche.
* Though not very often, pretty consistent updates, about 2 times a month.
* Videos available for streaming in FLV and download in WMV HD, MPG HD, WMV and MPG. Also available; Video to Go DVD-CD, iPod, iPhone, PSP and Xbox.
* Galleries are archived in zip-files and are High Res. Also available are screencaps. Also zipped
* Date is mentioned with every update.
* Gives access to the entire network.
*Ability to save your favorites, on the website for easy access in the future.
* Features the awesome Ron Jeremy!
Cons: * They use the same girls over and over. This can be a pro and a con.
* Pretty bad acting but it makes it sort of funny. But not hot as most would like.
* Could use some new flesh for both the men and women. Maybe some older men.
* Way too many advertisements on the website. On all pages. Makes for slower loading.
* They try to lure you onto other websites with links in the navigation menu.
* Lots of the same stuff over and over again.
* Only 2 updates a month
* Most of the men don't really look old.
Bottom Line: JurassicCock.com is a website featuring older men having sex with young girls. Most of the girls are pretty well known in the industry so it's fun to see them do something different.

The stories differ a lot. One is good and the other one isn't worth the left mouse click if it could save your life.

They are currently offering 71 videos of which the first video dates back to July 6th, 2009. This is one of the many videos featuring the classic Ron Jeremy.

Now, for those who don't know/like Ron Jeremy, then this website isn't anything you would want to spend your cash on. As he appears in the majority of the movies. But for those who loved him in the classics, this is the site where he decided to reside now, so it seems.

The rest of the movies feature either 1 or 2 of the male cast which consists of about 5 men.

In my opinion, when you create a website focused on a niche such as this, you need to have more men in your cast. Especially older men which look, well... ancient. It's called Jurassic Cock after all! Sure they're no spring chickens but there are plenty of websites who cater to lovers of this niche with real old looking men.

The galleries are available as high res photos as well as screencaps and are available for viewing on the website or as a zipped download.

On a brighter note, the website has lots of different search functions which makes navigation almost a breeze, if it wasn't for the darn advertisements everywhere. Even in the main navigation bar there are some hidden advertisements.
This makes for slower loading and the pages keep reloading once open because of the advertisements. It's just very annoying.

Luckily the website is connected to the pretty vast and growing network of PornPros.

The average 2 times a month update of JurassicCock.com doesn't satisfy the regular consumer so luckily you have 21 more sites to choose from until the next update.

All in all, the website itself is fun when you like the niche and you can stand a lot of advertisements on a site you paid for. The rest of the network looks the same and offers a pretty vast variety of videos in all sorts of niches and downloadable formats.

They deliver what they promise, but barely. In the end it could benefit from a little more finesse, better writing and real older men. This goes for the rest of the network as well, aside from the older men.

If you like anything else on the network, it's not an entire waste of money. But if this is the only thing that catches your eye, I recommend you look further to satisfy your need of older men with younger girls.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Old And Young Lesbians

24. Old And Young Lesbians (0)

Pay
Active
75
mbaya (356) 04-27-10  08:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of large network of 17 sites. 15 focus on mature women.
-No download limit.
-Most recent updates are WMV 1280x720, 4730kbps. Very sharp and appear to be DVD like in quality.
-Can download as clips or as whole videos. Streaming is also an option. With slow downloads and each scene going over 1GB, I used the clip option.
-At the moment there are 172 videos as well as the same number of photosets. Most recent photo updates are 1260x1890, over 400kb. Very clear and crisp.
-Natural looking women that appear to be amateurs.
Cons: -Mostly plain, some even unattractive women, both for the younger ones as well as the older.
-Cannot use download managers.
-The network is very expensive.
-Irregular updates. They seem to be about weekly though. For 2010 there are 17 so far.
Bottom Line: This is part of a network that specializes in mature women. I mean mature, like at least 50. Some are even in their 70s. These are not your standard MILFS in age or appearance and is definitely not for everyone. I expect younger PUers would feel they were watching their grandmothers.

Even the youngest of the older women here look worn and aged. It is obvious that they don't take care of themselves as well as those you would find on most sites that focus on older women. Not cute.

The younger women don't always look their reported ages either. Natural is the word here, not made up or attempting to look younger than their actual age.

As far as the sex, it often is done without any chemistry. In all fairness though, sometimes it may be surprisingly hot. I expect the older women to get excited about the prospect of sex with the younger ones. Sometimes the better scenes truly get going with the younger ones seeming to go with the spirit of things quite enthusiastically.

The sex is both soft, with a lot of touching and licking, as well as harder using a variety of toys. In the scenes that did not work for me, the younger women didn't go down on the older ones. They seem to get them off manually or with toys though.

The only site I have ever been a member of that had scenes that could be compared was momsteachingteens.com. Although that site has mostly scenes of older and younger women sharing a man, there are about two dozen lesbian scenes as well. There you get much more attractive women, both younger and older. The sex is also much hotter as well. Another difference is that those scenes seemed like slick standard gonzo nd these feel very unrehearsed and real. Nothing slick here.

Overall my impression is of a site that is a niche wtihin a niche. I thought some scenes were very hot, but mostly they were just ok. While I don't care for the glam porn look, it is just difficult to get into scenes featuring women that didn't age well.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Old And Young Gangbang

25. Old And Young Gangbang (0)

Pay
Active
95
mbaya (356) 04-22-10  07:17am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (89), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of large network of 17 sites. Most focus on mature women, not mature men though.
-No download limit.
-Most recent updates are WMV 1280x720, 4730kbps. Very sharp and appear to be DVD like in quality.
-Can download as clips or as whole videos. Streaming is also an option. With slow downloads and each scene going over 1GB, I used the clip option.
-Photo sets for each video. Most recent updates are 1260x1890, over 400kb. Very clear and crisp.
-Attractive, natural looking young women. Not overly made up, just being themselves as nature made them. They couldn't be less glamour or gonzo.
Cons: -Very expensive. However, I felt it was a good value for the money when you look at the whole network, not just this one site.
-Slow downloads. I got not more than 500kbps.
-Most videos included scenes involving piss. For me a real turn off.
-Infrequent updates. The site opened in February of 2007 with 13 updates. In the rest of 2007 there were 7, in 2008 7, in 2009 only 5, and in 2010 so far only 2.
Bottom Line: This site focuses on the niche of gangbangs involving old men and much younger women. I have been a member of beautyandthesenior.com, grandpasfuckteens.com, as well as oldfartsyoungtarts.com. Scenes of gangbangs within this already specialized niche are very rare on those sites. I feel this is the best and most interesting site of old and young porn.

When comparing all these sites, the first thing I noticed is that all of them are from the same country, the Netherlands. The male talent is very often the same few. Somehow that is not really surprising as I would expect very few men of that age group are capable of making a porn video, let alone be from the same small country. They do the job adequately, which I believe is saying a lot. They are very enthusiastic in their scenes on all these sites that I mentioned, but on this one they appear to be enjoying themselves the most.

The women also seem to enjoy the scenes here more than on the other sites. The sex is definitely more extreme, with camera work that is excellent for the most part. In scenes going over a half hour, you see everything imaginable. You get peeing, which I don't care for, but you also get oral, anal and vaginal galore. They often have long sections of ass licking. If you like this, which I do, you will not be able to take your eyes from the screen. You may find yourself not being able to believe your eyes. That great looking girl is doing WHAT to WHO?

If you like this niche, I highly recommend you give it a try. If they would update more often and lower the price, it would be a 99 in my book.
Respond: 8 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-25 of 64 Page :    Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Oldje (1)
2. My Friend's Hot Mom (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.14 seconds.