I'm sad to say that 6 months after my last report, it appears that probably none of the sites in this group have any new videos. They continue to label old videos as new updates. At YoungModels, the latest "updates" were Felicia Flynt "Added May 10, 2010", Renee "Added May 3, 2010", and Madison Monroe "Added April 26, 2010". I had downloaded all of these in June, 2009. On to some bonus sites. At Interracial Sluts, recent "updates" were Christie Lee "March 25, 2010" and Lisa Marie "February 24, 2010". I had downloaded these in March, 2009. At Creampie Fucking, Lorena Sanchez "May 5, 2010" I had downloaded in March, 2009. At Amateur Couples, I found Dana Marie & Tony "April 27, 2010" and Kasey Kox & Johnny "April 13, 2010", which I had downloaded in March, 2009. In conclusion, while these sites have some worthwhile videos, they are apparently a fixed set with no real updates. I'm knocking 10 points off the score of my review. Well, I would if I could. I'm up against the PU rule that you can't edit a review more than 6 months old. Seems to me this is a case where I should be able to!
Duke just posted a review on this site and I had been a member several years ago and posted a prior comment on this site. Since my last comment in 2008 (and stretching my memory) it looks like only a few updates have been added in the last few years. I doubt very much that they are adding anything new or, if they are adding updates, that they're probably recycled. Not a great site to begin with (certainly not worth the price of $30 a month) but I'd probably write this one off as a permanent "no go" if in fact they have stopped updating.
I returned to this site in November, hoping for some good new boy/girl videos. I was surprised and disappointed to find many old videos that I had downloaded months earlier being represented as updates in October or November! Many of those videos are quite good (to my taste) but still, it is dishonest to represent them as new. Destiny & Drifter, "added Nov 23, 2009", Madison & Derrick "added Nov 16, 2009", and Sabrina & Lucky, "added Oct 20, 2009": I had downloaded these videos when I was a member in June, 2009! Even worse, I had downloaded videos featuring Ginger, Sammy Cruz, and Aubrey (represented as recently added) in March, 2009. Although I kept no record of the site from which these were downloaded, the video filenames begin with "ym_" for YoungModels. Also, YoungModels is releasing content from their other sites, e.g. MacKenzie and Daisy/Nick which I had downloaded in March from AmateurCouples. That would be OK if they were not labeled as exclusive content. As you can tell from my review, I thought this was one of the better sites, so I am really disappointed to see what is happening there.
This is the followup to my previous comment about YoungModels titled "Warning: Fraudulent/Erroneous Charges!". Immediately upon complaining, I received a direct email response from a YoungModels staffer, who is also a PU member, khf2004. He promptly refunded the two erroneous monthly charges to my Visa account, and the erroneous membership was canceled. Further, he gave me a bonus gift. Therefore, I consider that this error was resolved promptly, courteously, professionally, and to my full satisfaction.
I subscribed to this site on 6/13/09 and canceled on 6/16/09. My membership was good thru 7/12/09. I was billed for one month ($29.95) in June, by cybersecurepayment.com. Other names used by this site are slickcash, netbilling, elecbillpayment. I was not billed for this site in July. In late September, I noticed that I had been billed on 8/21/09 and 9/20/09 by CMD-AZ.NET, $39.95 each time. I went to http://cmd-az.net and sent an email complaining. They responded that I have an active membership in YoungModels.Com! I then went to cybersecurepayment.com and was able to locate my original membership account, which confirmed that I had canceled it within the first month. Today I have sent a snapshot of the cancellation confirmation both to CMD-AZ.NET and to cs@slickcash.com (which sent me an email confirming my request to cancel in June). I am awaiting their responses. A SATISFACTORY RESPONSE WAS RECEIVED RESOLVING THIS MATTER -- PLEASE SEE MY SUBSEQUENT COMMENT.
Looks like every other facial site. Chick smiling with a teaspoon of cum in her mouth. I hate facials and I really hate sites that are mislabeled. This is hardly a CS Blast. It is a Cumshot pewpew
I joined this site about 18 months ago. My experience then was that the usual 3rd party content was probably better than the site. The pics were small and most of the couples were not very cute. The vids were average at best. The site advertises as an amateur sex site but some of the models have done other porn shoots. I downloaded only a little and saved even less.
I recently looked at the site and it looks like updates are very few and very far between (only about 10 more sets added since I joined). Unless you're really into amatuer porn I would probably pass on this one.
It kind of makes you wonder how sites like these can get away with what I'll call false advertising. Many of these girls (erm I mean women) are not virgins by a long shot!
LOL one of the girls on the video previews had mommy marks on her belly! She's a hottie but trying to pass her as a virgin Please stop. A decade ago thats being kind drrange, those cherry's are dust many moons ago. This site is trying to sell sweet fresh cherry pie with hot pork gravy dressing. It don't sell unless your deaf dumb and blind with no taste buds. PornUsers should start a dummy book for porn producers. These guys could be the test study on the do's and don't.
Perused this to see what's up but not to buy. Saw that Lucy Lee (the Asian one) was on the site. She's a prolific pornstar and these weren't any old pictures.
Her hymen was busted a decade ago. What a fraud this site is.
Ok, this is one really makes no sense to me. In the description for this one, which would have the full title of "Double Penetration Babes", it is listed at being an amateur site (see my previous comments for my feeling on this one), but the more shocking descriptor is "Soft Content". What? How can a site where a girl lets two guys penetrate her at once possibly be soft?
I gave it the benefit of the doubt figuring that someone may get off on something like that being implied and not shown, but even the tour shows the penetration without any little blurry spots to make it R rated as opposed to XXX. I understand the problem figuring out if a site is amateur, I really do. However, how can a site like this possibly be described as soft content?
I entered from TBP to this site SPH,tried to join but the
price is not $19.95 USD (DISCOUNT from your site to the TBP
users)the price is $435 MX!!? P/MONTH??!
I don't know what happened.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
