The Best Porn has this site listed as "new" with a launch date of May 2008. NOT! I have on record that it launched in August 2004 (based on the dated updates they at least had). I first joined it myself in March 2005.
Where does TBP get its information?
As for the site, it stopped updating approx late 2006. Nothing I can see on the site linked from TBP indicates any new updates. (The site used to have an updates link from which visitor's could view a listing of all the dated updates, but that disappeared at least a year ago and is still gone.)
Once again I let high scores given by fellow PUs persuade me to subscribe to a site like Naughty America and find it utterly boring. Each scene imitates the last, only the locations and ages change.
Is no one else bothered by the fact (except for Denner and a couple of others) that one moment the models are coming on to the guy or vice versa, and the next they are wrestling nude on the bed/sofa/desk?
No transition, no teasing. Nothing! I'd gladly give up five minutes of sex, which by nature always looks the same, for five minutes of a nice slow strip.
And those false breasts, man, the place is drowning in false breasts! I just canceled after only a couple of days and was offered a free month if I stayed. I turned it down.
I gave the site an 80 in my review but only because they weren't quite as eager as others to get to the money shot and offered at least a bit of an explanation on how two (or more) people got together sexually.
Now if only they remembered that people do a strip as well, many times a bit hesitantly, if it involves a stranger or the friend of a son, or the gardener, or the pizza man, or the neglected wife, before they finally end up in bed. :-) Quality and Quantity: 80. Eroticism: 20.
Sorry if I basically repeat what I wrote in my review but I am really upset about the lack of imagination on the part of webmasters. Most sites could be so much better, unless all porn has now been reduced to rutting and most people like it that way.
In that case I'll just chalk it up to the times.
I really did not like this site and only visited it four times during my one month subscription but now I just received a renewal notice from them and that's after I had canceled four weeks ago and had received acknowledgment of that cancellation, stating that there would be no further charges.
Time will tell if they will honor my request for a refund but since this is the very first time this has happened to me I will reduce the score of my review by five points. Reliability has to count for something!!
I am trying to cancel the rebill since mid January. Inititally I was contacted and I was offered bonus content when I kepp my subscription.I replied and expressed that I still wanted to cancel. Of course there was no reaction from Centrobill and the web form does not seem to work.
I contacted the suport numerous times and I have also tried Nicky from Eurorevenue as the actual content host.
Of course radio silence.
I have been rebilled now and despite numerous submissions via the contact form for refunds on the centrobill website there was no response but auto messages.
Does anybody else has still issues cancelling the subscription?
All the arguments going on over "is it shilling or not?" if a member of an amateur site recommends it glowingly made me curious enough to become a member of Newbie Nudes: for all of 15 minutes.
It is my personal opinion that the ratings given by present contributors to this site are way out of line when one takes a look at what is actually offered there. Forget, for a moment, that larger pictures and videos are available for a hefty price and look at the general make-up of this amateur site:
The overwhelming majority of the members choose to remain anonymous (for valid reasons) which means faceless body parts all over the place and very few pics where one could actually admire the beauty of the WHOLE woman (and a paid subscription and larger pictures wouldn't change that). When you do come across a "whole person" pic you still have to consider yourself lucky if the face isn't masked somehow.
In my opinion you would have to be a contributor who gets a thrill from exposing his/her genitalia anonymously, or someone who likes to mingle with fellow exhibitionists, (not that there is anything wrong with it) to give the site more than a fifty! To the uninvolved (non-contributing) voyeur the site isn't worth a second look.
After 8 years of constant subscription, I canceled my membership to ATK Hairy at the end of my billing month. Why you may ask?
Not because I think the site sucks.
Not because I am unhappy with customer service.
Factors contributing to my leaving are the following.
(1) After being a long-term subscriber I realized that there was no real incentive or discount for loyalty. I can always rejoin.
(2) A BIG reason is the site doesn't have as many American girl next door types as they used to. I generally do not like the Eastern European models and near-pro models. I like amateurs and hairy ladies that the site purports to get. Get more and I will come back.
(3) No interactive user forum for sharing comments.
(4) Some of their most used photographers are not that good and too tame. For example of two extremes - T. Mayes is lame, Sean R. is great.
I will use the money to subscribe to other sites and review them and if they suck worse, I'll be back to ATK Hairy.
I was finally ready to take the step and subscribe but am being scared off because I see nothing on the join page that indicates that the financial transaction would be secure. The page itself proclaims that it is 100% secure but Firefox is silent on the subject. How does it look on other browsers? That little lock on the bottom used to be helpful.
Just attempted to subscribe at our listed price and CCBill threw me a curve by wanting CA $32.00 for the first month and then reducing to CA $27.00 the following month. I have never come across this before with any other site. Is this a new business model for CCBill or is it Art-Lingerie's doing? BTW, present conversion rate is 0.983 US $ to 1.00 $ CA.
Watch the number of connections you use here. The same holds true for InFocusGirls. This site limits the number of connections you can use at a time. They do not kick you off for hitting the limit. They will pause any farther browsing of the site until you fall below the limit number. Also, be careful with download managers here. Refresh the page before starting a download or it can screw up if it has been idle for a while. And, do not pause downloads, mine do not resume!
Enough warnings though! I really love these sites and I am just finishing an update from InFocusGirls and getting ready to rejoin SaphicErotic, so that should tell you something about the quality of the sites!
I happened to notice my regular Met Art email and clicked it figuring it would be the usual Met Art + Met Models offer, instead, it was Met Art + Nubiles.net for $29.95. Anybody else get this offer? I haven't been on either site in awhile, so I may have to take this offer.
Along with bigger and bolder looks, this site got credits added few days ago. One can buy those with real cash starting from 500 for 4.95$ and up to 40% savings with bigger purchases.
For roughly 300 one can buy a scene to "own" it, meaning that he/she has access to it even after subscription ends. Don't know how usefull that is since I consider all downloaded scenes "owned" by me as well but might interest some so it's all good.
You also earn 10 credits per day of membership and in the future you can supposedly subscribe to the site itself with them. Probably means you have to cancel your recurring one first though which means losing any loyalty bonus but we'll see.
New things that take nothing away never hurt. I would love to see a chance to use those points on 21Sextury's partner sites. It'd reduce the stress with credit card when you could access other sites from one you already are a member to.
After having seen that the honourable Messmer gave this site a 99 I couldn't resist and had to join it immediately. Now there's a lot of new content waiting for me to explore some of it is already downloaded and I was able to watch some of the movies they offer. This is a dream for those not afraid of hairy pussy. I did find some models also appearing on AllOver30.com and I'm quite happy with the mixture of mature and younger hairy ladies/girls.
Guess I'll have to write a review soon. The best model so far is 41 year old Carmen who knows exactly how to tease :-).
And for a change ... something positve from me about this site!
I just re-subscribed, motivated by the positive comments of people I trust, and am delighted with what I have found so far. Plenty of mature models! Hooray! Plenty of mature models in lingerie! Hooray again! I just got finished with a download spree .. and if ATK should not publish anything else of interest to me for the rest of my subscription I already got my money's worth this evening.
Thanks for listening to your subscribers, ATK. Quite the change and improvement since I last reviewed you.
BTW, I just found a treasure trove of sets and videos of Eden, one of my all time favorites. Delight in site increased ten fold.
This morning VB didn't post today's updates, only yesterday's updates were shown. Later in the morning the site is down; no video's, no updates, can't even log in. Stay away, there is no infrastructure, technical expertise or customer support on this site.
I've been meaning to do a new review for this mess but it's so hard to access the site that I may not even be able to do so before my membership runs out. If I do finally get access to the site then I will post a more recent review but for now please, please don't join this site because you will regret the loss of that 20$.
I'm afraid they've gone too far for us - successive scenes with anal is just too much. We've cancelled membership. A real shame, this was a nice site, but they've obviously decided to change their target audience, and we're not part of it.
I don't know if this site has patent of giving the models their right or best know name. Anyway they seem to hit best....
But generally there's too much trouble with a lot of different names of the same models in different sites. (See my review for Sexy Employee and Droolers comment)
Maybe we should make a poll - or maybe not. 'cause why is it so. I only got two answers:
1) Most of the webmasters don't even know.
2) They speculate in different names so it may look like (to the rookie) they got some of it exclusive.
fine quality stands against big videos and only 45 films
if you look over the niche, which isn`t mine at all (takes all to long and looks like a sexnumber mobilemerchandising sometimes), there is nothing outraging but also nothing extraordinary here..therfore is my rating much lower then all others ...76 (with good will)
Three months ago I reported here how rapidly the Customer Support staff at 21Sextury responded to an issue. I love the content of their site and have been a member for a long time and their response to my issue was outstanding.
Unfortunately their Support function appears to have changed.
Suddenly, and with no warning, my access to the main site, 21Sextury, was locked right after the last monthly billing was processed. I now have access only to 21Sextreme.
Although I sent an email and submitted three customer support tickets, there has been no response of any kind other than acknowledgements that they have received my tickets, nor has there been any correction of the issue.
I am posting this comment here because I'm interested in finding out if others are also experiencing the same problems with the Customer Support function at 21Sextury.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.