In my opinion, this has to be one of the most bogus sites I have ever seen.
I have seen so many former porn star photos on this site who seem to be portraying available women, or women who might want to chat.
Every penny I spent on this membership was purely wasted money.
Just tried to join this site again. I renew at least once every couple of years. The best porn site says the site cost is $24.95 if you join through best porn BUT I found that the cost is actually $34.95.
Lately they have not been placing the picture zip files until a day or to later, and if you keep track of the up dates or up coming videos, you might notice sometimes the updates are short one update posting. Small draw back, but I did notice a lot of comments on brazzers about there later posting of the zip files. Still a pretty good site for the money. My personal thought.
Kelsey XXX has not done any new stuff since 2009. She is now married, so new stuff is out of the picture. Bye the way the tits are real as every reviewer thinks they are not and she has never met with the owners of the site. The site now is only posting only 3 videos and they have been cut down in length. She was in her late 20's when she did these shootsThe site claims she . is a teen in some shoots. She is way too old to start another career nor is she interested. Just an insider's comments
OK, maybe I'll submit a full review when time permits, but I just did a signup after the recent "95" rated review for this site... and I am sorely disappointed.
Honestly, for a site that's been around so long, you'd think that certain basics would have improved. (I did an earlier subscription a couple of years ago.) My major disappointment: the photos are not just smaller than most top sites -- they are very lacking in fine detail and resolution. Honestly, you could take sharper, higher quality pictures with a cell phone these days. I really don't know WHY Clubseventeen manages to take such aweful, soft and blurry images. And it applies to almost every set. I just gave up after a while.
Other issues: the preview pages give the impression that tons of galleries are added across the many categories. But actually, it's only the main (white shaved teens) categories that get regular updates. Others like "unshaved teens" and ethnic teens only get a handful of galleries each year, if that.
Oh, and navigation sucks. You can't even tell which page you're on because the "1,2,3...Last" links don't highlight the current page.
The girls are truly hot. If only Clubseventeen photographed them in sharp, high-quality images, they'd have a much better site. But things never seem to improve there. Rating: 55.
As the webmaster, James, has said, there is no longer regional billing which is great news.
Bryci has amassed many HC videos since I've been a member - there's now over 30 with her having sex or giving blowjobs. Really great work. The majority of updates are now hardcore, but there's still a lot of solo stuff.
The only cons are the lack of zips, and the download speeds seem pretty slow, too.
As always, these guys are fairly aggressively marketing to ex-members like myself. Their latest (Halloween-themed) e-mails advertise a deal on six of Met's sites, mostly on the harder end of the scale, including one called MagikSex that I hadn't previously heard of. Anyone know what the deal with this site is - how long it's been around, whether it's a pre-existing site or a newly created one, etc?
From the previews I looked at, it seems like the hardest site in Met's network currently with the possible exception of Ninn (e.g. there's a fair amount of orgies and DPs), but still artsy. However, oddly for this network, I've seen some of the content before - at least some of it seems to be repackaged from various Private films. So seeing it on Met's network is odd, to say the least.
Some of the male talent on this site completely ruin the scenes.
It's the most frustrating thing ever to see a super hot model, then be presented with the most insanely boring scene you've ever seen because of the terrible male talent, and Bangbros (Monsters of Cock) is getting really guilty of this lately. Charlie Mac - I'm looking straight at you as the main culprit. Seriously, watch some of the more recent scenes he is in with models like Alana Rains and Marry Lynn, scenes that could be 10's on a scale of hotness brought down to a 1 or 2 by the terrible male talent. And I would say whoever is in charge of editing has some blame too.
You don't even get a single look at the girl's pussies in these vids, because it starts with an edited intro into him already fucking the girl, then never pulls his dick out one time during the entire scene for a gape shot or anything, then the final pullout is cut out end of scene. Mindless pumping for 20-25 minutes as interesting as watching paint dry. You need to watch some vids of Shane Diesel, Ramon, or hell even Jack Napier to see how to at least make a scene somewhat interesting. God what a waste of potential some of these scenes lately.....
I was a member and still is for now until my order run's out. What I didn't like is the fact that if you try to download a scene it will freeze up and when you try to go to another scene you are bumped out and not able to logged back in for awhile. This suck's big time, for the money that you spend we should be able to download and watch later, but it's ok because I will be cautious next time with site's like this one. Support should honor there patriots when they have issues like this. Don't do bad business.
Iv just joined this site , downloading video,s isnt the problem, when i get to the main page and pick a scene to watch ,the scene doesnt show itself on my tv screen, i get the internet using wi-fi on the ps3 , it seems that the only way to watch a film is Flash video streaming, my ps3 is supposed to have the adobe flash player installed so i cant understand why the films are,nt playing on screen. My samsung tablet plays video,s easily thru flash, anyone out there any idea.s why the films arent playing. .
I've recently had membership to 'cumfortune'.
I like the site! A lot! The interface is clumsy---even clunky, but the operator (the photographer is the owner/producer) is continuously making improvements---the site isn't static,----- there are some truly phenomenal videos on the site, exhilarating. You will be well impressed. There are close enough to 300 videos, most are between 250 MB and 1.5 GB in size. So the content isn't trifling. They are all POV videos (some fixed cameras on tripods for supplementary angles), the guy who does the shooting is a professional photographer, he's not inept. He has a way with women, he doesn't try to make them feel small and really brings out their unforced sexiness. They are relaxed and yet aroused with him. You will know when he brings them to orgasm, he is very good at turning women on. There's little evidence of egotism here, the focus is upon the models almost exclusively---you never ever see the photographer's face, he talks very very little. The girls are free to talk. The download speeds for files is not slow---its comparable to most sites, but you won't be able to download more than 4 or at most 5 at a time.
Updates are 1 or 2 times a week, but the content is good! The models are primarily from Hungary, Czech Republic, and Russia. They are well chosen, you won't be disappointed, models like Henessy, Iwia, Dido/Lola, Angel Rivas, Bella Baby, and many many others appear. Most make a strong effort, they're not just going through motions. My personal favourite is (Playful) Ann. Some models don't do hardcore except at this site. Cumfortune is infinitely better, maybe not in quantity but in quality, than many many sites---for example Twisty's can't hold a candle to it! This site breathes and has some verve, so many sites feel petrified or mentally defective---they're so utterly dumb. There are previews available at the site for a good sampling of what's to be expected there. View those to get a bit more insight into the site. I don't think you'll be disappointed, quite the contrary. Its not a big budget site, its an extremely sexy site though, in the best of ways. The models like working for this guy. The producer gives you some pretty true insight into many of these models, not the usual made up brain-dead nonsense. You get a pretty strong sense of their personalities and what drives them as people.
Interesting Niche But Annoying & Frustrating Presentation
There is a good amount of content here, but getting to it can be a major hassle, and is sometimes downright impossible. Navigation is very awkward - models are listed out on separate video and photo sections which don't link to each other. Very often you'll find a model you like, but when you try to track down his video or picture set, you'll find it's been "archived" and is no longer available. Say what? Weirdly, the old archived material can apparently be periodically requested by users, and it is then brought back to the site at the top of the photo or video lists, making it seem like new content (even though in some cases the content is several years old - making it very hard to keep track of what's truly new, and what you haven't seen or downloaded before. Photo quality is pretty good, but there are far too many repetitive pictures, causing the site to break each set into as many as 12 sub-galleries, which can really be annoying to have to flip back and forth through to get to the pics you want. Video quality varies from small and very fuzzy to DVD-quality at very high file sizes - which will very quickly eat up the site's annoying 5G daily download maximum. Oh and once that happens? You're locked out completely for 24 hours. Not even any access to the pics.
This site could be a pretty good one if they'd get their act together and (1) make all the content available all the time (without any of their annoying "archive" BS), (2) have a model directory that links all photos and videos that each model appears in from one page, (3) lose the annoying daily download limit, and (4) put all photoshoots in single galleries, rather than breaking them down into so many sub-galleries. Until they do that, I'd suggest not giving them any more of your hard-earned money - they won't be getting mine.
You know the search function of a site is crap when you download a scene from "Where The Girls Sweat" and wonder who directed the thing so you put Where The Girls Sweat in the "search site" box and the response is "0 results".
The person who designed the search function for Videobox should go work for the Health & Human Service's website for insurance exchanges so all the people who can't get a website to function correctly can be in one place.
I'm surprised TBP hasn't blocked this site as they've done with other sites that engage in shady and deceptive business practices. All the other users' warning comments written before mine should be a pretty major indication that something is not right here. I had the same frustrating and expensive experience as other users: I thought I was signing up for one site, but simply by clicking on a video from a site I thought was included, suddenly found myself with an entirely separate subscription to a new set of sites. I'm also 100% sure I unchecked the pre-checked cross sale box upon signing up for the original site, but was still charged for the trial membership to yet another site. All of this meant I now had to cancel THREE memberships when I only signed up for one, and I'm still unsure if one of these sites was even canceled at all, since the specific site name did not show up on the list of cancellation options. They've got some interesting content here, and a lot of it, but I strongly warn people to steer clear until this site engages in more ethical billing practices.
Beeing fed up with a lot of repetitive porn, this site is the first I've joined for quite some time.
But like Drooler mentioned in September "For $10, You Can't Beat It"
Ok, it's now 13,95 - but still a good price for something different. Ok - it's softcore - but I like that, too. And here we got (still got) British and other Euro-models - some you can't find elsewhere - and some great models doing posing and strip - and they still update some of the rare once like Laurena Lacey with older nude posing vids - and Brooke Bailey and Lisa Marie - both british you won't see much elsewhere.....It's a nice site, if your're into softcore.
PS: Have not been at PU much lately. Two reasons: Have only joined very few sites and then: my English is getting rusty - maybe it's age........
MetArt adding a tinge of more eroticism to some photosets.
MetArt is still softcore. But yesterday, 2013-10-19, they added a softcore lesbian photoset of two models. The models actually were shown touching and kissing each other's breasts, as well as kissing each other on the lips. A few years back the models might have looked at each other with their eyes, but fondling was strictly forbidden.
I guess Met-Art is trying to boldly step into the new world of eroticism, where being nude is not enough to satisfy its audience.
I'll admit that this may be a problem that I alone have, but if you're considering a membership here you should at least be aware of it.
The site offers two types of HD files, on is MPG and the other is WMV. Both are 1920x1280. Both files are around 3GB is size per scene. I downloaded the MPG files and found that there is a lot of stuttering. This occurs with both Windows Media Player and VLC. I've started to replace those with the WMV files and they don't seem to have the same problem.
Like I said, this may be unique to me, though I tested the files with two computers and had the same problem with both.
If someone has some thoughts on what may be causing this I'd appreciate hearing from you.
Warning - this organisation does not register cancellations
A warning to anyone who may join a site from this organisation - they do not appear to register cancellations. For the second time in as many months, I had to go to live support to cancel my membership. They told me I did not receive a cancellation confirmation, because my cancellation had not been registered. I would suggest you cancel very close to joining, because it may well take some time and effort to cancel once you have joined.
I took up their $5/£5 discount offer even though they have pre checked cross selling and regional discrimination. The renewal is significantly higher, so I'm willing to steal at steal prices, but not willing to pay a fair price for reasonable content from organisations who are going to try and trick or cheat you. I can't argue with the content, and I can't argue with live support, who although it took some time to find someone available, were efficient once I contacted them.
I suppose the lesson is, if you are going to pay for membership to an organisation with questionable practices, you will have to be prepared to put in some time and effort to avoid being ripped off. Buyer beware.
I have some good news about this companies policy in regards to downloads. I don't exactly know when this happened but it has to be quite recent. All I know is that you can now download all of their library as opposed to only their most recent videos.
I read somewhere that this is for all of their sites but I can only confirm it for this one and 60 plus.
Had a little free time last week so I hopped onto this one via the $3, 3 day full trial through TBP. I didn't spend a lot of time here and I think the recent reviews and comments pretty much cover it. Just a few notes of my own:
I made a mistake by failing to notice the "no zips" warnings regarding the photos. Major Bummer as this definitely hurts the site since they offer up to 500 pics on some sets. Most photo sets across the network have nothing of value because they only have 8 to 40 pics but there is no way of knowing how my photos are in a set until you click on the scene you want to see. The internet Stone Age applications continue if you actually go into see the pics (they are good sized at roughly 1200 x 2000) and click on the photo thumbnails. If you click on 6 thumbnails on a page and make the pics full size that means 12 or more back page clicks to navigate back to the previous page. You get the idea here, ignore the pics.
Vids are all over the board. If it has an update stamp before 2010/2011 then it's not worth viewing as it means the scene was probably shot a long time ago and is grainy even at 480x640 resolution. The "540p" or "web hd" is something different that comes up on some recent vids but I found it to only be marginally better than standard resolution (I've never seen a camera with "540p resolution" settings so they're just doing some compressing of an hd file or enlarging a standard vid). The most recent vids have HD (probably several hundred across the network) and all are pretty much professionally done.
There is a fair amount of overlap with most vids appearing on at least 2 sites. The updates are not indicative of when a scene was filmed, I saw some updates within the last year that feature girls who left porn a long time ago. Navigation involves a lot of clicking and really needs to be upgraded. Be aware that the porn star directory is not complete on some sites. Really the best way to get around is to go to an individual site and start cruising the dvd scenes using their search tags (unfortunately you can only search one tag / category at a time).
There is a wide variety of porn to suit just about anyones taste with about 16,000 vids in total, although I'd say only about 1000 scenes have hd standards. I like the look and feel of the Devil's Film, Daring Film and Low Art films as they seem to be offering up more than just standard shoots, actually some artistic thought and production went into the scenes they shoot.
Like I said, I didn't spend much time here and since I'm more of a pic guy the lack of zips pretty much dampened my mood right off. I'd probably score this site in the 82-85 range if I did a full on review.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.