Lots of the preview page pics have nice gaping pussies then the video has 0
So for some mind boggling reason, all the previews on this site and the similar sites like PassionHD, castingcouch-x, etc all have some pretty interesting PICTURE previews of the scenes. Girls getting fucked by big dicks and having their pussies gaped open. But stop right there!!! Do not expect to see this in the videos. Video after video you will experience never once seeing the girls pussies. Scene after scene of robotic male talent never once pulling their dicks out to show us the goods. It's beyond boring and disappointing. Why in the hell do most of the pics on the preview pages focus on some pussy gaping when there is ZERO in the videos?????
Kasey Warner's scene on POVD is like a perfect example. The last 2 positions (doggie and piledriver) were absolute PERFECT opportunities for some pullouts to show a nice stretched vag. But nope, not 1 pullout during the fucking and even the pullout to switch positions is cut out. Good lord get a clue people.
Don't join this site and expect to see the videos you see on the preview page here. I should have known better, almost all of these GF sites are total BS jokes. You will find a few from the preview page but not many.
Just wanted to also warn users to stay away from Centrobill, they cancelled my subscription 4 months ago in response to my request, had an email asking if I wanted to stay with a discount etc, I replied no thanks, I then presumed everything was cancelled, so I thought. They been billing every since, I have tried to cancel again, tried to email, no answer from them, I am now changing my card because of this. This company is fraudulent and all porn sites that use them, please stay away from them....
I rejoined EB as part of a special with Watch4Beauty. The EB site has had a slight freshening, but I'm not terribly impressed with the most recent content. First, it is all "B" roll! It seems as though these are sets of slightly less attractive models or, if mainstream models, slightly lesser quality sets. So they may not have been good enough for the main site, Met Art, when they were taken. Second, it is an odd collection of old and new sets. I recognize several models that retired back around 2008 or earlier and here they are in "new releases" this month with different names and the exact same look. A few models have sets from 2007 and new sets in 2014 and they look exactly the same...because they are old sets just being released now. (To their credit, EB lists the age of the model when the sets were taken, but I don't think those ages are accurate.) That usually only happens because the set was not rated very highly back when the model was popular but now, what the heck, who cares, release it! Fourth, some sets of once popular models might be a bit off because when these sets were taken, these models were very near retirement. There are a few sets where I looked at the model, recognized her and although she was still very attractive, she was several years older than she was at her peak. My typical male reaction was "Wow, what happened? She used to be really hot!" There is nothing that reminds you that YOU are getting old more than images of a favorite model showing that SHE is getting old. Depressing. There are also a few sets from the time before a popular model perfected her look. A lot of eastern European girls took a little time to perfect their looks and some of these sets are the "before" pictures. And lastly, releasing a set in 3 parts is positively annoying. There is no reason for this other than to string us along and get more money. Many Met Art sets have 120-160 images in them. These EB sets usually have 40-60 images spread over 2-3 or more pages of 20 images a page. They either do that to minimize load on their servers, or to make it look like there are more images. Either way, its a really cheap trick!
This site is still better than a lot of others out there, but it is really unfortunate when a good site goes mediocre.
This site and any associated with them should be avoided because even if they only charged you a dollar to join. That would still be one dollar too many. The content looks old and grainy. I'm sure anyone reading this can find something better to do with their 20$ and if they don't then I'm confident a PU member will gladly steer them in the right direction.
non-exclusive content repeatedly posted on other sites in their own network
I've only joined for a couple of days. To my dismay, I discovered that many scenes (most if not all massage scenes and G/G scenes) are also on Massagerooms.com and Lesbea.com, respectively. Sometimes with the same name and sometimes with different names.
All these sites are not marketed and sold under Danespass, which collectively contain much less content than they appear because of the repeated posts. This is also extremely annoying for people who want to collect NON-REDUNDANT scenes.
They are running a promo for $10! (watch out for the cross-check) I just re-joined so I haven't seen much, but so far it looks about the same as it did in 2012 with more content. They still don't display sets on one page. Videos are 720p max and images are 3000 across max. Many very (too) familiar models here. Very easy to download zips. A lot of advertising...
For $10 I don't know how you can go wrong! (Read my old review.)
I wrote a review back in January of last year and am very happy to say the old login/password issue is gone! The photography is even better than it was last year and the collection is simply excellent, among the best soft core on the Internet. Now if only they would update once or more daily....... If you have never been to this site, I highly recommend it!
TRAUMARAMA !!! Look out boys... as if a restriction on the # of videos you can download in a 24 hour period isn't enough, you have to be a member for 120 days before you can download a single zip file. Here comes the good part though. Now that you've been a paying member for 120 day with some seriously outrageous restrictions now on day 121 you get the pleasure of being restricted to 5... lets count them shall we... 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 zip files in any 24 hour period. This isn't classified information... IT'S PORN! It's not even great porn. Might I suggest to anyone interested in joining EnglishLads or FitYoungMen to vote with your wallet and RUN those fingers across that keyboard until you arrive elsewhere. Sites like BelAmi, SeanCody, ChaosMen or even... dare I say the name Badpuppy (EEEK) all have higher production quality and # of models. I know I may be stretching it with the last one but you have to admit their models actually have gay sex and lets not forget that they don't restrict the flow of entertainment information that you've paid a membership fee to enjoy. I'm sure the owner/(s) of EnglishLads and FitYoungMen must have been in a horrible accident and is/are currently in a Drug induced coma(s) due to a severe head injury. Even more unfortunate and disturbing is that the company must have been left to some power hungry and greedy underling on a very low commission based salary to run the show until he/she recovers. Lets all remind him that without the satisfied paying members that commission/salary will be $ O.OO. GET WELL SOON!
Most here probably know the deal:
You just signed up/payed and look forward to login on a new site - and then nada.
This site looks just fine in the previews - som quite unfamiliar and great looking models....
But...I keep getting: Login og password invalid. By, George..I know how to write those two ....but still - and then: Wait 15 minuttes and try again. And the same over and over again...
No answer so far from neither Babefox or CCBill......grrrrr!
Really, I don't know why PU even lists it. If it didn't, I wouldn't have thrown away my money. After all, it hasn't been reviewed in years. But I stupidly assumed that since it was listed it must be ok.
I can't give a full review because all I did was download 5 videos, the newest of which was from 2011. None would play in VLS, a problem I never had before. I managed to find a way to watch them and couldn't bear watching more than a few minutes. The worst quality I have ever encountered. It would flunk as a free site.
I wrote several messages to them on Thursday or Friday. Two were to cancel. No response. Another one was to ask if the site was really as horrible as it seemed or if I might be missing something. I also mentioned I was a PU member and would be writing about my experience and I really wanted to get it right. No response.
PU gods, please take another look at this site to see if you want to continue to list it.
She´s got beautiful eyes and just so hot boobies! I admire her sincerely
Buffy is a miracle and her site is high quality from all points.
I feel there is a decent amount of videos for a new site but I would love more.
I appreciate she has erotic and sensual scenes too, not just explicit hardcore,
and she needs more girl on girl on this website. 1 lesbian scene is just not enough.
Some of you may recognize Lucie Wilde as being the model on Busty Buffy and you are be correct but Although it does star her. She said in an interview that she only shot for these guys and does not own the site. My guess is that what you see is all that you get and don't expect to see much more (if any).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.