Regarding the picture sets, the site is re-dating its old pic sets and claiming they are "new." The site has some stunning pics - at times - but compared to my last join several months ago I see very little that's truly new. The site is somewhat deceptive: specifically emphasizing its sets by date posted when many of the sets are old ones with new dates. If you've never joined, however, try the 3 day full trial for $4.95, it's a great deal, but as a prior member looking for new stuff, I found it lacking even at the dirt cheap price.
I was browsing through this network because they seem to have a ton of anal sex, however after a few minutes I realized that most of the girls (I'd say like 75%) are already available on a ton of other Russian porn sites (21sextury and teencoreclub) Maybe they're running out of girls in Eastern Europe, but I swear I saw almost all these girls in all imaginable positions and seeing them get fucked while wearing jeans simply doesn't do it for me.
Heck even the Iloveminiskirts site in the same network seems more interesting. All and all 21sextury seems like a much better deal, or if you want strictly anal maybe even firstanalquest...
Tour looks good and I'm surprised there is no review or comment yet. Site looks like it is right up a few fellow PU's alley (including mine), so I'm wondering if anyone has been a member and can answer a few questions. Let me know if you have joined. Thanks for your time!
The current poll is about nudity and sexuality. So here's a sideshow: Actiongirls has, for this entire month, had nothing in its stock of new photos but non-nude material. And frankly, I think they look pretty awful as well. It sure isn't what I'd signed up for (6 month subscription, stupid-stupid-stupid me!).
I haven't been able to equate any of them with sexuality, btw. ;)
-I counted 55 scenes
-some hot models like daisy marie, and they are all latin
-Only the last 16 picture sets are downloadable
-All models talk in a Spanish accent
-Not sure if they update anymore, no log or dates
-unlike most other Naughty America sites, there are many amateurs here
-newest set up like this:
Full Vids: 512k - 1000k - 2000k - MPEG
iPod – QuickTime- 512k Clip1 Clip2 Clip3 Clip4 Clip5 - 2000k Clip1 Clip2 Clip3 Clip4 Clip5 - QT Clip1 Clip2 Clip3 Clip4 Clip5 - MPEG Clip1 Clip2 Clip3 Clip4 Clip5
|Low Res Gallery|
|High Res Gallery|
I was a member there in late 2007. I don't want to do a review because of the time lag since I was there. I will generally note that the pictures for the new sets are full screen size or larger while the older sets were slightly smaller. The videos were generally good as well. My only real complaints were that most of the sets only offered a few positions which led me to burnout a little on the site given its niche schoolgirl status and some questionable picture cropping. If I were reviewing it I'd probably give it an 80 to 82 score. I will note that the bonus sites are not worth the bother.
The content looks pretty interesting for those ass fans out there. I was thinking it may be another good site to check out soon, especially with the other network sites included, but I was curious if anyone had any recent experience with with the site. If so, please do tell :-)
I like the look of this site but fact that TBP lists the videos as being 640 x 480 MPG is really putting me off. I really dont think I can go back to watching low res 4:3 videos after being spoilt by super high def for so long. Can a current member confirm this is the case? Also can anyone tell me if the codec is mpeg-1 or mpeg-2?
Good girls, but you can see them also in other european (est eu) site. In the FMJ site there are a mix of european and latinas girls (the "latino/american girls" performe their video with condom).
The scenes are very noisy, same positions (two or three at max)
Some parts of the network contain not exclusive scene (that you can see in other sites in a better quality video).
Quality video is poor and the format is different; the newest video are better than the oldest.
In a word: prefer other sites !!
After a day when the whole network members area was dead they have come back with a vengeance. Download speeds are now insanely fast, I can max out my 100mbit connection downloading a single file. Since they now have a lot of 2GB+ high def movies, decent download speeds are vital and they have them now. So I guess they upgraded their servers during the down time, would have been nice if they would have warned people but you cant have everything I suppose.
I got a peek insided this site and though I should share what I found. The site has around 34 models who all look great. They look like mature yet very sexy women who reminded me a lot of the pin-up style of photography in other words perfect secretaries. The settings are usually a formal office where the girls colored outfits make for a very striking and pleasant contrast. And the outfits are very diverse from flower dresses to sober business outfits. Stockings are a big player in many photos too.
However, you have to keep in mind that this is a non-nude site so the most you will get are some panty shots or a barely see-through gown. Now, I'm a fan of hardcore videos but even I appreciated some of the photos on here. They are very good quality and there is a sister site whenre you can theoretically see the girls naked (haven't visited it).
There are no videos and not all photo sets seemed to have zipped archives. The navigation being a bit funky at times (some sets had a preview others didn't some ahd more photos or a different layout). Each girl has around 8-15 photo sessions in different gowns with the images being around 680 x 1,024, so there is plenty of quality content.
All and all if you like panties, stockings, photos, pin-ups or secretaries this site is worth checking out.
So I think fair play to the webmaster for getting involved with the review replies, and ultimately the reviews do look truthful.
However I think one review would have been plenty at 60/65% I reckon, we could all put 97% for a site just because it was bang on what we were passionate about but it's useless to other people and not really (in my mind) the driving force behind a score.
Also all the cons are the same across all reviews and most of the pros simply state 'nice range of involved models', the 4 more recent reviewers could have just trusted and added comments to the first review, no need for that many seperate reviews.
It does look like a genuine site though, looks very transparent with contact details and cancellation links, lots of info in their FAQ section (probably more useful to read that than these reviews) and there are a couple of deviantart/youtube links on their site which sort of make up for a tour.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.