to provide the potential subscriber with just one preview showing the actual picture resolution of the member galleries? I hate these microsized preview pics and when you click on them you are kindly asked to join. Penny pinching.
This site USED to have some of the most unique content on the internet - shot-on-location craziness with gorgeous women with perfect bods being pursued by evil prison guards or zombies or whatever and fighting back with martial arts or big guns. Then they did some really wonderful surreal stuff with Susana Spears as a drunk Super-woman and other such stuff.
At a certain point, they started licensing material and throwing it up as "ActionGirls Recruits", which was fine as a supplement to their original material, but now they seem to have gone the "Babelicious" route where it's just "Throw Something Up As An Update And Call It A Day".
Where once this site was doing some of the most original material on the internet, that seems to be all in the past. What original vids they do now could have been done by Playboy or any paint-by-numbers "erotic vid" site. And they have even stopped regular posting of those. The most original stuff they do now is shoot girls against weird blurry backgrounds and call them "jungle" shoots, etc.
Regarding the picture sets, the site is re-dating its old pic sets and claiming they are "new." The site has some stunning pics - at times - but compared to my last join several months ago I see very little that's truly new. The site is somewhat deceptive: specifically emphasizing its sets by date posted when many of the sets are old ones with new dates. If you've never joined, however, try the 3 day full trial for $4.95, it's a great deal, but as a prior member looking for new stuff, I found it lacking even at the dirt cheap price.
This is a quaint little site that works for me fairly well.
Especially considering the only outfits used are horse riding outfits.
It is primarily a pics site & somewhat old fashioned, but what really does appeal to me is they often strip to full nude.
So I think fair play to the webmaster for getting involved with the review replies, and ultimately the reviews do look truthful.
However I think one review would have been plenty at 60/65% I reckon, we could all put 97% for a site just because it was bang on what we were passionate about but it's useless to other people and not really (in my mind) the driving force behind a score.
Also all the cons are the same across all reviews and most of the pros simply state 'nice range of involved models', the 4 more recent reviewers could have just trusted and added comments to the first review, no need for that many seperate reviews.
It does look like a genuine site though, looks very transparent with contact details and cancellation links, lots of info in their FAQ section (probably more useful to read that than these reviews) and there are a couple of deviantart/youtube links on their site which sort of make up for a tour.
... no downloads, no subscription from me. Ever! Other sites manage to survive with unlimited downloads. We'll probably see less options to download in the days to come as users with handheld devices increase but that doesn't mean I have to like it,
I was browsing through this network because they seem to have a ton of anal sex, however after a few minutes I realized that most of the girls (I'd say like 75%) are already available on a ton of other Russian porn sites (21sextury and teencoreclub) Maybe they're running out of girls in Eastern Europe, but I swear I saw almost all these girls in all imaginable positions and seeing them get fucked while wearing jeans simply doesn't do it for me.
Heck even the Iloveminiskirts site in the same network seems more interesting. All and all 21sextury seems like a much better deal, or if you want strictly anal maybe even firstanalquest...
After a day when the whole network members area was dead they have come back with a vengeance. Download speeds are now insanely fast, I can max out my 100mbit connection downloading a single file. Since they now have a lot of 2GB+ high def movies, decent download speeds are vital and they have them now. So I guess they upgraded their servers during the down time, would have been nice if they would have warned people but you cant have everything I suppose.
I didn't want to write another full review for this site as I tend to agree with what has been written by other members and the TBP review. I just want to add some facts*
* warning facts may not be actually factual, some are my opinion so reader discretion recommended :)
1. Download speeds are artificially restricted. A single file downloads at a maximum of 500kbps but multiple files or download managers can be used to increase that speed
2. Update schedule is all over the place. For 2011 they have been updating every week or so. Before that there would be a couple of updates, then regular updates, then nothing for months. Rinse and repeat.
3. The last 20 or so episodes are available in Full HD 1920x1080 but 5 of those are 3D duplicates of normal 2D scenes. So only ~15 HD scenes. Quality before that is way below average.
4. Half the scenes are filmed in south America, the other half in Russia. I generally don't find Latina women all that attractive so already half the content is in the bin.
Good girls, but you can see them also in other european (est eu) site. In the FMJ site there are a mix of european and latinas girls (the "latino/american girls" performe their video with condom).
The scenes are very noisy, same positions (two or three at max)
Some parts of the network contain not exclusive scene (that you can see in other sites in a better quality video).
Quality video is poor and the format is different; the newest video are better than the oldest.
In a word: prefer other sites !!
The site looks interesting. I like the idea of clothing and uniforms with nudity. However, I would pay a higher price due to regional billing. Instead of $6 for 2 days, I see $6.45, for 9 days it should be $9 but I see $9.67, for a month it should be $13.50 for recurring memberships and I see $14.51. This is inexpensive, but not fair. Perhaps the webmaster would like to explain how this policy makes sense.
The current poll is about nudity and sexuality. So here's a sideshow: Actiongirls has, for this entire month, had nothing in its stock of new photos but non-nude material. And frankly, I think they look pretty awful as well. It sure isn't what I'd signed up for (6 month subscription, stupid-stupid-stupid me!).
I haven't been able to equate any of them with sexuality, btw. ;)
Two and half months ago, posted a favorable comment about this site. I also joined soon after, and now I have a few warnings for those interested.
First, the maximum pixel resolution on new photos is their "super large," which is about 2000 pixels (sometimes exactly, sometimes a little less). But the site is still advertising "2722 PIXELS RES." to this very moment.
Did somebody just make a little mistake and just kept copying and pasting it? I mean, they're not just lying, are they?
The second problem is that although you get access to Viewpornstars, too, getting there is a hassle. You have to look around to find the entry point, turn off your popup blocker, click the Viewpornstars collage icon, then click this little button in a popup. Then the windows to the site open.
And then there's a third problem, and this one is really bad. The more recent galleries and zips prompt you for a usepass that you don't have! And not having it, you're up the River Shits.
I've emailed them twice about Viewporstars access problems. The responses: NOTHING. And that's problem #4.
I like the look of this site but fact that TBP lists the videos as being 640 x 480 MPG is really putting me off. I really dont think I can go back to watching low res 4:3 videos after being spoilt by super high def for so long. Can a current member confirm this is the case? Also can anyone tell me if the codec is mpeg-1 or mpeg-2?
It's $5 week in Droolerland, I guess. This site offers 3 days at that price. Have been a member before and although it was tough at first, having to put up with with confusing navigation and usepass boxes popping up too often, I finally tamed it.
There's some nice stuff here along with the "action" stuff that I myself don't care much for. (Women in grease paint, body oil, and dom uniforms welding weapons and baring their teeth is not my idea of sweet hunnykins.)
What's really great is that they've recently moved to a larger max photo size, 2722 px (was 1722). There's plenty of content I've not seen elsewhere of girls like Crissy Moran, Amy Reid, etc.
When you cancel the subscription, they force you to sign up for a trial to another site. When you cancel that subscription, it forces you to sign up for two more sites! What a scam. I decided to get a new debit card number to prevent these crooks from draining my bank account. This has taught me to only trust sites that use CCBill or Epoch which I've never had an issue with.
I notice from a lot of posts and comments that people want strip teases. Anyone think this site may be providing an interesting addition to the strip tease world? The site seems to start with a model fully clothed and the model cuts and rips her clothes off (who knows how slowly though) with even another model there ripping the clothes for her. I think it's an interesting approach to the strip tease world. What about you all?
By the way, are all these models British? I joined one mainly British site once and recognize only one of the model names, sO I'm assuming it's probably British...
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.