those reviews that gave the site 100 where both quite close of each other and well... the site looks good, but it's a softcore site most ly right? i don't know... 100 just seems abit too high for something like this...
From the small picture on the review page and the three reviews themselves, I had the sense that this was a mainstream erotic modeling website with a focus on photography. When I actually visited the site I found that it was very much centered on goth and tattoo culture. I'm not trying to knock that kind of site since I actually like them in general, but I think the reviews could have been improved by indicating the kind of site somehwere in the review. There are people that would very much dislike this content and could have been misled by the reviews. That aside, if this kind of thing does "float your boat" then this site is for you and appears to have great potential as stated in the reviews.
Anyone who's been around here for awhile knows of my rants, but only those who actually read them know about my affinity for short haired girls. I have such a hard time finding them since I think the majority for guys like girls with long hair, but does that mean 99.9% of girls in porn should have long hair? I certainly don't think so!
Where I do tend to find a concentration of short hair girls is goth models and those girls that perform in the "Alt" genre, which like it's musical cousin is becoming more mainstream every day. So, I often have a choice: Settle for a long haired girl or a short haired one that's tattooed like a sailor. That's not to say that all gotrh/alt girls have short hair...far from it. But the percentage seems just a little bit more in my favor.
Once again I find a site with a short haired girl covered with tattoos. I'm not complaining since I do like some girls who sport tats, but I find the female body to be the most beautiful thing in the universe and in most cases don't think it needs any help!
So, once again I have to make a choice (cue violins playing sad music) and wish to find a short haired girl with some spunk, but not covered in ink. My quest will continue and if anyone spots one, do let me know. In the meantime, I'll try to find the strength to go on. ;)
(from a 3 year member) Suicide Girls is recommended
I rejoined for one full year for only $29- four months ago... (as a return customer)I let it lapse about six months, they emailed me with the rejoin offer--and I took them up on it. Suicide Girls really offers beautifully photographed sets.. if you can deal with 1000 X 660; 660 x 1000 pic size you will get sets comparable to the major sites.. the only difference is the models are more artsy,dark, tattoed, some 50's pin up dolls, some are goth but not all....most are 18-23 range and are cute..college girls.. and true first timers; I'm a porn veteran and I've been getting off to this site for three years.... first timers can join for $48 for 1 year, $24 for three months, or twelve a month... for those on tight budgets this is my third year with SG...I was online this morning on the SG site looking throught their recent sets.. and I would consider this a dark horse site.. It doesn't get a lot of hype yet it is a very good site...you dont get a lot of samples on their tour but take my word for it...you will get a lot for that $48 / $29 per year...
Tina's a very cute kid with a nasty sexual energy but the tat's are a big bturnoff to me. When you've got a great body with very nice skin, why in the world would you make your body look like something a drunken sailor might have done to his body during a shore leave?
I found out that Suicide Girls are running a limited time special. If you subscribe using the link you'll only pay $29 instead of the usual $49 dollars per YEAR. No catches, no scams, nothing extra. Just a special they're running. So if you've ever been interested, but didn't want to pay the $25 for 3 months, this should be helpful towards you.
I saw this site listed as one of the top reviewed sites on PU and thought, what a load of junk. Then I took the site tour and was pretty damn impressed. It really is a whole on-line community with lots of interaction among members and with the models as well ... sort of like PU for alternative crowd. Millions of pics, thousands of vids, updates several times a day and an inexpensive price. I'm not really into the tats and alternative thing but I'm thinking it might be worth a membership in the near future.
As an aside, does anyone know what sizes the pics come and if there is a zip function? The tour pics weren't much better than 900x600 so I was hoping the members area had them larger sized.
I am a bit confused about the site. I looked around for a while and I looked at the video section which seemed to be all user submitted stuff. If this a social site or a softcore porn site with a strong community around it? Are all the shots made by similar people or do people just update their own photo sets?
Also as a fan of videos is there any purpose in joining? I read pinkpanter's review and I'm just curious if things changed since then.
Finally how easy is the navigation of the site? My partner might be interested in the content but she is pretty computer illiterate. The tag thing sounds cool but are there any other similar options?
I very much enjoy goth girls and I think Liz is gorgeous, but the cost of joining always makes me hesitate to give this site a try. I would probably even accept a trial that didn't give access to the full site because of my interest. That said, with it being a amateur site the cost really is too high and I would suggest Liz provide a full access one day trial. The price would be a big chunk of my porn budget but without a peek I don't think I'll be joining which is a real shame. She looks hot!
Is it me or do these girls not seem like real goth chicks. (Not really a big deal to me as I'm not crazy about goth chicks, but some do look pretty good) I mean the two girls on the front don't even have any tattoos. What's the point? How many real goth and rock chicks have you seen without ink done?
I think admins should erase reviews that are obviously untrustworthy, as all of the reviews for this site were done not too far apart by new members with no other reviews and they all say the exact same thing paraphrased. When this happens, you should start the site over with a clean slate rather than skew the ratings and the morals of the P2P rating system.
I am not a fan of tattooed girls in general since I think tats usually take away from the natural beauty of a woman. I don't say that to "diss" anyone who likes punk girls or anything in the goth genre. However, there are just some girls like Liz Vicious and Regan Reese who look good with numerous tats on different parts of their body (and I'm not counting girls who have the one tat above their asses which looks hot on many girls).
Another of those rare specimens (in my opinion) is Joanna Angel, and I was thrilled to see TBP note that she has her own personal site in addition to her BurningAngel website which is very popular. Joanna is definitely unique and I'm hopefully that her site is as well, but on the tour I didn't see that much hardcore except for her giving some guy a blowjob and plenty of masturbation sequences.
So, if anyone is already a member I'd sure like to know the hardcore level on her personal site. If the content is decent then I'd be ok with the price of under $25 a month, but without some "in and out" I'm not sure I'd signup, not because I don't like Joanna posing and getting herself off, but because there are other sites out there I'd like to try. Any thoughts are welcome.
In the new Best Porn Review, something that struck me was this:
Among the cons was that live cam shows are promised but none are scheduled. But then the bottom line headline was that this was an "honest" site.
What's honest about promising something significant such as live cam shows and then not delivering them - not having them scheduled, not giving any indication when they will be taking place or when the last one took place, according to the review.
That's not an indication of an honest site in my book, unfortunately. I do like Joanna Angel, though, and saw her do a great live cam show with Jenna Haze at Jenna's site - it's archived there too to be watched at will.
I don't know dudes - I love freaky white chicks as much as the next guy but I have seen too much bs and underhanded things in this business - like self promotion and self posts to write a book. The posts for review just seem too similar and the cons and pros are almost the same. The cons are hardly real cons if you can pick that out - they resemble more positive things like "wow this site so so great that you will spend eternity here"! Come on! - am from New York City and I wasn't born yesterday and I have had many try to sell me the Brooklyn Bridge. The site might be incredible but I need to know more info and see some different type reviews. The preview is good but what about the sex? The price seems low and that can be a sign that they don't offer too much in way of hard stuff - but I can be wrong.
1. How is the video quality?
2. Are the vids worth it?
3. Is there hard core sex or just a bunch of alterna gals mugging for the camera.
These are questions an educated consumer wants to know!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.