Just took the tour and can only say, no way would I subscribe to a site that restricts me to 2 Gigs a day! Add to that the "no zips" (according to our friend's review) and you got yourself a real deal breaker!
I am not crazy about uniforms or pantyhose, and am never reluctant to let everyone know, but I must say that the two bonus sites VFAcademy and Pantyhosed4U are making a believer out of me.
For one thing, in many sets the uniform isn't really all that obvious and I get a lot of good lingerie videos and pictures from VF Academy, and as far as tights go, this site actually has some videos and picture sets that make them look very sexy. An unexpected bonus for me because I signed up for Vintage Flash only. :-)
Only Opaques (most if not all of this review also holds true for the sister site – Only Tease) is a great site but a potential member must understand that this site is strictly R rated. In my mind, if you are going to have a soft core site, every girl should be incredibly good looking. And on this point, Only Opaques really delivers. The girls are overall gorgeous! They all have super bodies and pretty faces, but most importantly: great legs!
But my biggest criticism is the lack of platform shoes! I would never try to speak for all leg/nylons guys but I would say that most guys who like legs/nylons also love super high heel shoes? True? I would just like to see one pair of 7-8 inch platform heels! There isn’t a single heel higher than 4 inches on the whole site! The girls often look like they are just wearing the shoes they walked to the studio in. The outfits they pick for the girls are pretty awesome. Lots of nice lingerie and slinky dresses. A couple too many girls in costumes for my taste. I just don’t find a girl dressed like Little Red Riding Hood in pantyhose very sexy. Also, a couple too many sets with girls in blue jean skirts, pantyhose and 3 inch heels that is just a little boring. The videos here are pretty good. My only criticism is that too many of the videos just have a model sitting on a couch moving around and not talking. I find this sort of unexciting and mundane. I want to hear the girl talk to the camera, tell me about her legs/nylons, talk about what she is thinking…
My only other criticism is with the very nature of a soft core site. Now, I know I am telling a tiger to change his stripes, but I wish they would turn up the volume one more notch. I wish there was just a bit more sex/nudity/exposure here. I am not saying I want the girls to be swinging on trapezes with cucumbers but can’t they show/do a little more? Maybe the way they get such hot girls is by not requiring them to do extreme stuff?
Overall, I would give Only Opaques and the sister site Only Tease very high ratings. They do have a ton of content and frequent updates. It is very easy to navigate and very attractive girls. If they would add some platform shoes and a slightly “higher sexual” level, I would probably give them the keys to my car! LOL!
I have joined and rejoined the "addict" sites in the past few years and have noticed the whole experience to just go down hill. The main girl - Izzy is just getting a little old and it seems like 8 out of 10 sets is of her. With a couple exceptions, the other models are just ok looking. I also love to see the girls in super high stripper shoes in the sets. There are very few of these shoes on the site. They do have great pantyhose and nylon sets, but I just don't know if it is worth joining at this point?
Since my last comment things picked up slightly after I left the site. Recent visits however reveal that there has been no update since August 20th and the site owner has yet to respond to my e-mail after three days.
That's right dear fellow PU's -especially my fellow europeans compadres for obvious reasons-. They are charging 63 or 66 euros -if i remember correctly the former-, [the reviewer stops to satisfy his obssesive impulses and goes again to the site to see if 66 is the right amount, and...it is 66 euros not 63!]so that puts to rest the association of Ccbill with suspicious billing practices... It's the websites! Khan, was right from the start.
Does anyone know if they still split up their picture set updates over two weeks or more? That's what really put me off when I subscribed a few years ago
The site has been down since June 27th and they say that memberships will be extended. For now the only thing you can access is the link to join via CCBill-with regional pricing by the way.
Another classic question about the site, anyone got anything to add to TBP review in terms on their thoughts and suggestions about the site? Anything more about the content including what is offered vs. price and/or how well the content is? Of course, anything else is welcome and kindly appreciated. Thanks for your time.
Yes this site is good, but if you like feet you have to try the boys over at 21 Century: pixandvideo, footsiebabes. They know how to shoot feet and most of the girls know how to pose them.
Word to the wise - I understand that the website owner has recently moved house, and so the update rate has become increasingly erratic. At time of writing (10th April, 2228 BST) the site is two updates short, going on its usual rate of two a week.
Ah, Epoch! You sign up for the site, then a page appears that gives you your username, password, and member ID. All of these are generated automatically (you don't have the option).
Then the page with that information disappears and it cannot be regained! Then I go to the epoch site and, fortunately since I did manage to copy the member ID I was able to locate the purchase. But the password still isn't there. You have to click to have it emailed.
Do you think that this is hassle enough? It isn't! The email doesn't come!
You don't get this shit with ccbill, because their pages that summarize the purchase do stick around long enough. They don't vanish in a matter of .6 seconds. Whoever thought that was a smart idea ought to get a Wall Street bonus.
I just got a member here and after downloading about 970MB my access to the site is blocked. I did not notice this in their terms though. Maybe it's of interest to anybody who wants to join.
I appreciate it is obvious where the bias of this site will be, but I would just like to ask a couple of questions about the format of their photosets/videos.
Do they ever start fully clothed?
Do they ever reach full nudity?
( I have a pretty rigid definition of nude. Wearing a garter (suspender) belt and or hose & shoes is NOT nude ;0) )
They have some very pretty women, but very little sex, and only a few cumshots. The videos are not in parts, so it takes thirty minutes or more to download and there are no previews, so you are downloading vids that you might not even like. The picture navigation is really retarded. You have to either view many pages with only a few pics on each page or you have to view all picts on one page - which takes forever to download. There are no zips and no search function. Some of the pictures are screwed-up in that you click on a thumb but the picture that you get is not a match to the thumb. Unless you're unemployed you won't have enough time to get anywhere with this site. The advertising pages look really good but its just too much trouble to enjoy the content.
I have just joined Art Lingerie, having been longtime member of OAS and a huge stockings fan. I can tell you the members area is in exactly the same format as the OT sites, you can download all the images as zips, they are in the three sizes upt 3000 px wide and also videos are downloadable in HD and hig res sizes.
Quality is as good if not better than OT, and the girls are stunning. All the other features from the OT members area are there, like custom zips, slideshows etc, just no forum.
Judging from ONLY the preveiw this looks like another mistake from Only Tease Co. - Like the other new site Babespotting.tv - this only has in-browser flash-videos (and in a damn small/low quality).
Nowhere at Art-Lingerie it says anything about downloading the videos - when you play the previews, it states: 'See the videos on the net'
This site looks attractive, but I wonder what distinguishes it from the other "only" sites that this same company puts out. The tour isn't nearly as good as at OnlyTease, for instance. Sure, it looks good, but it lacks the important details about image dimensions, zips, and so on.
Don't they'd think that people would want such details?
That price is crazy! $85 for the first month then $50 thereafter.
I don't care if this is a network, that's too much to charge. Maybe it appeals to the fetish crowd. I recognize the names of some of these sites and I didn't even know they were still around. People must actually be paying this much.
There is no way this site should be that much. This looks like cheap eastern European and South American content. What I mean is the talent get paid very little.
I am sorely tempted to subscribe and would like to see the combined judgment of Denner and yourself when it comes to this site. If you don't feel up to a review can you leave another comment? Thanks.
When I tried to visit the site Firefox told me it was a dangerous page and I shouldn't visit it. Was it a fluke or is this site really dangerous in any way?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
