Occasionally, Met-Art deletes the photo sets of some models.
I assume this is probably done at the request of the model.
But I found that one photo set of the model named Anita C at Met-Art has been deleted.
The photo set is named "Chariye", originally posted 2014-04-26.
Anita C has plenty of other sets at Met-Art (and Femjoy and MPL Studios and many other sites), so I don't know what the reason would be for deleting this particular set.
Yesterday I decided to spend some money on this site and to be honest I'm quite surprised by what I could find until now. There are a lot of let's say not so pretty matures but some of the older ladies make me go wow!
Guess I will need some extra time to be able to write a review that is honest but one thing is clear to me already. I wanted to find some IMHO cool content that I saw one free sites within the last few years but as there is no real search except for some niches it's hard to find these gems instead I came across some hot ladies from the UK which is fine too!
The newer content seems to be much better in terms of quality but as written above please allow me some time to finish my review.
Any chance for a PU discount? As a photographer, everything I've seen from the site looks awesome. However the pricing scam keeps me from giving then my money without a review. What I mean by that is if you check out their site plastered everywhere is $14.99. However when you go to sign up, its $24.99 1st month then goes to $14.99 each additional month. To me that'd be like your cable company tellng you it'd be one price and then when you go to sign up the 1st month is double the price promoted/quoted.
I dont reaply have a problem with the price of $25 its more the shady way of doing it that bothers me. Too me it's look better to promote it as $25 a month not $15.
Really, I don't know why PU even lists it. If it didn't, I wouldn't have thrown away my money. After all, it hasn't been reviewed in years. But I stupidly assumed that since it was listed it must be ok.
I can't give a full review because all I did was download 5 videos, the newest of which was from 2011. None would play in VLS, a problem I never had before. I managed to find a way to watch them and couldn't bear watching more than a few minutes. The worst quality I have ever encountered. It would flunk as a free site.
I wrote several messages to them on Thursday or Friday. Two were to cancel. No response. Another one was to ask if the site was really as horrible as it seemed or if I might be missing something. I also mentioned I was a PU member and would be writing about my experience and I really wanted to get it right. No response.
PU gods, please take another look at this site to see if you want to continue to list it.
Signed up for the freebie 2 day membership today and was greeted with the message upon login in that I was entitled to 3 downloads on day one and 5 downloads on day two. Thus, no more unlimited free access contrary to the stated PU/TBP info.
My guess is that the limited free trial now extends across the DDF network of sites but I can't vouch for that.
I'm winding up a membership to this site and it's been good for what it's supposed to do, which is focus on Czech pussy in exclusive scenes, using both photos and videos as the media. The models are usually the popular ones; they have reached a population of 80, plus there are four really older ones at the bottom of the list for those who would like ...
The pics come in two sizes, 2400x3600 and 1600x2400. You can also switch viewing sizes in the galleries between those. They're nice and colorful and the girls dress in sexy clothes, though they soon have them off in order to put the assorted instruments of cunt stretching in.
The videos come in two sizes plus they stream. I never downloaded any, but tried streaming one. It was pixelated on my 1920x1080 screen. However, their videos to download also come in that size.
I was hoping for a lot more ass showing on this site (the kind you find at TorridArt, for instance), but none was ever promised, so I'll live with it and make it a one-time join unless the owners would like to give that Czech butt a little more display time. I shall remain at all times ready to worship.
For those who like an ALS-Scans type of approach with not quite as many photos but certainly enough, this site is definitely worth consideration.
just subbed to ddf and found out that they are recycling content for some shoots.it looks like they are updating multiple times a day but some of the scenes are way old dated with comments from 2008-2012.
I joined this website two days ago, I was able to download movies with no problem at all....I go to log in the next day and click the link to download and a freakin html link pops up.....I've e-mailed webmaster about 3 times and sent 2 help tickets.....no response. Here it is day 3 and I still can't download.....streaming works but no downloads. What kind of mess is this??? I'm seriously considering notifying the billing company they use and asking for a refund but I figured I'd give them a day or two to get back to me. I'm not at all pleased with having problems this early on with that website! #feeling angry!!!
I'll just add a few things to what's been said. My comments refer to the videos.
The girls are mostly hot, mostly from Holland I think. No overblown acting, tatoos or gonzo type videos for the most part. We're not in the San Fernando valley any more, thankst gawd. However, make no mistake, this is hardcore with a number of anal scenes and threesomes.
The technicalities... there's about 800 videos on the site, some fairly recent and none totally ancient. The recent ones have VG good quality at 1080p. The vast majority though are 540p. As with virtually every site I joined, there's not a helluvalot of variety in the scenes and direction. But it's not so tedious to make it a total turn off.
Willard pointed out some of the flaws. Searching, etc. My biggest complaint, which really isn't that BIG, is having to log in constantly and losing your place. That could be a real bummer if you're on page 50 of 100... you have to take the slow way back which can be tedious. However, the site sometimes allowed me to stay logged in without any use for a few hours.
As pointed out in my previous comment/problem, complaints are addressed and there are real people manning the site. I'd give it 85 or so.
It's so tiring that seemingly a majority of sites try to rip you off in one way or another. I joined 17 with my credit card card and simply got a page that said "Error." Having learned my lesson from another site, I did nothing. Lo and behold, the next day I was emailed my login and my card was charged. Since this kind of thing has happened more than once or twice, I have to think it's intentional and they're trying to get you to pay twice.
As stated in the previous post, customer support is lacking or, in my case, non-existent. I followed the instructions to cancel (my recurring subscription) and got error messages. An email got no response. Again, I learned my lesson the hard way. Some sites make it as difficult as possible to cancel. However, the fix comes by contacting (and threatening a chargeback if necessary) the credit card processor.
It's too early for a review. I'm still on the Club Seventeen site downloading videos. However, the quality went from good for the first dozen or so videos to fair - I'm about half way through. The quality as stated at the beginning was 1080p and now it's 540p or 720p. And the latter are from 2013.
Their work is wonderful. However, support is unsatisfactory.
They gave mail good for me.
The contents are about 20 dollars and are the member rights of Club Seventeen and Nubiles.net.
However, I cannot log in to Nubiles.net.
Although I mailed at Club Seventeen support, a reply does not come.
It has already passed several days.
Just wanted to let you know that Private is at present offering a 2 days trial, but it only allows you to view and download 5 episodes of your choice. It also reminds you continually (and annoyingly) that you can access everything by upgrading.
anyone joined recently? i remember having a few clips back in the day and loving it. just wondering if its worth it for a single month? also i seem to remember it was just a bunch of clips, the idea was to get you to buy dvds. was this true? thx
The PU/TBP link shows a signup price of $44.99 per month and $149.99 for one year. Looks like the special price shown on TBP has been withdrawn. They still offer the 2 day free trial that converts to $44.99 per month on day 3. They also still offer 3 months for $89.99.
First of all I have to say that I joined this site thanks to a 1 day free trial offer, so I cannot complain much since I didn't pay for it.
The reason I joined was, basically, to get access to the videos by some of my favorite girls, in particular Little Caprice (Caprice A in this site) and Blue Angel. And so I was a little dissapointed to see that there were only to videos of each, and although they were in fact highly erotic and extremely well filmed, well, I was expecting more.
During my 1 day free trial, of course, I also browsed and downloaded pictures and videos from other models, but I have to say that, after a while, and if the models didn't seem remarkable enough, it all started looking the same to me. I lost interest.
It's a pity because, in other aspects, this site seems made precisely for me: it offers high quality, sensual erotic material, without the hardcore, often extreme, sometimes disgusting stuff that you can find in most sites. Videos are filmed with care, and actors and actresses act passionately and with tenderness. Of course, if you are looking for a more extreme take on sex and porn, this site will probably dissapoint you.
From the technical point of view, I have almost nothing to complain about: you can stream videos (although I couldn't get to fast-forward) or download them in different qualities. Download speeds were good, and there didn't seem to be a download limit, even in free trial mode.
All in all, this site is excellent in the quality of the videos (technically and artistically), very good in relation to the beauty of models, quite good in design and navigation. It just gets a little repetitive when you browse through the archive. But hell, what site doesn't get repetitive after a while?
Site has a decent amount of content, but the pictures are completely unrelated to the videos. Picture quality is generally excellent HD, while the videos, despite their very large size (which download none too quickly) are blurry and badly shot. If you're only interested in pictures, you might like this site because it does feature some models you haven't seen over and over again. But it would be a much better site if we could see the movies that go along with these pics. Hopefully they'll post them at some point, but as of now, this site is pretty much a miss.
Since DDF seems to differ slightly from what I found to be very easy with other sites, I thought I'd post a question here on how other users/members do.
What I basically prefer to do is this: find a scene, download it together with a "cover" image, and store them together in a separate folder. This way its easy for me to browse through scenes by the cover images using a mediastreamer connected to a tv.
On first impression DDF seems to be exemplary: an excellent "cover" image showing not only the scene name and the performers but also the site name.
But when adding videofiles into a download manager, and downloading each "cover" images separately, its neither easy nor exemplary to me: the image found on the download page has no file name which relates to the downloaded scene, and can differ slightly from those "cover" images presented when browsing for scenes. The image found on the download page is both smaller in size and can be less informative.
So far I found it to be less than enjoyable manually renaming files/sorting out which image goes with which videofile.
Am I missing something? How do other users do when organizing their downloaded content from DDF network sites?
This site, and it's network, was once a great place before ownership changed. They now engage in the shady practice of throttling download speed during various times of the day, that is to say they intentionally and with malice aforethought slow down your speed, even to less than 100 kb/s at times. Of course the motive being to save bandwidth and increase profit. Before you ask, yes I checked this out thoroughly to make sure it wasn't me. For instance, I downloaded simultaneously form Met-Art and this site; Met had my normal speed, OBJ was drastically slower. I did join through TBP discount, perhaps it's only us. But I'll never know, because after I rip the whole site by downloading day and night, I will never join this or any of their sites again.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.