I would have reviewed this site, but because of job duties ended up missing the last two weeks of my membership. Admittedly, I wouldn't have joined this site if not for a promo Kink sent to join it at a much reduced price.
My feeling with this site is that it wasn't what I expected. As someone who isn't really into BDSM, but love Kink's "live" content, I was left with the feeling that this site would be much better for those who love BDSM, but are less into the live part. There is a voyeuristic feel to the content as well as exhibitionist, but some of the BDSM was just a little more than I can enjoy and the live parts aren't like the other Kink sites where a live crowd is brought in to watch.
I could be wrong there. The scenes generally revolve around a group of dressed people doing casual things like eating, cleaning, while a dom or doms, dominate a sub or subs, right in front of them. Where I could be wrong in this not being an actual live audience of normal people is that the "guests" are dressed as if they are at a social event. I think my believability factor is being pushed here. I can't imagine a group of everyday people going out and plunking down cash for a thousand or two thousand dollar outfit to watch someone be dominated, but again, I could be wrong. It's hard for me to see myself doing that so of course it makes it less believable for me.
On Ultimate Surrender's live shoots the crowd is a group of normally dressed people in t-shirts, jeans, shorts and while those are likely planned as well, with crowd/performers interaction, I find it more believable.
Not to down this site because I've never seen a bad Kink site. As always, the content is very high quality technically and in creativity. If I get another promo to it, I will definitely give it another go, but I can't see paying the non-promo price for it. Would definitely recommend it for those who like BDSM and even more of a recommendation if they like voyeurism and exhibitionism. The best compliment I can give is that I think the site is a bit ahead of its time. The other reason I wouldn't review it is I didn't even get a chance to try out the live cams or raw footage sections.
I'd like to draw your attention to this site, even encourage you to leave some nominations for a review at TBP.
This site introduces young college gals to full body bondage including some tickling and Hitachi play. It features vacbeds, vac cubes, duct tape, sleep bags, straps, cuffs, straightjackets, segufix, etc. There is also a heavy tendency for catsuits, zentai, pantyhose, lycra, latex, etc.
The strength of this site lies in its playful approach of interacting with young bondage newbies and their apparent fun of discovering something exciting and new.
Some remarks for clarification. There is no nudity (softcore might already be exaggerated). There are only external vibrators, mostly used for tickling experiences. Some (most?) scenes are purely fetish (bondage) based and may not appeal to everyone.
i bought some kinks (online money in this website) to download video. I only used 1/3 of the kinks but next time i logined everything was gone. I sent an e-mail to cust service couple days ago and gor no response so far :(
In the last 5 months or so there have been 16 updates. Of those 16 updates only 6 are actually new material, the other 10 are recycled from older content, mostly from 2010. This network has been doing this for quite a while now but on most other sites you would get about 80% new vs 20% recycled. Its a lot worse here which is a shame as this was one of my favourites on the network.
I have trouble with many links on this site and kink.com sites generally not working. They are not giving error or anything, clicking on them simply does nothing. I've tried on two different computers and on multiple browsers. The links not working are for example the ones on the top leading to forums and the site links on the site drop down menu. Right clicking with open to new tab works though. Anyone with same issues?
Also another question. Is there a way to preview other sites without logging out first?
Looks like an interesting new site from the studio/network that produces CFNM.net, CMNM.net and straighthell.
Looks like a more violent, extreme version of CFNM, a bit like a female/male version of straighthell, though interestingly enough it's not blocked in the UK like straighthell is, which I find odd.
Might join this one as my next one though. The previews look good and I like the way it says it updates every Thursday - their other sites sometimes update more than once a week but other times go on for longer without updating. Though I'd prefer more frequent updates, at least you know where you are with this site.
I'd requested a The Best Porn review and it's gone up to medium status, so join in with me for a request if you'd like to see a professional TBP review too!
I was on the Kink website recently and was surprised to see that two new Water Bondage scenes had been posted in late January. The site has been dormant for close to two years. There is also a mention of the scenes on the Behind Kink page but the information is a bit vague as to whether they're just 'testing the waters,' as the article is titled or whether the site will now be updating regularly. Water Bondage has always been one of my favourite sites so I hope this means they're back in business. If they're only testing the waters, I doubt they'll get a lot of interest since you have to pay for a full membership to get two new scenes.
I'll be emailing Kink to see if this the site will be updating more and if anyone's interested I can post an update here.
Blimey have you seen the new update The Party with Princess Donna
I don't think i've ever seen much as extreme as this, very hot stuff but rough as hell, I guess I wouldn't like it if it was not for the end interviews when they say they had a great time, if that's what she enjoys then its OK or she wouldn't do it that extreme. She certainly delivers in this one anyway by the look of the preview. I might have to join now to get this movie.
A little thing though about this movie did keep me awake a little last night though after having more of a think about it. Its a tricky one to say when is a scene going actually too far, I don't like those scenes when the girl is treated just like a piece of meat and not any respect as a human being and they are holding her throat and she is looking like she is just carrying on just to get paid and they can do what they like to her, its so sad and not in the least bit erotic but when the girl actually is up for rough sex its a bit of a mind fu** to be honest cause on one hand she is up for it, she is calling the shots, she likes it rough, but on the other hand, it is a strange thing to be seeing and looks very much like wild raw sex and all the human intimacy taken out. It just got me thinking about things really about human sexuality and what a strange thing it is sometimes when seen in these extremes with a woman getting hit about and fu**ed in every hole going, its an eye opener to the viewer cause lets face it few will ever have sex in real life like these porn star guys do.
I'm certainly not trying to say whats right and wrong here, just trying to work out my own limits of what I wanna see in a sex scene, and if this stuff is a turn on to me at all, when I know the girl is into it, it becomes a tough one to work out if its a turn on or not. Maybe I'm not sure I'm so keen in actually seeing the scene in full now, I feel it may be just a little too rough for me. I'll have to ponder this over a while I think.
I used to be a member of this site. Loved the content. They do rubber/medical/watersports like no one else.
My only, but big, complaint was/is the video format. They used to use something called F4V for their higher resolution videos, and the only player that would play their DRM'ed files was "Adobe Media Player" which apparently hates all my computers.
Does anyone know if they still use that format? I want to sign up again, but not if I can't download the videos
I like a bit of latex but this looks a bit too scary for me - although Juliland has certainly made me a bit more open to slightly more outlandish ideas.
I shall perhaps look forward to Ergo Proxy's take on it!
This is one of the new sites that Porn pros really seems to be pushing. They have weekly updates and while they only have around 25 scenes so far the content is pretty awesome.
Each scene seems to be around 30 minutes long and we get to see some gorgeous looking girls tied up and played with until they cum in a squirting explosion.
The male model uses all sorts of toys on the girls as well as fingering and fucking them. (Surprising not a lot of head from the guys in here) It's also interesting that some scenes end with the girl cumming while some end with her getting a facial from the dude. It almost feels like they had a lot of content from another one of their disgraced sites and decided to create a new site, then more recently started making content exclusively focused on squirting.
Anyhow, the scenes are fun and each one starts and ends with a very cute interview. Good, high quality stuff that fits right in with the rest of the porn pros content.
... is the short pre-action interview with the model in the beginning of many of the videos. I understand the reasoning behind it, it is meant to re-assure tender souls (and the law?) that the submission is not only willing but actually anticipated but to see a model gush how much she looks forward to the "abuse" makes the whole rough "play" unbelievable right from the start. The post-action interview is fine. This habit of a pre-action talk with the model is common to many Kink.com sites and I, for one wish they would do away with it. I know it's all game playing but why make it so obvious?
Types of Public Disgrace shoots makes interesting content
Public disgrace is still a very interesting site where pretty girls get a public fucking, often with a dose of BDSM.
It now breaks down into two types of shoots. One is where the girl is led around naked in a public place for many minutes and eventually gets fucked in a more semi-public area like a park. In these shoots there seems to be a lot of emphasis on the public reaction to the naked girl and the eventual naked sex by passers-by (seems to be in Europe where the public nudity laws are not like the USA). To be honest, this is fast-forward time for me and I feel the flaunting of nudity and sex in front of pedestrians, some of whom who would rather not see it, is problematic and not particularly sexy.
On the other hand, many shoots are inside, in porn shops or other small establishments or in the San Fransisco Kink.com Armory with an enthusiastic invited crowd. These scenes seem to be a lot hotter in my opinion and I really enjoy the crowd reaction enjoying the hot fucking.
A definitely interesting site with a "twist" from your everyday porn.
First of all this comes with the basic Teencore network membership and it looks pretty good. The same cute girls doing more bondage like stuff. Only problem is that each video is huge (over 1 gb) and with the site logging me out every so often I couldn't download anything yet. The download speeds were also horrible (around 100kb) I put in a complaint and hopefully I'll be able to get the scenes downloaded soon.
In the meantime the images look good and at the end of each set there are 10 or so photos of the girls just smiling and cleaning up next to the male model. Makes for a nice change to see some of the backstage stuff for once.
Will update with a full review if I ever can get the damn site to work
It says its 24.44 kinks for 1 scene some are less, not sure why they are not all the same price and its $19.99 for 20 kinks so it is more expensive for 1 scene than joining for $14 a month which is what it says most of their sites are.
Or have I got something wrong here, seems very odd, why would anyone pay $30 odd dollars for 1 scene when for half that they can download the whole of 1 site.
Quality, action and models look good if little repetitive. Maybe they should also introduce some other shooting locations, clothing, hardware and group action.
Can someone verify if this actually comes with Teen Core Club subscription? There is no mention of this site on their preview and the subscription is quite expensive so I would like to be sure. Any other packages with this one as the sites that come along if one joins via Defiled18 are not my favorites of the package?
While this is one of my favorite types of content and I generally like 21Sextreme's take on it, it's just getting quite repetitive. Too much ropes, too much candle wax and too much of the same dark cellar.
There have been some really good scenes, 46125, 46126, 46137, 46138, 46139, 46141, 46142 with varying themes and shooting locations just to name few (there was actually some very good streaks back around half a year ago!) but since then it's been back to the basement mostly.
This site has really hot models and excellent production values. They'd just need to take a look at sites like HouseOfTaboo and kink.com network for some ideas. Maybe some fetish wear (leather, latex etc.)? Restraints other than ropes? Better lit scenes shot in more varied locations?
Just read the review of this site and not sure if one should join it. From my point of view the rating looked suspiciously biased and gave a too high score. Judging from their previews I am concerned in two ways. First, I noticed that most of the mistresses looked worn out and with a ton of makeup in their faces. Secondly, the action is very generic with no innovation whatsoever. How often can you watch a girl tied up in mostly the same boring way and then get flogged and treated with a dildo anyway?
If you cancel this site be prepared. It does not give you until the end of your month if you try to cancel a few days early just to be safe. It shuts you out instantly.
I've been back and forth to this site probably a dozen times over the last few weeks considering joining it. The public part interests me a lot, but I notice in some of the samples, there's quite a bit of bondage/pain in the scenes. I'm pretty familiar with Kink's sites and have liked the ones I have joined, but I'm curious about the disgracing part and to what extent it goes. I know Kink had one site, don't remember the exact name to make a link that had to do with water torture and thought it was too harsh for me to enjoy. I guess it's one of those things where the models obviously consent to it and I can convince my brain of that, but I can't find sexual stimulation from seeing a woman being hurt physically whether with her consent or not. Also am wondering how believable the sets are. Which is the only constant problem I've had with Kink sites and that is repetitiveness. Thanks in advance for any info.
The brief TBP descriptions are usually pretty generic. In this case you can take it as very accurate:
'This is the website home of Queen Snake, a true BDSM fetishist, and where she demonstrates her extreme and bizzare fetish activities.'
Curiosity led me to visit the site and look at the trailers... um... staple guns, cattle prods, nettles, toilet brush? Made my eyes water - but I'd be worried if it didn't.
I do hope this works for some folk - It would be a shame for her to endure all that in vain!
...that makes me wonder how much is scripted and how much is genuine. I understand they have some sort of community with people joining their parties but at the time of STD's and everything it is very hard to believe that what looks in previews like spontaneous action between seemingly random participants is actually something but scripted and directed. Or do they maybe have amateur couples taking part there?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.