All the arguments going on over "is it shilling or not?" if a member of an amateur site recommends it glowingly made me curious enough to become a member of Newbie Nudes: for all of 15 minutes.
It is my personal opinion that the ratings given by present contributors to this site are way out of line when one takes a look at what is actually offered there. Forget, for a moment, that larger pictures and videos are available for a hefty price and look at the general make-up of this amateur site:
The overwhelming majority of the members choose to remain anonymous (for valid reasons) which means faceless body parts all over the place and very few pics where one could actually admire the beauty of the WHOLE woman (and a paid subscription and larger pictures wouldn't change that). When you do come across a "whole person" pic you still have to consider yourself lucky if the face isn't masked somehow.
In my opinion you would have to be a contributor who gets a thrill from exposing his/her genitalia anonymously, or someone who likes to mingle with fellow exhibitionists, (not that there is anything wrong with it) to give the site more than a fifty! To the uninvolved (non-contributing) voyeur the site isn't worth a second look.
I just saw this as a new site listing. Two comments-I have never seen a site as expensive. You are charged in Euros what comes out to nearly $75 dollars for a month. They must be kidding, or their greed has destroyed an interesting concept for a site. This price will not work, especially in today's economic times. I predict this site will close due to this. Second comment- the site is in Italian. I have no problem with this. If we want to join we are responsible for understanding what it says. However, this is clearly in contradiction to what Khan has told us is TBP policy. No English, no listing. Not only is it listed, an express review is coming. Has the policy changed?
It seems there is an effort by the fans of this site to give it a good showing. We've seen four high score reviews (84+) in two days. It's not unusual for a site with this type with member participation to be loyal fans, however, because of the nature of the site, it's obvious some have a vested interest in the site looking good.
So, for now, we're not accepting any new reviews for this site.
I recently wrote in the forums of this site and my critique was removed in less than 24 hours. Please note that #6 was wrong and I did add a reply to note this. Basically, the video I thought was reposts was video that appeared on another site (jackass-nudebeach.com) so it was not reposted for this site. Here is what I wrote:
Subject: We are not that stupid
While I appreciate the site there are several problems that could be addressed to make the site much better. However, I am guessing that those who own/manage it are soooo rich that they do not care to make more money, or they smoke pot all day and are unmotivated to improve it. In either case here is what needs to be fixed, because for those of use who subscribe and browse the collection from time to time...to put it bluntly...we are not that stupid to notice that...
1. Making 20 videos out of a single 5 minuet clip and then spreading them over a 5 month period doesn't mean that the site has more content. It just means the user has to spend more time downloading a bunch of short clips instead of one. I assume the owners feel this increases the appearance of their content and/or dissuades users from using more bandwidth. In either case it sucks and makes the experience second rate to quality adult sites.
2. Video shot from above that shows shoulders and bald-headed men plain suck and should appear very rarely. If I wanted to look at the tops of naked bald headed men I would find a spot in the ceiling of the men's locker room at the local YMCA.
3. High Definition video is NOT up-converted standard definition video OR compressed HD video made to be smaller in file size so that users use less bandwidth. Just because a video appears in HD aspect ratios doesn't make it HD, and yes we can tell. Come on most of us HAVE HD or are members of sites that offer REAL HD (e.g. ilovethebeach.com). Real HD doesn't take up 9MB for 17 sec clips but about 50+MB.
4. Did I mention how STUPID clips that are less than 1 minuet are...
5. Taking captures of the REAL HD video (which is not made available to subscribers) and then posting it as "pictures" is weak. It is quite obvious that this is what you are doing...
6. You may have 190+ pages of video content (mostly due to the STUPID 17 second clips), but that doesn't mean you need to repost so many videos. Sure most people will get tired of wading through the STUPID 17 second clips, but those of us with memories longer than goldfish are quite aware of how many reposts appear in the course of a year.
To summarize this site could be SUPER cool. It could have the quality that ilovethebeach.com has with its content. But it appears that those who manage this site are cheap and prefer to cut corners and maintain their profit margin instead of increase it. It could be such a great site too which is what makes it a shame...I do wish they read this and consider some of what I have said (even if it was caustic and sarcastic).
This always boggles my mind. I looked at the preview section of this and most of the girls are shaved.
These sites that claim 'real' women out there most always seem to have shaved women. I suspect that the average lady out there who is not in the sexual industry may be trimming, but I would suspect the vast minority are shaved. I think that one of the big reasons for the popularity of Abby Winters is that most of the girls are not shaved and look like the 'girl next door.'
I've had this site on my radar for a few years. The thing that keeps me from joining is that the front page/tour hasn't changed in that year. So my question is, is the site still updating? Or does anyone know?
It would seem there's a feud going on at Newbie Nudes and it has spilled over to here. Between the site detractors and the mods/loyal fans, we've seen a lot of very high or very low reviewers submitted of late.
What's worse is the ill-behaved bickering has spilled over to here and that we will not have.
So, for the foreseeable future, we are not taking new review submissions for this site. Comments and replies we'll decide on case-by-case.
Further ... we are removing all of the recent reviews for this site as they are all likely to be, in one way or the other, related to the problems they're having at Newbie Nudes.
We wish Newbie Nudes the best of luck in resolving the disputes their users are having amongst themselves.
Your anticipated cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
I've sent emails many times and no one ever responds. They have 12 pages of picture sets;however, they have disbled the first 6 pages; therefore, you are only getting half of what you paid for. It's a shame that the owner is so arrogant and careless because this site has a lot of potential -- this could easily be the best nudist/voyeur site on the net.
Most of their high-quality pics are from Baker Beach in the Bay area. This site features a lot of sexy Asian girls, Latinas, topless, nude,thongs, and even a few hairy girls which I particularly love. A lot of sexy white girls too and even some hot hippie chicks.
Joined the trial and got a good return on my investment; however, it makes me wonder how a site can operate like this one, with pictures that are non-exclusive, and many of which are plucked from pic-hosting sites like Webshots. I've seen photos from all over Netville, a few with the Teen Flood watermark still intact, for example, under their own watermark. Maybe they buy up old sets or soemthing? I don't know how this all works.
Main difficulty is this: these people need to remove children from their pics. MANY photos contain children, at beaches or pools, and they are not blurred or masked at all. One photo that needs mention is of a very-obviously under-age girl without a top in one of their topless beach sets. This is stupid practice and I'm surprised to see it.
Every candid-photo board I've ever frequented sternly reminds their posters not to upload pics with children in them, even if they are street candids or whatever.
I was a member of this site months ago and was very disappointed. First problem is that most of the site features just one somewhat attractive, but not everybody's taste, slightly plump MILF. The preview tour leads you to think there is a lot of variety in the models. The site FAQ addresses the issue of models in the tour who are not on the site by saying that they rotate their archives. I don't want to hear that as the site is just too small. I had no trouble downloading all of it in under an hour and that was before I got a download manager. Also, many of the pictures were NOT in public. There are better pantyhose sites, such as pantythoseaddict.com and better public sites such as publicflash.com. If I had to rate this site I would give it 60, maybe even less.
This site gets some great amateurs- as in UNPAID. There are lot's of photo sets that one would not care to see, but there are plenty of girls next door- literally. It's way more fun to see a girl not faking a smile.
Since my last comment about this site, the site administrators have updated the site and made all pages available for viewing. After fixing the problem, I can honestly give Enrique's Beach a positive recommendation. It's a very unique site that features hot Asian nudist girls -- along with hot white hairy hippie chicks -- at the beach which is a rarity elsewhere.
MassageRoomSeduction has only promo videos from FuckedHard18. The videos are mostly 5-15 min long and all the good parts are edited out. You can easily find these same promo videos at free sites that require no login. I joined the combo offer, paying for one month at RealitySexNetwork, mostly because of my interest in MassageRoomSeduction. It was a waste of time and money. There is nothing at RealitySexNetwork that interests me. If you like the promos, join FuckedHard18 instead.
Based on my experience with the site I would agree with the best porn review. The people om the site speak russian and very little action which i viewed on the site was worth watching. Alot of the time you sit there watching them watching the tv. The streaming video I found to be very average. The people living on camera are aware of the cameras of course, and they certainly censor some of the interactions if you know what i mean!.
I would give the site a wide berth there are better ways to spend $30 per month that's for sure.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.