I haven't been a member of this site for a while, but I pay it a "lurking" visit every once in a while. The Jan. 17th, 2013 gallery of Joysen (aka Jana, Lisen, etc.) looked strangely familiar. Then I checked my stash and there it was. The earliest date on the photos was June 20, 2009, which just happened also to be the date that I had joined the site for the first time. The girl has been a favorite of mine so I probably snapped up the gallery the day that I joined.
Sometimes, sites will use the same name of a gallery series, and different parts are posted on different dates. Errotica-Archives does that, for instance. However, the photos matched in the case of the Teen Models "Savage" gallery.
Gee, I hope this site hasn't started recycling content.
As a panty fan, I just noticed this site listed - it's from, and includes, Vintage Flash, Pantyhosed4U and a couple of others. Makes this network seem even more appealing and pushes it up my list a bit!
If you have an interest in Wet And Puffy, don't believe their offer on their sister site that says if you join Wet and Pissy, your subscription will give you access to two other sites; Wet and Puffy and We Love To Suck.
Because of that offer (and because of the good review by oldfizzywig) I signed up today for Wet And Pissy.com, both because I liked the preview site and because it would provide access to Wet And Puffy.
It turns out that the offer is totally BOGUS - You are required to buy a separate membership to access Wet And Puffy. The login tab is not functional and can only be made functional by buying a separate subscription.
Worse, they offer absolutely no customer support of any kind.
I suggest that PU blacklist all three sites operated by Wet And Puffy, Inc. for its deceptive business practices.
I joined again and obviously the updates come either slow or will be even absent in the near future, but damn it...Karbo's camera work is getting better and better and the fetish themes are presented in such a lovely way that I have no regrets. The girls are lovely as ever (but I miss Beata, maybe she left for good) and they are getting really skillful with the strapons now and screw each other big time. Man, it was even worth joining just to see the strapon creampies. I don't know if I will stick around for some months because of the update issues but so far it was (quite literally) a blast for me.
Sorry, but this is just an average female masturbation site. I didn't find the orgasms all that convincing. An authentic female orgasm is a sight to behold, but the videos on this site don't live up to expectations.
I think this site is officially the most fucked up thing I have seen. Take one teen, put her in a child's room and have her play with toys for a bit while loud horrible music plays in the background. Then get some guy dressed as A PANDA to come along and fuck said teen with a fake plastic dick before spraying fake cum all over her all the while making what I can only assume are panda noises. This is just wrong on so many levels.
Since I'm currently on the site, I was going to do a review until I saw exotic's exceptional wrap up. Instead of mirroring just about everything he said, I'll just add a couple of things as I see 'em.
I agree with everything he said except about the video quality. With maybe a few exceptions, where the camera work is less than ideal, you have to go back to somewhere to late 2009 to get to the lower quality, lower resolution video. Even if you want to avoid the older stuff, that means there's still enough higher resolution material to make a sign-up worthwhile. I'm more than happy with the picture quality of the 1280 resolution mp4s that I download, even on a 40 inch monitor.
The picture quality is another story. I get the feeling that there's very little reviewing of pictures before they're put online. Even in the newer sets, there are more than enough out of focus shots and oddities like what I'd call "mid-blink facial contortions" to make this a disappointment to picture fans.
The biggest complaint I have about this site has to do with the updates. It's a masturbation site and that's what I expect to see when I sign up. As an example, the updates from January 3rd to the 6th were, in order, a non-nude interview, a text biography, a 35-second face only clip, and a 9-picture non-nude picture set. Looking back through December's updates, there were 11 that were either interviews or biographies. That's a third of a month's membership.
OK - Even though I'm not a fan of non-nude content, I can accept that there are people who can appreciate interviews. But, the biographies? Yeah, some of the stuff the women put up was interesting, and I was positively thrilled to find out how many models had barely intelligible handwriting and couldn't spell worth a damn. "The vibrator is the best, it is a way better organism." But, on every other site with personal information like that, it's either a link on a model's page or printed directly on her page. I just don't see nineteen questions spread out over four pages qualifying as update material.
It's still all about the amateurs to me, so I still like the site, despite the shortcomings. I'd rate it in the high 80s. The piercings and tattoos aren't TOO overbearing, and silicone is rare here. I just wish I could get more out of a month's membership. The bios and interviews just mean I have to wait a little while longer to sign up again as the REAL content builds up.
The middle of last year (2011), I'd been a TM member for a few months and I noticed that there were a couple of snippets of one particularly hot video of Eufrat in the site's 2-minute teaser but that the full video was not available (the accompanying pix gallery was available, which made me want the vid even more!). It took a few tries but once I got their attention they responded and got to work on it--with a vengeance. As I understand it, they practically tore the place apart trying to find it. When they didn't find it right away, the W/M, Parker, kept sending progress reports assuring me that they hadn't given up. Finally, after two months they found it it, got it into editing and posted after a couple of weeks. The result was spectacular!...and, they also found some other earlier video gems which they posted, as well.
I highly recommend TeenModels not only for their Herculean efforts to find the Eufrat video and their great member service, but for all the content--it's truly a great site.
(So, Parker and co., if you're reading this thanks again. NOW, as I've gotten deeper into TM, I've been noticing that there are quite a few more earlier sets where the the pix are available but not a video: not saying that you guys should go through hell like you did before, but maybe you might want to rummage through some old drawers and cabinets to see what you might find. Just sayin'...
I just read the TBP review (quite positive) and checked out the preview site (Very well done) and am about to take the plunge. But at $30 the price exceeds my normal maximum. So before I do I would like an encouraging comment or two about the site. Yes, I'm into pussies and appreciate the site's classification scheme and the sample content. I also like the the statistical summary on the preview site and the variety of excellent models.
So it won't take much to make me sign up if there are no negatives of consequence reported by my fellow PU members.
This site is included with a membership to Gag Factor, which means that it has all the flaws of that site. With the full price of the membership at $30 it isnít a great value even considering that you get access to Gag Factor, Hardcore Fuck Machines, American Bukkake, Over Stuffed Holes and Ghetto Swarm. The problem is partly quantity, but mostly quality Ė the quality of the videos is much lower than the industry standard.
This site gives access to a lot (but not all) the scenes from the JM Productions series Over Stuffed. The theme is porn stars playing with extra-large toys.
The site started in August 2010 and has 51 scenes up. It updates at one scene per week.
The quantity of scenes isnít bad at all. This is a pretty good representation of the scenes available.
All files are uploaded at 720x480 @ 21kbps, which isnít a great resolution. Itís the only resolution available. Streaming is available too.
Pics are available (with and average of 40~ per scene) but there is no option for zips.
Please see my review of Gag Factor if youíre looking for more specific details as a lot of that is applicable here too.
Boy, I kept wondering if I was doing something wrong here at Aziani. I'd be going through the material just fine, with everything running at a good speed. Then I'd click on a single pic to view from one of the galleries and BAM! It was like time standing still.
Then shutting down Firefox took forever, with ctrl-alt-deletes and all. Reboot, and the damn Firefox was still in a coma. And shutting it down was another coffee break. Reboot again.
There are sites with pics much larger in file size that don't give me this problem. And I've had it again and again, even after taking the precaution of rebooting and visiting ONLY the Aziani site.
I like the site. It's got nice, new sets of models like Breanne Benson, Monique Alexander, Kagney Lynn Carter, and the still fabulous Kirsten Price (just one so far). Plus, there's recent stuff of Nikki Nova at her "ClubNikki" that prove that she's as dynamite as ever, too. And it's all exclusive stuff.
24MainStreet, which I'd thought was long gone, is now here and they've even just started posting pics, just new ones, at a size larger than 1200 px -- FINALLY. Welcome to the future! (I hadn't been there since 2005, so that's another six years of a very naked kind of conservatism.)
Glad I joined, but I'm getting just a little tired of the RAM problem. Just a little ...
Edit: Just wanted to edit to say the webmaster helped me get canceled, but will leave the rest of the comment in case it happens to a future member so they can reference it.
Going to take a few points off my review for the frustrating cancellation process. Here's the steps and mind you, I still have NOT been able to cancel my account.
First, they have four different billing processors, netbilling, ccbill, epoch and netcash. I don't know if certain ones are used based on the country you are in, but my account was processed by netbilling, who I have used a time or two in the past.
In my subscription confirmation email there is no link to cancel. I go to netbilling's homepage, have a member ID, but there is nowhere on netbilling's homepage to cancel. Went to Yanks support, clicked "cancel" it asked which biller I used. Clicked on netbilling. It tells me to put my username and password in. I do this and click "cancel account".
Well, the browser sits there with a working spinner going, "Connecting..." I go outside, take the trash out, come back and still is working and saying, "connecting". It finally pops up and says, "Cannot find account". I'll never understand why a biller gives a customer a "member ID number" but doesn't have a place to enter that when canceling.
I'll never understand why a site would hire a biller that doesn't allow direct cancel on the biller's homepage. You're just asking for dissatisfied customers.
And this is not just a one-time thing. I've tried it 3 nights in a row. There is an option to email the site's support with any cancellation problems, so I guess I'm going to have to do that. Whether fast reply or not, I don't think I should have to email the site to cancel when they have a cancellation system in place. It goes back to, I didn't have to email the site to JOIN the site so why should I have to email the site to cancel it? Go back to my review and see the part about my main frustration with the site itself being that it could be much better than it is if some time and effort was put into updating the way the site itself works. Looks like that carried right over into the billing too.
This site seems comparative to "I Feel Myself" but a main difference IMHO is the type of girl showcased. This site seems to cater to the regular, next door type while I Feel Myself tended to show more 'Hipster' girls and I think European or Australian (I don't remember clearly). Anyways, I like the other site so I wonder if anyone who knows can tell me how they are in comparison? If not, does anyone have any info on the site from a more recent subscription? The last PU review was awhile ago from a disabled user and TBP's review seems promising. Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.