I've just registered with this site and used my mastercard , I've never heard of the billing company localbillinglimited.com , Has anyone here heard of them. Its sounds fishy does this, the page after I got accepted came up without a subscription number like you get with all the others and said it had sent a confirmation email, only no email and it also had a link to the members area but when I enter and it is the correct username and password cause it says what they are on the acceptance page but they don't work and just return back the login box again blank.
Whats should I do, do you think its fraud, should I contact my creditcard company ?
Never had any trouble with any other site in the past.
update its working fine now, don't get why I had to wait 50 mins to access. Still haven't received the confirmation email though, I've sent a ticket to the customer support at the billing company, which to be fair does look very professional, it just had me worried a little when I couldn't get access.
Wanted to try this site again (maybe because I was a little drunk or because there seems to be some fine updates - or maybe in lack of any other new sites).
But again I get caught in currency-hassle.
The price (regular, not green)) is $ 24.95 according to good ol' TBP.
Try to join - the price here is Euro 39.95 (non recurring) as a choice for european users. That price is around: $48.
Another try, the price is Euro 29.95 - or around $37. (recurring).
Whatís up with 18 Only Girls and Diesel Access Network lately?
This may not qualify as a comment, but I thought it made more sense here than on the forum. Apologies if you think I made the wrong choiceÖ
18 Only Girls was reviewed at TBP today and that got me thinking about how the excellent Diesel Access sites used to be one of the best values on the internet. If you recall, if you joined through TBP / PU you not only got a $10 discount from the single-site price, but you got access to every site they had for that lower price. And the webmaster popped in to say hello once in a while.
But things are different today. 18 Only Girls is a stand-alone site with no discount for TBP / PU members. You do get access to Skinny Super Girl featuring Gloria. Iíll admit that.
But if you want access to their other signature site, Young Legal Porn, thatís a separate $30 membership. And, for some strange reason the bonus site here is also Skinny Super Girl.
The same goes for their other sites Ė they are all now stand-alone and $30 per month. Some donít even offer a bonus site Ė not even the same one that is offered with other sites.
To further erode the sense of value, Diesel spun off a separate company with Wow Girls and now Wow Porn that use the same format and even the same models but are stand-alone sites for $30 per month.
I realize that there are some obvious possible answers here, such as their high production costs make this an expensive venture, or now that theyíre established they donít need to offer discounts, but does anyone have any inside information on why this company changed its business model so quickly? They went from being our BFF here to pretending they donít even know us anymore.
I do realize that some of their sites offer five-month access to ďall our 13 sitesĒ but they donít list the sites. TBP lists 14 from Diesel, so my worry is that buying a $100 five-month membership through 18 Only Girls would exclude the other main site, Young Legal Porn.
Has anyone here tried the five-month, 13-site access who might give some advice?
(Not related to this already long Ďcomment,Ē but in my opinion one of the most sensual (and sexy) photos I have ever seen is the lead photo of Gloria on her Skinny Super Girl site where she is lying face down on a white-covered bed looking back at the camera and giving a sultry look. That photo melts every part of me except one. I only mention this because I saw her model photo on 18 Only Girls and she looks TERRIBLE. Yes sheís thin, but some of us like that. That photo makes her look anorexic. It isnít flattering. I know sheís not to everyoneís liking, but the webmaster must have been mad at her the day he opted to use that as her promo picture.)
What is likely to be) The Final Update on Network Access Issues at YLP
For those whoíve been following this story, and the couple of you who have put memberships on hold, the problem has been resolved.
The webmaster, Dieselman, replied that the problem has been fixed and that we should be back to full network access. At least thatís how Iím choosing to read what he wrote. What he specifically said was that my problem was fixed, and it has been. But since no one else had the problem Iím willing to assume that it is fixed for everyone.
I had hoped that this would get resolved this was, and Iím glad it did. These look like great sites and Iíll post a review later.
$69 to upgrade to Diesel network access....No thanks
Signed up just over 2 weeks ago to Young Legal Porn just opting for the single site access for $19.99. Now with about 2 weeks of my membership still left i've seen more or less everything i want to see on the site so decided i might try the upgrade to the Diesel all sites access for the remainder of my membership. As the initial subscription to the network is only $10 more than the single site access i was expecting that the upgrade fee would be somewhere around that so was quite astonished when hitting the upgrade button to find out it would cost $69. They say its a one time upgrade fee and don't really make it clear how long you get access for but i'm assuming it would only be as long as i maintained my recurring billing to Young Legal Porn so anyway end result is i just ended up cancelling my subscription and moved onto something else.
This site is made for the trial member, because if you stay monthly you will just see the same old videos disappear and then reappear as new releases over and over and over. Some of the content is good, but there needs to be more new material and the content rotation must stop.
Watch the number of connections you use here. The same holds true for InFocusGirls. This site limits the number of connections you can use at a time. They do not kick you off for hitting the limit. They will pause any farther browsing of the site until you fall below the limit number. Also, be careful with download managers here. Refresh the page before starting a download or it can screw up if it has been idle for a while. And, do not pause downloads, mine do not resume!
Enough warnings though! I really love these sites and I am just finishing an update from InFocusGirls and getting ready to rejoin SaphicErotic, so that should tell you something about the quality of the sites!
I happened to notice my regular Met Art email and clicked it figuring it would be the usual Met Art + Met Models offer, instead, it was Met Art + Nubiles.net for $29.95. Anybody else get this offer? I haven't been on either site in awhile, so I may have to take this offer.
This is a great site, and part of a decent network, but the problems keep piling on and I may cancel my membership without downloading everything that I want. That would be a first for me.
My initial problems have been outlined in earlier comments. Those were no network access for which I paid (resolved when the webmaster stepped in), and download speeds that can drop to virtually nothing.
The current problem may be more specific and might not be experienced by all users, but it is still frustrating to me. I use Free Download Manager. I donít use it to download multiple files at once, I just use it to queue up several files I want to download and then I can leave it unattended for a while and do other things. Video files were no problem at all: I loaded them in FDM and it churned away and downloaded them. Photos were a different story. Sometimes when I wanted to download a zipped photo set I could click on the download link and it would load into FDM and off Iíd go. Other times I needed to open the link in a new tab to then download it. I had to check at the beginning of each session which method was needed. That was odd, but I learned to work around it.
But today things have changed again. Today I canít download video files using FDM. I click on the link and it reads the name of the file to be downloaded, but then FDM reads it as a file name ďHDĒ and downloads a file that is just over 1000kb. The file is a video which tells me that my access is denied. So Iím now left with downloading each file through my browser which means that I have to check my computer regularly to start downloading manually.
Also, as of today I canít download photo sets using either of the methods that worked before. My access is denied for those too. But keep in mind that access is only denied using FDM Ė I can still download through my browser.
I havenít changed any settings on FDM so I really donít think the problem is on my end. A username and password hasnít been required before for each download, but I tried that too and that didnít fix it.
I sent a message to customer support and Iíll wait for their reply, but Iím pretty much fed up with this network. The frustration level is too high. The porn on the site is really top notch, but getting at it can be a chore. I'll submit a detailed review when I hear from customer support and my temper cools off a bit.
I was a member a few months ago. I would rate this network around 70 to 75. First of all, it is almost entirely video based and the tour does not make that clear at all. Yes, it is true that a few, very few, models only have photos. But then those photos are not exclusive but typical content-provider material, much of it fairly old. There are more than a few models whose photos I have seen previously, and in higher resolution, elsewhere, such as Teendreams. For example, the model this site calls Peris.
For a photo lover, not interested at all in video, such as myself, there is almost nothing in the network to download. They greatly concentrate on video. I joined mainly for the model they call Gloria (=Kylie A on MET, Kylie on Averotica etc). All her photo sets, except for one non-exclusive one, are just video caps. That seems true of the great majority of their photosets of all the models I looked at, and I looked at most of them. I found not one single photo set of Gloria to download from the entire network. I found no more than two or three photosets worth downloading in total from all the models in the whole network, such as one of Anjelica (aka Ebbie, Abby, Abbie). The later videos are excellent quality and probably many, or even most, are indeed exclusive, but video does not interest me.
The network is organised as a complete mess. Sets are duplicated between sites in the network but named differently so you can end up downloading the same thing several times. And you have to search each component site separately.
Despite the duplication, if you want everything for any one model, you need to join the network and the 29.99 is reasonable value for the network for a month if you have never joined before. It is really one site, split into several overlapping sub-sites.
But the network is a huge disappointment for photo lovers unless you aim to collect all that exists on the internet for some particular model, as I do for Gloria(Kylie) and are therefore prepared to accept that you will need to take videos to get anything at all from the network. Because I did actually download many of Gloria's videos, I do not feel it was a waste of money but I do not expect to join again.
In summary, I think that the ratings reflect the preference of reviewers for videos. Photo lovers really need not bother with this network.
ALS Scan is now officially part of the Met Art Network. This means that the site finally has a complete make-over - very well done, in my opinion - and, though there were predictions of glitchy connection speeds, the vid I downloaded came through smooth as one could want at over 2.5 mb/second.
If you're a member of Met-Art, you can now add ALS Scan to your Met Art membership for only $10/month.
I just signed up for this site with the trial membership which was verified by TBP to be full access. However, upon initial inspection I noticed that you can't download the photo sets in a zip file until you are a full member of the site. Now, I suppose it's strictly true that you still have access to all the site's content, but to me a full access trial refers not only to the content but also to the features available to full members.
It's certainly possible that this is a new development which TBP doesn't know about and, again, maybe they don't think a lack of zip downloads is really a big deal. They'd certainly have a point there, so any opinions on this are welcome. In any case, I thought it was worth reporting in case anyone feels the way I do. I know they just want to protect their content from those who do trial "hit and runs", but it does leave a bad taste in the mouth.
Good day!! I will get straight to it!! I basically watch porn to see all the different girls posing naked standing up and showing all of their frontal parts on the camera!! Then I like to see when a woman makes a man have to pull out his whatnot and empty his entire load all over the girl's body or her ass!! I CANNOT STAND FACIALS, I DON'T CARE WHAT THOSE OTHER CRACKHEAD PORN VIEWERS SAY ABOUT HOW GOOD A FACIAL LOOKS!! If I am having intercourse with a woman with a very vuluptuous ass, that is where I am going to unload my stock pile, RIGHT ON HER ASS!! To top it all of, there are women out there with the most gorgeous bodies and the most gorgeous asses, AND PORN INDUSTRIES ALWAYS GOES FOR THE FACIAL CUMSHOTS... ENOUGH ALREADY!!
More like 1010% Cute, almost want to join just for her
Just checking out FTV girls updates and this girl Riley was added in March, a very rare beauty, got a smile that will melt anyones heart, so cute its beyond words. Such a shame though when I saw the tatoos on her back, I'm not off her totally as she is amazing from the front and will have to join soon here again as there is a few other cuties been added since I was last a member, wish they'd do more lesbian stuff though as they are awesome, especially the public nudity stuff, my fav.
Teen Mega World is a great site for hardcore teen videos.
The network has a boatload of good quality hardcore videos, a huge number of very attractive models.
But it might be simpler if they consolidated the number of sites. I was searching for material on a particular model, named Sasha D at X-Art, and found that she is at Beauty-Angels under the name of Melika. So I was thinking, "Is it worthwhile joining Beauty-Angels to see her content--because Beauty-Angels is a good video site.
But then I realized that since I am a current member of ExGFBox, I already have access to Beauty-Angels through my network access.
There are so many attractive models at these sites, it's hard to keep track of them, especially when they have multiple names.
The larger pic sizes are a major plus, and are available singly or in zips. Too bad that a lot of earlier content apparently can't be upgraded in this way, though. I'm thinking Mia Stone, Sophie Moon, Lucy Stratilova, Nella, Jassie, Monique Alexander, Mili Jay ...
The updates lists are archived and have a thumb for each -- much better than the former text-only updates list that only ran for 1.5-2 months.
And the guy running it, "Alex DeLarge," really does take member opinions seriously. He's responded twice to emails from me in less than 24 hours. I think I might have been among the members to persuade him to do shoots of Peaches, whom he'd at first thought was too wide at the hips (?!). (They're not out yet, but we look forward to them!)
His director's blog is fun to read, too. You get a lot of inside scoop on the shoots and models' personalities.
I have but one wish, though: That in addition to all of that toy play and fisting that they post more ass shots, top of head to upper thighs, right and left cheeks equally displayed, with the model looking back amourously. Too many of them just show the back of her head, so there's no feeling of interaction. (Doing a nice job with Uma, aka Gitta Blond, though.)
I love this site and what it produces, but they have been doing some things in the last few months that need to be changed:
1. No more guys in photos or videos. They used to be pretty good about this, but now with "full" photoset releases (bloopers and outtakes included) they also have the occasional male assistant in some photos. I understand they work for the site and therefore help make it what it is, but I don't think it would too hard to keep them truly behind the scenes, or at least out of frame.
2. Cut down on the lollipops and baby oil. Lollipops and baby oil have been used by a lot of their models since the '90s, but they seem to really overdo it now. At most, they should only have one scene with a single lollipop or baby oil.
3. "Guest" photosets and videos. These are pretty rare, but I am not sure why they are there, maybe for some promotion agreement. They have only been from 1By-Day, usually with ALS models, but bottom line: it is just not ALSScan.
There are some great things they have been doing lately, and they need to keep it up:
1. New HD vid format. They now release new vids in an additional 1920x1080 wmv format Ė huge files, but huge videosÖvery nice.
2. Classic model remasters. These are great, especially since older releases were pretty limited in quantity and quality compared to today.
3. Hard with the soft. They might just be a girls-only site, but their hardcore is just as hot as the soft, and hopefully they wonít stop shooting it.
I join today. After paying via cc bill, I got an email that my acess code were send email to me. There are no acess codes in my mailfolder or spamfolder. Get's me a bit worried, since it seems there has been quite a few problems with this site.
FTVGirls has started releasing videos in HD (1440x1080) at a 8256kbs bit rate in the WMV format. AFAIK, this is the highest resolution available for porn on the net. And, the resultant image is almost like being there... :)
Mind you, this does come at a cost. For instance, the third video release totals a little over 79 minutes in length but is 4,563 MB in size.
I understand the site owner's decision not to go with a full HD resolution (1920x1080). Wide screen monitors (24" or larger) aren't ubiquitous. I'd be interested to learn of the viewing experience of users with 22" monitors (1680x1050) or CRT monitors at 1600x1200.
Should this new format prove, for some reason, to be problematic, users can still get DIVX videos at 352x256 with a bit rate of 64kbs and WMV videos at 720x480 (widescreen) with a bit rate of 3155kbs. It should be noted that the lower rate of WMV videos is an increase over that of previously offered WMV videos at 640x480 with a bit rate of 2079kbs.
Also of interest, the daily download limit has been raised to 15GB.
So, it seems that, once again, FTVGirls has leap-frogged the competition and succeeded in demonstrating it's commitment to providing customers an experience of superior quality.
I was browsing around and took a peek at the site. Clicked a girl's thumb and it took me to the join page. Whoops! But we know that's pretty common. My mistake (was hoping for an enlargement or more sample pics, like they do at ATK Galleria).
Clicked to close the window and ... a box came up offering an unspecified "last minute discount." At the same time, another box came up with lines showing up (being typed) from a "live agent," it said. I think someone was there, reaching out to help me.
I finally figured out how to escape with my virtual, window-shopping self.
Just wondering if there's any reliable research that shows this kind of approach works. Me, I'll just go in and rejoin some day. Devi looks like being part of the "rationale."
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.