I am too lazy to do a review at the moment, so, just a few first impressions. Downloads of zipped picture files impossibly slow on this, my first day. (4-6 KB!!!!!). Couldn't get a single set. Download speed of videos was great at my max of 2.35 MB/s but speed within the site itself was ultra-slow. Some models' names listed on their join page cannot be found once you are a member.
A few of the downloaded videos are incomplete and stop in the middle. Many videos feature Russian dialogue and are repetitious as well. Too many models obviously into their twenties already despite the name of the site. Too many anal videos .. a question of taste, I know, but for me that's the death knell of a site and I won't be back. And what the heck am I doing in a site that doesn't feature mature women??? I guess the price looked right but I am on my way to cancel.
P.S: This might not be of importance to most but I tend to watch videos on my smart TV through a memory stick but they cannot be watched that way. The sound codec for their wmv files is missing.
Really like tis site but those download speeds are ridiculous.
Still worth the money tough since you also get access to the hdpornpass network and some solo sites.
it appears sets and movies made this month (November 2013) download A LOT faster. If all of the site was this fast, it would be perfect.
OK, maybe I'll submit a full review when time permits, but I just did a signup after the recent "95" rated review for this site... and I am sorely disappointed.
Honestly, for a site that's been around so long, you'd think that certain basics would have improved. (I did an earlier subscription a couple of years ago.) My major disappointment: the photos are not just smaller than most top sites -- they are very lacking in fine detail and resolution. Honestly, you could take sharper, higher quality pictures with a cell phone these days. I really don't know WHY Clubseventeen manages to take such aweful, soft and blurry images. And it applies to almost every set. I just gave up after a while.
Other issues: the preview pages give the impression that tons of galleries are added across the many categories. But actually, it's only the main (white shaved teens) categories that get regular updates. Others like "unshaved teens" and ethnic teens only get a handful of galleries each year, if that.
Oh, and navigation sucks. You can't even tell which page you're on because the "1,2,3...Last" links don't highlight the current page.
The girls are truly hot. If only Clubseventeen photographed them in sharp, high-quality images, they'd have a much better site. But things never seem to improve there. Rating: 55.
MetArt adding a tinge of more eroticism to some photosets.
MetArt is still softcore. But yesterday, 2013-10-19, they added a softcore lesbian photoset of two models. The models actually were shown touching and kissing each other's breasts, as well as kissing each other on the lips. A few years back the models might have looked at each other with their eyes, but fondling was strictly forbidden.
I guess Met-Art is trying to boldly step into the new world of eroticism, where being nude is not enough to satisfy its audience.
The site is very expensive. It's very bad designed and hard to find what you are looking for. The videos are of average quality and not very hardcore at all. They promise much more than they deliver to that price!
I was lurking over at this site and got that "old familiar feeling." Then I checked my stash from way back 11-12 years ago. Yes, this site has been posting photo content that originally appeared years ago at SuperGlam.
SuperGlam is still listed as well. Whattaya do? I'd opt for TeenModels for the SuperGlam content because the pic sizes are twice as large and the annoying SuperGlam watermark across the top of the pic is worse (IMHO) than the TeenModels one at the bottom.
I don't mean imply, however, that everything that appeared at SuperGlam is already also on TeenModels. For one thing, there was stuff at SuperGlam of Evelyn Lory and Mia Stone that hasn't shown up at TM.
I continue to be impressed with Nubile Films but hold out hope they will go deeper into intensity sometimes...
For example, "Cum Desires", while beautifully shot, suffered some from the same problem as the video with Zoey: scant attention was given to keeping the focus on the eye contact, POV-style with a truly gorgeous woman looking into the camera. When Dido did look into the camera, it was absolutely the best moments in the film.
I notice other glamcore sites like Wow Girls will often go deep into one sort of genre (like "Fucking a Head", which explores blowjob + rimming + facial only).
I wish Nubile would consider deepening into different specific genres at times. Like shooting an ONLY POV-blowjob video or an only anal video...
Again also the post-cum head could be extended for at least 5 minutes with a woman like Dido. You could picture her facialized, and then suckling and moaning as she coaxed at the post-cum penis with her mouth and made a meal of the semen. All while looking into our eyes.
A lot of people get off after the male model has ejaculated, yet no glamcore site has yet seemed to grasp that post-cum video should exceed 30-60 seconds.
We want to see that cheerleader beauty really trying, really aiming to please by showing no shyness around cum and a special attention to the post-cum penis -- which is most sensitive at that time.
Finally, Nubile Films should consider doing some tasteful artistic rimming by the woman of the man as well. Rimming shot explicitly with the tongue meeting the anus, and not just a nose buried in the pelvis of the man would be really hot...
I firmly believe that a web site is only as good as its customer service. Once again this week, Met Art demonstrated that it is an AWESOME web site by providing some of the best online customer service I have ever experienced.
I upgraded my subscription from monthly to annual. My monthly subscription was through Epoch and my annual subscription is now through their new biller(Rocketgate?). What I did not realize is that Epoch had already queued me up for my monthly charge, which I saw on my account a few days after upgrading. I sent an email to Met Art support telling them about the issue. Within a few minutes, here is first class the response I got:
My name is amnon and im the CEO of MetArt,
So sorry for your trouble; however rest assured you are in great hands and our support team is looking into this issue ASAP.
we will make you happy.
all the best,
OK, I'm not easily impressed, but here is a guy who truly understands how important it is to be responsive to customers.
So many other websites (adult or otherwise) really don't care when there are problems and some (often adult) are downright obnoxious (Go look at the chain of my MPL Studios comments. I complained about an easily resolvable problem and MPL Studios blamed ME and permanently kicked me off of their site.)
Oh, and yes, I was promptly refunded the Epoch overcharge and received a follow up email from Met Art customer service to ensure everything was OK.
Kudos to Met Art for not only having a terrific web site, but for ensuring that, in the words of the CEO, "I am happy". Yes, I am happy. Thank you very much!
I was wondering why some models and their sets have been deleted. Have returned to the site after a hiatus and went looking for some of my favorite models; only do discover some of them, and all their seta, missing. Berengere A, Alessandra D, and Roarie A come to mind immediately.
Does anyone know why Met Art deletes some of their models and all of their sets?
What's the deal here, with this 50% off promo email
Just seen an email from Met Art network with yesterdays date and said 50% off which is $14.99 but when you click the join link it says $29.99 and even better for me in the UK £23.61 cause of ccbill ripoff regional pricing thing. So not a deal at all and at nearly £24 one of the most expensive out there.
That's what it says on the site home page. But I'd be surprised if there is even 1 real orgasm on this site. Other sites certainly have models faking orgasms, but at least they don't prominently claim real orgasms. How do they get away with this false advertising?
This site is gorgeous to behold -- with high quality models and gorgeous lighting and beautiful, breathtaking scenes.
Its main weakness is it needs more content -- and I would say also of a slightly more intimate sort.
Totemic of the problem is that extraordinary brunette blowjob picture of Zoey for "Dream Lovers" one sees on joining the site.
What's the problem with this incredible picture you might ask?
Once you watch the video, you notice a cameraman of immense stupidity cutting away from Zoey's eyes and refusing to indulge a more languid POV shot of her fiery beauty while suckling that cock tip. Instead the cameraman(-woman) rushes to show a side shot of the blowjob just when Zoey is looking into the camera. Hello?
If you can't understand that a blowjob -- (particularly, a blowjob with Zoey!!!) -- requires you to be almost OCD about POV, then you really don't belong in the business.
She is so gorgeous that this production oversight is one of the greatest pornographic sins I have ever seen.
I also sincerely hope that Nubile Films will consider more intimacy with facial cum -- as intimate, loving sex can involve what the woman does with the cum post-ejaculation.
Why should men at home have to rush their climax to fit a narrow 30-second window of facial cum?
Why not be truly daring and give us a full 30-minute exploration of semen?
I know that may seem too fetishistic -- but you might as well give it ONE try with a natural beauty like Zoey -- and then see if your ratings don't go through the roof.
(I parenthetically note that when Nubile Films shot their first extended cum-swapping video recently, it received one of the highest ratings ever. Wonder why.)
Nubile Films could improve by reading other comments on artistic facial cum:
I recently joined the site and I thought this was a pretty good site; although, the image sizes aren't consistent in resolution size. Also, in my opinion I think they should've cut out some similar images in the galleries to make the sets a little bit smaller in size. The site was well organized and easy to navigate through.
This was a great site with great content! But they started to update only old content from the old website xcoreclub.com to their teencoreclub.com website. I used to be member of xcoreclub.com and I'm very dissapointed that they only used old movies and do not seem to produce new updates to the sites. I consider to cancel the membership and I have followed these sites over many years.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.