Sex WITH real excitement, at least once in a while
I was asked to express my "expert opinion" on the disagreement between FuckingGambler and BabyGetReal about excitement in FuckingGamble games, and wasn't able to resist the temptation to pose as an "expert" :-), so here go my two cents.
I've took a closer look at game 4 which FuckingGambler is referring to, and IMHO it has much more passion and much more excitement from sex between the models then 99% of all the porn out there. To compare it to DareRing (which BabyGetReal refers to) I've even took a look at my old clips from Dare Ring (hey, now I know why I store all that old stuff :-)) to compare, and found that despite obviously more "amateur" feeling of "Dare Ring", I've felt that FuckingGamble's game 4 players shown significantly more "excitement" about sex then DareRing players (DareRing guys and girls were way too nervous, especially towards the end of the game, which obviously didn't help their excitement). And what is quite obvious to me now is that action is indeed NOT scripted on both DareRing and FuckingGamble (at least because writing and learning all those lines would be an absolute nightmare).
That said, I should add that not all the games on FuckingGamble are made equal. Some (like game 4, game 14, or the most recent game 26) are IMHO very emotional and show real "chemistry" (as FuckingGambler puts it) between the players, but some are less successful in this regard. In addition, I should add that all the above is just my personal opinion, so if your opinion differs, please don't hit me too hard :-).
Intrigued by the reviews, I took a look at the demo clip (which is unusually long and hires). The game idea is cool, but the models look like pros (sex is boring to them) and there seemed to be no arousal, plus too much emphasis on anal, double penetration, etc. Tho it has very little content, I like DareRing much better, where the game participants seem genuinely excited by the uncertanties in the game, reacted with real personalities (not plastic ones), were a little scared sometimes, a little embarrassed, and where some people really got off.
I checked this site out, and it surprisingly works well. A note, for the best quality 1080p 3D video requires purchase of a separate media player, it's written by an entirely different software company - this adult website does not program the software, nor holds licensing rights to redistribute the software.
I've yet only watched the videos in the cross-eye method, and it's dang good already, although this way is like you're watching too small a sized video. The software is capable of presenting the video file in either cross-eye view, or use with a wide range of other 3D options, like those red/blue glasses, or monitors & tv's with shutter glasses. Perhaps a full review when I get a hold of some red/blue glasses, or better yet figure out how to set it all up with the 3D capable dlp I coincidently have.
They've had for years the option to create custom scenes but they were only visible in-game. Their latest newsletter, though, says it's now possible to encode videos in standard codecs (MPEG, Divx, etc) so you can play them in external players and also edit with standard video-editing software. The resolution seems to be 800x600.
Looks like they keep solving the issues I had with the software when I was a member; last year they created Gamerotica user community and now this. Hope next year they do something about the stories and make them less dull.
Unfortunately, they've gone to the dark side of regional pricing: 30 EUR a month. Ouch.
Site tries to dupe you into signing up for trial memberships to two other sites when confirming cancellation. If box is not un-checked, you will end up with recurring memberships to sites which are not easily accessed or canceled (I'm still trying to get one $39 charge refunded). This network is NOT recommended.
I love watching women dance being a fan of electronic. Adding masturbating may seem like a gimmick but somewhat innovative to an extent in content. Can anyone give me any info about the site in terms of basically anything, but primarily what can I expect with the material. Plus, what format are the videos in with the resolution size and bitrate or an opinion on how well these videos may look?
Only 10 videos!!! why? I wanted more, the quality of the videos is great. They have good camerawork, nice sound effects and (if you like nerdy fantasy sex ) awesome hardcore scenes. This site was great and the content very fun and different but they seem to be dead or at least not updating anymore. Why?! A great idea that isn't taken all the way. Wonderful potential and quality ruined by lack of updated and small quantities....
Obviously this site isn't a regularly updated site, but when the sample video is so grainy that I can't even make out if the guy is wearing a condom, that's a bad sign. It'd be better to at least put a high quality sample together to try and trick people into joining.
So I have tons of video editing software that can convert any file to any format (PS3, X-box,PSP and even Wii) does anyone else have this kind of software, or is it worth paying a site which already have the files formatted?
I got a promo email from them today announcing they have launched a new free site by the name Gamerotica. There's a message board and sections where users can share the content they've generated with this company's games: models, custom movies, screen shots, etc. The only games that have this option are 3D Sex Villa 2 (3D Sex Games), Hentai 3D 2 and 3D Gay Villa 2. Why not 3D Lesbian?
If you have a current game account for any of those sites, you have to link it to a new Gamerotica account in order to access the shared content. Looks complicated and a BETA in capital letters: lots of things were not working. Don't bother creating one if you don't have a current membership: no access without them.
As I said in my 09-28-08 review and 06-25-08 comment, I felt that being able to share user generated content and building a community around this software were a must so I was excited to see it happen. My sudden desire to join back the site faded pretty fast as I got tangled in the account creation process. Hope they polish the product and get out of beta soon.
So far, the tour shows 8 scenes but, are there really so many sisters in US porn? Among those that aren't yet at the site and might still be active I can only think of the Milton Twins. Also, Ava Rose and Mia Rose. Will they stop at 10 scenes? Bring back some? Start with amateurs?
I noticed that the only price listed was the trial price
$9.95 3 day trial
$9.95 3 day trial THEN $29.95 (reoccurring) every 30 days
$9.95 3 day trial THEN $49.95 (reoccurring) every 60 days
$9.95 3 day trial THEN $65.95 (reoccurring) every 90 days
* Microsoft™ Windows XP / Vista
* Intel™ Pentium 4 or compatible (AMD, ...)
* Clock rate 1 Ghz or better
* Min. 100MB free harddisc space
* 64 MB 3D Graphics accelerator, resolution 1024*768 or higher
* OpenGL 1.1 (or higher; 1.5 recommended) or DirectX 8.1 (or higher; 9.0c recommended)
* 512MB RAM or more
It has been too long since I was a member to write a full review. However I still have many videos that I downloaded. The wrestling is just ok, the videos not clear enough to be really hot. It is very difficult to really see the girls in anything resembling a closeup as the shots are taken from too far away. The set has no personality, it is just the inside of a building and looks like a loft or warehouse. The sex parts are sometimes hot, but almost always vaginal use of dildos. Very rarely is there any anal use. Sometimes they seem to be not much into it, this is a real mixed bag. Using a dildo may be fun for some winners but, the best parts I felt were the forced cunt licking until orgasm. At least the winner got something out of winning. However most of the time the winner simply used a dildo vaginally on the loser or sometimes forced the loser to suck a plastic dildo, no big thrill for me,and seemed uninspired and unenthusiastic. Most of the time the winner was predictable as the matches were not close. Definitely don't join for the wrestling.
I found the site to be very different from the usual. I enjoyed the concept, but don't expect that you can get off on it. Even at its best it is very soft. Some attractive women who are wasted as there is no tease nor is it explicit. They really need to be one or the other. At least its cheap. I have even gotten it both by itself and as a bonus to joining another site, but don't remember which one.
I just finished a six month subscription to this site. Nostalgia made me do it because I remembered its earliest days when the novelty of naked women reading actual news made you gasp and when the anchor (Victoria Sinclair for the most part) would strip slowly and sensuously from business suit to very sexy lingerie, including nylons and garter belt, down to buff.
I found out very quickly that times had changed (along with subscribers' tastes?) because many times once that jacket came off the newsreader (model) would already be nude underneath, or, if you were lucky there might be a pair of panties or bra to get rid off. Commentators, too, were often fully nude right from the start.
The question is how often can one look at a limited pool of (admittedly) beautiful newspersons displaying their shaved pubes without getting bored. After only a few weeks I actually found myself watching the news more than the models and during my entire six month subscription I doubt I watched the show more than three weeks' worth altogether.
There should be more lingerie, more stripping, more variety in both rather than this confounded modern trend of getting to nude as quickly as possible. I realize it's a bit of a challenge for a model to strip and read the news at the same time but in its early days the site did manage to do just that.
This site still has exactly the same content as when originally reviewed by TBP. Not worth the money as it is just too small. They even have multimonth options, but why if there is nothing new and the site can be downloaded in only one day. Very disappointing.
I haven't used this site lately, but elsewhere on PU there was a request for feedback. I can't give a honest review because its been 8 months.
My past experience was no support response over a one month try.
And areas of the site looked to not have been updated in along time. My experience was that site at that time was not usable.
But that may have changed. Taking a look the front page looks the same as it did in November 2007.
But please make your own determination to join.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.