I dont know what to say. Im only reviewing the solo video's. I dont pay for high speed to view pictures and not interested in seeing someones balls.
But man, Is Matt going out of business? I was a member the month before last and decided to wait just incase it was a fluke. One update the entire month.
Looks like Matt's isnt the place to see some good solo's....looks like it never will be either.
warning! download limit 1,5gb if not they close your account
they closed my account after i have downloaded only 1,5gb, it's insane! in the term of their service, they declare" we have a 9 gigs per day limit" they talk nonsense. The webmaster did not never answer to my message!
The Best Porn has this site listed as "new" with a launch date of May 2008. NOT! I have on record that it launched in August 2004 (based on the dated updates they at least had). I first joined it myself in March 2005.
Where does TBP get its information?
As for the site, it stopped updating approx late 2006. Nothing I can see on the site linked from TBP indicates any new updates. (The site used to have an updates link from which visitor's could view a listing of all the dated updates, but that disappeared at least a year ago and is still gone.)
I really did not like this site and only visited it four times during my one month subscription but now I just received a renewal notice from them and that's after I had canceled four weeks ago and had received acknowledgment of that cancellation, stating that there would be no further charges.
Time will tell if they will honor my request for a refund but since this is the very first time this has happened to me I will reduce the score of my review by five points. Reliability has to count for something!!
Just joined SuperGlam, figuring that by now there would be enough content buildup to be worth it.
-There are no more than 23 really new photo galleries since June 22, 2007. Twenty-three. Everything else is older, redated content.
-There's only one size photo on this site: 1536px. That includes all of the new material. Anyone who tells you differently is not telling you what is so. The links to 1000, 2000, and 4000 px mean NOTHING.
-The zips don't work. Download them, and they ask you for a password, which you don't have, to open them.
I've had it. Sick of lies, sick of tricks, sick the cynical shits that rip all of us off.
But it's not enough to complain. It's time to do what some might call "overreacting," and feel free to say so if you like. I don't care. I'm gone. Completely. From signing up for ANY more sites for the next 9 months.
I asked a friend, who has a subscription, about this site and he told me the content is hazzy at best.
Girls that sometimes are described as hardcore only have softcore shots and the videos lack in quality as well as quantity.
I am uncertain what to do (get a subscription or not) I remember he showed me a set where you were promised sex between a teen and an old guy but the whole set was just the guy dancing around her and kissing her...rather disappointing...is the whole site like that? Can you find some nice hardcore on here?
I agree with the positive comments others have made about the concept, models, artistic presentation and skilful editing and presentation of the content.
But, and it's a very big but: having been encouraged to subscribe by seeing Ifm videos on xHamster (where downloads are very simple, and quick, and allow you to jump about the clips immediately within seconds of downloading) I've found the site is absolutely spoiled by tediously slow download speeds, apparently un-openable and incomplete clips and the inability to hop about the clips with a mouse-click.
Although I have a modern laptop and I'm reasonably competent with it I acknowledge I may not have the skills to get the best out of the Ifm server, but if xHamster can provide a slick presentation with nearly every video for free, why can't Ifm do it for a substantial subscription???
And as others have said, the 'formula' looks and pose (NB singular!) become boringly repetitious very quickly.
Honestly, friends at TBP!
I don't get it. From a users point of view - how can you guys at TBP honor this site with an average of 90,8?
The content should be in the 70...and that's better than fair...
The photos are not swell and most of the videos are just bad/average.
This is one of the FEW situations at TBP (and thank you!) where I have just a slight idea of somethings are not right.
This site is NOT worth the high points at TBP - 90,8- for me it looks like an inflation in points....
Don't you guys wonder why it's so much less among us users????
I'm with DigglerFL on this one: Poor photos and poor videos.
I thought it was only appropriate to commend these folks for their very open tour.
Whilst some may think their members pages look a little dated, they are actually quite intuitive in use, and through a few clicks you can see all the content of a selected model, albeit mostly in thumbnail form.
Some sites throw a lot of functionality out of the window when they revamp a site.
The layout here shows that a fair amount of thought has gone in.
If & when you do update, please keep the open informative non-member area.
Oh & I do like the way they stretch the 'teen' element.
It is very nice to see a young lady mature over a few years & sessions. ;0)
If you have an interest in Wet And Puffy, don't believe their offer on their sister site that says if you join Wet and Pissy, your subscription will give you access to two other sites; Wet and Puffy and We Love To Suck.
Because of that offer (and because of the good review by oldfizzywig) I signed up today for Wet And Pissy.com, both because I liked the preview site and because it would provide access to Wet And Puffy.
It turns out that the offer is totally BOGUS - You are required to buy a separate membership to access Wet And Puffy. The login tab is not functional and can only be made functional by buying a separate subscription.
Worse, they offer absolutely no customer support of any kind.
I suggest that PU blacklist all three sites operated by Wet And Puffy, Inc. for its deceptive business practices.
Does any one know if they still force the $40 fee for zip files of the photo set? I was a member previously and would not mind rejoining at some point, but I am not paying this fee again. I would if they charge it again if you paid for it before? Can another offer some insight here?
I email customer service a while back about the fee and if we have to prepay it if we rejoin, but I got no reply. :(
Whether it's getting frosty down in Satan's domain or the folks behind Danni.com just finally came to their senses, DRM has officially been banished by one of its most ardent supporters. I've been a member of the site with and without DRM and I can honestly say that there was absolutely no chance that I'd ever have joined again had they kept DRM. Why they thought this was a good idea in the first place is beyond me since the vast majority of users want to download their porn for that moment when the mood is right and the hard drive is ready to spin. ;)
It remains to be seen if this change will actually revitalize the site or return it to its former status as one of the top softcore sites on the internet that it was 10 years ago, but it's certainly a step in the right direction. Personally, I think the return of Danni Ashe to operating the site would definitely accomplish that, but since that's not in the cards we'll just have to wait and see what happens.
Today I see that MCN Nudes has a new look. They also seem to be up to standardizing all of their galleries in 3 sizes, the two largest being 1200px and 4000px, for all of their content from the beginning of the site's history.
BUT while they've put in the links for those sizes under the thumbnails in the galleries, the pic sizes have NOT changed as far as I've been able to tell, at least not yet. I went through several of my favorite models, such as Susana Spears and Marketa Belonoha, and that's what I've found as of the moment.
My subscription runs out pretty soon, so I might not be able to revise my review of Dec. 26 in time should real changes in those pic sizes take effect.
So this is an FYI. I will pass on this "splendid torch" to a future degenerate ...
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.