I got my hopes up when my eyes lit on all the "strip" tags underneath the scenes, contained in this site, until I realized that every site I have ever belonged to is a strip site by their standards if it means that a model takes only a couple of items of clothing off.
"Strip," to me, means more than taking off a bikini top and bottom, or a bra and panties. Another site that can't quite deliver to my taste. This is just a personal observation, since they call themselves a glamour site and not one that majors in full strips.
I just joined Bikini Riot, and really like the site so far! Lots of gorgeous women in sexy bikinis! The photos and videos look great--vids are 720p HD (last couple of years), and both photos and videos are well done. Site navigation is simple and intuitive. On the negative side, there's too many fake boobs for my taste, the update frequency is a bit low (though there is a lot of archived material), the high res pics are only 2000 pixel on the long dimension, and the videos are basically the same thing every time. But that's really not bad when the girls and their bikinis are so hot! I haven't even gotten to the 2 bonus sites yet. I'll post a review in 2 or 3 weeks.
Signed up here the other day and so far loving the high quality photography and the collection of first time never seen before models which features a good percentage of exotic beauties from Asian and Latin countries.
The video collection is rather limited though, only 13 total on the site and only 1 video update in the last year. Also there are no downloads available for the videos and even though the highest quality streaming states 720p it doesn't really look hd.
Hopefully I'll get back with a full review in the next week or so.
I can't seem to get the TBP price even if I enter the final payment section. The payment is powered by Pure Web Power, but I don't know if that matters. I really wanted to rejoin since I was here a couple years ago. Does anyone know if TBP link is not entered correct?
Just joined this Ferro-site via CCBill - no problems there: login/password (generated, arggh) - came second later.
Then: You have to write/copy those generated words/numbers three times - and then, halleluja - your're inside...But no, you can see the material, but in order to download you have to fill out yet another form with your email - and then you wait for a mail-authorization....
And I waited and waited - no return-email - then you get seriously pissed - and start to write suppert ect....
Finally got it after a long wait - and by then your're really agitated and at that state of mind the site is suddenly less interesting....
I'm not hugely into the schoolgirl niche, although St Mackenzies is vaguely on my list, both because most of the models are very obviously more than schoolgirl age and I'm a fan of the photographer - of Breath Takers and Girlfolio.
However, I do like a girl in uniform or workwear - especially a dominant one (in the milder sense) - so the teachers and matrons here should make it worth watching, hopefully there will be some more material soon!
This site gives the impression that it is updating daily but in reality all they are doing each day is taking a set from the bottom of the updates page (October 2010) and placing it back at the top with the current day's date. Hopefully I'll find time for a full review next week.
Joint this site. When opening HP for members you are informed to download 1 pic set per hour. This hint is on top of EVERY side.
Good photo contend, less videos.
When exceeding the "1 set/h" strange broken downloads occur.
In practice there is a download limit, cause it protects you from downloading in this annoying way.
have quitted the site after finding this out.
Sometimes it pays to read the fine print. Nosing around the site, I saw something that really caught my eye:
"OUR EASY CANCEL GUARANTEE
Choose a rebilling subscription with the confidence that if you forget to cancel, we will refund your rebill charge if you let us know within 7 days, and haven't used your account since the rebill."
I can't say I've ever seen that offer anywhere else. More sites should do this! I'm sure more than one of us has forgotten a subscription and let it roll over when we really didn't mean to. It would have been nice to have this option.
But... I'm laughing because my love/hate relationship still stands with this site. I've often said that my life is a series of contradictions, a lot like my screen name. This site is no exception. I just reread some of the expired reviews and it never ceases to amaze me how good content can be accompanied by an attitude that says you can't have the least bit of criticism about it without being told how wrong you are. Still a good join - just keep your mouth shut! LOL
Sweet Nature Nudes is up for Hot Review at TBP - and it looks great, though I prefer indoor shoots.
And then I take a look at the top site of the company: David Nudes. The content of that site is also and primarily outdoor shoots, so???
I've had Alison Angel sat in my bookmarks for years without ever joining, just checked out her tour again and its showing a couple of updates with release dates being shown as within the last week. I see there was a previous comment about her retiring so does anybody recognise if this is old content being rotated or has she come out of retirement?
He calls himself the king of orgasme. 80% of the videos are boring photo shots with hardly any action. In some of the videos the model are not even naked. They are chosing clothes and puting on makeup. When he shows some maturbation, its alway with that dam toothbrush of his. Boring, boring boring!
I was expecting something alot better,like MPL studios for example. I've deleted the video's I downloaded. Waste of storage space.
Following my recent glowing review, this site continues to impress with its creative scenarios, great photography and atmospheric, high-production-values videography. Eg:
* I just found an older update in which the model sneaks off to a secluded location somewhere; laughs off and ignores an incoming call from a presumed boyfriend, and starts to enjoy herself. Later on, the phone rings again and she proceeds to use it to masturbate with in some detail (presumably the vibrating ring was on...)
* A recent video was titled 'Sex Art' - I figured they were just copping out and reusing a video from sister site Sex Art. As it happens, the video showed the model on bed with a laptop, watching a Sex Art video - then getting aroused and reenacting the blowjob she was watching with a dildo. Toys generally aren't my thing - but, like close-ups - here they manage use them without being run of the mill porn.
This is proper, erotic stuff that's both explicit yet still evocative. Recommended!
It's been about 5 years since I was a member of this site. Back then, they had some really cute models. Nice softcore photography. Their preview pages give a very limited idea of the site contents. They advertise the site updates twice a week. But the preview pages don't show the posted dates of any recent updates.
What is new to me is that you are supposed to get a large number of bonus sites with your membership. The bonus sites are solo model sites and multi-model sites. I believe many of these bonus sites are archive sites, that have not updated in 1 or more years. But maybe it would be worth a 1-month membership to see what these sites have. Or not.
One cute model is Ema, who has her own site named Ema's Place. The site preview states she is 18, but she is also featured at Metart, under the name of Avril A, which says her current age is 25. I think Metart tries to be more accurate about a model's age than most web sites.
Anyway, Metart has 20 photosets of Avril A, the last one posted 2010-11-19.
The preview pages for Ema's Place state weekly updates, ultra fresh content. But my guess is that the last update to the Ema's Place site was probably a few years ago. I don't think Ema (or Avril A, or whatever name you use to call her) is still active as a model.
And that's probably true of many of the bonus sites you get with a Glam Deluxe membership. Bonus sites that no longer update.
I wish that the preview pages for these porn sites would more accurately reflect the current state of these sites, instead of promising you fresh, weekly updates that you won't be getting.
I just joined this site a few days ago and so far, it isn't bad at all. It is an "Art" or "Nude" site, mostly what I call "Girl in the woods" stuff, but many of the models are exclusive. The non-exclusive models are top-tier (perhaps from before they were mainstream), and all of the models are, for the most part, absolutley flawless.
I definitely see the granularity, mentioned elsewhere in feedback, in many of the larger images, even brand new posts. This leads me to believe that the host is drawing on older images that are previously unreleased..or he just doesn't want anybody zooming in or printing razor sharp, life-sized images of the models and thinks the grainy look is artsy. (Remember when the images in Penthouse Magazine had that odd glow/fuzz effect?) It's distracting but not terminal.
I'll do a full review in a few days once I 've had a chance to look around.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.