I don't understand the high rating. Granted there is no download limit. Download speed is fast. Supports download manager. But some of the videos files are less than 20 MB? When you click Back at the bottom you don't always go back to the previous page. The template for the design comes from some free software that a grade school kid would use. That faux wood look is so lame. Some of the spots are left empty as if they will be eventually be filled with updates I guess. I have been a member for 2 days and I already downloaded the low quality videos that I wanted. Going back to scoreland even if the reviewer hate the interface, at least there is a lot more material for less money. And yes, the guy that shows up is annoying.
I was told I'd get a reply back within 24 hours.
Well, it's been longer than three days. Nothing back.
However, The basis of my inquiry had to do with my interest in joining this site (Only Silk and Satin)
The only drawback is my intense dislike for pantyhose!
In fact, anything that remains leg cover throughout the entire scene.
I had asked if I could purchase the same subscription without the bulk of the model's screwing up the whole shoot with any form of fabric covering the thighs.
Over 2 weeks on the site I've seen no updates. I sent a message to their support about some bad links and haven't received a reply.
I'm using Safari on a Mac and the interview videos are either duplicates of some of the regular videos or invalid links. The interview videos do not match the thumbnail images on the interview pages. I suspect someone did a sloppy job setting up the interview pages, but why haven't they fixed it?
It's been almost a month now and no updates. No replies to my support requests either. I'm about to drop my membership and it is unlikely I'll join this site again.
As the webmaster, James, has said, there is no longer regional billing which is great news.
Bryci has amassed many HC videos since I've been a member - there's now over 30 with her having sex or giving blowjobs. Really great work. The majority of updates are now hardcore, but there's still a lot of solo stuff.
The only cons are the lack of zips, and the download speeds seem pretty slow, too.
Beeing fed up with a lot of repetitive porn, this site is the first I've joined for quite some time.
But like Drooler mentioned in September "For $10, You Can't Beat It"
Ok, it's now 13,95 - but still a good price for something different. Ok - it's softcore - but I like that, too. And here we got (still got) British and other Euro-models - some you can't find elsewhere - and some great models doing posing and strip - and they still update some of the rare once like Laurena Lacey with older nude posing vids - and Brooke Bailey and Lisa Marie - both british you won't see much elsewhere.....It's a nice site, if your're into softcore.
PS: Have not been at PU much lately. Two reasons: Have only joined very few sites and then: my English is getting rusty - maybe it's age........
I really love their style of work and they have great quality pictures, but does anyone know if they'll have any low priced deals anymore? I occasionally got emails from them, but the past year I haven't got anything.
I've found that if you choose the "only picture sets" option for browsing the collection, sooner or later it defaults to either the "All" (videos, too) option and transports you to a different time and place or to a parental warning-type page.
When I tried the "All" option, things worked OK.
However, the gallery browsing, page-by-page within a gallery, doesn't always work correctly either. I finally just went to downloading what I liked after a while and skipped the detailed photo viewing.
It's not a bad site, content-quality wise, but navigating it you could wind up like Henry Hudson looking for China.
this is a boring site...most of the sets look like they were taken in someones backyard....very few sexy locations...just some big tit babes lifting up their shirts...do yourself a favor...dont waste your money on this site...
I did a review on Fame Girls -- although over a year old -- that's not mentioned anywhere herein from the staff person writing up info on this current review.
I thought this was normal practice, to bring previous reviews back just to let readers know it had been reviewed here at another time. It couldn't help but offer additional prospective and add some hype to this latest review.
I saw one video of Meddie and Stacy, titled "Afternoon Orgasms", posted 2012-11-09, that is a shortened version of the same video posted at Beauty Angels (part of the Teen Mega World network). Meddie is called Meddie at TMW, but the other model is named Stasy. That video was posted 2012-04-16.
Very good video, 2 attractive models, nice lesbian scene.
This site remains on my to-join list since it features a number of models I like - although a bit tempered by some of the download issues folk have had and I'm not sure if there are still restrictions.
However, it's worth noting that if you like the style - and UK models - the photographer's work seems to be featured quite heavily on at least 3 other sites I know of:
Does anyone know if there has been some changes since Hicks died earlier this year? I know the price changed, but I was wondering since this was one of my favorite sites. By the way, at the time of Hicks' death was he actually doing some photography for DD?
It seems I now get an email every other day from Girls Out West with links to random sites. I was skeptical but thought maybe the links might be tied to the site somehow and that I could unsubscribe from there. Although the links don't work (odd in itself), what concerns me is that the links all have my email address AND my full name in them. It appears that GOW has sold my information to spammers. I just know I'm not too thrilled with this at all and would hope a site rep would respond to this comment.
I was gonna join this site but on the join up page my anti-virus software went off like crazy, blocked 4 viruses! 2 trojan horses, a worm, and a spyware app. Don't think I'll be joining this site, and that's a shame 'cause they have really good content. No wonder PU dropped them.
Apart from the mysterious billingco. and the strange cross-sales ect. (noted by Capn in May this year) - the once great, great Teendreams seems to have gone down in other ways:
New webmaster (it seems) - some here remember the fine communication over the years with the good webmaster at the site.
The preview is now hopeless/useless - no way to see updates or anything like in the past. Now they show some thumbnails of a few vids - and the same scenes are repeated with a little different thumb.
Should I say: Teendreams - R.I.P.
I haven't been able to access the site for over a day now so there's no way to contact the site to find out what's what. Hopefully they'll chime in here. All in all, a surprisngly disappointing experience...
I think this is a site for women not for men.
Nearly all videos and photo sets are the opposite of sexy (even the sex scenes).
And the videos are very slooooow, nearly impossible to watch online (stream).
Is Abby Winters better, or is it also a site for women?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.