It's been about 5 years since I was a member of this site. Back then, they had some really cute models. Nice softcore photography. Their preview pages give a very limited idea of the site contents. They advertise the site updates twice a week. But the preview pages don't show the posted dates of any recent updates.
What is new to me is that you are supposed to get a large number of bonus sites with your membership. The bonus sites are solo model sites and multi-model sites. I believe many of these bonus sites are archive sites, that have not updated in 1 or more years. But maybe it would be worth a 1-month membership to see what these sites have. Or not.
One cute model is Ema, who has her own site named Ema's Place. The site preview states she is 18, but she is also featured at Metart, under the name of Avril A, which says her current age is 25. I think Metart tries to be more accurate about a model's age than most web sites.
Anyway, Metart has 20 photosets of Avril A, the last one posted 2010-11-19.
The preview pages for Ema's Place state weekly updates, ultra fresh content. But my guess is that the last update to the Ema's Place site was probably a few years ago. I don't think Ema (or Avril A, or whatever name you use to call her) is still active as a model.
And that's probably true of many of the bonus sites you get with a Glam Deluxe membership. Bonus sites that no longer update.
I wish that the preview pages for these porn sites would more accurately reflect the current state of these sites, instead of promising you fresh, weekly updates that you won't be getting.
I just joined this site a few days ago and so far, it isn't bad at all. It is an "Art" or "Nude" site, mostly what I call "Girl in the woods" stuff, but many of the models are exclusive. The non-exclusive models are top-tier (perhaps from before they were mainstream), and all of the models are, for the most part, absolutley flawless.
I definitely see the granularity, mentioned elsewhere in feedback, in many of the larger images, even brand new posts. This leads me to believe that the host is drawing on older images that are previously unreleased..or he just doesn't want anybody zooming in or printing razor sharp, life-sized images of the models and thinks the grainy look is artsy. (Remember when the images in Penthouse Magazine had that odd glow/fuzz effect?) It's distracting but not terminal.
I'll do a full review in a few days once I 've had a chance to look around.
They are back which is great but not much of a preview
I think it's great to see TNV Girls have decided to come back to making new material and relaunched their website. Slightly disappointing though cause at the moment it looks very basic and not much to entice you to part with your money. I think I'll give it a while and see if they decide to give the punters a little peek at what is inside.
I hadn't ever seen this model or site until the review recently posted. Since I like, even usually prefer, solo models, it made me take notice.
On the TBP review in the notes over to the side it says, "Owner verifies that there are no restrictions on Europeans joining these sites." My question is, is this talking about with the download limit? It's not that I mind since I don't know if Europeans have slower internet connections or if the sites servers are maybe in Europe and that makes less/more stress on the servers. I'm mainly just trying to clarify that the restriction the note is talking about is on the download limit and there isn't some other restriction. I can work with 9 GB/day limit, so it doesn't bother me much and would give this network a try as long as I know there isn't other restrictions.
A quick review here of a site I joined last week: microminimus.com This is an amateur bikini site sponsored by Wicked Weasel bikinis from Australia. If you are not familiar with Wicked Weasel, they are one of about a dozen makers of risque bikinis, although they don’t have anything outrageous like the crotchless bikinis of some other makers. Amateur women from all around the world submit photosets of themselves in their “Wicked Weasels”. There are well over 100 new photosets submitted each week. This is a photo site only, no videos. Quality varies as you would expect with a true amateur site. I’d say about one-third of the submissions are from women in their 20s, while the remainder are from women over 30. This is not really a porn site—while topless photos are allowed, full frontal nudity is not (though there are quite a few sets with wet sheer bikinis). I’d say about 25% of the sets have some topless photos. In addition to the huge number of amateur photosets, they have about a hundred or so sets of their professional models, with some rotation of new sets throughout the year. The bikinis and many of the women are very hot! The poor site navigation and no zip files are the drawbacks. Only $25 Australian dollars gets you a year membership. The free tour is very limited--you can find a lot more at Wicked Weasel’s main site (galleries at the bottom of their home page). I’ll submit a full review in a couple of months at the same time I review Bikini Riot.
I was just reminded of this great British site I have subscribed to twice in the past and would like to re-subscribe but having moved on to downloading HD quality movies only I wonder if they are now available on this site. Thanks for an answer.
PS. Sorry, should have gone to our TBP review first. I see that their movies are now available in 1080p which is great. So let me rephrase: How long have they been updating their videos with a 1080p HD option? For a year, six months? Or shorter?
$19.95 (recurring $19.95 monthly)
$24.95 (non recurring 1 month)
$39.95 for 90 days (recurring $19.95 monthly)
Browsing the tour the content here looks very enticing and I would love to have the confidence to join but all the previous negative feedback on this site along with their ambiguous terms and conditions re download policies just puts me off. Has anyone joined this site in recent months and got any encouraging positive feedback suggesting that they might have got their act together and stopped jerking around with paying customers yet?
I've been mulling over this site for a long time now. The two expired reviews on here say it's a no go - especially if mbaya's saying that you can only download 3 videos still stands. Anybody have any updates?
I also can't figure out what the TBP note means by saying that "3 videos are full length in lower format; others are clips in higher format". I don't know... maybe my reading comprehension is slipping...
I joined the network and I'm getting blown away by all the options. Deauxma is a hot MILF and I'm enjoying her stuff. Can't wait to see how the live shows go. I'll get to a full review in a little bit. Fans of true MILF take note of this site.
Membership fee out of line with the site contents.
Since this is a new site that just started a few months ago, and the site has only a small amount of content, they should really offer, until the site has grown a lot, a smaller subscription fee, for at least 6 months or more.
I know that the site operators want to cover expenses and all, but considering the relative lack of content versus competing sites, it's seems like a bad business decision to charge more for a monthly membership than mega-sites like Met-Art, MPL Studios, or Femjoy, which have years of back-logged content, gorgeous models, and a lower monthly price (about $20/month with PU discount).
2011-05-28: New Video Added: Louisa Natalie Naughty Nurses
2011-05-25: New Gallery Added: Louisa Natalie Nurses
2011-05-21: New Video Added: Brook Louisa Spank Me Academy
2011-05-18: New Gallery Added: Brook Louisa Spank Me Academy
Just saw Spencer's new review of this site and it's a shame it seems to have stopped updating - it's one of my favourite sites in terms of material. It's rarely much, if any, more explicit that Met Art but somehow it puts more atmosphere and context into the photos, and makes them more appealing/arousing.
Interestingly, a quick look at Girlfolio, which has a large overlap with this site - the same photographer and locations, and many of the same models, shows it is still updating. That bumps it up my list a bit...
I thought I'd write a comment here just in case anyone thinks no review means this site might be worth it. In this case it isn't.
I am constantly getting unidentified anonymous spam from this site and others in this network. Anonymous spam....the worst possible kind. I've joined enough sites to know that when a legitimate site emails you, there is a link back to the site and there is an option to unsubscribe. Not with these emails. They are completely anonymous and say something like "(your name here), you won't believe this." Never, ever trust a solicitation to an adult site that does not adhere to ethical business practices. "Ethical" in this case means they properly identify who they are, what they want and how you can tell them to buzz off if you want to.
Now...about the site. At some point, I was a little curious about "Watch my Girlfriend" and another site in this network, so I joined. $30 totally and completely wasted. The "Network" recycles many of the same images across many sites. A significant number of images (look closely at a few on the Sluts with Phones teaseer page) are NOT EVEN REAL PHOTOS! Many are photoshopped. Many of the images were....obtained elsewhere and reposted. And the vast majority of them are not nude. There are no regular releases of new material and the material that is there is not organized with dates. What you get is a very small collection of crappy images. The ones on the teaser page are the best of the bunch. The rest are "user submissions" or somthing to that effect.
Although the concept seems interesting, I am practically certain that the only objective of this network is to hit-and run with your wallet. There are a lot of really excellent sites that will set you back far less than this garbage. You generally can't go wrong with the high scoring sites reviewed here at PU.
Big mistake joining the site. The largest pic size that gives decent quality is 1200 pixels. Come on, nowadays at 1200s. Sad!
3000 or above the become grainy, blurred. It's like 1200s resized to 3000s. No resolution at all.
I was going to write a review, but since this is a new site I decided to wait to see how the site works out. I believe the photographer is from Met-Art and is one of the best in the Met-Art network. As of now, there are about 60 models with about 80 photo sets and only 3 videos which are in 720 for the HD version. The image quality is great with about 50-70 images per set and the largest resolution I've noticed is 5000 on the long side. This is a very good site and I would recommend it, especially to soft-core fans.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.