Maybe against my better judgement I rejoined briefly on a discount to pick up some updates I liked the look of. Seriously this site has gone downhill, but now they seem to have stopped bothering completely.
There have been loads of days recently with no updates, lots of old stuff being reposted (without stating it is old), and almost all the blogging is about the rough new site Colette.com.
In the last 4 days there has been 1 update, and that was a reject from Colette.com which wasn't hard enough for that site - it was with Aubrey who had just done an anal scene and been so hurt by it that she couldn't do the anal planned in this scene so they just stuffed it up on x-art instead. It really is just rough hardcore porn now, and Brigham Field seems to have almost nothing to do with the site any more.
They seem to have given up on this site completely - why shouldn't the members do the same?
WARNING - My account got hacked and incurred charges
I joined through MBI-Probiller and just noticed several charges for Twisty's cams. I didn't sign up for that nor did I use it. I contacted MBI-Probiller first and they were useless. They actually went through their usual stuff about why I should remain a member even after I explained that I wasn't a member and my account was hacked.
Exercise care and keep an eye on your account!
The site owners were helpful and had the fraudulent account closed and the charges reversed but the biller's support was absurd.
Met-Art posted a new video, 2015-03-22, with model Adiba, titled: Viola Bailey.
What's new is this is a solo masturbation video.
A few years ago, Met-Art was strictly soft softcore. A girl would almost never touch herself. Or if there was a two-girl gallery, the two girls might kiss on the lips, but that was usually as far as the overt sex would show.
I'm thinking that Met-Art might show a boy and girl together, in the next few years.
I contacted customer support to ask why the thumbnails for older sets didn't match the set. I was told this was because they are eliminating zip downloads for older sets - 2010 and older. I don't see why that would affect the thumbnails and customer service had no explanation. However, a lot of the older sets do not have ZIPs. From what I gather I expect the zips are in the process of being removed.
Customer service is run by a third-party and has very little information about what's going on on the site itself.
I sent a message to their feedback address and haven't received a reply.
As you navigate backwards in time you will eventually get to the point where the thumbnails no longer match the photo sets! I've seen this a number of times, but the following example seems to be repeatable:
1. Go to the models page and select Nicole Graves (She has lots of sets)
2. Go to page 6 -- all the thumbnails should match
3. Go to page 7 -- starting about half way down the page (Nov 2012) you should see thumbnails of other models, but when you open the set it will be Nicole.
I've just rejoined the site after nearly a 2-year absence. Nearly all the sets have downloadable zip files. This is good, but although all the sets seem to have 3000p images about 1/3 do _not_ have zips in that size. Eight sets have no zips of any size. In the two years I've been gone, 99 new sets were added. At this time there are 583 sets on the site.
With regard to the videos, there is also something unusual. The home page claims 103 videos, but I only see 68 separate shows. The largest videos are marked 3000K. I think this refers to the bit rate. Most of them are 1280 X 720 in size, but some are smaller. The newest video is 980 X 552 with a data rate of 3.12 Mbits/sec. Only 9 videos were not present 2 years ago.
What the hell, seriously, not only did they stop having video updates but they REMOVED all the videos they had on the site. What a genius idea, let's give people LESS content. Let's get rid of all the stuff we already shot, yeah brilliant!
Still an amazing site that should be on any porn buyer's list
I recently rejoined FTV Girls. I wonít write a new review because there is nothing really changed since the last time I joined there 18 months ago. Thatís not a criticism of the site since they were then, and still are, one of the best adult sites on the internet.
My opinion remains unchanged that since Teasers VOD ceased operation FTV Girls has become one of the best American public nudity sites available. They aren't as risky as what Teasers VOD used to do, but then that risky public stuff got Teasers shut down too. FTV may be less risky but theyíre still making new stuff so thatís a fair trade-off.
The quality of their models is still among the traits that sets this site apart from many others. Iíll admit that your opinion may be different if you prefer a differ look and body type, but if you like young, petite women then you owe it to yourself to check this site out.
If I were writing a new review Iíd score the site at least at the 95 I gave it last time. Itís highly recommended to join.
It looks like MC-Nudes.com must have acquired the content from the now closed site teenrotica.com, and they are uploading it, including the peeing sets. This is great news. I hope that now that MC-Nudes.com has crossed the line into peeing, maybe they will shoot some new content of their own!
Is this site no longer $33, only comes up with $39
Seems like this site is a little out of my price range at $39 but do like the look of some of the group girl scenes like the nude yoga.
I'm curious about this sites group girl movies and would love to see how many of these type of movies are on the site, By group I mean 3+. I tried clicking on tags but sadly they just show 2 or 3 results as not all scenes must be tagged with the same tag which is frustrating.
Curious if anyone else has seen an email offer for a free month of either Femjoy or Nubiles. I clicked to check it out and I see no option for a free signup - all I get is the usual selection of memberships and request for credit card info.
I bit on the $10 per month offer and man am I regretting it. I haven't been here in a few years and boy have things changed (for the worse) under the new management.
Everything is now housed under the twistysnetwork portal. You can select a site and choose pics or vids or both to view. Sh*t immediately goes south after that. The page display only allows for 20 scenes. After that you can only advance 2 pages at a time (big problem with a site this large). Say you're on page 24 and you can click on a scene. After you're done you click the "back" button on your browser; PRESTO, you automatically get taken back to page one (a problem with a Flash driven sites with no internal site "back" and "forward" buttons). Now you get to keep on clicking two pages at a time to get back to the page you were on and repeat ad infinitum, ad nauseum. If you were screening under just pics or just vids it forgets that too. If you were on a particular subsite of Twistys sometimes it forgets that too.
Using the advanced navigation doesn't fix the problem and neither does switching browsers. The url specs in the browser only show that you're on a single page no matter what internal page you might be on so you can't manually override the "back to square one" problem either.
Postscript: The next day I finally figured a work around, you have to right click on a scene and open in a new tab (duh me). Still, why should I have to do this? It doesn't help that their regular search engine is crappola either. The inability to page jump on a site with so much content is still a pain.
Occasionally, Met-Art deletes the photo sets of some models.
I assume this is probably done at the request of the model.
But I found that one photo set of the model named Anita C at Met-Art has been deleted.
The photo set is named "Chariye", originally posted 2014-04-26.
Anita C has plenty of other sets at Met-Art (and Femjoy and MPL Studios and many other sites), so I don't know what the reason would be for deleting this particular set.
I hadn't browsed on this site in a while and I was very surprised to find that it seems they've taken down all the video content from the site in the past month or so (Sept/Oct '14). I'd always thought of this site as much more of a photography site anyway, but did they really do away with ALL their video content?
Although the site didn't have a lot of videos, at least compared with most other sites, virtually all of the videos were wickedly hot. Wildly uninhibited performances by well-known stars like Eufrat and Carmen Gemini as well as girl-next-door types, all of whom looked like they truly enjoyed showing themselves at their nastiest for the camera. Too bad that now seems to all be gone. I never got around to actually joining but now I know I definitely won't. Most of the appeal for me went away when they took down the videos.
Actually, reading some of the other comments esp. regarding all the potential malware associated with this site, I'm glad I didn't.
Maybe if they bring back the videos AND do something about the malware problems, I would finally get around to joining.
The way they film the video is get amazing. I like that they don't get into the useless staged conversations to get to the sex. They just let the models do their thing, and the models have great chemistry with each other. Great stuff.
I rejoined EB as part of a special with Watch4Beauty. The EB site has had a slight freshening, but I'm not terribly impressed with the most recent content. First, it is all "B" roll! It seems as though these are sets of slightly less attractive models or, if mainstream models, slightly lesser quality sets. So they may not have been good enough for the main site, Met Art, when they were taken. Second, it is an odd collection of old and new sets. I recognize several models that retired back around 2008 or earlier and here they are in "new releases" this month with different names and the exact same look. A few models have sets from 2007 and new sets in 2014 and they look exactly the same...because they are old sets just being released now. (To their credit, EB lists the age of the model when the sets were taken, but I don't think those ages are accurate.) That usually only happens because the set was not rated very highly back when the model was popular but now, what the heck, who cares, release it! Fourth, some sets of once popular models might be a bit off because when these sets were taken, these models were very near retirement. There are a few sets where I looked at the model, recognized her and although she was still very attractive, she was several years older than she was at her peak. My typical male reaction was "Wow, what happened? She used to be really hot!" There is nothing that reminds you that YOU are getting old more than images of a favorite model showing that SHE is getting old. Depressing. There are also a few sets from the time before a popular model perfected her look. A lot of eastern European girls took a little time to perfect their looks and some of these sets are the "before" pictures. And lastly, releasing a set in 3 parts is positively annoying. There is no reason for this other than to string us along and get more money. Many Met Art sets have 120-160 images in them. These EB sets usually have 40-60 images spread over 2-3 or more pages of 20 images a page. They either do that to minimize load on their servers, or to make it look like there are more images. Either way, its a really cheap trick!
This site is still better than a lot of others out there, but it is really unfortunate when a good site goes mediocre.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.